EEPROM array and method for operation thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7518908
  • Patent Number
    7,518,908
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 28, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 14, 2009
    15 years ago
Abstract
A method for operating an electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM) array includes providing an array including a multiplicity of memory cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines, selecting one of the memory cells, and erasing a bit of the selected memory cell while applying an inhibit word line voltage to a gate of an unselected memory cell. An EEPROM array is also described, the array including a multiplicity of NROM memory cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines, and wherein each NROM cell is individually erasable and individually programmable without significantly disturbing unselected cells.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to electrically erasable, programmable read only memory (EEPROM) arrays and methods for operation thereof, and more particularly, to nitride read only memory (NROM) EEPROM arrays and inhibiting disturbs in such arrays.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

EEPROM arrays are utilized for storage of data Typically, the data stored therein can be changed, either by programming or erasing, multiple times over the lifetime of the array. As in all non-volatile memory arrays, each cell is individually programmed; however, in contrast to either erasable, programmable read only memory (EPROM) or FLASH arrays, in EEPROM arrays each cell can also be individually erased.


Typical memory uses a single bit per cell, wherein electrical charge is stored on the floating gate of each cell. Within each cell, two possible voltage levels exist. The levels are controlled by the amount of charge that is stored on the floating gate; if the amount of charge on the floating gate is above a certain reference level, the cell is considered to be in a different level. Accordingly, each cell is characterized by a specific threshold voltage (Vt). Programming the cell increases threshold voltage Vt, whereas erasing the cell decreases threshold voltage Vt.


Non-volatile memory arrays comprise rows and columns of memory cells connected to word lines (rows of the array) and bit lines (columns). Each memory cell is connected to one word line and at least one bit line. Another terminal of the memory cell is connected either to another bit line (in which case, one of the bit lines is called the drain line and the other is the source line), or to a common line, such as a common source ground, depending on the array architecture. Programming or erasing an individual cell requires application of certain voltages to the word line and bit lines.


Generally, when programming or erasing a cell, one or more of the neighboring cells may also be affected by the programming/erasing operation, causing thereto a possible change in their threshold voltage. This unwanted change in threshold voltage of unselected cells is known in the art as the disturb problem, herein a “disturb”. A similar effect also occurs during a read operation. However, due to the relative weakness of the applied voltage levels, the effect is significantly smaller.


A standard prior art solution to the disturb problem in EEPROM arrays is to use two transistors per memory bit of the array, i.e., in addition to the memory transistor, a select transistor is also incorporated per cell. The select transistor usually disconnects the drain of the unselected memory transistors from the drain voltages used in the programming/erasing operations. The use of a select transistor per cell, however, significantly increases the area of the memory array.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention seeks to solve the abovementioned disturb problem. In the present invention, an unselected memory cell that can experience a possible drop in threshold voltage is inhibited from being erased by application of an inhibit word line voltage to the gate of the unselected cell. The term “inhibiting” as used throughout the specification and claims refers to reducing, minimizing or even eliminating the disturb effect.


The magnitude of the gate voltage is selected such that the difference between the drain or source and gate voltages applied to the unselected cell is sufficiently small so that the threshold voltage of the unselected cell does not drop below a predetermined value. By application of the inhibit voltage, it is possible to achieve negligible erasure of the unselected cell, even during relatively long erasure times and multitudes of selected cell accesses.


In a virtual ground array, the application of a relatively high voltage to the word line of a selected cell being programmed may cause a voltage propagation along unselected bit lines, thereby turning on the cells along the unselected bit lines. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the voltage propagation is blocked by isolation zones positioned alongside bit lines. The isolation zones may be positioned so as to isolate a single column of memory cells or a slice of a plurality of columns.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the EEPROM array comprises nitride read only memory (NROM) cells. Each NROM cell is individually erasable and individually programmable without significantly disturbing unselected cells, by using inhibit voltages as described hereinbelow.


There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for operating an electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM) array. The method includes providing an array which has a multiplicity of memory cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines, one of the bit lines serving as a source and the other bit line serving as a drain, selecting one of the memory cells, and erasing a bit of the selected memory cell, while applying an inhibit word line voltage to a gate of an unselected memory cell.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the memory cells are non-floating gate memory cells.


Further in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the memory cells are nitride read only memory (NROM) cells. The NROM cells may be single bit, or alternatively, they may have more than one bit.


Still further in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the array is a virtual ground array.


The unselected memory cell may or may not share the same bit line as the selected cell.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the inhibit gate voltage is of such magnitude that a threshold voltage of the unselected memory cell is lowered not more than a predetermined amount.


Further in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the erasing includes applying to the selected memory cell a negative gate voltage, a positive drain voltage and a floating source voltage.


Still further, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, at least one column of the memory cells is placed between a pair of isolation zones, the isolation zones defining therebetween a slice of word lines and bit lines.


There is also provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for operating an EEPROM array, the method including providing an array including a multiplicity of NROM cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines, one of the bit lines serving as a source and the other bit line serving as a drain, selecting one of the memory cells, and performing an operation on a bit of the selected memory cell, the operation including at least one of programming and erasing, while applying an inhibit word line voltage to a gate of an unselected memory cell.


There is also provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention an EEPROM array, the array including a multiplicity of NROM memory cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines, wherein each NROM cell is individually erasable and individually programmable without significantly disturbing unselected cells. In contrast to the prior art, there is no need for a select transistor for each bit or cell.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the appended drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an EEPROM array of virtual ground NROM memory cells, constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;



FIGS. 2 and 3 are schematic illustrations of the EEPROM array of FIGS. 1 and 2, showing the application of an inhibit voltage during program and erase operations, respectively, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the time required for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV as a function of the measured voltage difference between gate and drain voltages applied to the selected cell, for different operating conditions.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

Reference is now made to FIG. 1 which illustrates an EEPROM array 10 constructed and operative in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention. Array 10 comprises a multiplicity of memory cells 12 each connected to an associated word line, generally designated WL, and two bit lines, generally designated BL. For purposes of the following explanation, memory cells 12 are labeled K, P, Q, R, X, Y and Z, respectively. In FIG. 1, memory cells P, Q and R, share the same word line WLB. Cells K, P, X, Q and Y share the same bit line BLB. Cell Z is connected to word line WLC and bit lines BLC and BLD.


In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, memory cells 12 are nitride read only memory (NROM) cells. NROM cells are described in various publications, such as U.S. patent applications Ser. Nos. 08/902,890 and 08/905,286, assigned to the common assignee of the present invention, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent applications Ser. Nos. 08/902,890 and 08/905,286 describe, inter alia, the steps of programming, reading and erasing NROM cells. NROM cells have not heretofore been used in EEPROM arrays. The present invention enables individually accessing NROM cells in such an EEPROM array, and inhibiting program and erase disturbs in the array.


NROM cells may be single bit. Alternatively, they may have more than one bit, wherein two individual bits, a left-side bit 15 and a right-side bit 17, are stored in physically different areas of the charge-trapping region. Each bit may be single level or multi-level, i.e., may be programmed to different voltage levels.


If it is desired to program right-side bit 17, then the bit line closest to right-side bit 17 (e.g., BLB for cell P) is the drain and the bit line on the other side (e.g., BLA for cell P) is the source. When programming right-side bit 17, channel hot electrons are used to inject electrons in a lumped pocket close to the drain side of the cell. The electrons are located in localized states in the nitride layer. In order to program left-side bit 15 of the cell, one simply reverses the role of drain and source during programming.


The discussion follows hereinbelow with reference to a two-bit NROM cell. However, it is readily appreciated by those skilled in the art, that the invention is applicable for single and multi-bit cells as well.


If it is desired to program right-side bit 17 of memory cell P, a gate voltage Vg (typically in the range of approximately 7-10V, e.g., 9V) is applied to word line WLB, a drain voltage Vd (typically in the range of approximately 4-5V, e.g. 4.5V) is applied to bit line BLB, and bit line BLA is grounded (0V). All other bit lines are preferably floated near ground prior to any operation (programming or erasing). All other word lines are grounded. The right-side bits 17 of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y share the same bit line BLB as cell P, and also receive drain voltage Vd. Since the gate voltage of cells K, X and Y is zero, these bits experience a lowering of the threshold voltage. In other words, as a consequence of programming right-side bit 17 of cell P, right-side bits 17 of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y undergo partial erasure.


Unselected cell Z does not share the same bit line BLB or the same word line WLB as cell P. However, the application of the positive gate voltage to word line WLB causes some current flow towards the right side of array 10, until the bit lines towards the right of bit line BLB attain a drain voltage close to Vd. (This phenomenon is herein referred to as “high voltage propagation”.) The result is that both bits of unselected cell Z receive a zero gate voltage and a positive drain voltage, thereby lowering their threshold voltage. In other words, as a consequence of programming right-side bit 17 of cell P, both the left-side and right-side bits 15 and 17 of cell Z undergo partial erasure. The same holds true for right-side bit 17 of cell Y, as well as other similarly positioned bits in EEPROM array 10.


Fortunately, however, the duration of programming is typically in the range of approximately 1-10 μsec. Since this programming time is relatively short, the right-side bits 17 of cells K and X, and both bits of cells Y and Z are only slightly erased for each programming operation on right-side bit 17 of cell P. The fact that the gate voltage of cells K, X, Y and Z is only zero and not negative, also minimizes the extent of erasure of these bits.


In order to contain and control the voltage propagation due to the application of the programming voltage, memory cells 12 are preferably placed between a pair of isolation zones 24. The isolation zones 24 define therebetween a slice of word lines and bit lines. There is no voltage propagation past isolation zones 24. Depending on the array design and voltages used, the isolation zones 24 can divide the array into slices of just one column or a plurality of columns.


Unselected cells Q and R share the same word line WLB as cell P, and also receive the positive gate voltage Vg. Therefore, there is virtually no effect on the threshold voltages of both bits of cells Q and R, since the bit lines on either side of cells Q and R are relatively high.


All the bit lines to the left of bit line BLA are floated near ground, and thus there is virtually no effect on the threshold voltage of the bits of cells on those bit lines.


Table A summarizes the disturb on unselected cells due to programming right-side bit 17 of cell P:
















TABLE A







Cell
Bit
Vg
Vd
Vs
Effect on Vt























P
Right
9
4.5
0
Program



K
Right
0
4.5
0
Partial Erase



Q
Left
9
4.5
4.5
Virtually None



Q
Right
9
4.5
4.5
Virtually None



R
Both
9
4.5
4.5
Virtually None



X
Right
0
4.5
0
Partial Erase



Y
Left
0
4.5
4.5
Partial Erase



Y
Right
0
4.5
4.5
Partial Erase



Z
Both
0
4.5
4.5
Partial Erase










If it is desired to erase right-side bit 17 of memory cell P, a negative gate voltage Vg (such as approximately in the range of −5 to −7V) is applied to word line WLB, a positive drain voltage Vd (typically in the range of approximately 3-5V, e.g. 4V) is applied to bit line BLB, and bit line BLA is floating (or driven). Left-side bit 15 of cell Q receives the exact same gate, drain and source voltages. This means that left-side bit 15 of cell Q is also erased together with right-side bit 17 of cell P. Accordingly, after an erasure of right-side bit 17 of cell P, left-side bit 15 of cell Q must be re-progranmed to its original value. This is the case for a two-bit NROM cell. For single bit operation, it is preferable to arrange the bits so that they do not share a common bit line. In such an arrangement, no neighboring bit would be erased upon erasure of right-side bit 17 of cell P, for example.


Right-side bit 17 of cell Q and both bits of cell R share the same word line WLB as cell P, and also receive the negative gate voltage Vg. Since there is only a negative gate voltage applied to word line WLB and the other word lines are grounded, and the bit lines on either side of cells Q and R are floated near ground prior to erasure of right-side bit 17 of cell P, there is no voltage propagation to the other cells and there is negligible erasure of right-side bit 17 of cell Q and both bits of cell R.


The right-side bits 17 of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y share the same bit line BLB as cell P, and also receive drain voltage Vd. Since the gate voltage of cells K, X and Y is zero, right-side bits 17 of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y experience a lowering of the threshold voltage. In other words, as a consequence of erasing cell P, right-side bits 17 of cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y undergo partial erasure. Unfortunately, the duration of erasing is typically in the range of approximately 10 μsec-10 msec. After many cycles, the accumulated erasure of the unselected cells may be intolerably significant. Unselected cell Z does not share the same bit line BLB or the same word line WLB as cell P, and there is virtually no effect on its threshold voltage. The same holds true for right-side bit 17 of cell Y.


Table B summarizes the disturb effects on unselected cells due to erasing right-side bit 17 of cell P:
















TABLE B







Cell
Bit
Vg
Vd
Vs
Effect on Vt























P
Right
−7
4
Float
Erase



K
Right
0
4
Float
Partial Erase



Q
Left
−7
4
Float
Erase



Q
Right
−7
Float
Float
Virtually None



R
Both
−7
Float
Float
Virtually None



X
Right
0
4
Float
Partial Erase



Y
Left
0
4
Float
Partial Erase



Y
Right
0
Float
Float
Virtually None



Z
Both
0
Float
Float
Virtually None










In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, disturb of the unselected cells during programming or erasing of a selected memory cell is inhibited by applying a voltage to the word line of the unselected cell. FIG. 2 illustrates one example of the invention during programming right-side bit 17 of cell P. A gate voltage Vg of 9V is applied to word line WLB, a drain voltage Vd of 4.5V is applied to bit line BLB, and bit line BLA is grounded (0V). The remaining bit lines are floated near ground before programming.


In order to inhibit lowering of the threshold voltage of right-side bit 17 of cell K, an d both bits of cells X and Y, a positive gate voltage is applied to word lines WLA (of cell K) and WLC (of cells X and Y). The magnitude of the required inhibit voltage is a function of a number of variables, such as, but not limited to, programming time, drain voltage applied to the bit line of the programmed cell, voltage difference between gate and drain voltages applied to the programmed cell, and what is considered a tolerable drop in the threshold voltage of the unselected cell. The tolerable drop in the threshold voltage is further described hereinbelow with reference to FIG. 4. In general, the inhibit voltage should be low enough so as not to program unselected bits, and so as not to cause any significant leakage current, but high enough so that the threshold voltages of unselected memory cells are lowered not more than a predetermined amount (over time or after a predetermined amount of operations). Row and column decoders (not shown) may be used to provide the voltage levels necessary for inhibiting the disturb problem. Such decoders are known in the art and persons skilled in the art may design decoders in accordance with the principles outlined herein.


For the purposes of example only, in the case of Vg=9V, Vd=4.5V, and a programming time of 4 μsec, it has been found that an inhibit voltage in the range of 0-2.5V, most preferably in the range of 0-1V, is typically sufficient to inhibit the partial erasure of unselected cells K, X and Y such that their threshold voltages are lowered by less than 100 mV per 100,000 accesses (which is considered a tolerable lowering of threshold voltage). These are merely typical exemplary values, and the present invention is not restricted to these values. It is noted that an inhibit voltage of 0-1V is generally sufficiently low so as not to cause any significant leakage current through the cells that receive this gate voltage.


Table C summarizes the effect of the application of the inhibit voltage (e.g., 1V) on the unselected cells when programming right-side bit 17 of cell P:
















TABLE C







Cell
Bit
Vg
Vd
Vs
Effect on Vt























P
Right
9
4.5
0
Program



K
Right
1
4.5
0
Minute Erase



Q
Left
9
4.5
4.5
Virtually None



Q
Right
9
4.5
4.5
Virtually None



R
Both
9
4.5
4.5
Virtually None



X
Right
1
4.5
0
Minute Erase



Y
Left
1
4.5
4.5
Minute Erase



Y
Right
1
4.5
4.5
Minute Erase



Z
Both
1
4.5
4.5
Minute Erase











FIG. 3 illustrates one example of the invention during erasing of right-side bit 17 of cell P. As before, a gate voltage Vg of −7V is applied to word line WLB, a drain voltage Vd of 4V is applied to bit line BLB, and the remaining bit lines are floated near ground before erasing.


