The general technical field relates to micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS), and more particularly, to a MEMS device using silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology, and to associated fabrication methods.
MEMS devices, in particular inertial sensors such as accelerometers and angular rate sensors or gyroscopes, are being used in a steadily growing number of applications. As the number of these applications grows, the greater the demand to add additional functionality and more types of MEMS into a system chip architecture. Due to the significant increase in consumer electronics applications for MEMS sensors such as optical image stabilization (OIS) for cameras embedded in smart phones and tablet PCs, virtual reality systems and wearable electronics, there has been a growing interest in utilizing such technology for more advanced applications which have been traditionally catered to by much larger, more expensive and higher grade non-MEMS sensors. Such applications include single- and multiple-axis devices for industrial applications, inertial measurement units (IMUs) for navigation systems and attitude heading reference systems (AHRS), control systems for unmanned air, ground and sea vehicles and for personal indoor and even GPS-denied navigation. These applications also may include healthcare/medical and sports performance monitoring and advanced motion capture systems for next generation virtual reality. These advanced applications often require lower bias drift and higher sensitivity specifications well beyond the capability of existing consumer-grade MEMS inertial sensors on the market. In order to expand these markets and to create new ones, it is desirable and necessary that higher performance specifications be developed. It is also necessary to produce a low cost and small size sensor and/or MEMS inertial sensor-enabled system(s).
Given that MEMS inertial sensors such as accelerometers and gyroscopes are typically much smaller than traditional mechanical gyroscopes, they tend to be subject to higher mechanical noise and drift. Also, since position and attitude are calculated by integrating the acceleration and angular rate data, respectively, noise and drift can lead to growing errors. Consequently, for applications requiring high accuracy, such as navigation, it is generally desirable to augment the six-degree-of-freedom (6DOF) inertial capability of MEMS motion sensors (i.e., three axes of acceleration and three axes of angular rotation) with other position- and/or orientation-dependent measurements. By way of example, barometric pressure measurements can provide additional information about altitude, while magnetic field measurements can provide additional information about position on the Earth's surface and motion relative to the Earth's magnetic field. Thus, for MEMS inertial sensor systems, as well as other MEMS sensor systems, it is attractive to integrate more types of sensors onto a single chip.
The MEMS devices that measure these parameters include a MEMS mechanical element (e.g. proof mass, pressure-sensitive membrane, or magnetic transducer) that is free to move in response to a particular measured or stimulus. Additionally, since MEMS transducers are by design sensitive to some environmental influences, the packaging surrounding a MEMS transducer should protect it from undesired environmental influences. Thus the MEMS package surrounding the transducer should provide a hermetic, and in some cases a vacuum, environment while at the same time enabling electrical contact between the enclosed sensors and their corresponding IC electronics. In the past this has been accomplished by packaging the MEMS and IC side by side, fabricating the MEMS directly on the IC, or stacking the MEMS and IC, followed by attaching the MEMS and IC to a package substrate, protecting the MEMS with a non-functional silicon or glass cap, using wire bonds to make electrical connection to the IC and package substrate, and covering the substrate with a molded plastic cap. This chip-scale packaging adds considerable expense to the final device and makes chip stacking for 3DIC applications difficult, if not impossible.
Efforts have been made to include electrical feedthroughs through the cap over MEMS sensors, such as copper-filled or polysilicon-filled through-silicon-vias (TSVs). These TSVs consist of holes etched in the silicon that are lined with an insulator (e.g., thermal silicon dioxide), and then filled with a conductor (e.g., copper or polysilicon). In order to completely fill the TSV while limiting the diameter of the holes and, thus, the thickness of the fill material, the depth of the holes generally does not exceed about 100 micrometers (μm). The thickness of the MEMS cap is thus also limited to around 100 micrometers, rendering it susceptible to flexing due to pressure differences between the inside and the outside of the package, and also to external mechanical and thermal stresses. This flexing can cause delamination and cracking in the thin film layers of the TSVs which, in turn, can lead to leaks of air and moisture into the package and destroy or degrade its hermeticity.
Also, the performance of MEMS sensors generally depends on their operating environment, particularly the pressure environment. For example, resonant devices such as gyroscopes, silicon clocks and magnetometers typically operate at low or even vacuum pressures to minimize air damping and improve the quality factor of the resonance. Accelerometers, on the other hand, generally require some air damping to lower their ringing response to external impulse forces and enhance the response to the slowly varying accelerations of interest. Pressure sensors and microphones generally require access or exposure to the ambient pressure environment outside the sensor and may contain in their interiors gas of either high or low pressure, depending upon the application. In addition, for wafer level packaging of MEMS sensors, the pressure inside the sensor is typically determined by the ambient pressure at the time of wafer bonding. Thus, every sensor on the wafer is generally sealed in an environment at the same pressure. In order to integrate different sensors requiring different ambient pressures on the same chip, it may be needed or desirable to provide for each sensor an individual micro-environment at a desired pressure.
Accordingly, challenges remain in the development of methods for packaging MEMS devices. In light of the preceding, there is a need for an improved MEMS device and related fabrication process.
In accordance with an aspect, a three dimensional (3D) micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) device is provided. The device comprises a MEMS wafer, and top and bottom cap wafers. The MEMS wafer includes one or more MEMS structure(s), which can include or be embodied by any sensing and/or control element or combinations thereof such as, but not limited to, membranes, diaphragms, proof masses, actuators, transducers, micro-valves, micro-pumps, and the like. The MEMS wafer has opposed first and second sides. The top cap wafer and the bottom cap wafer are respectively bonded to the first side and the second side of the MEMS wafer. The top cap wafer, the bottom cap wafer and the MEMS wafer are stacked along a stacking axis and they form together at least one hermetic cavity enclosing the MEMS structure. A MEMS structure can comprise sub-structures or elements contained in a cavity or chamber of the device. At least one of the top cap wafer and the bottom cap wafer is a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) cap wafer comprising a cap device layer, a cap handle layer and a cap insulating layer interposed between the cap device layer and the cap handle layer. One of the cap handle layer and of the cap device layer has its inner side bonded to the MEMS wafer, and the other one of the cap handle layer and of the cap device layer has its outer side provided with outer electrical contacts formed thereon. At least one electrically conductive path extends through the cap handle layer and through the cap device layer of the SOI cap wafer, to establish an electrical connection between one of the outer electrical contacts and the MEMS structure. Preferably, both the top and the bottom cap wafers are SOI wafers.
In possible embodiments, the electrically conductive path comprises a conducting shunt, formed through the cap insulating layer, electrically connecting the cap handle layer and the cap device layer. A conducting shunt can be formed by etching a via or small area in the insulating layer, and by depositing a conductive material therein, to electrically connect the device and handle layers of the SOI cap wafer.
In possible embodiments, the electrically conductive path comprises a post formed in the cap handle layer, the post being delineated by a closed-loop trench patterned through the entire thickness of the cap handle layer. In this embodiment, one of the electrical contacts is located on top of said post.
In possible embodiments, the electrically conductive path comprises a pad formed in the cap device layer, the pad being delineated by a trench patterned through an entire thickness of the cap device layer, the pad being aligned with the post. It will be noted that by “aligned with” it is meant the pad and post are opposite each other along an axis parallel to the stacking axis, such that at least a portion of the pad faces at least a portion of the post.
In possible embodiments, the MEMS wafer is an SOI MEMS wafer comprising a MEMS device layer bonded to the top cap wafer, a MEMS handle layer bonded to the bottom cap wafer, and a MEMS insulating layer interposed between the MEMS device layer and the MEMS handle layer.
In possible embodiments, the electrically conductive path comprises a pad formed in the MEMS device layer, delineated by a trench, the pad being electrically connected to the MEMS structure, the pad formed in the MEMS device layer being aligned with the pad formed in the cap device layer.
In possible embodiments, the MEMS wafer comprises an outer frame, and the MEMS structure comprises at least one proof mass suspended by springs. The at least one proof mass is patterned in both the MEMS handle and device layers, and the springs are patterned in the MEMS device layer. This at least one proof mass includes conductive shunts electrically connecting the MEMS device and handle layers, and the electrically conductive path connects one of the electrical contacts to the MEMS structure via at least one of the springs. In possible embodiments, the electrically conductive path connecting an outer electrical contact located on the SOI cap wafer to the MEMS structure includes a post patterned in the cap handle layer, a pad patterned in the cap device layer, and a conductive shunt formed in the cap insulating layer, to connect the post with the pad; a pad patterned in the MEMS device layer, the pad being part of an outer frame; a spring patterned in the MEMS device layer, the spring suspending the MEMS structure in the hermetic cavity.
In possible embodiments, the cap device layer comprises cap electrodes patterned therein. The 3D MEMS device comprises additional electrically conductive paths, which are not connected to the MEMS structures but are connected to electrodes provided in one of the caps. These additional electrically conductive paths extend through the cap handle layer and through the cap device layer. The portion of the path extending in the cap can be referred to as “cap feedthrough”. At least some of the additional electrically conductive paths establish an electrical connection between a subset of the outer electrical contacts and the cap electrodes. The cap electrodes can be located in either one of the cap wafers, and preferably in both caps.
In possible embodiments, the cap device layer comprises leads patterned therein. The leads are electrically connected to some of the cap electrodes. The leads extend orthogonally to the stacking axis, and they form part of corresponding additional electrically conducting paths.
In possible embodiments, a device feedthrough extends along the stacking axis in the device. The device feedthrough comprises at least one cap feedthrough and a MEMS feedthrough aligned with one another. In embodiments where both cap wafers are provided with outer electrical contacts, a device feedthrough may comprise a first or top cap feedthrough, a MEMS feedthrough and a second or bottom cap feedthrough. A cap feedthrough comprises a cap feedthrough post patterned through the entire thickness of the cap handle layer, and electrically connected to one of the outer electrical contacts; a cap feedthrough pad patterned through the entire thickness of the cap device layer and facing the cap feedthrough post; and a cap conductive shunt formed through the cap insulating layer, electrically connecting the cap feedthrough post and the cap feedthrough pad. A MEMS feedthrough comprises a MEMS feedthrough post patterned through an entire thickness of the MEMS handle layer; a MEMS feedthrough pad patterned through an entire thickness of the MEMS device layer; and a MEMS conductive shunt formed through the MEMS insulating layer, electrically connecting the MEMS feedthrough post and the MEMS feedthrough pad. In cases where both cap wafers are provided with outer electrical contacts, they are located on the respective cap feedthrough posts, and the device feedthrough allows to connect the electrical contact of the top cap wafer to the electrical contact of the bottom cap wafer. In possible embodiments, the electrical contact on the SOI cap(s) are bond pads.
In some embodiments, the trenches delineating posts in at least one of the SOI cap wafer and the SOI MEMS wafer are left empty or unfilled.
In some embodiments, the cap feedthrough post and the MEMS feedthrough post which are aligned with one another have respective cross-sections, taken orthogonally with respect to the stacking axis. These cross-sections are of different sizes. Advantageously, having either one of the post or pad wider may limit potential leakage along the stacking axis.
In some embodiments, the cap device layer is a single crystal silicon layer. Still in possible embodiments, the cap handle layer has a thickness between 100 μm and 800 μm, and preferably between 200 μm and 800 μm.
In possible embodiments, the 3D MEMS device includes more than one cavity. The hermetic cavity enclosing the MEMS structure can be a first cavity, the MEMS structure being a first MEMS structure. The 3D MEMS device can include at least a second cavity enclosing at least a second MEMS structure, the first and second cavities having different internal pressures.
In possible embodiments, a vent extends through one of the top and bottom cap wafers, and defines a gas communication path between the second cavity and an exterior of the MEMS device. Preferably, the first cavity is a hermetically sealed vacuum cavity.
According to another possible aspect of the invention, a method for fabricating a 3D MEMS device is provided. The method can include the following steps:
In other possible embodiments of the fabrication method, a plurality of cavities is formed, each cavity including a MEMS structure. In such embodiments, a vent may be formed in one of the top and bottom SOI cap wafers, to provide at least one cavity at a different internal pressure than the hermetically sealed cavity.
Other features and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention will be better understood upon reading of preferred embodiments thereof with reference to the appended drawings.
It should be noted that the appended drawings illustrate only exemplary embodiments of the invention, and are therefore not to be construed as limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
In the following description, similar features in the drawings have been given similar reference numerals, and, in order to preserve clarity in the drawings, some reference numerals may be omitted when they were already identified in a preceding figure. It should also be understood that the elements of the drawings are not necessarily depicted to scale, since emphasis is placed upon clearly illustrating the elements and structures of the present embodiments. Also, while some of the drawings may illustrate a single device, it will be appreciated that the single device can be one of many chips fabricated in parallel on a single wafer. Consequently, the terms “wafer” and “silicon wafer” may sometimes be used in the present description to refer to a single chip.
Throughout the present description, and unless stated otherwise, positional descriptors such as “top” and “bottom” should be taken in the context of the figures and should not be considered as being limitative. In particular, the terms “top” and “bottom” are used to facilitate reading of the description, and those skilled in the art of MEMS will readily recognize that, when in use, MEMS devices can be placed in different orientations such that the “top face” and the “bottom face” of the proof mass and the “top cap layer” and the “bottom cap layer” of the support assembly are positioned upside down.
The present description generally relates to a 3D MEMS device comprising a first or top cap wafer, a central MEMS wafer and a second or bottom cap wafer stacked vertically along a stacking axis. At least one of the cap wafers is a Silicon-On-Insulator (SOI) cap wafer, and the central MEMS wafer is also preferably a SOI wafer. Preferably, both cap wafers are SOI wafers. The top cap, central and bottom cap wafers define together a cavity or chamber for housing a MEMS structure. It is noted that, in some instances, the terms “chamber” and “cavity” may be used interchangeably. A MEMS structure can include or be embodied by any sensing and/or control element or combinations thereof such as, but not limited to, membranes, diaphragms, proof masses, actuators, transducers, micro-valves, micro-pumps, and the like, including one or more proof masses suspended by flexible springs for example. A MEMS device can also be referred to as a MEMS chip or a MEMS package. The term “3D” refers to the fact that electrical pathways in the device can extend along three orthogonal axes, and are not limited to an “in plane” orientation. As a result, electrical signals can be routed in three dimensions, that is, not only in the plane of the MEMS device, but also across its thickness to allow electrical connections to be established between elements of the MEMS structure and electrical contacts and/or electrodes formed on the outer top and/or bottom and/or lateral sides of the MEMS sensor.
The SOI cap wafer is provided with electrical contacts, and at least one electrically conductive path extends from one of these electrical contacts to the MEMS structure, in view of transmitting signals (e.g., electrical signals such as charges, voltages and/or currents) to and/or from the MEMS structure. It will be understood that the electrical path forms an “insulated” conductive pathway in that it is electrically insulated from the bulk of the conductive SOI cap wafer. An electrically conductive path can thus be formed in the top and/or bottom cap wafers and in the central MEMS wafer by etching trenches in the silicon layers of the wafers, forming posts and pads aligned with one another in the different layers of wafers. An electrically conductive path can also include portions formed of leads extending “horizontally” in the device (i.e., in the plane of the wafers which is perpendicular to the stacking axis). Preferably, a post formed on the top or bottom cap wafer has a cross-section (or transverse area in a plane perpendicular to the stacking axis) of a different size than the size of the cross-section of the corresponding post formed in the central MEMS wafer. This optional configuration provides the advantage that in any cross-section taken along the stacking axis of the device (i.e. when cutting through the top cap wafer, the central MEMS wafer and the bottom cap wafer), there is a layer of silicon part of the outer frame of the 3D MEMS device, thus increasing resistance and robustness of the device to potential leaks to/from the hermetic cavity.
Optionally, the 3D MEMS device can include one or more additional cavities, for housing additional MEMS structures. One of the additional cavities can be provided with a vent.
Embodiments of a 3D MEMS Device
In accordance with an aspect, a 3D MEMS device or package having at least one hermetic cavity or chamber is provided. The exemplary 3D MEMS device is an inertial sensor since it is representative of mechanical, electrical, and vacuum requirements that are generally desired in common practical implementations of MEMS sensor packages. However, the packaging approach described is of more general applicability to other types of MEMS sensors with these requirements and could include, without limitation, pressure sensors, magnetometers, microphones, ultrasonic transducers, and the like.
Referring to
In the illustrated embodiment, the MEMS wafer 16 is a Silicon-On-Insulator (SOI) wafer, comprising a MEMS device layer 20 bonded to the top cap wafer 12 and a MEMS handle layer 22 bonded to the bottom cap wafer 14. A MEMS insulating layer 24 is interposed between the MEMS device layer 20 and the MEMS handle layer 22. The MEMS device and handle layers 20, 22 are preferably made of single crystal silicon (SCS) and the insulating layer 24 is typically silicon dioxide, often referred to as “buried oxide”, sandwiched between the device layer 20 and the handle layer 22. In the embodiment of
In this embodiment of the MEMS device 10, both the top 12 and bottom 14 cap wafers are SOI wafers. However, it is possible to have only one of the top and bottom cap wafers 12, 14 made of a SOI wafer. Similar to the MEMS wafer 16, the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) cap wafers 12, 14 comprise respective cap device layers 21, 26; cap handle layers 25, 29 and cap insulating layers 23, 28, each interposed between the cap device layer 21, 26 and the cap handle layer 25, 29. The device and handle layer 21, 25, 26, 29 are electrically conductive, and are made of silicon, preferably SCS, while the insulating layers 23, 28 are made of an electrically insulating material, typically buried oxide. It is preferable and more practical that the device layers 21, 26 be bonded to the first and second sides 162, 162 of the MEMS wafer 16. However, it is possible to have the handle layers 25, 29 of the caps 12, 14 bonded to the MEMS wafer 16 instead. In either case, the outer side of at least one of the top and bottom cap wafer 12, 14 is provided with outer electrical contacts 40 formed thereon. In the example shown in
Still referring to
In some implementations, forming the caps 12, 14 from SOI wafers is advantageous because the thickness of the cap device layers 21, 26, typically made of SCS, is well-controlled and separated from the cap handle layers 25, 29 by a robust thermal oxide insulating layer 23, 28. Portions of the electrically conductive paths extending in the device 10 are preferably patterned as posts, with the posts having different cross-sections (or transverse areas) in the caps and MEMS wafers, so as to provide at least one layer of silicon, in addition to the cap insulating layer (buried oxide), opposite the trenches. The use of feedthrough posts allows the SOI caps to be thicker than caps using TSVs, thus minimizing pressure sensitivity and potential leaks to/from the cavity 11. It will be noted that, in alternate embodiments, the caps 12, 14 can be constructed using standard silicon wafers with the insulating 23, 24 layers being deposited using thin film deposition techniques such as furnace oxidation or LPCVD (Low Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition) oxide, and the conducting or electrode layers 21, 26 deposited using LPCVD polysilicon, or sputter deposited or evaporated metals. The choice of approach and materials will be determined by subsequent processing temperatures, particularly wafer bonding temperatures.
Referring now to
Referring to
As can be appreciated, in addition to forming electrical pathways, a hermetic seal is provided with no vertical leakage path formed between the cavity 11 housing the MEMS structure 17 and the outer surfaces of the top and bottom cap wafers 12, 14. Furthermore, since the trenches 41 in the handle layer 21 of the top cap 12 do not have to be filled, the top cap 12 can be made thicker, such as between 100 and 800 μm, and preferably thicker than 200 μm, and thus they are less sensitive to flexing caused by external pressure, in turn enabling the sense capacitors to also be insensitive or less sensitive to external pressure. Also, since the etched trenches 41 terminate on the top cap insulating layer 23, over a pad 36 in the cap device layer, and over a solid post 35 of silicon patterned in the MEMS wafer 16, the seal of the cavity 11 is more resistant. For a leak to occur through the cap, the SOI bond would have to be broken for there to be any leakage path, which would only be lateral, i.e., in the plane of the SOI bond, along the interface. The likelihood of such a leakage mechanism is typically much smaller because the SOI bond is stronger than the bond between deposited films used in through-silicon-vias (TSVs) and the lateral leakage path from outside to inside would typically be much longer and more indirect.
Referring now to
More specifically, the bottom cap wafer 14 is formed of a device layer 26, an insulating layer 28 and a handle layer 29, the device and handle layers 26, 29 being made of silicon. Both the top and bottom caps 12, 14 are provided with outer electrical contacts 40, 44, and device feedthroughs 74 can be formed with a top cap feedthrough 32, a MEMS feedthrough 33, and a bottom cap feedthrough 42, providing electrical conductivity between outer electrical contacts 40, 44 formed on opposite outer top and bottom sides of the device 10. The top cap feedthrough 32 includes a cap feedthrough post 38, a cap feedthrough pad 36 and a cap conductive shunt 34 formed through the top cap insulating layer 23, to electrically connect the cap feedthrough post 38 with the cap feedthrough pad 36. The post 38 is provided with a bond pad 40. The MEMS feedthrough 33 includes a MEMS feedthrough post 35 patterned through the entire thickness of the MEMS handle layer 22, a MEMS feedthrough pad 37 patterned through the entire thickness of the MEMS device layer 20, and a MEMS conductive shunt 31 formed through the MEMS insulating layer 24, to electrically connect the MEMS feedthrough post 35 and the MEMS feedthrough pad 37. In a manner similar to that used for the top cap 12, a bottom cap feedthrough 42 is also formed by etching of a cap feedthrough post 38′ in the bottom cap handle layer 29, and a cap feedthrough pad 36′ in the device layer 26, with conducting shunts 43 used to connect the post and pad 38′, 36′ through the buried oxide 28. The SOI MEMS wafer 16 is bonded to the SOI cap wafers 12, 14 with conductive bonds, and thus there is an electrical pathway from the electrical outer contact 40 of the top cap 12 to the outer electrical contact 44 of the bottom cap 14. The device feedthrough 74 can be used to transmit signals through all three SOI layers of the MEMS device 10′.
Of course, electrical paths may also extend from the outer electrical contacts 44 of the bottom cap 14, through bottom cap posts 38′, and then to pads 36′ and leads 18′ in the bottom cap SCS layer 26. Thus, electrical paths can be established from the top or bottom cap electrodes 13, 15 to bond pads 40, 44 on either or both of the top cap 12 and bottom cap 14. It will be noted that for embodiments of the device 10 for which the bottom cap wafer 14 is not provided with any electrical contact, a “device feedthrough” may only comprise a top cap feedthrough 32 formed in the cap wafer 12, and a MEMS feedthrough 33 formed in the MEMS wafer 16, with electrical conductivity existing from an outer electrical contact 40 to the MEMS feedthrough 33.
Still referring to
Method of Fabricating the 3D MEMS Device
In accordance with another aspect, there is provided a method of fabricating a hermetic MEMS sensor and package. An exemplary embodiment of the fabrication method will be described with reference to the schematic diagrams of
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Finally, referring to
Embodiments of 3D MEMS Device Including Cavities at Different Pressures
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a multi-pressure, multi-chamber (or multi-cavities) 3D MEMS device 100 is provided. The exemplary device 100 described below and illustrated in the
The embodiment of the 3D MEMS device shown in
Referring to
In the illustrated embodiments, the MEMS structures 170, 172 enclosed in the cavities 110, 112 are part of a gyroscope and of an accelerometer, respectively. These illustrative embodiments are chosen because a MEMS gyroscope is a resonant device which typically requires a low pressure or vacuum environment, while a MEMS accelerometer typically requires mechanical damping that in many implementations, is provided by fluid or air damping. In the illustrated embodiments, the MEMS wafer 16 in which the gyroscope and accelerometer elements 170, 172 are fabricated is a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafer including a single crystal silicon (SCS) device layer 20, a handle layer 22, and an insulating layer 24 (e.g., buried oxide) sandwiched between the device layer 20 and the handle layer 22. Although the details of the MEMS elements 170, 172 are not critical to the packaging description, they are included for subsequent reference. Also, it is to be understood that, in other embodiments, the MEMS wafer 16 is not limited to the SOI technology but may be based on various other types of materials and structures.
In the embodiments of the 3D MEMS devices 100, 100′ of
Referring to
Referring still to
In addition to forming electrical pathways, a hermetic vacuum seal is provided between each of the first and second chambers 110, 112 housing the proof masses 174 and the inner surfaces of the top and bottom cap wafers 12, 14. Referring to
Method of Fabricating a 3D MEMS Device with Cavities at Different Pressures
The first steps for the fabrication of a 3D MEMS device similar to the embodiments of
Referring still to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It will be understood that in other embodiments of the manufacturing method, the fabricated MEMS device may include more than two chambers.
Advantageously, in the different embodiments described above, providing at least one of the cap wafer as an SOI wafer provides, in addition to the electrical pathways formed therein, a hermetic vacuum seal around at least one of the MEMS structures, with no vertical leakage path. Furthermore since the etched trench surrounding each electrical feedthrough need not be filled, the corresponding cap wafer can be made thicker and, thus, be less sensitive to flexing due to external pressure. Also, the possibility of providing chambers with independently adjustable pressure conditions can be advantageous in implementations where the multiple-chamber MEMS device includes or houses different types of MEMS structures that are preferably operated under different pressure conditions.
The scope of the claims should not be limited by the preferred embodiments set forth in the examples, but should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the description as a whole.
This patent application is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 national stage filing of International Application No. PCT/CA2016/050031, filed Jan. 14, 2016, which in turn claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 62/103,825, filed Jan. 15, 2015 and 62/138,161, filed Mar. 25, 2015, the above applications being incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2016/050031 | 1/14/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2016/112463 | 7/21/2016 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4430895 | Colton | Feb 1984 | A |
4483194 | Rudolf | Nov 1984 | A |
4553436 | Hansson | Nov 1985 | A |
4805456 | Howe et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4833417 | Schroeder | May 1989 | A |
4881408 | Hulsing, II et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4882933 | Petersen et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4905523 | Okada | Mar 1990 | A |
4967605 | Okada | Nov 1990 | A |
5235457 | Lichtman et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239984 | Cane et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5359893 | Dunn | Nov 1994 | A |
5557046 | Hulsing, II | Sep 1996 | A |
5596144 | Swanson | Jan 1997 | A |
5608210 | Esparza et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5614742 | Gessner et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623270 | Kempkes et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5646346 | Okada | Jul 1997 | A |
5662111 | Cosman | Sep 1997 | A |
5777226 | Ip | Jul 1998 | A |
5831163 | Okada | Nov 1998 | A |
5894090 | Tang et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895850 | Buestgens | Apr 1999 | A |
5898223 | Frye et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5920011 | Hulsing, II | Jul 1999 | A |
5959206 | Ryrko et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5962784 | Hulsing, II | Oct 1999 | A |
5977640 | Bertin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987985 | Okada | Nov 1999 | A |
6003371 | Okada | Dec 1999 | A |
6028773 | Hundt | Feb 2000 | A |
6053057 | Okada | Apr 2000 | A |
6058778 | Chan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6079272 | Stell et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6090638 | Vigna et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6091132 | Bryant | Jul 2000 | A |
6119517 | Breng et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122961 | Geen et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6159773 | Lin | Dec 2000 | A |
6184052 | Vigna et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6225699 | Ference et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235550 | Chan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6257057 | Hulsing, II | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282956 | Okada | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295870 | Hulsing, II | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6391673 | Ha et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6399997 | Lin et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6469330 | Vigna et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487000 | Mastromatteo et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6490923 | Breng et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508124 | Zerbini et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6539801 | Gutierrez et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6584845 | Gutierrez et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6587312 | Murari et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6621137 | Ma et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6651500 | Stewart et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6675630 | Challoner et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6696364 | Gelmi et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6701786 | Hulsing, II | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6705167 | Kvisteroey et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6715353 | Johnson | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6766689 | Spinola Durante et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6772632 | Okada | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6808952 | Sniegowski et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6808955 | Ma | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6829937 | Mahon | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6841861 | Brady | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6856144 | Lasalandra et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6863832 | Wiemer et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6865943 | Okada | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6892575 | Nasiri et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6925875 | Silverbrook | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6939473 | Nasiri et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6942750 | Chou et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944931 | Shcheglov et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953985 | Lin et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6990863 | Challoner et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6991957 | Eskridge | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993617 | Butcher et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7017410 | Challoner et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7040163 | Shcheglov et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7043985 | Ayazi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7056757 | Ayazi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7093486 | Challoner et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100448 | Ikegami | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7104129 | Nasiri et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7138694 | Nunan et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7159441 | Challoner et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7168317 | Chen et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7168318 | Challoner et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7176556 | Okamoto et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180019 | Chiou et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7210351 | Lo et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7217588 | Hartzell et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7238999 | LaFond et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7247246 | Nasiri et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250112 | Nasiri et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7250353 | Nasiri et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7258008 | Durante et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258011 | Nasiri et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258012 | Xie | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7275424 | Felton et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7291561 | Ma et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7318349 | Vaganov et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7322236 | Combi et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7337671 | Ayazi et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7347095 | Shcheglov et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360423 | Ayazi et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7402905 | Eskridge et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7417329 | Chuang et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7442570 | Nasiri et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7458263 | Nasiri et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7484410 | Tsuji et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7491567 | DCamp et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7518493 | Bryzek et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7541588 | Tabirian et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7543496 | Ayazi et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7578189 | Mehregany | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7615406 | Higashi et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7621183 | Seeger et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624494 | Challoner et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7642115 | Eriksen et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7642657 | Suilleabhain et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7677099 | Nasiri et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7684101 | Border et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689321 | Karlsson | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7694563 | Durante et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7748272 | Kranz et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7755367 | Schoen et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7767483 | Waters | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7784344 | Pavelescu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7786572 | Chen | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7851898 | Nakamura et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7863698 | Seeger et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7875942 | Cortese et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7882740 | Okada | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7886601 | Merassi et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7898043 | Ziglioli et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908921 | Binda et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7928632 | Yang et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7934423 | Nasiri et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7964428 | Breng et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7982291 | Kuisma | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7982558 | Sworowski et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8042394 | Coronato et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8047075 | Nasiri et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8049515 | Schoen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069726 | Seeger et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8071398 | Yang et al. | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8077372 | Border et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8080869 | Okudo et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8084332 | Nasiri et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8100012 | Martin et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8124895 | Merassi et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8134214 | Baldo et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8151640 | Kubena | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8176782 | Furukubo et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8227285 | Yang et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8227911 | Yang et al. | Jul 2012 | B1 |
8236577 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8258590 | Geiger et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8272266 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8283737 | Sugizaki | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8289092 | Pomarico et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8314483 | Lin et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8324047 | Yang | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8347717 | Seeger et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8350346 | Huang et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8365595 | Geiger et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8372677 | Mehregany | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8375789 | Prandi et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8384134 | Daneman et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8390173 | Yoshihara et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8395252 | Yang | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8395381 | Lo et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8402666 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
8405170 | Kohl et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8407905 | Hsu et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8413506 | Coronato et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8421082 | Yang | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8426961 | Shih et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8432005 | Yang et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8433084 | Conti et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8459093 | Donadel et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8459110 | Cazzaniga et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8461935 | McCraith et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8481365 | Verhelijden et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8487444 | Law et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8490461 | Sasaki et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8490483 | Wrede et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8497557 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8508039 | Nasiri et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8508045 | Khan et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8513747 | Huang et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8519537 | Jeng et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8567246 | Shaeffer et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8569090 | Taheri | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8587077 | Chen | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8593036 | Boysel | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8637943 | Yang | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8652961 | Yang | Feb 2014 | B1 |
8675181 | Hall | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8685776 | LaFond et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8704238 | Yang et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8759926 | Fujii et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8869616 | Sridharamurthy et al. | Oct 2014 | B1 |
8885170 | Kilic et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8921145 | Shu et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9046541 | Kubena et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9309106 | Boysel et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9499397 | Bowles et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9869754 | Campbell et al. | Jan 2018 | B1 |
9945950 | Newman et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
20010011994 | Morimoto et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020040602 | Okada | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030094046 | Okada | May 2003 | A1 |
20030209075 | Okada | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040052016 | Takagi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040063239 | Yun et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040224279 | Siemons | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040231422 | Okada | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050210981 | Okada | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050242991 | Montgomery et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060163453 | Hynes et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060179941 | Okada | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060180896 | Martin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060185428 | Combi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070273018 | Onozuka et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070279885 | Basavanhally et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080289417 | Okada | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090114016 | Nasiri et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090199637 | Sugiura et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100132460 | Seeger et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100176466 | Fujii et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100182418 | Jess et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100324366 | Shimotsu | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110030473 | Acar | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110219876 | Kalnitsky et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110228906 | Jaffray et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120042731 | Lin et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120048017 | Kempe | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120091854 | Kaajakari | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120137774 | Judy et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120142144 | Taheri | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120227487 | Ayazi et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120261822 | Graham et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120280594 | Chen | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120300050 | Korichi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120326248 | Daneman | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130019680 | Kittilsland et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130100271 | Howes | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130105921 | Najafi et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130115729 | Silverbrook et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130119492 | Feiertag et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130126992 | Ehrenpfordt et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130146994 | Kittilsland et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130147020 | Gonska et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130168740 | Chen | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130181355 | Tsai et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130192369 | Acar et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130221454 | Dunbar, III et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130253335 | Noto et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130277773 | Bryzek et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130285165 | Classen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130315036 | Paulson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130341737 | Bryzek et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140007685 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140090485 | Feyh et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140091405 | Weber | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140092460 | Schwedt et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140116135 | Cazzaniga et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140116136 | Coronato et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140124958 | Bowles et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140137648 | Zolfagharkhani et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140138853 | Liu et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140162393 | Yang | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140166463 | Jahnes et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140183729 | Bowles | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140186986 | Shu et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140193949 | Wu | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140203421 | Shu et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140210019 | Nasiri et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140227816 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140230548 | Coronato et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140231936 | Jahnes et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140231938 | Campedelli et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140260612 | Aono et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140260617 | Ocak et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264650 | Liu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140283605 | Baldasarre et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140287548 | Lin et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140291128 | Kwa | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140311242 | Lee et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140311247 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140318906 | Deimerly et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319630 | Conti et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140322854 | Nakatani et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140326070 | Neul et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140331769 | Fell | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140339654 | Classen | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140339656 | Schlarmann et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140349434 | Huang et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140352433 | Hammer | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140353775 | Formosa et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140357007 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140370638 | Lee et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374854 | Xue | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374917 | Weber et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140374918 | Weber et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150008545 | Quevy et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150115376 | Chen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150191345 | Boysel et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150198493 | Kaelberer et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150260519 | Boysel et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150353346 | Heuck et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150371390 | Gassner et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160060104 | Chu | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160229684 | Boysel | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160229685 | Boysel | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160289063 | Ocak et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160320426 | Boysel et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160327446 | Classen et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170030788 | Boysel et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170108336 | Boysel et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170363694 | Boysel | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180074090 | Boysel | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1802952 | Jul 2007 | EP |
1819012 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2410344 | Jan 2012 | EP |
2544302 | Jan 2013 | EP |
3019442 | May 2016 | EP |
2008-114354 | May 2008 | JP |
2008-132587 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2009-245877 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2011-194478 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2012-247192 | Dec 2012 | JP |
2013-030759 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2013-164285 | Aug 2013 | JP |
WO-2008086530 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2009057990 | May 2009 | WO |
WO-2011151098 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO-2013116356 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2014122910 | Aug 2014 | WO |
WO-2014159957 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO-2014177542 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO-2014184025 | Nov 2014 | WO |
WO-2015003264 | Jan 2015 | WO |
WO-2015013827 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO-2015013828 | Feb 2015 | WO |
WO 2015038078 | Mar 2015 | WO |
WO-2015042700 | Apr 2015 | WO |
WO-2015042701 | Apr 2015 | WO |
WO-2015042702 | Apr 2015 | WO |
WO-2015103688 | Jul 2015 | WO |
WO-2015154173 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Boysel, A Single-Proof-Mass MEMS Multi-Axis Motion Sensor. Semicon Japan. 6 pages. (2008). |
Boysel et al., Development of a Single-Mass Five-Axis MEMS Motion Sensor. Virtus Advanced Sensors, Inc., 17 pages. (May 2009). |
Boysel, White Paper Series: Virtus Sensor Technology. Virtus Advanced Sensors. Semicon Japan, 11 pages. Nov. 11, 2008. |
Watanabe et al., SOI micromachined 5-axis motion sensor using resonant electrostatic drive and non-resonant capacitive detection mode. Sensor and Actuators A. 2006;130-131:116-123. |
European Search Report for Application No. 14822259.9 dated Jan. 4, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2014/050729, dated Nov. 3, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2014/050902, dated Dec. 15, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2014/050904, dated Dec. 1, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2014/050910, dated Dec. 22, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2014/051245, dated Feb. 25, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2015/050018, dated Apr. 20, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2015/050026, dated Apr. 27, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/CA2016/050303, dated Jun. 13, 2016. 7 pages. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2016/050031, dated Mar. 16, 2016. 3 pages. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/CA2014/050730, dated Nov. 3, 2014. 3 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. 14831791.0, dated Jun. 12, 2017, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2017/015393, dated Apr. 26, 2017. 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/622,548, filed Feb. 13, 2015, 2015-0260519, published. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/024,711, filed Mar. 24, 2016, 2016-0229685, published. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/024,704, filed Mar. 24, 2016, 2016-0229684, published. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/206,935, filed Jul. 11, 2016, 10,214,414, Issued. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/283,002, filed Feb. 22, 2019, pending. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/302,731, filed Oct. 7, 2016, 2017-0030788, published. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/315,894, filed Dec. 2, 2016, 2017-0108336, published. |
U.S. Appl. No. 16/046,764, filed Jul. 26, 2018, pending. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/534,702, filed Jun. 9, 2017, 2017-0363694, published. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/558,807, filed Jul. 14, 2017, 2018-0074090, published. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/622,619, filed Feb. 13, 2015, 9,309,106, issued. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180002163 A1 | Jan 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62138161 | Mar 2015 | US | |
61103825 | Jan 2015 | US |