The instant application contains a Sequence Listing, which has been submitted electronically in ASCII format and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on May 6, 2019, is named Sequence_Listing.txt and is 140,347 bytes in size.
The present invention relates to the construction and use of an engineered cellular device comprising two parts, wherein each part comprises a distinct engineered cell system that are interacted with one another in operation of the system. The first part of the two-part cellular device is an antigen-presenting cell (APC) system that is engineered by genome editing to render the APC null for cell surface presentation of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules, HLA-like molecules and distinct forms of antigen-presenting molecules and antigenic molecules. In addition, the engineered APC system (eAPCS) contains genomic integration sites for insertion of antigen-presenting molecule encoding open reading frames (ORFs), and optionally insertion of genetically encoded analyte antigens. Genetic donor vectors designed to target the genomic integration sites of the APC as to rapidly deliver analyte antigen molecule- and/or antigen-presenting complex encoding ORFs completes the eAPCS. The second part of the two-part cellular device is a T-cell Receptor (TCR)-presenting cell system that is engineered by genome editing to render the cell null for surface expression of TCR chains. This engineered TCR-presenting cell system (eTPCS) remains competent to express TCR heterodimeric complexes on the cell surface in a CD3 complex context upon introduction of TCR-encoding ORFs, and is also competent to respond to TCR ligation in a detectable manner. Genetic donor vectors designed to target the genomic integration sites of the TCR-presenting cell as to rapidly deliver analyte TCR ORFs completes the eTPCS. This engineered two-part cellular device is designed for standardised analysis of TCR/antigen interactions in the native functional context of cell-cell communication.
Immune surveillance by T lymphocytes (T-cells) is a central function in the adaptive immunity of all jawed vertebrates. Immune surveillance by T-cells is achieved through a rich functional diversity across T-cell subtypes, which serve to eliminate pathogen-infected and neoplastic cells and orchestrate adaptive immune responses to invading pathogens, commensal microorganisms, commensal non-self factors such as molecular components of foodstuffs, and even maintain immune tolerance of self. In order to respond to various foreign and self factors, T-cells must be able to specifically detect molecular constituents of these foreign and self factors. Thus T-cells must be able to detect a large cross-section of the self and non-self molecules that an individual encounters, with sufficient specificity to mount efficient responses against pathogenic organisms and diseased self, while avoiding the mounting of such responses against health self. The highly complex nature of this task becomes clear when considering the practically unlimited diversity of both foreign and self molecules, and that pathogenic organisms are under evolutionary pressure to evade detection by T-cells.
T-cells are primarily defined by the expression of a T-cell receptor (TCR). The TCR is the component of the T-cell that is responsible for interacting with and sensing the targets of T-cell adaptive immunity. In general terms, the TCR is comprised of a heterodimeric protein complex presented on the cell surface. Each of the two TCR chains are composed of two extracellular domains, being the variable (V)-region and the constant (C)-region, both of the immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF) domain, forming antiparallel β-sheets. These are anchored in the cell membrane by a type-I transmembrane domain, which adjoins a short cytoplasmic tail. The quality of the T-cells to adapt and detect diverse molecular constituents arises from variation in the TCR chains that is generated during T-cell genesis. This variation is generated by somatic recombination in a similar manner to antibody genesis in B-cells.
The T cell pool consists of several functionally and phenotypically heterogeneous subpopulations. However, T cells may be broadly classified as αβ or γδ according to the somatically rearranged TCR form they express at their surface. There exist two TCR chain pair forms; TCR alpha (TRA) and TCR beta (TRB) pairs; and TRC gamma (TRG) and TCR delta (TRD) pairs. T-cells expressing TRA:TRB pairs are referred to as αβ T-cells, while T-cells expressing TRG:TRD pairs are often referred to as γδ T-cells.
TCRs of both αβ and γδ forms are responsible for recognition of diverse ligands, or ‘antigens’, and each T-cell generates αβ or γδ receptor chains de novo during T-cell maturation. These de novo TCR chain pairs achieve diversity of recognition through generation of receptor sequence diversity in a process called somatic V(D)J recombination after which each T-cell expresses copies of a single distinctly rearranged TCR. At the TRA and TRG loci, a number of discrete variable (V) and functional (J) gene segments are available for recombination and juxtaposed to a constant (C) gene segments, thus referred to as VJ recombination. Recombination at the TRB and TRD loci additionally includes a diversity (D) gene segment, and is referred to as VDJ recombination.
Each recombined TCR possess potential for unique ligand specificity, determined by the structure of the ligand-binding site formed by the α and β chains in the case of as T-cells or γ and δ chains in the case of γδ T-cells. The structural diversity of TCRs is largely confined to three short hairpin loops on each chain, called complementarity-determining regions (CDR). Three CDRs are contributed from each chain of the receptor chain pair, and collectively these six CDR loops sit at the membrane-distal end of the TCR extracellular domain to form the antigen-binding site.
Sequence diversity in each TCR chain is achieved in two modes. First, the random selection of gene segments for recombination provides basal sequence diversity. For example, TRB recombination occurs between 47 unique V, 2 unique D and 13 unique J germline gene segments. In general, the V gene segment contributes both the CDR1 and CDR2 loops, and are thus germline encoded. The second mode to generate sequence diversity occurs within the hypervariable CDR3 loops, which are generated by random deletion of template nucleotides and addition of non-template nucleotides, at the junctions between recombining V, (D) and J gene segments.
Mature αβ and γδ TCR chain pairs are presented at the cell surface in a complex with a number of accessory CD3 subunits, denoted ε, γ, δ and ζ. These subunits associate with αβ or γδ TCRs as three dimers (εγ, εδ, ζζ). This TCR:CD3 complex forms the unit for initiation of cellular signalling responses upon engagement of a αβ or γδ TCR with cognate antigen. The CD3 accessories associated as a TCR:CD3 complex contribute signalling motifs called immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs). CD3ε, CD3γ and CD3δ each contribute a single ITAM while the CD3ζ homodimer contains 3 ITAMs. The three CD3 dimers (εγ, εδ, ζζ) that assemble with the TCR thus contribute 10 ITAMs. Upon TCR ligation with cognate antigen, phosphorylation of the tandem tyrosine residues creates paired docking sites for proteins that contain Src homology 2 (SH2) domains, such as the critical β-chain-associated protein of 70 kDa (ZAP-70). Recruitment of such proteins initiate the formation of TCR:CD3 signalling complexes that are ultimately responsible for T-cell activation and differentiation.
αβ T-cells are generally more abundant in humans than their γδ T-cell counterparts. A majority of αβ T-cells interact with peptide antigens that are presented by HLA complexes on the cell surface. These peptide-HLA (pHLA)-recognising T-cells were the first to be described and are by far the best characterised. More rare forms of αβ T-cells have also been described. Mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells appear to have a relatively limited α and β chain diversity, and recognise bacterial metabolites rather than protein fragments. The invariant natural killer T-cells (iNK T-cells) and germline-encoded mycolyl-reactive T-cells (GEM T-cells) are restricted to recognition of glycolipids that are cross-presented by non-HLA molecules. iNK T-cells are largely considered to interact with CD1d-presented glycolipids, whereas GEM T-cells interact with CD1b-presented glycolipids. Further forms of T-cells are thought to interact with glycolipids in the context of CD1a and CD1c, however, such cells are yet to be characterised in significant detail.
The key feature of most αβ T-cells is the recognition of peptide antigens in the context of HLA molecules. These are often referred to as ‘conventional’ αβ T-cells. Within an individual, self-HLA molecules present peptides from self and foreign proteins to T-cells, providing the essential basis for adaptive immunity against malignancies and foreign pathogens, adaptive tolerance towards commensal organisms, foodstuffs and self. The HLA locus that encodes HLA proteins is the most gene-dense and polymorphic region of the human genome, and there are in excess of 12,000 alleles described in humans. The high degree of polymorphism in the HLA locus ensures a diversity of peptide antigen presentation between individuals, which is important for immunity at the population level.
There are two forms of classical HLA complexes: HLA class I (HLAI) and HLA class II (HLAII). There are three classical HLAI genes: HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C. These genes encode a membrane-spanning α-chain, which associates with an invariant β2-microglobulin (β2M) chain. The HLAI α-chain is composed of three domains with an immunoglobulin fold: α1, α2 and α3. The α3 domain is membrane-proximal and largely invariant, while the α1 and α2 domains together form the polymorphic membrane-distal antigen-binding cleft. There are six classical HLAII genes: HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DQA1, HLA-DQB1, HLA-DRA, and HLA-DRB1. These genes encode paired DP, DQ and DR heterodimeric HLA complexes comprising a α-chain and a β-chain. Each chain has two major structural domains with an immunoglobulin fold, where the α2 and β2 domain comprise membrane-proximal and largely invariant modules similar to that of HLAI α3 domain. The HLAII α2 and β2 domains together form the membrane-distal antigen-binding cleft and are regions of high polymorphism.
The antigen-binding cleft of HLAI and HLAII comprises two anti-parallel α-helices on a platform of eight anti-parallel β-sheets. In this cleft the peptide antigen is bound and presented in an extended conformation. The peptide-contacting residues in HLAI and HLAII are the location of most of the sequence polymorphism, which constitutes the molecular basis of the diverse peptide repertoires presented by different HLA alleles.
The peptide makes extensive contacts with the antigen-binding cleft and as a result each HLA allele imposes distinct sequence constraints and preferences on the presented peptides. A given peptide will thus only bind a limited number of HLAs, and reciprocally each allele only accommodates a particular fraction of the peptide collection from a given protein. The set of HLAI and HLAII alleles that is present in each individual is called the HLA haplotype. The polymorphism of HLAI and HLAII genes and the co-dominant expression of inherited alleles drives very large diversity of HLA haplotype across the human population, which when coupled to the enormous sequence diversity of αβ TCRs, presents high obstacles to standardisation of analysis of these HLA-antigen-TCR interactions.
αβ TCRs recognize peptides as part of a mixed pHLA binding interface formed by residues of both the HLA and the peptide antigen (altered self). HLAI complexes are presented on the surface of nearly all nucleated cells and are generally considered to present peptides derived from endogenous proteins. T-cells can thus interrogate the endogenous cellular proteome of an HLAI-presenting cell by sampling pHLAI complexes of an interacting cell. Engagement of HLAI requires the expression of the TCR co-receptor CD8 by the interacting T-cell, thus HLAI sampling is restricted to CD8+αβ T-cells. In contrast, the surface presentation of HLAII complexes is largely restricted to professional APC, and are generally considered to present peptides derived from proteins exogenous to the presenting cell. An interacting T-cell can therefore interrogate the proteome of the extracellular microenvironment in which the presenting cell resides. The engagement of HLAII requires the expression of the TCR co-receptor CD4 by the interacting T-cell, thus HLAII sampling is restricted to CD4+αβ T-cells.
Thymic selection of αβ TCRs
The role of αβ TCRs as described above is the detection of pHLA complexes, such that the TCR-presenting T-cell can raise responses germane to the role of that T-cell in establishing immunity. It should be considered that the αβ TCR repertoire generated within an individual must account for the immense and unforeseen diversity of all foreign antigens likely to be encountered in the context of a specific haplotype and prior to their actual occurrence. This outcome is achieved on a background where extremely diverse and numerous αβ TCRs are generated in a quasi-randomised manner with the potential to recognise unspecified pHLA complexes while only being specifically instructed to avoid strong interactions with self pHLA. This is carefully orchestrated during T-cell maturation in a process call thymic selection.
During the first step of T-cell maturation in the thymus, T-cells bearing αβ TCRs that are incapable of interacting with self-pHLA complexes with sufficient affinity, are deprived of a survival signal and eliminated. This step called positive selection assures that the surviving T-cells carry a TCR repertoire that is at least potentially capable of recognizing foreign or altered peptides presented in the right HLA context. Subsequently, αβ TCR that strongly interact with self-pHLA and thus have the potential to drive autoimmunity are actively removed through a process of negative selection. This combination of positive and negative selection results in only T-cells bearing αβ TCRs with low affinity for self-pHLA populating the periphery. This establishes an αβ T-cell repertoire that is self-restricted but not self-reactive. This highly individualised nature of T-cell genesis against HLA haplotype underscores the challenges in standardised analysis αβ TCR-antigen-HLA interactions. Moreover, it forms the basis of both graft rejection and graft versus host disease and the general principle that αβ TCRs identified in one individual may have completely different effect in a second individual, which has clear implications for TCR-based and T-cell based therapeutic and diagnostic strategies emerging in clinical practice.
The non-HLA-restricted, or ‘unconventional’, forms of αβ T-cells have very different molecular antigen targets. These unconventional αβ T-cells do not engage classical HLA complexes, but rather engage conserved HLA-like proteins such as the CD1 family or MR1. The CD1 family comprises four forms involved in antigen cross-presentation (CD1a, b, c and d). These cell surface complexes have an α-chain resembling HLAI, which forms heterodimers with β2-M. A small hydrophobic pocket presented at the membrane distal surface of the α-chain forms a binding site for pathogen-derived lipid-based antigens. Innate like NK T-cells (iNK T-cells) form the best-understood example of lipid/CD1 family recognition with GEM T-cells representing another prominent example. ‘Type I’ iNK T-cells are known to interact strongly with the lipid α-GalCer in the context of CD1d. These iNK T-cells display very limited TCR diversity with a fixed TCR α-chain (Vα10/Jα18) and a limited number of p-chains (with restricted vp usage) and they have been likened to innate pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPS) recognition receptors such αβ Toll-like and Nod-like receptors. In contrast, ‘type II’ NK T-cells present a more diverse TCR repertoire, and appear to have a more diverse mode of CD1d-lipid complex engagement. GEM T-cells recognise mycobacteria-derived glycolipids presented by CD1b, however, the molecular details of antigen presentation by CD1a, b and c as well as their T-cell recognition are only beginning to be understood.
MAIT cells largely express an invariant TCR α-chain (TRAV1-2 ligated to TRAJ33, TRAJ20, or TRAJ12), which is capable of pairing with an array of TCR β-chains. Instead of peptides or lipids MAIT TCRs can bind pathogen-derived folate- and riboflavin-based metabolites presented by the HLAI-like molecule, MR1. The limited but significant diversity in the TCRs observed on MAIT TCRs appear to enable the recognition of diverse but related metabolites in the context of the conserved MR1.
It is not well-understood how non-classical HLA-restricted αβ T-cell TCRs are selected in the thymus during maturation. However, it appears likely that the fundamental process of negative and positive selection outlined above still applies and some evidence suggests that this occurs in specialized niches within the thymus.
In contrast to the detailed mechanistic understanding of αβ TCR genesis and pHLA engagement, relatively little is known about the antigen targets and context of their γδ T-cell counterparts. This is in part due to their relatively low abundance in the circulating T-cell compartment. However, it is broadly considered that γδ T-cells are not strictly HLA restricted and appear to recognize surface antigen more freely not unlike antibodies. Additionally, more recently it has become appreciated that γδ T-cells can dominate the resident T-cell compartment of epithelial tissues, the main interaction site of the immune system with foreign antigen. In addition, various mechanisms for γδ T-cell tumour immunuosurveillance and surveillance of other forms of dysregulated-self are beginning to emerge in the literature. The specific antigen targets of both innate-like and adaptive γδ T-cells remain poorly defined but the tissue distribution and fast recognition of PAMPs suggests a fundamental role for γδ T-cells both early in responses to foreign antigens as well as early in life when the adaptive immune system is still maturing.
The diverse functions of γδ T-cells appear to be based on different Vγ Vδ gene segment usage and can be broadly understood in two main categories in which γδ T-cells with largely invariant TCRs mediate innate-like recognition of PAMPs very early during infection. Beyond PAMPs these type of γδ T-cells are furthermore believed to recognize self-molecules, including phosphoantigens that could provide very early signatures of cellular stress, infection and potentially neoplastic development. Recognition of PAMPs and such so-called danger associated molecular patterns (DAMPS) as well as the large numbers of tissue-restricted innate-like γδ T-cells strongly suggests that these cells are suited to respond rapidly to antigenic challenge without the need for prior activation, homing and clonal expansion.
A second form of γδ T-cells are considered to be more adaptive in nature, with a highly diverse γδ TCR repertoire and the ability to peripherally circulate and access lymphoid tissues directly. Such antigen-specific γδ T-cells to common human pathogens such as CMV have been described and they appear to form a memory response. However, it has also been observed that γδ T-cells show only relatively limited clonal proliferation after activation and little data is available on the extent of TCR diversity and specific responses of γδ T-cells in peripheral circulation, or in tissues. Furthermore, while it is generally considered that γδ TCRs do not interact with pHLA complexes, and thus do not engage with peptide antigens in this context only few antigen targets of γδ T-cells have been characterised and the underlying molecular framework is only poorly understood.
The low frequency of peripheral γδ T-cells and the difficulty to study tissue-resident T-cells in humans has limited our knowledge of how this important and diverse type of T-cells participate in adaptive immune responses. This emerging area of research would require more reliable technologies with which to capture and characterise rare γδ T-cells, isolate their TCR pairs, and to identify their cognate antigens.
In the context of T-cells and TCRs, antigens may be defined as any molecule that may be engaged by a TCR and resulting in a signal being transduced within the T-cell. The most well characterised T-cell antigens are peptides presented in an HLAI and HLAII complex, and which are engaged by conventional αβ T-cells. However, in recent years it has become apparent that non-conventional αβ T-cells and γδ T-cells are able to engage a wide range of biomolecules as antigens, including lipids, lipopeptides, glycopeptides, glycolipds and a range of metabolites and catabolites. In addition, it has emerged that γδ T-cells may be able to engage fully folded proteins directly in an antibody-like fashion. Therefore, the view of T-cell antigens being largely restricted to HLA-presented peptides has expanded over the past two decades to include almost any biomolecule. With this concept in mind, it is relevant to define what may be considered an antigen-presenting cell (APC).
As defined in the above sections, HLAI and HLAII have a disparate expression profiles across cell types. It is widely accepted that nearly all nucleated cells present HLAI complexes on the cell surface, and are thus competent to present peptide antigens for T-cell sampling. In contrast, HLAII has a restricted expression profile, and at least in steady state conditions is only expressed on the surface of cells that have a specialist role in antigen presentation, including dendritic cells (DC), macrophage and B-cells. These specialist cell types are often referred to as professional APC. For the purposes of this document, the term APC is used to describe any nucleated cell that is capable of presenting an antigen for sampling by αβ or γδ T-cells. Such antigens are not restricted to those presented as ‘cargo’ in specific antigen-presenting complexes such as HLA and HLA-like molecules, but may also include any cell-surface presented moiety that is able to engage a αβ or γδ TCR-bearing cell.
Adoptive transfer of primary T-cells was first trialed in a clinical setting in the early 1990s, starting with ex vivo expanded T-cells polarised towards viral antigens to confer viral immunity in immunocompromised patients. Similar approaches using primary T-cells expanded ex vivo against specific cancer antigens were soon after trialed in treatment of malignancies. One limitation in these early approaches that continues to be a challenge today is a lack of understanding of the nature and diversity of T-cells clashing with the need to finely-optimize their composition in the therapeutic product. At present, the use of ex vivo expanded primary T-cells has largely been abandoned by the pharmaceutical industry with the exception of a handful of initiatives using primary T-cells with specificity for viral antigens.
In recent years the ability to reliably introduce genetic material into primary human cells has seen a variety of experimental genetically modified T-cell therapeutics arise. Such therapeutic cell products aim to harness the power of T-cell responses and redirect T-cell specificity towards a disease-associated antigen target, for example, an antigen uniquely expressed by malignant cells. These have largely relied on the transfer of a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) into recipient T-cells, rather than actual TCR chain pairs. A CAR represents a targeting moiety (most often a single-chain antibody element targeting a surface expressed protein of malignant cells) grafted to signal receptor elements such as the ζ-chain of the CD3 complex, to produce a synthetic chimeric receptor that mimics CD3-TCR function. These so-called CAR T-cell (CAR-T) products have met mixed success in clinical trials to date and despite their potential are not easy to translate beyond tumours with inherent unique molecular targets such as B-cell malignancies. Alternatively, the transfer of full-length TCR chain pair ORFs into T-cells is of emerging interest. Such TCR-engineered T-cell therapeutics are at present limited by challenging manufacturing processes, and like the CAR-T products, a dearth of validated antigen targets and targeting constructs. To date this has been focused on the use of αβ TCRs for recognition of peptide antigens presented by HLAI on malignant cells and a fundamental challenge of this approach is the need for antigens that are specific to malignant cells.
It has been considered that since the TCR-pHLA interaction is of relatively low-affinity, native TCRs are likely to be suboptimal for TCR-engineered T-cell therapies. Several approaches have been devised to affinity-mature TCRs in vitro, in much the same manner as single-chain antibody affinity maturation. These TCR affinity maturation approaches generally also utilise a single-chain formats, wherein the V-region of one chain is fused to V-region of another chain to make a single polypeptide construct. Such single polypeptides may then be used in phage- or yeast-display systems adapted from antibody engineering workflows, and passed through rounds of selection based on target binding. Two inherent limitations exist in such a single-chain TCR approach in terms of yielding functional TCR chain pairs. Firstly, the selection is based on binding affinity to the target. However, it has been well documented that TCR affinity does not always correlate to the strength or competency of TCR signalling output. Secondly, the selection of single-chain constructs based on affinity does not always translate to equivalent affinities once they are reconstituted as full-length receptors.
In a therapeutic context, there exists an additional and crucial limitation in affinity-matured TCR pairs. That is, considering their sequences have been altered, the resulting constructs by definition have no longer been subject to thymic selection, wherein TCRs that react strongly to self-antigens are deleted from the repertoire. Therefore, these modified TCRs carry an inherent risk of being auto-reactive, which is very difficult to rule out in vitro using current methods. For the same reason, any selected or engineered TCR for therapeutic application needs to be individualised. If TCRs are artificially engineered or native TCRs applied across individuals, cross-reactivities have to be ruled out on the basis of the HLA haplotype and presented peptide repertoire of each specific individual in order to avoid potentially catastrophic autoimmunity. This is due to the fact that thymic selection is conducted on a background of all available HLA molecules specific only to that given individual. The likelihood of such cross-reactivity is unclear. However, the ability of our TCR repertoire to recognize pHLA complexes of other individuals of the same species as foreign is a fundamental property of adaptive immunity and underpins graft rejection and graft versus host disease. Recent clinical trials using a matured TCR chain pair against the cancer-specific melanoma associated antigen (MAGE) highlighted the potential problem of bypassing thymic selection. When autologous T-cells harbouring the matured TCRs were infused back to two cancer patients, these patients rapidly developed a fatal heart disease. Subsequent studies determined that the MAGE-specific matured TCRs were cross-reactive with an HLAI-presented peptide from the heart protein titin. This strongly suggests that cross-reactivity is a distinct possibility in therapeutic use of TCRs.
A distinct avenue of utilising TCRs for therapeutic purposes is in their use as affinity reagents in much the same manner as antibody therapeutic substances. Single-chain TCR molecules have been trialed for delivery of conjugated drug substances to specific HLA-antigen expressing cell populations. Such an approach is generally considered safer than CAR-T or TCR engineered T-cell therapeutics, as administration of the drug substance may simply be withdrawn. However, the potential for cross-reactivity and off target effects that are difficult to predict remains a potential limitation in this setting.
In a related aspect, there is an emerging interest in using the detection of the abundance of specific TCR sequences for clinical diagnostic purposes. With the rise of deep-sequencing methods in particular, it is possible to capture the full TCR diversity within an individual globally and for matched as pairs in specific contexts. This potentially represents a means to diagnose specific conditions and disease states simply by detecting the abundance of expanded T-cell clones, as proxy readout for established immune response against a disease-associated antigen in the patient. However, such global approaches are currently limited to very strong immune responses with established clinical time-points and suffer from the underlying difficulty in identifying the specific antigen target of any particular TCR identified via sequencing.
The fundamental strength of harnessing adaptive immune responses translates into a central technical challenge in that the exquisite specificity of the TCR-antigen interaction requires detailed knowledge of the antigens specifically associated with each pathogen, cancer cell or autoimmune disease. Furthermore, each antigen may be presented by a specific antigen presenting complex, or allele thereof, such that antigen discovery has be performed for each relevant HLA gene and allele. For several infectious diseases like HIV, influenza and CMV that are associated with strong adaptive immune responses and generally display conserved epitope response hierarchies, the most important epitopes have been mapped in context of some common HLA. Similarly, the fields of cancer, allergy and autoimmunity have seen increased and systematic efforts to map the associated T-cell antigens. However, these are challenging procedures and the efforts to systematically describe T-cell antigens associated with different clinical contexts are hindered by the absence of efficient, robust, fast and scalable protocols.
Specifically, cancer cells represent a challenging and important aspect as most of the peptides presented on the surface of malignant cells are self antigens or very similar to self antigens. Therefore, thymic selection will have deleted TCRs that could strongly recognize these peptides, while at the same time the tumour has evolved to evade immune recognition. This means that potent immune responses against established tumours are relatively rare and targets difficult to predict or discover. However, these responses do exist and, importantly, are generally associated with better outcome. The target of such responses, tumour-associated-antigens (TAA), will in most cases have distinguishing characteristics from self and be derived from proteins that are overexpressed during cancer development, otherwise absent from the cell type at this stage of development or specifically altered through genetic mutation or post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation.
When available, the knowledge of such epitopes makes it possible to interrogate the associated T-cell response for fundamental discovery, diagnostic purposes and for example as a test of vaccine efficacy. Importantly, they also provide highly specific targets for T-cell tolerization in allergy and autoimmunity and, crucially, point towards valuable targets for specific immunotherapy and against malignant cells. Malignancies represent a particularly valuable target as the promise of cellular immunotherapies and the progress in the T-cell manipulations are slowed by a lack of validated target TAAs that go beyond the few cases where specific markers for the type of cancer happen to be available.
In the light of the potential of cellular therapy and lack of validated targets the identification of promising TCR antigens remains one of the most pressing bottlenecks of TCR-based immunotherapy, particularly in the effort to treat cancer.
Overall, the development of TCR-based therapies is still in its early stages, and success has been limited. Diagnostic approaches, while of immense potential, have seldom been deployed into controlled clinical studies that aim to assess patient disease states or response to therapy. Underdeveloped techniques for the reliable capture of native TCR chain pairs, and the systematic analysis of TCR-antigen interactions at high-throughput and in a functional context of cell-cell communication, has been the main hurdle to the development of TCR-based therapies and diagnostics.
Deep sequencing approaches have led to an improved understanding of T-cell receptor diversity in heath and disease. However, these approaches have generally focused on short stretches spanning the CDR3 regions, mainly of the TCR β-chain. Most studies have ignored the contribution of the TCR α-chain, and few have sought to analyse paired as chains as well as the antigen specificity of TCRs determined to be of interest. Recent workflows using single cell encapsulation and genetic barcoding has enabled the pairing of native TCR αβ or γδ chain pairs and analysis of full-length sequences, however, such workflows remain experimental.
Isolated TCR chain pairs may be analysed in terms of antigen specificity in either biophysical or functional modes. Biophysical analysis requires the recombinant production of both the TCR as well as the analyte antigen in soluble form. In the case of HLA-restricted TCRs this would thus require the generation of all individual TCRs as well as the cognate pHLA complexes. This is technically highly challenging, slow and very low-throughput. Furthermore, such analysis would only provide interaction affinities, which are not well-correlated with functional characteristics in predictable ways.
Until recently, the detailed functional analysis of isolated TCR sequences in a cellular context has been limited to laborious protocols of transfection of analyte TCR chain pairs into primary T-cells or immortal T-cell lines, and detection of cellular responses by traditional flow cytometric analysis of cell activation, or detection of secreted factors from the transfected cells upon antigen challenge. In a recent publication by Guo et al, rapid cloning, expression, and functional characterization of paired TCR chains from single-cells was reported (Molecular Therapy—Methods and clinical development (2016) 3:15054). In this study, analyte human αβ TCR pairs were expressed in a reporter cell line that lacked αβ TCR expression, and which contained a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter system linked to the Nur77 promoter that is activated upon TCR stimulation. This system remains inefficient due to the lack of standardised TCR integration into the reporter cell line genome, and does not provide a systematic manner for cell-bound antigen challenge by an APC element.
Similar to workflows for identification of TCRs against known T-cell antigens, the de novo discovery of novel T-cell antigens in health and disease remains highly challenging. Most approaches remain biophysical in nature, and aim to produce candidate antigens that may be tested in immunisation protocols, or through identifying cognate TCRs as addressed above. Little or no standardisation exists in the field of T-cell antigen discovery, and the field is largely restricted to academic study.
With the accumulating interest in TCRs and their cognate antigens in both therapeutic and diagnostic use, and the emergence of means to capture significant numbers of native TCR αβ and γδ chain pairs, there remains a lack of reliable high-throughput and standardised technologies for the systematic analysis of TCR-antigen interactions. Importantly, there is a lack of standardised systems for functional analysis of TCR chain pairs in the native context of cell-cell communication wherein both the TCR and antigen are presented by a viable cell. Moreover, there is a lack of systems that may achieve TCR candidate selection, and/or affinity maturation of TCR chain pairs, in the relevant context of cell-cell communication.
As described, there is currently a lack of standardised technologies for the high-throughput generation of cells with TCR pairs expressed in a native cellular context. It is highly desirable to possess a system in which full-length TCR pairs may be inserted as single copies into the genome of a TCR-presenting cell such that said TCRs are presented in a native CD3 cell-surface complex for analysis and selection. A CD3 complex-presented TCR pair assures that affinity analyses are reflective of the actual native TCR composition, which is not the case for single-chain TCR and other non-native TCR-display technology. Moreover, the presentation of TCR pairs in a CD3 complex on a viable cell is an absolute requirement for functional analysis of TCR pairs. Functional analysis, meaning analysis of TCR signalling output, is of critical importance in TCR selection and engineering workflows where signal output is the parameter that is generally of greatest importance for use in the context of cellular therapeutics, and is not well correlated with the affinity of a TCR with cognate antigen/HLA as is determined within other display platforms.
The present invention addresses the above-mentioned needs. In particular, the present invention relates to the construction and use of an engineered two-part cellular device for discovery and characterisation of TCRs and T-cell antigens. The two parts of the overall cellular device are comprised of distinct engineered cell types that are contacted with one another in operation of the device. The device is used for standardised functional analysis of responsiveness of analyte TCRs towards analyte antigens. The readout of such responsiveness is used for the identification and selection of TCRs, T-cell antigens, and detailed functional characterisation of the TCR/antigen interactions. The device presents analyte antigens through a first cell population, the engineered antigen presenting cell (eAPC) that is prepared using the eAPC system (eAPCS). The device presents analyte TCRs through a second cell population, the engineered TCR-presenting cell (eTPC) that is prepared using the eTPC system (eTPCS).
The two-part device of the invention contains features that enable a high degree of standardisation, reproducibility and critically restricts the complexity of analyte TCR and T-cell antigens collections. Primarily, this standardisation is achieved through defined and highly controlled integration of analyte antigen-presenting complexes and antigens to the genome of eAPC, and TCR to the genome of eTPC. This permits rapid cycle times to generate analyte cell populations, and greatly reduces costs of current random-integration and viral vector platforms. Moreover, the present invention permits the generation of cell-based arrays of analyte entities in both a eAPC- and eTPC-centric manner, meaning that large libraries of vectors can be integrated into either cell population, and assayed as libraries of cells expressing single analyte entities per cell. Single-copy genomic receiver sites being engineered into the genome of eAPC and eTPC achieve this, such that when provided by an ORF (for HLA, antigen or TCR chain) within the matched donor vectors, only a single copy of an ORF can be integrated from the vector pool. This means that if the vector pool comprises ORFs of mixed identify, each integrated cell will only integrate a single identity; essentially creating cell-based arrays akin to other display platforms like bacteriophage. This high level of standardisation and reduction of complexity is in contrast to the current methods using primary or immortal cell cultures and extended outgrowth and endogenous singling responses to achieve outputs, or in partial systemisation of APC- or T-cell-centric inputs. Importantly, the two-part engineered cell device that represents the present invention achieves standardisation of relevant functional responses in the context of cell-cell communication. This is critical for reducing time and costs of discovery and clinical testing of new TCR and T-cell antigen candidates by increasing the predictability of their effects in vivo.
The present invention relates to the provision and operation of a two-part device, wherein a first part is an engineered antigen-presenting cell system (eAPCS), and a second part is an engineered TCR-presenting cell system (eTPCS). Overall, this device represents a multicellular analytical system comprised of two distinct types of engineered human cells for functional analyses of TCR recognition of T-cell antigens. The primary outputs of this device are cells that express analyte antigen or analyte TCR, which subsequently may be used to determine the terminal outputs of the device as specific T-cell antigens or TCR sequences, respectively (
The two-part device is operated in two phases comprising
The eAPCS is defined as a system to prepare various forms of analyte eAPC populations that are provided to the combined eAPC:eTPC system, wherein the analyte eAPC populations are defined as one of the following
The eTPCS is defined as a system to prepare analyte eTPC populations that are provided to the combined eAPC:eTPC system, wherein the analyte eTPC populations are defined as one of the following
Primary outputs from the device are selected cell populations, which have or have not responded to the analyte presented by the reciprocal cell provided in the eAPC:eTPC system. That is, such a primary output may be represented as a single cell, or a pool of cells, that have been selected on the presence or absence of a reported response within the combined eAPC:eTPC system (
A selection of analyte eAPC and/or analyte eTPC from the combined eAPC:eTPC system may be made on the basis of a response in the contacting cell. That is, an analyte eAPC may be selected on that basis of a reported response, or lack thereof, in the contacting analyte eTPC. Conversely, an analyte eTPC may be selected on that basis of a reported response, or lack thereof, in the contacting analyte eAPC.
Primary eAPC outputs from the device are selected cells, wherein selection is made based on the presence or absence of a reported signal response, and these cells may comprise one or more of
Primary eTPC outputs from the device are selected cells, wherein selection is made based on the presence or absence of a reported signal response, and these cells comprise eTPC-t, wherein selected cells may comprise a single cell, a pool of cells of the same identity, a pool of cells of different identities (
When the two-part cellular device is operated, the selection of analyte cell populations to prepare and combine into an eAPC:eTPC system is determined by the nature of analyte that each of the eAPC and eTPC populations present.
An eAPC-p is defined as expressing an antigen-presenting complex (aAPX) on the cell surface. An aAPX may have a cargo molecule (CM) loaded as antigen cargo. An aAPX loaded with antigen cargo is defined as an aAPX:CM complex.
An eAPC-a is defined as expressing an analyte antigen molecule (aAM). Such an aAM may be presented on the cell surface, and/or expressed or processed intracellularly such that it represents a cargo aAM that may be loaded into an aAPX.
An eAPC-pa is defined as expressing both an aAPX and an aAM. The aAM may be expressed or processed intracellularly such that it represents a cargo aAM that may be loaded into an aAPX. eAPC-pa thus expresses an aAPX at the cell surface, and may also express aAM loaded as cargo into said aAPX, which is defined as an aAPX:aAM complex. It is possible for an eAPC-pa does not load aAM as cargo into an aAPX to form the aAPX:aAM complex. Moreover, due to the nature of biological systems, it is unavoidable that aAPX:CM complexes are also present in the aAPC-pa.
An eTPC-t is defined as possessing an analyte pair of TCR chains that are expressed as TCR surface proteins in complex with CD3 (TCRsp), wherein CD3 represents the surface complex in which a TCR heterodimeric pair is presented and is defined as possessing ε, γ, δ and ζ subunits that associate with pair of complementary TCR chains as three dimers (εγ, εδ, ζζ). The expression of CD3 and a pair of complementary TCR chains is required for presentation at the cell surface, thus, the absence of expression of either TCR or CD3 will prevent the reciprocal from presenting on the cell surface. In the preparation of an eTPC-t, the expression of an as or γδ TCR pair and/or CD3 is used as a positive selection. Therefore, regardless of the nature of the TCR α, β, γ or δ chain combinations used to prepare the eTPC-t, only cells with a pair of complementary TCR chains presented on the surface of the cell in complex with CD3 are designated eTPC-t.
The above primary outputs all represent cell populations that are derived from a selection made upon their reported response in the combined eAPC:eTPC system. Each analyte eAPC presents a set of potential analyte antigens, intrinsic cargo molecules and/or analyte antigen presenting complexes, whereas the eTPC presents analyte TCRsp. It is from the selected cells that the selected analyte molecules may be obtained as terminal device outputs (
An eAPC-p is defined as presenting an aAPX on the cell surface, and may present aAPX:CM complex at the cell surface. Thus an eAPC-p that is selected from the combined eAPC:eTPC system based on a reported response, may be used to determine aAPX, CM and/or a aAPC:CM terminal device outputs, wherein these output identities have been selected on the ability of the determined analyte antigen to form a complex with, and/or report a signal response stimulated by, an analyte TCRsp presented by the analyte eTPC-t contacted with the selected eAPC-p in the combined eAPC:eTPC system.
An eAPC-a is defined as presenting an aAM on the cell surface or intracellularly. Thus an eAPC-a that is selected from the combined eAPC:eTPC system based on a reported response, may be used to determine an aAM terminal device output, wherein this output identity is selected on the ability of the determined analyte to form a complex with, and/or report a signal response stimulated by, an analyte TCRsp presented by the analyte eTPC-t contacted with the selected eAPC-a in the combined eAPC:eTPC system.
An eAPC-pa is defined as presenting an aAPX, aAM, aAPX, aAPX:aM, or an aAPX:CM at the cell surface. Thus, an eAPC-pa that is selected from the combined eAPC:eTPC system based on a reported response, may be used to determine aAM, aAPX, aAPX:aM and/or aAPX:CM terminal device outputs, wherein this output identity is selected on the ability of the determined analyte to form a complex with, and/or report a signal response stimulated by, an analyte TCRsp presented by the analyte eTPC-t contacted with the selected eAPC-pa in the combined eAPC:eTPC system.
As addressed above, selection of analyte eAPC may be made on basis of a reported response in a contacting eTPC. Therefore, any of eAPC-p, eAPC-a and eAPC-pa may be used to indirectly obtain the TCRsp output, if the TCRsp input(s) to the eTPCS are known prior to preparation of the analyte eTPC-t.
In the present context, an eTPC-t is defined as presenting TCRsp. Thus an eTPC-t that is selected from the combined eAPC:eTPC system based on a reported response, may be used to determine TCRsp terminal device outputs, wherein this output identity is selected on the ability of the determined analyte TCRsp to form a complex with, and/or report a signal response stimulated by, an analyte antigen presented by the analyte eAPC contacted with the selected eTPC in the combined eAPC:eTPC system.
As addressed above, selection of analyte eTPC may be made on basis of a reported response in a contacting eAPC. Therefore, an eTPC may be used to indirectly obtain any of the analyte antigen outputs, aAM, aAPX, aAPX:aM and/or aAPX:CM, if those analyte antigen input(s) to the eAPCS are known prior to preparation of the analyte eAPC.
Description of the eAPCS
As mentioned above, the present invention relates to the provision of a two-part cellular device, wherein each part is an engineered cellular system. The first engineered cell system is an engineered multicomponent eAPCS that is used to prepare analyte eAPC for combination into a two-part eACP:eTPC system within the device.
The minimal form of eAPCS is a multicomponent system wherein a first component is an eAPC, designated component 1A, containing a second component as a genomic receiver site component B, and a third component as a genetic donor vector, designated component 1C (
An eAPC represents the base component of the eAPCS, to which all other components of the system relate. Therefore, the eAPC contains certain features, that are native or engineered, that make the eAPC suitable for use in both the eAPCS and the combined two-part device.
In the present context the eAPC, component 1A
The selection of an eAPC cell candidate that lacks desired aAPX and/or aAM expression from naturally occurring cell populations can be achieved by methods well known in the art. This may be directly achieved by staining of target cells with affinity reagents specifically for the aAPX and/or aAM that are desired to be lacking from the eAPC, and selection of cells lacking target aAPX and/or aAM expression.
Engineering of cells to lack aAPX and/or aAM expression may be achieved by untargeted and targeted means. Untargeted mutagenesis of the cell can be achieved by providing a chemical, radiological or other mutagen to the cell, and then selecting cells lacking target aAPX and/or aAM expression. Targeted mutation of the genomic loci can be achieved via different means, including but not limited to site directed mutagenesis via
The component 1A, eAPC, may optionally include additional T-cell co-stimulation receptors, wherein such features permit robust or varying forms of communication of the analyte eAPC to the analyte eTPC, wherein the tuneable communication is relevant to identification or characterisation of specific analyte TCRsp and/or analyte antigens. In the present context, different forms of CD28 ligation on the eTPC can be promoted by inclusion of one or more of CD80, CD86 and/or further B7 family proteins.
The component 1A, eAPC, may optionally additionally include introduced cell surface adhesion molecule components, or ablation of endogenous cell surface adhesion molecules, to promote the eAPC engagement with analyte eTPC and formation of the immunological synapse, or to avoid tight binding and formation of deleterious cell clustering within the combined eAPC:eTPC system, respectively. Such adhesion molecules that may be introduced as additional ORFs to component 1A, or genetically ablated from 1A, can be selected from the integrin family of adhesion proteins.
An eAPC may optionally possesses the ability to process and load antigen as cargo into aAPX by native processing and loading machinery. An eAPC that possesses the ability to process and load antigen as cargo into aAPX by native processing and loading machinery, will also process and load cargo molecules (CM) that are intrinsic to the eAPC or the culture system in which it is contain, wherein aAPX that is loaded with a CM is designated as an aAPX:CM complex.
The second component of the minimal multicomponent eAPCS is a genetic donor vector, component 1C, which is used for integration of at least one ORF encoding at least one aAPX and/or aAM (
Component 1C is a genetic donor vector that is coupled with the genomic receiver site of Component 1B contained within the genome of the eAPC, Component 1A. Component 1C is designed for the integration of one or more ORFs encoding an aAPX and/or an aAM, encoded in the genetic donor vector, into the genomic receiver site, 1B, wherein integration results in the expression of aAPX and/or an aAM by the target eAPC.
In the present context, a paired genetic donor vector and genomic receiver site is described as an integration couple.
In an expanded form or the multicomponent eAPCS, the component 1A eAPC may further contain a second genomic receiver site, designated component 1D, which is coupled to a second genomic donor vector, designated component 1E, that is also added to the system (
A multicomponent eAPCS may further comprise one or more additional integration couples.
A multicomponent eAPCS, comprising an eAPC and either one or two integration couples, is used for preparation of the derivative eAPC forms
The genetic donor vector and genomic receiver sites operate as an integration couple subsystem of the eAPCS. A genetic donor vector must first be combined with target ORFs, such that base donor vector now encodes those target ORFs. The assembled primed donor vector is then introduced to the target eAPC to exchange target ORF(s) to the genomic receiver site, thus integrating the target ORFs to the coupled receiver site of the target cell (
A multicomponent eAPCS that comprises genetic donor vectors component 1C and/or 1E is combined with at least one ORF encoding at least one aAPX and/or aAM to obtain component 1C′ and/or 1E′, wherein the combination is defined as the ligation of genetic material into the correct coding frame(s), and in the correct orientation(s), of the genetic donor vector.
The combination of one or more ORFs into genetic donor vectors 1C and/or 1E may be performed multiple times with a library of unique ORFs as
The efficient integration of a predictable copy number of one or more ORFs into the genomic receiver site is highly advantageous for operation of a standardised eAPC, where analyte eAPC populations may be rapidly prepared and characterised. Thus, the genomic receiver site(s) and coupled donor vector(s) are critical to the function of the eAPC. Furthermore, it is strongly desirable to have an eAPC wherein component 1B and 1D, are insulated from one another, such that the donor vector component 1C cannot integrate at component 1B, and vice versa. In addition, it is also desirable that the component 1B and/or component 1D are amenable to a method of preparation of an eAPC wherein, the introduction of an analyte antigen is rapid, repeatable, with a high likelihood of correct integration and delivery of the desired number of copies of aAPX and/or aAM.
The genomic receiver site may be selected from the following
In the present context the genomic receiver site, component 1B and/or component 1 D comprises of at least one of the following genetic elements
The preferred genomic receiver site would comprise of two different arrangements using the following selected elements from the previously stated list of element. The first arrangement is for receiving a single ORF encoding one or more aAPX and/or one or more aAM chains and/or a selection mark of integration, via RMCE integration wherein the arrangement is
The second arrangement is for receiving two ORF encoding one or more aAPX and/or one or more aAM and/or a selection marker of integration, via RMCE integration wherein the arrangement is
Component 1C and/or 1E comprises of at least one of the following genetic elements
In a preferred embodiment of the genetic donor vector, component 1C and/or component 1E, would comprise of two different possible arrangements using the following selected elements from the previously stated list of elements.
The first arrangement is for delivery of a single ORF encoding one or more aAPX and/or one or more aAM and/or a selection mark of integration, via RMCE integration wherein the arrangement is
The second arrangement is for delivery of two ORF encoding one or more aAPX and/or aAM and/or a selection mark of integration, via RMCE integration wherein the arrangement is
The above described eAPCS system may be used in multiple ways to prepare distinct forms of analyte eAPC, or libraries thereof, that serve to present analyte aAPX, aAM, aAPX:aAM and aAPX:CM to the eTPC within the combined eAPC:eTPC system in operation of the two-part device.
An eAPCS comprising a single integration couple may be used to prepare an eAPC-p from component 1A in one step, by providing component 1C′ combined with an ORF for an aAPX, such that this aAPX is integrated to site 1B, to create 1B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided aAPX, and it is presented at the cell surface (
An eAPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eAPC-p from component 1A in one step, by providing component 1C′ combined with an ORF for an aAPX, such that this aAPX is integrated to site 1B, to create 1B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided aAPX, and it is presented at the cell surface. The second integration couple 1 D/1E remains unmodified and may be used for downstream integration steps (
An eAPCS comprising a single integration couple may be used to prepare an eAPC-a from component 1A in one step, by providing component 1C′ combined with an ORF for an aAM, such that this aAM is integrated to site 1B, to create 1B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided aAM, and is presented either at the cell surface or retained intracellularly (
An eAPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eAPC-a from component 1A in one step, by providing component 1C′ combined with an ORF for an aAM, such that this aAM is integrated to site 1B, to create 11B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided aAM, and is presented either at the cell surface or retained intracellularly. The second integration couple 1D/1E remains unmodified and may be used for downstream integration steps (
An eAPCS comprising a single integration couple may be used to prepare an eAPC-pa from component 1A in one step, by providing component 1C′ combined with two ORFs, one encoding and aAPX and the other an aAM, such that both aAPX and aAM are integrated to site 1B, to create 1B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided aAPX and aAM, and may present an aAPX:aAM at the cell surface (
An eAPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eAPC-pa from component 1A in one step, by providing component 1C′ combined with two ORFs, one encoding and aAPX and the other an aAM, such that both aAPX and aAM are integrated to site 1B, to create 1B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided aAPX and aAM, and may present an aAPX:aAM at the cell surface. The second integration couple 1D/1E remains unmodified and may be used for downstream integration steps (
An eAPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eAPC-pa from component 1A in one step, by providing component 1C′ and 1E′ each combined with one ORF encoding either an aAPX or an aAM, such that both aAPX and aAM are integrated to site 1B or 1 D, to create 1B′ and 1 D′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided aAPX and aAM, and may present an aAPX:aAM at the cell surface (
An eAPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eAPC-pa from component 1A in two steps, by first providing component 1C′ combined with an ORF encoding an aAPX such that this aAPX is integrated to site 1B, to create 1B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided aAPX, and it is presented at the cell surface. The second integration couple 1D/1E remains unmodified. In the second step 1E′ is provided wherein the donor vector is combined with an ORF encoding an aAM such that this aAM is integrated to site 1E, to create 1E′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided aAM, and this may be processed and loaded as cargo in the aAPX to form an aAPX:aAM complex on the cell surface (
An eAPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eAPC-pa from component 1A in two steps, by first providing component 1C′ combined with an ORF encoding an aAM such that this aAM is integrated to site 1B, to create 11B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided aAM (eAPC-a intermediate). The second integration couple 1D/1E remains unmodified. In the second step 1E′ is provided wherein the donor vector is combined with an ORF encoding an aAPX such that this aAPX is integrated to site 1E, to create 1E′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided aAPX, which is presented on the cell surface. The aAM integrated in the first step may be processed and loaded as cargo in the aAPX to form an aAPX:aAM complex on the cell surface (
In the abovementioned examples of preparing analyte eAPC-p, eAPC-a and eAPC-pa populations from eAPC, the eAPCS system is used to provide known aAPX and aAM candidates in a defined manner to prepare discrete populations of analyte eAPC expressing defined aAPX and/or aAM. Such a process may be repeated many times to build libraries of eAPC-p, eAPC-a and eAPC-pa to provide to the combined eAPC:eTPC system in operation of the device. An alternative approach is to take pooled libraries of candidate aAPX and/or aAM ORFs combined with genetic donor vectors, and integrate these in a single reaction to obtain pooled libraries of analyte eAPC-p, eAPC-a or eAPC-pa that express multiple aAPX, aAM and/or aAPX:aAM. This process of converting a pool of vectors to a pool of eAPC-p, -a, and/or -pa will be referred to as shotgun integration. This is particularly useful when analysing large libraries of candidate aAM against a fixed aAPX, or vice versa.
An eAPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eAPC-pa from component 1A in two steps, by first providing component 1C′ combined with an ORF encoding an aAPX such that this aAPX is integrated to site 1B, to create 11B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided aAPX on the cell surface (eAPC-p intermediate). The second integration couple 1D/1E remains unmodified. In the second step a library of multiple 1E′ is provided wherein the library of donor vectors comprises a pool of vectors each combined with a single ORF encoding an aAM such that each aAM is integrated to site 1E, to create 1E′, within single cells. The resulting pool of cells contains a collection of cells, wherein each cell has integrated a single random aAM ORF from the original pool of vectors. The aAM integrated in the second step may be processed and loaded as cargo in the aAPX integrated in the first step to form an aAPX:aAM complex on the cell surface (
An eAPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eAPC-pa from component 1A in two steps, by first providing component 1C′ combined with an ORF encoding an aAM such that this aAM is integrated to site 1B, to create 1B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided aAM (eAPC-a intermediate). The second integration couple 1D/1E remains unmodified. In the second step a library of multiple 1E′ is provided wherein the library of donor vectors comprises a pool of vectors each combined with a single ORF encoding an aAPX such that each aAPX is integrated to site 1E, to create 1E′, within single cells. The resulting pool of cells contains a collection of cells, wherein each cell has integrated a single random aAPX ORF from the original pool of vectors. The aAM integrated in the first step may be processed and loaded as cargo in the aAPX integrated in the second step to form an aAPX:aAM complex on the cell surface (
An eAPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eAPC-pa from component 1A in one steps, by providing component 1C′ and 1E′ each combined with a library of ORFs encoding either a library of aAPX or a library of aAM, such that both aAPX and aAM are integrated to site 1B or 1 D, to create 1B′ and 1 D′. The resulting pool of cells contains a collection of cells wherein each cell has integrated a single random aAPX ORF and a single random aAM ORF from the original pool of vectors. Within each cell in the pooled library, an integrated aAM may be processed and loaded as cargo in the aAPX integrated into the same cell to form an aAPX:aAM complex on the cell surface. Such a pooled library would contain all possible combinations of aAPX:aAM from the set of aAPX and aAM provided (
In the above-mentioned shotgun integration methods for providing pooled libraries of eAPC-pa, the robustness of the system relies on a single copy of the genomic receiver site. This is to ensure just a single analyte may be introduced into each cell via the integration couple. This single-copy genomic receiver site is an optional aspect of an eAPCS, as multiple copies of the same genomic receiver 25 site may be beneficial in providing integration steps where multiple ‘alleles’ from a library of provided vectors may be obtained in the prepared eAPC.
In the present context, an aAPX may be selected from one of the following
An aAPX may be selected from one of the following
As mentioned above, the present invention relates to the provision of a two-part cellular device, wherein each part is an engineered cellular system. The first engineered cell system is the eAPCS as described above. The second engineered cell system is an engineered multicomponent eTPCS that is used to prepare analyte eTPC for combination into a two-part eACP:eTPC system within the device.
The minimal form of eTPCS is a multicomponent system wherein a first component is an eTPC, designated component 2A, and a second component is a genetic donor vector, designated component 2C (
An eTPC represents the base component of the eTPCS, to which all other components of the system relate. Therefore, the eTPC contains certain features, that are native or engineered, that make the eTPC suitable for use in both the eTPCS and the combined two-part device.
The eTPC, component 2A,
The selection of an eTPC cell candidate that lacks TCR chains alpha, beta, delta and gamma from naturally occurring cell populations can be achieved by methods well known in the art. Staining of target cells with affinity reagents specifically for TCR chains alpha, beta, delta and gamma, and selection of cells TCR chains alpha, beta, delta and gamma may directly achieve this.
Engineering of eTPC to lack TCR chains alpha, beta, delta and gamma expression may be achieved by untargeted and targeted means. Untargeted mutagenesis of the cell can be achieved by providing a chemical, radiological or other mutagen to the cell, and then selecting cells lacking target aAPX and/or aAM expression. Targeted mutation of the genomic loci can be achieved via different means, including but not limited to site directed mutagenesis via
Options for Integration of CD3 and the components B and/or D are well known to those skilled in the art but may include homology directed recombination (HDR) and/or random integration methods, wherein HDR may be promoted by targeted mutation of the genomic loci at which HDR is to occur, and can be achieved via different means, including but not limited to site directed mutagenesis via
Alternatively, viral vectors could be used to deliver the required components in a site-directed or undirected manner.
Considering that the eTPC component 2A is designed to be used in conjunction with the above described eAPC component 1A, within a combined eAPC:eTPC system, for the purpose of analyses of TCR and T-cell antigen interactions (
The eTPC component 2A optionally lacks endogenous surface expression of at least one family of aAPX and/or aAM, wherein the lack of surface expression is selected as to minimise interference in matched analyses of target analyte antigens.
The family of aAPX may be any of the following
An aAM is selected from
The component 2A eTPC may optionally additionally include T-cell co-receptors, wherein such features permit robust or varying forms of communication of the analyte eTPC to the analyte eAPC, wherein the tuneable communication is relevant to identification or characterisation of specific analyte TCRsp and/or analyte antigens.
The eTPC component 2A may optionally express CD4 and/or CD8, wherein expression of CD4 or CD8 restrict eTPC to engaging aAPX of type HLAII and HLAI, respectively.
In the present context, the eTPC component 2A may optionally expresses CD28 and/or CD45, wherein CD28 and CD45 contribute to signal sensitivity through positive feed forward effects on signalling, whereas they may also contribute to signal specificity through negative feed back effects on signalling, as it relates to signalling though an expressed analyte TCRsp.
The component 2A eTPC may optionally additionally include introduced cell surface adhesion molecule components, or ablation of endogenous cell surface adhesion molecules, to promote the eTPC engagement with analyte eAPC and formation of the immunological synapse, or to avoid tight binding and formation of deleterious cell clustering within the combined eAPC:eTPC system, respectively.
Such adhesion molecules that may be introduced as additional ORFs to component 2A, or genetically ablated from 2A, can be selected from the integrin family of adhesion proteins.
The second component of the minimal multicomponent is a genetic donor vector, component 2C, which is used for integration of at least one ORF encoding at least one analyte TCR chain (
Component 2C is a genetic donor vector that is coupled with the genomic receiver site of the, 2B, contained within the genome of the eTPC, Component 2A. Component 2C is designed for the integration of one or more ORFs encoding an analyte TCR chain, encoded in the genetic donor vector, into the genomic receiver site, 2B, wherein integration results in the expression of analyte TCR chains by the target eTPC.
A paired genetic donor vector and genomic receiver site is described as an integration couple.
An eTPC is designed to respond to stimulation by cognate antigen, as presented by the eAPC within the combined eAPC:eTCP system. It is thus desirable to have a standardised reporter readout for signalling response from stimulation of the expressed TCRsp.
In the present context, the eTPC component 2A, further contains a component designated 2F, a synthetic genomic TCR-stimulation response element selected from
A eTPC is designed to assay engagement of the presented TCRsp with a analyte antigen. The readout of engagement may be achieved through induction of a synthetic reporter element that responds to TCRsp engagement. Therefore, the eTPC, may further contain a component designated 2F, a synthetic genomic TCR-stimulation response element selected from
Synthetic TCR-stimulation response elements (component 2F), with synthetic as opposed to native promoters, are less likely to mimic a natural TCR stimulation response and thus represent a more distant approximation to natural T-cell stimulation. However, synthetic promoters provide greater flexibility for tuning and adjustment of the reporter response for the robust identification of eTPC-t presenting TCRsp that productively engage analyte antigen.
Single component synthetic constructs provide limited space for amplification or modulation of the signal reporter response, but are more straightforward to implement and predict the outcome. Multi-component constructs have the advantage of having a virtually unlimited space to construct complex response networks, however, this comes with the cost of being more difficult to implement and predict. A network also provides instances to initiate feedback loops, repression and activation of secondary response reporters.
Synthetic promoters can be linked to artificial synthetic signalling components, which can be either downstream of the initial natural TCR signalling pathway or substitute it. In such an instance, the CD3 complex can be coupled in-part or wholly to an artificial synthetic signalling pathway and response network. Such artificial pathways provide the advantage of being very modular and adaptable, for greater fine tuning or increased variety of responses.
The preferred embodiment utilises a multi-component synthetic construct with synthetic promoters and at least a partial synthetic signalling pathway. This provides the most robust means to ensure limited resting state signal response but with high coupled reporter signal when ligation of analyte antigen to the TCRsp occurs.
Regardless of the exact architecture of coupling the TCRsp stimulation to a component 2F the desired end outcome is a detectable reporter. In the preferred embodiment, a reporter that is amenable to fluorescent detection (i.e. FACS) and/or physical selection methods such as Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting (MACS) is desired. Alternatively, the reporter could be a secreted or intracellular molecule for detection by spectrometric, fluorescent or luminescent assays, preferably in a non-destructive nature, wherein the populations can subsequently be selected based on the presence or absence of the reporter molecule. In addition, the response is not limited to a single reporter type but could be a combination of one or more different reporters.
In one context, a multi-component synthetic construct with synthetic promoters and a partial synthetic signalling pathway (Driver-Activator/Repressor+Amplifier-Reporter) would comprise of:
It is important to recognise that the Driver-Activator/Repressor coupled to Amplifier-Reporter paradigm can be extended to include additional Driver-Activator/Repressor and Amplifier-Reporter pairs and/or additional Amplifier-Reporter units. Furthermore, Activators can be replaced with Repressors to shutdown Amplifier-Reporter units and/or Driver-Activator/Repressor units, for negative selection methods and/or negative-feedback loops.
In a second context, a single-component synthetic construct with synthetic promoters (Driver-Reporter) would comprise of:
In an expanded form or the multicomponent eTPCS, the component 2A eTPC may further contain a second genomic receiver site, designated component 2D, which is coupled to a second genomic donor vector, designated component 2E, that is also added to the system (
An eTPCS component 2A may further comprise one or more additional integration couples.
An eTPCS, comprising an eTPC and either one or two integration couples, is used for preparation of the eTPC-t used for assembly of the combined eAPC:eTPC system.
An eTPC-t may be prepared by integration of two complementary TCR chains to form a TCRsp, or may alternatively may be prepared by two steps by providing each complementary chain sequentially (
The genetic donor vector and genomic receiver sites operate as an integration couple subsystem of the eTPCS. A genetic donor vector must first be combined with target ORFs, such that base donor vector now encodes those target ORFs. The assembled primed donor vector is then introduced to the target eTPC to exchange target ORF(s) to the genomic receiver site, thus integrating the target ORFs to coupled receiver site of the target cell (
An eTPCS that comprises genetic donor vectors component 2C and/or 2E is combined with at least one ORF encoding at least one analyte TCR chain to obtain component 2C′ and/or 2E′, wherein the combination is defined as the ligation of genetic material into the correct coding frame(s), and in the correct orientation(s), of the genetic donor vector.
The combination of one or more ORFs into genetic donor vectors 2C and/or 2E may be performed multiple times with a library of unique ORFs as
The efficient integration of a predictable copy number of one or more ORFs into the genomic receiver site is highly advantageous for operation of a standardised eTPC, where analyte eTPC populations may be rapidly prepared and characterised. Thus, the genomic receiver site(s) and coupled donor vector(s) are critical to the function of the eTPC. Furthermore, it is strongly desirable to have an eTPC wherein component 2B and 2D, are insulated from one another, such that the donor vector component 2C cannot integrate at component 2B, and vice versa. In addition, it is also desirable that the component 2B and/or component 2D are amenable to a method of preparation of an eTPC-t wherein, the introduction of a single pair of complementary TCR chains is rapid, repeatable, with a high likelihood of correct integration and delivery of only a single pair.
The genomic receiver site may be selected from the following
The genomic receiver site, component 2B and/or component 2D comprises of at least one of the following genetic elements
A preferred genomic receiver site would comprise of two different arrangements using the following selected elements from the previously stated list of element.
The first arrangement is for receiving a single ORF encoding one or more TCR chains and/or a selection mark of integration, via RMCE integration wherein the arrangement is
wherein
The second arrangement is for receiving a two ORF encoding one or more TCR chains and/or a selection mark of integration, via RMCE integration wherein the arrangement is
wherein
Component 2C and/or 2E comprises of at least one of the following genetic elements
A preferred genetic donor vector, component C and/or component E, would comprise of two different possible arrangements using the following selected elements from the previously stated list of elements.
The first arrangement is for receiving a single ORF encoding one or more TCR chains and/or a selection mark of integration, via RMCE integration wherein the arrangement is
wherein
wherein
The above described eTPCS system may be used in multiple ways to prepare distinct forms of analyte eTPC populations, or libraries thereof, that serve to present analyte TCRsp to the eAPC within the combined eAPC:eTPC system in operation of the two-part device.
The eTPC-t populations that are created need to derive analyte TCR chains from certain sources with which to analyse candidate antigens.
The sources of analyte TCR chain encoding sequences can be derived from
An eTPCS comprising a single integration couple may be used to prepare an eTPC-t from component 2A in one step, by providing component 2C′ combined with an ORF for complementary pair of TCR chains, such that this analyte TCR pair is integrated to site 2B, to create 2B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided TCR pair, and it is presented at the cell surface as a TCRsp (
An eTPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eTPC-t from component 2A in one step, by providing component 2C′ combined with an ORF for complementary pair of TCR chains, such that this analyte TCR pair is integrated to site 2B, to create 2B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided TCR pair, and it is presented at the cell surface as a TCRsp. The second integration couple 1 D/1E remains unmodified and may be used for downstream integration steps (
An eTPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eTPC-t from component 2A in one step, by providing component 2C′ and 2E′ each combined with one ORF encoding one chain of a complementary TCR chain pair, such that both analyte TCR chains are integrated to site 2B or 2D, to create 2B′ and 2D′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided TCR pair, and it is presented at the cell surface as a TCRsp. (
An eTPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eTPC-x from component 2A in one step, by providing component 2C′ combined with an ORF for a single analyte TCR chain, such that this analyte TCR chain is integrated to site 2B, to create 2B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided TCR chain, but lacks a complementary chain and thus does not express the any surface TCR. The second integration couple 1 D/1E remains unmodified and may be used for downstream integration steps (
An eTPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eTPC-t from component 2A in two steps, by first providing component 2C′ combined with an ORF for a single analyte TCR chain, such that this analyte TCR chain is integrated to site 2B, to create 2B′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided TCR chain, but lacks a complementary chain and thus does not express the any surface TCR (eTPC-x intermediate). The second integration couple 1 D/1E remains unmodified. In the second step 2E′ is provided, wherein the vector is combined with an ORF for a second single analyte TCR chain, complementary to the previously integrated TCR chain, such that this second complementary analyte TCR chain is integrated to site 2D, to create 2D′. The resulting cell line expresses the provided complementary analyte TCR chain pair and it is presented at the cell surface as a TCRsp. (
In the abovementioned examples of preparing analyte eTPC-x and/or eTPC-t populations from eTPC, the eTPCS system is used to provide known analyte TCR chains in a defined manner to prepare discrete populations of analyte eTPC expressing defined TCRsp. Such a process may be repeated many times to build libraries of eTCP-x and/or eTCP-t to provide to the combined eAPC:eTPC system in operation of the device. An alternative approach is to take pooled libraries of analyte eTPC-t, wherein each eTPC-t integrates a single random pair of TCR ORF from the original vector pool, and thus each eTPC-t expresses a single random TCRsp, but the collectively the pool encodes multiple species of TCRsp represented in the original vector pool. The same shotgun principle can be applied to create pools of eTPC-x. This is particularly useful when analysing large libraries of candidate TCRsp against analyte antigens. An eTPCS comprising one integration couple may be used to prepare an eTPC-t pool from component 2A in one step, by providing component 2C′ combined with a library of multiple ORF encoding a pool analyte of analyte TCR pairs, such that a pair is integrated to site B, to create B′, within each cell and wherein each eTPC-t integrates a single random pair of TCR ORF from the original vector pool, and thus each eTPC-t expresses a single random TCRsp, but the collectively the pool encodes multiple species of TCRsp represented in the original vector pool. The resulting pool of cells contains a collection of cells that collectively express multiple analyte TCRsp (
An eTPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eTPC-t pool from component 2A in one step, by providing component 2C′ combined with a library of multiple ORF encoding a pool of analyte TCR pairs, such that a pair is integrated to site B, to create B′, within each cell and wherein each eTPC integrates a single random pair of TCR ORF from the original vector pool, and thus each eTPC-t expresses a single random TCRsp, but the collectively the pool encodes multiple species of TCRsp represented in the original vector pool. The resulting pool of cells contains a collection of cells that collectively express multiple analyte TCRsp. The second integration couple 1D/1E remains unmodified (
An eTPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eTPC-t pool from component 2A in one step, by providing component 2C′ combined with a library of multiple ORF encoding a pool of single analyte TCR chains such that each eTPC integrates a single randomised TCR chain ORF encoded in component 2C′ to site 2B, to create 2B′. Simultaneously, providing component 2E′ combined with a library of multiple ORF encoding a pool of single analyte TCR chains complementary to first library provided in 2C′, such that each eTPC-t integrates a single randomised complementary TCR chain ORF encoded in component 2E′ into site 2D, to create 2D′. Each resulting cell in the eTPC-t pool has a single pair of randomised complementary TCR chain ORF, such that each cell in the pool expresses a randomised TCRsp. Such a pooled library would contain all possible combinations of provided complementary TCR chains from the sets proceed in components 2C′ and 2E′ (
In the present context, an eTPCS comprising two integration couples may be used to prepare an eTPC-t pool from a previously obtained e-TPC-x in one step, wherein the site 2B has been converted to 2B′ and contains the single analyte TCR chain. An eTPC-t is prepared by providing component 2E′ combined with a library of multiple ORF encoding a pool of single analyte TCR chains complementary to the already integrated chain, such that each such that each eTPC-t integrates a single randomised TCR chain ORF of the provided 2E′ library in to site 2D, to create 2D′. Each resulting cell in the eTPC-t pool has the analyte TCR chain provided by the starting eTPC-x, and a selection of each single complementary analyte TCR chain, such that each cell in the pool expresses a random pair of ORF as an TCRsp. Such an approach is used when analysing the effect of varying a single chain against a fixed chain in a complementary TCR chain pair (
An eTPC-x may be prepared from an eTPC-t by providing either one of further integration vectors, components 2Y or 2Z, which encode markers of integration or no ORF.
Combination of component 2Y or 2Z to an eTPC-t would exchange either of the sites to obtain a single TCR chain expressing eTPC-x.
A preferred genetic integration vector, component 2Y and component 2Z, for conversion of eTPC-t to eTPC-x would comprise the same integration vector requirements as component 2C and 2E above, though not encoding any TCR chain ORF, and preferably encoding a marker of integration.
Contacting Analyte eAPC and eTPC
The present invention relates to the provision of an engineered two-part cellular device. The two parts of the device, eAPCS and eTPCS, are used to assemble analyte eAPC and analyte eTPC, respectively. These analyte cell populations are then assembled into a combined eAPC:eTPC system from which the device outputs may be obtained. The eAPC:eTPC system is comprised of a selection of one or more of analyte eAPC populations, and one or more eTPC populations (
A contact between an analyte eAPC and analyte eTPC is performed in a permissive cell culture system, wherein said system comprises cell culture media that is permissive to function of both eAPC and eTPC cells.
An analyte eTPC obtained from the combined eAPC:eTPC system is used for characterisation of a signal response of the analyte eTPC, expressing analyte TCRsp, to an analyte antigen presented by the analyte eAPC, wherein such a signal response may be either binary or graduated, and may be measured as intrinsic to the eTPC (
The method for selecting one or more analyte eTPC from an input analyte eTPC or a library of analyte eTPC, from the combined eAPC:eTPC system, to obtain one or more analyte eTPC wherein the expressed TCRsp binds to one or more analyte antigen presented by the analyte eAPC comprises
An analyte eAPC obtained from the combined eAPC:eTPC system is used for characterisation of a signal response of the analyte eAPC, expressing analyte antigen, to an TCRsp presented by the analyte eTPC, wherein such a signal response may be either binary or graduated, and may be measured as intrinsic to the eTPC (
The method for selecting one or more analyte eAPC from an input analyte eAPC or a library of analyte eAPC, from the combined eAPC:eTPC system, to obtain one or more analyte eAPC wherein the expressed analyte antigen binds to one or more analyte TCRsp presented by the analyte eTPC comprises
Selection of eTPC or eAPC may be from an eAPC:eTPC system comprising binary culture system wherein a single prepared analyte eAPC population and single prepared analyte eTPC population are provided, and the responding eAPC or eTPC are selected on the basis of a binary or graduated response within the eTPC (
An eAPC:eTPC system may comprise an input of prepared single analyte eAPC and a prepared pooled library of eTPC (
An eAPC:eTPC system may comprise an input of prepared single analyte eTPC and a prepared pooled library of eAPC (
Within the combined eATP:eTPC system, measuring a signal response in the one or more analyte eTPC or one or more eAPC, if any, which may be induced by the formation of a complex between the analyte TCRsp with the analyte antigen is critical to selection of primary device outputs, wherein the primary device outputs are single cells or pools of cells of one or more of the following
In the present context, a method for selecting analyte eTPC and/or analyte eAPC from the combined eAPC:eTPC system on the basis of a reported signal response within the eTPC comprises
An induced native or synthetic signal response that is intrinsic to eAPC and/or eTPC is measured by detecting an increase or decrease in one or more of the following
The present invention relates to the provision of an engineered two-part cellular device. The two parts of the device, eAPCS and eTPCS, are used to assemble analyte eAPC and analyte eTPC, respectively. These analyte cell populations are then assembled into a combined eAPC:eTPC system from which the device outputs may be obtained. The eAPC:eTPC system is comprised of a selection of one or more of analyte eAPC populations, and one or more eTPC populations (
The modes of induced signal response reporting are described above, and it is these reported responses that are required to be measured in obtaining the primary output of the two-part device.
Primary outputs from the device are selected cell populations, which have or have not responded to the analyte presented by the reciprocal cell provided in the eAPC:eTPC system. That is, such a primary output may be represented as a single cell, or a pool of cells, that have been selected on the presence or absence of a reported response within the combined eAPC:eTPC system (
A selection of analyte eAPC and/or analyte eTPC from the combined eAPC:eTPC system may be made on the basis of a response in the contacting cell. That is, an analyte eAPC may be selected on that basis of a reported response, or lack thereof, in the contacting analyte eTPC. Conversely, an analyte eTPC may be selected on that basis of a reported response, or lack thereof, in the contacting analyte eAPC.
In the present context, primary eAPC outputs from the device are selected cells, wherein selection is made based on the presence or absence of a reported signal response, and these cells may comprise one or more of
Primary eTPC outputs from the device are selected cells, wherein selection is made based on the presence or absence of a reported signal response, and these cells comprise eTPC-t, wherein selected cells may comprise a single cell, a pool of cells of the same identity, a pool of cells of different identities (
The reported signals in the analyte eAPC and/or analyte eTPC in a combined eAPC:eTPC system is used to select analyte cell populations to provide the primary outputs.
A primary output of eAPC and/or eTPC types may be achieved in a an instance wherein the combined eAPC:eTPC system is of binary culture nature (e.g.
A primary output of eAPC and/or eTPC types may be achieved from an instance wherein the combined eAPC:eTPC system is of fixed eAPC and pooled library analyte eTPC nature (e.g.
There are several distinct modes in which the primary outputs may be obtained, wherein each mode entails a step of cell sorting. Cell sorting may be achieved through fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and/or magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) and/or distinct affinity-activated cell sorting methods.
Primary output eAPC and/or eTPC cells may be obtained by single cell sorting to obtain a single cell and/or cell sorting to a pool to obtain a pool of cells.
Primary output eAPC and/or eTPC cells may be obtained by single cell sorting to obtain a single cell, and subsequent outgrowth of the single cells to obtain monoclonal pool of selected eAPC or eTPC cells.
Primary output eAPC and/or eTPC cells may be obtained by cell sorting to a pool to obtain a pool of cells, and subsequent outgrowth of the pool of cells to obtain a pool of selected eAPC and/or eTPC cells.
Obtaining Terminal Device Outputs from the eAPC:eTPC System
Subsequent to the above-described methods of obtaining primary outputs, wherein primary outputs are selected analyte eAPC and/or eTPC cells that are selected on the basis of a measured signal response, the terminal outputs of the two part cellular device may be obtained via further processing of the selected eAPCa and/or eTPC primary outputs.
Terminal outputs from the two-part cellular device are the identities of
Within the two-part cellular device, it is often the case that analyte molecules that are presented by the analyte eAPC and analyte eTPC are genetically encoded. Therefore, to identify the analyte molecules presented by the analyte eAPC or eTPC, genetic sequencing of the prepared analyte molecules from the eAPC or eTPC may be performed.
eAPC may be processed such that genetic sequence is obtained for component 1B′ and/or component 1D′ of the sorted and/or expanded eAPC-p, eAPC-a or eAPC-pa cells to determine the identity of
eAPC may be processed such that genetic sequence is obtained for the genome of the sorted and/or expanded eAPC-p, eAPC-a or eAPC-pa cells to determine the identity of
eTPC may be processed such that genetic sequence is obtained for component 2B′ and/or component 2D′ of the sorted and/or expanded eTPC-t cells to determine the identity of TCRsp, wherein the obtained identity of TCRsp represents a terminal output from the two-part cellular device.
eTPC may be processed such that genetic sequence is obtained for the genome of the sorted and/or expanded eTPC-t cells to determine the identity of TCRsp, wherein the obtained identify of TCRsp represents a terminal output from the two-part cellular device.
Genetic sequencing can be achieved by a range of modes, and from arrange genetic material sources, with and without specific processing.
In the present context, the sequencing step may be preceded by
The sequencing step may be destructive to the eAPC or eTPC, or pool thereof, obtained as primary outputs from the two-part device.
If it is desirable to obtain primary outputs from the two-part device wherein the sequencing step has been destructive to the primary output eAPC or eTPC, the sequence information obtained as terminal output of the two-part device may be used to prepare equivalent output eAPC and eTPC as analyte eAPC or analyte eTPC through use of the eAPCS and eTPCS, respectively.
In the above-described scenarios of genetically encoded analyte molecules, the terminal outputs of the two-part device may be obtained by obtaining sequence information from component 1B′ and/or 1 D′ and/or 2B′ and/or 2D′, and/or from the cell genome. However, in some embodiments the antigen information will not be genetically encoded. Post-transnationally modified antigens, antigens provided to the combined eAPC:eTPC system through non-genetic means, antigens that are emergent from an induced or modified state of the analyte eAPC proteome or metabolite, and CM intrinsic to the eAPC:eTPC system, may not reasonably be identified through genetic means.
In the important case of aAM that may be provided to the eACP:eTPC system by non-genetic means, there are two distinct modes through which an eAPC-p or eAPC-pa may present a provided aAM as an aAPX:aAM complex. In the first scenario the aAM is provided in a form that may directly bind to the aAPX and forms an aAPX:aAM complex at the cells surface (
There are generally two modes through which a cargo molecule may be identified from a selected eAPC. First, a forced release of the cargo from the aAPX:aAM or aAPX:CM results in isolation of the aAM or CM that is available for subsequent identification (
Methods for identifying isolated aAM and/or CM directly, or from the isolated aAPX:aAM or an aAPX:CM complexes, can comprise
The invention is illustrated in the following non-limiting figures.
The two-part engineered cellular device is comprised of two multicomponent cell systems, the eAPCS and the eTPCS, which are contacted as a combined eAPC:eTPC system. Operation of the overall device comprises two phases, the preparation phase, and the analytical phase. In one aspect of Phase 1, the eAPCS system is used to prepare cells expressing analyte antigen-presenting complex (aAPX), and/or analyte antigenic molecule (aAM) at the cell surface (step i). An eAPC presenting aAPX alone is termed eAPC-p. An eAPC presenting aAM alone is termed eAPC-a. An eAPC presenting an aAM presented as cargo in an aAPX is termed an eAPC-pa. These analytes are collectively referred to as the analyte antigen. In a separate aspect of Phase 1, the eTPCS system is used to prepare cells expressing analyte TCR chain pairs (TCRsp) at the cell surface (step ii). An eTPC presenting a TCRsp at the cell surface is termed an eTPC-t. Phase 2 of the overall system is the contacting of the analyte-bearing cells prepared in Phase 1, to form the combined eAPC:eTPC system (step iii). Contacted analyte eAPC present analyte antigens to the analyte eTPC. Within the combined eAPC:eTPC system, the responsiveness of the analyte TCR chain pair towards the provided analyte antigen is determined by readout of a contact-dependent analyte eAPC and/or eTPC response, as denoted by * and the shaded box to represent an altered signal state of these reporting analyte cells (step iv). As an outcome of the eAPC:eTPC system specific eAPC and/or eTPC-t can be selected based on their response and/or their ability to drive a response in the other contacting analyte cell. It is thus selected single cells, or populations of cells, of the type, eAPC-p, eAPC-a, eAPC-pa and/or eTPC-t that are the primary outputs of the device operation (step v). By obtaining the analyte cells from step v, the presented analyte aAPX, aAM, aAPX:aAM, CM, aAPX:CM and/or TCRsp may be identified from these cells as the terminal output of the device operation (step vi).
An example of an eAPCS comprising three components. The first component 1A is the eAPC line itself with all required engineered features of that cell. The eAPC 1A contains one further component 1B, which is a genomic integration site for integration of aAPX and/or aAM. One additional component, 1C represents a genetic donor vector for site-directed integration of ORFs into sites 1B, wherein the arrow indicates coupled specificity. The paired integration site/donor vector couple may be formatted to integrate a single ORF or a pair of ORFs to introduce aAPX and/or aAM expression.
An example of an eAPCS comprising five components. The first component 1A is the eAPC line itself with all required engineered features of that cell. The eAPC 1A contains two further components, 1B and 1D, which are genomic integration sites for integration of aAPX and/or aAM. Two additional components, 1C and 1E, represent genetic donor vectors for site-directed integration of ORFs into sites 1B and 1D, respectively, wherein arrows indicate paired specificity. Each paired integration site/donor vector couple may be formatted to integrate a single ORF or a pair of ORFs to introduce aAPX and/or aAM expression.
The eAPCS system begins with the eAPC and uses a donor vector(s) to create cells expressing analyte antigen-presenting complex (aAPX), and/or analyte antigenic molecule (aAM) at the cell surface. An eAPC presenting aAPX alone is termed eAPC-p, and may be created by introduction of aAPX encoding ORF(s) to the eAPC (step i). An eAPC expressing aAM alone is termed eAPC-a, wherein aAM may be expressed at the cell surface and available for TCR engagement, or require processing and loading as cargo into an aAPX as the aAPX:aAM complex. An eAPC 1A may be created by introduction of aAM encoding ORF(s) to the eAPC (step ii). An eAPC presenting an aAM as cargo in an aAPX is termed an eAPC-pa. An eAPC-pa be produced either; introduction of aAM and aAPX encoding ORFs to an eAPC simultaneously (step iii); introduction of aAM encoding ORF(s) to an eAPC-p (step iv); introduction aAPX encoding ORF(s) to an eAPC-a (step v).
A genetic donor vector and genomic receiver site form an integration couple, wherein one or more ORFs encoded within the genetic donor vector can integrated specifically to its coupled genomic receiver site. Step 1 in operation of the integration couple is to introduce one or more target ORFs to the donor vector. The initial donor vector is denoted X, and is modified to a primed donor vector X′, by introduction of target ORF(s). Step 2 entails combination of the primed donor vector, X′, with a cell harbouring a genomic receiver site, Y. Introduction of the ORF encoded by the primed donor vector into the receiver site results in the creation of a cell harbouring an integrated site, Y′.
eAPC 1A contains genomic receiver site 1B. Primed genetic donor vector 1C′ is coupled to 1B and encodes an aAPX. When the 1A eAPC is combined with the 1C′ donor vector. The resulting cell has the ORF of 1C′ exchanged to the 1B genomic receiver site to create site 1B′ and introduce aAPX expression. This results in expression of the aAPX on the cell surface and creation of an eAPC-p.
eAPC 1A contains genomic receiver sites 1B and 1D. Primed genetic donor vector 1C′ is coupled to 1B and encodes an aAPX. When the 1A eAPC is combined with the 1C′ donor vector. The resulting cell has the ORF of 1C′ exchanged to the 1B genomic receiver site to create site 1B′ and introduce aAPX expression. This results in expression of the aAPX on the cell surface and creation of an eAPC-p. Genomic receiver site 1D remains unused.
eAPC 1A contains genomic receiver site 1B. Primed genetic donor vector 1C′ is coupled to 1B and encodes an aAM. When the 1A eAPC is combined with the 1C′ donor vector. The resulting cell has the ORF of 1C′ exchanged to the 1B genomic receiver site to create site 1B′ and introduce aAM expression. This results in one of two forms of eAPC-a, expressing aAM at the cell surface or intracellularly.
eAPC 1A contains genomic receiver sites 1B and 1D. Primed genetic donor vector 1C′ is coupled to 1B and encodes an aAM. When the 1A eAPC is combined with the 1C′ donor vector. The resulting cell has the ORF of 1C′ exchanged to the 1B genomic receiver site to create site 1B′ and introduce aAM expression. This results in one of two forms of eAPC-a, expressing aAM at the cell surface or intracellularly. Genomic receiver site 1D remains unused.
eAPC 1A contains genomic receiver site 1B. Genetic donor vector 1C′ is coupled to 1B. Donor vector 1C′ encodes an aAPX as well as an aAM.
The 1A eAPC is combined with donor vectors 1C′. The resulting cell has the ORFs 1C′ exchanged to the 1B genomic receiver site to create site 1B′ and deliver an ORF for an aAPX and an aAM. This results in expression of the aAPX on the cell surface, aAM intracellularly, and thus loading of the aAM as cargo in the aAPX in formation of the aAPX:aAM complex at the cell surface.
eAPC 1A contains distinct genomic receiver sites 1B and 1D. Genetic donor vector 1C′ is coupled to 1B. Donor vector 1C′ encodes an aAPX as well as an aAM. The 1A eAPC is combined with donor vectors 1C′. The resulting cell has the ORFs 1C′ exchanged to the 1B genomic receiver site to create site 1B′ and deliver an ORF for an aAPX and an aAM. Genomic receiver site 1D remains unused. This results in expression of the aAPX on the cell surface, aAM intracellularly, and thus loading of the aAM as cargo in the aAPX in formation of the aAPX:aAM complex at the cell surface. This creates an eAPC-pa cell line. Genomic receiver site 1D remains unused.
eAPC 1A contains distinct genomic receiver sites 1B and 1D. Distinct genetic donor vectors 1C′ and 1E′ are independently coupled to 1B and 1D, respectively. Donor vector 1C′ encodes an aAPX and donor vector 1E′ encodes an aAM. The 1A eAPC is combined with donor vectors 1C′ and 1E′ simultaneously. The resulting cell has the ORF 1C′ exchanged to the 1B genomic receiver site to create site 1B′ and deliver an ORF for an aAPX. Simultaneously, the ORF of 1E′ exchanged to the 1D genomic receiver site to create site 1D′ and deliver an ORF for an aAM. This results in expression of the aAPX on the cell surface, aAM intracellularly, and thus loading of the aAM as cargo in the aAPX in formation of the aAPX:aAM complex at the cell surface. This creates an eAPC-pa cell line.
eAPC 1A contains distinct genomic receiver sites 1B and 1D. Distinct genetic donor vectors 1C′ and 1E′ are independently coupled to 1B and 1D, respectively. Donor vector 1C′ encodes an aAPX and donor vector 1E′ encodes an aAM. In STEP1 the 1A eAPC is combined with the 1C′ donor vector. The resulting cell has insert 1C′ exchanged to the 1B genomic receiver site to create site 1B′ and deliver an ORF for an aAPX. This results in expression of the aAPX on the cell surface and creation of an eAPC-p. Genomic receiver site 1D remains unused. In STEP2 the eAPC-p created in STEP1 is combine with the 1E′ donor vector. The resulting cell has insert 1E′ exchanged to the 1D genomic receiver site to create site 1D′ and deliver an ORF for an aAM. This results in expression of the aAM on the cell surface as cargo of the expressed aAPX, and creation of an eAPC-pa.
eAPC 1A contains distinct genomic receiver sites 1B and 1D. Distinct genetic donor vectors 1C′ and 1E′ are independently coupled to 1B and 1D, respectively. Donor vector 1C′ encodes an aAM and donor vector 1E′ encodes an aAPX. In STEP1 the 1A eAPC is combined with the 1C′ donor vector. The resulting cell has insert 1C′ exchanged to the 1B genomic receiver site to create site 1B′ and deliver an ORF for an aAM. This results in expression of the aAM on the cell surface and creation of an eAPC-a. Genomic receiver site 1D remains unused. In STEP2 the eAPC-a created in STEP1 is combine with the 1E′ donor vector. The resulting cell has insert 1E′ exchanged to the 1D genomic receiver site to create site 1D′ and deliver an ORF for an aAPX. This results in expression of the aAPX on the cell surface with the aAM as cargo and creation of an eAPC-pa.
The eAPC-p contains the exchanged genomic receiver site 1B′ expressing an aAPX and the distinct genomic receiver site 1D. The pool of genetic donor vectors 1E′ i-iii are coupled to 1D. Donor vectors 1E′ i-iii each encode a single aAM gene. The eAPC-p is combined with donor vectors 1E′ i, 1E′ ii, 1E′ iii simultaneously. The resulting cell pool has either of inserts 1E′ i-iii exchanged to the 1D genomic receiver site in multiple independent instances to create sites 1D′ i-iii each delivering a single ORF for an aAM gene. The resulting eAPC-pa cell pool comprises a mixed population of three distinct cell cohorts each expressing a discrete combination of 1B′ presenting as aAPX:aAM either of the aAM genes contained in the initial vector library.
eAPC-a contains the exchanged genomic receiver site 1B′ expressing an aAM and the distinct genomic receiver site 1D. The pool of genetic donor vectors 1E′ i-iii are coupled to 1D. Donor vectors 1E′ i-iii each encode a single aAPX gene. The eAPC-a is combined with donor vectors 1E′ i, 1E′ ii, 1E′ iii simultaneously. The resulting cell pool has either of inserts 1E′ i-iii exchanged to the 1D genomic receiver site in multiple independent instances to create sites 1D′ i-iii each delivering a single ORF for an aAPX gene. The resulting eAPC-pa cell pool comprises a mixed population of three distinct cell cohorts each expressing a discrete combination of the aAM encoded in 1B′ and either of the aAPX genes contained in the initial vector library.
eAPC 1A contains distinct genomic receiver sites 1B and 1D. Distinct genetic donor vectors 1C′ and 1E′ are coupled to 1B and 1D, respectively. Donor vectors 1C′ i and 1C′ ii each encode a single aAM gene, and donor vectors 1E′ i and 1E′ ii each encode a single aAPX gene. The eAPC 1A is combined with donor vectors 1C′ i, 1C′ ii, 1E′ i and 1E′ ii simultaneously. The resulting cell pool has insert 1C′ i or 1C′ ii exchanged to the 1B genomic receiver site multiple independent instances to create sites 1B′ i and 1B′ ii, each delivering a single ORF for an aAM. The resulting cell pool further has insert 1E i or 1E ii exchanged to the 1D genomic receiver site multiple independent instances to create sites 1E′ i and 1E′ ii, each delivering a single ORF for an APX gene. The resulting eAPC-pa cell pool comprises a mixed population of four distinct cell cohorts each expressing a discrete randomised aAPX:aAM pair at the surface comprised of one of each gene contained in the initial vector library.
An example of an eAPCS comprising four components. The first component 2A is the eTPC line itself with all required engineered features of that cell. The eTPC 2A contains a second component, 2B, which is a genomic integration site for integration of a pair of complementary analyte TCR chain ORFs. A third component included in the eTPC, 2A, is a synthetic reporter construct that is induced upon TCR ligation, 2F. One additional independent component, 2C, represents a genetic donor vectors for site-directed integration of ORFs into site 2B, where arrow indicates coupled specificity.
An example of an eAPCS comprising six components. The first component 2A is the eTPC line itself with all required engineered features of that cell. The eTPC 2A contains three further components, two of which are 2B and 2D, which are genomic integration sites for integration of an analyte TCR chain pair. A third component included in the eTPC, 2A, is a synthetic reporter construct that is induced upon TCR ligation, 2F. Two additional independent components, 2C and 2E, represent genetic donor vectors for site-directed integration of ORFs into sites 2B and 2D, respectively, where arrows indicate coupled specificity. Each paired integration site/donor vector couple may be formatted to integrate a single ORF or a pair of ORFs to introduce analyte TCR chain pair expression by different means.
The eTPCS begins with the eTPC and uses a donor vector(s) to create cells expressing analyte TCRsp, or single analyte TCR chains. An eTPC presenting TCRsp is termed eTPC-t, and may be created by introduction of two complimentary TCR chain encoding ORFs to the eTPC (step i). An eTPC expressing a single analyte TCR chain alone is termed an eTPC-x, wherein a, and may be created by introduction of a single TCR chain encoding ORF(s) to the eTPC (step ii). A eTPC-t may alternatively be created from an eTPCx, wherein a second complimentary TCR chain encoding ORF is introduced to an existing eTPC-x (step iii).
eTPC 2A contains distinct genomic receiver sites 2B and 2D. The genetic donor vectors 2C′ is coupled to 2D. Donor vector 2C′ encodes a TCR chain pair. The eTPC 2A further contains a TCR signal response element 2F. The eTPC 2A is combined with donor vector 2C′. The resulting cell has insert 2C′ exchanged to the 2B genomic receiver site to create site 2B′ and deliver the two ORFs for a TCR chain pair. Genomic receiver site 2D remains unused. This cell is capable of presenting a TCRsp at the surface, and thus designated a eTPC-t.
eTPC 2A contains distinct genomic receiver sites 2B and 2D. The eTPC 2A further contains a TCR signal response element 2F. Distinct genetic donor vectors 2C′ and 2E′ are independently coupled to 2B and 2D, respectively. Donor vector 2C′ encodes a single TCR chain, and donor vector 2E′ encodes a second reciprocal TCR chain. The eTPC 2A is combined with donor vectors 2C′ and 2E′. The resulting cell has insert 2C exchanged to the 2B genomic receiver site to create site 2B′ and deliver an ORF for a first TCR chain. In addition, the resulting cell line has insert 2E′ exchanged to the 2D genomic receiver site to create site 2D′ and deliver an ORF for a second TCR chain. This cell is capable of presenting a TCRsp at the surface, and is thus designated a eTPC-t.
eTPC 2A contains distinct genomic receiver sites 2B and 2D. The genetic donor vectors 2C′ is coupled to 2D. Donor vector 2C′ encodes a single TCR chain. The eTPC 2A further contains a TCR signal response element 2F. The eTPC 2A is combined with donor vector 2C′. The resulting cell has insert 2C′ exchanged to the 2B genomic receiver site to create site 2B′ and deliver a single TCR chain ORF. Genomic receiver site 2D remains unused. This cell expresses only a single TCR chain and is thus designated a eTPC-x.
eTPC 2A contains distinct genomic receiver sites 2B and 2D. The eTPC 2A further contains a TCR signal response element 2F. Distinct genetic donor vectors 2C′ and 2E′ are independently coupled to 2B and 2D, respectively. Donor vector 2C′ encodes a single TCR chain, and donor vector 2E′ encodes a second reciprocal TCR chain. In STEP 1 a eTPC 2A is combined with donor vector 2C′. The resulting cell has insert 2C′ exchanged to the 2B genomic receiver site to create site 2B′ and deliver an ORF for a first TCR chain. This cell expresses only a single TCR chain and is thus designated a eTPC-x. Genomic receiver site 2D remains unused. In STEP 2, the eTPC-x is combined with donor vector 2E′. The resulting cell has insert 2E′ exchanged to the 2D genomic receiver site to create site 2D′ and deliver an ORF for a second complementary TCR chain. This cell is capable of presenting a TCRsp at the surface, and is thus designated a eTPC-t.
eTPC 2A contains a genomic receiver site 2B. The genetic donor vectors 2C′ is coupled to 2B. Donor vector 2C′ i, 2C′ ii and 2C′ iii encode a distinct TCR chain pair and constitutes a mixed vector library of discrete TCR chain pairs. The eTPC 2A further contains a TCR signal response element 2F. The eTPC 2A is combined with donor vectors 2C′ i, 2C′ ii and 2C′ iii simultaneously. The resulting cell pool has insert 2C exchanged to the 2B genomic receiver site multiple independent instances to create site 2B′ i, 2B′ ii and 2B′ iii delivering two ORFs for each discrete TCR chain pair contained in the initial vector library. This eTPC-t cell pool comprises a mixed population of three distinct cell clones each expressing a distinct TCR chain pairs, denoted TCRsp i, ii and iii, forming an eTPC-t pooled library.
eTPC 2A contains distinct genomic receiver sites 2B and 2D. The genetic donor vectors 2C′ is coupled to 2B. Donor vector 2C′ i, 2C′ ii and 2C′ iii encode a distinct TCR chain pair and constitutes a mixed vector library of discrete TCR chain pairs. The eTPC 2A further contains a TCR signal response element 2F. The eTPC 2A is combined with donor vectors 2C′ i, 2C′ ii and 2C′ iii simultaneously. The resulting cell pool has insert 2C exchanged to the 2B genomic receiver site multiple independent instances to create site 2B′ i, 2B′ ii and 2B′ iii delivering two ORFs for each discrete TCR chain pair contained in the initial vector library. This eTPC-t cell pool comprises a mixed population of three distinct cell clones each expressing a distinct TCR chain pairs, denoted TCRsp i, ii and iii, forming an eTPC-t pooled library. Genomic receiver site 2D remains unused.
eTPC 2A contains distinct genomic receiver sites 2B and 2D. Distinct genetic donor vectors 2C′ and 2E′ are independently coupled to 2B and 2D, respectively. Donor vectors 2C′ i and 2C′ ii each encode a single TCR chain, and donor vectors 2E′ i and 2E′ ii each encode a reciprocal single TCR chain. The eTPC 2A further contains a TCR signal response element 2F. The eTPC 2A is combined with donor vectors 2C′ i, 2C′ ii, 2E′ i and 2E′ ii simultaneously. The resulting cell pool has insert 2C′ i or 2C′ ii exchanged to the 2B genomic receiver site multiple independent instances to create sites 2B′ i and 2B′ ii, each delivering a single ORF for a TCR chain. The resulting cell pool further has insert 2E i or 2E ii exchanged to the 2D genomic receiver site multiple independent instances to create sites 2E′ i and 2E′ ii, each delivering a single ORF for a TCR chain reciprocal to those at sites 2C′i and 2C′ii. The resulting eTPC-t cell pool comprises a mixed population of four distinct cell cohorts each expressing a discrete randomised TCRsp at the surface comprised of one of each reciprocal TCR chain contained in the initial vector library.
eTPC-x contains the exchanged genomic receiver site 2B′ expressing a single TCR chain and the distinct genomic receiver site 2D. Distinct genetic donor vectors 2E′ i and 2E′ ii are coupled to 2D, respectively. Donor vectors 2E′ i and 2E′ ii each encode a single TCR chain. The eTPC-x further contains a TCR signal response element 2F. The eTPC-x is combined with donor vectors 2E′ i and 2E′ ii simultaneously. The resulting cell pool has insert 2E′ i or 2E′ ii exchanged to the 2D genomic receiver site multiple independent instances to create sites 2E i and 2E′ii, each delivering a single ORF for a TCR chain. The resulting eTPC-t cell pool comprises a mixed population of 2 distinct cell cohorts expressing a discrete TCRsp at the surface comprised of the TCR chain expressed from 2B′ paired with one of each TCR chain contained in the initial vector library.
The analyte eAPC contains sites 1C′ and 1E′ integrated with one ORF each to encode one aAPX and one aAM, with the aAM loaded as cargo in aAPX at the cell surface.
The analyte eTPC contains sites 2C′ and 2E′ each integrated with one ORF encoding a reciprocal TCRsp at the surface. The eTPC-t further contains a TCR signal response element 2F. When eTPC-t and eAPC-pa populations are contacted, four eTPC-t response states can be achieved, one negative and three positive. The negative state is the resting state of the eTPC-t, with no signal strength at the 2F element, denoting failure of the eAPC aAPX:aAM complex to stimulate the eTPC-t presented chain pair. Three positive states show increasing signal strength from the 2F. States 2F′+, 2F′++ and 2F′+++ denote low, medium and high signal strength, respectively. The gene product of 2F denoted as hexagons accumulates to report signal strength of each cell state, as denoted by darker shading of the cells. This indicates a graded response of analyte TCRsp expressed by eTPC-t population towards analyte aAPX:aAM presented by the eAPC-pa.
The analyte eAPC-pa contains sites 1C′ and 1E′ integrated with one ORF each to encode one aAPX and one aAM, with the aAM loaded as cargo in aAPX at the cell surface. The analyte eTPC contains sites 2C′ and 2E′ each integrated with one ORF encoding a reciprocal TCRsp at the surface. The eTPC-t further contains a TCR signal response element 2F. When analyte eTPC and eAPC-pa populations are contacted, four eAPC response states can be achieved, one negative and three positive. The negative state is the resting state of the analyte eAPC, denoting failure of the TCRsp chain pair to stimulate the aAPX:aAM complex presented by the analyte eAPC. Three positive states show increasing signal strength from the contacted aAPX:aAM. The reported signal strength of each cell state, is denoted by *, ** and **, and also denoted by darker shading of the cells. This indicates a graded response of analyte aAPX:aAM towards the analyte TCRsp chain pair.
The eTPC-t pool contains cells harboring sites 2C′ i, ii or ii, wherein each integrated with two ORFs encoding a reciprocal TCR chain pair, and thus each cell cohort in the population expresses a discrete TCRsp at the surface. The eTPC-t further contains a TCR signal response element 2F. The analyte eAPC contain sites 1C′ and 1E′ integrated with a distinct set of ORF to encode one aAPX and one aAM, with the aAM loaded as cargo in aAPX at the cell surface. In the present example, only the TRC chain pair expressed from 2C′ i is specific for the aAPX:aAM presented by the analyte APC, such that when eTPC-t pool and analyte APC population are contacted, only the cell cohort of the eTPC-t that bears 2C′ i reports TCRsp engagement through state 2F′.
The analyte eAPC contain sites 1C′ and 1E′ integrated with a distinct set of ORF each to encode one aAPX and one aAM, with the aAM loaded as cargo in aAPX at the cell surface. The analyte eTPC contain the exchanged genomic receiver site 2C′ expressing a TCRsp at the surface. It further contains a TCR signal response element 2F. In the present example, only the complex aAPX:aAM i is specific for the TCR presented by the analyte eTPC, such that when analyte eAPC pool and analyte eTPC population are contacted, only the cell cohort expressing aAM i express a distinct signal *.
eAPC-p contains the exchanged genomic receiver site 1B′ expressing an aAPX. A soluble, directly presentable antigen aAM is combined with the eAPC-p. This results in the formation of the aAPX:aAM complex on the cell surface and the generation of a eAPC-p+aAM.
eAPC-p+aAM contains the exchanged genomic receiver site 1B′ expressing an aAPX as well as internalized aAM that is presented on the surface as aAPX:aAM complex. The aAM is released from the aAPX:aAM surface complex through incubation and the released aAM available for identification.
eAPC-p+aAM contains the exchanged genomic receiver site 1B′ expressing an aAPX as well as internalized aAM that is presented on the surface as aAPX:aAM complex. The aAPX:aAM surface complex is captured for identification of loaded aAM.
a) GFP fluorescence signal in two independent cell populations 48 hours after transfection with plasmids encoding Cas9-P2A-GFP and gRNAs targeting the HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C loci (grey histogram) compared to HEK293 control cells (dashed lined histogram). Cells that had a GFP signal within the GFP subset gate were sorted as a polyclonal population. b) Cell surface HLA-ABC signal observed on the two sorted polyclonal populations when labelled with a PE-Cy5 anti-HLA-ABC conjugated antibody (grey histogram). Single cells that showed a low PE-Cy5 anti-HLA-ABC signal and were displayed within the sort gate were sorted to establish monoclones. Non-labelled HEK293 cells (dashed line histogram) and PE-Cy5 anti-HLA-ABC labelled HEK293 cells (full black lined histogram) served as controls.
a) GFP fluorescence signal 48 hours after transfection with plasmids encoding Cas9-P2A-GFP, gRNAs targeting the AAVS1 locus and component B genetic elements flanked by AAVS1 left and right homology arms (grey histogram). HEK293 cells server as a GFP negative control (dashed line histogram). Cells that had a GFP signal within the GFP+ gate were sorted as a polyclonal population. b) GFP fluorescence signal 48 hours after transfection with plasmids encoding Cas9-P2A-GFP, gRNAs targeting the AAVS1 locus and component B and D, both flanked by AAVS1 left and right homology arms (grey histogram). HEK293 cells server as a GFP negative control (dashed line histogram). Cells that had a GFP signal within the GFP+ gate were sorted as a polyclonal population c) Maintained BFP but no detectable RFP signal observed in the D1 sorted polyclonal population. Single cells that showed high BFP signal in quadrant Q3 were sorted to establish eAPC containing synthetic component B monoclones. d) Maintained BFP and RFP signal observed in the D2 sorted polyclonal population. Single cells that showed high BFP and RFP signals in quadrant Q2 were sorted to establish eAPC monoclones containing synthetic component B and synthetic component D.
a and b) Monoclone populations that display maintained BFP expression suggest the integration of synthetic component B. c) Monoclone populations that display maintained BFP and RFP expression suggest the integration of both synthetic component B and synthetic component D.
a) PCR amplicons were generated with primers that prime within component B and/or D and size determined by electrophoresis. The expected size of a positive amplicon is 380 bp indicating stable integration of component B and/or D. b) PCR amplicons were generated with primers that prime on AAVS1 genomic sequence distal to region encoded by the homologous arms and the SV40 pA terminator encoded by component B and/or D and size determined by electrophoresis. The expected size of a positive amplicon is 660 bp indicating integration of component B and/or D occurred in the AAVS1 site.
Monoclone populations were stained with the PE-Cy5 anti-HLA-ABC conjugate antibody, and were analysed by flow cytometry (grey histogram). ACL-128, the HLA-ABCnull and HLA-DR,DP,DQnull eAPC cell line (dashed line histogram) served as controls. ACL-321 and ACL-331 monoclone cell lines showed a stronger fluorescent signal compared to the HLA-ABCnull and HLA-DR,DP,DQnull eAPC cell line control, demonstrating that each line expresses their analyte aAPX, HLA-A*24:02 or HLA-B*-07:02 ORF, respectively, and therefore are eAPC-p cell lines.
Monoclone populations were stained with a Alexa 647 anti-HLA-DR,DP,DQ conjugated antibody, and analysed by flow cytometry (grey histogram). ACL-128 (HLA-ABCnull and HLA-DR,DP,DQnull eAPC cell line) (dashed line histogram) and ARH wild type cell line (full black lined histogram) served as controls. ACL-341 and ACL-350 monoclone cell lines showed a stronger fluorescent signal compared to the HLA-ABCnull and HLA-DR,DP,DQnull eAPC cell line control, demonstrating that each line expressed their analyte aAPX, HLA-DRA*01:01/HLA-DRB1*01:01 or HLA-DPA1*01:03/HLA-DPB1*04:01, respectively, and therefore are eAPC-p cell lines.
These results strongly indicated a successful RMCE occurred between the BFP ORF and HLA-A*02:01 ORF in both ACL-421 and ACL-422 cell lines.
An amplicon of 630 bp indicated presence of HLA-A2 in monoclones ACL-421 and 422 but not in the control line, ACL-128.
a) eAPC-p Monoclone populations were stained with the PE-Cy5 anti-HLA-ABC conjugated antibody, and were analysed by flow cytometry (grey histogram). ACL-128, the HLA-ABCnull and HLA-DR,DP,DQnull eAPC cell line (dashed line histogram) served as control. ACL-321 and ACL-331 monoclone cell lines showed stronger fluorescent signal compared to controls demonstrating that each line expressed their analyte aAPX, HLA-A*02:01 or HLA-B*35:01 ORF, respectively, and therefore were eAPC-p cell lines.
Two tables are presented summarising the genetic characterisation of eAPC generated to contain Component 1B, or Component 1B and 1 D, respectively.
An eAPC-p was created through RMCE by electroporation of the cell line ACL-402 with the plasmid that encodes expression of the Tyr-recombinase, Flp (SEQ ID NO: 13, V4.1.8), together with one Component 1C′ plasmid encoding an aAPX, selected from either HLA-A*02:01 (SEQ ID NO: 77, V4.H.5 or HLA-A*24:02 (SEQ ID NO: 78, V4.H.6). At 10 days post electroporation, individual cells positive for HLAI surface expression and diminished fluorescent protein signal, RFP, encoded by Component 1B selection marker, were sorted. Resulting monoclonal eAPC-p lines were analysed by flow cytometry in parallel with the parental eAPC line, and two examples are presented a) Individual outgrown monoclone lines (ACL-900 and ACL-963) were analysed by flow cytometry for loss of RFP, presence of BFP and gain of HLA-ABC (aAPX). Left-hand plots display BFP vs RFP, the parental cell has both BFP and RFP (Q2, top plot, 99.2%), whereas ACL-900 (Q3, middle plot, 99.7%) and ACL-963 (Q3, bottom plot, 99.9%) both lack RFP signal, indicating integration couple between Component 1B/1C′ has occurred. Right-hand plots display BFP vs HLA-ABC (aAPX), wherein both ACL-900 (Q2, top plot, 99.2%) and ACL-963 (Q2, bottom plot, 99.2%) show strong signal for HLA-ABC (aAPX), further reinforcing that 1B/1C′ integration. Critically, both ACL-900 and ACL-963 have strong BFP signal, indicating that Component 1 D remains open and isolated from the Component 1B/1C′ integration couple. b) To further characterize ACL-900 and ACL-963, and a third eAPC-p not presented in a) ACL-907, genomic DNA was extracted and PCR conducted using primers that target adjacent and internal of Component 1B′ (Table 5, 8.B.3, 15.H.2), thereby selectively amplifying only successful integration couple events. Comparison is made to an unmodified parental line, ACL-3 wherein the Component 1B is lacking. Amplicon products specific for Component 1B′ were produced for all three eAPC-p monoclones whereas no product was detected in the ACL-3 reaction, confirming the specific integration couple event between Component 1B and Component 1C′ had occurred.
Multiple eAPC-pa were constructed from a parental eAPC-p (ACL-905) in parallel, wherein the genomic receiver site, Component 1D, is targeted for integration by a primed genetic donor vector, Component 1E′, comprising of a single ORF that encodes an aAM. The eAPC-p (ACL-900, example 8) was independently combined with a vector encoding expression of the RMCE recombinase enzyme (SEQ ID NO: 13 Flp, V4.1.8) and each Component 1E′ of either SEQ ID NO: 81 V9.E.6, SEQ ID NO: 82 V9.E.7, or SEQ ID NO: 83 V9.E.8 by electroporation. At 10 days post electroporation, individual eAPC-pa were selected and single cell sorted (monoclones) based on diminished signal of the selection marker of integration BFP, encoded by Component 1 D. Resulting monoclonal eAPC-pa lines were analysed by flow cytometry in parallel with the parental eAPC line, and three examples are presented. In addition, resulting monoclones were also genetically characterized to confirm the integration couple event. a) Monoclones for eAPC-pa, ACL-1219, ACL-1227 and ACL-1233, were analysed and selected by flow cytometry for loss of BFP signal and retention of the HLA-ABC signal. Plots of BFP vs SSC are displayed with a BFP− gate. An increase in the number of BFP− events compared to parental eAPC-p is observed, indicating that an integration couple between Component 1D/1E′ has occurred. Single cells from the BFP− gate were selected, sorted and outgrown. b) Selected monoclones of ACL-1219, ACL-1227, ACL-1233 were analysed by flow cytometry to confirm loss of BFP and retention of HLA-ABC signals. Plots of BFP vs HLA-ABC are presented, wherein all three monoclones can be observed having lost the BFP signal in comparison to parental eAPC-p (right most plot), indicating a successful integration couple event. c) To demonstrate that the monoclones contained the correct fragment size for aAM ORF, a polymerase chain reaction was conducted, utilising primers targeting the aAM ORF and representative agarose gel is presented. Results from two monoclones representing each aAM ORF are shown. Lane 1: 2_log DNA marker, Lanes 2-3: pp28 ORF (expected size 0.8 kb), Lane 4: 2_log DNA marker, Lanes 5-6: pp52 ORF (expected size 1.5 kb), Lane 7: 2_log DNA marker, Lanes 8-9: pp65 ORF (expected size 1.9 kb), Lane 10: 2_log DNA marker. All monoclones analysed had the expected amplicon size for the respective aAM, further indicating the integration couple had occurred.
A pooled library of eAPC-pa were generated from a pool of primed Component 1E vectors (Component 1E′) collectively encoding multiple aAM ORF (HCMVpp28, HCMVpp52 and HCMVpp65) by integration in a single step into the parental eAPC-p, wherein each individual cell integrates a single random analyte antigen ORF derived from the original pool of vectors, at Component 1D′, such that each generated eAPC-pa expresses a single random aAM, but collectively the pooled library of eAPC-pa represents all of aAM ORF encoded in the original pooled library of vectors. The library of eAPC-pa was generated by electroporation by combing the eAPC-p (ACL-905, aAPX: HLA-A*02:01) with a pooled vector library comprised of individual vectors encoding an ORF for one of HCMVpp28, HCMVpp52 or HCMVpp65 (SEQ ID NO: 81 V9.E.6, SEQ ID NO: 82 V9.E.7, and SEQ ID NO: 83 V9.E.8), and being mixed at a molecular ratio of 1:1:1. Resulting eAPC-pa populations were analysed and selected by flow cytometry, in parallel with the parental eAPC-p line. a) At 10 days post electroporation putative eAPC-pa cells (Transfectants) were analysed and selected by flow cytometry, compared in parallel with the parental line (ACL-905). Plots display BFP vs SSC, gated for BFP− populations, wherein an increase in BFP− cells are observed in the BFP− gate compared to the parental line. Bulk cells were sorted form the transfectants based on BFP− gate, denoted ACL-1050. b) After outgrowth, ACL-1050 cells were analysed by flow cytometry for loss of BFP. Plots displayed are BFP vs SSC, wherein ACL-1050 has been enriched to 96.4% BFP− compared to parental line ˜4% BFP−. Subsequently, single cells were sorted from the BFP− pollution of ACL-1050. c) To demonstrate that the polyclone ACL-1050 was comprised of a mixture of HCMVpp28, HCMVpp52 and HCMVpp65 encoding cells, 12 monoclones were selected at random, outgrown and were used for genetic characterisation. Cells were characterised by PCR utilising primers targeted to the aAM ORF (Component 1D′), to amplify and detect integrated aAM. All 12 monoclones screened by PCR have detectable amplicons and are of the expected size for one of pp28 (0.8 kb), pp52 (1.5 kb) or pp65 (1.9 kb). In addition, all 3 aAMs were represented across the 12 monoclones. In comparison, amplicons from three discrete monoclones, wherein in the aAM was known, were amplified in parallel as controls; all three controls produced the correct sized amplicons of pp28 (0.8 kb), pp52 (1.5 kb) and pp65 (1.9 kb). Thus, it is confirmed that the pool is comprised of eAPC-pa wherein each cell has a single randomly selected aAM form the original pool of three vectors.
A model TCR alpha/beta pair (JG9-TCR), which has a known specificity for a HCMV antigen presented in HLA-A*02:01 was selected for integration to an eTPC parental line. The JG9-TCR-alpha ORF was cloned in a Component 2E′ context, and JG9-TCR-beta in a 2C′ context. An eTPC-t was created through RMCE by transfection of Component 2C′ and 2E′ plasmids and a construct encoding flp recombinase into the eTPC line ACL-488, which harbours two genomic integration sites, 2B and 2D, encoding reporters BFP and RFP, respectively. 10 days after transfection, individual cells diminished for the BFP and RFP signals, encoded by Components 2B and 2D selection markers, were sorted as single cells. Resulting monoclonal eTPC-t ACL-851 were analysed in parallel with the parental eTPC, and a single example presented. a) and b) Parental eTPC cell line ACL-488 and an example monoclonal was analysed by flow cytometry for BFP and RFP signals. The plot displays live single cells as BFP versus RFP, showing the eTPC cell line is positive for selection markers present in Component 2B and 2D (a), and resulting monoclone has lost these markers as expected for integration couple events between 2B/2C and 2D/2E (b). Percentage values represent the percentage of double positive cells in a) and double negative cells in b). c) to f) eTPC ACL-488 and monoclone eTPC-t ACL-851 were stained with antibodies for CD3 and TCR alpha/beta (TCRab) and HLA multimer reagent specific for the JG9-TCR (Dex HLA-A*02:01-NLVP) and analysed by flow cytometry and gated for live single cells. The parental eTPC line showed no positive staining for CD3 or TCR on the cell surface (c), and was also negative for staining with HLA multimer reagent (d). In contrast, the resulting monoclone showed positive staining for both CD3 and TCR on the cell surface (e) and showed positive staining with the multimer reagent specific for the expressed JG9-TCR. Percentage values represent the percentage of CD3/TCRab double positive cells in c) and e), and CD3/HLA-multimer double positive cells in d) and f). g) Genomic DNA was prepared from monoclonal eTPC-t ACL-851 and subjected to PCR with primers specific for the JG9-TCR-alpha chain encoded by Component 2D′, or the JG9-TCR-beta chain encoded by Component 2B′. PCR products were resolved by agarose gel and observed as expected band size. h) Genomic DNA was prepared from monoclonal eTPC-t ACL-851 and subjected to digital drop PCR with primers and probes specific for the JG9-TCR-alpha chain encoded by Component 2D′, or the JG9-TCR-beta chain encoded by Component 2B′. A reference amplicon primer/probe pair for an intron of the TCR alpha constant (TRAC) was included. The table presents ratios of reference to TCR alpha and TCR beta. A ratio of close to 0.33 indicates that a single copy of each TCR alpha and beta chain is present in the eTPC-t line ACL-851, which is a triploid line.
A parental eTPC-t cell line ACL-851, expressing a TCR alpha and beta chain at site 2D′ and 2B′, respectively was reverted to a eTPC-x line by exchanging Component 2D′ with a donor vector encoding GFP (Component 2Z). Component 2Z contained recombinase heterospecific F14/F15 sites flanking the GFP ORF, and was thus compatible with Component 2D′. eTPC-t line ACL-851 was transfected with Component 2Z along with a construct encoding flp recombinase. 7 days after transfection, individual cells positive for GFP signals were sorted and grown as monoclones. Resulting monoclonal eTPC-x lines were analysed by flow cytometry in parallel with the parental eTPC-t, and a single example presented. a) and b) The monolcone eTPC-x (ACL-987) derived from parental eTPC-t ACL-851 was analysed by flow cytometry for GFP expression along with the parental line. Plots display SSC versus GFP parameters of gated live single cells. The parental cell line has no GFP expression (a), while the monoclone ACL-987 has gained GFP as expected (b), indicating exchange of the TCR alpha ORF for a GPF ORF. c) and d) The monolcone eTPC-x ACL-987 derived from parental ACL-851 along with the parental eTPC-t ACL-851 were stained with antibodies for CD3 and TCRab and analysed by flow cytometry. Plots display CD3 versus TCRab parameters gated on live single cells. The parental cell showed positive staining for both CD3 and TCRab (c), while the derived monoclone showed negative staining for both (d); confirming loss of TCR alpha ORF in the derived eTPC-x line.
An eTPC-t pool was created from an eTPC-x parental line expressing a single TCR beta chain in Component 2B′. The eTPC-x line expressed GFP as the reporter at available site 2D. A pool of 64 variant TCR alpha chains, including the parental chain, were constructed. The parental TCR chain pair represents the JG9-TCR with known specificity for a HCMV antigen presented in HLA-A*02:01. The Component 2E pool was transfected into the parental eTPC-x ACL-987 along with a construct encoding flp recombinase. A polyclonal line was selected by sorting for GFP positive cells 10 days after transfection. The resulting ACL-988 polyclonal eTPC-t was subsequently sorted on the basis of negative staining for GFP and positive or negative staining for HLA multimer reagent (DEX HLA-A*02:01-NLVP). Recovered single cells were sequenced to identify the encoded TCR-alpha chains and compared to a parallel analysis of each of the TCR-alpha chain variants paired with the native TCR-beta chain in terms of staining with an HLA multimer reagent specific for the parental TCR chain pair. a) and b) Parental eTPC-x ACL-987 line and resulting polyclone eTPC-t ACL-988 line were analysed by flow cytometry for GFP expression. Plots display SSC versus GFP parameters of live single cells. Parental cell line shows positive signal for GFP, indicating intact Component 2D (a). Derived polyclonal line shows half positive and half negative for GFP (b), indicating that half of the cells in the polyclonal population have potentially exchanged the GFP ORF at D for TCR alpha ORF to form Component 2D′. c) and d) Parental eTPC-x ACL-987 line and resulting polyclone eTPC-t ACL-988 line were stained with and CD3 antibody and HLA multimer with specificity for the parental JG9-TCR (DEX HLA-A*02:01-NLVP), and analysed by flow cytometry. Plots display CD3 versus HLA multimer parameters of live single cells. The parental cell line is negative for both CD3 and HLA multimer staining (c). The left hand panel of d) displays gated GFP-negative events, and the right hand GFP-positive events. Only GFP-negative events, where the Component 2D is converted to D′, shows CD3 positive staining, of which a subset shows positive staining for HLA multimer. Single cells from the gated HLA multimer negative and positive gate were sorted and the integrated ORF at Component 2D′ sequenced to determine identity of TCR alpha ORF. e) All 64 JG9-TCR-alpha variants were cloned into an expression construct that permitted each to be independently transfected to parental eTPC-x (ACL-987). Relative staining units (RSU) against the HLA-A*02:01-NLVP tetramer reagent was determined for each. RSU is calculated as the ratio of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of HLA-A*02:01-NLVP tetramer signal for the CD3 positive population over the CD3 negative population, and is indicative of the binding strength of each TCR chain pair variant to the HLA multimer reagent. Each point plotted in Figure e) represents the observed RSU for each 64 variants. Open circles correlate to the sequenced cells recovered from the GFP-negative/HLA multimer-positive gate. Open triangles correlate to the sequenced cells recovered from the GFP-negative/HLA multimer-negative gate.
The eTPC-t cell line carrying a Component 2F (ACL-1277), wherein the TCR chains at Component 2B′ and 2D′ encode a TCR pair that is specific for HMCV antigenic peptide SEQ ID NO: 1 NLVPMVATV presented in HLA-A*02:01. The Component 2F reporter was RFP. This eTPC-t was contacted for 24 hours with various eAPC lines of differing −p characteristics in the presence and absence of model peptide antigens, and the contact cultures analysed by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry histogram plots show event counts against RFP signal of viable single T-cells identified by antibody staining for a specific surface marker that was not presented by the eAPC. a) and b) eAPC-p cells expressing only HLA-A*02:01 (ACL-209) were pulsed with SEQ ID NO: 1 NLVPMVATV (a) or VYALPLKML (b) peptides and subsequently co-cultured with eTPC-t for 24 hrs. c) and d) eAPC-p cells expressing only HLA-A*24:02 (ACL-963) were pulsed with SEQ ID NO: 1 NLVPMVATV (c) or VYALPLKML (d) peptides and subsequently co-cultured with eTPC-t for 24 hrs. e) eAPC-p cells expressing only HLAA*02:01 (ACL-209) were left without peptide pulsing and subsequently co-cultured with eTPC-t for 24 hrs. f) eAPC parental cells that express no HLA on the cell surface (ACL-128) were pulsed with SEQ ID NO: 1 NLVPMVATV and subsequently co-cultured with eTPC-t for 24 hrs. RFP signal was significantly increased in the eTPC-t ACL-1277 only in the presence of HLA-A*02:01 expressing eAPC-p pulsed with SEQ ID NO: 1 NLVPMVATV, representing the known target of the expressed TCR. Histogram gates and values reflect percentage of events in the RFP positive and RFP negative gates. This indicates the specific response of Component 2F to engagement of eTPC-t expressed TCRsp with cognate HLA/antigen (aAPX:aAM).
The eTPC-t cell line carrying a Component 2F (ACL-1150), wherein the TCR chains at Component 2B′ and 2D′ encode a TCR pair that is specific for HMCV antigenic peptide SEQ ID NO: 1 NLVPMVATV presented in HLA-A*02:01. The Component 2F reporter was RFP. This eTPC-t was contacted for 24 hours with various eAPC lines of differing −pa characteristics in the absence of exogenous antigen. a) eAPC-pa line (ACL-1044) expressing HLA-A*02:01 and the full-length ORF for HCMV protein pp52. pp52 does not contain antigenic sequences recognised by the JG9-TCR. b) eAPC-pa line (ACL-1046) expressing HLA-A*02:01 and the full-length ORF for HCMV protein pp65. pp65 contains antigenic sequence recognised by the JG9-TCR, when presented in HLAA*02:01. c) eAPC-pa line (ACL-1045) expressing HLA-B*07:02 and the full-length ORF for HCMV protein pp52. pp52 does not contain antigenic sequences recognised by the JG9-TCR. d) eAPC-pa line (ACL-1048) expressing HLA-B*07:02 and the full-length ORF for HCMV protein pp65. pp65 contains antigenic sequence recognised by the JG9-TCR, when presented in HLA-A*02:01. After independent co-culture of each eAPC-pa line with the eTPC-t for 48 hrs, RFP expression in the eTPC-t was determined by flow cytometry. RFP signal was significantly increased in the eTPC-t ACL-1150 only when contacted with eAPC-pa ACL-1046. This was the only eAPC-pa with both the recognised antigenic peptide sequence encoded by the integrated aAM ORF, and the correct HLA restriction. Histogram gates and values reflect percentage of events in the RFP positive and RFP negative gates. This indicates the specific response of Component 2F to engagement of eTPC-t expressed TCRsp with cognate HLA/antigen (aAPX:aAM).
All cell lines used in this application are either on the ARH or HEK293 background. They are denoted by ACL followed by a number. A summary of the cell lines used in this application is presented αβ Table 1.
One day prior to transfection/electroporation, cells were seeded at a density of 1.2-1.4×106 cells/60 mm dish in 90% DMEM+2 mML-glutamine+10% HI-FBS (Life Technologies). The following day, cells with 65% confluency were transfected with a total amount of 5 ug DNA and jetPEI® (Polyplus transfection reagent, Life Technologies) at a N/P ratio of 6. Stock solutions of DNA and jetPEI® were diluted in sterile 1M NaCl and 150 mM NaCl respectively. The final volume of each solution was equivalent to 50% of the total mix volume. The PEI solution was then added to the diluted DNA and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 15 min. Finally, the DNA/PEI mixtures were added to the 60-mm dishes, being careful not to disrupt the cell film. The cells were incubated for 48 hours at (37° C., 5% CO2, 95% relative humidity) prior to DNA delivery marker expression analysis. The medium was replaced before transfection.
Single cell sorting or polyclone sorting was achieved through standard cell sorting methodologies using a BD/nflux instrument. Briefly, ACL cells were harvested with TrypLE™ Express Trypsin (ThermoFisher Scientific) and resuspended in a suitable volume of DPBS 1× (Life Technologies) prior to cell sorting, in DMEM 1× medium containing 20% HI-FBS and Anti-Anti 100× (Life Technologies). Table 2 summarises the antibodies and multimers used in this application for FACS.
Flp-Mediated Integration of HLA-A*02:01 Sequences in eAPC Cell Line
eAPC cells were electroporated with vectors encoding Flp, DNA encoding a marker to track delivery (vector encoding GFP) and a vector containing HLA-A*02:01. The HLAA*02:01 sequence also encoded a linker and 3×Myc− tag at the 3′end. The electroporation conditions used were 258 V, 12.5 ms, 2 pulses, 1 pulse interval. Ratio between each integrating vector and the Flp-vector was 1:3. Cells electroporated with only GFP-vector and no electroporated cells were used as controls respectively in order to set the gates for GFP sort after two days. On the following day (2 days after electroporation), cells were analyzed and sorted based on GFP expression. Cells were sorted using the BD Influx Cell Sorter.
At 3 days after electroporation, a sort based on GFP-expression was performed in order to enrich for electroporated cells. 7-8 days after electroporation, the cells were harvested and surface stained for HLA-ABC expression. BFP+ve RFP−ve HLA+ve cells were single cell sorted for monoclonal.
To genotype the cells, 100 ng of DNA was used as template to run a PCR reaction to check if integrations had occurred at the expected integration site. A forward primer targeting the integration cassettes (Pan_HLA_GT_F1) and a reverse primer (SV40 pA_GT_R1) targeting just outside the integration site was used and the PCR product was run on a 1% agarose gel.
Flp-mediated integration of HCMV ORF sequences in eAPC-p cell line
eAPC-p cells were electroporated with vectors encoding Flp, DNA encoding a marker to track delivery (vector encoding GFP) and vectors containing HCMV pp28, pp52 or pp65 aAM-ORF. The HCMV-ORF sequences also encoded a linker and 3×Myc− tag at the 3′end. The electroporation conditions used were 258 V, 12.5 ms, 2 pulses, 1 pulse interval.
Ratio between each integrating vector and the Flp-vector was 1:3. Cells electroporated with only GFP-vector and no electroporated cells were used as controls respectively in order to set the gates for GFP sort after two days. On the following day (2 days after electroporation), cells were analyzed and sorted based on GFP expression. Cells were sorted using the BD Influx Cell Sorter.
Flp-mediated shotgun integration of 3 HCMV ORF sequences in eAPC-p cell line
eAPC-p cells were electroporated with vectors encoding Flp, DNA encoding a marker to track delivery (vector encoding GFP) and vectors containing HCMV pp28, pp52 or pp65 aAM-ORF. The HCMV-ORF sequences also encoded a linker and 3×Myc− tag at the 3′end. The electroporation conditions used were 258 V, 12.5 ms, 2 pulses, 1 pulse interval. For the shotgun integration, the vectors containing HCMV-ORFs were pooled in a ratio 1:1:1 and the mixture was electroporated into the eAPC-p cell. The resulting eAPC-pa cells were polyclonal. Individual monoclone cells were sorted and genetically characterized to demonstrate that the polyclone was made up of cells containing all three HCMV-ORFs.
PCR Reactions to Assess the RMCE-Integration of the HCMV ORFs into Component D
Primers used to assess integration of the HCMV ORF annealed to the linker (forward primer 10.D.1) and EF1alpha promoter (reverse primer 15.H.4). Expected size was 0.8 kb for pp28, 1.5 kb for pp52, 1.9 kb for pp65. PCR products were run on a 1% Agarose gel in 1×TAE buffer, using the PowerPac Basic (Bio-Rad), stained with 10,000 dilution of sybersafe and analyzed with Fusion SL (Vilber Lourmat).
For RMCE integration, cells were transfected with 0.6 μg of DNA vectors encoding FLP, (SEQ ID NO: 13 V4.1.8), 2 μg of Component C/Y, 2 μg of Component E/Z, 0.4 μg of DNA encoding a marker to track DNA delivery. 2 days after transfection cell positive for the DNA delivery marker, either GFP or RFP positive, were sorted by FACS. 4-10 days after transfection, individual cells displaying diminished fluorescent protein signal, encoded by Components D and B selection markers were sorted by FACS. The exception being for generating ACL-987 where individual cells displaying GFP positivity were sorted by FACS.
Transient Expression of TCR Chain Pairs to Characterization of their RSU
For transient expression, cells were transfected with DNA vectors encoding FLP, (SEQ ID NO: 13 V4.1.8), JG9-TCR-alpha variant (SEQ ID NOs: 14 VP.7751.RC1.A1 to SEQ ID NO: 76 VP.7751.RC1.H8), JG9-TCR-beta WT chain (SEQ ID NO: 8 V3.C.5), and DNA vector vehicle (SEQ ID NO: 7 V1.C.2). 2 days after transfection, all cells were stained with HLA-A*02:01-NLVP tetramer and anti-CD3 antibodies. RSU were calculated as the ratio of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of HLA-A*02:01-NLVP tetramer signal for the CD3 positive population over the CD3 negative population, and was indicative of the binding strength of each TCR chain pair variant.
Cells were stained with HLA-multimer reagent on ice for 10 mins, then with CD3 and/or TCRab antibodies. Detection of specific cell fluorescent properties by the BDInflux instrument are defined in table 6.
Sorting of single cells for monoclonal generation, the cells displaying the phenotype interest were deposited into 96-well plates, containing 200 ul of growth medium. One to two plates were sorted per sample. Polyclonal cell sorts were directed into FACS tubes, containing media, using the Two-way sorting setting in the cell sorter Influx™ (BD Biosciences).
Single cells sorts for molecular characterization of their JG9-TCR-alpha variant were sorted to PCR plate pre-loaded with 5 μL of nuclease-free water. Specimens were snap-frozen until subsequent processing.
DNA was extracted from 5×106 cells using the QIAamp DNA Minikit (Qiagen). DNA was stored in 1×TE (10 mM Tris pH8.0 and 0.1 mM EDTA).
PCR Reactions to Assess the RMCE-Integration of the TRA-ORF and TRB-ORF into Component 2B or 2D.
Primers used to assess integration of the TCR-alpha, annealed to the TRAC segment (SEQ ID NO: 91 forward primer 1.F.7) and the sv40 pA terminator (Reverse primer 15.H.2) that is a pre-existing part of the genomic receiving sites. Expected size 566 bp. Primers used to assess integration of the TCR-beta, annealed to the TRBC segment (SEQ ID NO: 94 forward primer 1.F.9) and the sv40 pA terminator (Reverse primer 15.H.2) that is a pre-existing part of the genomic receiving sites. Expected size 610 bp. PCR products were run on a 1% Agarose gel in 1×TAE buffer, using the PowerPac Basic (Bio-Rad), stained with 10,000 dilution of sybersafe and analyzed with Fusion SL (Vilber Lourmat).
ddPCR Reactions to Assess the Copy Number of TRA-ORF and TRB-ORF in the Genome after DNA Delivery
DNA of selected ACL-851 monoclones was analysed by using specific primers and probed targeting the TCR ORF C segment (TRAC) of interest. Primers and probe used to assess TRA-ORF copy number, annealed to the TRAC segment (SEQ ID NO: 91 forward primer 1.F.7, SEQ ID NO: 92 Reverse primer 1.F.8 and SEQ ID NO: 93 probe 1.G.1). Primers and probe used to assess TRB-ORF copy number, annealed to the TRB-C segment (SEQ ID NO: 94 forward primer 1.F.9, SEQ ID NO: 95 Reverse primer 1.F.10 and SEQ ID NO: 96 probe 1.G.2)
In all cases, a reference gene (TRAC) was simultaneously screened to chromosome determine copy numbers, using primers SEQ ID NO: 97 10.A.9 and SEQ ID NO: 98 10.A.10 together with the fluorescent probe SEQ ID NO: 99 10.B.6 conjugated with HEX. Integration copy number considered that HEK293 cells are triploid for reference gene (TRAC). Prior to Droplet Digital PCR, DNA was digested with MfeI (NEB) to separate tandem integrations. The reaction setup and cycling conditions were followed according to the protocol for ddPCR™ Supermix for Probes (No dUTP) (Bio-Rad), using the QX200™ Droplet Reader and Droplet Generator and the C1000 Touch™ deep-well Thermal cycler (Bio-Rad). Data was acquired using the QuantaSoft™ Software, using Ch1 to detect FAM and Ch2 for HEX.
Sequencing of TCR Alpha and Beta Chains from Single T-Cells
Individual FACS-sorted eTPC-t-cells were subjected to a two-step amplification process that entails a V-region specific primer collection for each TRA and TRB, followed by paired nested PCR reactions that create TRA and TRB amplicons for sequence analysis. This procedure is described previously (Han et. al. Nat Biotechnol. 2014 32(7): 684-692). The following materials were used in the described procedures:
eTPC-t and eAPC cells were routinely cultured in RPMI+10% heat-inactivated Fetal Calf Serum (complete media) between 0.2×10{circumflex over ( )}6-1.5×10{circumflex over ( )}6 cells/ml, at 37′C, 90% relative humidity and 5% CO2. Peptide SEQ ID NO: 1 NLVPMVATV were synthetized by Genescript, and received lyophilized. Peptide primary stocks were suspended in 10% DMSO and sorted at −80′C. Working stocks were prepared at the time of administration, at 50 μM in complete media (50× concentrated). The following eAPC-p presenting HLA-A*02:01 (ACL-900) or HLA-B*07:02 (ACL-906) or eAPC-pa with aAPX and exogenous aAM, HLA-A*02:01+HCMVpp52 (ACL-1044) or HLAA*02:01+HCMVpp65 (ACL-1046) or HLA-B*07:02+HCMVpp52 (ACL-1045) or HLA-B*07:02+HCMVpp65 (ACL-1048), or parent eAPC (ACL-128) were used. Two different eTPC-t cell lines were used; the first eTPC-t, ACL-1277, (Component A) was engineered with two unique genomic receiver sites, utilizing native CD3 expression, and harboring a genomic two-component, synthetic response element (Component F, RFP reporter) (See Example 14). The second eTPC-t, ACL-1150, (Component A) was engineered with two unique genomic receiver sites, utilizing native CD3 expression, and harboring a genomic one-component, synthetic response element (Component F, RFP reporter) (See Example 15). Both eTPC-t were loaded with the TCR chain ORF at Component 2B′ and 2E′ encoding a TCR pair that is specific for HLA-peptide complex (HLA), HLA-A*02:01-SEQ ID NO: 1 NLVPMVATV.
Actively growing cultures of eAPC cells (0.4-1.0×10{circumflex over ( )}6 cells/ml) were suspended, sample taken and counted to determine cell concentration. Subsequently, 1 million cells were harvested, washed once with Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (DPBS, Gibco) followed by suspension in complete media with 1 μM of peptide or no peptide at a cell concentration between 1 to 2×10{circumflex over ( )}6 cells/ml. Cells were incubated for 2 h in standard culturing conditions, in a 24-well culture plate. After 2 h the cells were harvested, pelleted by centrifugation (400 rcf, 3 min), followed by 3×10 ml washes with DPBS. Cells were subsequently suspended at 0.2×10{circumflex over ( )}6 cells/ml in complete media.
eTPC-t Harvesting
Actively growing cultures of eTPC-t cells (0.4-1.0×10{circumflex over ( )}6 cells/ml) were suspended, sample taken and counted to determine cell concentration. Cells were harvested, washed once with DPBS and then suspended at a concentration of 0.4×10{circumflex over ( )}6 (for endogenous assays) or 0.6×10{circumflex over ( )}6 cells/ml (or exogenous assays) in complete media.
Contacting eTPC-t and eAPC in an eTPC:eAPC System with Exogenous Antigenic Molecules
To each well of a 96-well round-bottom plate, 50 μl of complete media, 50 μl of eAPC, followed by 50 μl of eTPC-t were added. This equated to approximately 10,000 eAPC and 30,000 eTPC-t for a ratio of 1:3, at a total cell concentration of approximately 0.27×10{circumflex over ( )}6 cells/ml. The cell mixture was then incubated for approximately 24 hours at standard culturing conditions.
Contacting eTPC-t and eAPC in an eTPC:eAPC System with Endogenous Antigenic Molecules
To each well of a 96-well round-bottom plate, 50 μl of complete media, 50 μl of eAPC, followed by 50 μl of eTPC-t were added. This equated to approximately 10,000 eAPC and 20,000 eTPC-t for a ratio of 1:2, at a total cell concentration of approximately 0.2×10{circumflex over ( )}6 cells/ml. The cell mixture was then incubated for approximately 48 hours at standard culturing conditions.
After 24 or 48 hours incubation, the cells were harvested, and transplanted into 0.75 ml V-bottom Micronic tubes, washed once with 500 μl DPBS and subsequently stained with Dead Cell Marker (DCM-APC-H7) as follows; to each well 25 μl of staining solution was added, cells suspended by mixing and then incubated for 15-20 min. The staining solution comprised of 0.5 μl DCM-APC-H7 per 100 μl staining solution. After incubation, cells were washed twice with 500 μl DPBS+2% FCS (Wash Buffer). Cells were then stained for surface markers unique to the eTPC-t; to each well 30 μl of staining solution was added, cells suspended by mixing and then incubated for 30-45 min. The staining solution comprised of 2.5 μl anti-myc-AF647 per 100 μl staining solution (clone 9E10, Santa Cruz Biotech). After incubation, cells were washed twice with 500 μl Wash buffer, suspended in 200 μl of Wash buffer and then analysed by FACS on a LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences).
Herein describes how targeted mutagenesis of a family of antigen-presenting complex (APX) encoding genes was achieved to produce the first trait of an engineered antigen-presenting cell (eAPC). The said trait is the lack of surface expression of at least one member of the APX family.
In this example, the targeted APX comprised the three members of the major HLA class I family, HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C in the HEK293 cell line. HEK293 cells were derived from human embryonic kidney cells that showed endogenous surface expression of HLA-ABC. Cytogenetic analysis demonstrated that the cell line has a near triploid karyotype, therefore the HEK293 cells encoded three alleles of each HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C gene.
Targeted mutagenesis of the HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C genes was performed using an engineered CRISPR/Cas9 system, in which, Cas9 nuclease activity was targeted to the HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C loci by synthetic guide RNAs (gRNAs). 4 to 5 unique gRNAs were designed to target conserved nucleotide sequences for each HLA gene locus and the targeted sites were biased towards the start of the gene coding sequence as this was more likely to generate a null allele. The gRNAs efficiency to induce a mutation at their targeted loci was determined and the most efficient gRNAs were selected to generate the HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C null (HLA-ABCnull) HEK293 cell line.
Plasmid that encoded the optimal gRNAs targeting the HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C loci, together with a plasmid that encoded Cas9-P2A-GFP (SEQ ID 84) were transfected into HEK293 cells as described in the methods. Cells positive for Cas9-P2A-GFP plasmid uptake were FAC sorted based on GFP fluorescence, 2 days after transfection (
HLA-ABCnull monoclones were confirmed by lack of surface expression of HLA-ABC. It was demonstrated that a subset of monoclones lacked surface expression of HLA-ABC, of which three example monoclones, ACL-414, ACL-415 and ACL-416 are depicted in
In conclusion, the genetically modified HEK293 cell lines, including, ACL-414, ACL-415 and ACL-416, were demonstrated to lack surface expression of the HLA-ABC and therefore possessed the first trait of an engineered antigen-presenting cell (eAPC).
Herein describes how Component 1B was stably integrated into the HLA-ABCnull monoclone line ACL-414 to produce the second trait of an eAPC. The said second trait contained at least one genomic receiver site for integration of at least one ORF, wherein the genomic receiver site was a synthetic construct designed for recombinase mediated cassette exchange (RMCE).
In this example, the genomic integration site, component 1B, comprised of selected genetic elements. Two unique heterospecific recombinase sites, FRT and F3, which flanked an ORF that encoded the selection marker, blue fluorescent protein (BFP). Encoded 5′ of the FRT site, was an EF1a promoter and 3′ of the F3 site was a SV40 polyadenylation signal terminator. The benefit of positioning the non-coding cis-regulatory elements on the outside of the heterospecific recombinase sites was so they are not required in the matched genetic donor vector, component 1C. Therefore, after cellular delivery of the genetic donor vector, no transient expression of the encoded ORF would be observed. This made the selection of successful RMCE more reliable as the cellular expression of the ORF from the genetic donor vector would mostly likely occur only after correct integration into component 1B as it now contained the appropriate cis-regulator elements (see example 6).
To promote the stable genomic integration of component 1B into the genomic safe harbour locus, AAVS1, a plasmid was constructed, wherein; the DNA elements of component 1B were flanked with AAVS1 left and right homology arms. Each arm comprised of >500 bp of sequence homologous to the AAVS1 genomic locus.
Stable integration of component 1B was achieved through the process of homology directed recombination (HDR) at the genomic safe harbour locus, AAVS1. The ACL-414 cell line was transfected with plasmid that encoded the optimal gRNAs targeting the AAVS1 locus, plasmid that encoded Cas9-P2A-GFP and the plasmid that encoded component 1B genetic elements flanked by AAVS1 left and right homology arms. Cells positive for Cas9-P2A-GFP plasmid uptake were FAC sorted based on GFP fluorescence, 2 days after transfection (
Individual monoclone lines were selected as an eAPC on the basis of their maintained BFP expression and for a single integration of component 1B into the desired AAVS1 genomic location. Cell lines ACL-469 and ACL-470 represented monoclones with maintained BFP expression (
In conclusion, the genetically modified ACL-469 and ACL-470 cell lines, were HLA-ABCnull and contained a single copy of a synthetic genomic receiver site designed for RMCE and therefore demonstrated the creation of a eAPC with a single synthetic integration receiver site.
Herein describes how Component 1B and Component 1D were stably integrated into the HLA-ABCnull monoclone line ACL-414 to produce the second trait of an eAPC. The said second trait contains two genomic receiver sites for integration of at least one ORF, wherein the genomic receiver site was a synthetic construct designed for recombinase mediated cassette exchange (RMCE).
This example uses the same methods and components as described in example 2 but with the addition of a second genomic receiver site, Component 1D. Component 1D genetic elements comprised of two unique heterospecific recombinase sites, F14 and F15, which were different to component 1B. These sites flanked the ORF that encoded the selection marker, the red fluorescent protein (RFP). Encoded 5′ of the F14 site was an EF1a promoter and 3′ of the F15 site was a SV40 polyadenylation signal terminator. As in example 2, component 1D genetic elements were flanked with AAVS1 left and right homology arms, each comprised of >500 bp of sequence homologous to the AAVS1 genomic locus.
Component 1B and component 1 D were integrated into the AAVS1 as described in example 2 but with the addition of the plasmid that encoded component 1 D elements, to the transfection mix. Cells positive for Cas9-P2A-GFP plasmid uptake were FAC sorted based on GFP fluorescence, 2 days after transfection (
Individual monoclone lines were selected as an eAPC on the basis of their maintained BFP and RFP expression and for a single integration of component 1B and a single integration of component 1 D into different AAVS1 alleles. Cell line ACL-472 was a representative monoclone with maintained BFP and RFP expression (
In conclusion, the genetically modified ACL-472 cell line, was HLA-ABCnull and contained a single copies of the synthetic genomic receiver site component 1B and component 1 D, designed for RMCE and therefore demonstrated the creation of an eAPC with two unique synthetic integration receiver sites.
Herein describes how an eAPC-p was constructed in one step with one integration couple, wherein, the genomic receiver site, component 1B, is a native genomic site and the genetic donor vector, component 1C′, comprised a single ORF that encoded one analyte antigen-presenting complex (aAPX).
In this example, the eAPC was a genetically modified ARH-77 cell line, designated ACL-128, wherein, two families of APX, major HLA class I family and HLA class II, were mutated. The founding cell line, ARH-77, is a B lymphoblast derived from a plasma cell leukemia that showed strong HLA-A,B,C and HLA-DR,DP,DQ cell surface expression. Cytogenetic analysis demonstrated that the founding ARH-77 cell line has a near diploid karyotype, but also displayed a chromosome 6p21 deletion, the region encoding the HLA locus. DNA sequencing of the ARH-77 locus confirmed that ARH-77 encoded only a single allele of HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C and HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB, HLA-DQA, HLA-DQB, HLA-DPA and HLA-DPB gene families.
The HLA-ABCnull and HLA-DR,DP,DQnull cell line ACL-128, was generated by CRISPR/cas9 targeted mutagenesis with gRNA targeting the HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C and HLA-DRA, HLA-DRB, HLA-DQA, HLA-DQB, HLA-DPA and HLA-DPB gene families using the method described in Example 1. Surface labeling with a pan-anti-HLA-ABC or pan-anti-HLA-DR,DP,DQ confirmed that ACL-128 lacked surface expression of both APX families,
In this example, the genomic receiver site, component 1B, was the native AAVS1 genomic site, and the targeted integration was achieved through HDR. The genetic donor vector, component 1C, was matched to component 1B, by component 1C encoding the AAVS1 left and right homology arms, each comprised of >500 bp of sequence homologous to the AAVS1 genomic locus. Between the AAVS1 left and right homology arms, the plasmid encoded a CMV promoter and a SV40 terminator. The aAPX of interest was cloned between the promoter and the terminator, generating component 1C′. In this example, component 1C′ comprised a single ORF that encoded one aAPX, the HLA-A*24:02 or HLA-B*-07:02, denoted component 1C′HLA-A*24:02 and component 1C′HLA-B*-07:02 respectively.
The process to construct an eAPC-p was via HDR induced integration of component 1C′ into component 1B to produce component 1B′. The cell line ACL-128 was electroporated with plasmids that encoded the optimal gRNAs targeting the AAVS1 loci, Cas9-P2A-GFP and component 1C′. Cells positive for Cas9-P2A-GFP plasmid uptake were FAC sorted based on GFP fluorescence, 2 days after electroporation (
Individual monoclone lines were selected as an eAPC-p on the basis of their maintained analyte HLA surface expression and the integration of the analyte ORF into the genomic receiver site, creating component 1B′. Cell lines ACL-321 and ACL-331 were representative monoclones with maintained analyte HLA surface expression of HLAA*24:02 or HLA-B*-07:02 respectively (
In conclusion, the generation of the genetically modified ACL-321 and ACL-331 cell lines, which contained a copy of the aAPX HLA-A*24:02 or HLA-B*-07:02 ORF, respectively, within the genomic receiver site, component 1B′, resulted in the said analyte aAPX to be the only major HLA class I member expressed on the cell surface. Therefore, this demonstrated the creation of two defined eAPC-p cell lines using the multicomponent system.
Herein describes how an eAPC-p was constructed in one step with one integration couple, wherein, the genomic receiver site, component 1B, was a native genomic site and the genetic donor vector, component 1C′ comprised a single ORF that encoded two aAPX chains.
This example used eAPC, ACL-128, and component 1B, both of which are defined in example 4. However component 1C′ comprised a single ORF that encoded an HLA-DRA*01:01 allele linked to an HLA-DRB1*01:01 allele by a viral self-cleaving peptide element, or HLA-DPA1*01:03 allele linked to an HLA-DPB1*04:01 allele by a viral self-cleaving peptide element, denoted component 1C′HLA-DRA*01:01/HLA-DRB1*01:01 and component 1C′HLA-DPA1*01:03/HLA-DPB1*04:01 respectively. The viral self-cleaving peptide element encoded a peptide sequence, that when transcribed resulted in self-cleavage of the synthesized peptide and produced two polypeptides defining each HLA chain.
Within example 4, described the process to construct an eAPC-p with the exception that identification of cells that gained expression of an analyte HLA on their surface were assed by cell surface labelling with a pan-anti-HLA-DR,DP,DQ antibody (
Individual monoclone lines were selected as an eAPC-p on the basis of their maintained analyte HLA surface expression and the integration of the analyte ORF into the genomic receiver site, creating component 1B′ as described in example 4. Cell lines ACL-341 and ACL-350 were the representative monoclones with maintained analyte HLA surface expression of HLA-DRA*01:01/HLA-DRB1*01:01 or HLA-DPA1*01:03/HLA-DPB1*04:01 (
In conclusion, the generation of the genetically modified ACL-341 and ACL-350 cell lines, which contained a copy of the aAPX HLA-DRA*01:01/HLA-DRB1*01:01 or HLA-DPA1*01:03/HLA-DPB1*04:01 ORF, respectively, within the genomic receiver site, component 1B′, resulted in the said analyte aAPX to be the only major HLA class II member expressed on the cell surface. Therefore, this demonstrated the creation of two defined eAPC-p cell lines using the multicomponent system.
Herein describes how an eAPC-p was constructed in one step with one integration couple, wherein, the genomic receiver site, component 1B, was a synthetic construct designed for RMCE genomic site and the genetic donor vector, component 1C′ comprised a single ORF that encoded one aAPX.
In this example, the genomic integration site, component 1B, comprised of selected genetic elements. Two unique heterospecific recombinase sites, FRT and F3, which flanked the ORF that encoded the selection marker, blue fluorescent protein (BFP). Encoded 5′ of the FRT site, was an EF1a promoter and 3′ of the F3 site was a SV40 polyadenylation signal terminator. The genetic elements of component 1B, were integrated in the cell line ACL-128 by electroporation with the same plasmids as described in example 2. Individual monoclone lines were selected on the basis of their maintained BFP expression and were genetically characterised to contain a single integration of component 1B into the desired AAVS1 genomic location as described in example 2 (
The genetic donor vector, component 1C was matched to component 1B, as component 1C encoded the same heterospecific recombinase sites, FRT and F3. The aAPX ORF of interest, additionally encoded a kozak sequence just before the start codon, was cloned between the two heterospecific recombinase sites, and generated component 1C′. In this example, component 1C′ comprised a single ORF that encoded one aAPX, the HLA-A*02:01, designated component 1C′FRT:HLA-A*02:01:F3.
An eAPC-p was created through RMCE by electroporation of the cell line ACL-385 with plasmid that encoded the Tyr-recombinase, Flp, together with component 1C′FRT:HLA-A*02:01:F3. 4-10 days after electroporation, individual cells positive for HLAI surface expression and negative/reduced for the fluorescent protein marker, BFP, encoded by component 1B selection marker, were sorted. Individual outgrown monoclone lines were selected on the basis of their maintained HLAI allele expression and loss of BFP florescence, which indicated that the expected RMCE occurred. To identify such monoclones, both phenotypic and genetic tests were performed. Firstly, all monoclone cell lines were screened for cell surface HLA-ABC expression and lack of BFP florescence (
In conclusion, the generation of the genetically modified ACL-421 and ACL-422 cell lines, which contained a copy of the aAPX HLA-A*02:01 ORF, respectively, within the synthetic genomic receiver site, component 1B′, resulted in the said analyte aAPX to be the only major HLA class I member expressed on the cell surface. Therefore, this demonstrated the creation of two defined eAPC-p cell lines using the multicomponent system.
Herein describes how an eAPC-pa was constructed in two steps. Step 1, wherein the genomic receiver site, component 1B, was the native genomic site and the genetic donor vector, component 1C′ comprised a single ORF that encoded one aAPX. Step 2 the genomic receiver site, component 1 D, was a second native genomic site and the genetic donor vector, component 1E′ comprised a single ORF that encoded one analyte antigen molecule (aAM).
In this example, step 1 was performed, wherein, the eAPC was ACL-128, the genomic receiver site, component 1B, was the mutated HLA-A allele genomic site, designated HLA-Anull, and the targeted integration was achieved through HDR. The genetic donor vector, component 1C was matched to component 1B, by the component 1C encoding the HLA-Anull left and right homology arms, each comprised of >500 bp of sequence homologous to the HLA-Anull genomic locus. Between the HLA-Anull left and right homology arms, the plasmid encoded a CMV promoter and SV40 terminator. The aAPX of interest was cloned between the promoter and terminator, generating component 1C′. In this example, component 1C′ comprised a single ORF that encoded one aAPX, the HLA-A*02:01 or HLA-B*-35:01, denoted component 1C′HLA-A*02:01 component 1′HLA-B*-35:01 respectively.
The integration of component 1C′ into component 1B, and selection of monoclone eAPC-p cell lines was as described in example 4, with the exception that a gRNA targeting the HLA-Anull genomic locus was used to promote HDR integration of component 1C′ into component 1B. Monoclone eAPC-p ACL-191 and ACL-286 expressed HLAA*02:01 or HLA-B*-35:01 on the cell surface, respectively (
In this example, step 2 was performed, wherein, the genomic receiver site, component 1 D, was the native AAVS1 genomic site, and the targeted integration was achieved through HDR. The genetic donor vector, component 1E was matched to component 1D, by the component 1E that encoded the AAVS1 left and right homology arms, each comprised of >500 bp of sequence homologous to the AAVS1 genomic locus. Between the AAVS1 left and right homology arms, the plasmid encoded a CMV promoter and SV40 terminator. The aAM of interest was cloned between the promoter and terminator, generating Component 1E′. In this example, component 1E′ comprised a single ORF that encoded the selection marker, GFP, linked to the aAM ORF, encoding hCMV-pp65, denoted component 1E′GFP:2A:pp63. The viral self-cleaving peptide element encoded a peptide sequence, that when transcribed resulted in self-cleavage of the synthesized peptide and produced two polypeptides, GFP and the intracellular hCMV-pp65 protein.
The integration of component 1E′ into component 1 D, was as described in example 4. Individual monoclone lines, ACL-391 and ACL-395, were selected as an eAPC-pa on the basis of their maintained selection marker GFP expression (
In conclusion, the genetically modified ACL-391 and ACL-395 cell lines, which contained a copy of the aAPX HLA-A*02:01 or HLA-B*-35:01 ORF, respectively, within the genomic receiver site, component 1B′, and aAM ORF pp65 within the genomic receiver site component 1 D′ were generated. These genetic modifications resulted in the said aAPX to be the only major HLA class I member expressed on the cell surface of a cell that also expressed the said aAM. Therefore, this demonstrated the creation of two defined eAPC-pa cell lines using the multicomponent system.
Herein describes the conversion of an eAPC to an eAPC-p in one step, via a single integration couple event, to integrate a single HLAI ORF encoding analyte antigen-presenting complex (aAPX), and wherein the eAPC contains two synthetic genomic receiver sites Component 1B and Component 1D designed for RMCE based genomic integration. The created eAPC-p has one genomic receiver site occupied by the HLAI ORF (Component 1B′), while the remaining Component 1D is available for an additional integration couple event.
This example used the eAPC generated in example 3 (ACL-402) containing Components 1B and 1D, wherein Component 1B comprises two unique heterospecific recombinase sites, F14 and F15, which flank the ORF that encodes the selection marker, red fluorescent protein (RFP). Encoded 5′ of the F14 site is an EF1a promoter and 3′ of the F15 site is a SV40 polyadenylation signal terminator. Component 1D comprises of two unique heterospecific recombinase sites, FRT and F3, flanking the ORF that encodes the selection marker, blue fluorescent protein (BFP). Encoded 5′ of the FRT site, is an EF1a promoter and 3′ of the F15 site is a SV40 polyadenylation signal terminator.
This example utilizes a Component 1C genetic donor vector, comprising of heterospecific recombinase sites, F14 and F15 and thus is matched to Component 1B. Two independent Component 1C′ were generated from Component 1C, wherein one vector (SEQ ID NO: 77 V4.H.5) comprises of a Kozak sequence, start codon and aAPX ORF encoding HLA-A*02:01 between the F14/F15 sites, and wherein the second vector (SEQ ID NO: 78 V4.H.6) comprises a Kozak sequence, start codon and aAPX ORF encoding HLA-A*24:02 between the F14/F15 sites.
The eAPC (ACL-402) was independently combined with vector encoding expression of the RMCE recombinase enzyme (Flp, SEQ ID NO: 13 V4.1.8) and each Component 1C′ of either SEQ ID NO: 77 V4.H.5 or SEQ ID NO: 78 V4.H.6 by electroporation. Cells were cultured for 4-10 days, whereupon cells were selected and sorted based on loss of the selection marker of integration, RFP, and gain of HLAI on the surface of the cell. Subsequently, individual outgrown monoclone lines were characterized, confirmed and selected on the basis of the gain of HLAI surface expression and the loss of the RFP fluorescence, which indicated that the expected conversion of Component 1B to 1B′ had occurred. Selected eAPC-p monoclones ACL-900 (SEQ ID NO: 77 V4.H.5, HLAA*02:01) and ACL-963 (SEQ ID NO: 78 V4.H.6, HLA-A*24:02)—are negative for RFP compared to the parental ACL-402 cell line and maintain HLAI surface expression (
In summary, this example demonstrates two specific examples of conversion of an eAPC to an eAPC-p, using the multicomponent system, wherein two different aAPX are individually delivered (Component 1C′) and integrated into a single genomic receiver site (Component 1B) by RMCE genomic integration method, subsequently creating a limited library comprising two discrete eAPC-p. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that second genomic receiver site (Component 1D) was insulated and unaffected by the Component 1B/Component 1C′ integration couple.
The present example describes how multiple eAPC-pa are constructed from a parental eAPC-p (described in example 8) in parallel, wherein the genomic receiver site, Component 1D, is targeted for integration by a primed genetic donor vector, Component 1E′, comprising of a single ORF that encodes an aAM.
In the present example, the parental eAPC-p line used was ACL-900, which expresses a single aAPX (HLA-A*02:01) that is integrated at Component 1B′ (described in example 8). The eAPC-p Component 1D remains open and comprises of two unique heterospecific recombinase sites, FRT and F3, which flank the ORF that encodes the selection marker, blue fluorescent protein (BFP). Encoded 5′ of the FRT site, is an EF1a promoter, and 3′ of the F15 site is a SV40 polyadenylation signal terminator. The genetic donor vector, Component 1E was used in this example and comprises of two heterospecific recombinase sites, F14 and F15, thus being matched to Component 1D. In this example, the Component 1E was further primed with one aAM ORF of interest selected from HCMVpp28 (SEQ ID NO: 81 V9.E.6), HCMVpp52 (SEQ ID NO: 82 V9.E.7), or HCMVpp65 (SEQ ID NO: 83 V9.E.8), which also each encode a C-terminal glycine-serine rich linker and c-myc tag. Furthermore, each Component 1E′ further comprises of Kozak sequence and start codon immediately 5′ of the aAM ORF. Thus, a small discrete library of Component 1E′ was created, comprising of three vectors.
The eAPC-p (ACL-900) was independently combined with a vector encoding expression of the RMCE recombinase enzyme (Flp, SEQ ID NO: 13 V4.1.8) and each Component 1E′ of either SEQ ID NO: 81 V9.E.6, SEQ ID NO: 82 V9.E.7, or SEQ ID NO: 83 V9.E.8 by electroporation. Cells were incubated for 4-10 days to allow for the integration couple to occur, whereupon, individual eAPC-pa were selected and single cell sorted (monoclones) based on diminished signal of the selection marker of integration BFP, encoded by Component 1D (
In summary, this example demonstrates three specific examples of conversion of an eAPC-p to an eAPC-pa, using the multicomponent system, wherein three different aAM are individually delivered (Component 1E′) and integrated into a single genomic receiver site (Component 1D) by RMCE genomic integration method, subsequently creating a small library of three discrete eAPC-pa carrying three different aAM ORF. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the prior loaded second genomic receiver site (Component 1B′) was insulated and unaffected by the Component 1D/Component 1E′ integration couple.
Herein describes how a pool of primed Component 1E vectors (Component 1E′) collectively encoding multiple aAM ORF (HCMVpp28, HCMVpp52 and HCMVpp65) were integrated in a single step into the parental eAPC-p (described in example 8) to create a pooled eAPC-pa library, wherein each individual cell integrates a single random analyte antigen ORF derived from the original pool of vectors, at Component 1D′, such that each eAPC-pa expresses a single random aAM, but collectively the pooled library of eAPC-pa represents all of aAM ORF encoded in the original pooled library of vectors. This method of creating a pool of eAPC-pa each expressing a single random ORF from a pool of vectors is referred to as shotgun integration.
In this example, the parental eAPC-p line used was ACL-905 expressing an aAPX (HLA-A*02:01) on the cell surface (the construction of the cell line is described in example 8), Component 1D and Component 1E′ were as described in example 9. In this example, the individual Component 1E′ vectors of example 9, SEQ ID NO: 81 V9.E.6, SEQ ID NO: 82 V9.E.7, and SEQ ID NO: 83 V9.E.8, comprising of −aAM ORFs encoding HCMVpp28, HCMVpp52 and HCMVpp65, respectively, were mixed together in a 1:1:1 molar ratio to create a vector pool. The eAPC-p (ACL-905) was combined with the vector pool and a vector encoding expression of the RMCE recombinase enzyme (Flp, SEQ ID NO: 13 V4.1.8) by electroporation. Cells were incubated for 4-10 days, whereupon, cells were bulk sorted on the basis of having diminished signal for the selection marker of integration, BFP, encoded by Component 1D (
To confirm that the eAPC-pa pool ACL-1050 was comprised of a mixture of eAPC-pa each encoding one of HCMVpp28, HCMVpp52 or HCMVpp65 at Component 1D′, individual cells were single cell sorted from the polyclonal population and 12 were selected at random for genetic characterisation. Amplification of the Component 1D′ was conducted using primers that span each aAM (10.D.1 and 15.H.4). In
In conclusion, this example demonstrates the use of the multicomponent system for conversion of an eAPC-p into a pooled library of eAPC-pa in a single step, by combining the eAPC-p with a pooled library of three vectors encoding three different analyte antigen molecules (Component 1E′) and utilizing a RMCE based shotgun integration approach. Furthermore, this example demonstrates that each eAPC-pa within the generated pool of eAPC-pa has integrated a single random aAM ORF from the original vector pool by an integration couple event between Component 1D and Component 1E′, and that all three aAM ORF are represented within the generated pooled eAPC-pa library.
The present example describes the generation of eTPC-t in a standardised manner, wherein the parental eTPC contains distinct synthetic genomic receiver sites Components 2B and 2D. All eTPC parental lines described in this example and all further examples were generated with the same techniques as were the eAPC lines presented in above examples. The genetic donor vectors Components 2C′ and 2E′ comprised a single chain of a TCR pair (JG9-TCR) known to engage with the antigenic peptide NLVPMVATV SEQ ID NO: 1 (NLVP) derived from Human Cytomegalovirus polypeptide 65 (HCMV pp65) (SEQ ID 3 NLVP) (HCMV pp65) when presented in HLA-A*02 alleles. Components C′ and E′ are designed for RMCE, and derived from parental Components 2C and 2E.
This example uses a parental eTPC cell line ACL-488, which is TCR null, HLA null, CD4 null and CD8 null, and further containing Component 2B and 2D. Component 2B comprises two unique heterospecific recombinase sites, FRT and F3 that flank a Kozak sequence and ORF encoding the selection marker, blue fluorescent protein (BFP). Encoded 5′ of the FRT site, is an EF1a promoter and 3′ of the F3 site is a SV40 polyadenylation signal terminator. Component 2D comprises two unique heterospecific recombinase sites, F14 and F15, which were different to Component 2B. These sites flank a Kozak sequence and ORF that encodes the selection marker, the red fluorescent protein, (RFP). Encoded 5′ of the F14 site is an EF1a promoter, and 3′ of the F15 site is a SV40 polyadenylation signal terminator.
This example uses genetic donor vectors, Component 2C′ and Component 2E′, each comprising of two heterospecific recombinase sites, FRT/F3 (2C′) and F14/F15 (2E′), thus being matched to Component 2B and 2D, respectively. Component 2C′ further comprises, between the FRT/F3 sites, of a Kozak sequence, start codon and TCR ORF encoding JG9-TCR-beta chain. Component 2E′ further comprises, between the F14/F15 sites, of a Kozak sequence, start codon and TCR ORF encoding JG9-TCR-alpha chain.
An eTPC-t was created through RMCE by electroporation ACL-488 (eTPC). Four to ten days after electroporation, individual cells displaying diminished fluorescent protein signal, BFP and RFP, encoded by Components 2D and 2B selection markers, were sorted by FACS. Individual monoclones were out grown and then phenotypically assessed. The resulting monoclone, ACL-851, was BFP and RFP negative (
In summary, an eTPC was converted to an eTPC-t, by use of an RMCE based integration method to integrate TCR ORF delivered in Component 2C′ and 2E′, such that Components 2B and 2D were converted into Component 2B′ and 2D′, and where by this eTPC-t expressed a functional TCRsp on the surface of the cell. Furthermore, this example demonstrates operation of a simple eTPC:A system, where a binary composition of an eTPC-t and analyte antigen were combined and the eTPC-t selected based on a complex formation between the soluble analyte antigen (HLA multimer: HLAA*02:01-NLVPMVATV).
The present example describes conversion of an eTPC-t to an eTPC-x, wherein the eTPC-x has component 2B′ encoding a TCR chain ORF and Component 2D is available for integration of complementary TCR chain ORF. Conversion of Component 2D′ of the eTPC-t to Component 2D of the eTPC-x is achieved by use of a genetic donor vector (Component 2Z) matched to Component 2D′.
In this example, the parental eTPC-t cell line ACL-851 generated in example 11 was used. Component 2Z is a plasmid vector comprised of two heterospecific recombinase sites, F14/F15 matched to Component 2D′, a Kozak sequence, start codon and an ORF encoding a green fluorescent protein (GFP) as a selection marker of integration. The eTPC-t was combined with Component 2Z and a vector encoding RMCE recombinase enzyme by electroporation, whereupon the cells were subsequently selected for loss of CD3 presentation and gain of the GFP selection marker of integration. The monolcone ACL-987 was phenotypically characterised by FACS, and it was observed that the ACL-987 has gained GFP and lost CD3 and TCRab (
In summary, this example demonstrates conversion of an eTPC-t to an eTPC-x, with removal of the JG9-TCR-alpha TCR ORF at Component 2D′ in exchange for the GFP selection marker of integration thereby creating Component 2D, for further integration coupling events of alternative complementary TCR chain ORF. This conversion was conducted using the RMCE method for genomic integration.
The present example describes how a pool of vectors encoding 64 single JG9-TCR-alpha variants (as Component 2E′) were integrated as a single step into a parental eTPC-x cell line (described in example 12) to create a pooled eTPC-t library wherein each individual cell integrated a single random TCR ORF encoding alpha chain from the original pool of vectors, such that each eTPC-t expresses a single random pair of TCR ORF as TCRsp. Combined together the individual eTPC-t comprises a pooled a library of eTPC-t wherein the pool of cells potentially represents all possible combinations of the 64 TCR-alpha paired with constant original TCR beta chain. Such a method is now referred to as ‘shotgun’ integration. The 64 JG9-TCR-alpha variants have been created by modifying the CDR3 sequence which falls at the junction of the V and J fragments.
In this example, the parental eTPC-x cell line ACL-987 (see example 12), with non-surface expressed JG9-TCR-beta (Component 2B′) and CD3 complex was used. Component 2D encodes GFP, a selection marker, as described in example 12. In this example, the 64 JG9-TCR-alpha variant fragments were cloned into the Component 2E donor vector, creating Component 2E′, flanked by F14/F15 sites, matching to Component 2D. The 64 vectors were subsequently combined into a single pool of vectors.
An eTPC-t pool was created via RMCE based genomic integration, wherein the eTPC-x (ACL-987) and 64 Components 2E′ and RMCE recombinase vector were combined by electroporation. Polyclones were selected on the basis of the GFP expression. The resulting polyclone, ACL-988, comprised of both GFP positive and GFP negative cell populations, unlike the parental line which comprised of only GFP positive cells (
In parallel, all 64 JG9-TCR-alpha variants were cloned into an expression construct that permitted transient transfection to a parental eTPC-x (ACL-987) and relative staining units (RSU) against the HLA-A*02:01-NLVP multimer reagent to a reference for each TCR pair presented in the above-described pooled eTPC-t expressing variant JG9-TCR were determined. RSU were calculated as the ratio of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of HLA multimer signal for the CD3 positive population over the CD3 negative population, and was indicative of the binding strength of each TCR chain pair variant. After the independent transfection of the parental ACL-987 line with each JG9-TCR-alpha variant, the cells were stained with antibodies against CD3 and with the HLA-multimer reagent and analysed by flow cytometry. Each point plotted in
Individual cells from the pool of ACL-988 were single cell sorted, from the HLA-multimer positive population and the HLA-multimer negative population. The Component 2D′ encoding the variant JG9-TCR-alpha ORF for each single cell were amplified and sequenced and compared to the results of the transient expressions RSU units described above (
In conclusion, this example demonstrates use of the multi-component system for conversion of an eTPC-x and a pooled library of vectors (component 2E′) into a pooled library of eTPC-t containing multiple different TCRsp. This was achieved in a single step using shotgun integration. Moreover, this example demonstrated that the pool of eTPC-t were combined with an analyte antigen (as a soluble affinity reagent) into an eTPC:A system, wherein it was demonstrated that single cells of the pool could be selected on the basis of complex formation with the analyte antigen (HLA-multimer) and wherein the subsequent TCR chain ORF encoded in Component 2D′ were extracted and DNA sequences obtained.
Herein describes an eTPC cell line (ACL-1063, Component 2A) engineered with two unique genomic receiver sites (Components 2B, 2D), engineered to be HLA Null, utilizing native CD3 expression, and harbouring an engineered genomic two-component, synthetic response element (Component 2F). In this example, the eTPC cell line was converted to an eTPC-t cell line (ACL-1277) as described previously in example 11, wherein the TCR chain ORF at Component 2B′ and 2E′ encode a TCR pair that is specific for HLA-peptide complex (HLA), HLA-A*02:01-SEQ ID NO: 1 NLVPMVATV. This eTPC-t was combined with above-described eAPC-p in the presence of exogenous aAM in the form of soluble peptide to assemble a eAPC:eTPC systems. The readout of these combined systems was an RFP signal within the eTPC-t, which was the reporter from component 2F.
The response elements defined as Component 2F comprised of a Driver-Activator component and an Amplifier-Report component, wherein both units utilized synthetic promoters. The Driver is a synthetic promoter that is responsive to the native TCR signalling pathways, encoding three sets of tandem transcription factor binding sites for NFAT-AP1-NFkB (3×NF-AP-NB). Upon transcriptional activation, the Driver induces expression of the Activator protein, a synthetic designed transcription factor derived by fusion of the Herpes VP16 activation domain, the GAL4 DNA binding domain and two nuclear localization signals at the N- and C-terminals (NV16G4N), to which the cognate DNA recognition sequence is present 6 times in tandem in the Amplifier promoter. Both the Driver and Amplifier promoters utilized the core promoter sequence (B recognition element (BRE), TATA Box, Initiator (INR) and transcriptional start site) from HCMV IE1 promoter, immediately 3′ of the respective transcription factor binding sites. The Amplifier upon transcriptional activation drives expression of the reporter, red fluorescent protein (RFP).
The eTPC-t cell line was then challenged against eAPC-p presenting HLA-A*02:01 (ACL-209) or HLA-A*24:02 (ACL-963) or was HLA-null parental eAPC (ACL-128). Wherein analyte eAPC-pa were prepared by pulsing eAPC-p with analyte antigen of either peptide SEQ ID NO: 1 NLVPMVATV or VYALPLKML, or no peptide. Subsequently, an eTPC-t and analyte eAPC-pa were compiled into an eAPC:eTPC system consisting of 30,000 eTPC-t co-cultured with 10,000 eAPC-pa for 24h. After 24h the cells were harvested, washed, stained with markers specific for the eTPC-t and analyte eAPC-pa in order to distinguish the populations, and analysed by flow cytometry. Strong activation of the eTPC-t, Component 2F (was only observed in eTPC-t challenged with analyte eAPC-pa presenting the known cognate antigen pHLA complex, i.e. the eAPC-pa with HLA-A*02:01 and SEQ ID NO: 1 NLVPMVATV (
In conclusion, an eTPC-t cell line containing a functional component 2F was engineered, and subsequently used to create an eTPC-t. Upon interaction of the eTPC-t with analyte eAPC-pa presenting its cognate target T-cell antigen, provided as exogenous soluble aAM, a response was measurable as an increase in RFP expression. Conversely, when contacted with analyte eAPC or eAPC-p or eAPC-pa not presenting a cognate T-cell antigen and HLA, or no HLA, no measurable increase in RFP expression above background was exhibited by the eTPC-t. Furthermore, this example demonstrates an eAPC:eTPC system wherein analyte eAPC-pa and analyte eTPC-t are compiled in discrete binary compositions and the eTPC-t response is used to identify both the analyte eAPC-pa and eTPC-t wherein a co-operative complex between the TCRsp and analyte antigen occurs.
The present example describes the use of an eTPC-t (ACL-1150), (Component 2A) engineered with two unique genomic receiver sites, loaded with the TCR chain ORF at Component 2B′ and 2E′ encoding a TCR pair that is specific for HLA-peptide complex (HLA), HLA-A*02:01-SEQ ID NO: 1 NLVPMVATV, utilizing native CD3 expression, and harbouring a genomic one-component, synthetic response element (Component 2F), compiled into an eAPC:eTPC system with eAPC-pa that were generated by integration with aAM encoding ORF integrated at site 1 D′. In this example, four different eAPC-pa variants were assembled with two different HLA alleles, and two different aAM ORF derived from the HCMV genome; generating four distinct eAPC-pa lines.
The response elements defined as Component 2F comprised of a Driver-Reporter component. The Driver is a synthetic promoter that is responsive to the native TCR signalling pathways, encoding six sets of tandem transcription factor binding sites for NFAT-AP1 (6×NF-AP) and utilizes the core promoter sequence (B recognition element (BRE), TATA Box, Initiator (INR) and transcriptional start site) from HCMV IE1 promoter, immediately 3′ of the respective transcription factor binding sites. Upon transcriptional activation, the Driver induces expression of the reporter, red fluorescent protein (RFP).
The first eAPC-pa line (ACL-1046) expresses HLA-A*02:01 and the full-length ORF for HCMV protein pp65, wherein pp65 contains the antigenic peptide recognised by the eTPC-t TCRsp, when presented in HLA-A*02:01. The second eAPC-pa line (ACL-1044) expresses HLA-A*02:01 and the full-length ORF for HCMV protein pp52. The third eAPC-pa line ACL-1045 expresses HLA-B*07:02 and the full-length ORF for HCMV protein pp52. The fourth eAPC-pa line (ACL-1048) expresses HLA-B*07:02 and the full-length ORF for HCMV protein pp65. The second, third and fourth eAPC-pa express aAPX:aAM complexes not recognised by the eTPC-t TCRsp.
The eTPC-t cell line ACL-1150 was compiled into independent eAPC:eTPC system with each of the four eAPC-pa as described above. After 48h the cells were harvested, washed, stained with markers specific for the eTPC-t and analyte eAPC-pa in order to distinguish the populations, and analysed by flow cytometry. Strong activation of the eTPC-t, Component 2F, was only observed in eTPC-t challenged with analyte eAPC-pa presenting the known cognate antigen pHLA complex, i.e. the eAPC-pa with HLAA*02:01 and pp65 (
In conclusion, an eTPC-t cell line containing a functional component 2F was engineered, and subsequently used to create an eTPC-t. Upon interaction of the eTPC-t with analyte eAPC-pa presenting its cognate target T-cell antigen, provided as endogenous aAM ORF by integration, a response was measurable as an increase in RFP expression. Conversely, when contacted with analyte eAPC-pa not presenting a cognate T-cell antigen and HLA, no measurable increase in RFP expression above background was exhibited by the eTPC-t. Furthermore, this example demonstrates an eAPC:eTPC system wherein analyte eAPC-pa and analyte eTPC-t are compiled in discrete binary compositions and the eTPC-t response is used to identify both the analyte eAPC-pa and eTPC-t wherein a co-operative complex between the TCRsp and analyte antigen occurs.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PA 2016 70874 | Nov 2016 | DK | national |
The present application is the U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2017/078474, filed Nov. 7, 2017, and claims priority to Denmark Application No. PA 201670874, filed Nov. 7, 2016.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16347716 | May 2019 | US |
Child | 18320900 | US |