Correction of wafer temperature drift in a plasma reactor based upon continuous wafer temperature measurements using an in-situ wafer temperature optical probe

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6575622
  • Patent Number
    6,575,622
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 7, 2001
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 10, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
The invention solves the problem of continuously monitoring wafer temperature during processing using an optical or fluoro-optical temperature sensor including an optical fiber having an end next to and facing the backside of the wafer. This optical fiber is accommodated without disturbing plasma processing by providing in one of the wafer lift pins an axial void through which the optical fiber passes. The end of the fiber facing the wafer backside is coincident with the end of the hollow lift pin. The other end is coupled via an “external” optical fiber to temperature probe electronics external of the reactor chamber. The invention uses direct wafer temperature measurements with a test wafer to establish a data base of wafer temperature behavior as a function of coolant pressure and a data base of wafer temperature behavior as a function of wafer support or “puck” temperature. These data bases are then employed during processing of a production wafer to control coolant pressure in such a manner as to minimize wafer temperature deviation from the desired temperature.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Precise control of plasma processing of semiconductor wafers requires that the wafer temperature be carefully regulated or held very close to a desired temperature. Drift of wafer temperature causes various characteristics of the plasma process to change, so that the process cannot be accurately controlled. For example, in a plasma etch process, the etch rate may increase if the wafer temperature drifts toward a higher temperature. Typically, plasma processing will increase the wafer temperature. In order to maintain the wafer temperature at a desired level, the wafer is cooled during plasma processing by pumping a coolant such as Helium gas through the wafer support through coolant passages which permit the coolant to conduct heat away from the wafer backside. The cooling rate is proportional to the pressure at which the coolant is supplied to the coolant passages in the wafer support, so that the wafer temperature is directly affected by the coolant pressure. Thus, it is conventional to set the coolant pressure to a constant value corresponding to a desired wafer temperature during processing.




Heretofore, it has been assumed that with the foregoing cooling technique, wafer temperature is generally constant during plasma processing of the wafer. This is an important assumption, particularly in the case of nitride processes, because plasma etch processes for etching nitride layers are very sensitive to changes in temperature. Wafer temperature has typically been measured using conventional (commercially available) “temperature dots” which can be stuck to the surface of a test wafer. At the conclusion of plasma processing of the test wafer, the color of the temperature dot indicates the highest temperature reached during the process. Assuming the wafer temperature is constant over the duration of the plasma process, this temperature is generally taken to be the process temperature of the wafer.




However, it has not been practical to test the assumption of constant wafer temperature during the process. For example, at plasma ignition, it is assumed the wafer temperature climbs very quickly (e.g., within a matter of seconds) from room temperature to the steady-state plasma processing temperature. This assumption could not be verified because direct measurement of wafer temperature during processing—and particularly during processing of production wafers—has not been practical. The only temperature that can be continuously monitored during processing is the wafer support or “puck” temperature, which is at a temperature significantly lower than that of the wafer during processing.




As described below, one aspect of the present invention provides a highly accurate probe with which the temperature of a test wafer having a special dye in a predetermined spot can be continuously monitored during plasma processing. With this probe, it has been discovered that the wafer temperature is not constant during processing, because, among other things, the wafer takes a surprisingly long time (over one minute) to climb from room temperature to steady state process temperature following plasma ignition. Such variations in wafer temperature are detrimental because they tend to reduce the precision with which the process parameters (e.g., etch rate) may be controlled. It was also discovered that, in a plasma reactor employing an electrostatic chuck, the wafer temperature climbs very high near the end of plasma processing. This is because coolant pressure is removed before turning off RF power to the electrostatic chuck holding the wafer on the wafer support. Otherwise, the wafer would be blown off the wafer support by the coolant pressure on the wafer backside as soon as RF power is removed from the electrostatic chuck.




Thus, it is a discovery of the invention that there is a need to sense deviations in wafer temperature from a desired temperature and to somehow correct such deviations. While this is certainly possible in the case of a test wafer whose temperature throughout processing is continuously monitored using the probe of the invention referred to above, it does not seem possible in the case of a production wafer which should not be contaminated with the dye required for the probe to measure wafer temperature.




Thus, there is a need for a way of deducing in real time deviations of the temperature of a production wafer from a desired temperature during processing, without being able to directly measure the wafer temperature. Further, there is a need for a way of changing the system in response to such deviations to minimize or avoid them.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The invention solves the problem of continuously monitoring wafer temperature during processing using an optical or fluoro-optical temperature sensor including an optical fiber having an end next to and facing the backside of the wafer. This optical fiber is accommodated without disturbing plasma processing by providing in one of the wafer lift pins an axial void through which the optical fiber passes. The end of the fiber facing the wafer backside is coincident with the end of the hollow lift pin. The other end is coupled via an “external” optical fiber to temperature probe electronics external of the reactor chamber. In a preferred embodiment, the hollow lift pin is supported with the other lift pins on a lift spider and a flexible bellows assembly. The optical fiber inside the hollow lift pin and the external optical fiber are preferably coupled together by a flexure near the bottom of the bellows. Preferably, a cavity smaller than the diameter of the optical fiber is drilled in the wafer backside in registration with the optical fiber inside the lift pin, and a suitable dye is deposited in the cavity to facilitate temperature sensing by the sensor.




The invention also solves the problem of determining wafer temperature deviations in production wafers in which there is no cavity nor dye in the wafer backside enabling temperature measurement by the optical probe. The invention solves this problem by first, using direct wafer temperature measurements with a test wafer, establishing a data base of wafer temperature behavior as a function of coolant pressure and establishing a data base of wafer temperature behavior as a function of wafer support or “puck” temperature. These data bases are then employed during processing of a production wafer to control coolant pressure in such a manner as to minimize wafer temperature deviation from the desired temperature.




In a preferred embodiment, such control of the coolant pressure is accomplished by first measuring puck temperature and using the data base of wafer temperature as a function of puck temperature to deduce the wafer temperature from the measured puck temperature. Then, the wafer temperature thus deduced is compared with a desired temperature to calculate an error. This error is used with the data base of wafer temperature as a function of coolant pressure to determine a change in the coolant pressure which will tend to correct the error in the manner of a feedback control system.




In another embodiment, the corrections to the coolant pressure are established in a trial-and-error method. Thus, for example, the delay in wafer temperature rise immediately after plasma ignition is corrected by a corresponding delay in applying or increasing the coolant pressure immediately after plasma ignition, the coolant pressure being gradually increased in accordance with a schedule (of coolant pressure as a function of time after plasma ignition) that permits the wafer temperature to increase very quickly to the desired temperature and remain there. The trial-and-error method of establishing the schedule of coolant pressure is carried out with a test wafer using the optical wafer temperature probe of the invention. The coolant schedule is modified over successive attempts until a fairly constant wafer temperature from plasma ignition onward is achieved. Then, the schedule of coolant pressure is applied to production wafers.




In a yet further embodiment, the wafer temperature behavior observed in test wafers with the optical probe of the invention is parameterized in an equation as a function of coolant pressure and puck temperature. This equation is then employed to accurately calculate coolant pressure corrections based upon continuously measured puck temperature.




The problem of wafer temperature increase just prior to wafer de-chuck from the electrostatic chuck (i.e., when the coolant pressure is turned off) is solved by reducing the RF power on the electrostatic chuck to a level at which heat transfer to the wafer is reduced but which is still sufficient to electrostatically retain the wafer on the chuck.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a cross-sectional side view of a portion of a plasma reactor including a preferred embodiment of the optical temperature probe of the invention.





FIG. 2

illustrates the behavior of wafer temperature at plasma ignition using constant coolant pressure on the wafer backside.





FIG. 3

illustrates a system, including a plasma reactor having the optical temperature probe of

FIG. 2

, for characterizing wafer temperature behavior and for controlling coolant pressure to minimize wafer temperature-drift.





FIG. 4

illustrates a method of operating the system of

FIG. 3

to characterize or measure the temperature behavior of a test wafer as a function of coolant pressure and as a function of wafer support or puck temperature.





FIG. 5

illustrates a method of regulating the temperature of a production wafer by monitoring wafer support temperature or puck temperature using the wafer temperature behavior characterized in the method of FIG.


4


.





FIG. 6

is a graph illustrating the behavior of wafer temperature as a function of coolant pressure as measured with a test wafer using the optical probe of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 7

is a graph illustrating the behavior of wafer temperature as a function of puck temperature as measured with a test wafer using the optical probe of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 8

is a graph illustrating how a fairly constant wafer temperature is achieved at plasma ignition by increasing the coolant pressure in a schedule of steps established by trial and error.





FIG. 9

is a graph corresponding to

FIG. 8

in which the same reactor with the same process parameters was operated in the conventional manner with constant coolant pressure immediately upon plasma ignition, and illustrating for the sake of comparison the very slow rise of the wafer temperature.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Wafer Temperature Optical Probe




Referring to

FIG. 1

, a plasma reactor


100


has a vacuum chamber enclosure


102


including a ceiling


105


and cylindrical side wall


107


adjoining a floor


109


. An electrostatic chuck


111


on the floor


109


includes a ceramic (aluminum nitride) puck


113


on a support


115


and an electrode mesh


117


inside the ceramic puck


113


. A semiconductor wafer


119


is held firmly onto the ceramic puck


113


by an electrostatic force induced by a chucking voltage from a chuck voltage source


121


applied to the electrode mesh


117


. The ceramic puck


113


has coolant passages


123


in its top surface which permit a coolant circulated therethrough (such as helium gas) to directly contact the backside of the wafer


119


. For this purpose, a coolant pump


125


pumps helium gas into the coolant passages


123


at a selected gas pressure. The wafer


119


is lifted off the electrostatic chuck


111


by plural lift pins


127


which extend throughout the electrostatic chuck


111


to contact the backside of the wafer


119


. The lift pins


127


are moved up and down by a lift spider


129


through a bellows assembly including a rod


131


underlying each pin


127


, a portion of the rod being held within a flexible bellows


133


. The rod


131


supports a piston plate


135


and housing


137


to which the lift pin


127


is threadably connected and sealed by an O-ring


138


. The wafer


119


is placed on the electrostatic chuck


111


by lowering the lift spider


129


until the wafer backside touches the puck


113


. Then, the chucking voltage source


121


is activated to apply a chucking voltage to the electrode mesh


117


. Thereafter, the coolant pump


125


pumps coolant into the passages


123


to cool the wafer


119


. A plasma is ignited by introducing a processing gas through gas inlets


139


into the reactor chamber and coupling RF power into the chamber. The power may be coupled capacitively by applying it to the electrode mesh


117


and grounding the ceiling


105


. Alternatively, the RF power may be coupled inductively by applying RF power to a coil antenna


141


adjacent the wall


107


or ceiling


105


, in which case an RF bias voltage may be applied to the electrode mesh


117


to control ion energy near the wafer


119


.




In order to obtain an indirect indication of the temperature of the wafer


119


, a puck temperature probe


143


provides a continuous read out of the temperature of the puck


113


during plasma processing. Heretofore, it has not been practical to obtain a continuous direct measurement of wafer temperature, notwithstanding the criticality of the wafer temperature during certain plasma processes such as a nitride etch operation, for example.




In order to solve this problem, one of the cylindrical lift pins


127


is made to be hollow, and a light pipe


145


is inserted through the hollow lift pin


127


. In addition, the rod


131


is also hollow so that the light pipe


145


extends through the interior of the rod


131


as well. The top end of the light pipe


145


coincides with the top of the lift pin


127


against the wafer backside. The bottom end of the light pipe


145


extends to the lift spider


129


and is coupled to a flexible optical fiber


147


. For this purpose, the light pipe is fed through the top of the lift spider


129


by a flexure


149


and is terminated at the bottom of the lift spider


129


at one end of a standard fiber optic connector


151


. The flexible optical fiber


147


is connected to the other end of the fiber optic connector


151


. While the light pipe


145


may be a flexible quartz optical fiber, it is preferably a sapphire rod because it has a higher numerical aperture than a quartz fiber. The opposite end of the flexible optical fiber


147


is connected to conventional probe electronics


155


, which may be, for example, a Luxtron Fluoro-Optical Temperature (FOT) probe. This type of probe requires a chemical dye be placed on the surface whose temperature is to be measured by the probe. Therefore, a mechanical cavity


160


having a diameter less than that of the lift pin


127


is formed in the backside of the test wafer


119


, the mechanical cavity


160


being in registration with the lift pin


127


and light pipe


145


. The requisite chemical dye or phosphor


165


is placed in the cavity


160


. The presence of the light pipe


145


does not compromise the plasma processing because the light pipe is isolated from the plasma even though it may contact or at least nearly contact the backside of the wafer


119


. This is because the open end of hollow lift pin


127


abuts the wafer backside while the wafer backside is electrostatically clamped to the puck


113


. Moreover, the lift pin


127


is sealed to the housing


137


by the O-ring


138


. Therefore, the wafer temperature optical probe (i.e., the light pipe


145


, optical fiber


147


and FOT


155


) of the invention provides a continuous measurement of temperature of the wafer


119


.




