Utilizing a master control system in remote or de-operation applications poses various challenges. For instance, when a human operator remotely controls a slave system (e.g., as part of or comprising a non-humanoid robot, humanoid robot, hand robot, virtual avatar/robot, tele-operated robot, etc.) with a master control system (e.g., as part of or comprising an exoskeleton, virtual reality controls, manipulator, etc.), the slave system can experience various forces due to pushing a mass or bumping into an object, for instance. Under these circumstances, it is often desirable for the human operator to be able to perceive or “feel” these for various purposes, such as to increase the sense of telepresence, to be able to improve control of or more accurately control the slave system for a particular task. Thus, robotic systems can be configured to utilize what has been termed “force-reflection,” which is a type of force feedback where forces experienced by the slave are essentially “felt” by the user through the master control device.
Prior solutions used to achieve force reflection involve incorporating pneumatic or hydraulic actuators into a master control device of a robotic system that are controlled to provide a force reflection value to the human operator via joints of the master control device, which in some cases, for instance, can comprise an upper robotic exoskeleton worn by the operator. However, such solutions have various drawbacks, such as cost, complexity, weight, poor controllability, etc.
Features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the detailed description which follows, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which together illustrate, by way of example, features of the invention; and, wherein:
Reference will now be made to the exemplary embodiments illustrated, and specific language will be used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended.
As used herein, the term “substantially” refers to the complete or nearly complete extent or degree of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result. For example, an object that is “substantially” enclosed would mean that the object is either completely enclosed or nearly completely enclosed. The exact allowable degree of deviation from absolute completeness may in some cases depend on the specific context. However, generally speaking the nearness of completion will be so as to have the same overall result as if absolute and total completion were obtained. The use of “substantially” is equally applicable when used in a negative connotation to refer to the complete or near complete lack of an action, characteristic, property, state, structure, item, or result.
As used herein, “adjacent” refers to the proximity of two structures or elements. Particularly, elements that are identified as being “adjacent” may be either abutting or connected. Such elements may also be near or close to each other without necessarily contacting each other. The exact degree of proximity may in some cases depend on the specific context.
An initial overview of technology embodiments is provided below and then specific technology embodiments are described in further detail later. This initial summary is intended to aid readers in understanding the technology more quickly but is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the technology nor is it intended to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Disclosed herein is a stiffening element device operable to provide variable resistance to movement between a pair of members at a joint. The stiffening element comprises a filler flowable in a bladder, the filler comprising particles, wherein a flow characteristic of the filler varies, and interaction forces between the particles in the filler increase or vary, with pressure within the bladder, and resistance to movement of the pair of movable members varies with the flow characteristics of the filler. A pressure source can be coupled to the bladder to vary the pressure within the bladder, such as to collapse the bladder to some degree. Varying the flow characteristics of the filler, and varying interaction forces between the particles in the filler, varies resistance of the bladder to movement of the bladder, and thus a pair of movable members and the joint. In one aspect, the stiffening element can be part of a force reflective interface apparatus. In another aspect, the stiffening element can be part of a jamming or brake joint assembly for translating a force to a master robotic system. In another aspect, the stiffening element can be part of a force reflective interface apparatus for translating a force at a slave robotic system to a master system, and for generating a braking force within the joint corresponding to the force at the slave robotic system. In still another aspect, the stiffening element can be part of a force reflective interface apparatus for translating a force associated with a virtual environment to the apparatus, and for generating a braking force within the joint corresponding to the force associated with the virtual environment.
In addition, the stiffening element 10 can also comprise a bladder 26 coupled to the pair of movable members 18 and 22. The bladder 26 can be disposed at or about the joint 14, and can span across the joint 14. The bladder 26 can be flexible and resilient, or elastic, and can be formed of a flexible and resilient, or elastic, material. Thus, the bladder can have a volume that is changeable. For instance, the bladder can be configured to collapse a given degree under a corresponding given pressure, and can have a volume that is changeable. In addition, the bladder 26 can be configured to change shape and position as one member 22 moves with respect to the other 18. In one aspect, the bladder 26 can be formed of a single material, a laminate, or a reinforced material. The bladder 26 can be sealed with respect to the surrounding environment, and can be hermetically sealed. The bladder 26 can have an interior or hollow, and can define a pocket. In one aspect, the bladder 26 can be formed of a pair of layers sealed around a perimeter. An inner layer can be substantially and/or relatively flat, while an exterior layer can be substantially and/or relatively convex to create the hollow. The inner layer of the bladder can be coupled or otherwise secured to the members. An inner surface of the inner layer can be coupled or otherwise secured to the members such that a majority, or substantially all of the inner surface is coupled or secured to the members. In another aspect, a perimeter of the inner layer can extend beyond the seal to form a flange or tabs that can be coupled or otherwise secured to the members. In another aspect, opposite ends of the bladder can be coupled or otherwise secured to the members.
A filler 30 can be disposed in the bladder 16, and can be flowable or otherwise movable in the bladder 26. By flowable, it is meant that the particles can move relative to one another. In one example, the filler can comprise particles 34 that can flow and move with respect to one another, and that can bear against one another. In one aspect, the particles can substantially fill the bladder 26 in a loose manner, and can occupy a majority of the hollow of the bladder or volume thereof. The filler 30 flows, and the particles 34 move with respect to one another, within the bladder 26 as the bladder and the hollow or interior volume changes shape and position due to movement of the members 18 and 22. In one aspect, the filler 30 can further comprise a gas, such as air, filling interstices between the particles. Essentially, the filler can be contained within and caused to be flowable in the bladder, the filler comprising particles, wherein a flow characteristic of the filler varies with pressure within the bladder, and resistance to movement of the pair of movable members varies with the flow characteristics of the filler. In addition, the resistance to movement of the pair of movable members can be characterized as being the increase in interaction forces between the particles of the filler.
