Electroplating apparatus with improved throughput

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9624595
  • Patent Number
    9,624,595
  • Date Filed
    Friday, May 23, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 18, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
One embodiment provides an electroplating apparatus, which includes a tank filled with an electrolyte solution, a number of anodes situated around edges of the tank, a cathode situated above the tank, and a plurality of wafer-holding jigs attached to the cathode. A respective wafer-holding jig includes a common connector electrically coupled to the cathode and a pair of wafer-mounting frames electrically coupled to the common connector. Each wafer-mounting frame includes a plurality of openings, and a respective opening provides a mounting space for a to-be-plated solar cell, thereby facilitating simultaneous plating of front and back surfaces of the plurality of the solar cells.
Description
BACKGROUND

Field


This disclosure is generally related to an electroplating apparatus used for fabrication of solar modules. More specifically, this disclosure is related to an electroplating apparatus that has an improved throughput.


Related Art


Conventional solar cells often rely on Ag grid on the light-facing side to collect light generated current. To form the Ag grid, conventional methods involve printing Ag paste (which often includes Ag particle, organic binder, and glass frit) onto the wafers and then firing the Ag paste at a temperature between 700° C. and 800° C. The high-temperature firing of the Ag paste ensures good contact between Ag and Si, and lowers the resistivity of the Ag lines. The resistivity of the fired Ag paste is typically between 5×10−6 and 8×10−6 ohm-cm, which is much higher than the resistivity of bulk silver.


In addition to the high series resistance, the electrode grid obtained by screen-printing Ag paste also has other disadvantages, including higher material cost, wider line width, and limited line height. As the price of silver rises, the material cost of the silver electrode has exceeded half of the processing cost for manufacturing solar cells. With the state-of-the-art printing technology, the Ag lines typically have a line width between 100 and 120 microns, and it is difficult to reduce the line width further. Although inkjet printing can result in narrower lines, inkjet printing suffers other problems, such as low productivity. The height of the Ag lines is also limited by the printing method. One print can produce Ag lines with a height that is less than 25 microns. Although multiple printing can produce lines with increased height, it also increases line width, which is undesirable for high-efficiency solar cells. Similarly, electroplating of Ag or Cu onto the printed Ag lines can increase line height at the expense of increased line width. In addition, the resistance of such Ag lines is still too high to meet the requirement of high-efficiency solar cells.


Another solution is to electroplate a metal grid, which can include one or more metal layers, directly on the Si emitter or on a TCO layer above the emitter. The electroplated metal grid tend to have lower resistance (the resistivity of plated Cu is typically between 2×10−6 and 3×10−6 ohm-cm) than the printed metal grid. In large-scale solar cell fabrications, throughput can be a key to reduce to the overall fabrication cost.


SUMMARY

One embodiment provides an electroplating apparatus, which includes a tank filled with an electrolyte solution, a number of anodes situated around edges of the tank, a cathode situated above the tank, and a plurality of wafer-holding jigs attached to the cathode. A respective wafer-holding jig includes a common connector electrically coupled to the cathode and a pair of wafer-mounting frames electrically coupled to the common connector. Each wafer-mounting frame includes a plurality of openings, and a respective opening provides a mounting space for a to-be-plated solar cell, thereby facilitating simultaneous plating of front and back surfaces of the plurality of the solar cells.


In a variation on the embodiment, the cathode is configured to move from one end of the tank to the other end of the tank, thereby facilitating continuous operation of the electroplating apparatus.


In a variation on the embodiment, the wafer-mounting frame is made of one or more materials selected from the following group: stainless steel, Ti, and Cu.


In a variation on the embodiment, the opening is slightly larger than the to-be-plated solar cell.


In a variation on the embodiment, the wafer-mounting frame further comprises a plurality of spring-loaded pins that hold the to-be-plated solar cell inside the opening in a way such that a surface of the to-be-plated solar cell is substantially parallel to a surface of the wafer-mounting frame.


In a further variation, the spring-loaded pins act as electrodes to electrically couple front and back surfaces of the to-be-plated solar cell to the cathode.


In a variation on the embodiment, the wafer-mounting frames are parallel to each other, and a distance between the wafer-mounting frames is between 2 and 20 cm.


In a variation on the embodiment, the wafer-mounting frame further includes a plurality of through holes, thereby facilitating uniform metal deposition of both the front and back surfaces of the solar cell.


In a variation on the embodiment, a gap between two adjacent wafer-holding jigs is between 1 and 10 cm wide.


In a variation on the embodiment, the electroplating apparatus further includes an auxiliary anode situated between the pair of wafer-mounting frames.


In a further variation, the auxiliary anode is made of one or more materials selected from the following group: stainless steel, Ti, and Pt.


In a further variation, the auxiliary anode is made of similar metals that form the anodes situated around edges of the tank.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 presents a diagram illustrating an exemplary solar cell with electroplated metal grids, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2A presents a diagram illustrating a schematic top view of a conventional electroplating system (prior art).



FIG. 2B presents a diagram illustrating a schematic cross-sectional view of a conventional electroplating system (prior art).



FIG. 3A presents a diagram illustrating a partial front view of one arm of the wafer-holding jig, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3B presents a diagram illustrating a cross-sectional view of one arm of the wafer-holding jig, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4A presents a diagram illustrating a front view of a double-arm wafer-holding jig, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 4B presents a diagram illustrating a cross-sectional view of the double-arm wafer-holding jig, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 5 presents a diagram illustrating a schematic top view of an electroplating system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 6 presents a diagram illustrating a front view of a double-arm wafer-holding jig, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 7 presents a diagram illustrating a cross-sectional view of an electroplating system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.





In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same figure elements.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the embodiments, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure. Thus, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.


Overview


Embodiments of the present invention provide a high-throughput electroplating apparatus. More specifically, the electroplating apparatus includes novel wafer-holding jigs each having two arms. Each arm of the jig holds a plurality of solar cells submerged in a plating bath, allowing the solar cells to be plated on both sides simultaneously. Compared with conventional electroplating systems that use single-arm wafer-holding jigs, the system that uses the double-arm jigs can double its throughput.


