This application is based on and claims the benefit of priority of Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-280869, filed on Dec. 10, 2009 with the Japanese Patent Office, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a film deposition apparatus for depositing a film on a substrate by carrying out plural cycles of supplying in turn at least two reaction gases to the substrate in order to form plural layers of a reaction product, thereby depositing a thin film.
2. Description of the Related Art
As a film deposition technique in a semiconductor fabrication process, there has been known a film deposition method, in which a first reaction gas is adsorbed on a surface of a semiconductor wafer (referred to as a wafer hereinafter) under vacuum and then a second reaction gas is adsorbed on the surface of the wafer in order to form one or more atomic or molecular layers through reaction of the first and the second reaction gases on the surface of the wafer, and such an alternating adsorption of the gases is repeated plural times, thereby depositing a film on the wafer. This method is called a so-called Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) or Molecular Layer Deposition (MLD), and is advantageous in that the film thickness can be controlled at higher accuracy by the number of times of supplying in turn the gases, and in that the deposited film can have excellent uniformity over the wafer. Therefore, this deposition method is thought to be promising as a film deposition technique that can address further miniaturization of semiconductor devices.
As such a deposition method, a deposition method using a single-wafer deposition apparatus having a vacuum chamber and a shower head at an upper center portion of the vacuum chamber has been under consideration, in which the reaction gases are introduced into the chamber from the shower head, and unreacted gases and by-products are evacuated from a bottom portion of the vacuum chamber. When such a deposition chamber is used, it takes a long time for a purge gas to purge the reaction gases when the first reaction gas and the second reaction gas are switched, and in addition the number of cycles may reach several hundred, resulting in an extremely long process time. Therefore, a deposition method and apparatus that enable high throughput is desired.
Under these circumstances, film deposition apparatuses have been proposed that include a vacuum chamber, a wafer supporting member (or a turntable) that holds plural wafers along a rotation direction, which is provided in the vacuum chamber, first and second reaction gas nozzles that oppose the wafer supporting member and are arranged at equal angular intervals, and separation gas nozzles that are arranged between the first and the second reaction gas nozzles. In such a deposition apparatus, the first and the second reaction gases are concurrently supplied and the wafer supporting member by which the wafers are supported is rotated, thereby carrying out the film deposition method.
According to such a turntable-type ALD apparatus, higher throughput may be realized because the needs for switching the first reaction and the second reaction gases and purging the first reaction and the second reaction gases with a purge gas can be eliminated. On the other hand, because the first and the second reaction gases are supplied to the vacuum chamber at the same time, measures to reduce intermixing and gas-phase reaction of the first and the second reaction gases are necessary. In the film deposition apparatus in Patent Document 1, the first and the second reaction gases are separated only by supplying the separation gases from the separation gas nozzles.
However, when the separation gases are used, the first and the second reaction gases may be diluted by the separation gases, so that a relatively large amount of the first and the second reaction gases need to be supplied in order to maintain a sufficient deposition rate.
Patent Document 2 below has disclosed a film deposition apparatus in which a relatively flat gap area is defined above a rotational substrate holder (turntable) in a deposition chamber. In this film deposition apparatus, precursors (reaction gases) are introduced to the gap area and evacuated in an upward direction from suction zones provided in both sides of the gap area, thereby preventing the precursors from being diluted by the separation gases (purge gases).
However, when the precursors are confined in the gap area, thermal decomposition of the precursors, depending on the precursors, may take place, and by-products of the thermal decomposition may be deposited on inner walls of the gap area. Such deposition of the by-products may serve as a particle source, thereby reducing production yield.
The present invention has been made in view of the above, and provides a film deposition apparatus in which dilution of a first reaction gas and a second reaction gas, which may be caused by a separation gas that is used to separate the first and the second reaction gases, is reduced, thereby avoiding a reduction of a deposition rate.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, there is provided a film deposition apparatus for depositing a film on a substrate by performing a cycle of alternately supplying at least two kinds of reaction gases that react with each other to the substrate to produce a layer of a reaction product in a chamber. The film deposition apparatus includes a turntable that is rotatably provided in the chamber and has on a first surface a substrate receiving area in which the substrate is placed; a first reaction gas supplying portion that supplies a first reaction gas to the first surface of the turntable; a second reaction gas supplying portion that is provided away from the first reaction gas supplying portion along a rotation direction of the turntable and supplies a second reaction gas to the first surface of the turntable; a separation gas supplying portion that is provided between the first reaction gas supplying portion and the second reaction gas supplying portion and supplies a separation gas that separates the first reaction gas and the second reaction gas; an evacuation port that evacuates the chamber; a space defining member that is provided for at least one of the first reaction gas supplying portion and the second reaction gas supplying portion and defines a first space between the at least one of the first reaction gas supplying portion and the second reaction gas supplying portion and the turntable and a second space so that the separation gas is more likely to flow through the second space rather than the first space.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a film deposition apparatus in which dilution of a first reaction gas and a second reaction gas, which may be caused by a separation gas that is used to separate the first and the second reaction gases, is reduced, thereby avoiding a reduction of a deposition rate.
Non-limiting, exemplary embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings, the same or corresponding reference marks are given to the same or corresponding members or components. It is noted that the drawings are illustrative of the invention, and there is no intention to indicate scale or relative proportions among the members or components. Therefore, the specific size should be determined by a person having ordinary skill in the art in view of the following non-limiting embodiments.
Referring to
Referring to
As shown in
Section (a) of
In the bottom of the concave portion 24 there are formed three through holes (not shown) through which three corresponding lift pins (refer to reference symbols 16 in
Referring again to
Although not shown, the first reaction gas nozzle 31 is connected to a gas supplying source of bis (tertiary-butylamino) silane (BTBAS), which is a first source gas, and the second reaction gas nozzle 32 is connected to a gas supplying source of O3 (ozone) gas, which is a second source gas.
The reaction gas nozzles 31, 32 have plural ejection holes 33 (see
As shown in
As shown in Section (b) of
Incidentally, while the nozzle covers 34 are provided in both of the reaction gas nozzle 31 and the reaction gas nozzle 32 in this embodiment, the nozzle cover 34 may be provided in only one of the reaction gas nozzles 31, 32, depending on the reaction gas to be used.
The separation gas nozzles 41, 42 are connected to separation gas sources (not shown) of nitrogen (N2) gas. The separation gas nozzles 41, 42 have plural ejection holes 40 (see
The separation gas nozzles 41, 42 are provided in corresponding separation areas D that are configured to separate the first process area P1 and the second process area P2. In each of the separation areas D, there is provided a convex portion 4 on the ceiling plate 11, as shown in
In addition, the convex portion 4 has a groove portion 43 that extends in the radial direction and substantially bisects the convex portion 4. The separation gas nozzle 41 (or 42) is located in the groove portion 43. A circumferential distance between the center axis of the separation gas nozzle 41 (or 42) and one side of the sector-shaped convex portion 4 is substantially equal to the other circumferential distance between the center axis of the separation gas nozzle 41 (or 42) and the other side of the sector-shaped convex portion 4. Incidentally, while the groove portion 43 is formed in order to bisect the convex portion 4 in this embodiment, the groove portion 42 is formed so that an upstream side of the convex portion 4 relative to the rotation direction of the turntable 2 is wider, in other embodiments.
With the above configuration, there are flat low ceiling surfaces 44 (first ceiling surfaces) on both sides of the separation gas nozzles 41, 42, and high ceiling surfaces 45 (second ceiling surfaces) outside of the corresponding low ceiling surfaces 44, as shown in Section (a) of
“The gases being impeded from entering” means that the N2 gas as the separation gas ejected from the separation gas nozzle 41 flows between the first ceiling surfaces 44 and the upper surface of the turntable 2 and flows out to a space below the second ceiling surfaces 45, which are adjacent to the corresponding first ceiling surfaces 44 in the illustrated example, so that the gases cannot enter the separation space from the space below the second ceiling surfaces 45. “The gases cannot enter the separation space” means not only that the gases are completely prevented from entering the separation space, but that the gases cannot proceed farther toward the separation gas nozzle 41 and thus be mixed with each other even when a fraction of the reaction gases enter the separation space. Namely, as long as such effect is obtained, the separation area D is to separate atmospheres of the first process area P1 and the second process area P2. Incidentally, the BTBAS gas or the O3 gas adsorbed on the wafer W can pass through and below the convex portion 4. Therefore, the gases in “the gases being impeded from entering” means the gases are in a gaseous phase.
On the other hand, as shown in
In this embodiment, the wafer W to be placed on the concave portion 24 has a diameter of 300 mm. In this case, the convex portion 4 has a circumferential length of, for example, about 146 mm along an inner arc (a boundary between the convex portion 4 and the protrusion portion 5) that is at a distance 140 mm from the rotation center of the turntable 2, and a circumferential length of, for example, about 502 mm along an outer arc corresponding to the outermost portion of the concave portion 24 of the turntable 2. In addition, a circumferential length from one side wall of the convex portion 4 through the nearest side of the separation gas nozzle 41 (or 42) along the outer arc is about 246 mm.
On the other hand, in areas where the convex portions 4 are not arranged (areas excluding the separation area D), the inner circumferential wall of the chamber body 12 is indented, so that evacuation areas 6 are formed, as shown in
While the evacuation ports 61, 62 are formed in the bottom of the evacuation areas 6 in this embodiment, the evacuation ports 61, 62 may be provided in the circumferential wall of the chamber body 12. When the evacuation portions 61, 62 are provided in the circumferential wall, the evacuation ports 61, 62 may be located higher than the top surface of the turntable 2. In this case, gases flow along the top surface of the turntable 2 and into the evacuation ports 61, 62 located higher than the top surface of the turntable 2. Therefore, it is advantageous in that particles in the vacuum chamber 1 are not blown upward by the gases, compared to when the evacuation ports are provided, for example, in the ceiling plate 11. In addition, when the evacuation ports 61, 62 are provided in the bottom of the evacuation areas 6, the evacuation pipes 63, the pressure adjusting portion 65, and the vacuum pump 64 can be arranged below the vacuum chamber 1. Therefore, it is advantageous in that a footprint of the film deposition apparatus 1 can be reduced.
Referring to
Referring again to
With such a configuration, N2 purge gas flows from the purge gas supplying pipe 72 to a space between the turntable 2 and the heater unit 7 through a gap between the rotational shaft 22 and the center hole of the bottom portion 14, a gap between the core portion 21 and the raised portion R of the bottom portion 14, and a gap between the bottom surface of the turntable 2 and the raised portion R of the bottom portion 14. In addition, N2 gas flows from the purge gas supplying pipes 73 to the space where the heater unit 7 is housed. Then, these N2 gases flow into the evacuation port 61 through the gap between the flange portion 71a and the bottom surface of the turntable 2. These flows of N2 gas are illustrated by arrows in
As shown in
Referring to
In addition, the film deposition apparatus according to this embodiment is provided with a control portion 100 that controls the film deposition apparatus. The control portion 100 includes a process controller 100a composed of, for example, a computer, a user interface portion 100b, and a memory device 100c. The user interface portion 100b has a display that shows operation status of the film deposition apparatus, a keyboard or a touch panel (not shown) that is used by an operation in order to modify process recipes or by a process manager in order to modify process parameters, and the like.
The memory device 100c stores control programs that cause the process controller 100a to perform various film deposition processes, process recipes, parameters and the like to be used in the various processes. The programs include a group of instructions for causing the film deposition apparatus to perform operations described later. The control programs and process recipes are stored in a storage medium 100d such as a hard disk, a compact disk (CD), a magneto-optic disk, a memory card, a flexible disk, or the like, and installed into the control portion 100 from the storage medium 100d. In addition, the programs and recipes may be downloaded to the memory device 100c through a communication line.
Next, operations (a film deposition method) of the film deposition apparatus according to this embodiment are described. First, the concave portion 24 is aligned with the transfer opening 15 by rotating the turntable 2 (see
Subsequently, the turntable 2 is rotated clockwise when seen from above at a predetermined rotation speed. The turntable 2 is heated to a predetermined temperature (for example, 300° C.) by the heater unit 7 in advance, and the wafers W can also be heated at substantially the same temperature by being placed on the turntable 2. After the wafers W are heated and maintained at the predetermined temperature, N2 gas is supplied from the separation gas nozzles 41, 42. In addition, N2 gas is supplied from the separation gas supplying pipe 51 and the purge gas supplying pipes 72, 73. Then, an inner pressure of the vacuum chamber 1 is set at a predetermined process pressure by the pressure adjusting portion 65 and the vacuum pump 64 (
When the wafer W passes through the process area P1 below the reaction gas nozzle 31 due to the rotation of the turntable 2, the BTBAS gas is adsorbed on the wafer W. Next, the O3 gas is adsorbed on the wafer W when the wafer W passes through the process area P2 below the reaction gas nozzle 32, and thus the BTBAS gas on the wafer W is oxidized by the O3 gas. Namely, when the wafer W passes through both the first process area P1 and the second process area P2 once, a monolayers) of silicon oxide is formed on the wafer W. Then, the wafer W alternatively passes through the process area P1 and the process area P2 plural times, and thus a silicon oxide film having a predetermined thickness is deposited on the wafer W. After the silicon film having the predetermined thickness is deposited, the supplying of the BTBAS gas and O3 gas are stopped, and the rotation of the turntable 2 is stopped. Next, the wafers W are transferred out from the vacuum chamber 1 by the transfer arm 10 in an opposite manner when the wafers W were transferred into the vacuum chamber 1.
Next, a gas flow pattern in the vacuum chamber 1 is explained with reference to
Part of the BTBAS gas ejected from the reaction gas nozzle 31 flows along the top surface of the turntable 2 in the rotation direction of the turntable 2. This part of the BTBAS gas cannot substantially flow into the separation space between the turntable 2 and the ceiling surface 44 (Section (b) of
Furthermore, because the evacuation port 61 is arranged between the reaction gas nozzle 31 and the separation area D located downstream relative to the rotation direction of the turntable 2 in relation to the reaction gas nozzle 31 in the bottom portion of the evacuation area 6, a majority part of the BTBAS gas flowing toward the separation area D is evacuated from the evacuation port 61, which reduces an amount of the BTBAS gas that flows into the separation space D between the ceiling surface 44 of the convex portion 4 and the turntable 2. Therefore, the evacuation port 61 so arranged contributes to separation of the BTBAS gas and the O3 gas.
On the other hand, part of the O3 gas ejected from the reaction gas nozzle 32 toward the turntable 2 may flow along the top surface of the turntable 2 in a direction opposite to the rotation direction of the turntable 2. However, the O3 gas cannot substantially flow into the separation space between the turntable 2 and the convex portion 4 of the separation area D located upstream relative to the rotation direction in relation to the reaction gas nozzle 32. This is because the narrow and deep separation space is created by the convex portion 4, and because the separation gas is supplied from the separation gas nozzle 42 in the separation area D.
Namely, the BTBAS gas supplied from the reaction gas nozzle 31 and the O3 gas supplied from the reaction gas nozzle 32 are substantially completely separated by the separation area. D arranged between the reaction gas nozzles 31, 32, and cannot be intermixed with each other.
The same explanation holds true for the other separation area D located upstream relative to the rotation direction in relation to the reaction gas nozzle 31.
As stated, in the film deposition apparatus according to this embodiment, because the height h1 (Section (a) of
In addition, even if a fraction of the reaction gas flows into the separation space between the convex portion 4 and the turntable 2, the reaction gas is pushed backward by the separation gas supplied from the separation gas nozzle 41 (or 42) arranged in the groove portion 43 of the convex portion 4, and thus the intermixture of the reaction gases in a gas phase can be greatly reduced.
Such a separation gas is advantageous in terms of reduced intermixture of the reaction gases in a gas phase. However, the separation gas flows from the separation space between the low ceiling surface 44 and the turntable 2 out to the spaces below the high ceiling surface 45, which includes the process areas P1, P2, and thus dilutes the reaction gases supplied toward the turntable 2 from the corresponding reaction gas nozzle 31, 32, depending on a flow rate of the separation gas. In this case, an adsorption rate of the reaction gases onto the wafer W may be reduced. According to the film deposition apparatus of this embodiment of the present invention, such a reduced adsorption rate may be avoided in the following manner.
When the wafer W passes through the process area 21, if only half of the number of the BTBAS gas molecules that is enough to form one molecular layer of silicon oxide is adsorbed on the upper surface of the wafer W, two rotations of the turntable 2 are necessary to form one layer of the silicon oxide. However, because the adsorption rate of the reaction gas can be relatively high according to this embodiment of the present invention, one rotation of the turntable 2 may yield one monolayer of silicon oxide. In addition, even when the rotation speed of the turntable 2 is increased, it may be possible to make an amount of the reaction gas molecules be adsorbed in the wafer W, which contributes to increased process throughput. Moreover, because the reaction gas is not diluted, usage rate of the reaction gas can be improved, which leads to reduced production costs. From the foregoing, this embodiment of the present invention makes it possible to improve the adsorption rate and the usage rate of the reaction gases, thereby realizing increased process throughput and reduced production costs.
In addition, because the flow regulation plate 36A has a certain length along the rotation direction of the turntable 2, it is difficult for the separation gas to flow along the length direction in the first space S1 (the space below the flow regulation plate 36). Namely, the flow regulation plate 36A contributes to suppression of the separation gas flowing into the first space S1. Incidentally, because the separation gas flows at higher speed in an area near the circumference of the turntable 2 by centrifugal force due to the rotation of the turntable 2, a suppression effect of the separation gas flowing into the first space S1 may be reduced in the area near the circumference of the turntable 2. However, because a width of the flow regulation plate 36A becomes wider in a direction from the center to the circumference of the turntable 2, as shown in Section (a) of
Incidentally, it is difficult to completely prevent the separation gas from flowing into the first space S1, and only a fraction of the separation gas, which is small enough not to dilute the reaction gas, can flow into the first space S1. However, such a fraction of the separation gas may be advantageous in that the fraction of the separation gas can purge by-products produced as a result of oxidization of the BTBAS gas by the O3 gas.
In addition, the nozzle cover 34 may by provided only with the flow regulation plate 36A from a viewpoint of impeding the separation gas from flowing into the first space S1. However, the flow regulation plate 36B attached on a downstream side of the base portion 35 relative to the rotation direction of the turntable 2 is advantageous in that the BTBAS gas from the reaction gas nozzle 31 can remain for a relatively long time in the vicinity of the upper surface of the turntable 2. Namely, if there is not the flow regulation plate 36B, the BTBAS gas from the reaction gas nozzle 31 is guided by the separation gas flowing in the second space S2 and flows upward away from the upper surface of the wafer W. However, such a flow away from the wafer W can be reduced by the flow regulation plate 36B, which leads to an increased usage rate of the BTBAS gas. In addition, the flow regulation plate 36B is advantageous in order to impede the separation gas flowing from the separation area D located downstream relative to the rotation direction of the turntable 2 (the left separation area D in
While the reaction gas nozzle 31 and the nozzle cover 34 attached to the reaction gas nozzle 31 are explained, the nozzle cover 34 is provided with the reaction gas nozzle 32. Therefore, the O3 gas is not diluted by the separation gas, and thus the adsorption rate and usage rate of the O3 gas can be improved.
Incidentally, the reaction gas nozzle 32 is arranged close to the separation area D located upstream relative to the rotation direction of the turntable 2 in relation to the reaction gas nozzle 32, as shown in
In the following, modifications of the nozzle cover 34 are explained with reference to
In addition, the flow regulation plates 36A, 36B, 37A, 37B are not necessarily parallel with the upper surface of the turntable 2. For example, the flow regulation plates 37A, 37B may be slanted from the upper portion of the reaction gas nozzle 31 toward the upper surface of the turntable 2, as shown in Section (c) of
In addition, while the flow regulation plates 37A, 37B as well as the flow regulation plates 36A, 36B preferably have a top-view shape of a sector, as shown in Section (a) of
Next, other modifications of the nozzle cover 34 are explained with reference to
Referring to Section (a) of
In addition, as shown in Section (b) of
The flow regulation plate 36A is attached to a lower end of the guide plate 325, and the flow regulation plate 36B is attached to a lower end of the side wall of the reaction gas nozzle 321, where no reaction gas ejection holes 323 are formed. As shown in Section (b) of
Incidentally, the reaction gas nozzle 321 having the above configuration may be used to supply the second reaction gas (e.g., O3 gas) toward the turntable 2.
Next, another modification is explained with reference to
Moreover, the flow regulation plate 37A that extends in an upstream direction relative to the rotation direction of the turntable 2 is provided to a lower portion of the guide plate 325, and the flow regulation plate 37B that extends in a downstream direction relative to the rotation direction of the turntable 2 is provided to a lower end portion of the reaction gas nozzle 321.
The reaction gas nozzle 321 so configured is arranged so that the flow regulation plates 37A, 37B are close to the upper surface of the turntable 2 in order to define the first space S1 where the separation gas is unlikely to flow therethrough and the second space S2 through which the separation gas is likely to flow therethrough compared to the first space S1. Therefore, the same effect as explained above is provided.
Next, evacuation nozzles that facilitate a flow of the separation gas toward the second space S2 are explained with reference to
Referring to Section (a) of
With the above configurations, an area around the evacuation nozzle 91 is maintained at a lower temperature than other areas of the space 48. Therefore, the separation gas is likely to flow toward the second space S2 above the nozzle cover 34 rather than the first space S1 below the nozzle cover 34. Therefore, the separation gas is guided to the second space S2 and the reaction gas (e.g., the BTBAS gas) is not likely to be diluted by the separation gas. In other words, the evacuation nozzle 91 can enhance the effect caused by the nozzle cover 34.
In addition, as shown in Section (b) of
Moreover, as shown in Section (c) of
Next, referring to
In addition, the evacuation nozzle 92 may be arranged above and open toward the base portion 35 of the nozzle cover 34. With this, the separation gas is likely to flow toward the second space S2 above the nozzle cover 34. Incidentally, plural of the evacuation nozzles 92 may be arranged along the radius direction of the ceiling plate 11 at predetermined angular intervals. In addition, the evacuation nozzle(s) 92 is not necessarily arranged vertically with respect to the ceiling plate 11, but may be slanted toward the upstream side of the rotation direction of the turntable 2. Moreover, the evacuation nozzle(s) 92 may be introduced into the vacuum chamber 1 in order to be vertical relative to the ceiling plate 11 and then bent toward the upstream side of the rotation direction of the turntable 2. A bent angle may be, for example, more than 0° and less than 90°.
Incidentally, when the evacuation nozzle (s) 91 and/or 92 is used, the nozzle cover 34 is not always necessary. This is because a pressure in the space above the reaction gas nozzle 31 or 32 can be lower than that of the space below the reaction gas nozzle 31 or 32. However, the evacuation gas nozzle(s) 91 and/or 92 and the nozzle cover 34 are preferably used at the same time, because the evacuation nozzle(s) 91 or 92 tends to attract the reaction gas when the nozzle cover 34 is absent.
Next, referring to Section (a) of
In addition, as shown in Section (b) of
Incidentally, the evacuation nozzles 91, 92, 93 may be connected to another evacuation apparatus rather than the evacuation pipe 63 that evacuates the inside of the vacuum chamber 1.
Another example of a layout of the reaction gas nozzles 31, 32, the nozzle cover 34, and the separation area D is explained. Referring to
In addition, the separation area D is configured by forming the groove portion 43 in a sector-shaped plate to be the convex portion 4, and arranging the separation gas nozzle 41 (42) in the groove portion 43 in the above embodiments. However, two sector-shaped plates may be attached on the bottom surface of the ceiling plate 11 by screws so that the two sector-shaped plates are located with one plate on each side of the separation gas nozzle 41 (32), as shown in
Incidentally, three or more of the reaction gases may be provided rather than the two reaction gas nozzles 31, 32. When three or more reaction gases are supplied toward the wafers, a first reaction gas nozzle, a separation gas nozzle, a second reaction gas nozzle, a separation gas nozzle, a third reaction gas nozzle and a separation gas nozzle may be located in this order at predetermined angular intervals, and the separation areas D including the corresponding separation gas nozzles are configured in the same manner as explained above.
An example of the process conditions is as follows. The rotation speed of the turntable 2 is, for example, 1 through 500 revolutions per minute when the wafer W having a diameter of 300 mm is processed; a temperature of the wafer W is, for example, 350° C.; the process pressure is, for example, 1067 Pa (8 Torr); a flow rate of the BTBAS gas is, for example, 100 scan; a flow rate of the O3 gas is, for example, 10000 sccm; flow rates of the N2 gas from the separation gas nozzles 41, 42 are, for example, 20000 sccm; and a flow rate of the N2 gas from the separation gas supplying pipe 51 is, for example, 5000 sccm. In addition, the cycle number, which is the number of times which the wafer W passes through the first process area P1, the second process area 22, and the irradiation area P3, is, for example, 6000, although it depends on a target thickness of the silicon oxide film.
Incidentally, when the flow rate of the BTBAS gas is fairly low compared to that of the O3 gas as described above, the ceiling surface 45 above the reaction gas nozzle 31, which supplies the BTBAS gas, may be lower than the ceiling surface 44 above the reaction gas nozzle 32, which supplies the O3 gas. With this, a concentration of the BTBAS gas cannot be extremely low in the space 49 shown in
In the above embodiments, the rotational shaft 22 for rotating the turntable 2 is located in the center portion of the chamber 1. In addition, the space 52 between the core portion 21 and the ceiling plate 11 is purged with the separation gas. However, the vacuum chamber 1 may be configured as shown in
In addition, a rotation sleeve 82 is provided in order to coaxially surround the pillar 81. The rotation sleeve 82 is supported by bearings 86, 88 attached on the outer surface of the pillar 81 and a bearing 87 attached on the inner circumferential surface of the housing case 80. Additionally, a gear 85 is attached on the rotation sleeve 82. Moreover, a driving portion 83 is housed in the housing case 80, and a gear 84 is attached to a shaft extending from the driving portion 83. The gear 84 is meshed with the gear 85, so that the rotation sleeve 82 and thus the turntable 2 can be rotated by the driving portion 83.
A purge gas supplying pipe 74 is connected to the bottom of the housing case 80, so that a purge gas is supplied into the housing case 80. With this, the inside space of the housing case 80 can be maintained at higher temperatures than the inner space of the vacuum chamber 1 in order to substantially prevent the reaction gas from flowing into the housing case 80. Therefore, no film deposition takes place in the housing case 80 and thus maintenance frequency can be reduced. In addition, purge gas supplying pipes 75 are connected to corresponding conduits 75a reaching from the upper outside surface of the vacuum chamber 1 to the inner wall of the concave portion 80a, and thus purge gas is supplied to the upper end portion of the rotation sleeve 82. With this purge gas, the BTBAS gas and the O3 gas are not intermixed through a space between the inner wall of the concave portion 80a and the outer circumferential surface of the turntable 2. While two purge gas supplying pipes 75 and the two conduits 75a are illustrated, the number of the purge gas supplying pipes 75 and the number of the conduits 75a may be determined so that the intermixture of the BTBAS gas and the O3 gas is surely avoided through the space between the inner wall of the concave portion 80a and the outer circumferential wall of the turntable 2.
In the embodiment illustrated in
Even in the film deposition apparatus having the above configuration according to an embodiment of the present invention, at least one of the reaction gas nozzles 31, 32 is provided with the nozzle cover 34. Therefore, the same effect as explained above can be provided even in this film deposition apparatus.
The film deposition apparatuses according to embodiments of the present invention (including the modifications) may be integrated into a wafer process apparatus, an example of which is schematically illustrated in
Moreover, reaction gases that may be used in the film deposition apparatus according to embodiments of the present invention are dichlorosilane (DCS), hexadichlorosilane (HCD), trymethylaluminum (TMA), tris(dimethylamino)silane (3DMAS), tetrakis(ethylmethylamino)zirconium (TEMAZ), tetrakis (ethylmethylamino)hafnium (TEMAH), bis (tetra methyl heptandionate) strontium (Sr(THD)2) (methyl-pentadionate) (bis-tetra-methyl-heptandionate) titanium (Ti(MPD)(THD)2) monoaminosilne and the like, in addition to the above-mentioned reaction gases.
(Evaluation Test 1)
Computer simulation was carried out in order to verify the effect of the embodiment according to the present invention. As a model for this computer simulation, the reaction gas nozzles 31, 32 having the flow regulation plates 37A, 37B, which have been explained with reference to
For comparison, computer simulation was carried out using a reaction gas nozzle without the flow regulation plates 37A, 37B as a model. The areas where the reaction gas concentration is obtained and the rotation speed of the turntable 2 are the same as the above.
Sections (a) through (c) illustrate measurement results in the regions U1, U2, U3. A vertical axis in each graph represents a gas concentration (%) of the reaction gas in each measurement points, and a horizontal axis represents the measurement points. Incidentally, the horizontal axis represents an angle from the reference axis, where a “+” direction indicates an upstream direction relative to the rotation direction of the turntable 2, and a “−” direction indicates a downstream direction relative to the rotation direction of the turntable 2. In each graph, solid lines indicate results in a case where the flow regulation plates 37A, 37B are provided, and dotted lines indicate results in a case where the flow regulation plates 37A, 37B are not provided. In addition, in each graph, two dot-chain lines indicate a range from −7.3° to +7.3° in relation to the reference line in the region U1, a range from −6.2° to +6.2° in relation to the reference line in the region U2, and a range from −5.8° to +5.8° in relation to the reference line in the region U3.
As clearly understood from each graph, the reaction gas concentration in an area located downstream relative to the rotation direction of the turntable 2 in relation to the reaction gas nozzle 31 becomes increased in each region where the flow regulation plates 37A, 37B are provided, compared to a case where the flow regulation plates 37A, 37B are not provided. Therefore, the effects of the embodiments according to the present invention were verified from the results of the evaluation test 1.
(Evaluation Test 2)
Next, the computer simulation was carried out with the simulation conditions same as the above, except for the rotation speed of 240 rpm of the turntable 2. Sections (a) through (c) of
(Evaluation Test 3)
A distribution of a thickness of a silicon oxide film deposited by the film deposition apparatus according to embodiments of the present invention is investigated. Specifically, the film thickness distributions were taken along the radius direction of the turntable 2 from the center to the circumference of the turntable 2 shown by a dotted line as shown in Section (a) of
Section (b) of
From the result shown in the graph, it has been found that the film thickness per rotation was increased in every measurement points when the flow regulation plates 36A, 365 are used. This result may indicate that sufficient film deposition rate can be realized even when the rotation speed of the turntable 2 is further increased, thereby increasing throughput. Incidentally, while the graph indicates that film thickness uniformity is slightly degraded by using the flow regulation plates 36A, 36B, the film thickness uniformity can be improved by adjusting shapes of the ejection holes 33 of the reaction gas nozzles 31, 32 and intervals of the ejection holes 33.
(Evaluation Test 4)
Next, computer simulation was carried out for the reaction gas concentration when the reaction gas nozzle 31 with the flow regulation plates 37A, 37B is used, and the reaction gas nozzle without the flow regulation plates 37A, 37B is used, using the same conditions as those in Evaluation test 1.
Section (a) of
(Evaluation Test 5)
Finally, the computer simulation was carried out with the same conditions as those of Evaluation test 4, except the rotation speed of the turntable 2 was 240 rpm. Section (a) of
Although the invention has been described in conjunction with the foregoing specific embodiment, many alternatives, variations and modifications within the scope of the appended claims will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2009-280869 | Dec 2009 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4681773 | Bean | Jul 1987 | A |
4879970 | Barkalow et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5095300 | Alexander et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5266119 | Taniguchi et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5302209 | Maeda et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5314574 | Takahashi | May 1994 | A |
5338362 | Imahashi | Aug 1994 | A |
5540821 | Tepman | Jul 1996 | A |
5807792 | Ilg et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5849088 | DeDontney et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5855681 | Maydan et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5902088 | Fairbairn et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909994 | Blum et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5911834 | Fairbairn et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6120609 | Selyutin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6143082 | McInerney et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6203619 | McMillan | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6235656 | Clarke | May 2001 | B1 |
6319553 | McInerney et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6413321 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6474986 | Oda et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6562141 | Clarke | May 2003 | B2 |
6591850 | Rocha-Alvarez et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6634314 | Hwang et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6635115 | Fairbairn et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6696108 | Murayama et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6752874 | Shim et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6812157 | Gadgil | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6843882 | Janakiraman et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6869641 | Schmitt | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6872421 | Hwang et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6962644 | Paterson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6972055 | Sferlazzo | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7052576 | Park et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7153542 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7276122 | Devine et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7422636 | Ishizaka | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7566891 | Rocha-Alvarez et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7589336 | Kaszuba et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7655092 | Fairbairn et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7663121 | Nowak et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7763115 | Hatanaka et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7777198 | Rocha-Alvarez et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7794546 | Li | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7828900 | Hatanaka et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7861668 | Toyoda et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7909595 | Kaszuba et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7964858 | Yang et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8020514 | Toyoda et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8034723 | Ohizumi et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8043432 | Dip | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8066815 | Devine et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8093072 | Ishimaru | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8176871 | Okuda et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8187679 | Dickey et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8197636 | Shah et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20010007244 | Matsuse | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020000194 | Clarke | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020034595 | Tometsuka | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020056414 | Shim et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020088547 | Tomoyasu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030139035 | Yim et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040025786 | Kontani et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040052972 | Schmitt | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055636 | Rocha-Alvarez et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040187784 | Sferlazzo | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050084610 | Selitser | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050241579 | Kidd | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050247265 | Devine et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050268852 | Hatanaka et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060073276 | Antonissen | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060124058 | Sakai et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060177579 | Shin et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060213439 | Ishizaka | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060249175 | Nowak et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060251827 | Nowak et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260544 | Toyoda et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070116873 | Li et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070209590 | Li | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070212484 | Li | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070218702 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070286963 | Rocha-Alvarez et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080026162 | Dickey et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080075858 | Koh | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080096369 | Strzyzewski et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080121180 | Kontani et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080193643 | Dip | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202423 | Hatanaka et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080241384 | Jeong et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080251014 | Kontani et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080251015 | Kontani et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080286980 | Ishimaru | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090074984 | Shimizu et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090151632 | Okuda et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090255468 | Yamamoto et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090304924 | Gadgil | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324826 | Kato et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090324828 | Kato et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100050942 | Kato et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100050943 | Kato et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100050944 | Kato et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100055297 | Kato et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100055312 | Kato et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100055314 | Kato et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100055315 | Honma | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100055316 | Honma | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100055317 | Kato et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100055319 | Kato et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100055320 | Honma | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100055351 | Kato et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100116210 | Kato et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122710 | Kato et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100124610 | Aikawa et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100130009 | Ishimaru | May 2010 | A1 |
20100132614 | Kato et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100132615 | Kato et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100136795 | Honma | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100151131 | Obara et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100227046 | Kato et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100227059 | Kato et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100229797 | Kato et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100260935 | Kato et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100260936 | Kato et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100275848 | Fukuda et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100291319 | Yamashita et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110100489 | Orito et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110126985 | Ohizumi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110139074 | Kato et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110151122 | Kato et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110155056 | Kato et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110159187 | Kato et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110159702 | Ohizumi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110203524 | Uno | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20120075460 | Aikawa et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120094011 | Hishiya et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
63-000112 | Jan 1988 | JP |
05259332 | Oct 1993 | JP |
2001-254181 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2006057162 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2008-509547 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2008-516428 | May 2008 | JP |
2009-531535 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2010056477 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010059495 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010059496 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010059498 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010059499 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010062370 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010062371 | Mar 2010 | JP |
2010080924 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010087467 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2010135420 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2010153805 | Jul 2010 | JP |
2010206025 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2010212627 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2010219125 | Sep 2010 | JP |
2010239102 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2010245448 | Oct 2010 | JP |
2010263245 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2011103495 | May 2011 | JP |
2011103496 | May 2011 | JP |
2011119408 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2011124384 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2011134996 | Jul 2011 | JP |
2011135003 | Jul 2011 | JP |
10-2009-0118951 | Nov 2009 | KR |
WO 2006-042074 | Apr 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110139074 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |