Systems and methods for supporting a plurality of load and store accesses of a cache

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9720839
  • Patent Number
    9,720,839
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 23, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 1, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
Systems and methods for supporting a plurality of load and store accesses of a cache are disclosed. Responsive to a request of a plurality of requests to access a block of a plurality of blocks of a load cache, the block of the load cache and a logically and physically paired block of a store coalescing cache are accessed in parallel. The data that is accessed from the block of the load cache is overwritten by the data that is accessed from the block of the store coalescing cache by merging on a per byte basis. Access is provided to the merged data.
Description
BACKGROUND

A cache in a central processing unit is a data storage structure that is used by the central processing unit of a computer to reduce the average time that it takes to access memory. It is a memory which stores copies of data that is located in the most frequently used main memory locations. Moreover, cache memory is memory that is smaller and that may be accessed more quickly than main memory. There are several different types of caches. These include physically indexed physically tagged (PIPT), virtually indexed virtually tagged (VIVT) and virtually indexed physically tagged (VIPT).


Caches that can accommodate multiple accesses in a single cycle provide performance advantages. In particular, such caches feature reduced access latencies. Conventional approaches to accommodating multiple accesses in a single cycle include the use of multi-ported caches and the provision of caches that include a plurality of tag and data banks.


A multi-ported cache is a cache which can serve more than one request at a time. In accessing some conventional caches a single memory address is used, whereas in a multi-ported cache, N memory addresses can be requested at a time, where N is the number of ports that is possessed by the multi-ported cache. An advantage of a multi ported cache is that greater throughput (e.g., a greater number of load and store requests) may be accommodated. However, the number of cache ports that are needed to accommodate increasingly high levels of throughput may not be practical.


Caches that include a plurality of tag and data banks can serve more than one request at a time as each bank can serve at least one request. However, when more than one request attempts to access the same bank, the request that will be allowed to access the bank must be determined. In one conventional approach, serial arbitrations are used to determine which request will be allowed to access the data bank and to access the tag bank for the tag that corresponds to the request. However, the time that it takes to execute such arbitrations can delay access to the bank and thus delay the triggering of the critical Load Hit signal. Moreover, because a plurality of both loads and stores may need to be accommodated, the additional banks, ports and arbitration that may be needed can exact unsatisfactory latency penalties.


SUMMARY

This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.


Conventional approaches to accommodating throughput that involves multiple accesses can result in unsatisfactory latency penalties as it relates to the timing of load hit signals. A method for supporting a plurality of load and store accesses of a cache is disclosed that addresses these shortcomings. However, the claimed embodiments are not limited to implementations that address any or all of the aforementioned shortcomings. As a part of the aforementioned method, responsive to a request of a plurality of requests to access a block of a plurality of blocks of a load cache, the block of the load cache and a logically and physically paired block of a store coalescing cache are accessed in parallel. The data that is accessed from the block of the load cache is overwritten by the data that is accessed from the block of the store coalescing cache by merging on a per byte basis. Thereafter, access is provided to the merged data. Because the data is merged locally and block access arbitrations involving a plurality of access requests to the load cache and the store coalescing cache are executed in parallel with the identification of associated tags, a plurality of loads and stores are provided quick access to the data maintained by the load cache and the store coalescing cache.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention, together with further advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1A shows an exemplary operating environment of a system for supporting a plurality of load and store accesses of a cache in a single cycle based on an organization of load and store coalescing caches according to one embodiment.



FIG. 1B shows a diagram that illustrates the manner in which a plurality of data blocks facilitate the accessing of a load cache and a store coalescing cache by multiple requests in the same clock cycle according to one embodiment.



FIG. 1C shows a store coalescing cache and a load cache that are organized such that related entries are maintained in blocks of the respective caches that are positioned similarly within the caches according to one embodiment.



FIG. 1D shows blocks of a store coalescing cache and a load cache that provide data to a multiplexor as a part of merger operations according to one embodiment.