Electroplating System for Solar Cell Fabrication


It has been shown that, for solar cell applications, electroplated metal grids have lower resistivity compared with printed Ag grids, which include low-temperature-cured silver paste layers. For example, a metal grid that includes one or more electroplated Cu layers may have a resistivity equal to or less than 5×10−6 Ω·cm, which is significantly lower than the resistivity of a metal grid that is composed of printed Ag. FIG. 1 presents a diagram illustrating an exemplary solar cell with electroplated metal grids, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In the example shown in FIG. 1, solar cell 100 is a double-sided tunneling junction solar cell. More specifically, solar cell 100 includes a base layer 102, quantum tunneling barrier (QTB) layers 104 and 106 that cover both surfaces of base layer 102 and passivate the surface-defect states, a front-side doped a-Si layer forming a front emitter 108, a back-side doped a-Si layer forming a BSF layer 110, a front transparent conducting oxide (TCO) layer 112, a back TCO layer 114, a front-side electroplated metal grid 116, and a back-side electroplated metal grid 118. Note that a similar solar cell can have an emitter layer situated at the backside and a front surface field (FSF) layer situated at the front side. In addition to the tunneling junction solar cells, the electroplated metal grids can also be incorporated with other types of solar cell structure, such as diffusion based solar cells. Detailed descriptions of fabricating solar cells with electroplated metal grids can be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/835,670, entitled “SOLAR CELL WITH METAL GRID FABRICATED BY ELECTROPLATING,” by inventors Jianming Fu, Zheng Xu, Chentao Yu, and Jiunn Benjamin Heng, filed 13 Jul. 2010, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/220,532, entitled “SOLAR CELL WITH ELECTROPLATED METAL GRID,” by inventors Jianming Fu, Zheng Xu, Chentao Yu, and Jiunn Benjamin Heng, filed 29 Aug. 2011, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.


In common electroplating settings, work pieces (the parts to be plated) are electrically coupled to a cathode, and the metal to be plated (such as Cu and Ni) forms the anode. To facilitate the flow of current, all components, including the anode and the work pieces) are submerged in a suitable electrolyte solution, and a voltage is applied between the anode and the cathode. For a large-scale fabrication of the solar cells, the electrolyte solution along with the anode are usually placed in a large tank, forming an electrolyte bath, and work pieces (in this case solar cells) connecting to a moving cathode sequentially enter the bath from one end and get plated while they move from one end of the tank to the other. The moving speed is controlled based on the desired plating thickness. The plated solar cells are taken out of the bath once they reach the other end while new solar cells continuously enter the bath. To ensure plating uniformity, the electrolyte solution is circulated and filtered.



FIG. 2A presents a diagram illustrating a schematic top view of a conventional electroplating system (prior art). In FIG. 2, an electroplating system 200 includes a rectangular tank 202 filled with electrolyte solution, a number of anodes (such as anodes 204 and 206) situated on both sides of tank 202, and a number of wafer-holding jigs, such as jigs 208 and 210, submerged in the electrolyte solution. Each jig can hold multiple wafers. Note that the wafer-holding jigs not only provide mounting places for the to-be-plated solar cells but also provide electrical connections between the plating surfaces (in this case, both side of the solar cells) and the cathode (not shown in FIG. 2B), thus enabling metal ions to be deposited onto the plating surfaces. In the system shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B, the jigs placed in the bath form a single line, with each jig providing two plating surfaces (the front surface and the back surface). With a careful design, both sides of the solar cells mounted on a jig can be electroplated simultaneously. For example, both the front and back surfaces of a solar cell can include conducting portions that are electrically connected to the cathode and are exposed to the electrolyte solution. Hence, these conducting portions of both surfaces will be plated simultaneously.



FIG. 2B presents a diagram illustrating a schematic cross-sectional view of a conventional electroplating system (prior art). More specifically, FIG. 2B shows that the wafer-holding jigs, such as jigs 208 and 210, are attached to a cathode 212 and are submerged in the electrolyte solution inside tank 202. During plating, cathode 212, and hence the jigs and solar cells mounted on the jigs, can move along the longer edger of tank 202, as indicated by arrow 214, and the both sides of the solar cells are plated during the process. Depending on the desired plating thickness, various parameters, such as the moving speed of the jigs and the voltage applied between the cathode and the anodes, can be adjusted.


Electroplating system 200 shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B allows continuous, simultaneous plating of a plurality of solar cells, and hence it is favored for high-throughput fabrication of solar cells. However, such a system often occupies a large space (due to the size of the tank, which can be up to 50 m long), and a large-scale solar cell manufacturing facility may need to accommodate many such systems. In addition, building and maintaining such systems can also be costly. Therefore, it is desirable to improve the throughput of each electroplating system in order to reduce the number of needed equipments and to save space and cost.


In some embodiments of the present invention, in order to improve the plating throughput each wafer-holding jig provides four, instead of two, plating surfaces, thus allowing simultaneous plating of twice as many solar cells. More specifically, each jig now has two arms, with each arm holding multiple solar cells.



FIG. 3A presents a diagram illustrating a partial front view of one arm of the wafer-holding jig, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 3A, a wafer-holding jig 300 includes a frame 302, which include a number of pre-cut openings, such as openings 304 and 306. A to-be-plated solar cell can be placed inside an opening and mounted on frame 302 by multiple spring-loaded pins. For example, a solar cell 308 is placed inside opening 304 with its edges pined in position by spring-loaded pins 310, 312, 314, and 316. Note that, because the solar cells are mounted on frame 302 via the pre-cutting openings, both sides of the solar cells are exposed to the electrolyte solution and can be plated simultaneously.


Frame 302 is typically made of chemical-resistant metals, such as stainless steel, Cu, Ti, etc. In some embodiments, frame 302 is made of stainless steel. To prevent unintentional plating, most areas of frame 302 are covered with chemical-resistant paint and are electrically insulated, except at locations where electrical connections are needed. For example, at the location where frame 302 is in contact with a movable cathode (not shown in FIG. 3A), frame 302 may remain bare to enable direct electrical connection. In some embodiments, the cathode includes a metal rode that has a number of frame-hanging studs, and frame 302 can hang on one or more of the studs. Electrical connections between the frame and the cathode may be established via the direct metal-to-metal contact. The pre-cut openings may have difference sizes in order to fit solar cells of different sizes. In some embodiments, the solar cells have a dimension of 125×125 mm2 (or 5×5 inch2), and the openings can then have a dimension of 130×130 mm2 or a slightly larger dimension. In addition, depending on the design and the size of the plating tank, frame 302 may accommodate different number of solar cells. In the example shown in FIG. 3A, frame 302 includes 9 (3 rows and 3 columns) pre-cut openings, capable of holding 9 solar cells. In some embodiments, a frame may include 15 (5 rows and 3 columns) or more pre-cut openings. In such a case, frame 302 may be as large as 450×800 mm2.



FIG. 3B presents a diagram illustrating a cross-sectional view of one arm of the wafer-holding jig, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. From FIG. 3B, one can see that the solar cells, such as a solar cell 318, are held in place within the openings by the multiple spring-loaded pins. For example, FIG. 3B shows that solar cell 318 is held in place by at least spring-loaded pins 320 and 324. More specifically, the spring-loaded pins hold the solar cells in a way that surfaces of solar cells are substantially parallel to the surface of the frame, as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B.


The spring-loaded pins situated around each opening not only provide support to the solar cells but also act as electrodes that enable electrical connections between the solar cells and the metal frame. In the amplified view of spring-loaded pin 320 shown in FIG. 3B, one can see that a spring-loaded pin includes a front part 332 and a back part 334, with front part 332 being rotatable (in and out of the paper) by loading and unloading spring 336 and back part 334 being fixed in position. Note that both front part 332 and back part 334 have an extruded point that together can apply pressure to solar cell 318, which is situated between them. Note that the amount of pressure being applied to solar cell 318 can be carefully adjusted to make sure that such pressure can hold solar cell 318 in position without damaging it. Moreover, in some embodiments, the extruded portions of front part 332 and back part 334 include bare metal (which can be stainless steel, Cu, or Ti), thus facilitating the electrical coupling between both surfaces of solar cell 318 and the cathode, which is electrically coupled to the spring-loaded pins via frame 302. In some embodiments, the surfaces of solar cell 318 include pre-patterned (as bus bars and finger grids) seed and/or adhesive metal layers, and the extruded portions of front part 332 and back part 334 of spring-loaded pin 320 are in direct contact with the bus bars.



FIG. 4A presents a diagram illustrating a front view of a double-arm wafer-holding jig, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 4A, the front view of double-arm wafer-holding jig 400 shows a frame 402 and a common connector 404. Frame 402 is similar to frame 302 shown in FIG. 3A, and includes a number of pre-cut openings for mounting solar cells. Common connector 404 is a joint connection that connects both arms of double-arm wafer-holding jig 400 to the cathode (not shown in FIG. 4A). In some embodiments, common connector 404 may include a metal piece that is electrically coupled to the bare metal portion located on the metal frame of each arm.



FIG. 4B presents a diagram illustrating a cross-sectional view of the double-arm wafer-holding jig, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 4B shows that double-arm wafer-holding jig 400 includes two parallel situated arms (frames 402 and 406) and a common connector 404. The two parallel arms are mechanically attached to and electrically connected to common connector 404. In some embodiment, common connector 404 may include a metal beam. Each arm or frame shown in FIG. 4B is similar to frame 302 shown in FIG. 3B, and is capable of holding multiple solar cells. From FIG. 4B, one can see that, given the frames being identical, double-arm wafer-holding jig 400 can accommodate twice as many solar cells as a wafer-holding jig that has only one arm. When double-arm wafer-holding jig 400 is placed in the electrolyte bath, a channel 408 is formed, and electrolyte solution can flow in and out of channel 408. Therefore, the solar cell surfaces that face channel 408 can be plated the same time when the solar cell surfaces that face away channel 408 are plated. To ensure the plating of a sufficiently thick metal layer and to ensure the plating uniformity, the width of channel 408 (determined by the distance between frames 402 and 406) needs to be sufficiently large. In some embodiments, such a distance is kept between 2 and 20 cm. Note that jigs with a larger distance ensure better uniformity, but would need a larger tank to accommodate them.



FIG. 5 presents a diagram illustrating the schematic top view of an electroplating system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 5, an electroplating system 500 includes a rectangular tank 502 filled with electrolyte solution, a number of anodes (such as anodes 504 and 506) situated on both sides of tank 502, a cathode 508 situated above tank 502, and a number of double-arm wafer-holding jigs, such as a double-arm wafer-holding jig 510, attached to cathode 508. Rectangular tank 502 can be a standard tank built for large-scale electroplating operations. In some embodiments, the length of tank 502 can be between 4 and 50 m, and the width of tank 502 can be between 0.3 and 1 m. Depending on the size of tank 502, the number of wafer-holding jigs that are simultaneously submerged in tank 502 may vary. Note that, during operation, cathode 508 may move along the longer edge of tank 502, and jigs that are connected to cathode 508 then move together with cathode 508, moving from one end of tank 502 to the other end of tank 502. Each double-arm wafer-holding jig includes two parallel arms (or frames) for holding solar cells in an upright position in the electrolyte solution. For example, double-arm wafer-holding jig 510 includes a frame 512 and a frame 514 that are situated substantially parallel to each other. Note that each arm or frame can hold a plurality of solar cells with both sides of the solar cells exposed to the electrolyte solution to enable plating. More specifically, the anodes situated at both sides of tank 502, the electrolyte solution, and the conducting portions of solar cell surfaces (which are electrically coupled to cathode 508) form a closed circuit, and metal ions dissolved from the anodes are deposited onto the surfaces of the solar cells.


From FIG. 5, one can see that when solar cells are mounted on the double-arm wafer holding jigs, one side of the solar cells are facing the anodes, whereas the other side of the solar cells are facing the channel formed by the two arms of the jigs. This may lead to an uneven metal deposition on the two sides of the solar cells, because the electric field lines pointing to the channel-facing surface cells may be partially blocked by the metal frame itself, resulting in a weaker electrical field intensity at the channel-facing surface. Although the electrical field can still reach the channel-facing surface through the top and bottom opening of the channel, and through the gaps (such as a gap 516) between adjacent jigs, the field distribution at the channel-facing surface may be non-uniform and may not match the field intensity at the anode-facing surface. In addition, movement of metal ions may also be blocked by the frame, although may can go through the gaps by diffusion and circulation flow of the electrolyte solution. Installing carefully designed spargers at the tank edge may direct the electrolyte solution flow direction, assisting the flow of the metal ions. However, the different electric field strength between the anode-facing surface and the channel-facing surface can still lead to metal layers of different thickness being deposited at these two surfaces.


Increasing the gaps between two adjacent jigs may slightly improve the deposition uniformity between the two sides, because the increased gap allows stronger electrical field to go through to reach the channel-facing surface. However, the increased gap may reduce the overall throughput of plating system 500 due to the reduced number of jigs that can be accommodated in tank 502. In some embodiments, the distance between two adjacent double-arm wafer-holding jigs is between 1 and 10 cm. In a further embodiment, the distance is between 4 and 5 cm. Note that certain solar cells may require the front and back surfaces to have metal grids with different thicknesses. In such a scenario, the solar cells are place in a way such that the side requiring a thicker metal layer is facing the anodes. For example, some solar cells may require thicker metal grids on their front, light-facing surface and thinner metal grids on their back surface. To obtain this desired plating effect, one may mount the solar cells on each arm of the jig with the front surface facing the anodes, and the back surface facing the channel in between the arms. Note that the jigs may be placed in the tank in a symmetrical way to ensure that solar cells located on different arms are plated identically. For example, in some embodiments, the symmetrical axis of the jigs are aligned to the symmetrical axis of the electrolyte bath such that the electrical field is distributed symmetrically with the anode-facing surfaces of solar cells on both arms experiencing the same field intensity. Similarly, the channel-facing surfaces of solar cells on both arms also experience the same field intensity, resulting in similar plating effects on these surfaces.


In addition to adjusting the width of the gaps between jigs, in some embodiments, extra holes may be introduced on the metal frames to allow the penetration of the electric field. FIG. 6 presents a diagram illustrating a front view of a double-arm wafer-holding jig, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 6, the front view of double-arm wafer-holding jig 600 shows a frame 602 and a common connector 604. In addition to the pre-cut openings for mounting the solar cells, frame 602 includes a number of through holes, such as through holes 606 and 608. These through holes not only allow metal ions to reach the other side of frame 602 along with the flow of the electrolyte solution, but also allow additional electrical field to reach the other side of frame 602. A careful design of the shapes and sizes of these through holes may further improve the plating uniformity, especially on the channel-facing surface of the solar cells.


Another way for improving the deposition uniformity is to insert an auxiliary anode between the two arms of the double-arm wafer-holding jig in order to introduce additional electrical field. FIG. 7 presents a diagram illustrating a cross-sectional view of an electroplating system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 7, electroplating system 700 includes a tank 702 filled with electrolyte solutions, a number of anodes (such as anodes 704 and 706, a double-arm wafer-holding jig that includes a pair of wafer-holding frames 708 and 710 and a common connector 712, and an auxiliary anode 714 situated between frames 708 and 710. In some embodiments, tank 702 can be a stainless steel tank; anodes 704 and 704 may be cylindrically shaped metal rods that are made of metals that are to be deposited on the solar cell surfaces, such as Cu and Ni. As described previously, common connector 712 is electrically coupled to the cathode (not shown in FIG. 7), and the to-be-plated surfaces of the solar cells, such as solar cells 716 and 718, are electrically coupled to common connector 712 via s number of spring-loaded pins. Therefore, the to-be-plated surfaces, including the surfaces facing away from anodes 704 and 706 are electrically coupled to the cathode.


During plating, a voltage is applied between the anodes (such as anodes 704 and 706) and the cathode, thus facilitating metal ions dissolved from the anodes to be deposited on the conducting portions of the solar cell surfaces. In the mean time, a voltage can be applied between auxiliary anode 714 and the cathode, creating additional electric field, as indicated by the dashed arrows. The additional electrical field can improve the uniformity of the metal deposition on the solar cell surface (often the back surface) that faces away from the anodes. Moreover, it can slightly increase the electrical field intensity at the channel-facing surface, making it possible to match the field intensity at the channel-facing surface to the field intensity at the anode-facing surface.


In some embodiments, auxiliary anode 714 includes noble metals, such as platinum (Pt), titanium (Ti), and stainless steel. In such scenarios, auxiliary anode 714 only provides additional electrical field within the channel formed by the two arms of the wafer-holding jig, but does not participate actively (providing metal ions) in the electroplating process. Note that the shape of auxiliary anode 714 and the amount of voltage applied can be carefully designed to further improve the deposition uniformity or to achieve the desired metal plating effect.


In some embodiments, auxiliary anode 714 may include the metal used for plating, and hence actively participates in the electroplating process. In other words, auxiliary anode 714 can have a similar material make up as that of anodes 704 and 706. For example, when Cu is plated on the solar cell surfaces, auxiliary anode 714 may include Cu to provide additional Cu deposition at the back surface of the solar cells, thus ensuring that the back surface of the solar cells can be plated with a Cu layer of the same thickness as the Cu layer plated on the front surface. However, such as an arrangement has a drawback because the active anode needs to be replaced or replenished on a regular basis, requiring extra maintenance.


In addition to the configurations shown in FIGS. 4-7, the electroplating system may have different configurations as long as the wafer-holding jigs are capable of providing multiple wafer-mounting surfaces that enables effective use of space. In the example shown in FIGS. 4B and 7, each wafer-holding jig includes two parallel arms, with each arm providing a wafer-mounting surface. In practice, it is also possible to have more than two arms or to have the arms configured in a different way as long as plating uniformity can be achieved. For example, a jig with 4 arms may be configured to have all arms parallel to each other or to have the arms grouped into two pairs with each pair comprising two parallel arms. However, the more complex the jigs are, the more difficult it is to achieve the desired deposition uniformity. To do so, a more sophisticated design of the auxiliary anode or the spargers may be needed. Also noted that, in addition to electroplating solar cells, embodiments of the present invention can also be used for electroplating of other types of device, such as printed circuit board (PCB). Moreover, in the examples shown in FIG. 4A and FIG. 6, the frames are rectangular. In practice, the frames may take on other shapes that are suitable to accommodate the devices being plated.


The foregoing descriptions of various embodiments have been presented only for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A wafer-holding jig for electroplating of a plurality of photovoltaic structures, comprising: a common connector electrically coupled to a cathode, wherein the common connector is a metal beam;a wafer-holding mechanism consisting of a pair of wafer-mounting frames electrically coupled to the common connector, wherein each wafer-mounting frame comprises a plurality of openings and a plurality of spring-loaded mechanisms that hold to-be-plated photovoltaic structures in the openings,wherein each wafer-mounting frame comprises a plurality of through holes that are positioned between the openings, thereby facilitating flow of metal ions and electric field through the frame,wherein each spring-loaded mechanism comprises a back part in a fixed position, a rotatable front part, and a spring coupling the back part and the front part,wherein one end of the spring is directly attached to the wafer-mounting frame,wherein the wafer-mounting frames are arranged in such a way that a first to-be-plated photovoltaic structure mounted on a first wafer-mounting frame is positioned substantially parallel to a second to-be-plated photovoltaic structure mounted on a second wafer-mounting frame,wherein an open space exists between the first to-be-plated photovoltaic structure and the second to-be-plated photovoltaic structure to facilitate simultaneous plating of front and back surfaces of the plurality of the photovoltaic structures, andwherein a distance between the wafer-mounting frames is between 2 and 20 cm.
  • 2. The wafer-holding jig of claim 1, wherein a respective wafer-mounting frame is made of one or more materials selected from the following group: stainless steel;Ti; andCu.
  • 3. The wafer-holding jig of claim 1, wherein the opening is slightly larger than the to-be-plated solar cell.
  • 4. The wafer-holding jig of claim 1, wherein the rotatable front part and the back part of the spring-loaded mechanism act as electrodes to electrically couple front and back surfaces of the to-be-plated photovoltaic structure to the cathode.
  • 5. The wafer-holding jig of claim 1, wherein a respective wafer-mounting frame further includes a plurality of through holes, thereby facilitating uniform metal deposition of both the front and back surfaces of the plurality of photovoltaic structures.
  • 6. An electroplating apparatus, comprising: a tank filled with an electrolyte solution;a number of anodes situated around edges of the tank;a cathode; anda plurality of wafer-holding jigs attached to the cathode, wherein a respective wafer-holding jig comprises: a common connector electrically coupled to the cathode, wherein the common connector is a metal beam;a wafer-holding mechanism consisting of a pair of wafer-mounting frames electrically coupled to the common connector, wherein each wafer-mounting frame includes a plurality of openings and a plurality of spring-loaded mechanisms that hold to-be-plated photovoltaic structures in the opening,wherein each wafer-mounting frame comprises a plurality of through holes that are positioned between the openings, thereby facilitating flow of metal ions and electric field through the frame,wherein each spring-loaded mechanism comprises a back part in a fixed position, a rotatable front part, and a spring coupling the back part and the front part,wherein one end of the spring is directly attached to the wafer-mounting frame,wherein the wafer-mounting frames are arranged in such a way that a first to-be-plated photovoltaic structure mounted on a first wafer-mounting frame is positioned substantially parallel to a second to-be-plated photovoltaic structure mounted on a second wafer-mounting frame,wherein an open space exists between the first to-be-plated photovoltaic structure and the second to-be-plated photovoltaic structure to facilitate simultaneous plating of both the front and back sides of the first and second to-be-plated photovoltaic structures, andwherein a distance between the wafer-mounting frames is between 2 and 20 cm.
  • 7. The electroplating apparatus of claim 6, wherein the cathode is configured to move from one end of the tank to the other end of the tank, thereby facilitating continuous operation of the electroplating apparatus.
  • 8. The electroplating apparatus of claim 6, wherein a respective wafer-mounting frame is made of one or more materials selected from the following group: stainless steel;Ti; andCu.
  • 9. The electroplating apparatus of claim 6, wherein a respective opening is slightly larger than a to-be-plated photovoltaic structure.
  • 10. The electroplating apparatus of claim 6, wherein the rotatable front part and the back part of the spring-loaded mechanism act as electrodes to electrically couple front and back surfaces of the to-be-plated photovoltaic structure to the cathode.
  • 11. The electroplating apparatus of claim 6, wherein a respective wafer-mounting frame further includes a plurality of through holes, thereby facilitating uniform metal deposition of both the front and back surfaces of to-be-plated photovoltaic structures.
  • 12. The electroplating apparatus of claim 6, wherein a gap between two adjacent wafer-holding jigs is between 1 and 10 cm wide.
  • 13. The electroplating apparatus of claim 6, further comprising an auxiliary anode situated between the pair of wafer-mounting frames.
  • 14. The electroplating apparatus of claim 13, wherein the auxiliary anode is made of one or more materials selected from the following group: stainless steel;Ti; andPt.
  • 15. The electroplating apparatus of claim 13, wherein the auxiliary anode is made of similar metals that form the anodes situated around edges of the tank.
RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/827,460, entitled “ELECTROPLATING APPARATUS FOR IMPROVING THROUGHPUT,” by inventors Jianming Fu and Wen Zhong Kong, filed 24 May 2013.

US Referenced Citations (326)
Number Name Date Kind
819360 Mayer Mar 1902 A
2626907 De Groote Jan 1953 A
2938938 Dickson May 1960 A
3094439 Mann Jun 1963 A
3116171 Nielson Dec 1963 A
3459597 Baron Aug 1969 A
3961997 Chu Jun 1976 A
3969163 Wakefield Jul 1976 A
4015280 Matsushita Mar 1977 A
4082568 Lindmayer Apr 1978 A
4124410 Kotval Nov 1978 A
4124455 Lindmayer Nov 1978 A
4193975 Kotval Mar 1980 A
4200621 Liaw Apr 1980 A
4213798 Williams Jul 1980 A
4251285 Yoldas Feb 1981 A
4284490 Weber Aug 1981 A
4315096 Tyan Feb 1982 A
4336648 Pschunder Jun 1982 A
4342044 Ovshinsky Jul 1982 A
4431858 Gonzalez Feb 1984 A
4514579 Hanak Apr 1985 A
4540843 Gochermann Sep 1985 A
4567642 Dilts Feb 1986 A
4571448 Barnett Feb 1986 A
4577051 Hartman Mar 1986 A
4586988 Nath May 1986 A
4589191 Green May 1986 A
4612409 Hamakawa Sep 1986 A
4617421 Nath Oct 1986 A
4633033 Nath Dec 1986 A
4652693 Bar-On Mar 1987 A
4667060 Spitzer May 1987 A
4670096 Schwirtlich Jun 1987 A
4694115 Lillington Sep 1987 A
4771017 Tobin Sep 1988 A
4784702 Henri Nov 1988 A
4820396 de Masi Apr 1989 A
4877460 Flodl Oct 1989 A
4933061 Kulkarni Jun 1990 A
5053355 von Campe Oct 1991 A
5075763 Spitzer Dec 1991 A
5084107 Deguchi Jan 1992 A
5118361 Fraas Jun 1992 A
5131933 Floedl Jul 1992 A
5178685 Borenstein Jan 1993 A
5181968 Nath Jan 1993 A
5213628 Noguchi May 1993 A
5217539 Fraas Jun 1993 A
5279682 Wald Jan 1994 A
5286306 Menezes Feb 1994 A
5364518 Hartig Nov 1994 A
5401331 Ciszek Mar 1995 A
5455430 Noguchi Oct 1995 A
5461002 Safir Oct 1995 A
5563092 Ohmi Oct 1996 A
5576241 Sakai Nov 1996 A
5627081 Tsuo May 1997 A
5676766 Probst Oct 1997 A
5681402 Ichinose Oct 1997 A
5698451 Hanoka Dec 1997 A
5705828 Noguchi Jan 1998 A
5726065 Szlufcik Mar 1998 A
5808315 Murakami Sep 1998 A
5814195 Lehan Sep 1998 A
5903382 Tench May 1999 A
5935345 Kuznicki Aug 1999 A
6034322 Pollard Mar 2000 A
6091019 Sakata Jul 2000 A
6140570 Kariya Oct 2000 A
6232545 Samaras May 2001 B1
6303853 Fraas Oct 2001 B1
6333457 Mulligan Dec 2001 B1
6410843 Kishi Jun 2002 B1
6441297 Keller Aug 2002 B1
6488824 Hollars Dec 2002 B1
6538193 Fraas Mar 2003 B1
6552414 Horzel Apr 2003 B1
6586270 Tsuzuki Jul 2003 B2
6620645 Chandra Sep 2003 B2
6672018 Shingleton Jan 2004 B2
6683360 Dierickx Jan 2004 B1
6736948 Barrett May 2004 B2
6803513 Beernink Oct 2004 B2
6841051 Crowley Jan 2005 B2
7030413 Nakamura Apr 2006 B2
7164150 Terakawa Jan 2007 B2
7328534 Dinwoodie Feb 2008 B2
7388146 Fraas Jun 2008 B2
7399385 German Jul 2008 B2
7534632 Hu May 2009 B2
7635810 Luch Dec 2009 B2
7737357 Cousins Jun 2010 B2
7749883 Meeus Jul 2010 B2
7769887 Bhattacharyya Aug 2010 B1
7772484 Li Aug 2010 B2
7777128 Montello Aug 2010 B2
7825329 Basol Nov 2010 B2
7829781 Montello Nov 2010 B2
7829785 Basol Nov 2010 B2
7872192 Fraas Jan 2011 B1
7905995 German Mar 2011 B2
7977220 Sanjurjo Jul 2011 B2
8070925 Hoffman Dec 2011 B2
8152536 Scherer Apr 2012 B2
8168880 Jacobs May 2012 B2
8182662 Crowley May 2012 B2
8196360 Metten Jun 2012 B2
8209920 Krause Jul 2012 B2
8222513 Luch Jul 2012 B2
8222516 Cousins Jul 2012 B2
8343795 Luo Jan 2013 B2
8586857 Everson Nov 2013 B2
8671630 Lena Mar 2014 B2
20010008143 Sasaoka Jul 2001 A1
20020072207 Andoh Jun 2002 A1
20020086456 Cunningham Jul 2002 A1
20020176404 Girard Nov 2002 A1
20020189939 German Dec 2002 A1
20030000571 Wakuda Jan 2003 A1
20030034062 Stern Feb 2003 A1
20030042516 Forbes Mar 2003 A1
20030070705 Hayden Apr 2003 A1
20030097447 Johnston May 2003 A1
20030116185 Oswald Jun 2003 A1
20030121228 Stoehr Jul 2003 A1
20030168578 Taguchi Sep 2003 A1
20030183270 Falk Oct 2003 A1
20030201007 Fraas Oct 2003 A1
20040065363 Fetzer Apr 2004 A1
20040103937 Bilyalov Jun 2004 A1
20040112426 Hagino Jun 2004 A1
20040123897 Ojima Jul 2004 A1
20040135979 Hazelton Jul 2004 A1
20040152326 Inomata Aug 2004 A1
20040185683 Nakamura Sep 2004 A1
20040200520 Mulligan Oct 2004 A1
20050012095 Niira Jan 2005 A1
20050022861 Rose Feb 2005 A1
20050061665 Pavani Mar 2005 A1
20050064247 Sane Mar 2005 A1
20050074954 Yamanaka Apr 2005 A1
20050109388 Murakami May 2005 A1
20050133084 Joge Jun 2005 A1
20050178662 Wurczinger Aug 2005 A1
20050189015 Rohatgi Sep 2005 A1
20050199279 Yoshimine Sep 2005 A1
20050252544 Rohatgi Nov 2005 A1
20050257823 Zwanenburg Nov 2005 A1
20060012000 Estes Jan 2006 A1
20060060238 Hacke Mar 2006 A1
20060060791 Hazelton Mar 2006 A1
20060130891 Carlson Jun 2006 A1
20060154389 Doan Jul 2006 A1
20060213548 Bachrach Sep 2006 A1
20060231803 Wang Oct 2006 A1
20060255340 Manivannan Nov 2006 A1
20060283496 Okamoto Dec 2006 A1
20060283499 Terakawa Dec 2006 A1
20070023081 Johnson Feb 2007 A1
20070023082 Manivannan Feb 2007 A1
20070108437 Tavkhelidze May 2007 A1
20070110975 Schneweis May 2007 A1
20070132034 Curello Jun 2007 A1
20070137699 Manivannan Jun 2007 A1
20070148336 Bachrach Jun 2007 A1
20070186968 Nakauchi Aug 2007 A1
20070186970 Takahashi Aug 2007 A1
20070202029 Burns Aug 2007 A1
20070235829 Levine Oct 2007 A1
20070256728 Cousins Nov 2007 A1
20070274504 Maes Nov 2007 A1
20070283996 Hachtmann Dec 2007 A1
20070283997 Hachtmann Dec 2007 A1
20080000522 Johnson Jan 2008 A1
20080041437 Yamaguchi Feb 2008 A1
20080047602 Krasnov Feb 2008 A1
20080047604 Korevaar Feb 2008 A1
20080053519 Pearce Mar 2008 A1
20080061293 Ribeyron Mar 2008 A1
20080092947 Lopatin Apr 2008 A1
20080121272 Besser May 2008 A1
20080121276 Lopatin May 2008 A1
20080121932 Ranade May 2008 A1
20080128013 Lopatin Jun 2008 A1
20080149161 Nishida Jun 2008 A1
20080156370 Abdallah Jul 2008 A1
20080173350 Choi Jul 2008 A1
20080196757 Yoshimine Aug 2008 A1
20080202577 Hieslmair Aug 2008 A1
20080202582 Noda Aug 2008 A1
20080216891 Harkness Sep 2008 A1
20080230122 Terakawa Sep 2008 A1
20080251117 Schubert Oct 2008 A1
20080264477 Moslehi Oct 2008 A1
20080276983 Drake Nov 2008 A1
20080283115 Fukawa Nov 2008 A1
20080302030 Stancel Dec 2008 A1
20080303503 Wolfs Dec 2008 A1
20080308145 Krasnov Dec 2008 A1
20090007965 Rohatgi Jan 2009 A1
20090056805 Barnett Mar 2009 A1
20090078318 Meyers Mar 2009 A1
20090084439 Lu Apr 2009 A1
20090101872 Young Apr 2009 A1
20090139512 Lima Jun 2009 A1
20090151783 Lu Jun 2009 A1
20090155028 Boguslavskiy Jun 2009 A1
20090160259 Ravindranath Jun 2009 A1
20090188561 Aiken Jul 2009 A1
20090221111 Frolov Sep 2009 A1
20090229854 Fredenberg Sep 2009 A1
20090239331 Xu Sep 2009 A1
20090250108 Zhou Oct 2009 A1
20090255574 Yu Oct 2009 A1
20090283138 Lin Nov 2009 A1
20090283145 Kim Nov 2009 A1
20090293948 Tucci Dec 2009 A1
20090317934 Scherff Dec 2009 A1
20090320897 Shimomura Dec 2009 A1
20100006145 Lee Jan 2010 A1
20100015756 Weidman Jan 2010 A1
20100043863 Wudu Feb 2010 A1
20100065111 Fu Mar 2010 A1
20100068890 Stockum Mar 2010 A1
20100087031 Veschetti Apr 2010 A1
20100108134 Ravi May 2010 A1
20100116325 Nikoonahad May 2010 A1
20100124619 Xu May 2010 A1
20100132774 Borden Jun 2010 A1
20100132792 Kim Jun 2010 A1
20100147364 Gonzalez Jun 2010 A1
20100169478 Saha Jul 2010 A1
20100175743 Gonzalez Jul 2010 A1
20100186802 Borden Jul 2010 A1
20100193014 Johnson Aug 2010 A1
20100218799 Stefani Sep 2010 A1
20100224230 Luch Sep 2010 A1
20100240172 Rana Sep 2010 A1
20100269904 Cousins Oct 2010 A1
20100279492 Yang Nov 2010 A1
20100300506 Heng Dec 2010 A1
20100300507 Heng Dec 2010 A1
20100313877 Bellman Dec 2010 A1
20100326518 Juso Dec 2010 A1
20110005920 Ivanov Jan 2011 A1
20110073175 Hilali Mar 2011 A1
20110088762 Singh Apr 2011 A1
20110146781 Laudisio Jun 2011 A1
20110156188 Tu Jun 2011 A1
20110168250 Lin Jul 2011 A1
20110220182 Lin Sep 2011 A1
20110245957 Porthouse Oct 2011 A1
20110259419 Hagemann Oct 2011 A1
20110272012 Heng Nov 2011 A1
20110277688 Trujillo Nov 2011 A1
20110277825 Fu et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110284064 Engelhart Nov 2011 A1
20110297224 Miyamoto Dec 2011 A1
20110297227 Pysch Dec 2011 A1
20120000502 Wiedeman Jan 2012 A1
20120012174 Wu Jan 2012 A1
20120028461 Ritchie Feb 2012 A1
20120031480 Tisler Feb 2012 A1
20120040487 Asthana Feb 2012 A1
20120073975 Ganti Mar 2012 A1
20120085384 Beitel Apr 2012 A1
20120125391 Pinarbasi May 2012 A1
20120145233 Syn Jun 2012 A1
20120152349 Cao Jun 2012 A1
20120192932 Wu Aug 2012 A1
20120240995 Coakley Sep 2012 A1
20120248497 Zhou Oct 2012 A1
20120279443 Kornmeyer Nov 2012 A1
20120279548 Munch Nov 2012 A1
20120285517 Souza Nov 2012 A1
20120305060 Fu et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120318319 Pinarbasi Dec 2012 A1
20120318340 Heng Dec 2012 A1
20120325282 Snow Dec 2012 A1
20130000705 Shappir Jan 2013 A1
20130014802 Zimmerman Jan 2013 A1
20130096710 Pinarbasi Apr 2013 A1
20130112239 Liptac May 2013 A1
20130130430 Moslehi May 2013 A1
20130139878 Bhatnagar Jun 2013 A1
20130152996 DeGroot Jun 2013 A1
20130206213 He Aug 2013 A1
20130206221 Gannon Aug 2013 A1
20130213469 Kramer Aug 2013 A1
20130220401 Scheulov Aug 2013 A1
20130228221 Moslehi Sep 2013 A1
20130247955 Baba Sep 2013 A1
20130269771 Cheun Oct 2013 A1
20140000682 Zhao Jan 2014 A1
20140066265 Oliver Mar 2014 A1
20140124013 Morad May 2014 A1
20140124014 Morad May 2014 A1
20140154836 Kim Jun 2014 A1
20140196768 Heng Jul 2014 A1
20140242746 Albadri Aug 2014 A1
20140318611 Moslehi Oct 2014 A1
20140345674 Yang Nov 2014 A1
20150020877 Moslehi Jan 2015 A1
20150171230 Kapur Jun 2015 A1
20150176148 Kim Jun 2015 A1
20150349145 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349153 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349161 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349162 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349167 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349168 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349169 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349170 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349171 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349172 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349173 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349174 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349175 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349176 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349190 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349193 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349701 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349702 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20150349703 Morad Dec 2015 A1
20160190354 Agrawal Jun 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (47)
Number Date Country
100580957 Jan 2010 CN
104409402 Mar 2015 CN
4030713 Apr 1992 DE
202007002897 Aug 2008 DE
102012010151 Nov 2013 DE
1770791 Apr 2007 EP
1806684 Aug 2007 EP
2071635 Jun 2009 EP
2362430 Aug 2011 EP
2385561 Nov 2011 EP
2479796 Jul 2012 EP
2626907 Aug 2013 EP
2479796 Jul 2015 EP
2626907 Aug 2015 EP
H04245683 Sep 1992 JP
H07249788 Sep 1995 JP
10004204 Jan 1998 JP
H1131834 Feb 1999 JP
2002057357 Feb 2002 JP
2005159312 Jun 2005 JP
2009177225 Aug 2009 JP
20050122721 Dec 2005 KR
20060003277 Jan 2006 KR
20090011519 Feb 2009 KR
WO 2013109009 Jul 2013 KR
9117839 Nov 1991 WO
9120097 Dec 1991 WO
03083953 Oct 2003 WO
2006097189 Sep 2006 WO
2008089657 Jul 2008 WO
2009150654 Dec 2009 WO
2009150654 Dec 2009 WO
2010070015 Jun 2010 WO
2010075606 Jul 2010 WO
2010075606 Jul 2010 WO
2010085949 Aug 2010 WO
2010104726 Sep 2010 WO
2010123974 Oct 2010 WO
2011005447 Jan 2011 WO
2011005447 Jan 2011 WO
2011008881 Jan 2011 WO
2011008881 Jan 2011 WO
2011053006 May 2011 WO
2011123646 Oct 2011 WO
2013020590 Feb 2013 WO
2014074826 Jul 2014 WO
2014110520 Jul 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (26)
Entry
Beaucarne G et al: ‘Epitaxial thin-film Si solar cells’ Thin Solid Films, Elsevier-Sequoia S.A. Lausanne, CH LNKD—DOI:10.1016/J.TSF.2005.12.003, vol. 511-512, Jul. 26, 2006 (Jul. 26, 2006), pp. 533-542, XP025007243 ISSN: 0040-6090 [retrieved on Jul. 26, 2006].
Chabal, Yves J. et al., ‘Silicon Surface and Interface Issues for Nanoelectronics,’ The Electrochemical Society Interface, Spring 2005, pp. 31-33.
Collins English Dictionary (Convex. (2000). In Collins English Dictionary. http://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/hcengdict/convex/0 on Oct. 18, 2014).
Cui, ‘Chapter 7 Dopant diffusion’, publically available as early as Nov. 4, 2010 at <https://web.archive.org/web/20101104143332/http://ece.uwaterloo.ca/˜bcui/content/NE/%20343/Chapter/%207%20Dopant%20 diffusion%20—%20l.pptx> and converted to PDF.
Davies, P.C.W., ‘Quantum tunneling time,’ Am. J. Phys. 73, Jan. 2005, pp. 23-27.
Dosaj V D et al: ‘Single Crystal Silicon Ingot Pulled From Chemically-Upgraded Metallurgical-Grade Silicon’ Conference Record of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, May 6, 1975 (May 6, 1975), pp. 275-279, XP001050345.
Green, Martin A. et al., ‘High-Efficiency Silicon Solar Cells,’ IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-31, No. 5, May 1984, pp. 679-683.
Hamm, Gary, Wei, Lingyum, Jacques, Dave, Development of a Plated Nickel Seed Layer for Front Side Metallization of Silicon Solar Cells, EU PVSEC Proceedings, Presented Sep. 2009.
JCS Pires, J Otubo, AFB Braga, PR Mei; The purification of metallurgical grade silicon by electron beam melting, J of Mats Process Tech 169 (2005) 16-20.
Khattak, C. P. et al., “Refining Molten Metallurgical Grade Silicon for use as Feedstock for Photovoltaic Applications”, 16th E.C. Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, May 1-5, 2000, pp. 1282-1283.
Merriam-Webster online dictionary—“mesh”. (accessed Oct. 8, 2012).
Mueller, Thomas, et al. “Application of wide-band gap hydrogenated amorphous silicon oxide layers to heterojunction solar cells for high quality passivation.” Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2008. PVSC'08. 33rd IEEE. IEEE, 2008.
Mueller, Thomas, et al. “High quality passivation for heteroj unction solar cells by hydrogenated amorphous silicon suboxide films.” Applied Physics Letters 92.3 (2008): 033504-033504.
Munzer, K.A. “High Throughput Industrial In-Line Boron BSF Diffusion” Jun. 2005. 20th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, pp. 777-780.
National Weather Service Weather Forecast Office (“Why Do We have Seasons?” http://www.crh.noaa.gov/lmk/?n=seasons Accessed Oct. 18, 2014).
O'Mara, W.C.; Herring, R.B.; Hunt L.P. (1990). Handbook of Semiconductor Silicon Technology. William Andrew Publishing/Noyes. pp. 275-293.
Roedern, B. von, et al., ‘Why is the Open-Circuit Voltage of Crystalline Si Solar Cells so Critically Dependent on Emitter- and Base-Doping?’ Presented at the 9th Workshop on Crystalline Silicon Solar Cell Materials and Processes, Breckenridge, CO, Aug. 9-11, 1999.
Stangl et al., Amorphous/Crystalline Silicon heterojunction solar cells—a simulation study; 17th European Photovoltaic Conference, Munich, Oct. 2001.
Warabisako T et al: ‘Efficient Solar Cells From Metallurgical-Grade Silicon’ Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Japan Society of Applied Physics, JP, vol. 19, No. Suppl. 19-01, Jan. 1, 1980 (Jan. 1, 1980), pp. 539-544, XP008036363 ISSN: 0021-4922.
WP Leroy et al., “In Search for the Limits of Rotating Cylindrical Magnetron Sputtering”, Magnetron, ION Processing and ARC Technologies European Conference, Jun. 18, 2010, pp. 1-32.
Yao Wen-Jie et al: ‘Interdisciplinary Physics and Related Areas of Science and Technology;The p recombination layer in tunnel junctions for micromorph tandem solar cells’, Chinese Physics B, Chinese Physics B, Bristol GB, vol. 20, No. 7, Jul. 26, 2011 (Jul. 26, 2011), p. 78402, XP020207379, ISSN: 1674-1056, DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/20/7/078402.
Parthavi, “Doping by Diffusion and Implantation”, <http://www.leb.eei.uni-erlangen.de/winterakademie/2010/report/course03/pdf/0306.pdf>.
Weiss, “Development of different copper seed layers with respect to the copper electroplating process,” Microelectronic Engineering 50 (2000) 443-440, Mar. 15, 2000.
Tomasi, “Back-contacted Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells With Efficiency>21%” 2014 IEEE.
Hornbachner et al., “Cambered Photovoltaic Module and Method for its Manufacture” Jun. 17, 2009.
Machine translation of JP 10004204 A, Shindou et al.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140346035 A1 Nov 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61827460 May 2013 US