Formation of planar strained layers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6730551
  • Patent Number
    6,730,551
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 2, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 4, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A structure and a method for forming the structure, the method including forming a compressively strained semiconductor layer, the compressively strained layer having a strain greater than or equal to 0.25%. A tensilely strained semiconductor layer is formed over the compressively strained layer. The compressively strained layer is substantially planar, having a surface roughness characterized in (i) having an average wavelength greater than an average wavelength of a carrier in the compressively strained layer or (ii) having an average height less than 10 nm.
Description




FILED OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates generally to semiconductor substrates and particularly to semiconductor substrates with strained layers.




BACKGROUND




The recent development of silicon (Si) substrates with strained layers has increased the options available for design and fabrication of field-effect transistors (FETs). Enhanced performance of n-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (NMOS) transistors has been demonstrated with heterojunction metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) built on substrates having strained silicon and relaxed silicon-germanium (SiGe) layers. Tensilely strained silicon significantly enhances electron mobilities. NMOS devices with strained silicon surface channels, therefore, exhibit improved performance with higher switching speeds. Hole mobilities are enhanced in tensilely strained silicon as well, but to a lesser extent for strain levels less than approximately 1.5%. Accordingly, equivalent enhancement of p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (PMOS) device performance in such surface-channel devices presents a challenge.




Hole mobility enhancement has been demonstrated in highly strained SiGe layers. The formation of such highly strained layers is made difficult by the tendency of these layers to undulate, especially with increasing strain levels, i.e., with high Ge content. This undulation lowers hole mobilities, thereby offsetting the beneficial mobility enhancement provided by the strained layers.




The observed undulation arises from lattice mismatch with respect to an underlying layer, and increases in severity with formation temperature. Unfortunately, the formation of a tensilely strained layer made of, for example, Si, over the compressively strained layer is desirably carried out at a relatively high temperature, e.g., 550° C., to achieve a commercially viable formation rate and uniformity.




SUMMARY




The present invention facilitates formation of the tensilely strained layer at a relatively high average temperature, while keeping the compressively strained layer substantially planar. In accordance with the invention, the tensilely strained layer is initially grown at a relatively low temperature (i.e., sufficiently low to avoid undulations in the compressively strained layer) until a thin layer of the tensilely strained layer has been formed. It is found that this thin layer suppresses undulation in the compressively strained layer even at higher process temperatures that would ordinarily induce such undulation. As a result, formation of the tensilely strained layer may continue at these higher temperatures without sacrificing planarity.




In one aspect, therefore, the invention features a method for forming a structure based on forming a compressively strained semiconductor layer having a strain greater than or equal to 0.25%. A tensilely strained semiconductor layer is formed over the compressively strained layer. The compressively strained layer is substantially planar, having a surface roughness characterized by at least one of (i) an average roughness wavelength greater than an average wavelength of a carrier in the compressively strained layer and (ii) an average roughness height less than 10 nm.




One or more of the following features may also be included. The compressively strained layer may include at least one group IV element, such as at least one of silicon and germanium. The compressively strained layer may include >1% germanium. The tensilely strained layer may include silicon. The compressively strained layer may include at least one of a group III and a group V element. The compressively strained layer may include indium gallium arsenide, indium gallium phosphide, and/or gallium arsenide. The compressively strained layer may include at least one of a group II and a group VI element. The compressively strained layer may include zinc selenide, sulphur, cadmium telluride, and/or mercury telluride. The compressively strained layer may have a thickness of less than 500 Å, including less than 200 Å.




The compressively strained layer may be formed at a first temperature, and at least a portion of the tensilely strained layer may be formed at a second temperature, with the second temperature being greater than the first temperature. The tensilely strained layer may include silicon and the second temperature may be greater than 450° C. A first portion of the tensilely strained layer may be formed at a first temperature and a second portion of the tensilely strained layer may be formed at the second temperature, the first temperature being sufficiently low to substantially avoid disruption of planarity, with the first portion of the tensilely strained layer maintaining the planarity of the compressively strained layer notwithstanding transition to the second temperature.




The tensilely strained layer may be formed at a rate greater than 100 Å/hour. The compressively strained layer and/or the tensilely strained layer may formed by chemical vapor deposition. The wavelength of the surface roughness may be greater than 10 nanometers (nm).




In another aspect, the invention features a structure including a compressively strained semiconductor layer having a strain greater than or equal to 0.25% and a tensilely strained semiconductor layer disposed over the compressively strained layer. The compressively strained layer is substantially planar, having a surface roughness characterized by at least one of (i) an average roughness wavelength greater than an average wavelength of a carrier in the compressively strained layer and (ii) an average roughness height less than 10 nm.




