The present invention relates generally to surgical tools and, more particularly, to various wrist mechanisms in surgical tools for performing robotic surgery.
Advances in minimally invasive surgical technology could dramatically increase the number of surgeries performed in a minimally invasive manner Minimally invasive medical techniques are aimed at reducing the amount of extraneous tissue that is damaged during diagnostic or surgical procedures, thereby reducing patient recovery time, discomfort, and deleterious side effects. The average length of a hospital stay for a standard surgery may also be shortened significantly using minimally invasive surgical techniques. Thus, an increased adoption of minimally invasive techniques could save millions of hospital days, and millions of dollars annually in hospital residency costs alone. Patient recovery times, patient discomfort, surgical side effects, and time away from work may also be reduced with minimally invasive surgery.
The most common form of minimally invasive surgery may be endoscopy. Probably the most common form of endoscopy is laparoscopy, which is minimally invasive inspection and surgery inside the abdominal cavity. In standard laparoscopic surgery, a patient's abdomen is insufflated with gas, and cannula sleeves are passed through small (approximately ½ inch) incisions to provide entry ports for laparoscopic surgical instruments. The laparoscopic surgical instruments generally include a laparoscope (for viewing the surgical field) and working tools. The working tools are similar to those used in conventional (open) surgery, except that the working end or end effector of each tool is separated from its handle by an extension tube. As used herein, the term “end effector” means the actual working part of the surgical instrument and can include clamps, graspers, scissors, staplers, and needle holders, for example. To perform surgical procedures, the surgeon passes these working tools or instruments through the cannula sleeves to an internal surgical site and manipulates them from outside the abdomen. The surgeon monitors the procedure by means of a monitor that displays an image of the surgical site taken from the laparoscope. Similar endoscopic techniques are employed in, e.g., arthroscopy, retroperitoneoscopy, pelviscopy, nephroscopy, cystoscopy, cisternoscopy, sinoscopy, hysteroscopy, urethroscopy and the like.
There are many disadvantages relating to current minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technology. For example, existing MIS instruments deny the surgeon the flexibility of tool placement found in open surgery. Most current laparoscopic tools have rigid shafts, so that it can be difficult to approach the worksite through the small incision. Additionally, the length and construction of many endoscopic instruments reduces the surgeon's ability to feel forces exerted by tissues and organs on the end effector of the associated tool. The lack of dexterity and sensitivity of endoscopic tools is a major impediment to the expansion of minimally invasive surgery.
Minimally invasive telesurgical robotic systems are being developed to increase a surgeon's dexterity when working within an internal surgical site, as well as to allow a surgeon to operate on a patient from a remote location. In a telesurgery system, the surgeon is often provided with an image of the surgical site at a computer workstation. While viewing a three-dimensional image of the surgical site on a suitable viewer or display, the surgeon performs the surgical procedures on the patient by manipulating master input or control devices of the workstation. The master controls the motion of a servomechanically operated surgical instrument. During the surgical procedure, the telesurgical system can provide mechanical actuation and control of a variety of surgical instruments or tools having end effectors such as, e.g., tissue graspers, needle drivers, or the like, that perform various functions for the surgeon, e.g., holding or driving a needle, grasping a blood vessel, or dissecting tissue, or the like, in response to manipulation of the master control devices.
Some surgical tools employ a roll-pitch-yaw mechanism for providing three degrees of rotational movement to an end effector around three perpendicular axes. The pitch and yaw rotations are typically provided by a wrist mechanism coupled between a shaft of the tool and an end effector, and the roll rotation is typically provided by rotation of the shaft. At about 90° pitch, the yaw and roll rotational movements overlap, resulting in the loss of one degree of rotational movement, referred to as a singularity.
The present invention is directed to alternative embodiments of a tool having a wrist mechanism that provides pitch and yaw rotation in such a way that the tool has no singularity in roll, pitch, and yaw. In one preferred embodiment, a wrist mechanism includes a plurality of disks or vertebrae stacked or coupled in series. Typically the most proximal vertebrae or disk of the stack is coupled to a proximal end member segment, such as the working end of a tool or instrument shaft; and the most distal vertebrae or disk is coupled to a distal end member segment, such as an end-effector or end-effector support member. Each disk is configured to rotate in at least one degree of freedom or DOF (e.g., in pitch or in yaw) with respect to each neighboring disk or end member.
In general, in the discussion herein, the term disk or vertebrae may include any proximal or distal end members, unless the context indicates reference to an intermediate segment disposed between the proximal and distal end members. Likewise, the terms disk or vertebrae will be used interchangeably herein to refer to the segment member or segment subassembly, it being understood that the wrist mechanisms having aspects of the invention may include segment members or segment subassemblies of alternative shapes and configurations, which are not necessarily disk-like in general appearance.
Actuation cables or tendon elements are used to manipulate and control movement of the disks, so as to effect movement of the wrist mechanism. The wrist mechanism resembles in some respects tendon-actuated steerable members such as are used in gastroscopes and similar medical instruments. However, multi-disk wrist mechanisms having aspects of the invention may include a number of novel aspects. For example, a wrist embodiment may be positively positionable, and provides that each disk rotates through a positively determinable angle and orientation. For this reason, this embodiment is called a positively positionable multi-disk wrist (PPMD wrist).
In some of the exemplary embodiments having aspects of the invention, each disk is configured to rotate with respect to a neighboring disk by a nonattached contact. As used herein, a nonattached contact refers to a contact that is not attached or joined by a fastener, a pivot pin, or another joining member. The disks maintain contact with each other by, for example, the tension of the actuation cables. The disks are free to separate upon release of the tension of the actuation cables. A nonattached contact may involve rolling and/or sliding between the disks, and/or between a disk and an adjacent distal or proximal wrist portion.
As is described below with respect to particular embodiments, shaped contact surfaces may be included such that nonattached rolling contact may permit pivoting of the adjacent disks, while balancing the amount of cable motion on opposite sides of the disks. In addition, the nonattached contact aspect of the these exemplary embodiments promotes convenient, simplified manufacturing and assembly processes and reduced part count, which is particularly useful in embodiments having a small overall wrist diameter.
It is to be understood that alternative embodiments having aspects of the invention may have one or more adjacent disks pivotally attached to one another and/or to a distal or proximal wrist portion in the same or substantially similar configurations by employing one or more fastener devices such as pins, rivets, bushings and the like.
Additional embodiments are described which achieve a cable-balancing configuration by inclusion of one or more inter-disk struts having radial plugs which engage the adjacent disks (or disk and adjacent proximal or distal wrist portion). Alternative configurations of the intermediate strut and radial plugs may provide a nonattached connection or an attached connection.
In certain embodiments, some of the cables are distal cables that extend from a proximal disk through at least one intermediate disk to a terminal connection to a distal disk. The remaining cables are medial cables that extend from the proximal disk to a terminal connection to a middle disk. The cables are actuated by a cable actuator assembly arranged to move each cable so as to deflect the wrist mechanism. In one exemplary embodiment, the cable actuator assembly may include a gimbaled cable actuator plate. The actuator plate includes a plurality of small radius holes or grooves for receiving the medial cables and a plurality of large radius holes or grooves for receiving the distal cables. The holes or grooves restrain the medial cables to a small radius of motion (e.g., ½ R) and the distal cables to a large radius of motion (R), so that the medial cables to the medial disk move a smaller distance (e.g., only half as far) compared to the distal cables to the distal disk, for a given gimbal motion or rotation relative to the particular cable. Note that for alternative embodiments having more than one intermediate cable termination segment, the cable actuator may have a plurality of sets of holes at selected radii (e.g., R, ⅔ R, and ⅓ R). The wrist embodiments described are particularly suitable for robotic surgical systems, although they may be included in manually operated endoscopic tools.
Embodiments including a cable actuator assembly having aspects of the invention provide to the simultaneous actuation of a substantial plurality of cables, and provide for a predetermined proportionality of motion of a plurality of distinct cable sets. This capability is provided with a simple, inexpensive structure which avoids highly complex control mechanisms. As described further below, for a given total cross-sectional area in each cable set and a given overall disk diameter, a mechanically redundant number of cables permits the cable diameter to be smaller, permits increasing the moment arm or mechanical advantage of the cables, and permits a larger unobstructed longitudinal center lumen along the centerline of the disks. These advantages are particularly useful in wrist members built to achieve the very small overall diameter such as are currently used in endoscopic surgery.
In some embodiments, a grip actuation mechanism is provided for operating a gripping end effector. When cables are used to manipulate the end effector, the grip actuation mechanism may include a grip cable actuator disposed in a tool or instrument proximal base or “back end.” The path length of a grip actuation cable may tend to vary in length during bending of the wrist in the event that cable paths do not coincide with the neutral axis. The change in cable path lengths may be accounted for in the back end mechanism used to secure and control the cables. This may be achieved by including a cable tension regulating device in the grip actuation mechanism, so as to decouple the control of the end effector such as grip jaws from the bending of the wrist.
In specific embodiments, the back end mechanism is configured to allow for the replacement of the end effector, the wrist, and the shaft of the surgical instrument with relative ease.
In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, a minimally invasive surgical instrument comprises an elongate shaft having a working end, a proximal end, and a shaft axis between the working end and the proximal end. A wrist member has a proximal portion connected to the working end. An end effector is connected to a distal portion of the wrist member. The wrist member comprises at least three vertebrae connected in series between the working end of the elongate shaft and the end effector. The vertebrae include a proximal vertebra connected to the working end of the elongate shaft and a distal vertebra connected to the end effector.
Each vertebra is pivotable relative to an adjacent vertebra by a pivotal connection, which may employ a nonattached (or alternatively an attached) contact. At least one of the vertebrae is pivotable relative to an adjacent vertebra by a pitch contact around a pitch axis which is nonparallel to the shaft axis. At least one of the vertebrae is pivotable relative to an adjacent vertebra by another contact around a second axis which is nonparallel to the shaft axis and nonparallel to the pitch axis.
In accordance with another aspect of this invention, a minimally invasive surgical instrument comprises an elongate shaft having a working end, a proximal end, and a shaft axis between the working end and the proximal end. A wrist member has a proximal portion or proximal end member connected to the working end, and a distal portion or distal end member connected to an end effector. The wrist member comprises at least three vertebrae connected in series between the working end of the elongate shaft and an end effector.
The vertebrae include a proximal vertebra connected to the working end of the elongate shaft and a distal vertebra connected to the end effector. Each vertebra is pivotable relative to an adjacent vertebra by a pivotable vertebral joint. At least one of the vertebrae is pivotable relative to an adjacent vertebra by a pitch joint around a pitch axis which is nonparallel to the shaft axis. At least one of the vertebrae is pivotable relative to an adjacent vertebra by a yaw joint around a yaw axis which is nonparallel to the shaft axis and perpendicular to the pitch axis. An end effector is connected to a distal portion of the wrist member. A plurality of cables are coupled with the vertebrae to move the vertebrae relative to each other. The plurality of cables include at least one distal cable coupled with the terminating at the distal vertebra and extending proximally to a cable actuator member, and at least one intermediate cable coupled with and terminating at an intermediate vertebra disposed between the proximal vertebra and the distal vertebra and extending to the cable actuator member. The cable actuator member is configured to adjust positions of the vertebrae by moving the distal cable by a distal displacement and the intermediate cable by an intermediate displacement shorter than the distal displacement.
In some embodiments, a ratio of each intermediate displacement to the distal displacement is generally proportional to a ratio of a distance from the proximal vertebra to the intermediate vertebra to which the intermediate cable is connected and a distance from the proximal vertebra to the distal vertebra to which the distal cable is connected.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a method of performing minimally invasive endoscopic surgery in a body cavity of a patient comprises introducing an elongate shaft having a working end into the cavity. The elongate shaft has a proximal end and a shaft axis between the working end and the proximal end. A wrist member comprises at least three vertebrae connected in series between the working end of the elongate shaft and the end effector. The vertebrae include a proximal vertebra connected to the working end of the elongate shaft and a distal vertebra connected to the end effector. Each vertebra is pivotable relative to an adjacent vertebra by a pivotal coupling, which may employ a nonattached contact. An end effector is connected to a distal portion of the wrist member. The end effector is positioned by rotating the wrist member to pivot at least one vertebra relative to an adjacent vertebra by a pivotal pitch coupling around a pitch axis which is nonparallel to the shaft axis. The end effector is repositioned by rotating the wrist member to pivot at least one vertebra relative to an adjacent vertebra by another pivotal coupling around a second axis which is nonparallel to the shaft axis and nonparallel to the pitch axis.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a minimally invasive surgical instrument has an end effector which comprises a grip support having a left pivot and a right pivot. A left jaw is rotatable around the left pivot of the grip support and a right jaw is rotatable around the right pivot of the grip support. A left slider pin is attached to the left jaw and spaced from the left pivot pin, and a right slider pin is attached to the right jaw and spaced from the right pivot pin. A slotted member includes a left slider pin slot in which the left slider pin is slidable to move the left jaw between an open position and a closed position, and a right slider pin slot in which the right slider pin is slidable to move the right jaw between an open position and a closed position. A slider pin actuator is movable relative to the slotted member to cause the left slider pin to slide in the left slider pin slot and the right slider pin to slide in the right slider pin slot, to move the left jaw and the right jaw between the open position and the closed position.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method of performing minimally invasive endoscopic surgery in a body cavity of a patient comprises providing a tool comprising an elongate shaft having a working end coupled with an end effector, a proximal end, and a shaft axis between the working end and the proximal end. The end effector includes a grip support having a left pivot and a right pivot; a left jaw rotatable around the left pivot of the grip support and a right jaw rotatable around the right pivot of the grip support, a left slider pin attached to the left jaw and spaced from the left pivot pin, a right slider pin attached to the right jaw and spaced from the right pivot pin; and a slotted member including a left slider pin slot in which the left slider pin is slidable to move the left jaw between an open position and a closed position, and a right slider pin slot in which the right slider pin is slidable to move the right jaw between an open position and a closed position. The method further comprises introducing the end effector into a surgical site; and moving the left slider pin to slide in the left slider pin slot and the right slider pin to slide in the right slider pin slot, to move the left jaw and the right jaw between the open position and the closed position.
According to another aspect, a medical instrument comprises a base shaft having a working end, a proximal end, and a shaft axis between the working end and the proximal end. A segmented wrist member comprises a plurality of spaced-apart segment vertebrae disposed sequentially adjacent to one another along a wrist longitudinal line. The plurality of vertebrae include a proximal vertebra connected to the shaft working end, a distal vertebra supporting an end effector, and at least one intermediate vertebra disposed between the proximal vertebra and the distal vertebra, the at least one intermediate vertebrae being connected to each adjacent vertebra by a pivotally movable segment coupling. Each segment coupling has a coupling axis nonparallel to the wrist longitudinal line. At least two of the coupling axes are non-parallel to one another. At least one of the intermediate vertebrae is a medial vertebra. A plurality of movable tendon elements are disposed generally longitudinally with respect to the shaft and wrist member. The tendon elements each have a proximal portion, and have a distal portion connected to one of the distal vertebra and the medial vertebra so as to pivotally actuate the connected vertebra. At least one of the tendons is connected to the at least one medial vertebra and at least one of the tendons is connected to the distal vertebra. A tendon actuation mechanism is drivingly coupled to the tendons and configured to controllably move at least selected ones of the plurality of tendons so as to pivotally actuate the plurality of connected vertebrae to laterally bend the wrist member with respect to the shaft.
Another aspect is directed to a tendon actuating assembly for a surgical instrument, wherein the instrument includes a shaft-like member having a distal working end for insertion into a patient's body through an aperture, and wherein the working end includes at least one distal moveable member arranged to be actuated by at least one of a plurality of movable tendon element. The actuating assembly comprises a tendon actuator member which is configured to be movable to at least pivot in one degree of freedom, and which includes a plurality of tendon engagement portions. Each engagement portion is drivingly couplable to at least one of the plurality of tendons. A drive mechanism is drivingly coupled to the actuator member so as to controllably pivot the actuator member in the at least one degree of freedom, so as to move at least one of the tendons relative to the shaft-like member so as to actuate the distal moveable member.
In another aspect, a minimally invasive surgical instrument comprises a shaft having a working end, a proximal end, and a shaft axis between the working end and the proximal end. A segmented wrist member comprises a plurality of spaced-apart segment vertebrae disposed sequentially adjacent to one another along a wrist longitudinal line. The plurality of vertebrae include a proximal vertebra connected to the shaft working end, a distal vertebra supporting an end effector, and at least one intermediate vertebra disposed between the proximal vertebra and the distal vertebra. The at least one intermediate vertebrae is connected to each adjacent vertebra by a pivotally movable segment coupling. Each segment coupling has a coupling axis nonparallel to the wrist longitudinal line. At least two of the coupling axes are non-parallel to one another. The movable segment couplings include at least one spring-like element arranged to regulate the pivotal motion of at least one adjacent vertebra. A plurality of movable tendon elements are disposed generally longitudinally with respect to the shaft and wrist member. The tendon elements each have a proximal portion, and a distal portion connected to the distal vertebra so as to pivotally actuate the distal vertebra. A tendon actuation mechanism is drivingly coupled to the tendons and configured to controllably move at least one of the plurality of tendons so as to pivotally actuate the plurality of connected vertebrae to laterally bend the wrist member with respect to the shaft.
Another aspect is directed a segment pivoted coupling mechanism for pivotally coupling two adjacent segment vertebrae of a multi-segment flexible member of a medical instrument, wherein the two adjacent segments have bending direction with respect to one another, and wherein the flexible member has at least one neutral bending axis. The instrument includes at least two movable actuation tendon passing through at least two apertures in each adjacent vertebrae, wherein the at least two apertures in each of the vertebra are spaced apart on opposite sides of the neutral axis with respect to the pivot direction, and wherein openings of the apertures are disposed one adjacent surfaces of the two vertebrae so as to generally define an aperture plane. The coupling mechanism comprises at least one inter-vertebral engagement element coupled to each of the vertebrae, the element pivotally engaging the vertebrae so as to define at least two spaced-apart parallel cooperating pivot axes, each one of the pivot axes being aligned generally within the aperture plane of a respective one of the adjacent vertebra, so as to provide that each vertebra is pivotally movable about its respective pivot axis, so as to balance the motion of the tendons on opposite sides of the neutral axis when the flexible member is deflected in the bending direction.
As used herein, “end effector” refers to an actual working distal part that is manipulable by means of the wrist member for a medical function, e.g., for effecting a predetermined treatment of a target tissue. For instance, some end effectors have a single working member such as a scalpel, a blade, or an electrode. Other end effectors have a pair or plurality of working members such as forceps, graspers, scissors, or clip appliers, for example. In certain embodiments, the disks or vertebrae are configured to have openings which collectively define a longitudinal lumen or space along the wrist, providing a conduit for any one of a number of alternative elements or instrumentalities associated with the operation of an end effector. Examples include conductors for electrically activated end effectors (e.g., electrosurgical electrodes; transducers, sensors, and the like); conduits for fluids, gases or solids (e.g., for suction, insufflation, irrigation, treatment fluids, accessory introduction, biopsy extraction and the like); mechanical elements for actuating moving end effector members (e.g., cables, flexible elements or articulated elements for operating grips, forceps, scissors); wave guides; sonic conduction elements; fiberoptic elements; and the like. Such a longitudinal conduit may be provided with a liner, insulator or guide element such as a elastic polymer tube; spiral wire wound tube or the like.
As used herein, the terms “surgical instrument”, “instrument”, “surgical tool”, or “tool” refer to a member having a working end which carries one or more end effectors to be introduced into a surgical site in a cavity of a patient, and is actuatable from outside the cavity to manipulate the end effector(s) for effecting a desired treatment or medical function of a target tissue in the surgical site. The instrument or tool typically includes a shaft carrying the end effector(s) at a distal end, and is preferably servomechanically actuated by a telesurgical system for performing functions such as holding or driving a needle, grasping a blood vessel, and dissecting tissue.
A gastroscope style wrist has a plurality of vertebrae stacked one on top of another with alternating yaw (Y) and pitch (P) axes. For instance, an example of a gastroscope-style wrist may include twelve vertebrae. Such a wrist typically bends in a relatively long arc. The vertebrae are held together and manipulated by a plurality of cables. The use of four or more cables allows the angle of one end of the wrist to be determined when moved with respect to the other end of the wrist. Accessories can be conveniently delivered through the middle opening of the wrist. The wrist can be articulated to move continuously to have orientation in a wide range of angles (in roll, pitch, and yaw) with good control and no singularity.
One way to minimize backlash and avoid the S-shape configuration is to provide springs 54 between the vertebrae 52 of the wrist 50, as schematically illustrated in
As shown in the wrist 60 of
The wrist 60 is singularity free, and can be designed to bend as much as 360° if desired. The wrist 60 is versatile, and can be used for irrigation, imaging with either fiberoptics or the wires to a CCD passing through the lumen, and the like. The wrist 60 may be used as a delivery device with a working channel. For instance, the surgical instrument with the wrist 60 can be positioned by the surgeon, and hand-operated catheter-style or gastroenterology instruments can be delivered to the surgical site through the working channel for biopsies.
Note that in
A constant velocity or PPMD wrist also has a plurality of vertebrae or disks stacked one on top of another in a series of pivotally coupled engagements and manipulated by cables. In one five-disk embodiment (the disk count including end members), to prevent the S-shape configuration, one set of the cables (distal cables) extend to and terminate at the last vertebrae or distal end disk at the distal end of the wrist, while the remaining set of cables (medial cables) extend to and terminate at a middle disk. By terminating a medial set of cables at the medial disk, and terminating second distal set of cables at the distal disk, all pivotal degrees of freedom of the five disk sequence may be determinately controlled by cable actuators. There is no substantial uncertainty of wrist member shape or position for any given combination of cable actuations. This is the property implied by the term “positively positionable”, and which eliminates the cause of S-curve bending or unpredictable bending as described above with respect to
Note that medial cable set of the PPMD wrist will move a shorter distance than the distal set, for a given overall wrist motion (e.g., half as far). The cable actuator mechanism, examples of which are described further below, provides for this differential motion. Note also, that while the examples shown generally include a plurality of disks or segments which are similarly or identically sized, they need not be. Thus, where adjacent segments have different sizes, the scale of motion between the medial set(s) and the distal set may differ from the examples shown.
In certain preferred embodiments, one of a yaw (Y) or pitch (P) coupling is repeated in two consecutive segments. Thus, for the an exemplary sequence of four couplings between the 5 disk segments, the coupling sequence may be YPPY or PYYP, and medial segment disk (number 3 of 5) is bounded by two Y or two P couplings. This arrangement has the property that permits a “constant velocity” rolling motion in a “roll, pitch, yaw” type instrument distal end. In other words, in the event that the instrument distal portion (shaft/wrist/end effector) is rotated axially about the centerline while the wrist is bent and while the end effector is maintained at a given location and pointing angle (analogous to the operation of a flexible-shaft screw driver), both end effector and instrument shaft will rotate at the same instantaneous angular velocity.
This property “constant velocity” may simplify control algorithms for a dexterous surgical manipulation instrument, and produce smoother operation characteristics. Note that this coupling sequence is quite distinct from the alternating YPYP . . . coupling arrangement of the prior art gastroscope style wrist shown in
In an exemplary embodiment shown in
The wrist 70 is singularity free over a 180° range. The lumen formed by the annular disks can be used for isolation and for passing pull cables for grip. The force applied to the wrist 70 is limited by the strength of the cables. In one embodiment, a cable tension of about 15 lb. is needed for a yaw moment of about 0.25 N-m. Because there are only five disks, the grip mechanism needs to be able to bend sharply. Precision of the cable system depends on the friction of the cables rubbing on the apertures 78. The cables 80, 82 can be preloaded to remove backlash. Because wear is a concern, wear-resistant materials should desirably be selected for the wrist 70 and cables.
In another embodiment of the wrist 120 as shown in
In another embodiment of the wrist 140 as illustrated in
The protrusions 172 and 176 having curved, convex rolling surfaces that make nonattached, rolling contact with each other to guide the disks in pitch or yaw rotations to produce, for instance, the 90° pitch of the wrist 160 as seen in
Optionally, and particularly in embodiments not employing a “cable balancing pivotal mechanism” to couple adjacent disks, the instrument cable actuator(s) may employ a cable tension regulation device to take up cable slack or backlash.
The above embodiments show five disks, but the number of disks may be increased to seven, nine, etc. For a seven-disk wrist, the range of rotation increases from 180° to 270°. Thus, in a seven-disk wrist, typically ⅓ of the cables terminate at disk 3; ⅓ terminate at disk 5; and ⅓ terminate at disk 7 (most distal).
The actuator plate 250 includes a central aperture 256 having a plurality of grooves for receiving the cables. There are eight small radius grooves 258 and eight large radius grooves 260 distributed in pairs around the central aperture 256. The small radius grooves 258 receive medial cables that extend to the middle disk 164, while the large radius grooves 260 receive distal cables that extend to the distal disk 166. The large radius for grooves 260 is equal to about twice the small radius for grooves 258. The cables are led to the rim of the central aperture 256 through the grooves 258, 260 which restrain half of the cables to a small radius of motion and half of the cables to a large radius of motion, so that the medial cables to the medial disk 164 move only half as far as the distal cables to the distal disk 166, for a given gimbal motion. The dual radius groove arrangement facilitates such motion and control of the cables when the actuator plate 250 is rotated in the gimbaled cable actuator 240. A pair of set screws 266 are desirably provided to fix the cable attachment after pre-tensioning. The gimbaled cable actuator 240 acts as a master for manipulating and controlling movement of the slave PPMD wrist 160. Various kinds of conventional actuator (not shown in
The actuator plate 302 is coupled to a parallel linkage 340 as illustrated in
As best seen in
Note that the most distal disk (e.g., disk 166 in
Note that although gimbal ring support assembly 240 is shown in
A back end or instrument manipulating mechanism 410 is located at an opposed end of the shaft 402, and is arranged releasably to couple the instrument 400 to a robotic arm or system. The robotic arm is used to manipulate the back end mechanism 410 to operate the wrist-like mechanism 404 and the end effector 406. Examples of such robotic systems are found in various related applications as listed above, such as PCT International Application No. PCT/US98/19508, entitled “Robotic Apparatus”, filed on Sep. 18, 1998, and published as WO99/50721; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/398,958, entitled “Surgical Tools for Use in Minimally Invasive Telesurgical Applications”, filed on Sep. 17, 1999. In some embodiments, the shaft 402 is rotatably coupled to the back end mechanism 410 to enable angular displacement of the shaft 402 relative to the back end mechanism 410 as indicated by arrows H.
The wrist-like mechanism 404 and end effector 406 are shown in greater detail in
The grip movement is produced by a pair of slider pins 432, 434 connected to the jaws 422, 424, respectively, an opening actuator 436, and a closing actuator 438, which are best seen in
To ensure that the grip members or jaws 422′, 424′ move symmetrically, an interlocking tooth mechanism 449 may be employed, as illustrated in
A plurality of long or distal cables and a plurality of short or medial cables, similar to those shown in
The actuation cables 446, 448 and the wrist control cables such as 452, 454 pass through the lumen formed by the annular disks 412-416 back through the shaft 402 to the back end mechanism 410, where these cables are manipulated. In some embodiments, a conduit 450 is provided in the lumen formed by the annular disks 412-416 (see
The grip support 420 may be fastened to the wrist 404 using any suitable method. In one embodiment, the grip support 420 is held tightly to the wrist 404 by support cables 462, 464, as illustrated in
Referring to
As shown in
Instead of the clamping member 502 for clamping the actuation cables 446, 448, a different cable securing member 502′ may be used for the grip actuation pivot shaft 500, as shown in
As shown in
The grip actuation pivot shaft 500 and the pair of helical gear reduction idler pulleys 516, 518 are pivotally supported by a link box 520. The link box 520 is connected to a link beam 522, which is pivotally supported along the axis of the motor input shaft 510 to allow the grip actuation pivot shaft 500 to move back and forth to account for change in cable length due to bending of the wrist 404, without changing the relative position of the two actuation cables 446, 448 that control the grip jaws 422, 424. This feature decouples the control of the grip jaws 422, 424 from the bending of the wrist 404.
The configuration of the back end mechanism 410 facilitates relatively easy replacement of the actuators 436, 438 and actuation cables 446, 448, as well as the working members or jaws 422, 424. The cables can be released from the back end mechanism 410 with relative ease, particularly when the cables are secured to recesses by crimped sleeves (see
In another embodiment of the back end mechanism 410A as shown in
To achieve the replaceable scheme of the wrist 404 and shaft 402, the wrist cables are fastened to a smaller plate (e.g., by clamping), and the smaller plate is fed from the instrument from the front 550 of the back end housing 490 and affixed to the actuator plate 302.
In an alternate configuration, the actuator plate 302 may be repositioned to the front 550 of the back end housing 490 to eliminate the need to thread the smaller plate through the length of the shaft 402.
The actuation cables 446, 448 (see
The disk segment 610 includes a mating side having a plurality of mating extensions 622 extending in the axial direction (four mating extensions spaced around the circumference in a specific embodiment), and a pivoting side having a gear tooth 624 and a gear slot 626. The gear tooth 624 and gear slot 626 are disposed on opposite sides relative to a center opening 628. Twelve apertures 630 are distributed around the circumference of the disk segment 610 to receive cables for wrist actuation, as described in more detail below. The disk segment 610 further includes a pair of radial grooves or slots 632 disposed on opposite sides relative to the center opening 628. In the specific embodiment shown, the radial grooves 632 are aligned with the gear tooth 624 and gear slot 626.
The strut 620 includes a ring 634, a pair of upper radial plugs or projections 636 disposed on opposite sides of the ring 634, and a pair of lower radial plugs or projections 638 disposed on opposite sides of the ring 634. The upper radial projections 636 and lower radial projections 638 are aligned with each other.
To assemble a pair of disk segments 610 with the strut 620, the pair of lower radial projections 638 are inserted by sliding into the pair of radial grooves 632 of a lower disk segment. An upper disk segment is oriented in an opposite direction from the lower disk segment, so that the pivoting side with the gear tooth 624, gear slot 626, and radial grooves 632 faces toward the strut 620. The pair of upper radial projections 638 of the strut 620 are inserted by sliding into the pair of radial grooves 632 of the upper disk segment. In the specific embodiment, the radial projections and radial grooves are circular cylindrical in shape to facilitate pivoting between the disk segments. The gear tooth 624 of the lower disk segment is aligned with the gear slot 626 of the upper disk segment to pivot relative thereto, while the gear tooth 624 of the upper disk segment is aligned with the gear slot 626 of the lower disk segment to pivot relative thereto. This is best seen in
The proximal or first disk segment 611 is connected to the end of the tool shaft 602 by the mating extensions 622 of the disk segment 611 and mating extensions 603 of the shaft 602. The second disk segment 612 is oriented opposite from the first disk segment 611, and is coupled to the first segment 611 by a strut 620. The gear tooth 624 of the second disk segment 612 is engaged with the gear slot 626 of the first disk segment 611, and the gear tooth 624 of the first disk segment 611 is engaged with the gear slot 626 of the second disk segment 612. The third disk segment 613 is oriented opposite from the second disk segment 612, with their mating sides facing one another and the mating extensions 622 mating with each other. The second disk segment 612 and the third disk segment 613 forms a whole disk. Similarly, the fourth disk segment 614 and fifth disk segment 615 form a whole disk, and the sixth disk segment 616 and the seventh disk segment 617 form another whole disk. The other three struts 620 are used to rotatably connect, respectively, third and fourth disk segments 613, 614; fifth and sixth disk segments 615, 616; and seventh and eighth disk segments 617, 618. The eighth or distal disk segment 618 is connected to the end effector 604 by the mating extensions 622 of the disk segment 618 and the mating extensions 605 of the end effector 604.
As more clearly seen in
Note that the rotatable engagement of the pair of projections 638 of each strut 620 with a respective bearing surface of grooves 632 on each adjacent disk portion 610 assures a “dual pivot point” motion of adjacent disks with respect to one another, such that the pivot points are in coplanar alignment with the cable apertures 630. By this means, a “cable balancing” property is achieved, to substantially similar effect as is described above with respect to the embodiment of
The disk segments of the wrist 600 are manipulated by six cables 650 extending through the apertures 630 of the disk segments, as shown in
The lock plate 710 is assembled with the gimbal plate 706 after the cables 650 are inserted through the cable holes 714, 716 of the gimbal plate 706. As the lock plate 710 is moved toward the gimbal plate 706, the three outward wedges 720 of the lock plate 720 mate with the three movable inward wedges 730 in the slots of the gimbal plate 706 to push the movable inward wedges 730 radially outward against the six distal cables 650A extending through the six large radius apertures 714, which are captured between the curved outward surfaces 731 of the wedges 730 and the gimbal plate wall. The three inward wedges 722 of the lock plate 720 mate with the three movable outward wedges 732 in the slots of the gimbal plate 706 to push the movable outward wedges 732 radially inward against the six medial cables 650B extending through the six small radius apertures 716, which are captured between the curved inward surfaces 733 of the wedges 732 and the gimbal plate wall. As seen in
The gimbaled cable actuator 800 incorporating the gimbal mechanism 700 as illustrated in the back end 801
The gimbal plate 706 of the gimbal mechanism 700 is moved by a first actuator link 804 rotatably coupled to the first actuator connection 718 of the gimbal plate 706, and a second actuator link 806 rotatably coupled to the second actuator connection 719 of the gimbal plate 706, to produce pitch and yaw rotations. The rotatable coupling at the first actuator connection 718 and the second actuator connection 719 may be ball-in-socket connections. The actuator links 804, 806 are driven to move generally longitudinally by first and second follower gear quadrants 814, 816, respectively, which are rotatably coupled with the actuator links 804, 806 via pivot joints. The gear quadrants 814, 816 are rotated by first and second drive gears 824, 826, respectively, which are in turn actuated by drive spools 834, 836. The gear quadrants 814, 816 rotate around a common pivot axis 838. The arrangement is more compact than that of
The back end 801 structure of
The wrist shown is of the type having at least a pair of generally parallel adjacent axes (e.g., . . . YPPY . . . or . . . PYYP . . . ), but may alternatively be configured with a PY,PY,PY alternating perpendicular axes arrangement. Still further alternative embodiments may have combination configurations of inter-disk couplings, such as PYYP,YP and the like. The wrist illustrated has a constant segment length and sequentially repeated pivot axes orientations. In more general alternative exemplary embodiments, the “Y” and “P” axes need not be substantially perpendicular to each other and need not be substantially perpendicular to the centerline, and the sequential segments need not be of a constant length.
In more general form, alternative PPMD wrist embodiment and corresponding actuator plates having aspects of the invention may be configured as follows: Where N represents the number of disk segments (including end disks), the number of cable termination medial disks M may be: M=(N−3)/2. The number of cable sets and corresponding actuator plate “lever arm” radii, including the distal cable set connections, is M+1.
In general, the “constant velocity” segment arrangement described previously is analogous to an even-numbered sequence of universal-joint-like coupling pairs disposed back-to-front and front-to-back in alternation. For example, a YP,PY or YP,PY,YP,PY segment coupling sequence provides the “constant velocity” property. Thus may be achieved for arrangements wherein N−1 is a multiple of four, such as N=5, 9 and the like.
It may be seen that, for a given angular defection per coupling, the overall deflection of the wrist increases with increasing segment number (the example of
The above-described arrangements of apparatus and methods are merely illustrative of applications of the principles of this invention and many other embodiments and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the claims. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined not with reference to the above description, but instead should be determined with reference to the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/624,344, filed Jun. 15, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/536,899, filed Nov. 10, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,717,486, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/414,445, filed Mar. 7, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,911,428, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/782,833, filed May 19, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,421, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/980,119, filed Nov. 1, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,736,356, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/187,248, filed Jun. 28, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,817,974, which is based on and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/301,967, filed Jun. 29, 2001, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/327,702, filed Oct. 5, 2001, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application is related to the following patents and patent applications, the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference: PCT International Application No. PCT/US98/19508, entitled “Robotic Apparatus”, filed on Sep. 18, 1998, and published as WO99/50721; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/418,726, entitled “Surgical Robotic Tools, Data Architecture, and Use”, filed on Oct. 15, 1999; U.S. Patent Application No. 60/111,711, entitled “Image Shifting for a Telerobotic System”, filed on Dec. 8, 1998; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/378,173, entitled “Stereo Imaging System for Use in Telerobotic System”, filed on Aug. 20, 1999; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/398,507, entitled “Master Having Redundant Degrees of Freedom”, filed on Sep. 17, 1999; U.S. application Ser. No. 09/399,457, entitled “Cooperative Minimally Invasive Telesurgery System”, filed on Sep. 17, 1999; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/373,678, entitled “Camera Referenced Control in a Minimally Invasive Surgical Apparatus”, filed on Aug. 13, 1999; U.S. patent Application Ser. No. 09/398,958, entitled “Surgical Tools for Use in Minimally Invasive Telesurgical Applications”, filed on Sep. 17, 1999; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,808,665, entitled “Endoscopic Surgical Instrument and Method for Use”, issued on Sep. 15, 1998.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1418184 | Trunick | May 1922 | A |
2681991 | Marco et al. | Jun 1954 | A |
2815697 | Saunders-Singer | Dec 1957 | A |
2901258 | Brandafi | Aug 1959 | A |
3060972 | Sheldon | Oct 1962 | A |
3145333 | Pardini et al. | Aug 1964 | A |
3190286 | Stokes | Jun 1965 | A |
3266059 | Stelle | Aug 1966 | A |
3268059 | Hill | Aug 1966 | A |
3463329 | Gartner | Aug 1969 | A |
3557780 | Masaaki | Jan 1971 | A |
3628535 | Ostrowsky et al. | Dec 1971 | A |
3788303 | Hall | Jan 1974 | A |
3818125 | Butterfield | Jun 1974 | A |
3921445 | Hill et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3923166 | Fletcher et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3934201 | Majefski | Jan 1976 | A |
4038987 | Komiya | Aug 1977 | A |
4113115 | Yoshio | Sep 1978 | A |
4149278 | Frosch et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4150326 | Engelberger et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
4203430 | Takahashi | May 1980 | A |
4260319 | Motoda et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4264266 | Trechsel | Apr 1981 | A |
4281447 | Miller et al. | Aug 1981 | A |
4300362 | Lande et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4329980 | Terada | May 1982 | A |
4332066 | Hailey et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4349837 | Hinds | Sep 1982 | A |
4367998 | Causer | Jan 1983 | A |
4419041 | Rose | Dec 1983 | A |
4483326 | Yamaka et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4486928 | Tucker et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4500065 | Hennekes et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4510574 | Guittet et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4511305 | Kawai et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4512709 | Hennekes et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4562463 | Lipton | Dec 1985 | A |
4580551 | Siegmund et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4582067 | Silverstein et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4583117 | Lipton et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4611888 | Prenovitz et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4622954 | Arakawa et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4636138 | Gorman | Jan 1987 | A |
4651201 | Schoolman | Mar 1987 | A |
4697577 | Forkner | Oct 1987 | A |
4706372 | Ferrero et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4708434 | Tsuno | Nov 1987 | A |
4710093 | Zimmer et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4722056 | Roberts et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4726355 | Okada | Feb 1988 | A |
4744363 | Hasson | May 1988 | A |
4750475 | Yoshihashi | Jun 1988 | A |
4751925 | Tontarra | Jun 1988 | A |
4762455 | Coughlan et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4766775 | Hodge | Aug 1988 | A |
4793053 | Zuccaro et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4806068 | Kohli et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4808898 | Pearson | Feb 1989 | A |
4809747 | Choly et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4830569 | Jannborg | May 1989 | A |
4832198 | Alikhan | May 1989 | A |
4833383 | Skarr et al. | May 1989 | A |
4834069 | Umeda | May 1989 | A |
4837703 | Kakazu et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4837734 | Ichikawa et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4853874 | Iwamoto et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4855822 | Narendra et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4860215 | Seraji | Aug 1989 | A |
4862873 | Yajima et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4863133 | Bonnell | Sep 1989 | A |
4873572 | Miyazaki et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4899730 | Stennert et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4903536 | Salisbury, Jr. | Feb 1990 | A |
4919112 | Siegmund | Apr 1990 | A |
4919382 | Forman | Apr 1990 | A |
4922338 | Arpino | May 1990 | A |
4928546 | Walters | May 1990 | A |
4941106 | Krieger | Jul 1990 | A |
4942538 | Yuan et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4942539 | McGee et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4943939 | Hoover | Jul 1990 | A |
4947702 | Kato | Aug 1990 | A |
4979496 | Komi | Dec 1990 | A |
4979949 | Matsen, III | Dec 1990 | A |
4989253 | Liang et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4996975 | Nakamura | Mar 1991 | A |
5002418 | McCown et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5005558 | Aomori | Apr 1991 | A |
5018266 | Hutchinson et al. | May 1991 | A |
5020933 | Salvestro et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5029574 | Shimamura et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5045936 | Lobb et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5046022 | Conway et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5053687 | Merlet | Oct 1991 | A |
5060532 | Barker | Oct 1991 | A |
5062761 | Glachet | Nov 1991 | A |
5078140 | Kwoh | Jan 1992 | A |
5096236 | Thony | Mar 1992 | A |
5141519 | Smith et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142930 | Allen et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5143453 | Weynant Nee Girones | Sep 1992 | A |
5154717 | Matsen, III et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5174300 | Bales et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5179935 | Miyagi | Jan 1993 | A |
5182641 | Diner et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5184601 | Putman | Feb 1993 | A |
5187796 | Wang et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5209747 | Knoepfler | May 1993 | A |
5217003 | Wilk | Jun 1993 | A |
5219351 | Teubner et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5221283 | Chang | Jun 1993 | A |
5236432 | Matsen, III et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239883 | Rosheim | Aug 1993 | A |
5253706 | Reid | Oct 1993 | A |
5254130 | Poncet et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5255429 | Nishi et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5257998 | Ota et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5260319 | Effland et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5264266 | Yokoyama et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271381 | Ailinger et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5271384 | McEwen et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5273039 | Fujiwara et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5279309 | Taylor et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5281220 | Blake, III | Jan 1994 | A |
5284130 | Ratliff | Feb 1994 | A |
5294209 | Naka et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299288 | Glassman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299559 | Bruce et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305203 | Raab | Apr 1994 | A |
5312212 | Naumec | May 1994 | A |
5313306 | Kuban et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313935 | Kortenbach et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321353 | Furness | Jun 1994 | A |
5325866 | Krzyzanowski | Jul 1994 | A |
5325886 | Klink | Jul 1994 | A |
5339799 | Kami et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341950 | Sinz | Aug 1994 | A |
5343385 | Joskowicz et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351676 | Putman | Oct 1994 | A |
5354314 | Hardy et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355743 | Tesar | Oct 1994 | A |
5359993 | Slater et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368015 | Wilk | Nov 1994 | A |
5372147 | Lathrop, Jr. et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5382885 | Salcudean et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5383888 | Zvenyatsky et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5397323 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5399951 | Lavallee et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5400267 | Denen et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402801 | Taylor | Apr 1995 | A |
5403319 | Matsen, III et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405344 | Williamson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410944 | Cushman | May 1995 | A |
5417210 | Funda et al. | May 1995 | A |
5423648 | Akeel et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425528 | Rains et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5427097 | Depp | Jun 1995 | A |
5430643 | Seraji | Jul 1995 | A |
5441505 | Nakamura | Aug 1995 | A |
5448989 | Heckele | Sep 1995 | A |
5451368 | Jacob | Sep 1995 | A |
5454827 | Aust et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5460168 | Masubuchi et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5474566 | Alesi et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5474571 | Lang | Dec 1995 | A |
5479930 | Gruner et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5480409 | Riza | Jan 1996 | A |
5499320 | Backes et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5503320 | Webster et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5503616 | Jones | Apr 1996 | A |
5515478 | Wang | May 1996 | A |
5520678 | Heckele et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524180 | Wang et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5553198 | Wang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5573520 | Schwartz et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577991 | Akui et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582576 | Hori et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5611813 | Lichtman | Mar 1997 | A |
5618294 | Aust et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5619195 | Allen et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5624398 | Smith et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625576 | Massie et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5631973 | Green | May 1997 | A |
5636138 | Gilbert et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5649956 | Jensen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657429 | Wang et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5695500 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697889 | Slotman et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5697939 | Kubota et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699695 | Canfield et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5715729 | Toyama et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5737500 | Seraji et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5740699 | Ballantyne et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748767 | Raab | May 1998 | A |
5754741 | Wang et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755731 | Grinberg | May 1998 | A |
5762458 | Wang et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776049 | Takahashi | Jul 1998 | A |
5784542 | Ohm et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5791231 | Cohn et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5792135 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797900 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800423 | Jensen | Sep 1998 | A |
5808665 | Green | Sep 1998 | A |
5810715 | Moriyama | Sep 1998 | A |
5810880 | Jensen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814038 | Jensen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815640 | Wang et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820545 | Arbter et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5855553 | Tajima et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5855583 | Wang et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5859934 | Green | Jan 1999 | A |
5860912 | Chiba | Jan 1999 | A |
5864359 | Kazakevich | Jan 1999 | A |
5868760 | McGuckin, Jr. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876325 | Mizuno et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5878193 | Wang et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885288 | Aust et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5907664 | Wang et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908436 | Cuschieri et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5911036 | Wright et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5916146 | Allotta et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5931832 | Jensen | Aug 1999 | A |
5938678 | Zirps et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960125 | Michael et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5971976 | Wang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6053907 | Zirps | Apr 2000 | A |
6071233 | Ishikawa et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077287 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6116802 | Gueret | Sep 2000 | A |
6120433 | Mizuno et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6132368 | Cooper | Oct 2000 | A |
6174280 | Oneda et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6191809 | Hori et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196081 | Yau | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6244809 | Wang et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6270453 | Sakai | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6296635 | Smith et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6306081 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307285 | Delson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312435 | Wallace et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330837 | Charles et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6331181 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335755 | McLaine et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6394998 | Wallace et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6418811 | Rosheim | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424885 | Niemeyer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425177 | Akeel | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436107 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450948 | Matsuura et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6451027 | Cooper et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6471637 | Green et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6491701 | Tierney et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6516681 | Pierrot et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522906 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6592572 | Suzuta | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6658962 | Rosheim | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6676684 | Morley et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6699235 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6743239 | Kuehn et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6786896 | Madhani et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807295 | Ono | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6817974 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6858003 | Evans et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7066926 | Wallace et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7273488 | Nakamura et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7320700 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7691098 | Wallace et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7736356 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7862580 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8142421 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8337521 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8690908 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8790243 | Cooper et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8911428 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9005112 | Hasser et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9095317 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9585641 | Cooper et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9717486 | Cooper et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9730572 | Hasser et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
10105128 | Cooper et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10506920 | Hasser et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10524868 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
20010023313 | Ide | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020045888 | Ramans et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020103418 | Maeda et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020107530 | Sauer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120178 | Tartaglia et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030028217 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040158268 | Danitz et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186345 | Yang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040236316 | Danitz et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050182298 | Ikeda et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060178556 | Hasser et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060199999 | Ikeda et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070287992 | Diolaiti et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20110028991 | Ikeda et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20170156804 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170311778 | Hasser et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20200107700 | Hasser et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200107892 | Cooper et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1489 | Sep 1982 | AT |
482439 | Dec 1969 | CH |
1766809 | May 1972 | DE |
2819976 | Nov 1979 | DE |
3008120 | Sep 1980 | DE |
3309737 | Sep 1984 | DE |
3806190 | Sep 1988 | DE |
4138861 | Oct 1992 | DE |
4234833 | Apr 1993 | DE |
4136861 | May 1993 | DE |
4442185 | May 1996 | DE |
4213426 | Jan 1997 | DE |
19813781 | Oct 1999 | DE |
0009447 | Apr 1980 | EP |
0239409 | Sep 1987 | EP |
0291292 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0595291 | May 1994 | EP |
0612496 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0623316 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0626604 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0764423 | Mar 1997 | EP |
1575439 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2460762 | Jan 1981 | FR |
2593106 | Mar 1990 | FR |
2040134 | Aug 1980 | GB |
2045964 | Nov 1980 | GB |
2117732 | Oct 1983 | GB |
2295601 | Jun 1996 | GB |
S609676 | Jan 1985 | JP |
S62122650 | Jun 1987 | JP |
S63111114 | Jul 1988 | JP |
S63315026 | Dec 1988 | JP |
H04502584 | May 1992 | JP |
H0538342 | Feb 1993 | JP |
H05184525 | Jul 1993 | JP |
H05305052 | Nov 1993 | JP |
H06285010 | Oct 1994 | JP |
H06343644 | Dec 1994 | JP |
H07410 | Jan 1995 | JP |
H07163574 | Jun 1995 | JP |
H07328016 | Dec 1995 | JP |
H0871072 | Mar 1996 | JP |
H08160315 | Jun 1996 | JP |
H08224247 | Sep 1996 | JP |
H09288239 | Nov 1997 | JP |
H10109285 | Apr 1998 | JP |
H10258024 | Sep 1998 | JP |
H10277985 | Oct 1998 | JP |
H1110575 | Jan 1999 | JP |
H11267095 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2001145636 | May 2001 | JP |
2001161711 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2002503131 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002503132 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002282265 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003225201 | Aug 2003 | JP |
2003265500 | Sep 2003 | JP |
WO-8403761 | Sep 1984 | WO |
WO-9216141 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO-199219147 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO-9310711 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO-9313916 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO-9426167 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO-9501757 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO-9516396 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO-9530964 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO-9639944 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO-9723158 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO-9729690 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO-9740966 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO-9856297 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-9856299 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO-9910137 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO-9950721 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO-0051486 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO-0192971 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO-03001986 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-200301987 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO-2004052171 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO-2005099560 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO-2006094242 | Sep 2006 | WO |
WO-2007120353 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Adams, Ludwig et al., “Computer-Assisted Surgery,” IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications, May 1990, pp. 43-52, vol. 10—Issue 3, IEEE Computer Society Press. |
Agency of Industrial Science and Technology, Ministry of International Trade and Industry, Japan, “Introduction to New Project for the National Research Development Program (Large-Scale Project) in FY 1991—Micromachine Technology,” 1991, 8 pages. |
Alexander, Arthur D. III, “Impacts of Telemation on Modern Society,” Symposium on Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators, Centre for Mechanical Sciences 1st CISM IFToMM Symposium, Sep. 5-8, 1974, pp. 121-136, vol. 2, Springer-Verlag. |
Arai, Tatsuo et al., “Bilateral control for manipulators with different configurations,” IECON Inn Conference on Industrial Electronics Control and Instrumentation, Oct. 22-26, 1984, pp. 40-45, vol. 1. |
Asada Haruhiko et al., “Development of a direct drive arm using high torque brushless motors,” Proc. of 1st Int. Symp. on Robotics Research, 1984, pp. 583-599, Chapter 7, MIT Press. |
Baker, Daniel R. et al., “On the inverse kinematics of redundant manipulators,” The International Journal of Robotics Research Inc, Mar. 21, 1988, pp. 3-21, vol. 7—Issue 2, Sage Publications. |
Bejczy, Antal K. et al., “Controlling Remote Manipulators through Kinesthetic Coupling,” Computers in Mechanical Engineering, 1983, pp. 48-60, vol. 1—Issue 1. |
Blue Cross, Another Pair of Hands for Surgeon, The Blue Cross magazine Perspective, 1972, 3 Pages Total. |
Borovoi, A.V., “Stability of a manipulator with force feedback,” Izv. AN SSSR Mekhanika Tverdogo Teal, 1990, pp. 37-45, vol. 25—Issue 1, Allerton Press, Inc. |
Burdea, Grigore et al., “Dextrous Telerobotics with Force Feedback—an overview. Part 2: Control and Implementation,” Robotica, 1991, pp. 291-298, vol. 9. |
Caccavale, Fabrizio et al., “Experiments of kinematic control on a redundant robot manipulator with non-spherical wrist,” Laboratory Robotics and Automation, 1996, pp. 25-36, vol. 8—Issue 1. |
Chang, Kyong-Sok et al., “Manipulator control at kinematic singularities: A dynamically consistent strategy,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1995, pp. 84-88, vol. 3, IEEE. |
Colgate, Edward, J., “Power and Impedance Scaling in Bilateral Manipulation,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Sacramento, California, Apr. 1991, pp. 2292-2297, vol. 3, IEEE. |
Decision Rejecting the Opposition dated Jul. 7, 2014 for European Application No. 02756362 filed Jun. 28, 2002. |
ERCIM News, No. 42, Jul. 2000, Special Theme: Robotics, 60 pages. |
European Search Report for Application No. 11002838, dated Apr. 25, 2013, 6 pages. |
European Search Report for Application No. EP11002837 dated Apr. 25, 2013, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 11160272.8, dated Sep. 23, 2016, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 16162402.8, dated Aug. 17, 2016, 8 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 16175279.5, dated Oct. 6, 2016, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP14150662, dated Jul. 28, 2014, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP14193159.2, dated Apr. 25, 2015, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP14193162.6, dated Apr. 29, 2015, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP14193176.6, dated Apr. 28, 2015, 5 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP17188442.2, dated Mar. 28, 2018, 8 pages. |
Fisher, Scott S., “Virtual interface environment,” IEEE/A1AA 7th Digital Avionics Systems Conference Ft. Worth Texas, 1986, pp. 346-350, IEEE. |
Fu, K.S. et al., “Robotics: control, sensing, vision, and intelligence,” 1987, pp. 12-76 and 201-265, Ch. 2 & 5, McGraw-Hill Book Company. |
Fukuda, Toshio et al., “A new method of master-slave type of teleoperation for a micro-manipulator system,” IEEE Microrobots and Teleoperations Workshop, 1987, 5 pages, IEEE. |
Funda J., et al., “Constrained Cartesian Motion Control for Teleoperated Surgical Robots,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, Jun. 1996, vol. 12 (3), pp. 453-465. |
Furuta, Katsuhisa et al., “Master slave manipulator based on virtual internal model following control concept,” IEEE Intl. Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1987, pp. 567-572, vol. 1, IEEE. |
Green, Philip, S. et al., “Mobile telepresence surgery,” 2nd Annual Intl Symposium on Med. Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, Maryland Nov. 1995, pp. 97-103. |
Green P.S., et al., “Telepresence Surgery,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, IEEE Sevice Center, Pisacataway, NJ, US, May 1, 1995, vol. 14 (3), pp. 324-329, XP000505090. |
Guerrouad, Aicha et al., “SMOS: Stereotaxical Microtelemanipulator for Ocular Surgery,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society 11th annual international conference, Nov. 9-12, 1989, pp. 879-880, vol. 3, IEEE. |
Hannaford, Blake et al., “Experimental and simulation studies of hard contact in force reflecting teleoperation,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Proceedings, 1988, pp. 584-589, vol. 1, IEEE. |
Held, Richard et al., “Telepresence. Time Delay and Adaptation”, *, Spatial Displays and Spatial Instruments Proceedings of a Conference sponsored by NASA Ames Research Center and the School of Optometry, Univ. of California, Aug. 31-Sep. 3, 1987, Published 1989, pp. 28-1 through 28-16. |
Hill, John W., “Telepresence surgery demonstration system,” Robotics and Automation, 1994, pp. 2302-2307, vol. 3, SRI International. |
Hurteau et al., “Laparoscopic surgery assisted by a robotic cameraman: Concept and Experimental results,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 8-13, 1994, pp. 2286-2289, vol. 3, IEEE. |
Inoue, Masao; “Six-Axis bilateral control of an articulated slave manipulator using a Cartesian master manipulator,” Advanced robotics, 1990, pp. 139-150, vol. 4—Issue 2, Robotic society of Japan. |
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US02/20884, dated Jul. 13, 2004, 3 pages. |
International Preliminary Examination Report for Application No. PCT/US02/20921, dated May 24, 2004, 4 pages. |
International Search Report for application No. PCT/US02/20884, dated May 8, 2003, 1 page. |
International Search Report for application No. PCT/US02/20921, dated Jun. 17, 2003, 1 page. |
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US03/38462, dated Feb. 18, 2005, 1 page. |
International Search Report for application No. PCT/US06/07757, dated Jun. 27, 2006, 3 pages. |
Jau, B. M., “Anthropomorphic Remote Manipulator,” NASA Tech Briefs, Apr. 1991, p. 92, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California. |
Kazerooni, H., “Design and analysis of the statically balanced direct-drive robot manipulator,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 1989, pp. 287-293, vol. 6, Issue 4. |
Kazerooni, H. et al., “The Dynamics and Control of a Haptic Interface Device,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1994, pp. 453-464, vol. 10—Issue 4, IEEE. |
Kazerooni, H., “Human/Robot Interaction via the Transfer of Power and Information Signals Part I: Dynamics and Control Analysis,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1989, pp. 1632-1640, IEEE. |
Khatib. Oussama, “Reduced effective inertia in macro / mini manipulator systems,” Proceedings of ACC, 1988, pp. 2140-2147. |
Kim, Won S. et al., “A Helmet Mounted Display for Telerobotics,” Compcon Spring '88. Thirty-Third IEEE Computer Society International Conference, 1988, pp. 543-547, IEEE. |
Kim, Won S. et al., “Active compliance and damping in telemanipulator control,” Jet Propulsion Laboratory New technology Report, 1991, pp. 1-14a, vol. 15—Issue 4, JPL & NASA Case No. NPO-1796917466, Item 40. |
Kosuge Kazuhiro, et al., “Unified Approach for Teleoperation of Virtual and Real Environment for Skill Based Teleoperation,” Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ/GI International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1994, pp. 1242-1247, vol. 2, IEEE. |
Kosuge, Kazuhiro et al., “Unified approach for teleoperation of virtual and real environment manipulation based on reference dynamics,” IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1995, pp. 938-943, IEEE. |
Kwoh, Yik, San et al., “A Robot With Improved Absolute Positioning Accuracy for CT Guided Stereotactic Brain Surgery,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Feb. 1988, pp. 153-160, vol. 35—Issue 2, IEEE. |
Laika A., “Geregelte Vorschubantriebe Fur Numerisch Gesteuerte Arbeitsmaschinen,” Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff, 1984, vol. 42, pp. 461-466. |
Madhani, Akhil J., “Design of Teleoperated Surgical Instruments for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” Feb. 1998, pp. 1-251. |
Madhani, Akhil J. et al., “The black falcon: A teleoperated surgical instrument for minimally invasive surgery,” IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) Victoria B.C. Canada ), 1998, pp. 936-944, vol. 2, IEEE. |
Massie, Thomas H. et al., “The PHANTOM Haptic Interface: A Device for Probing Virtual Objects,” Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 1994, 7 pages. |
Matsushima, K. et al., “Servo Micro-Manipulator Tiny-Micro Mark-1,” 4th Symposium on Theory and Practice of Robots and Manipulators, 1982, pp. 193-201. |
Merlet J.P., “Optimal Design for the Micro Parallel Robot MIPS,” Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE, International Conference on Robotics & Automation Washington, DC, May 2002, pp. 1149-1154. |
Merlet J.P., Parallel Robots—First Edition (Solid Mechanics and its Applications, Band 74), Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000, ISBN: 0792363086, 9780792363088. |
Mitsuishi, Mamoru et al., “A tele-micro-surgery system with co-located view and operation points and a rotational-force-feedback-free master manipulator,” 2nd Annual Intl. Symposium on Medical robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery Baltimore Maryland, Nov. 4-7, 1995, pp. 111-118. |
Moyer, Thomas H., “The design for an integrated hand and wrist mechanism,” Masters Thesis, Feb. 1992, 106 pages, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. |
Neisius B. et al., “Entwicklung eines Manipulators zur endoskopischen Handhabung chirurgischer Effektoren,” Nachrichten—Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, 1995, pp. 173-180. |
Neisius B. et al., “Robotic manipulator for endoscopic handling of surgical effectors and cameras,” 1st Intl. Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 1994, pp. 169-175, vol. 2. |
Ng, W.S. et al., “Robotic Surgery, A First-Hand Experience in Transurethral Resection of the Prostate,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, Mar. 1993, pp. 120-125, vol. 12—Issue 1, IEEE. |
Office Action dated Jul. 1, 2014 for Japanese Application No. 2013-138343 filed Jul. 1, 2013, 4 pages. |
Office Action dated Jan. 22, 2016 for Japanese Application No. 2015-033632 filed Feb. 24, 2015, 7 pages. |
Office Action dated Feb. 28, 2014 for Japanese Application No. 2012-0222926 filed Oct. 5, 2012. |
PCT/US06/62385 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Mar. 28, 2008, 16 pages. |
Peirs J., et al., “A Flexible Distal Tip with Two Degrees of Freedom for Enhanced Dexterity in Endoscopic Robot Surgery,” MME'02, The 13th Micromechanics Europe Workshop, Oct. 6-8, 2002, Sinaia, Romania, pp. 271-274. |
Jones D. B. et al., Chapter 25,“Next-Generation 3D Videosystems may Improve Laprascopic Task Performance,” Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare, 1995, pp. 152-160. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP13162794.5, dated Feb. 10, 2017, 7 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP13162798.6, dated Feb. 16, 2017, 8 pages. |
Michael B. Cohn's Home Page, http://ww-bsac.ees.berkeley.edu/users/michaelc/, downloaded Nov. 1, 1996, p. 1; UC Berkeley/Endorobotics Corporation Surgical Robotics Project Job Openings, http:/www-bsac.eecs.berkeley.edu/users/michaelc/jobs.html, downloaded Nov. 1, 1996, p. 1; and Medical Robotics, http://robotics.eecs.berkeley.edu/˜mcenk/medical/, downloaded Nov. 1, 1996, pp. 1-8. |
Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP13162796.0, dated Feb. 16, 2017, 6 pages |
Thring, M.W., Robots and Telechirs: Manipulators with Memory; Remote Manipulators; Machine Limbs for the Handicapped, Ellis Horwood Limited, England,1983, 79 pages, including Table of Contents, Preface, Chap. 5 (pp. 108-131), Chap. 7 (pp. 194-195, 235), Chap. 8 (pp. 236-287), Chap. 9 (p. 279). |
Reboulet C., et al., “Optimal Design of Redundant Parallel Mechanism for Endoscopic Surgery,” Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1999, vol. 3, pp. 1432-1437. |
Richter, Ruthann, “Telesurgery may bridge future gaps,” Times Tribune, Jan. 24, 1988, pp. A-1 and A-16. |
Robodoc, aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopadie, 3 pages, [online], [retrieved Aug. 26, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet:< URL: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROBODOC>. |
Rosheim, Mark E., Chapter 5: “Pitch-Yaw-Roll Wrists,” Robot Wrist Actuators, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989, pp. 95-206. |
Rosheim, Mark E., “Robot Wrist Actuators,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1989, pp. 112-114, Figures 5.23-5.26, p. 140, figure 5.54. |
Rosheim, Mark E., “Robot Wrist Actuators,” Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989. |
Salisbury, Kenneth J., “Kinematic and force analysis of articulated hands,” Department of Computer Science Stanford University Report No. STAN CS 89 921, 1982, Chapter 9, pp. 67-77. |
Sastry, Shankar et al., “Millirobotics for remote minamally invasive surgery,” Proceedings of the Intl. Workshop on Some Critical Issues in Robotics, Singapore, Oct. 2-3, 1995, pp. 81-98. |
Sastry, Shankar, “MilliRobotics in Minimally Invasive Telesurgery,” Internet, http://robotics.eecs.berkeley.edu, 1996, 8 pages. |
Spain, Edward H., “Stereo Advantage for a Peg in Hole Task Using a Force Feedback Manipulator,” SPIE Stereoscopic Displays and Applications, 1990, pp. 244-254, vol. 1256, IEEE. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP02756362, dated Jun. 9, 2008, 3 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for Application No. EP03790301, dated Jul. 2, 2009, 3 pages. |
Supplementary Partial European Search Report for Application No. EP02748026, dated Jan. 14, 2011, 5 pages total. |
Tachi, Susumu et al., “Tele-Existence Master Slave System for Remote Manipulation (II),” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Honolulu Hawaii, Dec. 5-7, 1990, pp. 85-90, vol. 1—Issue 6, IEEE. |
TASK 2: Miniature end effector—A preliminary design, pp. 32-47, no date. |
Taubes, Gary et al., “Surgery in Cyberspace,” Discover magazine, Dec. 1994, vol. 15, issue 12, pp. 85-92. |
Taylor, Russell H. et al., “A Telerobotic Assistant for Laparoscopic Surgery,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, May/Jun. 1995, pp. 279-288, vol. 14, Issue 3, IEEE. |
Trevelyan, James P. et al., “Motion Control for a Sheep Shearing Robot,” IEEE Robotics Research Conference, the 1st International Symposium, Carroll, NH, USA., 1983, pp. 175-190, in Robotics Research, MIT Press. |
Tsai L.W., “The Mechanics of Serial and Parallel Manipulators”, in: Robot Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1999, [retrieved on Jul. 9, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet:< URL: http://books.google.com.pe/books?id=PK_N9aFZ3ccC&pg=PR3&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=false>. |
Vertut, Jean and Phillipe Coiffet, Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development, English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. |
Vibet, C., “Properties of Master-Slave Robots,” Motor-con, MOTORCON'87, Hannover, Apr. 1987, pp. 309-316. |
Wampler C. W., “Inverse Kinematic Functions for Redundant Sherical Wrists,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1989, pp. 106-111, vol. 5—Issue 1, IEEE. |
Wampler, Charles W. et al., “Wrist singularities: Theory and practice,” The Robotics Review 2, 1992, pp. 173-189, MIT Press. |
Wampler, Charles W. II et al., “An Implementation of Inverse Kinematic Functions for Control of a Redundant Wrist,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1989, vol. 2, pp. 914-919. |
Wampler, Charles W., “The Inverse Function Approach to Kinematic Control of Redundant Manipulators,” American Control Conference, 1982, pp. 1364-1369, vol. 25. |
Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US06/07757, dated Jun. 27, 2006, 5 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP20199958.8 dated Feb. 2, 2021, 07 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190046173 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60327702 | Oct 2001 | US | |
60301967 | Jun 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10980119 | Nov 2004 | US |
Child | 12782833 | US | |
Parent | 10187248 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 10980119 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15624344 | Jun 2017 | US |
Child | 16162652 | US | |
Parent | 14536899 | Nov 2014 | US |
Child | 15624344 | US | |
Parent | 13414445 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14536899 | US | |
Parent | 12782833 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 13414445 | US |