The present invention relates to an exposure apparatus for exposing a substrate to radiant energy. The exposure apparatus according to the present invention is suitable as an exposure apparatus using, e.g., EUV (Extreme Ultra Violet) light as radiant energy.
At present, the manufacture of semiconductor devices such as a DRAM and MPU are under extensive study and development, aiming at attaining devices having line widths of 50 nm or less on the design rule. A promising exposure apparatus used in this generation is an exposure apparatus (EUV exposure apparatus) using EUV light. In the EUV exposure apparatus, the optical path of EUV light is set under a vacuum environment to prevent gasses from absorbing the EUV light.
In general, a semiconductor exposure apparatus reduces and transfers a circuit pattern image drawn on a reticle (mask) onto a wafer using a projection optical system. If, for example, a particle (minute foreign substance) adheres on the circuit pattern surface of the reticle, its image is transferred at just the same position as that of each shot. This particle adhesion results in a decrease in the manufacturing yield of semiconductor devices or in a decrease in the reliability of the semiconductor devices itself.
To solve this problem, in an exposure apparatus using, e.g., a mercury lamp or excimer laser as a light source, a transparent protective film called a pellicle is formed with a spacing of several mm from the reticle to suppress any particles from directly adhering on the circuit pattern surface and their images from being transferred onto the wafer.
However, the pellicle thickness which satisfies the transmittance required for the EUV exposure apparatus is several tens of nm. Such a very thin pellicle can obtain neither a sufficient mechanical strength nor thermal resistance. For this reason, the EUV exposure apparatus can hardly prevent particle adhesion using the pellicle in practice.
Patent references 1 and 2 propose a method using a pulse laser as a means for preventing any particles from adhering on, e.g., a reticle without using the pellicle.
[Patent Reference 1] Japanese Patent Publication No. 6-95510
[Patent Reference 2] Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 2000-88999
Unfortunately, patent reference 1 removes particles adhering on the mask by moving it to a position different from that during exposure and cleaning it. This requires much time to clean the mask, resulting in a decrease in throughput. Still worse, particles may be inevitably generated upon sliding and friction in the process of moving the cleaned mask to the exposure position, and adhere on the mask again.
Patent reference 2 introduces an inert gas into a chamber to clean the reticle. This is to use the inert gas to trap particles separated upon laser irradiation and recover them together with the gas. However, the inside of a vacuum chamber of the EUV exposure apparatus must be kept under a high vacuum ((10×10−3 to 10×10−5) Pa) environment. Once the gas is introduced into the chamber as described in patent reference 2, exposure becomes impossible. In this case, it takes a much time to obtain a high vacuum state again, so the effective operation rate of the apparatus significantly decreases.
If a particle is generated in the exposure apparatus under a vacuum environment, there are often no clues to where and how it is generated, and its material and diameter. Therefore, a method using only a pulse laser is expected to drastically decrease the removal rate due to adhesion of particles.
It is an exemplary object of the present invention to reduce decreases in apparatus operation rate due to cleaning of an object.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided an exposure apparatus for exposing a substrate to radiant energy in a vacuum, the apparatus comprising a chamber in which the vacuum is generated, a blowing device including a supply nozzle located in the chamber and configured to blow, through the supply nozzle, a gas to an object arranged in the chamber in which the vacuum is generated, and a recovery device including a recovery nozzle located in the chamber and configured to recover, through the recovery nozzle, the gas blown into the chamber through the supply nozzle, wherein the apparatus is configured so that the object moves in a direction opposite to a direction from the supply nozzle to the recovery nozzle, parallel to blowing by the blowing device.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, there is provided an exposure apparatus for exposing a substrate to radiant energy in a vacuum, the apparatus comprising a chamber in which the vacuum is generated, a blowing device including a supply nozzle located in the chamber and configured to blow, through the supply nozzle, a gas to an object arranged in the chamber in which the vacuum is generated, a recovery device including a recovery nozzle located in the chamber and configured to recover, through the recovery nozzle, the gas blown into the chamber through the supply nozzle, and an irradiator configured to irradiate the object with a pulse laser light, wherein the apparatus is configured so that a region on the object, to which said blowing device blows the gas, overlaps a region on the object, which is irradiated with the pulse laser light, and gas blowing by the blowing device and pulse laser light irradiation by the irradiator are performed in synchronism with each other.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided an exposure apparatus for exposing a substrate to radiant energy in a vacuum, the apparatus comprising a chamber in which the vacuum is generated, a blowing device including a supply nozzle located in the chamber and configured to blow, through the supply nozzle, a gas to an object arranged in the chamber in which the vacuum is generated, and a recovery device including a recovery nozzle located in the chamber, and recovers, through the recovery nozzle, the gas blown into the chamber through the supply nozzle, wherein the apparatus is configured so that the blowing device blows a supersonic gas with a shock wave.
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided an exposure apparatus for exposing a substrate to radiant energy in a vacuum, the apparatus comprising a chamber in which the vacuum is generated, a blowing device including a supply nozzle located in the chamber and configured to blow, through the supply nozzle, a gas to an object arranged in the chamber in which the vacuum is generated, and a recovery device including a recovery nozzle located in the chamber and configured to recover, through the recovery nozzle, the gas blown into the chamber through the supply nozzle, wherein the apparatus is configured so that a component of the gas blown by the blowing device is sublimated to a solid.
According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of manufacturing a device, the method including: exposing a substrate to radiant energy using the above-described exposure apparatus; developing the exposed substrate; and processing the developed substrate to manufacture the device.
Further features of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of exemplary embodiments with reference to the attached drawings.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
An exposure apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
The scanning operations of the reticle stage 3 and wafer stage 27 are synchronously controlled to satisfy:
Vr/Vw=β
where 1/β is the reduction magnification of the projection optical system 5, Vr is the scanning velocity of the reticle chuck 7, and Vw is the scanning velocity of the wafer stage 27.
The reticle stage 3, projection optical system 5, and wafer stage 27 are accommodated in a reticle stage space 4a, projection optical system space 4b, and wafer stage space 4c, respectively. Gate valves 16a and 16b can partition these spaces. Vacuum exhaust units 10a, 10b, and 10c are independently accommodated in the respective spaces so as to independently control their pressures. With this arrangement, exposure can be performed under a vacuum environment as high as (10×10−3 to 10×10−5) Pa.
Reference numeral 15 denotes a wafer load lock chamber; 8, a transport hand for loading or unloading the wafer 1 between the wafer load lock chamber 15 and the wafer stage 27; 10e, a vacuum exhaust unit for the wafer load lock chamber 15; 14, a wafer exchange room for temporarily storing the wafer 1 under an atmospheric pressure; and 13, a transport hand for loading or unloading the wafer 1 between the transport hand 8 and the wafer 1. A gate valve 11a is inserted between the wafer stage space 4c and the wafer load lock chamber 15. A gate valve 11b is inserted between the wafer load lock chamber 15 and the wafer exchange room 14.
Reference numeral 23 denotes a reticle load lock chamber; 22, a transport hand for loading or unloading the reticle 2 between the reticle load lock chamber 23 and the reticle stage 3; 10d, a vacuum exhaust unit for the reticle load lock chamber 23; 19, a reticle exchange room for temporarily storing the reticle 2 under an atmospheric pressure; and 18, a transport hand for loading or unloading the reticle 2 between the reticle load lock chamber 23 and the reticle exchange room 19. A gate valve 12a is inserted between the reticle stage space 4a and the reticle load lock chamber 23. A gate valve 12b is inserted between the reticle load lock chamber 23 and the reticle exchange room 19.
In this embodiment, three removal action forces to be described hereinafter are used simultaneously or independently to remove particles adhering on a cleaning target surface (e.g., a reticle surface).
The first cleaning action uses irradiation with a UV pulse laser. This action utilizes, e.g., a thermoelastic wave action which instantaneously occurs on a substrate upon irradiation with a pulse beam having a cycle on the order of nsec, or a photochemical action which occurs upon irradiation with light in the UV range. By combining these actions, adhering particles are removed from the substrate.
The second cleaning action uses a gas jet. This action obtains a removal effect by blowing a gas jet onto a surface, on which particles are adhering, so that a supersonic shock wave acts on them. In general, when the gas is air, the flow rate exceeds the sound velocity as the pressure ratio becomes equal to or higher than 0.528. In this embodiment, a stream that flows at a velocity exceeding the sound velocity and produces a shock wave is easily generated by blowing a gas at normal pressure under a vacuum environment.
The third cleaning action uses adiabatic expansion by blowing a gas in a vacuum. In general, the temperature of a gas drops upon its rapid adiabatic expansion. At the same time, the saturated vapor pressure of the gas drops and it condenses. If the temperature drops more extremely, the droplet becomes colder and then solidifies into fine particles. This action obtains a particle removal action by causing these solidified fine particles to physically impinge on a particle at a supersonic velocity.
A mechanism associated with the third action will be explained using a simple model obtained by trial calculation shown in
More specifically, assume a case in which air at a relative humidity of 50% (23° C.) fills a closed space with a volume of about 1 cc. The probability of water vapor condensation was simulated assuming that an ideal exhaust system with an effective exhaust velocity of 200 cc/min evacuated the space. Referring to
where Psat is the saturated water vapor pressure of the gas, and Pvap is the water vapor pressure of the gas. When the saturation ratio Sr≧1 and the gas contains a particle, the water vapor normally condenses around the particle as a nucleus (heterogeneous nucleation). Since the gas used in this embodiment contains no particle which acts as a nucleus, homogeneous nucleation occurs in which the water vapor condenses without any nucleus. The saturation ratio at this time is normally Sr≧4. As is obvious from this trial calculation, when a gas is supplied under the above-described condition, the saturation ratio readily exceeds 4 and the water vapor condenses. In addition, since the gas temperature drops to the freezing point or less, the droplet generated upon condensation further condenses into fine particles, i.e., shifts to an ice phase.
Although the case using air and water vapor has been exemplified above, the same applies to other types of gasses. When a gas is blown into a vacuum, its temperature drops upon rapid adiabatic expansion in a nozzle. The gas condensed into fine particles impinges on a particle at a supersonic velocity. This physical action removes the particle. The fine gas particles remaining after particle removal vaporize again, and are discharged outside a vacuum chamber by a vacuum pump.
According to this embodiment, it is possible to effectively remove any particles on a reticle using the above-described three particle removal action forces simultaneously or independently.
A particle removal mechanism according to this embodiment will be explained in detail with reference to
The laser irradiation unit will be explained in detail first. Reference numeral 21 denotes a pulse laser source. The pulse laser source 21 uses, e.g., an ArF laser (wavelength: 193 nm), a KrF laser (wavelength: 248 nm), or a YAG laser (wavelength: 266 nm or the like). Reference numeral 70 denotes a homogenizer for uniforming the irradiation distribution of a pulse beam emitted by the pulse laser source 21. Reference numeral 20 denotes a laser light guiding window made of an optical material such as a silica glass, which exhibits a low absorbance of the incident wavelength. The laser light supplied by the pulse laser source 21 is guided into the reticle stage space 4a via the laser light guiding window 20. Reference numeral 26 denotes an optical system for conversing and enlarging the laser light, which is guided from the laser light guiding window 20 into the reticle stage space 4a, to have a beam shape suitable to remove particles. Reference numeral 35 denotes a variable angle reflecting mirror. The laser light reflected by the reflecting mirror 35 strikes a pattern surface 30 of the reticle 2. The laser irradiation unit includes the pulse laser source 21, homogenizer 70, laser light guiding window 20, optical system 26, and reflecting mirror 35.
The gas blowing unit will be explained. Reference numeral 17a denotes a gas jet nozzle (supply nozzle). Reference numeral 28a denotes a gas source for a gas jet. Examples of the gas to be supplied are inert gasses such as Ar, N2, Kr, and Xe gasses. Reference numeral 28b denotes a buffer chamber. The buffer chamber 28b is capable of gas flow control, and also functions as a cooling unit which cools a gas in advance to the degree that it condenses into fine particles upon adiabatic expansion. Reference numeral 28c denotes a flow control unit including, e.g., a metering valve and mass flow controller having a function which allows flow control. Reference numeral 25 denotes a solenoid valve for turning on/off gas supply to the supply nozzle 17a. The gas blowing unit includes the supply nozzle 17a, gas source 28a, buffer chamber 28b, flow control unit 28c, and solenoid valve 25.
As the gas reaches the supply nozzle 17a from the buffer chamber 28b via the flow control unit 28c and solenoid valve 25, the supply nozzle 17a blows it into a vacuum. At this time, since the pressure ratio between the gas supply side and the vacuum chamber side is equal to or higher than 0.528, the gas velocity at the outlet port of the nozzle is equal to or higher than the sound velocity, thus generating a stream which produces a shock wave. At the same time, the temperature rapidly drops upon rapid adiabatic expansion, and the gas condenses into fine particles in accordance with the above-described mechanism.
To blow a gas jet onto the entire reticle pattern surface 30, the supply nozzle 17a has a large number of orifices (gas supply port) formed to align themselves in one direction (the X direction) as shown in
The position at which the blown gas jet impinges on the reticle 2 overlaps the pulse laser irradiation position. The distance between the supply nozzle 17a and the reticle 2 is optimized to maximize the removal efficiency, and is normally set at several mm.
Reference numeral 17b denotes a recovery nozzle (recovery unit) having a recovery port for recovering removed particles or efficiently exhausting a jet stream. The recovery nozzle 17b is bent into a funnel shape, as shown in
In cleaning the reticle 2, the reticle stage 3 scan-moves the reticle 2 in a direction (the Y direction) perpendicular to the direction (the X direction) in which the gas supply port of the supply nozzle 17a extends. Then, the entire surface of the reticle 2 undergoes laser irradiation and gas blowing, thereby removing particles. Although the reticle 2 as a cleaning target moves in the Y direction here, its moving direction need not always be a direction perpendicular to the direction in which the gas supply port extends. If the moving direction of the target is different from the direction in which the gas supply port extends, wide-area cleaning is possible.
Referring to
Reference numeral 24 denotes a pulse generator which can generate a pulse signal with a predetermined repetition frequency. This pulse signal triggers laser oscillation. Likewise, this pulse signal turns on/off the solenoid valve so that the supply nozzle 17a blows a gas jet in a pulse manner and the pulse laser oscillates in synchronism with it.
This sequence will be explained with reference to
The relationship between the pulse beam irradiation count and the particle removal rate will be explained. An experiment concerning a pulse laser irradiation method conducted by the inventor of the present invention reveals that the removal rate of particles adhering on a substrate can be improved by irradiating it with a larger number of pulse beams.
Although the relationship between the pulse beam irradiation count and the removal rate has been exemplified above, the same applies to that between the pulse jet blowing count and the removal rate.
The laser irradiation position and gas blowing position on the reticle pattern surface will be explained.
The relationship among a desired removal rate, stage velocity, and laser setting parameter will be explained. Referring to
ΔTs=W/Vs (1)
Assuming that an irradiation area in which the reticle moves within this time requires at least N times of pulse irradiation, a pulse time interval ΔTp is given by:
ΔTp=ΔTs/N=W/(Vs×N) (2)
A pulse time interval Δτ of the pulse laser source is given by:
Δτ=1/F (3)
Since ΔTp must be larger than Δτ to form a desired cleaning system, we have:
W/(Vs×N)>1/F (4)
which is rewritten into:
(Vs×N)/W<F (5)
That is, to obtain a desired removal rate (corresponding to N pulse irradiation), simple relational expression (5) must hold. For example, if Vs=100 [mm/s], F=300 [Hz], and N=30 [#], the required sheet beam thickness W is found to be equal to or larger than 10 [mm] from relational expression (5).
Although pulse laser irradiation has been exemplified above, just the same applies to gas blowing. More specifically, the above-described relational expression (5) naturally holds even when the sheet beam thickness W is changed to a width (a width at which a gas jet in the scanning direction impinges on the reticle 2) W′ of a gas jet on the reticle 2, and the number N of pulses required for pulse laser removal is changed to a number N′ of pulses required for gas jet removal. In exactly the same way, relational expression (5) holds even when a pulse laser and pulse jet are used simultaneously.
A sequence for cleaning the reticle 2 in this embodiment will be explained next with reference to
In step 111, a reticle set sequence starts. In step 112, the reticle 2 is transported from a stocker in the reticle exchange room 19 into the reticle stage space 4a via the reticle load lock chamber 23. In step 114, the reticle 2 is held on the reticle stage 3 via the reticle chuck 7. In step 115, the gate valve 16a temporarily closes to prevent any gas and removed particles from flowing in the projection optical system space 4b upon cleaning. In step 116, the reticle 2 held on the reticle stage 3 starts moving to undergo cleaning. In step 117, laser irradiation and gas jet blowing for the reticle 2 are performed synchronously or independently. After completing pulse laser irradiation and gas jet blowing for the entire reticle pattern region, the operation of the reticle stage 3 ends in step 118. The gate valve 16a opens again in step 119, and the reticle 2 is aligned in step 120. In step 121, the reticle set sequence ends.
An example of a sequence in which particles readily adhere on the reticle is a transportation sequence. As illustrated in the sequence of
A case in which reticle cleaning is performed during wafer alignment in an exposure operation sequence will be exemplified with reference to
In step 122, lot processing starts after the reticle 2 is loaded on the exposure apparatus and reticle alignment is completed, in order to expose a desired layer. In step 123, an argument j indicating the wafer number is set to 1. In step 124, the first wafer 1 is loaded on the wafer stage 27. In step 125, the processing of the first wafer starts. In step 126, the wafer 1 undergoes alignment measurement prior to exposure.
A reticle cleaning sequence starts parallel to steps 124, 125, and 126. In step 132, the gate valve 16a temporarily closes to prevent any gas and particles from flowing in the projection optical system space 4b upon cleaning. In step 133, the reticle 2 held on the reticle stage 3 starts moving to undergo cleaning. In step 134, laser irradiation and gas jet blowing for the reticle 2 are performed synchronously or independently. After completing pulse laser irradiation and gas jet blowing for the entire reticle pattern region, the operation of the reticle stage 3 ends in step 135. In step 136, the gate valve 16a opens again and the cleaning sequence ends. The series of cleaning sequence operations need only be completed within a period during which the wafer 1 is transported and aligned.
After completing the exposure of all shots, the processing of the first wafer is thoroughly complete. Since only one wafer is exposed at this point, the determination result in step 129 is No and the wafer number argument j is incremented in step 131. In step 124, a wafer is loaded on the wafer stage 27 again to process it as the second wafer. In step 125, the processing of the second wafer starts. As described above, a series of reticle cleaning operations in steps 132, 133, 134, 135, and 136 is performed parallel to steps 124, 125, and 126. By repeating the above-described operations, the series of exposure operations is completed for all of M wafers in step 129. In step 130, the processing shifts to the next lot processing.
In this example, the reticle is cleaned parallel to wafer exchange and alignment. This makes it possible to always keep the reticle clean without lowering the throughput. Although reticle cleaning is performed for each wafer in this example, it is possible to decrease the cleaning frequency depending on the use state of the exposure apparatus, as a matter of course.
In recent years, there is known an exposure apparatus which separately has an exposure stage and alignment stage. The reticle cleaning sequence described in this embodiment is applicable to even an exposure apparatus of this type.
The second embodiment will be described with reference to
An electric field must be generated between the mesh electrodes 40 and the collecting plate 41, whereas the one must not be generated between the surface of a reticle 2 and the mesh electrodes 40 by connecting (grounding) them to the GND potential. That is, removed particles enter into the mesh electrodes 40 at an angle of about θ shown in
If there is a potential gradient between the reticle 2 and the mesh electrodes 40, a particle may adhere on the reticle 2 again depending on its polarity. To avoid this situation, the reticle surface and the mesh electrodes 40 are maintained at the same potential to prevent any particles from adhering on the reticle 2 again, as described above.
In general, fine particles produced upon a relatively rapid reaction are often electrically charged, whereas the ones produced upon a relatively slow reaction are often not electrically charged. From this viewpoint, even particles removed by a laser are electrically charged to some extent. In general, fine particles made of nonmetal materials or nonmetal oxides are positively charged, whereas the ones made of metals or metal oxides are negatively charged. For this reason, as in this embodiment, generating an electric field between the mesh electrodes 40 and the collecting plate 41 allows one of two electrodes to collect the particles even when they are made of materials having different electrification polarities.
Assume that the particles are not electrically charged. If they are conductors, their surfaces are electrically charged upon electrostatic induction by applying an electric field to them. Likewise, if they are nonconductors, their surfaces are electrically charged upon dielectric polarization. Collection becomes possible by forming a nonuniform electric field having a nonuniform electric field gradient. In this embodiment, even uncharged particles can be collected because a nonuniform electric field is formed.
Since electrodes can be easily introduced in a system design even though a recovery nozzle as explained in the first embodiment cannot be physically introduced in the design, the second embodiment has a higher versatility than the first embodiment.
