UVLED apparatus for curing glass-fiber coatings

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8604448
  • Patent Number
    8,604,448
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 30, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 10, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A UVLED apparatus and method provide efficient curing of an optical-fiber coating onto a drawn glass fiber. The apparatus and method employ one or more UVLEDs that emit electromagnetic radiation into a curing space. An incompletely cured optical-fiber coating, which is formed upon a glass fiber, absorbs emitted and reflected electromagnetic radiation to effect improved curing.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention embraces an apparatus and a method for curing coatings on drawn glass fibers.


BACKGROUND

Glass fibers are typically protected from external forces with one or more coating layers. Typically, two or more layers of coatings are applied during the optical-fiber drawing process (i.e., whereby a glass fiber is drawn from an optical preform in a drawing tower). A softer inner coating layer typically helps to protect the glass fiber from microbending. A harder outer coating layer typically is used to provide additional protection and to facilitate handling of the glass fiber. The coating layers may be cured, for example, using heat or ultraviolet (UV) light.


UV curing requires that the coated glass fiber be exposed to high intensity UV radiation. Curing time can be reduced by exposing the coating to higher intensity UV radiation. Reducing curing time is particularly desirable to permit an increase in fiber drawing line speeds and thus optical-fiber production rates.


Mercury lamps (e.g., high pressure mercury lamps or mercury xenon lamps) are commonly used to generate the UV radiation needed for UV curing. One downside of using mercury lamps is that mercury lamps require a significant amount of power to generate sufficiently intense UV radiation. For example, UV lamps used to cure a single coated fiber (i.e., one polymeric coating) may require a collective power consumption of 50 kilowatts.


Another shortcoming of mercury lamps is that much of the energy used for powering mercury lamps is emitted not as UV radiation, but rather as heat. Accordingly, mercury lamps must be cooled (e.g., using a heat exchanger) to prevent overheating. In addition, the undesirable heat generated by the mercury lamps may slow the rate at which the optical fiber coatings cure.


Furthermore, mercury lamps generate a wide spectrum of electromagnetic radiation, such as having wavelengths of less than 200 nanometers and greater than 700 nanometers (i.e., infrared light). Typically, UV radiation having wavelengths of between about 300 nanometers and 400 nanometers is useful for curing UV coatings. Thus, much of the electromagnetic radiation generated by mercury bulbs is wasted (e.g., 90 percent or more). Additionally, glass fibers possess an exemplary diameter of about 125 microns, which, of course, is much smaller than the mercury bulbs. Consequently, most of the UV radiation emitted by the mercury lamps does not reach the glass fiber's uncured coating (i.e., the energy is wasted).


It may thus be advantageous to employ UVLEDs, an alternative to conventional mercury lamps, to cure glass-fiber coatings. UVLEDs typically require significantly less energy and correspondingly generate much less heat energy than conventional UV lamps.


For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,022,382 (Khudyakov et al.), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, discloses the use of UV lasers (e.g., continuous or pulsed lasers) for curing optical fiber coatings.


U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0026919 (Kojima et al.), which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety, discloses the use of ultraviolet light emitting diodes (UVLEDs) for curing optical fiber coatings. The disclosed optical fiber resin coating apparatus includes a mold assembly in which a UV curable resin is coated onto an optical fiber. Also at the mold assembly, the coated optical fiber is exposed to UV radiation from a number of UVLEDs to cure the UV coating. A control circuit may be used to control the UV radiation output from the UVLED array. For example, the control circuit may reduce the current to one or more UVLEDs to reduce the intensity of emitted UV radiation. The control circuit may also be used to vary the intensity of the UV radiation as the optical fiber progresses through the mold assembly.


Even so, UVLEDs, though more efficient than mercury lamps, still waste a significant amount of energy in curing glass-fiber coatings. In particular, much of the emitted UV radiation is not used to cure the glass-fiber coatings.


Therefore, a need exists for a UVLED apparatus that, as compared with a conventional mercury-lamp device, not only consumes less power and generates less unwanted heat, but also is capable of curing glass-fiber coatings with improved curing efficiency.


SUMMARY

Accordingly, the invention embraces a UVLED apparatus and associated method for curing in situ optical-fiber coating. The apparatus and method employ one or more UVLEDs that emit electromagnetic radiation into a curing space. An incompletely cured, coated glass fiber passes through the curing space, thereby absorbing electromagnetic radiation to effect curing of the optical-fiber coating.


An exemplary UVLED apparatus includes one or more UVLED-mirror pairs. Each UVLED-mirror pair includes one or more UVLEDs capable of emitting electromagnetic radiation and one or more mirrors (or other reflective surfaces) that are capable of reflecting electromagnetic radiation. The UVLED(s) and corresponding mirror(s) are positioned apart from one another so as to define a curing space. As noted, this curing space permits the passage of a coated glass fiber between the UVLED(s) and the mirror(s). Moreover, the mirror(s) are typically positioned opposite corresponding UVLED(s) to efficiently reflect the electromagnetic radiation emitted from the UVLED(s) (and not already absorbed by the glass-fiber coating) into the curing space.


In another aspect, the present invention embraces a method for curing a coating on a glass fiber. UV radiation is emitted from one or more sources of electromagnetic radiation toward a curing space. A portion of the emitted UV radiation is transmitted entirely through the curing space. At least some of the UV radiation transmitted entirely through the curing space is reflected toward the curing space (e.g., with a mirror). A glass fiber having an incompletely cured coating is passed through the curing space to effect the absorption of both emitted and reflected UV radiation, thereby curing the coated glass fiber.


The foregoing illustrative summary, as well as other exemplary objectives and/or advantages of the invention, and the manner in which the same are accomplished, are further explained within the following detailed description and its accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 schematically depicts a UVLED configuration for the curing of a coating upon a glass fiber.



FIG. 2 schematically depicts an alternative staggered UVLED configuration for the curing of a coating upon a glass fiber.



FIG. 3 schematically depicts a staggered UVLED-mirror configuration for the high-efficiency curing of a coating upon a glass fiber.



FIG. 4 schematically depicts an alternative staggered UVLED-mirror configuration for the high-efficiency curing of a coating upon a glass fiber.



FIG. 5 schematically depicts a UVLED-mirror configuration having UVLEDs and mirrors positioned at an angle.



FIG. 6 schematically depicts a UVLED having an attached reflector for focusing emitted UV radiation.



FIG. 7 depicts a cross-sectional view of an elliptic cylinder having a reflective inner surface.



FIG. 8 schematically depicts an exemplary apparatus for curing a coated glass fiber.



FIG. 9 schematically depicts a cross-sectional view of an exemplary apparatus for curing a coated glass fiber.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In one aspect, the present invention embraces an apparatus for curing glass-fiber coatings.


The apparatus employs one or more UVLEDs that are configured to emit electromagnetic radiation toward a drawn glass fiber to cure its coating(s), typically polymeric coatings. In this regard, a plurality of UV lamps may be positioned in various configurations, such as an apparatus 10 containing opposing UVLEDs 11 schematically depicted in FIG. 1 and an apparatus 20 containing staggered UVLEDs 11 depicted in FIG. 2. The UVLEDs 11 define a curing space 15 having a central axis 14 along which an optical fiber (i.e., a glass fiber having one or more coating layers) may pass during the curing process. A heat sink 12 may be positioned adjacent to each UVLED 11 to dissipate generated heat energy. A mounting plate 13 provides structural support for the UVLEDs 11.


In one exemplary embodiment, the apparatus for curing glass-fiber coatings includes at least a UVLED-mirror pair, which includes (i) an ultraviolet light emitting diode (UVLED) and (ii) a mirror (e.g., a concave mirror) that is positioned to reflect and focus the UV-radiation emitted by the UVLED.



FIG. 3 schematically depicts an apparatus 30 containing a plurality of UVLED-mirror pairs. As depicted in FIG. 3, the UVLEDs 11 and corresponding mirrors 16 define a space through which the coated glass fiber can pass (i.e., a curing space 15). This curing space 15 further defines a central axis 14, typically the axis along which a drawn glass fiber passes during the curing process (i.e., the glass fiber's curing axis). Although the central axis 14 is typically vertical, non-vertical (e.g., horizontal) arrangements of the central axis 14 may also be used. Moreover, although the central axis may be centrally positioned in the curing space, a central axis that is not centrally positioned within the curing space is within the scope of the present invention.


Each UVLED 11 may be positioned such that it emits UV radiation toward the central axis 14. In this regard, those of ordinary skill will appreciate that the power per unit area (i.e., the radiant flux) emitted by a UVLED decreases exponentially as the distance of the UVLED from the optical fiber increases. Accordingly, each UVLED may be positioned at a distance of between about 1 millimeter and 100 millimeters (e.g., typically between about 5 millimeters and 20 millimeters) from the optical fiber to be cured (e.g., from the central axis).


Typically, a UVLED and its corresponding mirror are positioned so that a substantial portion of the UV radiation incident to the optical fiber is substantially perpendicular to the optical fiber (i.e., incident at about a 90 degree angle).


Alternatively, the UVLED and/or its corresponding mirror may be positioned at an angle so that most of the UV radiation incident to the optical fiber is incident at an angle other than 90 degrees. FIG. 5 schematically depicts an apparatus 50 containing UVLEDs 11 and mirrors 16 positioned at an angle (i.e., an angle other than 90 degrees relative to the optical fiber and the central axis 14).


It may be desirable for the power of the UV radiation incident to the optical fiber to vary as the optical fiber progresses through the apparatus. Varying the power of the UV radiation may aid in the curing of the glass-fiber coating. Depending on the curing properties of a particular coating, it may be desirable to initially expose the optical fiber to high intensity UV radiation. Alternatively, it may be desirable to initially expose the optical fiber to lower intensity UV radiation (e.g., between about 10 percent and 50 percent of the maximum exposure intensity) before exposing the optical fiber to high intensity UV radiation (e.g., the maximum intensity to which the optical fiber is exposed). In this regard, initially exposing the optical fiber to lower intensity UV radiation may be useful in controlling the generation of free radicals in an uncured coating. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that if too many free radicals are present, many of the free radicals may recombine rather than encourage the polymerization of the glass-fiber coating—an undesirable effect.


Varying the intensity of the UV radiation may, for example, be achieved by positioning the UVLED at an angle. As noted, the intensity of the UV radiation incident to a portion of the optical fiber may vary depending upon the distance from that portion to the UVLED. Alternatively, in an apparatus containing a plurality of UVLEDs the intensity of the UV radiation output from the UVLEDs may vary.


As noted, each UVLED may be positioned such that it emits UV radiation toward the central axis. That said, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that a UVLED does not emit UV radiation only toward a point or line, but rather emits UV radiation in many directions. Thus, most of the UV radiation emitted by a UVLED will not strike the glass-fiber coating to effect curing. However, in curing an optical fiber coating, it is desirable that as much UV radiation as possible strikes the optical fiber (i.e., a coated glass fiber). In this regard, it will be further appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that curing occurs when UV radiation is absorbed by photoinitiators in the glass-fiber coating.


Thus, a UVLED may have one or more associated reflectors that focus emitted UV radiation toward the central axis. For example, FIG. 6 depicts a cross-sectional view of a UVLED 11 having an attached reflector 17. The reflector 17 may, for example and as depicted in FIG. 6, have the shape of a rotated teardrop curve. By having a teardrop shape, the reflector focuses UV radiation having various angles of emittance toward the central axis. That said, the present invention embraces UVLEDs with associated reflectors of various shapes (e.g., a spherical, elliptical, cylindrical or parabolic mirror).


A UVLED may have one or more lenses attached for focusing UV radiation emitted by the UVLED toward the central axis. Typically, a lens for focusing electromagnetic radiation is convex (e.g., biconvex or plano-convex). In an alternative embodiment, a Fresnel lens may be employed. Moreover, the lens may be selected such that the lens has a focal point at the glass fiber's curing axis (e.g., the central axis).


One or more mirrors may be positioned opposite a UVLED (i.e., on the opposite side of the central axis) so as to reflect the UV radiation emitted by the UVLED in the general direction of the central axis. In other words, a UVLED emits UV radiation toward the curing space and the central axis, and its corresponding mirror(s) reflect emitted UV radiation not initially absorbed by optical fiber coatings back toward the central axis (e.g., the glass fiber's curing axis). In this respect, FIG. 3 depicts UVLEDs 11 having a mirror 16 positioned opposite the central axis 14. Typically a mirror will be larger than its corresponding UVLED. For example, a mirror may have a height of between about one inch and 1.5 inches; however, other mirror sizes are within the scope of the present invention. The mirror may be formed from a suitable reflective material. For example, the mirror may be formed from polished aluminum, polished stainless steel, or metalized glass (e.g., silvered quartz).


The mirror may have a concave shape (i.e., the mirror is curved inwards toward the curing space) so that the mirror focuses UV radiation emitted by the UVLED toward the central axis. By way of example, a concave mirror may have, inter alia, a cylindrical, elliptical, spherical, or parabolic shape (e.g., a paraboloid or a parabolic cylinder). A concave mirror can focus otherwise lost UV radiation (e.g., UV radiation not initially incident to an optical fiber to be cured) onto an optical fiber for curing, thus limiting the amount of wasted energy.


A UVLED-mirror pair as used herein is not limited to a single UVLED paired with a single mirror in a one-to-one relationship. A UVLED-mirror pair may include a plurality of UVLEDs. Alternatively, a UVLED-mirror pair may include a plurality of mirrors.


UVLEDs are capable of emitting wavelengths within a much smaller spectrum than conventional UV lamps. This promotes the use of more of the emitted electromagnetic radiation for curing.


In this regard, a UVLED for use in the present invention may be any suitable LED that emits electromagnetic radiation having wavelengths of between about 200 nanometers and 600 nanometers. By way of example, the UVLED may emit electromagnetic radiation having wavelengths of between about 200 nanometers and 450 nanometers (e.g., between about 250 nanometers and 400 nanometers). In a particular exemplary embodiment, the UVLED may emit electromagnetic radiation having wavelengths of between about 300 nanometers and 400 nanometers. In another particular exemplary embodiment, the UVLED may emit electromagnetic radiation having wavelengths of between about 350 nanometers and 425 nanometers.


As noted, a UVLED typically emits a narrow band of electromagnetic radiation. For example, the UVLED may substantially emit electromagnetic radiation having wavelengths that vary by no more than about 30 nanometers, typically no more than about 20 nanometers (e.g., a UVLED emitting a narrow band of UV radiation mostly between about 375 nanometers and 395 nanometers). It has been observed that a UVLED emitting a narrow band of UV radiation mostly between about 395 nanometers and 415 nanometers is more efficient than other narrow bands of UV radiation. Moreover, it has been observed that UVLEDs emitting UV radiation slightly above the wavelength at which a glass-fiber coating has maximum absorption (e.g., about 360 nanometers) promote more efficient polymerization than do UVLEDs emitting UV radiation at the wavelength at which the glass-fiber coating has maximum absorption.


In this regard, although an exemplary UVLED emits substantially all of its electromagnetic radiation within a defined range (e.g., between 350 nanometers and 450 nanometers, such as between 370 nanometers and 400 nanometers), the UVLED may emit small amounts of electromagnetic radiation outside the defined range. In this regard, 80 percent or more (e.g., at least about 90 percent) of the output (i.e., emitted electromagnetic radiation) of an exemplary UVLED is typically within a defined range (e.g., between about 375 nanometers and 425 nanometers).


UVLEDs are typically much smaller than conventional UV lamps (e.g., mercury bulbs). By way of example, the UVLED may be a 0.25-inch square UVLED. The UVLED may be affixed to a platform (e.g., a 1-inch square or larger mounting plate). Of course, other UVLED shapes and sizes are within the scope of the present invention. By way of example, a 3-millimeter square UVLED may be employed.


Each UVLED may have a power output of as much as 32 watts (e.g., a UVLED having a power input of about 160 watts and a power output of about 32 watts). That said, UVLEDs having outputs greater than 32 watts (e.g., 64 watts) may be employed as such technology becomes available. Using UVLEDs with higher power output may be useful for increasing the rate at which optical fiber coatings cure, thus promoting increased production line speeds.


Relative to other UV radiation sources, UVLED devices typically generate a smaller amount of heat energy. That said, to dissipate the heat energy created by a UVLED, a heat sink may be located behind the UVLED (e.g., opposite the portion of the UVLED that emits UV radiation). The heat sink may be one-inch square, although other heat sink shapes and sizes are within the scope of the present invention.


The heat sink may be formed of a material suitable for conducting heat (e.g., brass, aluminum, or copper). The heat sink may include a heat exchanger that employs a liquid coolant (e.g., chilled water), which circulates within the heat exchanger to draw heat from the UVLED.


Removing heat generated by the UVLED is important for several reasons. First, excess heat may slow the rate at which optical-fiber coatings cure. Furthermore, excess heat can cause the temperature of the UVLED to rise, which can reduce UV-radiation output. Indeed, continuous high-temperature exposure can permanently reduce the UVLED's radiation output. With adequate heat removal, however, the UVLED may have a useful life of 50,000 hours or more.


In another exemplary embodiment, the apparatus for curing glass-fiber coatings includes two or more UVLEDs.


For instance, the UVLEDs may be arranged in an array (e.g., a planar or non-planar array, such as a three-dimensional array). With respect to a three-dimensional array, two or more UVLEDs may be configured in two or more distinct planes that are substantially perpendicular to the central axis. As depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2, the UVLEDs 11, which emit UV radiation toward the curing space 15, are typically arranged approximately equidistant from the central axis 14.


The UVLEDs, for instance, may be arranged to define one or more helixes (i.e., a helical array of UVLEDs). In an array containing more than one helix, the helixes may have the same chirality (i.e., asymmetric handedness). Alternatively, at least one helix may have the opposite chirality (e.g., one helix may be right-handed and a second helix may be left-handed).


The three-dimensional array of UVLEDs may define a curing space that is suitable for the passage of a coated glass fiber for curing. As before, the curing space defines a central axis (e.g., the axis along which a drawn glass fiber passes during the curing process).


The apparatus employing a three-dimensional array of UVLEDs for curing glass-fiber coatings may also include one or more mirrors for reflecting UV radiation into the curing space. For example, the apparatus may include a plurality of the foregoing UVLED-mirror pairs. By way of further example and as depicted in FIG. 4, a plurality of UVLEDs 11 may be embedded in a mirror 46 (e.g., a mirror in the shape of a circular, elliptical, or parabolic cylinder), the interior of which defines the curing space 15.


It will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the position of the UVLEDs in a three-dimensional array may be defined by the cylindrical coordinate system (i.e., r, θ, z). Using the cylindrical coordinate system and as described herein, the central axis of the curing space defines a z-axis. Furthermore, as herein described and as will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art, the variable r is the perpendicular distance of a point to the z-axis (i.e., the central axis of the curing space). The variable θ describes the angle in a plane that is perpendicular to the z-axis. In other words and by reference to a Cartesian coordinate system (i.e., defining an x-axis, a y-axis, and a z-axis), the variable θ describes the angle between a reference axis (e.g., the x-axis) and the orthogonal projection of a point onto the x-y plane. Finally, the z variable describes the height or position of a reference point along the z-axis.


Thus, a point is defined by its cylindrical coordinates (r, θ, z). For UVLEDs employed in exemplary configurations, the variable r is usually constant. Stated otherwise, the UVLEDs may be positioned approximately equidistant from the central axis (i.e., the z axis). Accordingly, to the extent the variable r is largely fixed, the position of the UVLEDs can be described by the z and θ coordinates.


By way of example, a helical UVLED array may have a first UVLED at the position (1, 0, 0), where r is fixed at a constant distance (i.e., represented here as a unitless 1). Additional UVLEDs may be positioned, for example, every 90° (i.e., π/2) with a Δz of 1 (i.e., a positional step change represented here as a unitless 1). Thus, a second UVLED would have the coordinates (1, π/2, 1), a third UVLED would have the coordinates (1, π, 2), and a fourth UVLED would have the coordinates (1, 3π/2, 3), thereby defining a helical configuration.


Those having ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that, as used in the foregoing example, the respective distances r and z need not be equivalent. Moreover, those having ordinary skill in the art will further appreciate that several UVLEDs in an array as herein disclosed need not be offset by 90° (e.g., π/2, π, 3π/2, etc.). For example, the UVLEDs may be offset by 60° (e.g., π/3, 2π/3, π, etc.) or by 120° (e.g., 2π/3, 4π/3, 2π, etc.). Indeed, the UVLEDs in an array as discussed herein need not follow a regularized helical rotation.


It will be further appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that UVLEDs may absorb incident electromagnetic radiation, which might diminish the quantity of reflected UV radiation available for absorption by the glass-fiber coating. See FIG. 1. Therefore, in an apparatus for curing glass-fiber coatings having a plurality of UVLEDs, it may be desirable to position the UVLEDs in a way that reduces UV radiation incident to the UVLEDs. See FIGS. 2, 3, and 4.


In an exemplary embodiment described using the cylindrical coordinate system, UVLEDs with a Δθ of π (i.e., UVLEDs positioned on opposite sides of a UVLED array) may be positioned so that they have a Δz that is at least the height of the UVLED. Thus, if each UVLED has a height of 0.5 inch, a UVLED with a Δθ of π should have a Δz of at least 0.5 inch. It is thought that this would reduce the absorption by one UVLED of UV radiation emitted by another UVLED, thereby increasing the availability of UV radiation for reflection by one or more mirrors and absorption by the glass-fiber coating.


Alternatively (or in accordance with the foregoing discussion), the UVLEDs may employ a reflective surface (e.g., a surface coating) that promotes reflection of incident electromagnetic radiation yet permits the transmission of emitted electromagnetic radiation.


In view of the foregoing, yet another exemplary embodiment employs a plurality of UVLED-mirror pairs that are arranged in a three dimensional configuration. In particular, the plurality of UVLED-mirror pairs share a common curing space defining a common central axis. In an exemplary configuration, the UVLED-mirror pairs may be helically arranged (e.g., configured in a 60°, 90°, or 120° helical array).


In yet another exemplary embodiment, the apparatus for curing glass-fiber coatings includes one or more UVLEDs positioned within a cylindrical cavity (or a substantially cylindrical cavity) having a reflective inner surface (e.g., made from stainless steel or silvered quartz, or otherwise including a reflective inner surface).


The interior of the cylindrical cavity defines the curing space. As before, the curing space defines a curing axis (e.g., a central axis) along which a drawn glass fiber passes during the curing process. Moreover, one or more UVLEDs may be positioned within the cylindrical cavity such that they emit UV radiation in the direction of the curing axis.


In a typical embodiment, the cylindrical cavity has a non-circular elliptical cross-section. In other words, the cylindrical cavity typically has the shape of an elliptic cylinder. For an elliptic cylinder the curing axis may correspond with one of the two line foci defined by the elliptic cylinder. In addition, each UVLED may be positioned along the other line focus such that they emit UV radiation in the general direction of the curing axis. This arrangement is useful for improving curing efficiency, because any electromagnetic radiation that is emitted from one line focus (regardless of direction) will be directed toward the other line focus after being reflected at the inner surface of the cylinder. This principle is illustrated in FIG. 7, which depicts a cross-section of a reflective elliptic cylinder 55 having a first line focus 51 and a second line focus 52. As depicted in FIG. 7, each UV ray 53 emitted from the first line focus 51 will intersect the second line focus 52.


That said, the UV radiation emitted from a UVLED is not emitted from a single point. Therefore and because of the small size of a coated glass fiber, it is desirable to use small UVLEDs (e.g., a 3-millimeter square UVLED or a 1-millimeter square UVLED), because a greater percentage of emitted and reflected light from a small UVLED will be incident to the coated glass fiber.


In accordance with the foregoing, FIGS. 8-9 depict an exemplary apparatus 60 for curing a coated glass fiber 66. The apparatus 60 includes a substantially cylindrical cavity 65 having an elliptical shape and having a reflective inner surface. The cavity 65 defines a first line focus 61 and a second line focus 62. A plurality of UVLEDs 64 are positioned along the first line focus 61. The second line focus 62 further defines a curing axis along which a coated glass fiber 66 passes so it can be cured. As depicted in FIG. 9, UV rays 63 emitted from the UVLEDs 64 may reflect off the inner surface of the cavity 65 such that the reflected UV rays 63 are incident to the coated glass fiber 66. To facilitate uniform curing of the coated glass fiber 66, some of the UVLEDs 64 may be differently oriented. For example, a second apparatus 70 for curing a glass fiber could have a different orientation than the apparatus 60 (e.g., the second apparatus 70 may have UVLEDs positioned along a line focus 71 that differs from the first line focus 61).


In an alternative exemplary embodiment, rather than placing the UVLEDs along one of the line foci, each UVLED may include a lens for focusing emitted UV radiation. In particular, each lens may have a focus at one of the two line foci (e.g., the line focus not defining a curing axis). By including a lens with each UVLED, the efficiency of the apparatus can be further improved.


An apparatus as described herein may include a dark space between one or more UVLEDs. In other words, the apparatus may include a space in which substantially no UV radiation is incident to the optical fiber being cured. A pause in the curing process provided by a dark space can help to ensure even and efficient curing of the optical fiber coatings. In particular, a dark space may be useful in preventing too many free radicals from being present in a glass-fiber coating before it is cured (i.e., dark space helps to control free-radical generation).


For example, it may be desirable to initially expose an optical fiber to low power UV radiation and then pass the optical fiber through a dark space. After the optical fiber passes through a dark space, it is exposed to higher power UV radiation to complete the curing process. A curing apparatus employing dark space is disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. No. 7,322,122 for a Method and Apparatus for Curing a Fiber Having at Least Two Fiber Coating Curing Stages, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.


An apparatus for curing glass-fiber coatings may include a control circuit for controlling the UV radiation output from the UVLED. The control circuit may be used to vary the intensity of the UV radiation as an optical fiber progresses through the apparatus.


For example, to ensure that the optical fiber receives a consistent dose of ultraviolet radiation, the UV radiation output of the UVLEDs may vary with the speed at which the optical fiber passes through the apparatus. That is to say, at higher speeds (i.e., the speed the optical fiber passes through the apparatus) the output intensity of the UVLEDs may be greater than the output intensity at lower speeds. The output intensity of the UVLEDs may be controlled by reducing (or increasing) the current flowing to the UVLEDs.


In another aspect, the present invention embraces a method of employing the foregoing apparatus to cure a coating on a glass fiber (i.e., in situ curing).


In an exemplary method, a glass fiber is drawn from an optical preform and coated with a UV curable material. UV radiation is emitted from one or more sources of electromagnetic radiation (e.g., one or more UVLEDs) toward a curing space (e.g., in the general direction of the coated glass fiber). A portion, if not most, of the emitted UV radiation is transmitted entirely through the curing space. Typically, at least some, if not most, of the UV radiation transmitted entirely through the curing space (i.e., at least some UV radiation that has not been absorbed) is reflected (e.g., with a mirror) toward the curing space. A glass fiber having an incompletely cured coating is continuously passed through the curing space to effect the absorption of emitted and reflected UV radiation. The absorption of the UV radiation cures the glass-fiber coating. Moreover, and in accordance with the foregoing, to improve the curing rate, at least a portion of the reflected UV radiation may be focused on the glass fiber (e.g., by using a concave mirror to reflect UV radiation toward the curing space's curing axis).


In accordance with the foregoing, the resulting optical fiber includes one or more coating layers (e.g., a primary coating and a secondary coating). At least one of the coating layers—typically the secondary coating—may be colored and/or possess other markings to help identify individual fibers. Alternatively, a tertiary ink layer may surround the primary and secondary coatings.


For example, the resulting optical fiber may have one or more coatings (e.g., the primary coating) that comprise a UV-curable, urethane acrylate composition. In this regard, the primary coating may include between about 40 and 80 weight percent of polyether-urethane acrylate oligomer as well as photoinitiator, such as LUCIRIN® TPO, which is commercially available from BASF. In addition, the primary coating typically includes one or more oligomers and one or more monomer diluents (e.g., isobornyl acrylate), which may be included, for instance, to reduce viscosity and thereby promote processing. Exemplary compositions for the primary coating include UV-curable urethane acrylate products provided by DSM Desotech (Elgin, Ill.) under various trade names, such as DeSolite® DP 1011, DeSolite® DP 1014, DeSolite® DP 1014XS, and DeSolite® DP 1016.


Those having ordinary skill in the art will recognize that an optical fiber with a primary coating (and an optional secondary coating and/or ink layer) typically has an outer diameter of between about 235 microns and about 265 microns (μm). The component glass fiber itself (i.e., the glass core and surrounding cladding layers) typically has a diameter of about 125 microns, such that the total coating thickness is typically between about 55 microns and 70 microns.


With respect to an exemplary optical fiber achieved according to the present curing method, the component glass fiber may have an outer diameter of about 125 microns. With respect to the optical fiber's surrounding coating layers, the primary coating may have an outer diameter of between about 175 microns and about 195 microns (i.e., a primary coating thickness of between about 25 microns and 35 microns) and the secondary coating may have an outer diameter of between about 235 microns and about 265 microns (i.e., a secondary coating thickness of between about 20 microns and 45 microns). Optionally, the optical fiber may include an outermost ink layer, which is typically between two and ten microns thick.


In an alternative embodiment, the resulting optical fiber may possess a reduced diameter (e.g., an outermost diameter between about 150 microns and 230 microns). In this alternative optical fiber configuration, the thickness of the primary coating and/or secondary coating is reduced, while the diameter of the component glass fiber is maintained at about 125 microns. By way of example, in such embodiments the primary coating layer may have an outer diameter of between about 135 microns and about 175 microns (e.g., about 160 microns), and the secondary coating layer may have an outer diameter of between about 150 microns and about 230 microns (e.g., more than about 165 microns, such as 190-210 microns or so). In other words, the total diameter of the optical fiber is reduced to less than about 230 microns (e.g., about 200 microns).


Exemplary coating formulations for use with the apparatus and method described herein are disclosed in the following commonly assigned applications, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety: U.S. Patent Application No. 61/112,595 for a Microbend-Resistant Optical Fiber, filed Nov. 7, 2008, (Overton); International Patent Application Publication No. WO 2009/062131 A1 for a Microbend-Resistant Optical Fiber, (Overton); U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2009/0175583 A1 for a Microbend-Resistant Optical Fiber, (Overton); and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/614,011 for a Reduced-Diameter Optical Fiber, filed Nov. 6, 2009, (Overton).


To supplement the present disclosure, this application incorporates entirely by reference the following commonly assigned patents, patent application publications, and patent applications: U.S. Pat. No. 4,838,643 for a Single Mode Bend Insensitive Fiber for Use in Fiber Optic Guidance Applications (Hodges et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 7,623,747 for a Single Mode Optical Fiber (de Montmorillon et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 7,587,111 for a Single-Mode Optical Fiber (de Montmorillon et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 7,356,234 for a Chromatic Dispersion Compensating Fiber (de Montmorillon et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 7,483,613 for a Chromatic Dispersion Compensating Fiber (de Montmorillon et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,186 for an Optical Fiber (Flammer et al.); U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2009/0252469 A1 for a Dispersion-Shifted Optical Fiber (Sillard et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/098,804 for a Transmission Optical Fiber Having Large Effective Area (Sillard et al.), filed Apr. 7, 2008; U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2009/0279835 A1 for a Single-Mode Optical Fiber Having Reduced Bending Losses, filed May 6, 2009, (de Montmorillon et al.); U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2009/0279836 A1 for a Bend-Insensitive Single-Mode Optical Fiber, filed May 6, 2009, (de Montmorillon et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/489,995 for a Wavelength Multiplexed Optical System with Multimode Optical Fibers, filed Jun. 23, 2009, (Lumineau et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/498,439 for a Multimode Optical Fibers, filed Jul. 7, 2009, (Gholami et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/614,172 for a Multimode Optical System, filed Nov. 6, 2009, (Gholami et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/617,316 for an Amplifying Optical Fiber and Method of Manufacturing, filed Nov. 12, 2009, (Pastouret et al.) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/629,495 for an Amplifying Optical Fiber and Production Method, filed Dec. 2, 2009, (Pastouret et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/633,229 for an Ionizing Radiation-Resistant Optical Fiber Amplifier, filed Dec. 8, 2009, (Regnier et al.); and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/636,277 for a Buffered Optical Fiber, filed Dec. 11, 2009, (Testu et al.).


To supplement the present disclosure, this application further incorporates entirely by reference the following commonly assigned patents, patent application publications, and patent applications: U.S. Pat. No. 5,574,816 for Polypropylene-Polyethylene Copolymer Buffer Tubes for Optical Fiber Cables and Method for Making the Same; U.S. Pat. No. 5,717,805 for Stress Concentrations in an Optical Fiber Ribbon to Facilitate Separation of Ribbon Matrix Material; U.S. Pat. No. 5,761,362 for Polypropylene-Polyethylene Copolymer Buffer Tubes for Optical Fiber Cables and Method for Making the Same; U.S. Pat. No. 5,911,023 for Polyolefin Materials Suitable for Optical Fiber Cable Components; U.S. Pat. No. 5,982,968 for Stress Concentrations in an Optical Fiber Ribbon to Facilitate Separation of Ribbon Matrix Material; U.S. Pat. No. 6,035,087 for an Optical Unit for Fiber Optic Cables; U.S. Pat. No. 6,066,397 for Polypropylene Filler Rods for Optical Fiber Communications Cables; U.S. Pat. No. 6,175,677 for an Optical Fiber Multi-Ribbon and Method for Making the Same; U.S. Pat. No. 6,085,009 for Water Blocking Gels Compatible with Polyolefin Optical Fiber Cable Buffer Tubes and Cables Made Therewith; U.S. Pat. No. 6,215,931 for Flexible Thermoplastic Polyolefin Elastomers for Buffering Transmission Elements in a Telecommunications Cable; U.S. Pat. No. 6,134,363 for a Method for Accessing Optical Fibers in the Midspan Region of an Optical Fiber Cable; U.S. Pat. No. 6,381,390 for a Color-Coded Optical Fiber Ribbon and Die for Making the Same; U.S. Pat. No. 6,181,857 for a Method for Accessing Optical Fibers Contained in a Sheath; U.S. Pat. No. 6,314,224 for a Thick-Walled Cable Jacket with Non-Circular Cavity Cross Section; U.S. Pat. No. 6,334,016 for an Optical Fiber Ribbon Matrix Material Having Optimal Handling Characteristics; U.S. Pat. No. 6,321,012 for an Optical Fiber Having Water Swellable Material for Identifying Grouping of Fiber Groups; U.S. Pat. No. 6,321,014 for a Method for Manufacturing Optical Fiber Ribbon; U.S. Pat. No. 6,210,802 for Polypropylene Filler Rods for Optical Fiber Communications Cables; U.S. Pat. No. 6,493,491 for an Optical Drop Cable for Aerial Installation; U.S. Pat. No. 7,346,244 for a Coated Central Strength Member for Fiber Optic Cables with Reduced Shrinkage; U.S. Pat. No. 6,658,184 for a Protective Skin for Optical Fibers; U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,908 for a Buffer Tube that Results in Easy Access to and Low Attenuation of Fibers Disposed Within Buffer Tube; U.S. Pat. No. 7,045,010 for an Applicator for High-Speed Gel Buffering of Flextube Optical Fiber Bundles; U.S. Pat. No. 6,749,446 for an Optical Fiber Cable with Cushion Members Protecting Optical Fiber Ribbon Stack; U.S. Pat. No. 6,922,515 for a Method and Apparatus to Reduce Variation of Excess Fiber Length in Buffer Tubes of Fiber Optic Cables; U.S. Pat. No. 6,618,538 for a Method and Apparatus to Reduce Variation of Excess Fiber Length in Buffer Tubes of Fiber Optic Cables; U.S. Pat. No. 7,322,122 for a Method and Apparatus for Curing a Fiber Having at Least Two Fiber Coating Curing Stages; U.S. Pat. No. 6,912,347 for an Optimized Fiber Optic Cable Suitable for Microduct Blown Installation; U.S. Pat. No. 6,941,049 for a Fiber Optic Cable Having No Rigid Strength Members and a Reduced Coefficient of Thermal Expansion; U.S. Pat. No. 7,162,128 for Use of Buffer Tube Coupling Coil to Prevent Fiber Retraction; U.S. Pat. No. 7,515,795 for a Water-Swellable Tape, Adhesive-Backed for Coupling When Used Inside a Buffer Tube (Overton et al.); U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2008/0292262 for a Grease-Free Buffer Optical Fiber Buffer Tube Construction Utilizing a Water-Swellable, Texturized Yarn (Overton et al.); European Patent Application Publication No. 1,921,478 A1, for a Telecommunication Optical Fiber Cable (Tatat et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 7,570,852 for an Optical Fiber Cable Suited for Blown Installation or Pushing Installation in Microducts of Small Diameter (Nothofer et al.); U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2008/0037942 A1 for an Optical Fiber Telecommunications Cable (Tatat); U.S. Pat. No. 7,599,589 for a Gel-Free Buffer Tube with Adhesively Coupled Optical Element (Overton et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 7,567,739 for a Fiber Optic Cable Having a Water-Swellable Element (Overton); U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2009/0041414 A1 for a Method for Accessing Optical Fibers within a Telecommunication Cable (Lavenne et al.); U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2009/0003781 A1 for an Optical Fiber Cable Having a Deformable Coupling Element (Parris et al.); U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2009/0003779 A1 for an Optical Fiber Cable Having Raised Coupling Supports (Parris); U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2009/0003785 A1 for a Coupling Composition for Optical Fiber Cables (Parris et al.); U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US2009/0214167 A1 for a Buffer Tube with Hollow Channels, (Lookadoo et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/466,965 for an Optical Fiber Telecommunication Cable, filed May 15, 2009, (Tatat); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/506,533 for a Buffer Tube with Adhesively Coupled Optical Fibers and/or Water-Swellable Element, filed Jul. 21, 2009, (Overton et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/557,055 for an Optical Fiber Cable Assembly, filed Sep. 10, 2009, (Barker et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/557,086 for a High-Fiber-Density Optical Fiber Cable, filed Sep. 10, 2009, (Louie et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/558,390 for a Buffer Tubes for Mid-Span Storage, filed Sep. 11, 2009, (Barker); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/614,692 for Single-Fiber Drop Cables for MDU Deployments, filed Nov. 9, 2009, (Overton); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/614,754 for Optical-Fiber Loose Tube Cables, filed Nov. 9, 2009, (Overton); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/615,003 for a Reduced-Size Flat Drop Cable, filed Nov. 9, 2009, (Overton et al.); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/615,106 for ADSS Cables with High-Performance Optical Fiber, filed Nov. 9, 2009, (Overton); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/615,698 for Reduced-Diameter Ribbon Cables with High-Performance Optical Fiber, filed Nov. 10, 2009, (Overton); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/615,737 for a Reduced-Diameter, Easy-Access Loose Tube Cable, filed Nov. 10, 2009, (Overton); U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/642,784 for a Method and Device for Manufacturing an Optical Preform, filed Dec. 19, 2009, (Milicevic et al.); and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/648,794 for a Perforated Water-Blocking Element, filed Dec. 29, 2009, (Parris).


In the specification and/or figures, typical embodiments of the invention have been disclosed. The present invention is not limited to such exemplary embodiments. The figures are schematic representations and so are not necessarily drawn to scale. Unless otherwise noted, specific terms have been used in a generic and descriptive sense and not for purposes of limitation.

Claims
  • 1. A method for curing a coating on a glass fiber, comprising: emitting UV radiation from one or more sources of electromagnetic radiation into a substantially cylindrical cavity having an elliptical cross-section, the cavity (i) having a reflective inner surface, (ii) defining the curing space, and (iii) defining a first line focus and a second line focus;transmitting a portion of the emitted UV radiation entirely through the curing space;reflecting with the reflective inner surface at least some of the UV radiation toward the second line focus; andpassing through the curing space along the second line focus a glass fiber having an incompletely cured coating to effect the absorption of both emitted and reflected UV radiation.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of emitting UV radiation comprises emitting UV radiation from one or more UVLEDs.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of passing the glass fiber through the curing space substantially cures the coating on the glass fiber.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of emitting UV radiation comprises focusing with a lens at least some of the emitted UV radiation.
  • 5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the step of passing a glass fiber through the curing space comprises passing the glass fiber through the focus of the lens.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of emitting UV radiation comprises emitting UV radiation from one or more UVLEDs positioned along the first line focus to emit UV radiation in the direction of the second line focus.
  • 7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the step of emitting UV radiation comprises emitting UV radiation from at least two UVLEDS emitting electromagnetic radiation at different output intensities.
  • 8. The method according to claim 6, wherein substantially all of the electromagnetic radiation emitted by at least one of the UVLEDs has wavelengths of between about 200 nanometers and 600 nanometers.
  • 9. The method according to claim 6, wherein at least 90 percent of the electromagnetic radiation emitted by at least one of the UVLEDs has wavelengths of between about 250 nanometers and 400 nanometers.
  • 10. The method according to claim 6, wherein at least 80 percent of the electromagnetic radiation emitted by at least one of the UVLEDs has wavelengths of between about 300 nanometers and 450 nanometers.
  • 11. The method according to claim 6, wherein at least 80 percent of the electromagnetic radiation emitted by at least one of the UVLEDs has wavelengths of between about 375 nanometers and 425 nanometers.
  • 12. The method according to claim 6, wherein at least one of the UVLEDs emits electromagnetic radiation of wavelengths mostly between about 395 nanometers and 415 nanometers.
  • 13. The method according to claim 6, wherein at least 80 percent of the electromagnetic radiation emitted by at least one of the UVLEDs has wavelengths within a 30 nanometer range.
  • 14. The method according to claim 6, wherein the step of emitting UV radiation comprises emitting UV radiation from at one UVLED having a power output of at least about 30 watts.
  • 15. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of emitting UV radiation comprises focusing with a lens the emitted UV radiation toward the first line focus.
  • 16. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of emitting UV radiation comprises focusing with a lens the emitted UV radiation toward the second line focus.
  • 17. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of emitting UV radiation comprises adjusting the intensity of the emitted UV radiation in response to a change in the speed at which the coated glass fiber passes through the curing space.
  • 18. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of emitting UV radiation from one or more sources of electromagnetic radiation comprises emitting UV radiation from a UVLED device that includes a plurality of UVLEDs.
  • 19. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of emitting UV radiation from one or more sources of electromagnetic radiation comprises emitting UV radiation from an array of UVLEDs.
  • 20. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of emitting UV radiation from one or more sources of electromagnetic radiation comprises emitting UV radiation from a three-dimensional array of UVLEDs.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO PRIORITY APPLICATIONS

This application is a division of commonly assigned U.S. application Ser. No. 12/649,758 for a UVLED Apparatus for Curing Glass-Fiber Coatings, (filed Dec. 30, 2009, and published Jul. 22, 2010, as Publication No. 2010/0183821 A1), now U.S. Pat. No. 8,314,408, which itself claims the benefit of commonly assigned U.S. Patent Application No. 61/141,698 for a UVLED Apparatus for Curing Glass-Fiber Coatings (filed Dec. 31, 2008). Each of the foregoing patent applications and patent application publication is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (292)
Number Name Date Kind
3737051 Horino Jun 1973 A
3784836 Tolliver Jan 1974 A
3800160 Ishizawa et al. Mar 1974 A
3819929 Newman Jun 1974 A
3983039 Eastland Sep 1976 A
4010374 Ramler Mar 1977 A
4033263 Richmond Jul 1977 A
4070499 Ramier et al. Jan 1978 A
4145136 Takahashi Mar 1979 A
4309452 Sachs Jan 1982 A
4321073 Blair Mar 1982 A
4334733 Takeshima et al. Jun 1982 A
4479984 Levy et al. Oct 1984 A
4490410 Takiyama et al. Dec 1984 A
4518628 Biswas et al. May 1985 A
4591724 Fuse et al. May 1986 A
4636405 Mensah et al. Jan 1987 A
4683525 Camm Jul 1987 A
4710638 Wood Dec 1987 A
4761168 Blyler, Jr. et al. Aug 1988 A
4774104 Severijns et al. Sep 1988 A
4838643 Hodges et al. Jun 1989 A
4839513 Wijtsma Jun 1989 A
4853021 Soszka et al. Aug 1989 A
4910107 Kawanda et al. Mar 1990 A
4913859 Overton et al. Apr 1990 A
4962992 Chapin et al. Oct 1990 A
4980701 Contois et al. Dec 1990 A
4990971 Le Creff Feb 1991 A
5062723 Takeda et al. Nov 1991 A
5146531 Shustack Sep 1992 A
5208645 Inoue et al. May 1993 A
5219623 Petisce Jun 1993 A
5278432 Ignatius et al. Jan 1994 A
5278482 Bahn Jan 1994 A
5366527 Amos et al. Nov 1994 A
5405657 Bastian et al. Apr 1995 A
5418369 Moore et al. May 1995 A
5420768 Kennedy May 1995 A
5427862 Ngo et al. Jun 1995 A
5440137 Sowers Aug 1995 A
5440660 Dombrowski et al. Aug 1995 A
5535673 Bocko et al. Jul 1996 A
5574816 Yang et al. Nov 1996 A
5633123 Hill et al. May 1997 A
5634711 Kennedy et al. Jun 1997 A
5660461 Ignatius et al. Aug 1997 A
5712487 Adachi et al. Jan 1998 A
5717805 Stulpin Feb 1998 A
5731112 Lewis et al. Mar 1998 A
5733607 Mangum et al. Mar 1998 A
5756165 Ali et al. May 1998 A
5761362 Yang et al. Jun 1998 A
5761367 Matsumoto Jun 1998 A
5762867 D'Silva Jun 1998 A
5763003 Bonicel et al. Jun 1998 A
5764263 Lin Jun 1998 A
5840451 Moore et al. Nov 1998 A
5845034 Petisce Dec 1998 A
D404045 Mandellos Jan 1999 S
D404046 Mandellos Jan 1999 S
D404409 Mandellos Jan 1999 S
5857767 Hochstein Jan 1999 A
5885652 Abbott, III et al. Mar 1999 A
5911023 Risch et al. Jun 1999 A
5963240 Shinohara et al. Oct 1999 A
5973331 Stevens et al. Oct 1999 A
5982968 Stulpin Nov 1999 A
5986682 Itou Nov 1999 A
5990498 Chapnik et al. Nov 1999 A
6013330 Lutz Jan 2000 A
6018605 Mills et al. Jan 2000 A
6035087 Bonicel et al. Mar 2000 A
6066397 Risch et al. May 2000 A
6075595 Malinen Jun 2000 A
6085009 Risch et al. Jul 2000 A
6092890 Wen et al. Jul 2000 A
6112037 Nagata et al. Aug 2000 A
6118130 Barry Sep 2000 A
6134363 Hinson et al. Oct 2000 A
6145979 Caiger et al. Nov 2000 A
6163036 Taninaka et al. Dec 2000 A
6175677 Yang et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181857 Emeterio et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185394 Lee Feb 2001 B1
6188086 Masuda et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190483 Yang et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200134 Kovac et al. Mar 2001 B1
6210802 Risch et al. Apr 2001 B1
6215931 Risch et al. Apr 2001 B1
6287672 Fields et al. Sep 2001 B1
6314224 Stevens et al. Nov 2001 B1
6321012 Shen Nov 2001 B1
6321014 Overton et al. Nov 2001 B1
6331111 Cao Dec 2001 B1
6333509 Lumpp Dec 2001 B1
6334016 Greer, IV Dec 2001 B1
6338878 Overton et al. Jan 2002 B1
6345149 Ervin et al. Feb 2002 B1
6354700 Roth Mar 2002 B1
6376568 Baudin et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381390 Hutton et al. Apr 2002 B1
6425663 Eastlund et al. Jul 2002 B1
6447112 Hu et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457823 Cleary et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463872 Thompson Oct 2002 B1
6493491 Shen et al. Dec 2002 B1
6498355 Harrah et al. Dec 2002 B1
6501084 Sakai et al. Dec 2002 B1
6517218 Hochstein Feb 2003 B2
6523948 Matsumoto et al. Feb 2003 B2
6525752 Vackier et al. Feb 2003 B2
6528955 Powers et al. Mar 2003 B1
6536889 Biegelsen et al. Mar 2003 B1
6561640 Young May 2003 B1
6579495 Maiden Jun 2003 B1
6584263 Fewkes et al. Jun 2003 B2
6589716 Sweatt et al. Jul 2003 B2
6603908 Dallas et al. Aug 2003 B2
6613170 Ohno et al. Sep 2003 B1
6618538 Nechitailo et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626561 Carter et al. Sep 2003 B2
6630286 Kramer Oct 2003 B2
6658184 Bourget et al. Dec 2003 B2
6671421 Ogata et al. Dec 2003 B1
6683421 Kennedy et al. Jan 2004 B1
6720566 Blandford Apr 2004 B2
6726317 Codos Apr 2004 B2
6741780 Vanpoulle et al. May 2004 B2
6749446 Nechitailo Jun 2004 B2
6755647 Melikechi et al. Jun 2004 B2
6768839 Blomquist et al. Jul 2004 B2
6783810 Jin et al. Aug 2004 B2
6807906 DeMoore et al. Oct 2004 B1
6835679 Bilanin et al. Dec 2004 B2
6877248 Cross et al. Apr 2005 B1
6880954 Ollett et al. Apr 2005 B2
6885035 Bhat et al. Apr 2005 B2
6912347 Rossi et al. Jun 2005 B2
6913794 Hoult et al. Jul 2005 B2
6922515 Nechitailo et al. Jul 2005 B2
6929828 Baudin et al. Aug 2005 B2
6941049 Risch et al. Sep 2005 B2
6949591 Allard et al. Sep 2005 B1
7001644 Baudin et al. Feb 2006 B2
7022382 Khudyakov et al. Apr 2006 B1
7045010 Sturman, Jr. May 2006 B2
7080900 Takabayashi et al. Jul 2006 B2
7084183 Fuchs et al. Aug 2006 B2
7137696 Siegel Nov 2006 B2
7153015 Brukilacchio Dec 2006 B2
7162128 Lovie et al. Jan 2007 B2
7173266 Katsuki Feb 2007 B2
7175712 Siegel Feb 2007 B2
7211299 Siegel May 2007 B2
7232850 Johnson et al. Jun 2007 B2
7250611 Aguirre et al. Jul 2007 B2
7322122 Overton et al. Jan 2008 B2
7346244 Gowan et al. Mar 2008 B2
7356234 de Montmorillon et al. Apr 2008 B2
7399982 Siegel Jul 2008 B2
7465909 Siegel Dec 2008 B2
7470921 Custer Dec 2008 B2
7483613 Bigot-Astruc et al. Jan 2009 B2
7498065 Siegel Mar 2009 B2
7515795 Overton et al. Apr 2009 B2
7555186 Flammer et al. Jun 2009 B2
7567739 Overton et al. Jul 2009 B2
7570852 Nothofer et al. Aug 2009 B2
7587111 de Montmorillon et al. Sep 2009 B2
7599589 Overton et al. Oct 2009 B2
7623747 de Montmorillon et al. Nov 2009 B2
7639915 Parris et al. Dec 2009 B2
7646952 Parris Jan 2010 B2
7646954 Tatat Jan 2010 B2
7671346 Siegel Mar 2010 B2
7775690 Wakalopulos Aug 2010 B2
7842932 Knight et al. Nov 2010 B2
7847269 Cekic et al. Dec 2010 B2
7923706 Brassell et al. Apr 2011 B2
8314408 Hartsuiker et al. Nov 2012 B2
20010030866 Hochstein Oct 2001 A1
20010032985 Bhat et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010033725 Szum et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010046652 Ostler et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010048814 Lenmann et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010050344 Albou Dec 2001 A1
20010052920 Matsumoto et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020015234 Suzuki et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020016378 Jin et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020044188 Codos Apr 2002 A1
20020050575 Keogh et al. May 2002 A1
20020074554 Sweatt et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020074559 Dowling et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020149660 Cleary et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020172913 Cao Nov 2002 A1
20020175299 Kanie et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030026919 Kojima et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030035037 Mills et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030109599 Kamen Jun 2003 A1
20030218880 Brukilacchio Nov 2003 A1
20030222961 Nakajima Dec 2003 A1
20040011457 Kobayashi et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040033317 Baudin et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040036188 Arboix et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040075065 Spivak Apr 2004 A1
20040090794 Ollett et al. May 2004 A1
20040114016 Yokoyama Jun 2004 A1
20040134603 Kobayashi et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040135159 Siegel Jul 2004 A1
20040152038 Kumagai et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040156130 Powell et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040164325 Siegel Aug 2004 A1
20040166249 Siegel Aug 2004 A1
20040189773 Masumi Sep 2004 A1
20040238111 Siegel Dec 2004 A1
20050042390 Siegel Feb 2005 A1
20050051741 Hallett et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050099478 Iwase May 2005 A1
20050104946 Siegel May 2005 A1
20050115498 Ingram et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050116176 Aguirre et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050152146 Owen et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050222295 Siegel Oct 2005 A1
20050228062 Wolf et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050234145 Sitzmann et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060007290 Oshima et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060121208 Siegel Jun 2006 A1
20060127594 Siegel Jun 2006 A1
20060192829 Mills et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060204670 Siegel Sep 2006 A1
20060216193 Johnson et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060230969 Vosahlo Oct 2006 A1
20060233501 Sampson Oct 2006 A1
20060237658 Waluszko Oct 2006 A1
20060241259 Tanabe et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060245187 Scott et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060263921 Nakamura et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060266955 Arvin et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060270748 Sommerlade et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060274421 Okamitsu et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070241478 Buckley Oct 2007 A1
20070286963 Rocha-Alvarez et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080021126 Dietliker et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080096115 Tanabe et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080160211 Siegel Jul 2008 A1
20080226272 Kasai et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080290301 Gardner Nov 2008 A1
20080292262 Overton et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090003785 Parris et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090032740 Smith et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090041414 Lavenne et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090065715 Wainright Mar 2009 A1
20090127480 Briggs et al. May 2009 A1
20090175583 Overton Jul 2009 A1
20090190349 Middlemass et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090214167 Lookadoo et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090252469 Sillard et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090279833 Overton et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090279835 de Montmorillon et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090279836 de Montmorillon et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090297107 Tatat Dec 2009 A1
20090321666 Hilgers Dec 2009 A1
20100021170 Lumineau et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100028020 Gholami et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100067855 Barker Mar 2010 A1
20100067857 Lovie et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100092135 Barker et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100092138 Overton Apr 2010 A1
20100092139 Overton Apr 2010 A1
20100092140 Overton Apr 2010 A1
20100096564 Yang et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100118388 Pastouret et al. May 2010 A1
20100119202 Overton May 2010 A1
20100135623 Overton Jun 2010 A1
20100135624 Overton et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100135625 Overton Jun 2010 A1
20100135627 Pastouret et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100142033 Regnier et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100142969 Gholami et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100150505 Testu et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100154479 Milicevic et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100166375 Parris Jul 2010 A1
20100183821 Hartsuiker et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100189397 Richard et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100223803 Karlicek et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100242299 Siegel Sep 2010 A1
20110287195 Molin Nov 2011 A1
20120009358 Gharbi et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120040105 Overton Feb 2012 A1
20130052364 Hartsuiker et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130068969 Childers Mar 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (55)
Number Date Country
2911410 Sep 1980 DE
4226344 Feb 1994 DE
4226344 Jul 2002 DE
102004008812 Sep 2005 DE
0228896 Jul 1987 EP
0854022 Jul 1998 EP
1139439 Oct 2001 EP
1138642 Jul 2004 EP
1508157 Feb 2005 EP
1250297 Oct 2005 EP
1651916 May 2006 EP
1701984 Sep 2006 EP
1704170 Sep 2006 EP
1764220 Mar 2007 EP
1765878 Mar 2007 EP
1599340 Sep 2007 EP
1861234 Dec 2007 EP
1871608 Jan 2008 EP
1921478 May 2008 EP
2085801 Aug 2009 EP
2388239 Nov 2011 EP
2418183 Feb 2012 EP
2166975 May 1986 GB
2350321 Nov 2000 GB
2390332 Jan 2004 GB
2396331 Jun 2004 GB
60-126830 Jul 1985 JP
61-010440 Jan 1986 JP
62-026876 Feb 1987 JP
63-182528 Jul 1988 JP
1-107865 Apr 1989 JP
1-124324 May 1989 JP
5-213636 Aug 1993 JP
5-323462 Dec 1993 JP
2000-268416 Sep 2000 JP
2001-209980 Aug 2001 JP
2002-248803 Sep 2002 JP
2003-029099 Jan 2003 JP
2003-034557 Feb 2003 JP
2003-034558 Feb 2003 JP
2003089555 Mar 2003 JP
2005-129662 May 2005 JP
2010-117526 May 2010 JP
2010-117527 May 2010 JP
0111426 Feb 2001 WO
02093265 Nov 2002 WO
2004002746 Jan 2004 WO
2004011848 Feb 2004 WO
2005082548 Sep 2005 WO
2006096061 Sep 2006 WO
2006101519 Sep 2006 WO
2006101526 Sep 2006 WO
2008040650 Apr 2008 WO
2009062131 May 2009 WO
2010077132 Jul 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (17)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 12/098,804 for a “Transmission Optical Fiber Having Large Effective Area,” Sillard et al., filed Apr. 7, 2008, pp. 1-45.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/112,595 for a Microbend Resistant Optical Fiber, filed Nov. 7, 2008, (Overton), pp. 1-321.
Dake et al., “LED Curing Versus Conventional UV Curing Systems: Property Comparisons of Acrylates and Epoxies,” Radtech Report 51 (2004) DSM Desotech, USA, pp. 1-5.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in counterpart International Application No. PCT/NL2009/000273, dated Apr. 14, 2010, pp. 1-11.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/141,698 for a UVLED Apparatus for Curing Glass-Fiber Coatings, filed Dec. 31, 2008, (Hartsuiker et al.), pp. 1-35.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/986,737 for a Microbend Resistant Optical Fiber, filed Nov. 9, 2007, (Overton), pp. 1-65.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/041,484 for a Microbend Resistant Optical Fiber, filed Apr. 1, 2008, (Overton), pp. 1-80.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/351,151 for a Curing Apparatus Employing Angled UVLEDs, filed Jun. 3, 2010, (Molin), pp. 1-61.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/351,205 for a Curing Apparatus Having UV Sources That Emit Differing Ranges of UV Radiation, filed Jun. 3, 2010, (Gharbi et al.), pp. 1-65.
Dutch Search Report and Written Opinion in counterpart Dutch Application No. 1036470 dated Sep. 10, 2009, pp. 1-9.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in counterpart International Application No. PCT/NL2009/000273 mailed Jul. 14, 2011, pp. 1-10.
Overton, U.S. Appl. No. 13/206,601, “Method and Apparatus Providing Increased UVLED Intensity and Uniform Curing of Optical-Fiber Coatings” Aug. 10, 2011, pp. 1-72.
Gharbi et al., U.S. Appl. No. 13/152,651, “Curing Method Employing UV Sources That Emit Differing Ranges of UV Radiation” Jun. 3, 2011, pp. 1-64.
Ciba, “Photoinitiators for UV Curing,” Key Products Selection Guide 2003, Switzerland, pp. 1-8.
Ciba. “Photoinitiators for UV Curing,” Formulators' Guide for Coatings, Additives, Switzerland, downloaded from www.mufon.com.tw/Ciba/ciba—guid/photo—uv—2.pdf on May 30, 2012, pp. 1-14.
Davidson, “Fundamental of Light-Emitting Diodes” Zeiss Microscopy (2008), online at http://zeiss-cannpus.magnet.fsu.edu/print/lightsources/leds-print.html, pp. 1-12.
Moreno et al., “Modeling the radiation pattern of LEDs”, Optics Express, vol. 16, No. 3, (2008), pp. 1808-1819.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130052364 A1 Feb 2013 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61141698 Dec 2008 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12649758 Dec 2009 US
Child 13663662 US