A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright or mask work protection. The copyright or mask work owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright or mask work rights whatsoever.
This application is related to and claims priority from U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/238,991, titled “Ultra-Small Resonating Charged Particle Beam Modulator,” and filed Sep. 30, 2005, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/917,511, filed on Aug. 13, 2004, entitled “Patterning Thin Metal Film by Dry Reactive Ion Etching,” and to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/203,407, filed on Aug. 15, 2005, entitled “Method Of Patterning Ultra-Small Structures,” and to U.S. application Ser. No. 11/243,476, titled “Structures And Methods For Coupling Energy From An Electromagnetic Wave,” filed on even date herewith, all of which are commonly owned with the present application at the time of filing, and the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
This disclosure relates to resonance induced in ultra-small metal-layer structures by a charged particle beam.
Electromagnetic Radiation & Waves
Electromagnetic radiation is produced by the motion of electrically charged particles. Oscillating electrons produce electromagnetic radiation commensurate in frequency with the frequency of the oscillations. Electromagnetic radiation is essentially energy transmitted through space or through a material medium in the form of electromagnetic waves. The term can also refer to the emission and propagation of such energy. Whenever an electric charge oscillates or is accelerated, a disturbance characterized by the existence of electric and magnetic fields propagates outward from it. This disturbance is called an electromagnetic wave. Electromagnetic radiation falls into categories of wave types depending upon their frequency, and the frequency range of such waves is tremendous, as is shown by the electromagnetic spectrum in the following chart (which categorizes waves into types depending upon their frequency):
The ability to generate (or detect) electromagnetic radiation of a particular type (e.g., radio, microwave, etc.) depends upon the ability to create a structure suitable for electron oscillation or excitation at the frequency desired. Electromagnetic radiation at radio frequencies, for example, is relatively easy to generate using relatively large or even somewhat small structures.
Electromagnetic Wave Generation
There are many traditional ways to produce high-frequency radiation in ranges at and above the visible spectrum, for example, up to high hundreds of Terahertz. There are also many traditional and anticipated applications that use such high frequency radiation. As frequencies increase, however, the kinds of structures needed to create the electromagnetic radiation at a desired frequency become generally smaller and harder to manufacture. We have discovered ultra-small-scale devices that obtain multiple different frequencies of radiation from the same operative layer.
Resonant structures have been the basis for much of the presently known high frequency electronics. Devices like klystrons and magnetrons had electronics that moved frequencies of emission up to the megahertz range by the 1930s and 1940s. By around 1960, people were trying to reduce the size of resonant structures to get even higher frequencies, but had limited success because the Q of the devices went down due to the resistivity of the walls of the resonant structures. At about the same time, Smith and Purcell saw the first signs that free electrons could cause the emission of electromagnetic radiation in the visible range by running an electron beam past a diffraction grating. Since then, there has been much speculation as to what the physical basis for the Smith-Purcell radiation really is.
We have shown that some of the theory of resonant structures applies to certain nano structures that we have built. It is assumed that at high enough frequencies, plasmons conduct the energy as opposed to the bulk transport of electrons in the material, although our inventions are not dependent upon such an explanation. Under that theory, the electrical resistance decreases to the point where resonance can effectively occur again, and makes the devices efficient enough to be commercially viable.
Some of the more detailed background sections that follow provide background for the earlier technologies (some of which are introduced above), and provide a framework for understanding why the present inventions are so remarkable compared to the present state-of-the-art.
Microwaves
As previously introduced, microwaves were first generated in so-called “klystrons” in the 1930s by the Varian brothers. Klystrons are now well-known structures for oscillating electrons and creating electromagnetic radiation in the microwave frequency. The structure and operation of klystrons has been well-studied and documented and will be readily understood by the artisan. However, for the purpose of background, the operation of the klystron will be described at a high level, leaving the particularities of such devices to the artisan's present understanding.
Klystrons are a type of linear beam microwave tube. A basic structure of a. klystron is shown by way of example in
The electron bunches are formed when an oscillating electric field causes the electron stream to be velocity modulated so that some number of electrons increase in speed within the stream and some number of electrons decrease in speed within the stream. As the electrons travel through the drift tube of the vacuum cavity the bunches that are formed create a space-charge wave or charge-modulated electron beam. As the electron bunches pass the mouth of the output cavity, the bunches induce a large current, much larger than the input current. The induced current can then generate electromagnetic radiation.
Traveling Wave Tubes
Traveling wave tubes (TWT)—first described in 1942—are another well-known type of linear microwave tube. A TWT includes a source of electrons that travels the length of a microwave electronic tube, an attenuator, a helix delay line, radio frequency (RF) input and output, and an electron collector. In the TWT, an electrical current was sent along the helical delay line to interact with the electron stream.
Backwards Wave Devices
Backwards wave devices are also known and differ from TWTs in that they use a wave in which the power flow is opposite in direction from that of the electron beam. A backwards wave device uses the concept of a backward group velocity with a forward phase velocity. In this case, the RF power comes out at the cathode end of the device. Backward wave devices could be amplifiers or oscillators.
Magnetrons
Magnetrons are another type of well-known resonance cavity structure developed in the 1920s to produce microwave radiation. While their external configurations can differ, each magnetron includes an anode, a cathode, a particular wave tube and a strong magnet.
Reflex Klystron
Multiple cavities are not necessarily required to produce microwave radiation. In the reflex klystron, a single cavity, through which the electron beam is passed, can produce the required microwave frequency oscillations. An example reflex klystron 120 is shown in
In each of the resonant cavity devices described above, the characteristic frequency of electron oscillation depends upon the size, structure, and tuning of the resonant cavities. To date, structures have been discovered that create relatively low frequency radiation (radio and microwave levels), up to, for example, GHz levels, using these resonant structures. Higher levels of radiation are generally thought to be prohibitive because resistance in the cavity walls will dominate with smaller sizes and will not allow oscillation. Also, using current techniques, aluminum and other metals cannot be machined down to sufficiently small sizes to form the cavities desired. Thus, for example, visible light radiation in the range of 400 Terahertz-750 Terahertz is not known to be created by klystron-type structures.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,373,194 to Small illustrates the difficulty in obtaining small, high-frequency radiation sources. Small suggests a method of fabricating a micro-magnetron. In a magnetron, the bunched electron beam passes the opening of the resonance cavity. But to realize an amplified signal, the bunches of electrons must pass the opening of the resonance cavity in less time than the desired output frequency. Thus at a frequency of around 500 THz, the electrons must travel at very high speed and still remain confined. There is no practical magnetic field strong enough to keep the electron spinning in that small of a diameter at those speeds. Small recognizes this issue but does not disclose a solution to it.
Surface plasmons can be excited at a metal dielectric interface by a monochromatic light beam. The energy of the light is bound to the surface and propagates as an electromagnetic wave. Surface plasmons can propagate on the surface of a metal as well as on the interface between a metal and dielectric material. Bulk plasmons can propagate beneath the surface, although they are typically not energetically favored.
Free electron lasers offer intense beams of any wavelength because the electrons are free of any atomic structure. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,740,973, Madey et al. disclose a free electron laser. The free electron laser includes a charged particle accelerator, a cavity with a straight-section and an undulator. The accelerator injects a relativistic electron or positron beam into said straight section past an undulator mounted coaxially along said straight section. The undulator periodically modulates in space the acceleration of the electrons passing through it inducing the electrons to produce a light beam that is practically collinear with the axis of undulator. An optical cavity is defined by two mirrors mounted facing each other on either side of the undulator to permit the circulation of light thus emitted. Laser amplification occurs when the period of said circulation of light coincides with the period of passage of the electron packets and the optical gain per passage exceeds the light losses that occur in the optical cavity.
Smith-Purcell
Smith-Purcell radiation occurs when a charged particle passes close to a periodically varying metallic surface, as depicted in
Known Smith-Purcell devices produce visible light by passing an electron beam close to the surface of a diffraction grating. Using the Smith-Purcell diffraction grating, electrons are deflected by image charges in the grating at a frequency in the visible spectrum. In some cases, the effect may be a single electron event, but some devices can exhibit a change in slope of the output intensity versus current. In Smith-Purcell devices, only the energy of the electron beam and the period of the grating affect the frequency of the visible light emission. The beam current is generally, but not always, small. Vermont Photonics notice an increase in output with their devices above a certain current density limit. Because of the nature of diffraction physics, the period of the grating must exceed the wavelength of light.
Koops, et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,909,104, published Nov. 30, 2000, (§ 102(e) date May 24, 2002) describe a miniaturized coherent terahertz free electron laser using a periodic grating for the undulator (sometimes referred to as the wiggler). Koops et al. describe a free electron laser using a periodic structure grating for the undulator (also referred to as the wiggler). Koops proposes using standard electronics to bunch the electrons before they enter the undulator. The apparent object of this is to create coherent terahertz radiation. In one instance, Koops, et al. describe a given standard electron beam source that produces up to approximately 20,000 volts accelerating voltage and an electron beam of 20 microns diameter over a grating of 100 to 300 microns period to achieve infrared radiation between 100 and 1000 microns in wavelength. For terahertz radiation, the diffraction grating has a length of approximately 1 mm to 1 cm, with grating periods of 0.5 to 10 microns, “depending on the wavelength of the terahertz radiation to be emitted.” Koops proposes using standard electronics to bunch the electrons before they enter the undulator.
Potylitsin, “Resonant Diffraction Radiation and Smith-Purcell Effect,” 13 Apr. 1998, described an emission of electrons moving close to a periodic structure treated as the resonant diffraction radiation. Potylitsin's grating had “perfectly conducting strips spaced by a vacuum gap.”
Smith-Purcell devices are inefficient. Their production of light is weak compared to their input power, and they cannot be optimized. Current Smith-Purcell devices are not suitable for true visible light applications due at least in part to their inefficiency and inability to effectively produce sufficient photon density to be detectible without specialized equipment.
We realized that the Smith-Purcell devices yielded poor light production efficiency. Rather than deflect the passing electron beam as Smith-Purcell devices do, we created devices that resonated at the frequency of light as the electron beam passes by. In this way, the device resonance matches the system resonance with resulting higher output. Our discovery has proven to produce visible light (or even higher or lower frequency radiation) at higher yields from optimized ultra-small physical structures.
Coupling Energy from Electromagnetic Waves
Coupling energy from electromagnetic waves in the terahertz range from 0.1 THz (about 3000 microns) to 700 THz (about 0.4 microns) is finding use in numerous new applications. These applications include improved detection of concealed weapons and explosives, improved medical imaging, finding biological terror materials, better characterization of semiconductors; and broadening the available bandwidth for wireless communications.
In solid materials the interaction between an electromagnetic wave and a charged particle, namely an electron, can occur via three basic processes: absorption, spontaneous emission and stimulated emission. The interaction can provide a transfer of energy between the electromagnetic wave and the electron. For example, photoconductor semiconductor devices use the absorption process to receive the electromagnetic wave and transfer energy to electron-hole pairs by band-to-band transitions. Electromagnetic waves having an energy level greater than a material's characteristic binding energy can create electrons that move when connected across a voltage source to provide a current. In addition, extrinsic photoconductor devices operate having transitions across forbidden-gap energy levels use the absorption process (S. M., Sze, “Semiconductor Devices Physics and Technology,” 2002).
A measure of the energy coupled from an electromagnetic wave for the material is referred to as an absorption coefficient. A point where the absorption coefficient decreases rapidly is called a cutoff wavelength. The absorption coefficient is dependant on the particular material used to make a device. For example, gallium arsenide (GaAs) absorbs electromagnetic wave energy from about 0.6 microns and has a cutoff wavelength of about 0.87 microns. In another example, silicon (Si) can absorb energy from about 0.4 microns and has a cutoff wavelength of about 1.1 microns. Thus, the ability to transfer energy to the electrons within the material for making the device is a function of the wavelength or frequency of the electromagnetic wave. This means the device can work to couple the electromagnetic wave's energy only over a particular segment of the terahertz range. At the very high end of the terahertz spectrum a Charge Coupled Device (CCD—an intrinsic photoconductor device—can successfully be employed. If there is a need to couple energy at the lower end of the terahertz spectrum certain extrinsic semiconductors devices can provide for coupling energy at increasing wavelengths by increasing the doping levels.
Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS)
Raman spectroscopy is a well-known means to measure the characteristics of molecule vibrations using laser radiation as the excitation source. A molecule to be analyzed is illuminated with laser radiation and the resulting scattered frequencies are collected in a detector and analyzed.
Analysis of the scattered frequencies permits the chemical nature of the molecules to be explored. Fleischmann et al. (M. Fleischmann, P. J. Hendra and A. J. McQuillan, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1974, 26, 163) first reported the increased scattering intensities that result from Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS), though without realizing the cause of the increased intensity.
In SERS, laser radiation is used to excite molecules adsorbed or deposited onto a roughened or porous metallic surface, or a surface having metallic nano-sized features or structures. The largest increase in scattering intensity is realized with surfaces with features that are 10-100 nm in size. Research into the mechanisms of SERS over the past 25 years suggests that both chemical and electromagnetic factors contribute to the enhancing the Raman effect. (See, e.g., A. Campion and P. Kambhampati, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1998, 27 241.)
The electromagnetic contribution occurs when the laser radiation excites plasmon resonances in the metallic surface structures. These plasmons induce local fields of electromagnetic radiation which extend and decay at the rate defined by the dipole decay rate. These local fields contribute to enhancement of the Raman scattering at an overall rate of E4.
Recent research has shown that changes in the shape and composition of nano-sized features of the substrate cause variation in the intensity and shape of the local fields created by the plasmons. Jackson and Halas (J. B. Jackson and N. J. Halas, PNAS, 2004, 101 17930) used nano-shells of gold to tune the plasmon resonance to different frequencies.
Variation in the local electric field strength provided by the induced plasmon is known in SERS-based devices. In U.S. Patent application 2004/0174521 A1, Drachev et al. describe a Raman imaging and sensing device employing nanoantennas. The antennas are metal structures deposited onto a surface. The structures are illuminated with laser radiation. The radiation excites a plasmon in the antennas that enhances the Raman scatter of the sample molecule.
The electric field intensity surrounding the antennas varies as a function of distance from the antennas, as well as the size of the antennas. The intensity of the local electric field increases as the distance between the antennas decreases.
Advantages & Benefits
Myriad benefits and advantages can be obtained by a ultra-small resonant structure that emits varying electromagnetic radiation at higher radiation frequencies such as infrared, visible, UV and X-ray. For example, if the varying electromagnetic radiation is in a visible light frequency, the micro resonant structure can be used for visible light applications that currently employ prior art semiconductor light emitters (such as LCDs, LEDs, and the like that employ electroluminescence or other light-emitting principals). If small enough, such micro-resonance structures can rival semiconductor devices in size, and provide more intense, variable, and efficient light sources. Such micro resonant structures can also be used in place of (or in some cases, in addition to) any application employing non-semiconductor illuminators (such as incandescent, fluorescent, or other light sources). Those applications can include displays for personal or commercial use, home or business illumination, illumination for private display such as on computers, televisions or other screens, and for public display such as on signs, street lights, or other indoor or outdoor illumination. Visible frequency radiation from ultra-small resonant structures also has application in fiber optic communication, chip-to-chip signal coupling, other electronic signal coupling, and any other light-using applications.
Applications can also be envisioned for ultra-small resonant structures that emit in frequencies other than in the visible spectrum, such as for high frequency data carriers. Ultra-small resonant structures that emit at frequencies such as a few tens of terahertz can penetrate walls, making them invisible to a transceiver, which is exceedingly valuable for security applications. The ability to penetrate walls can also be used for imaging objects beyond the walls, which is also useful in, for example, security applications. X-ray frequencies can also be produced for use in medicine, diagnostics, security, construction or any other application where X-ray sources are currently used. Terahertz radiation from ultra-small resonant structures can be used in many of the known applications which now utilize x-rays, with the added advantage that the resulting radiation can be coherent and is non-ionizing.
The use of radiation per se in each of the above applications is not new. But, obtaining that radiation from particular kinds of increasingly small ultra-small resonant structures revolutionizes the way electromagnetic radiation is used in electronic and other devices. For example, the smaller the radiation emitting structure is, the less “real estate” is required to employ it in a commercial device. Since such real estate on a semiconductor, for example, is expensive, an ultra-small resonant structure that provides the myriad application benefits of radiation emission without consuming excessive real estate is valuable. Second, with the kinds of ultra-small resonant structures that we describe, the frequency of the radiation can be high enough to produce visible light of any color and low enough to extend into the terahertz levels (and conceivably even petahertz or exahertz levels with additional advances). Thus, the devices may be tunable to obtain any kind of white light transmission or any frequency or combination of frequencies desired without changing or stacking “bulbs,” or other radiation emitters (visible or invisible).
Currently, LEDs and Solid State Lasers (SSLs) cannot be integrated onto silicon (although much effort has been spent trying). Further, even when LEDs and SSLs are mounted on a wafer, they produce only electromagnetic radiation at a single color. The present devices are easily integrated onto even an existing silicon microchip and can produce many frequencies of electromagnetic radiation at the same time.
There is thus a need for a device having a single layer basic construction that can couple energy from an electromagnetic wave over the full terahertz portion of the electromagnetic spectrum.
As used throughout this document:
The phrase “ultra-small resonant structure” shall mean any structure of any material, type or microscopic size that by its characteristics causes electrons to resonate at a frequency in excess of the microwave frequency.
The term “ultra-small” within the phrase “ultra-small resonant structure” shall mean microscopic structural dimensions and shall include so-called “micro” structures, “nano” structures, or any other very small structures that will produce resonance at frequencies in excess of microwave frequencies.
a) shows a prior art example klystron.
b) shows a prior art example magnetron.
c) shows a prior art example reflex klystron.
d) depicts aspects of the Smith-Purcell theory.
As shown in
The etching does not need to remove the metal between posts all the way down to the substrate level, nor does the plating have to place the metal posts directly on the substrate (they can be on a silver layer on top of the substrate, for example). That is, the posts may be etched or plated in a manner so a small layer of conductor remains beneath, between and connecting the posts. Alternatively, the posts can be conductively isolated from each other by removing the entire metal layer between the posts. In one embodiment, the metal can be silver, although other metal conductors and even dielectrics are envisioned as well.
A charged particle beam, such as an electron beam 12 produced by an electron microscope, cathode, or any other electron source 10 and passing closely by a series of appropriately-sized structures, causes the electrons in the structures to resonate and produce visible light. In
The spaces between the post members 15a, 15b, . . . 15n (
That resonance is occurring can be seen in
For completeness, the substrate used in the above finger length resonance tests is shown in
Notably, the resonance effect described in
We have also detected with angle periodic structures that running the beam one way over the angled teeth produces an effective output while running the beam the other way decreases the output dramatically.
We have also detected that, unlike the general theory on Smith-Purcell, which states that frequency is only dependant on period and electron beam characteristics (such as beam intensity), some of the frequencies of our detected beam change with the finger length. Thus, as shown in
where λ is the frequency of the resonance, L is the period of the grating, n is a constant, β is related to the speed of the electron beam, and θ is the angle of diffraction of the electron.
It is reasonable to suggest, that if the other modes are aligned to the operating frequency, the Q of the device will be improved. A sweep of the duty cycle of the space width s (shown in
Using the above-described sweeps, one can also find the point of maximum Q for given posts 14 as shown in
Some example geometries are described herein and are shown in the associated figures. Those geometries do not limit the present inventions, but are described in order to provide illustrative examples of geometries that work for the intended purpose. In
In
In
As described previously, by altering the combined length, period 1, spaces s, and post members 15a . . . 15n, the center frequency of the radiation changes. It is thus valuable to size a row of posts 14 such that a desired frequency of visible light is emitted when the charged particle beam is passed near it.
Indeed, we can envision a row of posts having varying lengths within the row itself, such that different frequencies of radiation are excited by different ones or combinations of posts. The result could be a mixed, multiple wavelength light.
Different frequency outputs can also be obtained by directing multiple charged particle beams at different rows of posts etched from or plated on the same metal layer. Thus, one can obtain any color of visible light from a single layer metal nano- or micro-structure. Because the rows are only about a few micrometers or less apart, directing multiple electron beams simultaneously at different ones of the rows could also mix the visible light to yield to the human eye essentially any color frequency in the visible spectrum. The breadth and sensitivity of color options available in such a system is limited only by the number and geometries of the rows, and the number of electron beam sources available to stimulate the rows into resonance.
As shown in
When the backbone is removed, for certain wavelengths, radiation can emit from both sides of the device. Depending on the spacing and the XY-dimensions of the post members, it may be possible that there is a blocking mode that negates the photon emission from that side. The emissions are thus altered by the presence/absence of the backbone, but the existence of resonance remains.
The direction of the radiation can also be adjusted. We have noted that radiation has been detected outwardly from the row (essentially parallel to the long dimension of the posts and spaces), as well as upwardly (relative, for example, to the plane of
Given that plasmon velocity is material dependent, it can be advantageous to build devices using conductive materials other than silver. We expect that less conductive materials would have a lower emission wavelength due to the slower plasmon velocity. Similarly, more conductive material would have higher emission wavelengths. Thus, metal or other conductive layers of different types can be employed. As described above, we envision single metal or alloy layers of different row geometries producing different frequencies. We also envision different metal layer types with the same or different row geometries to produce different frequencies.
With the two row embodiments of
As should be understood from these descriptions, there is a wide variety of geometries of posts, geometries of rows, orientations of posts and rows, kinds of posts, kinds of metal, kinds of substrates, backbones, electron beam characteristics and other criteria that we envision within the framework of our inventions. We envision within our inventions deviations from the above criteria, whether or not specifically described herein. For example,
All of the structures described operate under vacuum conditions. Our invention does not require any particular kind of evacuation structure. Many known hermetic sealing techniques can be employed to ensure the vacuum condition remains during a reasonable lifespan of operation. We anticipate that the devices can be operated in a pressure up to atmospheric pressure if the mean free path of the electrons is longer than the device length at the operating pressure.
The conductive structures described herein are preferably comprised of silver, but may be any conductive metal or may be any non-metallic conductor such as an ionic conductor. Dielectrics are also envisioned as layer materials in the alternative to conductive layers, or in combination with them.
We have thus described electron beam induced resonance that can be used to produce visible light of optimized frequencies from a single metal layer. Such devices have application in such fields as ultra high-speed data communications and in any light producing application.
The various devices and their components described herein may be manufactured using the methods and systems described in related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/917,511, filed on Aug. 13, 2004, entitled “Patterning Thin Metal Film by Dry Reactive Ion Etching,” and U.S. Application Ser. No. 11/203,407, filed on Aug. 15, 2005, entitled “Method Of Patterning Ultra-Small Structures,” both of which are commonly owned with the present application at the time of filing, and the entire contents of each of have been incorporated herein by reference.
Thus are described electron beam induced resonance and methods and devices for making and using same. While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiment, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1948384 | Lawrence | Feb 1934 | A |
2307086 | Varian et al. | Jan 1943 | A |
2431396 | Hansell | Nov 1947 | A |
2473477 | Smith | Jun 1949 | A |
2634372 | Salisbury | Apr 1953 | A |
2932798 | Kerst et al. | Apr 1960 | A |
2944183 | Drexler | Jul 1960 | A |
2966611 | Sandstrom | Dec 1960 | A |
3231779 | White | Jan 1966 | A |
3297905 | Rockwell et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
3315117 | Udelson | Apr 1967 | A |
3387169 | Farney | Jun 1968 | A |
3543147 | Kovarik | Nov 1970 | A |
3546524 | Stark | Dec 1970 | A |
3560694 | White | Feb 1971 | A |
3571642 | Westcott | Mar 1971 | A |
3586899 | Fleisher | Jun 1971 | A |
3761828 | Pollard et al. | Sep 1973 | A |
3886399 | Symons | May 1975 | A |
3923568 | Bersin | Dec 1975 | A |
3989347 | Eschler | Nov 1976 | A |
4053845 | Gould | Oct 1977 | A |
4282436 | Kapetanakos | Aug 1981 | A |
4450554 | Steensma et al. | May 1984 | A |
4453108 | Freeman, Jr. | Jun 1984 | A |
4482779 | Anderson | Nov 1984 | A |
4528659 | Jones, Jr. | Jul 1985 | A |
4589107 | Middleton et al. | May 1986 | A |
4598397 | Nelson et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4630262 | Callens et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4652703 | Lu et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4661783 | Gover et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4704583 | Gould | Nov 1987 | A |
4712042 | Hamm | Dec 1987 | A |
4713581 | Haimson | Dec 1987 | A |
4727550 | Chang et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4740963 | Eckley | Apr 1988 | A |
4740973 | Madey | Apr 1988 | A |
4746201 | Gould | May 1988 | A |
4761059 | Yeh et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4782485 | Gollub | Nov 1988 | A |
4789945 | Niijima | Dec 1988 | A |
4806859 | Hetrick | Feb 1989 | A |
4809271 | Kondo et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4813040 | Futato | Mar 1989 | A |
4819228 | Baran et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4829527 | Wortman et al. | May 1989 | A |
4838021 | Beattie | Jun 1989 | A |
4841538 | Yanabu et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4864131 | Rich et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4866704 | Bergman | Sep 1989 | A |
4866732 | Carey et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4873715 | Shibata | Oct 1989 | A |
4887265 | Felix | Dec 1989 | A |
4890282 | Lambert et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4898022 | Yumoto et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4912705 | Paneth et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4932022 | Keeney et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4981371 | Gurak et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5023563 | Harvey et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5036513 | Greenblatt | Jul 1991 | A |
5065425 | Lecomte et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5113141 | Swenson | May 1992 | A |
5121385 | Tominaga et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5127001 | Steagall et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5128729 | Alonas et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5130985 | Kondo et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5150410 | Bertrand | Sep 1992 | A |
5155726 | Spinney et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5157000 | Elkind et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5163118 | Lorenzo et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5185073 | Bindra | Feb 1993 | A |
5187591 | Guy et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5199918 | Kumar | Apr 1993 | A |
5214650 | Renner et al. | May 1993 | A |
5233623 | Chang | Aug 1993 | A |
5235248 | Clark et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5262656 | Blondeau et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5263043 | Walsh | Nov 1993 | A |
5268693 | Walsh | Dec 1993 | A |
5268788 | Fox et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5282197 | Kreitzer | Jan 1994 | A |
5283819 | Glick et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5293175 | Hemmie et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5302240 | Hori et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305312 | Fornek et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5341374 | Lewen et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5354709 | Lorenzo et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5446814 | Kuo et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5504341 | Glavish | Apr 1996 | A |
5578909 | Billen | Nov 1996 | A |
5604352 | Schuetz | Feb 1997 | A |
5608263 | Drayton et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5663971 | Carlsten | Sep 1997 | A |
5666020 | Takemura | Sep 1997 | A |
5668368 | Sakai et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5705443 | Stauf et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5737458 | Wojnarowski et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744919 | Mishin et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5757009 | Walstrom | May 1998 | A |
5767013 | Park | Jun 1998 | A |
5780970 | Singh et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790585 | Walsh | Aug 1998 | A |
5811943 | Mishin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821836 | Katehi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821902 | Keen | Oct 1998 | A |
5825140 | Fujisawa | Oct 1998 | A |
5831270 | Nakasuji | Nov 1998 | A |
5847745 | Shimizu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5889449 | Fiedziuszko | Mar 1999 | A |
5889797 | Nguyen | Mar 1999 | A |
5902489 | Yasuda et al. | May 1999 | A |
5963857 | Greywall | Oct 1999 | A |
5972193 | Chou et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6005347 | Lee | Dec 1999 | A |
6008496 | Winefordner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6040625 | Ip | Mar 2000 | A |
6060833 | Velazco | May 2000 | A |
6080529 | Ye et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6117784 | Uzoh | Sep 2000 | A |
6139760 | Shim et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6180415 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195199 | Yamada | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6222866 | Seko | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6278239 | Caporaso et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281769 | Fiedziuszko | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6297511 | Syllaios et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301041 | Yamada | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309528 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6316876 | Tanabe | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6338968 | Hefti | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6370306 | Sato et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373194 | Small | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6376258 | Hefti | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6407516 | Victor | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6441298 | Thio | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448850 | Yamada | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453087 | Frish et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6470198 | Kintaka et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6504303 | Small | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6525477 | Small | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6534766 | Abe et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6545425 | Victor | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6552320 | Pan | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6577040 | Nguyen | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6580075 | Kametani et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6603781 | Stinson et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6603915 | Glebov et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6624916 | Green et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636185 | Spitzer et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636534 | Madey et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6636653 | Miracky et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640023 | Miller et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6642907 | Hamada et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6687034 | Wine et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6700748 | Cowles et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6724486 | Shull et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738176 | Rabinowitz et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6741781 | Furuyama | May 2004 | B2 |
6777244 | Pepper et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6782205 | Trisnadi et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6791438 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800877 | Victor et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6801002 | Victor et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6819432 | Pepper et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6829286 | Guilfoyle et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834152 | Gunn et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6870438 | Shino et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6871025 | Maleki et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6885262 | Nishimura et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6900447 | Gerlach et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6909092 | Nagahama | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6909104 | Koops et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6924920 | Zhilkov | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936981 | Gesley | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6943650 | Ramprasad et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952492 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6953291 | Liu | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954515 | Bjorkholm et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6944369 | Deliwala | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965284 | Maekawa et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965625 | Mross et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972439 | Kim et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6995406 | Tojo et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7010183 | Estes et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7064500 | Victor et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068948 | Wei et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7092588 | Kondo | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7092603 | Glebov et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7122978 | Nakanishi et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130102 | Rabinowitz | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7177515 | Estes et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7230201 | Miley et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7253426 | Gorrell et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7267459 | Matheson | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7267461 | Kan et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7309953 | Tiberi et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7342441 | Gorrell et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7362972 | Yavor et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7375631 | Moskowitz et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7436177 | Gorrell et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442940 | Gorrell et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7443358 | Gorrell et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7470920 | Gorrell et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7473917 | Singh | Jan 2009 | B2 |
20010025925 | Abe et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020009723 | Hefti | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020027481 | Fiedziuszko | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020036121 | Ball et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020036264 | Nakasuji et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020053638 | Winkler et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068018 | Pepper et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020070671 | Small | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020071457 | Hogan | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020122531 | Whitham | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135665 | Gardner | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020139961 | Kinoshita et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158295 | Armgarth et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020191650 | Madey et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030010979 | Pardo | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030012925 | Gorrell | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016412 | Small | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016421 | Small | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030034535 | Barenburu et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030103150 | Catrysse et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030106998 | Colbert et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030155521 | Feuerbaum | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158474 | Scherer et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030164947 | Vaupel | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179974 | Estes et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030206708 | Estes et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214695 | Abramson et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040061053 | Taniguchi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040080285 | Victor et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085159 | Kubena et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092104 | Gunn, III et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040108471 | Luo et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040108473 | Melnychuk et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040108823 | Amaldi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040136715 | Kondo | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040150991 | Ouderkirk et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040171272 | Jin et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180244 | Tour et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040184270 | Halter | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040213375 | Bjorkholm et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217297 | Moses et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040218651 | Iwasaki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040231996 | Webb | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040240035 | Zhilkov | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264867 | Kondo | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050023145 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050045821 | Noji et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050045832 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054151 | Lowther et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050067286 | Ahn et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082469 | Carlo | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050092929 | Schneiker | May 2005 | A1 |
20050104684 | Wojcik | May 2005 | A1 |
20050105690 | Pau et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050145882 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050152635 | Paddon et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050162104 | Victor et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190637 | Ichimura et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050194258 | Cohen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201707 | Glebov et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201717 | Matsumura et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212503 | Deibele | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231138 | Nakanishi et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050249451 | Baehr-Jones et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050285541 | LeChevalier | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060007730 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018619 | Helffrich et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060035173 | Davidson et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045418 | Cho et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060050269 | Brownell | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060782 | Khursheed | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062258 | Brau et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060131176 | Hsu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060131695 | Kuekes et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060159131 | Liu et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060164496 | Tokutake et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060187794 | Harvey et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060208667 | Lys et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216940 | Gorrell et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060243925 | Barker et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274922 | Ragsdale | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003781 | de Rochemont | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013765 | Hudson et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070075263 | Gorrell et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070075264 | Gorrell et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070085039 | Gorrell et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070086915 | LeBoeuf et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070116420 | Estes et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070146704 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070152176 | Gorrell et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070154846 | Gorrell et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070194357 | Oohashi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200940 | Gruhlke et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070252983 | Tong et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258492 | Gorrell | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258689 | Gorrell et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258690 | Gorrell et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070259641 | Gorrell | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070264023 | Gorrell et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070264030 | Gorrell et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070284527 | Zani et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080069509 | Gorrell et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080302963 | Nakasuji et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0237559 | Dec 1991 | EP |
2004-32323 | Jan 2004 | JP |
WO 8701873 | Mar 1987 | WO |
WO 9321663 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO 0072413 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0225785 | Mar 2002 | WO |
WO 02077607 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2004086560 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2005015143 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005098966 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2006042239 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2007081389 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007081390 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007081391 | Jul 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070075264 A1 | Apr 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11238991 | Sep 2005 | US |
Child | 11243477 | US |