Patent Grant
11364304
The disclosure relates generally to spherical nucleic acids. More particularly, the disclosure related to crosslinked micellar spherical nucleic acids that can be prepared under moderate conditions.
Spherical nucleic acids (SNAs) have become an important platform for programmable assembly,1 bio-detection2, and nucleic acid-based therapeutics.3 Historically, SNAs have been synthesized by covalently immobilizing a dense layer of highly oriented nucleic acids onto a spherical gold nanoparticle core.4 The resulting three-dimensional polyvalent architecture of the SNA makes it a higher affinity binder than the same linear sequence from which it is comprised.5 The dense oligonucleotide shell also increases the resistance of SNAs to enzymatic degradation,6 increasing intact oligonucleotide lifetimes. In addition, by engaging cell-surface receptors, SNAs can actively traverse cell membranes without the need for transfection agents.7 As a result, SNAs have emerged as “single-entity” intracellular diagnostic tools,2a gene-regulating structures,3 and immunomodulatory agents8 that exhibit minimal cytotoxicity and non-specific immunogenic responses.9
Since the aforementioned physical and biological properties of SNAs are independent of the nature of the core,5 a broad range of materials (Au,4 Ag,10 γ-Fe2O3,11 CdSe, Pt, Pd) have been used as templates for their syntheses. However, concerns about the potential long-term toxicity and metabolic fate of metallic nanoparticle cores12,13 have inspired a shift to the use of organic templates such as lipisomes,14 proteins,15 and block copolymer nanostructures16 as template materials.
An ideal SNA is one that can be rapidly made under moderate conditions from biocompatible reagents in monodisperse and size tunable form. Thus, a need exists for such methods to prepare SNAs.
One aspect of the disclosure provides a method of making a crosslinked micellar spherical nucleic acid (SNA) comprising (a) admixing a polyethyleneoxide-polypropyleneoxide-polyethyleneoxide (PEO-PPO-PEO) block copolymer and a plurality of amphiphilic oligonucleotides in a buffer to form an SNA, wherein the amphiphilic oligonucleotide comprises (i) a lipid moiety and (ii) at least one reactive group, (b) admixing the resulting SNA with a PEGylated crosslinking agent to form the crosslinked micellar SNA, wherein the PEGylated crosslinking agent comprises at least two reactive sites, each reactive site reacting with the reactive group of the amphiphilic oligonucleotide to form a covalent bond and thereby crosslink the amphiphilic oligonucleotides, and (c) optionally washing the crosslinked micellar SNA to remove uncrosslinked amphiphilic oligonucleotides.
Another aspect of the disclosure provides a crosslinked micellar spherical nucleic acid prepared according to the method of the disclosure.
Another aspect of the disclosure provides a method of inhibiting expression of a gene comprising the step of hybridizing a polynucleotide encoding said gene product with one or more oligonucleotides complementary to all or a portion of said polynucleotide, said oligonucleotide being attached to the crosslinked micellar SNA of the disclosure, wherein hybridizing between said polynucleotide and said oligonucleotide occurs over a length of said polynucleotide with a degree of complementarity sufficient to inhibit expression of said gene product.
Another aspect of the disclosure provides a method for up-regulating activity of a toll-like receptor (TLR), comprising contacting a cell having the toll-like receptor with a crosslinked micellar SNA of the disclosure.
Another aspect of the disclosure provides a method for down-regulating toll-like receptor (TLR), comprising contacting a cell having the toll-like receptor with a crosslinked micellar SNA of the disclosure.
Further aspects and advantages will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from a review of the following detailed descriptions. While the compositions and methods are susceptible of embodiments in various forms, the description hereafter includes specific embodiments with the understanding that the disclosure is illustrative and is not intended to limit the invention to the specific embodiments described herein.
For a more complete understanding of the disclosure, reference should be made to the following detailed description and accompanying drawings wherein:
Provided herein are methods of making crosslinked micellar spherical nucleic acids (SNAs) under moderate conditions from biocompatible materials. The spherical nucleic acids of the disclosure comprise polyethyleneoxide-polypropyleneoxide-polyethyleneoxide, a plurality of oligonucleotides, wherein each oligonucleotide comprises a lipid moiety and a nucleobase portion, and the oligonucleotides are crosslinked with a PEGylated crosslinking agent. The methods disclosed herein allow for the facile assembly of nucleic acids with hydrophobic tails and stretches of functionalized T-bases biocompatible SNA constructs.
Polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene-polyoxyethylene (PEO-PPO-PEO) is an amphiphilic block copolymer that can be assembled into spherical micelles at room temperature at low critical micelle concentrations (CMC). In addition, PEO-PPO-PEO has a thermo-responsive CMC, and therefore micelles made from PEO-PPO-PEO can be easily assembled and disassembled based upon a change in temperature. The thermo-responsive CMC can be used for purifying the targeted SNA architectures.18a, 19
Above their CMC, PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymers can assemble into small, monodispersed micelles that consist of a hydrophobic PPO as the core surrounded by a hydrophilic PEO shell.20 The micelles can have a diameter of about 2 nm to about 100 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 90 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 80 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 70 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 60 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 50 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 40 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 30 nm in mean diameter, or about 2 nm to about 20 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 10 nm in mean diameter, about 5 nm to about 80 nm in mean diameter, about 5 nm to about 70 nm in mean diameter, about 5 nm to about 60 nm in mean diameter, about 5 nm to about 50 nm in mean diameter, about 5 nm to about 40 nm in mean diameter, about 5 nm to about 30 nm in mean diameter, about 6 nm to about 25 nm in mean diameter, about 7 nm to about 20 nm in mean diameter, about 8 nm to about 15 nm in mean diameter, about 8 nm to about 12 nm in mean diameter, about 10 nm to about 14 nm in mean diameter. At these size ranges, PEO-PPO-PEO-derived micelles advantageously demonstrate long in vivo circulation time and can deliver encapsulated chemotherapeutics into a tumor tissue via the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect.21
The PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymers can have a molecular weight in a range of about 500 Da to about 20000 Da, about 500 Da to about 14000, about 800 Da to about 13800 Da, about 1000 Da to about 12000 Da, about 1500 Da to about 11800 Da, about 2000 Da to about 11000 Da, about 2200 Da to about 10000 Da, about 2500 Da to about 9000 Da, about 3000 Da to about 8000 Da, about 3300 Da to about 7000 Da, about 3500 Da to about 6500 Da, about 3500 Da, about 6000 Da, about 1200 Da, and/or up to about 20000 Da. The block copolymer can be represented by the formula (PEO)x(PEO)y(PEO)z wherein x can be in a range of 2 to 130, y can be in a range of 6 to 67, and z can be in a range of 2 to 130. In some embodiments, x and z have different values. In some embodiments, x and z have the same value. PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymers, also known as poloxamers, are available commercially, for example, under the Pluronic® tradename from BASF Chemicals, under the Synperonics® tradename from Croda International Chemicals Company, and under the Kolliphor® tradename from BASF Chemicals. Suitable block copolymers are pharmaceutical-grade. An exemplary pharmaceutical grade PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymer is Pluronic® F127, a solid block copolymer having a molecular weight of about 12500 Da and a 70% polyoxyethylene content and can be represented by the formula (PEO)98(PPO)67(PEO)98.
Methods of forming PEO-PPO-PEO micelles are known in the art. PEO-PPO-PEO micelles readily assemble when the block copolymer is provided in solution in a concentration in an amount greater than its critical micelle concentration at a given solution temperature.
The SNA can have a diameter of about 2 nm to about 250 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 240 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 230 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 220 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 210 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 200 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 190 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 180 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 170 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 160 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 150 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 140 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 130 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 120 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 110 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 100 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 90 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 80 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 70 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 60 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 50 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 40 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 30 nm in mean diameter, or about 2 nm to about 20 nm in mean diameter, about 2 nm to about 10 nm in mean diameter. The size of the SNA is from about 5 nm to about 150 nm (mean diameter), from about 5 to about 50 nm, from about 10 to about 30 nm, from about 10 to 150 nm, from about 10 to about 100 nm, from about 20 nm to about 150 nm, from about 10 to about 50 nm, from about 20 nm to about 50 nm, from about 25 to about 45 nm, or from about 30 nm to about 40 nm. The size of the SNA is from about 5 nm to about 150 nm (mean diameter), from about 30 to about 100 nm, from about 40 to about 80 nm. The size of the SNA used in a method varies as required by their particular use or application. The variation of size is advantageously used to optimize certain physical characteristics of the SNA, for example, optical properties or the amount of surface area that can be functionalized as described herein.
The SNA provided herein comprise amphiphilic oligonucleotides including (i) a lipid portion and (ii) a nucleobase portion. The SNA can include at least about 10 strands of amphiphilic oligonucleotides, at least about 50 strands of amphiphilic oligonucleotides, at least about 100 strands of amphiphilic oligonucleotides, at least about 150 strands of amphiphilic oligonucleotides, at least about 200 strands of amphiphilic oligonucleotides, at least about 250 strands of oligonucleotides, at least 300 strands of oligonucleotides, or at least 350 strands of oligonucleotides and/or up to about 400 strands of oligonucleotides, up to about 350 strands of oligonucleotides, or up to about 300 strands of oligonucleotides.
The oligonucleotide can comprise either RNA or DNA. In embodiments, the oligonucleotide comprises RNA. The RNA can be an inhibitory RNA (RNAi) that performs a regulatory function, and is chosen from the group consisting of a small RNAi that is selected from the group consisting of a small inhibitory RNA (siRNA), an RNA that forms a triplex with double stranded DNA, and a ribozyme. Alternatively, the RNA is microRNA that performs a regulatory function. In still further embodiments, the RNA is a piwi-interacting RNA (piRNA). In embodiments, the oligonucleotide comprises DNA. The DNA can be, in some embodiments, an antisense-DNA.
Oligonucleotides contemplated for use according to the disclosure are from about 5 to about 100 nucleotides in length. Methods and compositions are also contemplated wherein the oligonucleotide is about 10 to about 100 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 90 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 80 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 70 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 60 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 50 nucleotides in length about 5 to about 45 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 40 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 35 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 30 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 25 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 20 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 15 nucleotides in length, about 5 to about 10 nucleotides in length, and all oligonucleotides intermediate in length of the sizes specifically disclosed, for example about 15 to about 35 nucleotides, to the extent that the oligonucleotide is able to achieve the desired result. Accordingly, oligonucleotides of 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, and 100 nucleotides in length are contemplated. Throughout, the term nucleotide is interchangeably referred to as a nucleobase. In embodiments, the oligonucleotide comprises a section of at least two nucleobases each having an amine functional group, at least three nucleobases each having an amine functional group, or at least four nucleobases each having an amine functional group and/or up to six nucleobases each having an amine functional group, up to five nucleobases each having an amine functional group, or up to four nucleobases each having an amine functional group.
The oligonucleotide can include a section having a therapeutic sequence. The therapeutic sequence can encode a single gene, multiple genes, chimeric proteins, DNA sequences or regulator RNA, or precursor of such regulatory RNA molecules. Encoded proteins can include signal peptides to aid in the excretion of gene products and/or other specific sequences to aid in the delivery, stability and activity of the gene product, depending on the therapeutic application. In embodiments, the therapeutic sequence comprises an immunomodulatory sequence. In embodiments, the therapeutic sequence can be complementary to a target polynucleotide.
Modified Oligonucleotides
Specific examples of oligonucleotides include those containing modified backbones or non-natural internucleoside linkages. Oligonucleotides having modified backbones include those that retain a phosphorus atom in the backbone and those that do not have a phosphorus atom in the backbone. Modified oligonucleotides that do not have a phosphorus atom in their internucleoside backbone are considered to be within the meaning of “oligonucleotide.”
Modified oligonucleotide backbones containing a phosphorus atom include, for example, phosphorothioates, chiral phosphorothioates, phosphorodithioates, phosphotriesters, aminoalkylphosphotriesters, methyl and other alkyl phosphonates including 3′-alkylene phosphonates, 5′-alkylene phosphonates and chiral phosphonates, phosphinates, phosphoramidates including 3′-amino phosphoramidate and aminoalkylphosphoramidates, thionophosphoramidates, thionoalkylphosphonates, thionoalkylphosphotriesters, selenophosphates and boranophosphates having normal 3′-5′ linkages, 2′-5′ linked analogs of these, and those having inverted polarity wherein one or more internucleotide linkages is a 3′ to 3′, 5′ to 5′ or 2′ to 2′ linkage. Also contemplated are oligonucleotides having inverted polarity comprising a single 3′ to 3′ linkage at the 3′-most internucleotide linkage, i.e. a single inverted nucleoside residue which can be a basic (the nucleotide is missing or has a hydroxyl group in place thereof). Salts, mixed salts and free acid forms are also contemplated. Representative United States patents that teach the preparation of the above phosphorus-containing linkages include, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,687,808; 4,469,863; 4,476,301; 5,023,243; 5,177,196; 5,188,897; 5,264,423; 5,276,019; 5,278,302; 5,286,717; 5,321,131; 5,399,676; 5,405,939; 5,453,496; 5,455,233; 5,466,677; 5,476,925; 5,519,126; 5,536,821; 5,541,306; 5,550,111; 5,563,253; 5,571,799; 5,587,361; 5,194,599; 5,565,555; 5,527,899; 5,721,218; 5,672,697 and 5,625,050, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Modified oligonucleotide backbones that do not include a phosphorus atom therein have backbones that are formed by short chain alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, mixed heteroatom and alkyl or cycloalkyl internucleoside linkages, or one or more short chain heteroatomic or heterocyclic internucleoside linkages. These include those having morpholino linkages; siloxane backbones; sulfide, sulfoxide and sulfone backbones; formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; methylene formacetyl and thioformacetyl backbones; riboacetyl backbones; alkene containing backbones; sulfamate backbones; methyleneimino and methylenehydrazino backbones; sulfonate and sulfonamide backbones; amide backbones; and others having mixed N, O, S and CH2 component parts. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,034,506; 5,166,315; 5,185,444; 5,214,134; 5,216,141; 5,235,033; 5,264,562; 5,264,564; 5,405,938; 5,434,257; 5,466,677; 5,470,967; 5,489,677; 5,541,307; 5,561,225; 5,596,086; 5,602,240; 5,610,289; 5,602,240; 5,608,046; 5,610,289; 5,618,704; 5,623,070; 5,663,312; 5,633,360; 5,677,437; 5,792,608; 5,646,269 and 5,677,439, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
In still other embodiments, oligonucleotide mimetics wherein both one or more sugar and/or one or more internucleotide linkage of the nucleotide units are replaced with “non-naturally occurring” groups. In one aspect, this embodiment contemplates a peptide nucleic acid (PNA). In PNA compounds, the sugar-backbone of an oligonucleotide is replaced with an amide containing backbone. See, for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,539,082; 5,714,331; and 5,719,262, and Nielsen et al., 1991, Science, 254: 1497-1500, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
In still other embodiments, oligonucleotides are provided with phosphorothioate backbones and oligonucleosides with heteroatom backbones, and including —CH2—NH—O—CH2—, —CH2—N(CH3)—O—CH2—, —CH2—O—N(CH3)—CH2—, —CH2—N(CH3)—N(CH3)—CH2— and —O—N(CH3)—CH2—CH2— described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,489,677, and 5,602,240. Also contemplated are oligonucleotides with morpholino backbone structures described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,034,506.
In various forms, the linkage between two successive monomers in the oligonucleotide consists of 2 to 4, desirably 3, groups/atoms selected from —CH2—, —O—, —S—, —NRH—, >C═O, >C═NRH, >C═S, —Si(R″)2—, —SO—, —S(O)2—, —P(O)2—, PO(BH3)—, —P(O,S)—, —P(S)2—, —PO(R″)—, —PO(OCH3)—, and —PO(NHRH)—, where RH is selected from hydrogen and C1-4-alkyl, and R″ is selected from C1-6-alkyl and phenyl. Illustrative examples of such linkages are —CH2—CH2—CH2—, —CH2—CO—CH2—, —CH2—CHOH—CH2—, —O—CH2—O—, —O—CH2—CH2—, —O—CH2—CH═, —CH2—CH2—O—, —NRH—CH2—CH2—, —CH2—CH2—NRH, —CH2—NRH—CH2—, —O—CH2—CH2—NRH—, —NRH—CO—O—, —NRH—CO—NRH—, —NRH—CS—NRH, —NRH—C(═NRH)—NRH—, —NRH—CO—CH2—NRH—O—CO—O—, O—CO—CH2—O—, —O—CH2—CO—O—, —CH2—CO—NRH—, —O—CO—NRH—, —NRHCO—CH2—, —O—CH2—CO—NRH—, —O—CH2—CH2—NRH—, —CH═N—O—, —CH2—NRH—O—, —CH2—O—N═, —CH2—O—NRH—, —CO—NRH—CH2—, —CH2—NRH—O—, —CH2—NRH—CO—, —O—NRH—CH2—, —O—NRH, —O—CH2—S—, —S—CH2—O—, —CH2—CH2—S—, —O—CH2—CH2—S—, —S—CH2—CH═, —S—CH2—CH2—, —S—CH2—CH2—O—, —S—CH2—CH2—S—, CH2—S—CH2—, —CH2—SO—CH2—, —CH2—SO2—CH2—, —O—SO—O—, —O—S(O)2—O—, —O—S(O)2—CH2—, —OS(O)2—NRH, —NRH—S(O)2—CH2—; —O—S(O)2—CH2—, —O—P(O)2—O—, —O—P(O,S)—O—, —O—P(S)2—O—, —S—P(O)2—O—, —S—P(O,S)—O—, —S—P(S)2—O—, —O—P(O)2—S—, —O—P(O,S)—S—, —O—P(S)2—S—, —S—P(O)2—S—, —S—P(O,S)—S—, —S—P(S)2—S—, —O—PO(R″)—O—, —O—PO(OCH3)—O—, —O—PO(OCH2CH3)—O—, —O—PO(O CH2CH2S—R)—O—, —O—PO(BH3)—O—, —O—PO(NHRN)—O—, —O—P(O)2—NRH H—, —NRH—P(O)2—O—, —O—P(O,NRH)—O—, —CH2—P(O)2—O—, —O—P(O)2—CH2—, and —O—Si(R″)2—O—; among which —CH2—CO—NRH—, —CH2—NRH—O—, —S—CH2—O—, —O—P(O)2—O—O—P(—O,S)—O—, —O—P(S)2—O—, —NRH P(O)2—O—, —O—P(O,NRH)—O—, —O—PO(R″)—O—, —O—PO(CH3)—O—, and —O—PO(NHRN)—O—, where RH is selected form hydrogen and C1-4-alkyl, and R″ is selected from C1-6-alkyl and phenyl, are contemplated. Further illustrative examples are given in Mesmaeker et. al., 1995, Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 5: 343-355 and Susan M. Freier and Karl-Heinz Altmann, 1997, Nucleic Acids Research, vol 25: pp 4429-4443.
Still other modified forms of oligonucleotides are described in detail in U.S. Patent Application No. 20040219565, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Modified oligonucleotides can also contain one or more substituted sugar moieties. In certain aspects, oligonucleotides comprise one of the following at the 2′ position: OH; F; O-, S-, or N-alkyl; O-, S-, or N-alkenyl; O-, S- or N-alkynyl; or O-alkyl-O-alkyl, wherein the alkyl, alkenyl and alkynyl can be substituted or unsubstituted C1 to C10 alkyl or C2 to C10 alkenyl and alkynyl. Other embodiments include O[(CH2)nO]mCH3, O(CH2)nOCH3, O(CH2)nNH2, O(CH2)nCH3, O(CH2)nONH2, and O(CH2)nON[(CH2)nCH3]2, where n and m are from 1 to about 10. Other oligonucleotides comprise one of the following at the 2′ position: C1 to C10 lower alkyl, substituted lower alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, alkaryl, aralkyl, O-alkaryl or O-aralkyl, SH, SCH3, OCN, Cl, Br, CN, CF3, OCF3, SOCH3, SO2CH3, ONO2, NO2, N3, NH2, heterocycloalkyl, heterocycloalkaryl, aminoalkylamino, polyalkylamino, substituted silyl, an RNA cleaving group, a reporter group, an intercalator, a group for improving the pharmacokinetic properties of an oligonucleotide, or a group for improving the pharmacodynamic properties of an oligonucleotide, and other substituents having similar properties. In one aspect, a modification includes 2′-methoxyethoxy (2′-O—CH2CH2OCH3, also known as 2′-O-(2-methoxyethyl) or 2′-MOE) (Martin et al., 1995, Helv. Chin. Acta, 78: 486-504) i.e., an alkoxyalkoxy group. Other modifications include 2′-dimethylaminooxyethoxy, i.e., a O(CH2)2ON(CH3)2 group, also known as 2′-DMAOE, as described in examples herein below, and 2′-dimethylaminoethoxyethoxy (also known in the art as 2′-O-dimethyl-amino-ethoxy-ethyl or 2′-DMAEOE), i.e., 2′-O—CH2—O—CH2N(CH3)2, also described in examples herein below.
Still other modifications include 2′-methoxy (2′-O—CH3), 2′-aminopropoxy (2′-OCH2CH2CH2NH2), 2′-allyl (2′-CH2CH═CH2), 2′-O-allyl(2′-O—CH2CH═CH2) and 2′-fluoro (2′-F). The 2′-modification can be in the arabino (up) position or ribo (down) position. In one aspect, a 2′-arabino modification is 2′-F. Similar modifications can also be made at other positions on the oligonucleotide, for example, at the 3′ position of the sugar on the 3′ terminal nucleotide or in 2′-5′ linked oligonucleotides and the 5′ position of 5′ terminal nucleotide. Oligonucleotides can also have sugar mimetics such as cyclobutyl moieties in place of the pentofuranosyl sugar. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,981,957; 5,118,800; 5,319,080; 5,359,044; 5,393,878; 5,446,137; 5,466,786; 5,514,785; 5,519,134; 5,567,811; 5,576,427; 5,591,722; 5,597,909; 5,610,300; 5,627,053; 5,639,873; 5,646,265; 5,658,873; 5,670,633; 5,792,747; and 5,700,920, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
In one aspect, a modification of the sugar includes Locked Nucleic Acids (LNAs) in which the 2′-hydroxyl group is linked to the 3′ or 4′ carbon atom of the sugar ring, thereby forming a bicyclic sugar moiety. The linkage is in certain aspects is a methylene (CH2)n group bridging the 2′ oxygen atom and the 4′ carbon atom wherein n is 1 or 2. LNAs and preparation thereof are described in WO 98/39352 and WO 99/14226.
Oligonucleotides can also include base modifications or substitutions. As used herein, “unmodified” or “natural” bases include the purine bases adenine (A) and guanine (G), and the pyrimidine bases thymine (T), cytosine (C) and uracil (U). Modified bases include other synthetic and natural bases such as 5-methylcytosine (5mC), 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine, xanthine, hypoxanthine, 2-aminoadenine, 6-methyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-propyl and other alkyl derivatives of adenine and guanine, 2-thiouracil, 2-thiothymine and 2-thiocytosine, 5-halouracil and cytosine, 5-propynyl uracil and cytosine and other alkynyl derivatives of pyrimidine bases; 6-azo uracil, cytosine and thymine; 5-uracil (pseudouracil); 4-thiouracil; 8-halo, 8-amino, 8-thiol, 8-thioalkyl, 8-hydroxyl and other 8-substituted adenines and guanines; 5-halo (particularly 5-bromo, 5-trifluoromethyl) and other 5-substituted uracils and cytosines; 7-methylguanine and 7-methyladenine, 2-F-adenine, 2-amino-adenine, 8-azaguanine and 8-azaadenine, 7-deazaguanine and 7-deazaadenine and 3-deazaguanine and 3-deazaadenine. Further modified bases include tricyclic pyrimidines such as phenoxazine cytidine(1H-pyrimido[5,4-b][1,4]benzoxazin-2(3H)-one), phenothiazine cytidine (1H-pyrimido[5,4-b][1,4]benzothiazin-2(3H)-one), G-clamps such as a substituted phenoxazine cytidine (e.g. 9-(2-aminoethoxy)-H-pyrimido[5,4-b][1,4]benzoxazin-2(3H)-one), carbazole cytidine (2H-pyrimido[4,5-b]indol-2-one), pyridoindole cytidine (H-pyrido[3′,2′:4,5]pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-2-one). Modified bases can also include those in which the purine or pyrimidine base is replaced with other heterocycles, for example 7-deaza-adenine, 7-deazaguanosine, 2-aminopyridine and 2-pyridone. Further bases include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808, those disclosed in The Concise Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, pages 858-859, Kroschwitz, J. I., ed. John Wiley & Sons, 1990, those disclosed by Englisch et al., 1991, Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 30: 613, and those disclosed by Sanghvi, Y. S., Chapter 15, Antisense Research and Applications, pages 289-302, Crooke, S. T. and Lebleu, B., ed., CRC Press, 1993. Certain of these bases are useful for increasing the binding affinity and include 5-substituted pyrimidines, 6-azapyrimidines and N-2, N-6 and O—6 substituted purines, including 2-aminopropyladenine, 5-propynyluracil and 5-propynylcytosine. 5-methylcytosine substitutions have been shown to increase nucleic acid duplex stability by 0.6-1.2° C. and are, in certain aspects combined with 2′-O-methoxyethyl sugar modifications. See, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,687,808, 4,845,205; 5,130,302; 5,134,066; 5,175,273; 5,367,066; 5,432,272; 5,457,187; 5,459,255; 5,484,908; 5,502,177; 5,525,711; 5,552,540; 5,587,469; 5,594,121, 5,596,091; 5,614,617; 5,645,985; 5,830,653; 5,763,588; 6,005,096; 5,750,692 and 5,681,941, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
A “modified base” or other similar term refers to a composition which can pair with a natural base (e.g., adenine, guanine, cytosine, uracil, and/or thymine) and/or can pair with a non-naturally occurring base. In certain aspects, the modified base provides a Tn, differential of 15, 12, 10, 8, 6, 4, or 2° C. or less. Exemplary modified bases are described in EP 1 072 679 and WO 97/12896.
By “nucleobase” is meant the naturally occurring nucleobases adenine (A), guanine (G), cytosine (C), thymine (T) and uracil (U) as well as non-naturally occurring nucleobases such as xanthine, diaminopurine, 8-oxo-N6-methyladenine, 7-deazaxanthine, 7-deazaguanine, N4,N4-ethanocytosin, N′,N′-ethano-2,6-diaminopurine, 5-methylcytosine (mC), 5-(C3-C6)-alkynyl-cytosine, 5-fluorouracil, 5-bromouracil, pseudoisocytosine, 2-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-triiazolopyridin, isocytosine, isoguanine, inosine and the “non-naturally occurring” nucleobases described in Benner et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,432,272 and Susan M. Freier and Karl-Heinz Altmann, 1997, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25: pp 4429-4443. The term “nucleobase” thus includes not only the known purine and pyrimidine heterocycles, but also heterocyclic analogues and tautomers thereof. Further naturally and non-naturally occurring nucleobases include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,687,808 (Merigan, et al.), in Chapter 15 by Sanghvi, in Antisense Research and Application, Ed. S. T. Crooke and B. Lebleu, CRC Press, 1993, in Englisch et al., 1991, Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 30: 613-722 (see especially pages 622 and 623, and in the Concise Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, J. I. Kroschwitz Ed., John Wiley & Sons, 1990, pages 858-859; Cook, Anti-cancer Drug Design 1991, 6, 585-607, each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety). The term “nucleosidic base” or “base unit” is further intended to include compounds such as heterocyclic compounds that can serve like nucleobases including certain “universal bases” that are not nucleosidic bases in the most classical sense but serve as nucleosidic bases. Especially mentioned as universal bases are 3-nitropyrrole, optionally substituted indoles (e.g., 5-nitroindole), and optionally substituted hypoxanthine. Other desirable universal bases include, pyrrole, diazole or triazole derivatives, including those universal bases known in the art.
In certain aspects, the oligonucleotide further comprises a spacer between the nucleotide portion and the lipid portion. “Spacer” as used herein means a moiety that does not participate in modulating gene expression per se but which serves to increase distance, for example, between the nucleobases and the lipid moiety. The spacer can be a polymer, including but not limited to a water-soluble polymer, a nucleic acid, a polypeptide, an oligosaccharide, a carbohydrate, a lipid, an ethylglycol, or combinations thereof.
The amphiphilic oligonucleotide further comprises a reactive group. The amphiphilic oligonucleotide can be covalently bound to the crosslinking agent through the reactive group. In embodiments, the reactive group can include a nucleophile that can react with a succinimidyl group on a PEGylated crosslinking agent. The nucleophile can be any nucleophile that reacts with a succinimidyl group, for example an amine. In embodiments, the reactive group of the amphiphilic oligonucleotide comprises an amine, a hydroxyl, a succinimidyl, an alkyne, or an azide. In embodiments, the reactive group comprises an amine. In embodiments wherein the reactive group is an alkyne, the oligonucleotide can bind to a PEGylated crosslinking agent with an azide at each terminus (or vice versa) to allow crosslinking via a click chemistry type reaction.
The lipid moiety of the amphiphilic oligonucleotide can be chosen from the phosphocholine family of lipids or the phosphoethanolamine family of lipids. Examples include 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC), 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-phosphatidylcholine (DMPC), 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-phosphatidylcholine (POPC), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (DSPG), 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phospho-(1′-rac-glycerol) (DOPG), 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC), 1,2-di-(9Z-octadecenoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE), and 1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DPPE).
The lipid moiety and the oligonucleotide can be connected via Cu-free click chemistry using click-chemistry reactive pairs. Click-chemistry reactive pairs include a first click chemistry reagent (e.g., an azide) and a second click chemistry reagent (e.g., an alkyne). It will be appreciated that either entity of the click chemistry reactive pair can be incorporated into the lipid while the other entity of the reactive pair can be incorporated into the oligonucleotide. Additional suitable reactive pairs are well known in the art and include, but are not limited to, reactive pairs that couple amines to carboxylic acids, maleimides to sulfhydryls, vinyl sulfones to sulfhydryls, and acrylates to sulfhydryls. In embodiments, the lipid moiety and the oligonucleotide are connect via a triazolyl. The triazolyl can be formed by reacting an oligonucleotide having an alkyne moiety and a lipid having an azide moiety under conditions to form the triazolyl.
The amphiphilic oligonucleotide can be prepared by reacting a lipid moiety comprising a first click chemistry reagent with an oligonucleotide comprising a second click chemistry reagent, under conditions suitable for click chemistry. Suitable conditions are well known to one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, the lipid can be dissolved or suspended in a solvent, optionally activated, and admixed with an excess of a first click chemistry reagent, at ambient conditions. The reagent can be added in an amount to provide a reagent to lipid ratio of about 1:1 to about 1000:1, for example, about 1:1 to about 750:1, about 1:1 to about 500:1, about 1:1 to about 250:1, about 1:1 to about 100:1, about 1:1 to about 50:1, or about 1:1 to about 25:1. Similarly, the oligonucleotide can be dissolved in a solvent, optionally activated, and admixed with an excess of a second click chemistry reagent, at ambient conditions. The second reagent can be added in an amount to provide a reagent to oligonucleotide ratio of about 1:1 to about 1000:1, for example, about 1:1 to about 750:1, about 1:1 to about 500:1, about 1:1 to about 250:1, about 1:1 to about 100:1, about 1:1 to about 50:1, or about 1:1 to about 25:1. The lipid moiety comprising a first click chemistry reagent and oligonucleotide comprising a second click chemistry reagent can be admixed under ambient conditions to form the amphiphilic oligonucleotide. As used herein, and unless specified otherwise, “ambient conditions” refers to room temperature and atmospheric pressure.
The amphiphilic oligonucleotides can be covalently bound to a PEGylated crosslinking agent to form the crosslinked micellar SNA. The PEGylated cross-linking agent includes at least two reactive sites, each of which can form a covalent bond with the reactive group of two amphiphilic oligonucleotide and thereby crosslink the amphiphilic oligonucleotides. The PEGylated crosslinking agent advantageously increases the stability of the SNA. PEGylated crosslinking agents can include PEGylated bis(sulfosuccinimidyl)suberate to increase the stability of the SNA. As can be readily appreciated, the oligonucleotides can be crosslinked with a PEGylated crosslinking agent using other compatible reactive groups. For example, the oligonucleotide can be modified to include a succinimidyl moiety and the PEGylated crosslinking agent can have each terminus modified with an amine or other nucleophile that reacts with the succinimidyl group. Or the oligonucleotide can be modified with an alkyne and the PEGylated crosslinking agent with an azide at each terminus (or vice versa) to allow crosslinking via a click chemistry type reaction. Thus other appropriate functional groups on the oligonucleotide and the PEGylated crosslinking agent are also contemplated in this disclosure. In embodiments, the reactive sites of the PEGylated crosslinking agent comprise an amine, a hydroxyl, a succinimidyl, an alkyne, or an azide. In embodiments, at least one of the reactive sites of the PEGylated crosslinking agent comprises a succinimidyl moiety. In embodiments, each reactive site of the PEGylated crosslinking agent comprises a succinimidyl moiety.
The crosslinked micellar SNA can be cooperatively bound to a complementary SNA.
The methods disclosed herein comprise (a) admixing a polyethyleneoxide-polypropyleneoxide-polyethyleneoxide (PEO-PPO-PEO) block copolymer and a plurality of amphiphilic oligonucleotides in a buffer to form a SNA, wherein the amphiphilic oligonucleotide comprises (i) a lipid moiety and (ii) at least one reactive group, (b) admixing the resulting SNA with a PEGylated crosslinking agent to form the crosslinked SNA, wherein the PEGylated crosslinking agent comprises at least two reactive sites, each reactive site reacting with the reactive group of the amphiphilic oligonucleotide to form a covalent bond and thereby crosslink the amphiphilic oligonucleotides, and (c) optionally washing the crosslinked SNA to remove uncrosslinked amphiphilic oligonucleotides.
Admixing the PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymer and plurality of amphiphilic oligonucleotides can be performed at any suitable temperature for forming and/or maintaining PEO-PPO-PEO micelles. It is understood in the art that as the temperature of a system increases, the critical micelle concentration decreases. In embodiments, the admixing of step (a) is performed at room temperature. The PEO-PPO-PEO and amphiphilic oligonucleotides can be admixed in any suitable solvent. Suitable solvents include physiologically acceptable solvents, media, and buffers including, but not limited to HEPES buffered saline (HBS) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS). In embodiments, the PEO-PPO-PEO and amphiphilic oligonucleotides are admixed in a buffer.
The PEO-PPO-PEO can be provided as already-formed micelles or as individual polymers. The concentration of PEO-PPO-PEO, whether in the form of micelles or individual polymers, is at least equal to or greater than the critical micelle concentration of the PEO-PPO-PEO such that the individual PEO-PPO-PEO polymers will assemble into micelles and any formed PEO-PPO-PEO micelles will not disassemble. In embodiments, the PEO-PPO-PEO can be provided in a concentration in a range of about 0.5 wt. % to about 15 wt. % based on the total weight of the solution/dispersion, for example, about 0.5 wt. %, about 0.75 wt. %, about 1 wt. %, about 1.5 wt. %, about 2 wt. %, about 2.5 wt. %, about 3 wt. %, about 3.5 wt. %, about 4 wt. %, about 4.5 wt. %, about 5 wt. %, about 6 wt. %, about 7 wt. %, about 8 wt. %, about 9 wt. %, about 10 wt. %, about 11 wt. %, about 12 wt. %, about 13 wt. %, about 14 wt. %, or about 15 wt. %, based on the total weight of the solution/dispersion. It is understood in the art that once the PEO-PPO-PEO is provided at the critical micelle concentration, any additional PEO-PPO-PEO or other surfactants added to the system will form micelles.
Surface functionalization of the PEO-PPO-PEO micelles with the amphiphilic oligonucleotides to form the SNA can be readily achieved. The amphiphilic oligonucleotide can be added in a suitable concentration to achieve the desired number of strands of amphiphilic oligonucleotide per PEO-PPO-PEO micelle. Suitable concentrations include at least about 0.5 μM, at least about 1 μM, at least about 5 μM, at least about 10 μM, at least about 15 μM, at least about 20 μM, at least about 25 μM, at least about 30 μM, at least about 35 μM, at least about 40 μM, at least about 45 μM, or at least about 50 μM, and up to about 100 μM, up to about 90 μM, up to about 80 μM, up to about 70 μM, up to about 60 μM, or up to about 50 μM. After admixing the PEO-PPO-PEO and the amphiphilic oligonucleotide, the mixture can be allowed to equilibrate prior to crosslinking. Without intending to be bound by theory it is believed that the lipid tail of the amphiphilic oligonucleotide intercalates into the hydrophobic core of the micelles, thereby allowing facile incorporation of the oligonucleotide into the micelles to form the SNA, without compromising the polydispersity of the micelles. The duration of equilibration of the mixture can be varied for any suitable time period for intercalating the lipid tail of the oligonucleotide into the PEO-PPO-PEO micelle. The rate of the intercalation of the lipid tail of the amphiphilic oligonucleotide into the hydrophobic core of the micelle can depend, in part, on the concentration of the amphiphilic oligonucleotide, the micelle surface to solution volume ratio, and the temperature. When the duration of equilibrium increases above 24 hours (and one of the foregoing exemplary concentrations of amphiphilic oligonucleotide is used), little difference in the amount of amphiphilic oligonucleotide incorporated into the SNA is expected (relative to a 24 hour exposure time). The concentration of oligonucleotide strands in the micellar SNAs can be determined by UV-vis spectroscopy nanoparticle tracking analysis to calculate the number of nanoparticles using dynamic light scattering technique.
The oligonucleotide strands of the resulting SNA can be crosslinked to increase stability of the SNA. Crosslinking of the oligonucleotide strands of the SNA can be achieved by admixing the SNA with a PEGylated crosslinking agent to form the crosslinked micellar SNA. Suitable solvents for crosslinking include physiologically acceptable solvents, media, and buffers, including, but not limited to HEPES buffered saline (HBS) and phosphate buffered saline (PBS). In embodiments, the SNA and PEGylated crosslinking agents are admixed in a buffer.
The PEGylated crosslinking agent can be added in any concentration suitable to achieve substantial crosslinking of the oligonucleotide strands. As used herein, “substantial crosslinking” and “substantially crosslinked” refer to at least 50%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 90%, or at least 95% of the reactive groups provided on the oligonucleotide strands are crosslinked. Because the PEGylated crosslinking agents have two reactive sites, the molar ratio of reactive groups to PEGylated crosslinking agent can be in a range of about 2:1 to about 4:1, or about 2:1, about 2.5:1, about 3:1, about 3.5:1, or about 4:1. An excess of PEGylated crosslinking agent (e.g., said ratio of about 2:1.1) can be used to ensure 99% or more crosslinking. Suitable concentrations include at least about 10 μM, at least about 15 μM, at least about 20 μM, at least about 25 μM, at least about 30 μM, at least about 35 μM, at least about 40 μM, at least about 45 μM, or at least about 50 μM, and up to about 100 μM, up to about 90 μM, up to about 80 μM, up to about 70 μM, up to about 60 μM, or up to about 50 μM. Suitable concentrations include at least about 10 μM, at least about 15 μM, at least about 20 μM, at least about 25 μM, at least about 30 μM, at least about 35 μM, at least about 40 μM, at least about 45 μM, or at least about 50 μM, and up to about 100 μM, up to about 90 μM, up to about 80 μM, up to about 70 μM, up to about 60 μM, or up to about 50 μM. In embodiments, the concentration of PEGylated crosslinking agent is provided in an amount that is half of the concentration of reactive groups. Particles not substantially crosslinked can be disassembled using the temperature-dependent property of PEO-PPO-PEO.
After admixing the SNA and the PEGylated crosslinking agent, the mixture can be agitated to facilitate crosslinking of the oligonucleotide strands. Without intending to be bound by theory it is believed that agitation of the mixture facilitates the diffusion of the PEGylated crosslinking agent into the SNA to access the strands of the oligonucleotide. The duration of agitation of the mixture can be varied for any suitable time period. The rate of the diffusion of the crosslinking agent into the SNA can depend, in part, on the concentration of the PEGylated crosslinking agent, the SNA surface to solution volume ratio, and the temperature. When the duration of agitation increases above 24 hours (and one of the foregoing exemplary concentrations of PEGylated crosslinking agent is used), little difference in the amount of crosslinking is expected (relative to a 24 hour exposure time). Suitable agitation times are at least about 30 min, at least about 1 h, at least about 2 h, at least about 4 h, at least about 6 h and/or up to about 24 h, up to about 18 h, up to about 16 h, up to about 14 h, up to about 12 h, up to about 10 h, or up to about 8 h.
Isolation of the crosslinked micellar SNAs from any excess PEO-PPO-PEO and any non-crosslinked, unbound amphiphilic oligonucleotides can be easily accomplished by low-temperature centrifugal filtration. Lowering the temperature of the crosslinked micellar SNA dispersion to a temperature below the critical micelle temperature of the PEO-PPO-PEO allows for the disassembly of any non-functionalized micelles (or those with low levels of functionalization) into individual polymer chains after crosslinking. These left-over block copolymer-based components, together with unincorporated oligonucleotides, can be removed via low-temperature cycles of membrane-filter-centrifugation/resuspension, where the temperature of the crosslinked micellar SNA dispersion is maintained below the temperature at which non-crosslinked polymer chains no longer remain a micelle. As used herein “micelle disassembly temperature” refers to the temperature at which non-crosslinked polymer chains no longer remain a micelle. The temperature of the crosslinked micellar SNA dispersion can be lowered to about 10° C. or less, about 8° C. or less, about 6° C. or less, or about 4° C. or less, for example, about 10° C., about 9° C., about 8° C., about 7° C., about 6° C., about 5° C., about 4° C., about 3° C., or about 2° C. In embodiments, the crosslinked micellar SNA is cooled to a temperature of less than 10° C. to remove free PEO-PPO-PEO. In embodiments, the crosslinked micellar SNA is cooled to a temperature of less than 4° C. to remove any free Pluronic F127. The low-temperature cycle of membrane-filter-centrifugation/resuspension can be performed at least 3 times, at least 4 times, or at least 5 times and/or up to about 8 times, up to about 7 times, up to about 6 times, or up to about 5 times. In embodiments, isolating the crosslinked SNA comprises filtering. In embodiments, the method comprises three low-temperature cycles of membrane-filter-centrifugation/resuspension. As shown in
The isolated crosslinked micellar SNAs can retain their as-synthesized particle characteristics (e.g., polydispersity index, mean particle diameter, and/or surface charge), suggesting that the crosslinking was effective and the purification process did not cause a significant loss in the template-assembled oligonucleotide component. Imaging of the crosslinked micellar SNAs deposited on a mica surface by atomic force microscopy (AFM, as shown in
SNAs can cooperatively bind to a complementary SNA partner, resulting in sharp and enhanced melting transition compared to the typical broad melting transitions observed for free DNA duplexes (
The crosslinked micellar SNAs presented herein exhibit remarkable stability in biological media at physiological conditions. The crosslinked micellar SNAs can be stored at 37° C. for at least 3 days, at least 5 days, or at least 7 days without demonstrating oligonucleotide leakage or interparticle fusion, as analyzed by direct gel electrophoresis of the nanoconstruct. Without intending to be bound by theory, it is believed that the thermal stability of the SNAs can be attributed to the electrostatic repulsive forces of the negatively charged oligonucleotide strands on the particle surface. It is further believed that the oligonucleotide corona is accompanied by a dense counter-ion cloud that decreases the propensity of SNAs interaction with nucleases and the crosslinking of the nucleic acids extends its serum stability. Thus, the SNAs disclosed herein can be used for delivery of a therapeutic agent encapsulated in the SNA and released upon cellular uptake. For example, a chemotherapeutic agent can be included in the SNA and can then be released after cellular uptake.
The ease of synthesis and scalability from readily available, non-toxic starting materials makes crosslinked micellar SNAs an advantageous route for effective intracellular delivery of therapeutically active nucleic acids with attractive properties. Furthermore, crosslinked micellar SNAs are advantageously in a size range which allows for enhanced circulation and tumor penetration, thereby allowing for effective delivery of therapeutically active nucleic acids that exhibit immunomodulation in diseased cells.
Methods for inhibiting gene product expression provided herein include those wherein expression of the target gene product is inhibited by at least about 5%, at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 75%, at least about 80%, at least about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 96%, at least about 97%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%, or 100% compared to gene product expression in the absence of an SNA. In other words, methods provided embrace those which results in essentially any degree of inhibition of expression of a target gene product.
The degree of inhibition is determined in vivo from a body fluid sample or from a biopsy sample or by imaging techniques well known in the art. Alternatively, the degree of inhibition is determined in a cell-culture assay, generally as a predictable measure of a degree of inhibition that can be expected in vivo resulting from use of a specific type of SNA and a specific oligonucleotide.
In some aspects of the disclosure, it is contemplated that a SNA performs both a gene inhibitory function as well as a therapeutic agent delivery function. In such aspects, a therapeutic agent is encapsulated in a SNA of the disclosure and the particle is additionally functionalized with one or more oligonucleotides designed to effect inhibition of target gene expression. In further embodiments, a therapeutic agent is attached to the SNA of the disclosure.
In various aspects, the methods include use of an oligonucleotide which is 100% complementary to the target polynucleotide, i.e., a perfect match, while in other aspects, the oligonucleotide is at least (meaning greater than or equal to) about 95% complementary to the polynucleotide over the length of the oligonucleotide, at least about 90%, at least about 85%, at least about 80%, at least about 75%, at least about 70%, at least about 65%, at least about 60%, at least about 55%, at least about 50%, at least about 45%, at least about 40%, at least about 35%, at least about 30%, at least about 25%, at least about 20% complementary to the polynucleotide over the length of the oligonucleotide to the extent that the oligonucleotide is able to achieve the desired degree of inhibition of a target gene product.
It is understood in the art that the sequence of an antisense compound need not be 100% complementary to that of its target nucleic acid to be specifically hybridizable. Moreover, an oligonucleotide can hybridize over one or more segments such that intervening or adjacent segments are not involved in the hybridization event (e.g., a loop structure or hairpin structure). The percent complementarity is determined over the length of the oligonucleotide. For example, given an antisense compound in which 18 of 20 nucleotides of the antisense compound are complementary to a 20 nucleotide region in a target polynucleotide of 100 nucleotides total length, the oligonucleotide would be 90 percent complementary. In this example, the remaining noncomplementary nucleotides can be clustered or interspersed with complementary nucleobases and need not be contiguous to each other or to complementary nucleotides. Percent complementarity of an antisense compound with a region of a target nucleic acid can be determined routinely using BLAST programs (basic local alignment search tools) and PowerBLAST programs known in the art (Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol., 1990, 215, 403-410; Zhang and Madden, Genome Res., 1997, 7, 649-656).
Accordingly, methods of utilizing SNAs in gene regulation therapy are provided. This method comprises the step of hybridizing a polynucleotide encoding said gene product with one or more oligonucleotides complementary to all or a portion of said polynucleotide, said oligonucleotide being attached to a SNA, wherein hybridizing between said polynucleotide and said oligonucleotide occurs over a length of said polynucleotide with a degree of complementarity sufficient to inhibit expression of said gene product. The inhibition of gene expression can occur in vivo or in vitro. In embodiments, the expression of the gene product is inhibited in vivo. In embodiments, the expression of the gene product is inhibited in vitro.
The oligonucleotide utilized in this method is either RNA or DNA. In embodiments, the oligonucleotide comprises RNA. The RNA can be a non-coding RNA. The non-coding RNA can be an inhibitory RNA (RNAi). The RNA can be an inhibitory RNA (RNAi) that performs a regulatory function, and in various embodiments is selected from the group consisting of a small inhibitory RNA (siRNA), an RNA that forms a triplex with double stranded DNA, and a ribozyme. Alternatively, the RNA is microRNA that performs a regulatory function. The oligonucleotide can be DNA. The DNA is, in some embodiments, an antisense-DNA.
In another aspect of the disclosure, a SNA is used in a method for treating a traumatic brain injury (TBI). In the United States, there have been over 244,000 cases of TBI in the military since 2000, and it is the leading cause of death and disability in people under the age of 45. Further, it is currently difficult to predict the neurological outcome of “mild severity” incidents, and the secondary phase of the injury (e.g., inflammation, ischemia, and apoptosis) is very difficult to treat.
Thus, in some embodiments, methods of the disclosure are directed to the use of a SNA designed to target and regulate the expression of a gene product implicated in TBI. For example and without limitation, the target gene product is selected from the group consisting of histone deacetylase (HDAC), BCL2-associated X (BAX), a matrix metallopeptidase/metalloproteinase (MMP; including, without limitation, matrix metallopeptidase 9 (MMP-9)), a hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF; including, without limitation, hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF1-α)), and calpain.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a class of proteins, expressed in sentinel cells, that plays a key role in regulation of innate immune system. The mammalian immune system uses two general strategies to combat infectious diseases. Pathogen exposure rapidly triggers an innate immune response that is characterized by the production of immunostimulatory cytokines, chemokines, and polyreactive IgM antibodies. The innate immune system is activated by exposure to Pathogen Associated Molecular Patterns (PAMPs) that are expressed by a diverse group of infectious microorganisms. The recognition of PAMPs is mediated by members of the Toll-like family of receptors. TLR receptors, such as TLR 4, TLR 8, and TLR 9, that response to specific oligonucleotide are located inside special intracellular compartments, called endosomes. The mechanism of modulation of TLR 4, TLR 8, and TLR9 receptors is based on DNA-protein interactions.
Synthetic immunostimulatory oligonucleotides that contain CpG motifs that are similar to those found in bacterial DNA stimulate a similar response of the TLR receptors. Therefore immunomodulatory oligonucleotides have various potential therapeutic uses, including treatment of immune deficiency and cancer. Employment of liposomal nanoparticles functionalized with immunomodulatory oligonucleotides will allow for increased preferential uptake and therefore increased therapeutic efficacy. Notably, smaller particles (25 to 40 nm) such as those provided herein penetrate tissue barriers more efficiently, therefore providing more effective activation of innate immune responses. Thus, SNAs of 30 nm in size, functionalized with stabilized with functional CpG motif-containing DNA, would provide enhanced therapeutic effect.
Down regulation of the immune system would involve knocking down the gene responsible for the expression of the Toll-like receptor. This antisense approach involves use of SNAs functionalized with specific antisense oligonucleotide sequences to knock out the expression of any toll-like protein.
Accordingly, methods of utilizing SNAs for modulating toll-like receptors are disclosed. The method either up-regulates or down-regulates the Toll-like-receptor through the use of a TLR agonist or a TLR antagonist, respectively. The method comprises contacting a cell having a toll-like receptor with an SNA. The toll-like receptors modulated include toll-like receptor 1 (TLR1), toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2), toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3), toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5), toll-like receptor 6 (TLR6), toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7), toll-like receptor 8 (TLR8), toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), toll-like receptor 10 (TLR10), toll-like receptor 11 (TLR11), toll-like receptor 12 (TLR12), and toll-like receptor 13 (TLR13). In embodiments, modulating toll-like receptors can be performed in vitro. In embodiments, modulating toll-like receptors can be performed in vivo.
In additional aspects of the disclosure, an SNA is used to detect an intracellular target. Such methods are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,507,200, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Briefly, an oligonucleotide containing a recognition sequence that is specific for a target molecule is attached to an SNA as described herein. Thus, “recognition sequence” as used herein is understood to mean a sequence that is partially or completely complementary to a target molecule of interest.
The SNA with attached oligonucleotide containing a recognition sequence is initially associated with a reporter sequence. As used herein, a “reporter sequence” is understood to mean a sequence that is partially or completely complementary and therefore able to hybridize to the recognition sequence. The reporter sequence is labeled with a detectable label (such as, without limitation, a fluorophore), and is also referred to as a nanoflare. The reporter sequence is in various aspects comprised of fewer, the same or more bases than the recognition sequence, such that binding of the recognition sequence to its target molecule causes release of the hybridized reporter sequence, thereby resulting in a detectable and measurable change in the label attached to the reporter sequence.
Instrumentation.
UV-vis absorbance spectra and thermal denaturation curves were collected on an Varian Cary 5000 UV-vis spectrometer (Varian, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif.), or equivalent, using quartz cuvettes with a 1 cm path length.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-ToF) data was obtained on a Bruker AutoFlex III MALDI-ToF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics Inc., MA, USA), or equivalent. For MALDI-ToF analysis, the matrix was prepared by mixing an aqueous solution of ammonium hydrogen citrate (0.6 μL of a 35 wt % solution (15 mg in 30 μL of H2O)) and 2-hydroxypicolinic acid (Fluka #56297, 2 mg in H2O:MeCN (30 pt of a 1:1 v/v mixture). An aliquot of the DNA (˜0.5 pt of a 150 μM solution) was then mixed with the matrix (1:1) and the resulting solution was added to a steel MALDI-ToF plate and dried at 25 C for 1 h before analysis. Samples were detected as negative ions using the linear mode. The laser was typically operated at 10-20% power with a sampling speed of 10 Hz. Each measurement averaged for five hundred scans with the following parameters: ion source voltage 1=20 kV, ion source voltage 2=18.5 kV, lens voltage=8.5 kV, linear detector voltage=0.6 kV, deflection mass=3000 Da.
Centrifugation was carried out in a temperature-controlled Eppendorf centrifuge 5430R (Eppendorf, Hauppauge, N.Y.), or equivalent.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed on a Hitachi H2300 transmission electron microscope (Hitachi High-Technologies Corp., Tokyo, Japan), or equivalent, operating at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and zeta potential measurements were collected on a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments, UK), or equivalent, equipped with a He—Ne laser (633 nm).
Materials.
Unless otherwise noted, all reagents were purchased from commercial sources and used as received. For oligonucleotide synthesis, all phosphoramidites and reagents were purchased from Glen Research (Sterling, Va.). The BS(PEG)5 (PEGylated bis(sulfosuccinimidyl)suberate) crosslinker and buffer solutions were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Richardson, Tex.). Gold nanoparticles were purchased from Ted Pella (Redding, Calif.). Amicon® Ultra centrifugal filter units were purchased from EMD Millipore (Billerica, Mass.). All other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.). Ultrapure deionized (DI) H2O (18.2 MΩ·cm resistivity) was obtained from a Millipore system (Milli-Q Biocel).
The oligonucleotides described in Table 1 were synthesized on CPG support using an automated Expedite Nucleotide system (MM48 Synthesizer, Bioautomation, Plano, Tex.), or equivalent. Whenever a modified (i.e., non-nucleoside-bearing) phosphoramidites was used, the coupling time was extended to 20 min compared to the usual 90 seconds for a typical phosphoramidite coupling. After synthesis, the completed DNA was cleaved off the CPG support through an overnight exposure to aqueous 8 M ammonium hydroxide (28-30 wt %). Excess ammonium hydroxide was removed from the cleaved DNA solution by passing a stream of dry nitrogen gas over the content of the vial until the characteristic ammonia smell disappears. The remaining solution was then passed through a 0.2 μm cellulose acetate membrane filter to remove the solid support and then purified on a Varian ProStar 210 (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) equipped with reverse-phase semi-preparative Varian column ((Agilent Technologies, 250 mm×10 mm, Microsorb 300 Å/10 μm/C4), gradient=100:0 v/v 0.1 M TEAA (aq):MeCN (TEAA (aq)=triethylammonium acetate, aqueous solution), and increased to pure acetonitrile in 30 min, flow rate=3 mL/min for each 1 μmol DNA). The product fractions collected were concentrated using lyophilization. The lyophilized oligonucleotides were then re-suspended in ultrapure deionized water and their concentrations were measured using UV-vis spectroscopy. The purity of synthesized oligonucleotides was assessed using MALDI-ToF.
aSpacer18 = 18-O-Dimethoxytritylhexaethyleneglycol,1-[(2-cyanoethyl)-(N,N-diisopropyl)]-phosphoramidite
bDBCO = 5′-Dimethoxytrityl-5-[(6-oxo-6-(dibenzo[b,f]azacyclooct-4-yn-1-yl)-capramido-N-hex-6-yl)-3-acrylimido]-2′-deoxyuridine,3′-[(2-cyanoethyl)-(N,N-diisopropyl)]-phosphoramidite
Thus, Example 1 demonstrates the preparation of an oligonucleotide in accordance with the disclosure.
For the synthesis of lipid-conjugated oligonucleotides, the purified DBCO-terminated oligonucleotides prepared according to Example 1 (1 mol, see Table 1) were re-suspended in an aliquot of water (250 μL). In a separate Eppendorf tube, 10 μmol of DPPE (1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-(6-azidohexanoyl) (ammonium salt), Avanti Polar Lipids, AL, USA) was suspended in ethanol (250 μL). The lipid solution was then added to the oligonucleotide solution and the resulting mixture was allowed to shake overnight at room temperature on a benchtop Thermomixer R 5355 (Eppendorf AG North America, NY) instrument, or equivalent, at 850 rpm. The following day, the content was dried on a Labconco centrivap (Labconco, Kansas City, Miss. USA). The obtained dried pellet was re-suspended in ultrapure deionized water (300 μL) and the resulting mixture was extracted with chloroform (3×300 μL) to remove excess lipid. The lipid-conjugated DNA was purified from the unconjugated DNA via size exclusion chromatography on Sepharose CL6B (Sigma).
Thus, Example 2 demonstrates the preparation of an amphiphilic oligonucleotide in accordance with the disclosure.
For the preparation of micellar SNAs, free lipid-conjugated DNA strands (10 nmol for T3-sequence) was added to an aliquot of aqueous PEO-PPO-PEO block copolymer, Pluronic F127 (1 mL of a 2 wt % solution in 1×HBS (20 mM of HEPES buffer, 150 mM aqueous NaCl)). The resulting solution was allowed to shake at room temperature overnight on a benchtop Thermomixer R 5355 (Eppendorf AG North America, Hauppauge, N.Y.) instrument, or equivalent. To crosslink the DNA strands, a BS(PEG)5 linker (2.5 equiv of DNA concentration, or 50% of the amino group concentration for achieving a theoretical 100% crosslink density) was next added and the resulting solution allowed to shake for 6 h more. In situ analysis of the reaction mixture shows particles with an increased size and a more negative surface charge, demonstrating successful functionalization of the micelle core with the nucleic acid strands. To remove the unincorporated Pluronic F127, the reaction mixture was cooled to 4° C. and then centrifuged in an Amicon® Ultra centrifugal filter units (100,000 MWCO, 7500 g) at 4° C. until ˜100 μL of solution was retained. This solution of the desired micellar SNA products were subjected to three washes with 1×HBS and passed through a 0.1 μm syringe filter before use.
To quantify the incorporated Pluronic F127, the collected filtrates were collected separately and the Pluronic F127 concentration in each filtrate fraction was determined by a previously reported colorimetric assay method with minor modifications. In brief, cobalt nitrate hexahydrate (0.3 g) and ammonium thiocyanate (1.2 g) were dissolved in water (3 mL) to make a cobalt thiocyanate reagent. Into an Eppendorf tube were combined an aliquot (100 μL) of the cobalt thiocyanate solution, an aliquot (40 μL) of the filtrate solution, ethyl acetate (200 μL), and ethanol (80 μL). The resulting semi-cloudy mixture was vortexed gently and centrifuged at 14000 g for 1 min. The blue supernatant was removed and the left-over blue pellet was washed with diethyl ether several (˜5) times until the supernatant became colorless. The resulting pellet was then dissolved in acetone (1 mL) and subjected to UV-vis measurement. The absorbance value at 623 nm was compared to a calibration curve prepared from the colorimetric assay of standard Pluronic F127 solutions over a 0-2.5 wt % concentration range. The DNA:Pluronic F127 molar ratio in the purified solution is 0.55 (assuming a rounded-up molecular weight of Pluronic F127 to be 10,000 and the DNA sequence to be CyT-T30 (Table 1)).
The concentration of DNA strands in the crosslinked micellar SNAs is estimated against the UV-vis extinction coefficient for DNA at 260 nm (6=243600 L/mol cm for a T30 sequence) after disassembly (by sonicating with 0.1 M HCl and 0.01 wt % SDS solution for 30 sec and left in a 37° C. water bath for 10 min). As the initial Pluronic F127 template at a high 2 wt % concentration does not show a significant absorption at 260 nm, the small amount that may be retained in the dissembled crosslinked micellar SNAs does not interfere with calculations of the DNA concentrations.
The purified micellar SNAs retain many of the as-synthesized (in situ) particle characteristics (particle size, poly dispersity, surface charge), demonstrating that the crosslinking was effective and the purification process did not cause a significant loss in the template-assembled DNA component.
Thus, Example 3 demonstrates the preparation of a crosslinked micellar SNA according to the disclosure.
Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)
The particle size distribution, and charge characterization of micellar SNAs was carried out via dynamic light scattering. To measure the size of nanoparticles, non-invasive backscatter method (detection at 173° scattering angle) was used. The collected data were fitted, using the method of cumulants, to the logarithm of the correlation function, yielding the diffusion coefficient D. The calculated diffusion coefficient was applied to the Stokes-Einstein equation (DH=kBT/3πηD, where kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, and η is the solvent viscosity (η=0.8872 cP for water at 25° C.)), to obtain the hydrodynamic diameters (DH) of the nanoparticles (NPs). The reported DLS size for each sample was based on six measurements, each of which was subjected to non-negative least squares analysis.
Scanning and Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM) Imaging.
In a typical experiment, the micellar SNAs sample was first “stirred up” gently using a micropipetting technique to ensure complete homogeneity (even though there was no visual evidence of precipitation). An aliquot (1.5 μL) of this solution was then placed on a TEM carbon sample grid (Ted Pella, Inc. #01820). After 1 min, the excess solution was gently wicked away from the grid with a piece of filter paper. The excess of salt was removed from the grid by touching it briefly with a drop of ultrapure DI water and then gently wicking away the excess solution. The grid was allowed to air-dry for 1 h before being stained with a drop (1.5 μL) of uranyl acetate solution (2 wt % in water). After 20 s, the excess solution was gently wicked away from the grid with a piece of filter paper and the grid was allowed to air-dry prior to analysis.
Atomic Force Microscropy (AFM) Imaging.
Sample for AFM imaging was carried out by drop-casting a small drop (2 μL of 2 μM solution of micellar SNAs) in H2O and air-drying the droplet on freshly cleaved muscovite mica (Ted Pella, Inc.). The DNA-functionalized particles appeared monodispersed on the substrate under the same conditions.
Gel Electrophoresis.
The gel electrophoresis experiments were performed on a 1% agarose gel made in 1×TBE buffer (Tris/borate/EDTA) buffer. An aqueous solution of glycerol (30% v/v) was used as a loading agent. The gel was allowed to run at 80 V in 1×TBE buffer for 60 min. After the run was complete, the gel was imaged with Flourchem Q (BioRad, Hercules, Calif.) with Cy5 filter.
Thermal Stability
An aliquot (1 mL of a 10 μM stock solution) of the Cy5-labeled micellar SNAs was transferred into an 1.5 mL safe-lock Eppendorf and diluted in 1×PBS (final concentration 1 μM). The resulting solution was incubated at 37° C. and 100 μM aliquots were collected after one week for analysis by gel electrophoresis.
The cooperative melting profiles of materials assembled from complementary SNAs are diagnostic indicators of the SNA structure. This cooperative binding is a consequence of the dense, uniform arrangement of nucleic acids on their surfaces, which allows them to hybridize in a polyvalent fashion. A DNA-hybridized nanoparticle aggregate (
Into an Eppendorf tube was combined a DMSO aliquot (1 μL of a 25 mM solution) of the hydrophobic dye Dil Stain (1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-Tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (aka—‘Dil’; DilC18(3)) and an aliquot (1 mL) of a Pluronic F127 solution (1% w/v). The resulting solution (final dye concentration=25 μM) was allowed to shake for 4 h on a benchtop shaker to form the Dil-encapsulated Pluronic F127 micelles, which were purified from the free dye by size-exclusion chromatography (NAP 25, GE Healthcare, Arlington Heights, Ill., USA).
The purified Dil-encapsulated micelles were further incubated overnight with lipid-functionalized DBCO-BHQ-2 dT-(NH2)5-T20 sequence to form the Dil-encapsulated, BHQ-2-labeled micellar SNA, which was then isolated following the functionalization and purification protocols discussed above. The quenching of the Dil dye due to the proximity of BHQ-2-labeled DNA with the Pluronic F127 template in this latter sample was confirmed by the decrease of a fluorescence from the Dil dye in the core.
The serum stability of crosslinked micellar SNAs was assessed using purified DilC18-encapsulated micelles that were functionalized with BHQ (black hole quencher)-T20-lipid material to form a DilC18-encapsulated, BHQ-2-labeled micellar SNA sample (10 μM final DNA concentration, volume=3 mL). An aliquote (1.5 mL) of this material was removed and added to a separate Eppendorf tube. The BS(PEG)5 crosslinker was added to the remaining mixture to form crosslinked micellar SNAs. The two samples were purified using size-exclusion chromatography with Sepharose CL-4B (Sigma-Aldrich). The quenching of the DilC18 dye due to the proximity of the BHQ-2-labeled DNA was confirmed by the decrease of its fluorescence. To analyze the serum stability of non-crosslinked and crosslinked micellar SNAs, the DilC18-encapsulated versions of these constructs were suspended in a solution comprising 10 vol % fetal bovine serum (FBS) in HBS at 37° C. The release of the dye at 37° C., as represented by the intensity of the solution fluorescence at 560 nm, was monitored continuously for a period of 200 minutes with sample excitation at 540 nm on a BioTek Synergy H4 Hybrid Reader (BioTek, Inc., Winooski, Vt., USA).
In an Eppendorf tube an aliquot from the stock solution of the Cy5-labeled micellar SNAs (stock solution: 1 mL of a 10 uM) was combined with a solution comprising 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in 1×PBS to achieve a final concentration of 2.5 uM of final DNA concentration. The resulting mixture was incubated at 37° C. and 100 uL aliquots were collected after 2, 4 and 8 h for analysis by gel electrophoresis.
As described in the previous paragraphs, the stability of the SNAs in serum can be experimentally determined by measuring the increase in fluorescence of DiIC16 dye encapsulated in the Pluronic F127 core. DiIC16-encapsulated Pluronic F127 core was functionalized with lipid-tailed DNA with a quencher modification. The dissociation of the lipid-tailed DNA from the core allows for an increase in fluorescence. In this experiment, the DiIC16-containing micellar SNAs with BHQ modifications were incubated at 37° C. in 10 vol % serum media and the fluorescence was recorded for 2 h. A similar study was performed on the non-crosslinked micellar SNAs of same composition. Minimal increase in fluorescence was observed for crosslinked micellar SNAs suggested that the structures remained stable in serum. However, the non-crosslinked micellar SNAs showed a significant increase in fluorescence due to the dissociation of intercalated DNA strands from the DiIC16 containing Pluronic F127 core.
Thus, in Example 7, crosslinking the nucleic acids of the SNAs of the disclosure was shown to result in improved stability of the micellar SNA structures against degradation by nucleases, and increased serum stability.
HEK-Blue™-mTLR9 cells (InvivoGen, NY, USA) and Ramos-Blue cells (InvivoGen), derivatives of HEK-293 cells and Ramos cells, respectively, both stably expressing a secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) inducible by NF-κB, were cultured as recommended by the supplier.
Confocal Microscopy.
The HEK-Blue cells were plated on 35 mm FluoroDish™ chambers at 30% confluency. Cy5-labeled micellar SNAs (0.1 μM DNA) were incubated with cells (100,000 cell/well) in OptiMEM serum-free medium (Invitrogen, Grand Island, N.Y.) for 4 h and then washed three times with 1×PBS. After the incubation, the cell media was switched to normal serum-containing DMEM medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island, N.Y.) for 1 h before imaging. The resulting cell suspension was centrifuged and the supernatant was removed. The nuclei of incubated and untreated cells were stained with Hoechst 3342 (Invitrogen, NY, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. The pellet was re-suspended in mounting medial (ProLong® Gold Antifade Mountant, ThermoFisher Scientific; 50 μL final volume). A 10 μL solution was added on a glass slide and allowed to dry in a dark chamber for 48 h. Confocal microscopy imaging of these live cells were carried out on an a Zeiss LSM 510 inverted laser-scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc., NY, USA) equipped with a Mai Tai 3308 laser (Spectra-Physics, CA, USA) at 40× magnification. The Hoechst dye was excited at 780 nm and emission data were collected at 390-495 nm; the Cy5 dye was excited at 640 nm and emission data were collected at 650-710 nm.
Flow Cytometry Experiments.
A comparative cell-uptake study between the micellar SNAs and free DNA was carried out using HEK-BLUE cells. Cells were plated on a 96 well plate in DMEM medium (supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10 vol %), penicillin (0.2 units/mL), and streptomycin (0.1 μg/mL), Normocin™ (100 μg/mL) 2 mM L-glutamine); 100 μL of media/well) and incubated with either free-DNA or micellar SNAs (final DNA concentration 0.1 μM) for 16 h. The fluorescence was normalized using untreated cells as a negative control for these time-points. At the end of incubation period, the cells were washed 3 times with 1×PBS. The resulting cell suspension was subjected to flow cytometry using the Cy5 intensity channel on a Guava easyCyte 8HT instrument (Millipore, Billerica, Mass., USA). The error-values were calculated using the standard error of the mean of median signal from different wells representing one type of sample.
As expected, the nucleic acid shell on the surface of micellar SNAs of the disclosure also facilitated their rapid cellular uptake into macrophages such as HEK-Blue cells. Indeed, incubating HEK-Blue cells with micellar SNAs comprising Cy5-labeled DNA for 4 h resulted in excellent cellular uptake in comparison to free DNA (see
The HEK-Blue cells were plated onto a 96 well plate, as described in the flow cytometry experiments above, 24 h before the experiment. The cells were then incubated with micellar SNAs at different concentrations for 24 h, washed three times with 1×PBS, and incubated in alamarBlue® solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, Mass., USA) for 4 h at 37° C. under a humidified atmosphere with 5 vol % CO2. The fluorescence emission at 590 nm was recorded using a BioTek Synergy H4 Hybrid Reader (BioTek, Winooski, Vt.) and normalized to the signals for untreated cells.
In Vitro Cell Stimulation Studies.
HEK-Blue or Ramos-Blue cells were plated in 96 well plates at a density of 60,000 cells per well for HEK-Blue cells; Ramos-Blue cells were plated at 400,000 cells per well in their respective medium (supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10 vol %), penicillin (0.2 units/mL), and streptomycin (0.1 μg/mL), Normocin™ (100 μg/mL) 2 mM L-glutamine); 200 μL of media/well). Immediately after the plating, the cells were treated with test reagent and incubated at 37° C. in 5% CO2 for 16 h.
For analysis, in a separate plate, 180 μL of QUANTI-Blue™ solution (Invivogen, prepared as per the manufacturer's protocol) was added to each well. To this plate, a 20 μL aliquot of the supernatant of treated HEK-cells was added (20 μl supernatant of untreated HEK-cells was used as a negative control). After 4 h incubation, the change in color due to SEAP activity was quantified by reading the OD at 620-655 nm using a BioTek Synergy H4 Hybrid Reader.
Micellar SNAs were investigated for their ability for immunomodulatory activity, by incubating Ramos and Raw-Blue cells for 16 h with micellar SNAs synthesized using IS (TLR9 agonist) sequences. A dose-dependent immunostimulatory response was observed when compared to the untreated and negative controls. Convincingly, the micellar SNAs constructed with sequence-specific and therapeutically relevant immunostimulatory nucleic acids can perform better than linear unmodified strands but similar to previously synthesized IS-liposomal SNAs to their rapid cellular uptake, nuclease resistance and accumulation in endosomes. However, nucleic acids with hydrophobic modification form small micellar structures ensuing in similar IS activity as compared to SNAs.
This Application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/048726, filed Aug. 25, 2017, entitled “MICELLAR SPHERICAL NUCLEIC ACIDS FROM THERMORESPONSIVE, TRACELESS TEMPLATES,” which claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 62/379,352, filed Aug. 25, 2016, entitled “MICELLAR SPHERICAL NUCLEIC ACIDS FROM THERMORESPONSIVE, TRACELESS TEMPLATES”, the entire contents of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
This invention was made with government support under U54 CA199091 and U54 CA151880 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2017/048726 | 8/25/2017 | WO | 00 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2018/039629 | 3/1/2018 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3687808 | Merigan, Jr. et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
| 4469863 | Ts'o et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4476301 | Imbach et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4489055 | Couvreur et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4845205 | Huynh Dinh et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4904582 | Tullis | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4981957 | Lebleu et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5023243 | Tullis | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5034506 | Summerton et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5118800 | Smith et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5130302 | Spielvogel et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5134066 | Rogers et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5166315 | Summerton et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5175273 | Bischofberger et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5177196 | Meyer, Jr. et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5185444 | Summerton et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5188897 | Suhadolnik et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5194599 | Froehler et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5214134 | Weis et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5216141 | Benner | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5235033 | Summerton et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5264423 | Cohen et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264562 | Matteucci | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5264564 | Matteucci | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5276019 | Cohen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5278302 | Caruthers et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5286717 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5319080 | Leumann | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5321131 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5359044 | Cook et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5367066 | Urdea et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5393878 | Leumann | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5399676 | Froehler | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5405938 | Summerton et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5405939 | Suhadolnik et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5432272 | Benner | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5434257 | Matteucci et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5446137 | Maag et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5453496 | Caruthers et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5455233 | Spielvogel et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5457187 | Gmeiner et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5459255 | Cook et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5466677 | Baxter et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5466786 | Buhr et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5470967 | Huie et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5472881 | Beebe et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5476925 | Letsinger et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5484908 | Froehler et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5489677 | Sanghvi et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5502177 | Matteucci et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5512439 | Hornes et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5514785 | Van Ness et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5519126 | Hecht | May 1996 | A |
| 5519134 | Acevedo et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5525711 | Hawkins et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5527899 | Froehler | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5536821 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539082 | Nielsen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541306 | Agrawal et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5541307 | Cook et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5550111 | Suhadolnik et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5552540 | Haralambidis | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5561225 | Maddry et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5563253 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5565555 | Froehler et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5567811 | Misiura et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5571799 | Tkachuk et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5576427 | Cook et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5587361 | Cook et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5587469 | Cook et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5591722 | Montgomery et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596086 | Matteucci et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596091 | Switzer | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5597909 | Urdea et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5602240 | De Mesmaeker et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5608046 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5610289 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5610300 | Altmann et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5614617 | Cook et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618704 | Sanghvi et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5623070 | Cook et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5625050 | Beaton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5627053 | Usman et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5633360 | Bischofberger et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5639873 | Barascut et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5645985 | Froehler et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5646265 | McGee | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5646269 | Matteucci et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658873 | Bertsch-Frank et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5663312 | Chaturvedula | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5670633 | Cook et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5672697 | Buhr et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5677437 | Teng et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5677439 | Weis et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681941 | Cook et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5688941 | Cook et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5700920 | Altmann et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5714331 | Buchardt et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5719262 | Buchardt et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5721218 | Froehler | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5750692 | Cook et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5763588 | Matteucci et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5780448 | Davis | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5792608 | Swaminathan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5792747 | Schally et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5830653 | Froehler et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 6005096 | Matteucci et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6051698 | Janjic et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6194388 | Krieg et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6207646 | Krieg et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6239116 | Krieg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6271209 | Smith et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6361944 | Mirkin et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6406705 | Davis et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6417340 | Mirkin et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6495324 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6506564 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6534062 | Raz et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6582921 | Mirkin et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6602669 | Letsinger et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6610308 | Haensler | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 6610491 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6677122 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6682895 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6709825 | Mirkin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6720147 | Mirkin et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6720411 | Mirkin et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6750016 | Mirkin et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6759199 | Mirkin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6767702 | Mirkin et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6773884 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6777186 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6812334 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6818753 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6828432 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6849725 | Junghans et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6861221 | Mirkin et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6878814 | Mirkin et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 7038029 | Lopez | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7098320 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
| 7129222 | Van Nest et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7176296 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7208587 | Mirkin et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7223741 | Krieg | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7238472 | Mirkin et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7250403 | Van Nest et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7255868 | Fearon et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7262286 | Kandimalla et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7276489 | Agrawal et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7291284 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7332586 | Franzen et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7354907 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7387271 | Noelle et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7404969 | Chen et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7427405 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7470674 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7514099 | Chen et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7563618 | Gryaznov et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7569553 | Krieg | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7569554 | Kandimalla et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7615539 | Uhlmann et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7628990 | Tuck et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7666674 | Klinman et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7709617 | Kandimalla et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7713535 | Agrawal et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7718622 | Tuck et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7727969 | Farokhzad et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7745606 | Dina et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7776834 | Agrawal et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7786089 | Kandimalla et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7833992 | Vargeese et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7850990 | Tardi et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7851453 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7875594 | Kandimalla et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7884083 | Van Nest et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7884197 | Kandimalla et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7956176 | McSwiggen et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7960362 | Kandimalla et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7964578 | Vargeese et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7993659 | Noelle et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8008266 | Krieg et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8008267 | Kandimalla et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8017591 | Brzezicha et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 8058249 | Krieg et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
| 8088388 | Sokoll | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8124590 | Van Nest et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8128944 | Jurk et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8158768 | Dina et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
| 8188261 | Kandimalla et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 8202979 | McSwiggen et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8273866 | McSwiggen et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8283328 | Krieg et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8304396 | Krieg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8309527 | Krieg et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
| 8323686 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8333980 | Van Nest et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8431544 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8507200 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
| 8846080 | Biemans et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8853375 | Kandimalla et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8871732 | Dina et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
| 8889181 | Kwon | Nov 2014 | B2 |
| 8940310 | Barrat et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8945590 | Fairman et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
| 8968746 | Baumhof et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 8987221 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9061001 | van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9066978 | Ilyinskii et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9139827 | Mirkin et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9192667 | Hoves et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9200287 | Uhlmann et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9212366 | Wittig et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9265729 | Nakamura | Feb 2016 | B2 |
| 9308253 | Kim et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
| 9364443 | Beduneau et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
| 9421254 | Berzofsky et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9499815 | Schroff et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
| 9506056 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 9522958 | Epstein et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
| 9532948 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9549901 | Shi et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 9617541 | Mirkin et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9617547 | Gemba | Apr 2017 | B2 |
| 9764031 | Ilyinskii et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
| 9844562 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
| 9868955 | Guiducci et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
| 9889209 | Mirkin et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9901616 | Dhar et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 9907845 | Reed et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9907862 | Baumhof et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9919058 | Klinman et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
| 9950063 | Reed et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9950064 | Ott et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
| 9968673 | Navarro y Garcia et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9976147 | Kortylewski et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
| 9987355 | Reed et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 9993495 | Guiducci et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 9999673 | Rajeev et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10006032 | Schroff et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
| 10029016 | Irvine et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
| 10098958 | Mirkin et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10111899 | Guiducci et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10144933 | Gemba et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10149905 | Gemba et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10155950 | Munnes et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
| 10182988 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
| 10196643 | Dina et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10208310 | Mader et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
| 10280424 | Kleuss et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10314854 | Salem et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10322173 | Gemba et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
| 10369220 | Kaplan | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10370656 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10391116 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
| 10398784 | Mirkin et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
| 10435469 | Goldberg et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10449212 | Hanagata et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10456463 | Davis et al. | Oct 2019 | B2 |
| 10463686 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10487333 | Schroff et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
| 10792251 | Mirkin et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
| 20020156033 | Bratzler et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020172953 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020197269 | Lingnau et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030026782 | Krieg | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030050261 | Krieg et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030091599 | Davis et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030104044 | Semple et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030129251 | Van Nest et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030133988 | Fearon et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030138413 | Vicari et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030147966 | Franzen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030170162 | Nayfeh et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030181412 | Erikson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030212026 | Krieg et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20040014956 | Woolf et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040023382 | Dean et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040053384 | Sligar et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040087534 | Krieg et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040092468 | Schwartz | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040131628 | Bratzler et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040143112 | Krieg et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040158051 | Ozkan et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040219565 | Kauppinen et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040247680 | Farokhzad et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040266719 | McCluskie et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050009773 | Kandimalla et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050130911 | Uhlmann et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050169888 | Hartmann et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20060003962 | Ahluwalia et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060014191 | Lao et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060014713 | Agrawal et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060019916 | Krieg et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060083781 | Shastri et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060147456 | Lebecque et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060159921 | Murthy et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060188560 | Cheresh et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060251623 | Bachmann et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060292174 | de los Rios et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070066554 | Krieg et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093439 | Agrawal et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070148251 | Hossainy et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070184068 | Renner et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070243196 | Bruck et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070298257 | Ludwig et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080003232 | Wang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080097092 | Khvorova et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080124366 | Ohlfest et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080181928 | Hakimi-Mehr et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080194463 | Weller et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080206265 | Kandimalla et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080213177 | Rademacher et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080220072 | Unger et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080274454 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080279785 | Kandimalla et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080306016 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080311182 | Ferrari et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090018028 | Lindsay et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090035576 | Prasad et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090081157 | Kornbluth et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090148384 | Fischer et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090155173 | Scherman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090191185 | Selander | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090191188 | Krieg et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090209629 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090220607 | Kiser | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090299045 | Richards et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090317802 | Bhatia et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090322327 | Gao | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090324706 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100003287 | Mills et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100003317 | Akinc et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100092486 | Kandimalla et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100136682 | Mirkin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100144848 | Vogel et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100166842 | Lu et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100167051 | Goia et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100183634 | Luo et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100184844 | Mirkin et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100203142 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100233270 | Mirkin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100267814 | Bennett et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100303803 | Schroff et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110009477 | Yu et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110052697 | Farokhzad et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110111974 | Mirkin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110158937 | Kandimalla et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110172404 | Luo et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110201672 | Krieg et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20110223257 | Zhao et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110229529 | Irvine et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110237435 | Ryan | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110256224 | Sigalov | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110262347 | Ruoslahti et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293700 | Bratzler et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293701 | Bratzler et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110293723 | Bratzler et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110305734 | Edelson et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120093804 | Schroff et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120093914 | Schubert | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120107303 | Kandimalla et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
| 20120149843 | Chien et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120244230 | Mirkin et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120258126 | Scholler et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120258140 | Jurk et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120282186 | Mirkin et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120288935 | Mirkin | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20120301499 | Bachmann et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
| 20130028857 | Gao et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20130034599 | Thaxton et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
| 20130071403 | Rolland et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
| 20130095039 | Lu et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
| 20130123333 | Mirkin et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130136714 | Wang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130178610 | Mirkin et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20130252852 | Pfeiffer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
| 20130287814 | Schroff et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| 20130295129 | Irvine et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20130315831 | Shi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20140005258 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
| 20140065425 | Bogdanov | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140199379 | Tartour et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20140227327 | Bencherif et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
| 20140294927 | Thaxton et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20150104501 | Um et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150118264 | Baumhof et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20160082103 | Dickey et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20160101128 | Wang et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160108123 | Freeman et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
| 20160159905 | Abdiche et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160194642 | Gryaznov et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160237429 | Cubillos-Ruiz et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160310425 | Mirkin et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20160339090 | Hacohen et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
| 20160375115 | Binder et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170042920 | Banti | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170044544 | Mirkin et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
| 20170130231 | Chae et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
| 20170224797 | Popescu et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170232109 | Mirkin et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170239338 | Szalay et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
| 20170274004 | Wang et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
| 20170306038 | Brogdon et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
| 20170326232 | Guiducci et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
| 20180000851 | Krieg | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180021253 | Sandeep et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
| 20180043023 | Ilyinskii et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| 20180085350 | Avigan et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180085398 | Avigan et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
| 20180125877 | Agrawal et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180127717 | Decker et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180140691 | Takasu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
| 20180161427 | Yu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180169229 | Yu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
| 20180193382 | Barrat | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180200381 | Kannan et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
| 20180216196 | Kadel et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180222982 | Dranoff et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
| 20180251767 | Schroff et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180264105 | Kugimiya et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
| 20180311176 | Ozsolak et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180312536 | Sakamuri et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180312837 | Kortylewski et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180318365 | Yeung et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
| 20180344873 | Mirkin et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
| 20190030185 | Mirkin et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
| 20190046638 | Krieg | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190048342 | Wang et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
| 20190077856 | Scheinberg et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190083626 | Goldberg et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
| 20190134172 | Gunn et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190153098 | Goldberg et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
| 20190201334 | Hakim et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190209604 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190216816 | Kutok | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20190233825 | Ilg et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
| 20190275166 | Mirkin et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
| 20190321613 | Jones et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
| 20190351053 | Lamprecht et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20190359983 | O'Neill et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
| 20200031930 | Goldberg et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200032265 | Hornung et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
| 20200101156 | Mirkin et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
| 20200230234 | Schroff et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
| 20200291394 | Mirkin et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
| 20210052497 | Mirkin et al. | Feb 2021 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 070368 | Mar 2010 | AR |
| 2004218696 | Nov 2004 | AU |
| 102165061 | Aug 2011 | CN |
| 103212089 | Jul 2013 | CN |
| 1 072 679 | Jan 2001 | EP |
| 1 221 955 | Sep 2005 | EP |
| 1628531 | Mar 2006 | EP |
| 1 700 603 | Jun 2007 | EP |
| 1802757 | Jul 2007 | EP |
| 1 889 911 | Feb 2008 | EP |
| 1350262 | Jun 2008 | EP |
| 1991678 | Nov 2008 | EP |
| 2162117 | Mar 2010 | EP |
| 1408110 | Jun 2011 | EP |
| 2391718 | Dec 2011 | EP |
| 2399608 | Dec 2011 | EP |
| 1807094 | Jan 2012 | EP |
| 2563384 | Mar 2013 | EP |
| 2874651 | May 2015 | EP |
| 2970369 | Jan 2016 | EP |
| 2759306 | Apr 2016 | EP |
| 2 360 252 | Feb 2017 | EP |
| 3204040 | Aug 2017 | EP |
| 3209778 | Apr 2019 | EP |
| 3492098 | Jun 2019 | EP |
| 2014-503475 | Feb 2014 | JP |
| WO 89002439 | Mar 1989 | WO |
| WO 9221330 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| WO 93007883 | Apr 1993 | WO |
| WO 9321528 | Oct 1993 | WO |
| WO 95006731 | Mar 1995 | WO |
| WO 96034876 | Nov 1996 | WO |
| WO-199712896 | Apr 1997 | WO |
| WO 9748715 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| WO 199804740 | Feb 1998 | WO |
| WO-199839352 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| WO-199914226 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| WO 9927086 | Jun 1999 | WO |
| WO 0020645 | Apr 2000 | WO |
| WO 2001000876 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 2001049869 | Jul 2001 | WO |
| WO 2002044321 | Jun 2002 | WO |
| WO 2002096262 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO 2003008539 | Jan 2003 | WO |
| WO 03030941 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003051278 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO 2003086280 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004047870 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005063201 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005079462 | Sep 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005116226 | Dec 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006015560 | Feb 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006088833 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006108405 | Oct 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006138145 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007008463 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007044851 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007047455 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007055682 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007055704 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007064857 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007089607 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007096134 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007122405 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008014979 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO 200842156 | Apr 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008097328 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008127789 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009012786 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009026412 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009051451 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009061515 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009105260 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009120887 | Oct 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010017152 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010017154 | Feb 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010060110 | May 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010081049 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010081049 | Jul 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010091293 | Aug 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010105209 | Sep 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010120420 | Oct 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010148249 | Dec 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011017456 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011017690 | Feb 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011037973 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| WO 2010147387 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011053940 | May 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011079290 | Jun 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011091065 | Jul 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011113054 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011143608 | Nov 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012084991 | Jun 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013012628 | Jan 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013049941 | Apr 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013086207 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013151771 | Oct 2013 | WO |
| WO 2013177419 | Nov 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014025795 | Feb 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014123935 | Aug 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014133547 | Sep 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014169264 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014172698 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014175836 | Oct 2014 | WO |
| WO 2014201245 | Dec 2014 | WO |
| WO 2015153975 | Oct 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015187966 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2015195628 | Dec 2015 | WO |
| WO 2016057898 | Apr 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016081503 | May 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016115320 | Jul 2016 | WO |
| WO-2016134104 | Aug 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016179475 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2016187122 | Nov 2016 | WO |
| WO 2017024296 | Feb 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017035278 | Mar 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017075477 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017085248 | May 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017160717 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017161032 | Sep 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017173334 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017181128 | Oct 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017185180 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017186815 | Nov 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017223085 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2017223422 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| WO 2018007475 | Jan 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018053242 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018053508 | Mar 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018067302 | Apr 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018078620 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018087699 | May 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018152327 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018156617 | Aug 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018191746 | Oct 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018193137 | Oct 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018198076 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018203833 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018209270 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018211453 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018213585 | Nov 2018 | WO |
| WO 2018227116 | Dec 2018 | WO |
| WO 2019006371 | Jan 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019036031 | Feb 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019038671 | Feb 2019 | WO |
| WO 2019118883 | Jun 2019 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Jain et al., Synthesis of protein-loaded hydrogel particles in an aqueous two-phase system for coincident antigen and CpG oligonucleotide dllivery to antigen-presenting cells, Biomacromolecules, vol. 6, pp. 2590-2600. (Year: 2005). |
| Chandaroy et al., Temperature-controlled content release from liposomes encapsulating Pluronic F127, Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 76, pp. 27-37. (Year: 2001). |
| Kaczmarek et al., 2'-linking of lipids and other functions to uridine through 1,2,3-triazoles and membrane anchoring of the amphiphilic products, European Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 2010, pp. 1579-1586. (Year: 2010). |
| [No Author Listed] KeraFAST Chemoselective ligation through copper-free click chemistry. Sep. 21, 2021. published online via http://www.kerafast.com/PDF/Chemoselective_Ligation_Sheet.pdf 2 pages. |
| Agasti et al., Photoregulated release of caged anticancer drugs from gold nanoparticles, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131(16):5728-9. |
| Agbasi-Porter et al., Transcription inhibition using oligonucleotide-modified gold nanoparticles, Bioconjugate Chem., 17(5):1178-83 (2006). |
| Agrawal et al., Antisence therapeutics: Is it as simple as complementary base recognition? Mol. Med. Today. 2000; 6: 72-81. |
| Ahmadi et al., Shape-Controlled Synthesis of Colloidal Platinum Nanoparticles. Science. 1996; 272(5270): 1924-1926. |
| Alemdaroglu et al., DNA Block Copolymer Micelles—A Combinatorial Tool for Cancer Nanotechnology. Advanced Materials. Mar. 2008;20(5)899-902. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200700866l. |
| Ali et al., Vaccines Combined with Immune Checkpoint Antibodies Promote Cytotoxic T-cell Activity and Tumor Eradication. Cancer Immunol Res. Feb. 2016;4(2):95-100. Doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-14-0126. Epub Dec. 15, 2015. |
| Alivisatos et al., Organization of ‘nanocrystal molecules’ using DNA. Nature. 1996; 382: 609-11. |
| Alivisatos, The use of nanocrystals in biological detection. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004; 22(1):47-52. |
| Andrews et al., Conjugation of Lipid and CpG-Containing Oligonucleotide Yields an Efficient Method for Liposome Incorporation. Bioconjuqate Chem. 2011;22:1279-1286. |
| Anton et al., Design and production of nanoparticles formulated from nano-emulsion templates-a review. J. Control Release. 2008; 128(3):185-99. |
| Asthana et al., Mannosylated chitosan nanoparticles for delivery of antisense oligonucleotides for macrophage targeting. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:526391. Doi: 10.1155/2014/526391. Epub Jun. 26, 2014. |
| Aurasense Therapeutics, NIH grant. Topically-delivered Target Gene Suppression of Immune Activation in Psoriasis. David Giljohann. Accessed on Aug. 2, 2017 from http://grantome.com/grant/NIH/R41-AR066438-01. Accessible online on Feb. 21, 2016 as verified through Wayback Machine. |
| Auyeung et al., DNA-mediated nanoparticle crystallization into Wulff polyhedral. Nature 505(7481): 73-77 (2014). |
| Auyeung et al., Synthetically programmable nanoparticle superlattices using a hollow three dimensional; spacer approach. Nat Nanotechnol;2012;7(1 ):24-28. |
| Auyeung et al., Transitioning DNA-Engineered Nanoparticle Superlattices from Solution to the Solid State. Adv Mater 24(38):5181-5186 (2012). |
| Aynie et al., Spongelike alginate nanoparticles as a new potential system for the delivery of antisense oligonucleotides. Antisense Nucl. Acid Drug Dev. 1999; 9: 301-12. |
| Bae et al., Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myths, reality and possibility. J Control Release. Aug. 10, 2011; 153(3): 198-205. Doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.06.001. Epub Jun. 6, 2011. |
| Baker et al., Dendrimer-mediated cell transfection in vitro. Meth. Malec. Biol. 2004;245: 67-81. |
| Balasubramanian et al., Biodistribution of gold nanoparticles and gene expression changes in the liver and spleen after intravenous administration in rats. Biomaterials. 2010;31(8):2034-42. |
| Bath et al., DNA nanomachines. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007;2:275-84. |
| Berton et al., Highly loaded nanoparticulate carrier using an hydrophobic antisense oligonucleotide complex. Eur. J. Pharma. Sci. 1999;9:163-70. |
| Bharali et al., Organically modified silica nanoparticles: a nonviral vector for in vivo gene delivery and expression in the brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102(32): 11539-44. |
| Bhattarai et al., “Enhanced Gene and siRNA Delivery by Polycation-Modified Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Loaded with Chloroquine,” Pharm. Res., 2010, 27, 2556-2568. |
| Bielinska et al., DNA complexing with polyamidoamine dendrimers: implications for transfection. Bioconjug Chem. 1999;10(5): 843-50. |
| Bisht et al., Polymeric nanoparticle-encapsulated curcumin (“nanocurcumin”): a novel strategy for human cancer therapy. J. Nanobiotechnology. 2007;5:3. 18 pages. |
| Bonoiu et al., Nanotechnology approach for drug addiction therapy: gene ; silencing using delivery of gold nanorod-siRNA nanoplex in dopaminergic neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 7, 2009;106(14):5546-50. Doi:; 10.1073/pnas.0901715106. Epub Mar. 23, 2009. |
| Boudreault et al., Nanoscale tools to selectively destroy cancer cells. Chem Commun. May 14, 2008;(18):2118-20. Doi: 10.1039/b800528a. Epub Apr. 7, 2008. |
| Briley et al., In Nanomaterials for Biomedicine; American Chemical Societv. 2012;1119:1-20. |
| Brown et al., Surface treatment of the hydrophobic drug danazol to improve drug dissolution. Int. J. Pharmaceutics. 1998;165:227-37. |
| Bunge et al., Lipophilic oligonucleotides spontaneously insert into lipid membranes, bind complementary DNA strands, and sequester into lipid-disordered domains. Langmuir. Apr. 10, 2007;23(8):4455-64. Epub Mar. 17, 2007. |
| Cao et al., Reversible Cell-Specific Drug Delivery with Aptamer-Functionalized Liposomes, Anqew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:6494-8. |
| Capaccioli et al., Cationic lipids improve antisense oligonucleotide uptake and prevent degradation in cultured cells and inhuman serum. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1993;197(2): 818-25. |
| Castoldi et al., A sensitive array for micro RNA expression profiling (miChip) based on locked nucleic acids (LNA). RNA. 2006;12: 913-20. |
| Charreyre et al., Fluorescence energy transfer study of the conformation of oligonucleotides covalently bound to polystyrene latex particles. Langmuir. 1997; 13: 3103-10. |
| Chavany et al., Polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles as polymeric carriers for antisense oligonucleotides. Pharma. Res. 1992;9(4): 441-9. |
| Chavany, et al., Adsorption of oligonucleotides onto polyisohexylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles protects them against nucleases and increases their cellular uptake. Pharma. Res. 1994;11(9): 1370-8. |
| Chen et al., Ionic strength-dependent persistence lengths of single-stranded RNA and DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:799-804. |
| Chen et al., Kinetics and thermodynamics of DNA hybridization on gold nanoparticles. Nucleic Acids Res. Jun. 2009;37(11):3756-65. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp230. Epub Apr. 20, 2009. |
| Chen et al., Nanoparticle-aptamer: an effective growth inhibitor for human cancer cells. IMECE 2009-11966. Jul. 8, 2010;271 -2. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2009-11966. 2 pgs. |
| Cheng et al., Interdigitated phospholipid/alkanethiol bilayers assembled on APTMS-supported gold colloid electrodes. Electroanalysis. 2004;16(1-2):127-31. Doi: 10.1002/elan.200302929. |
| Cheng et al., Tandem synthesis of core-shell brush copolymers and their transformation to peripherally cross-linked and hollowed nanostructures. J Am Chem Soc. May 31, 2006; 128(21):6808-9. Published on web May 6, 2006. |
| Chinen et al., Spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates enhance G-quadruplex formation and increase serum protein interactions. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Jan. 7, 2015;54(2):527-31. Doi: 10.1002/anie.201409211. Epub Nov. 13, 2014. |
| Chinnathambi et al., Binding mode of CpG Oligodeoxynucleotides to nanoparticles regulates bifurcated cytokine induction via Toll-like Receptor 9. Sci Reports. 2012;2(534):1-9. |
| Chirila et al., The use of synthetic polymers for delivery of therapeutic antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Biomaterials. 2002;23: 321-42. |
| Chithrani et al., Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett. 2006;6(4):662-8. |
| Cho et al., Immunostimulatory DNA-based vaccines induce cytotoxic lymphocyte activity by a T-helper cell-independent mechanism. Nature Biotechnol. May 2000;18:509-14. |
| Cho et al., Targeted delivery of siRNA-generating DNA nanocassettes using multifunctional nanoparticles. Small. Jun. 10, 2013;9(11):1964-73. Doi: 10.1002/smll.201201973. Epub Jan. 6, 2013. |
| Cho et al., Therapeutic nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. Mar. 1, 2008;14(5):1310-6. Doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1441. |
| Choi et al., DNA aptamer-passivated nanocrystal synthesis: a facile approach for nanoparticle-based cancer cell growth inhibition. Small. Mar. 2009;5(6):672-5. Doi: 10.1002/smll.200801821. |
| Chrisey et al., Covalent attachment of synthetic DNA to self-assembled monolayer films. Nucl. Acids Res. 1996;24: 3031-9. |
| Cload et al., Polyether tethered oligonucleotide probes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991;113(16): 6324-6. |
| Concise Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, “Polynucleotides,” J. I. Kroschwitz Ed., John Wiley & Sons, pp. 858-859 (1990). |
| Cook, Medicinal chemistry of antisense oligonucleotides-future opportunities, Anti-Cancer Drug Design, 6:585-607 (1991). |
| Coyle et al., DNA-Mediated Assembly of Protein Heterodimers on Membrane Surfaces. J Am Chem Soc 135(13):5012-5016 (2013). |
| Crooke et al., Progress in antisense technology. Ann. Rev. Med. 2004;55: 61-95. |
| Crooke, S. T. and Lebleu, B., Ed., CRC Press “Antisense Research and Applications” Table of Contents. 1993. |
| Cui et al., Topical immunization using nanoengineered genetic vaccines. J Control Release. May 17, 2002;81(1-2):173-84. |
| Cutler et al., Polyvalent nucleic acid nanostructures. J Am Chem Soc. Jun. 22, 2011;133(24):9254-7. Doi:10.1021/ja203375n. Epub Jun. 1, 2011. |
| Dave et al., Programmable assembly of DNA-functionalized liposomes by DNA. ACS Nano. Feb. 22, 2011;5(2):1304-12. Doi: 10.1021/nn1030093. Epub Jan. 4, 2011. |
| De Mesmaeker et al., Antisense oligonucleotides. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995;28(9): 366-74. |
| De Mesmaeker et al., Backbone modifications in oligonucleotides and peptide nucleic acid systems, Curr. Opin. In Struct. Biol., 5: 343-55 (1995). |
| Deering et al., Nucleic acid vaccines: prospects for non-viral delivery of mRNA vaccines. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. Jun. 2014;11(6):885-99. Doi: 10.1517/17425247.2014.901308. Epub Mar. 26, 2014. Review. |
| Demers et al., Thermal Desorption Behavior and Binding Properties of DNA Bases and Nucleosides on Gold. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:11248-11249. |
| Dhar et al., Polyvalent oligonucleotide gold nanoparticle conjugates as delivery vehicles for platinum (IV) warheads. J Am Chem Soc. Oct. 21, 2009;131(41):14652-3. Doi: 10.1021/ja907182. |
| Diebold et al., Nucleic acid agonists for Toll-like receptor 7 are defined by the presence of uridine ribonucleotides. Eur J Immunol. Dec. 2006;36(12):3256-67. |
| Dreyfus et al., Simple quantitative model for the reversible associate of DNA coated colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009;102: 048301. |
| Durand et al., Circular dichroism studies of an oligodeoxyribonucleotide containing a hairpin loop made of a hexaethylene glycol chain: conformation and stability. Nucl. Acids Res. 1990;18(21): 6353-9. |
| Dykxhoorn et al., Killing the messenger: short RNAs that silence gene expression. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003;4(6):457-67. |
| Eckstein, Oligonucleotides and Analogues, 1st Ed. (Oxford University Press, New York) (1991). |
| Elaissari et al., Effect of charge nature on the adsorption of single-stranded DNA fragments onto latex particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1998;202: 251-60. |
| Elbakry, A. et al., “Layer-by-Layer Assembled Gold Nanoparticles for siRNA Delivery,” Nano Lett., 2009, 9 (5), 2059-2064. |
| Elghanian et al., Selective colorimetric detection of polynucleotides based on the distance-dependent optical properties of gold nanoparticles. Science. 1997;277(5329):1078-81. |
| Eltekova et al., Adsorption of aromatic compounds from solutions in titanium dioxide and silica. Langmuir. 1687;3:951-7. |
| Eltoukhy et al., Nucleic acid-mediated intracellular protein delivery by lipid-like nanoparticles. Biomaterials. Aug. 2014;35(24):6454-61. Doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.014. Epub May 13, 2014. |
| Fahy et al., Design and synthesis of polyacrylamide-based oligonucleotide supports for use in nucleic acid diagnostics. Nucl. Acids Res. 1993;21: 1819-26. |
| Fan, H. et al., “Self-Assembly of Ordered, Robust, Three-Dimensional Gold Nanocrystal/Silica Arrays,” Science, 2004, 403, 567-571. |
| Farokhzad et al., Nanomedicine: developing smarter therapeutic and diagnostic modalities, Drug Delivery Rev., 58:1456 (2006). |
| Fattal et al., Biodegradable polyalkylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles for the delivery of oligonucleotides. J. Controlled Release. 1998;53:137-143. |
| Ferentz et al., Disulfide-crosslinked oligonucleotides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991;113(10): 4000-2. |
| Forsbach et al., Identification of RNA sequence motifs stimulating sequence-specific TLR8-dependent immune responses. J Immunol. Mar. 15, 2008;180(6):3729-38. |
| Frens, Particle size and sol stability in metal colloids. Kolloid-Zeitschrift und Zeitschrift fur Polymere. 1972;250(7):736-41. |
| Fukuda et al., Effective transformation of unactivated alkynes into ketones or acetals by means of Au(III) catalyst. J. Org. Chem. 1991;56(11):3729-31. |
| Fukuda et al., Efficient transformation of methyl propargyl ethers into alpha, beta-unsaturated ketones. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1991;64:2013-5. |
| Furstner et al., Catalytic carbophilic activation: catalysis by platinum and gold pi acids. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl.. 2007;46(19):3410-49. |
| Gao et al., Secondary structure effects on DNA hybridization kinetics: a solution versus surface comparison. Nucl. Acids Res. 2006;34: 3370-7. |
| Gehring et al., A tetrameric DNA structure with protonated cytosine-cytosine base pairs. Nature. 1993;363:561-565. |
| Ghosh et al., Gold nanoparticles in delivery applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2008;60(11):1307-15. |
| Gibson et al., Paclitaxel-functionalized gold nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129(37):11653-61. |
| Gidwani et al., Hybridization kinetics of double-stranded DNA probes for rapid molecular analysis. Analyst. 2009;134: 1675-81. |
| Cigler et al., “DNA-controlled assembly of a NaTI lattice structure from gold and protein nanoparticles,” Nat Mater 9(11): 918-922 (2010). |
| Giljohann et al., Gene regulation with polyvalent siRNA-nanoparticle conjugates. J Am Chem Soc. Feb. 18, 2009;131(6):2072-3. |
| Giljohann et al., Gold nanoparticles for biology and medicine. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Apr. 26, 2010;49(19):3280-94. Doi: 10.1002/anie.200904359. |
| Giljohann et al., Oligonucleotide loading determines cellular uptake of DNA-modified gold nanoparticles. Nano Lett. Dec. 2007;7(12):3818-21. Epub Nov. 13, 2007. |
| Gissot et al., Nucleoside, nucleotide and oligonucleotide based amphiphiles: a successful marriage of nucleic acids with lipids. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008;6:1324-33. |
| Godard, G. et al., “Antisense Effects of Cholesterol-Oligodeoxynucleotide Conjugates Associated with Poly(alkylcyanoacrylate) Nanoparticles,” Eur. J. Biochem., 1995, 232 (2), 404-410. |
| Grabar et al., Preparation and characterization of Au colloid monolayers. Anal. Chem. 1995;67:735-43. |
| Gramzinski et al., Interleukin-12 and gamma interferon-dependent protection against malaria conferred by CpG oligodeoxynucleotide in mice. Infection and Immunity. Mar. 2001:1643-9. |
| Grijalvo et al., Oligonucleotide delivery: a patent review (2010-2013). Expert Opin Ther Pat. Jul. 2014;24(7):801-19. Doi:10.1517/13543776.2014.915944. Epub May 5, 2014. |
| Gryaznov, Oligonucleotide n3′→p5′ phosphoramidates and thio-phoshoramidates as potential therapeutic agents. Chem Biodivers. Mar. 2010;7(3):477-93. Doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200900187. Review. |
| Guiducci et al., Properties regulating the nature of the plasmacytoid dendritic cell response to Toll-like receptor 9 activation. J Exp Med. Aug. 7, 2006;203(8):1999-2008. Epub Jul. 24, 2006. |
| Hames et al., Gene Probes 1 A Practical Approach, IRL Press, New York (1995). |
| Hamilton et al., A species of small antisense RNA in posttranscriptional gene silencing in plants. Science. 1999;286: 950-2. |
| Hammond et al., An RNA-directed nuclease mediates post-transcriptional gene silencing in Drosophilia cells. Nature. 2000;404: 293-6. |
| Han et al., A gold nanoparticle based approach for screening triplex DNA binders. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128(15):4954-5. |
| Han et al., Drug and gene delivery using gold nanoparticles. NanoBiotechnology. Mar. 2007;3(1):40-5. |
| Hartmann et al., Delineation of a CpG phosphorothioate oligodeoxynucleotide for activating primate immune responses in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol. Feb. 1, 2000 ;164(3): 1617-24. |
| Hashmi et al., Gold catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2006;45(47):7896-936. |
| Hashmi et al., Gold-catalyzed organic reactions. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:3180-211. |
| Hayashi, Ultrafine particles. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 1987;5(4):1375-1384. |
| Hayat, (Ed.) Colloidal Gold: Principles, Methods, and Applications, vol. 1, Table of Contents, pp. v-xvii; vol. 2, Table of Contents pp. v-xix; vol. 3, Table of Contents, ppv-xiv, Academic Press, San Diego (1989-1991). |
| He et al., Colloidal Au-enhanced surface plasmon resonance for ultrasensitive detection of DNA hybridization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122(38): 9071-7. |
| He et al., Phospholipid-stabilized Au-nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules. May 2005-Jun.;6(3):1224-5. |
| Hegner et al., Modified DNA immobilized on bioreactive self-assembled monolayer on gold for dynamic force microscopy imaging in aqueous buffer solution. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 1996;14(2):1418-21. |
| Heil et al., Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8. Science. Mar. 5, 2004;303(5663):1526-9. Epub Feb. 19, 2004. |
| Hellstrom et al., Epitaxial growth of DNA-assembled nanoparticle superlattices on patterned substrates. Nano Lett. 2013;13(12):6084-90. Doi: 10.1021/n14033654. Epub Nov. 20, 2013. |
| Henglein, “Small-Particle Research: Physicochemical Properties of Extremely Small Colloidal Metal and Semiconductor Particles,” Chem. Rev., 89:1861-1873 (1989). |
| Henglein, Mechanism of Reactions on Colloidal Microelectrodes and Size Quantization Effects. Top. Curr. Chem. 1988;143:113-180. |
| Hill et al., “Controlling the Lattice Parameters of Gold Nanoparticle FCC Crystals with Duplex DNA Linkers,” Nano Lett 8(8): 2341-2344 (2008). |
| Holen et al., Positional effects of short interfering RNAs targeting the human coagulation trigger tissue factor. Nucl. Acids Res. 2002;30: 1757-66. |
| Hotz et al., VEGF antisense therapy inhibits tumor growth and improves survival in experimental pancreatic cancer. Surgery. Feb. 2005;137(2):192-9. |
| Houot et al., T-cell modulation combined with intratumoral CpG cures lymphoma in a mouse model without the need for chemotherapy. Blood. Apr. 9, 2009; 113(15):3546-52. Doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-170274. Epub Oct. 21, 2008. |
| Hussain et al., A novel anionic dendrimer for improved cellular delivery of antisense oligonucleotides. J. Controlled Rel. 2004;99: 139-55. |
| Huxley et al., Preferential Staining of Nucleic Acid-Containing Structures for Electron Microscopy. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 1961;11:273-296 (1961). |
| Hwu et al., Targeted Paclitaxel by conjugation to iron oxide and gold nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 2009;131(1):66-8. |
| Iler, The surface chemistry of silica (chapter 6), IN: ILER, Chemistry of Silica, New York: John Wiley & Sons (1979). |
| Jackson et al., How do microRNAs regulate gene expression? Sci STKE. 2007(367):re1. |
| Jaschke et al., Automated incorporation of polyethylene glycol in synthetic oligonucleotides. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993;34: 301-4. |
| Jason et al., Toxicology of antisense therapeutics. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004;201(1): 66-83. |
| Jen et al., A nonviral transfection approach in vitro: the design of a gold nanoparticle vector joint with microelectromechanical systems. Langmuir, 2004;20(4): 1369-74. |
| Jensen et al., Spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates as an RNAi-based therapy for glioblastoma, Sci. Trans. Med., 5:209ra152 (2013). |
| Jeong et al., Novel intracellular delivery system of antisense oligonucleotide by self-assembled hybrid micelles composed of DNA/PEG conjugate and cationic fusogenic peptide. Bioconjugate Chem. 2003; 14: 473-9. |
| Jin et al., What controls the melting properties of DNA-linked gold nanoparticle assemblies? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125: 1643. |
| Kachura et al., A CpG-Ficoll Nanoparticle Adjuvant for Anthrax Protective Antigen Enhances Immunogenicity and Provides Single-Immunization Protection against Inhaled Anthrax in Monkeys. J Immunol. Jan. 1, 2016; 196(l):284-97. Doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501903. Epub Nov. 25, 2015. |
| Kandimalla et al., Conjugation of Ligands at the 5′-End of CpG DNA Affects Immunostimulatory Activity. Bioconjugate Chemistry 2002 13 (5), 966-974. DOI: 10.1021/bc0200374. |
| Kandimalla et al., Secondary structures in CpG oligonucleotides affect immunostimulatory activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Jul. 11, 2003;306(4):948-53. |
| Kanzler et al., Therapeutic targeting of innate immunity with Toll-like receptor agonists and antagonists. Nat Med. May 2007;13(5):552-9. |
| Katz et al., Integrated nanoparticle-biomolecule hybrid systems: synthesis, properties, and applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004;43: 6042-108. |
| Kawasaki et al., Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Front Immunol. Sep. 25, 2014;5:461. Doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00461. eCollection 2014. Review. |
| Khmelinskaia et al., Effect of anchor positioning on binding and diffusion of elongated 3D DNA nanostructures on lipid membranes. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. Apr. 13, 2016;49(19): 194001. |
| Kim et al., Cationic solid lipid nanoparticles reconstituted from low density lipoprotein components for delivery of siRNA. Mol Pharm. Jul. 2008-Aug.;5(4):622-31. Doi: 10.1021/mp8000233. Epub May 8, 2008. |
| Kim et al., Direct synthesis of polymer nanocapsules with a noncovalently tailorable surface. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2007;46(19):3471-4. |
| Kim et al., Direct synthesis of polymer nanocapsules: self-assembly of polymer hollow spheres through irreversible covalent bond formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132(28):9908-19. |
| Kim et al., Effect of bovine serum albumin on the stability of methotrexate-encapsulated liposomes, Arch. Pharmacal Res. 1991;14:336. |
| Kim et al., Facile, template-free synthesis of stimuli-responsive polymer nanocapsules for targeted drug delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2010;49(26):4405-8. |
| Kim, S. et al., “Systemic and Specific Delivery of Small Interfering RNAs to the Liver Mediated by Apolipoprotein A-I,” Mol. Ther., 2007, 15 (6), 1145-1152. |
| Kimura-Suda et al., Base-Dependent Competive Adsorption of Single-Stranded DNA on Gold. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2003; 125: 9014-9015. |
| Kloosterman et al., In situ detection of miRNAs in animal embryos using LNA-modified oligonucleotide probes. Nat. Methods. 2006;3: 27-9. |
| Kolarova et al., Preparation of magnetic oligo (dT) particles. Biotechniques. 1996;20: 196-8. |
| Kondo et al., Nano tube formation through the continuous one-dimensional fusion of hollow nanocapsules composed of layer-by-layer poly(lactic acid) stereocomplex films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132(24):8236-7. |
| Kong et al., Cationic lipid-coated gold nanoparticles as efficient and non-cytotoxic intracellular siRNA delivery vehicles. Pharm Res. Feb. 2012;29(2):362-74. Doi: 10.1007/s11095-011-0554-y. Epub Aug. 13, 2011. |
| Krieg, Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonists in the treatment of cancer.; Oncogene. Jan. 7, 2008;27(2): 161-7. Doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210911. |
| Krieg. Antiinfective applications of toll-like receptor 9 agonists. Proc Am Thorac Soc. Jul. 2007;4(3):289-94. |
| Krug et al. Identification of CpG oligonucleotide sequences with high induction of IFN-alpha/beta in plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol. Jul. 2001;31(7):2154-63. |
| Krutzfeldt et al., Silencing of microRNAs in vivo with ‘antagomirs’. Nature. 2005;438(7068):685-9. |
| Kukowska-Latallo et al., “Efficient transfer of genetic material into mammalian cells using Starburst polyamidoamine dendrimers,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:4897-4902 (1996). |
| Kwoh et al., Stabilization of poly-L-lysine/DNA polyplexes for in vivo gene delivery to the liver. Biochim Biophys Acta. Feb. 16, 1999;1444(2):171-90. |
| Landfester et al., From polymeric particles to multifunctional nanocapsules for biomedical applications using the miniemulsion process. J. Polymer Sci. Part A.2010; 48(3)493-515. |
| Langer, New methods of drug delivery. Science. Sep. 28, 1990;249(4976):1527-33. |
| Leander, D., “Mixed-Monolayer Gold Nanoparticles for Cancer Therapeutics,” Nanoscape, 2010, 7(1), 11-14. |
| Lebedeva et al., Antisense oligonucleotides: Promise and reality. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2001;41:403-19. |
| Lee et al., A DNA-Gold Nanoparticle-Based Colormetric Competition Assay for the Detection of Cysteine. Nano Letter. 2008;8(2):529-533. |
| Lee et al., All-in-one target-cell-specific magnetic nanoparticles for simultaneous molecular imaging and siRNA delivery. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48(23):4174-9. Doi: 10.1002/anie.200805998. |
| Lee et al., Chip-based scanometric detection of mercuric ion using DNA-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2008;80(17):6805-8. |
| Lee et al., Colorimetric detection of mercuric ion (Hg2+) in aqueous media using DNA-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2007;46(22):4093-6. |
| Lee et al., Silver nanoparticle-oligonucleotide conjugates based on DNA with triple cyclic disulfide moieties, Nano Lett., 7: 2112 (2007). |
| Leleux et al., Biophysical Attributes of CpG Presentation Control TLR9 Signaling to Differentially Polarize Systemic Immune Responses. Cell Rep. Jan. 17, 2017;18(3):700-710. Doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.073. |
| Lemaigre et al., Transcriptional control of genes that regulate glycolysis and gluconeogenesis in adult liver. Biochem. J. 1994;303: 1-14. |
| Lennox et al., Characterization of modified antisense oligonucleotides in Xenopus laevis embryos. Oligonucleotides. 2006 Spring;16(1):26-42. |
| Leslie et al., A new tool for oligonucleotides import into cells. Clin. Chem. 009;55: 609-10. |
| Leunissen et al., Switchable self-protected attractions in DNA-functionalized colloids. Nat. Mater. 2009;8: 590-95. |
| Lewandowski et al., Topically delivered spherical nucleic acid nanoconjugates targeting TNF improve the psoriatic phenotype. J Invest Dermatol. 2015 135:S71. Abstract 413. |
| Lewis, Controlled release of bioactive agents from lactide/glycolide polymer. pp. 1-41, in Chasin et al. (eds.), Biodegradable Polymers as Drug Delivery Systems, Marcel Dekker (1990). |
| Li et al., Combination delivery of antigens and CpG by lanthanides-based core-shell nanoparticles for enhanced immune response and dual-mode imaging. Adv Healthc Mater. Oct. 2013;2(10):1309-13. Doi:10.1002/adhm.201200364. Epub Mar. 25, 2013. |
| Li et al., Dual-reactive surfactant used for synthesis of functional nanocapsules in miniemulsion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132(23):7823-5. |
| Li et al., Gold-catalyzed organic transformations. Chem. Rev. 2008;108(8):3239-65. |
| Li et al., Nanofabrication by DNA self-assembly. Materials Today. Elsevier Science. May 1, 2009; 12(5)24-32. |
| Li et al., Nucleolin-targeting liposomes guided by aptamer AS1411 for the delivery of siRNA for the treatment of malignant melanomas. Biomaterials. Apr. 2014;35(12):3840-50. Doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.019. Epub Jan. 31, 2014. |
| Li et al., Reversible and chemically programmable micelle assembly with DNA block-copolymer amiphiphiles. Nano Lett.. 2004;4(6):1055-8. |
| Li et al., Thermal stability of DNA functionalized gold nanoparticles, Bioconjugate Chem., 24:1790-7 (2013). |
| Lin et al., Gold nanoparticle delivery of modified CpG stimulates macrophages and inhibits tumor growth for enhanced immunotherapy. PloS One. May 15, 2013;8(5):e63550. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063550. Print 2013. |
| Lipshutz et al., High density synthetic oligonucleotide arrays. Nanotechnology. 2003; 14: R15-27. |
| Liu et al., DNA-based micelles: synthesis, micellar properties and size-dependent cell permeability, Chemistry. 2010;16:3791-7. |
| Liu et al., Membrane anchored immunostimulatory oligonucleotides for in vivo cell modification and localized immunotherapy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Jul. 25, 2011;50(31):7052-5. Doi: 10.1002/anie.201101266. Epub Jun. 17, 2011. |
| Liu et al., New poly(d-glucaramidoamine)s induce DNA nanoparticle formation and efficient gene delivery into mammalian cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004; 126: 7422-3. |
| Liu et al., Structure-based programming of lymph-node targeting in molecular vaccines. Nature. Mar. 27, 2014;507(7493):519-22. Doi: 10.1038/nature12978. |
| Liu, J. et al., Silica Nanoparticle Supported Lipid Bilayers for Gene Delivery, Chem. Commun., 2009, 5100-5102. |
| Ljubimova et al., Nanoconjugate based on polymalic acid for tumor targeting. Chem Biol Interact. Jan. 30, 2008;171(2):195-203. Epub Feb. 8, 2007. |
| Love et al., Self-assembled monolayers of thiolates on metals as a form of nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 2005;105: 1103-69. |
| Luo et al., Synthetic DNA delivery systems. Nat Biotechnol. Jan. 2000;18(1):33-7. |
| Lytton-Jean et al., A thermodynamic investigation into the binding properties of DNA functionalized gold nanoparticle probes and molecular fluorophore probes. J Am Chem Soc. Sep. 21, 2005; 127(37):12754-5. |
| Lytton-Jean et al., Highly Cooperative Behavior of Peptide Nucleic Acid-Linked DNA-Modified Gold-Nanoparticle and Comb-Polymer Aggregates, Advanced Materials, 21: 706 (2009). |
| Ma et al., Design and synthesis of RNA miniduplexes via a synthetic linker approach. 2. Generation of covalently closed, double-stranded cyclic HIV-1 TAR RNA analogs with high Tat- binding affinity. Nucl. Acids Res. 1993;21: 2585-9. |
| Ma et al., Design and synthesis of RNA miniduplexes via a synthetic linker approach. Biochemistry. 1993;32(7): 1751-8. |
| Macfarlane et al., “Establishing the Design Rules for DNA-Mediated Programmable Colloidal Crystallization,” Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 49(27): 4589-4592 (2010). |
| Macfarlane et al., “Nanoparticle Superlattice Engineering with DNA,” Science 334:204-208 (2011). |
| Macfarlane et al., Nucleic Acid-Modified Nanostructures as Programmable Atom Equivalents: Forainq a New “Table of Elements,” Anaew Chem Int Ed 52(22): 5688-5698 (2013). |
| Madan-Lala et al., Combinatorial Delivery of Dual and Triple TLR Agonists via Polymeric Pathogen-like Particles Synergistically Enhances Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses. Sci Rep. May 31, 2017;7(1):2530. Doi:10.1038/s41598-017-02804-y. |
| Mangsbo et al., Enhanced tumor eradication by combining CTLA-4 or PD-1 blockade with CpG therapy. J Immunother. Apr. 2010;33(3):225-35. Doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181c01fcb. |
| Maoz et al., Penetration-controlled reactions in organized monolayer assemblies. 1. Aqueous permanganate interaction with monolayer and multilayer films of long-chain surfactants. Langmuir. 1987;3:1034-44. |
| Maoz et al., Penetration-controlled reactions in organized monolayer assemblies. 2. Aqueous permanganate interaction with self-assembling monolayers of long-chain surfactants. Langmuir. 1987;3:1045-51. |
| Marabelle et al. Depleting tumor-specific Tregs at a single site eradicates disseminated tumors, J Clin Invest. 2013; 123(6):2447-2463. |
| Marinakos et al., Gold Nanoparticles as Templates for the Synthesis of Hollow Nanometer-Sized Conductive Polymer Capsules. Adv. Mater. 1999; 11: 34-37. |
| Marshall et al., Novel chimeric immunomodulatory compounds containing short CpG oligodeoxyribonucleotides have differential activities in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. Sep. 1, 2003;31(17):5122-33. |
| Martinez et al., Locked nucleic acid based beacons for surface interaction studies and biosensor development. Anal. Chem. 2009;81: 3448-54. |
| Martinson et al., Impact of Class A, B and C CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides on in vitro activation of innate immune cells in human immunodeficiency virus-1 infected individuals. Immunology. 2007;120(4):526-35. |
| Maruyama, et al., Nanoparticle DNA carrier with poly(L-lysine) grafted polysaccharide copolymer and poly(D,L-lactic acid). Bioconjugate Chem.. 1997;8: 735-742. |
| Massich et al., Regulating immune response using polyvalent nucleic acid-gold nanoparticle conjugates. Mol Pharm. Nov. 2009-Dec.;6(6):1934-40. |
| Matijevic et al., Fine Particles Part II: Formation Mechanisms and Applications. MRS Bulletin pp. 16-47 (1990). |
| Matteucci et al., Synthesis of deoxyoligonucleotides on a polymer support. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981;103:3185-3191. |
| Mattson et al., A practical approach to crosslinking. Malec. Biol. Rep. 1993; 17: 167-83. |
| Maxwell et al., Self-assembled nanoparticle probes for recognition and detection of biomolecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124: 9606-12. |
| Maye et al., A simple method for kinetic control of DNA-induced nanoparticle assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006; 128: 14020-1. |
| McAllister et al., Polymeric nanogels produced via inverse microemulsion polymerization as potential gene and antisense delivery agents, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124:15198 (2002). |
| McBain, S. et al., “Polyethyleneimine Functionalized Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as Agents for DNA Deliver and Transfection,” J. Mater. Chem., 2007, 17, 2561-2565. |
| McGehee et al., Differentiation-specific element: a cis-acting developmental switch required for the sustained transcriptional expression of the angiotensinogen gene during hormonal-induced differentiation of 3T3-L 1 fibroblasts to adipocvtes. Mol. Endocrinol. 1993;7: 551-60. |
| McKay et al., Characterization of a potent and specific class of antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of human protein kinase C-alpha expression. J Biol Chem. Jan. 15, 1999;274(3): 1715-22. |
| McKenzie et al., Sequence-specific DNA detection using high-affinity LNA-functionalized gold nanoparticles. Small. Nov. 2007;3(11):1866-8. |
| McManus et al., Gene silencing in mammals by small interfering RNAs. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2002;3(10): 737-47. |
| Medintz et al., A reactive peptidic linker for self-assembling hybrid quantum dot-DNA bioconjugates. Nano Lett. Jun. 2007;7(6):1741-8. Epub May 26, 2007. |
| Mendell, MicroRNAs: critical regulators of development, cellular physiology and malignancy. Cell Cycle. 2005;4(9):1179-84. |
| Miller et al., Antisense oligonucleotides: Strategies for delivery. PSTT. 1998; 1(9): 377-86. |
| Ming et al., Albumin-based nanoconjugates for targeted delivery of; therapeutic oligonucleotides. Biomaterials. Oct. 2013;34(32):7939-49. Doi:; 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.066. Epub Jul. 19, 2013. |
| Mohamed et al., TLR9 mediates S. aureus killing inside osteoblasts via induction of oxidative stress. BMC Microbiol. Oct. 3, 2016;16(1):230. |
| Monia et al., Nuclease resistance and antisense activity of modified oligonucleotides targeted to Ha-ras. J Biol Chem. Jun. 14, 1996;271(24):14533-40. |
| Moughton et al., Hollow nanostructures from self-assembled supramolecular metallo-triblock copolymers. Soft Matter. 2009;5(12):2361-70. |
| Mucic et al., Synthesis and characterization of DNA with ferrocenyl groups attached to their 5′-termini: electrochemical characterization of a redox-active nucleotide monolayer. Chem. Comm. 1996;555-7. |
| Mui et al., Immune stimulation by a CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotide is enhanced when encapsulated and delivered in lipid particles. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. Sep. 2001;298(3): 1185-92. |
| Niemeyer, C. et al., “Bifunctional DNA-Gold Nanoparticle Conjugates as Building Blocks for the Self-Assembly of Cross-Linked Particle Layers,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2003, 311 (4), 995-999. |
| Nykypanchuk et al., “DNA-guided crystallization of colloidal nanoparticles,” Nature 451 :549-552 (2008). |
| O'Meara et al., Capture of single-stranded DNA assisted by oligonucleotide modules. Anal. Biochem. 1998;255: 195-203. |
| O'Reilly et al., Identification of an activating transcription factor (ATF) binding site in the human transforming growth factor-beta 2 promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267: 19938-43. |
| Ono et al., DNA triplex formation of oligonucleotide analogues consisting of linker groups and octamer segments that have opposite sugar-phosphate backbone polarities. Biochemistry. 1991;30(41): 9914-2. |
| Opalinska et al., Nucleic-acid therapeutics: basic principles and recent applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. Jul. 2002;1(7):503-14. |
| Opdahl et al., Independent control of grafting density and conformation of single-stranded DNA brushes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A. 2007;104: 9-14. |
| Ow Sullivan et al., Development of a novel gene delivery scaffold utilizing colloidal gold-polvethylenimine coniuqates for DNA condensation. Gene Ther. 2003; 10(22): 1882-90. |
| Ozpolat et al., Nanomedicine based approaches for the delivery of siRNA in cancer. J. Intern. Med. 2010;267(1):44-53. |
| Paciotti et al., Colloidal gold: a novel nanoparticle vector for tumor directed drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 2004;11(3):169-83. |
| Pan et al., Dendrimer-Modified Magnetic Nanoparticles Enhance Efficiency of Gene Delivery System. Cancer Res. 2007;67:8156-8163. |
| Parak et al., Biological applications of colloidal nanocrystals. Nanotechnol. 2003; 14: R15-27. |
| Park et al., DNA-programmable nanoparticle cystrallization. Nature. 2008;451: 553-6. |
| Parrish et al., Functional anatomy of a dsRNA trigger: Differential requirement for the two trigger strands in RNA interference. Mol. Cell. 2000;6: 1077-87. |
| Parrish et al., Soluble Camptothecin Derivatives Prepared by Click Cycloaddition Chemistry on Functional Aliphatic Polyesters. Bioconjugate Chem. 2006;18: 263-267. |
| Patel et al., Peptide antisense nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Nov. 11, 2008;105(45):17222-6. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801609105. |
| Patel et al., Scavenger receptors mediate cellular uptake of polyvalent oligonucleotide-functionalized gold nanoparticles, Bioconj. Chem., 21:2250 (2010). |
| Patil et al., DNA-based therapeutics and DNA delivery systems: a comprehensive review. AAPS J., 2005;7(1): E61-77. |
| Patwa et al., Hybrid lipid oligonucleotide conjugates: synthesis, self-assemblies and biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40:5844-54. |
| Paunesku et al., Gadolinium-conjugated Ti02-DNA oligonucleotide nanoconjugates show prolonged intracellular retention period and T1 -weighted contrast enhancement in magnetic resonance images. Nanomedicine, 2008;4(3):201-7. |
| Peng et al., Real-time detection of gene expression in cancer cells using molecular beacon imaging: New strategies for cancer research. Cancer Res., 2005;65: 1909-17. |
| Penn et al., Nanoparticles for bioanalysis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol., 2003;7: 609-15. |
| Pfeiffer et al., Bivalent Cholesterol-Based Coupling of Oligonucleotides to Lipid Membrane Assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:10224-10225. |
| Pfeiffer et al., Quantification of oligonucleotide modifications of small unilamellar lipid vesicles. Anal. Chem. 2006;78:7493-8. |
| Phan, Human telomeric G-quadruplex: structures of DNA and RNA sequences. Febs J. Mar. 2010;277(5):1107-17. Doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07464.x. Epub 2009; Nov. 27. |
| Pokholenko et al., Lipid oligonucleotide conjugates as responsive nanomaterials for drug delivery. J of Materials Chemistry B. 2013;5329-34. |
| Pon, Solid-phase supports for oligonucleotide synthesis. Meth. Malec. Biol., 1993;20: 465-96. |
| Prasad et al., Oligonucleotides tethered to a short polyguanylic acid stretch are targeted to macrophages: enhanced antiviral activity of a vesicular stomatitis virus-specific antisense oligonucleotide. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Nov. 1999;43(11):2689-96. |
| Raetz J Lipid Res 2009 50:s103-s108. |
| Ramos-Casals et al., Autoimmune diseases induced by TNF-targeted therapies: analysis of 233 cases. Medicine (Baltimore). Jul. 2007;86(4):242-51. |
| Rethore et al., Preparation of chitosan/polyglutamic acid spheres based on the use of polystyrene template as nonviral gene carrier. Tissue Engineering, 2009;15(4): 605-13. |
| Rethore et al., Use of templates to fabricate nanoscale spherical structures for defined architectural control. Small, 2010;6(4):488-98. |
| Riccelli et al., Hybridization of single-stranded DNA targets to immobilized complementary DNA probes: comparison of hairpin versus linear capture probes. Nucl. Acids Res., 2001 ;29: 996-1004. |
| Richardson et al., Tethered oligonucleotide probes. A strategy for the recognition of structured RNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991;113(13): 5109-11. |
| Rosi et al., Nanostructures in biodiagnostics, Chem. Rev., 105:1547 (2005). |
| Rosi et al., Oligonucleotide-modified gold nanoparticles for intracellular gene regulation. Science. May 19, 2006;312(5776):1027-30. |
| Rush et al., Intracellular mRNA regulation with self-assembled locked nucleic acid polymer nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. May 28, 2014;136(21):7615-8. Doi: 10.1021/ja503598z. Epub May 14, 2014. |
| Rusling et al., “Functionalizing Designer DNA Crystals with a Triple-Helical Veneer,” Angew Chem Int Ed 53(15): 3979-3982 (2014). |
| Santangelo et al., Nanostructured probes for RNA detection in living cells. Ann. Biomed. Eng., 2006;34:39-50. |
| Schifferlers et al., Cancer siRNA therapy by tumor selective delivery with ligand-targeted sterically stabilized nanoparticle. Nucl. Acid Res., 2004;32(19): e149. |
| Schwab et al., An approach for new anticancer drugs: Oncogene-targered antisense DNA. Ann Oncol. 1994;5(Supp14):S55-8. |
| Seela et al., Oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing 1,3-propanediol as nucleoside substitute. Nucl. Acids Res., 1987;15(7): 3113-29. |
| Seelig et al., Catalyzed relaxation of a metastable DNA fuel. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006;128: 12211-20. |
| Seeman, “An Overview of Structural DNA Nanotechnology,” Mol Biotechnol 37(3): 246-257 (2007). |
| Seferos et al., Locked nucleic acid-nanoparticle conjugates, Chem. Bio. Chem., 8:1230 (2007). |
| Seferos et al., Polyvalent DNA nanoparticle conjugates stabilize nucleic acids. Nano Lett. Jan. 2009;9(1):308-11. |
| Sen et al., Formation of parallel four-stranded complexes by guanine-rich motifs in DNA and its implications; for meiosis. Nature, 1988, 334:364-366. |
| Shahzad et al., Targeted delivery of small interfering RNA using reconstituted high-density lipoprotein nanoparticles. Neoplasia. Apr. 2011;13(4):309-19. |
| Sharma et al., Targeting mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase in the mutant (V600E) B-Raf signaling cascade effectively inhibits melanoma lung metastases. Cancer Res., 2006;66: 8200-9. |
| Sharp et al., RNA interference—2001. Genes Dev., 2001; 15: 485-90. |
| Shukla et al., Development of streptavidin-based ; nanocomplex for siRNA delivery. Mol Pharm. Dec. 2, 2013;10(12):4534-45. Doi:; 10.1021/mp400355q. Epub Oct. 25, 2013. |
| Shukoor et al., CpG-DNA loaded multifunctional MnO nanoshuttles for TLR9-specific cellular cargo delivery, selective immune-activation and Mri. J. Mater. Chem., 2012,22, 8826-8834. |
| Simmel et al., DNA nanodevices. Small, 2005;1: 284-99. |
| Sita et al., Dual bioluminescence and near-infrared fluorescence monitoring to evaluate spherical nucleic acid nanoconjugate activity in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Apr. 18, 2017;114(16):4129-4134. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702736114. Epub Apr. 3, 2017. |
| Sohlenkamp et al., FEMS Microbiol Rev. Jan. 2016;40(l):133-59. Doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv008. Epub Apr. 9, 2015. |
| Sokolova et al., The use of calcium phosphate nanoparticles encapsulating Toll-like receptor ligands and the antigen hemagglutinin to induce dendritic cell maturation and T cell activation. Biomaterials. Jul. 2010;31(21):5627-33. Doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.067.Epub Apr. 24, 2010. |
| Song et al., Backbone-modified oligonucleotides for tuning the cellular uptake 35ehavior of spherical nucleic acids. Biomater Sci. Feb. 28, 2017;5(3):412-416. Doi: 10.1039/c6bm00792a. |
| Stahl et al., Deregulated Akt3 activity promotes development of malignant melanoma. Cancer Res., 2004;64: 7002-10. |
| Stengel et al., Determinants for Membrane Fusion Induced by Cholesterol-Modified DNA Zippers, J. Phys. Chem. B., 112:8264-74 (2008). |
| Stengel et al., DNA-Induced Programmable Fusion of Phospholipid Vesicles, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129:9584-5 (2007). |
| Stephenson et al., Inhibition of Rous sarcoma viral RNA translation by a specific oligodeoxyribonucleotide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1978;75(1): 285-8. |
| Stoermer et al., Distance-dependent emission from dye-labeled oligonucleotides on striped Au/Ag nanowires: effect of secondary structure and hybridization efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006;128: 13243-54. |
| Storhoff et al., One-pot colorimetric differentiation of polynucleotides with single base imperfections using gold nanoparticle probes. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998;120:1959-64. |
| Storhoff et al., Sequence-Dependent Stability of DNA-Modified Gold Nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2002;18: 6666-6670. |
| Storhoff et al., What controls the optical properties of DNA-linked gold nanoparticle assemblies? J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000;122: 4640-50. |
| Storz et al., An abundance of RNA regulators. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 2005;74:199-217. |
| Strable et al., “Natural Nanochemical Building Blocks: Icosahedral Virus Particles Organized by Attached Oligonucleotides,” Nano Lett 4(8): 1385-1389 (2004). |
| Sugihara et al., One-pot synthesis of biomimetic shell cross-linked micelles and nanocages by ATRP in alcohol/water mixtures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2010;48(20):3500-3. |
| Sundaram et al., Particle-mediated delivery of recombinant expression vectors to rabbit skin induces high-titered polyclonal antisera (and circumvents purification of a protein immunogen). Nucl. Acids Res., 1996;24(7): 1375-7. |
| Switaj et al., CpG immunostimulatory oligodeoxynucleotide 1826 enhances antitumor effect of interleukin 12 gene-modified tumor vaccine in a melanoma model in mice. Clin Cancer Res. Jun. 15, 2004;10(12 Pt l):4165-75. |
| Taton et al., Scanometric DNA array detection with nanoparticle probes. Science, 2000;289(5485):1757-60. |
| Thomas, “The Interaction of HgC12 with Sodium Thymonucleate,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 76:6032-6034 (1954). |
| Thompson et al., Smart lipids for programmable nanomaterials. Nano Lett. Jul. 14, 2010;10(7):2690-3. doi: 10.1021/n1101640k. |
| Thurn et al., Labeling TiO2 nanoparticles with dyes for optical fluorescence microscopy and determination of TiO2-DNA nanoconjuqate stability. Small, 2009;5(11):1318-25. |
| Timmons et al., Investigation of fatty acid monolayers on metals by contact potential measurements. J. Phys. Chem., 1965;69:984-90. |
| Tincer et al., Immunostimulatory activity of polysaccharide-poly(I:C) nanoparticles. Biomaterials. Jun. 2011;32(18):4275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.028.Epub Apr. 2, 2011. |
| Tiwari et al., Functionalized gold nanoparticles and their biomedical applications. Nanomaterials. 2011;1:31-63. doi: 10.3390/nano1010031. |
| Tkachenko et al., Multifunctional gold nanoparticle-peptide complexes for nuclear targeting. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003;125: 4700-1. |
| Tondelli, et al., Highly efficient cellular uptake of c-myb antisense oligonucleotides through specifically designed polymeric nanospheres. Nucl. Acids Res. 1998;26:5425-5431. |
| Tuerk et al., Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment: RNA Ligands to Bacteriophage T4 DNA Polymerase. Science. 1990;249:505-510. |
| Turberfield et al., DNA fuel for free-running nanomachines. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2003;90: 118102. |
| Turner et al., Nanoscale Cage-like Structures Derived from Polyisoprene-Containing Shell Cross- linked Nanoparticle Templates. Nano Lett., 2004;4(4):683-8. |
| Vorobjev et al., Nuclease resistance and RNase H sensitivity of oligonucleotides bridged by oligomethylenediol and oligoethylene glycol linkers. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. Apr. 2001;11(2):77-85. |
| Wagner et al., Gene inhibition using antisense oligodeoxynucleotides. Nature, 1994;372: 333-5. |
| Wang, Synthetic CPG ODNs activate immune cells through the Toll-like receptor (TLR) pathway. Integrated DNA Technologies. Apr. 11, 2017. 3 pages. |
| Wang et al., “Hierarchical Assembly of Plasmonic Nanosctuctures Using Virus Capsid Scaffolds on DNA Oriqami Templates,” ACS Nano 8(8):7896-7904 (2014). |
| Wang et al., Speeding up a single-molecule DNA device with a simple catalyst. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Nonlin. Soft Matter. Phys., 2005;72: 051918. |
| Wei et al., Polyvalent immunostimulatory nanoagents with self-assembled CpG oligonucleotide-conjugated gold nanoparticles. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Jan. 27, 2012;51(5):1202-6. doi:10.1002/anie.201105187. Epub Dec. 21, 2011. |
| West et al., Recognition and signaling by toll-like receptors. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22:409-37. |
| Whitehead et al., Knocking down barriers: advances in siRNA delivery, Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov., 8:129 (2009). |
| Willis et al., Liposome-Anchored Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aptamers, Biocon. Chem., 9:573-82 (1998). |
| Wilson et al., pH-Responsive nanoparticle vaccines for dual-delivery of antigens and immunostimulatory oligonucleotides. ACS Nano. May 28, 2013;7(5):3912-25. doi: 10.1021/nn305466z. Epub Apr. 30, 2013. |
| Wilton et al. Antisense oligonucleotide-induced exon skipping across the human dystrophin gene transcript. Mol Ther. Jul. 2007;15(7):1288-96. Epub Feb. 6, 2007. |
| Winfree et al., “Design and self-assembly of two-dimensional DNA crystals,” Nature 394(6693): 539-544 (1998). |
| Wolf et al., Rapid hybridization kinetics of DNA attached to submicron latex particles. Nucl. Acids Res., 1987;15: 2911-26. |
| Wolfe et al., Modulation of Tetraplex Formation by Chemical Modifications of a G4-Containing Phosphorothioate Oligonucleotide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6301-6302 (Year: 1996). |
| Wolfrum et al., Mechanisms and optimization of in vivo delivery of lipophilic siRNAs. Nat Biotechnol. Oct. 2007;25(10):1149-57. Epub Sep. 16, 2007. |
| Wu et al., DNA aptamer-micelle as an efficient detection/delivery vehicle toward cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jan. 5, 2010;107(1):5-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909611107. Epub Dec. 22, 2009. |
| Wu et al., Intracellular fate of spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates. J Am Chem Soc. May 28, 2014;136(21):7726-33. doi: 10.1021/ja503010a. Epub May 19, 2014. |
| Xiao et al., Mannosylated bioreducible nanoparticle-mediated macrophage-specific TNF-? RNA interference for IBD therapy. Biomaterials. Oct. 2013;34(30):7471-82. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.008. Epub Jun. 29, 2013. |
| Xiong et al., “Phase Behavior of Nanoparticles Assembled by DNA Linkers,” Phys Rev Lett 102(1): 015504 (2009). |
| Xu et al., A gold-nanoparticle-based real-time colorimetric screening method for endonuclease activitv and inhibition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 2007;46(19):3468-70. |
| Xu et al., Homogeneous detection of nucleic acids based upon the light scattering properties of silver-coated nanoparticle probes. Anal. Chem., 2007;79(17):6650-4. |
| Xu et al., Thermodynamics of DNA hybridization on gold nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005;127(38): 13227-31. |
| Yan et al., “Aptamers and aptamer targeted delivery,” RNA Biol. 6(3) 316-320 (2009). |
| Yan et al., “DNA-Templated Self-Assembly of Protein Arrays and Highly Conductive Nanowires,” Science 301 (5641): 1882-1884 (2003). |
| Yang et al., Evidence that processed small dsRNAs may mediate sequence-specific mRNA degradation during RNAi in Drosophila embryos. Curr. Biol., 2000;10: 1191-200. |
| Yin et al., Supramolecular self-assembled nanoparticles mediate oral delivery of therapeutic TNF-? siRNA against systemic inflammation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. May 27, 2013;52(22):5757-61. doi: 10.1002/anie.201209991. Epub Apr. 22, 2013. |
| Yin Win et al., Effects of particle size and surface coating on cellular uptake of polymeric nonparticles for oral delivery of anticancer drugs. Biomaterials, 2005;26: 2713-22. |
| You et al., Engineering the nanoparticle-biomacromolecule interface. Soft Matter, 2006;2: 190-204. |
| Young et al., Hollow spherical nucleic acids for intracellular gene regulation based upon biocompatible silica shells, Nano Lett., 12:3867 (2012). |
| Yu et al., Exoplasmic cysteine Cys384 of the HDL receptor SR-BI is critical for its sensitivity to a small-molecule inhibitor and normal lipid transport activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 26, 2011;108(30): 12243-8. Epub Jul. 11, 2011. |
| Zabner et al., Cellular and molecular barriers to gene transfer by a cationic lipid. J. Biol. Chem., 1995;270: 18997-9007. |
| Zamai et al., Camptothecin Poly[N-(2-Hydroxypropyl) Methacrylamide] Copolymers in Antitopoisomerase-1 Tumor Therapy: Intratumor Release and Antitumor Efficacy. Mol Cancer Ther 2003;2: 29-40. |
| Zamecnik et al., Inhibition of Rous sarcoma virus replication and cell transformation by a specific oligodeoxynucleotide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1978;75(1): 280-4. |
| Zamore et al., RNAi: Double-Stranded RNA Directs the ATP-Dependent Cleavage of mRNA at 21 to 23 Nucleotide Intervals. Cell. 2000;101:25-33. |
| Zhang et al., “A general strategy for the DNA-mediated self-assembly of functional nanoparticles into heterogeneous systems,” Nat Nanotechnol 8(11): 865-872 (2013). |
| Zhang et al., “DNA-Directed Three-Dimensional Protein Organization,” Angew Chem Int Ed 51(14): 3382-3385 (2012). |
| Zhang et al., A general approach to DNA-programmable atom equivalents. Nat Mater. Aug. 2013;12(8):741-6. doi: 10.1038/nmat3647. Epub May 19, 2013. |
| Zhang et al., An extremely stable and orthogonal DNA base pair with a simplified three-carbon backbone. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005;127:74-75. |
| Zhang et al., Antibody-linked spherical nucleic acids for cellular targeting, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134:16488-91 (2012). |
| Zhang et al., Cationic shell-crosslinked knedel-like nanoparticles for highly efficient gene and oligonucleotide transfection of mammalian cells. Biomaterials, 2009;30(5):968-77. |
| Zhang et al., Control of DNA strand displacement kinetics using toehold exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009;131: 17303-14. |
| Zhang et al., Informational liposomes: Complexes derived from cholesteryl-conjugated oligonucleotides and liposomes. Tetrahedron Letters. 1996. 37(35):6243-6. |
| Zhang et al., Nanopod formation through gold nanoparticle templated and catalyzed crosslinking of polymers bearing pendant propargyl ethers. J Am Chem Soc. Nov. 3, 2010;132(43):15151-3. |
| Zhang et al., Structure-activity relationships of cationic shell-crosslinked knedel-like nanoparticles: shell composition and transfection efficiency/cytotoxicity, Biomaterials, 31:1805 (2010). |
| Zhang et al., TLR9-mediated siRNA delivery for targeting of normal and malignant human hematopoietic cells in vivo. Blood. Feb. 21, 2013;121(8):1304-15. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-07-442590. Epub Jan. 3, 2013. |
| Zhao et al., A rapid bioassay for single bacterial cell quantitation using bioconjugated nanoparticles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004;101(42):15027-32. |
| Zheng et al., “From Molecular to Macroscopic via the Rational Design of a Self-Assembled 3D DNA Crystal,” Nature 461 (7260): 74-77 (2009). |
| Zheng et al., A spherical nucleic acid platform based on self-assembled DNA biopolymer for high-performance cancer therapy. ACS Nano. Aug. 27, 2013;7(8):6545-54. doi: n402344v. Epub Jul. 23, 2013. |
| Zheng et al., Topical delivery of siRNA-based spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates for gene regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul. 24, 2012;109(30):11975-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.lll8425109. Epub Jul. 6, 2012. |
| Zimmer, Antisense oligonucleotide delivery with polyhexylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles as carriers. Methods, 1999; 18: 286-95. |
| Aissaoui et al., Efficient topical delivery of plasmid DNA to lung in vivo mediated by putative triggered, PEGylated pDNA nanoparticles, J .Control Release. 154:275-84 (2011). |
| Alkilany et al., Toxicity and cellular uptake of gold nanoparticles: what we have learned so far?, N. Nanopart Res. 12:2313-33 (2010). |
| Altschul et al., Basic local alignment search tool, J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-10 (1990). |
| Arnida et al., Cellular uptake and toxicity of gold nanoparticles in prostate cancer cells: a comparative study of rods and spheres., J. Appl. Toxicol. 30:212-7 (2010). |
| Bae et al., Oil-encapsulating PEO-PPO-PEO/PEG shell cross-linked nanocapsules fortarget-specific delivery of paclitaxel, Biomacromolecules. 8:650-6 (2007). |
| Banchelli et al., Phospholipid membranes decorated by cholesterol-based oligonucleotides as soft hybrid nanostructures, J. Phys. Chern B. 112:10942-52 (2008). |
| Banerjee et al., Poly(ethylene glycol)-Prodrug Conjugates: Concept, Design, and Applications, J. Drug Deliv. 2012:103973 (2012). |
| Banga et al., Cross-linked miceller spherical nucleic acids from thermoresponsive templates, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139:4278-81 (2017). |
| Banga et al., Liposomal spherical nucleic acids, J. Am. Chem. Soc.136:9866-9 (2014). |
| Batrakova et al., Pluronic block copolymers: evolution of drug delivery concept from inert nanocarriers to biological response modifiers, J. Control. Release. 130:98-106 (2008). |
| Brodin et al., DNA-mediated engineering of multicomponent enzyme crystals, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 112:4564-9 (2015). |
| Carson et al., Hydroxymethyluracil modifications enhance the flexibility and hydrophilicity of double-stranded DNA, Nucleic Acids Res. 44:2085-92 (2016). |
| Calabrese et al., Biocompatible infinite-coordination-polymer nanoparticle-nucleic-acid conjugates for antisense gene regulation, Agnew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54:476-80 (2015). |
| Choi et al., Mechanism for the endocytosis of spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 110:7625-30 (2013). |
| Chung et al., Nuclease-resistant DNA aptamer on gold nanoparticles for the simultaneous detection of Pb2+ and Hg2+ in human serum, Biosens. Bioelectron. 41:827-32 (2013). |
| Cutler et al., Polyvalent oligonucleotide iron oxide nanoparticle “click” conjugates, Nano. Lett.10:1477-80 (2010). |
| Cutler et al., Spherical nucleic acids, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134:1376-91 (2012). |
| De Mesmaeker et al., Backbone modifications in oligonucleotides and peptide nucleic acid systems, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5:343-55 (1995). |
| Diniz et al., Pluronic F-127 hydrogel as a promising scaffold for encapsulation of dental-derived mesenchymal stem cells, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 26:153 (2015). |
| Englisch et al., Chemically Modified Oligonucleotides as Probes and Inhibitors, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 30: 613-629 (1991). |
| Freier et al., The ups and downs of nucleic acid duplex stability: structure-stability studies on chemically-modified DNA:RNA duplexes, Nucleic Acids Res. 25:4429-43 (1997). |
| Greish, Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for anticancer nanomedicine drug targeting, Methods Mol. Biol. 624:25-37 (2010). |
| Hong et al., Directed Assembly of Nucleic Acid-Based Polymeric Nanoparticles from Molecular Tetravalent Cores, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137:8184-91 (2015). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2017/048726 (dated Mar. 26, 2019). |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCTUS17/48726 (dated Feb. 2, 2018). |
| Kroschwitz, The Concise Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, pp. 858-859, John Wiley & Sons, (1990). |
| Lee et al., Silver nanoparticle-oligonucleotide conjugates based on DNA with triple cyclic disulfide moieties., Nano. Lett. 7:2112-5 (2007). |
| Lin, et al., Temperature-dependent adsorption of pluronic F127 block copolymers onto carbon black particles distersed in aqueous media, J Phys Chem B. 106:10834-10844 (2002). |
| Linse et al., Temperature-dependent micellization in aqueous block copolymer solutions, Macromolecules. 25:5434-5439 (1992). |
| Liu et al., Bioconjugated pluronic triblock-copolymer micelle-encapsulated quantum dots for targeted imaging of cancer: in vitro and in vivo studies, Theranostics. 2:705-13 (2012). |
| Macfarlane et al., Nanoparticle superlattice engineering with DNA, Science. 334:204-8 (2011). |
| Martin, Ein neuer A New Access to 2′-O-Alkylated ribonucleosides and properties of of 2′O-Alkylated Oligoribonucleotides, Helv. Chim. Acta. 78:486-504 (1995). |
| Massich et al., Cellular response of polyvalent oligonucleotide-gold nanoparticle conjugates, ACS Nano. 4:5641-6 (2010). |
| Mirkin et al., A DNA-based method for rationally assembling nanoparticles into macroscopic materials, Nature. 382:607-9 (1996). |
| Nielsen et al., Sequence-selective recognition of DNA by strand displacement with a thymine-substituted polyamide, Science. 254:1497-1500 (1991). |
| Radovic-Moreno et al., Immunomodulatory spherical nucleic acids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 112:3892-7 (2015). |
| Rosi et al., Oligonucleotide-modified gold nanoparticles for intracellular gene regulation, Science. 312:1027-30 (2006). |
| Sanghvi, Antisense Research and Applications, Chapter 15, CRC Press (1993). |
| Seferos et al., Nano-flares: probes for transfection and mRNA detection in living cells, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129:15477-9 (2007). |
| Sun et al., Multidimensional sensor for pattern recognition of proteins based on DNA-gold nanoparticles conjugates, Anal. Chem. 87:3354-9. |
| Trong et al., Mechanisms of micellization and rheology of PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymers with various architectures, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 328:278-87 (2008). |
| Watson et al., DNA-block copolymer conjugates, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123:5592-3 (2001). |
| Zhang et al., Non-invasive multimodal functional imaging of the intestine with frozen micellar naphthalocyanines, Nat. Nanotechnol. 9:631-8 (2014). |
| Zhang et al., PowerBLAST: a new network BLAST application for interactive or automated sequence analysis and annotation, Genome Res. 7:649-56 (1997). |
| D'ydewalle et al., The Antisense Transcript SMN-AS1 Regulates SMN Expression and Is a Novel Therapeutic Target for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Neuron. 2017;93(1):66-79. |
| Li et al., Targeted delivery of antisense oligodeoxynucleotide and small interference RNA into lung cancer cells. Mol Pharm. Sep. 2006-Oct.;3(5):579-88. doi: 10.1021/mp060039w. Publication Date:Jul. 12, 2006. |
| Manoharan et al., Lipidic nucleic acids. Tetrahedron Letters. May 22, 1995;36(21):3651-4. |
| Osman et al., Morpholino antisense oligonucleotides targeting intronic repressor Element1 improve phenotype in SMA mouse models. Human Molecular Genetics. 2014;23(18):4832-45. |
| Pao et al., Dual Masking of Specific Negative Splicing Regulatory Elements Resulted in Maximal Exon 7 Inclusion of SMN2 Gene. Molecular Therapy. 2014;22(4):854-61. |
| Rubenstein et al., Antisense oligonucleotide intralesional therapy for human PC-3 prostate tumors carried in athymic nude mice. J Surg Oncol. Jul. 1996;62(3):194-200. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199607)62:3<194::AID-JS09>3.0.CO;2-2. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/772,551. filed Jun. 12, 2020, Mirkin et al. |
| Banga et al., Drug-Loaded Polymeric Spherical Nucleic Acids: Enhancing Colloidal Stability and Cellular Uptake of Polymeric Nanoparticles through DNA Surface-Functionalization. Biomacromolecules. Feb. 13, 2017;18(2):483-489. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01563. Epub Jan. 18, 2017. |
| [No Author Listed] Modern Pharmaceutical Design. 2006. Chapter 5. p. 273. English language summary. 2 pages. |
| Dokka et al., Dermal delivery of topically applied oligonucleotides via follicular transport in mouse skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;124(5):971-975. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23672.x. |
| Leachman et al., Therapeutic siRNAs for dominant genetic skin disorders including pachyonychia congenita. J Dermatol Sci. 2008;51(3): 151-157. doi: 10.1016/j .jdermsci.2008.04.003. |
| Lewandowski et al., Topically Delivered Tumor Necrosis Factor-?-Targeted Gene Regulation for Psoriasis. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(9):2027-2030. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2017.04.027. |
| Tran et al., Targeting V600EB-Raf and Akt3 using nanoliposomal-small interfering RNA inhibits cutaneous melanocytic lesion development. Cancer Res. Sep. 15, 2008;68(18):7638-49. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472. CAN-07-6614. |
| Wang et al., Co-delivery of drugs and DNA from cationic core-shell nanoparticles selfassembled from a biodegradable copolymer. Nat Mater. Oct. 2006;5(10):791-6. doi: 10.1038/nmat1737. Epub Sep. 24, 2006. PMID: 16998471. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/502,955, filed Feb. 9, 2017, Mirkin et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 15/527,840, filed May 18, 2017, Mirkin et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/611,502, filed Nov. 7, 2019, Mirkin et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/611,548, filed Nov. 7, 2019, Mirkin et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 16/160,196, filed Oct. 15, 2018, Mirkin et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 17/011,658, filed Sep. 3, 2020, Mirkin et al. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190275166 A1 | Sep 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62379352 | Aug 2016 | US |