Furthermore, a pressure source 38 can be operatively coupled to the bladder 26 (e.g., operable to induce a pressure within or about the bladder 26), and capable of varying a pressure within the bladder. In one aspect, the pressure source 38 can comprise a vacuum source configured to selectively withdraw an interstitial material or fluid, such as gas or air, from the bladder 26. For example, the vacuum source can be a vacuum pump, such as a piston moveable within a cylinder. As the pressure changes within the bladder 26, the bladder collapses and the flow characteristics of the filler material 30 and the particles 34 vary. By collapse it is meant that the bladder collapses or reduces in volume at least some degree from its fully expanded state or condition. As the bladder changes volume, the contact and/or interference between the particles 34 of the filler is increased. As the flow characteristics of the filler and particles vary, a resistance of the bladder 26, with the filler 30 therein, to movement of the pair of movable members 18 and 22, and thus the joint 14, varies. Thus, the pressure source 38 or vacuum source can be selectively varied to selectively vary the resistance of the stiffening element 10. In one aspect, the resistance of the stiffening element 10 can be selectively varied through a continuous range of resistance between a zero resistance that permits free movement within the joint, and a resistance operable to lock the stiffening element 10 and the joint 14. The resistance can be adjusted dynamically to be essentially zero all the way to completely locked, or rigid, and any state in between. The pressure source 38 is capable of providing a variable degree/range of pressure within the bladder 26 to provide a variable degree/range of resistance of the bladder 26 with the filler 30 to the joint 14. The pressure source 38 is capable of varying pressure within the bladder 26 to provide a zero degree of resistance facilitating free movement within the joint 14, and a locked degree of resistance of the bladder 26 with the filler 30 within the joint 14. In another aspect, and although not shown, one skilled in the art will recognize that rather than varying the pressure source 38, the pressure source 38 can be operable with one or more valves in fluid communication with the pressure source 38 and the bladder 26, where the valves are controllable to vary the pressure within the bladder 26.
Referring again to
In one aspect, the joint and the pair of members described above and herein can comprise and can be part of a wearable article, system, etc. capable of being donned and doffed (i.e., worn) by a user. In one aspect, the wearable article can comprise a rigid exoskeleton, and the members can be rigid. In another aspect, the wearable article can be flexible, and the members and joints can be flexible. Such wearable articles can be utilized in translating force reflection to master robotic control systems and the operators of such systems. In addition, such wearable articles can be utilized to provide haptic feedback as part of a virtual environment of a virtual reality system.
The brake joint assembly and/or the stiffening element can translate a force to the master robotic system. The brake joint can comprise a stiffening element, or bladder with filler therein, as described above, and operable to selectively generate a braking and/or resistive force within the brake joint as corresponding to a force experienced by a slave robotic system associated with (or operable by) the master robotic system. In one aspect, the braking force can be dynamically controlled by the master robotic system as corresponding to a dynamic resistance force experienced by the slave robotic system, such that a magnitude of the braking force can be varied as needed or desired.
In addition, a system is provided for providing force feedback from a slave robotic system to a master robotic system. The system can comprise a slave robotic system comprising a plurality of slave joints and a master robotic system having a one or a plurality of master brake joints each corresponding to respective slave joints controlled by the master robotic system. In one aspect, each master brake joint can comprise a stiffening element, or bladder with filler therein, as described above, and operable to generate a variable braking or resistive force to the master brake joint corresponding to a variable force reflection of the respective slave joint of the slave robotic system. The master robotic system can comprise a humanoid robotic assembly, an exoskeleton robotic assembly, a human-operated robotic assembly, a manipulator, etc.
The brake-based joints are provided in an input device as part of a master robotic system operable to control a slave robotic system. Any particular master brake-based joint assembly can have position and load sensors associated with one or more degrees of freedom (DOF(s)) of the brake-based joint and that are used in controlling a corresponding DOF of a slave joint of a slave robotic system.
Regarding force-reflection, when the slave joint 508a experiences a force or breaches or attempts to breach a restricted zone of travel (e.g., the right slave arm contacts a wall or lifts a mass or extends beyond a given point, etc.), a force is sensed by load and/or position sensors associated with the slave joint 508a. The slave robotic system 502 transmits force reflection data (associated with the resistance force) to the master robotic system 504 (or other control system). The master robotic system 504 then causes (i.e., via a controller) the brake joint 506a to generate a braking force (apply or release) as force reflection that corresponds to the force experienced by the slave robotic system 502 via the slave joint 508a. This force reflection or force feedback may be configured to be proportional or not. Thus, the master robotic system 502 can, at least to some degree, “feel” what the slave robot “feels”, and such force reflection can be transferred as a resistance force to the operator (in the exoskeleton example) or to a humanoid robot, for instance.
Generally, as with the exoskeleton type of master control device example, with force reflection the operator is provided with sensory input for operating a (e.g., right) slave arm, for instance, with a (e.g., right) master control arm (
In certain aspects, force reflection implementation can include an increased load produced by the master control arm on the operator when the slave arm experiences an impact event. In other words, an impact sensed by the load sensors can be reflected to the user via the master control arm as a transient spike in load disproportionate to the normal proportional setting for force reflection. For example, when the slave arm collides with a wall, the load sensors of the slave arm sense the impact. To alert the operator that an impact has occurred, the master control arm can produce a load on the user that is disproportionately large relative to the current proportional force reflective setting for a brief period of time that can effectively represent the impact to the operator. For example, the force on the operator produced on an impact could be so disproportionately large that the operator would not be able to further move the master arm, effectively generating a hard stop of the master control arm regardless of the strength of the user or any existing momentum. Thus, force reflection can provide a safety feature of the robotic system.
Also shown in
The hand control device 600 can include a handle 610 configured to be grasped by a user. The handle 610 can comprise a body portion 611 to be supported against a palm 604 of a user. In one aspect, the handle 110 can be configured to be supported against the palm 604 of the user by at least one finger of the user, such as by a middle finger 605, a ring finger 606, and/or a little finger 607. The handle 610 can form the basis for the physical interface with the user. As illustrated, the handle 610 can comprise a pistol grip configuration, although any other suitable configuration may be used. Utilizing the handle 610 as a basis of support for the finger control 620 and the thumb control 630 can provide a compact form factor for the hand control device 600.
The hand control device 600 can further comprise and can further include a finger control 620 supported about the handle 610. The finger control 620 can comprise a rotatable joint 621 to facilitate control based on intuitive and normal human flexion/extension of an index finger 608 of the user. In addition, the hand control device 600 can further comprise and can further include a thumb control 630 supported about the handle 610. The thumb control 630 can comprise first and second rotatable joints 631a, 631b to facilitate control based on normal and human flexion/extension and abduction/adduction of a thumb 609 of the user. Essentially, the hand control device 600 provides an operator to control a peripheral system or device by moving his/her finger(s) and thumb in a familiar, intuitive manner, which movements translate into manipulation of the finger and thumb controls 620 and 630, respectively, each of which are strategically located about the hand of the user to receive the finger and thumb, and each of which are configured to move in a coordinated, harmonized manner. The rotatable joints 621, 631a and 631b, can be or can comprise stiffening elements, with bladders and filler therein, as described above.
The master control arm can be configured as a kinematic system to include DOF and linkages that correspond to the DOF and linkages of the human arm from the shoulder to the wrist. The master control arm can be kinematically equivalent to a user's arm from the shoulder to the wrist. A human arm includes seven degrees of freedom from the shoulder to the wrist. Specifically, a human shoulder includes three DOF: abduction/adduction, flexion/extension, and humeral rotation. A human elbow includes one DOF. A human wrist can be generalized to include three DOF: wrist rotation, abduction/adduction, and flexion/extension. The upper arm extends from the shoulder and is connected to the lower arm by the elbow. The wrist is at the opposite end of the lower arm. The human arm from the shoulder to the wrist can thus be generalized as a kinematic system that includes a first joint having three rotational DOF connected to a second joint having one DOF by a first linkage, which is connected to a third joint having three DOF by a second linkage. As used herein, the terms “kinematically equivalent” or “kinematic equivalence” refer to a relationship between two or more separate systems of rigid bodies, wherein the rigid bodies of each system are linked by rotational joints to provide rotational degrees of freedom (DOF). Kinematically equivalent systems have similar corresponding rotational DOF, which are joined by similar corresponding linkages that are proportional in length between the systems. It is noted that “equivalent” or “equivalence” does not refer to a kinematic identity between the systems. Indeed, “kinematically equivalent” or “kinematic equivalence” can include some degree of variation from true kinematic identity.
In operation, the system can include force reflection from the slave arm to the master control arm. With force reflection, the user is provided with an additional sensory input for operating the slave arms. Unlike positional control, where the slave arm will operate to carry out the positional command from the master control arm regardless of obstacles that may be in the path of the slave arm, force reflection provides a proportional force feedback to the user via the master control arm to indicate loads that the slave arm is experiencing. For example, if the slave arm encounters an obstacle while executing a positional command from the master control arm, a load sensor on the slave arm can provide load information that is communicated to the master control arm, and actuators operable with the master control arm can apply a proportional load to the user based on the load information, which proportional load may be varied or different depending upon the particular operating environment and what may be desired to be applied to the user. With this force feedback, the user can more intuitively control the slave arm in the operating environment because it more closely resembles the user's experience operating the user's own body in everyday life.
In one aspect, the system can be configured to apply a force or load to the user that is proportional to the weight of an object being picked up by the slave arm. For example, if an object weighs 500 pounds, the proportional force reflected load experienced by the user could be 10 pounds. In another aspect, force reflection functions can be implemented that apply a force or load to the user when the slave arm encounters an object, wherein the user feels the resistance of the object via the master control arm and can take action to avoid or minimize harmful effects. Thus, force reflection can be a safety feature of the robotic system.
In certain aspects, force reflection implementation can include an increased load produced by the master control arm on the user when the slave arm experiences an impact event. In other words, an impact sensed by the load sensors can be reflected to the user via the master control arm as a transient spike in load disproportionate to the normal proportional setting for force reflection. For example, when the slave arm collides with a wall, the load sensors of the slave arm sense the impact. To alert the user that an impact has occurred, the master control arm can produce a load on the user that is disproportionately large relative to the current proportional force reflective setting for a brief period of time that can effectively represent the impact to the user. For example, the force on the user produced on an impact could be so disproportionately large that the user would not be able to further move the master arm, effectively generating a hard stop of the master control arm regardless of the strength of the user or any existing momentum.
The master control arm can include structure that positions the wrist DOF of the user in sufficient alignment with the corresponding DOF of the master control arm about the axes, such that kinematic equivalency can result. The wrist positioning structure, or wrist unit 701, is configured to support the handle 702 such that when the user is grasping the handle to manipulate the master control arm, the user's wrist is appropriately positioned relative to the DOF of the master control arm corresponding to the DOF of the user's wrist.
