The invention generally relates to methods and apparatuses for generating a desired pattern on a specified target by irradiating a target with a beam of energetic radiation formed by electrically charged particles.
The use of charged particle beams in the field of generating desired patterns such as for example those found on printed circuit boards is well known. One common technique for generating such patterns uses a Multibeam-Writer (MBW) which projects a charged particle beam through a series of apertures onto a desired surface. Such devices typically employ charged-particle optics systems, Pattern Definition (PD) devices, and a variety of methods for creating the ultimate pattern on the desired target surface.
In typical MBW systems the charged particle beam is moved along a predetermined path with respect to a target area, upon which a desired image is thereby created.
Systems and methods in accordance with various embodiments of the invention provide a multibeam-writing system which projects a charged particle beam through a series of apertures onto a target area and methods for improving the clarity of the final desired pattern. In a number of embodiments the methods providing a pattern definition device having a plurality of apertures transparent to a source of radiation, and directing an illuminating wide beam through the apertures of the pattern definition device to form a patterned beam consisting of a corresponding plurality of beamlets, and illuminating a target with the patterned beam during a sequence of exposure intervals to form a pattern image on the target, wherein the pattern image further comprises a plurality of pattern pixels located on the target wherein the plurality of pattern pixels correspond to at least a portion of the plurality of apertures, and wherein during the sequence of exposure intervals, the at least a portion of the plurality of apertures are selectively controlled such that the plurality of pattern pixels are exposed to a respective dose amount in accordance with the desired pattern, generating a relative movement between the target and the pattern definition device to produce a stepwise movement of the pattern image on the target along a path over an exposure region, said path comprising a plurality sections which extend along a scanning direction, wherein the plurality of sections correspond to a plurality of exposure stripes that collectively cover the entirety of said exposure region over sequential exposures, wherein the exposure stripes are mutually overlapping and offset from each other in a direction transverse to the scanning direction, such that exposure region is exposed by at least two different exposure stripes at different transversal offsets, and calculating, for each pixel, a corrected dose amount by dividing the value of the nominal dose amount by a correction factor, wherein the same correction factor is used with pixels written by beamlets located at positions which differ only by said transversal offsets of overlapping stripes.
In other embodiments the method further provides that wherein during the step of calculating a corrected dose amount for each pixel, an available current density at the respective pixel is determined, wherein said maximum available current density is determined as the actual current density of the irradiating beam radiated through the aperture corresponding to the respective pixel, said correction factor of the respective pixel is calculated as the ratio of said available current density to the minimum current density across the overall beam array field, and correction factors are averaged among those pixels that are located at positions which differ only by said transversal offsets of overlapping stripes.
In yet other embodiments the further provides multiplicative renormalization of the correction factors, using a renormalizing factor chosen such that one of the largest value and the smallest value of the correction factors is renormalized to 1.
In still other embodiments the method provides that step of calculating a corrected dose amount for each pixel comprises calculating, for each pixel in a row of pixels parallel to the scanning direction within a respective exposure stripe, corrected dose amounts by dividing the values of the dose amounts by a row correction factor, wherein said row correction factor is uniformly applied to all pixels of a row of pixels.
In yet still other embodiments the method provides that said row correction factor is calculated for a respective row of pixels based on the values of current dose actually radiated through a series of apertures, said series of apertures containing all apertures within the pattern definition device which impart dose amounts to the respective row of pixels, wherein the row correction factor of a row of pixels is calculated as the ratio of actual current dose of an aperture, as averaged over the corresponding series of apertures, to a nominal current dose value assumed to be constant over the plurality of apertures of the pattern definition device.
In even other embodiments the method provides that said region where a beam exposure is to be performed is composed of a plurality of pattern pixels arranged in a regular arrangement, said region having a total width as measured across said scanning direction, said exposure stripes within said region running substantially parallel to each other along said scanning direction and having uniform widths as measured across said scanning direction.
In other embodiments the method provides that the exposure stripes are mutually overlapping, the position of the stripes differing by a transversal offset in a direction across the scanning direction, wherein the row correction factors of rows of pixels are averaged over those rows of pixels which are offset to each other by said transversal offset.
In still other embodiments the method provides that the correction factor varies between groups of pixels where said groups of pixels differ by an offset which does not correspond to a transversal offset of overlapping stripes.
In yet other embodiments the method further provides computing an exposure pattern suitable for exposing the desired pattern on a target using said pattern definition device for writing said desired pattern by exposing a multitude of pixels within said region on the target, wherein during exposing the desired pattern on a target: in said pattern definition device said plurality of blanking apertures is arranged in a predetermined arrangement defining mutual positions of the blanking apertures, each blanking aperture being selectively adjustable with regard to a dose value to be exposed through the respective blanking aperture onto a corresponding aperture image on the target during a respective exposure interval, said dose value taking a respective value in accordance with a discrete palette, said discrete palette including a number of gray values forming a scale ranging from a minimum value to a maximum value, during a writing process of said desired pattern, a sequence of exposure intervals is made, wherein in each exposure interval the blanking apertures are imaged onto the target, thus generating a corresponding plurality of aperture images, wherein the position of aperture images is kept fixed relative to the target at the position of a pixel during an exposure interval, but between exposure intervals the position of aperture images is shifted over the target, thus exposing the multitude of pixels on the target, and the aperture images are mutually overlapping on the target, and the aperture images have a nominal width which is greater than the distance between pixel positions of neighboring aperture images on the target, by an oversampling factor greater than one, wherein computing the exposure pattern comprises: determining the discrete palette, providing the desired pattern and calculating a nominal exposure pattern as a raster graphics defined on the multitude of pixel elements, said nominal exposure pattern being suitable to create a nominal dose distribution on the target realizing contour lines of the desired pattern and including for each pixel element a respective nominal dose value, and determining, for each pixel element, a discrete value which approximates the nominal dose value of the respective pixel element, said discrete value being selected from the discrete palette, wherein determining the discrete values includes employing ordered dithering using a dither matrix of a predefined size.
In yet still other embodiments the method provides that the dither matrix is a Bayer matrix.
In even other embodiments a pattern definition device is provided comprising: a plurality of apertures transparent to a source of radiation, a data processing unit having at least one input terminal and in communication with the plurality of apertures transparent to a source of radiation wherein the data processing unit is configured to receive a set of instructions defining a desired pattern image to be exposed on a target area, wherein at least a portion of the plurality of apertures correspond to a plurality of pattern image pixels on the target area and the at least a portion of the plurality of apertures are configured to expose the pattern image pixels to a respective dose amount in accordance with the desired pattern image, and wherein the data processing is further configured to calculate a correction needed for each of the pattern image pixels to correct for a pattern beam overlap by dividing a value of the nominal dose amount by a correction factor dose, and wherein the data processing unit is further configured to communicate the correction dose to the plurality of apertures.
The description will be more fully understood with reference to the following figures, which are presented as exemplary embodiments of the invention and should not be construed as a complete recitation of the scope of the invention, wherein:
Turning now to the description and drawings, methods and apparatus for improving a multibeam-writing systems are provided. In many embodiments of a multibeam-writer, a charged-particle beam is directed onto a desired target area as the beam device moves in relation to the target area. In such embodiments, a desired pattern is translated onto the target as the charged particle beam passes through a series of imaging apertures and/or subsequent lenses and deflectors that direct the beam onto the target in the desired positions (i.e. pixel locations) as the device is moved over the target area. In various embodiments exposure stripes are formed over the region to be exposed as the device moves; creating mutually overlapping exposure areas from each subsequent pass. In embodiments, at each desired pixel location correction factors are applied to account for image blurring from the exposure stripe overlap.
A typical implementation of a Multibeam-Writer (MBW) utilizes a 50 keV electron writer tool resulting in a total beam size of 20 nm which comprises a 512×512 grid of 262,144 total programmable beamlets within a beam array field of 81.92 μm×81.92 μm at the target area. An MBW of this type typically utilizes a 152.4 mm×152.4 mm substrate that is approximately 6.35 mm thick. The substrate is typically covered in an electron beam sensitive resist.
Beam size can be reduced from the typical 20 nm to 10 nm through a variety of changes. Reducing the beam size from 20 to 10 nm can typically be achieved by using a different aperture array plate (AAP), with 2 μm×2 μm opening size of the apertures instead of 4 μm×4 μm opening size. As outlined in U.S. Pat. No. 8,546,767, whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference, a change of the beam size may also be realized in-situ by spatial adjustment of the AAP having multiple aperture arrays of different geometric parameters, such a total size, aperture spacing, aperture shapes etc.
Even with the reduction of beam size typical overlapping and column blur can occur. For example, a 10 nm beam size and a substrate with a current density of 4 A/cm2, would produce a maximum individual beamlet current of 1.05 μA for each of the 262,144 programmable beamlets; if all beamlets were activated. This example would still produce a 1 sigma blur of the column.
First generation MBW production machines use 20 nm and 10 nm beams providing up to approximately 1 μA current for all 262,144 programmable beamlets. New MBW production machines use even smaller beam size. In some cases, an 8 nm beam size would provide a 640×640 array with 409,600 beamlets within the 81.92 μm×81.92 μm beam array field at the substrate. Keeping the maximum current density at 4 A/cm2 will ensure that the maximum current (with all beamlets “on”) is 1.05 μA. In other cases, a 5 nm beam size would provide a 1024×1024 array equaling 1,048,576 programmable beamlets at the substrate; again, at a maximum current density of 4 A/cm2 the maximum current (with all beamlets “on”) is 1.05 μA.
In many applications the MBW performance becomes increasingly more demanding as the Critical Dimension requirements become increasingly smaller for example at the nanometer level. In some applications Local Critical Dimension Uniformity (LCDU) and Global Critical Dimension Uniformity (GCDU) are required to be within a 3 sigma or 6 sigma variation at the nanometer level over the entire MBW writing field.
Therefore, it is desirable to finely-adjust the line edge position by means of a specifically adapted exposure dose profile. Such a fine-adjustment should not only be adaptable within the MBW beam array field (local) but also over the whole MBMW writing field on a substrate (global). However, in order to fulfill the very demanding MBW specifications of very low LCDU and GCDU values, there is the need for additional fine corrections. Here, the terms “local” and “global” refer again to small fields (e.g. the area of the MBW beam array field) and the whole MBW writing field on a substrate, respectively.
In addition to the blurring and clarity issues the use of MBWs often involves the use of exposure stripes for which an effect called “substripes” typically occurs which can affect the overall clarity of the projected image. Essentially the beamlets may be affected by imperfections arising from spatial variations in the current density within the beam illuminating the Aperture Array Plate (AAP). Additionally, imperfections in the AAP may contribute to the substripes. Consequently, there is a need to allow for crisper line creation and the reduction of substripes.
Such clarity issues as previously discussed may be corrected in accordance with the various embodiments described herein.
According to an exemplary embodiment of the invention, it is possible to correct the “substripe” effect by applying a correction factor to the nominal dose amounts at the pixels, where the presence of overlapping stripes is taken into account by averaging of the correction factors. More specifically where the exposure stripes mutually overlap in the transverse direction to the scanning direction the corrected dose factor can be calculated. The desired image pattern will produce a number of image pixels that correspond to a variety of apertures. The pixels required the corrected dose amount calculated based on the substripe overlap wherein the corrected dose for each pixel is calculated by dividing the value of the nominal dose by a correction factor for each pixel. The same correction factor may be used for pixels that have equivalent positions with respect to the mutually overlapping substripes. Otherwise the correction factor may, in general, vary, in particular between pixels (or groups of pixels) which do not have equivalent positions.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the correction factors are calculated to correct variations of the current density within the irradiating beam. Thus, during the step of calculating a corrected dose amount for each pixel, the following steps may be performed:
Optionally, a multiplicative renormalization of the correction factors, in particular the averaged correction factors, may be added, for instance such that the largest or, preferably, the smallest (averaged) correction factor is set to 1.
A further development of this method extends the range of averaging to an entire row of pixels. Thus, in this case the step of calculating a corrected dose amount for each pixel would comprise calculating, for each pixel in a row of pixels parallel to the scanning direction within a respective exposure stripe, corrected dose amounts by dividing the values of the dose amounts by a row correction factor, wherein said row correction factor is uniformly applied to all pixels of a row of pixels. Additionally, the row correction factor may be calculated for a respective row of pixels based on the values of current dose actually radiated through a series of apertures. Such a series of apertures may contain all apertures within the pattern definition device which impart dose amounts to the respective row of pixels. The row correction factor of a row of pixels is calculated as the ratio of actual current dose of an aperture averaged over the corresponding series of apertures, where a nominal current dose value assumed to be constant over the plurality of apertures of the pattern definition device.
Another embodiment of the invention may be directed to the region where a beam exposure is to be performed. Such embodiment may comprise of a plurality of pattern pixels arranged in a regular arrangement, said region having a total width as measured across said scanning direction. Additionally, the exposure stripes within said region will run substantially parallel to each other along said scanning direction and have uniform widths as measured across the scanning direction. A typical implementation of this embodiment may provide that exposure stripes are mutually overlapping, the position of the stripes differing by a transversal offset in a direction across the scanning direction; in this case it may be suitable to average row correction factors of rows of pixels over those rows of pixels which are offset to each other by said transversal offset.
Another exemplary embodiment, which further improves avoiding the “substripe” effect and similar rasterizing effects, relates to computing an exposure pattern which is suitable for exposing a desired pattern on a target in a charged-particle lithography apparatus as mentioned above. During the exposure of the desired pattern on the target, a particle beam is directed to and illuminates a pattern definition device comprising an aperture array composed of a plurality of blanking apertures through which said particle beam penetrates for writing said desired pattern by exposing a multitude of pixels within a region (region of exposure) on the target. In the pattern definition device, the plurality of blanking apertures are arranged in a predetermined arrangement defining mutual positions of the blanking apertures. Each of the various apertures selectively adjustable with regard to a dose value to be exposed through the respective blanking aperture onto a corresponding aperture image on the target during a respective exposure interval. The dose value is a respective value in accordance with a discrete palette, where the palette includes a number of gray values forming a scale ranging from a minimum value to a maximum value. During a writing process of the desired pattern, a sequence of exposure intervals is made, wherein in each exposure interval the blanking apertures are imaged onto the target, thus generating a corresponding plurality of aperture images. The position of aperture images is thereby kept fixed relative to the target at the position of a pixel during an exposure interval. However, between exposure intervals the position of aperture images is shifted over the target, thus exposing the multitude of pixels on the target; and the aperture images are mutually overlapping on the target. The nominal width of the aperture image is typically greater than the distance between pixel positions of neighboring aperture images on the target, by an oversampling factor greater than one. In this context, according to the various embodiments, computing the exposure pattern comprises:
Compared to other dithering methods, ordered dithering has several advantages in context of a charged particle multibeam writer. Firstly, it is computationally inexpensive which is highly important for a fast (i.e. real-time) data processing in the datapath. Secondly, it is a deterministic procedure, which means that its results are uniquely reproducible. Thirdly, the ordered dithering matrix can be chosen (i.e. optimized) in a way such that line edge placement and line edge roughness in specific directions becomes optimal. This is particularly useful since the layout of semi-conductor devices mainly have two preferred (orthogonal) axes, i.e. usually horizontal and vertical lines are more important and dominant as compared to lines in arbitrary direction.
Further details of the aforementioned embodiments of a novel dose-level quantization method for pixel data, as part of the on-line data path of a lithographic charged particle multibeam exposure tool are discussed in the subsequent sections.
Various aspects of the multibeam exposure tool are further discussed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,768,125 and 7,781,748, whose disclosures are incorporated herein by reference.
Lithographic Apparatus
An overview of a lithographic apparatus suitable to employ exemplary embodiments of the invention is illustrated in
In many embodiments the illumination system 3 comprises, for instance, an electron gun 7, an extraction system 8 as well as a condenser lens system 9. It should, however, be noted that in place of electrons, in general, other electrically charged particles can be used as well. Apart from electrons these can be, for instance, hydrogen ions or heavier ions, charged atom clusters, or charged molecules.
The extraction system 8 accelerates the particles to a defined energy of typically several keV, e.g. 5 keV. By means of a condenser lens system 9, the particles emitted from the illumination source 7 are formed into a broad, substantially telecentric particle beam 50 serving as Lithography Beam 19a. The Lithography Beam 19a then irradiates a PD system 4 which comprises a number of plates with a plurality of openings (also referred to as apertures). The PD system 4 is held at a specific position in the path of LB, which thus irradiates the plurality of apertures and/or openings and is split into a number of beamlets 51 and 52.
Some of the apertures/openings are “switched on” or “open” so as to be transparent to the incident beam in the sense that they allow the portion of the beam that is transmitted through it, i.e. the beamlets 51, to reach the target; the other apertures/openings are “switched off” or “closed”, i.e. the corresponding beamlets 52 cannot reach the target. Thus, effectively these apertures/openings are non-transparent (opaque) to the beam. Thus, the Lithography Beam 19a is structured into a Patterned Beam 19b, emerging from the PD system 4. The pattern of switched on apertures is chosen according to the pattern to be exposed on the substrate 16 covered with charged-particle sensitive resist 17. It has to be noted that the “switching on/off” of the apertures/openings is usually realized by a suitable type of deflection means provided in one of the plates of the PD system 4: “Switched off” beamlets 52 are deflected off their path (by sufficient albeit very small angles) so they cannot reach the target but are merely absorbed somewhere in the lithography apparatus, e.g. at an absorbing plate 11.
The pattern as represented by the patterned beam 19b is then projected by means of an electro-magneto-optical projection system 5 onto the substrate 16 where the beam forms an image of the “switched-on” apertures and/or openings. In accordance with various embodiments, the projection system 5 may implement a demagnification of, for instance, 200:1 with two crossovers c1 and c2. In many embodiments the substrate 16 may be a 6″ mask blank or a silicon wafer covered with a particle sensitive resist layer 17. The substrate is held by a chuck 15 and positioned by a substrate stage 14 of the target station 6.
The information regarding the pattern to be exposed is supplied to the PD system 4 by the data path realized by means of an electronic pattern information processing system 18. The data path is explained further below in section “Datapath.”
In accordance with many embodiments the projection system 5 may include a number of consecutive electro-magneto-optical projector stages 10a, 10b, 10c, which preferably include electrostatic and/or magnetic lenses, and possibly other deflection means. The projection system 5 employs a demagnifying imaging through crossovers c1, c2. The demagnification factor for both stages is chosen such that an overall demagnification of several hundred results, e.g. 200:1 reduction. A demagnification of this order is in particular suitable with a lithography setup, in order to alleviate problems of miniaturization in the PD device.
In the whole projection system 5, provisions may be made to extensively compensate the lenses and or deflection means with respect to chromatic and geometric aberrations. As a means to shift the image laterally as a whole, i.e. along a direction perpendicular to the optical axis 19, deflection means 12a, 12b, and 12c may be provided in the condenser 3 and projection system 5. The deflection means may be realized as a multi-pole electrode system which is either positioned near the source extraction system 8 or one of the crossovers c1 and c2, as shown in
Turning now to
In various embodiments the flat upper surface of AAP 20 forms a defined potential interface to the charged-particle condenser optics/illumination system 3. The AAP may, for example be made from a square or rectangular piece of a silicon wafer (approx. 1 mm thickness) 21 with a thinned center part 22. The plate may be covered by an electrically conductive protective layer 23 which will be particularly advantageous when using hydrogen or helium ions further illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 6,858,118 which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference. When using electrons or heavy ions (e.g. argon or xenon), the layer 23 may also be of silicon provided by the surface section of 21 and 22, respectively, so that there is no interface between layer 23 and the bulk parts 21, 22.
In accordance with many embodiments the AAP 20 may comprise a plurality of apertures 24 formed by openings traversing the thinned part 22. The apertures 24 are arranged in a predetermined arrangement within an aperture area provided in the thinned part 22, thus forming an aperture array 26. The arrangement of the apertures in the aperture array 26 may be, for instance, a staggered arrangement or a regular rectangular or square array. In various embodiments, the apertures 24 are realized having a straight profile fabricated into the layer 23 and a “retrograde” profile in the bulk layer of the AAP 20 such that the downward outlets 25 of the openings are wider than in the main part of the apertures 24. Both the straight and retrograde profiles can be fabricated with state-of-the-art structuring techniques such as reactive ion etching. The retrograde profile strongly reduces mirror charging effects of the beam passing through the opening.
As illustrated in
In accordance with some embodiments the deflection electrodes 38 may be configured to be selectively applied with an electrostatic potential; when such electrostatic potential is applied to an electrode 38, this will generate an electric field causing a deflection upon the corresponding beamlet, deflecting it off its nominal path. Additionally, the electrodes 38 may have a retrograde section 39 in order to avoid charging. Each of the electrodes 38 is connected at its lower part to a respective contact site within the CMOS circuitry 34.
In many embodiments the ground electrodes 35 may be higher than the height of the deflection electrodes 38 in order to suppress cross-talk effects between channels. Although the electrodes 35 and 38 are illustrated in a specific configuration, it should be understood that they may take on any suitable configuration for example the electrodes may face upstream rather than downstream as illustrated in
The arrangement of a PD system 4 with a DAP 30 shown in
In accordance with various embodiments the third plate 40 serving as FAP may have a flat surface facing the first lens part of the down-stream demagnifying charged-particle projection optics 5 and thus provides a defined potential interface to the first lens 10a of the projection optics. The thicker part 41 of FAP 40 may be a square or rectangular frame made from a part of a silicon wafer. The FAP 40 may further comprise a thinned center section 42. In accordance with many embodiments the FAP 40 may be provided with a plurality of openings 43 which correspond to the openings 24, 33 of the AAP 20 and DAP 30 but are wider as compared to the latter.
In accordance with many embodiments the PD system 4, and in particular the first plate of it, the AAP 20, may be illuminated by a broad charged particle beam 50 (herein, “broad” beam means that the beam is sufficiently wide to cover the entire area of the aperture array formed in the AAP), which is thus divided into many thousands of micrometer-sized beamlets 51 when transmitted through the apertures 24. The beamlets 51 will traverse the DAP and FAP unhindered.
As already mentioned, whenever a deflection electrode 38 is powered through the CMOS electronics, an electric field will be generated between the deflection electrode and the corresponding ground electrode, leading to a small but sufficient deflection of the respective beamlet 52 passing therethrough (
The ensemble of (unaffected) beamlets 51 as formed by AAP may be projected to the substrate with a predefined reduction factor R of the projection charged-particle optics. Thus, at the substrate a “beam array field” (BAF) is projected having widths BX=AX/R and BY=AY/R, respectively, where AX and AY denote the sizes of the aperture array field along the X and Y directions, respectively. The nominal width of a beamlet at the substrate (i.e. aperture image) is given by bX=aX/R and bY=aY/R, respectively, where aX and aY denote the sizes of the beamlet 51 as measured along the X and Y directions, respectively, at the level of the DAP 30. Thus, the size of a single aperture image formed on the target is bX×bY
The reduction factor of the demagnifying charged-particle optics 5, as illustrated in
In many embodiments the beamlets 51 and 52 as represented in
Pattern Exposure
Turning now to
Turning now to
In accordance with many embodiments the intensity or varying level of which the pixel is exposed may be determined by the sequence of apertures activated to produce the pattern on the desired pixel location. For example, while the substrate 16 moves, the same image element corresponding to a pattern pixel 28B on the target may be exposed many times by the images of a sequence of apertures.
The image pattern may be shifted through the apertures of the PD system. In some embodiments, for example, all apertures may be switched on when such apertures are directed to a specific pixel location. The result would be the maximum exposure level to that pixel thus producing a “white” shade. Yet in many embodiments the number of “switched on” apertures may vary thus producing a variety of exposure dose levels; accordingly producing a variety of gray levels on the substrate. In some embodiments the dose level may be minimum equating to a “black” shade. Thus in an actual pattern not all pixels are exposed to the full dose of the aperture array plate due to various apertures being “switched off.”
In some embodiments the dose level is regulated by reducing the duration of unblanked exposure for the apertures involved. Thus, the exposure duration of one aperture image may be controlled by a discrete number of gray levels; each of which represents a particular dose to be applied on the substrate/target, e.g. 0, 1/(nY−1) . . . , i/(nY−1), . . . , 1 with nY being the number of available “pixel gray levels” and i an integer (“gray index”, 0≤i≤nY). Generally, however, the dose increments need not be equidistant and form a non-decreasing sequence between 0 and 1. The exposed aperture image may be the manifestation of one of a given numbers of gray shades that correspond to zero and the maximum exposure duration and dose level.
Turning now to
In accordance with many embodiments an exposure scheme of the pixels, which is suitable for the invention is illustrated in
In many embodiments the beamlets are moved over the distance of LG during the exposure of one set of image elements together with the target. In other words, all beamlets maintain a fixed position with regard to the surface of the substrate during the time interval T1. After moving the beamlets with the target along distance LG, the beamlets are relocated to start the exposure of the image elements of the next placement grid. After a full cycle through the positions p11 . . . p31 of a placement grid cycle, the sequence starts anew, with an additional longitudinal offset L=bNM parallel to the X direction (scanning direction). At the beginning and at the end of the stripe the exposure method may not produce a contiguous covering, so there may be a margin of length L that is not completely filled.
In various embodiments an overlapping stripe (“multi-pass”) strategy for error reduction may be used. Similar strategies are described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,053,906 B2 which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference. An exemplary embodiment (“double-pass”) is illustrated in
As illustrated in
Turning now to
In accordance with many embodiments,
In accordance with many embodiments of the invention dose variations may be utilized in the MBMW to achieve edge placement with sub-pixel precision.
Turning now to
The line width can be made smaller or larger in very fine steps, which are smaller than the grid size, in this case the quad-grid size 62. Reducing the line width can be achieved by lowering the dose level of the outermost exposure spots and/or omitting exposure spots (the latter when the reduction is at least about one half of an exposure spot size). Increasing the line width can be achieved by enhancing the dose level of the outermost exposure spots and/or, in particular when the maximum dose level has been reached, by adding an additional, preferably overlapping, exposure spot. The latter aspect is illustrated in
The intensity profiles illustrated in
Dose Inhomogeneity Correction
U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2015/0347660 A1, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference, illustrates the current transmitted by each beamlet (or aperture) may not be uniform but may vary, mainly as a function of the distance to the optical axis 19 (
In accordance with many embodiments dose variations may be corrected by updating the dose corresponding to a pixel by dividing by a homogenizing “dose correction factor” q depending on the beamlet writing said pixel, which is given by q=C(1+α), where C=1/[min[X,Y] (1+α(X,Y))] is a constant that fixes the minimum dose inhomogeneity correction factor at 1. (Here the symbol min[X,Y] is the minimum value among the values within the entire range of interest of X and Y coordinates.) This correction typically happens on-line as part of the data path.
Data Path
In accordance with many embodiments the MBW integrates a processing system 18, as illustrated in
The complete pattern image may comprise a vast amount of image data, which is why for efficient computation of those data a high-speed data path that generates the pixel data to be exposed, preferably in real-time, will be suitable. The pattern to be exposed is typically described in a vector format, for example as a collection of geometries like rectangles, trapezoids or general polygons, which typically offers better data compaction and therefore reduces the requirements on data storage. Therefore, in accordance with many embodiments, the data path may consist of three major parts:
As illustrated in
Stage 161 as illustrated in
Stage 162 as illustrated in
Stage 163 as illustrated in
Stage 164 as illustrated in
Stage 165 as illustrated in
Stage 166 as illustrated in
Dose-Level Quantization
The present invention pertains to the QUANT stage 164 of the data path, which converts the floating-point (or equivalently high-resolution) intensity data into a quantized (i.e. discrete) gray level scale. In a typical realization of the invention the gray-level data is finally represented by a low-bit code, i.e., a code expressed through a small number of data bits. For instance, in a scenario where every pixel is described by 4 bits, pixels that are switched on have 24=16 possible configurations, i.e. nY=16 dose levels (0, 1, 2, . . . , 15). In a realization where the minimum dose 0% and the maximum dose 100% is equidistantly divided into 16 discrete dose levels, the step between two dose levels is 100%/15=6.67%.
In accordance with various embodiments finer dose-steps may be achieved via a suitable approach that exploits for oversampling o>1 to improve the discretization by means of a dithering process. The main principle of altering the dose in steps finer than 6.67% is illustrated in
As the number of overlapping pixels only depends on the oversampling factor o, it is straight-forward to compute the number of dose levels for any combination of oversampling o and gray-level n-bit resolution. In detail, the number of overlapping pixels is o2, resulting in o2×(2n−1)+1 effective gray-levels in steps of 1/(o2×(2n−1)+1). Besides the mentioned cases of oversampling o=2 and bit-resolution n=4, another interesting scenario with respect to the implementation of the applicant is o=4 (so-called quad-grid-mode) and n=4, where nY=42×(24−1)+1=241 effective dose-levels are available, which can be varied in steps of 0.4167%. It will be evident to the skilled person that other combinations of o and n may be suitable depending on the individual implementation.
A computationally inexpensive algorithm is required which, starting from a desired floating-point pixel intensity, determines a proper discrete gray-level assignment for neighboring pixels. Besides the requirement of being computationally inexpensive, this algorithm will have to ensure that the entire range of o2×(2n-1)+1 effective dose-levels can be exploited.
Quantization Using Ordered Dithering
Due to its ease of calculation and deterministic behavior, ordered dithering is a method particularly suited for dose level discretization. During ordered dithering quantization, for every pixel (aperture image position) the fractional gray level value of the nominal dose is compared against a threshold value in a regular pattern obtained from a Bayer index matrix which is used as dithering matrix. The dose is then rounded up to the next dose step if it surpasses the threshold and rounded down otherwise. In general, the relationship between threshold matrix T and Bayer index matrix B (which describes the order in which beamlets are rounded up for increasing target dose) is given by
where d is the dithering order, i.e., the size of the dithering matrix B, which is usually quadratic. The dithering order d may be conveniently chosen equal to the oversampling factor o. Given the fundamental Bayer matrix B2 of
where Bn is a Bayer matrix of dimension n×n
A simplified example for the application of a dithering matrix for rounding is presented in
Another example is given in
The general procedure for arbitrary dithering order d and bits per pixel n is as follows:
Thus, in the second step, a floating point nominal dose value y (unless it already coincides with one of the values in the gray scale palette) is either rounded up or down, relative to the discrete grey-level scale with step-size k.
Ordered Dithering and Dose Corrections
The combination of oversampling, dose corrections, and ordered dithering can lead to complex stochastical effects. Various exemplary embodiments consider the case of double-grid exposure (o=2) and nY=16, i.e. 16 gray levels (4-bit) for every pixel/beamlet and double-dithering (using the dithering matrices of
While in this example, the rounding error is larger than the ideal quantization error, it is the worst case scenario when writing a line with this dithering matrix and homogeneous beamlet doses. Also note that this is not a generic error that occurs when using ordered dithering, which means that there are also cases where there is no rounding error at all. Consider for example the case in
In the case of inhomogeneous beamlet current the rounding behavior can be much worse. This is due to the fact that the corrected doses may align with the dithering thresholds in an unfavorable way. An example is given in
In accordance with many embodiments, the above scenario can be resolved by using the same or very similar dose correction values for overlapping pixels which undergo the dithering process. Consider, for example,
In accordance with many embodiments
The data in
In order to avoid that the unfavorable worst-case rounding occurs, one computes the averaged dose profile along the scanning direction sd, which in this example is the X-axis. Re-normalized, this yields the effective dose-values shown in
While the worst-case rounding behavior (of two effective gray levels) described earlier only occurs by chance, it may appear systematically if an overlapping stripe strategy (=multipass) is applied as described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,053,906; which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference. Consider again a double-grid double-dithering strategy with ordered dithering discretization as illustrated in
An example is given in
The solution to this problem is presented in accordance with many embodiments and further illustrated in
It is straightforward to generalize the procedure described above to other scenarios. For instance, the quad-pass variant is illustrated in
Although various embodiments are presented herein, it should be understood that any suitable embodiment may be utilized.
As can be inferred from the above discussion, the above-mentioned concepts can be implemented in a variety of arrangements in accordance with embodiments of the invention. For example, though the method for correcting the written pattern from a multibeam-writer is described in relation to the various components of the MBW, other arrangements may be contemplated within the scope of the current disclosure.
Accordingly, although the present invention has been described in certain specific aspects, many additional modifications and variations would be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore to be understood that the present invention may be practiced otherwise than specifically described. Thus, embodiments of the present invention should be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 62/451,528 entitled “Advanced Dose-Level Quantization for Multibeam-Writers” filed on Jan. 27, 2017, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1033741 | Sims | Jul 1912 | A |
1420104 | Howe et al. | Jun 1922 | A |
1903005 | McCuen | Mar 1933 | A |
2187427 | Middleton | Jan 1940 | A |
2820109 | Dewitz | Jan 1958 | A |
2920104 | Brooks et al. | Jan 1960 | A |
3949265 | Holl | Apr 1976 | A |
4467211 | Smith | Aug 1984 | A |
4735881 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4899060 | Lischke | Feb 1990 | A |
5103101 | Berglund et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5189306 | Frei | Feb 1993 | A |
5260579 | Yasuda et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5369282 | Arai et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5393987 | Abboud et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5399872 | Yasuda et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5533170 | Teitzel | Jul 1996 | A |
5814423 | Maruyama et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5841145 | Satoh et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5847959 | Veneklasen | Dec 1998 | A |
5857815 | Bailey et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5866300 | Satoh et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876902 | Veneklasen | Mar 1999 | A |
5933211 | Nakasugi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6014200 | Sogard et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6043496 | Tennant | Mar 2000 | A |
6049085 | Ema | Apr 2000 | A |
6107636 | Muraki | Aug 2000 | A |
6111932 | Dinsmore | Aug 2000 | A |
6137113 | Muraki | Oct 2000 | A |
6225637 | Terashima et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6229595 | McKinley | May 2001 | B1 |
6252339 | Kendall | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258511 | Okino et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280798 | Ring et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6333138 | Higashikawa et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6472673 | Chalupka et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473237 | Mei | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6552353 | Muraki et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6617587 | Parker | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6768123 | Giering | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768125 | Platzgummer et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6835937 | Muraki et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6858118 | Platzgummer et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6897454 | Sasaki et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6965153 | Ono et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7084411 | Lammer-Pachlinger et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7124660 | Chiang | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7129024 | Ki | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7199373 | Stengl et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7201213 | Leeson | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214951 | Stengl et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7276714 | Platzgummer et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7368738 | Platzgummer et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7446601 | LeChevalier | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7459247 | Bijnen et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7671687 | LeChevalier | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7683551 | Miyamoto et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7687783 | Platzgummer et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7710634 | Sandstrom | May 2010 | B2 |
7714298 | Platzgummer et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7741620 | Doering et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7772574 | Stengl et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7777201 | Fragner et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7781748 | Platzgummer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7823081 | Sato et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8057972 | Heinrich et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8115183 | Platzgummer et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8178856 | Nakayamada et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8183543 | Platzgummer et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8198601 | Platzgummer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8222621 | Fragner et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8227768 | Smick et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8257888 | Sczyrba et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8258488 | Platzgummer et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8294117 | Kruit et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8304749 | Platzgummer et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8378320 | Platzgummer | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8502174 | Wieland | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8531648 | Jager et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8546767 | Platzgummer et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8563942 | Platzgummer | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8598544 | Van De Peut et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8859983 | Wieland | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9053906 | Platzgummer | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9093201 | Platzgummer et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9099277 | Platzgummer | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9184026 | Wieland | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9188874 | Johnson | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9269543 | Reiter et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9335638 | Jager et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9373482 | Platzgummer | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9443699 | Platzgummer et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9495499 | Platzgummer et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9520268 | Platzgummer | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9568907 | Platzgummer et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9653263 | Platzgummer | May 2017 | B2 |
9691589 | Van De Peut | Jun 2017 | B2 |
9799487 | Platzgummer | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9978562 | Van De Peut | May 2018 | B2 |
20010028038 | Hamaguchi et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020021426 | Mei et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020148978 | Innes et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030085360 | Parker | May 2003 | A1 |
20030106230 | Hennessey | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030155534 | Platzgummer et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030160980 | Olsson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040058536 | Ki | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040119021 | Parker et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040157407 | Qin-Yi et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169147 | Ono et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050063510 | Hieronimi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050072941 | Tanimoto et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050104013 | Stengl et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050242302 | Platzgummer et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050242303 | Platzgummer | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060060775 | Sakakibara et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076509 | Okino et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060169925 | Miyajima et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070138374 | Nishibashi et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070178407 | Hatakeyama et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070279768 | Shibazaki et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080024745 | Baselmans et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080080782 | Olsson et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080099693 | Platzgummer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080105827 | Tamamushi | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128638 | Doering et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080142728 | Smick et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080198352 | Kugler et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080203317 | Platzgummer et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080212052 | Wagner et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080237460 | Fragner et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080257096 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260283 | Ivansen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080283767 | Platzgummer | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080299490 | Takekoshi | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090032700 | Park et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090101816 | Noji et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090200495 | Platzgummer et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090256075 | Kemen et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090321631 | Smick et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100124722 | Fragner | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127185 | Fragner et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127431 | Sandstrom | May 2010 | A1 |
20100178602 | Seto et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100187434 | Platzgummer et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100288938 | Platzgummer | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110053087 | Nielsen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073782 | Wieland | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110121208 | Nakayamada et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110204253 | Platzgummer et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110226968 | Platzgummer | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120001097 | Yashima | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120007002 | Nakayamada et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120076269 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120085940 | Matsumoto | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120151428 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120211674 | Kato | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120286169 | Van de Peut et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120286170 | Van De Peut | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288787 | Choi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120329289 | Fujimura et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130120724 | Wieland et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130157198 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130164684 | Yamanaka | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130198697 | Hotzel et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130201468 | Manakli | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130252145 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253688 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140042334 | Wieland | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140158916 | Fujimura | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140197327 | Platzgummer | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140240732 | Tinnemans et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140264066 | Van De Peut | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140264086 | Van De Peut | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140322927 | Morita | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140346369 | Matsumoto | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150021493 | Platzgummer | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150028230 | Platzgummer | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150069260 | Platzgummer | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150243480 | Yamada et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150248993 | Reiter et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150311030 | Platzgummer et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150311031 | Platzgummer et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150347660 | Platzgummer et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160012170 | Platzgummer | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160013019 | Platzgummer | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160071684 | Platzgummer et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160276131 | Platzgummer | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160276132 | Platzgummer | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160336147 | Platzgummer | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170357153 | Platzgummer | Dec 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202204836 | Apr 2012 | CN |
0178156 | Apr 1986 | EP |
1033741 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1993118 | Nov 2008 | EP |
2019415 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2187427 | May 2010 | EP |
2214194 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2317535 | May 2011 | EP |
2363875 | Sep 2011 | EP |
2950325 | Dec 2015 | EP |
2993684 | Mar 2016 | EP |
3037878 | Jun 2016 | EP |
2349737 | Nov 2000 | GB |
08213301 | Aug 1996 | JP |
2006019436 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006332289 | Dec 2006 | JP |
2006084298 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2008053140 | May 2008 | WO |
2009147202 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2012172913 | Dec 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Li et al., “Through-Silicon Interposer Technology for Heterogeneous Integration”, Future Fab Intl., Issue 45, Apr. 25, 2013, 6 pgs. |
Palfrader et al., “Computing Mitered Offset Curves Based on Straight Skeletons”, Computer-Aided Design & Applications, vol. 12, No. 4, Feb. 11, 2015, pp. 414-424. |
Paraskevopoulos et al., “Scalable (24-140 Gbps) optical data link, well adapted for future maskless lithography applications”, Proc. SPIE vol. 7271, 72711 I, 2009, 11 pgs. |
Platzgummer et al., “eMET—50keV electron Mask Exposure Tool Development based on proven multi-beam projection technology”, Proc. of SPIE, 2010, vol. 7823, pp. 782308-1-782308-12. |
Platzgummer et al., “eMET POC: Realization of a proof-of-concept 50 keV electron multibeam Mask Exposure Tool”, Proc. of SPIE, 2011, vol. 8166, pp. 816622-1-816622-7. |
Shih, “Image processing and mathematical morphology: fundamentals and applications”, CRC Press, 2009, pp. 26-32. |
Vink et al., “Materials with a high secondary-electron yield for use in plasma displays”, Applied Physics Letters, Mar. 25, 2002, vol. 80, No. 12, pp. 2216-2218. |
Wheeler et al., “Use of Electron Beams in VLSI”, G.E.C.Journal of Science and Technology, General Electric Company. Wembley, Middlesex, GB, vol. 48, No. 2, Jan. 1, 1982, pp. 103-107, XP000820522. |
Zhang et al., “Integrated Multi-Electron-Beam Blanker Array for Sub-10-nm Electron Beam Induced Deposition”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Nov./Dec. 2006, vol. B24, No. 6, pp. 2857-2860. |
European Search Report for Application 08450077.6, report dated Jan. 29, 2010, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 09450211.9-1226; report dated Sep. 14, 2010; 4 pgs. |
European Search Report for application 09450212.7; dated Sep. 28, 2010, 9 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 141501197.7, report dated Jun. 6, 2014, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 14165967, report dated Oct. 30, 2014, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 14165970, report dated Jun. 18, 2014, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 14170611, report dated Nov. 4, 2014, 3 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 14176563, report dated Jan. 14, 2015, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 14177851; report dated Oct. 16, 2014; 1 page. |
European Search Report for Application 14199183, report dated Jun. 19, 2015, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 15159397.7, report dated Sep. 28, 2015, 7 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 15159617.8, report dated Oct. 19, 2015, 3 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 15164770, report dated Sep. 18, 2015; 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 15164772, report dated Sep. 11, 2015, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 15169632, report dated Oct. 20, 2015, 3 pgs. |
European Search Report for Application 15171348, report dated Oct. 30, 2015, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for EP 14176645, completed Dec. 1, 2014, 1 pg. |
European Search Report for EP Application No. 16174185, Search Completed Dec. 6, 2016, 2 pgs. |
European Search Report for European Application 10450070.7 dated May 7, 2012, 13 pgs. |
European Search Report for European Application No. 16160622, Search completed Jul. 21, 2016, dated Jul. 21, 2016, 3 pgs. |
European Search Report for European Patent Application 16160621, Report Completed Oct. 5, 2016, 3 pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 16169216.5, Search completed Sep. 21, 2016, dated Sep. 29, 2016, 12 Pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17153506, Search completed Oct. 5, 2017, dated Oct. 16, 2017, 2 Pgs. |
“Dither”, Wkipedia, Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dither&oldid=762118152 on Oct. 5, 2017. |
“Ordered dithering”, Wikipedia, Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ordered_dithering&oldid=759840417 on Oct. 5, 2017. |
Berry et al., “Programmable aperture plate for maskless high-throughput nanolithography”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Nov./Dec. 1997, vol. B15, No. 6, pp. 2382-2386. |
Borodovsky, “EUV, EBDW—ARF Replacement or Extension?”, KLA-Tencor Lithography User Forum, Feb. 21, 2010, San Jose, CA, USA, 21 pgs. |
Borodovsky, “MPProcessing for MPProcessors”, SEMATECH Maskless Lithography and Multibeam Mask Writer Workshop, May 10, 2010, New York, NY, USA, 35 pgs. |
Disclosed Anonymously, “Multi-tone rasterization, dual pass scan, data path and cell based vector format”, IPCOM000183472D, printed from ip.com PriorArtDatabase, published May 22, 2009, 108 pages. |
Hinterberger, “Ion optics with electrostatic lenses”, University of Bonn, Germany, 2006, 18 pgs. |
Huber et al., “Computing Straight Skeletons and Motorcycle Graphs: Theory and Practice”, Thesis, Univ. of Salzburg (Austria) Jun. 2011, 134 pgs. |
Kapl et al., “Characterization of CMOS programmable multi-beam blanking arrays as used for programmable multi-beam projection lithography and resistless nanopatterning”, Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 21, Mar. 24, 2011, pp. 1-8. |
Kim et al., “Binary-encounter-dipole model for electron-impact ionization”, Phys. Rev. A 50, 3954 (1994). |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17187922.4, Search completed Feb. 21, 2018, dated Mar. 6, 2018, 7pgs. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 17191553.1, Search completed Mar. 22, 2018, dated Apr. 9, 2018, 5pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180218879 A1 | Aug 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62451528 | Jan 2017 | US |