EEPROM array and method for operation thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6614692
  • Patent Number
    6,614,692
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, January 18, 2001
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 2, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A method for operating an electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM) array includes providing an array including a multiplicity of memory cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines, selecting one of the memory cells, and erasing a bit of thief selected memory cell while applying an inhibit word line voltage to a gate of an unselected memory cell. An EEPROM array is also described, the array including a multiplicity of NROM memory cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines, and wherein each NROM cell is individually erasable and individually programmable without significantly disturbing unselected cells.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to electrically erasable, programmable read only memory (EEPROM) arrays and methods for operation thereof, and more particularly, to nitride read only memory (NROM) EEPROM arrays and inhibiting disturbs in such arrays.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




EEPROM arrays are utilized for storage of data Typically, the data stored therein can be changed, either by programming or erasing, multiple times over the lifetime of the array. As in all non-volatile memory arrays, each cell is individually programmed; however, in contrast to either erasable, programmable read only memory (EPROM) or FLASH arrays, in EEPROM arrays each cell can also be individually erased.




Typical memory uses a single bit per cell, wherein electrical charge is stored on the floating gate of each cell. Within each cell, two possible voltage levels exist. The levels are controlled by the amount of charge that is stored on the floating gate; if the amount of charge on the floating gate is above a certain reference level, the cell is considered to be in a different level. Accordingly, each cell is characterized by a specific threshold voltage (V


t


. Programing the cell increases threshold voltage V


t


, whereas erasing the cell decreases threshold voltage V


t


.




Non-volatile memory arrays comprise rows and columns of memory cells connected to word lines (rows of the array) and bit lines (columns). Each memory cell is connected to one word line and at least one bit line. Another terminal of the memory cell is connected either to another bit line (in which case, one of the bit lines is called the drain line and the other is the source line), or to a common line, such as a common source ground, depending on the array architecture. Programing or erasing an individual cell requires application of certain voltages to the word line and bit lines.




Generally when programming or erasing a cell, one or more of the neighboring cells may also be affected by the programming/erasing operation, causing thereto a possible change in their threshold voltage. This unwanted change in threshold voltage of unselected cells is known in the art as the disturb problem, herein a “disturb”. A similar effect also occurs during a read operation. However, due to the relative weakness of the applied voltage levels, the effect is significantly smaller.




A standard prior art solution to the disturb problem in EEPROM arrays is to use two transistors per memory bit of the array, i.e., in addition to the memory transistor, a select transistor is also incorporated per cell. The select transistor usually disconnects the drain of the unselected memory transistors from the drain voltages used in the programming/erasing operations. The use of a select transistor per cell, however, significantly increases the area of the memory array.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention seeks to solve the abovementioned disturb problem. In the present invention, an unselected memory cell that can experience a possible drop in threshold voltage is inhibited from being erased by application of an inhibit word line voltage to the gate of the unselected cell. The term “inhibiting” as used throughout the specification and claims refers to reducing, minimizing or even eliminating the disturb effect.




The magnitude of the gate voltage is selected such that the difference between the drain or source and gate voltages applied to the unselected cell is sufficiently small so that the threshold voltage of the unselected cell does not drop below a predetermined value. By application of the inhibit voltage, it is possible to achieve negligible erasure of the unselected cell, even during relatively long erasure times and multitudes of selected cell accesses.




In a virtual ground array, the application of a relatively high voltage to the word line of a selected cell being programmed may cause a voltage propagation along unselected bit lines, thereby tuning on the cells along the unselected bit lines. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the voltage propagation is blocked by isolation zones positioned alongside bit lines. The isolation zones may be positioned so as to isolate a single column of memory cells or a slice of a plurality of columns.




In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the EEPROM array comprises nitride read only memory (NROM) cells. Each NROM cell is individually erasable and individually programmable without significantly disturbing unselected cells, by using inhibit voltages as described hereinbelow.




There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for operating an electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM) array, the method including providing an array including a multiplicity of memory cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines, one of the bit lines serving as a source and the other bit line serving as a drain, selecting one of the memory cells, and erasing a bit of the selected memory cell, while applying an inhibit word line voltage to a gate of an unselected memory cell.




In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the memory cells are non-floating gate memory cells.




Further in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the memory cells are nitride read only memory (NROM) cells. The NROM cells may be single bit, or alternatively, they may have more than one bit.




Still further in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the array is a virtual ground array.




The unselected memory cell may or may not share the same bit line as the selected cell, In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the inhibit gate voltage is of such magnitude that a threshold voltage of the unselected memory cell is lowered not more than a predetermined amount.




Further in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the erasing includes applying to the selected memory cell a negative gate voltage, a positive drain voltage and a floating source voltage.




Still further, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, at least one column of the memory cells is placed between a pair of isolation zones, the isolation zones defining therebetween a slice of word lines and bit lines.




There is also provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for operating an EEPROM array, the method including providing an array including a multiplicity of NROM cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines, one of the bit lines serving as a source and the other bit line serving as a drain, selecting one of the memory cells, and performing an operation on a bit of the selected memory cell, the operation including at least one of programming and erasing, while applying an inhibit word line voltage to a gate of an unselected memory cell.




There is also provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention an EEPROM array, the array including a multiplicity of NROM memory cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines, wherein each NROM cell is individually erasable and individually programmable without significantly disturbing unselected cells. In contrast to the prior art, there is no need for a select transistor for each bit or cell.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the appended drawings in which:





FIG. 1

is a schematic illustration of an EEPROM array of virtual ground NROM memory cells, constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;





FIGS. 2 and 3

are schematic illustrations of the EEPROM array of

FIGS. 1 and 2

, showing the application of an inhibit voltage during program and erase operations, respectively, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention; and





FIG. 4

is a graph illustrating the time required for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV as a function of the measured voltage difference between gate and drain voltages applied to the selected cell, for different operating conditions.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION




Reference is now made to

FIG. 1

which illustrates au EEPROM array


10


constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Array


10


comprises a multiplicity of memory cells


12


each connected to an associated word line, generally designated WL, and two bit lines, generally designated BL. For purposes of the following explanation, memory cells


12


are labeled K, P, Q, R, X, Y and Z, respectively. In

FIG. 1

, memory cells P, Q and R, share the same word line WL


B


. Cells K, P, X, Q and Y share the same bit line BL


B


. Cell Z is connected to word line WL


C


and bit lines BL


C


and BL


D.






In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, memory cells


12


are nitride read only memory (NROM cells. NROM cells are described in various publications, such as U.S. patent applications Ser. Nos. 08/902,890 and 08/905,286, assigned to the common assignee of the present invention, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent application ser. Nos. 08/902,890 and 08/905,286 describe, inter alia, the steps of programming reading and erasing NROM cells. NROM cells have not heretofore been used in EEPROM arrays. The present invention enables individually accessing NROM cells in such an EEPROM array, and inhibiting program and erase disturbs in the array.




NROM cells may be single bit. Alternatively, they may have more than one bit wherein two individual bits, a left-side bit


15


and a right-side bit


17


, are stored in physically different areas of the charge-trapping region. Each bit may be single level or multi-level, i.e., may be programed to different voltage levels.




If it is desired to program right-side bit


17


, then the bit line closest to right-side bit


17


(e.g., BL


B


for cell P) is the drain and the bit line on the other side (e.g., BL


A


for cell P) is the source. When programming right-side bit


17


, channel hot electrons are used to inject electrons in a lumped pocket close to the drain side of the cell. The electrons are located in localized states in the nitride layer. In order to program left-side bit


15


of the cell, one simply reverses the role of drain and source during programming.




The discussion follows hereinbelow with reference to a two-bit NROM cell. However, it is readily appreciated by those skilled in the art, that the invention is applicable for single and multi-bit cells as well.




If it is desired to program right-side bit


17


of memory cell P, a gate voltage V


g


(typically in the range of approximately 7-10V, e.g., 9V) is applied to word line WL


B


, a drain voltage V


d


(typically in the range of approximately 4-5V, e.g. 4.5V) is applied to bit line BL


B


, and bit line BL


A


is grounded (0V). All other bit lilies are preferably floated near ground prior to any operation (programming or erasing). All other word lines are grounded. The right-side bits


17


of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit


15


of cell Y share the same bit line BL


B


as cell P, and also receive drain voltage V


d


. Since the gate voltage of cells K, X and Y is zero, these bits experience a lowering of the threshold voltage. In other words, as a consequence of programming right-side bit


17


of cell P, right-side bits


17


of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit


15


of cell Y undergo partial erasure.




Unselected cell Z does not share the same bit line BL


B


or the same word line WL


B


as cell P. However, the application of the positive gate voltage to word line WL


B


causes some current flow towards the right side of array


10


, until the bit lines towards the right of bit line BL


B


attain a drain voltage close to V


d


. (This phenomenon is herein referred to as “high voltage propagation”.) The result is that both bits of unselected cell Z receive a zero gate voltage and a positive drain voltage, thereby lowering their threshold voltage. In other words, as a consequence of programming right-side bit


17


of cell P, both the left-side and right-side bits


15


is and


17


of cell Z undergo partial erasure. The same holds true for right-side bit


17


of cell Y, as well as other similarly positioned bits in EEPROM array


10


.




Fortunately, however, the duration of programming is typically in the range of approximately 1-10 μsec. Since this programming time is relatively short, the right-side bits


17


of cells K and X, and both bits of cells Y and Z are only slightly erased for each programming operation on right-side bit


17


of cell P. The fact that the gate voltage of cells K, X, Y and Z is only zero and not negative, also minimizes the extent of erasure of these bits.




In order to contain and control the voltage propagation due to the application of the programming voltage, memory cells


12


are preferably placed between a pair of isolation zones


24


. The isolation zones


24


define therebetween a slice of word lines and bit lines. There is no voltage propagation past isolation zones


24


. Depending on the array design and voltages used, the isolation zones


24


can divide the array into slices of just one column or a plurality of columns.




Unselected cells Q and R share the same word line WL


B


as cell P, and also receive the positive gate voltage V


g


. Therefore, there is virtually no effect on the threshold voltages of both bits of cells Q and R, since tie bit lines on either side of cells Q and R are relatively high.




All the bit lines to the left of bit line BL


A


are floated near ground, and thus there is virtually no effect on the threshold voltage of the bits of cells on those bit lines.




Table A summarizes the disturb on unselected cells due to programming right-side bit


17


of cell P:

















TABLE A









Cell




Bit




V


g






V


d






V


s






Effect on V


t






























P




Right




9




4.5




0




Program






K




Right




0




4.5




0




Partial Erase






Q




Left




9




4.5




4.5




Virtually None






Q




Right




9




4.5




4.5




Virtually None






R




Both




9




4.5




4.5




Virtually None






X




Right




0




4.5




0




Partial Erase






Y




Left




0




4.5




4.5




Partial Erase






Y




Right




0




4.5




4.5




Partial Erase






Z




Both




0




4.5




4.5




Partial Erase














If it is desired to erase right-side bit


17


of memory cell P, a negative gate voltage V


g


(such as approximately in the range of −5 to −7V) is applied to word line WL


B


, a positive drain voltage V


d


(typically in the range of approximately 3-5V, e.g. 4V) is applied to bit line BL


B


, and bit line BL


A


is floating (or driven). Left-side bit


15


of cell Q receives the exact same gate, drain and source voltages. This means that left-side bit


15


of cell Q is also erased together with right-side bit


17


of cell P. Accordingly, after an erasure of right-side bit


17


of cell P, left-side bit


15


of cell Q must be re-programmed to its original value. This is the case for a two-bit NROM cell. For single bit operation, it is preferable to arrange the bits so that they do not share a common bit line. In such an arrangement, no neighboring bit would be erased upon erasure of right-side bit


17


of cell P, for example.




Right-side bit


17


of cell Q and both bits of cell R share the same word line WL


B


as cell P, and also receive the negative gate voltage V


g


. Since there is only a negative gate voltage applied to word line WL


B


and the other word lines are grounded, and the bit lines on either side of cells Q and R are floated near ground prior to erasure of right-side bit


17


of cell P, there is no voltage propagation to the other cells and there is negligible erasure of right-side bit


17


of cell Q and both bits of cell R.




The right-side bits


17


of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit


15


of cell Y share the same bit line BL


B


as cell P, and also receive drain voltage V


d


. Since the gate voltage of cells K, X and Y is zero, right-side bits


17


of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit


15


of cell Y experience a lowering of the threshold voltage. In other words, as a consequence of erasing cell P, right-side bits


17


of cells K and X, and left-side bit


15


of cell Y undergo partial erasure. Unfortunately, the duration of erasing is typically in the range of approximately 10 μsec-10 msec. After many cycles, the accumulated erasure of the unselected cells may be intolerably significant. Unselected cell Z does not share the same bit line BL


B


or the same word line WL


B


as cell P, and there is virtually no effect on its threshold voltage. The same holds true for right-side bit


17


of cell Y.




Table B summarizes the disturb effects on unselected cells due to erasing right-side bit


17


of cell P:



















TABLE B











Cell




Bit




V


g






V


d






V


s






Effect on V


t

































P




Right




−7




4




Float




Erase







K




Right




0




4




Float




Partial Erase







Q




Left




−7




4




Float




Erase







Q




Right




−7




Float




Float




Virtually None







R




Both




−7




Float




Float




Virtually None







X




Right




0




4




Float




Partial Erase







Y




Left




0




4




Float




Partial Erase







Y




Right




0




Float




Float




Virtually None







Z




Both




0




Float




Float




Virtually None















In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention) disturb of the unselected cells during programming or erasing of a selected memory cell is inhibited by applying a voltage to the word line of the unselected cell.

FIG. 2

illustrates one example of the invention during programming right-side bit


17


of cell P. A gate voltage V


g


of 9V is applied to word line WL


B


, a drain voltage V


d


of 4.5V is applied to bit line BL


B


, and bit line BL


A


is grounded (0V). The remaining bit lines are floated near ground before programming.




In order to inhibit lowering of the threshold voltage of right-side bit


17


of cell K, and both bits of cells X and Y, a positive gate voltage is applied to word lines WL


A


(of cell K) and WL


C


(of cells X and Y). The magnitude of the required inhibit voltage is a function of a number of variables, such as, but not limited to programming time, drain voltage applied to the bit line of the programmed cell, voltage difference between gate and drain voltages applied to the programmed cell, and what is considered a tolerable drop in the threshold voltage of the unselected cell. The tolerable drop in the threshold voltage is further described hereinbelow with reference to FIG.


4


. In general, the inhibit voltage should be low enough so as not to program unselected bits, and so as not to cause any significant leakage current, but high enough so that the threshold voltages of unselected memory cells are lowered not more than a predetermined amount (over time or after a predetermined amount of operations). Row and column decoders (not shown) may be used to provide the voltage levels necessary for inhibiting the disturb problem. Such decoders are known in the art and persons skilled in the art may design decoders in accordance with the principles outlined herein.




For the purposes of example only, in the case of V


g


=9V, V


d


=4.5V, and a programming time of 4 μsec, it has been found that an inhibit voltage in the range of 0-2.5V, most preferably in the range of 0-1V, is typically sufficient to inhibit the partial erasure of unselected cells K, X and Y such that their threshold voltages are lowered by less than 100 mV per 100,000 accesses (which is considered a tolerable lowering of threshold voltage). These are merely typical exemplary values, and the present invention is not restricted to these values. It is noted that an inhibit voltage of 0-1V is generally sufficiently low so as not to cause any significant leakage current through the cells that receive this gate voltage.




Table C summarizes the effect of the application of the inhibit voltage (e.g., 1V) on the unselected cells when programming right-side bit


17


of cell P:

















TABLE C









Cell




Bit




V


g






V


d






V


s






Effect on V


t






























P




Right




9




4.5




0




Program






K




Right




1




4.5




0




Minute Erase






Q




Left




9




4.5




4.5




Virtually None






Q




Right




9




4.5




4.5




Virtually None






R




Both




9




4.5




4.5




Virtually None






X




Right




1




4.5




0




Minute Erase






Y




Left




1




4.5




4.5




Minute Erase






Y




Right




1




4.5




4.5




Minute Erase






Z




Both




1




4.5




4.5




Minute Erase















FIG. 3

illustrates one example of the invention during erasing of right-side bit


17


of cell P. As before, a gate voltage V


g


of −7V is applied to word line WL


B


, a drain voltage V


d


of 4V is applied to bit line BL


B


, and the remaining bit lines are floated near ground before erasing.




In order to inhibit lowering of the threshold voltage of right-side bits


17


of cells K and X, and left-side bit


15


of cell Y, a positive gate voltage is applied to word lines WL


A


(of cell K) and WL


C


(of cells X and Y). For the purposes of example only, in the case of V


g


=7V, V


d


=4V, and an erasing time of 2 msec, it has been found that an inhibit voltage in the range of 2.54-5V, most preferably in the range of 3-4V, is typically sufficient to inhibit the partial erasure of right-side bits


17


of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit


15


of cell Y, such that their threshold voltages are lowered by less than about 100 mV per 100,000 accesses Again, it is noted that these are merely typical exemplary values, and the present invention is not restricted to these values.




As described hereinabove, if no inhibit voltage were to be applied to the unselected word lines, there would be no voltage propagation to the right-side bit lines of array


10


, because the only gate voltage applied would be the negative gate voltage to word line WL


B


. However, the application of the inhibit voltage of 3V, for example, to the unselected word lines may be of sufficient magnitude so as to slightly turn on the cells to the right and left of bit line BL


B


and cause a voltage propagation to all the bit lines of array


10


, This means that the bit lines towards the right and left of bit line BL


B


receive a positive voltage, the magnitude of which is a function of the inhibit voltage diminished by the threshold voltage, which in turn depends upon the bulk effect of the memory transistors on those unselected bit lines. For example, for an inhibit voltage of 3V and threshold voltage of 1.5V, the bit line voltages may rise to about 1.5V. The result is that for unselected bits on unselected word lines, the combination of the positive inhibit voltage and the positive drain and source voltages causes a disturb, but of generally negligible magnitude. For unselected bits on the selected word line (to which the negative erasure voltage has been applied) the combination of the negative gate voltage and the positive drain and source voltages causes a slight disturb. In the above example, the combination of V


g


=−7V, V


d


=1.5V and V


s


=1.5V, causes a slight erasure but significantly less than the combination of V


g


=−7V, V


d


=4V and V


s


=1.5V on the selected bit which is erased. It is noted that since the memory transistors that propagate the bit line voltage are only slightly turned on, the extent to which the bit line voltage propagates during the erase pulse is limited.




In general, in the present invention the application of the inhibit voltage on the unselected word lines during an erase operation significantly reduces the bit line disturb to the unselected bits, and replaces the relatively high bit line disturb with two other disturbs of a lesser magnitude:




a) a negligible disturb to unselected bits on unselected word lines, and




b) a small disturb to unselected bits on the selected word line.




The presence of isolation zones


24


reduces the unwanted voltage propagation, and in doing so, prevents the spread of these two minor disturbs.




Table D summarizes the effect of the application of the inhibit voltage (e.g., 3V) on the unselected cells when erasing right-side bit


17


of cell P:

















TABLE D









Cell




Bit




V


g






V


d






V


s






Effect on V


t






























P




Right




−7




4




1.5




Erase






K




Right




3




4




1.5




Virtually None






Q




Left




−7




4




1.5




Erase






Q




Right




−7




1.5




4




Minute Erase






R




Both




−7




1.5




1.5




Minute Erase






X




Right




3




4




1.5




Virtually None






Y




Left




3




4




1.5




Virtually None






Y




Right




3




1.5




4




Virtually None






Z




Both




3




1.5




1.5




Virtually None














As mentioned hereinabove, the magnitude of the requited inhibit voltage is a function of a number of variables, such as, but not limited to, programming time, drain voltage applied to the bit line of the programmed cell, voltage difference between gate and drain voltages applied to the selected cell, and the tolerable drop in the threshold voltage of the unselected cell.




In the NROM array of the invention, program disturb of unselected bits may also be reduced by using longer programming times and/or lower bit line voltages to complete the programming of the selected bit. Erase disturb of unselected bits may be reduced by using more negative word line voltages and/or shorter erasing times and/or lower bit line voltages to complete the erasing of the selected bit.




Reference is now made to

FIG. 4

, which graphically illustrates the time required for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV as a function of the measured voltage difference between gate and drain voltages applied to the selected cell. The lower curve of

FIG. 4

(data marked by diamonds) graphically depicts the time for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV for the combination of V


g


=0V and V


s


floating, as a function of different drain voltages. For example, for a combination of V


d


/V


g


/V


s


of 5.5/0/float (as measured in volts), it takes about 0.5 sec for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV. For a combination of V


d


/V


g


V


s


of 5/0/float, it takes about 20 sec for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV. For a combination of V


d


/V


g


/V


s


of 4.5/0/float, it takes about 85 sec for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV. Thus, the time for erase disturbs to affect unselected cells is not very prolonged.




In contrast, as depicted in the upper curve of

FIG. 4

(data marked by circles), for a combination of V


d


/V


g


/V


s


of 5.5/3/float, i.e., upon application of a 3V inhibit gate voltage, it takes about 4600 sec for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV. For a combination of V


d


/V


g


/V


s


of 5/3/float, it takes about 6800 sec for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV. Thus, when an inhibit voltage is applied to unselected cells, the time for erase disturbs to affect the unselected cells is greatly increased. There is no appreciable lowering of the threshold voltage of the unselected cells even after a long time.




The accumulated disturb, i.e., change in threshold voltage, over many access operations, and with the application of the inhibit voltage, may be calculated for the unselected bits as follows, for all operations of erase or program:




ΔV


t total


(the total change in the threshold voltage of a bit due to disturbs)=ΔV


t1


(due to erase and program operations on the other bits residing on the same bit line)+ΔV


t2


(due to erase and program operations on the other bits residing on other bit lines and other word Lines)+ΔV


t3


(due to erase and program operations on the other bits residing on other bit lines and on the same word line).




The following is an illustrative example based upon Tables C and D hereinabove. The total change in the threshold voltage of the left-side bit


15


of cell Y, ΔV


t total


(assuming that this bit has been previously programmed), would be the sum of:




ΔV


t1


caused by the application of a combination of V


d


/V


g


/V


s


=4.5/1/4.5 (volts) while programming any or all of the other bits on bit line BL


B


, and V


d


/V


g


/V


s


=4/3/1.5 while erasing any or all of the other bits on bit line BL


B


, plus




ΔV


t2


caused by the application of a combination of V


d


/V


g


/V


s


=4.5/1/4.5 while programming any or all of the other bits on bit lines other than BL


B


and on word lines other than WL


C


, and V


d


/V


g


/V


s


=1.5/3/1.5 while erasing any or all of the other bits on bit lines other than BL


B


and on word lines other than WL


C


, plus




ΔV


t3


caused by the application of a combination of V


d


/V


g


/V


s


=4.5/9/4.5 while programming any or all of the other bits on bit lines other than BL


B


and on word line WL


C


, and V


d


/V


g


/V


s


=1.5/-7/1.5 while erasing any or all of the other bits on bit lines other than BL


B


and on word line WL


C.






The accumulated disturb times are calculated as follows:




For bits on the selected bit line and unselected word lines, corresponding to AV,?, the accumulated disturb time is:






τ


disturb





operation


N


WLφ








wherein τ


disturb


is the accumulated disturb time, τ


operation


is the average time duration of performing operation (erase or program), N


WL


is the number of word lines in the array and φ is the number of times cell is accessed.




For bits on unselected bit lines and unselected word lines, corresponding to ΔV


t2


, the accumulated disturb time is:






τ


disturb





operation


N


WL


N


BL


φ






wherein N


BL


is the number of bit lines in the array.




For bits on unselected bit lines and on the selected word line, corresponding to ΔV


t3


, the accumulated disturb time is:






τ


disturb





operation


N


BLφ








It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described herein above. Rather the scope of the invention is defined by the claims that follow.



Claims
  • 1. A method for operating an electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM) array, the method comprising:providing an array comprising a multiplicity of nitride read only memory (NROM) cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines; selecting one of said memory cells; and erasing a bit of the selected memory cell, while applying an inhibit word line voltage to a gate of an unselected memory cell.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1 wherein said memory cells comprise non-floating gate memory cells.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1 wherein said memory cells are nitride read only memory (NROM) cells.
  • 4. The method according to claim 3 wherein said NROM cells comprise a single bit per cell.
  • 5. The method according to claim 3 wherein said NROM cells comprise more than one bit per cell.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1 wherein said array comprises a virtual ground array.
  • 7. The method according to claim 1 wherein said unselected memory cell shares the same bit line as said selected cell.
  • 8. The method according to claim 1 wherein said unselected memory cell does not share the same bit line as said selected cell.
  • 9. The method according to claim 1 wherein said inhibit gate voltage is of such magnitude that a threshold voltage of said unselected memory cell is lowered not more than a predetermined amount.
  • 10. The method according to claim 1 wherein one of said bit lines serves as a drain and another of said bit lines serves as a source, and wherein said erasing of said bit comprises applying to said selected memory cell a negative word line voltage and a positive voltage to the bit line where said bit is located.
  • 11. The method according to claim 10 wherein said bit of the selected memory cell shares a common bit line with another bit which is unselected, and wherein erasing said bit of the selected memory cell also causes erasing of said other bit on the common bit line.
  • 12. The method according to claim 1 and further comprising having at least one column of said memory cells located between a pair of isolation zones.
  • 13. A method for operating an EEPROM array, the method comprising:providing an array comprising a multiplicity of nitride read only memory (NROM) cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines; selecting one of said memory cells; and performing an operation on a bit of the selected memory cell, said operation comprising at least one of programming and erasing, while applying an inhibit word line voltage to a gate of an unselected memory cell.
  • 14. The method according to claim 13 wherein said array comprises a virtual ground array.
  • 15. The method according to claim 13 wherein said NROM cells comprise a single bit per cell.
  • 16. The method according to claim 13 wherein said NROM cells comprise more than one bit per cell.
  • 17. The method according to claim 13 wherein said unselected memory cell shares the same bit line as said selected cell.
  • 18. The method according to claim 13 wherein said unselected memory cell does not share the same bit line as said selected cell.
  • 19. The method according to claim 13 wherein said inhibit gate voltage is of such magnitude that a threshold voltage of said unselected memory cell is lowered not more than a predetermined amount.
  • 20. The method according to claim 13 wherein one of said bit lines serves as a drain and another of said bit lines serves as a source, and wherein said programming comprises applying to said selected memory cell a positive gate voltage, a positive drain voltage and a ground source voltage.
  • 21. The method according to claim 13 wherein one of said bit lines serves as a drain and another of said bit lines serves as a source, and wherein said erasing comprises applying to said selected memory cell a negative word line voltage and a positive voltage to the bit line where said bit is located.
  • 22. The method according to claim 21 wherein said bit of the selected memory cell shares a common bit line with another bit which is unselected, and wherein erasing said bit of the selected memory cell also causes erasing of said other bit on the common bit line.
  • 23. The method according to claim 13 and further comprising placing at least one column of said memory cells between a par of isolation zones.
US Referenced Citations (110)
Number Name Date Kind
3895360 Cricchi et al. Jul 1975 A
4016588 Ohya et al. Apr 1977 A
4017888 Christie et al. Apr 1977 A
4151021 McElroy Apr 1979 A
4173766 Hayes Nov 1979 A
4173791 Bell Nov 1979 A
4281397 Neal et al. Jul 1981 A
4306353 Jacobs et al. Dec 1981 A
4342149 Jacobs et al. Aug 1982 A
4360900 Bate Nov 1982 A
4380057 Kotecha et al. Apr 1983 A
4388705 Sheppard Jun 1983 A
4389705 Sheppard Jun 1983 A
4471373 Shimizu et al. Sep 1984 A
4527257 Cricchi Jul 1985 A
4586163 Koike Apr 1986 A
4630085 Koyama Dec 1986 A
4667217 Janning May 1987 A
4780424 Holler et al. Oct 1988 A
4847808 Kobatake Jul 1989 A
4870470 Bass, Jr. et al. Sep 1989 A
4916671 Ichiguchi Apr 1990 A
4941028 Chen et al. Jul 1990 A
5021999 Kohda et al. Jun 1991 A
5075245 Woo et al. Dec 1991 A
5117389 Yiu May 1992 A
5168334 Mitchell et al. Dec 1992 A
5172338 Mehrotra et al. Dec 1992 A
5175120 Lee Dec 1992 A
5204835 Eitan Apr 1993 A
5214303 Aoki May 1993 A
5241497 Komarek Aug 1993 A
5260593 Lee Nov 1993 A
5268861 Hotta Dec 1993 A
5289412 Frary et al. Feb 1994 A
5293563 Ohta Mar 1994 A
5305262 Yoneda Apr 1994 A
5311049 Tsuruta May 1994 A
5315541 Harari et al. May 1994 A
5345425 Shikatani Sep 1994 A
5349221 Shimoji Sep 1994 A
5350710 Hong et al. Sep 1994 A
5359554 Odake et al. Oct 1994 A
5393701 Ko et al. Feb 1995 A
5394355 Uramoto et al. Feb 1995 A
5399891 Yiu et al. Mar 1995 A
5412601 Sawada et al. May 1995 A
5414693 Ma et al. May 1995 A
5418176 Yang et al. May 1995 A
5418743 Tomioka et al. May 1995 A
5422844 Wolstenholme et al. Jun 1995 A
5424978 Wada et al. Jun 1995 A
5426605 Van Berkel et al. Jun 1995 A
5434825 Harari Jul 1995 A
5450341 Sawada et al. Sep 1995 A
5450354 Sawada et al. Sep 1995 A
5467308 Chang et al. Nov 1995 A
5477499 Van Buskirk et al. Dec 1995 A
5495440 Asakura Feb 1996 A
5496753 Sakurai et al. Mar 1996 A
5521870 Ishikawa May 1996 A
5523251 Hong Jun 1996 A
5553018 Wang et al. Sep 1996 A
5583808 Brahmbhatt Dec 1996 A
5599727 Hakozaki et al. Feb 1997 A
5623438 Guritz et al. Apr 1997 A
5654568 Nakao Aug 1997 A
5656513 Wang et al. Aug 1997 A
5661060 Gill et al. Aug 1997 A
5683925 Irani et al. Nov 1997 A
5712814 Fratin et al. Jan 1998 A
5726946 Yamagata et al. Mar 1998 A
5751037 Aozasa et al. May 1998 A
5754475 Bill et al. May 1998 A
5768192 Eitan Jun 1998 A
5777919 Chi-Yung et al. Jul 1998 A
5787036 Okazawa Jul 1998 A
5793079 Georgescu et al. Aug 1998 A
5834851 Ikeda et al. Nov 1998 A
5836772 Chang et al. Nov 1998 A
5841700 Chang Nov 1998 A
5847441 Cutter et al. Dec 1998 A
5862076 Eitan Jan 1999 A
5864164 Wen Jan 1999 A
5870335 Khan et al. Feb 1999 A
5946558 Hsu Aug 1999 A
5949728 Liu et al. Sep 1999 A
5963412 En Oct 1999 A
5963465 Eitan Oct 1999 A
5966603 Eitan Oct 1999 A
5973373 Krautschneider et al. Oct 1999 A
5990526 Bez et al. Nov 1999 A
5991202 Derhacobian et al. Nov 1999 A
5999444 Fujiwara et al. Dec 1999 A
6011725 Eitan Jan 2000 A
6018186 Hsu Jan 2000 A
6020241 You et al. Feb 2000 A
6028324 Su et al. Feb 2000 A
6030871 Eitan Feb 2000 A
6034403 Wu Mar 2000 A
6063666 Chang et al. May 2000 A
6081456 Dadashev Jun 2000 A
6128226 Eitan et al. Oct 2000 A
6134156 Eitan Oct 2000 A
6137718 Reisinger Oct 2000 A
6147904 Liron Nov 2000 A
6163048 Hirose et al. Dec 2000 A
6218695 Nachumovsky Apr 2001 B1
6222768 Hollmer et al. Apr 2001 B1
6256231 Lavi et al. Jul 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
0693781 Jul 1994 EP
0751560 Jun 1995 EP
1073120 Jul 2000 EP
2157489 Mar 1984 GB
04291962 Mar 1991 JP
05021758 Jul 1991 JP
04226071 Aug 1992 JP
07193151 Dec 1993 JP
09162314 Dec 1995 JP
WO 9615553 Nov 1994 WO
WO 9931670 Dec 1997 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (11)
Entry
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/082,280, Eitan, filed May 20, 1998.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/348,720, Eitan, filed Jul. 6, 1999.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/413,408, Eitan, filed Oct. 6, 1999.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/536,125, Eitan, filed Mar. 28, 2000.
Ricco, Bruno, “Nonvolatile Multilevel Memories for Digital Application,” IEEE, vol. 86, No. 12, pp. 2399-2421, issued 1998.
“2 Bit/Cell EEPROM Cell Using Band-To-Band Tunneling For Data Read-Out,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, U.S. IBM Corp. NY vol. 35, No. 4B, ISSN:0018-8689, Sep. 1992.
Hsing-Huang Tsent et al. “Thin CVD Gate Dielectric for ULSI Technology”, IEEE, 0-7803-1450-6, 1993.
Pickar, K.A., “Ion Implantation in Silicon,” Applied Solid State Science, vol. 5, R. Wolfe Edition, Academic Press, New York, 1975.
Bhattacharyya et al., “FET Gate Structure for Nonvolatile N-Channel Read-Mostly Device,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, U.S. IBM Corp. vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 1768, 1976.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/902,890, Eitan.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/905,286, Eitan.