The invention relates to the field of vacuum systems, and more specifically to differential pumping of vacuum systems.
Typical turbo-molecular pumps such as those manufactured by BOC Edwards of Crawley, West Sussex, United Kingdom (“Edwards”) and Pfeiffer Vacuum Inc. of NH, USA (“Pfeiffer”) have a single high vacuum inlet at the top of the rotor stack designed to evacuate a single vacuum region.
Some turbo-molecular pumps also have inter-stage ports that allow for pumping of more than one vacuum region. For example, the Edwards EXT255H is a compound molecular pump with a high-vacuum stage and a drag stage (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,709,228B2 to Stuart). This configuration allows for pumping on two vacuum regions, one high vacuum and one low vacuum. However, an additional one of these pumps would be required to evacuate a second high vacuum region.
There are also “split flow” turbo-molecular pumps, such as the Edwards EXT200/200/30, which create a second high vacuum stage by placing a port in the side of the turbo-molecular section of the pump, at a distance of a few rotor blade heights downstream from the high vacuum inlet.
However, both the compound and split flow types of pumps increase the cost of the pumping system and require more space for the vacuum pumps.
There are some turbo-molecular pumps, such as the Pfeiffer TMH 262-020 YP, that have a support structure above the top rotor blades in the high vacuum inlet. This structure is used to support the rotor shaft bearing at the top of the rotor stack. The gap between the structure and the rotor blades is roughly one-half the width of the support. There is no provision to mate the support structure to the vacuum manifold to create multiple vacuum regions. Thus, this structure is only used as a support structure and does not result in the division of the turbo-molecular pump's high-vacuum inlet into more than one vacuum region for differential pumping.
The cost of the pumping system in instruments using a vacuum system can be a significant portion of the total cost of the instrument. The addition of another vacuum pump or the use of a more costly vacuum pump can be a significant cost disadvantage. It can also result in bulky and difficult to manage vacuum systems.
It would be desirable to provide a low cost and compact pumping system for pumping a differential vacuum between several vacuum chambers of a vacuum system.
These and other objects are provided by the present invention which provides a divider in the high vacuum inlet of a turbo-molecular pump allowing for the evacuation of a second high vacuum region without a significant increase in the cost of the pumping system.
In general terms an embodiment of the invention is a vacuum divider positioned between rotor blades of a turbo-molecular pump and a vacuum manifold formed from multiple vacuum chambers. A first coupling aperture passes through the vacuum divider and allows gas to pass from a first of the multiple vacuum chambers to the turbo-molecular pump. A second coupling aperture passes through the vacuum divider and allows gas to pass from a second of the multiple vacuum chambers to the turbo-molecular pump.
Further preferred features of the invention will now be described for the sake of example only with reference to the following figures, in which:
Referring to
A vacuum divider 101 is installed at a high vacuum inlet 103 of a turbo-molecular pump 105 in close proximity to the top of rotor blades 107 of the turbo-molecular pump 105. The turbo-molecular pump 105 can be a Pfeiffer THM 261-020 YP, for example.
The vacuum divider 101 can be attached to the turbo-molecular pump 105 and the vacuum manifold 201 by a vacuum-tight seal. A vacuum-tight seal is defined as a seal where the leak rate into a vacuum chamber through the seal is small enough so as not to substantially affect the vacuum level within the vacuum chamber. Removable, vacuum-tight connections can be used to connect the vacuum divider 101 to the turbo-molecular pump 105 and/or vacuum manifold 201 using copper gasket/knife edge vacuum connections, o-ring connections, zero-clearance matching flat surfaces, overlapping joints, or other methods known in the art. Also, the vacuum divider 101 can be welded to either the turbo-molecular pump 105 or the vacuum manifold 201 or both of them.
In other embodiments the vacuum divider 101 is integral with the turbo-molecular pump 105 or the vacuum manifold 201. For example, the vacuum divider 101 can be machined as a single piece with either the turbo-molecular pump 105 or the vacuum manifold 201 or both of them. This eliminates the need to fabricate the vacuum divider 101 as a separate part.
The vacuum manifold 201 includes a first vacuum chamber 313 and a second vacuum chamber 315. A bulkhead wall 317 of the vacuum manifold 201 divides the manifold 201 into the first vacuum chamber 313 and the second vacuum chamber 315. The bulkhead wall 317 follows and is sealed with a vacuum-tight seal to the ribs 305, 307. The ribs 305, 307 are aligned with the bulkhead wall 317 so that the first coupling aperture 301 and first vacuum chamber 313 form a first continuous space and the second coupling aperture 303 and the second vacuum chamber 315 form a second continuous space. Thus, the first coupling aperture 301 is fixed with a vacuum-tight seal to the first vacuum chamber 313 and the second coupling aperture 303 is fixed with a vacuum-tight seal to the second vacuum chamber 315. Also, the first coupling aperture 301 allows gas to pass from the first vacuum chamber 313 to the turbo-molecular pump 105 and the second coupling aperture 301 allows gas to pass from the second vacuum chamber 313 to the turbo-molecular pump 105.
A “pump inlet area allocation” is defined to be the area of each coupling aperture expressed as a percentage of the total area of all coupling apertures. The pump inlet area allocation of all apertures should add up to 100%. The ribs 305, 307 and the divider central portion 309 are not considered in the calculation of pump inlet area. In this embodiment, the pump inlet area allocation can be set at 32% for the vacuum chamber 313 and 68% for the vacuum chamber 315, for example.
In some embodiments the vacuum manifold 201 includes a floor 318 with it's own coupling apertures passing through the floor and corresponding to the first and second coupling apertures 301, 303 of the vacuum divider 101.
The invention also encompasses embodiments having additional coupling apertures passing through the vacuum divider for allowing gas to pass from additional ones of the multiple vacuum chambers, through the vacuum divider 101 and into the turbo-molecular pump 105. For example, the vacuum divider 101 can include three or more coupling apertures and the vacuum manifold 201 can include three or more vacuum chambers. Then each of the coupling apertures allows gas to pass from one of the vacuum chambers, through the vacuum divider 101 and into the turbo-molecular pump 105. The single turbo-molecular pump 105 can thereby pump three or more vacuum chambers of the vacuum system to produce three or more different vacuum pressures.
In one embodiment the vacuum divider 101 of
Experimental prototypes of the vacuum divider 101 were built and tested. The vacuum dividers were inserted into the high vacuum inlet of an Edwards EXT255H turbo-molecular pump. With a vacuum divider installed, the turbo-molecular pump was mounted to a vacuum manifold. The vacuum divider used for the tests had the radially extending ribs 305, 307 of
A precision leak valve was added to the vacuum chamber 313 to allow for an adjustable gas load. The vacuum chamber 315 had no external gas load. Thus, during the tests, the vacuum chamber 313 was at a higher pressure than the vacuum chamber 315.
A “Differential Pumping Ratio” (“DPR”), is defined as the pressure in the vacuum chamber 313 divided by the pressure in the vacuum chamber 315. During testing of the prototypes, four different parameters were varied to find their effect on the DPR:
1. The vacuum divider design of
2. The closest distances between both of the rotor-blade-directed faces 401, 503 and the rotor blades 107 were set to both 0.75 mm or 1.50 mm.
3. The pump inlet area allocation was set at 68% for the vacuum chamber 313 and 32% for the vacuum chamber 315 and also set at 32% for the vacuum chamber 313 and 68% for the vacuum chamber 315.
4. The gas load was varied by changing the precision leak valve settings.
Previous to the testing of the present invention, the expectation would be to obtain a DPR of between 3 and 5. However, it was found that the present invention easily produces a DPR of more than 5, or even a DPR of more than 10. Moreover, for this particular configuration utilizing the vacuum divider 101 of the present invention, and when the gas load was increased to the point where the pressure in the vacuum chamber 313 was approximately 1.0×10−4 Torr, the results showed that the vacuum divider worked together with the turbo-molecular pump and vacuum manifold in an unexpected and fruitful manner to produce an amazing DPR of 17! This is about a quadruple improvement over what would previously have been expected.
Some general observations of the effects of the different parameters on the DPR are now explained.
The divider design of
It was expected that smaller gap distances between the vacuum divider and the rotor blades would result in an improved DPR. This was indeed shown in the experiments, but the effect was relatively small. Changing the gap distance from 0.75 mm to 1.50 mm resulted in only a 7% reduction in the DPR. In general it can be desirable to set the gap distance at 1.50 mm or less.
On the other hand, the pump inlet area allocation had a significant effect on the DPR. As mentioned above, the test setup was configured in two ways with regard to the pump inlet area allocation. The pump inlet area allocation was set at 68% for the vacuum chamber 313 and 32% for the vacuum chamber 315 and also set at 32% for the vacuum chamber 313 and 68% for the vacuum chamber 315. The DPR more than doubled when the pump inlet area allocation was switched from 68% for the vacuum chamber 313 and 32% for the vacuum chamber 315 to 32% for the vacuum chamber 313 and 68% for the vacuum chamber 315.
The vacuum divider 101 of the present invention can be used with a turbo-molecular pump, such as the Pfeiffer TMH 262-020 YP, to provide differential pumping for an Agilent Technologies 6110 Single quad LCMS for example.
In another embodiment, the relative sizes of the coupling apertures 301, 303 can be adjustable. For example at least one of the coupling apertures 301, 303 can be an adjustable iris. Thus the pump inlet area allocation can be varied and in this way, the relative pressures of the vacuum chambers 313, 315 and thereby the relative pressures of the ion optics chamber 803 and mass analyzer chamber 805 can be fine tuned.
By adjusting the various parameters, such as the pump inlet area allocation, the measured DPRs of the vacuum chambers 313, 315 can be customized for particular applications. The DPRs can be adjusted to, for example, at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 or 20.
In the present invention the gas referred to can be air or other gasses.
The vacuum divider can be made from aluminum, stainless steel, high performance engineering plastic or other known materials.
The present invention may be embodied in other forms without departing from its spirit and scope. The embodiments described above are therefore illustrative and not restrictive, since the scope of the invention is determined by the appended claims rather then by the foregoing description, and all changes that fall within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4581533 | Littlejohn et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
5482430 | Hablanian | Jan 1996 | A |
5565679 | Tanner et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5733104 | Conrad et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6014892 | Baret et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6142163 | McMillin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6589009 | Shiokawa et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
7033142 | Conrad et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20030222213 | Taniguchi | Dec 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080283125 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |