1. Field of the Disclosure
The present disclosure relates to semiconductor devices and more particularly to methods related to reducing the thickness of semiconductor devices.
2. Description of the Related Art
Empirical studies and computer models have demonstrated that the performance of a semiconductor device can be improved by thinning the semiconductor die. The method used most commonly to thin the die is a back grinding procedure done prior to die sawing or singulation. However, grinding alone can accommodate die thinning only so much before the mechanical forces involved chip or break semiconductor wafers. In addition, subsequent to the back-grind process, the individual die formed on the wafer are singulated using a saw cutting or scribing technique. During the separate process of singulating the die, there is a likelihood of causing further damage to the die, especially when they are in a thinned state. Therefore, a method of overcoming this problem would be useful.
The present disclosure may be better understood, and its numerous features and advantages made apparent to those skilled in the art by referencing the accompanying drawings.
The use of the same reference symbols in different drawings indicates similar or identical items.
In accordance with a specific embodiment of the present disclosure, a method of processing a semiconductor substrate is disclosed whereby the substrate is both thinned and diced (singulated) during a common process. In one embodiment, a mask layer, such as a photoresist or other patternable organic layer having open trench regions, is formed on the backside of the substrate using standard lithography coupled with backside alignment techniques. The trench regions are typically aligned to scribe grid regions defined on the frontside of the substrate. An anisotropic etch applied to the backside results in a pattern transfer of the trench regions onto the backside of the substrate. After the mask layer is removed, either by etch consumption or stripping, etch of the backside of the substrate is performed to thin the wafer evenly over the backside surface. The trench areas, which constitute the deepest portion of the backside are etched simultaneously and remain the deepest portion of the backside throughout. Thinning of the substrate by etching continues until the trench regions break through to the frontside at which time the wafer is singulated into individual die. The trench depth at the time the mask layer is depleted or removed, i.e., at the onset of the bulk wafer etch, determines the maximum thickness of the final die. A specific embodiment of the present disclosure will be better understood with reference to
The substrate 10 is typically a silicon or gallium arsenide wafer, but can also be a germanium doped layer, epitaxial silicon, a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate, or any like substrate suitable for formation of a semiconductor device.
In one embodiment, mask layer 16 is formed of a photoresist material having a thickness typically in the range of 0.25 to 25 micron, with other thickness ranges of 1-2 microns, 1-4 microns, 0.75-1.25 microns, 0.5-1.5 microns, and 0.5-3 microns, and a typical thickness of approximately 1 micron. When mask layer 16 is a photoresist layer, trenches 41 are formed into the photoresist material through the use of photolithography techniques. In another embodiment, mask layer 16 is formed of a hard-mask material, i.e., non-irradiation sensitive material, and is etched using a separate masking layer (not shown), such as a photoresist layer to define the location of trench regions 41 during an etch of the mask layer 16. The hard mask material may be any material which provides etch resistance. Hard mask materials can include organic materials, silicon oxides, silicon nitrides, silicon carbides, or metals such as aluminum, tungsten, titanium, or combinations thereof.
An enlarged view of a portion 110 of the workpiece 33 (
In an alternate embodiment, the trench regions 43 of workpiece 35 are formed simultaneously during an etch that consumes the mask layer 16. For example, etch 62 (
A typical Bosch etch process is predicated on iterative deposition (with e.g., C4H8) and etch (e.g., SF6/O2) sequences. In general, deposition of a polymer is performed on a feature being etched. An applied substrate bias is used to facilitate polymer removal at the bottom of trenches as opposed to along the sidewalls. An etch step is then performed long enough to etch the trench deeper without punching through the protective sidewall polymer. The deposition and etch steps are repeated until the requisite depth is reached.
In a Bosch process, the low substrate bias is used to enhance the anisotropic etch characteristic. The plasma is high density, resulting in high etch rates and, potentially high selectivities. The pumping package is configured to allow for low pressures with very high gas flows.
The result of a Bosch etch can be horizontal (major) surfaces having a roughness that is atomically smooth, i.e., a surface roughness of less than 5 nm, and vertical (minor) surfaces having roughness of a scalloping nature of approximately 50 nm.
In an embodiment where the mask layer 16 is a photoresist removed by simultaneous consumption during formation of the trenches 43, the minimum thickness of the mask layer 16 is determined by the equation below. The known variables include the rate of substrate 10 removal, the rate of photoresist removal, and a desired die thickness. The desired die thickness can be obtained by forming trenches 41 through the photoresist mask layer 16 having a minimum thickness, defined by the following equation, and over etching subsequent to singulation as needed.
Minimum Mask Thickness=Desired Die Thickness*(Etch_Rate(Mask)/Etch_Rate(Substrate).
As the etch proceeds to a conclusion by stopping at the breakthrough to the front active side, the original mask thickness defines the die thickness at the time of singulation.
It will be appreciated that the final die thickness 214 can be precisely controlled to a predetermined amount based on a starting depth of trench regions 43 (
Subsequent to singulation, the die 47 can be packaged using conventional or proprietary packaging techniques and material. For example, the die can be packaged using flip chip techniques, wire bond techniques, or a combination thereof. The packages can be of any material type including ceramic and plastic packages, as well as ball-grid packages, wire-lead packages, or any other package type.
In the preceding detailed description of the preferred embodiments, reference has been made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part thereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific preferred embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. To avoid detail not necessary to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, the description may omit certain information known to those skilled in the art. Furthermore, many other varied embodiments that incorporate the teachings of the invention may be easily constructed by those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the specific form set forth herein, but on the contrary, it is intended to cover such alternatives, modifications, and equivalents, as can be reasonably included within the spirit and scope of the invention. The preceding detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/881,144, entitled “Ultra-Thin Die and Method of Fabricating Same,” filed on Jun. 30, 2004, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
599868 | Russell | Mar 1898 | A |
4720317 | Kuroda et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
5034347 | Kakihana | Jul 1991 | A |
5769269 | Peters | Jun 1998 | A |
5851845 | Wood et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5888882 | Igel et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5911329 | Wark et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5927993 | Lesk et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5998868 | Pogge et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6159754 | Li et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162702 | Morcom et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6262078 | Loughhead et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6328902 | Hantschel et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6362078 | Doyle et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6425971 | Silverbrook | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6468889 | Iacoponi et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6632706 | Leedy | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6692978 | Tandy et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6734032 | Tandy et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6765279 | Leedy | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6818532 | Yeom et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7037755 | Enquist | May 2006 | B2 |
7138295 | Leedy | Nov 2006 | B2 |
20020013061 | Siniaguine et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016013 | Iketani | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020020862 | Livengood et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030160315 | Kovar et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040072388 | Sekiya | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040256726 | Harada et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2-132844 | May 1990 | JP |
8-264490 | Oct 1996 | JP |
2626033 | Apr 1997 | JP |
10-27769 | Jan 1998 | JP |
2002-093752 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2004-172365 | Jun 2004 | JP |
200225948 | Jan 2005 | JP |
9009093 | Aug 1990 | WO |
9214263 | Aug 1992 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090008748 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10881144 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 12211556 | US |