Charged particle beam microscope with minicolumn

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6740889
  • Patent Number
    6,740,889
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 28, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 25, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A charged particle beam microscope is described, which is equipped with a minicolumn. Various embodiments are disclosed, suitable for various uses. According to one embodiment the minicolumn is situated inside a mini-environment and can be introduced into and withdrawn from the main vacuum chamber. According to other embodiments, the minicolumn is situated inside the main vacuum chamber. According to further embodiments, a turntable stage is used and the minicolumn is attached to an arm movable in the radial direction of the turntable.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The invention relates to charged particle beam microscopes and, particularly, to arrangements for equipping such a microscope with a minicolumn.




2. Discussion of Related Art




Charged particle beam microscopes, such as an electron microscope, are well known in the art, and are widely used during the manufacture of semiconductor wafers. For ease of discussion, the remaining disclosure makes reference to electrons as the charged particles; however, it should be appreciated that the discussion is equally applicable to other charged particles. The elements of a conventional electron microscope which are of particular relevance here are depicted in FIG.


1


. Specifically, a vacuum chamber


10


houses an x-y stage


20


upon which the wafer


40


is placed by a robot (not shown). The chamber


10


is evacuated via outlet


70


. The wafer


40


is introduced into the chamber


10


via a load lock


30


so as to avoid having to evacuate the chamber


10


each time a wafer is loaded.




An electron column


50


is hermetically attached to the chamber


10


. The column


50


houses the electron source and all the necessary electron optics (not shown). The column


50


is evacuated via outlet


60


. The diameter of a conventional column is roughly 6-10 inches, while its height is roughly 15-30 inches. The conventional column is capable of providing an electron beam of sufficiently small diameter for wafer and reticle inspection, review and metrology.




One disadvantage of the prior art design is that whenever the column requires a repair which necessitates its removal from the chamber or breaking the vacuum in the column, the vacuum of the chamber is also broken. Breaking the vacuum in the chamber necessarily means that the microscope will be out of service for several hours. Another disadvantage is the requirement for separate vacuum systems for the column and the chamber, which increases the complexity and price of the system, while adversely affecting its reliability and stability.




Recently, a new type of column has been developed, and is generally referred to as a “minicolumn.” A cross section of a minicolumn investigated by the current inventors is depicted in FIG.


2


. In

FIG. 2

, element


200


is the electron source (preferably a Schottky emitter),


210


is an aperture (suppressor), and


220


generally designates the lens arrangement. More specifically, lens arrangement


220


comprises three lenses


230


made of a conductive material and insulating spacers


240


interposed between the lenses


230


. Ordered from the emitter, the lenses


230


comprise an extraction lens, a focusing lens, and an acceleration lens, respectively.




Notably, the diameter and height of such a column is measured in single-digit centimeters. More specifically, the diameter of the lens arrangement depicted in

FIG. 2

is on the order of 3 centimeters, while its height is on the order of 1 centimeter. While this column is remarkably smaller than the conventional column, it provides an electron beam which has small diameter and was determined by the present inventors to be suitable for use in electron microscopes. Further information regarding the study of the minicolumn is presented in F. Burstert, D. Winkler and B. Lischke, Microelectronic Engineering 31 (1996) 95; and in Miniature Electrostatic Lens for Generation of a Low-Voltage High Current Electron Probe, C. D. Bubeck, A.; Fleischmann, G. Knell, R. Y. Lutsch, E. Plies and D. Winkler, Proceedings of the. Charged Particle Optics Conference, Apr. 14-17, 1998.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Accordingly, the present invention provides arrangements for installing minicolumns onto a charged particle microscope, especially electron microscopes, to while providing synergistic advantages over the prior art column arrangement. That is, the disclosed arrangements provide advantages in addition to the advantages of the minicolumn per se.




According to one set of embodiments of the invention, a second load lock is provided on the microscopes vacuum chamber. The second load lock is used to introduce the minicolumn into the chamber without having to break the vacuum in the chamber. Thus, a technician can replace the minicolumn without having to break the vacuum in the chamber.




According to another set of embodiments, the minicolumn is situated inside the microscope's vacuum chamber. While this arrangement necessitates breaking the vacuum for each minicolumn service, is still advantageous in that here is no need for separate vacuum system for the column. This is advantageous especially if more than one minicolumn is used inside the chamber.




Another advantage of the invention is that it provides arrangements for more than one minicolumn per microscope. This arrangement is especially advantageous for taking multiple perspectives simultaneously or for increasing the throughput.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

depicts relevant elements of a conventional electron microscope.





FIG. 2

depicts a lens arrangement of a minicolumn investigated by the present inventors.





FIG. 3A

depicts an embodiment of an isolation valve arrangement in a closed position, while

FIG. 3B

depicts the arrangement of

FIG. 3A

in an open position.





FIG. 4A

depicts another embodiment of an isolation valve in a closed position, and

FIG. 4B

depicts the embodiment of

FIG. 4A

in an open position.





FIG. 5A

depicts an embodiment of a minicolumn within the microscope chamber, while

FIG. 5B

depicts an embodiment of a plurality of minicolumns arranged inside the chamber, at different angles.





FIGS. 6A and 6B

depict embodiment using a turntable stage for reduced footprint.





FIG. 7A

depicts an arrangement of an arm having a plurality of minicolumns situated at different angles advantageous for defect review, while

FIG. 7B

depicts an arm having a plurality of minicolumns at a single angle advantageous for sector-wise inspection.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIGS. 3A and 3B

depict a first embodiment of an isolation valve for the minicolumn


300


Specifically, the vacuum chamber


310


is equipped with a valve


320


capable of hermetically sealing chamber


320


in the closed position. Minicolumn


300


is positioned inside a mini-environment chamber


330


, which can be evacuated via outlet


335


. In the exemplified embodiment, the mini-environment chamber


330


has collapsible walls


340


, which are actuated by bellows


345


. However, it should be appreciated that other solutions having rigid walls with means for elevating and lowering the columns are also workable.




During maintenance, the mini-environment chamber


330


is in its closed position. In the closed position, exemplified in

FIG. 3A

, the bellows


345


are extended so as to raise the walls


340


to upright position. In this upright position, the minicolumn is extruded from the chamber


310


and valve


320


is closed to maintain the vacuum level inside the chamber


310


. When maintenance is completed, the mini-environment chamber


330


can be evacuated via outlet


335


and, when the evacuation is completed, the valve


320


can be opened and the minicolumn lowered to the chamber


310


.




Specifically,

FIG. 3B

exemplifies the situation during operation of the microscope. When the mini-environment chamber


330


has been evacuated and the valve


320


opened, the bellows collapse the walls


340


so as to introduce the minicolumn into the chamber


310


, close to the stage


315


. Unless the minicolumn malfunctions, there is not need to revert to the position shown in

FIG. 3A

, and the microscope can be maintained in the position shown in FIG.


3


B. However, if the minicolumn requires maintenance or replacement, the bellows


345


are extended to raise the walls


340


and extrude the minicolumn


300


from chamber


310


; the valve


320


is closed; and the mini-environment chamber


330


is brought to atmospheric pressure via outlet


335


.




Another embodiment for isolation valve is depicted in

FIGS. 4A and 4B

. Minicolumn


400


is situated inside a mini-environment chamber


430


that is open at its bottom to chamber


410


. Mini-environment chamber


430


has an outlet


435


which, in this example, is connected to the outlet


445


via vacuum valve


440


. Thus, mini-environment chamber


430


and chamber


410


can be connected to the same vacuum pump (not shown). However, it should be appreciated that outlet


435


can be connected independently to a separate vacuum pump. Isolation valve


450


is pivoted on shaft


455


, which is capable of elevation motion, i.e., in the Z direction.




During operation (depicted in FIG.


4


B), isolation valve


450


is swiveled away from the opening of mini-environment chamber


430


, and the shaft


455


is in its upper-most position so as to place the isolation valve


450


out of the working area of the microscope. Preferably, stage


415


is equipped with actuators for Z motion so that during operation the distance between the minicolumn and the specimen can be adjusted for proper imaging. Such stages are well known in the art and will not be described here. If the outlet arrangement depicted in

FIG. 3B

is used, then during operation valve


440


can be maintained open so that vacuum pump operation maintains vacuum in both chambers


410


and


430


.




When access to the minicolumn is required, the stage is lowered and the valve


450


is brought to its close position. For that operation, preferably the shaft


455


is lowered to its lowest position, the valve


450


is swiveled to its closed position and the shaft


455


is elevated sufficiently to cause an hermetic seal between the valve


450


and the opening of the mini-environment chamber


430


. Then valve


440


can be moved to the open position so that mini-environment chamber


430


is brought to atmospheric pressure. Then the back plate


460


can be removed for access to the minicolumn. Preferably, the minicolumn itself is secured to the back plate


460


, so that it is removed together with the back plate


460


.





FIG. 5A

depicts an arrangement of a minicolumn enclosed within the microscope chamber. Specifically, minicolumn


500


is positioned completely inside the chamber


510


, so that no separate evacuation is necessary for the minicolumn


500


. Preferably the stage


515


is capable of elevation motion to control the distance between the minicolumn


500


and the specimen. Here again, it is preferred that the minicolumn be attached to a back plate


560


, so that removal of the back plate


560


would remove the minicolumn


500


as well. Such an arrangement is particularly useful for metrology, such as for critical dimension (CD) measurement microscopes. Also exemplified in

FIG. 5A

is an in-chamber integrated vacuum pump, which controls the vacuum inside the minicolumn


500


.




Electron microscopes can also be used for review of locations on wafers which are suspected of having defects thereupon. In such application, it is particularly useful to be able to scan the suspect area at different angles. A particularly elegant way of doing so using a conventional column is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,329,125 to Feuerbaurn. In that patent, a system is disclosed which is capable of placing the column at any tilt between 0-45 degrees, without breaking the vacuum inside the column or the microscope chamber. Thus, one can take a picture at 0 tilt, and then tilt the column to a desired position and take another picture for added information. Notably pictures taken at a tilt tend to have more topographic information than those taken without tilt.





FIG. 5B

exemplifies a system having a plurality of minicolumns, and particularly suitable for an electron microscope review station. As shown in the Figure, a first minicolumn


500


is situated inside the chamber at zero tilt. A second minicolumn


520


is positioned at a first tilt θ and a third minicolumn is positioned at a second tilt φ. In the preferred embodiment, the tilt angles θ and φ are fixed and different from each other. Preferably the tilts are fixed at 30 and 60 degrees, respectively, or 30 and 45 degrees, respectively. However; as shown in

FIG. 5B

, the tilts can be variable by, for example, pivoting the columns


520


and


525


about pivots


530


and


535


, respectively.




It is well known that chamber size directly affects the quality of the vacuum maintained within the chamber and, consequently, can affect the reliability and “cleanliness” of the equipment. Additionally, large chambers require a large footprint, which is of paramount consideration for fabrication plants, wherein clean-room real estate is at a premium. However, x-y stages generally require large chambers since they require motion space that is at least twice the size of the largest specimen to be inspected. Considering that the semiconductor industry is moving towards a 300 mm wafers, an x-y stage for such wafer can dictate a very large footprint.





FIGS. 6A and 6B

depict embodiments which are particularly advantageous for reducing the footprint of the microscope. Specifically,

FIGS. 6A and 6B

depicts a minicolumn


600


attached to an arm


620


, which is situated inside the chamber


610


. Rather than an x-y stage, a turntable stage


615


is used. In

FIG. 6A

the arm


620


is pivoted about pivot


625


, while in

FIG. 6B

the arm is attached to a linear carriage


635


. In both cases, the arms


620


are capable of moving the minicolumn


600


through the entire radius of the stage


615


. Through the rotational motion of the turntable stage


615


, and the motion of the arm


630


(whether radial or linear), every location on the specimen can be reached in polar (r,θ) coordinates.




As noted above, it is desirable to be able to obtain images of the same spot using tilt.

FIG. 7A

depicts a turntable arrangement similar to that depicted in

FIG. 6B

, except that the arm


720


carries two minicolumns


700


and


705


. In the exemplified embodiment, minicolumn


700


is situated with zero tilt, while minicolumn


705


is, situated with a fixed tilt, preferably of 30 or 45 degrees. However, it should be appreciated that more than two minicolumns can be provided, and that the tilt can be variable rather than fixed.




It is also known to use electron microscopes to inspect wafers and reticles for defects. An exemplary system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,502,306 to Meisburger et al. That system uses a single conventional column to scan the entire wafer/reticle for defects. The system is sold under the name of SEMSpec by KLA of San Jose/Calif. and is known to have a very slow throughput.





FIG. 7B

depicts an arm


740


structured to support a plurality of columns


745


positioned with zero tilt. The arm


740


is attached to a linear carriage


755


. Such an arm can be installed in a chamber having a turntable stage for inspecting an entire wafer for defects. Specifically, the wafer is divided to concentric sectors corresponding to the number of minicolumns


745


attached to arm


740


. Thus, as the wafer is rotated, the carriage


755


need travel only a length equal to the radial length of one sector. During such motion, each minicolumn


745


would scan its corresponding sector, thereby covering the entire wafer. Of course, an small overlap may be provided to ensure complete coverage.




While the invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments thereof, it should be appreciated that that other embodiments and modifications can be implemented without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. An electron microscope, comprising:a main vacuum chamber housing a stage therein and connected to a vacuum pump; a load lock for loading a specimen into said main vacuum chamber, a minicolumn for inspecting said specimen and, a mini-environment chamber housing said minicolumn and being capable of isolating said minicolumn from said main vacuum chamber.
  • 2. The electron microscope of claim 1, wherein said mini-environment comprises an opening to the main chamber for introducing said minicolumn into the main vacuum chamber and extracting said minicolumn form said main vacuum chamber.
  • 3. The electron microscope of claim 1, wherein said mini-environment comprises a bellows structure for introducing said minicolumn into the main vacuum chamber and extracting said minicolumn form said main vacuum chamber.
  • 4. The electron microscope of claim 1, wherein said mini-environment comprises an evacuation outlet.
  • 5. The electron microscope of claim 1, wherein said mini-environment comprises a second chamber having an opening into said main chamber, and a valve structure for hermetically sealing said opening.
  • 6. The electron microscope of claim 5, wherein said valve comprises a sealing plate that is pivoted on a shaft, which shaft is capable of elevation motion.
  • 7. An electron microscope for inspection of a semiconductor wafer comprising:a main vacuum chamber housing a stage therein and connected to a vacuum pump, a load lock for loading said wafer into said main vacuum chamber; a turntable stage for placing said wafer thereupon; a mounting arm positioned inside said main vacuum chamber, said mounting arm having a motion mechanism imparting one of rotational or linear translational motion to the mounting arm; and a minicolumn non-translatably mounted on said mounting arm inside said main vacuum chamber; wherein inspection of every point upon said wafer is enabled by the turntable rotating the wafer, and the mounting arm translating or rotating the minicolumn.
  • 8. The electron microscope of claim 2, further comprising a removable back plate attached to said main chamber, and wherein said minicolumn is connected to the removable back plate.
  • 9. The electron microscope of claim 7, further comprising at least one tilted minicolumn mounted on said mounting arm at a tilt with respect a to a perpendicular to a surface of the stage.
  • 10. The electron microscope of claim 9, wherein the tilt of said tilted minicolumn is variable.
  • 11. The electron microscope of claim 7, further comprising a radial pivot, and wherein said mounting arm is connected to said radial pivot.
  • 12. The electron microscope of claim 7, further comprising a linear motion carriage, and wherein said mounting arm is connected to said linear motion carriage.
  • 13. The electron microscope of claim 7, further comprising at least one additional minicolumn connected to said mounting arm.
  • 14. The electron microscope of claim 13, wherein said at least one additional minicolumn has a tilt with respect to a perpendicular to a surface of the turntable stage.
  • 15. The electron microscope of claim 14, wherein the tilt is variable.
  • 16. An electron microscope, comprising:a main vacuum chamber housing a stage therein and connected to a vacuum pump; a lead lock for loading a specimen into said main vacuum chamber; a plurality of minicolumns; and a mini-environment chamber housing said minicolumns and being capable of isolating said minicolumns from said main vacuum chamber.
  • 17. The electron microscope of claim 16, wherein said mini-environment comprises an opening to the main chamber for introducing said minicolumns into the main vacuum chamber and extracting said minicolumns from said main vacuum chamber.
  • 18. The electron microscope of claim 16, wherein said mini-environment comprises a bellows structure for introducing said minicolumns into the main vacuum chamber and extracting said minicolumns form said main vacuum chamber.
  • 19. An electron microscope for semiconductor wafer inspection, comprising:a main vacuum chamber connected to a vacuum pump and housing; a turntable stage for holding said wafer thereupon; a holding arm capable of one of translational or rotational motion; and, a plurality of minicolumns attached to said holding arm; wherein inspection of every point upon said wafer is enabled by the turntable rotating the wafer, and the holding arm translating or rotating the minicolumns.
  • 20. The electron microscope of claim 19, wherein at least one of said minicolumns has a tilt with respect to a perpendicular to a surface of the stage.
  • 21. The electron microscope of claim 20, wherein said tilt is variable.
  • 22. The electron microscope of claim 1 wherein the mini-environment further comprises a back plate.
  • 23. The electron microscope of claim 22 wherein the minicolumn is connected to the back plate.
  • 24. The electron microscope of claim 5 wherein, the mini-environment further comprises a back plate.
  • 25. The electron microscope of claim 24 wherein the minicolumn is connected to the back plate.
  • 26. The electron microscope of claim 7 wherein the minicolumn is disposed at a tilt with respect to a perpendicular to a surface of the stage.
  • 27. The electron microscope of claim 26 wherein the tilt is variable.
  • 28. An electron microscope for inspection of a semiconductor wafer, comprising:a main vacuum chamber housing a stage therein and connected to a vacuum pump; a load lock for loading said wafer into said main vacuum chamber; a turntable stage for placing said wafer thereupon; a mounting arm positioned inside said main vacuum chamber, said mounting arm having a motion mechanism imparting rotational motive to the mounting arm in a plane parallel to a surface of the turntable stage; and a minicolumn non-translatably mounted in said mounting arm inside said main vacuum chamber, wherein inspection of every point upon said wafer is enabled by the turntable rotating the wafer, and the mounting arm rotating the minicolumn.
US Referenced Citations (15)
Number Name Date Kind
4706019 Richardson Nov 1987 A
4864228 Richardson Sep 1989 A
4954711 Finkes et al. Sep 1990 A
5122663 Chang et al. Jun 1992 A
5155412 Chang et al. Oct 1992 A
5229607 Matsui et al. Jul 1993 A
5329125 Feuerbaum Jul 1994 A
5376792 Schamber et al. Dec 1994 A
5399860 Miyoshi et al. Mar 1995 A
5502306 Meisburger et al. Mar 1996 A
5546337 Hurt et al. Aug 1996 A
5587586 Kruit Dec 1996 A
5786601 Sturrock et al. Jul 1998 A
5811803 Komatsu et al. Sep 1998 A
5831272 Utsumi Nov 1998 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
404116843 Apr 1992 JP
HEI 11-16967 Jan 1999 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Chang et al., “Electron beam technology—SEM to microcolumn,” Microelectronic Engineering, 32 (1996) pp. 113-130.
“Novel High Brightness Minature Electron Gun for High Current E-Beam Applications”, Burstert et al., Microelectronics Engineering, 31, 1996, pp. 96-100.
“Miniature Electrostatic Lens for Generation of a Low-Voltage High Current Electron Probe”, Bubeck et al, pp. 1-9, 5th International Conference on Charged Particle Optice, Dellft, Apr., 1998.