1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to semiconductor wafer processing and, more particularly, to apparatuses and techniques for more effectively conducting patterning a photoresist in a photolithographic operation.
2. Description of the Related Art
The ability to work selectively on small well defined areas of a substrate is paramount in the manufacture of semiconductor devices. In the continuing quest to achieve higher levels of performance and higher functional density of the semiconductor devices, the microelectronics industry is committed to applying new processes to further reduce the minimum feature sizes of the semiconductor devices.
As feature sizes are reduced, the devices can become smaller or remain the same size but become more densely packed. As such, advances in lithographic technologies used to pattern the semiconductor devices must keep pace with the progress to reduce feature sizes, in order to allow for smaller and more dense semiconductor devices. In order to do this, the lithographic technology must increasingly improve its ability to resolve smaller and smaller line widths. The resolution limit is in good part determined by the wavelength of light used to pattern the photoresist. Therefore one of the main ways to reduce the device critical dimensions (CD) through lithographic technologies has been to continually reduce the wavelength of the radiation used to expose the photoresist to yield well-defined pattern profiles.
High resolution lithographic transmission becomes more of a challenge as wafers progress to higher density chips with shrinking geometries. Furthermore, as metallization interconnect technology transitions to dual damascene processes, lithography techniques to pattern holes or trenches in the dielectric become more critical and has a direct impact on yield and reliability. In particular, optical lithographic methods utilizing shorter wavelengths are often utilized to pattern the photoresist. For example, attempts to use wavelengths as low as 157 nm have been made. Unfortunately, present optical lithographic methods and tools have to be changed to utilize this shorter wavelength. Regrettably, to change over to the 157 nm wavelength from a higher wavelength process, optical lithographic tools must generally be changed such as using different materials for optics and different lens concepts, as well as changing the photomask materials.
Therefore, there is a need for a method and an apparatus that can utilize the same masks, resists, and lens concepts as existing systems but at the same time also provide the sharper pattern profile that results from using shorter wavelengths to pattern the photoresist.
Broadly speaking, the present invention fills these needs by providing a method and apparatus for conducting photolithography in an optimal and effective manner. It should be appreciated that the present invention can be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process, an apparatus, a system, a device or a method. Several inventive embodiments of the present invention are described below.
In one embodiment, a method for processing a substrate is provided which includes generating a fluid meniscus to process the substrate where the fluid meniscus is constantly replenished with fluid by addition of the fluid into the fluid meniscus and by removal of the fluid from the fluid meniscus by a vacuum. The method also includes applying the fluid meniscus to a photoresist on a substrate surface and transmitting a patterned light to the photoresist on the substrate surface through the fluid meniscus.
In another embodiment, an apparatus for processing a substrate is provided which includes a proximity head configured to generate a fluid meniscus to facilitate patterning of a photoresist on a substrate surface where the fluid meniscus is constantly replenished with fluid by addition of the fluid into the fluid meniscus and by removal of the fluid from the fluid meniscus by a vacuum. The apparatus also includes a lithography lens structure at least partially defined within the proximity head where the lithography lens structure has a lithography lens in direct contact with the fluid meniscus during operation. The lithography lens structure applies a patterned light from the lithography lens through the fluid meniscus to pattern the photoresist on the substrate surface.
In yet another embodiment, an apparatus for processing a substrate is provided which includes a proximity head capable of generating a fluid meniscus to process a substrate surface where the fluid meniscus is constantly replenished with fluid by addition of the fluid into the fluid meniscus and by removal of the fluid from the fluid meniscus by a vacuum. The apparatus further includes a light generating source within the proximity head where the light generating source is in direct contact with the fluid meniscus during operation. The light generating source applies a patterned light into and through the fluid meniscus. The patterned light has a first wavelength before entrance into the fluid meniscus and an effective wavelength when applied to the photoresist through the fluid meniscus where the effective wavelength is shorter than the first wavelength.
In another embodiment, a method for processing a substrate is provided which includes generating a meniscus on the surface of the substrate and applying photolithography light through the meniscus to enable photolithography processing of a surface of the substrate.
In yet another embodiment, a photolithography apparatus is provided which includes a proximity head where the proximity head is capable of generating a meniscus on a surface of a substrate. The apparatus also includes a light source for applying photolithography light from the proximity head and through the meniscus where the photolithography light contacts the surface of the substrate to enable photolithography processing.
The advantages of the present invention are numerous. Most notably, the apparatuses and methods described herein efficiently pattern photoresist in an immersion lithography operation by converting a wavelength of an optical signal to a shorter effective wavelength. The shorter effective wavelength may be generated using a proximity head with lithography lens that is capable of directly contacting a fluid meniscus for transmitting optical signals to a photoresist layer on a substrate surface through the fluid meniscus.
The proximity head with the photolithography lens can optimally manage fluid application and removal from the wafer thereby generating the fluid meniscus through which the optical signal may be sent. The fluid meniscus can be effectively moved without losing significant stability and in addition can be constantly replenished with new liquid thereby enhancing the photolithography process by significantly reducing bubbling and contamination within the fluid meniscus. Moreover, with the use the fluid meniscus as described herein, contamination left on the wafer surface can be dramatically reduced. As a result, by using the fluid meniscus that can shorten the effective wavelength of the optical signal from the lithography lens, equipment such as lens and optical apparatus generally used for longer wavelength photolithographic methods may be utilized to generate a much more precise and sharp patterning than is generally available.
Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, illustrating by way of example the principles of the present invention.
The present invention will be readily understood by the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. To facilitate this description, like reference numerals designate like structural elements.
An invention for methods and apparatuses for processing a substrate is disclosed. Specifically, an efficient and effective way of patterning photoresist in a photolithographic operation is provided. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be understood, however, by one of ordinary skill in the art, that the present invention may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process operations have not been described in detail in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present invention.
While this invention has been described in terms of several preferable embodiments, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art upon reading the preceding specifications and studying the drawings will realize various alterations, additions, permutations and equivalents thereof. It is therefore intended that the present invention includes all such alterations, additions, permutations, and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
The figures below illustrate embodiments of an exemplary wafer processing system where optimized photolithographic operations may be conducted. Specifically, the figures below illustrate embodiments of an exemplary wafer photolithographic system using proximity heads to generate a fluid meniscus in a controlled environment that includes a lithography lens structure located at least partially within a proximity head. In one embodiment, the lithography lens may contact the fluid meniscus and transmit patterned optical signals through the fluid meniscus to a photoresist that has been applied to a surface of the substrate. It should be appreciated that application of a photoresist onto a substrate is well known to those skilled in the art. By transmitting the optical signals through the fluid meniscus and applying the optical signals to the photoresist, the wavelength of the optical signal may be changed to a shorter effective wavelength thereby resulting in more precise patterning of the photoresist. Consequently, a more precise way of patterning photoresist may be utilized to generate smaller critical dimensions leading to smaller and more dense features within a semiconductor wafer.
It should be appreciated that the systems described herein are exemplary, and that any other suitable type of configuration that would enable movement of the proximity head(s) into close proximity to the wafer may be utilized. In the embodiments shown, the proximity head(s) may move in any fashion to facilitate photoresist patterning. In one embodiment, the proximity head may be configured to move in any manner typically associated with a stepper mechanism as known to those known skilled in the art. In another embodiment, the proximity head may move in a rasterized movement. In another embodiment, the proximity head(s) may be moved in a linear fashion from a center portion of the wafer to the edge of the wafer. It should be appreciated that other embodiments may be utilized where the proximity head(s) move in a linear fashion from one edge of the wafer to another diametrically opposite edge of the wafer, or other non-linear movements may be utilized such as, for example, in a radial motion, in a circular motion, in a spiral motion, in a zig-zag motion, etc. The motion may also be any suitable specified motion profile as desired by a user as long as the desired photolithographic patterning of the wafer is accomplished. In addition, the proximity head and the wafer processing system described herein may be utilized to photolithographically pattern any shape and size of substrates such as for example, 200 mm wafers, 300 mm wafers, flat panels, etc.
A fluid meniscus can be supported and moved (e.g., onto, off of and across a wafer) with a proximity head. Various proximity heads and methods of using the proximity heads are described in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/330,843 filed on Dec. 24, 2002 and entitled “Meniscus, Vacuum, IPA Vapor, Drying Manifold,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/261,839 filed on Sep. 30, 2002 and entitled “Method and Apparatus for Drying Semiconductor Wafer Surfaces Using a Plurality of Inlets and Outlets Held in Close Proximity to the Wafer Surfaces,” both of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Additional embodiments and uses of the proximity head are also disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/330,897, filed on Dec. 24, 2002, entitled “System for Substrate Processing with Meniscus, Vacuum, IPA vapor, Drying Manifold” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/404,692, filed on Mar. 31, 2003, entitled “Methods and Systems for Processing a Substrate Using a Dynamic Liquid Meniscus.” Still additional embodiments of the proximity head are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/404,270, filed on Mar. 31, 2003, entitled “Vertical Proximity Processor,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/603,427, filed on Jun. 24, 2003, and entitled “Methods and Systems for Processing a Bevel Edge of a Substrate Using a Dynamic Liquid Meniscus,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,022, filed on Jun. 24, 2003, and entitled “System and Method for Integrating In-Situ Metrology within a Wafer Process,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/607,611 filed on Jun. 27, 2003 entitled “Apparatus and Method for Depositing and Planarizing Thin Films of Semiconductor Wafers,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/611,140 filed on Jun. 30, 2003 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Cleaning a Substrate Using Megasonic Power,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/738,164 filed on Dec. 16, 2003 entitled “Apparatus for Oscillating a Head and Methods for Implementing the Same,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/918,487 filed on Mar. 31, 2004 entitled “Proximity Head Heating Method and Apparatus,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/742,303 filed on Dec. 18, 2003 entitled “Proximity Brush Unit Apparatus and Method,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/816,432 filed on Mar. 31, 2004 entitled “Substrate Brush Scrubbing and Proximity Cleaning-Drying Sequence Using Compatible Chemistries, and Method, Apparatus, and System for Implementing the Same,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/817,398 filed on Apr. 1, 2004 entitled “Controls of Ambient Environment During Wafer Drying Using Proximity Head,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/817,355 filed on Apr. 1, 2004 entitled “Substrate Proximity Processing Structures and Methods for Using and Making the Same,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/817,620 filed on Apr. 1, 2004 entitled “Substrate Meniscus Interface and Methods for Operation,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/817,133 filed on Apr. 1, 2004 entitled “Proximity Meniscus Manifold,” and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/742,303 entitled “Proximity Brush Unit Apparatus and Method.” The aforementioned patent applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
It should be appreciated that the methods and apparatuses discussed herein may be utilized in any suitable wafer processing system described in the above referenced patent applications. It should also be appreciated that the lithography lens may be utilized with any suitable proximity head that can generate a stable but dynamic fluid meniscus that can contact the lithography lens to photolithographically pattern a photoresist on a wafer surface. The lithography lens as utilized herein may be any suitable type of lithographic apparatus that can transmit patterned light through the lens to pattern a photoresist. In one embodiment, the lithography lens can be a part of a lithographic lens structure that is attached to a column system to form a photolithographic light system which can include a light source, a reticle, and one or more lens.
It should also be appreciated that the system 100 may be configured in any suitable manner as long as the proximity head(s) may be moved in close proximity to the wafer to generate and control a meniscus while patterning a photoresist layer by a lithography lens structure 200 that contacts the fluid meniscus 112. The lithography lens structure 200 is described in further detail in reference to
In one embodiment, the system 100, the proximity head 106 may be moved from patterned to unpatterned portions of the photoresist that has been applied to the wafer 108. It should be appreciated that the proximity head 106 may be movable in any suitable manner that would enable movement of the proximity head 106 to pattern the photoresist layer on the wafer 108 as desired as discussed above. The proximity head 106 of the wafer processing system 100 may also be any suitable size or shape as shown by, for example, any of the proximity heads as described herein including those described in the patent Applications incorporated by reference above. The different configurations described herein can therefore generate a fluid meniscus between the proximity head and the wafer, and in addition, the lithography lens structure 200 may apply a patterning light (also known as patterned light) onto the photoresist 110 through a lens that is in direct contact with the fluid meniscus 112. Once the light moves directly from the lens to the fluid meniscus 112, depending on the refractive index of the fluid, the effective wavelength of the light may be a much shorter effective wavelength that the wavelength of the light before entrance into the fluid meniscus. It should be appreciated that any suitable liquid that may shorten the effective wavelength of the light applied from the lithography lens may be used such as, for example, water, aqueous solutions of sucrose, maltose, or chloride salts, etc. By positioning the fluid meniscus in direct contact with the lens and the photoresist, refraction at the meniscus-lens interface and the liquid-photoresist interface are significantly reduced or eliminated. This may enable the patterned light from the lens of the lithography lens to move through the meniscus without refraction which can reduce the effective wavelength of the patterned light using the formula as indicated in Table 1 below.
In the above equation, λ is the wavelength of the patterned light before entry into the fluid meniscus and λeffective is the effective wavelength of the patterned light that is applied to the photoresist on a wafer surface. In one embodiment, water may be utilized as the fluid for the immersion lithography. Water has a refractive index of 1.43 and therefore, if the lithography lens applies a wavelength of 193 nm to the fluid meniscus, the effective wavelength of the optical signal applied to the photoresist may be shortened to about 135 nm. Therefore, by using a configuration where the lithography lens directly contacts the liquid of the fluid meniscus, the effective wavelength of light from the lithography lens may be decreased significantly. The decreased effective wavelength light hitting the photoresist on the wafer surface may pattern the photoresist into any suitable pattern desired. It should be appreciated that the light from a light source may be sent through a reticle which may generate the pattern desired. The light source may be any suitable apparatus that may generate an optical signal that can pattern a photoresist such as, for example, a UV lamp, an excimer laser, etc. The reticle may be generated by any suitable method as known to those skilled in the art.
In one embodiment, the lithography lens structure 200 is attached to a patterned light generating apparatus such as, for example, the column system 202 as shown in
The fluid meniscus may be moved across the wafer to process the wafer by applying fluid to the wafer surface and removing fluids from the surface while at the same time applying a patterning light to the photoresist on the wafer surface. In one embodiment, a stepper apparatus may be used to move the lithography lens over portions of the wafer to be patterned. The wafer 108 may also be moved in a rasterized motion as the photolithographic patterning operation progresses. It should also be appreciated that the system 100 may process one surface of the wafer or both the top surface and the bottom surface of the wafer.
In one embodiment, the fluid meniscus 112 may be generated by applying fluids to the wafer surface and removing the fluids from the wafer surface through conduits such as the source inlets and source outlets located in the proximity head as described herein. It should be appreciated that conduits such as, for example, inlets and outlets, may have openings located on a face of the proximity head and may be in any suitable configuration as long as a stable meniscus as described herein may be utilized.
In one exemplary embodiment, at least one gas inlet may be adjacent to at least one vacuum outlet which may be in turn adjacent to at least one processing fluid inlet to form an gas-vacuum-processing fluid orientation. It should be appreciated that other types of orientations such as gas-processing fluid-vacuum, processing fluid-vacuum-gas, vacuum-gas-processing fluid, etc. may be utilized depending on the wafer processes desired and what type of wafer processing mechanism is sought to be enhanced. In another embodiment, the gas-vacuum-processing fluid orientation may be utilized to intelligently and powerfully generate, control, and move the meniscus located between a proximity head and a wafer to process wafers. By having the ability to manage the fluid meniscus, the lithography lens may be kept in a position so the liquid/lens interface and the liquid/photoresist interface can reduce the effective wavelength of the optical signal being applied to the photoresist.
The processing fluid inlets, the gas inlets, and the vacuum outlets may be arranged in any suitable manner if the fluid meniscus may be generated and maintained in a stable manner. For example, in addition to the gas inlet, the vacuum outlet, and the processing fluid inlet, in an additional embodiment, there may be additional sets of gas inlets, processing fluid inlets and/or vacuum outlets depending on the configuration of the proximity head desired. It should be appreciated that the exact configuration of the gas-vacuum-processing fluid orientation may be varied depending on the application. For example, the distance between the gas inlet, vacuum, and processing fluid inlet locations may be varied so the distances are consistent or so the distances are inconsistent. In addition, the distances between the gas inlet, vacuum, and processing fluid inlet may differ in magnitude depending on the size, shape, and configuration of the proximity head 106 and the desired size of a process meniscus (i.e., meniscus shape and size). Moreover, exemplary gas-vacuum-processing fluid orientation may be found as described in the U.S. patent Applications referenced above.
In one embodiment, the proximity head 106 may be positioned in close proximity to a top surface of the wafer 108 and may utilize the gas and processing fluid inlets and a vacuum outlet(s) to generate wafer processing meniscuses in contact with the wafer 108 which are capable of processing the top surface. The wafer processing meniscus may be generated in accordance with the descriptions in reference to Applications referenced and incorporated by reference above. In one embodiment, IPA/N2 vapor gas may be inputted as the gas through the gas inlet and deionized water may be inputted as the processing fluid through the processing fluid inlet. At substantially the same time the IPA and the processing fluid are inputted, a vacuum may be applied in close proximity to the wafer surface to remove the IPA vapor, the processing fluid, and/or the fluids that may be on the wafer surface. It should be appreciated that although EPA is utilized in the exemplary embodiment, any other suitable type of vapor may be utilized such as for example, any suitable vapor of alcohols (ethanol, propanol, butanol, hexanol etc.), ketones, ethers, or other organic compounds, etc. that may be miscible with the liquid being used to generate the fluid meniscus the vapor of which can be carried via an inert gas. The portion of the processing fluid that is in the region between the proximity head and the wafer is the meniscus. It should be appreciated that as used herein, the term “output” can refer to the removal of fluid from a region between the wafer 108 and a particular proximity head, and the term “input” can be the introduction of fluid to the region between the wafer 108 and the particular proximity head.
In one embodiment, the system 100 further includes a fluid supply distributor that can supply to, and remove fluids from, the proximity head 106. It should be appreciated that the fluid supply distributor may be any suitable apparatus that can supply and receive fluids in an controlled manner such as, for example, a manifold. In one embodiment, the fluid supply distributor receives fluid from a fluid supply. The fluid supply may be managed and controlled by a fluid supply control which may be any suitable hardware/software that can manage fluid input to the proximity head 106. The proximity head 106 may then produce the meniscus 112 that can process the wafer 108.
In one embodiment, the proximity head 106 includes inlets 302 and 306 as well as outlets 304. In an exemplary embodiment of an immersion lithography operation, the proximity head 106 may produce a fluid meniscus through which the lithography lens structure 200 may pass a patterning light to pattern the photoresist that is on the surface of the wafer 108 (as discussed in further detail in reference to
It should be appreciated that in another embodiment of the proximity head 106, the inlets 302 may be eliminated so just the inlets 306 and outlets 304 remain. In such a configuration, the region where the outlets 304 and inlets 306 are located may be indented as compared with the rest of the processing surface of the proximity head 106. Consequently, the fluid meniscus may be contained within the indented region without the need to apply a confinement gas and/or a surface tension altering gas. Therefore, a processing fluid may be inputted through the inlets 306 and the processing fluid may be removed through the outlets 304 to generate a stable meniscus through which photolithography may take place.
In a further embodiment, the fluid meniscus may be maintained at a tightly controlled temperature to control the effective wavelength; additionally, the temperature can be lowered to increase the refractive index of the fluid, and hence lowering the effective wavelength.
While this invention has been described in terms of several preferred embodiments, it will be appreciated that those skilled in the art upon reading the preceding specifications and studying the drawings will realize various alterations, additions, permutations and equivalents thereof. It is therefore intended that the present invention includes all such alterations, additions, permutations, and equivalents as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This is a continuation-in-part of a co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/606,022, from which priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 is claimed, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTEGRATING IN-SITU METROLOGY WITHIN A WAFER PROCESS” filed on Jun. 24, 2003. The aforementioned patent application is hereby incorporated by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10,606,022 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/404,270 from which priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 was claimed, entitled “VERTICAL PROXIMITY PROCESSOR” filed on Mar. 31, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,069,937 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/330,843 from which priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 was claimed, entitled “MENISCUS, VACUUM, IPA VAPOR, DRYING MANIFOLD” filed on Dec. 24, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,198,055 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/261,839 from which priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 was claimed, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DRYING SEMICONDUCTOR WAFER SURFACES USING A PLURALITY OF INLETS AND OUTLETS HELD IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE WAFER SURFACES” filed on Sep. 30, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,234,477.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3953265 | Hood | Apr 1976 | A |
4086870 | Canavello et al. | May 1978 | A |
4367123 | Beck | Jan 1983 | A |
4444492 | Lee | Apr 1984 | A |
4838289 | Kottman et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
5102494 | Harvey et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5180431 | Sugimoto et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5271774 | Leenaars et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5294257 | Kelly et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5343234 | Kuehnle | Aug 1994 | A |
5361449 | Akimoto | Nov 1994 | A |
5472502 | Batchelder | Dec 1995 | A |
5558111 | Lofaro | Sep 1996 | A |
5601655 | Bok et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5660642 | Britten | Aug 1997 | A |
5705223 | Bunkofske | Jan 1998 | A |
5709757 | Hatano et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5807522 | Brown et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830334 | Kobayashi | Nov 1998 | A |
5882433 | Ueno | Mar 1999 | A |
5945351 | Mathuni | Aug 1999 | A |
5975098 | Yoshitani et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989478 | Ouellette et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997653 | Yamasaka | Dec 1999 | A |
6132586 | Adams et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6341998 | Zhang | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6391166 | Wang | May 2002 | B1 |
6398975 | Mertens et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6446358 | Mitsumori et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6491764 | Mertens et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6514570 | Matsuyama et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6517635 | Mitsumori et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6531206 | Johnston et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6550988 | Sugimoto et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6555017 | Rushford et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6616772 | De Larios et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629540 | Mitsumori et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6689323 | Fisher et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6764720 | Pui et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6799584 | Yogev et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6854473 | Hanson et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6954993 | Smith et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6988326 | O'Donnell et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6988327 | Garcia et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000622 | Woods et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7069937 | Garcia et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
20020121290 | Tang et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020125212 | Mertens et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030091754 | Chihani et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030092264 | Shinji et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040060573 | Woods | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040069319 | Boyd et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040069329 | De Larios et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040136494 | Lof et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040178060 | Ravkin et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040182422 | Boyd et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050132515 | Boyd et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050139318 | Woods et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145265 | Ravkin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050145267 | Korolik et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050145268 | Woods | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050148197 | Woods et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050217703 | O'Donnell | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050259234 | Hirukawa et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060064895 | Garcia et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060152697 | Poon et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070058263 | Chang et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070243329 | De Graaf | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070258064 | Hirukawa | Nov 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 905 746 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0 905 747 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1 489 461 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 489 462 | Dec 2004 | EP |
1 571 697 | Sep 2005 | EP |
05837190 | Mar 1983 | JP |
62150828 | Jul 1987 | JP |
02280330 | Nov 1990 | JP |
02309638 | Dec 1990 | JP |
08277486 | Oct 1996 | JP |
11031672 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11350169 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2003-151948 | May 2003 | JP |
WO 9916109 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 9949504 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 02001613 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 0232825 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 02101795 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 03014416 | Feb 2003 | WO |
WO 2004030051 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10606022 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 10834548 | US | |
Parent | 10404270 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 10606022 | US | |
Parent | 10330843 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 10404270 | US | |
Parent | 10261839 | Sep 2002 | US |
Child | 10330843 | US |