The present invention relates generally to electrically erasable, programmable read only memory (EEPROM) arrays and methods for operation thereof, and more particularly, to nitride read only memory (NROM) EEPROM arrays and inhibiting disturbs in such arrays.
EEPROM arrays are utilized for storage of data Typically, the data stored therein can be changed, either by programming or erasing, multiple times over the lifetime of the array. As in all non-volatile memory arrays, each cell is individually programmed; however, in contrast to either erasable, programmable read only memory (EPROM) or FLASH arrays, in EEPROM arrays each cell can also be individually erased.
Typical memory uses a single bit per cell, wherein electrical charge is stored on the floating gate of each cell. Within each cell, two possible voltage levels exist. The levels are controlled by the amount of charge that is stored on the floating gate; if the amount of charge on the floating gate is above a certain reference level, the cell is considered to be in a different level. Accordingly, each cell is characterized by a specific threshold voltage (Vt). Programming the cell increases threshold voltage Vt, whereas erasing the cell decreases threshold voltage Vt.
Non-volatile memory arrays comprise rows and columns of memory cells connected to word lines (rows of the array) and bit lines (columns). Each memory cell is connected to one word line and at least one bit line. Another terminal of the memory cell is connected either to another bit line (in which case, one of the bit lines is called the drain line and the other is the source line), or to a common line, such as a common source ground, depending on the array architecture. Programming or erasing an individual cell requires application of certain voltages to the word line and bit lines.
Generally, when programming or erasing a cell, one or more of the neighboring cells may also be affected by the programming/erasing operation, causing thereto a possible change in their threshold voltage. This unwanted change in threshold voltage of unselected cells is known in the art as the disturb problem, herein a “disturb”. A similar effect also occurs during a read operation. However, due to the relative weakness of the applied voltage levels, the effect is significantly smaller.
A standard prior art solution to the disturb problem in EEPROM arrays is to use two transistors per memory bit of the array, i.e., in addition to the memory transistor, a select transistor is also incorporated per cell. The select transistor usually disconnects the drain of the unselected memory transistors from the drain voltages used in the programming/erasing operations. The use of a select transistor per cell, however, significantly increases the area of the memory array.
The present invention seeks to solve the abovementioned disturb problem. In the present invention, an unselected memory cell that can experience a possible drop in threshold voltage is inhibited from being erased by application of an inhibit word line voltage to the gate of the unselected cell. The term “inhibiting” as used throughout the specification and claims refers to reducing, minimizing or even eliminating the disturb effect.
The magnitude of the gate voltage is selected such that the difference between the drain or source and gate voltages applied to the unselected cell is sufficiently small so that the threshold voltage of the unselected cell does not drop below a predetermined value. By application of the inhibit voltage, it is possible to achieve negligible erasure of the unselected cell, even during relatively long erasure times and multitudes of selected cell accesses.
In a virtual ground array, the application of a relatively high voltage to the word line of a selected cell being programmed may cause a voltage propagation along unselected bit lines, thereby turning on the cells along the unselected bit lines. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the voltage propagation is blocked by isolation zones positioned alongside bit lines. The isolation zones may be positioned so as to isolate a single column of memory cells or a slice of a plurality of columns.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the EEPROM array comprises nitride read only memory (NROM) cells. Each NROM cell is individually erasable and individually programmable without significantly disturbing unselected cells, by using inhibit voltages as described hereinbelow.
There is thus provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for operating an electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM) array. The method includes providing an array which has a multiplicity of memory cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines, one of the bit lines serving as a source and the other bit line serving as a drain, selecting one of the memory cells, and erasing a bit of the selected memory cell, while applying an inhibit word line voltage to a gate of an unselected memory cell.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the memory cells are non-floating gate memory cells.
Further in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the memory cells are nitride read only memory (NROM) cells. The NROM cells may be single bit, or alternatively, they may have more than one bit.
Still further in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the array is a virtual ground array.
The unselected memory cell may or may not share the same bit line as the selected cell.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the inhibit gate voltage is of such magnitude that a threshold voltage of the unselected memory cell is lowered not more than a predetermined amount.
Further in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention the erasing includes applying to the selected memory cell a negative gate voltage, a positive drain voltage and a floating source voltage.
Still further, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, at least one column of the memory cells is placed between a pair of isolation zones, the isolation zones defining therebetween a slice of word lines and bit lines.
