Patent Grant
9968713
This invention relates generally to medical devices, and particularly to intracorporeal devices for therapeutic or diagnostic uses, such as balloon catheters.
In percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures, a guiding catheter is advanced until the distal tip of the guiding catheter is seated in the ostium of a desired coronary artery. A guidewire, positioned within an inner lumen of a dilatation catheter, is first advanced out of the distal end of the guiding catheter into the patient's coronary artery until the distal end of the guidewire crosses a lesion to be dilated. Then the dilatation catheter having an inflatable balloon on the distal portion thereof is advanced into the patient's coronary anatomy, over the previously introduced guidewire, until the balloon of the dilatation catheter is properly positioned across the lesion. Once properly positioned, the dilatation balloon is inflated with fluid one or more times to a predetermined size at relatively high pressures (e.g. greater than 8 atmospheres) so that the stenosis is compressed against the arterial wall and the wall expanded to open up the passageway. Generally, the inflated diameter of the balloon is approximately the same diameter as the native diameter of the body lumen being dilated so as to complete the dilatation but not overexpand the artery wall. Substantial, uncontrolled expansion of the balloon against the vessel wall can cause trauma to the vessel wall. After the balloon is finally deflated, blood flow resumes through the dilated artery and the dilatation catheter can be removed therefrom.
In such angioplasty procedures, there may be restenosis of the artery, i.e. reformation of the arterial blockage, which necessitates either another angioplasty procedure, or some other method of repairing or strengthening the dilated area. To reduce the restenosis rate and to strengthen the dilated area, physicians frequently implant a stent inside the artery at the site of the lesion. Stems may also be used to repair vessels having an intimal flap or dissection or to generally strengthen a weakened section of a vessel. Stents are usually delivered to a desired location within a coronary artery in a contracted condition on a balloon of a catheter which is similar in many respects to a balloon angioplasty catheter, and expanded to a larger diameter by expansion of the balloon. The balloon is deflated to remove the catheter and the stent left in place within the artery at the site of the dilated lesion. Stent covers on an inner or an outer surface of the stent have been used in, for example, the treatment of pseudo-aneurysms and perforated arteries, and to prevent prolapse of plaque. Similarly, vascular grafts comprising cylindrical tubes made from tissue or synthetic materials such as polyester, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, and DACRON may be implanted in vessels to strengthen or repair the vessel, or used in an anastomosis procedure to connect vessels segments together.
In the design of catheter shafts, strength, stiffness and flexibility of various sections of the catheter shaft are specifically tailored to provide the desired catheter performance. However, one difficulty has been optimizing the often competing characteristics of strength and flexibility of the catheter shaft.
Accordingly, it would be a significant advance to provide a catheter having a catheter shaft with an improved combination of characteristics such as strength, flexibility and ease of manufacture. This invention satisfies these and other needs.
This invention is directed to a catheter having an elongated shaft with a tubular member which forms at least a portion of the shaft and which is formed of a biaxially oriented thermoplastic polymeric material. One aspect of the invention is directed to a method of forming the catheter shaft by radially and longitudinally expanding the tubular member to biaxially orient the polymeric material. Additionally, one aspect of the invention is directed to forming a taper along at least a section of the biaxially oriented tubular member to provide a bending stiffness transition. A catheter of the invention preferably has an improved combination of low bending stiffness, high rupture pressure, and high tensile strength, for improved catheter performance.
A method of making a catheter shaft of the invention generally comprises radially and longitudinally expanding an extruded tube, which results in an expanded tubular member having a higher rupture pressure and tensile strength than a tube extruded directly to the same final dimensions (i.e., wall thickness and outer diameter) as the expanded tubular member. It is believed that the radial and longitudinal expansion circumferentially and longitudinally orients the polymeric structure within the material. However, the orientation does not significantly increase the bending stiffness of the tubular member. Thus, a relatively low durometer polymer can be selected to minimize bending stiffness in the radially and axially deformed tubular member. The inherently low bending stiffness of the low durometer polymer provides a longitudinally flexible shaft tubular member which more readily bends during maneuvering of the catheter within the patient.
In a presently preferred embodiment, the catheter is a balloon catheter generally comprising an elongated shaft having a proximal end, a distal end, an inflation lumen extending therein, and a tubular member which has the inflation lumen therein and which is formed of a biaxially oriented nonporous thermoplastic polymer, and a balloon sealingly secured to a distal shaft section. In one embodiment, the balloon is a relatively high pressure balloon. The biaxially oriented polymer has polymer chains oriented longitudinally along the tubular member for increased tensile strength, and circumferentially around the tubular member for increased rupture pressure. The high tensile strength of the shaft tubular member improves catheter performance by, for example, increasing the ability to safely pull the catheter from within the patient's vessel without tearing apart/damaging the catheter, e.g., during retrieval of the catheter lodged in a calcific lesion.
The balloon has an interior in fluid communication with the inflation lumen, and a rupture pressure which is significantly less than the rupture pressure of the shaft tubular member. As a result, the balloon catheter preferably has a failure mode in which the balloon will rupture before the pressure-containing catheter shaft tubular member, to prevent or minimize vessel injury in the event of a catheter rupture. In one embodiment, the balloon is a relatively high pressure balloon, for example having a rupture pressure of at least about 20 atm or more. The shaft tubular member preferably has a mean rupture strength substantially greater than that of the balloon, so that the distribution of the two rupture pressure ranges have essentially no statistical overlap.
In a method of making a balloon catheter having an elongated shaft and a balloon on a distal shaft section, a thermoplastic polymeric material having a relatively low Shore durometer hardness is melt-extruded to form a tube having a lumen and a first inner and outer diameter which are smaller than the desired final dimensions of a shaft tubular member. The method includes cooling the extruded tube to a temperature less than an elevated temperature of the melt-extrusion, and placing the extruded tube in a lumen of a capture member, and biaxially orienting the polymeric material of the extruded tube within the capture member at an elevated temperature. The tube is biaxially oriented by radially expanding the heated extruded tube with pressurized media in the tube lumen and simultaneously or sequentially axially expanding the extruded tube with a load applied on at least one end of the tube. The expanded tube is thus radially and axially expanded to a second (larger) outer and inner diameter and a second (longer) length. The second outer diameter is generally about equal to the inner diameter of the capture member, and the second inner diameter is preferably at least about 5 times larger than the first inner diameter of the extruded tube. The expanded tube is then cooled to room temperature, to produce the biaxially oriented nonporous thermoplastic polymer tubular member (hereafter, “the biaxially oriented tubular member”), which forms at least a portion of the catheter shaft.
The amount of radial expansion is selected to produce a high degree of circumferential orientation, which results in a correspondingly high rupture pressure for use as a shaft section which contains the inflation lumen therein. Thus, the method includes sealingly securing a balloon to a distal end of the biaxially oriented tubular member, such that the balloon has an interior in fluid communication with the lumen (i.e., the inflation lumen) of the biaxially oriented tubular member during catheter assembly.
By extruding a low durometer thermoplastic material to form a tube having a significantly smaller inner diameter and larger wall thickness than the required shaft tubular member, and then radially and longitudinally expanding the tube, a tubular member is provided which has a low bending stiffness but nonetheless has high rupture pressure and tensile strength. Moreover, the increased rupture pressure is not provided at the expense of other performance characteristics of the catheter. For example, although the rupture pressure of a tubular shaft can be increased by increasing the wall thickness, the corresponding decrease in the shaft inner and/or outer diameter disadvantageously increases the inflation/deflation time and the profile of the shaft.
The Shore durometer hardness of the polymeric material, and the extruded and expanded dimensions of the tubing are selected such that the resulting tubular member preferably has a Gurley bending stiffness value of not greater than about 50 to about 150 mg, a rupture pressure of at least about 25 to about 50 atm, and a tensile break load of at least about 1.0 to about 5.0 lbf. In a presently preferred embodiment, the Shore durometer hardness of the polymeric material is about 63 D, although a polymeric material having a lower or higher Shore durometer hardness can alternatively be used. Polymeric materials found useful in the invention typically have a Shore durometer hardness of about 55 D to about 75 D.
In the design of shafts for balloon catheters, extruded catheter shaft tubing is conventionally resized to a smaller diameter and wall thickness by necking the tubing using a die and mandrel. Unlike such conventional necking procedures which force the tubing through a die and thus primarily elongate the tubing with only a minimal decrease in tubing diameter and/or wall thickness, the catheter shaft tubing of the invention is highly circumferentially oriented by being radially expanded to an inner diameter significantly larger than the original (extruded) inner diameter. In one embodiment, the tubing is radially expanded to substantially the maximum amount possible (based on the polymeric material and extruded tubing dimensions), which results in expanded tubing having minimal radial growth at increasing inner pressures. Consequently, the expanded tubing has an improved controlled failure mode. In the event that the shaft tubing is over-pressurized above the rupture pressure of the shaft tubing, the expanded tubing preferably fails by rupturing with a small longitudinally extending slit and without radially expanding against the vessel wall, which thus prevents or minimizes vessel injury.
In one embodiment, the biaxially oriented tubular member is provided with a wall thickness and/or diameter that tapers along at least a section of the biaxially oriented tubular member, to thereby vary the bending stiffness therealong. In a presently preferred embodiment, the tapered section is formed during the biaxial orientation of the tube by varying an external load applied on at least one end of the extruded tube as a function of a heating nozzle position (i.e., as the heating nozzle traverses along the length of the extruded tube during the biaxial orientation expansion, the external axial load is varied, to vary the amount of axial expansion). The resulting tapered section of the biaxially oriented tubular member can have a variety of different configurations depending on factors such as the amount by which the external load is varied and whether the capture member has a tapered inner diameter. In a presently preferred embodiment, the resulting tapered section of the biaxially oriented tubular member tapers distally to a smaller outer diameter and wall thickness, but has a substantially constant inner diameter. However, a variety of suitable configurations can be used including a tapered section having a tapered inner diameter with or without a tapered outer diameter and wall thickness.
Although discussed herein primarily in terms of a tapering method in which the extruded tube is tapered by varying the external axial load during the biaxial expansion of the tube, the taper can be formed using additional or alternative methods. For example, the internal pressure used to radially expand the extruded tube during the biaxial orientation also exerts an axial force which can expand the tube in the axial direction. Therefore, varying the internal gas pressure during biaxial orientation will change the overall axial load carried by the tube's cross section and thus the total axial stress arising during biaxial orientation. Additionally, the expanded tubular member's dimensions can be modified after the biaxial expansion by radially shrinking the biaxially oriented tubular member onto a mandrel during a heat stabilization process. Depending on the shape (e.g., tapering or nontapering) of the mandrel and the biaxially oriented tubular member prior to the heat stabilization process, this radial shrinking can produce a finished part having a constant or varying inner diameter and/or outer diameter. However, radial and axial shrinkage onto a mandrel after the biaxial orientation produces a greater wall thickening in sections having greater initial clearance between the biaxially oriented tubular member and the mandrel outer diameter. Thus, in one presently preferred embodiment, the amount of shrinkage during the heat stabilization process is minimized, by heat stabilizing the biaxially oriented tubular member on a mandrel having an outer diameter profile which closely matches (i.e., little initial clearance within) the inner diameter of the as-expanded biaxially oriented tubular member.
Although a taper can be produced using various methods, a preferred embodiment produces a relatively large stiffness transition, without sacrificing the desired degree of biaxial orientation, and without a disadvantageous decrease in the inner lumen diameter. In a presently preferred embodiment, the bending stiffness of the tapered biaxially oriented tubular member varies by a factor of about 2 to about 4.5 along the length of the taper. The stiffness transition is typically provided over a relatively long length. However, the biaxially oriented tubular member can be provided with a stiffness transition due to the varying wall thickness and/or diameter which is abrupt (e.g., occurring over about 1 cm), less abrupt (e.g., occurring over a few to many centimeters), or essentially continuous (e.g., occurring over all or a substantial majority of the length of the tubular member). Generally, the tapered biaxially oriented tubular member has at least a section which has a distally tapering wall thickness and/or diameter along a length of at least about 1 cm, or about 2% of the total length of the biaxially oriented tubular member.
The tapered biaxially oriented tubular member can be used in a variety of suitable locations of a variety of catheters, although it is typically a relatively flexible distal section of the catheter shaft, with the tapered section enhancing the stiffness transition from a highly flexible distal end to a substantially more rigid proximal section of the catheter shaft. In a presently preferred embodiment, the stiffness transition of the tapered biaxially oriented tubular member eliminates the need for a separate mid-shaft section secured to the distal end of a stiff proximal section and the proximal end of a flexible distal section of the shaft. The tapered biaxially oriented tubular member thus preferably provides improved catheter deliverability without increasing the number of shaft components or complicating catheter assembly.
The invention provides a catheter shaft tubular member having an improved combination of low bending stiffness, high rupture pressure, and high tensile strength. Preferably, a catheter shaft tubular member of the invention has a low profile and high flexibility such that the catheter has excellent ability to track and to cross tight, tortuous anatomy, while having a high rupture pressure and the ability to maintain inflation lumen integrity during a medical procedure. The high rupture pressure catheter shaft assures that inadvertent over-pressurization will normally result in rupture within the balloon (and most notably even a relatively high rupture pressure balloon) at the treatment site rather than elsewhere in the patient's vasculature. Unlike conventional catheter design in which shaft sections requiring minimized profile and/or maximized lumen size are typically formed of high strength/stiffness materials to allow for the shaft to be formed with thin walls, the catheter shaft section of the invention is formed of a relatively low durometer polymeric material providing a low bending stiffness. Similarly, unlike shaft sections formed with multiple layers or reinforcements to increase the burst pressure/strength of the shaft, the catheter shaft section of the invention has relatively thin walls, for minimizing the shaft profile while maximizing the shaft lumen size, and for minimizing the shaft bending stiffness.
These and other advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description and accompanying exemplary drawings.
In the illustrated embodiment, the proximal shaft section 16 comprises a proximal tubular member 22 defining a proximal portion of the inflation lumen 20, and the distal shaft section 17 comprises a distal outer tubular member 23 defining a distal portion of the inflation lumen 20, and an inner tubular member 24 defining the guidewire lumen 21 configured to slidably receive guidewire 26 therein. As a rapid exchange type catheter, the guidewire lumen 21 extends from a distal port 27 at the distal end of the catheter to a proximal port 28 spaced distally from the proximal end of the catheter. The rapid exchange junction at the guidewire proximal port 28 is the transition between the single lumen proximal shaft section and the multilumen distal shaft section in the illustrated embodiment. Similarly, in one embodiment, the guidewire proximal port 28 is located in a midshaft section extending between and connecting the proximal tubular member 22 and the distal outer member 23. The distal shaft section is preferably more flexible than the proximal shaft section, and the proximal tubular member is therefore typically a relatively high stiffness material such as a metal or high durometer polymer. As best illustrated in
Balloon 14 is sealingly secured to the shaft such that the balloon interior is in fluid communication with the shaft inflation lumen 20. Specifically, in the illustrated embodiment, the balloon 14 has a proximal skirt section bonded to the distal end of shaft distal outer tubular member 23 and a distal skirt section bonded to the distal end of shaft inner tubular member 24. The balloon 14 is preferably formed of a polymeric material which is compatible with the material forming the outer surface of the shaft, to allow for fusion bonding, although the balloon can alternatively or additionally be adhesively bonded to the shaft. The balloon 14 is preferably a relatively high rupture pressure, non-compliant balloon, which in one embodiment has a rupture pressure of about 20 to about 30 atm, such that the balloon can be inflated in the patient during a procedure at relatively high working pressure of about 18 atm. In one embodiment, the balloon has a rated burst pressure of about 14 to about 25 atm. The rated burst pressure (RBP), calculated from the average rupture pressure, is the pressure at which 99.9% of the balloons can be pressurized to without rupturing, with 95% confidence. Generally, a balloon 14 is inflated in the patient during a procedure at working pressure of about 8 to about 18 atm.
In accordance with the invention, at least a portion of the catheter shaft 11 comprises a tubular member formed of a biaxially oriented thermoplastic polymeric material, which in the illustrated embodiment preferably is the distal outer tubular member 23 (hereafter “the biaxially oriented distal outer tubular member”) having the inflation lumen 20 therein. A catheter of the invention can have a biaxially oriented tubular member alternatively or additionally forming other sections of the catheter shaft including proximal and midshaft sections. However, unlike the proximal shaft section which is typically formed of a relatively high bending stiffness material to provide sufficient push (force transmission) for advancing the catheter in the patient's vasculature, the distal shaft section preferably has tubular members with a low bending stiffness to provide sufficient flexibility to track over a guidewire in the patient's distal tortuous vasculature.
The polymeric material of the biaxially oriented distal outer tubular member 23 is biaxially oriented by radially and longitudinally expanding an extruded tube used to form the distal outer tubular member 23, as discussed in more detail below.
The biaxially oriented distal outer tubular member 23 is formed of a relatively soft/low durometer polymeric material. The polymer preferably has a Shore durometer hardness of not greater than about 63 D to about 70 D. A variety of suitable nonporous polymeric materials can be used including polyether block amide (PEBAX) copolymers, polyurethanes, polyethylenes, and polyesters. The polymeric material can have various levels of crystallinity, and thus can be crystalline or noncrystalline. In a presently preferred embodiment, the polymer is a single polymer or copolymer (i.e., not a blend of two separate polymers). For example, a presently preferred polymer is PEBAX 63D, which has a Shore durometer hardness of about 63 D.
In a presently preferred embodiment, the distal outer tubular member 23 is a single-layered tubular member (i.e., not a multi-layered tube), formed of the biaxially oriented polymer tubing. The biaxially oriented distal outer tubular member 23 thus does not require multiple layers of different polymeric materials or reinforcements to provide the desired combination of characteristics. Additionally, unlike porous polymeric materials which are expanded during processing to produce a desired porosity, the biaxially oriented distal outer tubular member 23 is itself fluid tight (i.e., non-porous) and thus does not require a non-porous additional layer in order to hold the inflation fluid. Thus, due to the nature of the thermoplastic polymeric material, the tubular member formed therefrom is not porous, and the radial and longitudinal expansion does not render the tubular member porous. A single-layered tubular member provides ease of manufacture and avoids problems associated with multi-layered shafts such as layer delamination and thickness nonuniformities.
In the illustrated embodiment, the biaxially oriented distal outer tubular member 23 has a uniform outer diameter along the entire length of the tubular member 23. In one embodiment, the biaxially oriented distal outer tubular member 23 has an inner diameter of about 0.028 to about 0.029 inches, and an outer diameter of about 0.0325 to about 0.0335 inches along at least a section thereof. The length of the biaxially oriented distal outer tubular member 23 is typically about 15 to about 20 em.
The rupture strength of the catheter shaft is important for insuring that the balloon 14 can be inflated to the desired high pressure during a medical procedure. If the relatively low durometer polymeric material was extruded to the final (expanded) dimensions of the biaxially oriented distal outer tubular member 23, the resulting tubular member would have a rupture strength which would be significantly lower than the desired value, and, for example, which would not be significantly greater than the balloon 14 rupture pressure. In the catheter 10 of the invention, the balloon rated burst pressure is significantly less than (e.g., about 4 atm less than, or about 20% less than) that of the biaxially oriented tubular outer member 23.
The dimensions of the extruded tube 30 are set by the extrusion apparatus, and are typically not resized (e.g., hot die necked) prior to the radial and longitudinal expansion. For example, the tubular member is typically extruded by a screw extruder having a die and mandrel sized so that upon ordinary draw-down the tubular member exiting the extruder has the first outer diameter (OD1), and the first inner diameter (ID1).
In the embodiment of
The extruded tube 30 is heated to the elevated temperature within the capture member 32, which in the illustrated embodiment comprises directing heat from a heating nozzle 35 at the outer surface of the capture member 32. In a presently preferred embodiment, the heating nozzle 35 traverses along a length of the extruded tube 30, from a first end to the opposite end. Thus, the radial and longitudinal expansion is initiated with only the first end of the extruded tube 30 heated by the nozzle 35 in one embodiment. In a presently preferred embodiment, the extruded tube 30 is heated to an expansion elevated temperature which is less than the melt-extrusion elevated temperature (i.e., less than a melting temperature of the polymeric material).
The extruded tube 30 is axially expanded with a load applied on at least one end of the tube, e.g., using a vertical necking apparatus (not illustrated), and is radially expanded with pressurized media introduced into the extruded tube lumen from a pressurized media source (not illustrated) connected to one end of the extruded tube 30. Specifically, with the heating nozzle 35 heating the first end of the extruded tube 30, the heating nozzle 35 is moved toward the second end and the load is applied to the second end in the same direction as the heating nozzle movement to axially expand (i.e., stretch lengthwise) the extruded tube 30. The amount of the load required to provide the desired stretch percent depends on factors such as the tensile elongation, dimensions, material of the tubing 30, pressure of the pressurized media, and the expanded inner diameter. The pressurized media, e.g., compressed air, is at an elevated pressure sufficient to initiate the radial expansion, such that the wall hoop stress exceeds the material resistance (typically the yield stress) to stretching at the blowing temperature. The internal pressure used to radially expand the tubing 30 is typically about 400 to about 600 psi.
The extruded tube 30 is preferably simultaneously radially and axially expanded at the elevated temperature, for ease of manufacture. However, it can alternatively be sequentially expanded (i.e., first radially then longitudinally, or first longitudinally and then radially).
The tubing 30 is preferably radially expanded into contact with the inner surface of the capture member 31, to the second outer diameter which is about equal to the inner diameter of the capture member 31. The tubing 30 radially expands in all directions around the tubing circumference, resulting in circumferential orientation of the polymeric material. In a presently preferred embodiment, the second inner diameter (ID2) is at least about 5 times larger than the first inner diameter (ID1) of the extruded tube (i.e., the blow-up-ratio, BUR, of the expanded tubular member 30′ is at least about 5, and is more specifically about 5.8 to about 6). The large BUR provides a high degree of circumferential orientation, for a large increase in the rupture pressure of the tubing. In one embodiment, the tubing is radially expanded to substantially the maximum amount possible (i.e., to a BUR which is at least about 80% of the maximum BUR possible). Specifically, as the tubing radially expands, the radius increases and the tubing wall thickness decreases, which results in a rapid increase in the wall hoop stress during constant pressure blowing. If the wall hoop stress of the growing tubing exceeds the ultimate hoop strength of the material, rupture will occur. As a result, there is a limit to the BUR (i.e., a maximum attainable BUR) of a polymeric material forming the tubing. The resulting expanded tubular member 30′ exhibits little additional radial expansion at increasing internal pressures and preferably has a rupture mode consisting of a small longitudinally extending slit, for minimal vessel injury in the event of a shaft rupture. Within the working pressure range of the balloon 14, the biaxially oriented distal outer member 23 preferably has minimal radial growth, and as the pressure is increased above the rated burst pressure, the orientation preferably prevents the formation of a bulbous, highly expanded pocket along the biaxially oriented distal outer member 23 which can otherwise form as an outer member wall expands as the pressure therein approaches the rupture pressure.
Although the dimensions will vary depending upon the type of catheter and desired use of the biaxially oriented tubular member, the extruded first inner diameter (ID1) is generally about 0.004 to about 0.006 inches and the extruded first outer diameter (OD1) is generally about 0.021 to about 0.023 inches, whereas the expanded second inner diameter (ID2) is generally about 0.028 to about 0.029 inches and the expanded second outer diameter (OD2) is generally about 0.0325 to about 0.0335 inches.
The dimensions of the expanded tube 30′ are typically stabilized after the radial and longitudinal expansion using a heat stabilization process in which the expanded tube 30′ is heated for a duration at an elevated temperature sufficient to stabilize the polymeric material of the tube. In a presently preferred embodiment, the heat stabilization comprises heating the expanded tube 30′ on a mandrel which controls the amount of radial shrinkage. Specifically, the expanded tube 30′ is placed on a mandrel and reheated to a temperature above room temperature but typically below the expansion temperature to allow for radial recovery onto the mandrel and for the radial and axial dimensions to stabilize. The mandrel outer diameter is slightly smaller than the inner diameter of the expanded tubular member 30′, to allow for slidably mounting the expanded tubular member 30′ thereon. The amount of radial and axial shrinkage is relatively minimal, i.e., not greater than about 5%, and the heat stabilization preferably does not substantially decrease the rupture pressure of the tubular member. The heat stabilization temperature is typically significantly more than the polymeric glass transition temperature but less than the elevated temperature used during the radial and axial expansion. In a presently preferred embodiment, a PEBAX tubular member is heat stabilized at about 100 to about 140° C. for about 10 to about 15 minutes.
In one embodiment, the biaxial orientation of the polymer of the tubular member 30′ is substantially uniform along the entire length thereof. Thus, the extruded tube 30 is radially expanded by a substantially uniform amount along the length thereof, and is longitudinally expanded by a substantially uniform amount, to produce an expanded tube 30′ having a substantially uniform inner and outer diameter along the length thereof. For example, in the embodiment illustrated in
The final expanded dimensions (ID2, OD2) are preferably predicted and controlled during formation of the expanded tubular member 30′, to thereby provide a desired bending stiffness, rupture strength, tensile break load, and percent elongation to failure. During the radial and axial expansion, the inner diameter of the extruded tubing 30 increases due to both the internal pressure and the longitudinal stretching. Thus, extruded tubes having different wall thicknesses can be expanded to similar final expanded dimensions (ID2, OD2) using the same capture member 32 by using different stretch percentages. Moreover, significant characteristics of the resulting expanded tubular member can be tailored by selecting and controlling the nature of the extruded tube and amount of expansion. For example, the break load of the expanded tubular member can be increased by increasing the outer diameter of the starting extrusion (OD1) and correspondingly increasing the stretch percent. The elongation to failure of the expanded tubular member can be increased by increasing the elongation of the starting extrusion.
In the embodiment of
The tapered biaxially oriented distal outer tubular member 123 has a first (distal) section 130 with a uniform wall thickness and diameter, and a second (proximal) section 131 with a wall thickness and outer diameter tapering distally from the proximal end of the distal outer tubular member 123, as best illustrated in
The distal section 130 of the biaxially oriented distal outer tubular member 123 extends from the tapering proximal section 131 to the distal end of the biaxially oriented distal outer tubular member, and has a constant inner and outer diameter and a constant wall thickness along substantially its entire length (i.e., constant within normal manufacturing tolerances). The tapering proximal section 131 similarly has a constant inner diameter, such that the inner diameter is constant along the entire length of the biaxially oriented distal outer tubular member 123 in the embodiment of
The proximal end of the tapering proximal section 131 is bonded, typically by fusion and/or adhesive bonding, to the distal end of a proximally adjacent section of the shaft (e.g., to the proximal outer tubular member 122), and the tapered proximal section 131 extends distally of the bond. The tapered proximal section is generally about 2% to about 80% of the length of the tapered biaxially oriented tubular member 123 of over-the-wire catheter 110, and specifically, in the embodiment illustrated in
The taper length of a tapered biaxially oriented tubular member would typically be longer in an over-the-wire balloon catheter compared to a rapid exchange balloon catheter due at least in part to the affect of the formation of the rapid exchange notch (i.e., at proximal guidewire port 28 in the embodiment of
In a presently preferred embodiment, the catheter 110 does not have a separate midshaft outer tubular member of intermediate stiffness to transition from the relatively stiff proximal shaft section to the relatively flexible distal shaft section. Rather, the tapered section 131 of biaxially oriented outer tubular member 123 provides a sufficiently large change in bending stiffness therealong that the proximal end of the biaxially oriented distal outer member 123 is secured directly to the distal end of the relatively stiff proximal outer member 122. The bending stiffness of the tapered biaxially oriented tubular member typically decreases distally along the length of the taper by about 20% to about 80%, more preferably by about 40% to about 80% (the 80% decrease corresponding to a percent increase (proximally) of about 350%). Thus, the bending stiffness changes along an integral, one-piece tubular member (tapered biaxially oriented tubular member 123), without requiring variable reinforcements such as braids, coils, sleeves, or multiple layers along the tubular member 123 to vary the bending stiffness therealong.
In a presently preferred embodiment, in order to provide a relatively large bending stiffness change along the length of the taper, the wall thickness in addition to the diameter of the biaxially oriented tubular member varies along the length of the taper. Preferably, the wall thickness of the tapered biaxially oriented tubular member 123 increases by about 50% to about 250% proximally along the tapered section 131, and as a result the bending stiffness of tapered tubular member 123 increases proximally by at least about 65%, and more preferably about 100% to about 350%, and more specifically by about 200% to about 350% therealong. For example, in one embodiment of tapered tubular member 123 having an inner diameter of about 0.7 mm, the wall thickness along constant wall thickness section 130 is about 0.05 mm to about 0.06 mm, and the wall thickness increases to a maximum of about 0.14 mm to about 0.16 mm at the proximal end section of the tapered section 131, such that the bending stiffness increases proximally by as much as about 340% (corresponding to a decreases distally of as much as about 78%). The inner diameter of tubular member 123 is typically about 0.65 mm to about 0.75 mm.
In a method of making a tapered biaxially oriented tubular member, the extruded tube is biaxially oriented as discussed above in relation to the embodiment of
In one presently preferred embodiment, the tapered biaxially oriented tubular member is biaxially oriented in a capture member which tapers from a larger to a smaller inner diameter along at least a section of the capture member.
Preferably, the inner diameter contour of the tapered capture member corresponds to the desired expanded outer diameter profile of the tapered biaxially oriented tubular member. Thus, by increasing the inner diameter of the capture tube 132 along section 134, a biaxially oriented tubular member can be formed which has a tapered outer diameter, such as tubular member 123 of the embodiment of
The axial external weight values which are required to prepare a desired tapered biaxially oriented tubular member are predicted based on calculated axial stretch percentages and calculated total axial stress values for an extruded tube 30 of a given as-extruded inner and outer diameter. By selecting the varying external weight values applied to the tube 30, the resulting biaxially expanded tubular member can be caused to have a variety of different tapering configurations. For example, as tube 30 is expanded in the tapered capture member 132, the external weight decreases by a relatively large amount (see below Example 2) in order to provide the tapered biaxially oriented tubular member 123 of
Thus, the biaxially oriented tubular member can be provided with a variety of different tapering configurations. For example,
By varying the tension along the length to form the taper during biaxial orientation, the method of the invention facilitates localized compensation for dimensional and property variability within the original as-extruded tube 30 (i.e., adjusting for lot-to-lot material property variation).
A tapered biaxially oriented tubular member of the invention generally has a bending stiffness that decreases by the relatively large amount of a factor of about 2 to about 4 along the length of the tapering section, which is provided by varying the wall thickness and the diameter of the biaxially oriented tubular member along the length of the tapering section. The change in bending stiffness (moment of inertia) is preferably linear, or substantially linear (i.e., within normal manufacturing tolerance), and the uniform taper is specifically provided with desired dimensions at a desired location along the biaxially oriented tubular member using a method of the invention.
As discussed above in relation to the embodiment of
Thus, heat stabilization on a mandrel with a profile which closely matches the as-expanded tapered biaxially oriented tubular member's inner diameter not only provides the expected dimensional stability which comes from radial recovery of the expanded tube onto the mandrel, but also improved dimension control by avoiding inconsistencies in the as-expanded inner diameter. Specifically, the finished heat stabilized tube has tight inner diameter tolerances that match those of the heat stabilization mandrel, and outer diameters that are less variable than before the heat stabilization. For example, in one embodiment, tapered biaxially oriented tubular member 123 has an inner diameter of about 0.77+/−0.04 mm before heat stabilization, and of about 0.725+/−0.005 after heat stabilization on a mandrel.
The heat stabilization mandrel has an outer diameter that is less than the inner diameter of the tapered biaxially oriented tubular member to allow the mandrel to be slid therein, but is preferably not more than about 10% less than the inner diameter of the as-expanded (before heat stabilization) tapered biaxially oriented tubular member.
To prepare a tapered biaxially oriented tubular member according to a method of the invention, a combination of experimental and analytical methods can be used in order to predict the varying diameter/wall thickness of the resulting tapered biaxially oriented tubular member. The experimental and analytical methods take into account a number of factors such as the external axial load, capture member inner diameter, and the actual deformation behavior of the extruded tube 30 during its brief exposure to the moving heat source (nozzle 35). For example, a number of samples of extruded tubes 30 were biaxially oriented with radially expansive gas pressure and a varying external weight, and the total axial stress was calculated and the actual axial expansion was experimentally observed. The total axial stress was calculated by first calculating the total axial load, which is the sum of the external weight and the axial load due to the gas pressure within the tube 30. The axial load due to the gas pressure within the tube is based on the as-expanded inner diameter, which is calculated using the as-extruded dimensions, the as-expanded outer diameter, and the axial expansion percentage for a constant gas pressure of, e.g., 475 psig.
A second order polynomial was fit to a plot of the calculated total axial stress vs. observed axial expansion percentage, as illustrated in
To make the external axial load predictions, typically the as-extruded outer and inner diameters are selected and the target final outer and inner diameter values are identified at various locations along the length of the tubular member. The first step is then to determine the required stretch percentages at locations of interest per the following formula where OD1 and ID1 are as-extruded tube dimensions, and OD2 and ID2 are the expanded dimensions at a given location:
Stretch Percentage=100×[(OD12−ID12)/(OD22−ID22)−1] Eq. 1)
Using the calculated stretch percentage values, the associated total axial stress values (S) are then determined using the experimentally derived polynomial, where a, b, and c are the coefficients obtained from fitting a second order polynomial to experimental data (in
S(total)=a×(Stretch %)2+b×(Stretch %)+c Eq. 2)
Using the total axial stress determined via equations 1 and 2, the necessary external weight (W) at each location can be predicted using the following equation:
W=[S(total)−(P×ID22)/(OD22−ID22)]×[(3.14159/4)×(OD22−ID22)] Eq. 3)
The resulting prediction of external weight for each location of interest is then used to prepare a tapered biaxially oriented tubular member having specific, desired dimensions. In one embodiment, the production is automated by programming the predicted external weight values into a closed loop feedback-controlled tension system so that the applied external weight is controllably varied as a function of axial location (i.e., the position of the traveling heat source). Alternatively, an operator can manually adjust the applied external axial weight during the biaxial expansion process.
The following examples illustrate the formation of biaxially oriented tubular members in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
PEBAX 63D was used to extrude four sets of multiple tubing samples (N=5) having an extruded inner diameter (ID) of about 0.005 inches, and an extruded outer diameter (OD) ranging from about 0.0217 inches to about 0.0264 inches. The extruded tubing was placed inside a stainless steel capture tube having a Teflon liner with an ID of about 0.034 inches, and radially and axially expanded therein at an elevated temperature. Specifically, a vertical hot air necking apparatus was used to pressurize the tubing with pressurized air at about 500 psi and to simultaneously lengthen the tubing with an axial load pulling on one end of the tubing, while the tubing was heated within the capture tube using a heating nozzle traversing along the outside of the capture tube at a set point of about 385° F. (196° C.) (the temperature within the inner chamber of the capture tube is typically less than the set point, and depends upon factors such as the nozzle temperature set point, the nozzle speed, the nozzle air flow rate, and the capture tube materials and dimensions). The resulting biaxially oriented expanded tubular member samples had similar final dimensions of about 0.0285 inch ID and 0.033 inch OD, and a relatively high rupture pressure of not less than about 600 psi, and relatively low Gurley bending stiffness of about 102 mg or less. The average longitudinal stretch percentage, and the mean rupture pressure, Gurley bending stiffness, and tensile load of the resulting tubular member samples, following stabilization at 100° C./15 minutes on a 0.028-0.0285 inch mandrel, are given below in Table 1.
Extruding a soft material such as PEBAX 63D directly to the final dimensions (0.0285 inch ID, 0.033 inch OD) would be expected to produce a tubular member having an unacceptably low rupture and tensile strength for use as the shaft tubular member. By way of comparison, tubular members of PEBAX 72D extruded directly to the final dimensions of about 0.028 inch ID and 0.032 inch OD, and similarly stabilized at 100° C./15 min., had a Gurley Bending Stiffness of about 223.1 mg, and a mean rupture pressure of about 436 psi. It should be noted that PEBAX 72D has a higher durometer than the PEBAX 63D, so that the higher bending stiffness is to be expected. Increasing the wall thickness in a second set of PEBAX 72D comparison tubular members, which is expected to increase the rupture pressure and bending stiffness of the tubing (specifically, the tubing had extruded dimensions of about 0.031 ID and 0.037 inch OD, and was similarly stabilized at 100° C./15 min.), increased the mean rupture pressure of the comparison tubular members to about 499 psi, but also (disadvantageously) increased the Gurley Bending Stiffness to 258.6 mg. Although this bending stiffness would be expected to decrease with a lower durometer material (e.g., PEBAX 63D), a corresponding decrease in the rupture pressure, with large radial growth prior to rupture, would also be expected.
Equation 3 was used to predict the external weight values required to make a variable outer diameter, constant inner diameter tubular member such as the tapered biaxially oriented tubular member 123 of
The as-expanded outer diameter set forth in Table 2 is the result of a capture member, such as tapered capture member 132, having an inner diameter contoured to correspond to the desired expanded outer diameter of the biaxially oriented tubular member. The as-expanded inner diameter is to be held constant over the entire length by controllably varying the external weight. The predicted external weight is diminished from approximately 560 grams to approximately 107 grams, and the predicted diminishment of weight is nearly linear. As a result, the actual weight decline could be made linear with minimal impact on the resulting dimensions of the tapered section of the tubular member.
To make a variable outer diameter, variable inner diameter, constant wall thickness tubular member such as the tapered biaxially oriented tubular member 135 of
The bending moment of inertia (I) can be calculated using the engineering formula for a hollow cylindrical beam, I=(3.14159/64).times.(OD24−ID24).
Thus, as illustrated in
While the present invention is described herein in terms of certain preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that various modifications and improvements may be made to the invention without departing from the scope thereof. Moreover, although individual features of one embodiment of the invention may be discussed herein or shown in the drawings of the one embodiment and not in other embodiments, it should be apparent that individual features of one embodiment may be combined with one or more features of another embodiment or features from a plurality of embodiments.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 13/775,659, filed Feb. 25, 2013, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 11/763,623, filed Jun. 15, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,738, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/480,143, filed Jun. 30, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,906,066, the contents of each of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4425919 | Alston et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
| 4563181 | Wijayarathna et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4596563 | Pande | Jun 1986 | A |
| 4775371 | Mueller, Jr. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4820349 | Saab | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4877031 | Conway et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4886506 | Lovgren et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4892519 | Songer et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4952357 | Euteneuer | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4955895 | Sugiyama et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
| 4960410 | Pinchuck | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4976720 | Machold et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4994047 | Walker et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5047045 | Arney et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5061273 | Yock | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5078702 | Pomeranz | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5085649 | Flynn et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5112304 | Barlow et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5156594 | Keith | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5176661 | Evard et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5195969 | Wang et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5205822 | Johnson et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5207700 | Euteneuer | May 1993 | A |
| 5217434 | Arney | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5217482 | Keith | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5250059 | Andreas et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5270086 | Hamlin | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5277199 | DeBois et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5290232 | Johnson et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5290306 | Trotta et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5300025 | Wantink | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5304134 | Kraus et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5312430 | Rosenbluth et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5318032 | Lonsbury et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5318526 | Cohen | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5334146 | Ozasa | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5342386 | Trotta | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5358486 | Saab | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5364357 | Aase | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5370616 | Keith et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5378238 | Peters et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5395336 | Barclay et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5425712 | Goodin | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5447497 | Sogard et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5451233 | Yock | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5454789 | Burns et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5470315 | Adams | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5476477 | Bums | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5478320 | Trotta | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5484409 | Atkinson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5490837 | Blaeser et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5496275 | Sirhan et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5499980 | Euteneuer | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5507766 | Kugo et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5512051 | Wang et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5526823 | Wheeler | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5538510 | Fontirroche et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538513 | Okajima | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5545134 | Hilaire et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5549552 | Peters et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5554121 | Ainsworth et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5556383 | Wang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5569195 | Saab | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5587125 | Roychowdhury | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5599326 | Carter | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5613979 | Trotta et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5620649 | Trotta | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5622665 | Wang | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5632760 | Sheiban et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5643209 | Fugoso et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658264 | Samson | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5690613 | Verbeek | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5728063 | Preissman et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5743874 | Fischell et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5743875 | Sirhan et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5749849 | Engelson et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5755690 | Saab | May 1998 | A |
| 5759173 | Preissmann et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766151 | Valley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5769817 | Burgmeier | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5769819 | Schwab et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5775327 | Randolph et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5779731 | Leavitt | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5782811 | Samson et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5791036 | Goodin et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5792124 | Horrigan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5792144 | Fischell et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5795325 | Valley et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5795341 | Samson | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5797887 | Rosen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5814016 | Valley et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5820594 | Fontirroche et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5833657 | Reinhardt et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5853400 | Samson | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5879369 | Ishida | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5879499 | Corvi | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5902290 | Peacock et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5908406 | Ostapchenko et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5911715 | Berg et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5916193 | Stevens et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5947939 | Mortier et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5964778 | Fugoso et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5989218 | Wasicek | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6004289 | Saab | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6004339 | Wijay | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6010521 | Lee et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021340 | Randolph et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6024693 | Schock et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6024722 | Rau et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6027510 | Alt | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6036670 | Wijeratne et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6056719 | Mickley | May 2000 | A |
| 6059751 | Ostapchenko et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6059770 | Peacock et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6071266 | Kelley | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6086556 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6102890 | Stivland et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6124007 | Wang et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6132824 | Hamlin | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6136258 | Wang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6146356 | Wang et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6165166 | Samuelson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165195 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6168588 | Wilson | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171275 | Webster, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6171278 | Wang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6179810 | Wantik et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6179856 | Barbere | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6193686 | Estrada et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6197015 | Wilson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6210396 | MacDonald et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6217547 | Lee | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6217565 | Cohen | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6242063 | Ferrera et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6245053 | Benjamin | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6251093 | Valley et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6264683 | Stack et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6265016 | Hostettler et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6306097 | Park et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6306124 | Jones et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6308342 | Qi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6358227 | Ferrera et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6364894 | Healy et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6402720 | Miller et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6416494 | Wilkins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6482348 | Wang | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6495090 | Wilkins et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6495127 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6500148 | Pinchuk et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6508784 | Shu | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6530938 | Lee et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6548010 | Stivland et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6575934 | Duchamp | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6575958 | Happ et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6579259 | Stevens et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6585687 | Shkolnik | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6585688 | Ferrera et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6589207 | El-Nounou | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6589226 | Owens | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6591472 | Noone et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6620127 | Lee et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6620128 | Simhambhatla | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6626889 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6629961 | Israelsson et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6645422 | Jung, Jr. et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6648854 | Patterson et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6663614 | Carter et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6673291 | Field et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6673302 | Wang et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6695809 | Lee | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6702802 | Hancock et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6718211 | Smits et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6733487 | Keith et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6756094 | Wang et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6777644 | Peacock et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6793647 | Cryer | Sep 2004 | B1 |
| 6796958 | Chen et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6796960 | Cioanta et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6835189 | Musbach et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6837890 | Chiudzinski | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6863678 | Lee et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6875197 | Simhambhatia et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6887219 | Wantik et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6890395 | Simhanbhatia | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6893456 | Lumauig | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6911038 | Mertens et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6913600 | Valley et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6918920 | Wang et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6946092 | Bertolino et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6951555 | Suresh | Oct 2005 | B1 |
| 6951675 | Chin et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6979342 | Lee et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7026026 | Ferrera et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7029732 | Wang et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7037291 | Lee et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7037295 | Tiernan et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7074206 | Lee et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7108877 | Blair et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7112357 | Miller et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7141059 | Duchamp et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7147817 | Lim et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7163523 | Devens, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7195638 | Sridharan | Mar 2007 | B1 |
| 7273485 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7335185 | Tang et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7341571 | Harris et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7556634 | Lee et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7662130 | Lee et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7828766 | Durcan | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7833193 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7906066 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7947059 | Chin et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8012300 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8052638 | Lee et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8070719 | Lee et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8382738 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
| 8388602 | Simpson et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8403885 | Arana et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
| 8444608 | Haslinger et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8721624 | Wilson et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 20010001812 | Valley et al. | May 2001 | A1 |
| 20010016702 | Benjamin | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010029362 | Sirhhan et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010037085 | Keith et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020018866 | Lee et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020072755 | Bigus et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020082637 | Lumauig | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020165523 | Chin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009151 | Wang | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030028234 | Miller et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030032920 | Wantik | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030055447 | Lee et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030105426 | Jorgensen | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125712 | Zhou | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030139762 | Lee | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20040059291 | McDonnell et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059292 | Hisamatsu et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040064130 | Carter | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040068240 | Goodin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040087901 | Rice et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097892 | Evans et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040131808 | Schoenie et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167441 | Reynolds et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170782 | Wang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040173935 | Lim et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040181206 | Chiu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040191443 | Hamlin | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040215141 | Clarke et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267195 | Currlin | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040267280 | Nishide et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050015048 | Chiu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050043679 | Devens et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050124976 | Devens et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050131445 | Holman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050148997 | Valley et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050154414 | Perreault et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050186370 | Hamilton et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050228429 | Burgmeier et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050238833 | Wang et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050277878 | Lee | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060008606 | Horn et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060136032 | Legarda et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060165926 | Weber | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060175739 | Hession et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060282041 | Melsheimer et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070060863 | Goeken et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070142771 | Durcan | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070167973 | Stupecky et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070191813 | Chen | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070240817 | Strong et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260177 | Warnack | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080045895 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080045928 | Simpson et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080065188 | Pallazza | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080262470 | Lee et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090005754 | Soertermans | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090156998 | Arana et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090247946 | Lee et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090264822 | Johnson | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20100010439 | Burgmeier et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100130925 | Haslinger et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20110315301 | Simpson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120065586 | Lee et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120143129 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120296273 | Arana et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130160932 | Simpson et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130178795 | Wilson et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130253425 | Haslinger et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20140081310 | Lee et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140163466 | Arana et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 277 368 | Aug 1988 | EP |
| 0 414 350 | Feb 1991 | EP |
| 0 420 488 | Mar 1991 | EP |
| 0 737 487 | Oct 1996 | EP |
| 0 821 979 | Feb 1998 | EP |
| 0 904 795 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 0 931 558 | Jul 1999 | EP |
| 0 962 227 | Dec 1999 | EP |
| 1 103 280 | May 2001 | EP |
| 1 287 846 | Mar 2003 | EP |
| 10-290837 | Nov 1998 | JP |
| 2001-018290 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2001-353225 | Dec 2001 | JP |
| 2005-167638 | Jun 2005 | JP |
| WO 1989002763 | Apr 1989 | WO |
| WO 1993020882 | Oct 1993 | WO |
| WO 1995018647 | Jul 1995 | WO |
| WO 1996003175 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| WO 1996034646 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| WO 1997026027 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO 199913924 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO 2001034240 | May 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001051115 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001089621 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 2002036194 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002036196 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 2003004248 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 2005021083 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006126311 | Nov 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007054364 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007146572 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2010141765 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,581, Aug. 5, 2015 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Jan. 16, 2014 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Mar. 17, 2014 Response after Final Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Apr. 10, 2014 Applicant Initiated Interview Summary. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, May 16, 2014 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Jul. 1, 2015 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Oct. 1, 2015 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,917, Dec. 10, 2014 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,917, Mar. 2, 2015 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,917, Mar. 25, 2015 Issue Fee Payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,699, Mar. 31, 2014 Issue Fee Payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,659, Jan. 26, 2015 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,659, Feb. 17, 2015 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,659, May 12, 2015 Issue Fee Payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,550, Apr. 13, 2015 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,550, Aug. 17, 2015 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/324,425 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,070,719), filed Nov. 26, 2008 (Dec. 6, 2011). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,929 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,444,608), filed Jun. 5, 2009 (May 21, 2013). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,143 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,906,066), filed Jun. 30, 2006 (Mar. 15, 2011). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,382,738), filed Jun. 15, 2007 (Feb. 26, 2013). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,178 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,388,602), filed Feb. 16, 2012 (Mar. 5, 2013). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,403,885), filed Dec. 17, 2007 (Mar. 26, 2013). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/479,700 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,052,638), filed Jun. 5, 2009 (Nov. 8, 2011). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/240,453 (US 2012/0065586), filed Sep. 22, 2011 (Mar. 15, 2012). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/957,526 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,863,678), filed Sep. 19, 2001 (Mar. 8, 2005). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695 (US 2009/0247946), filed Jun. 3, 2009 (Oct. 1, 2009). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/392,697 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,273,485), filed Mar. 20, 2003 (Sep. 25, 2007). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,917 (US 2011/0315301), filed Sep. 2, 2011 (Dec. 29, 2011). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,037,291), filed Dec. 4, 2001 (May 2, 2006). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/687,265 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,833,193), filed Jan. 14, 2010 (Nov. 16, 2010). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/562,810 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,657,782), filed Jul. 31, 2012 (Feb. 25, 2014). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/038,971 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,556,634), filed Jan. 18, 2005 (Jul. 7, 2009). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/196,134 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,662,130), filed Aug. 2, 2005 (Feb. 16, 2010). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,117 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,012,300), filed Aug. 23, 2007 (Sep. 6, 2011). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,699 (US 2013/0178795), filed Feb. 25, 2013 (Jul. 11, 2013). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,659 (US 2013/0160932), filed Feb. 25, 2013 (Jun. 27, 2013). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/898,027 (US 2013/0253425), filed May 20, 2013 (Sep. 26, 2013). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/083,821 (US 2014/0081310), filed Nov. 19, 2013 (Mar. 20, 2014). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,550 (US 2014/0163466), filed Feb. 14, 2014 (Jun. 12, 2014). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,581 (US 2014/0213967), filed Mar. 31, 2014 (Jul. 31, 2014). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/324,425, Oct. 31, 2011 Amendment after Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/324,425, Sep. 22, 2011 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/324,425, Aug. 31, 2011 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/324,425, Jun. 6, 2011 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/324,425, Mar. 4, 2011 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,143, Feb. 3, 2011 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,143, Nov. 18, 2010 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,143, Aug. 23, 2010 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,143, Apr. 22, 2010 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,143, Feb. 18, 2010 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,143, Feb. 4, 2010 Advisory Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,143, Jan. 15, 2010 Response to Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,143, Aug. 18, 2009 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,143, May 27, 2009 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,143, Jan. 27, 2009 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,143, Oct. 28, 2008 Response to Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/480,143, Oct. 17, 2008 Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Jan. 29, 2013 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Oct. 29, 2012 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Oct. 17, 2012 Applicant Initiated Interview Summary. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Oct. 21, 2010 Examiner Interview Summary. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Aug. 24, 2010 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, May 24, 2010 Notice of Appeal. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Feb. 23, 2010 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Jan. 15, 2010 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Oct. 15, 2009 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Jul. 20, 2009 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Mar. 20, 2009 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Mar. 3, 2009 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Dec. 3, 2008 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Oct. 2, 2008 Response to Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/763,623, Sep. 25, 2008 Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,178, Jan. 25, 2013 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,178, Oct. 25, 2012 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/398,178, Oct. 16, 2012 Preliminary Amendment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106, May 21, 2013 Certificate of Correction. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106, Feb. 20, 2013 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106, Nov. 20, 2013 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106, Oct. 23, 2012 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106, Aug. 1, 2012 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106, May 29, 2012 Response to Notice of Non-Compliant. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106, May 17, 2012 Notice of Non-Compliant. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106, May 7, 2012 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106, Jan. 6, 2012 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106, Jun. 17, 2010 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106, Mar. 17, 2010 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106, Jan. 8, 2010 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/958,106, Jul. 8, 2009 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/479,700, Sep. 22, 2011 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/479,700, Aug. 22, 2011 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/479,700, May 20, 2011 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/479,700, May 13, 2011 Examiner Interview Summary. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/479,700, Apr. 27, 2011 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/479,700, Oct. 24, 2010 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/479,700, Oct. 14, 2010 Response to Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/479,700, Oct. 4, 2010 Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/240,453, Nov. 19, 2013 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/240,453, Aug. 20, 2013 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/240,453, Apr. 30, 2013 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/240,453, Apr. 17, 2013 Applicant Initiated Interview Summary. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/240,453, Dec. 5, 2012 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/240,453, Nov. 1, 2012 Response to Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/240,453, Oct. 2, 2012 Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/957,526, Jun. 6, 2006 Certificate of Correction. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/957,526, Jan. 24, 2005 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/957,526, Nov. 4, 2004 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/957,526, Sep. 21, 2004 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/957,526, Jul. 1, 2004 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/957,526, Apr. 22, 2004 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/957,526, Feb. 17, 2004 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/957,526, Nov. 26, 2003 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 09/957,526, Jun. 23, 2003 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Sep. 20, 2013 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Jun. 20, 2013 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Jan. 15, 2013 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Oct. 24, 2012 Advisory Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Oct. 11, 2012 Response to Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Aug. 15, 2012 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Apr. 16, 2012 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Dec. 16, 2011 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/392,697, Aug. 22, 2007 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/392,697, May 31, 2007 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/392,697, Feb. 26, 2007 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/392,697, Jan. 5, 2007 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/392,697, Sep. 29, 2006 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/392,697, Jul. 13, 2006 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/392,697, May 1, 2006 Response to Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/392,697, Mar. 27, 2006 Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,917, Sep. 12, 2013 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,917, Sep. 11, 2014 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,917, Aug. 23, 2013 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,917, May 28, 2013 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,917, Dec. 13, 2013 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,917, Jan. 14, 2013 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/224,917, Oct. 12, 2012 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Mar. 6, 2006 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Feb. 9, 2006 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Dec. 27, 2005 Response to Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Oct. 19, 2005 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Aug. 4, 2005 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, May 6, 2005 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Feb. 4, 2005 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Dec. 2, 2004 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Aug. 9, 2004 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Jun. 16, 2004 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Mar. 22, 2004 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Dec. 31, 2003 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Oct. 14, 2003 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Jul. 7, 2003 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Apr. 18, 2003 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Jan. 15, 2003 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Dec. 17, 2002 Response to Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 10/010,212, Nov. 25, 2002 Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/687,265, Oct. 14, 2010 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/687,265, Aug. 5, 2010 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/562,810, Nov. 6, 2013 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/562,810, Oct. 8, 2013 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/562,810, Jul. 8, 2013 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/038,971, May 29, 2009 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/038,971, Mar. 13, 2009 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/038,971, Sep. 19, 2008 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/038,971, Jul. 29, 2008 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/038,971, Feb. 28, 2008 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/038,971, Nov. 28, 2007 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/038,971, Sep. 18, 2007 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/038,971, Jun. 28, 2007 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/038,971, Apr. 12, 2007 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/038,971, Feb. 16, 2007 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/038,971, Nov. 13, 2006 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/038,971, Sep. 21, 2006 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/196,134, Dec. 29, 2009 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/196,134, Sep. 30, 2009 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/196,134, Sep. 10, 2009 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/196,134, Jun. 10, 2009 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/196,134, Mar. 24, 2009 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/196,134, Dec. 24, 2008 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,117, Aug. 2, 2011 Issue Fee payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,117, Jun. 15, 2011 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,117, Mar. 23, 2011 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,117, Nov. 23, 2010 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,117, Nov. 17, 2010 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,117, Aug. 17, 2010 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,117, Jun. 30, 2010 Response to Notice of Non-Compliant. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,117, Jun. 23, 2010 Notice of Non-Compliant. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,117, Jun. 17, 2010 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,117, Mar. 17, 2010 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,117, Jan. 5, 2010 Response to Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 11/844,117, Oct. 13, 2009 Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,699, Dec. 31, 2013 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,699, Oct. 28, 2013 Response to Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,699, Sep. 27, 2013 Restriction Requirement. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/775,659, Oct. 24, 2014 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,550, Jan. 13, 2015 Non-Final Office Action. |
| Cordis' Product Brochure; The Journey Inspires the Design, AQUA T3, Dec. 2002. |
| The Manufacturing Process Section of the Phelps Dodge High Performance Conductors Brochure, a Primer on Polymide Tubing, p. 1. (No date available). |
| http://www.zeusinc.com/peek_resin.asp. Retrieved Jun. 10, 2014. |
| www.sigmaaldrich.com/img/assets/3990/Thermal_Transitions_of_Homopolymers.pdf. (No date available). |
| Etherington & Roberts Dictionary, http://Palimpsest.stanford.edu/don/dt/dt1549.html. Retrieved Jan. 9, 2003. |
| Polymers: Structure and Properties, C.A. Daniels, Ph.D., P.E.; Technomic Publishing Co., Inc. (No date available). |
| International Search Report for PCT/US2010/037313, dated Apr. 28, 2011. |
| International Search Report for PCT/US2007/071873, dated Apr. 14, 2008. |
| International Search Report for PCT/US2008/086270, dated Jun. 3, 2009. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/950,414 (US 2016/0074636), filed Nov. 24, 2015 (Mar. 17, 2016). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/176,297, filed Jun. 8, 2016. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Jun. 21, 2016 Amendment and Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Apr. 21, 2016 Response after Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/477,695, Jan. 21, 2016 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,929, Apr. 18, 2013 Issue Fee Payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,929, Jan. 18, 2013 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,929, Sep. 24, 2012 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,929, Jun. 22, 2012 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,929, Jul. 18, 2011 Request for Continued Examination (RCE). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,929, Jun. 6, 2011 Response after Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,929, Mar. 4, 2011 Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,929, Dec. 9, 2010 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/478,929, Jul. 9, 2010 Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/562,810, Jan. 9, 2014 Issue Fee Payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/898,027, Jun. 8, 2016 Issue Fee Payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 13/898,027, Mar. 21, 2016 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/083,821, Aug. 18, 2016 Restriction Requirement Filed. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/180,550, Nov. 17, 2015 Issue Fee Payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/230,581, Nov. 5, 2015 Issue Fee Payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/950,414, Sep. 14, 2016 Issue Fee Payment. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/950,414, Jun. 15, 2016 Notice of Allowance. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/950,414, May 6, 2016 Response to Non-Final Office Action. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 14/950,414, Feb. 8, 2016 Non-Final Office Action. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20150238737 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13775659 | Feb 2013 | US |
| Child | 14710212 | US | |
| Parent | 11763623 | Jun 2007 | US |
| Child | 13775659 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11480143 | Jun 2006 | US |
| Child | 11763623 | US |
