The embodiment discussed herein is related to a via design apparatus and a via design method.
When the layers of a multilayer printed board are connected with lines, holes are made on the printed board and the inner walls (side walls) of the holes are plated to create vias. The vias allow connections between the layers.
Incidentally, as a structure of printed board to achieve a higher density of wiring, there is a via division structure in which a via is divided and a plurality of wiring patterns are connected.
However, in the above via division structure, an impedance mismatch may occur on the transmission path due to the impedance of the via, causing the quality of signals to deteriorate.
According to an aspect of the invention, a via design apparatus for designing a via providing connections between a plurality of layers inside a multilayer board is provided. The via design apparatus includes: a determination section that determines a value of a shape parameter indicating a shape of a via in the multilayer board, the via having a hole passing through the plurality of layers and a conductive section on a side wall of the hole; and a calculation section that calculates a value of impedance of the via according to the value of the shape parameter.
The object and advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by means of the elements and combinations particularly pointed out in the claims.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The configuration of a via design apparatus according to the embodiment will be described.
In accordance with instructions from the user, the impedance calculation section 12 then determines a physical property parameter indicating physical properties of materials of the via and an electrical parameter indicating the input and output of the via; and sets the physical property parameter and the electrical parameter in the simulation model of the via (S12). The electrical parameter here includes for example the output impedance of an output circuit connected to an input end of the via and the load impedance of a load connected to an output end of the via. Subsequently, the impedance calculation section 12 uses the simulation model to perform an impedance calculation process by which the impedance of the via is calculated (S13). The impedance here is characteristic impedance or differential impedance. The impedance calculation section 12 is for example realized by three-dimensional electromagnetic field analysis software such as HFSS (High-Frequency Structure Simulator). HFSS calculates the properties of a device represented by the simulation model by solving Maxwell's equations of electromagnetic field through numerical simulation.
The impedance calculation section 12 then makes a determination as to whether the calculated impedance meets a predetermined condition (S14). When the impedance does not meet the condition (S14, N), the impedance calculation section 12 returns to the process S11, determines as the shape parameter a value different from the preset value, and sets the shape parameter in the simulation model. When the condition is met (S14, Y), the impedance calculation section 12 registers in the components library 13 information about the via including parameters and impedance (S15) and the flow ends. The above predetermined condition for example is that a difference between the calculated impedance and desired impedance becomes less than a predetermined threshold. The predetermined condition is that the calculated impedance falls within a predetermined range. First and second conditions for example are the predetermined condition.
The following describes a via having a via division structure.
The following describes a simulation model of the via division structure.
A first simulation model that represents a via having one conductive section 21 will be described.
The following describes a second simulation model that represents a via having two conductive sections 21.
The following describes the impedance calculation process.
The following describes the results of the impedance calculation process when the first simulation model is used.
When one conductive section 21 is used, the impedance calculation process calculates the characteristic impedance. The characteristic impedance is the impedance of a transmission line when the length of the transmission line is assumed to be infinite. By using the characteristic impedance, impedance matching is carried out to cause the following impedances to be equal to each other: the output impedance of an output circuit that outputs signals to the transmission line, the characteristic impedance of the transmission line, and the load impedance of a load connected to the end of the transmission line. Since the impedance-matched circuit is the equivalent of a transmission line along which uniform characteristic impedance is maintained infinitely, reflections of signals can be prevented.
According to the results of the impedance calculation process, a combination of θ and d can be determined so that the characteristic impedance Z0 of the via is brought closer to a desired value.
The following describes the results of the impedance calculation process when the second simulation model is used.
When two conductive sections 21 are used, the impedance calculation process calculates differential impedance. When there are two lines of conductive section, the differential impedance is characteristic impedance of the two lines of conductive section.
Incidentally, the impedance calculation section 12 may calculate a plurality of values of impedance in response to combinations of a plurality of values of shape parameter; select, out of a plurality of the calculated values of impedance, the value of impedance that is closest to the desired impedance and the value of shape parameter corresponding to the value of impedance; and output the values.
Moreover, the change of the shape parameter value by the shape setting section 11 and the calculation of the impedance by the impedance calculation section 12 may be repeated until the calculated impedance meets the above predetermined condition and the resultant shape parameter and impedance may be output.
According to the results of the impedance calculation process, a combination of θ and d can be determined so that the differential impedance Zdiff of the via is brought closer to a desired value.
The following describes a circuit design apparatus that uses the via design apparatus according to the present embodiment.
First, the implementation design section 34 determines how components are arranged and connected using the circuit design data and components registered in the components library 13 and carries out the design of implementation by wiring lines to produce a wiring pattern (S34).
Subsequently, the checking section 35 carries out the circuit simulation of the produced wiring pattern, checks the wiring pattern, and conducts thermal analysis and the like for checking (S35). The checking section 35 then makes a determination as to whether the check results satisfy the specifications and the capability (S36). If the check results do not satisfy the specifications and the capability (S36, N), the checking section 35 returns to the process S34 to carry out the design of implementation again. When the check results satisfy the specifications and the capability (S36, Y), the flow ends.
The above circuit design apparatus can design circuits and multilayer boards using vias designed by the via design apparatus. Therefore, it is possible to control the impedance of a via and to match impedance between the via and the previous or subsequent component in designing a circuit.
According to the present embodiment, the control of impedance is possible in the via division structure.
Moreover, a via design program can be provided as a program for causing a computer that constitutes the via design apparatus to perform the above steps. Computer-readable recording media on which the above program is recorded allow the computer that constitutes the via design apparatus to execute the program (see
All examples and conditional language recited herein are intended for pedagogical purposes to aid the reader in understanding the invention and the concepts contributed by the inventor to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions, nor does the organization of such examples in the specification relate to a depicting of the superiority and inferiority of the invention. Although the embodiment(s) of the present inventions have been described in detail, it should be understood that the various changes, substitutions, and alterations could be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation application, filed under 35 U.S.C. §111(a), of PCT Application No. PCT/JP2007/072546, filed on Nov. 21, 2007, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated in its entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5966237 | Sugaya et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5995274 | Sugaya et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6025947 | Sugaya et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6144485 | Sugaya et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157481 | Sugaya et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6198572 | Sugaya et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6377395 | Sugaya et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6466348 | Izumi | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6646791 | Sugaya et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6698000 | Tanaka | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6759257 | McCormack et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6865016 | Sugaya et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6976233 | Frank et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7224899 | Noheji | May 2007 | B2 |
7346869 | Tai et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7409668 | Lin et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7793241 | Tai et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7831949 | Tokunaga et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20040028407 | Noheji | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050046927 | Sugaya et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050230146 | Koyama | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070245274 | Kimura | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070300195 | Li | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080052649 | Tai et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
6-69660 | Mar 1994 | JP |
8-123839 | May 1996 | JP |
9-325983 | Dec 1997 | JP |
11-261490 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-101241 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-196169 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2000-216513 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2002-334956 | Nov 2002 | JP |
2004-56245 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004-158754 | Jun 2004 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Shariff et al., Via Interconnections for Wafer Level Packaging: Impact of Tapered Via Shape and Via Geometry on Product Yield and Reliability, 2007 Electronic Components and Technology Conference, pp. 858-863, May 2007. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, mailed Jun. 8, 2010, in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/JP2007/072546 (5 PP.). |
Form PCT/ISA/210, mailed Jan. 15, 2008, in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/JP2007/072546 (3 PP.). |
Form PCT/ISA/220, mailed Jan. 15, 2008, in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/JP2007/072546 (4 PP.). |
Form PCT/ISA/237, mailed Jan. 15, 2008, in corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/JP2007/072546 (3 PP.). |
Japanese Office Action mailed Nov. 29, 2011 issued in corresponding corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-542438. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100251200 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/JP2007/072546 | Nov 2007 | US |
Child | 12781009 | US |