The present invention is generally related to steam generators with lance type water cannons for cleaning heat transfer surfaces. More particularly, the present invention is directed to a method and system for controlling the positioning of the water cannon lance by measuring the angular displacements of the lance with respect to the wall on which the water cannon is mounted.
Large steam generators such as boilers have a combustion chamber and heat transfer surfaces on which soot and ash deposits build up as a result of the combustion process. The soot and ash buildup form a contamination layer on the heat transfer surfaces that reduces the heat exchange efficiency of the boiler. Some of the negative impacts of the thermal efficiency of these boilers are: (1) added fuel consumption in order to maintain the proper steam conditions that are required by the downstream processes; and (2) an increase in boiler flue gas temperature leading to increased fouling and plugging of the gas passages requiring the boiler to be taken off line to be cleaned.
In order to combat the buildup of ash, boilers are fitted with automatic cleaning devices known as soot blowers. There are many types of soot blowers based on boiler design as well as the area of the boiler that needs to be cleaned. In the case of boilers burning fossil fuels such as coal or heavy oil, there also is a need to clean the walls of the boiler in the area known as the lower furnace or hearth.
In this area of the boiler, the walls are comprised of tubes that are positioned side by side to form a box type shape. Fuel such as coal or oil is introduced into the cavity of this box (hearth) where it is burned. High pressure water flows through the inside of the tubes and is used to absorb the heat. In doing so, the water eventually picks up enough heat to be converted into steam.
Some of the residue of combustion adheres to the walls of the hearth inhibiting the transfer of heat. There are three methods in the prior art that have been used for cleaning the furnace wall: (1) traditional soot (wall) blowers containing a lance tube, and introduced through an opening in the boiler wall, eject steam/air back towards the wall; (2) water blowers that eject water back towards the wall; and (3) water cannons that eject water toward opposing or adjacent side walls.
Lance-type water cannons inserted through a front wall of the generator are used to direct a stream of fluid to clean the heat transfer surfaces. However, not all heat transfer surfaces develop an ash buildup at the same rate. Ash can accumulate more in one corner than in another. Likewise, more contamination by ash and soot can occur in one zone of a generator wall than in another zone of the same wall because of temperature differentials during the combustion process. The temperatures in some zones are higher than in others. The zones in which contaminants such as ash and soot build up more quickly require more frequent cleaning in order to retain heat exchange efficiency of the steam generator. Often sensors are installed in the furnace walls that measure the temperature or heat flux in order to determine the cleanliness of the heating surface that the water cannon is intended to keep in a clean condition. The information provided by the sensors is used in a control system to determine whether and where the water cannon shall clean.
The present invention provides a more efficient method for controlling the blower used in cleaning the ash and soot contamination off the zones where the buildup is the worst. It does this by a process of determining the appropriate angles with respect to the horizontal and to the cannon wall that correspond to the X, Y, Z coordinates of the points that bound the zone to be cleaned. The angles are measured by angular resolvers positioned at a cardan joint supporting the water cannon lance at the blower end.
The present invention provides a technique that maps any location in space to the appropriate angles that relate to the inclination of the lance with respect to the horizontal as well as the cannon wall. The angle made with the horizontal is further corrected to account for the gravitational effects on the trajectory of the water jet. In some instances both angles may have to be not only corrected for gravity but also for the influence of gas side turbulence. In this case the turbulence in the ambient flue gas deflects the jet away from the intended target. Those two angles represent the feedback provided by the X and Y resolvers for the cannon. The X and Y resolvers are positioned at the cardan joint that attaches the water cannon to the lance tube. The prior art used methods, particularly encoders, for measuring displacements in the x and y directions that related the position in space to a position on the motion wall.
In one exemplary embodiment, a method for controlling the positioning of a stream of pressurized fluid against a surface zone of a steam generator to clean contaminants is provided. The coordinates of the boundary points of the surface zone (i.e., defined area of a wall of the steam generator) to be cleaned are first determined. The coordinates are measured with respect to a fixed coordinate system such as the Cartesian coordinate system with origin point at the location where the water cannon lance penetrates the cannon wall of the steam generator. The determined boundary points are converted into corresponding angles with respect to the horizontal plane and the cannon wall (i.e., the wall of the steam generator or boiler through which the water cannon lance penetrates. These angles can be used directly to control the position of the cannon, or they can be translated into corresponding points on a motion plane defined by the prior art encoders with respect to the fixed coordinate system. The stream of pressurized fluid is directed against the surface zone in a predetermined pattern by monitoring and controlling the angle of the lance.
The invention is better understood by reading the following detailed description of an exemplary embodiment in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The water cannon lance is mounted in a cardan-type (universal) joint on the cannon wall as illustrated in the prior art FIG. 1. This particular drawing is from U.S. Pat. No. 5,882,430, which is commonly-owned with the present invention. The disclosure of this patent, in its entirety, is incorporated by reference herein. This drawing will be used as a basis for explaining the novelty of the present invention, which uses axial resolvers instead of encoders. An advantage of measuring the angles directly by resolvers is that measuring angles actually provides the state of the lance tube, whereas using the encoders of the prior art, an indirect determination of the state of the lance tube was obtained by measuring the x and y displacements.
As shown in
Resolvers measure the angular rotation of the lance. The resolvers are positioned a fixed distance from the cannon wall and measure the angle of rotation of the lance with respect to the X-Y and X-Z planes, respectively. In directing the stream of fluid against the zone to be cleaned, various patterns can be developed to cover the zone. In one exemplary embodiment, a zone is covered by following a zigzag pattern from the left edge of the zone to right edge of the zone at the highest elevation of the top boundary points and then right edge to left edge at an angle depressed a fixed amount from the initial angle, etc. until the entire zone has been covered. Regions in a zone can be excluded such as, for example, the door of the boiler, by mapping out the boundary points of the door in X, Y, Z space.
Also shown in the figure is an inclined wall representing part of the boiler nose. This wall is inclined at an angle γ with respect to the opposite wall. If necessary, point P′ could be such that OP′ never intersects the opposite wall, but instead intersects a point on either the inclined nose wall or one of the side walls of the boiler. If the inclined wall shown in the figure were facing downwards, it would represent a hopper wall.
The following represents the vector analysis for a boiler wall. Vector {overscore (OP)} represent the line of sight (water jet) from the lance tip to point P on the opposite wall.
{overscore (OP)}=Xpī+Yp{overscore (j)}+Zp{overscore (k)} (1)
ī, {overscore (j)}, and {overscore (k)} are the unit vectors, in the direction of the three axes X, Y and Z, respectively. Point E represents the location of the normal from point P to the horizontal X-Z plane. Therefore, vector {overscore (OE)} is:
{overscore (OE)}=Xpī+Zp{overscore (k)} (2)
Taking the dot product between these two vectors gives,
Substituting equations (1) and (2) in equation (3) provides:
In the front wall, Zp=2W, the angle β represents measurements made by the Y-axis resolver for the water cannon.
In order to determine the angle θ measured between the plane OPE and the Y-Z plane, the dot product between vector {overscore (OE)} and {overscore (OX)}={overscore (k)} is taken. The result is
Substituting for {overscore (OE)} and {overscore (OZ)} in equation (5) gives the angle measured by the X-axis resolver for the water cannon.
In the case of the front wall, Zp=2W while for the side wall Xp=L.
The following represents the vector analysis for the motion plane. The motion plane of the cannon is a plane parallel to the cannon plane set back by a distance of ‘b’ on the Z-axis. The equation of the motion plane is:
ZM=−b (7)
The parametric form of vector {overscore (OP)} is given by:
X=Xpt, Y=Ypt and Z=Zpt (8)
If E1(XM, YM, ZM) represents the point of intersection of the vector {overscore (OP)} with the motion plane then, Zpt=−b or t=−b/Zp. Therefore,
In the case of the front wall Zp=2W . Substituting this value into the above expressions yields
Consider a point P on the side wall where Yp=±L If Z′ is the projection of point E′ on the OZ axis then,
Substituting Zp from equation (12) in equation (9) provides:
and
The angle θ has already been derived in equation (6).
As examples of the use of the invention for determining the angular rotation of the lance to direct a stream of fluid to a point in the steam generator, consider a boiler whose dimensions are 2L=150′ and 2W=100′. A water cannon is placed on the front wall at an elevation 40′ below the inclined surface of the nose. In the following examples, three cases are considered wherein a point P (Xp, Yp, Zp) lies on the boiler rear wall, side wall and inclined surface of the nose, respectively. The examples determines the angles that represent the inclination of the lance with respect to the horizontal and the boiler wall so that the lance points in the direction of point P.
Case 1—Boiler Rear Wall
Let Point P lie on the boiler rear wall where Xp=−50′, Yp=25′ and Zp=2W=100′. Therefore the inclination of the lance tube β with respect to the X-Z plane is:
The angle θ made by the lance tube and the Y-Z plane is:
Case 2—Boiler Side Wall
Point P lies on the side wall where Xp=−75′, Yp=25′ and Zp=90′. Once again angles β and θ are calculated according to equations (4) and (6) to yield:
Case 3—Boiler Nose
Consider a point P that lies on the lower inclined surface of the boiler nose. The coordinates for point P are as follows: Xp=50′, Yp=65′, and Zp=92′. Note that the boiler rear wall is at a distance 2W=100′. The inclinations of the lance, to the X-Z and Y-Z planes respectively, are:
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that many modifications to the exemplary embodiments of the present invention are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. In addition, it is possible to use some of the features of the present invention without the corresponding use of the other features. Accordingly, the foregoing description of the exemplary embodiments are provided for the purpose of illustrating principles of the present invention and not in limitation thereof, since the scope of the present invention is defined solely by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3941987 | Tack, Jr. | Mar 1976 | A |
4083135 | Van den Brink et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4097072 | Van Heijst | Jun 1978 | A |
4159660 | Buckley et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4254521 | Papmahl | Mar 1981 | A |
4487436 | Mares et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4499436 | Grib | Feb 1985 | A |
4509002 | Hollis, Jr. | Apr 1985 | A |
4514814 | Evans | Apr 1985 | A |
4644188 | Grib | Feb 1987 | A |
4832902 | Kaufmann et al. | May 1989 | A |
5503115 | Franzke et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5882430 | Kleye et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5925193 | Bude et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6035811 | Bude et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6119955 | Starr | Sep 2000 | A |
6283069 | Bude et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6325025 | Perrone | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6425352 | Perrone | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6453916 | Tran et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6581549 | Stewart et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6655397 | Brown et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
20020078982 | Ackerman et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
145476 | Nov 2003 | DE |