A. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates generally to systems and methods for light transmission and reception, and more particularly to improving the security of light transmission and reception systems by applying unique and identifiable light pulse sequences to hinder spoofing of reflected light detected by the system(s).
B. Background
Light detection and ranging systems, such as a LIDAR system, operate by transmitting a series of light pulses that reflect off objects. The reflected signal, or return signal, is received by the light detection and ranging system, and based on the detected time-of-flight (TOF), the system determines the range (distance) the system is located from the object. Light detection and ranging systems may have a wide range of applications including autonomous driving and aerial mapping of a surface. These applications may place a high priority on the security, accuracy and reliability of the operation. If another party intentionally or unintentionally distorts the laser beam or the return signal, the accuracy and reliability may be negatively impacted. One form of disruption may be a spoofing attack where a malicious party distorts or impersonate the characteristics of the return signal.
Accordingly, what is needed are systems and methods for improving detection of a return signal in a light detection and ranging system including mitigating the impact of a spoofing attack.
References will be made to embodiments of the invention, examples of which may be illustrated in the accompanying figures. These figures are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Although the invention is generally described in the context of these embodiments, it should be understood that it is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to these particular embodiments. Items in the figures are not to scale.
Figure (“FIG.”) 1 depicts the operation of a light detection and ranging system according to embodiments of the present document.
In the following description, for purposes of explanation, specific details are set forth in order to provide an understanding of the invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the invention can be practiced without these details. Furthermore, one skilled in the art will recognize that embodiments of the present invention, described below, may be implemented in a variety of ways, such as a process, an apparatus, a system, a device, or a method on a tangible computer-readable medium.
Components, or modules, shown in diagrams are illustrative of exemplary embodiments of the invention and are meant to avoid obscuring the invention. It shall also be understood that throughout this discussion that components may be described as separate functional units, which may comprise sub-units, but those skilled in the art will recognize that various components, or portions thereof, may be divided into separate components or may be integrated together, including integrated within a single system or component. It should be noted that functions or operations discussed herein may be implemented as components. Components may be implemented in software, hardware, or a combination thereof.
Furthermore, connections between components or systems within the figures are not intended to be limited to direct connections. Rather, data between these components may be modified, re-formatted, or otherwise changed by intermediary components. Also, additional or fewer connections may be used. It shall also be noted that the terms “coupled,” “connected,” or “communicatively coupled” shall be understood to include direct connections, indirect connections through one or more intermediary devices, and wireless connections.
Reference in the specification to “one embodiment,” “preferred embodiment,” “an embodiment,” or “embodiments” means that a particular feature, structure, characteristic, or function described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention and may be in more than one embodiment. Also, the appearances of the above-noted phrases in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment or embodiments.
The use of certain terms in various places in the specification is for illustration and should not be construed as limiting. A service, function, or resource is not limited to a single service, function, or resource; usage of these terms may refer to a grouping of related services, functions, or resources, which may be distributed or aggregated.
The terms “include,” “including,” “comprise,” and “comprising” shall be understood to be open terms and any lists the follow are examples and not meant to be limited to the listed items. Any headings used herein are for organizational purposes only and shall not be used to limit the scope of the description or the claims. Each reference mentioned in this patent document is incorporate by reference herein in its entirety.
Furthermore, one skilled in the art shall recognize that: (1) certain steps may optionally be performed; (2) steps may not be limited to the specific order set forth herein; (3) certain steps may be performed in different orders; and (4) certain steps may be done concurrently.
A light detection and ranging system, such as a LIDAR system, may be a tool to measure the shape and contour of the environment surrounding the system. LIDAR systems may be applied to numerous applications including both autonomous navigation and aerial mapping of a surface. LIDAR systems emit a light pulse that is subsequently reflected off an object within the environment in which a system operates. The time each pulse travels from being emitted to being received may be measured (i.e., time-of-flight “TOF”) to determine the distance between the object and the LIDAR system. The science is based on the physics of light and optics.
In a LIDAR system, light may be emitted from a rapidly firing laser. Laser light travels through a medium and reflects off points of things in the environment like buildings, tree branches and vehicles. The reflected light energy returns to a LIDAR receiver (detector) where it is recorded and used to map the environment.
Some embodiments of a LIDAR system may capture distance data in a 2-D (i.e. single plane) point cloud manner. These LIDAR systems may be often used in industrial applications and may be often repurposed for surveying, mapping, autonomous navigation, and other uses. Some embodiments of these devices rely on the use of a single laser emitter/detector pair combined with some type of moving mirror to effect scanning across at least one plane. This mirror not only reflects the emitted light from the diode, but may also reflect the return light to the detector. Use of a rotating mirror in this application may be a means to achieving 90-180-360 degrees of azimuth view while simplifying both the system design and manufacturability.
LIDAR system 300 comprises laser electronics 302, which comprises a single light emitter and light detector. The emitted laser signal 301 may be directed to a fixed mirror 304, which reflects the emitted laser signal 301 to rotating mirror 306. As rotating mirror 306 “rotates”, the emitted laser signal 301 may reflect off object 308 in its propagation path. The reflected signal 303 may be coupled to the detector in laser electronics 302 via the rotating mirror 306 and fixed mirror 304.
Coupled to rotor components 352 via connections 354 are ring 356 and ring 358. Ring 356 and ring 358 are circular bands located on the inner surface of rotor 351 and provide electrode plate functionality for one side of the air gap capacitor. Coupled to shaft components 366 via connections 364 are ring 360 and ring 362. Ring 360 and ring 362 are circular bands located on the outer surface of shaft 361 and provide electrode plate functionality for the other side of the air gap capacitor. A capacitor C1 may be created based on a space between ring 356 and ring 360. Another capacitor C2 may be created based on a space between ring 358 and ring 362. The capacitance for the aforementioned capacitors may be defined, in part, by air gap 368.
Ring 356 and ring 360 are the electrode plate components of capacitor C1 and ring 358 and ring 362 are the electrode plate components of capacitor C2. The vertical gap 370 between ring 356 and ring 358 may impact the performance of a capacitive link between capacitor C1 and capacitor C2 inasmuch as the value of the vertical gap 370 may determine a level of interference between the two capacitors. One skilled in the art will recognize that rotor 351 and shaft 361 may each comprise N rings that may support N capacitive links.
As previously noted, time of flight or TOF is the method a LIDAR system uses to map the environment and provides a viable and proven technique used for detecting target objects. Simultaneously, as the lasers fire, firmware within a LIDAR system may be analyzing and measuring the received data. The optical receiving lens within the LIDAR system acts like a telescope gathering fragments of light photons returning from the environment. The more lasers employed in a system, the more the information about the environment may be gathered. Single laser LIDAR systems may be at a disadvantage compared with systems with multiple lasers because fewer photons may be retrieved, thus less information may be acquired. Some embodiments, but without limitation, of LIDAR systems have been implemented with 8, 16, 32 and 64 lasers. Also, some LIDAR embodiments, but without limitation, may have a vertical field of view (FOV) of 30-40° with laser beam spacing as tight as 0.3° and may have rotational speeds of 5-20 rotations per second.
The rotating mirror functionality may also be implemented with a solid state technology such as MEMS.
One objective of embodiments of the present documents is the creation of a spoof-proof light detection and ranging system. As used herein, the light detection and ranging system may be, but not limited to, a LIDAR system.
A spoof-proof LIDAR system may have the ability to analyze a return signal comprising a sequence of pulses and match the received sequence of pulses with a transmitted sequence of pulses in order to distinguish from other spurious pulses. As used herein, a return signal comprising a sequence of pulses may be equivalent to a multiple return signal or a single-return signal.
A spoof-proof system may be based on anti-spoofing signatures. An anti-spoofing signature may uniquely identify a valid reflected light signal. An anti-spoofing signature may be encoded or embedded in the pulses that are subsequently fired by the LIDAR system. When the LIDAR system receives a return signal, the LIDAR system may extract the anti-spoofing signature from the single-return or multiple return signal and determine if the decoded pulses of the received return signal match the pulses transmitted in the laser beam. If the pulses do match, the return signal may be considered authenticated and data may be decoded from the return signal pulses. If the pulses do not match, the return signal may be considered a spurious signal, and the return signal may be discarded. Effectively, the system authenticates or validates the return signal using the characteristics of the transmitted pulses that comprises the embedded anti-spoofing signature. The system may identify intentional or unintentional spurious return signals than may erroneously trigger a bogus return signal calculation. That is, the LIDAR system may distinguish and confirm the transmitted pulses from spurious pulses. Moreover, the system may include two features to mitigate spoofing of return signals:
First, the LIDAR system may dynamically change the characteristics of the pulses for the next or subsequent laser firing. As previously discussed, the characteristics of the pulses may be defined by the anti-spoofing signature. This feature allows the LIDAR system to respond to a spoofing attack of spurious pulses. A malicious party may be monitoring the transmitted laser beam or return signals in order to spoof the LIDAR system. With a static operation, rather than a dynamic operation, for the anti-spoofing signature, the malicious party may be able to readily spoof the LIDAR system.
The LIDAR system may also dynamically change the signature for the next firing when the transmitted sequences of pulse match the return signal sequences of pulses. As noted, by dynamically changing the anti-spoofing signature for the next laser firing, the potential for intentional or unintentional spoofing may be mitigated. Typically, the time for the time of flight (TOF) for a laser beam to travel to an object and be reflected back to the LIDAR system is in the order of 0.5 to 2 microseconds. In this time period, the LIDAR system may analyze the return signal and decide to change or not the signature for the next laser firing.
In various embodiments, the LIDAR system may also dynamically change the transmitted sequence of pulses to include the anti-spoofing signature as well as adapt the pulse sequence to the environment in which it operates. For example, if a LIDAR system is employed within an autonomous navigation system, weather patterns and/or traffic congestion may affect the manner in which the light signals propagate. In this embodiment, the LIDAR system may adjust the pattern of light pulses to not only uniquely identify it to a receiver but also to improve performance of the system based on the environment in which it operates.
Second, to add another element of security, the LIDAR system may randomly alter transmitted pulses. Encoding based on a random algorithm may be initiated by an instruction from a controller. This feature may be beneficial to mitigate the impact of non-intentional return signals. Unintentional return signals may increase with the growth of autonomous driving based on LIDAR systems.
Anti-spoofing signatures may be based, but without limitations, the number of pulses, the distance between pulses, the amplitude and ratio of amplitudes of the pulses and the shape of pulses. As an example of one anti-spoofing signature, the number of pulses in a two firing sequences may comprise X pulses in a first sequence and Y pulses in a second sequence, where X is not equal to Y.
One skilled in the art will recognize that the anti-spoofing signatures may vary based on the application and environment in which embodiments of the invention are implemented, all of which are intended to fall under the scope of the invention. Anti-spoofing signatures may be utilized separately or in combination. Anti-spoofing signature detection may be implemented with fixed or variable thresholds.
Signature extractor 524 may send a signal, which specifies a signature to be embedded in a sequence of pulses, to anti-spoof encoder 506 and controller 504. Anti-spoof encoder 506 may generate, based on the specified signature, signature encoding signal 507, which comprise the sequence of pulses with the embedded signature to be fired by laser 514. To create a randomized element in the sequences of pulses, random encoder 508 (based on instructions from controller 504) may provide a random adjustment to the current pulse sequence relative to a prior pulse sequence. Random encoder 508 is operable to randomize the characteristics of the sequences of pulses of the transmitted laser beam relative to a prior sequence of transmitted pulses. Controller 504 may initiate a random adjustment to the current pulse sequence even if a spoofing attack has not been identified. Signature extractor 524 may provide controller 504 status for the anti-spoofing operation.
The signature encoding signal 507 may be coupled to multiplexer 510. In turn, multiplexer 510 combines randomized signal 509 from random encoder 508 and signature encoding signal 507 from anti-spoofing encoder 506. An output of the multiplexer 510 may be coupled to transmitter 512, which may be coupled to laser 514. Upon receiving the pulse sequence from the transmitter 512, laser 514 fires laser beam 516 that includes a sequence of pulses with the embedded signature.
Light return signal 518 may be generated by a reflection off an object by laser beam 516, and may be received by photo detector 520. Alternatively, light return signal 518 may be a spoof return signal generated by another light transmitter. The spoof return signal may be an intentional or unintentional return signal.
Photo detector 520 converts the signal from the optical domain to the electrical domain and couples return signal information to receiver 522. Receiver 522 may output a digitized form of the return signal information to signature extractor 524 or an analog signal based on the specific characteristics of the photo detector. Signature extractor 524 processes the return signal information and extracts the signature in order to authenticate or validates the return signal. If characteristics of the pulse sequence of the return signal match characteristics of the transmitted sequence of pulses, then the multiple return signal may be considered authenticated. Signature extractor may proceed to output data 526. Signature extractor may also proceed to output alert 528, which may be coupled to a higher-level controller.
If characteristics of the return signal sequence do not match characteristics of the transmitted sequence of pulses, then the return signal may be considered not authenticated. In response, signature extractor 524 may dynamically direct anti-spoof encoder 506 to select another signature for the next laser firing. In other words, signature extractor 524 may dynamically change the anti-spoofing signature for a next sequence of pulses to be transmitted relative to a prior sequence of transmitted pulses. The threshold for determining the matching of the pulses may be pre-determined or dynamically adjusted based on a variation of performance parameters.
Controller 504 receives environmental condition 502, which may include information on weather, congestion, test/calibration/factory conditions. Based on environmental conditions 502 and instructions from signature extractor 524, controller 504 may provide instructions for the operation of random encoder 508 and multiplexer 510.
Selecting an anti-spoofing signature. (step 602)
Encoding a sequence of pulses with the anti-spoofing signature. (step 606)
Activating an encoding random algorithm. (step 604) (optional)
Modify the sequence of pulses based on the encoding random algorithm, if activated. (step 608)
Firing a laser beam comprising the modified sequence of pulses. (step 609)
At an object, generating a valid multiple return signal when the laser beam reflects off the object. (step 610)
Or, at another light transmitter, generating a spurious multiple return signal. (step 611)
Receiving and decoding the received signal that comprises the valid multiple return signal or the spurious multiple return signal. (step 612)
Extracting the anti-spoofing signature from the received signal. (step 614)
Determining if pulse characteristics of the pulses in the received signal match the pulse characteristics in the transmitted sequences of pulses? (step 616)
If yes, generating a data output. (step 618)
If no, generate an alert (step 617) and repeat step 602.
Embodiments of the present document may include a system comprising a signature extractor operable for selecting an anti-spoofing signature; an anti-spoofing encoder operable to embed the anti-spoofing signature in a transmitted laser beam comprises a sequence of pulses; a controller; and a decoder operable to decode a return signal. The signature extractor extracts the anti-spoofing signature from the decoded return signal and determines whether characteristics of the decoded return signal match characteristics of the sequences of pulses of the transmitted laser beam. If the decoded return signal matches characteristics of the transmitted laser beam, the signature extractor validates the decoded return signal and outputs data of the decoded return signal. If the decoded return signal does not match characteristics of the transmitted laser beam, the signature extractor invalidates the decoded return signal, disregards the decoded return signal and outputs an alert. For a next sequence of pulses to be transmitted, the signature extractor dynamically changes the anti-spoofing signature.
The system further comprises a random encoder operable to randomize the characteristics of the sequences of pulses of the transmitted laser beam relative to a prior sequence of transmitted pulses. The controller receives environmental conditions that define characteristics for the sequence of pulses of the transmitted laser beam. The anti-spoof signature is dynamically changed based on the environmental conditions. The anti-spoof signature is dynamically changed based on the environmental conditions. The characteristics for the sequences of pulses of the transmitted laser beam are randomized based on the environmental conditions. The environmental conditions comprise weather, congestion, or test/calibration/factory conditions. The anti-spoofing signature is based on characteristics of pulses including variations in a number of pulses in two or more sequences of pulses, variations in distances between pulses, variations of pulse amplitude ratios, or variations of pulse widths.
In embodiments, aspects of the present patent document may be directed to or implemented on information handling systems/computing systems. For purposes of this disclosure, a computing system may include any instrumentality or aggregate of instrumentalities operable to compute, calculate, determine, classify, process, transmit, receive, retrieve, originate, route, switch, store, display, communicate, manifest, detect, record, reproduce, handle, or utilize any form of information, intelligence, or data for business, scientific, control, or other purposes. For example, a computing system may be an optical measuring system such as a LIDAR system that uses time of flight to map objects within its environment. The computing system may include random access memory (RAM), one or more processing resources such as a central processing unit (CPU) or hardware or software control logic, ROM, and/or other types of memory. Additional components of the computing system may include one or more network or wireless ports for communicating with external devices as well as various input and output (I/O) devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, touchscreen and/or a video display. The computing system may also include one or more buses operable to transmit communications between the various hardware components.
As illustrated in
A number of controllers and peripheral devices may also be provided, as shown in
In the illustrated system, all major system components may connect to a bus 716, which may represent more than one physical bus. However, various system components may or may not be in physical proximity to one another. For example, input data and/or output data may be remotely transmitted from one physical location to another. In addition, programs that implement various aspects of this invention may be accessed from a remote location (e.g., a server) over a network. Such data and/or programs may be conveyed through any of a variety of machine-readable medium including, but are not limited to: magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical media such as CD-ROMs and holographic devices; magneto-optical media; and hardware devices that are specially configured to store or to store and execute program code, such as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), flash memory devices, and ROM and RAM devices.
Embodiments of the present invention may be encoded upon one or more non-transitory computer-readable media with instructions for one or more processors or processing units to cause steps to be performed. It shall be noted that the one or more non-transitory computer-readable media shall include volatile and non-volatile memory. It shall be noted that alternative implementations are possible, including a hardware implementation or a software/hardware implementation. Hardware-implemented functions may be realized using ASIC(s), programmable arrays, digital signal processing circuitry, or the like. Accordingly, the “means” terms in any claims are intended to cover both software and hardware implementations. Similarly, the term “computer-readable medium or media” as used herein includes software and/or hardware having a program of instructions embodied thereon, or a combination thereof. With these implementation alternatives in mind, it is to be understood that the figures and accompanying description provide the functional information one skilled in the art would require to write program code (i.e., software) and/or to fabricate circuits (i.e., hardware) to perform the processing required.
It shall be noted that embodiments of the present invention may further relate to computer products with a non-transitory, tangible computer-readable medium that have computer code thereon for performing various computer-implemented operations. The media and computer code may be those specially designed and constructed for the purposes of the present invention, or they may be of the kind known or available to those having skill in the relevant arts. Examples of tangible computer-readable media include, but are not limited to: magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical media such as CD-ROMs and holographic devices; magneto-optical media; and hardware devices that are specially configured to store or to store and execute program code, such as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), flash memory devices, and ROM and RAM devices. Examples of computer code include machine code, such as produced by a compiler, and files containing higher level code that are executed by a computer using an interpreter. Embodiments of the present invention may be implemented in whole or in part as machine-executable instructions that may be in program modules that are executed by a processing device. Examples of program modules include libraries, programs, routines, objects, components, and data structures. In distributed computing environments, program modules may be physically located in settings that are local, remote, or both.
One skilled in the art will recognize no computing system or programming language is critical to the practice of the present invention. One skilled in the art will also recognize that a number of the elements described above may be physically and/or functionally separated into sub-modules or combined together.
It will be appreciated to those skilled in the art that the preceding examples and embodiments are exemplary and not limiting to the scope of the present disclosure. It is intended that all permutations, enhancements, equivalents, combinations, and improvements thereto that are apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the specification and a study of the drawings are included within the true spirit and scope of the present disclosure. It shall also be noted that elements of any claims may be arranged differently including having multiple dependencies, configurations, and combinations.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3064252 | Varela | Nov 1962 | A |
3373441 | Zadig | Mar 1968 | A |
3551845 | Zelina | Dec 1970 | A |
3636250 | Haeff | Jan 1972 | A |
3686514 | Dube et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3781111 | Fletcher et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
3862415 | Hamden, Jr. et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3897150 | Bridges et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3921081 | Lane | Nov 1975 | A |
4179216 | Theurer et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4199697 | Edwards | Apr 1980 | A |
4201442 | McMahon et al. | May 1980 | A |
4212534 | Bodlaj | Jul 1980 | A |
4220103 | Kasahara et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4477184 | Endo | Oct 1984 | A |
4516837 | Soret et al. | May 1985 | A |
4634272 | Endo | Jan 1987 | A |
4656462 | Araki et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4681433 | Aeschlimann | Jul 1987 | A |
4700301 | Dyke | Oct 1987 | A |
4730932 | Iga et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4742337 | Haag | May 1988 | A |
4834531 | Ward | May 1989 | A |
4862257 | Ulich | Aug 1989 | A |
4895440 | Cain et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4896343 | Saunders | Jan 1990 | A |
4902126 | Koechner | Feb 1990 | A |
4944036 | Hyatt | Jul 1990 | A |
4952911 | D'Ambrosia et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4967183 | D'Ambrosia et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5004916 | Collins, Jr. | Apr 1991 | A |
5006721 | Cameron et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5023888 | Bayston | Jun 1991 | A |
5026156 | Bayston | Jun 1991 | A |
5033819 | Tanaka | Jul 1991 | A |
5059008 | Flood et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5175694 | Amato | Dec 1992 | A |
5177768 | Crespo et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5210586 | Grage et al. | May 1993 | A |
5212533 | Shibuya et al. | May 1993 | A |
5241481 | Olsen | Aug 1993 | A |
5249157 | Taylor | Sep 1993 | A |
5291261 | Dahl et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5309212 | Clark | May 1994 | A |
5314037 | Shaw et al. | May 1994 | A |
5319201 | Lee | Jun 1994 | A |
5357331 | Flockencier | Oct 1994 | A |
5365218 | Otto | Nov 1994 | A |
5463384 | Juds | Oct 1995 | A |
5465142 | Krumes et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5515156 | Yoshida et al. | May 1996 | A |
5546188 | Wangler et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5563706 | Shibuya et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572219 | Silverstein et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5691687 | Kumagai et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5710417 | Joseph et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5757472 | Wangler et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757501 | Hipp | May 1998 | A |
5757677 | Lennen | May 1998 | A |
5789739 | Schwarz | Aug 1998 | A |
5793163 | Okuda | Aug 1998 | A |
5793491 | Wangler et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805468 | Blohbaum | Sep 1998 | A |
5847815 | Albouy et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847817 | Zediker et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5877688 | Morinaka et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889479 | Tabel | Mar 1999 | A |
5895984 | Renz | Apr 1999 | A |
5903355 | Schwarz | May 1999 | A |
5903386 | Mantravadi et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923910 | Nakahara et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942688 | Kimura et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949530 | Wetteborn | Sep 1999 | A |
5953110 | Burns | Sep 1999 | A |
5991011 | Damm | Nov 1999 | A |
6034803 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043868 | Dunne | Mar 2000 | A |
6069565 | Stern et al. | May 2000 | A |
6088085 | Wetteborn | Jul 2000 | A |
6091071 | Franz et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6100539 | Blumcke et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6137566 | Leonard | Oct 2000 | A |
6153878 | Jakob et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157294 | Urai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6201236 | Juds | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6259714 | Kinbara | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6297844 | Schatz et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321172 | Jakob et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327806 | Paige | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329800 | May | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335789 | Kikuchi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6365429 | Kneissl et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6396577 | Ramstack | May 2002 | B1 |
6420698 | Dimsdale | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6441363 | Cook, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6441889 | Patterson | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442476 | Poropat | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473079 | Kacyra et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6504712 | Hashimoto et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6509958 | Pierenkemper | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6593582 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6621764 | Smith | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636300 | Doemens et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6646725 | Eichinger et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650402 | Sullivan et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6664529 | Pack et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665063 | Jamieson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670905 | Orr | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6682478 | Nakamura | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6687373 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6710324 | Hipp | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6742707 | Tsikos et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6747747 | Hipp | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759649 | Hipp | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6789527 | Sauler et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798527 | Fukumoto et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6812450 | Hipp | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6876790 | Lee | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6879419 | Richman et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6969558 | Walston et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7030968 | D'Aligny et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7041962 | Dollmann et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7089114 | Huang | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7106424 | Meneely et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7129971 | McCutchen | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130672 | Pewzner et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131586 | Tsikos et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7190465 | Froehlich et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7240314 | Leung | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7248342 | Degnan | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7281891 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295298 | Willhoeft et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7313424 | Mayevsky et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7315377 | Holland et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7319777 | Morcom | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7345271 | Boehlau et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7358819 | Rollins | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7373473 | Bukowski et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7408462 | Pirkl et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7477360 | England et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7480031 | Mack | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7544945 | Tan et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7570793 | Lages et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583364 | Mayor et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7589826 | Mack et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7619477 | Segarra | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7623222 | Benz et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7640068 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7642946 | Wong et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7684590 | Kampchen et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7697581 | Walsh et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7741618 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7746271 | Furstenberg | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7868665 | Turner et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7944548 | Eaton | May 2011 | B2 |