In order to inhibit lowering of the threshold voltage of right-side bits 17 of cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y, a positive gate voltage is applied to word lines WLA (of cell K) and WLC (of cells X and Y). For the purposes of example only, in the case of Vg=−7V, Vd=4V, and an erasing time of 2 msec, it has been found that an inhibit voltage in the range of 2.5-4.5V, most preferably in the range of 3-4V, is typically sufficient to inhibit the partial erasure of right-side bits 17 of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y, such that their threshold voltages are lowered by less than about 100 mV per 100,000 accesses. Again, it is noted that these are merely typical exemplary values, and the present invention is not restricted to these values.


As described hereinabove, if no inhibit voltage were to be applied to the unselected word lines, there would be no voltage propagation to the right-side bit lines of array 10, because the only gate voltage applied would be the negative gate voltage to word line WLB. However, the application of the inhibit voltage of 3V, for example, to the unselected word lines may be of sufficient magnitude so as to slightly turn on the cells to the right and left of bit line BLB and cause a voltage propagation to all the bit lines of array 10. This means that the bit lines towards the right and left of bit line BLB receive a positive voltage, the magnitude of which is a function of the inhibit voltage diminished by the threshold voltage, which in turn depends upon the bulk effect of the memory transistors on those unselected bit lines. For example, for an inhibit voltage of 3V and threshold voltage of 1.5V, the bit line voltages may rise to about 1.5V. The result is that for unselected bits on unselected word lines, the combination of the positive inhibit voltage and the positive drain and source voltages causes a disturb, but of generally negligible magnitude. For unselected bits on the selected word line (to which the negative erasure voltage has been applied), the combination of the negative gate voltage and the positive drain and source voltages causes a slight disturb. In the above example, the combination of Vg=−7V, Vd=1.5V and Vs=1.5V, causes a slight erasure but significantly less than the combination of Vg=−7V, Vd=4V and Vs=1.5V on the selected bit which is erased. It is noted that since the memory transistors that propagate the bit line voltage are only slightly turned on, the extent to which the bit line voltage propagates during the erase pulse is limited.


In general, in the present invention, the application of the inhibit voltage on the unselected word lines during an erase operation significantly reduces the bit line disturb to the unselected bits, and replaces the relatively high bit line disturb with two other disturbs of a lesser magnitude:


a) a negligible disturb to unselected bits on unselected word lines, and


b) a small disturb to unselected bits on the selected word line.


The presence of isolation zones 24 reduces the unwanted voltage propagation, and in doing so, prevents the spread of these two minor disturbs.


Table D summarizes the effect of the application of the inhibit voltage (e.g., 3V) on the unselected cells when erasing right-side bit 17 of cell P:
















TABLE D







Cell
Bit
Vg
Vd
Vs
Effect on Vt























P
Right
−7
4
1.5
Erase



K
Right
3
4
1.5
Virtually None



Q
Left
−7
4
1.5
Erase



Q
Right
−7
1.5
4
Minute Erase



R
Both
−7
1.5
1.5
Minute Erase



X
Right
3
4
1.5
Virtually None



Y
Left
3
4
1.5
Virtually None



Y
Right
3
1.5
4
Virtually None



Z
Both
3
1.5
1.5
Virtually None










As mentioned hereinabove, the magnitude of the required inhibit voltage is a function of a number of variables, such as, but not limited to, programming time, drain voltage applied to the bit line of the programmed cell, voltage difference between gate and drain voltages applied to the selected cell, and the tolerable drop in the threshold voltage of the unselected cell.


In the NROM array of the invention, program disturb of unselected bits may also be reduced by using longer programming times and/or lower bit line voltages to complete the programming of the selected bit. Erase disturb of unselected bits may be reduced by using more negative word line voltages and/or shorter erasing times and/or lower bit line voltages to complete the erasing of the selected bit.


Reference is now made to FIG. 4, which graphically illustrates the time required for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV as a function of the measured voltage difference between gate and drain voltages applied to the selected cell. The lower curve of FIG. 4 (data marked by diamonds) graphically depicts the time for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV for the combination of Vg=0V and Vs floating, as a function of different drain voltages. For example, for a combination of Vd/Vg/Vs of 5.5/0/float (as measured in volts), it takes about 0.5 sec for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV. For a combination of Vd/Vg/Vs of 5/0/float, it takes about 20 sec for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV. For a combination of Vd/Vg/Vs of 4.5/0/float, it takes about 85 sec for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV. Thus, the time for erase disturbs to affect unselected cells is not very prolonged.


In contrast, as depicted in the upper curve of FIG. 4 (data marked by circles), for a combination of Vd/Vg/Vs of 5.5/3/float, i.e., upon application of a 3V inhibit gate voltage, it takes about 460 sec for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV. For a combination of Vd/Vg/Vs of 5/3/float, it takes about 6800 sec for the threshold voltage to drop by 100 mV. Thus, when an inhibit voltage is applied to unselected cells, the time for erase disturbs to affect the unselected cells is greatly increased. There is no appreciable lowering of the threshold voltage of the unselected cells even after a long time.


The accumulated disturb, i.e., change in threshold voltage, over many access operations, and with the application of the inhibit voltage, may be calculated for the unselected bits as follows, for all operations of erase or program:


ΔVt total (the total change in the threshold voltage of a bit due to disturbs)=ΔVt1 (due to erase and program operations on the other bits residing on the same bit line)+ΔVt2 (due to erase and program operations on the other bits residing on other bit lines and other word lines)+ΔVt3 (due to erase and program operations on the other bits residing on other bit lines and on+the same word line).


The following is an illustrative example based upon Tables C and D hereinabove. The total change in the threshold voltage of the left-side bit 15 of cell Y, ΔVt total (assuming that this bit has been previously programmed), would be the sum of:


ΔVt1 caused by the application of a combination of Vd/Vg/Vs=4.5/1/4.5 (volts) while programming any or all of the other bits on bit line BLB, and Vd/Vg/Vs=4/3/1.5 while erasing any or all of the other bits on bit line BLB, plus


ΔVt2 caused by the application of a combination of Vd/Vg/Vs=4.5/1/4.5 while programming any or all of the other bits on bit lines other than BLB and on word lines other than WLC, and Vd/Vg/Vs=1.5/3/1.5 while erasing any or all of the other bits on bit lines other than BLB and on word lines other than WLC, plus


ΔVt3 caused by the application of a combination of Vd/Vg/Vs=4.5/9/4.5 while programming any or all of the other bits on bit lines other than BLB and on word line WLC, and Vd/Vg/Vs=1.5/−7/1.5 while erasing any or all of the other bits on bit lines other than BLB and on word line WLC.


The accumulated disturb times are calculated as follows:


For bits on the selected bit line and unselected word lines, corresponding to ΔVt1, the accumulated disturb time is:

τdisturboperationNWLφ

wherein τdisturb is the accumulated disturb time, τoperation is the average time duration of performing operation (erase or program), NWL is the number of word lines in the array and φ is the number of times cell is accessed.


For bits on unselected bit lines and unselected word lines, corresponding to ΔVt2, the accumulated disturb time is:

τdisturboperationNWLNBLφ


wherein NBL is the number of bit lines in the array.


For bits on unselected bit lines and on the selected word line, corresponding to ΔVt3, the accumulated disturb time is:

τdisturboperationNBLφ


It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described herein above. Rather the scope of the invention is defined by the claims that follow:

Claims
  • 1. A method for operating an electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM) array of non-volatile memory (“NVM”) cells having one or more charge storage regions, said method comprising: mitigating disturb effect during an erase operation by selecting one of said memory cells; and erasing a bit of the selected memory cell while substantially concurrently applying an inhibit word-line voltage to a terminal of an unselected memory cell in proximity with the selected memory cell, such that the inhibit voltage mitigates disturb effect on the unselected cell.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1 wherein said memory cells comprise non-floating gate memory cells.
  • 3. The method according to claim 2, wherein said cells comprise one or more charge storage regions per cell and each charge storage region is associated with one or more bits.
  • 4. The method according to claim 3, wherein a charge storage region may be charged to one of three or more charge levels, wherein each of the three or more charge levels is associated with a different logical state.
  • 5. The method according to claim 4, wherein either the selected or unselected cell is operated as a multi-level cell.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1 wherein said memory cells are nitride read only memory (NROM) cells.
  • 7. The method according to claim 6, wherein said cells comprise one or more charge storage regions per cell and each charge storage region is associated with one or more bits.
  • 8. The method according to claim 7, wherein a charge storage region may be charged to one of three or more charge levels, wherein each of the three or more charge levels is associated with a different logical state.
  • 9. The method according to claim 8, wherein either the selected or unselected cell is operated as a multi-level cell.
  • 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein said array is a virtual ground array.
  • 11. The method according to claim 1, wherein said unselected memory cell shares the same bit line as said selected cell.
  • 12. The method according to claim 1, wherein said inhibit gate voltage is of such magnitude that a threshold voltage of said unselected memory cell is lowered not more than a predetermined amount.
  • 13. The method according to claim 1 and further comprising having at least one column of said memory cells located between a pair of isolation zones.
  • 14. A device comprising: an electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM) array of non-volatile memory (“NVM”) cells having one or more charge storage regions, and a controller adapted to mitigate disturb effect during an erase operation by selecting one of said memory cells, and applying an erase pulse to a bit of the selected memory cell while substantially concurrently applying an inhibit word-line voltage to a terminal gate of an unselected memory cell in proximity with the selected memory cell, such that the inhibit voltage mitigates disturb effect on the unselected cell.
  • 15. The device according to claim 14, wherein said memory cells comprise nonfloating gate memory cells.
  • 16. The device according to claim 15, wherein said cells comprise one or more charge storage regions per cell and each charge storage region is associated with one or more bits.
  • 17. The device according to claim 16, wherein a charge storage region may be charged to one of three or more charge levels, wherein each of the three or more charge levels is associated with a different logical state.
  • 18. The device according to claim 17, wherein either the selected or unselected cell is operated as a multi-level cell.
  • 19. The device according to claim 14, wherein said memory cells are nitride read only memory (NROM) cells.
  • 20. The device according to claim 19, wherein said cells comprise one or more charge storage regions per cell and each charge storage region is associated with one or more bits.
  • 21. The device according to claim 20, wherein a charge storage region may be charged to one of three or more charge levels, wherein each of the three or more charge levels is associated with a different logical state.
  • 22. The device according to claim 21, wherein either the selected or unselected cell is operated as a multi-level cell.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No. 09/761,818, filed Jan. 18, 2001, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,614,692 on Sep. 2, 2003, which application is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (302)
Number Name Date Kind
3881180 Gosney, Jr. Apr 1975 A
3895360 Cricchi et al. Jul 1975 A
3952325 Beale et al. Apr 1976 A
4016588 Ohya et al. Apr 1977 A
4017888 Christie et al. Apr 1977 A
4145703 Blanchard et al. Mar 1979 A
4151021 McElroy Apr 1979 A
4173766 Hayes Nov 1979 A
4173791 Bell Nov 1979 A
4247861 Hsu et al. Jan 1981 A
4257832 Schwabe et al. Mar 1981 A
4281397 Neal et al. Jul 1981 A
4306353 Jacobs et al. Dec 1981 A
4342102 Puar Jul 1982 A
4342149 Jacobs et al. Aug 1982 A
4360900 Bate Nov 1982 A
4373248 McElroy Feb 1983 A
4380057 Kotecha et al. Apr 1983 A
4388705 Sheppard Jun 1983 A
4389705 Sheppard Jun 1983 A
4435786 Tickle Mar 1984 A
4448400 Harari May 1984 A
4471373 Shimizu et al. Sep 1984 A
4494016 Ransom et al. Jan 1985 A
4507673 Aoyama et al. Mar 1985 A
4521796 Rajkanan et al. Jun 1985 A
4527257 Cricchi Jul 1985 A
4586163 Koike Apr 1986 A
4613956 Paterson et al. Sep 1986 A
4630085 Koyama Dec 1986 A
4663645 Komori et al. May 1987 A
4665426 Allen et al. May 1987 A
4667217 Janning May 1987 A
4672409 Takei et al. Jun 1987 A
4742491 Liang et al. May 1988 A
4758869 Eitan et al. Jul 1988 A
4760555 Gelsomini et al. Jul 1988 A
4769340 Chang et al. Sep 1988 A
4780424 Holler et al. Oct 1988 A
4839705 Tigelaar et al. Jun 1989 A
4847808 Kobatake Jul 1989 A
4870470 Bass, Jr. et al. Sep 1989 A
4916671 Ichiguchi Apr 1990 A
4941028 Chen et al. Jul 1990 A
4992391 Wang Feb 1991 A
5021999 Kohda et al. Jun 1991 A
5027321 Park Jun 1991 A
5042009 Kazerounian et al. Aug 1991 A
5075245 Woo et al. Dec 1991 A
5086325 Schumann et al. Feb 1992 A
5094968 Schumann et al. Mar 1992 A
5104819 Freiberger et al. Apr 1992 A
5117389 Yiu May 1992 A
5120672 Mitchell et al. Jun 1992 A
5159570 Mitchell et al. Oct 1992 A
5168334 Mitchell et al. Dec 1992 A
5172338 Mehrotra et al. Dec 1992 A
5175120 Lee Dec 1992 A
5204835 Eitan Apr 1993 A
5214303 Aoki May 1993 A
5241497 Komarek Aug 1993 A
5260593 Lee Nov 1993 A
5268861 Hotta Dec 1993 A
5289412 Frary et al. Feb 1994 A
5293563 Ohta Mar 1994 A
5295108 Higa Mar 1994 A
5305262 Yoneda Apr 1994 A
5311049 Tsuruta May 1994 A
5315541 Harari et al. May 1994 A
5324675 Hayabuchi Jun 1994 A
5334555 Sugiyama et al. Aug 1994 A
5335198 Van Buskirk et al. Aug 1994 A
5338954 Shimoji Aug 1994 A
5345425 Shikatani Sep 1994 A
5349221 Shimoji Sep 1994 A
5350710 Hong et al. Sep 1994 A
5352620 Komori et al. Oct 1994 A
5357134 Shimoji Oct 1994 A
5359554 Odake et al. Oct 1994 A
5366915 Kodama Nov 1994 A
5375094 Naruke Dec 1994 A
5393701 Ko et al. Feb 1995 A
5394355 Uramoto et al. Feb 1995 A
5399891 Yiu et al. Mar 1995 A
5400286 Chu et al. Mar 1995 A
5402374 Tsuruta et al. Mar 1995 A
5412601 Sawada et al. May 1995 A
5414693 Ma et al. May 1995 A
5418176 Yang et al. May 1995 A
5418743 Tomioka et al. May 1995 A
5422844 Wolstenholme et al. Jun 1995 A
5424567 Chen Jun 1995 A
5424978 Wada et al. Jun 1995 A
5426605 Van Berkel et al. Jun 1995 A
5434825 Harari Jul 1995 A
5436481 Egawa et al. Jul 1995 A
5440505 Fazio et al. Aug 1995 A
5450341 Sawada et al. Sep 1995 A
5450354 Sawada et al. Sep 1995 A
5455793 Amin et al. Oct 1995 A
5467308 Chang et al. Nov 1995 A
5477499 Van Buskirk et al. Dec 1995 A
5495440 Asakura Feb 1996 A
5496753 Sakurai et al. Mar 1996 A
5518942 Shrivastava May 1996 A
5521870 Ishikawa May 1996 A
5523251 Hong Jun 1996 A
5523972 Rashid et al. Jun 1996 A
5537358 Fong Jul 1996 A
5553018 Wang et al. Sep 1996 A
5563823 Yiu et al. Oct 1996 A
5583808 Brahmbhatt Dec 1996 A
5590068 Bergemont Dec 1996 A
5592417 Mirabel Jan 1997 A
5599727 Hakozaki et al. Feb 1997 A
5606523 Mirabel Feb 1997 A
5617357 Haddad et al. Apr 1997 A
5623438 Guritz et al. Apr 1997 A
5654568 Nakao Aug 1997 A
5656513 Wang et al. Aug 1997 A
5661060 Gill et al. Aug 1997 A
5683925 Irani et al. Nov 1997 A
5689459 Chang et al. Nov 1997 A
5712814 Fratin et al. Jan 1998 A
5712815 Bill et al. Jan 1998 A
5715193 Norman Feb 1998 A
5717632 Richart et al. Feb 1998 A
5726946 Yamagata et al. Mar 1998 A
5748534 Dunlap et al. May 1998 A
5751037 Aozasa et al. May 1998 A
5754475 Bill et al. May 1998 A
5760445 Diaz Jun 1998 A
5768192 Eitan Jun 1998 A
5777919 Chi-Yung et al. Jul 1998 A
5784314 Sali et al. Jul 1998 A
5787036 Okazawa Jul 1998 A
5793079 Georgescu et al. Aug 1998 A
5796657 Lee et al. Aug 1998 A
5801076 Ghneim et al. Sep 1998 A
5812449 Song Sep 1998 A
5812456 Hull et al. Sep 1998 A
5812457 Arase Sep 1998 A
5825686 Schmitt-Landsiedel et al. Oct 1998 A
5828601 Hollmer et al. Oct 1998 A
5834851 Ikeda et al. Nov 1998 A
5836772 Chang et al. Nov 1998 A
5841700 Chang Nov 1998 A
5847441 Cutter et al. Dec 1998 A
5862076 Eitan Jan 1999 A
5864164 Wen Jan 1999 A
5870334 Hemink et al. Feb 1999 A
5870335 Khan et al. Feb 1999 A
5877537 Aoki Mar 1999 A
5886927 Takeuchi Mar 1999 A
5896340 Wong et al. Apr 1999 A
5909618 Forbes et al. Jun 1999 A
5920503 Lee et al. Jul 1999 A
5933366 Yoshikawa Aug 1999 A
5933367 Matsuo et al. Aug 1999 A
5936888 Sugawara Aug 1999 A
5940332 Artieri Aug 1999 A
5946558 Hsu Aug 1999 A
5949714 Hemink et al. Sep 1999 A
5949728 Liu et al. Sep 1999 A
5963412 En Oct 1999 A
5963465 Eitan Oct 1999 A
5966603 Eitan Oct 1999 A
5969989 Iwahashi Oct 1999 A
5973373 Krautschneider et al. Oct 1999 A
5986940 Atsumi et al. Nov 1999 A
5990526 Bez et al. Nov 1999 A
5991202 Derhacobian et al. Nov 1999 A
5999444 Fujiwara et al. Dec 1999 A
5999494 Holzrichter Dec 1999 A
6011725 Eitan Jan 2000 A
6018186 Hsu Jan 2000 A
6020241 You et al. Feb 2000 A
6028324 Su et al. Feb 2000 A
6030871 Eitan Feb 2000 A
6034403 Wu Mar 2000 A
6034896 Ranaweera et al. Mar 2000 A
6037627 Kitamura et al. Mar 2000 A
6044022 Nachumovsky Mar 2000 A
6063666 Chang et al. May 2000 A
6074916 Cappelletti Jun 2000 A
6081456 Dadashev Jun 2000 A
6084794 Lu et al. Jul 2000 A
6108240 Lavi et al. Aug 2000 A
6117714 Beatty Sep 2000 A
6128226 Eitan et al. Oct 2000 A
6133095 Eitan et al. Oct 2000 A
6134156 Eitan Oct 2000 A
6137718 Reisinger Oct 2000 A
6147904 Liron Nov 2000 A
6154081 Pakkala et al. Nov 2000 A
6163048 Hirose et al. Dec 2000 A
6175523 Yang et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181597 Nachumovsky Jan 2001 B1
6195196 Kimura et al. Feb 2001 B1
6201282 Eitan Mar 2001 B1
6201737 Hollmer et al. Mar 2001 B1
6205056 Pan et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208557 Bergemont et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214666 Mehta Apr 2001 B1
6215148 Eitan Apr 2001 B1
6218695 Nachumovsky Apr 2001 B1
6222762 Guterman et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222768 Hollmer et al. Apr 2001 B1
6240032 Fukumoto May 2001 B1
6248633 Ogura et al. Jun 2001 B1
6252799 Liu et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256231 Lavi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261904 Pham et al. Jul 2001 B1
6265268 Halliyal et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272047 Mihnea et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275414 Randolph et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281545 Liang et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282145 Tran et al. Aug 2001 B1
6285574 Eitan Sep 2001 B1
6285589 Kajitani Sep 2001 B1
6287917 Park et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297096 Boaz Oct 2001 B1
6297143 Foote et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304485 Harari et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307807 Sakui et al. Oct 2001 B1
6308485 Blumenthal Oct 2001 B1
6326265 Liu et al. Dec 2001 B1
6335874 Eitan Jan 2002 B1
6337502 Eitan et al. Jan 2002 B1
6339556 Watanabe Jan 2002 B1
6346442 Aloni et al. Feb 2002 B1
6348381 Jong et al. Feb 2002 B1
6348711 Eitan Feb 2002 B1
6349062 Thurgate Feb 2002 B1
6351415 Kushnarenko Feb 2002 B1
6353554 Banks Mar 2002 B1
6410388 Kluth et al. Jun 2002 B1
6417081 Thurgate Jul 2002 B1
6429063 Eitan Aug 2002 B1
6436766 Rangarajan et al. Aug 2002 B1
6436768 Yang et al. Aug 2002 B1
6440797 Wu et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445030 Wu et al. Sep 2002 B1
6458656 Park et al. Oct 2002 B1
6458677 Hopper et al. Oct 2002 B1
6469935 Hayashi Oct 2002 B2
6472706 Widdershoven et al. Oct 2002 B2
6490204 Bloom et al. Dec 2002 B2
6496414 Kasa et al. Dec 2002 B2
6528390 Komori et al. Mar 2003 B2
6532173 Iioka et al. Mar 2003 B2
6537881 Rangarajan et al. Mar 2003 B1
6538270 Randolph et al. Mar 2003 B1
6541816 Ramsbey et al. Apr 2003 B2
6552387 Eitan Apr 2003 B1
6555436 Ramsbey et al. Apr 2003 B2
6559500 Torii May 2003 B2
6562683 Wang et al. May 2003 B1
6566194 Ramsbey et al. May 2003 B1
6566699 Eitan May 2003 B2
6570211 He et al. May 2003 B1
6583005 Hashimoto et al. Jun 2003 B2
6583479 Fastow et al. Jun 2003 B1
6593606 Randolph et al. Jul 2003 B1
6614692 Eliyahu et al. Sep 2003 B2
6617179 Kim Sep 2003 B1
6617215 Halliyal et al. Sep 2003 B1
6627555 Eitan et al. Sep 2003 B2
6630384 Sun et al. Oct 2003 B1
6633496 Maayan et al. Oct 2003 B2
6633499 Eitan et al. Oct 2003 B1
6639271 Zheng et al. Oct 2003 B1
6642148 Ghandehari et al. Nov 2003 B1
6642573 Halliyal et al. Nov 2003 B1
6642586 Takahashi Nov 2003 B2
6645801 Ramsbey et al. Nov 2003 B1
6653191 Yang et al. Nov 2003 B1
6664588 Eitan Dec 2003 B2
6674138 Halliyal et al. Jan 2004 B1
6680509 Wu et al. Jan 2004 B1
6768165 Eitan Jul 2004 B1
20020004878 Norman Jan 2002 A1
20020034097 Banks Mar 2002 A1
20020064911 Eitan May 2002 A1
20020132436 Eliyahu et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020191465 Maayan et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030001213 Lai Jan 2003 A1
20030117841 Yamashita Jun 2003 A1
20030117861 Maayan et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030134476 Roizin et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030142544 Maayan et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030190786 Ramsbey et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030197221 Shinozaki et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030206435 Takahashi Nov 2003 A1
20030209767 Takahashi et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030214844 Iijima Nov 2003 A1
20030218207 Hashimoto et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030222303 Fukuda et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040008541 Maayan et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040014290 Yang et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040021172 Zheng et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040027858 Takahashi et al. Feb 2004 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (45)
Number Date Country
0693781 Jan 1996 EP
0751560 Jan 1997 EP
1073120 Jan 2001 EP
1 091 418 Apr 2001 EP
1126468 Aug 2001 EP
0 822 557 Sep 2001 EP
1 207 552 May 2002 EP
1223586 Jul 2002 EP
0 656 628 Apr 2003 EP
1 365 452 Nov 2003 EP
1297899 Nov 1972 GB
2157489 Oct 1985 GB
4226071 Aug 1992 JP
04226071 Aug 1992 JP
04291962 Oct 1992 JP
05021758 Jan 1993 JP
06-111592 Apr 1994 JP
06-349289 Dec 1994 JP
07193151 Jul 1995 JP
408106791 Apr 1996 JP
08-153396 Jun 1996 JP
408297988 Nov 1996 JP
409017981 Jan 1997 JP
09-115291 May 1997 JP
09-153559 Jun 1997 JP
09162314 Jun 1997 JP
09-259594 Oct 1997 JP
11162182 Jun 1999 JP
411354758 Dec 1999 JP
2000-068483 Mar 2000 JP
02001085646 Mar 2001 JP
2001118392 Apr 2001 JP
02002216488 Aug 2002 JP
WO 8100790 Mar 1981 WO
WO 9615553 May 1996 WO
WO 9625741 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9803977 Jan 1998 WO
WO 9931670 Jun 1999 WO
WO 9957728 Nov 1999 WO
WO 03032393 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03054964 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03079446 Sep 2003 WO
WO 03083916 Oct 2003 WO
WO 03088259 Oct 2003 WO
WO 03088353 Oct 2003 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20030039153 A1 Feb 2003 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09761818 Jan 2001 US
Child 10155215 US