Turboengine water wash system

Abstract
A system for cleaning gas turbine engines is described. More specifically, methods and apparatuses for cleaning stationary gas turbines and on-wing turbofan engines found on aircraft are disclosed that includes a trailer-mounted, automated low-pressure water delivery system, additive and detergent injection system, nozzle and manifold technology, and active waste water effluent collector system. The system will deliver the liquid cleaning medium at a specific pressure, temperature, and flow rate to optimize the atomization that occurs at the nozzles.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention generally relates to a system for cleaning gas turbine engines, and more specifically, to methods and apparatuses for cleaning on-wing turbofan engines found on aircraft that includes, among other things, a trailer-mounted, automated low-pressure water delivery system, additive and detergent injection system, nozzle and manifold technology, and active waste water effluent collector system.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A gas turbine is comprised of a compressor section for compressing ambient air, a combustor section for mixing and burning fuel and the compressed air, and a turbine section driven by the expanding combustion gases for powering the compressor and turning an output shaft for ancillary devices or power generation or for providing thrust for propelling an aircraft. In an aircraft application, one of these ancillary devices may be a large turbofan used to provide additional thrust for the aircraft.


Modern gas turbine engines require very large quantities of atmospheric air. Entrained in the air is particulate matter of various sizes and made up of many different substances, such as aerosolized salts, volatile organic compounds, smog particulate, dust, agricultural debris, pollen, hydrocarbons, insects, de-icing chemicals, and the like. Stationary gas turbines such as those used in power generation utilize air filtering mechanisms to remove the majority of the particulates. Even with this filtering, however, very small contaminants and foreign matter dissolved in the air humidity still remain in the airflow. Gas turbines on aircraft do not have any filtering system on the airflow—so all of the particulate matter enters the turbine. The majority of large particulate matter and debris entering an aircraft engine are centrifuged away from the gas turbine through the action of the turbofan; however some of this large particulate matter and debris may remain on the turbofan blades reducing their effectiveness. While most of the smaller particulate matter follows the gas path and becomes part of the engine exhaust, some of the particles will remain on the intake, compressor and gas path components of the engine. This remaining particulate matter is referred to as “fouling,” and after a period of operation will build up on the engine components. Any large debris that is ingested through the turbofan, such as insects and birds, can also cause considerable immediate fouling of the intake and gas path components.


The fouling on the turbofan and compressor blades of the turbine causes a loss in the aerodynamic properties of these components. The air stream is deflected by the increased roughness of the blade surfaces, and the boundary layer of the air stream is thickened resulting in a negative vortex at the trailing edge of the blade. The deflection and vortex results in a loss of air mass flow through the engine thereby reducing engine performance. Secondary effects of this fouling include reduced compressor pressure gain, which leads to the engine operating at a reduced pressure ratio, and a reduction in the compressor isentropic efficiency. The overall effect of these negative effects, all caused by turbofan and compressor blade contamination, is that the engine will utilize more of the power it is generating to turn the compressor rather than producing thrust (in the case of an aircraft) or powering other ancillary systems (such as generators in a power generation application).


In an aircraft application, it is necessary to increase the throttle for more power to compensate for the lost thrust. In a stationary application, it is necessary to increase fuel flow to make up for the lost power. In both cases, operating costs increase as more fuel is required to perform the same amount of work. The increased fuel burn, in addition to increasing operating costs, has other deleterious effects;


First, the loss in performance caused by fouling causes a rise in the temperature at which the engine operates. This is most critical in aircraft engines since they operate at temperatures very close to the limit of what the engine material can withstand. The temperature is measured after combustion and is designated as the Exhaust Gas Temperature (EGT). The difference between the actual EGT and the safe operating limit established by the engine manufacturer is the EGT Operating Margin. As fouling takes place over time, the EGT rises to a point closer to the upper limit of the EGT Operating Margin. When the EGT is too close to the EGT Operating Margin, the engine must be removed from service and overhauled. In stationary power generation applications, the increase in engine operating temperature reduces the serviceable life of the gas turbine due to early component failure.


Second, fouling of the engine is harmful for the environment. Increased fuel burn increases emissions of gases known to cause global warming such as carbon dioxide. Each additional pound of fuel burned results in the emission of approximately 3.4 pounds of carbon dioxide. Increased combustion temperatures due to fouling also results in increased nitrogen oxides (NOx) known to cause smog.


In addition to the above described intake component fouling effects, fouling in the combustor and other post-compressor areas has negative effects on the engine. Debris in the air stream carried into the rear section of the engine increases the amount of ash and soot in the combustor, reducing its effectiveness and leading to potential corrosion of components.


Gas turbines, both in aircraft and stationary applications, can have many different designs but the above-described problem of airborne contaminants fouling the engine is common to all of them. There is a difference, however, in the types of fouling that occurs in the different sections of the engine. Most modern aircraft have a turbofan engine that is designed to provide thrust. The engine is comprised of a core fuel-burning gas turbine that drives a bypass fan. The fan is located upstream of the compressor and may be as large as 120 inches or more in diameter. The air being ingested into the engine first comes into contact with this bypass fan, and a portion of the airflow (known commonly as the “bypass ratio”) is then forced under very high velocity around the core of the engine and out through the rear of the engine producing most of the thrust utilized to propel the aircraft. Due to centrifugal and inertial forces, most of the large particulates (including insects, bird residue, large dirt particles, etc.) in the air follow this path and subject the fan to fouling. Cleaning this fan is performed by a liquid cleaning medium generally using some form of impingement.


