Optical image scanners, also known as document scanners, convert a visible image (e.g., on a document or photograph, an image in a transparent medium, etc.) into an electronic form suitable for copying, storing, or processing by a computer. An optical image scanner may be a separate device, or an image scanner may be a part of a copier, part of a facsimile machine, or part of a multipurpose device. Reflective image scanners typically have a controlled source of light, and light is reflected off the surface of a document, through an optics system, and onto an array of photosensitive devices (e.g., a charge-coupled device, complimentary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS), etc.). Transparency image scanners pass light through a transparent image, for example a photographic positive slide, through optics, and then onto an array of photosensitive devices. The optics focus at least one line, called a scanline, of the image being scanned, onto the array of photosensitive devices. The photosensitive devices convert received light intensity into an electronic signal. An analog-to-digital converter converts the electronic signal into computer readable binary numbers, with each binary member representing an intensity value.
There are two common types of image scanners. In a first type, a single spherical reduction lens system is commonly used to focus the scanline onto the photosensor array, and the length of the photosensor array is much less than the length of the scanline. In a second type, an array of many lenses is used to focus the scanline onto the photosensor array, and the length of the photosensor array is the same length as the scanline. For the second type, it is common to use Selfoc® lens arrays (SLA) (available from Nippon Sheet Glass Co.), in which an array of rod-shaped lenses is used, typically with multiple photosensors receiving light through each individual lens.
Depth of focus refers to the maximum distance that the object position may be changed while maintaining a certain image resolution (i.e., the amount by which an object plane may be shifted along the optical path with respect to some reference plane and introduce no more than a specified acceptable blur). The depth of focus for lens arrays is typically relatively short in comparison to scanners using a single spherical reduction lens system. Typically, flat documents are forced by a cover against a transparent platen for scanning, so depth of focus is not a problem. However, there are some situations in which the surface being scanned cannot be placed directly onto a platen. One example is scanning 35 mm slides. A typical frame for a 35 mm slide holds the surface of the film about 0.7–1.5 mm above the surface of the platen. As a result, slides may be slightly out of focus when using lens arrays that are focused at the surface of the platen. Another example is scanning books or magazines where part of a page being scanned curves into a binding spline, causing part of the surface being scanned to be positioned above the transparent platen. A large depth of focus is needed to sharply image the binding spline.
Embodiments of the present invention provide systems and methods for optically scanning multiple object planes.
One embodiment is a system for optically scanning multiple object planes comprising a platen and an optical head for scanning. The optical head comprises an optical delay element, a first optical sensor array positioned relative to a lens array along an optical path for receiving an optical signal corresponding to a first object plane located a first distance from the platen, and a second optical sensor array positioned relative to the lens array along another optical path for receiving an optical signal corresponding to a second object plane located a second distance from the platen. The optical delay element is configured to increase the effective distance between the lens array and the second optical sensor.
Another embodiment comprises an optical head for scanning. The optical head comprises a beam splitter positioned relative to a lens array and configured to reflect a first optical signal and transmit a second optical signal. The optical head further comprises a first optical sensor array positioned to receive the first optical signal corresponding to a first object plane located a first distance from the platen and a second optical sensor array to receive the second optical signal corresponding to a second object plane located a second distance from the platen.
Many aspects of the invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present invention. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
The relative sizes of various objects in
As further illustrated in
Lens array 110 may comprise an array of rod-shaped lenses which have a relatively short depth of focus. For example, lens array 110 may comprise a Selfoc® lens array (SLA), which is manufactured and sold by Nippon Sheet Glass Co. of Somerset, N.J. A rod-lens array may comprise at least one row of graded-index micro lenses, which may be equal in dimensions and optical properties. The lenses may be aligned between two fiberglass-reinforced plastic (FRP) plates. Because FRP has a coefficient of thermal expansion equal to glass, thermal distortion and stress effects is minimal. The FRP also increases mechanical strength of the SLA. The interstices may be filled with black silicone to prevent flare (crosstalk) between the lenses and protect each individual lens.
Referring again to
It should be appreciated that optical image scanner 100 may be configured in a variety of other ways. For example, the second reflective surface 108 may be optional. For instance, in order to alter the cross-sectional profile of optical head 104, second reflective surface 108 may be removed and the image sensor module 114 may be oriented perpendicular to the optical axis of lens array 110. Alternatively, the optical axis of lens array 110 may be oriented perpendicular to platen 102 to direct light through lens array 100 and onto photosensor arrays 112. The particular orientation of lens array 110 is not relevant to the present invention.
The optical components within optical head 104 focus at least one line (i.e., a scanline) of the image being scanned onto photosensor array 112. As known in the art, scanning of the entire image may be accomplished by translating optical head 104 relative to document 106 (e.g., by using cables) as indicated by reference number 118.
As mentioned above, due to the relatively small depth of focus of lens array 110, existing optical image scanners may produce blurred images of documents 106 that are positioned a small distance above/below the primary focal point of lens array 10. For example, existing optical image scanners may be configured with the primary focal point at a relatively short distance H 0 above the top surface of platen 102. When a document 106, such as a sheet of paper, etc. is positioned on platen 102, it may be located approximately the distance H 0 above the top surface of platen 102 or within the relatively small range of the depth of focus. However, if the document 106 is positioned at an object plane that is outside of a range of acceptable focus, existing optical image scanners may produce a blurred image. For instance, various types of documents (or portions of the document) may be located at an object plane outside of the range of acceptable focus when positioned on platen 102 (e.g., 35 mm slides, transparencies, photographs, books, magazines, etc.).
In this regard, the present invention provides a means for scanning an image at multiple object planes without having to reposition optical head 104 relative to platen 102. In general, optical image scanner 100 provides multiple object planes relative to platen 102 by changing the effective distance of one optical path (between lens array 110 and photosensor array 112) relative to the other optical path. For instance, referring to
The relative difference in effective optical distance between lens array 110 and photosensor arrays 112 may be accomplished in a variety of ways. (e.g., filter, prism, etc.). As illustrated in
As known in the art, the index of refraction of a medium is defined as the ratio of the velocity of light in a vacuum to the velocity of light in the medium (Equation 1). A ray of light travels more slowly in an optically dense medium than in one that is less dense, and the index of refraction (n) gives a measure of this effect.
Referring to
The difference in effective optical path lengths (between d2 and d1) may be calculated according to Equation 2.
The relative difference in effective optical distance for optical path lengths d1 and d2 may be calculated as the difference between the effective distance and the actual thickness of delay optical element 120 along optical path 124. As stated above, the relative difference in effective optical distance translates into a proportional difference in corresponding object planes (i.e., the primary focal point above platen 102). Thus, by positioning optical delay element 120 along optical path 124, the corresponding object plane maybe shifted relative to platen 102 equal to the difference between the thickness of optical delay element 410 and the effective optical distance of optical delay element 120.
Referring again to
There a number of alternative ways for generating multiple object planes by creating the relative difference in effective optical distances along optical paths 122 and 124.
It should be appreciated that the first reflective surface 108 may also, or instead, be configured with a prism 302. However, in order to maintain the relative difference in effective optical distances along optical paths 122 and 124, the optical properties and/or the dimensions of the respective prisms 302 would be different.
In the embodiment illustrated in
It should be appreciated that alternative beam splitting mechanisms may be employed. For example, partially-silvered reflective surface 402 and second reflective surface 108 may be combined as a beam splitting prism. In this configuration, the relative difference between the two optical paths would still be proportional to the additional distance that the transmitted light travels relative to the reflected light. One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that a number of alternative configurations may achieve the beam splitting function. For instance, where partially-silvered reflective surface 402 is used to split the optical axis of lens array 110, a second reflective surface need not be employed. Instead, the corresponding photosensor array 112 may be located to receive the transmitted light without reflecting it toward image sensor module 114. Rather, two image sensor modules 114 may be employed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3623024 | Hamilton | Nov 1971 | A |
3729249 | Habegger et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3961841 | Giordmaine | Jun 1976 | A |
3982835 | Schwomma | Sep 1976 | A |
4059756 | Wilwerding | Nov 1977 | A |
4097881 | Katagiri | Jun 1978 | A |
4225215 | Cojan | Sep 1980 | A |
4413905 | Holzapfel | Nov 1983 | A |
4607954 | Osaka et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4712886 | Mercado | Dec 1987 | A |
4872775 | Chang | Oct 1989 | A |
4901297 | Komatsu et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4912508 | Zawadzki et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4999826 | Fujita | Mar 1991 | A |
5028963 | Ohashi et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5210398 | Metlitsky | May 1993 | A |
5278677 | Lee et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5362958 | Ando | Nov 1994 | A |
5402210 | Hart et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5448407 | Tzeng et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450157 | Rees | Sep 1995 | A |
5453784 | Krishnan et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5477386 | Okuda et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5489993 | Ito et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5616909 | Arackellian | Apr 1997 | A |
5726775 | Walsh | Mar 1998 | A |
5736738 | Movaghar et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742326 | Matsui et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5756981 | Roustaei et al. | May 1998 | A |
5786582 | Roustaei et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5878152 | Sussman | Mar 1999 | A |
5898171 | McConica et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5998786 | Movaghar et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6037968 | Emge et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6123261 | Roustaei | Sep 2000 | A |
6124952 | Shieh et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6188465 | Rees et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6238063 | Tanitsu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6347163 | Roustaei | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6348982 | Iseki et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6385352 | Roustaei | May 2002 | B1 |
6399937 | Huang et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6438271 | Usami et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449065 | Luther et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6735005 | Karin et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
20020100863 | Spears | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20040094626 | Sillman et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
63222573 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0 570958 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0946040 | Sep 1999 | EP |
1003323 | May 2000 | EP |
2 376 370 | Dec 2002 | GB |
61045419 | Mar 1986 | JP |
11341219 | Dec 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040164151 A1 | Aug 2004 | US |