Method for Controlling Wafer Temperature




The probe of

FIG. 1

has enabled for the first time an accurate assessment of wafer temperature behavior throughout the entire plasma process cycle.

FIG. 2

is a graph illustrating the wafer temperature measured with the probe of

FIG. 1

over time beginning with plasma ignition at 0 seconds and concluding with wafer de-chucking at about 240 seconds. What

FIG. 2

indicates is that the assumptions regarding fairly constant wafer temperature behavior were incorrect, in that the wafer temperature does not reach the equilibrium plasma processing temperature around 90 degrees C. for nearly two minutes. Thus, for the first two minutes of a plasma process cycle that is only four minutes in duration, the wafer temperature is not in control and is below the desired temperature, in the example of FIG.


2


.

FIG. 2

also shows that at 210 seconds when the helium coolant pressure is removed in preparation for dechucking the wafer, the wafer temperature soars by about 15 degrees until RF power is turned off at about 235 seconds.




In order to solve the problem of the slow warming up of the wafer during the first 90 seconds after plasma ignition, the invention uses a large data base gathered using the optical temperature probe of

FIG. 1

with a test wafer. One difficulty is that a straightforward approach of directly monitoring the temperature of each wafer being processed using the probe of FIG.


1


and altering the coolant pressure in a directly controlled feedback control loop to maintain the desired wafer temperature is not possible except in the special case of a test wafer having the mechanical cavity


160


and phosphor dye placed therein. Unfortunately, a production wafer cannot have such a cavity nor a chemical dye or phosphor placed thereon. Therefore, direct continuous temperature measurement of a production wafer is not possible, even with the probe of FIG.


1


. The closest temperature to the wafer


119


that can be continuously monitored during processing of production wafers is that of the puck


113


. However, tests conducted using the wafer temperature probe of

FIG. 1 and a

temperature probe in the puck


113


reveal that the puck temperature is well below the wafer temperature, particularly during the first


120


following plasma ignition. Therefore, the puck temperature cannot be substituted for the wafer temperature in a control loop, particularly during the early part of the plasma process cycle following plasma ignition.




The foregoing problems are solved in the invention by first employing a test wafer with the probe of

FIG. 1 and a

puck temperature probe and correlating the temperature behavior of the wafer the temperature behavior of the puck. Furthermore, the test wafer is employed with the probe of

FIG. 1

to correlate wafer temperature with the coolant pressure. Then, whenever a production wafer is processed, the puck temperature is monitored, and the actual wafer temperature is inferred from the measured puck temperature using the correlation of wafer and puck temperatures obtained with the test wafer. If the inferred temperature of the production wafer deviates from a desired wafer temperature, a correction to the coolant pressure is inferred from the observed deviation using the correlation of wafer temperature and coolant pressure obtained with the test wafer. The result is that the slow increase in wafer temperature is automatically corrected by a series of coolant temperature corrections, in which the coolant pressure is suppressed near the beginning of the plasma process and is increased during the process to maintain the desired wafer temperature.




Alternatively, the optimum coolant pressure profile over time may be found by trial and error using a test wafer and the probe of FIG.


1


. The coolant pressure is controlled in accordance with this optimum profile during the processing of production wafers.





FIG. 3

illustrates a system for carrying out the foregoing temperature control methods. The plasma reactor of

FIG. 1

is illustrated in

FIG. 3

as including, in addition to the features discussed above with reference to

FIG. 1

, a puck temperature probe


305


, a gas pressure probe


310


and the wafer temperature probe of

FIG. 1

designated by the reference numeral


315


in FIG.


3


. The puck temperature probe


305


consists of a conventional temperature sensor inside the puck


113


. The helium pressure probe


310


consists of a conventional pressure sensor inside one of the coolant passages


123


. Each of the three probes


305


,


310


,


315


has its output connected to a microprocessor


320


which uses a memory


330


.




Referring to

FIG. 4

, the test wafer


119


is chucked on the electrostatic chuck


111


(block


410


of FIG.


4


), a plasma is struck and the wafer temperature and puck temperature are continuously monitored and recorded by the microprocessor


32


.


0


(block


420


of FIG.


4


). The microprocessor


320


(or a human) varies the coolant pressure controlled by the pump


125


(block


430


of FIG.


4


). This variation may be performed as part of a feedback control loop in an effort to maintain wafer temperature at a desired level, or else it may be a trial and error iterative process to find the best coolant pressure time profile. The resulting data from the three probes


305


,


310


,


315


is stored by the microprocessor


320


in the memory


330


(block


440


). This data is then organized into a first look-up table (look-up table


1


) correlating simultaneous readings from the wafer temperature probe


315


and the coolant pressure probe


310


(block


450


of FIG.


4


). The data is also organized into a second look-up table (look-up table b


2


) correlating simultaneous readings from the wafer temperature probe


315


and the puck temperature probe


310


(block


460


of FIG.


4


). Look-up tables


1


and


2


are then used to control helium (coolant) pressure based upon only measuring puck temperature during the plasma processing of production wafers.




Referring to

FIG. 5

, a production wafer (i.e., a semiconductor wafer lacking the mechanical cavity


160


formed in the test wafer


119


of

FIG. 1

) is chucked onto the electrostatic chuck


111


(block


510


of FIG.


5


). The production wafer preferably has no cavity


160


and no dye on its backside, in order to satisfy specifications for production wafer purity and structural integrity. The optical temperature probe (i.e., the hollow lift pin


127


, the light pipe


145


and the FOT


155


, etc.) cannot be used with the production wafer because of the absence of any optical dye on the production wafer's backside. Therefore, one reactor, a test reactor including the optical probe, may be used to carry out the method of

FIG. 4

, while another reactor, a production reactor used to carry out the method of

FIG. 5

, may not necessarily include the optical temperature probe of FIG.


1


. Alternatively, the same reactor that includes the optical probe may be used to carry out both operations. Continuing now with the description of the method of

FIG. 5

, a plasma is struck and the puck temperature is continuously monitored during plasma processing (block


515


). Each sample of the puck temperature is used by the computer


320


to infer a corresponding wafer temperature using look-up table


2


. From this, a wafer temperature drift (e.g., from desired temperature) is inferred (block


520


). The temperature drift is used to infer from look-up table


1


an optimal correction to the coolant pressure (block


525


). The coolant pressure is then corrected accordingly, and the process repeats itself with the next sample of puck temperature (block


530


).





FIG. 6

is a graph depicting the data corresponding to look-up table


1


correlating simultaneous wafer temperature measurements and helium pressure measurements at two different RF power levels, 1.8 kWatts (upper curve) and 1.0 kWatts (lower curve).

FIG. 7

is a graph depicting the data corresponding to look-up table


2


correlating simultaneous measurements of wafer temperature and puck temperature. In the graphs of both FIG.


6


and

FIG. 7

, plasma ignition begins at time 0 seconds.

FIG. 7

shows that the difference between puck and wafer temperatures varies with the puck temperature. The behavior illustrated in

FIG. 7

was obtained by varying the helium pressure in accordance with an optimal helium pressure time profile for maintaining a nearly constant wafer temperature (by permitting the wafer to reach its equilibrium temperature very quickly after plasma ignition). This profile was obtained by trial and error and is illustrated in FIG.


8


. In

FIG. 8

, the step-wise curve is helium pressure as a function of time, and is the optimum profile referred to above. The upper curve in

FIG. 8

is the wafer temperature as a function of time. Referring again to

FIG. 7

, the puck temperature apparently approaches the steady state wafer temperature in an asymptotic fashion and therefore the difference between wafer and puck temperature depends on the instantaneous puck temperature. The microprocessor


520


, in controlling the temperature of a production wafer, correlates the current puck temperature with the closest puck temperature in look-up table


2


(whose contents corresponds to the graph of FIG.


