An on implantation step 45 is undertaken, in this example using n-type dopant, to form N+ source 46 and drain 48 in the substrate 40, the photoresist 42 and the layers therebeneath acting as a mask. (
This structure 49 is an electrically programmable and erasable memory device wherein the silicon dioxide layer 32A is a tunneling gate layer, the silicon nitride layer 34A is a storage layer (floating gate), the silicon dioxide layer 36A and silicon nitride layer 38A together form a dielectric 39 between the storage layer 34A and the polysilicon layer 40A, and the polysilicon layer 40A is the control gate of the device 49.
In programming the device 49, as is well known, a positive voltage is applied to the drain 48, and the source 46 is grounded. Applying a positive voltage pulse of sufficient magnitude to the control gate 40A causes electrons to travel from the substrate 30 through the tunneling gate layer 32A and into the storage layer 34A, such electrons stored in the storage layer 34A causing the device 49 to be in its programmed state. In the erasing of the device 49, a positive voltage is applied to the control gate 40A, while the substrate 30, source 46 and drain 48 are grounded. Applying a positive voltage pulse of sufficient magnitude to the control gate 40A causes holes in the gate 40A to travel through the dielectric 39 (which includes layers 36A, 38A) and into the storage layer 34A, wherein they are combined with electrons stored in the storage layer 34A to cause the device 49 to be in its erased state.
While the device 49 thus far shown and described is highly efficient in operation, it will be understood that it is always desirable to improve operational speed thereof. In furtherance thereof, the present approach improves erase speed as compared to the prior device as will be shown and described.
Broadly stated, in the present approach a method of forming a memory device is provided, comprising providing a substrate, providing a tunneling layer over the substrate, providing a floating gate over the tunneling layer, providing a dielectric over the floating gate comprising providing a first insulating layer over the floating gate, providing a second insulating layer over the first insulating layer, and providing a third insulating layer over the second insulating layer, and providing a control gate over the dielectric.
Broadly stated, in the present approach, is memory device comprises a substrate, a tunneling layer over the substrate a floating gate over the tunneling layer, a dielectric over the floating gate and comprising silicon oxynitride, and a control gate over the dielectric.
The present invention is better understood upon consideration of the detailed description below, in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. As will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description, there are shown and described embodiments of this invention simply by way of the illustration of the best mode to carry out the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other embodiments and its several details are capable of modifications and various obvious aspects, all without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and detailed description will be regarded as illustrative in nature and not as restrictive.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as said preferred mode of use, and further objects and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Reference is now made in detail to specific embodiments of the present invention which illustrate the best mode presently contemplated by the inventors for practicing the invention.
A layer of photoresist is then provided on the polysilicon layer 62, and portions of the photoresist layer are removed using a well known procedure, so that the remaining photoresist 64 is provided on the polysilicon layer 62 as shown in
An ion implantation step 66 is undertaken, in this example using n-type dopant, to form N+ source 68 and drain 70 in the substrate 50, the photoresist 64 and the layers therebeneath acting as a mask (
This structure 72 is an electrically programmable arid erasable memory device wherein the silicon dioxide layer 52A is a tunneling gate layer, the silicon nitride layer 54A is a storage layer (floating gate), the silicon dioxide layer 56A, silicon oxynitride layer 58A, and silicon nitride layer 60A together form a dielectric 63 between the storage layer 54A and the polysilicon layer 62A, and the polysilicon layer 62A is the control gate of the device 72.
Again, in programming the device 72, a positive voltage is applied to the drain 70, and the source 68 is grounded. Applying a positive voltage pulse of sufficient magnitude to the control gate 62A causes electrons to travel from the substrate 50 through the tunneling gate layer 52A and into the storage layer 54A, such electrons stored in the storage layer 54A causing the device 72 to be in its programmed state. In the erasing of the device 72, a positive voltage is applied to the control gate 62A. a positive voltage is applied to the drain 70, the source 68 is grounded, and the substrate 50 is allowed to float. Applying a positive voltage pulse of sufficient magnitude to the control gate 62A causes holes in the control gate 62A to travel through the dielectric 63 (which includes layers 56A, 58A, 60A) and into the storage layer 54A, wherein they are combined with electrons stored in the storage layer 54A to cause the device 72 to be in its erased state. However, due to the inclusion of the silicon oxynitride layer 58 in the memory device 72, the erase mechanism of the device 72 is fundamentally different from that as previously shown and described above. This mechanism will be shown and described further on. The various approaches for providing the silicon oxynitride layer 58 will now be described with reference to
In a first approach, and referring to
In another approach, referring to
In yet another approach, referring to
In yet another approach, referring to
In yet another approach, referring to
In yet another approach, referring to
In yet another approach, referring to
In yet another approach, referring to
In the prior art device 49, applying a positive voltage of magnitude Vg2 greater than Vg1 to the polysilicon gate 40A while holding the substrate 30, source 46 and drain 48 at ground causes the energy bands to shift to levels shown in
It will therefore be seen that inclusion of the silicon oxynitride layer as shown and described significantly decreases erase speed of the device as compared to the prior art.
The foregoing description of the embodiments of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Other modifications or variations are possible in light of the above teachings.
The embodiments were chosen and described to provide the best illustration of the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable one of ordinary skill of the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such modifications and variations are within the scope of the invention as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are fairly, legally and equitably entitled.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/284,002, filed Sep. 17, 2008, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety and for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5940325 | Chang et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6064595 | Logie et al. | May 2000 | A |
6157059 | Kauffman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6930060 | Chou et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
20030151948 | Bhattacharyya | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050018490 | Leconte et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060035433 | Jung | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060211212 | Banieckil et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080093646 | Lee et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080146013 | Ino et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080230826 | Das | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090079016 | Chen et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090140318 | Dong | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090201741 | Eitan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090234838 | Li | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236684 | Lee | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090294838 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100018460 | Singh et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100102376 | Ma et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100129969 | Kawamata et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100207181 | Ahn et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100311217 | Wu et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120127796 | Eitan et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120223380 | Lee et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
59055062 | Mar 1984 | JP |
59055064 | Mar 1984 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Guo et al. “Tunneling Leakage Current in Oxynitride; Dependence on Oxygen/Nitrogen Content”, Jun. 1998, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 207-209. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/284,002 dated Feb. 24, 2012; 12 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/284,002 dated Apr. 14, 2011; 19 pages. |
USPTO Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/284,002 dated Nov. 21, 2012; 8 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/284,002 dated May 8, 2013; 20 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/284,002 dated Jul. 24, 2012; 18 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/284,002 dated Oct. 24, 2011; 23 pages. |
USPTO Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/284,002 dated Nov. 9, 2010; 14 pages. |
USPTO Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/284,002 dated Sep. 16, 2013; 10 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140124848 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12284002 | Sep 2008 | US |
Child | 14153900 | US |