Patent Grant
9904138
Electrochromism is a phenomenon in which a material exhibits a reversible electrochemically-mediated change in an optical property when placed in a different electronic state, typically by being subjected to a voltage change. The optical property is typically one or more of color, transmittance, absorbance, and reflectance. One well known electrochromic material, for example, is tungsten oxide (WO3). Tungsten oxide is a cathodic electrochromic material in which a coloration transition, transparent to blue, occurs by electrochemical reduction.
Electrochromic materials may be incorporated into, for example, windows and mirrors. The color, transmittance, absorbance, and/or reflectance of such windows and mirrors may be changed by inducing a change in the electrochromic material. One well known application of electrochromic materials, for example, is the rear view mirror in some cars. In these electrochromic rear view mirrors, the reflectivity of the mirror changes at night so that the headlights of other vehicles are not distracting to the driver.
While electrochromism was discovered in the 1960's, electrochromic devices still unfortunately suffer various problems and have not begun to realize their full commercial potential.
The inventors have observed that prior electrochromic devices frequently suffer from high levels of defectivity. The defects may be manifest as pin holes or spots where the electrochromic transition is impaired. This is unacceptable for many applications such as electrochromic architectural glass. In the case of an electrochromic window, for example an architectural glass window, such defects may appear as bright spots or “constellations” when the window is electrochromically darkened. Persons occupying a room where such defective windows are installed will find that they are periodically distracted by the bright spots on the windows.
The inventors have discovered that improved electrochromic devices with low defectivity can be fabricated by depositing certain layered components of the electrochromic device in a single integrated deposition system. While these layers are being deposited and/or treated on a substrate, for example a glass window, the substrate never leaves a controlled ambient environment, for example a low pressure controlled atmosphere having very low levels of particles. In some embodiments, the layers of interest are deposited using physical vapor deposition. Highly reliable electrochromic devices may employ entirely solid inorganic components.
In one embodiment, an electrochromic window is fabricated by sequentially depositing on a substrate (i) an electrochromic layer, (ii) an ion conducting layer, and (iii) a counter electrode layer. These layers form a stack in which the ion conducting layer separates the electrochromic layer and the counter electrode layer. Each of the sequentially deposited layers is vapor deposited using a single integrated deposition system having a controlled ambient environment in which the pressure and gas composition are controlled independently of an external environment outside of the integrated deposition system. The substrate does not leave the integrated deposition system at any time during the sequential deposition of the electrochromic layer, the ion conducting layer, and the counter electrode layer.
In an embodiment of an integrated deposition system for fabricating an electrochromic window, the system includes a plurality of deposition stations aligned in series and interconnected and operable to pass a substrate from one station to the next without exposing the substrate to an external environment. The plurality of deposition stations include (i) a first deposition station containing a material source for depositing an electrochromic layer; (ii) a second deposition station containing a material source for depositing an ion conducting layer; and (iii) a third deposition station containing a material source for depositing a counter electrode layer. The system further includes a controller containing program instructions for passing the substrate through the plurality of stations in a manner that sequentially deposits on the substrate (i) an electrochromic layer, (ii) an ion conducting layer, and (iii) a counter electrode layer to form a stack in which the ion conducting layer separates the electrochromic layer and the counter electrode layer.
These and other features and advantages of the invention will be described in further detail below, with reference to the associated drawings.
The following detailed description can be more fully understood when considered in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Electrochromic Devices
A schematic cross-section of an electrochromic device 100 in accordance with some embodiments is shown in
It should be understood that the reference to a transition between a bleached state and colored state is non-limiting and suggests only one example, among many, of an electrochromic transition that may be implemented. Unless otherwise specified herein, whenever reference is made to a bleached-colored transition, the corresponding device or process encompasses other optical state transitions such non-reflective-reflective, transparent-opaque, etc. Further the term “bleached” refers to an optically neutral state, e.g., uncolored, transparent or translucent. Still further, unless specified otherwise herein, the “color” of an electrochromic transition is not limited to any particular wavelength or range of wavelengths. As understood by those of skill in the art, the choice of appropriate electrochromic and counter electrode materials governs the relevant optical transition.
In certain embodiments, the electrochromic device reversibly cycles between a bleached state and a colored state. In the bleached state, a potential is applied to the electrochromic stack 120 such that available ions in the stack that can cause the electrochromic material 106 to be in the colored state reside primarily in the counter electrode 110. When the potential on the electrochromic stack is reversed, the ions are transported across the ion conducting layer 108 to the electrochromic material 106 and cause the material to enter the colored state. A more detailed description of the transition from bleached to colored state, and from colored to bleached state, is included below in the description of
In certain embodiments, all of the materials making up electrochromic stack 120 are inorganic, solid (i.e., in the solid state), or both inorganic and solid. Because organic materials tend to degrade over time, inorganic materials offer the advantage of a reliable electrochromic stack that can function for extended periods of time. Materials in the solid state also offer the advantage of not having containment and leakage issues, as materials in the liquid state often do. Each of the layers in the electrochromic device is discussed in detail, below. It should be understood that any one or more of the layers in the stack may contain some amount of organic material, but in many implementations one or more of the layers contains little or no organic matter. The same can be said for liquids that may be present in one or more layers in small amounts. It should also be understood that solid state material may be deposited or otherwise formed by processes employing liquid components such as certain processes employing sol-gels or chemical vapor deposition.
Referring again to
Any material having suitable optical, electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties may be used as substrate 102. Such substrates include, for example, glass, plastic, and mirror materials. Suitable plastic substrates include, for example acrylic, polystyrene, polycarbonate, allyl diglycol carbonate, SAN (styrene acrylonitrile copolymer), poly(4-methyl-1-pentene), polyester, polyamide, etc. If a plastic substrate is used, it is preferably barrier protected and abrasion protected using a hard coat of, for example, a diamond-like protection coating, a silica/silicone anti-abrasion coating, or the like, such as is well known in the plastic glazing art. Suitable glasses include either clear or tinted soda lime glass, including soda lime float glass. The glass may be tempered or untempered. In some embodiments of electrochromic device 100 with glass, e.g. soda lime glass, used as substrate 102, there is a sodium diffusion barrier layer (not shown) between substrate 102 and conductive layer 104 to prevent the diffusion of sodium ions from the glass into conductive layer 104.
In some embodiments, the optical transmittance (i.e., the ratio of transmitted radiation or spectrum to incident radiation or spectrum) of substrate 102 is about 40 to 95%, e.g., about 90-92%. The substrate may be of any thickness, as long as it has suitable mechanical properties to support the electrochromic stack 120. While the substrate 102 may be of any size, in some embodiments, it is about 0.01 mm to 10 mm thick, preferably about 3 mm to 9 mm thick.
In some embodiments of the invention, the substrate is architectural glass. Architectural glass is glass that is used as a building material. Architectural glass is typically used in commercial buildings, but may also be used in residential buildings, and typically, though not necessarily, separates an indoor environment from an outdoor environment. In certain embodiments, architectural glass is at least 20 inches by 20 inches, and can be much larger, e.g., as large as about 72 inches by 120 inches. Architectural glass is typically at least about 2 mm thick. Architectural glass that is less than about 3.2 mm thick cannot be tempered. In some embodiments of the invention with architectural glass as the substrate, the substrate may still be tempered even after the electrochromic stack has been fabricated on the substrate. In some embodiments with architectural glass as the substrate, the substrate is a soda lime glass from a tin float line. The percent transmission over the visible spectrum of an architectural glass substrate (i.e., the integrated transmission across the visible spectrum) is generally greater than 80% for neutral substrates, but it could be lower for colored substrates. Preferably, the percent transmission of the substrate over the visible spectrum is at least about 90% (e.g., about 90-92%). The visible spectrum is the spectrum that a typical human eye will respond to, generally about 380 nm (purple) to about 780 nm (red). In some cases, the glass has a surface roughness of between about 10 and 30 nm.
On top of substrate 102 is conductive layer 104. In certain embodiments, one or both of the conductive layers 104 and 114 is inorganic and/or solid. Conductive layers 104 and 114 may be made from a number of different materials, including conductive oxides, thin metallic coatings, conductive metal nitrides, and composite conductors. Typically, conductive layers 104 and 114 are transparent at least in the range of wavelengths where electrochromism is exhibited by the electrochromic layer. Transparent conductive oxides include metal oxides and metal oxides doped with one or more metals. Examples of such metal oxides and doped metal oxides include indium oxide, indium tin oxide, doped indium oxide, tin oxide, doped tin oxide, zinc oxide, aluminum zinc oxide, doped zinc oxide, ruthenium oxide, doped ruthenium oxide and the like. Since oxides are often used for these layers, they are sometimes referred to as “transparent conductive oxide” (TCO) layers. Thin metallic coatings that are substantially transparent may also be used. Examples of metals used for such thin metallic coatings include transition metals including gold, platinum, silver, aluminum, nickel alloy, and the like. Thin metallic coatings based on silver, well known in the glazing industry, are also used. Examples of conductive nitrides include titanium nitrides, tantalum nitrides, titanium oxynitrides, and tantalum oxynitrides. The conductive layers 104 and 114 may also be composite conductors. Such composite conductors may be fabricated by placing highly conductive ceramic and metal wires or conductive layer patterns on one of the faces of the substrate and then over-coating with transparent conductive materials such as doped tin oxides or indium tin oxide. Ideally, such wires should be thin enough as to be invisible to the naked eye (e.g., about 100 μm or thinner).
In some embodiments, commercially available substrates such as glass substrates contain a transparent conductive layer coating. Such products may be used for both substrate 102 and conductive layer 104. Examples of such glasses include conductive layer coated glasses sold under the trademark TEC Glass™ by Pilkington, of Toledo, Ohio and SUNGATE™ 300 and SUNGATE™ 500 by PPG Industries of Pittsburgh, Pa. TEC Glass™ is a glass coated with a fluorinated tin oxide conductive layer.
In some embodiments of the invention, the same conductive layer is used for both conductive layers (i.e., conductive layers 104 and 114). In some embodiments, different conductive materials are used for each conductive layer 104 and 114. For example, in some embodiments, TEC Glass™ is used for substrate 102 (float glass) and conductive layer 104 (fluorinated tin oxide) and indium tin oxide is used for conductive layer 114. As noted above, in some embodiments employing TEC Glass™ there is a sodium diffusion barrier between the glass substrate 102 and TEC conductive layer 104.
In some implementations, the composition of a conductive layer, as provided for fabrication, should be chosen or tailored based on the composition of an adjacent layer (e.g., electrochromic layer 106 or counter electrode layer 110) in contact with the conductive layer. For metal oxide conductive layers, for example, conductivity is a function of the number of oxygen vacancies in the conductive layer material, and the number of oxygen vacancies in the metal oxide is impacted by the composition of the adjacent layer. Selection criteria for a conductive layer may also include the material's electrochemical stability and ability to avoid oxidation or more commonly reduction by a mobile ion species.
The function of the conductive layers is to spread an electric potential provided by voltage source 116 over surfaces of the electrochromic stack 120 to interior regions of the stack, with very little ohmic potential drop. The electric potential is transferred to the conductive layers though electrical connections to the conductive layers. In some embodiments, bus bars, one in contact with conductive layer 104 and one in contact with conductive layer 114, provide the electric connection between the voltage source 116 and the conductive layers 104 and 114. The conductive layers 104 and 114 may also be connected to the voltage source 116 with other conventional means.
In some embodiments, the thickness of conductive layers 104 and 114 is between about 5 nm and about 10,000 nm. In some embodiments, the thickness of conductive layers 104 and 114 are between about 10 nm and about 1,000 nm. In other embodiments, the thickness of conductive layers 104 and 114 are between about 10 nm and about 500 nm. In some embodiments where TEC Glass™ is used for substrate 102 and conductive layer 104, the conductive layer is about 400 nm thick. In some embodiments where indium tin oxide is used for conductive layer 114, the conductive layer is about 100 nm to 400 nm thick (280 nm in one embodiment). More generally, thicker layers of the conductive material may be employed so long as they provide the necessary electrical properties (e.g., conductivity) and optical properties (e.g., transmittance). Generally, the conductive layers 104 and 114 are as thin as possible to increase transparency and to reduce cost. In some embodiment, conductive layers are substantially crystalline. In some embodiment, conductive layers are crystalline with a high fraction of large equiaxed grains
The thickness of the each conductive layer 104 and 114 is also substantially uniform. Smooth layers (i.e., low roughness, Ra) of the conductive layer 104 are desirable so that other layers of the electrochromic stack 120 are more compliant. In one embodiment, a substantially uniform conductive layer varies by no more than about ±10% in each of the aforementioned thickness ranges. In another embodiment, a substantially uniform conductive layer varies by no more than about ±5% in each of the aforementioned thickness ranges. In another embodiment, a substantially uniform conductive layer varies by no more than about ±2% in each of the aforementioned thickness ranges.
The sheet resistance (Rs) of the conductive layers is also important because of the relatively large area spanned by the layers. In some embodiments, the sheet resistance of conductive layers 104 and 114 is about 5 to 30 Ohms per square. In some embodiments, the sheet resistance of conductive layers 104 and 114 is about 15 Ohms per square. In general, it is desirable that the sheet resistance of each of the two conductive layers be about the same. In one embodiment, the two layers each have a sheet resistance of about 10-15 Ohms per square.
Overlaying conductive layer 104 is electrochromic layer 106. In embodiments of the invention, electrochromic layer 106 is inorganic and/or solid, in typical embodiments inorganic and solid. The electrochromic layer may contain any one or more of a number of different electrochromic materials, including metal oxides. Such metal oxides include tungsten oxide (WO3), molybdenum oxide (MoO3), niobium oxide (Nb2O5), titanium oxide (TiO2), copper oxide (CuO), iridium oxide (Ir2O3), chromium oxide (Cr2O3), manganese oxide (Mn2O3), vanadium oxide (V2O5), nickel oxide (Ni2O3), cobalt oxide (Co2O3) and the like. In some embodiments, the metal oxide is doped with one or more dopants such as lithium, sodium, potassium, molybdenum, vanadium, titanium, and/or other suitable metals or compounds containing metals. Mixed oxides (e.g., W—Mo oxide, W—V oxide) are also used in certain embodiments. An electrochromic layer 106 comprising a metal oxide is capable of receiving ions transferred from counter electrode layer 110.
In some embodiments, tungsten oxide or doped tungsten oxide is used for electrochromic layer 106. In one embodiment of the invention, the electrochromic layer is made substantially of WOx, where “x” refers to an atomic ratio of oxygen to tungsten in the electrochromic layer, and x is between about 2.7 and 3.5. It has been suggested that only sub-stoichiometric tungsten oxide exhibits electrochromism; i.e., stoichiometric tungsten oxide, WO3, does not exhibit electrochromism. In a more specific embodiment, WOx, where x is less than 3.0 and at least about 2.7 is used for the electrochromic layer. In another embodiment, the electrochromic layer is WOx, where x is between about 2.7 and about 2.9. Techniques such as Rutherford Backscattering Spectroscopy (RBS) can identify the total number of oxygen atoms which include those bonded to tungsten and those not bonded to tungsten. In some instances, tungsten oxide layers where x is 3 or greater exhibit electrochromism, presumably due to unbound excess oxygen along with sub-stoichiometric tungsten oxide. In another embodiment, the tungsten oxide layer has stoichiometric or greater oxygen, where x is 3.0 to about 3.5.
In certain embodiments, the tungsten oxide is crystalline, nanocrystalline, or amorphous. In some embodiments, the tungsten oxide is substantially nanocrystalline, with grain sizes, on average, from about 5 nm to 50 nm (or from about 5 nm to 20 nm), as characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The tungsten oxide morphology may also be characterized as nanocrystalline using x-ray diffraction (XRD); XRD. For example, nanocrystalline electrochromic tungsten oxide may be characterized by the following XRD features: a crystal size of about 10 to 100 nm (e.g., about 55 nm. Further, nanocrystalline tungsten oxide may exhibit limited long range order, e.g., on the order of several (about 5 to 20) tungsten oxide unit cells.
The thickness of the electrochromic layer 106 depends on the electrochromic material selected for the electrochromic layer. In some embodiments, the electrochromic layer 106 is about 50 nm to 2,000 nm, or about 200 nm to 700 nm. In some embodiments, the electrochromic layer is about 300 nm to about 500 nm. The thickness of the electrochromic layer 106 is also substantially uniform. In one embodiment, a substantially uniform electrochromic layer varies only about ±10% in each of the aforementioned thickness ranges. In another embodiment, a substantially uniform electrochromic layer varies only about ±5% in each of the aforementioned thickness ranges. In another embodiment, a substantially uniform electrochromic layer varies only about ±3% in each of the aforementioned thickness ranges.
Generally, in electrochromic materials, the colorization (or change in any optical property—e.g., absorbance, reflectance, and transmittance) of the electrochromic material is caused by reversible ion insertion into the material (e.g., intercalation) and a corresponding injection of a charge balancing electron. Typically some fraction of the ion responsible for the optical transition is irreversibly bound up in the electrochromic material. As explained below some or all of the irreversibly bound ions are used to compensate “blind charge” in the material. In most electrochromic materials, suitable ions include lithium ions (Li+) and hydrogen ions (H+) (i.e., protons). In some cases, however, other ions will be suitable. These include, for example, deuterium ions (D+), sodium ions (Na+), potassium ions (K+), calcium ions (Ca++), barium ions (Ba++), strontium ions (Sr++), and magnesium ions (Mg++). In various embodiments described herein, lithium ions are used to produce the electrochromic phenomena. Intercalation of lithium ions into tungsten oxide (WO3-y (0<y≦˜0.3)) causes the tungsten oxide to change from transparent (bleached state) to blue (colored state).
Referring again to
In some embodiments, suitable materials for the counter electrode complementary to WO3 include nickel oxide (NiO), nickel tungsten oxide (NiWO), nickel vanadium oxide, nickel chromium oxide, nickel aluminum oxide, nickel manganese oxide, nickel magnesium oxide, chromium oxide (Cr2O3), manganese oxide (MnO2), Prussian blue. Optically passive counter electrodes comprise cerium titanium oxide (CeO2—TiO2), cerium zirconium oxide (CeO2—ZrO2), nickel oxide (NiO), nickel-tungsten oxide (NiWO), vanadium oxide (V2O5), and mixtures of oxides (e.g., a mixture of Ni2O3 and WO3). Doped formulations of these oxides may also be used, with dopants including, e.g., tantalum and tungsten. Because counter electrode layer 110 contains the ions used to produce the electrochromic phenomenon in the electrochromic material when the electrochromic material is in the bleached state, the counter electrode preferably has high transmittance and a neutral color when it holds significant quantities of these ions.
In some embodiments, nickel-tungsten oxide (NiWO) is used in the counter electrode layer. In certain embodiments, the amount of nickel present in the nickel-tungsten oxide can be up to about 90% by weight of the nickel-tungsten oxide. In a specific embodiment, the mass ratio of nickel to tungsten in the nickel-tungsten oxide is between about 4:6 and 6:4 (e.g., about 1:1). In one embodiment, the NiWO is between about 15% (atomic) Ni and about 60% Ni; between about 10% W and about 40% W; and between about 30% O and about 75% O. In another embodiment, the NiWO is between about 30% (atomic) Ni and about 45% Ni; between about 10% W and about 25% W; and between about 35% O and about 50% O. In one embodiment, the NiWO is about 42% (atomic) Ni, about 14% W, and about 44% O.
When charge is removed from a counter electrode 110 made of nickel tungsten oxide (i.e., ions are transported from the counter electrode 110 to the electrochromic layer 106), the counter electrode layer will turn from a transparent state to a brown colored state.
The counter electrode morphology may be crystalline, nanocrystalline, or amorphous. In some embodiments, where the counter electrode layer is nickel-tungsten oxide, the counter electrode material is amorphous or substantially amorphous. Substantially amorphous nickel-tungsten oxide counter electrodes have been found to perform better, under some conditions, in comparison to their crystalline counterparts. The amorphous state of the nickel-tungsten oxide may be obtained though the use of certain processing conditions, described below. While not wishing to be bound to any theory or mechanism, it is believed that amorphous nickel-tungsten oxide is produced by relatively higher energy atoms in the sputtering process. Higher energy atoms are obtained, for example, in a sputtering process with higher target powers, lower chamber pressures (i.e., higher vacuum), and smaller source to substrate distances. Under the described process conditions, higher density films, with better stability under UV/heat exposure are produced.
In some embodiments, the thickness of the counter electrode is about 50 nm about 650 nm. In some embodiments, the thickness of the counter electrode is about 100 nm to about 400 nm, preferably in the range of about 200 nm to 300 nm. The thickness of the counter electrode layer 110 is also substantially uniform. In one embodiment, a substantially uniform counter electrode layer varies only about ±10% in each of the aforementioned thickness ranges. In another embodiment, a substantially uniform counter electrode layer varies only about ±5% in each of the aforementioned thickness ranges. In another embodiment, a substantially uniform counter electrode layer varies only about ±3% in each of the aforementioned thickness ranges.
The amount of ions held in the counter electrode layer during the bleached state (and correspondingly in the electrochromic layer during the colored state) and available to drive the electrochromic transition depends on the composition of the layers as well as the thickness of the layers and the fabrication method. Both the electrochromic layer and the counter electrode layer are capable of supporting available charge (in the form of lithium ions and electrons) in the neighborhood of several tens of millicoulombs per square centimeter of layer surface area. The charge capacity of an electrochromic film is the amount of charge that can be loaded and unloaded reversibly per unit area and unit thickness of the film by applying an external voltage or potential. In one embodiment, the WO3 layer has a charge capacity of between about 30 and about 150 mC/cm2/micron. In another embodiment, the WO3 layer has a charge capacity of between about 50 and about 100 mC/cm2/micron. In one embodiment, the NiWO layer has a charge capacity of between about 75 and about 200 mC/cm2/micron. In another embodiment, the NiWO layer has a charge capacity of between about 100 and about 150 mC/cm2/micron.
In between electrochromic layer 106 and counter electrode layer 110, there is an ion conducting layer 108. Ion conducting layer 108 serves as a medium through which ions are transported (in the manner of an electrolyte) when the electrochromic device transforms between the bleached state and the colored state. Preferably, ion conducting layer 108 is highly conductive to the relevant ions for the electrochromic and the counter electrode layers, but has sufficiently low electron conductivity that negligible electron transfer takes place during normal operation. A thin ion conducting layer with high ionic conductivity permits fast ion conduction and hence fast switching for high performance electrochromic devices. In certain embodiments, the ion conducting layer 108 is inorganic and/or solid. When fabricated from a material and in a manner that produces relatively few defects, the ion conductor layer can be made very thin to produce a high performance device. In various implementations, the ion conductor material has an ionic conductivity of between about 108 Siemens/cm or ohm−1 cm−1 and about 109 Siemens/cm or ohm−1 cm−1 and an electronic resistance of about 1011 ohms-cm.
Examples of suitable ion conducting layers include silicates, silicon oxides, tungsten oxides, tantalum oxides, niobium oxides, and borates. The silicon oxides include silicon-aluminum-oxide. These materials may be doped with different dopants, including lithium. Lithium doped silicon oxides include lithium silicon-aluminum-oxide. In some embodiments, the ion conducting layer comprises a silicate-based structure. In other embodiments, suitable ion conductors particularly adapted for lithium ion transport include, but are not limited to, lithium silicate, lithium aluminum silicate, lithium aluminum borate, lithium aluminum fluoride, lithium borate, lithium nitride, lithium zirconium silicate, lithium niobate, lithium borosilicate, lithium phosphosilicate, and other such lithium-based ceramic materials, silicas, or silicon oxides, including lithium silicon-oxide. Any material, however, may be used for the ion conducting layer 108 provided it can be fabricated with low defectivity and it allows for the passage of ions between the counter electrode layer 110 to the electrochromic layer 106 while substantially preventing the passage of electrons.
In certain embodiments, the ion conducting layer is crystalline, nanocrystalline, or amorphous. Typically, the ion conducting layer is amorphous. In another embodiment, the ion conducting layer is nanocrystalline. In yet another embodiment, the ion conducting layer is crystalline.
In some embodiments, a silicon-aluminum-oxide (SiAlO) is used for the ion conducting layer 108. In a specific embodiment, a silicon/aluminum target used to fabricate the ion conductor layer via sputtering contains between about 6 and about 20 atomic percent aluminum. This defines the ratio of silicon to aluminum in the ion conducting layer. In some embodiments, the silicon-aluminum-oxide ion conducting layer 108 is amorphous.
The thickness of the ion conducting layer 108 may vary depending on the material. In some embodiments, the ion conducting layer 108 is about 5 nm to 100 nm thick, preferably about 10 nm to 60 nm thick. In some embodiments, the ion conducting layer is about 15 nm to 40 nm thick or about 25 nm to 30 nm thick. The thickness of the ion conducting layer is also substantially uniform. In one embodiment, a substantially uniform ion conducting layer varies by not more than about ±10% in each of the aforementioned thickness ranges. In another embodiment, a substantially uniform ion conducting layer varies by not more than about ±5% in each of the aforementioned thickness ranges. In another embodiment, a substantially uniform ion conducting layer varies by not more than about ±3% in each of the aforementioned thickness ranges.
Ions transported across the ion conducting layer between the electrochromic layer and the counter electrode layer serve to effect a color change in the electrochromic layer (i.e., change the electrochromic device from the bleached state to the colored state). Depending on the choice of materials for the electrochromic device stack, such ions include lithium ions (Li+) and hydrogen ions (H+) (i.e., protons). As mentioned above, other ions may be employed in certain embodiments. These include deuterium ions (D+), sodium ions (Na+), potassium ions (K+), calcium ions (Ca++), barium ions (Ba++), strontium ions (Sr++), and magnesium ions (Mg++).
As noted, the ion conducting layer 108 should have very few defects. Among other problems, defects in the ion conducting layer may result in short circuits between the electrochromic layer and the counter electrode layer (described in more detail below in relation to
The electrochromic device 100 may include one or more additional layers (not shown) such as one or more passive layers. Passive layers used to improve certain optical properties may be included in electrochromic device 100. Passive layers for providing moisture or scratch resistance may also be included in the electrochromic device 100. For example, the conductive layers may be treated with anti-reflective or protective oxide or nitride layers. Other passive layers may serve to hermetically seal the electrochromic device 100.
The electrochromic device 200 also includes substrate 202, conductive layer (CL) 204, ion conducting layer (IC) 208, and conductive layer (CL) 214. In some embodiments, the substrate 202 and conductive layer 204 together comprise a TEC-Glass™. As indicated, the electrochromic devices described herein, such as those of
The voltage source 216 is configured to apply a potential to electrochromic stack 220 through suitable connections (e.g., bus bars) to conductive layers 204 and 214. In some embodiments, the voltage source is configured to apply a potential of about 2 volts in order to drive a transition of the device from one optical state to another. The polarity of the potential as shown in
In embodiments employing tungsten oxide as the electrochromic layer and nickel-tungsten oxide as the counter electrode layer, the ratio of the electrochromic layer thickness to the counter electrode layer thickness may be about 1.7:1 to 2.3:1 (e.g., about 2:1). In some embodiments, the electrochromic tungsten oxide layer is about 200 nm to 700 nm thick. In further embodiments, the electrochromic tungsten oxide layer is about 400 nm to 500 nm thick. In some embodiments, the nickel-tungsten oxide counter electrode layer is about 100 nm to 350 nm thick. In further embodiments, and the nickel-tungsten oxide counter electrode layer is about 200 nm to 250 nm thick. In yet further embodiments, the nickel-tungsten oxide counter electrode layer is about 240 nm thick. Also, in some embodiments, the silicon-aluminum-oxide ion conducting layer 208 is about 10 nm to 100 nm thick. In further embodiments, the silicon-aluminum-oxide ion conducting layer is about 20 nm to 50 nm thick.
As indicated above, electrochromic materials may contain blind charge. The blind charge in an electrochromic material is the charge (e.g., negative charge in the cases of tungsten oxide electrochromic material) that exists in the material as fabricated, absent compensation by oppositely charged ions or other charge carriers. With tungsten oxide, for example, the magnitude of the blind charge depends upon the excess oxygen concentration during sputtering of the tungsten oxide. Functionally, blind charge must be compensated before the ions employed to transform the electrochromic material can effectively change an optical property of the electrochromic material. Without prior compensation of the blind charge, ions supplied to an electrochromic material will irreversibly incorporate in the material and have no effect on the optical state of the material. Thus, an electrochromic device is typically provided with ions, such as lithium ions or protons, in an amount sufficient both to compensate the blind charge and to provide a supply of ions for reversibly switching the electrochromic material between two optical states. In many known electrochromic devices, charge is lost during the first electrochemical cycle in compensating blind charge.
In some embodiments, lithium is present in the electrochromic stack 220 in an amount sufficient to compensate the blind charge in the electrochromic layer 206 and then an additional amount of about 1.5 to 2.5 times the amount used to compensate the blind charge (by mass) in the stack (initially in the counter electrode layer 210 for example). That is, there is about 1.5 to 2.5 times the amount of lithium needed to compensate the blind charge that is provided for reversible cycling between the electrochromic layer 206 and the counter electrode layer 210 in the electrochromic stack 220. In some embodiments, there are enough lithium in the electrochromic stack 220 to compensate the blind charge in the electrochromic layer 206 and then about two times this amount (by mass) in the counter electrode layer 210 or elsewhere in the stack.