7


), and finds the corresponding wafer temperature. For example, a puck temperature of 50 degrees C. in

FIG. 7

corresponds to a wafer temperature of about 65 degrees C. If the desired wafer temperature were, for example, 60 degrees C., then an error of +5 degrees C. has been detected. The correction to the coolant pressure is obtained by referring to the data of look-up table


1


represented by the graph of FIG.


6


. Specifically, assuming the RF power is 1.8 kWatts, an excursion from 65 degrees to 60 degrees C. corresponds to an increase in helium pressure of 1 Torr. Therefore, the helium pressure correction to be applied in this example is an increase of 1 Torr. This method is only a first order approximation but provides an improvement over conventional techniques which have generally assumed no need for wafer temperature correction.




Yet another approach is to use curve-fit the data of

FIGS. 6 and 7

(look-up tables


1


and


2


) to approximate constants of a quadratic equation expressing the wafer temperature T as a function of helium pressure P and puck temperature E:








T=AP




2




+BP+CE.








Once the constants A, B and C are found, the variation in helium pressure P to correct T is found in straight-forward fashion using conventional mathematical techniques carried out by the microprocessor


520


.




Referring to

FIG. 8

, the problem of wafer temperature rise just prior to wafer de-chuck, when the helium pressure is removed, is solved by briefly reducing the RF power applied to the plasma to about 100 Watts.





FIG. 9

illustrates for the sake of comparison the inferior results obtained in the same reactor under the same conditions when the helium pressure is held constant throughout the process in accordance with conventional techniques. For nearly half of the duration of the process, the wafer temperature is below the steady state operating temperature.




While the invention has been described in detail by specific reference to preferred embodiments, it is understood that variations and modifications thereof may be made without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. In a plasma reactor having a vacuum chamber containing a wafer support for supporting a semiconductor wafer to be processed and plural elongate lift pins extending through said wafer support to abut the backside of said wafer at the top ends of said lift pins, a temperature measurement system for continuously monitoring the temperature of said wafer during plasma processing of said wafer in said reactor, said system comprising:a light pipe extending through one of said lift pins, and having a top end generally coincident with the top end of said one lift pin, said light pipe having a bottom end extending through the bottom end of said hollow lift pin; and an optical temperature measuring sensor coupled to the bottom end of said light pipe.
  • 2. The temperature measurement system of claim 1 wherein said light pipe comprises one of:a sapphire rod; a quartz optical fiber.
  • 3. The temperature measurement system of claim 1 further comprising a flexible optical fiber having one end connected to said bottom end of said light pipe and its other end connected to said optical temperature measuring sensor.
  • 4. The temperature measurement system of claim 3 wherein said reactor further comprises a lift spider supporting the bottom ends of said lift pins, wherein said flexible optical fiber flexes to accommodate movement of said lift spider and lift pins.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/547,359, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,353,210 filed Apr. 11, 2000.

US Referenced Citations (31)
Number Name Date Kind
3501380 Perch Mar 1970 A
3529121 Bobo et al. Sep 1970 A
3626758 Stewart et al. Dec 1971 A
4328068 Curtis May 1982 A
4396791 Mazzoni Aug 1983 A
4626643 Minet Dec 1986 A
4780832 Shah Oct 1988 A
4981815 Kakoschke Jan 1991 A
5017761 Brunner May 1991 A
5028145 Borkemhagen et al. Jul 1991 A
5315092 Takahashi et al. May 1994 A
5441344 Cook, III Aug 1995 A
5469742 Lee et al. Nov 1995 A
5556204 Tamura et al. Sep 1996 A
5791782 Wooten et al. Aug 1998 A
5893643 Kumar et al. Apr 1999 A
6004029 Moslehi et al. Dec 1999 A
6046439 Johngard et al. Apr 2000 A
6056433 Yam May 2000 A
6079874 Hegrdus Jun 2000 A
6084215 Furuya et al. Jul 2000 A
6086246 Shufflebotham et al. Jul 2000 A
6140612 Husain et al. Oct 2000 A
6174080 Jennings Jan 2001 B1
6179466 Peuse et al. Jan 2001 B1
6235146 Kadotani et al. May 2001 B1
6293696 Guardado Sep 2001 B1
6303895 Husain et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307184 Womack et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320736 Shamouilian et al. Nov 2001 B1
20010040155 Womack et al. Nov 2001 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
10150099 Jun 1998 JP