Downstream of the bypass fan is the core engine compressor. A core engine compressor is a component of all gas turbines (unlike the bypass fan which is only found on aircraft engines). The purpose of the compressor is to compress the air to high pressure ratios for maximum combustion efficiency. Compressing the air takes place in a series of rows of decreasing size rotating blades and stationary vanes. The compression of the air leads to high pressure ratios and concurrent high temperatures that may exceed 900 degrees Fahrenheit. Most of the large particles of potential contaminants trapped in the airflow, as stated above, have either been filtered out through the use of filtering media or, in the case of turboaircraft, been centrifuged within the bypass fan area. Most of the remaining contaminants are very small particles in the airflow and other matter (such as aerosolized salts, for example) entrained in the humidity of the airflow. As the air is accelerated before the first stages of the compressor, according to the Bernoulli Effect, there is a corresponding initial temperature drop. This may cause some of the humidity to condense freeing the matter dissolved in the humidity. A portion of this freed matter strikes and adheres to the first rows of the compressor. The remaining freed matter mixes with the other fine particulate in the airflow. As the airflow continues through the compressor and the air is heated, this matter is subject to continued adhesion to the compressor blades and other gas path components causing additional fouling. The increasing heat may cause the fouling to be baked on to the blades. Typical fouling in the compressor section of gas turbines is salt, hydrocarbons, chemical residue, and other fine matter. This fouling is different than that generally found on the bypass blades and as such needs a different cleaning methodology. Where the bypass cleaning is accomplished by impingement of the cleaning medium on the bypass blades, the compressor cleaning is accomplished by reversing the process whereby the fouling was created in the first place. This process reversal is to re-entrain the particulate and fouling matter in a liquid medium which is then carried through the compressor and gas path and out the engine exhaust.


Removal of the aforedescribed contaminants from blades and vanes of in-service compressors is desirable to restore compressor and engine efficiency. Since it is both time-consuming and expensive to disassemble the engine from the aircraft and then the compressor from the engine, it is also desirable to remove the contaminants while the engine is on-wing. Furthermore, any method utilized to remove the contaminants must not interfere with the structural or metallurgical integrity of other components of the engine. In this regard, it is known in the art that contaminants can be removed from the internal components of a gas turbine engine by ingesting, into the engine inlet at dry-motoring or idle speed, substances generally characterized as aqueous cleaning compositions.


One of the early leaders in this field of cleaning aircraft engines is Juniper Aircraft Service Equipment of Liverpool, England. In the 1960's, they produced and patented one of the first gas turbine compressor washing units under U.S. Pat. No. 3,335,916. This patent discloses a mobile spray unit for use in the washing of compressor blades of gas turbine engines. The washing liquid is supplied under pressure through the use of a hand pump or through pressurized air provided by an external engine compressor connected to an air inlet to the unit. A flexible hose delivers the washing liquid from the mobile spray unit to the gas turbine engine. Improvements to this type of device have occurred, such as the mobile cart-mounted unit described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,059,123 to Bartos, et al. In contrast to the Juniper device described above, pressurization is achieved by the use of an integrally mounted air compressor driven by an internal combustion engine. In both of these devices, and others of a similar design using hand pumps or air pressure systems, the water pressure achieved is insufficient to atomize the washing liquid into a spray fine enough to get complete gas path penetration without having the liquid subjected to the centrifugal forces of the rotating components. A high pressure device described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,868,860 to Peter Asplund describes a wash system improvement that sought to improve on the existing low pressure systems by utilizing a high pressure electrically powered pump. This system specifies delivering the wash fluid at a pressure in excess of 50 bar (725 psi) in order to more finely atomize the wash fluid. The problem with this system is that the pressures utilized by this system are such that damage to the engine components may occur.


Many prior art methods exist for directing the washing liquid from the mobile units described above to the compressor components of the aircraft engines. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,196,020 to Hornak, et al. discloses a typical engine wash spray apparatus that is releasably connected to the leading edge of a gas turbine engine for dispersing a cleaning or rinsing fluid to the air intake area of the engine and on into the engines internal air flow path. The apparatus includes a manifold having a plurality of spray nozzles symmetrically disposed about the air intake of a combustion turbine engine. Water is sprayed under pressure from these nozzles into the inlet of the compressor during operation. The inlet air is used to carry the atomized water mist through the turbine. A similar system is disclosed by McDermott in U.S. Pat. No. 5,011,540. The McDermott patent discloses a manifold having a plurality of nozzles for mounting in front of the air intake of a combustion turbine. McDermott proposes that a cleaning solution be injected into the air intake as a cloud dispersed in the less turbulent air found at the periphery of the intake. McDermott asserts that dispersal in the less turbulent air improved cleaning. In each of these and all other spray apparatus art the nozzles being used on the manifold each deliver the cleaning fluid at the same flowrate and spray droplet size. This fails to account for the different types of fouling occurring on the different components of the engine, and water flowrate and spray droplet size needed to address these differences.


The wash water and engine effluent is often collected for treatment, rather than being expelled directly onto the underlying surface (such as the hangar floor). One such system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,899,217 to Testman. Testman describes an engine wash recovery system that is temporarily installed on an aircraft turbine engine to recover wash liquids and contaminants washed from the engine during engine cleaning operations. The apparatus basically comprises a collector, an engine exhaust duct, and a container. The collector is formed of a flexible, liquid-proof material which is removably secured beneath the engine housing of the aircraft, to capture wash liquids which spill from the housing. The duct is removably connected to the engine exhaust, to capture spray which has passed through the engine as the engine is turned over at a relatively low rpm to flush the fluid through the engine. Both the collector and the duct are connected to a container for recovering all liquids emanating from the engine and its housing during the wash process. The collector may include a forward extension to capture liquids which back up out of the engine intake or inlet, and a rearward extension which extends back to the exhaust. A more involved collector system is seen in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US-2003/0209256-A1 which discloses a large jacket, wet suit, or cover that completely encases a turbojet or turbofan engine and a drum or 55 gallon barrel interconnected by hoses creating a jet engine cleaning system that confines the spraying, filtering, and collecting of chemical spray and toxic runoff to a confined system. These and all other collector systems are passive in nature; that is, they rely on the low-RPM exhaust of the engine to move the effluent. Very low engine RPM may cause the effluent spray to be too weak to enter or penetrate the collector or mist eliminator. At higher RPMs, any pressure drop or resistance along this path may lead to effluent being expelled around or in front of the collector or through leaks in the hoses or apparatus, or backed up in the tubing/hoses with resultant spillage.


Accordingly, there is a need for improved methods and apparatuses for cleaning gas turbine engines and collecting the resultant effluent to eliminate the constraints, and design drawbacks seen in the prior art and described above.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a system for cleaning gas turbine engines, and more specifically, to methods and apparatuses for cleaning on-wing turbofan engines found on aircraft that includes, among other things, a trailer-mounted, automated low-pressure water delivery system, additive and detergent injection system, nozzle and manifold technology, and active waste water effluent collector system.


In one embodiment, the invention includes means for pressurizing an aqueous wash medium, means for incorporating additives and/or detergents into the wash medium, and one or more nozzles for delivering the wash medium into the engine. More specifically, the pressurization may be accomplished with an automated, low-pressure water delivery system operating from about 200 psi to about 725 psi, the additives and/or detergents are injected into the wash medium before or after pressurization, and the nozzles have unique characteristics as to droplet size, flowrate, and dispersion spray pattern.


The invention can also include means for actively, through suction of the engine exhaust airflow, collecting the aqueous wash medium after the medium transverses the engine. Likewise, the invention can include means for purging the wash medium from the engine cleaning apparatus, means for controlling the engine cleaning apparatus, and a portable power generator that can power the engine cleaning apparatus.


In another embodiment, the invention includes the steps of pressurizing an aqueous wash medium with an automated, low-pressure water delivery system operating from about 200 psi to about 725 psi, incorporating additives and/or detergents into the wash medium before or after pressurization, and delivering the wash medium into the engine with one or more nozzles, wherein the nozzles are arranged on a manifold array with each nozzle having unique characteristics as to droplet size, flowrate, and dispersion spray pattern.


Accordingly, several objects and advantages of the invention are:


(a) to provide delivery of the heated, as required, cleaning medium, with precise, automated injection of required additives such as detergents, emulsifiers, freeze depressants, corrosion inhibitors, and the like at the correct pressure and flow rate to insure nozzle-tip spray atomization at the ideal purity, droplet size, temperature, and flow rate within the manufacturer's specifications;


(b) to provide multiple nozzles on a single manifold per engine each with a specific orientation, droplet size, and water flow rate to provide maximum cleaning efficacy for the specific engine components towards which they are directed without exceeding manufacturer's specifications; and


(c) to provide an active effluent collection system that supplements the engine exhaust with a powered suction to insure that all cleaning effluent is collected.


This complete self-contained system for the washing of gas turbine engines has the advantage of allowing for the exact delivery of cleaning solution dispersion and effluent collection in an automated format to exactly conform to the requirements of each engine being cleaned. Prior systems only address one area of the cleaning process. Prior systems are manually operated devices that cannot easily be regulated for the different requirements of different engines and applications. Prior systems do not deliver cleaning medium at the proper temperature as required. Prior systems do not have exact additive injection systems or variable dispersion processes at the nozzle manifold. Prior systems do not have an air purge system to flush the wash solution from the lines and nozzles to prevent line corrosion and contamination of the wash solution. And last, prior systems do not have an active effluent collection system to insure environmental safety through the complete collection of the hazardous waste effluent.


The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention so that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter, which form the subject of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and the specific embodiments disclosed might be readily used as a basis for modifying or designing other methods or apparatuses for carrying out the same turboengine water washing and cleaning purposes of the present invention and in related cleaning applications such as land-based, stationary power generation gas turbines. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth herein.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, illustrate the embodiments of the present invention, and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:



FIG. 1 is an isometric view of some of the components of the present invention mounted inside a trailer;



FIG. 2 is a top view of the inside of the trailer;



FIG. 3 is a side view of the inside of the trailer;



FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 are several views of the manifold and nozzle technology;



FIG. 7 is an isometric view of the wash water collection system;



FIG. 8 is a side view of the wash water collection system, with partial cross-section;



FIG. 9 is an isometric view of the trailer and the wash water collection system in association with the aircraft wing and engine;



FIG. 10 is a side view of the wash water collection system in association with a low mounted aircraft engine;



FIG. 11 is an isometric view of the wash water collection system with a chute extension for an elevated or tail mounted aircraft engine;



FIG. 12 is a schematic of the plumbing, piping, and instrumentation of the present invention from the clean water tank to the nozzle manifold, along with the air purge system; and



FIG. 13 is a schematic of the plumbing, piping, and instrumentation of the present invention from the wash water collection system to the grey water tank.





It is to be noted that the drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention will admit to other equally effective embodiments.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In general, the present invention relates to methods and apparatuses for cleaning gas turbine engines. More specifically, the invention relates to methods and apparatuses for cleaning on-wing turbofan engines found on aircraft that includes, among other things, a trailer-mounted, automated low-pressure water delivery system, additive and detergent injection system, nozzle and manifold technology, and active waste water effluent collector system.


Turning now to FIGS. 1 and 2, there are shown, as an isometric view and top view, the principal components of the present invention, all of which have been mounted inside a trailer. In general, the water wash system includes a trailer 10, a clean water tank 20, a grey water tank 30, a wash pump 40, one or more additive/detergent tanks 50, a waste water effluent collector 60, a power generation system 70, an air compressor/purge system 120, and a mechanic's point-of-use supply cabinet 150.


The trailer 10 is a street-legal, enclosed, steel-framed trailer such as those made available from Pace American of Middlebury, Ind., one of the largest manufacturers of enclosed cargo and auto trailers in the world. Depending upon the size of the components, the trailer can range in size from about 4′ wide×6′ long to about 8.5′ wide×53° in length, and can be enclosed, partially enclosed, or not enclosed at all. In addition, the trailer can include factory-installed options and accessories such as air conditioning units, living quarters, awnings, heaters, winches, TVs and sound systems, refrigerators, and other such items. Here, the trailer 10 is about 20 feet in length and includes a trailer hitch 12, one or more access or side doors 14, modular tires 16, and ramp door 18. While the components and machinery are all shown in one trailer, the separate components can be mounted on separate trailers (or grouped in different configurations and then mounted on different trailers) to allow for user versatility. Likewise, one or more of the components can be skid mounted. In addition, rather than using a trailer towed by a vehicle with a towing hitch, the components of the present invention could be mounted inside a tractor trailer rig. The use of a trailer is only necessary when the invention is to be portable. In those applications where portability is not required, a permanent fixed platform may be utilized.


The clean water tank 20 is a square, 316 stainless steel IBC tank capable of holding from about 50 to about 300 gallons of water, preferably 250 gallons. If desired, the tank may be of welded steel construction with its internal surfaces treated, as for example by tinning, to resist corrosion. As is known in the art, there are many available shapes for stainless steel tanks or totes including round, elliptical, conical, cylindrical, cone-topped, truncated, and square. In addition, single and double wall tanks, stackable tanks, and tanks made of different materials (such as aluminum or plastic) are also available and can be used in the present invention. The tank can also be outfitted with emergency vents, pumps, meters, and level indicators. To prevent jostling of liquids, the tank may be baffled. The clean water tank 20 has a closable filler aperture 23 near its roof whereby a supply of water may be filled into said tank. The tank is also provided with one or more drain plugs with sloped bottoms to allow for virtually complete drainage of the transported liquid. If desired, the clean water tank 20 may include banded or immersion heaters or panels (and sufficient tank insulation) to keep the water at proper operating temperatures, preferably from about 150 to about 200 degrees Fahrenheit, most preferably 180 degrees Fahrenheit, or as otherwise required by the appropriate Aircraft Maintenance Manual or turbine engine manufacturer. As described in more detail below, the clean water tank 20 is filled with ultra pure water with less than 0.1 parts per million Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and near 18 MegaOhm resistivity


The grey water tank 30 is also a square, 316 stainless steel IBC tank capable of holding from about 50 to about 300 gallons of water, preferably 250 gallons. It has the same characteristics of the clean water tank, with a closable filler aperture 33, one or more drain plugs, and baffles to prevent jostling of liquids. The grey water tank 30 is designed to hold the waste water effluent directed from the effluent collector 60 described below. In fact, the collector 60 may have a sump dewatering pump at its lower trough.


The wash pump 40 is a stainless steel axial piston pump such as those manufactured by Danfoss. This pump is specifically designed for high-purity water applications and is a stainless steel, high efficiency axial piston pump with high recirculating capability. The pump is designed to deliver from about 1 to about 50 gallons per minute of wash water at a pressure of from about 200 to about 725 psi. The pump's operating parameters may be adjusted by a variable-frequency drive attached to the pump's electric motor. As is known in the art, a variable-frequency drive is an electronic controller that adjusts the speed of the electric motor by modulating the power being delivered. Variable-frequency drives provide continuous control, matching motor speed to the specific demands of the work being performed. Variable-frequency drives enable pumps to accommodate fluctuating demand, running pumps at lower speeds and drawing less energy while still meeting pumping needs.


One or more additive/detergent tanks 50 can be in fluid communication with the clean water tank. These tanks are preferably 10-50 gallon stainless steel square tanks or totes with large fill openings and output ports for piping. The typical detergents, freeze depressants, corrosion inhibitors, and other additives used in this process can be obtained from manufacturers such as ZOK International Group. Preferably, these chemicals are non-flammable, environmentally friendly, and biodegradable.


Rather than being expelled directly onto the underlying surface (such as the hangar floor), the wash water and engine effluent is collected for treatment with a waste water effluent collector 60. As described in more detail below, the waste water effluent collector 60 is a mobile device that is placed under and behind the aircraft engine 160. The device captures the contaminated wash water as it exits the engine and separates the waste wash water from the air flow of the engine. The contaminated wash water is collected in a collection base pan 61 and pumped to the grey water tank 30 for later processing.


In some operating environments, the present invention will also need a power generation system 70 to power the various components discussed above. For example, if airport power is not available, a power source will be provided on the trailer 10 to run, among other things, (a) the heater for the clean water tank, (b) the water pump for the spraying steps, (c) the air purge system, (d) the active fan for the air mist eliminator, (e) the additive injector pumps, (f) the automation panel and related electronics, (g) the effluent collector bilge pump, and (h) the external lighting for night-time or low-light level operations. A suitable power generation system can include a 480 volt, 3 phase, 60 Hertz diesel engine-driven generator unit from such suppliers as Caterpillar, Honda, or Kubota. For non-US systems, the power generation system may be a different voltage, phase and frequency.



FIG. 3 is a side view of the inside of the trailer 10. As noted above, the trailer 10 is about 20 feet in length, 6 feet in width, and includes a trailer hitch 12, one or more roll-up access or side doors 14, modular tires 16, and ramp door 18. To assist the operator of the present invention, trailer 10 can include one or more awnings 11 (for protection from sun and rain) and one or more exterior lights 13, such as 500 watt quartz lights, for night-time or low-level light conditions. In addition to the mechanic's point-of-use supply cabinet 150, one or more storage cabinets, compartments, or shelves can be integrated into the trailer side walls or otherwise provided, for the storage of a variety of equipment or tools used in the present invention. Specifically, there can be a manifold storage area, duct and hose storage area, and shelving storage area. Access to these storage areas can be obtained behind one or more roll-up doors 14 and the door ramp 18. In addition, this side view shows one or more automation panels 92 for controlling and monitoring the operation of the system—for example, the trailer can incorporate, among other automation panels and devices, a system control panel, a power generator control panel, a data logging panel, an alarm panel, and an electrical panel; all of which can be stand-alone or incorporated into one CPU-driven device.



FIGS. 4-6 include several views of the manifold and nozzle technology; specifically, FIG. 4 is a perspective view, FIG. 5 is a front view, and FIG. 6 is a side view of the manifold and nozzle technology used in the present invention. The piping from the clean water tank 20 and chemical injection tanks 50 has connected thereto a length of flexible hose 167 (as shown in FIG. 9) for delivering the washing liquid from the trailer 10 to the aircraft for use in washing the blades of the turbine engine. The hose 167 is releasably connected to a manifold device 100 with stainless steel connectors 105 such as those manufactured by Parker or Swagelok attached to the main manifold inlet pipe 107. The manifold device may have a single spray nozzle or a plurality of spray nozzles, each with its own specific spray dispersion pattern, flowrate, and droplet size symmetrically disposed about the air intake of the combustion turbine engine. More specifically, for illustration purposes, the manifold 100 has four arms 101, 102, 103, and 104, radiating from the main manifold inlet pipe 107, with each arm having a flow meter 106 and nozzle 108. Water is sprayed under pressure from these nozzles onto the bypass turbofan blades and into the inlet of the compressor during operation.


For the nozzles directed towards the engine core, the liquid is finely-divided to a degree such that when the liquid is sprayed against and through the object, the liquid particles will follow the same routes as those earlier taken by the air-borne contaminants through the object. The engine is running during the actual cleaning process, i.e. is rotated with the aid of its start motor, for instance; this provides the air flow that is needed for the finely-divided liquid particles to follow the same route as the air-borne particles and therewith reach contamination coatings throughout the engine.


For the nozzles directed towards the bypass blades, the liquid is dispersed so as to directly impinge upon the pressure and suction side of the bypass blades.


In practice, the pressure for injecting the liquid through the spray nozzles 108 is from about 200 to about 725 psi, preferably 700 psi, with a delivery quantity of from about 1 to about 50 gallons per minute of wash water, with the exact flow rate to be determined by the requirements and specifications of the turbine manufacturer or Aircraft Maintenance Manual. The nozzle orifices are fixed at sizes ranging from 0.05 mm to 1.3 mm. The number of nozzles and radial displacement of each nozzle employed can be varied to provide the desired volume of liquid for the engine and the wash solution droplet size and spray pattern for the engine component the nozzle is targeting.


As is known in the art, the manifold and nozzle apparatus is releasably connected to the leading edge of the gas turbine engine for dispersing the cleaning or rinsing fluid to the air intake area of the engine and on into the engine's internal air flow path.



FIGS. 7 and 8 are an isometric and side view, with partial cross-section, of the wash water collection system. The collector 60 includes a commercially available air mist eliminator 62 manufactured by companies such as Koch Industries mounted in front of and ducted to a large capacity outdoor-rated electrically powered fan 64, a flexible trough 66 mounted on a roller device 68 to channel spillage and engine drain runoff, a collection base pan 61, and a marine grade bilge pump 63 mounted on the collection base pan with necessary piping and connections to the grey water holding tank 30 in the system trailer 10. All the components of the collector are mounted on a wheeled frame 65 with pull handle 67. The arrows in FIG. 8 show the direction of engine 160 exhaust air flow through the air mist eliminator 62.



FIG. 9 is an isometric view of the trailer 10 and the wash water collection system 60 in association with the aircraft wing 166 and engine 160. During operation, the clean wash water is delivered from the trailer 10 through connector 15 to hose 167 which is connected to the nozzle manifold 100 at connector 105. The hose 167 is a commercial grade, high-pressure hydraulic hose of from about ⅜ inch to about ⅞ inch diameter with a burst strength of about 2000 psi, which can be from about 25 to about 75 feet in length to reach from the trailer 10 to the aircraft engine 160. The wash fluid is expelled through nozzles 108 through the aircraft engine 160 and the resultant effluent is captured by the waste waster collection system 60. The effluent thus captured is collected and pumped via the marine grade bilge pump 63 through hose 130 to connector 17 on trailer 10 and piped to the grey water holding tank 30. Electrical power to the waste water collection system 60 is provided by electrical power cabling 169 extending from power connector 19 on trailer 10 to an electrical receptor box 168.



FIG. 10 is a side view of the wash water collection system 60 in association with a low mounted aircraft engine 160. As the effluent is being expelled by the dry-motoring or idling engine 160, the collector 60 actively assists the effluent mist by having the fan 64 suction the mist through the mist eliminator 62 where the water droplets are removed by direct impaction to the components of the eliminator 62. The water droplets are separated from the air flow in the eliminator 62 and drop to a collection base pan 61 mounted on the frame 65 of the collector 60. The now dry air flow continues through the fan 64 and is expelled into the atmosphere. Additional effluent that is expelled from the front of the engine 160, the engine sump drains and side ports, are caught in the trough 66 and channeled to the collection base pan 61. As seen in FIG. 10, the trough 66 is supported at its front by one or more support tripods 69. The collected effluent in the collection base pan 61 is pumped, via a mounted bilge pump 63, to the grey water holding tank 30 in the system trailer 10.



FIG. 11 is an isometric view of the wash water collection system with a chute extension for an elevated or tail mounted aircraft engine. The air mist eliminator 62 has a diameter just slightly larger than the rear exhaust of the turboengine 160; for engines mounted higher than the mist eliminator 62, a flexible, liquid-impervious connector duct 170 is attached to the mist eliminator 62 and is positioned behind the engine 160 exhaust. The flexible duct 170 is supported in the air by two or more adjustable support poles 172 removably mounted on the cart frame 65 of the wash water collection system 60 by insertion into one or more stanchions 174. The flexible duct frame 176 is slightly larger than the exhaust section of the engine 160 and can be of any geometric shape. The poles 172, which are terminated on the duct frame 176 with mounted pole brackets 178, can be height adjusted by various means described in existing art.



FIG. 12 is a schematic of the plumbing, piping, and instrumentation of the present invention associated with the clean water tank 20 and the air purge system, with the components inside the outer rectangle being found inside the trailer 10. The clean water tank 20 has a closable filler aperture 23 near its roof whereby a supply of wash water may be filled into the tank. Here, the preferred wash water is ultra pure water with less than 0.1 parts per million Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) and near 18 MegaOhm resistivity.


Of course, the use of ultra pure water necessitates the use of high-purity water pipe, fittings, and valves. For best results, the ultra pure water is added to the clean water tank 20 no more than about four hours before the washing process takes place. In addition, a resistivity meter or conductivity probe 25 can be used to monitor the purity of the wash water. The clean water tank 20 may include banded or immersion heaters or panels 27 (and sufficient tank insulation) to keep the water at proper operating temperatures.



FIG. 12 shows one or more additive/detergent tanks 50 in fluid communication with the clean water tank 20. In each case, the additive or detergent or other chemical of interest can be stored in its own storage tank 50 mounted to the trailer 10, ready to be mixed with the wash water from the clean tank 20, by means of a valve or flow meter 52 and chemical injection pump 54 that may be controlled by a variable frequency drive (VFD) and a programmable logic controller. Each additive/detergent tank 50 will have its own pump 54, such as a Webtrol booster pump from Weber Industries.


The additive or detergent used depends upon the amount and type of fouling found in the engines, the operating environment of use, and the degree of cleaning required. For example, one or more cleaning solutions or detergents can be added to the wash water to assist in the efficacy and efficiency of the cleaning process. Any conventional cleaning solution appropriate for removal of the specific contaminants in the compressor section, typically oils, greases, dust, and entrapped particulates may be employed. Those skilled in the art are adept at selecting, preparing, and producing such solutions in the desired consistency. Moreover, water alone can be used only when certain environmental conditions are met. In particular, when ambient temperatures are below 45 degrees Fahrenheit, there is a strong likelihood that the water will freeze, thereby creating ice formations that can damage the compressor and associated inlet guide vanes, which are expensive to manufacture and replace. In an attempt to increase the temperature range within which water can be used, freeze depressant additives can be mixed with the water to lower its freezing point.


In certain situations it may be necessary to employ a corrosion resistance additive if the engine will not be utilized for a specified length of time.


If desired, other additives can be injected into the engine to facilitate reducing a rate of formation of particulate matter within the gas turbine engine. More specifically, an anti-static liquid that coats compressor blades within the gas turbine engine to facilitate suppressing static charges from developing within the compressor blades can be employed.


As seen in FIG. 12, the clean water tank 20 and additive/detergent tanks 50 are in fluid communication with the wash pump 40. The pump 40 has a pressure control valve 42 and a variable-frequency drive controller 44 attached to the pump's electric motor to adjust the pump's operating parameters. The piping from the pump 40 to the nozzles includes a strainer 110, temperature indicator 112, and flow meter 52. As is known in the art, strainers are placed in-line with process piping to remove large solid contaminants from the flow.



FIG. 12 also shows the plumbing, piping, and instrumentation for the air purge system, specifically, an air compressor 120, air regulator 122, pressure gauge 124, compressed air filter 126, and compressed air dryer 128. There is also a pressure gauge 121, pressure transmitter 123, purge solenoid valve 125, and purge check valve 127 in fluid communication with the plumbing for the wash pump. The purpose of this apparatus is to force instrument quality air through the lines post-wash to flush any remaining wash solution, thereby reducing the possibility of line corrosion or wash solution contamination. The post-wash purge may be through the nozzle apparatus or through a separate electrically controlled solenoid three-way valve 182 connected to a drainpipe or hose 184. The instrument quality air is also used by the system operators to purge any remaining wash solution from the turboengine components such as passenger air bleed systems and the like through connector 129.



FIG. 13 is a schematic of the plumbing, piping, and instrumentation of the present invention associated with the grey water tank, with the components inside the outer rectangle being found inside the trailer 10. The waste water effluent collector 60, which has a marine grade bilge (sump) dewatering pump 62, is in fluid communication with the gray tank 30 by means of a return hose 130 and associated valves 132. As is known in the art, sump pumps are used in applications where excess water must be pumped away from a particular area. They generally sit in a basin or sump that collects this excess water, hence the name basin sump pump, or simply sump pump. When selecting between the available styles of sump pumps, the most important specifications to consider include the size of the pump and the size of the sump pump pit into which it will be placed, as well as maximum discharge flow, maximum discharge pressure, discharge size, and media temperature. Once filled, the grey water tank 30 can be emptied by means of a transfer pump 140 through connector drain 31. The grey water effluent is then available for disposal or further processing in an environmentally safe manner.


Operation of Invention


The procedures for washing engines are specified by the turbine manufacturers or the Aircraft Maintenance Manual. In general, the cleaning composition is applied to the deposits on the turbofan blades and internal engine components by spraying into the engine from about 30 seconds to about 5 minutes, preferably three one minute intervals. The engine may be turned by hand (windmilled) or run using the starter motor alone during application to further promote uniform distribution of the cleaning composition within the engine. The cleaning composition is allowed to soak into the deposits for about 2 to 5 minutes, which allows surface reactions to occur. To properly clean an aircraft engine, about 3 to 5 such application and soak steps are cyclically repeated to assure adequate dislodging of the deposits from the engine components. Of course, the method of application and number of application and soak steps will vary depending on the engine type, severity of deposit accumulation, and resistance to removal. In non-aircraft applications, the procedures for on-line and off-line washing of the turbine compressor outlined by the turbine manufacturers are followed.


Rinsing may be required to remove both the cleaning composition and loosened deposits from the engine. A rinse solution may be applied in a similar cyclic application and soak pattern. Using water as the preferred rinsing agent, a 30 second application, while windmilling, followed by soaking for 1½ minutes and then repeating for about 3 to 8 cycles will provide adequate rinsing. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, any rinsing means which sufficiently removes residual cleaning composition and loosened deposits from the engine may be used.


The present invention will allow for the introduction of certain additives into the wash solution by injection into the suction input plumbing or high pressure output of the main wash delivery pump. Additives required will be injected in precise operator-specified quantities and flow rates for specific time durations controlled by the system automation devices.


The present invention will use a feed-back automation system with electronic controllers to adjust the pressure, flow rate, temperature, and duration of the water wash system. The wash procedure needed for each engine type and for specific applications will be specified in a proprietary computer program running on the system. The operator will input the necessary information and the system will begin operation according to the required parameters. Of course, manual override and emergency stop procedures will be allowed.


While not required, sampling of the resulting effluent liquid may be periodically conducted during the cleaning operation for analysis of suspected contaminants. Upon determining that the concentration of one or more selected contaminants in the effluent has dropped below predetermined values, the cleaning operation can be modified. The constituent contaminants, the degree of contamination, the selected solvents, the concentration thereof, and the operating temperature all affect the cleaning time and efficacy.


After the cleaning and rinsing steps are completed, and the waste water effluent collected, the manifold and nozzles are then removed and stowed in the trailer, and the engine prepared for operation utilizing the instrument air purge. The engine is then run-dried as per the specifications and requirements of the turboengine manufacturer or the Aircraft Maintenance Manual


Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations could be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of cleaning a gas turbine engine, the method comprising: pressurizing a wash fluid;incorporating additives and/or detergents into the wash fluid by injection of additives and/or detergents into the wash fluid;delivering wash fluid into the gas turbine engine at a low pressure, finely divided spray at about 200 psi to about 725 psi and a delivery rate of about 1 gallon per minute to about 50 gallons per minute to clean the gas turbine engine; anddispersing, simultaneously, a first low pressure, finely divided spray in a first spray pattern, and a second low pressure, finely divided spray in a second spray pattern different from the first spray pattern.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein pressurizing the wash fluid includes heating and maintaining a temperature of the wash fluid to a range from about 150 degrees to about 200 degrees Fahrenheit.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein the wash fluid is heated using any of tank band heaters, immersion heaters or panels.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein said additives and/or detergents are selected from a group consisting of cleaning solutions, foaming agents, detergents, freeze depressants, emulsifiers, corrosion inhibitors, and anti-static additives.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the first and second sprays are dispersed through a plurality of nozzles, each having unique characteristics as to droplet size, flowrate, and dispersion spray pattern.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein delivering wash fluid further includes pumping the wash fluid using a wash delivery pump.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, and further comprising: purging the wash fluid from the wash delivery pump.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein purging the wash fluid comprises activating a compressed air source to flush the wash fluid from the wash delivery pump at the end of the wash cycle.
  • 9. The method of claim 6, and further comprising: powering the wash delivery pump using a portable power generator.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein wash fluid is delivered into the gas turbine engine through a manifold and injection nozzle assembly, having a plurality of nozzles mounted on a moveable manifold that is fluidly connected to a source of the wash fluid; andwherein the manifold is positioned directly in front of an air inlet of a gas turbine engine for delivering the wash fluid into the air inlet of the gas turbine engine and connectable to the gas turbine engine.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, and further comprising: dispersing the wash fluid through the plurality of nozzles in the multiple, different spray patterns, each having unique characteristics as to droplet size, flowrate, and dispersion spray pattern.
  • 12. The method of claim 10 wherein a first of the nozzles provides finely-divided spray to a core of the gas turbine engine located remote from the first of the nozzles, and wherein a second of the nozzles provides direct impingement of the wash fluid on bypass blades of the gas turbine engine located in close proximity to the second of the nozzles.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, and further comprising: purging the wash fluid from the manifold array and nozzles.
  • 14. The method of claim 13 wherein purging the wash fluid comprises activating a compressed air source to flush the wash fluid from the manifold array and nozzles at the end of the wash cycle.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, and further comprising: collecting the wash fluid delivered into the gas turbine engine through a manifold and injection nozzle assembly, wherein the step of collecting the wash fluid comprises: expelling waste wash fluid from the gas turbine engine;separating the waste wash fluid from air flow; andcollecting the waste wash fluid in a container.
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 14/096,528, filed on Dec. 4, 2013, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 11/644,784, filed on Dec. 22, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,628,627, which issued on Jan. 14, 2014, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/536,002, filed on May 20, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,297,260, which issued on Nov. 20, 2007, which is a §371 national stage application of PCT/SE2004/000922, filed on Jun. 14, 2004.

US Referenced Citations (139)
Number Name Date Kind
1834534 Richards et al. Dec 1931 A
1890156 Konig Dec 1932 A
1926924 Sylvan Sep 1933 A
2385393 Wilson Sep 1945 A
2760597 Brixius Aug 1956 A
2804903 Davies Sep 1957 A
2862222 Cockrell Dec 1958 A
2878892 Field Mar 1959 A
2922173 Lind et al. Jan 1960 A
3219188 Hirs Nov 1965 A
3263341 Allen Aug 1966 A
3308840 Kelley Mar 1967 A
3335916 Juniper Aug 1967 A
3384239 Berardi May 1968 A
3481544 Jackson Dec 1969 A
3502215 Cahan Mar 1970 A
3527030 Hungate Sep 1970 A
3533395 Yaste Oct 1970 A
3550778 Kesselman Dec 1970 A
3564820 Nelson Feb 1971 A
3572030 Cuff Mar 1971 A
3601832 Cook Aug 1971 A
3612075 Cook Oct 1971 A
3616623 Reid Nov 1971 A
3623668 Freid et al. Nov 1971 A
3646980 Peterson Mar 1972 A
3766719 McAnally, III Oct 1973 A
3774625 Wiltrout Nov 1973 A
3835498 Arato Sep 1974 A
3911938 Wiltrout Oct 1975 A
3923658 Lancaster Dec 1975 A
3938972 Sugimura Feb 1976 A
4029114 Wiltrout Jun 1977 A
4059123 Bartos et al. Nov 1977 A
4065322 Langford Dec 1977 A
4158449 Sun et al. Jun 1979 A
4168232 Allen et al. Sep 1979 A
4191348 Holwerda Mar 1980 A
4196020 Hornak et al. Apr 1980 A
4225188 McGuire et al. Sep 1980 A
4234323 Maher Nov 1980 A
4300918 Cary Nov 1981 A
4378755 Magnusson et al. Apr 1983 A
4439241 Ault et al. Mar 1984 A
4462192 Fisher Jul 1984 A
4530707 Ovard Jul 1985 A
4543108 Wurz Sep 1985 A
4557740 Smith Dec 1985 A
4642192 Heskett Feb 1987 A
4652368 Ennis et al. Mar 1987 A
4684379 Gambrell Aug 1987 A
4713120 Hodgens, II et al. Dec 1987 A
H535 Sam et al. Oct 1988 H
4802901 Wurz et al. Feb 1989 A
4834912 Hodgens, II et al. May 1989 A
4975101 Swanborn Dec 1990 A
5011540 McDermott Apr 1991 A
5018355 Foster May 1991 A
5060887 Kean Oct 1991 A
5090588 VanRomer et al. Feb 1992 A
5093012 Bundy et al. Mar 1992 A
5114098 Campbell May 1992 A
5137555 Fewel, Jr. Aug 1992 A
5160430 Gasser et al. Nov 1992 A
5193976 Kolev et al. Mar 1993 A
5268011 Wurz Dec 1993 A
5269823 Wurz Dec 1993 A
5273059 Gross et al. Dec 1993 A
5273395 McDermott Dec 1993 A
5318254 Shaw et al. Jun 1994 A
5330579 Rushing et al. Jul 1994 A
5350619 Rasmussen Sep 1994 A
5354014 Anderson Oct 1994 A
5374352 Pattee Dec 1994 A
5454533 Grant et al. Oct 1995 A
5458299 Collins et al. Oct 1995 A
5462655 Ladd et al. Oct 1995 A
5464459 VanBuskirk et al. Nov 1995 A
5490646 Shaw et al. Feb 1996 A
5498329 Lamminen et al. Mar 1996 A
5507306 Irvine et al. Apr 1996 A
5556535 Van Der Est Sep 1996 A
5560782 Latimer Oct 1996 A
5618353 Irvine et al. Apr 1997 A
5669982 Latimer Sep 1997 A
5725611 Wright et al. Mar 1998 A
5868860 Asplund Feb 1999 A
5899217 Testman, Jr. May 1999 A
5972062 Zimmermann Oct 1999 A
6017377 Brown et al. Jan 2000 A
6021792 Petter et al. Feb 2000 A
6062486 Hill May 2000 A
6073637 Hayward et al. Jun 2000 A
6080225 Forster Jun 2000 A
6155277 Barry Dec 2000 A
6164298 Petter et al. Dec 2000 A
6310022 Amiran Oct 2001 B1
6394108 Butler May 2002 B1
6402855 Damron et al. Jun 2002 B1
6470668 Payling et al. Oct 2002 B2
6478033 Foster Nov 2002 B1
6484508 Rocklin et al. Nov 2002 B2
6491048 Foster Dec 2002 B1
6503334 Ruiz et al. Jan 2003 B2
6553768 Trewin et al. Apr 2003 B1
6565758 Thomas May 2003 B1
6630198 Ackerman et al. Oct 2003 B2
6675437 York Jan 2004 B1
6883527 Travaly et al. Apr 2005 B2
6932093 Ogden et al. Aug 2005 B2
6964699 Carns et al. Nov 2005 B1
7018965 Yan et al. Mar 2006 B2
7065955 Reback et al. Jun 2006 B2
7150431 Dennis Dec 2006 B2
7185663 Koch et al. Mar 2007 B2
7198052 Watt Apr 2007 B2
7297260 Hjerpe et al. Nov 2007 B2
20010039794 Rocklin et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020001255 Flood et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020088480 Woodmansee et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020092423 Gillingham et al. Jul 2002 A1
20030209256 Tadayon Nov 2003 A1
20050199270 Watt Sep 2005 A1
20050199271 Watt Sep 2005 A1
20060048796 Asplund et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060060218 Lakdawala et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060060233 Lakdawala et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060081521 Hjerpe et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060219269 Rice et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060243308 Asplund et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070000528 Asplund et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070048127 O'Neill et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070059159 Hjerpe Mar 2007 A1
20080040872 Hjerpe Feb 2008 A1
20080149141 Sales Jun 2008 A1
20080178909 Alvestig et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080216873 Hjerpe et al. Sep 2008 A1
20090050183 Rice et al. Feb 2009 A1
20140083466 Sales, Jr. et al. Mar 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (32)
Number Date Country
2506174 Dec 2005 CA
1085176 Apr 1994 CN
2597335 Jan 2004 CN
341262 Sep 1959 DE
2701823 Aug 1977 DE
9420362 Mar 1995 DE
0262097 Mar 1988 EP
0628477 Dec 1994 EP
1205640 May 2002 EP
1225307 Jul 2002 EP
2074048 Oct 1981 GB
S52109769 Sep 1977 JP
H03501360 Mar 1991 JP
06171600 Jun 1994 JP
06211198 Aug 1994 JP
11137938 May 1999 JP
H11507583 Jul 1999 JP
2000136702 May 2000 JP
2000161081 Jun 2000 JP
2002242613 Aug 2002 JP
2002256889 Sep 2002 JP
19980017193 Jun 1998 KR
100331311 Mar 2002 KR
1755965 Aug 1992 SU
WO9214557 Sep 1992 WO
WO9640453 Dec 1996 WO
WO2004055334 Jan 2004 WO
WO2005024096 Mar 2005 WO
WO2005028119 Mar 2005 WO
WO2005077554 Aug 2005 WO
WO2005121501 Dec 2005 WO
WO2005121509 Dec 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (5)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT Application Serial No. PCT/SE2004/000922; Dated Jan. 13, 2005, 5 pages.
“Engine Washing”, from <http://www.aviationtoday.com/am/categories/bga/Engine-Washing—5248.html>, Oct. 1, 2006, 4 pages.
Extended European Search Report from EP Application Serial No. 101696532, dated Oct. 5, 2011, 5 pages.
Canadian Office Action from Application Serial No. 2,570,243, dated Dec. 3, 2010, 3 pages.
Japanese Office Action from Application Serial No. 2010-205931, dated Aug. 2, 2011, 3 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160251978 A1 Sep 2016 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14096528 Dec 2013 US
Child 15152082 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11644784 Dec 2006 US
Child 14096528 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10536002 US
Child 11644784 US