7969558 | Hall | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8042056 | Wheeler et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8072582 | Meneely | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8077047 | Humble | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8139685 | Simic et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8203702 | Kane et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8274037 | Ritter et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8310653 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8451432 | Crawford et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8605262 | Campbell et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8675181 | Hall | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8736818 | Weimer et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8767190 | Hall | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8875409 | Kretschmer et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8976340 | Gilliland et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8995478 | Kobtsev et al. | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9059562 | Priest et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9063549 | Pennecot et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9069061 | Harwit | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9069080 | Stettner et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9086273 | Gruver et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9093969 | Gebeyehu et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9110154 | Bates et al. | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9151940 | Chuang et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9191260 | Grund | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9194701 | Bosch | Nov 2015 | B2 |
RE45854 | Gittinger et al. | Jan 2016 | E |
9239959 | Evans et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9246041 | Clausen et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9250327 | Kelley et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9285477 | Smith et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9286538 | Chen et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9310197 | Gogolla et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9383753 | Templeton et al. | Jul 2016 | B1 |
9453914 | Stettner et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9529079 | Droz et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9772607 | Decoux et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
RE46672 | Hall | Jan 2018 | E |
9964632 | Droz et al. | May 2018 | B1 |
9983297 | Hall et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9989629 | LaChapelle | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10003168 | Villeneuve | Jun 2018 | B1 |
10018726 | Hall et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10048374 | Hall et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10094925 | LaChapelle | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10109183 | Franz et al. | Oct 2018 | B1 |
10120079 | Pennecot et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10126412 | Eldada et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10132928 | Eldada et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10309213 | Barfoot et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10330780 | Hall et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10386465 | Hall et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10393874 | Schmidtke et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10393877 | Hall et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10436904 | Moss et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
10545222 | Hall et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
RE47942 | Hall | Apr 2020 | E |
10613203 | Rekow et al. | Apr 2020 | B1 |
10627490 | Hall et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10627491 | Hall et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10712434 | Hall et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20010011289 | Davis et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010017718 | Ikeda et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020003617 | Doemens et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020060784 | Pack et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020117545 | Tsikos et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030041079 | Bellemore et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043363 | Jamieson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030043364 | Jamieson et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030057533 | Lemmi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066977 | Hipp et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076485 | Ruff | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090646 | Riegl et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030163030 | Arriaga | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040021852 | DeFlumere | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040066500 | Gokturk et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040134879 | Kochergin et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150810 | Muenter et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040213463 | Morrison | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040240706 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040240710 | Lages et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040247157 | Lages et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050023353 | Tsikos et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050168720 | Yamashita et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050211893 | Paschalidis | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050232466 | Kampchen et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246065 | Ricard | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050248749 | Kiehn et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050279914 | Dimsdale et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060007350 | Gao et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060073621 | Kneissel et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089765 | Pack et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100783 | Haberer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060115113 | Lages et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132635 | Land | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060176697 | Arruda | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060186326 | Ito | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197867 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231771 | Lee et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060290920 | Kampchen et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070035624 | Lubard et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070071056 | Chen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070121095 | Lewis | May 2007 | A1 |
20070181810 | Tan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201027 | Doushkina et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219720 | Trepagnier et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070241955 | Brosche | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070272841 | Wiklof | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080002176 | Krasutsky | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013896 | Salzberg et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080074640 | Walsh et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080079371 | Kang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080154495 | Breed | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080170826 | Schaafsma | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186501 | Xie | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080302971 | Hyde et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090010644 | Varshneya | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090026503 | Tsuda | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090085901 | Antony | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090122295 | Eaton | May 2009 | A1 |
20090142053 | Varshneya | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090168045 | Lin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090218475 | Kawakami et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245788 | Varshneya | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090323737 | Ensher et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100006760 | Lee et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100020306 | Hall | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100045965 | Meneely | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100046953 | Shaw et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100067070 | Mamada et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100073780 | Ito | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100074532 | Gordon et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100134596 | Becker | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100188722 | Yamada et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198487 | Vollmer et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204964 | Pack et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100239139 | Hunt et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265077 | Humble | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100271615 | Sebastian et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100302528 | Hall | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110028859 | Chian | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040482 | Brimble et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110176183 | Ikeda et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110211188 | Juenemann et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110216304 | Hall | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110305250 | Chann et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120038903 | Weimer et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120195597 | Malaney | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120287417 | Mimeault | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130024176 | Woodford | Jan 2013 | A2 |
20130038915 | Kusaka et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050144 | Reynolds | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050486 | Omer et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130070239 | Crawford et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130093583 | Shapiro | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130094960 | Bowyer et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130151198 | Brown | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130168673 | Yu et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130206967 | Shpunt et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130241761 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242283 | Bailey et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130258312 | Lewis | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130286404 | Cenko et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130300479 | Thibault | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130314711 | Cantin et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130336375 | Rank et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130342366 | Kiefer et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140063189 | Zheleznyak et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140063483 | Li | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140071234 | Millett | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140078519 | Steffey et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140104592 | Tien et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140176657 | Nemoto | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140240317 | Go et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240721 | Herschbach | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140253369 | Kelley et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140259715 | Engel | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267848 | Wu | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140274093 | Abdelmonem | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140347650 | Bosch | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150015895 | Bridges et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150035437 | Panopoulos et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055117 | Pennecot et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150101234 | Priest et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150116695 | Bartolome et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150131080 | Retterath et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150144806 | Jin et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150185325 | Park et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150202939 | Stettner et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150219764 | Lipson | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150219765 | Mead et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150226853 | Seo et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150293224 | Eldada et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150293228 | Retterath et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150303216 | Tamaru | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20160003946 | Gilliland et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160009410 | Derenick et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160014309 | Ellison et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160021713 | Reed | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160049058 | Allen et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160098620 | Geile | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160117431 | Kim et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160154105 | Sigmund et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160161600 | Eldada et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191173 | Malaney | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160209499 | Suzuki | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160245919 | Kalscheur et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160259038 | Retterath et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160279808 | Doughty et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160300484 | Torbett | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160306032 | Schwarz et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160313445 | Bailey et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160363659 | Mindell et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160365846 | Wyland | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170146639 | Carothers | May 2017 | A1 |
20170146640 | Hall et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170153319 | Villeneuve et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170214861 | Rachlin et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170219695 | Hall et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170220876 | Gao et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170242102 | Dussan et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170269198 | Hall et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170269209 | Hall et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170269215 | Hall et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170299721 | Eichenholz et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170350983 | Hall et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180019155 | Tsang et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180058197 | Barfoot et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180059219 | Irish et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180074382 | Lee et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180100924 | Brinkmeyer | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180106902 | Mase et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180131449 | Kare et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180168539 | Singh et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180267151 | Hall et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180275249 | Campbell et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180284227 | Hall et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180284274 | LaChapelle | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180321360 | Hall et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180364098 | McDaniel et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190001442 | Unrath et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190011563 | Hall et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190178991 | Hall et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190293764 | Van Nieuwenhove et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190339365 | Hall et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190361092 | Hall et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190369257 | Hall et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20190369258 | Hall et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200025896 | Gunnam | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200064452 | Avlas et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200142070 | Hall et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200144971 | Pinto et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200166613 | Hall et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200191915 | Hall et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200249321 | Hall et al. | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200319311 | Hall et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2089105 | Aug 1994 | CA |
641583 | Feb 1984 | CH |
1106534 | Aug 1995 | CN |
1576123 | Feb 2005 | CN |
2681085 | Feb 2005 | CN |
2773714 | Apr 2006 | CN |
103278808 | Dec 2015 | CN |
107037444 | Aug 2017 | CN |
206773192 | Dec 2017 | CN |
108061884 | May 2018 | CN |
207457499 | Jun 2018 | CN |
207457508 | Jun 2018 | CN |
109116367 | Jan 2019 | CN |
106443699 | Feb 2019 | CN |
106597471 | May 2019 | CN |
208902906 | May 2019 | CN |
930909 | Jul 1955 | DE |
3134815 | Mar 1983 | DE |
3216312 | Nov 1983 | DE |
3216313 | Nov 1983 | DE |
3701340 | Jul 1988 | DE |
3741259 | Jun 1989 | DE |
3808972 | Oct 1989 | DE |
3821892 | Feb 1990 | DE |
4040894 | Apr 1992 | DE |
4115747 | Nov 1992 | DE |
4124192 | Jan 1993 | DE |
4127168 | Feb 1993 | DE |
4137550 | Mar 1993 | DE |
4215272 | Nov 1993 | DE |
4243631 | Jun 1994 | DE |
4340756 | Jun 1994 | DE |
4411448 | Oct 1995 | DE |
4412044 | Oct 1995 | DE |
19512644 | Oct 1996 | DE |
19512681 | Oct 1996 | DE |
4345446 | Jul 1998 | DE |
4345448 | Jul 1998 | DE |
19727792 | Feb 1999 | DE |
19741730 | Apr 1999 | DE |
19741731 | Apr 1999 | DE |
19752145 | May 1999 | DE |
19717399 | Jun 1999 | DE |
19757847 | Jul 1999 | DE |
19757848 | Jul 1999 | DE |
19757849 | Jul 1999 | DE |
19757840 | Sep 1999 | DE |
19815149 | Oct 1999 | DE |
19828000 | Jan 2000 | DE |
19902903 | May 2000 | DE |
19911375 | Sep 2000 | DE |
19919925 | Nov 2000 | DE |
19927501 | Nov 2000 | DE |
19936440 | Mar 2001 | DE |
19953006 | May 2001 | DE |
19953007 | May 2001 | DE |
19953009 | May 2001 | DE |
19953010 | May 2001 | DE |
10025511 | Dec 2001 | DE |
10110420 | Sep 2002 | DE |
10114362 | Oct 2002 | DE |
10127417 | Dec 2002 | DE |
10128954 | Dec 2002 | DE |
10141055 | Mar 2003 | DE |
10143060 | Mar 2003 | DE |
10146692 | Apr 2003 | DE |
10148070 | Apr 2003 | DE |
10151983 | Apr 2003 | DE |
10162668 | Jul 2003 | DE |
10217295 | Nov 2003 | DE |
10222797 | Dec 2003 | DE |
10229408 | Jan 2004 | DE |
10244638 | Apr 2004 | DE |
10244640 | Apr 2004 | DE |
10244643 | Apr 2004 | DE |
10258794 | Jun 2004 | DE |
10303015 | Aug 2004 | DE |
10331529 | Jan 2005 | DE |
10341548 | Mar 2005 | DE |
102004010197 | Sep 2005 | DE |
102004014041 | Oct 2005 | DE |
102005050824 | May 2006 | DE |
102005003827 | Jul 2006 | DE |
102005019233 | Nov 2006 | DE |
102007013023 | Sep 2008 | DE |
202015009250 | Jan 2017 | DE |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 16, 2019, in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/059452, filed Nov. 6, 2018 (13 pgs). |
Carson, N. “Defending GPS against the Spoofing Threat using Network Based Detection and 3, 15,20 Successive Interference Cancellation”. Auburn University. Nov. 2015. [Retrieved Dec. 24, 2018]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://web.stanford.edu/group/scpnt/pnt//2015/S07-Carson-Spoofing_Attacks.pdf>, (35 pgs). |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2018/025395, dated Jun. 25, 2018, 14 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2018/031682, dated Sep. 17, 2018, 12 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2018/050934, dated Nov. 20, 2018, 10 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2018/051497, dated Nov. 28, 2018, 11 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2018/059062, dated Jan. 16, 2019, 6 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2019/016259, dated Apr. 26, 2019, 6 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2019/046412, dated Jun. 24, 2020, 10 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2019/046419, dated Oct. 29, 2019, 14 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2019/046422, dated Dec. 3, 2019, 9 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2019/046573, dated Nov. 15, 2019, 9 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2019/051729, dated Nov. 20, 2019, 7 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion (Corrected), App. No. PCT/US2020/026925, dated May 12, 2020, 5 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2020/012633, dated Jun. 2, 2020, 13 pages. |
PCT Search Report and Written Opinion, App. No. PCT/US2020/012635, dated Jun. 4, 2020, 10 pages. |
Piatek et al., Lidar: A photonics guide to autonomous vehicle market, Hamamatsu.com, https://hub.hamamatsu.com/US/en/application-note/LiDAR-competingtechnologies-automotive/index.html (Nov. 18, 2017), 6 pages. (IPR Nos. '255 and '256 Exhibit 2136). |
Piatek, Measuring distance with light, Hamamatsu.com, https://hub.hamamatsu.com/US/en/application-note/measuringdistance-with-light/index.html (Apr. 2, 2015), 18 pages. (IPR Nos. '255 and '256 Exhibit 2132). |
Piatek, Presentation entitled ‘LIDAR and Other Techniques—Measuring Distance with Light for Automotive Industry’, authored by Slawomir Piatek, Technical Consultant, Hamamatsu Corp. (Dec. 6, 2017), 66 pages. (IPR Nos. '255 and '256 Exhibit 2131). |
Popper, Guiding Light, The Billion-Dollar Widget Steering the Driverless Car Industry, The Verge (Oct. 18, 2017), 17 pages. (IPR Nos. '255 and '256 Exhibit 2076). |
Qing, “Method of 3D visualization using laser radar on board of mobile robot,” Journal of Jilin University (Information Science Ed.), vol. 22 (Jul. 2004), 4 pages. |
Quanergy Systems, Inc.v. Velodyne LIDAR, Inc.(N.D. Cal.), Case No. 5:16-cv-05251, “Plaintiff Quanergy Systems, Inc.'s Amended Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent Local Rule 3-3,” May 23, 2017, 238 pages. |
Quanergy Systems, Inc.v. Velodyne LiDAR, Inc.(N.D. Cal.), Case No. 5:16-cv-05251, “Plaintiff Quanergy Systems, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions and Production of Documents Pursuant to Patent Local Rules 3-3 and 3-4,” Mar. 27, 2017, 24 pages. |
Quanergy Systems, Inc.v. Velodyne LiDAR, Inc.(N.D. Cal.), Case No. 5:16-cv-05251, Amended Complaint, Nov. 18, 2016, 6 pages. |
Quanergy Systems, Inc.v. Velodyne LiDAR, Inc.(N.D. Cal.), Case No. 5:16-cv-05251, Answer to Counterclaim, (Jan. 16, 2017) 9 pages. |
Quanergy Systems, Inc.v. Velodyne LiDAR, Inc.(N.D. Cal.), Case No. 5:16-cv-05251, Defendant Velodyne's Answer and Counterclaim, Dec. 5, 2016, 20 pages. |
Quanergy Systems, Inc.v. Velodyne LiDAR, Inc.(N.D. Cal.), Complaint, Case No. 5:16-cv-05251 (Sep. 13, 2016), 21 pages. |
Ramsey et al., Use Scenarios to Plan for Autonomous Vehicle Adoption, Gartner (Jun. 26, 2017), 17 pages. (IPR Nos. '255 and '256 Exhibit 2064). |
Reutebuch, “LiDAR: an Emerging Tool for Multiple Resource Inventory,” Journal of Forestry (Sep. 2005) 7 pages. |
Reymann et al., Improving LiDAR Point Cloud Classification using Intensities and Multiple Echoes, IEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (Sep. 2015), 8 pages. (IPR Nos. '255 and '256 Exhibit 2167). |
Richmond et al., Polarimetric Imaging Laser Radar (PILAR) Program. In Advanced Sensory Payloads for UAV, Meeting Proceedings RTO-MP-SET-092, Paper 19. Neuilly-sur-Seine, France: RTO (May 1, 2005), 35 pages. (IPR Nos. '255 and '256 Exhibit 1129). |
Riegl LMS-Q120, http://web.archive.org/web/20050113054822/ http:/www.riegl.com/industrial_scanners_/lms_q120_/q120_all_.htm (2005), 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190178991 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |