The present invention relates to lasers. The present invention is particularly, but not exclusively useful for providing a laser output having a bandwidth that is controlled within a pre-selected range.
Pulsed lasers, such as KrF excimer lasers, ArF excimer lasers and molecular fluorine (F2) lasers, are often used in conjunction with a lithography tool to selectively expose a photoresist in a semiconductor wafer fabrication process. In these processes, the mask and optics in the lithography tool are typically optimized for a particular laser wavelength. More specifically, the tool is typically optimized for a particular center wavelength. For a variety of reasons, the center wavelength of the light exiting the laser may drift over time and, thus, a feedback network may be employed to detect the center wavelength exiting the laser and modify one or more laser parameters to correct the wavelength as necessary.
Recently, optical proximity correction (OPC) has been employed to more exactly obtain a desired exposure pattern on the resist by selectively changing the sizes and shapes of corresponding patterns on the mask. More specifically, OPC perturbs mask aperture shapes to systematically compensate for nonlinear feature distortions arising from optical diffraction and resist process effects. Common types of OPC may include: (1) the introduction of serifs, hammerheads and tomahawks in the mask pattern to reduce corner rounding and line-end shortening in the resist pattern; (2) the use of notches to control linewidth accuracy; and (3) the use of sub-resolution assist features (SRAFs, or scattering bars) for narrow gate geometries.
Heretofore, efforts have been drawn largely to reducing the spectral bandwidth of the light exiting the laser source to ever smaller dimensions. In short, large bandwidths have been troublesome because, as indicated above, lithography tool optics are generally designed for a specific center wavelength and chromatic doublets are generally unavailable at the wavelengths of interest, e.g., 248 for KrF sources and 193 nm for ArF sources. More recently, and more particularly with the recent use of OPC, the design rules used to generate complex masks require bandwidth stability rather than mere bandwidth reduction. As used herein, the term “bandwidth stability” means controlling bandwidth within a spectral range having both a maximum acceptable bandwidth value and a minimum acceptable bandwidth value.
In one type of arrangement used to measure the wavelength and spectral bandwidth of a laser, a portion of the emitted light is made incident upon an etalon. The etalon creates an interference fringe pattern having concentric bands of dark and light levels due to destructive and constructive interference by the laser light. The fringe pattern may then be optically detected by a sensitive photodetector array (PDA). In the fringe pattern, the concentric bands surround a center bright portion. The position of the bright center portion of the interference pattern can be used to determine wavelength to a relatively coarse degree, such as to within 5 picometers (pm). The diameter of a light band is then used to determine the wavelength of the laser output to a fine degree, such as to within 0.01-0.03 pm. Also, the width of a light band may be used to determine the spectral bandwidth of the laser output.
In one method commonly used to characterize spectral bandwidth, the bandwidth at 50% peak intensity is measured. This definition of bandwidth is referred to as full width, half maximum (FWHM). Another definition of bandwidth, sometimes referred to as spectral purity, involves measuring a spectrum width where a selected percentage of the entire spectral energy is concentrated. For example, a common indicator is E95 which corresponds to the spectrum width where 95% of the entire spectral energy is concentrated.
Various methods can be used for wavelength tuning of lasers. Typically, the tuning takes place in a device referred to as a line narrowing package or line narrowing module. A typical technique used for line narrowing and tuning of excimer lasers is to provide a window at the back of the discharge cavity through which a portion of the laser beam passes into the line narrowing package. There, the portion of the beam is expanded in a beam expander and directed to an echelle grating that is aligned at a Littrow angle relative to the expanded beam. The grating reflects a narrow portion of the laser's untuned broader spectrum back into the discharge chamber where it is then amplified. With this arrangement, the laser can be tuned to a target center wavelength by changing the angle at which the beam illuminates the grating. This may be done by adjusting the position of the grating or providing a moveable mirror in the beam path.
Modern gas discharge lasers may be operable at a relatively high repetition rate, e.g., four to six kilohertz, and modem advancements are pushing this number higher. In a typically lithography procedure, the lithography tool may demand a burst of pulses, e.g., for exposing a particular mask position. As used herein, the term “burst of pulses” and its derivatives means a continuous train of pulses demanded by the lithography tool at the operable repetition rate of a discharge laser. A typical burst of pulses may include, but is not limited to, about 100-300 pulses. The termination of a burst of pulses may be achieved by terminating electrode discharge in the laser, the use of an appropriate shutter, or other suitable techniques known in the pertinent art. Thus, an active control system may alter a pulse characteristic within a burst of pulses by measuring a characteristic of a first pulse within the burst and using the measurement to alter a characteristic of at least one other pulse in the burst of pulses.
Typical industry specifications may require a laser output having an average center wavelength or average bandwidth (FWHM and/or E95) averaged over as a series of pulses referred to as a “pulse window”. A typical pulse window may be, for example, 30 pulses, and, in general, may be shorter than a “burst of pulses”. Thus, an active control system may alter a pulse characteristic within a pulse window by measuring a characteristic of a first pulse within the window and may be the measurement to alter a characteristic of at least one other pulse in the pulse window. Another level of active control is referred to as “pulse to pulse” control. In this technique, an active control system may measure a characteristic of a pulse and use the measurement to alter a characteristic of the very next pulse exiting the laser after the measured pulse.
With the above considerations in mind, Applicants disclose systems and methods for actively controlling the bandwidth of a laser during a burst of pulses.
In a first aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, a lithography apparatus for exposing a resist with a pre-selected pattern may comprise a mask designed using optical proximity correction (OPC) to produce the pre-selected pattern on the resist. For this aspect, the apparatus may include a laser source for generating a laser light beam for transmission through the mask to expose the resist and an instrument measuring laser bandwidth. In addition, the laser source may comprise an active bandwidth control system to increase a bandwidth of a subsequent pulse in response to a measured pulse bandwidth that is below a predetermined bandwidth range and decrease a bandwidth of a subsequent pulse in response to a measured pulse bandwidth that is above the predetermined bandwidth range.
In another aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, an active bandwidth control system operable within a burst of pulses from a laser source may comprise an instrument to measure laser bandwidth and produce a control signal proportional to a measured bandwidth. Also, the active bandwidth control system may include an optic for altering a wavefront of a laser beam in a laser cavity of the laser source to selectively adjust an output laser bandwidth in response to the control signal. In one implementation, the optic is configured to alter coma.
In yet another aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, an active bandwidth control system for a laser source which produces a laser beam having a wavelength variation across an aperture may comprise an instrument for measuring laser bandwidth and for producing a control signal proportional thereto. The control system may also include an aperture blocking element that is moveable to adjust a size of the aperture to selectively vary an output laser bandwidth in response to the control signal.
With initial reference to
For the apparatus 20 shown in
Within the discharge chamber, the laser source 26 may include a pair of spaced apart discharge electrodes 46a,b defining an arc direction 48 as shown in
The laser source 26 may also include, as part of an active bandwidth control system, an adjustable aperture blocking subsystem 56, as shown schematically in
Features of the subsystem 56 are shown in further detail in
Depending of the laser repetition rate, movements of the aperture blocking element may be on a pulse-to pulse basis, e.g., a movement preceding each pulse, or may occur near the end of a pulse window, e.g., 3-50 pulses, e.g. to establish a pulse window bandwidth average within a specified range. Thus, a pulse measurement output may be used to move the aperture blocking element prior to the very next pulse or a subsequent pulse. In some cases, movement of the aperture blocking element may occur near the end of a burst of pulses, e.g., to establish a bandwidth average for a burst of pulses that is within a pre-determined specified range.
In greater structural detail, the optic 200 shown in
A comparison of
In more detail, the optic 200′ shown in
While the particular aspects of embodiment(s) described and illustrated in this patent application in the detail required to satisfy 35 U.S.C. §112 is fully capable of attaining any above-described purposes for, problems to be solved by or any other reasons for or objects of the aspects of an embodiment(s) above described, it is to be understood by those skilled in the art that it is the presently described aspects of the described embodiment(s) of the present invention are merely exemplary, illustrative and representative of the subject matter which is broadly contemplated by the present invention. The scope of the presently described and claimed aspects of embodiments fully encompasses other embodiments which may now be or may become obvious to those skilled in the art based on the teachings of the Specification. The scope of the present invention is solely and completely limited by only the appended claims and nothing beyond the recitations of the appended claims. Reference to an element in such claims in the singular is not intended to mean nor shall it mean in interpreting such claim element “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more”. All structural and functional equivalents to any of the elements of the above-described aspects of an embodiment(s) that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the present claims. Any term used in the specification and/or in the claims and expressly given a meaning in the Specification and/or claims in the present application shall have that meaning, regardless of any dictionary or other commonly used meaning for such a term. It is not intended or necessary for a device or method discussed in the Specification as any aspect of an embodiment to address each and every problem sought to be solved by the aspects of embodiments disclosed in this application, for it to be encompassed by the present claims. No element, component, or method step in the present disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or method step is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element in the appended claims is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited as a “step” instead of an “act”.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the aspects of embodiments of the present invention disclosed above are intended to be preferred embodiments only and not to limit the disclosure of the present invention(s) in any way and particularly not to a specific preferred embodiment alone. Many changes and modification can be made to the disclosed aspects of embodiments of the disclosed invention(s) that will be understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art. The appended claims are intended in scope and meaning to cover not only the disclosed aspects of embodiments of the present invention(s) but also such equivalents and other modifications and changes that would be apparent to those skilled in the art.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2045093 | Newcomer | Jun 1936 | A |
2121567 | Newcomer | Jun 1938 | A |
4223279 | Bradford, Jr. et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4455658 | Sutter et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4959840 | Akins et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5023884 | Akins et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5025445 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5025446 | Kuizenga | Jun 1991 | A |
5189678 | Ball et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5243614 | Wakara et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5313481 | Cook et al. | May 1994 | A |
5315611 | Ball et al. | May 1994 | A |
5359620 | Akins | Oct 1994 | A |
5448580 | Birx et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5471965 | Kapich | Dec 1995 | A |
5562334 | Wortel | Oct 1996 | A |
5597670 | Aketagawa et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5621523 | Oobayashi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5852621 | Sandstrom | Dec 1998 | A |
5863017 | Larson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864574 | Welch et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5953360 | Vitruk et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970076 | Hamada | Oct 1999 | A |
5978394 | Newman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991324 | Knowles et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005879 | Sandstrom et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016325 | Ness et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018537 | Hofmann et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028880 | Carlesi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6040552 | Jain et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043883 | Leckel et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6067311 | Morton et al. | May 2000 | A |
6088379 | Owa et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094448 | Fomenkov et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104735 | Webb | Aug 2000 | A |
6128323 | Myers et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151349 | Gong et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160831 | Kleinschmidt et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6164116 | Rice et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6192064 | Algots et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208674 | Webb et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208675 | Webb | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219368 | Govorkov | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240117 | Gong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6317448 | Das et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330261 | Ishihara et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6392743 | Zambon et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6408260 | Watts et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414979 | Ujazdowski et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6442181 | Oliver et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6456380 | Naganurna | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6477193 | Oliver et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6493374 | Fomenkov et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496528 | Titus et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6567450 | Myers et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6580517 | Lokai et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6611336 | Walmsley et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6621580 | Myatt et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6625191 | Knowles et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6690704 | Fallon et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6693939 | Klene et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6735236 | Cybulski et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6750972 | Sandstrom et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6757316 | Newman et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6778584 | Partlo et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6801560 | Knowles et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6853653 | Spangler et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6882674 | Wittak et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
20020006149 | Spangler et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020048288 | Kroyan et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020101589 | Sandstrom et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020154668 | Knowles et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020154671 | Knowles et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030012234 | Watson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018072 | Joshi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030099269 | Ershov et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030138019 | Rylov et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
HEI 04-036622 | Feb 1992 | JP |
HEI 05-067821 | Mar 1993 | JP |
HEI 05-312646 | Nov 1993 | JP |
HEI 05-322661 | Dec 1993 | JP |
HEI 06-112571 | Apr 1994 | JP |
HEI 06-160187 | Jun 1994 | JP |
HEI 11-298084 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2004-311766 | Nov 2004 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070001127 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |