Patent Application
20160208284
Herein are reported novel combinations of expression vector elements, such as promoter, polyA signal sequence, and transcription terminator, expression vector organizations, combinations thereof, as well as novel methods for the generation of production cell lines, such as novel transfection or selection methods, as well as the use of these expression vectors and production cell lines for the recombinant production of polypeptides of interest.
The transcription level of a gene can have a strong influence on its expression level and therefore determines the productivity of a cell. It is mainly influenced by three vector elements: by the promoter, the polyA signal sequence and (if present) by a transcription terminator.
The nucleic acid encoding an antibody heavy chain generally comprises a leader sequence (a signal sequence) (approximately 57 bp/19 aa), which is removed upon maturation of the protein, a variable region, VH (approximately 350 bp/115 aa), and the constant region, CH (approximately 990 bp/330 aa). The nucleic acid encoding an antibody light chain is generally composed of a leader sequence (approximately 66 bp/22 aa) which is removed upon maturation of the protein, a variable region, VK or VL (approximately 350 bp/115 aa), and a constant region, CK or CL (approximately 321 bp/107 aa).
The recombinant production of antibodies in eukaryotic cells involves the creation of expression systems (see, McCafferty, J., et al., (eds.), Antibody Engineering, A Practical Approach., IRL Press (1997)). For development of antibody expression systems an expression cassette comprising a light chain encoding nucleic acid flanked by a promoter and a poly-adenylation (polyA) region is created. Also, a heavy chain expression cassette comprising a heavy chain encoding nucleic acid flanked by a promoter and a polyA region is created. The expression cassette of the heavy chain may be combined into the light chain expression cassette in a single vector containing both heavy and light chain expression cassettes or may be integrated in two separate vectors.
Immunoglobulin DNA cassette molecules, monobody constructs, methods of production, and methods of use therefor are reported in U.S. Pat. No. 7,053,202. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,168,062 transfer vectors and microorganisms containing human cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter-regulatory DNA sequence are reported. A DNA fragment containing a promoter region for human polypeptide chain elongation factor-1α, its base sequence and expression plasmids containing the DNA fragment having high applicability to a wide range of host cells with high expression capacity is reported in U.S. Pat. No. 5,225,348. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,266,491 expression plasmids containing SV40 replication origin and a DNA fragment having a promoter region for a human polypeptide chain elongation factor-1α gene are reported. Recombinant DNA compounds and the expression of polypeptides such as tPA are reported in U.S. Pat. No. 5,122,458. In U.S. Pat. No. 7,422,874 an expression vector for animal cell is reported.
Sanna Pietro, P., reports the expression of antibody Fab fragments and whole immunoglobulin in mammalian cells (Meth. Mol. Biol. 178 (2002) 389-395). A cell display library for gene cloning of variable regions of human antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen is reported by Higuchi, K., et al. (J. Immunol. Meth. 202 (1997) 193-204). Kim, D., et al., report improved mammalian expression systems by manipulating transcriptional termination regions (Biotechnol. Progress 19 (2003) 1620-1622). Guidelines to cell engineering for monoclonal antibody production are reported by Costa, R. A., et al. (Eur. J. Pharmaceut. Biopharmaceut. 74 (2010) 127-138). Kim, D. W., et al., report the use of the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter as a versatile and efficient expression system (Gene 91 (1990) 217-223). Comparison of intron-dependent and intron independent gene expression is reported by Buchman, A. R., et al., (Mol. Cell. Biol. 8 (1988) 4395-4405). Wang, F., et al., report antibody expression in mammalian cells (in Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies—From bench to clinic, Wiley (2009) pages 557-572). A comparative study of different vector designs for the mammalian expression of recombinant lgG antibodies is reported by Li et al. (J. Immunol. Meth. 318 (2007) 113-124). Ho, S. C. L., et al. report “IRES-mediated tricistronic vectors for enhancing generation of high monoclonal antibody expressing CHO cell lines (J. Biotechnol. 157 (2011) 130-139). Production of anti-CD2 chimeric antibody by recombinant animal cells are reported by Hotta, A., et al. (J. Biosci. Bioeng. 98 (2004) 298-303). Lee, J-C., et al. report “High-efficiency protein expression mediated by enterovirus 71 internal ribosome entry (Biotechnol. Bioeng. 90 (2005) 656-662). In WO 2008/142124 recombinant protein production in Avian EBX® cells is reported.
It has been found that the performance of an expression vector largely depends on its intended use and that best vectors for transient transfections, stable pools and single clone selection differ.
To highlight the main findings: For transient transfection the bidirectional expression of the antibody light and heavy chain and the use of the full length hCMV promoter including Intron A were advantageous. For stable transfection, however, the in row arrangement of 1) antibody light chain, 2) antibody heavy chain and 3) selection marker has shown to be advantageous.
But whereas the hEF1α promoter is clearly superior to the hCMV promoter in stable pools, the clear opposite effect on single clone level has been found. Here, with the human cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter/enhancer (hCMV) clones with highest productivity were obtained.
Moreover, the hCMV promoter performance can further be improved by combining it with the bGH polyA signal and the terminator sequence of the human gastrin gene (hGT), which increases both productivity and stability of expression.
It has been found that the use of an expression vector comprising an expression cassettes for an antibody heavy chain and an expression cassette for an antibody light chain each comprising a promoter, a structural gene and a polyA signal sequence and optionally a terminator sequence, results in a higher number of antibody producing/secreting cell clones after transfection if i) the promoter is the human cytomegalovirus promoter (hCMV), the polyA signal sequence is the bovine growth hormone polyA signal sequence (bGH polyA) and the terminator sequence is the human gastrin gene transcription terminator sequence (hGT), or 2) the promoter is the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter (hEF1alpha), the polyA signal sequence is the bovine growth hormone polyA signal sequence (bGH polyA) and the terminator sequence is absent.
By using an expression vector as outlined above a higher number of antibody producing/secreting cells can be obtained after transfection and, thus, the required efforts to identify a high producer cell suitable for large scale recombinant antibody production are reduced.
Therefore, one aspect as reported herein is a method for selecting a recombinant mammalian cell comprising the following step:
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain comprises at least one intron.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain is cDNA.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged unidirectional for the selection of a stable transfected cell.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged bidirectional for the selection of a transient transfected cell.
In one embodiment the expression plasmid further comprises a selection marker. In one embodiment the expression cassettes and the selection marker are arranged unidirectional. In one embodiment the expression cassettes are arranged in the sequence LC-HC-SM.
In one embodiment the mammalian cell is selected from CHO cell, HEK cell, BHK cell, NS0 cell, and SP2/0 cell. In one embodiment the mammalian cell is a CHO cell for the selection of a stable transfected cell. In one embodiment the mammalian cell is a HEK cell for the selection of a transient transfected cell.
One aspect as reported herein is a method for producing an antibody comprising the following step:
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain comprises at least one intron.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain is cDNA.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged unidirectional for the stable production of an antibody.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged bidirectional for the transient production of an antibody.
In one embodiment the expression plasmid further comprises a selection marker. In one embodiment the expression cassettes and the selection marker are arranged unidirectional. In one embodiment the expression cassettes are arranged in the sequence LC-HC-SM.
In one embodiment the mammalian cell is selected from CHO cell, HEK cell, BHK cell, NS0 cell, and SP2/0 cell. In one embodiment the mammalian cell is a CHO cell for the stable production of an antibody. In one embodiment the mammalian cell is a HEK cell for the transient production of an antibody.
One aspect as reported herein is an expression vector comprising
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain comprises at least one intron.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain is cDNA.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged unidirectional for the selection of a stable transfected cell.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged bidirectional for the selection of a transient transfected cell.
In one embodiment the expression plasmid further comprises a selection marker. In one embodiment the expression cassettes and the selection marker are arranged unidirectional. In one embodiment the expression cassettes are arranged in the sequence LC-HC-SM.
It has been found that for the generation of stable recombinant antibody expressing/secreting cells lines when using a human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter (hEF1alpha) in combination with bGH polyA signal sequence the presence of an hGT terminator sequence reduces obtainable expression yield.
One aspect as reported herein is a method for selecting a recombinant mammalian cell comprising the following step:
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain comprises at least one intron.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain is cDNA.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged unidirectional for the selection of a stable transfected cell.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged bidirectional for the selection of a transient transfected cell.
In one embodiment the expression plasmid further comprises a selection marker. In one embodiment the expression cassettes and the selection marker are arranged unidirectional. In one embodiment the expression cassettes are arranged in the sequence LC-HC-SM.
In one embodiment the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter comprises an Intron A.
In one embodiment the expression vector is free of any transcription terminator sequences. In one embodiment the terminator sequence is the hGT sequence.
In one embodiment the mammalian cell is selected from CHO cell, HEK cell, BHK cell, NS0 cell, and SP2/0 cell. In one embodiment the mammalian cell is a CHO cell for the selection of a stable transfected cell. In one embodiment the mammalian cell is a HEK cell for the selection of a transient transfected cell.
One aspect as reported herein is a method for producing an antibody comprising the following step:
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain comprises at least one intron.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain is cDNA.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged unidirectional for the selection of a stable transfected cell.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged bidirectional for the selection of a transient transfected cell.
In one embodiment the expression plasmid further comprises a selection marker. In one embodiment the expression cassettes and the selection marker are arranged unidirectional. In one embodiment the expression cassettes are arranged in the sequence LC-HC-SM.
In one embodiment the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter comprises an Intron A.
In one embodiment the expression vector is free of any transcription terminator sequences. In one embodiment the terminator sequence is the hGT sequence.
In one embodiment the mammalian cell is selected from CHO cell, HEK cell, BHK cell, NS0 cell, and SP2/0 cell. In one embodiment the mammalian cell is a CHO cell for the stable production of an antibody. In one embodiment the mammalian cell is a HEK cell for the transient production of an antibody.
One aspect as reported herein is an expression vector comprising
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain comprises at least one intron.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain is cDNA.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged unidirectional for the selection of a stable transfected cell.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged bidirectional for the selection of a transient transfected cell.
In one embodiment the expression plasmid further comprises a selection marker. In one embodiment the expression cassettes and the selection marker are arranged unidirectional. In one embodiment the expression cassettes are arranged in the sequence LC-HC-SM.
In one embodiment the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter comprises an Intron A.
In one embodiment the expression vector is free of any transcription terminator sequences. In one embodiment the terminator sequence is the hGT sequence.
It has been found that for the stable recombinant production of an antibody the use of an expression vector comprising
In contrast to the above it has been found that for the transient recombinant production of an antibody the use of an expression vector comprising
The term in opposite direction denotes that one expression cassette is transcribed in the 5′->3′ direction and one expression cassette is transcribed in 3′->5′ direction.
Thus, one aspect as reported herein is the use of an expression vector comprising
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain comprises at least one intron.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain is cDNA.
In one embodiment the first and the second promoter are the hCMV promoter, the first and second polyA signal sequence are the bGH polyA signal sequence, and the transcription termination sequence is present and is the hGT terminator sequence.
In one embodiment the first and the second promoter are the hEF1alpha promoter, the first and second polyA signal sequence are the bGH polyA signal sequence, and the expression cassettes are free of a transcription terminator sequence.
In one embodiment the mammalian cell is selected from CHO cell, HEK cell, BHK cell, NS0 cell, and SP2/0 cell. In one embodiment the mammalian cell is a CHO cell.
One aspect as reported herein is an expression vector comprising
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain comprises at least one intron.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain is cDNA.
In one embodiment the first and the second promoter are the hCMV promoter, the first and second polyA signal sequence are the bGH polyA signal sequence, and the transcription termination sequence is present and is the hGT terminator sequence.
In one embodiment the first and the second promoter are the hEF1alpha promoter, the first and second polyA signal sequence are the bGH polyA signal sequence, and the expression cassettes are free of a transcription terminator sequence.
One aspect as reported herein is the use of an expression vector comprising
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain comprises at least one intron.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain is cDNA.
In one embodiment the first and the second promoter are the hCMV promoter, the first and second polyA signal sequence are the bGH polyA signal sequence, and the transcription termination sequence is present and is the hGT terminator sequence.
In one embodiment the first and the second promoter are the hEF1alpha promoter, the first and second polyA signal sequence are the bGH polyA signal sequence, and the expression cassettes are free of a transcription terminator sequence.
In one embodiment the mammalian cell is selected from CHO cell, HEK cell, BHK cell, NS0 cell, and SP2/0 cell. In one embodiment the mammalian cell is a HEK cell.
One aspect as reported herein is an expression vector comprising
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain comprises at least one intron.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain is cDNA.
In one embodiment the first and the second promoter are the hCMV promoter, the first and second polyA signal sequence are the bGH polyA signal sequence, and the transcription termination sequence is present and is the hGT terminator sequence.
In one embodiment the first and the second promoter are the hEF1alpha promoter, the first and second polyA signal sequence are the bGH polyA signal sequence, and the expression cassettes are free of a transcription terminator sequence.
Further, it has been found among other things that expression vectors comprising the hCMV promoter and the human Ef1α promoter with Intron A instead of the short human CMV promoter without Intron A enhance transient and pool gene expression.
One aspect as reported herein is an expression plasmid comprising
In one embodiment the first and the second polyA signal sequence is selected independently of each other from the SV40 polyA signal sequence and the bovine growth hormone polyA signal sequence.
In one embodiment the first and the second promoter are selected independently of each other from the human CMV promoter, the SV40 promoter, and the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain comprises at least one intron.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain is cDNA.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged unidirectional.
In one embodiment the expression plasmid further comprises a selection marker. In one embodiment the expression cassettes and the selection marker are arranged bidirectional.
One aspect as reported herein is the use of an expression plasmid as reported herein for the transient expression of an antibody or the stable expression of an antibody.
One aspect as reported herein is a eukaryotic cell comprising an expression plasmid as reported herein.
One aspect as reported herein is a method for the production of an antibody comprising the steps of
In one embodiment the eukaryotic cell is a mammalian cell. In one embodiment the mammalian cell is selected from CHO cell, HEK cell, BHK cell, NS0 cell, and SP2/0 cell.
One aspect as reported herein is an expression plasmid comprising
In one embodiment one or both of the expression cassettes do not comprise in addition after the polyA signal sequence the human gastrin terminator sequence.
In one embodiment one or both of the expression cassettes are free of the human gastrin terminator sequence.
In one embodiment the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter comprises an Intron A.
In one embodiment the first and the second polyA signal sequence is selected independently of each other from the SV40 polyA signal sequence and the bovine growth hormone polyA signal sequence.
In one embodiment the first and the second promoter are selected independently of each other from the human CMV promoter, the SV40 promoter, and the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain comprises at least one intron.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encoding the antibody light chain and/or the nucleic acid encoding the antibody heavy chain is cDNA.
In one embodiment the first expression cassette and the second expression cassette are arranged unidirectional.
In one embodiment the expression plasmid further comprises a selection marker.
In one embodiment the expression cassettes and the selection marker are arranged bidirectional.
One aspect as reported herein is the use of an expression plasmid as reported herein for the transient expression of an antibody or the stable expression of an antibody.
One aspect as reported herein is a eukaryotic cell comprising an expression plasmid as reported herein.
One aspect as reported herein is a method for the production of an antibody comprising the steps of
In one embodiment the eukaryotic cell is a mammalian cell. In one embodiment the mammalian cell is selected from CHO cell, HEK cell, BHK cell, NS0 cell, and SP2/0 cell.
One aspect as reported herein is an expression plasmid comprising in 5′ to 3′ direction a promoter sequence, a nucleic acid encoding an antibody heavy chain or an antibody light chain, an IRES element, a nucleic acid sequence encoding a selection marker, and a polyA signal sequence, whereby the IRES element is the EMCV-IRES element.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encodes an antibody heavy chain.
In one embodiment the selection marker is a fusion protein of the formula A-C-S, whereby A is a detectable polypeptide, C is a proteolytic signal sequence and S is a selectable marker.
In one embodiment the proteolytic signal sequence is the PEST sequence of the ornithine decarboxylase.
In one embodiment the detectable polypeptide is green fluorescent protein.
In one embodiment the selectable marker is neomycin.
One aspect as reported herein is a nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide that comprises in N-terminal to C-terminal direction a green fluorescent protein, the PEST sequence of ornithine decarboxylase, and neomycin.
One aspect as reported herein is the use of a nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide that comprises in N-terminal to C-terminal direction a green fluorescent protein, the PEST sequence of ornithine decarboxylase, and neomycin for the selection of antibody secreting cells.
One aspect as reported herein is the use of an expression cassette comprising in 5′ to 3′ direction a promoter sequence, a nucleic acid encoding an antibody heavy chain or an antibody light chain, an IRES element, a nucleic acid sequence encoding a selection marker, and a polyA signal sequence for the selection of antibody producing cells, whereby the IRES element is the EMCV-IRES element.
In one embodiment the nucleic acid encodes an antibody heavy chain.
In one embodiment the selection marker is a fusion protein of the formula A-C-S, whereby A is a detectable polypeptide, C is a proteolytic signal sequence and S is a selectable marker.
In one embodiment the proteolytic signal sequence is the PEST sequence of the ornithine decarboxylase.
In one embodiment the detectable polypeptide is green fluorescent protein.
In one embodiment the selectable marker is neomycin.
One aspect as reported herein is a method for the selection of eukaryotic cell expressing an antibody comprising the following steps:
One aspect as reported herein is an expression plasmid comprising in 5′ to 3′ direction a promoter sequence, a nucleic acid encoding an antibody light chain, an IRES element, a nucleic acid sequence encoding an antibody heavy chain, and a polyA signal sequence, whereby the IRES element is the EV71-IRES element.
In one embodiment the promoter sequence is selected from the human CMV promoter sequence with or without Intron A, the SV40 promoter sequence, and the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter sequence with or without Intron A.
In one embodiment the polyA signal sequence is selected from the bovine growth hormone polyA signal sequence and the SV40 polyA signal sequence.
In one embodiment the plasmid comprises 3′ to the polyA signal sequence the human gastrin terminator sequence.
One aspect as reported herein is the use of an expression plasmid comprising in 5′ to 3′ direction a promoter sequence, a nucleic acid encoding an antibody light chain, an IRES element, a nucleic acid sequence encoding an antibody heavy chain, and a polyA signal sequence, for the expression of an antibody, whereby the IRES element is the EV71-IRES element.
In one embodiment the promoter sequence is selected from the human CMV promoter sequence with or without Intron A, the SV40 promoter sequence, and the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter sequence with or without Intron A.
In one embodiment the polyA signal sequence is selected from the bovine growth hormone polyA signal sequence and the SV40 polyA signal sequence.
In one embodiment the plasmid comprises 3′ to the polyA signal sequence the human gastrin terminator sequence.
One aspect as reported herein is a method for the production of an antibody comprising the following steps:
In one embodiment the hCMV promoter has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 01. This is the hCMV promoter without Intron A and without 5′UTR.
In one embodiment the hCMV promoter has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 02. This is the hCMV promoter without Intron A and with 5′UTR.
In one embodiment the hCMV promoter has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 03. This is the full length hCMV promoter with Intron A.
In one embodiment the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 04. This is the hEF1alpha promoter without Intron A.
In one embodiment the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 05. This is the hEF1alpha promoter with Intron A.
In one embodiment the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 06. This is a short hEF1alpha promoter with Intron A and with 5′UTR.
In one embodiment the rat CMV promoter has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 07.
In one embodiment the SV40 polyA signal sequence has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 08.
In one embodiment the bovine growth hormone polyA signal sequence has the sequence SEQ ID NO: 09.
In one embodiment the human gastrin terminator has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 10.
In one embodiment the SV40 promoter has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 11.
In one embodiment the PEST sequence of ornithine decarboxylase is encoded by the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 12.
In one embodiment the GFP sequence is encoded by the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 13.
In one embodiment the neomycin selection marker has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 14.
In one embodiment the GFP-PEST-NEO fusion polypeptide is encoded by the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 15.
In one embodiment the EMCV-IRES has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 16.
In one embodiment the EV71-IRES has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 17.
In one embodiment of all aspects as reported herein the antibody is a bispecific antibody.
In one embodiment the bispecific antibody has a first binding specificity or binding site that specifically binds to a first antigen or a first epitope on an antigen and the bispecific antibody has a second binding specificity or binding site that specifically binds to a second antigen or second epitope on the antigen.
If one embodiment the expression vector comprises either
In one embodiment of all aspects as reported herein the expression vector comprises
In one embodiment of all aspects as reported herein the expression vector comprises
In one embodiment encodes the one of the antibody heavy chain expression cassettes an antibody heavy chain comprising a hole mutation.
In one embodiment encodes one of the antibody heavy chain expression cassettes an antibody heavy chain comprising a knob mutation.
In one embodiment encodes one of the antibody light chain expression cassettes an antibody light chain comprising an antibody light chain variable domain and an antibody heavy chain CH1 domain as constant domain and/or one of the antibody light chain expression cassettes an antibody light chain comprising an antibody light chain variable domain and an antibody light chain CL domain as constant domain.
In one embodiment one of the antibody heavy chain expression cassettes encodes an antibody heavy chain comprising as first constant domain an antibody light chain constant domain (CL), and/or one of the antibody heavy chain expression cassettes encodes an antibody heavy chain comprising as first constant domain an antibody heavy chain CH1 domain.
As known to a person skilled in the art enables the use of recombinant DNA technology the production of numerous derivatives of a nucleic acid and/or polypeptide. Such derivatives can, for example, be modified in one individual or several positions by substitution, alteration, exchange, deletion, or insertion. The modification or derivatization can, for example, be carried out by means of site directed mutagenesis. Such modifications can easily be carried out by a person skilled in the art (see e.g. Sambrook, J., et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, USA (1999)). The use of recombinant technology enables a person skilled in the art to transform various host cells with heterologous nucleic acid(s). Although the transcription and translation, i.e. expression, machinery of different cells use the same elements, cells belonging to different species may have among other things a different so-called codon usage. Thereby identical polypeptides (with respect to amino acid sequence) may be encoded by different nucleic acid(s). Also, due to the degeneracy of the genetic code, different nucleic acids may encode the same polypeptide.
The use of recombinant DNA technology enables the production of numerous derivatives of a nucleic acid and/or polypeptide. Such derivatives can, for example, be modified in one individual or several positions by substitution, alteration, exchange, deletion, or insertion. The modification or derivatization can, for example, be carried out by means of site directed mutagenesis. Such modifications can easily be carried out by a person skilled in the art (see e.g. Sambrook, J., et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, USA (1999); Hames, B. D. and Higgins, S. J., Nucleic acid hybridization—a practical approach, IRL Press, Oxford, England (1985)).
The use of recombinant technology enables the transformation of various host cells with heterologous nucleic acid(s). Although the transcription and translation, i.e. expression, machinery of different cells use the same elements, cells belonging to different species may have among other things a different so-called codon usage. Thereby identical polypeptides (with respect to amino acid sequence) may be encoded by different nucleic acid(s). Also, due to the degeneracy of the genetic code, different nucleic acids may encode the same polypeptide.
An “affinity matured” antibody refers to an antibody with one or more alterations in one or more hypervariable regions (HVRs), compared to a parent antibody which does not possess such alterations, such alterations resulting in an improvement in the affinity of the antibody for antigen.
The term “antibody” herein is used in the broadest sense and encompasses various antibody structures, including but not limited to monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal antibodies, multispecific antibodies (e.g., bispecific antibodies), and antibody fragments so long as they exhibit the desired antigen-binding activity.
An “antibody fragment” refers to a molecule other than an intact antibody that comprises a portion of an intact antibody that binds the antigen to which the intact antibody binds. Examples of antibody fragments include but are not limited to Fv, Fab, Fab′, Fab′-SH, F(ab′)2; diabodies; linear antibodies; single-chain antibody molecules (e.g. scFv); and multispecific antibodies formed from antibody fragments.
The term “chimeric” antibody refers to an antibody in which a portion of the heavy and/or light chain is derived from a particular source or species, while the remainder of the heavy and/or light chain is derived from a different source or species.
The “class” of an antibody refers to the type of constant domain or constant region possessed by its heavy chain. There are five major classes of antibodies: IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG, and IgM, and several of these may be further divided into subclasses (isotypes), e.g., IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgA1, and IgA2. The heavy chain constant domains that correspond to the different classes of immunoglobulins are called a, δ, ε, γ, and μ, respectively.
The term “expression” as used herein refers to transcription and/or translation processes occurring within a cell. The level of transcription of a nucleic acid sequence of interest in a cell can be determined on the basis of the amount of corresponding mRNA that is present in the cell. For example, mRNA transcribed from a sequence of interest can be quantitated by RT-PCR or by Northern hybridization (see Sambrook et al., 1999, supra). Polypeptides encoded by a nucleic acid of interest can be quantitated by various methods, e.g. by ELISA, by assaying for the biological activity of the polypeptide, or by employing assays that are independent of such activity, such as Western blotting or radioimmunoassay, using immunoglobulins that recognize and bind to the polypeptide (see Sambrook et al., 1999, supra).
An “expression cassette” refers to a construct that contains the necessary regulatory elements, such as promoter and polyadenylation site, for expression of at least the contained nucleic acid in a cell.
An “expression vector” is a nucleic acid providing all required elements for the expression of the comprised structural gene(s) in a host cell. Typically, an expression plasmid comprises a prokaryotic plasmid propagation unit, e.g. for E. coli, comprising an origin of replication, and a selectable marker, an eukaryotic selection marker, and one or more expression cassettes for the expression of the structural gene(s) of interest each comprising a promoter, a structural gene, and a polyadenylation signal (polyA signal sequence). Gene expression is usually placed under the control of a promoter, and such a structural gene is said to be “operably linked to” the promoter. Similarly, a regulatory element and a core promoter are operably linked if the regulatory element modulates the activity of the core promoter.
The term “Fc-region” herein is used to define a C-terminal region of an immunoglobulin heavy chain that contains at least a portion of the constant region. The term includes native sequence Fc-regions and variant Fc-regions. In one embodiment, a human IgG heavy chain Fc-region extends from Cys226, or from Pro230, to the carboxγ1-terminus of the heavy chain. However, the C-terminal lysine (Lys447) of the Fc-region may or may not be present. Unless otherwise specified herein, numbering of amino acid residues in the Fc-region or constant region is according to the EU numbering system, also called the EU index, as described in Kabat, E. A., et al., Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th ed., Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. (1991), NIH Publication 91-3242.
An “Fc-region” is a term well known and defined on basis of the papain cleavage of an antibody heavy chain. The complexes as reported herein may comprise in one embodiment as antibody heavy chain hinge region polypeptide a human Fc-region or an Fc-region derived from human origin. In a further embodiment the Fc-region is either an Fc-region of a human antibody of the subclass IgG4 or an Fc-region of a human antibody of the subclass IgG1, IgG2, or IgG3, which is modified in such a way that no Fcγ receptor (e.g. FcγRIIIa) binding and/or no C1q binding can be detected. In one embodiment the Fc-region is a human Fc-region and especially either from human IgG4 subclass or a mutated Fc-region from human IgG1 subclass. In one embodiment the Fc-region is from human IgG1 subclass with mutations L234A and L235A. While IgG4 shows reduced Fcγ receptor (FcγRIIIa) binding, antibodies of other IgG subclasses show strong binding. However Pro238, Asp265, Asp270, Asn297 (loss of Fc carbohydrate), Pro329, Leu234, Leu235, Gly236, Gly237, Ile253, Ser254, Lys288, Thr307, Gln311, Asn434, or/and His435 are residues which, if altered, provide also reduced Fcγ receptor binding (Shields, R. L., et al., J. Biol. Chem. 276 (2001) 6591-6604; Lund, J., et al., FASEB J. 9 (1995) 115-119; Morgan, A., et al., Immunology 86 (1995) 319-324; EP 0 307 434). In one embodiment the antibody to be expressed in an aspect as reported herein is in regard to Fcγ receptor binding of IgG4 subclass or of IgG1 or IgG2 subclass, with a mutation in L234, L235, and/or D265, and/or contains the PVA236 mutation. In one embodiment the mutations are S228P, L234A, L235A, L235E, and/or PVA236 (PVA236 denotes that the amino acid sequence ELLG (given in one letter amino acid code) from amino acid position 233 to 236 of IgG1 or EFLG of IgG4 is replaced by PVA). In one embodiment the mutations are S228P of IgG4, and L234A and L235A of IgG1. The Fc-region of an antibody is directly involved in ADCC (antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity) and CDC (complement-dependent cytotoxicity). A complex which does not bind Fey receptor and/or complement factor C1q does not elicit antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and/or complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). The knob modification denotes the mutation T366W in the CH3 domain of an antibody (numbering according to Kabat). The hole-modification denotes the mutations T366S, L368A and Y407V in the CH3 domain of an antibody. In addition to the knob and hole modification the mutation S354C in the one CH3 domain and the mutation Y349C in the other CH3 domain can be present.
“Framework” or “FR” refers to variable domain residues other than hypervariable region (HVR) residues. The FR of a variable domain generally consists of four FR domains: FR1, FR2, FR3, and FR4. Accordingly, the HVR and FR sequences generally appear in the following sequence in VH (or VL): FR1-H1(L1)-FR2-H2(L2)-FR3-H3(L3)-FR4.
The terms “full length antibody”, “intact antibody”, and “whole antibody” are used herein interchangeably to refer to an antibody having a structure substantially similar to a native antibody structure or having heavy chains that contain an Fc-region as defined herein.
A “gene” denotes a nucleic acid which is a segment e.g. on a chromosome or on a plasmid which can affect the expression of a peptide, polypeptide, or protein. Beside the coding region, i.e. the structural gene, a gene comprises other functional elements e.g. a signal sequence, promoter(s), introns, and/or terminators.
The terms “host cell”, “host cell line”, and “host cell culture” are used interchangeably and refer to cells into which exogenous nucleic acid has been introduced, including the progeny of such cells. Host cells include “transformants” and “transformed cells,” which include the primary transformed cell and progeny derived therefrom without regard to the number of passages. Progeny may not be completely identical in nucleic acid content to a parent cell, but may contain mutations. Mutant progeny that have the same function or biological activity as screened or selected for in the originally transformed cell are included herein.
A “human antibody” is one which possesses an amino acid sequence which corresponds to that of an antibody produced by a human or a human cell or derived from a non-human source that utilizes human antibody repertoires or other human antibody-encoding sequences. This definition of a human antibody specifically excludes a humanized antibody comprising non-human antigen-binding residues.
A “humanized” antibody refers to a chimeric antibody comprising amino acid residues from non-human HVRs and amino acid residues from human FRs. In certain embodiments, a humanized antibody will comprise substantially all of at least one, and typically two, variable domains, in which all or substantially all of the HVRs (e.g., CDRs) correspond to those of a non-human antibody, and all or substantially all of the FRs correspond to those of a human antibody. A humanized antibody optionally may comprise at least a portion of an antibody constant region derived from a human antibody. A “humanized form” of an antibody, e.g., a non-human antibody, refers to an antibody that has undergone humanization.
The term “hypervariable region” or “HVR” as used herein, refers to each of the regions of an antibody variable domain which are hypervariable in sequence and/or form structurally defined loops (“hypervariable loops”). Generally, native four-chain antibodies comprise six HVRs; three in the VH (H1, H2, H3), and three in the VL (L1, L2, L3). HVRs generally comprise amino acid residues from the hypervariable loops and/or from the “complementarity determining regions” (CDRs), the latter being of highest sequence variability and/or involved in antigen recognition. Exemplary hypervariable loops occur at amino acid residues 26-32 (L1), 50-52 (L2), 91-96 (L3), 26-32 (H1), 53-55 (H2), and 96-101 (H3) (Chothia, C. and Lesk, A. M., J. Mol. Biol. 196 (1987) 901-917). Exemplary CDRs (CDR-L1, CDR-L2, CDR-L3, CDR-H1, CDR-H2, and CDR-H3) occur at amino acid residues 24-34 of L1, 50-56 of L2, 89-97 of L3, 31-35B of H1, 50-65 of H2, and 95-102 of H3 (Kabat, E. A., et al., Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th ed. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. (1991), NIH Publication 91-3242). With the exception of CDR1 in VH, CDRs generally comprise the amino acid residues that form the hypervariable loops. CDRs also comprise “specificity determining residues,” or “SDRs,” which are residues that contact antigen. SDRs are contained within regions of the CDRs called abbreviated-CDRs, or a-CDRs. Exemplary a-CDRs (a-CDR-L1, a-CDR-L2, a-CDR-L3, a-CDR-H1, a-CDR-H2, and a-CDR-H3) occur at amino acid residues 31-34 of L1, 50-55 of L2, 89-96 of L3, 31-35B of H1, 50-58 of H2, and 95-102 of H3 (Almagro, J. C. and Fransson, J., Front. Biosci. 13 (2008) 1619-1633). Unless otherwise indicated, HVR residues and other residues in the variable domain (e.g., FR residues) are numbered herein according to Kabat et al., supra.
An “internal ribosome entry site” or “IRES” describes a sequence which functionally promotes translation initiation independent from the gene 5′ of the IRES and allows two cistrons (open reading frames) to be translated from a single transcript in an animal cell. The IRES provides an independent ribosome entry site for translation of the open reading frame immediately downstream (downstream is used interchangeably herein with 3′) of it. Unlike bacterial mRNA which can be polycistronic, i.e. encode several different polypeptides that are translated sequentially from the mRNAs, most mRNAs of animal cells are monocistronic and code for the synthesis of only one protein. With a polycistronic transcript in a eukaryotic cell, translation would initiate from the 5′ most translation initiation site, terminate at the first stop codon, and the transcript would be released from the ribosome, resulting in the translation of only the first encoded polypeptide in the mRNA. In a eukaryotic cell, a polycistronic transcript having an IRES operably linked to the second or subsequent open reading frame in the transcript allows the sequential translation of that downstream open reading frame to produce the two or more polypeptides encoded by the same transcript. The use of IRES elements in vector construction has been previously described, see, e.g., Pelletier, J., et al., Nature 334 (1988) 320-325; Jang, S. K., et al., J. Virol. 63 (1989) 1651-1660; Davies, M. V., et al., J. Virol. 66 (1992) 1924-1932; Adam, M. A., et al., J. Virol. 65 (1991) 4985-4990; Morgan, R. A., et al. Nucl. Acids Res. 20 (1992) 1293-1299; Sugimoto, Y, et al., Biotechnology 12 (1994) 694-698; Ramesh, N., et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 24 (1996) 2697-2700; and Mosser, D. D., et al., BioTechniques 22 (1997) 150-152).
The term “monoclonal antibody” as used herein refers to an antibody obtained from a population of substantially homogeneous antibodies, i.e., the individual antibodies comprising the population are identical and/or bind the same epitope, except for possible variant antibodies, e.g., containing naturally occurring mutations or arising during production of a monoclonal antibody preparation, such variants generally being present in minor amounts. In contrast to polyclonal antibody preparations, which typically include different antibodies directed against different determinants (epitopes), each monoclonal antibody of a monoclonal antibody preparation is directed against a single determinant on an antigen. Thus, the modifier “monoclonal” indicates the character of the antibody as being obtained from a substantially homogeneous population of antibodies, and is not to be construed as requiring production of the antibody by any particular method. For example, the monoclonal antibodies to be used in accordance with the present invention may be made by a variety of techniques, including but not limited to the hybridoma method, recombinant DNA methods, phage-display methods, and methods utilizing transgenic animals containing all or part of the human immunoglobulin loci, such methods and other exemplary methods for making monoclonal antibodies being described herein.
“Native antibodies” refer to naturally occurring immunoglobulin molecules with varying structures. For example, native IgG antibodies are heterotetrameric glycoproteins of about 150,000 daltons, composed of two identical light chains and two identical heavy chains that are disulfide-bonded. From N- to C-terminus, each heavy chain has a variable region (VH), also called a variable heavy domain or a heavy chain variable domain, followed by three constant domains (CH1, CH2, and CH3). Similarly, from N- to C-terminus, each light chain has a variable region (VL), also called a variable light domain or a light chain variable domain, followed by a constant light (CL) domain. The light chain of an antibody may be assigned to one of two types, called kappa (κ) and lambda (λ), based on the amino acid sequence of its constant domain.
A “nucleic acid” as used herein, refers to a polymeric molecule consisting of individual nucleotides (also called bases) a, c, g, and t (or u in RNA), for example to DNA, RNA, or modifications thereof. This polynucleotide molecule can be a naturally occurring polynucleotide molecule or a synthetic polynucleotide molecule or a combination of one or more naturally occurring polynucleotide molecules with one or more synthetic polynucleotide molecules. Also encompassed by this definition are naturally occurring polynucleotide molecules in which one or more nucleotides are changed (e.g. by mutagenesis), deleted, or added. A nucleic acid can either be isolated, or integrated in another nucleic acid, e.g. in an expression cassette, a plasmid, or the chromosome of a host cell. A nucleic acid is likewise characterized by its nucleic acid sequence consisting of individual nucleotides.
To a person skilled in the art procedures and methods are well known to convert an amino acid sequence, e.g. of a polypeptide, into a corresponding nucleic acid sequence encoding this amino acid sequence. Therefore, a nucleic acid is characterized by its nucleic acid sequence consisting of individual nucleotides and likewise by the amino acid sequence of a polypeptide encoded thereby.
A “nucleic acid” as used herein, refers to a naturally occurring or partially or fully non-naturally occurring nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide which can be produced recombinantly. The nucleic acid can be build up of DNA-fragments which are either isolated or synthesized by chemical means. The nucleic acid can be integrated into another nucleic acid, e.g. in an expression plasmid or the genome/chromosome of a eukaryotic host cell. Plasmid includes shuttle and expression plasmids. Typically, the plasmid will also comprise a prokaryotic propagation unit comprising an origin of replication (e.g. the ColE1 origin of replication) and a selectable marker (e.g. ampicillin or tetracycline resistance gene), for replication and selection, respectively, of the plasmid in prokaryotes.
“Operably linked” refers to a juxtaposition of two or more components, wherein the components so described are in a relationship permitting them to function in their intended manner. For example, a promoter and/or enhancer are operably linked to a coding sequence, if it acts in cis to control or modulate transcription of the linked sequence. Generally, but not necessarily, the DNA sequences that are “operably linked” are contiguous and, where necessary to join two protein encoding regions such as a secretory leader and a polypeptide, contiguous and in (reading) frame. However, although an operably linked promoter is generally located upstream of the coding sequence, it is not necessarily contiguous with it. Enhancers do not have to be contiguous. An enhancer is operably linked to a coding sequence if the enhancer increases transcription of the coding sequence. Operably linked enhancers can be located upstream, within or downstream of coding sequences and at considerable distance from the promoter. A polyadenylation site is operably linked to a coding sequence if it is located at the downstream end of the coding sequence such that transcription proceeds through the coding sequence into the polyadenylation sequence. A translation stop codon is operably linked to an exonic nucleic acid sequence if it is located at the downstream end (3′ end) of the coding sequence such that translation proceeds through the coding sequence to the stop codon and is terminated there. Linking is accomplished by recombinant methods known in the art, e.g., using PCR methodology and/or by ligation at convenient restriction sites. If convenient restriction sites do not exist, then synthetic oligonucleotide adaptors or linkers are used in accord with conventional practice.
A “polycistronic transcription unit” is a transcription unit in which more than one structural gene is under the control of the same promoter.
The term “polyadenylation signal” as used within this application denotes a nucleic acid sequence used to induce cleavage and polyadenylation of primary transcripts of a specific nucleic acid sequence segment. The 3′ untranslated region comprising a polyadenylation signal can be selected from the group consisting of the 3′ untranslated region comprising a polyadenylation signals derived from SV40, the gene for bovine growth hormone (bGH), immunoglobulin genes, and the thymidine kinase gene (tk, e.g. Herpes Simplex thymidine kinase polyadenylation signal).
A “promoter” refers to a polynucleotide sequence that controls transcription of a gene/structural gene or nucleic acid sequence to which it is operably linked. A promoter includes signals for RNA polymerase binding and transcription initiation. The promoters used will be functional in the cell type of the host cell in which expression of the selected sequence is contemplated. A large number of promoters including constitutive, inducible and repressible promoters from a variety of different sources, are well known in the art (and identified in databases such as GenBank) and are available as or within cloned polynucleotides (from, e.g., depositories such as ATCC as well as other commercial or individual sources).
A “promoter” comprises a nucleotide sequence that directs the transcription of a structural gene. Typically, a promoter is located in the 5′ non-coding or untranslated region of a gene, proximal to the transcriptional start site of a structural gene. Sequence elements within promoters that function in the initiation of transcription are often characterized by consensus nucleotide sequences. These promoter elements include RNA polymerase binding sites, TATA sequences, CAAT sequences, differentiation-specific elements (DSEs; McGehee, R. E., et al., Mol. Endocrinol. 7 (1993) 551), cyclic AMP response elements (CREs), serum response elements (SREs; Treisman, R., Seminars in Cancer Biol. 1 (1990) 47), glucocorticoid response elements (GREs), and binding sites for other transcription factors, such as CRE/ATF (O'Reilly, M. A., et al., J. Biol. Chem. 267 (1992) 19938), AP2 (Ye, J., et al., J. Biol. Chem. 269 (1994) 25728), SP1, cAMP response element binding protein (CREB; Loeken, M. R., Gene Expr. 3 (1993) 253) and octamer factors (see, in general, Watson, et al., (eds.), Molecular Biology of the Gene, 4th ed. (The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc. (1987)), and Lemaigre, F. P. and Rousseau, G. G., Biochem. J. 303 (1994) 1-14). If a promoter is an inducible promoter, then the rate of transcription increases in response to an inducing agent. In contrast, the rate of transcription is not regulated by an inducing agent if the promoter is a constitutive promoter. Repressible promoters are also known. For example, the c-fos promoter is specifically activated upon binding of growth hormone to its receptor on the cell surface. Tetracycline (tet) regulated expression can be achieved by artificial hybrid promoters that consist e.g. of a CMV promoter followed by two Tet-operator sites. The Tet-repressor binds to the two Tet-operator sites and blocks transcription. Upon addition of the inducer tetracycline, Tet-repressor is released from the Tet-operator sites and transcription proceeds (Gossen, M. and Bujard, H., PNAS 89 (1992) 5547-5551). For other inducible promoters including metallothionein and heat shock promoters, see, e.g., Sambrook et al. (supra) and Gossen et al., Curr. Opin. Biotech. 5 (1994) 516-520. Among the eukaryotic promoters that have been identified as strong promoters for high-level expression are the SV40 early promoter, adenovirus major late promoter, mouse metallothionein-I promoter, Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat, Chinese hamster elongation factor 1 alpha (CHEF-1, see e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,888,809), human EF-1 alpha, ubiquitin, and human cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter (CMV IE).
The “promoter” can be constitutive or inducible. An enhancer (i.e., a cis-acting DNA element that acts on a promoter to increase transcription) may be necessary to function in conjunction with the promoter to increase the level of expression obtained with a promoter alone, and may be included as a transcriptional regulatory element. Often, the polynucleotide segment containing the promoter will include enhancer sequences as well (e.g., CMV or SV40).
The terms “stably transformed”, “stable transfected”, or “stable” as used within this application denotes a heritable and stable integration of exogenous nucleic acid into a host cell genome/chromosome. A stable transfected cell is obtained after a cell selection process under selective growth conditions, i.e. in the presence of one or more selection markers.
A “structural gene” denotes the region of a gene without a signal sequence, i.e. the coding region.
The term “transcription terminator” denotes a DNA sequence of 50-750 base pairs in length which gives the RNA polymerase the signal for termination of the mRNA synthesis. Very efficient (strong) terminators at the 3′ end of an expression cassette are advisable to prevent the RNA polymerase from reading through particularly when using strong promoters. Inefficient transcription terminators can lead to the formation of an operon-like mRNA which can be the reason for an undesired, e.g. plasmid-coded, gene expression.
Within the scope of the present invention, transfected cells may be obtained with substantially any kind of transfection method known in the art. For example, the nucleic acid may be introduced into the cells by means of electroporation or microinjection. Alternatively, lipofection reagents such as FuGENE 6 (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany), X-tremeGENE (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany), and LipofectAmine (Invitrogen Corp., USA) may be used. Still alternatively, the nucleic acid may be introduced into the cell by appropriate viral vector systems based on retroviruses, lentiviruses, adenoviruses, or adeno-associated viruses (Singer, O., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 (2004) 5313-5314).
The term “transient transfection” as used within this application denotes a process in which the nucleic acid introduced into a cell does not integrate into the genome or chromosomal DNA of that cell. It is in fact maintained as an extrachromosomal element, e.g. as an episome, in the cell. Transcription processes of the nucleic acid of the episome are not affected and e.g. a protein encoded by the nucleic acid of the episome is produced. A transient transfection results in a “transient transfected” cell.
The term “variable region” or “variable domain” refers to the domain of an antibody heavy or light chain that is involved in binding the antibody to antigen. The variable domains of the heavy chain and light chain (VH and VL, respectively) of a native antibody generally have similar structures, with each domain comprising four conserved framework regions (FRs) and three hypervariable regions (HVRs) (see, e.g., Kindt, T. J., et al., Kuby Immunology, 6th ed., W.H. Freeman and Co., N.Y. (2007), page 91). A single VH or VL domain may be sufficient to confer antigen-binding specificity. Furthermore, antibodies that bind a particular antigen may be isolated using a VH or VL domain from an antibody that binds the antigen to screen a library of complementary VL or VH domains, respectively (see, e.g., Portolano, S., et al., J. Immunol. 150 (1993) 880-887; Clackson, T., et al., Nature 352 (1991) 624-628).
The term “vector” as used herein, refers to a nucleic acid molecule capable of propagating another nucleic acid to which it is linked. The term includes the vector as a self-replicating nucleic acid structure as well as the vector incorporated into the genome of a host cell into which it has been introduced. Certain vectors are capable of directing the expression of nucleic acids to which they are operatively linked. Such vectors are referred to herein as “expression vectors.”
The methods and compositions provided herein are for the production of recombinant monoclonal antibodies. An antibody can be of various structures, such as but not limited to monospecific antibodies, multispecific antibodies (e.g., bispecific antibodies), antibody fragments, monovalent antibodies, multivalent antibodies (e.g. bivalent antibodies).
In certain embodiments, the antibody is an antibody fragment. Antibody fragments include, but are not limited to, Fab, Fab′, Fab′-SH, F(ab′)2, Fv, and scFv fragments, and other fragments described below. For a review of certain antibody fragments, see Hudson, P. J., et al., Nat. Med. 9 (2003) 129-134. For a review of scFv fragments, see, e.g., Plueckthun, A., In: The Pharmacology of Monoclonal Antibodies, Vol. 113, Rosenburg and Moore (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York (1994), pp. 269-315; see also WO 1993/16185; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,894 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,587,458. For discussion of Fab and F(ab′)2 fragments comprising salvage receptor binding epitope residues and having increased in vivo half-life, see U.S. Pat. No. 5,869,046.
Diabodies are antibody fragments with two antigen-binding sites that may be bivalent or bispecific (see, for example, EP 0 404 097; WO 1993/01161; Hudson, P. J., et al., Nat. Med. 9 (2003) 129-134; and Holliger, P., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 (1993) 6444-6448). Triabodies and tetrabodies are also described in Hudson, P. J., et al., Nat. Med. 9 (2003) 129-134).
Single-domain antibodies are antibody fragments comprising all or a portion of the heavy chain variable domain or all or a portion of the light chain variable domain of an antibody. In certain embodiments, a single-domain antibody is a human single-domain antibody (Domantis, Inc., Waltham, Mass.; see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,248,516).
Antibody fragments can be made by various techniques, including but not limited to proteolytic digestion of an intact antibody as well as production by recombinant host cells (e.g. E. coli or phage), as described herein.
In certain embodiments, the antibody is a chimeric antibody. Certain chimeric antibodies are described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567; and Morrison, S. L., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81 (1984) 6851-6855. In one example, a chimeric antibody comprises a non-human variable region (e.g., a variable region derived from a mouse, rat, hamster, rabbit, or non-human primate, such as a monkey) and a human constant region. In a further example, a chimeric antibody is a “class switched” antibody in which the class or subclass has been changed from that of the parent antibody. Chimeric antibodies include antigen-binding fragments thereof.
In certain embodiments, a chimeric antibody is a humanized antibody. Typically, a non-human antibody is humanized to reduce immunogenicity to humans, while retaining the specificity and affinity of the parental non-human antibody. Generally, a humanized antibody comprises one or more variable domains in which HVRs, e.g., CDRs, (or portions thereof) are derived from a non-human antibody, and FRs (or portions thereof) are derived from human antibody sequences. A humanized antibody optionally will also comprise at least a portion of a human constant region. In some embodiments, some FR residues in a humanized antibody are substituted with corresponding residues from a non-human antibody (e.g., the antibody from which the HVR residues are derived), e.g., to restore or improve antibody specificity or affinity.
Humanized antibodies and methods of making them are reviewed, e.g., in Almagro, J. C. and Fransson, J., Front. Biosci. 13 (2008) 1619-1633, and are further described, e.g., in Riechmann, I., et al., Nature 332 (1988) 323-329; Queen, C., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 (1989) 10029-10033; U.S. Pat. No. 5,821,337, U.S. Pat. No. 7,527,791, U.S. Pat. No. 6,982,321, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,087,409; Kashmiri, S. V., et al., Methods 36 (2005) 25-34 (describing SDR (a-CDR) grafting); Padlan, E. A., Mol. Immunol. 28 (1991) 489-498 (describing “resurfacing”); Dall'Acqua, W. F., et al., Methods 36 (2005) 43-60 (describing “FR shuffling”); and Osbourn, J., et al., Methods 36 (2005) 61-68 and Klimka, A., et al., Br. J. Cancer 83 (2000) 252-260 (describing the “guided selection” approach to FR shuffling).
Human framework regions that may be used for humanization include but are not limited to: framework regions selected using the “best-fit” method (see, e.g., Sims, M. J., et al., J. Immunol. 151 (1993) 2296-2308); framework regions derived from the consensus sequence of human antibodies of a particular subgroup of light or heavy chain variable regions (see, e.g., Carter, P., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 (1992) 4285-4289; and Presta, L. G., et al., J. Immunol. 151 (1993) 2623-2632); human mature (somatically mutated) framework regions or human germline framework regions (see, e.g., Almagro, J. C. and Fransson, J., Front. Biosci. 13 (2008) 1619-1633); and framework regions derived from screening FR libraries (see, e.g., Baca, M., et al., J. Biol. Chem. 272 (1997) 10678-10684 and Rosok, M. J., et al., J. Biol. Chem. 271 (19969 22611-22618).
In certain embodiments, the antibody is a human antibody. Human antibodies can be produced using various techniques known in the art. Human antibodies are described generally in van Dijk, M. A. and van de Winkel, J. G., Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 5 (2001) 368-374 and Lonberg, N., Curr. Opin. Immunol. 20 (2008) 450-459.
Human antibodies may be prepared by administering an immunogen to a transgenic animal that has been modified to produce intact human antibodies or intact antibodies with human variable regions in response to antigenic challenge. Such animals typically contain all or a portion of the human immunoglobulin loci, which replace the endogenous immunoglobulin loci, or which are present extrachromosomally or integrated randomly into the animal's chromosomes. In such transgenic mice, the endogenous immunoglobulin loci have generally been inactivated. For review of methods for obtaining human antibodies from transgenic animals, see Lonberg, N., Nat. Biotech. 23 (2005) 1117-1125 and also, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,075,181 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,150,584 describing XENOMOUSE™ technology; U.S. Pat. No. 5,770,429 describing H
Human antibodies can also be made by hybridoma-based methods. Human myeloma and mouse-human heteromyeloma cell lines for the production of human monoclonal antibodies have been described (see, e.g., Kozbor, D., J. Immunol. 133 (1984) 3001-3005; Brodeur, B. R., et al., Monoclonal Antibody Production Techniques and Applications, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1987), pp. 51-63; and Boerner, P., et al., J. Immunol. 147 (1991) 86-95). Human antibodies generated via human B-cell hybridoma technology are also described in Li, J., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103 (2006) 3557-3562. Additional methods include those described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,189,826 (describing production of monoclonal human IgM antibodies from hybridoma cell lines) and Ni, J., Xiandai Mianyixue 26 (2006) 265-268 (describing human-human hybridomas). Human hybridoma technology (Trioma technology) is also described in Vollmers, H. P. and Brandlein, S., Histology and Histopathology 20 (2005) 927-937 and Vollmers, H. P. and Brandlein, S., Methods and Findings in Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology 27 (2005) 185-191.
Human antibodies may also be generated by isolating Fv clone variable domain sequences selected from human-derived phage display libraries. Such variable domain sequences may then be combined with a desired human constant domain. Techniques for selecting human antibodies from antibody libraries are described below.
Antibodies may be isolated by screening combinatorial libraries for antibodies with the desired activity or activities. For example, a variety of methods are known in the art for generating phage display libraries and screening such libraries for antibodies possessing the desired binding characteristics. Such methods are reviewed, e.g., in Hoogenboom, H. R., et al., Methods in Molecular Biology 178 (2001) 1-37 and further described, e.g., in the McCafferty, J., et al., Nature 348 (1990) 552-554; Clackson, T., et al., Nature 352 (1991) 624-628; Marks, J. D., et al., J. Mol. Biol. 222 (1992) 581-597; Marks, J. D. and Bradbury, A., Methods in Molecular Biology 248 (2003) 161-175; Sidhu, S. S., et al., J. Mol. Biol. 338 (2004) 299-310; Lee, C. V., et al., J. Mol. Biol. 340 (2004) 1073-1093; Fellouse, F. A., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101 (2004) 12467-12472; and Lee, C. V., et al., J. Immunol. Methods 284 (2004) 119-132.
In certain phage display methods, repertoires of VH and VL genes are separately cloned by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and recombined randomly in phage libraries, which can then be screened for antigen-binding phage as described in Winter, G., et al., Ann. Rev. Immunol. 12 (1994) 433-455. Phage typically display antibody fragments, either as single-chain Fv (scFv) fragments or as Fab fragments. Libraries from immunized sources provide high-affinity antibodies to the immunogen without the requirement of constructing hybridomas. Alternatively, the naive repertoire can be cloned (e.g., from human) to provide a single source of antibodies to a wide range of non-self and also self-antigens without any immunization as described by Griffiths, A. D., et al., EMBO J. 12 (1993) 725-734. Finally, naive libraries can also be made synthetically by cloning non-rearranged V-gene segments from stem cells, and using PCR primers containing random sequence to encode the highly variable CDR3 regions and to accomplish rearrangement in vitro, as described by Hoogenboom, H. R. and Winter, G., J. Mol. Biol. 227 (1992) 381-388. Patent publications describing human antibody phage libraries include, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,750,373, and US 2005/0079574, US 2005/0119455, US 2005/0266000, US 2007/0117126, US 2007/0160598, US 2007/0237764, US 2007/0292936, and US 2009/0002360.
Antibodies or antibody fragments isolated from human antibody libraries are considered human antibodies or human antibody fragments herein.
In certain embodiments, the antibody is a multispecific antibody, e.g. a bispecific antibody. Multispecific antibodies are monoclonal antibodies that have binding specificities for at least two different sites. In certain embodiments, one of the binding specificities is for a first antigen and the other is for a different second antigen. In certain embodiments, bispecific antibodies may bind to two different epitopes of the same antigen. Bispecific antibodies may also be used to localize cytotoxic agents to cells which express the antigen. Bispecific antibodies can be prepared as full length antibodies or antibody fragments.
Techniques for making multispecific antibodies include, but are not limited to, recombinant co-expression of two immunoglobulin heavy chain-light chain pairs having different specificities (see Milstein, C. and Cuello, A. C., Nature 305 (1983) 537-540, WO 93/08829, and Traunecker, A., et al., EMBO J. 10 (1991) 3655-3659), and “knob-in-hole” engineering (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,731,168). Multi-specific antibodies may also be made by engineering electrostatic steering effects for making antibody Fc-heterodimeric molecules (WO 2009/089004); cross-linking two or more antibodies or fragments (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,676,980, and Brennan, M., et al., Science 229 (1985) 81-83); using leucine zippers to produce bi-specific antibodies (see, e.g., Kostelny, S. A., et al., J. Immunol. 148 (1992) 1547-1553; using “diabody” technology for making bispecific antibody fragments (see, e.g., Holliger, P., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90 (1993) 6444-6448); and using single-chain Fv (sFv) dimers (see, e.g., Gruber, M., et al., J. Immunol. 152 (1994) 5368-5374); and preparing trispecific antibodies as described, e.g., in Tutt, A., et al., J. Immunol. 147 (1991) 60-69).
Engineered antibodies with three or more functional antigen binding sites, including “Octopus antibodies”, are also included herein (see, e.g. US 2006/0025576).
The antibody can be a “Dual Acting Fab” or “DAF” comprising an antigen binding site that binds to a first antigen as well as another, different antigen (see, US 2008/0069820, for example).
The antibody or fragment can also be a multispecific antibody as described in WO 2009/080251, WO 2009/080252, WO 2009/080253, WO 2009/080254, WO 2010/112193, WO 2010/115589, WO 2010/136172, WO 2010/145792, or WO 2010/145793.
In certain embodiments, the methods provided herein are used to alter, i.e. to increase or decrease, the extent to which the antibody is glycosylated.
Where the antibody comprises an Fc-region, the carbohydrate attached thereto may be altered. Native antibodies produced by mammalian cells typically comprise a branched, biantennary oligosaccharide that is generally attached by an N-linkage to Asn297 of the CH2 domain of the Fc-region (see, e.g., Wright, A. and Morrison, S. L., TIBTECH 15 (1997) 26-32). The oligosaccharide may include various carbohydrates, e.g., mannose, N-acetyl glucosamine (GlcNAc), galactose, and sialic acid, as well as a fucose attached to a GlcNAc in the “stem” of the biantennary oligosaccharide structure. In some embodiments, modifications of the oligosaccharide in an antibody of the invention may be made in order to create antibody variants with certain improved properties.
In one embodiment, the method provided results in the production of antibodies having a carbohydrate structure that lacks fucose attached (directly or indirectly) to an Fc-region. For example, the amount of fucose in such antibody may be from 1% to 80%, from 1% to 65%, from 5% to 65% or from 20% to 40%. The amount of fucose is determined by calculating the average amount of fucose within the sugar chain at Asn297, relative to the sum of all glycostructures attached to Asn 297 (e. g. complex, hybrid and high mannose structures) as measured by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, as described in WO 2008/077546, for example. Asn297 refers to the asparagine residue located at about position 297 in the Fc-region (EU numbering according to Kabat of Fc-region residues); however, Asn297 may also be located about ±3 amino acids upstream or downstream of position 297, i.e., between positions 294 and 300, due to minor sequence variations in antibodies. Such fucosylation variants may have improved ADCC function (see, e.g., US 2003/0157108; US 2004/0093621). Examples of publications related to “defucosylated” or “fucose-deficient” antibody variants include: US 2003/0157108; WO 2000/61739; WO 2001/29246; US 2003/0115614; US 2002/0164328; US 2004/0093621; US 2004/0132140; US 2004/0110704; US 2004/0110282; US 2004/0109865; WO 2003/085119; WO 2003/084570; WO 2005/035586; WO 2005/035778; WO2005/053742; WO2002/031140; Okazaki, A., et al., J. Mol. Biol. 336 (2004) 1239-1249; Yamane-Ohnuki, N., et al., Biotech. Bioeng. 87 (2004) 614-622. Examples of cell lines capable of producing defucosylated antibodies include Lec13 CHO cells deficient in protein fucosylation (Ripka, J., et al., Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 249 (1986) 533-545; US 2003/0157108; and WO 2004/056312, especially at Example 11), and knockout cell lines, such as alpha-1,6-fucosyltransferase gene, FUT8, knockout CHO cells (see, e.g., Yamane-Ohnuki, N., et al., Biotech. Bioeng. 87 (2004) 614-622; Kanda, Y., et al., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 94 (2006) 680-688; and WO 2003/085107).