There is also provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention a method for operating an EEPROM array, the method including providing an array including a multiplicity of NROM cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines, one of the bit lines serving as a source and the other bit line serving as a drain, selecting one of the memory cells, and performing an operation on a bit of the selected memory cell, the operation including at least one of programming and erasing, while applying an inhibit word line voltage to a gate of an unselected memory cell.
There is also provided in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention an EEPROM array, the array including a multiplicity of NROM memory cells, wherein each memory cell is connected to a word line and to two bit lines, wherein each NROM cell is individually erasable and individually programmable without significantly disturbing unselected cells. In contrast to the prior art, there is no need for a select transistor for each bit or cell.
The present invention will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the appended drawings in which:
Reference is now made to
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, memory cells 12 are nitride read only memory (NROM) cells. NROM cells are described in various publications, such as U.S. patent applications Ser. Nos. 08/902,890 and 08/905,286, assigned to the common assignee of the present invention, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent applications Ser. Nos. 08/902,890 and 08/905,286 describe, inter alia, the steps of programming, reading and erasing NROM cells. NROM cells have not heretofore been used in EEPROM arrays. The present invention enables individually accessing NROM cells in such an EEPROM array, and inhibiting program and erase disturbs in the array.
NROM cells may be single bit. Alternatively, they may have more than one bit, wherein two individual bits, a left-side bit 15 and a right-side bit 17, are stored in physically different areas of the charge-trapping region. Each bit may be single level or multi-level, i.e., may be programmed to different voltage levels.
If it is desired to program right-side bit 17, then the bit line closest to right-side bit 17 (e.g., BLB for cell P) is the drain and the bit line on the other side (e.g., BLA for cell P) is the source. When programming right-side bit 17, channel hot electrons are used to inject electrons in a lumped pocket close to the drain side of the cell. The electrons are located in localized states in the nitride layer. In order to program left-side bit 15 of the cell, one simply reverses the role of drain and source during programming.
The discussion follows hereinbelow with reference to a two-bit NROM cell. However, it is readily appreciated by those skilled in the art, that the invention is applicable for single and multi-bit cells as well.
If it is desired to program right-side bit 17 of memory cell P, a gate voltage Vg (typically in the range of approximately 7-10V, e.g., 9V) is applied to word line WLB, a drain voltage Vd (typically in the range of approximately 4-5V, e.g. 4.5V) is applied to bit line BLB, and bit line BLA is grounded (0V). All other bit lines are preferably floated near ground prior to any operation (programming or erasing). All other word lines are grounded. The right-side bits 17 of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y share the same bit line BLB as cell P, and also receive drain voltage Vd. Since the gate voltage of cells K, X and Y is zero, these bits experience a lowering of the threshold voltage. In other words, as a consequence of programming right-side bit 17 of cell P, right-side bits 17 of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y undergo partial erasure.
Unselected cell Z does not share the same bit line BLB or the same word line WLB as cell P. However, the application of the positive gate voltage to word line WLB causes some current flow towards the right side of array 10, until the bit lines towards the right of bit line BLB attain a drain voltage close to Vd. (This phenomenon is herein referred to as “high voltage propagation”.) The result is that both bits of unselected cell Z receive a zero gate voltage and a positive drain voltage, thereby lowering their threshold voltage. In other words, as a consequence of programming right-side bit 17 of cell P, both the left-side and right-side bits 15 and 17 of cell Z undergo partial erasure. The same holds true for right-side bit 17 of cell Y, as well as other similarly positioned bits in EEPROM array 10.
Fortunately, however, the duration of programming is typically in the range of approximately 1-10 μsec. Since this programming time is relatively short, the right-side bits 17 of cells K and X, and both bits of cells Y and Z are only slightly erased for each programming operation on right-side bit 17 of cell P. The fact that the gate voltage of cells K, X, Y and Z is only zero and not negative, also minimizes the extent of erasure of these bits.
In order to contain and control the voltage propagation due to the application of the programming voltage, memory cells 12 are preferably placed between a pair of isolation zones 24. The isolation zones 24 define therebetween a slice of word lines and bit lines. There is no voltage propagation past isolation zones 24. Depending on the array design and voltages used, the isolation zones 24 can divide the array into slices of just one column or a plurality of columns.
Unselected cells Q and R share the same word line WLB as cell P, and also receive the positive gate voltage Vg. Therefore, there is virtually no effect on the threshold voltages of both bits of cells Q and R, since the bit lines on either side of cells Q and R are relatively high.
All the bit lines to the left of bit line BLA are floated near ground, and thus there is virtually no effect on the threshold voltage of the bits of cells on those bit lines.
Table A summarizes the disturb on unselected cells due to programming right-side bit 17 of cell P:
If it is desired to erase right-side bit 17 of memory cell P, a negative gate voltage Vg (such as approximately in the range of −5 to −7V) is applied to word line WLB, a positive drain voltage Vd (typically in the range of approximately 3-5V, e.g. 4V) is applied to bit line BLB, and bit line BLA is floating (or driven). Left-side bit 15 of cell Q receives the exact same gate, drain and source voltages. This means that left-side bit 15 of cell Q is also erased together with right-side bit 17 of cell P. Accordingly, after an erasure of right-side bit 17 of cell P, left-side bit 15 of cell Q must be re-progranmed to its original value. This is the case for a two-bit NROM cell. For single bit operation, it is preferable to arrange the bits so that they do not share a common bit line. In such an arrangement, no neighboring bit would be erased upon erasure of right-side bit 17 of cell P, for example.
Right-side bit 17 of cell Q and both bits of cell R share the same word line WLB as cell P, and also receive the negative gate voltage Vg. Since there is only a negative gate voltage applied to word line WLB and the other word lines are grounded, and the bit lines on either side of cells Q and R are floated near ground prior to erasure of right-side bit 17 of cell P, there is no voltage propagation to the other cells and there is negligible erasure of right-side bit 17 of cell Q and both bits of cell R.
The right-side bits 17 of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y share the same bit line BLB as cell P, and also receive drain voltage Vd. Since the gate voltage of cells K, X and Y is zero, right-side bits 17 of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y experience a lowering of the threshold voltage. In other words, as a consequence of erasing cell P, right-side bits 17 of cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y undergo partial erasure. Unfortunately, the duration of erasing is typically in the range of approximately 10 μsec-10 msec. After many cycles, the accumulated erasure of the unselected cells may be intolerably significant. Unselected cell Z does not share the same bit line BLB or the same word line WLB as cell P, and there is virtually no effect on its threshold voltage. The same holds true for right-side bit 17 of cell Y.
Table B summarizes the disturb effects on unselected cells due to erasing right-side bit 17 of cell P:
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, disturb of the unselected cells during programming or erasing of a selected memory cell is inhibited by applying a voltage to the word line of the unselected cell.
In order to inhibit lowering of the threshold voltage of right-side bit 17 of cell K, an d both bits of cells X and Y, a positive gate voltage is applied to word lines WLA (of cell K) and WLC (of cells X and Y). The magnitude of the required inhibit voltage is a function of a number of variables, such as, but not limited to, programming time, drain voltage applied to the bit line of the programmed cell, voltage difference between gate and drain voltages applied to the programmed cell, and what is considered a tolerable drop in the threshold voltage of the unselected cell. The tolerable drop in the threshold voltage is further described hereinbelow with reference to
For the purposes of example only, in the case of Vg=9V, Vd=4.5V, and a programming time of 4 μsec, it has been found that an inhibit voltage in the range of 0-2.5V, most preferably in the range of 0-1V, is typically sufficient to inhibit the partial erasure of unselected cells K, X and Y such that their threshold voltages are lowered by less than 100 mV per 100,000 accesses (which is considered a tolerable lowering of threshold voltage). These are merely typical exemplary values, and the present invention is not restricted to these values. It is noted that an inhibit voltage of 0-1V is generally sufficiently low so as not to cause any significant leakage current through the cells that receive this gate voltage.
Table C summarizes the effect of the application of the inhibit voltage (e.g., 1V) on the unselected cells when programming right-side bit 17 of cell P:
In order to inhibit lowering of the threshold voltage of right-side bits 17 of cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y, a positive gate voltage is applied to word lines WLA (of cell K) and WLC (of cells X and Y). For the purposes of example only, in the case of Vg=−7V, Vd=4V, and an erasing time of 2 msec, it has been found that an inhibit voltage in the range of 2.5-4.5V, most preferably in the range of 3-4V, is typically sufficient to inhibit the partial erasure of right-side bits 17 of unselected cells K and X, and left-side bit 15 of cell Y, such that their threshold voltages are lowered by less than about 100 mV per 100,000 accesses. Again, it is noted that these are merely typical exemplary values, and the present invention is not restricted to these values.
As described hereinabove, if no inhibit voltage were to be applied to the unselected word lines, there would be no voltage propagation to the right-side bit lines of array 10, because the only gate voltage applied would be the negative gate voltage to word line WLB. However, the application of the inhibit voltage of 3V, for example, to the unselected word lines may be of sufficient magnitude so as to slightly turn on the cells to the right and left of bit line BLB and cause a voltage propagation to all the bit lines of array 10. This means that the bit lines towards the right and left of bit line BLB receive a positive voltage, the magnitude of which is a function of the inhibit voltage diminished by the threshold voltage, which in turn depends upon the bulk effect of the memory transistors on those unselected bit lines. For example, for an inhibit voltage of 3V and threshold voltage of 1.5V, the bit line voltages may rise to about 1.5V. The result is that for unselected bits on unselected word lines, the combination of the positive inhibit voltage and the positive drain and source voltages causes a disturb, but of generally negligible magnitude. For unselected bits on the selected word line (to which the negative erasure voltage has been applied), the combination of the negative gate voltage and the positive drain and source voltages causes a slight disturb. In the above example, the combination of Vg=−7V, Vd=1.5V and Vs=1.5V, causes a slight erasure but significantly less than the combination of Vg=−7V, Vd=4V and Vs=1.5V on the selected bit which is erased. It is noted that since the memory transistors that propagate the bit line voltage are only slightly turned on, the extent to which the bit line voltage propagates during the erase pulse is limited.
In general, in the present invention, the application of the inhibit voltage on the unselected word lines during an erase operation significantly reduces the bit line disturb to the unselected bits, and replaces the relatively high bit line disturb with two other disturbs of a lesser magnitude:
a) a negligible disturb to unselected bits on unselected word lines, and
b) a small disturb to unselected bits on the selected word line.
The presence of isolation zones 24 reduces the unwanted voltage propagation, and in doing so, prevents the spread of these two minor disturbs.
Table D summarizes the effect of the application of the inhibit voltage (e.g., 3V) on the unselected cells when erasing right-side bit 17 of cell P:
As mentioned hereinabove, the magnitude of the required inhibit voltage is a function of a number of variables, such as, but not limited to, programming time, drain voltage applied to the bit line of the programmed cell, voltage difference between gate and drain voltages applied to the selected cell, and the tolerable drop in the threshold voltage of the unselected cell.
In the NROM array of the invention, program disturb of unselected bits may also be reduced by using longer programming times and/or lower bit line voltages to complete the programming of the selected bit. Erase disturb of unselected bits may be reduced by using more negative word line voltages and/or shorter erasing times and/or lower bit line voltages to complete the erasing of the selected bit.
Reference is now made to
In contrast, as depicted in the upper curve of
The accumulated disturb, i.e., change in threshold voltage, over many access operations, and with the application of the inhibit voltage, may be calculated for the unselected bits as follows, for all operations of erase or program:
ΔVt total (the total change in the threshold voltage of a bit due to disturbs)=ΔVt1 (due to erase and program operations on the other bits residing on the same bit line)+ΔVt2 (due to erase and program operations on the other bits residing on other bit lines and other word lines)+ΔVt3 (due to erase and program operations on the other bits residing on other bit lines and on+the same word line).
The following is an illustrative example based upon Tables C and D hereinabove. The total change in the threshold voltage of the left-side bit 15 of cell Y, ΔVt total (assuming that this bit has been previously programmed), would be the sum of:
ΔVt1 caused by the application of a combination of Vd/Vg/Vs=4.5/1/4.5 (volts) while programming any or all of the other bits on bit line BLB, and Vd/Vg/Vs=4/3/1.5 while erasing any or all of the other bits on bit line BLB, plus
ΔVt2 caused by the application of a combination of Vd/Vg/Vs=4.5/1/4.5 while programming any or all of the other bits on bit lines other than BLB and on word lines other than WLC, and Vd/Vg/Vs=1.5/3/1.5 while erasing any or all of the other bits on bit lines other than BLB and on word lines other than WLC, plus
ΔVt3 caused by the application of a combination of Vd/Vg/Vs=4.5/9/4.5 while programming any or all of the other bits on bit lines other than BLB and on word line WLC, and Vd/Vg/Vs=1.5/−7/1.5 while erasing any or all of the other bits on bit lines other than BLB and on word line WLC.
The accumulated disturb times are calculated as follows:
For bits on the selected bit line and unselected word lines, corresponding to ΔVt1, the accumulated disturb time is:
τdisturb=τoperationNWLφ
wherein τdisturb is the accumulated disturb time, τoperation is the average time duration of performing operation (erase or program), NWL is the number of word lines in the array and φ is the number of times cell is accessed.
For bits on unselected bit lines and unselected word lines, corresponding to ΔVt2, the accumulated disturb time is:
τdisturb=τoperationNWLNBLφ
wherein NBL is the number of bit lines in the array.
For bits on unselected bit lines and on the selected word line, corresponding to ΔVt3, the accumulated disturb time is:
τdisturb=τoperationNBLφ
It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited by what has been particularly shown and described herein above. Rather the scope of the invention is defined by the claims that follow:
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No. 09/761,818, filed Jan. 18, 2001, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,614,692 on Sep. 2, 2003, which application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3881180 | Gosney, Jr. | Apr 1975 | A |
3895360 | Cricchi et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3952325 | Beale et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4016588 | Ohya et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4017888 | Christie et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4145703 | Blanchard et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4151021 | McElroy | Apr 1979 | A |
4173766 | Hayes | Nov 1979 | A |
4173791 | Bell | Nov 1979 | A |
4247861 | Hsu et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4257832 | Schwabe et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4281397 | Neal et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4306353 | Jacobs et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4342102 | Puar | Jul 1982 | A |
4342149 | Jacobs et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4360900 | Bate | Nov 1982 | A |
4373248 | McElroy | Feb 1983 | A |
4380057 | Kotecha et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4388705 | Sheppard | Jun 1983 | A |
4389705 | Sheppard | Jun 1983 | A |
4435786 | Tickle | Mar 1984 | A |
4448400 | Harari | May 1984 | A |
4471373 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4494016 | Ransom et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4507673 | Aoyama et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4521796 | Rajkanan et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4527257 | Cricchi | Jul 1985 | A |
4586163 | Koike | Apr 1986 | A |
4613956 | Paterson et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4630085 | Koyama | Dec 1986 | A |
4663645 | Komori et al. | May 1987 | A |
4665426 | Allen et al. | May 1987 | A |
4667217 | Janning | May 1987 | A |
4672409 | Takei et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4742491 | Liang et al. | May 1988 | A |
4758869 | Eitan et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4760555 | Gelsomini et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4769340 | Chang et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4780424 | Holler et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4839705 | Tigelaar et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4847808 | Kobatake | Jul 1989 | A |
4870470 | Bass, Jr. et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4916671 | Ichiguchi | Apr 1990 | A |
4941028 | Chen et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4992391 | Wang | Feb 1991 | A |
5021999 | Kohda et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5027321 | Park | Jun 1991 | A |
5042009 | Kazerounian et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5075245 | Woo et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5086325 | Schumann et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5094968 | Schumann et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5104819 | Freiberger et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5117389 | Yiu | May 1992 | A |
5120672 | Mitchell et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5159570 | Mitchell et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5168334 | Mitchell et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5172338 | Mehrotra et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5175120 | Lee | Dec 1992 | A |
5204835 | Eitan | Apr 1993 | A |
5214303 | Aoki | May 1993 | A |
5241497 | Komarek | Aug 1993 | A |
5260593 | Lee | Nov 1993 | A |
5268861 | Hotta | Dec 1993 | A |
5289412 | Frary et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5293563 | Ohta | Mar 1994 | A |
5295108 | Higa | Mar 1994 | A |
5305262 | Yoneda | Apr 1994 | A |
5311049 | Tsuruta | May 1994 | A |
5315541 | Harari et al. | May 1994 | A |
5324675 | Hayabuchi | Jun 1994 | A |
5334555 | Sugiyama et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5335198 | Van Buskirk et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5338954 | Shimoji | Aug 1994 | A |
5345425 | Shikatani | Sep 1994 | A |
5349221 | Shimoji | Sep 1994 | A |
5350710 | Hong et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352620 | Komori et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5357134 | Shimoji | Oct 1994 | A |
5359554 | Odake et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5366915 | Kodama | Nov 1994 | A |
5375094 | Naruke | Dec 1994 | A |
5393701 | Ko et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5394355 | Uramoto et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5399891 | Yiu et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5400286 | Chu et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402374 | Tsuruta et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5412601 | Sawada et al. | May 1995 | A |
5414693 | Ma et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418176 | Yang et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418743 | Tomioka et al. | May 1995 | A |
5422844 | Wolstenholme et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5424567 | Chen | Jun 1995 | A |
5424978 | Wada et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5426605 | Van Berkel et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5434825 | Harari | Jul 1995 | A |
5436481 | Egawa et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440505 | Fazio et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450341 | Sawada et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450354 | Sawada et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5455793 | Amin et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467308 | Chang et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5477499 | Van Buskirk et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5495440 | Asakura | Feb 1996 | A |
5496753 | Sakurai et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5518942 | Shrivastava | May 1996 | A |
5521870 | Ishikawa | May 1996 | A |
5523251 | Hong | Jun 1996 | A |
5523972 | Rashid et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537358 | Fong | Jul 1996 | A |
5553018 | Wang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563823 | Yiu et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5583808 | Brahmbhatt | Dec 1996 | A |
5590068 | Bergemont | Dec 1996 | A |
5592417 | Mirabel | Jan 1997 | A |
5599727 | Hakozaki et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606523 | Mirabel | Feb 1997 | A |
5617357 | Haddad et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623438 | Guritz et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5654568 | Nakao | Aug 1997 | A |
5656513 | Wang et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661060 | Gill et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5683925 | Irani et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689459 | Chang et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5712814 | Fratin et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712815 | Bill et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715193 | Norman | Feb 1998 | A |
5717632 | Richart et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5726946 | Yamagata et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748534 | Dunlap et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751037 | Aozasa et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754475 | Bill et al. | May 1998 | A |
5760445 | Diaz | Jun 1998 | A |
5768192 | Eitan | Jun 1998 | A |
5777919 | Chi-Yung et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784314 | Sali et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787036 | Okazawa | Jul 1998 | A |
5793079 | Georgescu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796657 | Lee et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801076 | Ghneim et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812449 | Song | Sep 1998 | A |
5812456 | Hull et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812457 | Arase | Sep 1998 | A |
5825686 | Schmitt-Landsiedel et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828601 | Hollmer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5834851 | Ikeda et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836772 | Chang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841700 | Chang | Nov 1998 | A |
5847441 | Cutter et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862076 | Eitan | Jan 1999 | A |
5864164 | Wen | Jan 1999 | A |
5870334 | Hemink et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870335 | Khan et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877537 | Aoki | Mar 1999 | A |
5886927 | Takeuchi | Mar 1999 | A |
5896340 | Wong et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5909618 | Forbes et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920503 | Lee et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933366 | Yoshikawa | Aug 1999 | A |
5933367 | Matsuo et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936888 | Sugawara | Aug 1999 | A |
5940332 | Artieri | Aug 1999 | A |
5946558 | Hsu | Aug 1999 | A |
5949714 | Hemink et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5949728 | Liu et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963412 | En | Oct 1999 | A |
5963465 | Eitan | Oct 1999 | A |
5966603 | Eitan | Oct 1999 | A |
5969989 | Iwahashi | Oct 1999 | A |
5973373 | Krautschneider et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5986940 | Atsumi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990526 | Bez et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991202 | Derhacobian et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999444 | Fujiwara et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999494 | Holzrichter | Dec 1999 | A |
6011725 | Eitan | Jan 2000 | A |
6018186 | Hsu | Jan 2000 | A |
6020241 | You et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028324 | Su et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030871 | Eitan | Feb 2000 | A |
6034403 | Wu | Mar 2000 | A |
6034896 | Ranaweera et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6037627 | Kitamura et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044022 | Nachumovsky | Mar 2000 | A |
6063666 | Chang et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074916 | Cappelletti | Jun 2000 | A |
6081456 | Dadashev | Jun 2000 | A |
6084794 | Lu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108240 | Lavi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117714 | Beatty | Sep 2000 | A |
6128226 | Eitan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133095 | Eitan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134156 | Eitan | Oct 2000 | A |
6137718 | Reisinger | Oct 2000 | A |
6147904 | Liron | Nov 2000 | A |
6154081 | Pakkala et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6163048 | Hirose et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175523 | Yang et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181597 | Nachumovsky | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195196 | Kimura et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201282 | Eitan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201737 | Hollmer et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205056 | Pan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208557 | Bergemont et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214666 | Mehta | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215148 | Eitan | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6218695 | Nachumovsky | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222762 | Guterman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222768 | Hollmer et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240032 | Fukumoto | May 2001 | B1 |
6248633 | Ogura et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6252799 | Liu et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256231 | Lavi et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261904 | Pham et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265268 | Halliyal et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272047 | Mihnea et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275414 | Randolph et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281545 | Liang et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282145 | Tran et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285574 | Eitan | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6285589 | Kajitani | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287917 | Park et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297096 | Boaz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6297143 | Foote et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304485 | Harari et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307807 | Sakui et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308485 | Blumenthal | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6326265 | Liu et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335874 | Eitan | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6337502 | Eitan et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339556 | Watanabe | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6346442 | Aloni et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348381 | Jong et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348711 | Eitan | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349062 | Thurgate | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351415 | Kushnarenko | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353554 | Banks | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6410388 | Kluth et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6417081 | Thurgate | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429063 | Eitan | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436766 | Rangarajan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6436768 | Yang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440797 | Wu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445030 | Wu et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458656 | Park et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6458677 | Hopper et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469935 | Hayashi | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6472706 | Widdershoven et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6490204 | Bloom et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496414 | Kasa et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6528390 | Komori et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6532173 | Iioka et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537881 | Rangarajan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538270 | Randolph et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6541816 | Ramsbey et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6552387 | Eitan | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6555436 | Ramsbey et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6559500 | Torii | May 2003 | B2 |
6562683 | Wang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6566194 | Ramsbey et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6566699 | Eitan | May 2003 | B2 |
6570211 | He et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6583005 | Hashimoto et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6583479 | Fastow et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6593606 | Randolph et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614692 | Eliyahu et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6617179 | Kim | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6617215 | Halliyal et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6627555 | Eitan et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6630384 | Sun et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6633496 | Maayan et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6633499 | Eitan et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639271 | Zheng et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6642148 | Ghandehari et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6642573 | Halliyal et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6642586 | Takahashi | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6645801 | Ramsbey et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6653191 | Yang et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6664588 | Eitan | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6674138 | Halliyal et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680509 | Wu et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6768165 | Eitan | Jul 2004 | B1 |
20020004878 | Norman | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020034097 | Banks | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020064911 | Eitan | May 2002 | A1 |
20020132436 | Eliyahu et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020191465 | Maayan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030001213 | Lai | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030117841 | Yamashita | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117861 | Maayan et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030134476 | Roizin et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142544 | Maayan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030190786 | Ramsbey et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030197221 | Shinozaki et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030206435 | Takahashi | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030209767 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214844 | Iijima | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218207 | Hashimoto et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030222303 | Fukuda et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040008541 | Maayan et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040014290 | Yang et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021172 | Zheng et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040027858 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0693781 | Jan 1996 | EP |
0751560 | Jan 1997 | EP |
1073120 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 091 418 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1126468 | Aug 2001 | EP |
0 822 557 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1 207 552 | May 2002 | EP |
1223586 | Jul 2002 | EP |
0 656 628 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1 365 452 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1297899 | Nov 1972 | GB |
2157489 | Oct 1985 | GB |
4226071 | Aug 1992 | JP |
04226071 | Aug 1992 | JP |
04291962 | Oct 1992 | JP |
05021758 | Jan 1993 | JP |
06-111592 | Apr 1994 | JP |
06-349289 | Dec 1994 | JP |
07193151 | Jul 1995 | JP |
408106791 | Apr 1996 | JP |
08-153396 | Jun 1996 | JP |
408297988 | Nov 1996 | JP |
409017981 | Jan 1997 | JP |
09-115291 | May 1997 | JP |
09-153559 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09162314 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09-259594 | Oct 1997 | JP |
11162182 | Jun 1999 | JP |
411354758 | Dec 1999 | JP |
2000-068483 | Mar 2000 | JP |
02001085646 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001118392 | Apr 2001 | JP |
02002216488 | Aug 2002 | JP |
WO 8100790 | Mar 1981 | WO |
WO 9615553 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9625741 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9803977 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 9931670 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 9957728 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 03032393 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03054964 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03079446 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03083916 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03088259 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 03088353 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030039153 A1 | Feb 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09761818 | Jan 2001 | US |
Child | 10155215 | US |