In certain embodiments, electrochromic devices of the types described above are very reliable, often substantially more so than counterpart devices of the prior art. Reliability may be characterized by various metrics. Some of these are described in ASTM E2141-06 (Standard Test Methods for Assessing the Durability of Absorptive Electrochromic Coatings on Sealed Insulating Glass Units). In some specific cases, the devices are able to cycle between two distinct optical states (e.g., between bleached and colored) over 50,000 times while maintaining a ratio of the bleached Tvis to colored Tvis (also know as PTR or photopic transmission ratio) of >4. The longevity of these electrochromic devices makes them suitable for use in applications where the electrochromic devices are expected to be in place for tens of years. Furthermore, the electrochromic devices in embodiments of the invention are able to cycle between bleached and unbleached states without losing transmissivity in the bleached state and without degradation of the color or other property in the unbleached state. In some cases, the high reliability of an electrochromic device in accordance with embodiments herein described is due in part to a design in which the thickness of the electrochromic layer and/or the thickness of the counter electrode layer in a stack do not substantially change during electrochemical cycling of the electrochromic device from their as deposited, post lithiation thickness (e.g., by no more than about 4%).
As indicated above, many electrochromic devices as described herein have a reduced number of defects; i.e., considerably fewer than are present in comparable prior devices. As used herein, the term “defect” refers to a defective point or region of an electrochromic device. Defects may be caused by electrical shorts or by pinholes. Further, defects may be characterized as visible or non-visible. In general, a defect in an electrochromic device does not change optical state (e.g., color) in response to an applied potential that is sufficient to cause non-defective regions of the electrochromic device to color or otherwise change optical state. Often a defect will be manifest as visually discernable anomalies in the electrochromic window or other device. Such defects are referred to herein as “visible” defects. Other defects are so small that they are not visually noticeable to the observer in normal use (e.g., such defects do not produce a noticeable light point when the device is in the colored state during daytime). A short is a localized electronically conductive pathway spanning the ion conducting layer (e.g., an electronically conductive pathway between the two TCO layers). A pinhole is a region where one or more layers of the electrochromic device are missing or damaged so that electrochromism is not exhibited. Pinholes are not electrical shorts. Three types of defects are of primary concern: (1) visible pinholes, (2) visible shorts, and (3) non-visible shorts. Typically, though not necessarily, a visible short will have defect dimension of at least about 3 micrometers resulting in a region, e.g. of about 1 cm in diameter, where the electrochromic effect is perceptibly diminished—these regions can be reduced significantly by isolating the defect causing the visible short so that to the naked eye the visible short will resemble only a visible pinhole. A visible pinhole will have a defect dimension of at least about 100 micrometers.
In some cases, an electrical short is created by a conductive particle lodging in the ion conducting layer, thereby causing an electronic path between the counter electrode layer and the electrochromic layer or the TCO associated with either one of them. In some other cases, a defect is caused by a particle on the substrate (on which the electrochromic stack is fabricated) and such particle causes layer delamination (sometimes called “pop-off”) or the layers not to adhere to the substrate. Both types of defects are illustrated below in
An electrical short, even a non-visible one, can cause leakage current across the ion conducting layer and result in a potential drop in the vicinity of the short. If the potential drop is of sufficient magnitude it will prevent the electrochromic device from undergoing an electrochromic transition in the vicinity of the short. In the case of a visible short the defect will appear as a light central region (when the device is in the colored state) with a diffuse boundary such that the device gradually darkens with distance from the center of the short. If there are a significant number of electrical shorts (visible or non-visible) concentrated in an area of an electrochromic device, they may collectively impact a broad region of the device whereby the device cannot switch in such region. This is because the potential difference between the EC and CE layers in such regions cannot attain a threshold level required to drive ions across the ion conductive layer. In certain implementations described herein, the shorts (both visible and non-visible) are sufficiently well controlled that the leakage current does not have this effect anywhere on the device. It should be understood that leakage current may result from sources other than short-type defects. Such other sources include broad-based leakage across the ion conducting layer and edge defects such as roll off defects as described elsewhere herein and scribe line defects. The emphasis here is on leakage caused only by points of electrical shorting across the ion conducting layer in the interior regions of the electrochromic device.
Referring to
Pop-off defects due to particles or debris on substrate 202 or 204 (as described above), on ion conducting layer 208, and on counterelectrode layer 210 may also occur, causing pinhole defects when the electrochromic device is in the colored state. Also, if particle 502 is large enough and does not cause a pop-off, it might be visible when electrochromic device 500 is in the bleached state.
The electrochromic devices in embodiments of the invention are also scalable to substrates smaller or larger than architectural glass. An electrochromic stack can be deposited onto substrates that are a wide range of sizes, up to about 12 inches by 12 inches, or even 80 inches by 120 inches. The capability of manufacturing electrochromic devices of 20 by 20 inches allows the manufacture of electrochromic architectural glass for many applications.
Even very small defects, ones that do not create noticeable points of light or constellations, can cause serious performance problems. For example, small shorts, particularly multiple instances of them in a relatively small area, can cause a relatively large leakage current. As a result, there may be a large local potential drop which prevents the electrochromic device from switching in the vicinity of the leakage current. Hence small defects can limit the scalability of electrochromic devices and sometimes preclude deployment on architectural glass.
In one embodiment, the number of visible pinhole defects is no greater than about 0.04 per square centimeter. In another embodiment, the number of visible pinhole defects is no greater than about 0.02 per square centimeter, and in more specific embodiments, the number of such defects is no greater than about 0.01 per square centimeter. Typically, the visible short-type defects are individually treated after fabrication to leave short-related pinholes as the only visible defects. In one embodiment, the number of visible short-related pinhole defects is no greater than about 0.005 per square centimeter. In another embodiment, the number of visible short-related pinhole defects is no greater than about 0.003 per square centimeter, and in more specific embodiments, the number of such defects is no greater than about 0.001 per square centimeter. In one embodiment, the total number of visible defects, pinholes and short-related pinholes created from isolating visible short-related defects, is less than about 0.1 defects per square centimeter, in another embodiment less than about 0.08 defects per square centimeter, in another embodiment less than about 0.045 defects per square centimeter (less than about 450 defects per square meter of window).
In some embodiments, the number of non-visible electrical short defects results in leakage currents of less than about 5 μA/cm2 at ±2V bias. These values apply across the entire face of the electrochromic device (i.e., there is no region of the device (anywhere on the device) having a defect density greater than the recited value).
In some embodiments, the electrochromic device has no visible defects greater than about 1.6 mm in diameter (the largest transverse dimension of the defect). In another embodiment, the device has no visible defects greater than about 0.5 mm in diameter, in another embodiment the device has no visible defects greater than about 100 μm in diameter.
In some embodiments, electrochromic glass is integrated into an insulating glass unit (IGU). An insulating glass unit consists of multiple glass panes assembled into a unit, generally with the intention of maximizing the thermal insulating properties of a gas contained in the space formed by the unit while at the same time providing clear vision through the unit. Insulating glass units incorporating electrochromic glass would be similar to insulating glass units currently known in the art, except for electrical leads for connecting the electrochromic glass to voltage source. Due to the higher temperatures (due to absorption of radiant energy by an electrochromic glass) that electrochromic insulating glass units may experience, more robust sealants than those used in conventional insulating glass units may be necessary. For example, stainless steel spacer bars, high temperature polyisobutylene (PIB), new secondary sealants, foil coated PIB tape for spacer bar seams, and the like.
Method of Fabricating Electrochromic Windows
Deposition of the Electrochromic Stack
As mentioned in the summary above, one aspect of the invention is a method of fabricating an electrochromic window. In a broad sense, the method includes sequentially depositing on a substrate (i) an electrochromic layer, (ii) an ion conducting layer, and (iii) a counter electrode layer to form a stack in which the ion conducting layer separates the electrochromic layer and the counter electrode layer. The sequential deposition employs a single integrated deposition system having a controlled ambient environment in which the pressure, temperature, and/or gas composition are controlled independently of an external environment outside of the integrated deposition system, and the substrate does not leave the integrated deposition system at any time during the sequential deposition of the electrochromic layer, the ion conducting layer, and the counter electrode layer. (Examples of integrated deposition systems which maintain controlled ambient environments are described in more detail below in relation to
Typically, but not necessarily, this method of fabrication is integrated into a multistep process for making an electrochromic window using architectural glass as the substrate. For convenience, the following description contemplates the method and its various embodiments in the context of a multistep process for fabricating an electrochromic window, but methods of the invention are not so limited. Electrochromic mirrors and other devices may be fabricated using some or all of the operations and approaches described herein.
Method 700 begins with a cleaning process, 705, where the substrate is cleaned to prepare it for subsequent processing. As mentioned above, it is important to remove contaminants from the substrate because they can cause defects in the device fabricated on the substrate. One critical defect is a particle or other contaminant that creates a conductive pathway across the IC layer and thus shorts the device locally causing visually discernable anomalies in the electrochromic window. One example of a cleaning process and apparatus suitable for the fabrication methods of the invention is Lisec™ (a trade name for a glass washing apparatus and process available from (LISEC Maschinenbau Gmbh of Seitenstetten, Austria).
Cleaning the substrate may include mechanical scrubbing as well as ultrasonic conditioning to remove unwanted particulates. As mentioned, particulates may lead to cosmetic flaws as well as local shorting within the device.
Once the substrate is cleaned, a first laser scribe process, 710, is performed in order to remove a line of the first TCO layer on the substrate. In one embodiment, the resulting trench ablates through both the TCO and the diffusion barrier (although in some cases the diffusion barrier is not substantially penetrated).
The laser trench is dug along a side of the substrate from end to end to isolate a portion of the first TCO layer; the depth and width dimensions of trench 620 made via first laser scribe 710 should be sufficient to isolate the first TCO layer from the bulk TCO once the device is subsequently deposited. The depth and width of the trench should be sufficient to prevent any remaining particulates to short across the trench. In one embodiment, the trench is between about 300 nm and 500 nm deep and between about 20 μm and 50 μm wide. In another embodiment, the trench is between about 350 nm and 450 nm deep and between about 30 μm and 45 μm wide. In another embodiment, the trench is about 400 nm deep and about 40 μm wide.
After the first laser scribe 710, the substrate is cleaned again (operation 715), typically but not necessarily, using cleaning methods described above. This second cleaning process is performed to remove any debris caused by the first laser scribe. Once cleaning operation 715 is complete, the substrate is ready for deposition of EC stack 625. This is depicted in process flow 700 as process 720. As mentioned above, the method includes sequentially depositing on a substrate (i) an EC layer, (ii) an IC layer, and (iii) a CE layer to form a stack in which the IC layer separates the EC layer and the CE layer using a single integrated deposition system having a controlled ambient environment in which the pressure and/or gas composition are controlled independently of an external environment outside of the integrated deposition system, and the substrate does not leave the integrated deposition system at any time during the sequential deposition of the EC layer, the IC layer, and the CE layer. In one embodiment, each of the sequentially deposited layers is physical vapor deposited. In general the layers of the electrochromic device may be deposited by various techniques including physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition, and atomic layer deposition, to name a few. The term physical vapor deposition as used herein includes the full range of art understood PVD techniques including sputtering, evaporation, ablation, and the like.
It should be understood that while certain embodiments are described in terms of a counter electrode layer, an ion conductor layer, and an electrochromic layer, any one or more of these layers may be composed of one or more sub-layers, which may have distinct compositions, sizes, morphologies, charge densities, optical properties, etc. Further any one or more of the device layers may have a graded composition or a graded morphology in which the composition or morphology, respectively, changes over at least a portion of the thickness of the layer. In one example, the concentration of a dopant or charge carrier varies within a given layer, at least as the layer is fabricated. In another example, the morphology of a layer varies from crystalline to amorphous. Such graded composition or morphology may be chosen to impact the functional properties of the device. In some cases, additional layers may be added to the stack. In one example a heat spreader layer is interposed between one or both TCO layers and the EC stack.
Also, as described above, the electrochromic devices of the invention utilize ion movement between the electrochromic layer and the counter electrode layer via an ion conducting layer. In some embodiments these ions (or neutral precursors thereof) are introduced to the stack as one or more layers (as described below in more detail in relation to
Referring again to process 722 in
In one embodiment, in order to normalize the rate of deposition of tungsten, multiple targets are used so as to obviate the need for inappropriately high power (or other inappropriate adjustment to desired process conditions) to increase deposition rate. The distance between the target and the substrate may also be important. In one embodiment, the distance between the target (cathode or source) to the substrate surface is between about 35 mm and about 150 mm; in another embodiment between about 45 mm and about 130 mm; and in another embodiment between about 70 mm and about 100 mm.
It should be understood that while deposition of the EC layer is described in terms of sputtering from a target, other deposition techniques are employed in some embodiments. For example, chemical vapor deposition, atomic layer deposition, and the like may be employed. Each of these techniques, along with PVD, has its own form of material source as is known to those of skill in the art.
Referring again to
Referring again to
In one embodiment, in order to normalize the rate of deposition of the CE layer, multiple targets are used so as to obviate the need for inappropriately high power (or other inappropriate adjustment to desired process conditions) to increase deposition rate. In one embodiment, the distance between the CE target (cathode or source) to the substrate surface is between about 35 mm and about 150 mm; in another embodiment between about 45 mm and about 130 mm; and in another embodiment between about 70 mm and about 100 mm.
It should be understood that while the order of deposition operations is depicted in
Since the amount of charge each of the EC and the CE layers can safely hold varies, depending on the material used, the relative thickness of each of the layers may be controlled to match capacity as appropriate. In one embodiment, the electrochromic layer includes tungsten oxide and the counter electrode includes nickel tungsten oxide, and the ratio of thicknesses of the electrochromic layer to the counter electrode layer is between about 1.7:1 and 2.3:1, or between about 1.9:1 and 2.1:1 (with about 2:1 being a specific example).
Referring again to
In certain specific embodiments, the second TCO layer 630 is deposited using some or all of the following conditions. The recited conditions may be employed to form a thin, low-defect layer of indium tin oxide by sputtering a target containing indium oxide in tin oxide, e.g. with an argon sputter gas with or without oxygen. In one embodiment, the thickness of the TCO layer is between about 5 nm and about 10,000 nm, in another embodiment between about 10 nm and about 1,000 nm, In yet another embodiment between about 10 nm and about 500 nm. In one embodiment, the substrate temperature for operation 728 is between about 20 and about 300° C., in another embodiment between about 20 and about 250° C., and in another embodiment between about 80 and about 225° C. In one embodiment, depositing the TCO layer includes sputtering a target including between about 80% (by weight) to about 99% of In2O3 and between about 1% and about 20% SnO2 using an inert gas, optionally with oxygen. In a more specific embodiment, the target is between about 85% (by weight) to about 97% of In2O3 and between about 3% and about 15% SnO2. In another embodiment, the target is about 90% of In2O3 and about 10% SnO2. In one embodiment, the gas composition contains between about 0.1% and about 3% oxygen, in another embodiment between about 0.5% and about 2% oxygen, in yet another embodiment between about 1% and about 1.5% oxygen, in another embodiment about 1.2% oxygen. In one embodiment, the power density used to sputter the TCO target is between about 0.5 Watts/cm2 and about 10 Watts/cm2 (determined based on the power applied divided by the surface area of the target); in another embodiment between about 0.5 Watts/cm2 and about 2 Watts/cm2; and in yet another embodiment between about 0.5 Watts/cm2 and about 1 Watts/cm2, in another embodiment about 0.7 Watts/cm2. In some embodiments, the power delivered to effect sputtering is provided via direct current (DC). In other embodiments, pulsed DC/AC reactive sputtering is used. In one embodiment, where pulsed DC/AC reactive sputtering is used, the frequency is between about 20 kHz and about 400 kHz, in another embodiment between about 50 kHz and about 100 kHz, in yet another embodiment between about 60 kHz and about 90 kHz, in another embodiment about 80 kHz. The pressure in the deposition station or chamber, in one embodiment, is between about 1 and about 10 mTorr, in another embodiment between about 2 and about 5 mTorr, in another embodiment between about 3 and about 4 mTorr, in another embodiment about 3.5 mTorr. In one embodiment, the indium tin oxide layer is between about 20% (atomic) In and about 40% In; between about 2.5% Sn and about 12.5% Sn; and between about 50% O and about 70% O; in another embodiment, between about 25% In and about 35% In; between about 5.5% Sn and about 8.5% Sn; and between about 55% O and about 65% O; and in another embodiment, about 30% In, about 8% Sn; and about 62% O. The above conditions may be used in any combination with one another to effect deposition of a high quality indium tin oxide layer.
As mentioned, the EC stack is fabricated in an integrated deposition system where the substrate does not leave the integrated deposition system at any time during fabrication of the stack. In one embodiment, the second TCO layer is also formed using the integrated deposition system where the substrate does not leave the integrated deposition system during deposition of the EC stack and the TCO layer. In one embodiment, all of the layers are deposited in the integrated deposition system where the substrate does not leave the integrated deposition system during deposition; that is, in one embodiment the substrate is a glass sheet and a stack including the EC layer, the IC layer and the CE layer, sandwiched between a first and a second TCO layer, is fabricated on the glass where the glass does not leave the integrated deposition system during deposition. In another implementation of this embodiment, the substrate is glass with a diffusion barrier deposited prior to entry in the integrated deposition system. In another implementation the substrate is glass and the diffusion barrier, a stack including the EC layer, the IC layer and the CE layer, sandwiched between a first and a second TCO layer, are all deposited on the glass where the glass does not leave the integrated deposition system during deposition.
While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that prior art electrochromic devices suffered from high defectivity for various reasons, one of which is the integration of unacceptably high numbers of particles into the IC layer during fabrication. Care was not taken to ensure that each of the EC layer, IC layer, and CE layer were deposited in a single integrated deposition apparatus under a controlled ambient environment. In one process, the IC layer is deposited by a sol gel process, which is necessarily performed apart from other vacuum integrated processes. In such process, even if the EC layer and/or the CE layer are deposited in a controlled ambient environment, thereby promoting high quality layers, the substrate would have to be removed from the controlled ambient environment to deposit the IC layer. This would normally involve passing the substrate through a load lock (from vacuum or other controlled ambient environment to an external environment) prior to formation of the IC layer. Passage through a load lock typically introduces numerous particles onto the substrate. Introducing such particles immediately before the IC layer is deposited greatly increases the likelihood that defects will form in the critical IC layer. Such defects lead to bright spots or constellations as discussed above.
As mentioned above, lithium may be provided with the EC, CE and/or IC layers as they are formed on the substrate. This may involve, for example, co-sputtering of lithium together with the other materials of a given layer (e.g., tungsten and oxygen). In certain embodiments described below the lithium is delivered via a separate process and allowed to diffuse or otherwise incorporate into the EC, CE and/or IC layers.
Direct Lithiation of the Electrochromic Stack
In some embodiments, as mentioned above, intercalation of lithium ions is responsible for switching the optical state of an electrochromic device stack. It should be understood that the needed lithium may be introduced to the stack by various means. For example, lithium may be provided to one or more of these layers concurrently with the deposition of the material of the layer (e.g., concurrent deposition of lithium and tungsten oxide during formation of the EC layer). In some cases, however, the process of
In certain embodiments, lithium is deposited using a high voltage lithium cathode since there are not many secondary electron emissions during lithium sputtering. In some embodiments, the power delivered to effect sputtering is provided via direct current (DC). In other embodiments, pulsed DC/AC reactive sputtering is used. In one embodiment, where pulsed DC/AC reactive sputtering is used, the frequency is between about 20 kHz and about 400 kHz, in another embodiment between about 100 kHz and about 300 kHz, in yet another embodiment between about 200 kHz and about 250 kHz, in another embodiment about 220 kHz. A lithium target is used. In one embodiment the target is between about 80% (by weight) and 100% Li, in another embodiment between about 90% and about 99% Li, in another embodiment about 99% Li. Typically, due to the extreme reactivity of elemental lithium, lithiation is performed in an inert environment (e.g., argon alone). The power density used to sputter the lithium target is between about 1 Watts/cm2 and about 10 Watts/cm2 (determined based on the deposition surface area of the substrate); in another embodiment between about 2 Watts/cm2 and about 4 Watts/cm2; in yet another embodiment between about 2.5 Watts/cm2 and about 3 Watts/cm2; in another embodiment about 2.7 Watts/cm2. In one embodiment the lithium sputtering is done at a pressure of between about 1 and about 20 mTorr, in another embodiment between about 5 and about 15 mTorr, in another embodiment about 10 mTorr. The above conditions may be used in any combination with one another to effect deposition of a high quality lithiation process.
In one embodiment, lithium is deposited on both the EC layer and the CE layer as depicted in dual lithiation process 720a. After the EC layer is deposited as described above, operation 722, lithium is sputtered on the EC layer; see operation 723. Thereafter, the IC layer is deposited, operation 724, followed by the CE layer, operation 726. Then lithium is deposited on the CE layer; see operation 727. In one embodiment where, e.g., the EC layer is tungsten oxide and about twice as thick as a nickel tungsten oxide CE layer, the total amount of lithium added to the stack is proportioned between the EC layer and the CE layer in a ratio of about 1:3 to 2:3; that is, the EC layer is sputtered with ⅓ of the total lithium and the CE layer with about ⅔ of the total lithium added to the stack. In a specific embodiment, the lithium added to the stack is proportioned between the EC layer and the CE layer in a ratio of about 1:2.
In the depicted dual lithiation method, both the EC layer and the CE layer are lithiated. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that by delivering lithium to both the EC layer and the CE layer, performance and yield are improved. The relatively large volume change due to insertion of lithium ions into a depleted layer (as fabricate) during initial equilibration (from a single lithiation on one side of the IC layer) is avoided. These volume changes, which are reported to be as large as 6% in electrochromically active tungsten oxide initially devoid of lithium, can produce cracking and delamination of the stack layers. Therefore, improvements can be realized by fabricating the stack with a dual lithiation process as described herein, which results in less than 6% volume change in the electrochromic layer. In certain embodiments, the volume change is at most about 4%.
In one embodiment of the dual lithiation method, as explained above, the EC layer is treated with sufficient lithium to satisfy the requirements of the EC material irreversibly bound lithium (to, e.g., compensate “blind charge”). The lithium needed for reversible cycling is added to the CE layer (which also may have a blind charge). In certain embodiments, the lithium needed to compensate the blind charge can be titrated by monitoring optical density of the EC layer as lithium is added since the EC layer will not substantially change color until sufficient lithium has been added to fully compensate the blind charge.
One of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that because metallic lithium is pyrophoric, i.e. highly reactive with moisture and oxygen, that lithiation methods described herein where lithium might be exposed to oxygen or moisture are performed either under vacuum, inert atmosphere or both. The controlled ambient environment of apparatus and methods of the invention provides flexibility in lithium depositions, particularly where there are multiple lithiation steps. For example, where lithiation is performed in a titration process and/or among multiple steps in a stack layering, the lithium can be protected from exposure to oxygen or moisture.
In certain embodiments, the lithiation is performed at a rate sufficient to prevent formation of a substantial thickness of free lithium on the EC layer surface. In one embodiment, during lithiation of the EC layer, lithium targets are spaced sufficiently to give time for lithium to diffuse into the EC layer. Optionally, the substrate (and hence the EC layer) is heated to between about 100° C. and about 150° C. to enhance diffusion of lithium into the EC layer. Heating may be done separately or in combination with target spacing and substrate translation past the target(s). In some cases, the substrate is moved back and forth in front of a sputtered lithium target in order to slow the delivery of lithium to the substrate and prevent accumulation of free metallic lithium on the stack surface.
In some cases, the lithiation processes are performed with isolation protocols in place. In one example, isolation protocols are performed with isolation valves within the integrated deposition system. For example, once a substrate is moved into a lithiation station, isolation valves shut to cut off the substrate from other stations and for example, flush with argon or evacuate to prepare for the lithiation. In another embodiment, the isolation is achieved by manipulating the controlled ambient environment, e.g., by creating a flow dynamic in the controlled ambient environment via differential pressures in a lithiation station of the integrated deposition system such that the lithium deposition is sufficiently isolated from other processes in the integrated deposition system. In another embodiment, a combination of the aforementioned conditions are used. For example valves can partially close (or the lithiation station can be configured so that the substrate entry and/or exit ports are minimized) and one or more flow dynamics are used to further isolate the lithiation process from adjoining processes. Referring again to
Multistep Thermochemical Conditioning
Referring again to
Referring to
Optionally, after the oxidative anneal, the device is heated in air (ex situ). In one embodiment, the device is heated at between about 150° C. and about 500° C. for between about 1 minutes and about 60 minutes, in another embodiment at between about 200° C. and about 400° C. for between about 5 minutes and about 30 minutes, process 736. It should be understood that the MTC process may include two, three, or more separate and distinct operations. The three operations described here are provided solely for purposes of exemplifying the process. Further, the process conditions presented here are appropriate for architectural glass, but may have to be scaled for other applications, recognizing that the time to heat a device is dependent upon the size of the device. After the MTC process is complete, the device is ready for further processing.
As mentioned above, additional layers may be needed for improved optical performance (e.g. anti-reflectives), durability (due to physical handling), hermeticity, and the like. Addition of one or more of these layers is meant to be included in additional embodiments to those described above.
Fabrication Process for Completion of the Device
Again referring to
Next, a third laser scribe, 745, is performed along the perimeter of the stack near the edge of the substrate opposite the first laser scribe and parallel to the first laser scribe. This third laser scribe is only deep enough to isolate the second TCO layer and the EC stack, but not cut through the first TCO layer. Referring to
Referring again to process 700, in
Referring again to
In addition to the process steps described in relation to the methods above, an edge deletion step or steps may be added to the process flow. Edge deletion is part of a manufacturing process for integrating the electrochromic device into, e.g. a window, where the roll off (as described in relation to
Integrated Deposition System
As explained above, an integrated deposition system may be employed to fabricate electrochromic devices on, for example, architectural glass. As described above, the electrochromic devices are used to make IGUs which in turn are used to make electrochromic windows. The term “integrated deposition system” means an apparatus for fabricating electrochromic devices on optically transparent and translucent substrates. The apparatus has multiple stations, each devoted to a particular unit operation such as depositing a particular component (or portion of a component) of an electrochromic device, as well as cleaning, etching, and temperature control of such device or portion thereof. The multiple stations are fully integrated such that a substrate on which an electrochromic device is being fabricated can pass from one station to the next without being exposed to an external environment. Integrated deposition systems of the invention operate with a controlled ambient environment inside the system where the process stations are located. A fully integrated system allows for better control of interfacial quality between the layers deposited. Interfacial quality refers to, among other factors, the quality of the adhesion between layers and the lack of contaminants in the interfacial region. The term “controlled ambient environment” means a sealed environment separate from an external environment such as an open atmospheric environment or a clean room. In a controlled ambient environment at least one of pressure and gas composition is controlled independently of the conditions in the external environment. Generally, though not necessarily, a controlled ambient environment has a pressure below atmospheric pressure; e.g., at least a partial vacuum. The conditions in a controlled ambient environment may remain constant during a processing operation or may vary over time. For example, a layer of an electrochromic device may be deposited under vacuum in a controlled ambient environment and at the conclusion of the deposition operation, the environment may be backfilled with purge or reagent gas and the pressure increased to, e.g., atmospheric pressure for processing at another station, and then a vacuum reestablished for the next operation and so forth.
In one embodiment, the system includes a plurality of deposition stations aligned in series and interconnected and operable to pass a substrate from one station to the next without exposing the substrate to an external environment. The plurality of deposition stations comprise (i) a first deposition station containing a target for depositing an electrochromic layer; (ii) a second deposition station containing a target for depositing an ion conducting layer; and (iii) a third deposition station containing a target for depositing a counter electrode layer. The system also includes a controller containing program instructions for passing the substrate through the plurality of stations in a manner that sequentially deposits on the substrate (i) an electrochromic layer, (ii) an ion conducting layer, and (iii) a counter electrode layer to form a stack in which the ion conducting layer separates the electrochromic layer and the counter electrode layer. In one embodiment, the plurality of deposition stations are operable to pass a substrate from one station to the next without breaking vacuum. In another embodiment, the plurality of deposition stations are configured to deposit the electrochromic layer, the ion conducting layer, and the counter electrode layer on an architectural glass substrate. In another embodiment, the integrated deposition system includes a substrate holder and transport mechanism operable to hold the architectural glass substrate in a vertical orientation while in the plurality of deposition stations. In yet another embodiment, the integrated deposition system includes one or more load locks for passing the substrate between an external environment and the integrated deposition system. In another embodiment, the plurality of deposition stations include at least two stations for depositing a layer selected from the group consisting of the electrochromic layer, the ion conducting layer, and the counter electrode layer.
In some embodiments, the integrated deposition system includes one or more lithium deposition stations, each including a lithium containing target. In one embodiment, the integrated deposition system contains two or more lithium deposition stations. In one embodiment, the integrated deposition system has one or more isolation valves for isolating individual process stations from each other during operation. In one embodiment, the one or more lithium deposition stations have isolation valves. In this document, the term “isolation valves” means devices to isolate depositions or other processes being carried out one station from processes at other stations in the integrated deposition system. In one example, isolation valves are physical (solid) isolation valves within the integrated deposition system that engage while the lithium is deposited. Actual physical solid valves may engage to totally or partially isolate (or shield) the lithium deposition from other processes or stations in the integrated deposition system. In another embodiment, the isolation valves may be gas knifes or shields, e.g., a partial pressure of argon or other inert gas is passed over areas between the lithium deposition station and other stations to block ion flow to the other stations. In another example, isolation valves may be an evacuated regions between the lithium deposition station and other process stations, so that lithium ions or ions from other stations entering the evacuated region are removed to, e.g., a waste stream rather than contaminating adjoining processes. This is achieved, e.g., via a flow dynamic in the controlled ambient environment via differential pressures in a lithiation station of the integrated deposition system such that the lithium deposition is sufficiently isolated from other processes in the integrated deposition system. Again, isolation valves are not limited to lithium deposition stations.
Target 830, in this case a cylindrical target, is oriented substantially parallel to and in front of the substrate surface where deposition is to take place (for convenience, other sputter means are not depicted here). Substrate 825 can translate past target 830 during deposition and/or target 830 can move in front of substrate 825. The movement path of target 830 is not limited to translation along the path of substrate 825. Target 830 may rotate along an axis through its length, translate along the path of the substrate (forward and/or backward), translate along a path perpendicular to the path of the substrate, move in a circular path in a plane parallel to substrate 825, etc. Target 830 need not be cylindrical, it can be planar or any shape necessary for deposition of the desired layer with the desired properties. Also, there may be more than one target in each deposition station and/or targets may move from station to station depending on the desired process.
Integrated deposition system 800 also has various vacuum pumps, gas inlets, pressure sensors and the like that establish and maintain a controlled ambient environment within the system. These components are not shown, but rather would be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. System 800 is controlled, e.g., via a computer system or other controller, represented in
As mentioned, the various stations of an integrated deposition system of the invention may be modular, but once connected, form a continuous system where a controlled ambient environment is established and maintained in order to process substrates at the various stations within the system.
Systems 800b and 800c also have a TCO layer station, 808, for depositing the TCO layer on the EC stack. Depending on the process demands, additional stations can be added to the integrated deposition system, e.g., stations for cleaning processes, laser scribes, capping layers, MTC, etc.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail to facilitate understanding, the described embodiments are to be considered illustrative and not limiting. It will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that certain changes and modifications can be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/610,716, filed on Sep. 11, 2012 and titled “FABRICATION OF LOW DEFECTIVITY ELECTROCHROMIC DEVICES,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/645,111, filed on Dec. 22, 2009 and titled “FABRICATION OF LOW DEFECTIVITY ELECTROCHROMIC DEVICES,” which claims benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/165,484, filed on Mar. 31, 2009 and titled “ALL-SOLID-STATE ELECTROCHROMIC DEVICE;” all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties and for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3521941 | Deb et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
| 3568632 | Cawthon | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3845286 | Aronstein et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
| 4139275 | Yano et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
| 4194962 | Chambers et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
| 4274936 | Love | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4293194 | Takahashi | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4375319 | Wada et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4405435 | Hideki et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4421985 | Billingsley et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4524385 | Billingsley et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4643629 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4663009 | Bloomquist | May 1987 | A |
| 4664890 | Tawada et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4722298 | Rubin | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4735840 | Hedgcoth | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4774757 | Sakamoto et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4824545 | Arnold et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4828346 | Jacobson et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4830471 | Demiryont | May 1989 | A |
| 4851095 | Scobey et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4858556 | Siebert | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4864536 | Lindmayer | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4879644 | Gottshall | Nov 1989 | A |
| 4892451 | Mahler | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4951601 | Maydan et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4960324 | Brown | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5019420 | Rauh | May 1991 | A |
| 5024570 | Kiriseko et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5062771 | Satou et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5066111 | Singleton et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5110249 | Norman | May 1992 | A |
| 5124832 | Greenberg et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5151305 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5164855 | Buffat et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5177628 | Moddel | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5209980 | Spindler | May 1993 | A |
| 5215821 | Ho | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5225057 | LeFebvre et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5260821 | Chu et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| RE34469 | Cogan et al. | Dec 1993 | E |
| 5291416 | Hutchins | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5298048 | Lingle et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5327281 | Cogen et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5330633 | Matsumoto et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5352504 | Boulanger | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5448470 | Nishihata et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5471338 | Yu et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5471554 | Rukavina et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5514496 | Mishima et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5520851 | Yu et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5532869 | Goldner et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5536128 | Shimoyashiro et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5538610 | Gesche et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5585959 | Brown et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5598293 | Green | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5618390 | Yu et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5635729 | Griessen et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5657150 | Kallman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5659417 | Van Dine et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5660114 | Gruber | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5666771 | Macquart et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5683561 | Hollars et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5721633 | Nagai et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5724175 | Hichwa et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5724177 | Ellis, Jr. et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5753089 | Haag | May 1998 | A |
| 5757537 | Ellis, Jr. et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5777780 | Terada et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5793518 | Lefrou et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5798860 | Yu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5814195 | Lehan et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814196 | Hollars et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5830336 | Schulz | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5831760 | Hashimoto et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5831851 | Eastburn et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5849415 | Shalaby et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5905590 | Van Der Sluis et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5916398 | Coleman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5953150 | Smarto et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5969847 | Coleman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5970187 | Notten et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5972184 | Hollars et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5973818 | Sjursen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5973819 | Pletcher et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978126 | Sjursen | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995273 | Chandrasekhar | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6006582 | Bhandari et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6010220 | Smarto | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6033518 | Backfisch | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6039850 | Schulz | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6047107 | Roozeboom et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6066269 | Wei et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6067184 | Bonhote et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6091184 | De Vries | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6094292 | Goldner et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6099117 | Gregory | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6101298 | Den Broeder et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6110016 | Coleman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6118572 | Kostecki et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120696 | Armand et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6127516 | Bard et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6136161 | Yu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6156154 | Mcleod et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6156171 | Hollars et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6163926 | Watanabe | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165547 | Leedom | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165643 | Doyle et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6166849 | Coleman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6173116 | Roozeboom et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6177130 | Frey | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6185034 | Nakamura et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6198225 | Kano et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6211995 | Azens et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6213602 | Smarto | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6214261 | Smarto et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6232782 | Kacprowicz et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6259549 | Leupolz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6265222 | DiMeo, Jr. et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6277523 | Giron | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6290821 | McLeod | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6291096 | Klein | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6309516 | McLeod | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6310725 | Duine et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6317531 | Chen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6328856 | Brucker | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6337758 | Beteille et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6356376 | Tonar et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6358377 | Schloremberg et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6383956 | Hawryluk et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6395350 | Balkus, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6420071 | Lee et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6437900 | Cornelissen et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6444100 | McLeod | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6468405 | Rou et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6488824 | Hollars et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6495390 | Hawryluk et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
| 6497799 | McLeod | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6515787 | Westfall et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6529308 | Beteille et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6559411 | Borgeson et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6582572 | McLeod | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6608713 | Ouwerkerk et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6620342 | Burchill et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6635194 | Kloeppner et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6652974 | Krisko | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6689253 | Koh et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6749729 | Xu et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6791737 | Giron | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6815122 | Barker et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6822778 | Westfall et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6843892 | Mcleod et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6844115 | Gan et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6856444 | Ingalls et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6859297 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6893544 | Song et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6919530 | Borgeson et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6940628 | Giron | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 7042615 | Richardson | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7150810 | Hasegawa | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7193763 | Beteille et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7230748 | Giron et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7265891 | Demiryont | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7277215 | Greer | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7286061 | Atkinson | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7372610 | Burdis et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7428090 | Fukazawa et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7531101 | Beteille | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7564611 | Jang et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7593154 | Burdis et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7604717 | Beteille et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7678198 | Hartig | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7704555 | Demiryont | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7715082 | Wang et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7830583 | Neuman et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7830585 | Widjaja et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7869114 | Valentin et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7871169 | Varaprasad et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7894120 | Valentin et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
| 7911674 | Gaskell et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 7961375 | Phillips | Jun 2011 | B2 |
| 7998762 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
| 8004744 | Burdis et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8071420 | Su et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
| 8133368 | Hawrylchak et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
| 8243357 | Kozlowski et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8416486 | Widjaja et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 8432603 | Wang et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
| 9429809 | Kailasam et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
| 9477129 | Kozlowski et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
| 9664974 | Kozlowski et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
| 20010003628 | Demiryont | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20020154535 | Bociam et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020160270 | Bronstert et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20040021921 | Richardson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040150867 | Lee et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20060035021 | Hartig | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060209383 | Burdis et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070041074 | Mathey | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070097481 | Burdis et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20080169185 | Burdis et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20090057137 | Pitts et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090097096 | Noh et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090303565 | Karmhag et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100007937 | Widjaja et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100071810 | Nadaud et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100108500 | Hawrylchak et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100126415 | Ishino et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100243427 | Kozlowski et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100245973 | Wang et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20110019260 | McCabe et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110043885 | Lamine et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110043886 | Jeon et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110151283 | Gillaspie et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110211247 | Kozlowski et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110266138 | Wang et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110267674 | Wang et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110267675 | Wang et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20130107345 | Kailasam et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20150060264 | Kozlowski et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
| 20150362763 | Wheeler et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
| 20160202588 | Bass et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1501155 | Jun 2004 | CN |
| 1510494 | Jul 2004 | CN |
| 4017888 | Oct 1991 | DE |
| 4312931 | Dec 1993 | DE |
| 1260605 | Nov 2002 | EP |
| 1696261 | Aug 2006 | EP |
| 2009685 | Dec 2008 | EP |
| 2146795 | Apr 1985 | GB |
| S58-209721 | Dec 1983 | JP |
| S59-18651 | Jan 1984 | JP |
| S61-182084 | Aug 1986 | JP |
| S63-066933 | Mar 1988 | JP |
| H01-251606 | Oct 1989 | JP |
| H03-253031 | Nov 1991 | JP |
| H04-336410 | Nov 1992 | JP |
| H05-313111 | Nov 1993 | JP |
| H06-160915 | Jun 1994 | JP |
| H07-14810 | Jan 1995 | JP |
| H07-28098 | Jan 1995 | JP |
| H07-28099 | Jan 1995 | JP |
| H09-50992 | Feb 1997 | JP |
| 2000-509100 | Jul 2000 | JP |
| 2000-336476 | Dec 2000 | JP |
| 2002-520653 | Jul 2002 | JP |
| 2003-119562 | Apr 2003 | JP |
| 2004-537755 | Dec 2004 | JP |
| 2005-340425 | Dec 2005 | JP |
| 2006-502545 | Jan 2006 | JP |
| 2006-235632 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| 2007-39157 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2007-39158 | Feb 2007 | JP |
| 2007-204824 | Aug 2007 | JP |
| 2007-262539 | Oct 2007 | JP |
| 2008-532080 | Aug 2008 | JP |
| 2008-223140 | Sep 2008 | JP |
| 2008-545168 | Dec 2008 | JP |
| 2002-348659 | Dec 2012 | JP |
| 10-2004-0057144 | Jul 2004 | KR |
| 10-2006-0092362 | Aug 2006 | KR |
| 10-874662 | Dec 2008 | KR |
| WO1996006203 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| WO2000017706 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO2004026633 | Apr 2004 | WO |
| WO2007042882 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO2008055824 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO2008096089 | Aug 2008 | WO |
| WO2009029111 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO2011050291 | Apr 2011 | WO |
| WO2012138281 | Oct 2012 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 25, 2010, in PCT/US2010/029455. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 19, 2010, in PCT/US2010/029458. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 4, 2011, in PCT/US2010/029455. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 4, 2011, in PCT/US2010/029458. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Sep. 21, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,111. |
| U.S. Final Office Action, dated Apr. 16, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,111. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Mar. 27, 2014, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,111. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,111. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,111. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2016 issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,111. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Jul. 5, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/105,776. |
| Preliminary Amendment filed Feb. 26, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/610,716. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/610,716. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated May 9, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/610,716. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/536,462. |
| U.S. Final Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2015, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/536,462. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Jan. 8, 2016, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/536,462. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Jun. 8, 2016, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/536,462. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Jul. 28, 2011, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,159. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Jan. 20, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,159. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Apr. 26, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,159. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Aug. 16, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,159. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 21, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,159. |
| Notice of Allowance, dated Apr. 5, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,159. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Mar. 16, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/165,292. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Sep. 2, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/165,292. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance, dated Feb. 22, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/165,292. |
| U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 21, 1997 in U.S. Appl. No. 08/407,826. |
| U.S. Office Action, dated Sep. 10, 1996 in U.S. Appl. No. 08/407,826. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Oct. 16, 1997 in U.S. Appl. No. 08/407,826. |
| Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2013 for CN Application No. 201080015115.8. |
| Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 19, 2014 for CN Application No. 201080015115.8. |
| Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 5, 2013 for CN Application No. 201080015114.3. |
| Chinese Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2014 for CN Application No. 201080015114.3. |
| CN Office Action dated Mar. 17, 2015 for CN Application No. 201080015114.3. |
| CN Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2015 for CN Application No. 201080015114.3. |
| EP Search Report dated Jan. 30, 2013 for EP Application No. 10764872.7. |
| EP Office Action dated Oct. 7, 2013 for EP Application No. 10764872.7. |
| EP Office Action dated Jul. 4, 2014 for EP Application No. 10764872.7. |
| EP Office Action dated May 28, 2015 for EP Application No. 10764872.7. |
| EP Office Action dated Jan. 26, 2016 for EP Application No. 10764872.7. |
| EP Summons to Oral Proceedings dated Jun. 9, 2016 for EP Application No. 10764872.7. |
| EP Search Report dated Jan. 24, 2013 for EP Application No. 10764874.3. |
| EP Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2014 for EP Application No. 10764874.3. |
| EP Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2014 for EP Application No. 10764874.3. |
| EP Summons to Oral Proceedings dated Dec. 7, 2015 for EP Application No. 10764874.3. |
| JP Office Action dated Apr. 30, 2013 for JP Application No. 2012-503670. |
| JP Office Action dated Oct. 15, 2013 for JP Application No. 2012-503670. |
| JP Decision of Rejection dated Jun. 17, 2014 for JP Application No. 2012-503670. |
| JP Office Action dated Dec. 26, 2014 for JP Application No. 2012-503670. |
| JP Office Action dated Jun. 4, 2013 for JP Application No. 2012-503671. |
| JP Office Action dated Dec. 3, 2013 for JP Application No. 2012-503671. |
| JP Examination Report dated May 9, 2014 for JP Application No. 2012-503671. |
| JP Office Action dated Jun. 10, 2014 for JP Application No. 2012-503671. |
| JP Decision on Appeal dated Jan. 6, 2015 for JP Application No. 2012-503671. |
| JP Office Action dated Mar. 31, 2015 for JP Application No. 2014-076981. |
| JP Office Action dated Jul. 28, 2015 for JP Application No. 2014-076981. |
| JP Office Action dated Apr. 5, 2016 for JP Application No. 2015-131909. |
| Burdis, et al., “Technology Advancements to Lower Costs of Electrochromic Window Glazings”, SAGE Electronics, Inc., DE-PS26-06NT42764, Final Report, Apr. 2, 2010. |
| Green, et al., “WO3-Based Electrochromic Windows—Problems and Status,” Ionics, vol. 5, Nos. 3-4, May 1999, pp. 161-170. |
| Hersh, H.N., “Mechanism of Electrochromism in WO3,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 27, No. 12, Dec. 15, 1975, pp. 646-648. |
| Kamal, et al., “The Electrochromic Behavior or Nickel Oxide Films Sprayed at Different Preparative Conditions”, Thin Solid Films 483 (2005), pp. 330-339. |
| Velux SageGlass Flyer, 2007, 4 pages. |
| Yoshimura, et al., “Electrochromism in a Thin-Film Device Using Li2WO4 as an Li-Electrolyte”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 22, No. 1, Jan. 1983, pp. 152-156. |
| Burdis, et al., “Electrochromic Windows: Process and Fabrication Improvements for Lower Total Costs”, SAGE Electrochromics, Inc., DE-FC26-03NT41952, Final Report, Mar. 31, 2009. |
| U.S. Dept of Energy, Final Environmental Assessment for Department of Energy Loan Guarantee for Sage Electrochromics SageGlass® High Glass Volume Manufacturing (HVM) Facility in Faribault, MN, DOE/EA-1645, Jul. 2009. |
| Sage Electrochromics, Inc., White Paper: “Electrochromic Windows: Advanced Processing Technology”, Contract No. DE-FG36-03GO13004, Dec. 13, 2006. |
| Burdis, et al., “Focused R&D for Electrochromic Smart Windows: Significant Performance and Yield Enhancements”, SAGE Electrochromics, Inc., DE-FC26-01NT41259, Topical Report, Nov. 30, 2002. |
| Burdis, et al., “Increasing Yields and Broadening Markets: Process Innovations in the Manufacturing of Energy-Saving Window Glazings”, SAGE Electrochromics, Inc., DE-FC26-99FT40647, Final Report, Nov. 2003 (rev. Apr. 2005). |
| Burdis, et al., “Focused R&D for Electrochromic Smart Windows: Significant Performance and Yield Enhancements”, SAGE Electrochromics, Inc., DE-FC26-01NT41259, Final Report, Sep. 23, 2004. |
| U.S. Dept of Energy, Small Business Innovation Research Program, Final Report—Project DE-FG02-99ER82875: Evaluation of Integrated Wall Systems Incorporating Electrochromic Windows, Sage Electrochromics, Inc., Project Summary and SBIR Phase I Final Report (approx. 2002). |
| Ashrit et al., “Electrochromic properties of nancrystalling tungsten oxide thin films”, Thin Solid Films, vol. 320, No. 2, May 18, 1998, pp. 324-328. |
| Exhibits A-F from SAGE Electrochromics, Inc.'s Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-3 and 3-4, in Sage Electrochromics, Inc. v. View, Inc., Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-06441-JCS (U.S. District Court, No. District of California), dated Aug. 1, 2013. |
| Voutsas et al., Sputtering Technology of Si Films for Low-Temperature Poly-Si TFTs, May 24, 2001, 7 pages. |
| M.E. Bader et al, Integrated Processing Equipment, Solid State Technology, May 1990, vol. 33:5, pp. 149-154. |
| Huntley, Cluster Tool Communications: The Path to an Open Standard, Solid State Technology, Nov. 1990. |
| Vakuumbeschichtung 3, Anlagenautomatisierung—Meβ- und Analysentechnik, Kienel ed. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH, 1994. With Certified English translation. |
| Moyne, James Robert, “System Design for Automation in Semiconductor Manufacturing,” Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Michigan, 1990. |
| Dachselt et al., Low Emissivity and Solar Control Coatings on Architectural Glass, International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE), Jul. 1982, pp. 9-15. |
| Claim Construction Order dated Apr. 8, 2014 in Sage Electrochromics, Inc. v. View, Inc., Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-06441-JCS (U.S. District Court, No. District of California). |
| In the matter of the application of Percy St. George Kirke, 5 USPQ 539. |
| U.S. Notice of Allowance dated Mar. 14, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/645,111. |
| JP Office Action dated Dec. 1, 2015 for JP Application No. 2012-503670. |
| JP Office Action dated Dec. 27, 2016 for JP Application No. 2015-131909. |
| Decision for Grant dated Oct. 4, 2016 for JP Patent Application No. 2015-246682. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 17, 2017 for EP Patent Application No. 16200985.6. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Oct. 23, 2017 for EP Patent Application No. 17179038.9. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20160327846 A1 | Nov 2016 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61165484 | Mar 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13610716 | Sep 2012 | US |
| Child | 15214340 | US | |
| Parent | 12645111 | Dec 2009 | US |
| Child | 13610716 | US |