FIG. 1E illustrate operations performed by system for supporting a plurality of load and store accesses of a cache in a single cycle based on an organization of load and store coalescing caches according to one embodiment.



FIG. 2 shows components of a system for supporting a plurality of load and store accesses of a cache in a single cycle according to one embodiment.



FIG. 3 shows a flowchart of the steps performed in a method for supporting a plurality of load and store accesses of a cache in a single cycle according to one embodiment.





It should be noted that like reference numbers refer to like elements in the figures.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Although the present invention has been described in connection with one embodiment, the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific forms set forth herein. On the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as can be reasonably included within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.


In the following detailed description, numerous specific details such as specific method orders, structures, elements, and connections have been set forth. It is to be understood however that these and other specific details need not be utilized to practice embodiments of the present invention. In other circumstances, well-known structures, elements, or connections have been omitted, or have not been described in particular detail in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring this description.


References within the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” are intended to indicate that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. The appearance of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places within the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment, nor are separate or alternative embodiments mutually exclusive of other embodiments. Moreover, various features are described which may be exhibited by some embodiments and not by others. Similarly, various requirements are described which may be requirements for some embodiments but not other embodiments.


Some portions of the detailed descriptions, which follow, are presented in terms of procedures, steps, logic blocks, processing, and other symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. A procedure, computer executed step, logic block, process, etc., is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps or instructions leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals of a computer readable storage medium and are capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated in a computer system. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.


It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussions, it is appreciated that throughout the present invention, discussions utilizing terms such as “accessing” or “comparing” or “merging” or “providing access” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories and other computer readable media into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.


Exemplary Operating Environment of a System for Supporting a Plurality of Load and Store Accesses of a Cache According to One Embodiment


FIG. 1A shows an exemplary operating environment of a system 101 for supporting a plurality of load and store accesses of a cache in a single cycle based on an organization of load and store coalescing caches according to one embodiment. System 101 directs, in response to each request of a plurality of requests to access a load cache, parallel accesses of the load cache and a store coalescing cache and a local comparing of their accessed content in a single cycle. Moreover, as a part of the operation of system 101, block access arbitrations involving a plurality of access requests to the load cache and the store coalescing cache are executed in parallel with the identification of associated tags. Consequently, a plurality of loads and stores are provided quicker access to data maintained by the load cache and the store coalescing cache. FIG. 1A shows system 101, level one (L1) cache 103, level two (L2) cache 107, CPU 105, main memory 109 and system interface 111.


Referring to FIG. 1A, L1 cache 103 is a level 1 cache and L2 cache 107 is a level 2 cache. In one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 1B, L1 cache 103 can include store coalescing cache 103a, load cache 103b, store coalescing cache tag memory 103c (e.g., SRAM or other type memory) and load cache tag memory 103d (e.g., SRAM or other type memory). In other embodiments, L1 cache 103 can include other components. As shown in FIG. 1B, load cache 103b can be divided into a plurality of data blocks. In one embodiment, load cache 103b can be divided into four 8 kilobyte data blocks. In other embodiments, load cache 103b can be divided into other numbers of data blocks that have the capacity to store other amounts of data. In one embodiment, store coalescing cache 103a, although smaller in size than load cache 103b, is organized similarly to load cache 103b. In one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 1B, the plurality of data blocks that are possessed by these caches facilitates the accessing of load cache 103b and store coalescing cache 103a by a throughput of multiple requests, 1-N, in the same clock cycle.


Referring to FIG. 1B, in one embodiment, as a part of the aforementioned configuration, store coalescing cache tag memory 103c and load cache tag memory 103d maintain a plurality of copies, 1-N, of the tags that correspond to cache line entries of store coalescing cache 103a and load cache 103b respectively. Accordingly, a dedicated tag memory copy for each access request 1-N is provided that facilitates the identification of tags that correspond to the requests and to the cache line entries within a single clock cycle. In one embodiment, arbitrations related to block accesses are executed in parallel with the identification of tags associated with the cache line entries (see FIG. 1B).


In one embodiment, store coalescing cache 103a and load cache 103b are organized such that related entries are maintained in blocks of the respective caches that are positioned similarly within the caches as is shown in FIG. 1C. Moreover, the blocks are logically and physically paired such that an access request to a block in load cache 103b results in an access request to the logically and physically paired block in store coalescing cache 103a (and a corresponding search of both store coalescing cache tag memory 103c and load cache tag memory 103d for the tags that correspond to the requests). Consequently, arbitrations related to block access as well as operations relating to the identification of tags corresponding to the requests are merged with regard to store coalescing cache 103a and load cache 103b.


In one embodiment, the data maintained in store coalescing cache 103a is considered to be more up to date (e.g., is considered to be the latest version) than the data that is maintained in the logically and physically paired load cache 103b. Accordingly, the data that is maintained in store coalescing cache 103a is given priority over data that is maintained in load cache 103b in merge operations involving such data. This is shown in FIG. 1D where the input into a 2:1 multiplexor from a store coalescing cache block (store coalescing cache block 0) is given priority over an input from a load cache block (load cache block 0). The prioritization of the store coalescing cache contents over the load cache contents ensures the provision of the latest data to access requestors.


Referring again to FIG. 1A, system 101, responsive to a request to access load cache 103b, directs accesses of store coalescing cache 103a and load cache 103b in parallel. Thereafter, the data that is accessed from store coalescing cache 103a and the data that is accessed from load cache 103b is merged. The merged data is then made available to the access requestor. In one embodiment, the data can be merged using a 2:1 multiplexer as discussed above. In other embodiments, other manners of merging the data can be used. In one embodiment, as a part of the merger of the data, as discussed above, the data that is stored in store coalescing cache 103a is given priority over the data that is stored in load cache 103b.


In one embodiment, system 101, is able to facilitate the execution of a plurality of loads and stores in a single cycle based on the organization of load cache 103b and store coalescing cache 103a. In one embodiment, the parallelism facilitated by system 101 operates to provide quicker load and store accesses. In one embodiment, system 101 can be located in a cache controller (not shown). In other embodiments, system 101 can be separate from a cache controller, but operate cooperatively therewith.


Main memory 111 includes physical addresses that store the information that is copied into cache memory. In one embodiment, when the information that is contained in the physical addresses of main memory that have been cached is changed, the corresponding cached information is updated to reflect the changes made to the information stored in main memory. Also shown in FIG. 1A is system interface 111.


Operation



FIG. 1E illustrates operations performed by system 101 for supporting a plurality of load and store accesses of a cache in a single cycle based on an organization of load and store coalescing caches according to one embodiment. These operations, which relate to supporting a plurality of loads and stores in a single cycle, are only exemplary. It should be appreciated that other operations not illustrated by FIG. 1E can be performed in accordance with one embodiment.


Referring to FIG. 1E, at A, a load request involving a specific block of a level one load cache is received.


At B, the block of the store coalescing cache that logically and physically corresponds to the specific block of the level one load cache is simultaneously identified. In one embodiment, because both the load cache and the store coalescing cache are similarly organized, the bits of the virtual address associated with the request that addresses the aforementioned specific block of the load cache, simultaneously addresses the similarly situated, logically and physically paired, block of the store coalescing cache.


At C, a read enable that corresponds to the block of the store coalescing cache and a read enable that corresponds to the block of the load cache are asserted in parallel (because arbitration for both blocks are the same) and data from each of the blocks is accessed.


At D, the data accessed from the accessed block of the store coalescing cache and the data accessed from the accessed block of the load cache is locally compared.


At E, the data accessed from the accessed block of the store coalescing cache and the data accessed from the accessed block of the load cache is merged. And, the merged data is made available to the load requestor.


In exemplary embodiments stores can access the store coalescing cache without a corresponding access of the load cache. However, as discussed herein, load requests trigger a parallel access of both the load cache and the store coalescing cache. Exemplary embodiments accommodate a throughput of many loads and stores, do not penalize the timing of the “load hit” signal and maintain consistency between loads and stores.


Components of System for Supporting a Plurality of Load and Store Accesses of a Cache According to One Embodiment


FIG. 2 shows components of a system 101 for supporting a plurality of load and store accesses of a cache in a single clock cycle based on an organization of load and store coalescing caches according to one embodiment. In one embodiment, components of system 101 implement an algorithm for supporting a plurality of load and store accesses in a single clock cycle. In the FIG. 3 embodiment, components of system 101 include load request accessor 201, block accessor 201, data comparer/merger 203 and data access provider 205.


Load request accessor 201 accesses requests to access blocks of a load cache (e.g., load cache 103b in FIG. 1B) and/or a store coalescing cache (e.g., store coalescing cache 103a in FIG. 1B). In one embodiment, the requests can include a plurality of load and store requests.


Block accessor 203, responsive to a request of a plurality of requests to access a block of a plurality of blocks in a load cache (e.g., 103b in FIG. 1B), accesses the block in the load cache and a logically and physically paired block in a store coalescing cache (e.g., 103a in FIG. 1B) in parallel. In one embodiment, the block in the load cache and the block in the store coalescing cache are logically paired and are situated similarly within the organizational structure of the respective caches.


Data comparer/merger 205 compares and merges data accessed from the accessed block of the load cache to data that is accessed from the accessed block of the store coalescing cache on a per byte basis. In one embodiment, the data that is maintained in the store coalescing cache is given priority over the data that is maintained in the load cache. As such, data that is inconsistent with that which is supplied by the store coalescing cache is replaced by the data supplied from the store coalescing cache. In one embodiment, data comparer/merger 203 can be implemented using a multiplexer that compares and merges the data supplied by the store coalescing cache and the data supplied by the load cache. In one embodiment, the multiplexer can be a 2:1 multiplexer. In one embodiment, the comparison is locally performed (carried out inside the level one data cache).


Data access provider 207 provides access to the merged data to the load requestor. In one embodiment, the herein described processes ensure that the data provided can be a part of a throughput of many loads and stores, is provided in a manner that does not penalize the timing of the “load hit” signal and maintains consistency between loads and stores.


It should be appreciated that the aforementioned components of system 101 can be implemented in hardware or software or in a combination of both. In one embodiment, components and operations of system 101 can be encompassed by components and operations of one or more computer components or programs (e.g., a cache controller). In another embodiment, components and operations of system 101 can be separate from the aforementioned one or more computer components or programs but can operate cooperatively with components and operations thereof.


Method for Supporting a Plurality of Load and Store Accesses of a Cache According to One Embodiment


FIG. 3 shows a flowchart 300 of the steps performed in a method for supporting a plurality of loads and stores in a single clock cycle based on an organization of load and store coalescing caches according to one embodiment. The flowchart includes processes that, in one embodiment can be carried out by processors and electrical components under the control of computer-readable and computer-executable instructions. Although specific steps are disclosed in the flowcharts, such steps are exemplary. That is the present embodiment is well suited to performing various other steps or variations of the steps recited in the flowchart. Although specific steps are disclosed in the flowcharts, such steps are exemplary. That is the present embodiments are well suited to performing various other steps or variations of the steps recited in the flowcharts.


Referring to FIG. 3, at 301, responsive to a request of a plurality of requests to access a block of a plurality of blocks of a load cache, the block of the load cache and a logically and physically paired block of a store coalescing cache are accessed in parallel. In one embodiment, the block of the load cache and the block of the store coalescing cache are logically and physically paired and are a part of similarly organized caches that facilitate their access in a single clock cycle.


At 303, data accessed from the block of the load cache is compared and merged with data that is accessed from the block of the store coalescing cache on a per byte basis. In one embodiment, as a part of the data comparison and merger process, the data that is maintained in the block of the store coalescing cache is given priority over the data that is maintained in the block of the load cache. Consequently, where the data in the block of the load cache and the data in the block of the store coalescing cache are different, the data from the block of the store coalescing cache is included in the merged data result.


At 305, access to the result of the data merger is provided to access requestors. In one embodiment, operations described herein ensure that access to the latest version of data that is associated with an address is provided to the requestor.


With regard to exemplary embodiments thereof, systems and methods for supporting a plurality of load and store accesses of a cache are disclosed. Responsive to a request of a plurality of requests to access a block of a plurality of blocks of a load cache, the block of the load cache and a logically paired block of the store coalescing cache are accessed in parallel. The data that is accessed from the block of the load cache is compared to the data that is accessed from the block of the store coalescing cache and merged on a per byte basis. Access is provided to the merged data.


Although many of the components and processes are described above in the singular for convenience, it will be appreciated by one of skill in the art that multiple components and repeated processes can also be used to practice the techniques of the present invention. Further, while the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that changes in the form and details of the disclosed embodiments may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. For example, embodiments of the present invention may be employed with a variety of components and should not be restricted to the ones mentioned above. It is therefore intended that the invention be interpreted to include all variations and equivalents that fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method for processing a cache access request, the method comprising: receiving a request to access a data block of a plurality of data blocks of a load cache;accessing the data block of the load cache and an associated data block of a store coalescing cache in parallel;comparing data accessed from the data block of the load cache to data accessed from the data block of the store coalescing cache and merging the data; andsending the merged data.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the data block of the load cache and the associated data block of the store coalescing cache are logically paired.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the data block of the load cache and the associated data block of the store coalescing cache are physically paired.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the merging is performed on a per byte basis.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the comparing and the merging are performed locally within a cache that comprises the load cache and the store coalescing cache.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the data block of the load cache and the associated data block of the store coalescing cache are situated similarly within organizational structures of the load cache and the store coalescing cache respectively.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the merging prioritizes data from the store coalescing cache over data from the load cache.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein access arbitrations related to the data block, and searches for a tag corresponding to the request to access the data block, are merged with respect to the load cache and the store coalescing cache.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein a plurality of requests to access a same block of the plurality of blocks causes an access arbitration that is executed in parallel with accessing of a tag memory for tags corresponding to each request of the plurality of requests.
  • 10. A cache apparatus comprising: a cache comprising: a store coalescing cache;a load cache; anda cache controller comprising: a location accessing component responsive to a request to access a data block of the load cache and configured for accessing the data block of the load cache and an associated data block of the store coalescing cache in parallel;a comparing and merging component configured for comparing data from the data block of the load cache to data of the associated data block of the store coalescing cache and merging the data; andan access component for facilitating access to the merged data.
  • 11. The cache apparatus of claim 10, wherein the data block of the load cache and the associated data block of the store coalescing cache are logically paired.
  • 12. The cache apparatus of claim 10, wherein the data block of the load cache and the associated data block of the store coalescing cache are physically paired.
  • 13. The cache apparatus of claim 10, wherein the merging is performed on a per byte basis.
  • 14. The cache system of claim 10, wherein the comparing and the merging are performed locally within the cache.
  • 15. The cache system of claim 10, wherein the data block of the load cache and the associated data block of the store coalescing cache are situated similarly within organizational structures of the load cache and the store coalescing cache respectively.
  • 16. The cache system of claim 10, wherein in the merging, data from the store coalescing cache is given priority over data from the load cache.
  • 17. The cache system of claim 10, wherein a plurality of requests to access a same block of a plurality of blocks of the load cache causes an access arbitration that is executed in parallel with an accessing of a tag storage memory for tags corresponding to each of the plurality of requests.
  • 18. A processor, comprising: a cache system, comprising: a level one cache system; anda level two cache system;the level one cache system comprising: a store coalescing cache;a load cache; anda cache controller configured for accessing a data block of the load cache and an associated data block of the store coalescing cache in parallel and merging data from the data block of the load cache and an associated data block of the store coalescing cache.
RELATED U.S. APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of, claims the benefit of, and priority to the copending non-provisional patent application Ser. No. 13/561,570, entitled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SUPPORTING A PLURALITY OF LOAD AND STORE ACCESSES OF A CACHE,” with filing date Jul. 30, 2012, and hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (165)
Number Name Date Kind
4075704 O'Leary Feb 1978 A
4245344 Richter Jan 1981 A
4356550 Katzman et al. Oct 1982 A
4414624 Summer, Jr. et al. Nov 1983 A
4524415 Mills, Jr. et al. Jun 1985 A
4527237 Frieder et al. Jul 1985 A
4577273 Hopper et al. Mar 1986 A
4597061 Cline et al. Jun 1986 A
4600986 Scheuneman et al. Jul 1986 A
4633434 Scheuneman Dec 1986 A
4682281 Woffinden et al. Jul 1987 A
4816991 Watanabe et al. Mar 1989 A
4920477 Colwell et al. Apr 1990 A
5294897 Notani et al. Mar 1994 A
5317705 Gannon et al. May 1994 A
5317754 Blandy et al. May 1994 A
5548742 Wang et al. Aug 1996 A
5559986 Alpert et al. Sep 1996 A
5574878 Onodera et al. Nov 1996 A
5581725 Nakayama Dec 1996 A
5634068 Nishtala et al. May 1997 A
5752260 Liu May 1998 A
5754818 Mohamed May 1998 A
5787494 DeLano et al. Jul 1998 A
5793941 Pencis et al. Aug 1998 A
5802602 Rahman et al. Sep 1998 A
5806085 Berliner Sep 1998 A
5813031 Chou et al. Sep 1998 A
5835951 McMahan Nov 1998 A
5852738 Bealkowski et al. Dec 1998 A
5860146 Vishin et al. Jan 1999 A
5864657 Stiffler Jan 1999 A
5872985 Kimura Feb 1999 A
5881277 Bondi et al. Mar 1999 A
5903750 Yeh et al. May 1999 A
5905509 Jones et al. May 1999 A
5918251 Yamada et al. Jun 1999 A
5956753 Glew et al. Sep 1999 A
5974506 Sicola et al. Oct 1999 A
6016533 Tran Jan 2000 A
6073230 Pickett et al. Jun 2000 A
6075938 Bugnion et al. Jun 2000 A
6088780 Yamada et al. Jul 2000 A
6092172 Nishimoto et al. Jul 2000 A
6101577 Tran Aug 2000 A
6115809 Mattson, Jr. et al. Sep 2000 A
6134634 Marshall, Jr. et al. Oct 2000 A
6138226 Yoshioka et al. Oct 2000 A
6157998 Rupley, II et al. Dec 2000 A
6167490 Levy et al. Dec 2000 A
6205545 Shah et al. Mar 2001 B1
6212613 Belair Apr 2001 B1
6226732 Pei et al. May 2001 B1
6247097 Sinharoy Jun 2001 B1
6253316 Tran et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256727 McDonald Jul 2001 B1
6256728 Witt et al. Jul 2001 B1
6260131 Kikuta et al. Jul 2001 B1
6260138 Harris Jul 2001 B1
6272662 Jadav Aug 2001 B1
6275917 Okada Aug 2001 B1
6321298 Hubis Nov 2001 B1
6332189 Baweja et al. Dec 2001 B1
6341324 Caulk, Jr. et al. Jan 2002 B1
6437789 Tidwell Aug 2002 B1
6449671 Patkar et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457120 Sinharoy Sep 2002 B1
6557083 Sperber et al. Apr 2003 B1
6594755 Nuechterlein et al. Jul 2003 B1
6604187 McGrath et al. Aug 2003 B1
6609189 Kuszmaul et al. Aug 2003 B1
6658549 Wilson et al. Dec 2003 B2
6681395 Nishi Jan 2004 B1
6907600 Neiger et al. Jun 2005 B2
6912644 O'Connor et al. Jun 2005 B1
7007108 Emerson et al. Feb 2006 B2
7111145 Chen et al. Sep 2006 B1
7143273 Miller et al. Nov 2006 B2
7149872 Rozas et al. Dec 2006 B2
7213106 Koster et al. May 2007 B1
7278030 Chen et al. Oct 2007 B1
7380096 Rozas et al. May 2008 B1
7406581 Southwell Jul 2008 B2
7546420 Shar et al. Jun 2009 B1
7680988 Nickolls et al. Mar 2010 B1
7783868 Ukai Aug 2010 B2
7856530 Mu Dec 2010 B1
7913058 Rozas et al. Mar 2011 B2
8145844 Bruce Mar 2012 B2
8239656 Rozas et al. Aug 2012 B2
8301847 Dantzig Oct 2012 B2
8522253 Rozas et al. Aug 2013 B1
8868838 Glasco et al. Oct 2014 B1
8930674 Avudaiyappan et al. Jan 2015 B2
9047178 Talagala et al. Jun 2015 B2
20010049782 Hsu et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020069326 Richardson et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020082824 Neiger et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020099913 Steely, Jr. Jul 2002 A1
20030065887 Maiyuran et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030088752 Harman May 2003 A1
20040034762 Kacevas Feb 2004 A1
20040044850 George et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064668 Kjos et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093483 Nguyen et al. May 2004 A1
20040103251 Alsup May 2004 A1
20040117593 Uhlig et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117594 VanderSpek Jun 2004 A1
20040143727 McDonald Jul 2004 A1
20040193857 Miller et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040205296 Bearden Oct 2004 A1
20040215886 Cargnoni et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040225872 Bonanno et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050005085 Miyanaga Jan 2005 A1
20050027961 Zhang Feb 2005 A1
20050060457 Olukotun Mar 2005 A1
20050108480 Correale, Jr. et al. May 2005 A1
20050154867 DeWitt, Jr. et al. Jul 2005 A1
20060004964 Conti et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026381 Doi et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060190707 McIlvaine et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060236074 Williamson et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060277365 Pong Dec 2006 A1
20080077813 Keller et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080091880 Vishin Apr 2008 A1
20080126771 Chen et al. May 2008 A1
20080195844 Shen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215865 Hino et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080235500 Davis et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080270758 Ozer et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270774 Singh et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080282037 Kusachi et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090138659 Lauterbach May 2009 A1
20090157980 Bruce Jun 2009 A1
20090158017 Mutlu et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090164733 Kim et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090172344 Grochowski et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090287912 Sendag Nov 2009 A1
20100138607 Hughes et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100169578 Nychka Jul 2010 A1
20100169611 Chou et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100211746 Tsukishiro Aug 2010 A1
20110010521 Wang et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110082980 Gschwind et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110082983 Koktan Apr 2011 A1
20110153955 Herrenschmidt et al. Jun 2011 A1
20120005462 Hall et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120042126 Krick et al. Feb 2012 A1
20130019047 Podvalny et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130046934 Nychka Feb 2013 A1
20130086417 Sivaramakrishnan et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130097369 Talagala et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130238874 Avudaiyappan et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130304991 Bottcher et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130311759 Abdallah Nov 2013 A1
20130346699 Walker Dec 2013 A1
20140032844 Avudaiyappan et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032845 Avudaiyappan et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032856 Avudaiyappan et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140075168 Abdallah Mar 2014 A1
20140108730 Avudaiyappan et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140156947 Avudaiyappan et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140281242 Abdallah et al. Sep 2014 A1
20160041908 Avudaiyappan et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160041930 Avudaiyappan et al. Feb 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
1305150 Jul 2001 CN
0596636 May 1994 EP
0706133 Apr 1996 EP
2343270 May 2000 GB
200707284 Mar 1995 TW
539996 Jul 2003 TW
200401187 Jan 2004 TW
591530 Jun 2004 TW
I233545 Jun 2005 TW
I281121 May 2007 TW
WO0125921 Apr 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (56)
Entry
Barham et al., “Xen and the Art of Virtualization,” ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles, Oct. 19, 2003, pp. 164-177.
Cooperman, Gene; Cache Basics, 2003, http://www.ccs.neu.edu/course/com3200/parent/Notesicache-basics.html, pp. 1-3.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,441, dated Oct. 14, 2016, 14 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,441, dated Sep. 26, 2014, 16 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,491, dated Jan. 14, 2015, 14 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,491, dated Nov. 12, 2014, 14 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,491, dated Oct. 13, 2015, 16 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,528, dated Nov. 10, 2014, 19 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/173,602, dated Jan. 8, 2016, 32 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/173,602, dated Jan. 9, 2017, 18 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,042, dated Oct. 14, 2016, 15 pages.
Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,053, dated Oct. 14, 2016, 16 pages.
Garmany J., “The Power of Indexing,” archived on Mar. 9, 2009, 7 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2013/051128, dated Feb. 12,2015, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2013/051128, dated Oct. 30, 2013, 9 pages.
Jacobson et al., “Path-based Next Trace Prediction,” IEEE, 1997, pp. 14-23.
Nanda Ax., et al., “The Misprediction Recovery Cache,” International Journal of Parallel Programming, Plenum Publishing Corporation, 1998, vol. 26 (4), pp. 383-415.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,441, dated Dec. 22, 2014, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,441, dated Jan. 39, 2017, 17 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,441, dated Jun. 4, 2014, 12 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,441, dated May 17, 2016, 17 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,491, dated Feb. 8, 2016, 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,491, dated Jun. 16, 2014, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,491, dated May 5, 2015, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,528, dated Dec. 19, 2014, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,528, dated Jun. 17, 2014 , 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/173,602, dated Jul. 29, 2016, 19 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/173,602, dated Sep. 8, 2015, 32 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,042, dated Apr. 7, 2016, 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,042, dated Dec. 14, 2016, 20 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,053, dated Apr. 7, 2016, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/922,053, dated Dec. 15, 2016, 16 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,441, dated Feb. 2, 2016, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,441, dated Jun. 23, 2015, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,441, dated Mar. 18, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,441, dated Oct. 21, 2015, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,491, dated Dec. 19, 2016, 13 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,491, dated Jun. 8, 2016, 12 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,491, dated Sep. 14, 2016, 18 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,528, dated Aug. 3, 2016, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,528, dated Feb. 8, 2016, 15 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,528, dated Jul. 13, 2015, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,528, dated Mar. 31, 2015, 5 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,528, dated May 2, 2016, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,528, dated Oct. 21, 2015, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,570, dated Aug. 27, 2015, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,570, dated Dec. 7, 2015, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,570, dated Jan. 29, 2015, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,570, dated Jun. 20, 2014, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,570, dated May 20, 2015, 3 pages.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 13/561,570, dated Oct. 22, 2014, 16 pages.
Rotenberg E., et al.,“Trace Cache: a Low Latency Approach to High Bandwidth Instruction Fetching,” Apr. 11, 1996, 48 pages.
Techopedia, Cache Memory Definition, www.techopedia.com/definition/6307/cache-memory.
Wallace S., et al.,“Multiple Branch and Block Prediction,” Third International symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, IEEE, Feb. 1997, pp. 94-103.
Ye J., et al.,“A New Recovery Mechanism in Superscalar Microprocessors by Recovering Critical Misprediction,”IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, 2011, vol. E94-A (12), pp. 2639-2648.
Yeh T., et al.,“Increasing the Instruction Fetch Rate Via Multiple Branch Prediction and a Branch Address Cache,” 7th International Conference on Supercomputing, ACM, 1993, pp. 67-76.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160041913 A1 Feb 2016 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13561570 Jul 2012 US
Child 14922035 US