To collect removed particles using the electrostatic force, an electrode may be built in the recovery nozzle, as shown in
The third embodiment will be described with reference to
Referring to
Referring to
Similar to the first embodiment, let Vs [m/s] be the constant moving velocity of the wafer stage 27; W [m], the beam sheet thickness of the pulse laser; and F [Hz], the repetition frequency of the pulse laser. Then; to obtain a desired removal rate (corresponding to N pulse irradiation), simple relational expression (5) must hold.
Although pulse laser irradiation has been exemplified above, just the same applies to gas blowing. Even when pulse laser irradiation and pulse jet blowing are used simultaneously, the above-described relational expression (5) naturally holds as long as the parameters are changed.
A sequence for cleaning the wafer stage 27 will be explained next with reference to the flowchart shown in
In step 137, wafer processing starts. In step 138, an argument j indicating the wafer number is set to 1. In step 139, a wafer 1 is transported into the exposure apparatus. After an alignment operation in step 140, the circuit pattern of the reticle 2 is transferred onto the wafer 1 by exposure. Since only one wafer is exposed at this point, the determination result in step 142 is No and the wafer number argument j is incremented in step 150. The processing returns to step 139 to perform the series of exposure operations again. The above-described operations are repeated until the Nth wafer is processed. After that, the processing advances to a chuck cleaning operation. In step 143, a gate valve 16b closes to prevent any gas and particles from flowing in a projection optical system space 4b upon cleaning. In step 144, the wafer stage 27 moves to a wafer stage cleaning port (not shown). In step 145, an operation for cleaning the wafer stage 27 starts. In step 146, pulse laser irradiation and gas jet blowing for the wafer chuck 6 are performed synchronously or independently. After cleaning the entire surface of the wafer chuck 6, the operation of the wafer stage 27 ends in step 147. The gate valve 16b opens again in step 148, and the cleaning of the wafer chuck 6 ends in step 149.
Although the wafer chuck 6 is cleaned at the timing at which the Nth wafer is processed in this example, it can be cleaned occasionally.
Although the third embodiment has exemplified the method of cleaning the wafer chuck 6, just the same applies to a case in which the cleaning target is a reticle chuck, and a description thereof will not be made.
The fourth embodiment will be described with reference to
Pulse laser irradiation is sometimes unsuitable to remove particles adhering on the wafer. This is because the wafer 1 is coated with a resist. When the wafer 1 is irradiated with a UV pulse laser light, the resist may often be exposed. In this case, only gas jet blowing can be used as the particle removal means. The arrangement shown in
The correlation between the laser irradiation position and the pulse jet blowing position is exactly the same as in the above-described case using a wafer chuck.
A sequence for cleaning the wafer 1 will be explained with reference to
In step 152, wafer processing starts. In step 153, the wafer 1 is transported from a stocker in a wafer exchange room 14 into a wafer stage space 4c via a wafer load lock chamber 15. In step 154, the wafer 1 is held on a wafer stage 27 via a wafer chuck 6. In step 155, a gate valve 16b temporarily closes to prevent any gas and removed particles from flowing in a projection optical system space 4b upon cleaning. In step 156, the wafer stage 27 moves to a cleaning port. In step 157, the wafer 1 held on the wafer stage 27 starts moving by scanning to undergo cleaning. In step 158, a gas jet is blown onto the wafer surface. After completing gas jet blowing for the entire wafer surface, the operation of the wafer stage 27 ends in step 159. In step 160, the gate valve 16b opens again and the processing returns to a normal wafer processing sequence.
In this way, even particles which have adhered on the wafer upon wafer transportation can be removed by performing wafer cleaning immediately after the transportation.
An embodiment of a method of manufacturing a semiconductor device using an EUV exposure apparatus described in each of the above-described embodiments will be explained next.
When the manufacturing method according to this embodiment is used, a semiconductor device with high degree of integration, which is conventionally difficult to manufacture, can be manufactured.
According to the present invention, it is possible to satisfactorily suppress any particles from adhering on an object without significantly decreasing the throughput and apparatus operation rate.
While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the disclosed exemplary embodiments. The scope of the following claims is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures and functions.
This application claims the benefit of Japanese Patent Application No. 2006-332172, filed on Dec. 8, 2006, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2006-332172 | Dec 2006 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2007/073888 | 12/5/2007 | WO | 00 | 12/19/2008 |