The wrist positioning structure can include various members 715, 716, 717 and 718 intercoupled by joints 735, 736 and 737. The joints can comprise stiffening elements 745, 746 and 747, with bladders with filler therein, as described above. The structure of the wrist unit 701 can provide a master control having three orthogonal axes corresponding to the three human wrist DOF that substantially align with the actual wrist DOF of the system operator. Additionally, the wrist unit 701 structure can accommodate a position sensor, a load sensor, and/or an actuator for each DOF of the wrist unit. Thus, the wrist unit 701 can be suitable for position control of a slave arm, load control of a slave arm, force reflection feedback from a slave arm, gravity compensation of the wrist unit, torque assistance of the wrist unit, and combinations thereof.
In addition, a leg sleeve 1100 can have a thigh sleeve 1118 and a lower leg sleeve 1122 coupled at a knee joint 1114. A knee bladder 1126 can be disposed at the knee joint 1114 and coupled to the thigh and lower leg sleeves 1118 and 1122. In addition, a boot or sock 1130 can be coupled to the lower leg sleeve 1122 at an ankle joint 1134 with a bladder 1138 coupled to the lower leg sleeve 1122 and the boot or sock 1130. Furthermore, a torso sleeve 1200 with upper and lower portions can be disposed around a user's torso, and can have torso bladders 1226 coupled thereto. Each of the bladders can comprise filler, and can be operable with a pressure source to control the stiffening of the joint, as described herein.
The stiffening element(s) and the force reflective interface system(s) described above are capable of being used to provide a reflected force and/or a haptic response to a virtual environment. Thus, the stiffening element(s) and the force reflective interface system(s) described above can be used with a virtual display displaying a virtual reality, such as the virtual headset 522, as shown in
In another aspect, the controller 42 can be capable of modulating the pressure source 38 to modulate the pressure within the bladder 26 at a frequency greater than 0.1 Hz in one aspect, between 0.1 to 60 Hz in another aspect, and between 0.1 to 500 Hz in another apsect. Modulating the pressure at high frequency can be utilized to mimic surface roughness or texture, such that the master control system, the operator or both can feel and discern surface roughness or texture.
Although the disclosure may not expressly disclose that some embodiments or features described herein may be combined with other embodiments or features described herein, this disclosure should be read to describe any such combinations that would be practicable by one of ordinary skill in the art. The user of “or” in this disclosure should be understood to mean non-exclusive or, i.e., “and/or,” unless otherwise indicated herein.
Reference was made to the examples illustrated in the drawings and specific language was used herein to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the technology is thereby intended. Alterations and further modifications of the features illustrated herein and additional applications of the examples as illustrated herein are to be considered within the scope of the description.
Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more examples. In the preceding description, numerous specific details were provided, such as examples of various configurations to provide a thorough understanding of examples of the described technology. It will be recognized, however, that the technology may be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, devices, etc. In other instances, well-known structures or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the technology.
Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or operations, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features and operations described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims. Numerous modifications and alternative arrangements may be devised without departing from the spirit and scope of the described technology.
While the foregoing examples are illustrative of the principles of the present invention in one or more particular applications, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that numerous modifications in form, usage and details of implementation can be made without the exercise of inventive faculty, and without departing from the principles and concepts of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited, except as by the claims set forth below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1880138 | Franz | Sep 1932 | A |
2850189 | Leroy | Sep 1958 | A |
2981198 | Nettel | Apr 1961 | A |
3171549 | Orloff | Mar 1965 | A |
3280991 | Melton et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
3306646 | Flora, Jr. | Feb 1967 | A |
3358678 | Kulstar | Dec 1967 | A |
3449008 | Colechia | Jun 1969 | A |
3449769 | Mizen | Jun 1969 | A |
3535711 | Fick | Oct 1970 | A |
3759563 | Kitamura | Sep 1973 | A |
3858468 | Pasbrig | Jan 1975 | A |
4046262 | Vykukal et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4179233 | Bromell et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4200596 | Iiyama et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4251791 | Yanagisawa et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4398110 | Flinchbaugh et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4483407 | Iwamoto et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4561686 | Atchley | Dec 1985 | A |
4567417 | Francois et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4575297 | Richter | Mar 1986 | A |
4591944 | Gravel | May 1986 | A |
4603896 | Vasseur et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4661032 | Arai | Apr 1987 | A |
4666357 | Babbi | May 1987 | A |
4723353 | Monforte | Feb 1988 | A |
4762455 | Coughlan et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4768143 | Lane et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4821594 | Rosheim et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4834443 | Crowder et al. | May 1989 | A |
4853874 | Iwamoto et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4883400 | Kuban et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4884720 | Whigham et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4915437 | Cherry | Apr 1990 | A |
4921292 | Harwell et al. | May 1990 | A |
4997095 | Jones et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5004391 | Burdea | Apr 1991 | A |
5038089 | Szakaly | Aug 1991 | A |
5072361 | Davis et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5080682 | Schectman | Jan 1992 | A |
5101472 | Repperger | Mar 1992 | A |
5105367 | Tsuchihashi et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5117814 | Luttrell et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5144943 | Luttrell et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5172951 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5230147 | Asaoka et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239246 | Kim | Aug 1993 | A |
5246216 | Oberst | Sep 1993 | A |
5280981 | Schulz | Jan 1994 | A |
5282460 | Boldt | Feb 1994 | A |
5328224 | Jacobsen et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5336982 | Backes | Aug 1994 | A |
5389849 | Asano et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5399951 | Lavallee et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5516249 | Brimhall | May 1996 | A |
5577417 | Fournier | Nov 1996 | A |
5577902 | Todo et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5588688 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5664636 | Ikuma et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5704945 | Wagner et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5762390 | Gosselin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5784542 | Ohm et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785505 | Price | Jul 1998 | A |
5797615 | Murray | Aug 1998 | A |
5845540 | Rosheim | Dec 1998 | A |
5865770 | Schectman | Feb 1999 | A |
5898599 | Massie et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5912658 | Bergamasco et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5949686 | Shinada et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957981 | Gramnas | Sep 1999 | A |
5961476 | Betto et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5967580 | Rosheim | Oct 1999 | A |
5994864 | Inoue et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6016385 | Yee et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6170162 | Jacobsen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6202013 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6272924 | Jansen | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301526 | Kim et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6338605 | Halverson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6340065 | Harris | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6360166 | Alster | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6394731 | Konosu et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6425865 | Salcudean et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430473 | Lee et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6435794 | Springer | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6507163 | Allen | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508058 | Seaverson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6554342 | Burnett | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6641371 | Graziani et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6659703 | Kirkley | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6659939 | Moll et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6663154 | Pancheri | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6714839 | Salisbury, Jr. et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6740125 | Mosier | May 2004 | B2 |
6855170 | Gramnas | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7168748 | Townsend et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7396057 | Ye et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7405531 | Khatib et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7409882 | Massimo et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7410338 | Schiele et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7509905 | Jacobsen et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7628766 | Kazerooni et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7783384 | Kraft | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7862522 | Barclay et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7862524 | Carignan et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883546 | Kazerooni et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7947004 | Kazerooni et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7965006 | Kang et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8024071 | Komatsu et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8051764 | Jacobsen et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8100451 | Okuda et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8132835 | Ban et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8151401 | Cheyne | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8182010 | Lee et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8245728 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8295975 | Arimatsu et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8375982 | Gray, Jr. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8435309 | Gilbert et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8452447 | Nixon | May 2013 | B2 |
8473101 | Summer | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8511192 | Hirtt et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8516918 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8529582 | Devengenzo et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8534728 | Bosscher et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8560118 | Greer et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8640723 | Jacobsen et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8667643 | Simonelli et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8672378 | Yamasaki et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8747486 | Kawasaki et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8794262 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821338 | Thorson | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8849457 | Jacobsen et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8870967 | Herr et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8881616 | Dize et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8888864 | Iverson et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8892258 | Jacobsen et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8920517 | Smith et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8942846 | Jacobsen et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8977388 | Jacobsen et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8977398 | Jacobsen et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9295604 | Zoss et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9314921 | Jacobsen et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9329587 | Fudaba et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9333097 | Herr et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9533411 | Jacobsen et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9616580 | Smith et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9643323 | Nagatsuka et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9727076 | Smith et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9789603 | Jacobsen et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9895812 | Gonzalez et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10028844 | Cheng et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10071485 | Schiele et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10216177 | Gildert et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10406676 | Smith et al. | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10512583 | Smith | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10533542 | Smith et al. | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10566914 | Fujita et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
20010033146 | Kato et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010043847 | Kramer | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020075233 | White et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020094919 | Rennex et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030005896 | Jacobsen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030146720 | Riwan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030152452 | Hodgson | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030223844 | Schiele et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040004362 | Love | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040037681 | Marcotte | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040102723 | Horst | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106881 | McBean et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040116836 | Kawai et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040246769 | Ido | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040250644 | Gosselin et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050059908 | Bogert | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050099386 | Kukita | May 2005 | A1 |
20050159850 | Melman | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050166413 | Crampton | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050193451 | Quistgaard et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050251110 | Nixon | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060052732 | Shimada et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060064047 | Shimada et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069449 | Bisbee, III et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060130594 | Ikeuchi | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149419 | Ogawa et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184275 | Hosokawa et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060197049 | Hamada et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060245897 | Hariki et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060249315 | Herr et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070054777 | Kawai et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070105070 | Trawick | May 2007 | A1 |
20070123997 | Herr et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070129653 | Sugar et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080009771 | Perry et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080023974 | Park et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080156363 | Ikeuchi et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080269027 | Chen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080271942 | Yamashita et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281468 | Jacobsen et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090036815 | Ido | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090038258 | Pivac et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090039579 | Clifford et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090199883 | Hiki | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090210093 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090294238 | Gilmore | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100050947 | Kortekaas | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100089855 | Kjolseth | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100094185 | Amundson et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100152630 | Matsuoka et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100198402 | Greer et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241242 | Herr et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100295497 | Takamatsu | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110010012 | Murayama et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110040216 | Herr et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046781 | Summer | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110066088 | Little et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071677 | Stillman | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110214524 | Jacobsen et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110219899 | Dize et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110264230 | Herr et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120000891 | Nakanishi et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120060322 | Simonelli et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120065902 | Nakajima | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120073930 | Lansberry et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120137667 | Jacobsen et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179075 | Perry et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191245 | Fudaba et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120216671 | Gammon | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120237319 | Jacobsen et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120259429 | Han et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120277901 | Jacobsen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277911 | Jacobsen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120277915 | Jacobsen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120328395 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130011220 | Jacobsen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013108 | Jacobsen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130023803 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130033050 | Matsuoka et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130057001 | Tsai | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130090580 | Hong et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130106127 | Lipson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130106128 | Yamasaki et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130192406 | Godowski | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130226048 | Unluhisarcikili et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130253385 | Goffer et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130296746 | Herr et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130302129 | Smith et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130306430 | Laffranchi et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130331744 | Kamon | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130333368 | Durfee et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140088728 | Herr | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140100492 | Nagasaka | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140190289 | Zhu | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195052 | Tsusaka et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150073595 | Fudaba et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150073596 | Fudaba et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150173929 | Kazerooni et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150209214 | Herr et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150272749 | Amend, Jr. et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150278263 | Bowles et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150321340 | Smith | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150321342 | Smith et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160003268 | Shevchenko | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160114482 | Lessing et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160153508 | Battlogg | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160279788 | Kanaoka et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160331556 | Wijesundara et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160331572 | Popovic et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160332302 | Bingham et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160332305 | Gonzalez et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170050310 | Kanaoka | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20180133905 | Smith et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180133906 | Smith et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180193172 | Smith et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180193999 | Jacobsen et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180194000 | Smith et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180290309 | Becker et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180298976 | Battlogg | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20190105777 | Dalley et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190176320 | Smith et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20200001450 | Smith et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101214653 | Jul 2008 | CN |
103610524 | Mar 2014 | CN |
203495949 | Mar 2014 | CN |
203752160 | Aug 2014 | CN |
104843484 | Aug 2015 | CN |
105411813 | Mar 2016 | CN |
105818143 | Aug 2016 | CN |
107471203 | Dec 2017 | CN |
108081303 | May 2018 | CN |
102004029513 | Sep 2005 | DE |
102010029088 | Nov 2011 | DE |
202013009698 | Nov 2013 | DE |
102016201540 | Aug 2017 | DE |
0039578 | Nov 1981 | EP |
0616275 | Sep 1998 | EP |
1037264 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1258324 | Nov 2002 | EP |
1442846 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1721593 | Nov 2006 | EP |
2198810 | Jun 2010 | EP |
2548543 | Jan 2015 | EP |
2942162 | Nov 2015 | EP |
2168548 | Oct 2016 | EP |
2651220 | Mar 1991 | FR |
686237 | Jan 1953 | GB |
2278041 | Nov 1994 | GB |
S34-015764 | Oct 1959 | JP |
S36-005228 | May 1961 | JP |
S44-000603 | Jan 1969 | JP |
S50-009803 | Jan 1975 | JP |
S50-006043 | Mar 1975 | JP |
S52-013252 | Feb 1977 | JP |
S52-134985 | Nov 1977 | JP |
S56-140510 | Nov 1981 | JP |
S58-113586 | Jul 1983 | JP |
S58-45724 | Oct 1983 | JP |
S60-177883 | Nov 1985 | JP |
S62-193784 | Aug 1987 | JP |
S62-200600 | Sep 1987 | JP |
H01-295772 | Nov 1989 | JP |
H02-51083 | Apr 1990 | JP |
H03-85398 | Aug 1991 | JP |
H04-44296 | Apr 1992 | JP |
H05-004177 | Jan 1993 | JP |
H05-023989 | Feb 1993 | JP |
H06-213266 | Aug 1994 | JP |
H07-001366 | Jan 1995 | JP |
H07-5129 | Feb 1995 | JP |
H07-060679 | Mar 1995 | JP |
H07-112377 | May 1995 | JP |
H07-031291 | Jun 1995 | JP |
H07-246578 | Sep 1995 | JP |
H08-126984 | May 1996 | JP |
H09-11176 | Jan 1997 | JP |
H1156931 | Mar 1999 | JP |
H11-130279 | May 1999 | JP |
2002-161547 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2003-103480 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2004-105261 | Apr 2004 | JP |
2005-118938 | May 2005 | JP |
2005-237504 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2005-334999 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-016916 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006007337 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006-028953 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006-051558 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006-167223 | Jun 2006 | JP |
3909770 | Apr 2007 | JP |
2007-130234 | May 2007 | JP |
2007-252514 | Oct 2007 | JP |
2007-307216 | Nov 2007 | JP |
2008-143449 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2009-023828 | Feb 2009 | JP |
2009-167673 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-178253 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009-219650 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2009-240488 | Oct 2009 | JP |
2009-268839 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2010-098130 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010-110381 | May 2010 | JP |
2010-110465 | May 2010 | JP |
2010-142351 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2011-193899 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2012-501739 | Jan 2012 | JP |
2012-125279 | Jul 2012 | JP |
2013-022091 | Feb 2013 | JP |
2013-090693 | May 2013 | JP |
2013-123786 | Jun 2013 | JP |
2013-142445 | Jul 2013 | JP |
5267730 | Aug 2013 | JP |
2013-220496 | Oct 2013 | JP |
2013-248699 | Dec 2013 | JP |
2014-054273 | Mar 2014 | JP |
2014-073222 | Apr 2014 | JP |
2014200853 | Oct 2014 | JP |
2014200853 | Oct 2014 | JP |
2015112649 | Jun 2015 | JP |
2015-212010 | Nov 2015 | JP |
2015-214019 | Dec 2015 | JP |
2016-539017 | Dec 2016 | JP |
2005-0037754 | Apr 2005 | KR |
2007-0057209 | Jun 2007 | KR |
2012-0105194 | Sep 2012 | KR |
10-1219795 | Jan 2013 | KR |
2013-0001409 | Jan 2013 | KR |
2013-0045777 | May 2013 | KR |
2018-0128731 | Dec 2018 | KR |
WO 2003002309 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003081762 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2007144629 | Dec 2007 | WO |
WO 2009143377 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO 2010025409 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2010027968 | Mar 2010 | WO |
WO 2012042471 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2017148499 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO 2017159504 | Sep 2017 | WO |
WO 2018118004 | Jun 2018 | WO |
WO 2018211869 | Nov 2018 | WO |
WO 2018215705 | Nov 2018 | WO |
WO 2019060791 | Mar 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2019/068998 dated May 20, 2020, 15 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2019/069004 dated Apr. 1, 2020, 15 pages. |
Aghili et al., Sensing the torque in a robot's joints, www.memagazine.org/backissues/september98/features/torque/torque.html, 1998, pp. 1-9, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers. |
Amikabir University of Technology, Manipulator Dynamics (Power Point), Computer Engineering and Information Technology Department, to the best of applicant's knowledge article was available before the application filing date, 44 pages. |
Barras, Stabilization of a Biped Robot with its arms—A Practical Approach, http://biorob.epfl.ch/files/content/sites/biorob/filed/users/170220/public/Report.pdf; May 2010, 33 pages, EPFL Biorobotics Laboratory (BioRob), Switzerland. |
Bauman, Utah Firm Markets on Big Gorilla of an Arm, Deseret News; Jan. 27, 1993, 2 pages, Deseret News Publishing Company, Salt Lake City, Utah. |
Claeyssen et al., Magnetostrictive actuators compared to piezoelectric actuators, Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering 4763, Mar. 2003, 6 pages. |
Digital World Tokyo, Giant Robot Grabbing Hands Grab All They Can, www.digitalwordtokyo.com/index.php/digital_tokyo/articles/giant_robot_grabbing_hands_grab_all_they_can/, Jul. 17, 2007, 3 pages. |
Elliott et al., The Biomechanics and Energetics of Human Running using an Elastic Knee Exoskeleton, Jun. 2013, 7 pages, IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Seattle, Washington. |
Elliott et al., Design of a Clutch-Spring Knee Exoskeleton for Running, Journal of Medical Devices, Sep. 2014, 11 pages, vol. 8, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York City, New York. |
Endo et al., A quasi-passive model of human leg function in level-ground walking, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 9-15, 2006, pp. 4935-4939, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey. |
Gauthier et al., Magnetic Shape Memory Alloy and Actuator Design, Conference: 5th International Workshop on Microfactories (IWMF'06), Oct. 2006, 5 pages, Besançon, France. |
Grabowski et al., Exoskeletons for Running and Hopping Augmentation, Journal of Applied Physiology, http://biomech_media_mit.edu/portfolio_page/load-bearing-exoskeleton-for-augmentation-of-human-running/, 2009, 4 pages, vol. 107, No. 3, American Physiological Society, United States. |
Hauser et al., JammJoint: A Variable Stiffness Device Based on Granular Jamming for Wearable Joint Support, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Apr. 2017, 7 pages, vol. 2, Issue 2, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey. |
Huber et al., The selection of mechanical actuators based on performance indices, Oct. 8, 1997, pp. 2185-2205, vol. 453 Issue 1965, The Royal Society, London. |
Hunter et al., Fast Reversible NiTi Fibers for Use in Microrobotics, Proceedings. IEEE Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Jan. 30-Feb. 2, 1991, pp. 166-170, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey. |
Industrial Magnetics, Inc., PowerLift® Magnets; www.magnetics.com/product.asp?ProductID=1; as accessed Nov. 6, 2012, 2 pages; Boyne City, Michigan. |
Jacobsen et al., Research Robots for Application in A1, Teleoperation and Entertainment, Proceedings of the International Fluid Power Exposition and Technical Conference, Mar. 24-24, 1992, pp. 1-19, Chicago, Illinois. |
Jacobsen et al., Research Robots for Applications in Artificial Intelligence, Teleoperation and Entertainment; The International Journal of Robotics Research; Apr.-May 2004, pp. 319-330, vol. 23, No. 4-5, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, California. |
Jacobsen, Science, Robotics, and Superheroes, Presented at Department of Science University of Utah Science at Breakfast, Mar. 17, 2010, 16 pages. |
Jafari et al., A Novel Actuator with Adjustable Stiffness (AwAS), Oct. 18-22, 2010, 6 pages, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Taiwan. |
Jansen et al., Exoskeleton for Soldier Enhancement Systems Feasibility Study, Sep. 2000, 44 pages, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. |
Kazerooni, Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX), to the best of applicant's knowledge article was available before the application filed, 3 pages, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California. |
Kim, Development of a small 6-axis force/moment sensor for robot's fingers, Measurement Science and Technology, Sep. 30, 2004, 2 pages, Issue 11, Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited. |
Kim et al, A Force Reflected Exoskeleton-Type Masterarm for Human-Robot Interaction, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybertentics—Part A: Systems and Humans, Mar. 2005, pp. 198-212, vol. 35, No. 2, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey. |
Kulick, An Unpowered Exoskeleton Springs Into Action: Researchers Increase Walking Efficiency, http://www.cmu.edu/me/news/archive/2015/collins-clutch.html, Apr. 1, 2015, 2 pages, Carnegie Mellon University Mechanical Engineering, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. |
Laliberte et al., Underactuation in Space Robotic Hands, Proceeding of the 6th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics & Automation in Space, Jun. 18-22, 2001, 8 pages, Canadian Space Agency, Canada. |
Magnetic Base, www.ask.com/wiki/magnetic_base; page last updated Sep. 12, 2012, 2 pages, retrieved from www.ask.com/wiki/magnetic_base. |
Miao et al., Mechanical Design of Hybrid Leg Exoskeleton to Augment Load-Carrying for Walking, International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, Mar. 28, 2013, 11 pages, vol. 10, Intech open science open minds, Europe. |
Mirfakhrai et al., Polymer artificial muscles, materialstoday, Apr. 2007, pp. 30-38, vol. 10 No. 4, Elsevier, Netherlands. |
Mombaur et al., HEiKA-EXO: Optimization-based development and control of an exoskeleton for medical applications, http://typo.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/groups/orb/research/heika-exo/, Optimization in Robotics & Biomechanics, Oct. 20, 2014, 3 pages, Germany. |
Moosavian et al., Dynamics Modeling and Tip-Over Stability of Suspended Wheeled Mobile Robots with Multiple Arms, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Oct. 29-Nov. 2, 2007; pp. 1210-1215, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey. |
Newport Corporation, Heavy-Duty Magnetic Base, 300 lb (1334 N) Holding Force, ¼-20 Thread, http://search.newport.com/?q=*&x2=sku&q2=200, as accessed Apr. 23, 2011, 1 page, Irvine, CA. |
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Foot Force—Torque Sensor Novel Sensor for Measuring Forces and Torques at the Foot, www.ornl.gov, to the best of applicant's knowledge article was available before the application filed, 1 page, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee. |
Omega, Load Cell Designs, www.omega.com/liturature/transactions/volume3/load3.html, Nov. 1, 2005, 3 pages. |
Ostling, Wearable Robots, Technology Review, Jul./Aug. 2004, pp. 70-73, Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau, Cambridge, Massachusetts. |
Pan, Improved Design of a Three-degree of Freedom Hip Exoskeleton Based on Biomimetic Parallel Structure, Jul. 2011, 132 pages, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Canada. |
Pelrine et al., Electrostriction of polymer dielectrics with compliant electrodes as a means of actuation, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Jan. 1998, pp. 77-85, vol. 64 Issue 1, Elsevier, Netherlands. |
Pelrine et al., High-field deformation of elastomeric dielectrics for actuators, Materials Science and Engineering, Nov. 28, 2000, pp. 89-100, vol. 11 Issue 2, Elsevier, Netherlands. |
Pelrine et al., Dielectric Elastomer Artificial Muscle Actuators: Toward Biomimetic Motion, Proceedings of SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, Jul. 2002, pp. 126-137, vol. 4695, SPIE, Bellingham, WA. |
Pin, Wearable Robotics Presented to New Horizons in Science Briefing, Oct. 2003, 34 pages, Knoxville, Tennessee. |
Pratt et al., The RoboKnee: An Exoskeleton for Enhancing Strength and Endurance During Walking, International Conference on Robotics & Automation, Apr. 2004, 6 pages, IEEE, New Orleans, LA. |
Robotics Research Group, Degrees of Freedom, www.robotics.utexas.edu/rrg/learn_more/low_ed/dof/, Oct. 25, 2006, 2 pages, University of Texas. |
Rouse et al., Clutchable Series-Elastic Actuator: Design of a Robotic Knee Prosthesis for Minimum Energy Consumption, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR), Jun. 24-26, 2013, 6 pages, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey. |
Schuler et al., Dextrous Robot Arm, in Proceedings of the 8th ESA Workshop on Advanced Space Technologies for Robotic and Automation ‘ASTRA 2004’ ESTEC, Nov. 2-4, 2004, 8 pages, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. |
Searchmap Blog, Scientists Develop Mechanical Spring-Loaded Leg Brace to Improve Walking, http://www.searchmap.eu/blog/scientists-develop-mechanical-spring-loaded-leg-brace to-improve-walking/, Apr. 1, 2015, 5 pages, Searchmap Blog. |
Seppala, These exoskeleton heels could help stroke victims walk again, https:/www.engadget.com/2015/04/02/feet-exoskeletons/, Apr. 2, 2015, Engadget, San Francisco, California. |
Shamaei et al., Estimation of Quasi-Stiffness of the Human Knee in the Stance Phase of Walking, Mar. 22, 2013, 10 pages, vol. 8 Issue 3, PLOS One, San Francisco, California. |
Siddharth et al., Design and Analysis of a 1-DOF Walking Mechanism, http://siddharthswaminathan.in/files/WalkingMechanism.pdf , Nov. 2012, 7 pages, India. |
Smith et al., Integrated thin-film piezoelectric traveling wave ultrasonic motors, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, Dec. 2012, pp. 305-311, vol. 188, Elsevier, Netherlands. |
Song et al, Kinematics Analysis and Implementation of a Motion-Following Task for a Humanoid Slave Robot Controlled by an Exoskeleton Master Robot, International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, Dec. 2007, pp. 681-690, vol. 5, No. 6, Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers, South Korea. |
Suitx, Phoenix Medical Exoskeleton, https://www.suitx.com/phoenix-medical-exoskeleton., 3 pages, to the best of the applicant's knowledge article was available before the application filed, US Bionics, Inc., Berkeley, California. |
Suleiman, Engineering an affordable exoskeleton, Phys.org, https://phys.org/news/2014-06-exoskeleton.html, Jun. 12, 2014, 5 pages, Science X Network. |
TMSUK, Rescue Robot “T-53” release Control Technologies to Control the Synchronous Operation of the Arm, http://robot.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/news/2007/07/18/564.html, as accessed Sep. 1, 2011 5 pages, Robot Watch website. |
Ueda et al., Large Effective-Strain Piezoelectric Actuators Using Nested Cellular Architecture With Exponential Strain Amplification Mechanisms, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, Oct. 2010, pp. 770-782, vol. 15 Issue 5, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey. |
Vanderborght et al., Variable impedance actuators: A review, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Dec. 2013, 14 pages, vol. 61, Issue 12, Elsevier, Netherlands. |
Walsh, Biomimetic Design of an Under-Actuated Leg Exoskeleton for Load-Carrying Augmentation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Feb. 2006, 97 pages, Massachusetts. |
Walsh et al., A Quasi-Passive Leg Exoskeleton for Load-Carrying Augmentation, International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, Mar. 8, 2007, 20 pages, vol. 4, No. 3, World Scientific Publishing Company. |
Wang et al., A highly-underactuated robotic hand with force and joint angle sensors, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sep. 25-30, 2011, 6 pages, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey. |
Yeates, Utah-built robot safeguards the workplace, http://www.ksl.com?nid=148&sid=17654421&autostart=y; Oct. 13, 2011, 3 pages, KSL Broadcasting, Salt Lake City, Utah. |
Yip et al., High-Performance Robotic Muscles from Conductive Nylon Sewing Thread, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 26-30, 2015, 6 pages, Seattle, Washington. |
Zubrycki et al., Novel haptic glove-based interface using jamming principle, Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control, Jul. 6-8, 2015, 6 pages, IEEE, Poland. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2019/069001 dated Apr. 30, 2020, 18 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190184576 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |