This invention relates generally to electrostatic discharge devices, and more specifically to obtaining uniformity of current flow in a grounded gate nMOS.
Electrostatic discharge (ESD) is a phenomenon where electrostatic charges migrate from a non-conductive surface via a conductive material. Since an electrostatic voltage is usually quite high, the ESD can easily damage the substrate and other components of an integrated circuit. For example, an electrostatic voltage from hundreds to thousands of volts can be created on a human body walking on a carpet under a higher relative humidity, while more than 10,000 volts can be created under a lower relative humidity. Also, an electrostatic voltage from hundreds to thousands of volts can be created in machines for packaging or testing integrated circuits. Therefore, when a human body or a machine carrying electrostatic charges contacts a chip, a large transient ESD current is generated, damaging or destroying the integrated circuits on the chip.
To protect the integrated circuits from being damaged by ESD, ESD devices capable of conducting an ESD current to ground are incorporated into the integrated circuits. Grounded gate NMOS (GGNMOS) devices are commonly used in protecting circuits.
A typical GGNMOS ESD protection circuit is illustrated in
Multiple contact plugs divide the source region 14 and drain region 16 into sub regions. For simplicity purposes, each sub drain region and sub source region is referred to as the contact plug number next to it. The GGNMOS can be treated as sub NMOS transistors 321 through 327 connected in parallel. Each sub NMOS transistor 321 through 327 is formed of a drain 261 through 267, a gate electrode 18 and a source 221 through 227, respectively. When an ESD current occurs, it first flows from metal line 28 to contact plugs 261 through 267, then to the sub transistors 321 through 327 that are turned on. The ESD current then goes through contact plugs 221 through 227, then to metal 24, and finally to p-well pick-up regions 20 and 21. It is to be noted that besides the current flowing from the drain to the source of each transistor, there is also a substrate current flowing at a direction from sub transistor 324 to transistors 325, 326 and 327, and a substrate current flowing at a direction from sub transistor 324 to transistors 323, 322 and 321.
Turning on sub transistors at different times causes current crowding. At a lower ESD current, only sub transistors in the center, such as transistors 324, 323 and 325 are turned on. When current increases, from the center to the end, more and more sub transistors are turned on until at a certain time all sub transistors are turned on. It is noted that even when all the sub transistors are on, the center transistors carry more ESD current than the transistors at the ends so that they are more prone to damage.
In order to improve the ESD level of such a large dimension GGNMOS, the multiple fingers of the large dimension GGNMOS have to be uniformly triggered on to share ESD current. If all the fingers and the sub transistors of the large dimension GGNMOS can be uniformly turned on during the ESD stress condition, the GGNMOS can sustain a much higher ESD level. Therefore, there is the need to achieve uniformity among the multiple sub transistors of the large-dimension GGNMOS.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention presents a semiconductor structure for electrostatic discharge protection.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the semiconductor structure comprises a grounded gate nMOS (GGNMOS) having a substrate, a gate electrode, a source region and a drain region. A plurality of contact plugs is formed on the source and drain side. A plurality of first level vias is electrically coupled to the GGNMOS and has a substantially asymmetrical layout in the source and drain regions. A second level via(s) re-routes the ESD current to the desired first level vias.
The present invention provides a novel structure and method to improve the uniformity of a GGNMOS. By making the sub transistors turn on more uniformly, the preferred embodiment of the present invention makes the ESD protection circuit more efficient. This in turn improves the breakdown current and voltages, and the GGNMOS can be made smaller, therefore saving layout space without sacrificing protection ability.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
a illustrates a prior art GGNMOS having one p-well pick-up region;
b illustrates an embodiment of the present invention having one p-well pick-up region; and
The making and using of the presently preferred embodiments are discussed in detail below. It should be appreciated, however, that the present invention provides many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed are merely illustrative of specific ways to make and use the invention, and do not limit the scope of the invention.
The preferred embodiments are illustrated in
The present invention is related to an asymmetrical layout of openings on drain and source sides of a GGNMOS device for improving ESD performance. The asymmetrical layout of openings may be contact plugs, via openings or trench openings, where in each case, the openings are filled with conductive materials. A preferred embodiment is described in
In order to explain the structure of the preferred embodiment in detail, cross-sectional views of
Compared to the prior art in
Also, there is another effect that possibly contributes to the uniformity of the turn on voltages, although it has less effect than the one discussed in the previous paragraph. In
a illustrates another prior art. If there is only one p-well pick-up region 21 coupled to the source side contact plugs 221 through 227 through a metal line 57, the sub transistor 321 has the highest substrate resistance since it is furthest from the ground 4, and it will be turned on first. The ESD current crowding effect causes the transistor 321 to be more prone to failure. To counteract this effect, a drain side via 52 is placed nearest the contact plug 267 and is connected to contact plugs 261 through 267 through a metal 56, as shown in
In a typical layout of the GGNMOS using the present invention, the GGNMOS has multiple fingers. For a layout using 0.13 μm technology, in order to sink an ESD current of about one to two amps at human body mode (HMB), a GGNMOS preferably has a total length of about 720 μm and a width of a little greater than about 30 μm. Each gate has a preferred length of about 0.2 μm and a preferred width of about 30 μm. The source and drain regions on each gate are within an active region in the substrate. The active region has a preferred length of about 1 μm to about 10 μm, and more preferably about 1 μm to about 3 μm. The active region has a preferred width of about 10 μm to about 100 μm, and more preferably about 10 μm to about 30 μm.
Since the ESD current is distributed to multiple fingers, the more fingers the GGNMOS has, the less ESD current each finger needs to carry, hence less first level vias 52 are needed. For example, if a GGNMOS has 15 fingers, for each finger, two first level vias 52 are typically enough. Also since the ESD current is distributed to the vias, the more vias a GGNMOS has, the less ESD current one via needs to carry. Typically, for 0.13 μm technology, 32 vias on each of the source and drain sides are enough for discharging the ESD current.
The improvement of the preferred embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in
It is noted that besides the IT2 breakdown voltage improvement, the highest voltage sustained is also improved significantly. In human body mode (HBM), the highest voltage is increased to 4.0 kV for the present invention from 2.5 kV for the conventional GGNMOS. In machine mode (MM), the highest voltage is increased to 225 V for the present invention from 100 V for the conventional GGNMOS.
The present invention provides a novel structure and method to improve the uniformity of a GGNMOS. By making the sub transistors turn on more uniformly, the ESD protection circuit is made more efficient. This in turn improves the breakdown current and voltages, and the GGNMOS can be made smaller therefore saving layout space without sacrificing protection ability.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, and composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure of the present invention, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed, that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the present invention. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5338986 | Kurimoto | Aug 1994 | A |
5451799 | Kurimoto et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459345 | Okudaira et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5623159 | Monk et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5721445 | Singh et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5728594 | Efland et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5789791 | Bergemont | Aug 1998 | A |
5793093 | Warwick | Aug 1998 | A |
5801091 | Efland et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5831219 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5831316 | Yu et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5903030 | Kim | May 1999 | A |
5910677 | Irino | Jun 1999 | A |
5955781 | Joshi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5990504 | Morifuji | Nov 1999 | A |
6028338 | Saito et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034552 | Chang et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6236073 | Hsu | May 2001 | B1 |
6388850 | Ker et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6462384 | Kwon | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6483045 | Wang et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489689 | Nojiri | Dec 2002 | B2 |
RE38319 | Lin et al. | Nov 2003 | E |
6660618 | Chen et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6713820 | Omi et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6724677 | Su et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6744107 | Ker et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6747307 | Vathulya et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6873017 | Cai et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6914305 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7112855 | Fong | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7209333 | Lee et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
20010033024 | Fraser et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020000668 | Sakihama et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020033504 | Ohnakado | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020130367 | Cabral et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030218841 | Kodama | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040125520 | McGruer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040178454 | Kuroda et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050093163 | Ho et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050098830 | Honjoh et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050173806 | Matsubara | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060097330 A1 | May 2006 | US |