1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a scanning type exposure apparatus and method, and a device manufacturing method, wherein the exposure apparatus is preferably used in a lithography process for manufacturing micro-devices.
2. Description of the Related Art
In a lithography process of micro-device (semiconductor) manufacturing, two types of exposure apparatuses are known. One is a step-and-repeat type (so-called a stepper) and the other is a step-and-scan type (so-called a scanner or a scanning type exposure apparatus).
The former type uses a step-and-repeat sequence for transferring stepwise a pattern of an original (e.g., a reticle or a mask) onto a substrate (e.g., a semiconductor wafer or a glass substrate). In that sequence, the whole pattern of the original is illuminated and is projected onto one of a plurality of exposure regions of the substrate through a projection optical system, while the original and the substrate are maintained stationary. Next, the substrate is moved stepwise to change the exposure region and then exposure is repeated in the same manner.
On the other hand, the latter type uses a step-and-scan sequence. In that sequence, the original pattern is illuminated with a slit-like beam and a portion of the pattern is projected onto one of the exposure regions of the substrate, while both the original and the substrate are scanningly moved. Then, the substrate is moved stepwise to change the exposure region, and thereafter the exposure is repeated in the same manner.
The latter step-and-scan type exposure apparatus seems to have become the mainstream, expected at least in the near future, for the reason that it has a high potential of exposure performance in terms of an increase in transferring precision and field size.
The scanning type exposure apparatus mainly comprises stage devices (e.g., a wafer stage or a reticle stage) for scanningly moving the wafer and the reticle (mask), an illumination optical system and a projection optical system. In this apparatus, while scanning exposure is performed, the wafer stage and the reticle stage are synchronously controlled by a master-slave control method, in which the wafer stage is a master stage and the reticle stage is a slave stage, and the reticle stage follows the movement of the wafer stage in the scanning direction. The master-slave control method provides an advantage in improving movement resolution, especially when the projection optical system is a reduced scale system.
The apparatus also includes detection systems, e.g., laser interferometers for detecting the stage positions in the scanning direction, and a focus detector for detecting a distance between the wafer surface and a focal plane of a projection optical system during the scanning exposure, for adjusting the wafer surface with respect to a focal plane of the projection optical system.
Time series outputs from the focus detector tend to have smooth variations. With the recent advancements in wafer planarization processes and to increase pattern transfer accuracy, wafers are processed to be as smooth as possible. As a result, the focus detection outputs typically do not have sudden variations, at least within each chip area (shot area).
Conversely, adjusting the wafer surface in the tilt direction according to a detection having sudden variations causes defocusing within the chip area. For example, if a 50 ppm inclination was obtained as the focus detection on a condition that the chip area has a 20 mm size in a longitudinal slit direction, there exists 50 ppm×20 mm=1 micron of height difference in a Z direction between edge portions of the chip area. Since the recent exposure apparatuses have a DOF (Depth Of Focus) of at most 0.7 micron, it is difficult to perform exposure without causing any defocusing in each of the chip areas.
One of the expected causes of sudden focus detection variations is the presence of contaminated particles on the wafer or the wafer chuck surface. For example, wafer resist exfoliation particles are apt to cling onto the wafer surface or the chuck surface in the form of such contaminated particles. Semiconductor manufacturing processes pay close attention to reduce such resist exfoliation particles, and regular maintenance checks are performed to replace and clean the wafer chuck. However, the contaminated particles on the chuck are frequently not detected. Therefore, the chuck may become contaminated during the term between the maintenance checks. Consequently, productivity (e.g., chip production yield) deteriorates.
It is an object of the invention to provide an improved exposure apparatus and a semiconductor manufacturing method having high reliability and productivity.
According to one aspect of the present invention, a scanning type exposure apparatus comprises a projection optical system which projects a pattern of a reticle onto a wafer, which is held by a wafer chuck, a scanning stage system which scanningly moves the reticle and the wafer synchronously with respect the projection optical system, and an inspection system which automatically inspects influence of particles on at least one of the wafer and on the wafer chuck.
According to another aspect of the present invention, an inspection method for a scanning type exposure apparatus comprises the steps of holding a wafer on a chuck of a wafer stage, scanningly moving, by the wafer stage, the held wafer relative to a focus detector, detecting, by the focus detector, a focus state of the wafer a plurality of times in a row while scanning is performed, and producing a plurality of detection data, and comparing the plurality of detection data to a threshold, in order to determine sudden changes of the plurality of data.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, a device manufacturing method for manufacturing micro-devices comprises the steps of holding a wafer on a chuck of a wafer stage, holding a reticle having a pattern on a reticle stage, scanningly moving the reticle and the wafer synchronously with respect a projection optical system and a focus detector, so as to transfer the pattern onto the wafer, detecting, by the focus detector, a focus state of the wafer a plurality of times in a row while scanning is performed, and producing a plurality of detection data, and comparing the plurality of detection data to a threshold in order to determine sudden changes of the plurality of data.
These and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The invention will be described in further detail by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The apparatus further comprises laser interferometers 17, 18, which respectively measure the position of the reticle stage 12 and the wafer stage 15 in the scanning direction (Y-direction), and a focus detector 19, which detects a distance (Z-direction) and an inclination (tilt-directions) between the wafer surface and a focal plane of the projection optical system 14. The focus detector 19 comprises an oblique incidence detection system, having a light source and a photodetector, which illuminates the wafer 16 with an oblique light beam by the light source and detects a focusing state or a position of the reflected light by the photodetector. In another embodiment, the focus detector may include a fluid micrometer system, which applies a pressurized gas toward the wafer and detects a back pressure of the gas.
While scanning exposure is performed, movement of the reticle stage 12 and the wafer stage 15 is synchronously controlled using a master-slave control method, based on the measurements of the interferometers 17, 18. Thereby, a larger exposure field can be obtained. Also, the focus in the Z-direction and the leveling in the tilt-directions of the wafer stage can be controlled based on the measurement of the focus detector 19.
In step 8, after the scanning exposure is finished, the calculator 7 calculates differences between measured values of an N(1˜M−1)th detection and an (N+1)th detection. In step 9, a calculated difference is compared with a threshold. In step 10, if no calculated difference exceeds a threshold (predetermined value), then operation proceeds to the end. However, if any calculated difference exceeds a threshold, that means a sudden change of values has occurred and it is determined in step 11 that at least one particle could exist on or near the measured position on the wafer 16 or on the holding surface of the wafer chuck 20.
In step 12, the operational console 8 displays a message or sounds a warning signal to indicate to the operator that a potential particle exists, based on the calculation. Therefore, it is possible to abort an exposure operation based on an instruction of the operator, or automatically, in order to clean the wafer chuck 16 for removing the particles. Hence, it is easy to reduce defective chips and to increase manufacturing productivity.
Meanwhile, although the above example shows a method of performing the focus detection during the pattern transfer for detecting particles, another solution could be provided. That is, the apparatus can have a special inspection mode to detect particles without performing pattern transfer, namely, by performing the focus detection while moving the wafer stages without illuminating the reticle and the wafer with exposure light.
Further, it may be desirable to modify the above embodiment into determining particles for every wafer (including a plurality of chip areas), instead of for each chip area. That would be achieved by memorizing the measured data of all chip areas of the wafer and performing calculations for every wafer at the time of wafer replacement. Also, it is possible to analyze historical data for each wafer, for example, by comparing the Nth and the (N+1)th wafer.
Except as otherwise disclosed herein, the various components shown in outline or in block form in the figures are individually well known and their internal construction and operation are not critical either to the making or using of this invention or to a description of the best mode of the invention.
While the present invention has been described with respect to what is at present considered to be the preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments. To the contrary, the invention is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10-313957 | Oct 1998 | JP | national |
This application is a divisional application of copending patent application Ser. No. 10/207,768, filed on Jul. 31, 2002, which is a continuation of patent application Ser. No. 09/418,253, filed on Oct. 15, 1999, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,456,374 on Sep. 24, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4849901 | Shimizu | Jul 1989 | A |
4893932 | Knollenberg | Jan 1990 | A |
5105075 | Ohta et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5124562 | Kawashima et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5142156 | Ozawa et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5162867 | Kohno | Nov 1992 | A |
5218415 | Kawashima | Jun 1993 | A |
5243377 | Umatate et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5363172 | Tokuda | Nov 1994 | A |
5448332 | Sakakibara et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5473424 | Okumura | Dec 1995 | A |
5559582 | Nishi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5569930 | Imai | Oct 1996 | A |
5585918 | Takeuchi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587794 | Mizutani et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5602400 | Kawashima | Feb 1997 | A |
5602639 | Kohno | Feb 1997 | A |
5657130 | Shirasu et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5729337 | Tanaka | Mar 1998 | A |
5737063 | Miyachi | Apr 1998 | A |
5747202 | Tanaka | May 1998 | A |
5751428 | Kataoka et al. | May 1998 | A |
5777744 | Yoshii et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5825043 | Suwa | Oct 1998 | A |
5825468 | Ishimaru | Oct 1998 | A |
5942357 | Ota | Aug 1999 | A |
5978078 | Salamati-Saradh et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6080517 | Miyachi | Jun 2000 | A |
6117598 | Imai | Sep 2000 | A |
6118515 | Wakamoto et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6163369 | Yamada et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6277533 | Wakamoto et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287734 | Imai | Sep 2001 | B2 |
6411387 | Kaneko et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6456374 | Takeishi | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6894763 | Murakami et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
61-287229 | Dec 1986 | JP |
63006511 | Jan 1988 | JP |
1-264220 | Oct 1989 | JP |
2-122613 | May 1990 | JP |
7-37772 | Feb 1995 | JP |
8-37150 | Feb 1996 | JP |
9-266169 | Oct 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050185164 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10207768 | Jul 2002 | US |
Child | 11114158 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09418253 | Oct 1999 | US |
Child | 10207768 | US |