In certain embodiments, the methods provided can be used to produce antibodies with bisected oligosaccharides, e.g., in which a biantennary oligosaccharide attached to the Fc-region of the antibody is bisected by GlcNAc. Such antibody variants may have reduced fucosylation and/or improved ADCC function. Examples of such antibody variants are described, e.g., in WO 2003/011878; U.S. Pat. No. 6,602,684; and US 2005/0123546. Antibody variants with at least one galactose residue in the oligosaccharide attached to the Fc-region can also be produced. Such antibody variants may have improved CDC function. Such antibody variants are described, e.g., in WO 1997/30087; WO 1998/58964; and WO 1999/22764.
Antibodies may be produced using recombinant methods and compositions, e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567. Nucleic acid may encode an amino acid sequence comprising the VL and/or an amino acid sequence comprising the VH of the antibody (e.g., the light and/or heavy chains of the antibody). In a further embodiment, one or more vectors (e.g., expression vectors) comprising such nucleic acid are provided. In a further embodiment, a host cell comprising such nucleic acid is provided. In one such embodiment, a host cell comprises (e.g., has been transformed with): (1) a vector comprising a nucleic acid that encodes an amino acid sequence comprising the VL of the antibody and an amino acid sequence comprising the VH of the antibody, or (2) a first vector comprising a nucleic acid that encodes an amino acid sequence comprising the VL of the antibody and a second vector comprising a nucleic acid that encodes an amino acid sequence comprising the VH of the antibody. In one embodiment, the host cell is eukaryotic, e.g. a Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell or lymphoid cell (e.g., Y0, NS0, Sp2/0). In one embodiment, a method of making an antibody is provided, wherein the method comprises culturing a host cell comprising a nucleic acid encoding the antibody, as provided above, under conditions suitable for expression of the antibody, and optionally recovering the antibody from the host cell (or host cell culture medium).
For recombinant production of an antibody, nucleic acid encoding an antibody is isolated and inserted into one or more vectors for further cloning and/or expression in a host cell. Such nucleic acid may be readily isolated and sequenced using conventional procedures (e.g., by using oligonucleotide probes that are capable of binding specifically to genes encoding the heavy and light chains of the antibody).
Suitable host cells for cloning or expression of antibody-encoding vectors include prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells described herein. For example, antibodies may be produced in bacteria, in particular when glycosylation and Fc-region effector function are not needed. For expression of antibody fragments and polypeptides in bacteria, see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,648,237, U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,199, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,523; see also Charlton, K. A., In: Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 248, Lo, B. K. C. (ed.), Humana Press, Totowa, N.J. (2003), pp. 245-254, describing expression of antibody fragments in E. coli. After expression, the antibody may be isolated from the bacterial cell paste in a soluble fraction and can be further purified.
In addition to prokaryotes, eukaryotic microbes such as filamentous fungi or yeast are suitable cloning or expression hosts for antibody-encoding vectors, including fungi and yeast strains whose glycosylation pathways have been “humanized,” resulting in the production of an antibody with a partially or fully human glycosylation pattern (see Gerngross, T. U., Nat. Biotech. 22 (2004) 1409-1414; and Li, H., et al., Nat. Biotech. 24 (2006) 210-215).
Suitable host cells for the expression of glycosylated antibody are also derived from multicellular organisms (invertebrates and vertebrates). Examples of invertebrate cells include plant and insect cells. Numerous baculoviral strains have been identified which may be used in conjunction with insect cells, particularly for transfection of Spodoptera frugiperda cells.
Plant cell cultures can also be utilized as hosts (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,959,177, U.S. Pat. No. 6,040,498, U.S. Pat. No. 6,420,548, U.S. Pat. No. 7,125,978, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,417,429 (describing PLANTIBODIES™ technology for producing antibodies in transgenic plants)).
Vertebrate cells may also be used as hosts. For example, mammalian cell lines that are adapted to grow in suspension may be useful. Other examples of useful mammalian host cell lines are monkey kidney CV1 line transformed by SV40 (COS-7); human embryonic kidney line (293 or 293 cells as described, e.g., in Graham, F. L., et al., J. Gen Virol. 36 (1977) 59-74); baby hamster kidney cells (BHK); mouse sertoli cells (TM4 cells as described, e.g., in Mather, J. P., Biol. Reprod. 23 (1980) 243-252); monkey kidney cells (CV1); African green monkey kidney cells (VERO-76); human cervical carcinoma cells (HELA); canine kidney cells (MDCK; buffalo rat liver cells (BRL 3A); human lung cells (W138); human liver cells (Hep G2); mouse mammary tumor (MMT 060562); TRI cells, as described, e.g., in Mather, J. P., et al., Annals N.Y. Acad. Sci. 383 (1982) 44-68; MRC 5 cells; and FS4 cells. Other useful mammalian host cell lines include Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, including DHFR negative (DHFR−) CHO cells (Urlaub, G., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77 (1980) 4216-4220); and myeloma cell lines such as Y0, NS0 and Sp2/0. For a review of certain mammalian host cell lines suitable for antibody production, see, e.g., Yazaki, P. and Wu, A. M., Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 248, Lo, B. K. C. (ed.), Humana Press, Totowa, N.J. (2004), pp. 255-268.
It has been found that depending on the vector organization the performance of the expression vector differs for (1) the vector design, and (2) identical vectors between transient and stable transfections.
It has been found that the optimal vector organization for transient and stable transfections can clearly differ. Without being bound by this theory several points might contribute to these differences: 1) transcriptional interference phenomena between integrated vector copies in the host genome which depend on and are specific for the respective vector design and that do not exist in the transient system, 2) the influence of the selection process and selection stringency which depends on the respective vector organization and that plays an important role in in the stable but not in the transient system, and 3) the optimal LC to HC polypeptide ratio which obviously differs for transient and stable expression of monoclonal antibodies and that is lower in transient than in stable transfections.
It has been found that for transient transfections the bidirectional expression of the LC and HC reached highest product titer of all tested vector organizations. Without being bound by theory it is assumed that this vector design fulfill both criteria for an optimal IgG expression A) high expression levels of the LC and HC polypeptides and B) an optimal ‘transient’ LC to HC polypeptide ratio, and C) the bidirectional expression of the LC and HC might also minimize transcriptional interference mechanisms as read through effects of the RNA polymerase
It has been found that for stable transfections, however, the bidirectional expression of LC and HC was worse than the in row organization LC-HC-SM. Without being bound by this theory 1) the convergent organization of the expression cassettes for LC, HC and SM might reduce transcriptional interference phenomena between integrated vector copies, 2) the LC upstream of the HC obviously facilitates a LC to HC polypeptide ratio that is (more) optimal for stable transfections, and 3) the downstream position of the selection marker obviously increases stringency of selection. Moreover, the percentage of IgG producing cells and productivity of cell lines has been found to be increased. Increasing the concentration of selection pressure for vectors containing the selection marker bidirectionally upstream of the antibody expression cassettes did not increase productivity of stable pools or clones although stringency of selection clearly increased (data not shown).
It has been found that the concomitant exchange of the hCMV promoter and the SV40 poly signal by the hEF1α promoter and the bGH polyA signal significantly increased transient product titers when the antibody expression cassettes were unidirectionally organized but decreased product titers when the LC and HC expression cassettes were positioned bidirectionally.
It has been found that the hEF1α promoter generates a high number of well-producing and a very low number of non- or low-producing clones. However, product titers for the best individual clones of the hEF1α promoter in fed-batch analysis were lower than for clones of the hCMV promoter. But the overall number of top clones for the hCMV promoter is relatively low and their identification usually requires high screening efforts.
It has been found that the use of hGT significantly increased productivity for vectors containing the hCMV promoter when combined with the SV40 or bGH polyA signal in transient but also in stable transfections. For vectors containing the hEf1α promoter, however, its effect on product titer was negligible when combined with the bGH polyA signal. Thus, it has been found that the influence of the hGT on the vector performance is dependent on the used promoter.
The choice of appropriate clones for the final evaluation in fully controlled large scale fermentations is usually based on batch or fed batch analysis in shake flasks. It has been found that differences in the performance and ranking of some expression vectors or elements between batch and fed-batch analysis are present. Replacing the SV40 polyA by the bGH polyA signal increased productivity for vectors containing the hCMV promoter in batch but not in fed-batch analysis. The hGT has no significant influence on product titer of clones in batch but in fed-batch analysis. Differences between vectors differing in the position of selection marker or in the promoter (hEf1α or hCMV promoter) were moderately pronounced in batch-but strongly evident in fed-batch analysis. Expression levels and specific production rates are higher in a fed-batch than in a batch mode.
A good correlation in the performance of fed-batch analysis and 2L fermentations for most clones has been found, not only on level of absolute product titers, but also in ranking between different vectors and clones.
It has been found that the downstream position of the selection marker slightly reduced loss in productivity compared to the bidirectional position of the selection marker upstream of the antibody expression cassettes. Without being bound by theory, this might be due to increased selection stringency and thus a higher mRNA level or by an improved LC to HC mRNA or polypeptide ratio. Both factors might lead to a higher tolerance towards changes in productivity.
The bGH polyA signal significantly decreased stability of antibody expression in clones compared to the SV40 polyA signal. However, the insertion of the hGT downstream of the bGH polyA signal clearly increased stability of expression. The positive effect of the hGT on stability was most apparent in absence of selection pressure.
Stability analysis of stable pools revealed that cells rapidly lost productivity when generated with the hCMV but not when generated with the hEf1α promoter. Strikingly, although the hGT decreased productivity of clones for vectors containing the hEf1α promoter it slightly increased their stability.
Only a small portion of the clones significantly produces antibody after the selection process. However, modifications in vector organization and/or elements significantly increased the ratio of IgG producing to non-producing clones. Different vector organizations and thus different expression levels of the selection marker that determine stringency of selection also clearly affect the percentage of IgG producing cells. Statistical simulations based on data of the screening process demonstrated that some expression vectors also bear the potential to decrease workload during screening process considerably. This fact has a major impact on costs for biopharmaceutical companies.
The promoter determines the transcription level of a gene and therefore has a strong influence on productivity and stability of cell lines:
Promoters shown to be strong promoters in a variety of cell lines are described. It is known that introns can contain enhancer-like elements. Often, the first intron (Intron A) contains most of the regulatory elements. This Intron A is the first occurring intron within the full length natural promoter sequence/organization.
Polyadenylation of the mRNA Mediated by the polyA Signal
Polyadenylation of the mRNA has various functions. It strongly influences the mRNA export out of the nucleus, the translational initiation and the mRNA stability. The efficiency of the polyadenylation process therefore has a strong influence on the expression level of a gene and, thus, on productivity.
Several publications have shown that the polyadenylation signal can have a strong influence on protein expression. It has been reported that the polyA signal derived by the bovine growth hormone (bGH polyA signal) can result in enhanced protein expression when substituted for the SV40 polyA signal.
It has been found that the bovine growth hormone polyA signal can have improved properties in the recombinant production of antibody chains.
The elements comprised in an expression vector can strongly interfere with each other (transcriptional interference). This is due to competition during the transcription process. For example, suboptimal promoter accession for transcription factors and/or the RNA polymerase due to steric constraints and reduced availability of resources of the transcription machinery. Interference can also occur between different close neighboring expression cassettes. For example, a read through of the RNA polymerase from a first through a second expression unit due to an inefficient transcription termination can occur.
It has been reported that an inefficient transcription termination may lead to transcriptional interference, which can result in inefficient expression of a gene. The use of the human gastrin gene transcription terminator (hGT) can improve transcription termination and therefore contribute to an enhanced expression of recombinant proteins. This effect depends on the promoter with which the hGT is combined. Further effective transcription terminators are known.
It has been found that by the insertion of the sequence of the human gastrin transcription terminator after the early SV40 polyA signal of antibody expression cassettes an enhanced transcription termination and prevention of transcriptional interference between expression cassettes e.g. of an antibody light chain and an antibody heavy chain, can be achieved.
Herein are reported expression vectors for enhanced expression of one or more coding nucleic acids, e.g. of structural genes encoding antibody chains.
It has been found that the productivity of a recombinant cell expressing the structural gene is improved when the genetic elements required for transcription are chosen and arranged properly.
polyA Signal Sequence and Transcription Terminator Sequence
In vector p5068 the expression cassettes were terminated by the SV40 polyA signal.
In vector px6001 the expression cassettes additionally contained the human gastrin transcription terminator (hGT) that was placed downstream of the SV40 PolyA signal.
In vector px6007 the expression cassettes were terminated by the bGH polyA signal and the hGT transcription terminator.
In vector px6008 the expression cassettes were terminated by the bGH polyA signal without an additional transcription terminator.
These vectors were transiently transfected into CHO-K1 cells and six days after transfection cell culture supernatants were harvested and the amount of produced antibody in the cultivation supernatant was determined by ELISA.
The replacement of the SV40 polyA signal by the bGH polyA signal and the addition/insertion of the human gastrin terminator (hGT) after the SV40 polyA signal (vector px6001) resulted in an increase in productivity in transient expression of about 45% to 30% compared to the control vector p5068. The combination of the bGH polyA signal and the human gastrin terminator (hGT) resulted in biggest titer increase (+58%) compared to the control vector p5068.
Thus, it has been found that in transient expression systems a polyadenylation by the bGH polyA signal and an improved transcription termination by the addition of the human gastrin transcription terminator enhances antibody secretion.
The vectors p5068, px6001, px6007 and px6008 were used to generate stable antibody expressing cell lines.
The average productivity of the best 15 single clones generated with the vector p5068 in batch antibody production was 624 μg/ml. Clones generated with the vector px6001 (containing the human gastrin terminator (hGT)) or the vector px6007 (containing a combination of the bGH polyA signal and the hGT) had a productivity that was increased by 23% and 40%, respectively (770 μg/ml for vector px6001 and 872 μg/ml for vector px6007) compared to vector p5068 (see
Clones generated with the vector px6008 had an average productivity of the 15 best clones of 576 μg/ml.
The average productivity of the three best clones for the vector px6008 is 760 μg/ml.
Promoter Sequence
In vector px6051 the expression cassettes comprised the full length human CMV promoter with Intron A and a SV40 polyA signal.
In vector px6052 the expression cassettes comprised the human Ef1α promoter and a SV40 polyA signal.
In vector px6062 the expression cassettes comprised the full length human CMV promoter with Intron A and the bGH polyA signal and the human gastrin terminator.
In vector px6063 the expression cassettes comprised the human Ef1α promoter and the bGH polyA signal and the human gastrin terminator.
The best 18 stable clones obtained for each vector were identified and productivity of the clones was tested in batch analysis.
The exchange of the SV40 polyA signal by the combination of the bGH polyA signal and the hGT enhances average productivity: in case of the hEF1α promoter by about 19% (505 μg/ml for vector px6063 versus 426 μg/ml for vector 6052) and in the case of the full length hCMV promoter by about 71% (333 μg/ml for vector px6062 versus 195 μg/ml for vector px6051).
The increase in productivity can also be seen on top clone level (+36% for vector px6063 (693 μg/ml) versus vector px6052 (511 μg/ml) and +102% for vector px6062 (529 μg/ml) versus vector px6051 (262 μg/ml), values are calculated for the three best clones each vector) (see
Thus, it has been found that the combination of the hEF1alpha promoter with bGH polyA signal and the hGT enhances productivity in stable transfection using a bidirectional vector organization with the expression cassette for the selection marker in one transcription direction and the expression cassettes for the light chain upstream of the expression cassette for the heavy chain in the respective other transcription direction (see px6052).
Further, it has been found that the combination of the bGH polyA signal and the hGT enhances productivity in stable transfection for the hCMV promoter using either an unidirectional vector organization with the expression cassette for the light chain upstream of the expression cassette for the heavy chain which in turn is located upstream of the expression cassette of the selection marker (5′->3′ orientation of LC-HC-SM expression cassettes) (see px9005), or a bidirectional vector organization with the expression cassette for the selection marker in one transcription direction and the expression cassettes for the light chain upstream of the expression cassette for the heavy chain in the respective other transcription direction (see px6007).
The combination of the bGH polyA signal and the hGT was also employed in a transient transfections approach. Vectors px6062 and px6063 (containing the full length hCMV promoter or the hEF1α promoter with the combination of the bGH polyA signal and the hGT) were directly compared to vectors px6051 and px6052 (containing the containing the full length hCMV promoter or the hEF1α promoter with the SV40 polyA signal).
In contrast to stable transfections the combination of the bGH polyA signal and the human gastrin terminator (hGT) does not increase productivity in transient transfections, neither in the case of the full length human CMV promoter with Intron A nor in the case of the human EF1α promoter with Intron A (2.38 μg/ml for vector px6052 versus 2.32 μg/ml for vector px6063). In the case of the full length human CMV promoter with Intron A the combination of the bGH polyA signal and the human gastrin terminator (hGT) resulted in a productivity of 2.74 μg/ml for vector px6062A and 3.64 μg/ml for vector px6051.
In cells obtained by transient transfection it has been found that the combination of short hCMV promoter with bovine growth hormone polyA signal sequence and human gastrin terminator results in an improved antibody expression yield.
In cell lines obtained by transfection and selection of stable cell clones it has been found that the combination of bovine growth hormone polyA signal sequence and human gastrin terminator independently of the used promoter results in an improved antibody expression yield.
In vector p5068 the expression of the genes encoding for both the light (LC) and the heavy (HC) chain of the antibody is driven by the short human CMV promoter (hCMV). This promoter is active in a broad range of cell types and is commonly used in mammalian expression plasmids. As promoter activity is strongly cell type dependent and as it is known that the hCMV promoter is sensitive to gene silencing effects as promoter methylation possibly stronger and/or more resistant promoters in CHO-K1 cells exist.
Expression vectors comprising different promoters were constructed: i) comprising the short-length hCMV without Intron A, ii) the full-length hCMV promoter with Intron A, iii) the full-length ratCMV promoter with Intron A, and iv) the hEF1 alpha promoter with Intron A.
Vectors containing the full length hCMV promoter (px6051), the hEf1α promoter (px6052) and the rat CMV promoter (px6053) were constructed and used for transient and stable transfections.
The expression vectors p5068, px6051, px6052, and px6053 were transiently transfected into CHO-K1 cells by nucleofection and four days after transfection cell culture supernatant was harvested and productivity was determined by ELISA.
Vectors containing the hEF1α promoter with Intron A (px6052) or the full length hCMV promoter with Intron A (px6051) had an increased productivity by 53% and 134%, respectively, compared to expression vector p5068 (3.64 μg/ml for vector px6051, 2.38 μg/ml for vector px6052, 1.56 μg/ml for vector p5068). Vector px6053 containing the ratCMV promoter however showed an approximately 50% reduced productivity (0.8 μg/ml for p5068) (see
Vectors containing the full length human CMV promoter (vectors px6051 and px6062) or the hEF1 alpha promoter with Intron A (vectors px6052 and px6063) were also used for stable transfections.
The expression vectors p5068, px6051, px6052, and px6053 were transfected into CHO-K1 cells by nucleofection and stable pools were selected. Productivity of the pools was analyzed in batch analysis.
Batch analysis of stable pools showed that antibody titers from cells transfected with the vector containing the hEF1 alpha promoter with Intron A (vector px6052) were more than 4 fold higher than those of cells transfected with the vector containing the short-length hCMV promoter (vector p5068) or with the vector containing the full-length hCMV promoter with Intron A (vector px6051) (78 μg/ml for vector px6052, 14 μg/ml for vector p5068, 17 μg/ml for vector px6051, 8.46 μg/ml for vector px6053) (
Using the expression vector p5068, px6051, and px6052 stable clones were generated. Additionally vectors px6062 and px6063 (both containing the combination of the bGH polyA signal and the human gastrin terminator instead the SV40 polyA signal) were used.
Batch analysis of the best 54 clones obtained for each vector showed that the average productivity from cells transfected with the vector px6052 was 316 μg/ml, and for vector p5068 341 μg/ml. Clones generated with the vectors px6051 and px6062 containing the full length hCMV promoter had an average productivity of 141 μg/ml for vector px6051 and 220 μg/ml for vector px6062.
The average productivity of the 54 tested clones transfected with the vector px6063 (containing the hEF1 alpha promoter in combination with the bGH polyA signal and the hGT) in batch analysis had a productivity of 367 μg/ml. The best clones with the highest titer are derived from the vector px6063 (748 and 731 μg/ml, respectively).
It has been found that clones generated with the vector containing the human EF1α promoter (px6052 and px6063) show a reduced number of low producing clones.
The clones were tested for stability of antibody production. Twelve clones obtained with the vectors p5068 and px6052 were cultivated in the presence and in the absence of Hygromycin B for three passages.
In the absence of selection pressure (Hygromycin B) for three passages, a 35% decrease in the average productivity of the 12 tested clones was observed for the short-length hCMV promoter lacking intron A (p5068; 264 μg/ml versus 410 μg/ml). In contrast only an 18% decrease in the average productivity was observed for the hEF1-alpha promoter with intron A (px6052; 256 μg/ml versus 312 μg/ml).
In the presence of selection pressure, the clones obtained with vector p5068 showed a decrease in average productivity of 27% (298 μg/ml versus 410 μg/ml) and titers from clones obtained with vector px6052 containing the hEF1-alpha promoter with intron A decreased by 15% (266 μg/ml versus 312 μg/ml).
The number of stable clones, transfected with the vector p5068 containing the short-length hCMV promoter lacking intron A or with the vector px6052 containing the hEF1-alpha promoter with intron A, after three passages with or without selection pressure was determined. To determine whether a clone is “stable” after three passages, IgG titers from passage zero were set to 100% and a threshold of 80% was defined. Clones showing relative IgG titers after 3 passages with or without selection pressure that are lower than 80% of the IgG titer at passage zero (passage 0) were defined as instable.
Relative antibody titers after three passages, either with or without selection pressure, from all clones transfected with p5068 dropped below 80% compared to the antibody titer of passage zero. A stable cell clone is a clonal cell population that produces an antibody titer that is 80% or more compared to the antibody titer of passage zero in the presence of selection pressure as well as in absence of selection pressure
Relative titers after three passages, either with or without selection pressure, from clones transfected with px6052 dropped below 80% compared to the IgG titer of passage zero in 8 of 12 cases, but 4 clones were defined as “stable”. In contrast to clones generated with the vector p5068 8 of 12 clones generated with the vector px6052 are “stable” in the presence of selection pressure. In contrast only one clone derived by the vector p5068 is stable in the presence of selection pressure.
Vectors px6014, px6014A and px6014B contain the hEF1α promoter in front of the light chain of the antibody and the short hCMV promoter in front of the heavy chain. These vectors vary in the 5′ UTR of the light chain (px6014: 5′ UTR of the hEF1α promoter containing the PmeI restriction site; px6014A: 5′ UTR of the hEF1α promoter without PmeI restriction site; px6014B: 5′ UTR of the hEF1α promoter plus the 5′ UTR of the vector p5068). The vectors were transiently transfected in CHO-K1 cells using nucleofection.
Vectors px6014A and px6014B show a 20% and 40%, respectively, enhanced productivity compared to the vector px6014 (2.01 μg/ml for vector px6014B, 1.71 μg/ml for vector px6014A, 1.41 μg/ml for vector px6014).
It has been found that in transient transfections vectors containing the human EF1α promoter or the full length human CMV promoter (both with Intron A) show an improved productivity compared to vector p5068.
It has been found that stable pools generated with vectors containing the human EF1α promoter show an improved productivity in batch analysis compared to vector p5068.
It has been found that cell clones obtained by stable transfection with vectors containing the human EF1α promoter with Intron A show a reduced number of low producing clones.
It has been found that cell clones obtained by stable transfection with vectors containing the full length human CMV promoter with Intron A show a strongly reduced productivity both in average and on top clone level.
Thus, it has been found that the combination of the bGH polyA signal and the hGT enhances productivity compared to SV40 polyA in stable transfection independently of the used promoter using a bidirectional vector organization with the expression cassette for the selection marker in one transcription direction and the expression cassettes for the light chain upstream of the expression cassette for the heavy chain in the respective other transcription direction (see px6052).
Further, it has been found that the combination of the bGH polyA signal and the hGT enhances productivity in stable transfection for the hCMV promoter using an unidirectional vector organization with the expression cassette for the light chain upstream of the expression cassette for the heavy chain which in turn is located upstream of the expression cassette of the selection marker (5′->3′ orientation of LC-HC-SM expression cassettes).
Due to the high number of none and low producing clones and the low stability of gene expression cell line development is currently very time-consuming and cost intensive. In thousands of clones you normally find only a few stable “high producers”.
Without being bound by theory a possible reason for the low selectivity and stringency of a selection strategy can be the separate expression of antibody and selection marker in the used vector system that does not exert selection pressure on the antibody expression (see e.g. vector p5069).
It has been found that by the use of an IRES element this problem can be overcome.
IRES elements are DNA elements that function—on mRNA level—as an internal ribosome entry site, and therefore allow the expression of two genes from one mRNA.
The IRES-linked expression of the selection marker and the antibody chain exerts selection pressure on total antibody expression (i.e. one mRNA coding for both the selection marker and the antibody chain) and, thus, warrants the selectivity of selection. The stability of gene expression can be increased.
The use of an IRES element with weak IRES activity allows a weak expression of the selection marker. This weak expression of the selection marker can increase the stringency of selection.
By the IRES-linked co-expression of selection marker and antibody chain the selection process can be improved by
For the IRES-linked co-expression of antibody and selection marker the used IRES element has to fulfill two requirements:
The light and the heavy chain encoding nucleic acid were linked by several IRES elements, the EV71-IRES, the ELF4G-IRES and the EMCV-IRES element (vectors px6015A, px6015B, and px6015C). The expression cassette comprises in 5′ to 3′ direction the human CMV promoter, the light chain encoding nucleic acid, the IRES, the heavy chain encoding nucleic acid, and the polyA site.
The vector p5068 without IRES element as reference and the vectors px6015A, px6015B, and px6015C, were transiently transfected in CHO-K1 cells and productivity was determined by ELISA.
Vectors px6015B and px6015C (containing the ELF4G and the EMCV-IRES respectively) show an IgG expression of 0.1 μg/ml to 0.15 μg/ml. Vector p5068 shows an IgG expression of 2 μg/ml. Vector px6015A containing the EV71-IRES shows a productivity of 1.7 μg/ml.
Alternatively the selection marker Neomycin can be linked by the IRES element directly to the heavy chain of the antibody. The vector comprises in 5′ to 3′ direction the elements human CMV promoter, light chain encoding nucleic acid, polyA site, human CMV promoter, heavy chain encoding nucleic acid, IRES element, neomycin selection marker nucleic acid, and polyA site.
The vectors px6010A, px6010B and px6010C were transiently transfected in CHO-K1 cells as described and productivity was determined by ELISA.
Vector px6010C containing the EMCV-IRES shows a productivity of 13 μg/ml. The vector p5069 shows a productivity of 14 μg/ml. Vectors containing the EV71-IRES (vector px6010A) or the ELF4G-IRES (vector px6010B) show a productivity of 4.3 μg/ml and 2.4 μg/ml, respectively.
Thus, it has been found that the EMCV-IRES element fulfills the requirements that are necessary for the IRES-linked expression of a selection marker:
Thus, the selection marker Neomycin (mediates resistance to G418) can be linked to the heavy chain encoding nucleic acid by the EMCV-IRES.
Vectors p5069 and px6010C were tested for productivity and stability in stable transfections, both on pool and on single clone level.
The vectors were transfected into CHO-K1 cells by nucleofection technology. Stable pools were selected and productivity of the pools was analyzed in batch analysis.
Pools generated with the vector px6010C show a productivity in batch analysis of 14 μg/ml. Pools generated with the vector p5069 show a productivity in batch analysis of 5.4 μg/ml (
It has been found that pools generated with the vector px6010C consist of more producing cells (or more good producing cells) and/or stability of IgG expression is enhanced (compared to the vector p5069).
It has been found that the IRES-linked expression of the selection marker Neomycin in the vector px6010C also leads to an enhanced stability of the pool. Stable pools were cultured in the presence and in the absence of selection pressure for 30 generations. At the beginning (=generation 0) and at the end (=generation 30) of the stability test productivity of the pools was determined in batch analysis.
Pools generated with the vector px6010C show an enhanced stability of IgG expression in batch analysis compared to pools generated with the vector p5069. The productivity of pools obtained with the vector p5069 in batch analysis strongly decreased (>80%; values under the detection limit) after 30 generations both in the presence and in the absence of selection pressure. Productivity of pools generated with the vector px6010C also decreased about 70% in the absence of selection pressure. In the presence of selection pressure however productivity of pools generated with the vector px6010C decreased only by 10% (
Vector p5069 and vector px6010C were transfected into CHO-K1 cells by nucleofection and stable clones were generated as described above. Clones were screened and productivity of the best 15 clones each transfection was analyzed in batch analysis. Two independent transfections each vector were performed.
Clones generated with the vector px6010C show an average productivity of 348 μg/ml. Clones generated with the vector p5069 shows an average productivity of 239 μg/ml. The increased average productivity of clones generated with the vector px6010C is not due to better top clones but to a clearly decreased number of low producing clones. In contrast to the vector p5069 clones generated with the vector px6010C do not show lower productivities than 200 μg/ml in batch analysis (
The stability of antibody expression was tested for 17 clones (p5069) and 14 clones (px6010C), respectively, by cultivation in the presence and in the absence of selection pressure for 45 generations. Productivity of clones was measured at the beginning of the stability test (generation 0) and at generation 45 in batch analysis. IgG titer of generation 45 were compared to productivity of the clones at the beginning of the stability test.
The average productivity of the 17 clones generated with the vector p5069 decreased after 45 generations both in the presence and in the absence of selection pressure (approximately 43% loss in productivity). The average productivity of the 14 clones generated with the vector px6010C decreased in the absence of selection pressure for approximately 45%. However, in the presence of selection marker the decrease in productivity for these clones is 4%.
In the presence of selection pressure only 6 of the 17 tested clones generated by the vector p5069 show a productivity that is still above 80% of the productivity at generation 0. In contrast 10 of the 14 tested clones generated with the vector px6010C show a productivity that is above 80% of the productivity at generation 0.
In the absence of selection pressure there is no significant difference in stability between clones generated with the vector p5069 and the vector px6010C respectively.
Due to intensive screening efforts cell line development is currently very time- and cost-intensive. In thousands of clones you generally find only a few stable high producers.
Currently several screening strategies for the identification of high producing clones exist:
In most of the cases the expression of the fluorescence marker is not linked to the expression of the antibody. This limits the dependence of fluorescence intensity and productivity, so there is often no good correlation between fluorescence intensity and productivity.
The GFP-protein (as example of a fluorescence marker) is stable and tends to accumulate. There is (in most cases) no good correlation between the expression level of the fluorescence marker in the cells (fluorescence intensity) and their productivity.
It has been found that by linking the antibody expression and the fluorescent marker expression a combined selection and screening strategy to identify cell clones having an enhanced stability and productivity but at the same time being simple and, thus, allowing a fast and easy identification of high producers.
It has been found that the IRES-linked expression of a fusion protein functions both as selection and as a quantitative screening marker.
A fusion protein of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) and the selection marker neomycin that is directly linked to the heavy chain of the antibody by an IRES element has been constructed. The green fluorescent protein and the selection marker neomycin in the fusion protein are separated by the PEST sequence (sequence corresponding to codons 423-449 of the mouse ornithine decarboxylase gene (mODC)). This PEST sequence serves on the protein level as a strong proteolytic signal sequence, thus clearly reducing the half-life of the protein.
The GFP-PEST-Neo fusion protein functions not only as selection but additionally as quantitative screening marker.
The use of the PEST sequence provides for an improved selection of clones due to the PEST mediated decreased half-life of the fusion protein (enhanced stringency of selection).
The use of the PEST sequence provides for a good correlation between the GFP fluorescence intensity of the fusion protein and the antibody expression level due to the IRES-linked co-expression of antibody and selection marker.
The use of the PEST sequence reduces accumulation of the fusion protein due to decreased half-life of the protein.
The GFP expression level of stable single clones was analyzed by FACS and correlated to the productivity in batch analysis. Populations with different GFP expressing levels from stable pools were sorted by FACS and the productivity of the sorted populations was analyzed.
IRES elements that fulfill the requirements for this approach:
IRES activity or strength was determined by linking the light and heavy chain expression by several IRES elements, the EV71-IRES, the ELF4G-IRES and the EMCV-IRES element (see vectors px6015A, px6015B, and px6015C). Vector p5068 (without IRES element) as reference and the vectors px6015A, px6015B, and px6015C, were transiently transfected in CHO-K1 cells and productivity was measured by ELISA.
Vectors px6015B and px6015C (containing the ELF4G and the EMCV-IRES, respectively) show an IgG expression of 0.1 to 0.15 μg/ml. An IgG expression of 2 μg/ml was shown for vector p5068. Vector px6015A containing the EV71-IRES showed a productivity of 1.7 μg/ml indicating that the EV71-IRES element has a strong IRES activity in CHO-K1 cells.
The GFP-PEST-Neo fusion protein is linked by the IRES element directly to the heavy chain encoding nucleic acid of the antibody (see
A construct in which the IRES element linked the selection marker to the heavy chain of the antibody comprised in vectors px6011A, px6011B and px6011C was transiently transfected in CHO-K1 cells as described and productivity was determined by ELISA.
Vector px6011C containing the EMCV-IRES shows an IgG productivity of 8.7 μg/ml and vector p5059 showed an IgG productivity of 10.8 μg/ml. Vector px6011A containing the EV71-IRES showed an IgG productivity of 3.9 μg/ml. Vector px6011B containing the ELF4G-IRES did not show relevant productivity.
Vector px6011C with the IRES-linked GFP-PEST-Neo fusion protein, vector p5069, and vector px6010C were tested in batch analysis of stable pools and stable clones.
Vectors p5069, px6010C, and px6011C were transfected into CHO-K1 cells by nucleofection. Stable pools were selected as described and productivity of the stable pools was analyzed in batch analysis.
Stable pools generated with vector px6010C containing the IRES-linked selection marker showed an IgG productivity of 9.5 μg/ml. Stable pools generated with vector p5069 showed an IgG productivity of 5.4 μg/ml. Pools generated with the vector px6011C containing the IRES-linked fusion protein showed a productivity of 36.3 μg/ml (
These data suggest that pools generated with the vectors px6010C and px6011C apparently consist of much more producing or even good producing cells than the pools (generated with the vector p5069). An enhanced stability of IgG expression of/in the px6010C and px6011C pools can also contribute to the increased productivity.
To compare productivity of the expression vector p5068 with the vectors px6010C and px6011C in stable clones vectors were transfected into CHO-K1 cells by nucleofection. Stable clones were selected as described and clones were screened. Productivity of the best 15 clones each vector was analyzed in batch analysis.
For the vector p5068 95 of overall 3072 wells in 384 well plates showed an IgG production that is above 2 μg/ml (background). The IRES-linked expression of the selection marker (px6010C) doubled the number of producing clones/wells to 195, and in the case of the IRES-linked fusion protein (px6011C) the number of producing cells/wells was further increased to over 280.
Moreover, not only the number of producing clones but also the average productivity of the IRES containing clones (generated by the vectors px6010C and px6011C is higher (3.4 μg/ml for vector p5069, 4.2 μg/ml for vector px6010C, 8.1 μg/ml for vector px6011C for the best 100 clones each vector; 2.2 mg/ml for vector p5069, 3.0 μg/ml for vector px6010C, 5.1 μg/ml for vector px6011C for the best 250 clones each vector).
Clones generated with the IRES vectors px6010C and px6011C and p5059 show an average productivity in the 24 well screening of 212 μg/ml for vector px6011C, 178 μg/ml for vector px6010C, and 118 μg/ml for vector p5069 (determined in 24 well cultures with an undefined cell count at day 4 after cell split). For vectors px6010C and px6011C a reduced number of non or low producing clones and an increased number of good producing cells can be seen (
Batch analysis of single clones showed that the average productivity of the 15 best clones generated with the vector px6010C is 348 μg/ml and 239 μg/ml for vector p5069. The average productivity of the 15 best clones generated with the vector px6010C is 404 μg/ml. The clones with the highest overall titer derive from transfectants with the vector px6011C. Clones generated with the vector px6010C and the vector px6011C do not show lower productivities than 200 μg/ml in batch analysis.
In order to test the clones for stability of antibody expression, 14 to 19 clones obtained with each vector were cultivated in the presence and in the absence of selection pressure (G418) for 45 generations. Productivity of clones was measured at the beginning of the stability test (generation 0) and at generation 45 in batch analysis. IgG titer of generation 45 were compared to the productivity of the clones at the beginning of the stability test at generation 0 (values set to 100%).
The average productivity of the 17 clones generated with vector p5069 decreased after 45 generations both in the presence and in the absence of selection pressure (approximately 43% loss in productivity). The average productivity of the 14 to 19 clones generated with the vectors px6010C and px6011C, respectively, also decreased in the absence of selection pressure (approximately 45-35% loss in productivity), but in the presence of selection marker G418 the decrease in average productivity for these clones is only 0 to 4% after 45 generations.
In the presence of selection pressure G418 6 of the 17 tested clones generated by the vector p5069 showed a productivity that is above 80% of the productivity at generation 0. In contrast 10 of the 14 tested clones generated with the vector px6010C and 17 of the 19 tested clones generated with the vector px6011C showed a productivity that is above 80% of the productivity at generation 0.
In the absence of selection pressure the clones generated with vectors p5069, px6010C, and px6011C show comparable behavior.
It has been found that IRES comprising vectors and, thus, the clones obtained therefrom have an enhanced stability in the presence of selection marker.
In the absence of selection marker however there is no difference in stability between clones obtained with an IRES containing vector or an IRES-free vector.
The GFP-PEST-Neo fusion protein is useful as a quantitative screening marker. The GFP fluorescent level of clones generated with the vector px6011C is predictive for their productivity.
The GFP expression level/fluorescence intensity of single clones were determined and results were correlated to the productivity of the clones in batch analysis, populations with different GFP expressing levels/fluorescence intensities were sorted from stable pools by FACS (1,000 cells each vector) and then productivity of these different populations was analyzed in batch analysis. Three different populations were sorted:
Batch and FACS analysis show that there is both on single clone and on pool level a good correlation between the GFP fluorescence of the clones/pools and their productivity. Clones or pools with a high GFP fluorescence generally show a higher productivity than cells showing a low GFP fluorescence. In general the productivity of a clone/pool increases with its fluorescence intensity (
High producer clones can be identified directly by a FACS based sorting of high GFP fluorescing single clones from stable pools. Single clones showing no or high GFP expression were sorted by FACS. Clones were expanded to shaken 6-well plates and productivity of clones was determined in batch analysis.
It has been found that the EMCV-IRES linked expression of the selection marker or the GFP-PEST-Neo fusion protein clearly enhances selectivity of selection (resulting in more producing clones) and it also enhances stringency of selection (average productivity of the producing clones is higher). Thus, the screening efforts are clearly reduced.
The stronger effect of the IRES-linked fusion protein (px6011C) in comparison to the IRES-linked selection marker (px6010C) is probably due to the PEST sequence in the fusion protein that mediates a reduced half time of the fusion protein and/or a less affinity of the fusion protein for the selection agent—both factors that apparently enhance stringency of selection.
Vector Elements in Combination with Vector Organization
The following vectors were tested in a CHO-K1 host cell line in transient transfections, in stable pools and some on single clone level.
Performances of different vectors in transient transfections were tested after nucleofection into CHO-K1 cells.
Vectors containing the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter (hEF1α) (based on the vector organization LC-HC-SM) have an increased productivity of about +34% (px9003 versus px9002; SV40 polyA signal sequence) and +30% (px9006 versus px9004; bGH polyA signal sequence), dependent on the used polyA signal sequence, respectively, compared to the use of the hCMV promoter.
The addition of the human gastrin terminator (hGT) to the bGH polyA signal sequence has a positive effect on productivity for vectors containing the hCMV-(px9005 versus px9004; +13%).
Expression vectors based on the bidirectional expression of the light and the heavy chain of the antibody show improved performance. Product titers are about 2.7 to 3.4 fold increased compared to the control vector px9001 dependent on the used promoter (hEF1α or hCMV) and the used polyA signal sequence (SV40 or bGH polyA signal sequence).
It has been found that the use of human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter and the bGH polyA signal sequence has a positive effect on productivity in the vector organization LC-HC-SM (+50%; compare px9006 and px9002) but not in vector organization LC(3′-5′)-HC-SM (−28%; compare px9010 and px9011).
To compare the productivity of the expression vector px9002 with the vectors px9003-9007 vectors were transfected into CHO-K1 cells by nucleofection and stable pools were selected. Productivity of the pools was analyzed in batch analysis (see
Batch analysis of stable pools showed that antibody titers from pools transfected with the vector containing the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter (px9003, px9006, px9007) were approximately 7-8 fold higher than those of cells transfected with the reference vector containing the short-length hCMV promoter (vector px9002) (compare 97.5 μg/ml, 112.5 μg/ml and 95.6 μg/ml and for vectors px9003, px9006 and px9007 versus 14.0 μg/ml for vector px9002.
Vectors px9001, px9002 and px9004 to px9007 were transfected into CHO-K1 cells by nucleofection and best single clones were identified by classical screening process. Productivity of best 36 clones each vector were analyzed in batch analysis and best 15 clones in batch analysis were tested in fed batch analysis.
The average productivity of the best 36 single clones generated with the vector px9001 in batch analysis is 356 μg/ml. Clones generated with the vector px9002 or with the vectors px9004 and 9005 (additionally containing the bGH PolyA signal (alone or in combination with the HGT) instead the SV40 PolyA signal) show a 37% (px9002) respectively 61% (px9004) to 53% (px9005) increase in productivity compared to the control vector px9001. Clones of vector px9006 and px9007 show an increase in productivity of about 19% and 7% respectively.
In fed batch experiments best 15 clones obtained with each vector in batch analysis were tested in fed batch analysis over 14 days.
The average productivity of the best 15 single clones (generated with vector px9001) in fed batch analysis is 1345 μg/ml. Clones generated with the vector px9002 or with the vectors px9004 and px9005 (additionally containing the bGH polyA signal sequence (alone or in combination with the hGT) instead of the SV40 polyA signal sequence) show a 80% (px9002) respectively 58% (px9004) to 92% (px9005) increase in productivity compared to the control vector px9001.
Beside an increased average productivity (see above) also the performance of the top clones is strongly improved. Vectors px9002, px9004 and px9005 show—with regard to productivity of the top 5 clones an increase of about 64% (px9002), 50% (px9004) and 88% (px9005) compared to control vector px9001.
In the following the percentage of producing respectively non-producing cells for each of the different vectors was compared directly. 14.2% of clones generated with vector px9001 produce antibody, in the rest of the resistant clones antibody expression is either silenced or clones have other defects.
The vector organization of vector px9002 almost doubled the percentage of producing cells (to 26.0%). Vector additionally containing the bGH PolyA signal sequence alone instead the SV40 polyA signal sequence either alone (vector px9004) or in combination with the hGT (vector px9005) show an approximately 3 fold increase in percentage of producing cells (39% and 43%, respectively).
The use of the human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter instead of the hCMV promoter increased the number of producing cells up to 5 fold (more than 70% of the clones obtained after the selection process do really produce antibody).
The 15 best clones obtained by transfection with vectors px9001-9007 (based on fed batch results) were cultivated in the presence and in the absence of Hygromycin B for 15 passages (=approximately 60 generations). Product titers of clones in batch analysis after 15 passages were compared with product titer of clones in batch at the beginning of stability test.
In the presence of selection pressure the change in product titer between 15 clones of each vector varies from −14.7% for vector px9007 and +0.2% for vector px9002 after 15 passages.
In the absence of selection pressure the decrease in product titer varies from 25.5% for vector px9004 up to 5.9% for vector px9005.
The number of clones that fulfill defined stability criteria such as >80% of product titer in batch analysis compared to values at starting point (GO) both in the presence and in the absence of selection marker varies from 4-10. Vectors px9005, px9007 and px9002 lead to the highest number of stable clones likewise in the presence and absence of selective pressure/selection marker (px9005: 10; px9007: 7; px9002:6)).
Thus, it has been found that the organization of vectors px9005 shows positive effects on stability and increase number of stable clones, especially in the absence of selection pressure.
It has been found that the combination of the bGH polyA and the hGT compared to the SV40 polyA without transcription terminator (hGT) clearly increases productivity of stable clones independent of the used promoter.
Several different transcriptional relevant genetic elements and combinations thereof have been compared to a reference genetic element combination. On the basis of comparative transient experiments the following results have been obtained for the bidirectional vector organization with the expression cassette for the selection marker in opposite direction to the expression cassettes of the light and heavy chain (light chain expression cassette upstream of heavy chain expression cassette) (see table below).
Different promoters have been combined with the bGH polyA signal and the hGT transcription terminator (see table below).
Several transcription related genetic elements and combinations thereof have been compared to a reference vector (px9001, vector organization SM (3′-5′ orientation)-LC-HC (5′-3′ orientation)). On the basis of comparative experiments the following results have been obtained for the unidirectional vector organization with the expression cassette for the light and heavy chain (light chain expression cassette upstream of the heavy chain expression cassette) and for the selection marker in same direction (see table below) compared to a reference vector (px9001, bidirectional vector organization SM (3′-5′)-LC-HC (5′-3′)).
It has been found that an increased expression (productivity) using the vector elements/element combination as reported herein can be achieved:
A high selectivity and high stringency selection process can be provided by using an IRES-linked expression cassette for the expression of the selection marker:
Selection marker linked to heavy antibody chain by different IRES elements
GFP-Neo Fusion protein linked to heavy antibody chain by different IRES elements
It has been found that an increased expression (productivity) using the linking of the light chain expression cassette to the heavy chain expression cassette can be achieved by the EV71-IRES element:
One aspect as reported herein is an optimized human elongation factor 1 alpha promoter comprising an optimized 5′UTR that has the sequence of SEQ ID NO: 06.
The following examples, figures and sequences are provided to aid the understanding of the present invention, the true scope of which is set forth in the appended claims. It is understood that modifications can be made in the procedures set forth without departing from the spirit of the invention.
SEQ ID NO: 01 short human CMV promoter without Intron A
SEQ ID NO: 02 short human CMV promoter without Intron A with 5′UTR
SEQ ID NO: 03 full length human CMV promoter with Intron A
SEQ ID NO: 04 full length human EF1 alpha promoter without Intron A
SEQ ID NO: 05 full length human EF1 alpha promoter with Intron A
SEQ ID NO: 06 short human EF1 alpha promoter with Intron A with 5′UTR
SEQ ID NO: 07 full length rat CMV promoter with Intron A
SEQ ID NO: 08 SV40 polyA signal sequence
SEQ ID NO: 09 bGH polyA signal sequence
SEQ ID NO: 10 hGT terminator sequence
SEQ ID NO: 11 SV40 promoter
SEQ ID NO: 12 PEST sequence of ornithine decarboxylase
SEQ ID NO: 13 nucleic acid sequence encoding GFP
SEQ ID NO: 14 neomycin selection marker
SEQ ID NO: 15 GFP-PEST-NEO fusion polypeptide encoding nucleic acid
Expression plasmids p5068 and p5069 comprise expression cassettes for the expression of an anti-P-selectin antibody (genomically organized expression cassette with retained exon-intron organization) as reported in WO 2005/100402.
The anti-P-selectin HuMab light and heavy chain encoding genes were separately assembled in mammalian cell expression vectors.
Thereby the gene segments encoding the anti-P-selectin HuMab light chain variable region (VL) and the human κ-light chain constant region (CL) were joined as were gene segments for the anti-P-selectin HuMab heavy chain variable region (VH) and the human γ1-heavy chain constant region or the human γ4-heavy chain constant region (CH1-Hinge-CH2-CH3).
General information regarding the nucleotide sequences of human light and heavy chains from which the codon usage can be deduced is given in: Kabat, E. A., et al., Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th ed., Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. (1991), NIH Publication No 91-3242.
The transcription unit of the anti-P-selectin HuMab κ-light chain is composed of the following elements:
The transcription unit of the anti-P-selectin HuMab γ1-heavy chain is composed of the following elements:
Beside the anti-P-selectin HuMab κ-light chain or γ1-heavy chain expression cassette these plasmids contain
Cloning was performed using standard cloning techniques as described in Sambrook et al., 1999 (supra). All molecular biological reagents were commercially available (if not indicated otherwise) and were used according to the manufacturer's instructions.
DNA of the different genetic elements was synthesized by Geneart AG, Regensburg.
DNA sequences were determined by double strand sequencing performed at SequiServe (SequiServe GmbH, Germany).
DNA and protein sequence analysis and sequence data management
The Vector NTI Advance suite version 9.0 was used for sequence creation, mapping, analysis, annotation, and illustration.
CHO-K1 cells were grown in CD-CHO medium (Invitrogen Corp., Gibco®, Cat. No. 10743-011) supplemented with 1×HT supplement (Invitrogen Corp., Gibco®, Cat. No. 11067-030).
For the selection of stably transfected CHO-K1 pools/cells lines 400 to 800 μg/ml G418 or 200 to 400 μg/ml Hygromycin was added (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Roche Applied Sciences, Germany, Cat. No.: 843555).
All cell lines were maintained in humidified incubators at 37° C. with 5% CO2 under constant agitation at 120 to 140 rpm/min. Every 3 to 4 days the cells were split into fresh medium. Density and viability of the cultures was determined using the Casey TT or Cedex Hires cell counter (Roche innovates AG, Bielefeld). Transfection of cells was performed by the Amaxa nucleofection technology (Lonza GmbH, Germany).
Furthermore standard cell culture techniques were applied as described e.g. in Bonifacino, J. S., et al., (eds.), Current Protocols in Cell Biology, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. (2000).
The CASY® Technology Cell Counter, Model TT (Roche Innovatis AG, Bielefeld) uses electric current for cell counting. The Pulse Area Analysis was used to get information from signals created when a cell passes through the measuring pore in a low voltage field. The structural integrity of the cell membrane is a degree for cell viability. Dyes such as trypan blue are therefore not needed for determination of viability.
A Cedex HiRes system (Roche Innovatis AG, Bielefeld) was used to determine cell viabilities during pool selections and for automated cell counting.
Trypan blue is a dye that cannot enter cells through intact cell membranes. Only those cells are stained, and marked dead, which have a damaged cell membrane. The staining process, cell counting and graphical analysis of the results were performed automatically by the Cedex system by digital image recognition. Other measurement parameters are cell size, morphology and aggregation rate. With the multi sampler, up to 20 samples were measured consecutively.
Transfection efficacy and therefore productivity is strongly influenced by several factors such as DNA amount and quality. To ensure equal starting conditions for each vector the DNA amount and quality of all vectors were intensively checked before transfection.
Simultaneously Preparation of Expression Vectors
All vectors were simultaneously prepared by the High Speed Maxi plasmid isolation Kit (Qiagen GMBH, Hilden) according to manufactures' instructions.
Phenol/Chloroform Purification and Ethanol Precipitation
All vectors were simultaneously purified by a phenol/chloroform purification. 500 μg each linearized plasmid DNA was mixed with 200 μl Tris-buffered 50% (v/v) phenol, 48% (v/v) chloroform, 2% (v/v) isoamyl alcohol solution and centrifuged for 1 min. at 13,000 rpm. The upper aqueous phase was then transferred into a new tube and mixed with 200 μl 96% (v/v) chloroform, 4% (v/v) isoamyl alcohol and centrifuged for 1 min. at 13;000 rpm. The upper phase was again transferred into a new tube and mixed with 1/10 (total volume) 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.2) and 2.5 times (total volume) 100% ethanol. After mixing and incubating the reaction for 5 min. at room temperature, the mixture was centrifuged for 5 min. at 13,000 rpm in order to pellet the DNA. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was washed with 900 μl 70% (v/v) ethanol and incubated for 5 min. at room temperature. After a final centrifugation step at maximum speed for 5 min., the supernatants were discarded and the pellets were dried and resuspended with sterile H2O.
DNA Determination
The DNA amount of each vector was determined using the BioPhotometer (Eppendorf; Hamburg). DNA measurement was always performed in triplicates by using a 1:20 dilution in Tris pH 8.0).
Agarose Gel
DNA quality of each plasmid was checked on a 0.8% agarose gel. DNA degradation, vector conformations and DNA concentrations were determined. Vectors showing comparable quantities and qualities (no DNA degradation, similar supercoiled (ccc) forms, similar DNA amounts on gel) were used for transient and stable transfections.
All vectors were transfected in CHO-K1 cells by the Amaxa 96 well shuttle system (Lonza GmbH, Germany) according to manufactures' instructions. Each vector was transfected in 8 replicates. DNA amounts of transfected vector were normalized to equal molar amounts/copy numbers according to 1 μg of the reference expression plasmid (p5068 or p5069). To determine productivity cell free cell culture supernatant was analyzed for IgG titer on day 4 to 7 after transfection by a one-step universal ELISA (Dianova).
CHO-K1 cells growing in spinner flasks were pelleted by centrifugation at 850 rpm for 5 min. and resuspended in culture medium. Circular plasmids were plated out in 96-well nucleofection plates at equimolar concentrations according to 1 μg of the reference expression vector p5068 or p5069. Cells were then added into the plates at a concentration of 4×105 cells per well. The transfection was carried out by the Amaxa program DN-137. Cells were incubated for 10 min. after transfection and then transferred into 96 well flat-bottom incubation plates containing 200 μl culture medium. Cells were then statically cultivated. On day 4 to 6 after transfection IgG levels were determined using the one-step universal ELISA.
Stable transfections were performed by the nucleofection technology (Amaxa Biosystems, Lonza cologne AG) according to manufactures' instructions. Before transfection plasmids were linearized by the restriction enzyme SgrA I. Each plasmid was transfected in duplicates or triplicates. 5×106 cells and 1.2 pmol linearized plasmid were used per single transfection. (Nucleofector Kit T, Amaxa program A33).
For transfection cells were resuspended in the Nucleofector solution T and aliquoted into 2 ml tubes. After the addition of the plasmid, the transfection was carried out by applying the pulse. Cells were then transferred into T25 tissue culture flasks containing pre-warmed 4 ml fresh medium and 4 ml conditioned medium. Selective pressure was applied 24 hours post-transfection by adding 250 μg/ml Hygromycin B.
Vectors were transfected into CHO-K1 cells by Amaxa nucleofection technology and stable pools were selected using Hygromycin B or G418 as selection agent. Each transfection was performed in triplicates. For generation of stable pools, all plasmids were uniformly linearized by restriction digestion with SgrA I. The Nucleofector Kit T by Amaxa was used for carrying out stable transfections and each plasmid was transfected in triplicates.
Stable pools were established as follows: 5×106 cells and 1.2 pmol linearized plasmid were used for each transfection. Cells were resuspended in Solution T and aliquoted into 2 ml tubes. After the addition of the plasmid, the transfection was carried out by applying the pulse (Amaxa program A33). The transfected cell pools were statically cultivated in T25 tissue culture flasks containing pre-warmed 4 ml fresh medium and 4 ml conditioned medium.
After 24 h post-transfection selection pressure was applied: Cells were centrifuged for 5 min. at 800 rpm, resuspended in 3 ml culture medium containing 300 μg/ml Hygromycin B. Cells were transferred into flat-bottom 6-well plates 3 days post-transfection. Cells were then cultivated for two weeks till cell viabilities dropped to a minimum and rose again over 99%. Cell numbers and viabilities were constantly determined with a Cedex HiRes system (Innovatis, Bielefeld). During cultivation, cell debris was removed by centrifugation and cells were always resuspended in 3 ml fresh medium.
Vectors were transfected into CHO-K1 cells as described above. 48 hours after transfection selection pressure was applied (Hygromycin B or G418) and cells were seeded onto 384 well flat-bottom plates at a concentration of 350 to 700 cells per well using an automated high-throughput clone isolation system (Sciclone ALH 3000 workstation, Caliper Life Sciences GmbH, Mainz).
After 10 to 14 days the 384 well plates were screened for IgG levels using an ELISA based ultrahigh-throughput screening (ELSIA uHTS). From a primary screening the best producing clones were chosen and transferred into flat-bottom 96 well plates. After 3 to 6 days cells were screened for IgG levels in a second round. The best producing clones again were chosen and manually transferred into flat-bottom 24 well plates. After a further ELISA based screening step the best clones were chosen and transferred into flat-bottom 6 well plates. IgG levels in the 6-well plates were determined by ProtA measurement to identify the final best clones for batch culture in shaken 6 well plates.
In order to detect differences in productivity and stability, cell numbers of the clones/pools were counted using a Casey cell counter and uniformly seeded into flat-bottom 6 well plates at a concentration of 3×105 cells/ml and a total volume of 3.0 ml. All batch cultures were cultivated for 12 days and cell culture supernatants were screened for human IgG levels at day 4, 7, 9, 11 or 12.
The IgG titer in transient experiments and in the screening formats (384 well to 24-well) were determined by using the one-step universal ELISA. Productivity of stable pools and stable single clones in batch experiments were determined by Protein A HPLC.
A one-step universal ELISA (Dianova) was used to determine human IgG levels from cell culture supernatants. A standard curve was prepared using serial dilutions of an anti-P-Selectin antibody (F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basle, Switzerland) with a range of 0.3125-20 ng/ml using dilution buffer (PBS+5% (w/v) RPLA1). 95 μl antibody-mix containing 0.5 μg/ml biotinylated F(ab′)2-anti-human Fc antibody (Jackson laboratories) and 0.1 μg/ml peroxidase conjugated F(ab′)2-anti-human Fcγ antibody (Jackson laboratories; Suffolk) was added to streptavidin-coated 96-well MTP (StreptaWell, Roche Diagnostics GmbH). 5 μl of 1:20.000 diluted cell culture supernatant was added to the plates and incubated for 1 hour. Antibody coated plates were washed three times with 200 μl washing buffer (PBS+0.05% (v/v) Tween20). 100 μl ABTS (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) was added to the plates and the absorbance was measured at 405 nm with a reference wavelength of 492 nm.
The IgG titer of batch analysis were determined by Protein A using a HPLC based chromatography in combination with the one-step universal ELISA.
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting was used to determine transfection efficiencies (based on GFP expressing cells) or GFP expression levels of stably or transiently transfected cells. In general 5×106 cells each clone or pool were measured using a FACSCalibur Flow Cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Diego, Calif.). Forward and sideward scatter data were used to determine cell size, viability and cell morphology.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11195361.8 | Dec 2011 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2012/076203 | 12/19/2012 | WO | 00 |
