This application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. 371 of PCT Application No. PCT/KR2007/000832 having an international filing date of 16 Feb. 2007, which designated the United States, which PCT application claimed the benefit of Korea Application Nos. 10-2006-0089853 filed 16 Sep. 2006, 10-2006-0124928filed 8 Dec. 2006, and 10-2007-0008668 filed 29 Jan. 2007, the entire disclosure of each of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to an apparatus and a method for chemical vapor deposition (CVD) with a showerhead which supplies a plural kind of reactive gases and a purge gas over a substrate to grow a film on the substrate uniformly in thickness and composition. Here, the present invention is associated with U.S. Pat. No. 7,156,921 (“Method and apparatus for chemical vapor deposition capable of preventing contamination and enhancing film growth rate”, filed on Oct. 9, 2002), the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
In an apparatus for chemical vapor deposition (CVD), a reactive gas is introduced into a vacuum reaction chamber, flows through a showerhead, and reaches a susceptor or a substrate holder on which a substrate is located. The reactive gas causes chemical reaction on the substrate to form a desired film. As a means to provide energy necessary to induce chemical reactions on the substrate, a method of simply heating the substrate or atomically exciting the reactive gas, such as making plasma, is widely used. After the reaction is finished, byproduct gases are removed from the reaction chamber by an exhaust system including a vacuum pump, then, passing through a purifying system, finally, being discharged into the atmosphere. However, since it is very important to prevent undesired particle deposition on a wall of the reaction chamber or the showerhead during a deposition process, it is preferable that the reactive gases do not react each other in a gaseous state. Unfortunately, if reactive gases whose decomposition temperature are substantially lower than 200° C. like metal- organic compounds are mixed in the reaction chamber, the mixture may cause homogeneous reactions in the gas phase leading to a generation of contaminant particles, or cause heterogeneous reactions on a solid-state surface such as a showerhead surface or a reaction chamber wall. Particularly, it may happen that the reactive gas is sensitive to a specific material. For example, zirconium tert-butoxide (Zr(OC4H9)4) is extremely sensitive to moisture, which is strongly like to form zirconium hydroxide (Zr(OH)x) of white powder type. The moisture could have been physically adsorbed on the inner side of the reaction chamber, but it may be also generated over the substrates as a byproduct gas. Then, the moisture reacts with (Zr(OC4H9)4) on the inner wall of the reaction chamber or the surface of the showerhead, depositing zirconium hydroxides. The unwanted deposits are eventually flaked off into fine particles due to a repeated thermal expansion and contraction and/or a lattice parameter mismatch between the surface materials and the deposits. As a result of this, the film formed on the substrate may be contaminated and the productivity becomes deteriorated due to a shortened preventative maintenance cycle time to remove the unwanted deposits.
When a highly integrated semiconductor is manufactured, contaminant particles may cause a pattern defect such as a short or disconnection between lines, and the size of the contaminant particle influencing yield is in proportion to the line width. Therefore, as the line size becomes smaller, that is, as the density of the integration is increased, the size of particle influencing yield becomes smaller, whereby the number of contaminant particles to be permitted in the reaction chamber is more seriously limited.
However, provided not with adequate means, a reactive gas such as metal-organic compound gas having a low decomposition temperature or sensitive to moisture may cause unwanted deposits at the bottom of the showerhead. In the prior art of
In the prior art of
The behavior of the film growing on substrates is dominated by the mass transport of the reactive gas containing components of the film. The mass transport of reactive gases from the showerhead to the substrate is done via multiple paths including convection, diffusion, and thermo-phoresis. Among those, the convection is relatively easy to handle. It may be an effective solution to regulate the injection velocity of the reactive gases independently for meeting required composition and uniformity of the film. However, prior arts do not mention about the way to enhance the uniformity of the film growing on the substrate.
A necessity to form various kinds of films using various kind of reactive gas by CVD process has been increased. However, if the conventional showerhead device is used further, undesired particles may deposit in the showerhead due to the unexpected properties of the reactive gases used, or a good quality of the film grown on substrates may not be attained, which may limit the wide application of the CVD process.
In the present invention there is provided an apparatus for chemical vapor deposition (CVD) with a showerhead and a method thereof, wherein each reactive gas is supplied to the substrate independently while passing through the showerhead, wherein a purge gas is injected from the bottom surface of the showerhead and forms a protective curtain, wherein the injection velocity of each kind of reactive gas is positively and externally regulated to make a uniform mixing of the reactive gases over the substrate, and wherein the showerhead is applied to a reactive gas confining means which surrounds the substrate and extended to the bottom of the reaction chamber at its one end.
A plural kind of reactive gases and injection support gases are supplied into the showerhead in such a way that each reactive gas is mixed with each injection support gas in a mixing zone at inside of the showerhead, and a purge gas is supplied into a compartment formed at inside of the showerhead. Then, the reactive gas mixed with the injection support gas and the purge gas are injected through a large number of reactive gas exits and a large number of purge gas exits formed at the bottom surface of the showerhead, respectively, thereby the injection velocities of each reactive gas and the purge gas are positively regulated.
The showerhead includes a plurality of reactive gas showerhead modules and a purge gas showerhead module separated each other, the number of the reactive gas showerhead modules is same as the number of kinds of reactive gases, and a large number of reactive gas injection tubes are connected to the bottom of a reactive gas shower head module for injecting a reactive gas mixed with an injection support gas which is a kind of a inert gas. A purge gas showerhead module, having a large number of guide tubes of which ends are hermetically joined at the holes formed at top and bottom plate of the purge gas showerhead module for accepting the reactive gas injection tubes along the inside thereof, is mounted under the reactive gas showerhead modules. A large number of exits are formed at the bottom of the purge gas showerhead module for injecting the purge gas. The guide tubes are also inserted to the reactive gas showerhead modules in such a way that reactive gas injection tubes connected to a reactive gas showerhead module at upper position passes through a reactive gas showerhead modules at lower position along the inside of the guide tube of the lower reactive gas showerhead module.
A cooling jacket constitutes the lowest part of the showerhead by keeping the temperature of the showerhead at proper levels to suppress both condensation and thermal decomposition of the reactive gas in the showerhead.
As described above the present invention has a function that each reactive gas passes through a showerhead independently, thereby preventing mixing of the reactive gases at inside of the showerhead. Moreover, the present invention has a function that a purge gas is injected from a bottom surface of the showerhead and forms a protective curtain beneath the bottom of the showerhead, thereby suppressing diffusion of the reactive gas backwardly. Moreover, the present invention has a function that the injection velocity of each reactive gas is positively regulated by controlling the amount of the injection support gas which is mixed to the reactive gas in the showerhead, thereby determining composition of the film growing on substrates easily. Furthermore, the present invention has a function that the temperature of showerhead is maintained at proper levels by mounting a cooling jacket which constitutes the lowest part of the showerhead, thereby unwanted film deposition caused by thermal decomposition of the reactive gases is suppressed at inside and bottom of the showerhead. In addition to this, if the present invention is applied to a CVD system together with a reactive gas confining means, the contamination at inside of the reactive gas confining means is prevented, and the film growth rate is increased by confining the reactive gas in the vicinity of the substrates.
While the present invention has been described with reference to the particular illustrative embodiments, it is not to be restricted by the embodiments but only by the appended claims. It is to be appreciated that those skilled in the art can change or modify the embodiments without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.
The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The purge gas in the present invention doesn't either dissolve or generate byproducts by itself. For example, the purge gas includes Ar, N2, and He. If no chemical reactions are induced in the showerhead, H2 or O2 may be included as a purge gas and may participate in the deposition process on substrates as a source material. The purge gas, having a relatively small molecular weight, diffuses instantly in the reaction chamber and is relatively less influenced by a force circulation caused by the act of vacuum pump.
Meanwhile, the reactive gas is a source material gas that participates directly in the deposition process on substrates by pyrolysis, combination, and/or etc., for example, a gaseous source material containing components of the film deposited, a mixture of a vaporized source material containing components of the film deposited and a carrier gas for vaporizing, or a purely vaporized source material containing components of the film deposited without the aid of carrier gas. The source material includes, for example, Pb(C2H5)4 for Pb, Zr(OC4H9)4 for Zr, and Ti(OC3H7)4 for Ti, which are all metal-organic compounds in the deposition of PZT (Lead Zirconium-Titanate) films. The carrier gas includes, for example, Ar, N2, He, H2 and etc. The reactive gas causes adsorption and surface reaction on all of the inner structure of the reaction chamber including substrates, reaction chamber inner wall, and the showerhead. The injection support gas is a kind of an inert gas, such as Ar, N2, or H2. If no chemical reactions are induced in the showerhead, H2 or O2 may be included as an injection support gas too.
As shown in
Then, the reactive gas injection tube 151 passes through the lower reactive gas showerhead module 210 along a guide tube 281 of which ends are hermetically joined to holes formed at top 261 and bottom plate 269 of the lower reactive gas showerhead module 210. On the other hand, a purge gas is introduced into a purge gas showerhead module 410 through a purge gas inlet 423 thereof, sufficiently diffused at inside of the purge gas showerhead module 410 after flowing through a large number of holes 437 formed at the intermediate plate 435, and then, injected from the purge gas exits 446 which are located at the bottom 469 of the purge gas showerhead module 410. It is preferable that the size of the purge gas exit 446 is small enough to induce uniform distribution of the purge gas within the purge gas showerhead module, where the recommended size is 0.3 to 0.6mm in inner diameter. It may be necessary that the purge gas exit 446 is extended towards the substrate within a predetermined distance (“d1” in
As shown in
As shown in
In case that a plurality of reactive gases is used, the injection velocity of each reactive gas can be positively regulated by the amount of injection support gas without influencing the delivering rate of the reactive gas. As shown in
A kind of reactive gas does not mix with another kind of reactive gas until they are injected from the showerhead, then, every kind of reactive gases and the purge gas injected are mixed together at the space between the bottom surface 479 of the showerhead 410 and the substrate. It is preferred that the bottom surface 479 of the showerhead 410 is spaced apart to the substrate by 20 mm to 60 mm so as to achieve best compromise between the uniformity and the growth rate of films growing on substrates.
The number density of reactive gas injection tubes is directly related to the uniformity of the films on substrates. For one kind of reactive gas, the appropriate number density is about 0.2˜0.4 per unit square cm. And the effective size of the bottom of the showerhead, that is the area where the reactive gas injection tubes are formed, would be large enough to cover the substrate. For the case of the substrate of 150 mm in diameter, the effective bottom size of the showerhead is about 200 mm in diameter, and the total number of the reactive gas injection tubes of one kind lies between 60 and 120. With regards to the arrangement of the reactive gas injection tubes, if the arrangement could assure a uniform spreading of the reactive gas, it would have any specific pattern or even randomness. Considering that three reactive gases are used, which are denoted as “A”, “B”, and “C”, respectively,
As shown in
While the present invention has been described with reference to the particular illustrative embodiments, it is not to be restricted by the embodiments but only by the appended claims. It is to be appreciated that those skilled in the art can change or modify the embodiments without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention.
According the present invention, regardless of the condition whether the material is complicated to handle or the process is restrictive in CVD, thick films can be deposited without concern about the contamination of the reaction chamber including reaction chamber inner wall and showerhead. Therefore, the present invention can be effectively used as a solution in the process where unwanted films are grown on surfaces of internal parts of the reaction chamber caused by chemical reactions of reactive gases. Since the present invention comprises very simple and compatible structures, the detailed parts of the present invention can be easily adopted. For a new applicability, as the present invention is advantageous in growing PZT films as thick as 2˜8□ for inkjet head, the performance of the inkjet can be greatly enhanced and the inkjet technology can be more widely used in the deposition of electronic materials like LCD color filters. Moreover, the present invention has a wide industrial applicability including the miniaturization and high efficiency of electronic parts such as multi-layer ceramic chip condensers (MLCC).
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10-2006-0089853 | Sep 2006 | KR | national |
10-2006-0124928 | Dec 2006 | KR | national |
10-2007-0008668 | Jan 2007 | KR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/KR2007/000832 | 2/16/2007 | WO | 00 | 6/2/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/032910 | 3/20/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3381114 | Nakanuma | Apr 1968 | A |
4584206 | Sleighter | Apr 1986 | A |
4717049 | Green et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4767641 | Kieser et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4900411 | Poong et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5006192 | Deguchi | Apr 1991 | A |
5192370 | Oda et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5324360 | Kozuka | Jun 1994 | A |
5556476 | Lei et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5571332 | Halpern | Nov 1996 | A |
5647912 | Kaminishizono et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5772771 | Li et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5935336 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5950925 | Fukunaga et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958140 | Arami et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6086677 | Umotoy et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6089472 | Carter | Jul 2000 | A |
6090210 | Ballance et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6113705 | Ohashi et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6143081 | Shinriki et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6143082 | McInerney et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6187214 | Ganan-Calvo | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6221166 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6302964 | Umotoy et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6435428 | Kim et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6436193 | Kasai et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6478872 | Chae et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6508197 | Omstead et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6544341 | Omstead et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6623656 | Baum et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6626998 | Dunham | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631692 | Matsuki et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6692575 | Omstead et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6800139 | Shinriki et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6886491 | Kim et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7018940 | Dunham | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7156921 | Byun | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7229666 | Mardian et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7410676 | Kim et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7479303 | Byun | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7651568 | Ishizaka et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7674352 | Bour et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7931749 | Amikura et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7976631 | Burrows et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8298370 | Byun | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8361892 | Tam et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8679956 | Tam et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
20010042799 | Kim et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020129769 | Kim et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030077388 | Byun | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097987 | Fukuda | May 2003 | A1 |
20050092248 | Lee et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050217582 | Kim et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060263522 | Byun et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070148349 | Fukada | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070163440 | Kim et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070272154 | Amikura et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090169744 | Byun et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090178616 | Byun | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20110052833 | Hanawa et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073038 | Chien et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110253044 | Tam et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110256315 | Tam et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110256645 | Tam et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110256692 | Tam et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120052216 | Hanawa et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120067971 | Byun et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120234945 | Olgado | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130298835 | Tam et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2005-129712 | May 2005 | JP |
WO 2005041285 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005041285 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005041285 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005041285 | Jun 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 12/351,540, Byun. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International (PCT) Application No. PCT/KR2007/000832, issued Mar. 17, 2009. |
International Search Report prepared by the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Jun. 4, 2007 for International Application No. PCT/KR2007/000832; Applicant, Piezonics Co. Ltd. |
Written Opinion prepared by the Korean Intellectual Property Office on Jun. 4, 2007 for International Application No. PCT/KR2007/000832; Applicant, Piezonics Co. Ltd. |
Tripathi, et al., “Comparison of the Applications of Process Simulations and FMEA: Two Case Studies”, IEEE/SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference, 1994, pp. 140-143. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090169744 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |