The inventions described below relate the field of wafer carriers and particularly to wafer carriers used during chemical mechanical planarization of silicon wafers.
Integrated circuits, including computer chips, are manufactured by building up layers of circuits on the front side of silicon wafers. An extremely high degree of wafer flatness and layer flatness is required during the manufacturing process. Chemical-mechanical planarization (CMP) is a process used during device manufacturing to flatten wafers and the layers built-up on wafers to the necessary degree of flatness.
Chemical-mechanical planarization is a process involving polishing of a wafer with a polishing pad combined with the chemical and physical action of a slurry pumped onto the pad. The wafer is held by a wafer carrier, with the backside of the wafer facing the wafer carrier and the front side of the wafer facing a polishing pad. The polishing pad is held on a platen, which is usually disposed beneath the wafer carrier. Both the wafer carrier and the platen are rotated so that the polishing pad polishes the front side of the wafer. A slurry of selected chemicals and abrasives is pumped onto the pad to affect the desired type and amount of polishing. (CMP is therefore achieved by a combination of chemical softener and physical downward force that removes material from the wafer or wafer layer.) The downward force, referred to in this application as the Spindle Force, is split in the wafer carrier to a Retaining Ring Force and a Wafer Force.
Using the CMP process, a thin layer of material is removed from the front side of the wafer or wafer layer. The layer may be a layer of oxide grown or deposited on the wafer or a layer of metal deposited on the wafer. The removal of the thin layer of material is accomplished so as to reduce surface variations on the wafer. Thus, the wafer and layers built-up on the wafer are very flat and/or uniform after the process is complete. Typically, more layers are added and the chemical mechanical planarization process repeated to build complete integrated circuit chips on the wafer surface.
A variety of wafer carrier configurations are used during CMP. One such wafer carrier configuration is the hard backed configuration. The hard backed configuration utilizes a rigid surface such as a piston or backing plate against the backside of the silicon wafer during CMP forcing the front surface of the silicon wafer to the surface of the polishing pad. Using this type of carrier may not conform the front wafer surface of the wafer to the surface of the polishing pad resulting in planarization non-uniformities. Such hard backed wafer carrier designs generally utilize a relatively high polishing pressure. These relatively high pressures effectively deform the wafer to match the surface conformation of the polishing pad. When wafer surface distortion occurs, the high spots are polished at the same time as the low spots giving some degree of uniformity but also resulting in poor planarization. Too much material from some areas of the wafer will be removed and too little material from other areas will also be removed. In addition to wafer distortion, the relatively high pressure also results in excessive material removal along the edges of the silicon wafer. When the amount of material removed is excessive, the entire wafer or portions of the wafer become unusable.
In other wafer carrier configurations, the wafer is pressed against the polishing pad using a membrane or other soft material. Use of a membrane carriers tend to not cause distortion of the wafer. Lower polishing pressures may be employed, and conformity of the wafer front surface is achieved without distortion so that both some measure of global polishing uniformity and good planarization may be achieved. Better planarization uniformity is achieved at least in part because the polishing rate on similar features from die to die on the wafer is the same.
While many soft backed wafer carrier configurations are used in CMP, their use has not been entirely satisfactory. In some carrier designs, there have been attempts to use a layer of pressurized air over the entire surface of the wafer to press the wafer during planarization. Unfortunately, while such approaches may provide a soft back for the wafer carrier, it does not permit independent adjustment of the pressure at the edge of the wafer and at more central regions of the wafer to solve the wafer edge non-uniformity problems.
In order to correct or compensate for edge polishing effects, attempts have been made to adjust the shape of the retaining ring and to modify a retaining ring pressure so that the amount of material removed from the wafer near the retaining ring was modified. Typically, more material is removed from the edge of the wafer resulting in over polishing. In order to correct this over polishing, usually, the retaining ring pressure is adjusted to be somewhat lower than the wafer backside pressure so that the polishing pad in that area was somewhat compressed by the retaining ring and less material was removed from the wafer within a few millimeters of the retaining ring. These attempts, however, have not been entirely satisfactory as the planarization pressure at the outer peripheral edge of the wafer was only indirectly adjustable based on the retaining ring pressure. It was not possible to extend the effective distance of a retaining ring compensation effect an arbitrary distance into the wafer edge. Neither was it possible to independently adjust the retaining ring pressure, edge pressure, or independently adjust backside wafer pressure with respect to retaining ring pressure to achieve a desired result.
There remains a need for a membrane backed wafer carrier having independent control of both the membrane pressure and retaining ring pressure providing excellent planarization, control of edge planarization effects, and adjustment of the wafer material removal profile to compensate for non-uniform deposition of the structural layers on the wafer semiconductor substrate.
The methods and devices described below provide for a wafer carrier adapted to greatly reduce the edge effect and allow a wafer to be uniformly polished across its entire surface. A wafer carrier having a pressure-regulated soft membrane behind the wafer, a retaining ring having a retaining ring actuator, and a pressurized edge control bladder or resilient ring is used during CMP. Pressures behind the soft membrane, within the retaining ring actuator, and within the edge control bladder are regulated independently from one another. This enables the wafer carrier to account for non-uniformities on the wafer surface, changes in the retaining ring, and edge effect.
The soft membrane 29 extends horizontally over a peripheral portion of the backside of the wafer 3 and extends vertically between the side of the piston plate 28 and the retaining ring 25 and gimbal plate 27. An extension of the membrane 29 projects into an annular space 31 provided in the gimbal plate 27. Thus, the pressure-regulated soft membrane 29 moves with the wafer and the piston plate but, during polishing, moves independently of the movement of the gimbal plate 27 and the retaining ring 25. Pressure in the soft membrane is adjusted by a control computer to apply downward force to the backside 32 of the wafer and to ensure that the rate at which material is removed from the front side 33 of the wafer is uniform across the entire front side of the wafer.
The retaining ring actuator in the wafer carrier 2 is independently controlled and affects the amount of force being applied behind the retaining ring 25. A retaining ring actuator 26 is provided within the retaining ring 25. When the actuator is pressurized, it extends against the retaining ring and increases the amount of force being applied to the polishing pad by the retaining ring relative to the rest of the wafer carrier 2. The retaining ring 25 is attached to the gimbal plate 27 in such a manner that allows the pressure inside the retaining ring actuator 26 to be increased or decreased. Change of pressure within the retaining ring actuator will influence the amount of force acting on the polishing pad by the retaining ring. Using a control computer, pressure in the retaining ring actuator 26 is regulated independent of the pressure in the inflatable membrane 29 and pressure in the edge control bladder 37. Pressure inside the retaining ring actuator 26 is used to force the retaining ring 25 downwardly as material is removed from the bottom surface of the retaining ring 25.
Polishing removes material from the bottom surface of the retaining ring, particularly over the course of multiple polishing runs. When the carrier 2 is in use, the soft membrane pressure, retaining ring actuator pressure, and edge control bladder pressure can all be regulated independently. This enables an operator to account for non-uniformities on the wafer surface, changes in the height of the retaining ring, and edge effect while using a CMP tool. Thus, the front side 33 of the wafer will remain substantially co-planar with the bottom surface of the retaining ring even as material is removed from the bottom surface of the retaining ring. The retaining ring actuator 26 and the fluid inside it allow the retaining ring 25 to move independently of the wafer 3 and the inflatable membrane 29.
The soft membrane 29 and the edge of the wafer 3 move up and down relative to the carrier 2, thereby allowing the force applied to the edge of the wafer 3 to vary relative to the force applied to the rest of the wafer 3. Thus, pressure in the edge control bladder 37 and pressure behind the soft membrane 29 may be regulated such that the rate at which polishing removes material from the wafer 3 is uniform across the entire front side 33 of the wafer 3.
The edge control bladder 37 and soft membrane 29 also reduce vibration of the carrier system including the wafer carrier 2 and the wafer 3. The fluids used in the edge control bladder 37 and behind the soft membrane 29 function as dampeners. Pressure in the edge control bladder 37 and behind the soft membrane 29 may be adjusted to reduce the amount of vibration in the carrier system.
In another embodiment of the wafer carrier, active regulation of the pressure in the edge control bladder 37 is not provided. As an alternative to active edge control, a passive annular bladder filled with a fluid pressurized to a predetermined pressure. Alternatively, a substantially solid ring of resilient material can also be used in the wafer carrier. The passive annular bladder or a ring of resilient material is located between the piston plate 28 and retaining ring behind the inflatable membrane 29. The pressure in the bladder or the resiliency of the material is selected to adjust the force applied to the edge of the wafer 3 in order to ensure a uniform rate of material removal from the front side of the wafer.
Thus, while the preferred embodiments of the devices and methods have been described in reference to the environment in which they were developed, they are merely illustrative of the principles of the inventions. Other embodiments and configurations may be devised without departing from the spirit of the inventions and the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/410,440, filed Apr. 24, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,131,892, which is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/055,550, filed Feb. 10, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,033,252, which claims priority to U.S. provisional application 60/550,806, filed Mar. 5, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4821997 | Zdeblick | Apr 1989 | A |
5795215 | Guthrie et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6019670 | Cheng et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024630 | Shendon et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6080050 | Chen et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6110025 | Williams et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113480 | Hu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6143123 | Robinson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6196905 | Inaba | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215642 | Sogard | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6277009 | Chen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6325696 | Boggs et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6368189 | Maloney et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386957 | Masumura et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6458015 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6506105 | Kajiwara et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6579151 | Tseng et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6716094 | Shendon et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726537 | Crevasse et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6746318 | Mallery et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6869348 | Spiegel | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6890249 | Zuniga et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6976908 | Masunaga et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
20030053283 | Loo et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030151153 | Jarvinen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030181151 | Chao et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030211811 | Berman et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040102138 | Saldana | May 2004 | A1 |
20040235399 | Owczarz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070054603 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60550806 | Mar 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11410440 | Apr 2006 | US |
Child | 11594267 | US | |
Parent | 11055550 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 11410440 | US |