Claims
- 1. A characteristic evaluation method for insulated gate type transistors, comprising:a) preparing at least two insulated gate type transistors including first and second insulated gate type transistors that differ from each other only in mask channel width; b) extracting a threshold voltage of said first transistor that has a mask channel width larger than that of said second transistor, estimating a threshold voltage of said second transistor, and employing a value of the estimated threshold voltage as a first estimated value; c) when a difference between a gate voltage of said first transistor and said extracted threshold voltage of said first transistor is defined as a first gate overdrive, a difference between a gate voltage of said second transistor and said first estimated value is defined as a second gate overdrive, (i) under a condition that said first and second gate overdrives are equal in an X-Y plane whose X-axis is said mask channel width and Y-axis is source-drain conductance, extracting a virtual point at which a change in Y coordinate value is estimated to be approximately zero even if said first and second gate overdrives are finely changed, from points on a straight line passing through a first point whose X coordinate is said mask channel width of said first transistor and Y coordinate is said source-drain resistance of said second transistor, and a second point whose X coordinate is said mask channel width of said second transistor and Y coordinate is said source-drain resistance of said first transistor, (ii) defining values of the X coordinate and Y coordinate at said virtual points as second and third estimated values, respectively, and (iii) extracting a slope of said straight line at said virtual points and employing a value of the extracted slope as a fourth estimated value; d) repeating said step c) while varying said first estimated value; e) after said steps c) and d), determining a true threshold voltage of said second transistor by using said first to fourth estimated values; and f) determining a difference between said mask channel width and an effective channel width, based on said true thrreshold voltage.
- 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said step e) comprises: (i) finding, from said second to fourth estimated values, optimum second to fourth estimated values with which a change of said third estimated value is equal to a product of a change of said second estimated value and said fourth estimated value, in reply to fine changes of said first and second gate overdrives; (ii) determining an optimum first estimated value that corresponds to said optimum second to fourth estimated values; and (iii) determining the true threshold voltage of said second transistor, based on said optimum first estimated value.
- 3. The method of claim 2, wherein in said step e), said optimum second to fourth estimated values are determined from a relational expression: F(δ,VgtWi)=h2(δ,VgtWi)h′(δ,VgtWi)·dW**′(δ,VgtWi)-R#(δ,VgtWi)where δ is a difference between the first estimated value and the threshold voltage of said first transistor; VgtWi is said first gate overdrive; dW** is a value of an X intercept that is obtained by extrapolating said straight line; h is said slope of said straight line; R# is a Y coordinate value at said virtual point; and a prime is the first-order differentiation of VgtWi.
- 4. The method of claim 2, wherein in said step e), said optimum second to fourth estimated values are determined from a relational expression: F(δ,VgtWi)= R**(δ,VgtWi)-h(δ,VgtWi)h′(δ,VgtWi)·R**′(δ,VgtWi)- R#(δ,VgtWi)where δ is a difference between the first estimated value and the threshold voltage of said first transistor; VgtWi is said first gate overdrive; R** is a value of a Y intercept that is obtained by extrapolating said straight line; h is said slope of said straight line; R# is a Y coordinate value at said virtual point; and a prime is the first-order differentiation of VgtWi.
- 5. The method of claim 2, wherein in said step e), said optimum second to fourth estimated values are determined from a relational expression: F(δ,VgtWi)=R**′(δ,VgtWi)h′(δ,VgtWi)+DW#(δ,VgtWi)where δ is a difference between the first estimated value and the threshold voltage of said first transistor; VgtWi is said first gate overdrive; R** is a value of a Y intercept that is obtained by extrapolating said straight line; h is said slope of said straight line; DW# is an X coordinate value at said virtual point; and a prime is the first-order differentiation of VgtWi.
- 6. The method of claim 2, wherein in said step e), said optimum second to fourth estimated values are determined from a relational expression: F(δ,VgtWi)= dW**(δ,VgtWi)+h(δ,VgtWi)h′(δ,VgtWi)·dW**′(δ,VgtWi)- DW#(δ,VgtWi)where δ is a difference between the first estimated value and the threshold voltage of said first transistor; VgtWi is said first gate overdrive; dW** is a value of an X intercept that is obtained by extrapolating said straight line; h is said slope of said straight line; DW# is an X coordinate value at said virtual point; and a prime is a first-order differentiation of VgtWi.
- 7. The method of claim 1, wherein said step e) comprises: (i) finding, an optimum first estimated value with which a characteristic curve exhibiting the relationship between said second gate overdrive and said second estimated value has a predetermined shape in a predetermined range of said second gate overdrive in an X-Y plane whose X-axis is said second gate overdrive and Y-axis is said second estimated value; and (ii) determining the true threshold voltage of said second transistor, based on said optimum first estimated value.
- 8. The method of claim 7, wherein said step e) comprises estimating an optimum characteristic curve with which said second estimated value is best converged on a fixed value in said predetermined range, from said characteristic curve in plural.
- 9. The method of claim 1, wherein in said step f), a difference between said mask channel width and an effective channel width is determined from said second estimated value when said gate overdrive is in a vicinity of 0 V.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
P10-239148 |
Aug 1998 |
JP |
|
Parent Case Info
This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/714,148, filed Nov. 17, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,373,274 which is a continuation of Ser. No. 09/249,139, filed Feb. 12, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,169,415.
US Referenced Citations (4)
Number |
Name |
Date |
Kind |
5646870 |
Krivokapic et al. |
Jul 1997 |
A |
5838164 |
Chen |
Nov 1998 |
A |
6107108 |
Chen et al. |
Aug 2000 |
A |
6407573 |
Yamaguchi et al. |
Jun 2002 |
B1 |
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry |
U.S. patent application No. 10/093,933, filed Mar. 11, 2002, pending. |
Continuations (2)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
09/714148 |
Nov 2000 |
US |
Child |
10/093933 |
|
US |
Parent |
09/249139 |
Feb 1999 |
US |
Child |
09/714148 |
|
US |