One or more of the following features may also be included. The compressively strained layer may include a group IV element, such as at least one of silicon and germanium. The strain of the compressively strained layer may be greater than 1%. The compressively strained layer may have a thickness of less than 500 Å, including less than 200 Å. The wavelength of the surface roughness may be greater than 10 nm. The tensilely strained layer may include silicon.




The compressively strained layer may include at least one of a group III and a group V element. For example, the compressively strained layer may include indium gallium arsenide, indium gallium phosphide, and/or gallium arsenide.




The compressively strained layer may include at least one of a group II and a group VI element. For example, the compressively strained layer may include zinc selenide, sulphur, cadmium telluride, and/or mercury telluride.




The structure may also include a first transistor formed over the compressively strained layer. The first transistor may include a first gate dielectric portion disposed over a first portion of the compresssively strained layer, a first gate disposed over the first gate dielectric portion, the first gate comprising a first conducting layer, and a first source and a first drain disposed proximate the first gate and extending into the compressively strained layer. The first transistor may be an n-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor and the first source and first drain may include n-type dopants. The first transistor may be a p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor and the first source and first drain may include p-type dopants.




The structure may also include a second transistor formed over the compressively strained layer. The second transistor may include a second gate dielectric portion disposed over a second portion of the compresssively strained layer, a second gate disposed over the second gate dielectric portion, the second gate including a second conducting layer, and a second source and a second drain disposed proximate the second gate and extending into the compressively strained layer. The first transistor may be an n-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor, with the first source and first drain including n-type dopants, and the second transistor may be a p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor, with the second source and second drain including p-type dopants.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS





FIGS. 1 and 2

are schematic cross-sectional views of a semiconductor substrate with several semiconductor layers disposed thereon; and





FIG. 3

is a schematic cross-sectional view of a semiconductor structure formed on a semiconductor substrate.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Referring to

FIG. 1

, which illustrates a structure amenable to use with the present invention, a substrate


10


is made of a semiconductor, such as silicon. Several layers collectively indicated at


11


are formed on substrate


10


. Layers


11


may be grown, for example, in a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) system. In some embodiments, layers


11


are grown in an ultra-high vacuum chemical vapor deposition system (UHVCVD). In certain other embodiments, layers


11


may be grown in an atmospheric pressure CVD (APCVD) system or a low pressure CVD (LPCVD) system.




Layers


11


include a graded layer


12


disposed over substrate


10


. Graded layer


12


may include Si and Ge with a grading rate of, for example, 10% Ge per micrometer (μm) of thickness, and a thickness T


1


of, for example, 2-9 μm. Graded layer


12


may be grown, for example, at 600-1100° C. A relaxed layer


14


is disposed over graded SiGe layer


12


. Relaxed layer


14


may include Si


1−x


Ge


x


with a uniform composition, containing, for example, 20-90% Ge and having a thickness T


2


of, e.g., 0.2-2 μm. In an embodiment, T


2


is 1.5 μm. A virtual substrate


15


includes relaxed layer


14


and graded layer


12


.




A compressively strained layer


16


including a semiconductor material is disposed over relaxed layer


14


. In an embodiment, compressively strained layer


16


includes group IV elements, such as Si


1−y


Ge


y


, with a Ge content (y) higher than the Ge content (x) of relaxed Si


1−x


Ge


x


layer


14


. Compressively strained layer


16


contains, for example, 1-100% Ge and has a thickness T


3


of, e.g., 10-500 angstroms (Å). The Ge content (x) of relaxed Si


1−x


Ge


x


layer


14


may be 20-90%, and the Ge content (y) of compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


may be 28-100%. In some embodiments, compressively strained layer


16


has a thickness T


3


of less than 500 Å. In certain embodiments, T


3


is less than 200 Å.




In some embodiments, compressively strained layer


16


includes at least one group III and/or one group V element. Compressively strained layer


16


may include, for example, indium gallium arsenide, indium gallium phosphide, or gallium arsenide.




In alternative embodiments, compressively strained layer


16


includes at least one group II and/or one group VI element. Compressively strained layer may include, for example, zinc selenide, sulphur, cadmium telluride, or mercury telluride.




A tensilely strained layer


18


is disposed over compressively strained layer


16


, sharing an interface


19


with compressively strained layer


16


. In an embodiment, tensilely strained layer


18


is formed of silicon. Tensilely strained layer


18


has a thickness T


4


of, for example, 50-300 Å. In an embodiment, thickness T


4


is approximately 200 Å.




Substrate


10


with layers


11


typically has a threading dislocation density of 10


5


/cm


2


.




The requirements for attaining a substantially planar compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


and an acceptably high growth rate for tensilely strained Si layer


18


formed by CVD are sometimes mutually exclusive. For example, a high growth rate of tensilely strained Si layer


18


is more readily achieved by deposition at high CVD temperatures. Further, higher CVD temperatures reduce the incorporation of impurities and improve layer uniformity. More specifically, tensilely strained Si layer


18


may be deposited by the use of a silane (SiH


4


) source gas. Adequate growth rates, i.e., >0.01 Å/s with SiH


4


, may be attained at 550° C. On the other hand, germane (GeH


4


) and SiH


4


may be used to deposit compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


. GeH


4


decomposes at approximately 400° C. To remain planar after deposition, compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


may need to be maintained at a relatively low temperature, i.e., less than the 550° C. temperature needed for subsequently achieving rapid Si deposition rates with SiH


4


to form tensilely strained Si layer


18


.




As a result, maintaining adequate planarity of compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


is a challenge, particularly with high Ge content, i.e., with y>40%. Si has a lattice constant of 5.431 Å and Ge has a lattice constant of 5.658 Å. The lattice mismatch between Si and Ge, therefore, is approximately 4%. Because of this lattice mismatch, a high Ge content leads to high compressive strain in compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


. High compressive strain may be desirable for attaining high carrier mobilities in subsequently fabricated devices.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, the 4% difference in lattice constants of Si and Ge may lead to undulations


50


in a top surface


52


of compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


, particularly if the Ge content y is greater than 40%, and/or when the strain of compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


is greater than 0.25%. Undulations


50


may form to partially accommodate the lattice mismatch between compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


and relaxed layer


14


. Undulations


50


may define a sinusoidal shape having a wavelength λ and a height h


1


. Wavelength λ and height h


1


may depend on the Ge content of compressively strained Si


1 −y


Ge


y


layer


16


, the lattice mismatch between compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


and relaxed layer


14


, and deposition conditions. Wavelength λ may be, for example, 1-100 nm, and height h


1


may be several nm, e.g., 5 nm. The sinusoidal shape of undulations


50


results in surface


52


having a surface roughness with wavelength λ. In an embodiment, the wavelength λ of the surface roughness is greater than a wavelength of a carrier in compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


. The surface roughness, therefore, does not reduce carrier mobility in compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


.




Referring to FIG.


2


and also to

FIG. 1

, a compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


that is substantially planar may be grown as follows. Compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


may be deposited at a first temperature low enough to enable formation of planar Si


1−y


Ge


y


layers but not low enough to provide a suitably high deposition rate for tensilely strained Si layer


18


. In the case of compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


having a relatively high strain, e.g., greater than 0.25% and/or with y>40%, this deposition temperature for compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


may be, e.g., 400° C. for UHVCVD using SiH


4


and GeH


4


source gases. The tensilely strained Si layer


18


may then be deposited in a two-step process. During the first step, the silicon source gas, e.g., SiH


4


, is flowed while the growth temperature is slowly raised from a relatively low temperature, e.g., 400° C., to a final desired temperature in which the silicon growth rate is acceptably high. The final desired temperature may be, e.g., >450° C., such as 550° C., for UHVCVD using SiH


4


source gas. This step allows enough silicon to deposit at a low temperature to help stabilize the compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


against strain-induced undulations, as explained below. Second, deposition of tensilely strained layer


18


may be completed at a faster rate at a second deposition temperature, e.g., a temperature greater than 450° C., such as 550° C., for UHVCVD using SiH


4


source gas. The deposition rate of tensilely strained layer


18


may be greater than 100 Å/hour. Another possible result of forming a substantially planar compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


is an increase in wavelength λ of surface


52


of compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


. The increase in planarity may also be accompanied by a reduction in height h


1


of undulations to, e.g., less than 10 nm. After deposition of tensilely strained layer


18


, compressively strained layer


16


has a surface roughness with wavelength λ greater than a wavelength of a carrier in compressively strained layer


16


, e.g., greater than 10 nm.




A possible mechanism for formation of tensilely strained Si layer


18


, deposited as described above, may be as follows. During the first step of the deposition of tensilely strained Si layer


18


, surface


52


of compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


is initially passivated by hydrogen atoms bonding to silicon and germanium during CVD when exposed to a hydrogen-containing source gas, such as SiH


4


. The bond of hydrogen atoms to germanium, however, is relatively weak in comparison to the bond of hydrogen atoms to silicon. This bond strength difference is manifested, e.g., in the difference in the activation energy of decomposition of silane in UHVCVD (i.e., 2.22 eV) in comparison to the activation energy of decomposition of germane in UHVCVD (i.e., 1.68 eV). After passivation of surface


52


, a surface exchange takes place in which a silicon atom from the SiH


4


source gas exchanges bonds to hydrogen with a germanium atom from compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


. The silicon atom thereby adheres to surface


52


of compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


, beginning formation of tensilely strained layer


18


. Initially, a relatively fast growth rate of tensilely strained layer


18


may be attained at the relatively low temperature of approximately 400° C. because the exchange of Ge—H bonds with Si—H bonds is energetically favored and Ge atoms are directly at surface


52


, or are relatively close to surface


52


. Deposition at a higher temperature, however, may cause surface


52


to buckle excessively, resulting in undulations


50


with unacceptably short wavelength λ and/or high height h


1


. As SiH


4


continues to flow and more Si atoms are deposited on surface


52


by exchange with Ge atoms, the deposition temperature may be raised. Buckling of surface


52


due to exposure to higher temperatures is prevented by the deposited Si atoms forming tensilely strained layer


18


. Specifically, the deposited Si atoms physically suppress buckling of surface


52


. As tensilely strained layer


18


becomes thicker, there is an increase in a migration path distance that Ge atoms in compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


need to traverse to reach surface


52


. This increase in Ge migration path distance becomes prohibitive, even at higher temperatures, resulting in Ge segregation from tensilely strained Si layer


18


and allowing the deposition of tensilely strained Si layer


18


, substantially free of Ge. Consequently, initially depositing tensilely strained Si layer


18


at a relatively low temperature retards subsequent undulation formation, thereby facilitating completion of the deposition of tensilely strained Si layer at a higher temperature while maintaining the planarity of compressively strained layer


16


.




In an alternative embodiment, during the first step of the deposition of tensilely strained Si layer


18


, the flow of SiH


4


may be stopped during the increase in temperature, after the formation of a thin tensilely strained Si layer


18


. The SiH


4


flow may then be resumed when the deposition system reaches the desired higher temperature.




In some embodiments, a substantially planar compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


may be formed, with compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


having a strain greater than 1%, by using the two-step silicon deposition process described above.




In another embodiment, compressively strained layer


16


may be formed as follows. Compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


having a relatively low Ge content is deposited on relaxed Si


1−x


Ge


x


layer


14


, e.g., y˜0.4-0.6, under relatively light compressive strain, e.g., y−x≈0.2. In this embodiment, device layers


20


, including compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


and tensilely strained Si layer


18


, may be deposited at a temperature that permits deposition of planar compressively strained Si


1−y


Ge


y


layer


16


and simultaneously provides an acceptably high growth rate, e.g., >0.01 Å/s, for tensilely strained Si layer


18


. This temperature may be, e.g., 550° C. in ultrahigh vacuum chemical vapor deposition using SiH


4


and GeH


4


source gases.




Referring to

FIG. 3

as well as to

FIGS. 1 and 2

, a first transistor


60


and a second transistor


62


may be formed over a substantially planar compressively strained semiconductor layer


16


having a strain greater than or equal to 0.25%. Tensilely strained semiconductor layer


18


is disposed over compressively strained layer


16


. First transistor


60


includes a first gate dielectric portion


64


disposed over a first portion


66


of compressively strained semiconductor layer


16


. First dielectric portion


64


may be formed of a dielectric such as, e.g., silicon dioxide. A first gate


68


is disposed over first gate dielectric portion


64


. First gate


68


includes a first conducting layer, such as, e.g., doped polysilicon. First transistor


60


also includes a first source


70


and a first drain


72


(defined for purposes of illustration by the interior boundaries), disposed proximate first gate


68


and extending into compressively strained layer


16


. In an embodiment, first transistor


60


is a PMOS field-effect transistor, and first source


70


and first drain


72


are formed by the introduction of p-type dopants, such as boron. In an alternative embodiment, first transistor


60


is an NMOS field-effect transistor, and first source


70


and first drain


72


are formed by the introduction of n-type dopants, such as phosphorus or arsenic.




Second transistor


62


includes a second gate dielectric portion


74


disposed over second portion


76


of compressively strained semiconductor layer


16


. Second dielectric portion


74


may be formed of a dielectric such as, e.g., silicon dioxide. A second gate


78


is disposed over second gate dielectric portion


74


. Second gate


78


includes a second conducting layer, such as, e.g., doped polysilicon. Second transistor


62


also includes a second source


80


and a second drain


82


(defined for purposes of illustration by the interior boundaries), disposed proximate second gate


78


and extending into compressively strained layer


16


. Second transistor


62


may be an NMOS field-effect transistor. Second source


80


and second drain


82


may be formed by the introduction of n-type dopants, such as phosphorus or arsenic.




In an embodiment, first transistor


60


is a PMOS field-effect transistor with first source


70


and first drain


72


including p-type dopants, and second transistor


62


is an NMOS field-effect transistor with second source


80


and second drain


82


including n-type dopants. Together, first transistor


60


and second transistor


62


form a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) device.




The functionality of first and second transistors


60


,


62


is enhanced by the use of substrate


10


with a substantially planar compressively strained semiconductor layer


16


. The planarity of compressively strained semiconductor layer


16


enhances mobility of carriers within compressively strained layer


16


, thereby enabling faster speeds during operation of first and second transistors


60


,


62


.




The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit of essential characteristics thereof. The foregoing embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects illustrative rather than limiting on the invention described herein. Scope of the invention is thus indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are intended to be embraced herein.



Claims
  • 1. A method for forming a structure, the method including:forming a compressively strained semiconductor layer, the compressively strained layer having a strain greater than or equal to 0.25%; and forming a tensilely strained semiconductor layer over the compressively strained layer, wherein the compressively strained layer is substantially planar, having a surface roughness characterized by at least one of (i) an average roughness wavelength greater than an average wavelength of a carrier in the compressively strained layer and (ii) an average roughness height less than 10 nm.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the compressively strained layer comprises at least one group IV element.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the compressively strained layer comprises at least one of silicon and germanium.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the compressively strained layer comprises >1% germanium.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the tensilely strained layer comprises silicon.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the compressively strained layer comprises at least one of a group III and a group V element.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the compressively strained layer comprises indium gallium arsenide.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the compressively strained layer comprises indium gallium phosphide.
  • 9. The method of claim 6, wherein the compressively strained layer comprises gallium arsenide.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the compressively strained layer comprises at least one of a group II and a group VI element.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the compressively strained layer comprises zinc selenide.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the compressively strained layer comprises sulphur.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the compressively strained layer comprises cadmium telluride.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, wherein the compressively strained layer comprises mercury telluride.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the compressively strained layer has a thickness of less than 500 Å.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the compressively strained layer has a thickness of less than 200 Å.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the compressively strained layer is formed at a first temperature, at least a portion of the tensilely strained layer is formed at a second temperature, and the second temperature is greater than the first temperature.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the tensilely strained layer comprises silicon and the second temperature is greater than 450° C.
  • 19. The method of claim 17, wherein forming the tensilely strained layer at a second temperature includes initially forming a first portion of the tensilely strained layer at the first temperature and forming a second portion of the tensilely strained layer at the second temperature, the first temperature being sufficiently low to substantially avoid disruption of planarity, the first portion of the tensilely strained layer maintaining the planarity of the compressively strained layer notwithstanding transition to the second temperature.
  • 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the tensilely strained layer is formed at a rate greater than 100 Å/hour.
  • 21. The method of claim 1, wherein the compressively strained layer is formed by chemical vapor deposition.
  • 22. The method of claim 1, wherein the tensilely strained layer is formed by chemical vapor deposition.
  • 23. The method of claim 1, wherein the wavelength of the surface roughness is greater than 10 nanometers.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/310,346, filed Aug. 6, 2001, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.

GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made with government support under Grant Number N66001-00-1-8954, awarded by the U.S. Navy. The government has certain rights in the invention.

US Referenced Citations (50)
Number Name Date Kind
4710788 Dämbkes et al. Dec 1987 A
4920076 Holland et al. Apr 1990 A
4990979 Otto Feb 1991 A
5241197 Murakami et al. Aug 1993 A
5291439 Kauffmann et al. Mar 1994 A
5312766 Aronowitz et al. May 1994 A
5327375 Harari Jul 1994 A
5442205 Brasen et al. Aug 1995 A
5461243 Ek et al. Oct 1995 A
5523592 Nakagawa et al. Jun 1996 A
5534713 Ismail et al. Jul 1996 A
5596527 Tomioka et al. Jan 1997 A
5617351 Bertin et al. Apr 1997 A
5683934 Candelaria Nov 1997 A
5739567 Wong Apr 1998 A
5777347 Bartelink Jul 1998 A
5780922 Mishra et al. Jul 1998 A
5786612 Otani et al. Jul 1998 A
5792679 Nakato Aug 1998 A
5808344 Ismail et al. Sep 1998 A
5847419 Imai et al. Dec 1998 A
5891769 Liaw et al. Apr 1999 A
5906951 Chu et al. May 1999 A
5986287 Eberl et al. Nov 1999 A
5998807 Lustig et al. Dec 1999 A
6013134 Chu et al. Jan 2000 A
6058044 Sugiura et al. May 2000 A
6059895 Chu et al. May 2000 A
6096590 Chan et al. Aug 2000 A
6107653 Fitzgerald Aug 2000 A
6111267 Fischer et al. Aug 2000 A
6117750 Bensahel et al. Sep 2000 A
6130453 Mei et al. Oct 2000 A
6143636 Forbes et al. Nov 2000 A
6204529 Lung et al. Mar 2001 B1
6207977 Augusto Mar 2001 B1
6249022 Lin et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251755 Furukawa et al. Jun 2001 B1
6266278 Harari et al. Jul 2001 B1
6333518 Seo Dec 2001 B1
6339232 Takagi Jan 2002 B1
6350993 Chu et al. Feb 2002 B1
6399970 Kubo et al. Jun 2002 B2
6498359 Schmidt et al. Dec 2002 B2
20010003364 Sugawara et al. Jun 2001 A1
20020072130 Cheng et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020100942 Fitzgerald et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020125471 Fitzgerald et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020125497 Fitzgerald Sep 2002 A1
20020140031 Rim Oct 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (24)
Number Date Country
41 01 167 Jul 1992 DE
0 683 522 Nov 1995 EP
0 829 908 Mar 1998 EP
0 838 858 Apr 1998 EP
0 844 651 May 1998 EP
1 020 900 Jul 2000 EP
1 174 928 Jan 2002 EP
63122176 May 1988 JP
4-307974 Oct 1992 JP
7-106466 Apr 1995 JP
11-233744 Aug 1999 JP
2001319935 May 2000 JP
WO 9859365 Dec 1998 WO
WO 9953539 Oct 1999 WO
WO 0054338 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0154202 Jul 2001 WO
WO 0193338 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0199169 Dec 2001 WO
WO 0213262 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0215244 Feb 2002 WO
WO 0247168 Jun 2002 WO
WO 02071488 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02071491 Sep 2002 WO
WO 02071495 Sep 2002 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (72)
Entry
Meyerson et al., “Cooperative Growth Phenomena in Silicon/Germanium Low-Temperature Epitaxy,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 53, No. 25 (Dec. 19, 1988) pp. 2555-2557.
Garone et al., “Silicon vapor phase epitaxial growth catalysis by the presence of germane,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 56, No. 13 (Mar. 26, 1990) pp. 1275-1277.
Robbins et al., “A model for heterogeneous growth of Si1-xGex films for hydrides,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 69, No. 6 (Mar. 15, 1991) pp. 3729-3732.
“2 Bit/Cell EEPROM Cell Using Band-to-Band Tunneling for Data Read-Out,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 35, No. 4B (Sep. 1992) pp. 136-140.
Wesler et al., “NMOS and PMOS Transistors Fabricated in Strained/Relaxed Silicon-Germanium Structures,” Electron Devices Meeting, 1992. Technical Digest (Dec. 13, 1992) pp. 31.7.1-31.7.3.
Grützmacher et al., “Ge segregation in SiGe/Si heterostructures and its dependence on deposition technique and growth atmosphere,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 63, No. 18 (Nov. 1, 1993) pp. 2531-2533.
Welser et al., “Evidence of Real-Space Hot-Electron Transfer in High Mobility, Strained-Si Multilayer MOSFETs,” Electron Devices meetings, 1993. Technical Digest (Dec. 1993) pp. 21.3.1-21.3.4.
Cullis et al, “Growth ripples upon strained SiGe epitaxial layers on Si and misfit dislocation interactions,” Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, vol. 12, No. 4 (Jul./Aug. 1994) pp. 1924-1931.
Tweet et al., “Factors determining the composition of strained GeSi layers grown with disilane and germane,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 65, No. 20 (Nov. 14, 1994) pp. 2579-2581.
Armstrong et al., “Design of Si/SiGe Heterojunction Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Transistors,” IEDM Technical Digest (1995) pp. 761-764.
König et al., “SiGe HBTs and HFETs,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 38, No. 9 (1995) pp. 1595-1602.
Rim et al., “Enhanced Hole Mobilities in Surface-Channel Strained-Si p-MOSFETs,” Solid State Electronics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 (1995) pp. 20.3.1-20.3.4.
Welser, “The Application of Strained Silicon/Relaxed Silicon Germanium Heterostructures to Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors,” Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University (1995) pp. 1-205.
Sadek et al., “Design of Si/SiGe Heterojunction Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Transistors,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 43, No. 8 (Aug. 1996) pp. 1224-1232.
Nayak et al., “High Mobility Strained-Si PMOSFET's,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 43, No. 10 (Oct. 1996) pp. 1709-1716.
Schäfler, “High-mobility Si and Ge structures,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., vol. 12 (1997) pp. 1515-1549.
Usami et al., “Spectroscopic study of Si-based quantum wells with neighboring confinement structure,” Semicon. Sci. Technol. (1997) (abstract).
König et al., “Design Rules for n-Type SiGe Hetero FETs,” Solid State Electronics, vol. 41, No. 10 (1997), pp. 1541-1547.
Höck et al., “Carrier mobilities in modulation doped Si1-xGex heterostructures with respect to FET applications,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 336 (1998) pp. 141-144.
Maiti et al., “Strained-Si heterostructure field effect transistors,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., vol. 13 (1998) pp. 1225-1246.
Hackbarth et al., “Strain relieved SiGe buffers for Si-based field-effect transistors,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 201 (1999) pp. 734-738.
Armstrong, “Technology for SiGe Heterostructure-Based CMOS Devices,” Submitted to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science on Jun. 30, 1999, pp. 1-154.
O'Neill et al., “SiGe Virtual substrate N-channel heterojunction MOSFETs,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., vol. 14 (1999) pp. 784-789.
Rim, “Application of Silicon Based Heterostrucutres to Enhanced Mobility Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors,” Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University (Jul. 1999) pp. 1-184.
Parker et al., “SiGe heterostructure CMOS circuits and applications,” Solid State Electronics, vol. 43, No. 8, (Aug. 1999) pp. 1497-1506.
Xie, “SiGe Field effect transistors,” Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 25 (1999) pp. 89-121.
Hackbarth et al., “Alternatives to thick MBE-grown relaxed SiGe buffers,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 369, No. 1-2 (2000) pp. 148-151.
Herzog et al., “SiGe-based FETs: buffer issues and device results,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 380 (2000) pp. 36-41.
Mizuno et al., “Electron and Hole Mobility Enhancement in Strained-Si MOSFET's on SiGe-on-Insulator Substrates Fabricated by SIMOX Technology,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 5 (May 2000) pp. 230-232.
Höck et al., “High hole mobility in Si0.17 Ge0.83 channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors grown by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, No. 26 (Jun. 26, 2000) pp. 3920-3922.
Rim et al., “Fabrication and Analysis of Deep Submicron Strained-Si N-MOSFET's,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 47, No. 7 (Jul. 2000) pp. 1406-1415.
Barradas et al., “RBS analysis of MBE-grown Si/Ge/(001) Si heterostructures with thin, high Ge content SiGe channels for HMOS transistors,” Modern Physics Letters B (2001) (abstract).
Cheng et al., “Relaxed Silicon-Germanium on Insulator Substrate by Layer Transfer,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 30, No. 12 (2001) pp. L37-L39.
Lee et al., “Strained Ge channel p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors grown on Si1-xGex/Si virtual substrates,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 20 (Nov. 12, 2001) pp. 3344-3346.
Leitz et al., “Hole mobility enhancements in strained Si/Si1-yGey p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors grown on relaxed Si1-xGex (x<y) virtual substrates,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 25 (Dec. 17, 2001) pp. 4246-4248.
Canaperi et al., “Preparation of a relaxed Si-Ge layer on an insulator in fabricating high-speed semiconductor devices with strained epitaxial films,” Intern. Business Machines Corporation, USA (2002) (abstract).
Lee et al., “Strained Ge channel p-type MOSFETs fabricated on Si1-xGex/Si virtual substrates,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 686 (2002) pp. Al.9.1-A1.9.5.
Leitz et al., “Channel Engineering of SiGe-Based Heterostructures for High Mobility MOSFETs,” Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 686 (2002) pp. A3.10.1-A3.10.6.
Li et al., “Design of high speed Si/SiGe heterojunction complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors with reduced short-channel effects,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A 20(3) (May/Jun. 2002) pp. 1030-1033.
Eaglesham et al., “Dislocation-Free Stranski-Krastanow Growth of Ge on Si(100),” Physical Review Letters, vol. 64, No. 16 (Apr. 16, 1990) pp. 1943-1946.
Fitzgerald et al., “Totally relaxed GexSi1-x layers with low threading dislocation densities grown on Si substrates,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 59, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 1991) pp. 811-813.
Fitzgerald et al., “Relaxed GexSi1-x structures for III-V integration with Si and high mobility two-dimensional electron gases in Si,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 10, No. 4 (Jul./Aug. 1992) pp. 1807-1819.
Xie et al., “Very high mobility two-dimensional hole gas in Si/ GexSi1-xGe structures grown by molecular beam epitaxy,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 63, No. 16 (Oct. 18, 1993) pp. 2263-2264.
Wesler et al., “Electron Mobility Enhancement in Strained-Si N-Type Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 15, No. 3 (Mar. 1994) pp. 100-102.
Ismail et al., “Modulation-doped n-type Si/SiGe with inverted interface,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 65, No. 10 (Sep. 5, 1994) pp. 1248-1250.
Xie et al., “Semiconductor Surface Roughness: Dependence on Sign and Magnitude of Bulk Strain,” The Physical Review Letters, vol. 73, No. 22 (Nov. 28, 1994) pp. 3006-3009.
Bouillon et al., “Search for the optimal channel architecture for 0.18/0.12 μm bulk CMOS Experimental study,” IEEE, (1996) pp. 21.2.1-21.2.4.
Kearney et al., “The effect of alloy scattering on the mobility of holes in a Si1-xGex quantum well,” Semicond. Sci. Technol., vol. 13 (1998) pp. 174-180.
Höck et al., “High performance 0.25 μm p-type Ge/SiGe MODFETs,” Electronic Letters, vol. 34, No. 19 (Sep. 17, 1998) pp. 1888-1889.
Bufler et al., “Hole transport in strained Si1-xGex alloys on Si1-yGey substrates,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 84, No. 10 (Nov. 15, 1998) pp. 5597-5602.
Fitzgerald et al., “Dislocation dynamics in relaxed graded composition semiconductors,” Materials Science and Engineering B67, (1999) pp. 53-61.
Fischetti, “Long-range Coulomb interactions in small Si devices. Part II. Effective electronmobility in thin-oxide structures,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 89, No. 2 (Jan. 15, 2001) pp. 1232-1250.
Cheng et al., “Electron Mobility Enhancement in Strained-Si n-MOSFETs Fabricated on SiGe-on-Insulator (SGOI) Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 22, No. 7 (Jul. 2001) pp. 321-323.
Leitz et al., “Dislocation glide and blocking kinetics in compositionally graded SiGe/Si,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 90, No. 6 (Sep. 15, 2001) pp. 2730-2736.
Currie et al., “Carrier mobilities and process stability of strained S in- and p-MOSFETs on SiGe virtual substrates,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 19, No. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2001) pp. 2268-2279.
Ransom et al., “Gate-Self-Aligned n-channel and p-channel Germanium MOSFET's,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 38, No. 12 (Dec. 1991) pp. 2695.
König et al., “p-Type Ge-Channel MODFET's with High Transconductance Grown on Si Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 14, No. 4 (Apr. 1993) pp. 205-207.
Fischetti et al., “Brand structure, deformation potentials, and carrier mobility in strained Si, Ge, and SiGe alloys,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 80, No. 4 (Aug. 15, 1996) pp. 2234-2252.
Currie et al., “Controlling threading dislocation in Ge on Si using graded SiGe layers and chemical-mechanical polishing,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 72, No. 14 (Apr. 6, 1998) pp 1718-1720.
Reinking et al., “Fabrication of high-mobility Ge p-channel MOSFETs on Si substrates,” Electronics Letters, vol. 35, No. 6 (Mar. 18, 1999) pp. 503-504.
Koester et al., “Extremely High Transconductance Ge/Si0.4Ge0.6 p-MODFET's Grown by UHV-CVD,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 3 (Mar. 2000) pp. 110-112.
Carlin et al., “High Efficiency GaAs-on-Si Solar Cells with High Voc Using Graded GeSi Buffers,” IEEE, (2000) pp. 1006-1011.
Rosenblad et al., “Virtual Substrates for the n- and p-type Si-MODFET Grown at Very High Rates,” Materials Science and Engineering, vol. B74 (2000) pp. 113-117.
Ueno et al., “Low Temperature Buffer Growth for Modulation Doped SiGe/Ge/SiGe Heterostructures with High Hole Mobility,” Thin Solid Films, vol. 369 (2000) pp. 320-323.
Yousif et al., “Recent Critical Issues in Si/Si1-xGexSi Heterostructure FET Devices,” Solid-State Electronics, vol. 45, No. 11 (2001) pp. 1931-1937.
Anonymous, “Germanium P-Channel Mosfet,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 28, No. 2 (Jul. 1, 1985) p. 500.
Aigouy et al., “MOVPE Growth and optical characterization of ZnSe/ZnS strained layer superlattices,” Superlattices and Microstructures, vol. 16, No. 1 (1994) pp. 71-76.
Kikkawa et al., “Effect of strained InGaAs step bunching on mobility and device performance in n-InGaP/InGaAs/GaAs pseudomorphic heterostructures grown by metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 145 (1994) pp. 799-807.
Pelekanos et al., “Interface roughness correlation in CdTe/CdZnTe strained quantum wells,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 184/185 (1998) pp. 886-889.
Srolovitz, “On the Stability of Surfaces of Stressed Solids,” Acta metall., vol. 37, No. 2 (1989) pp. 621-625.
Cullis et al, “The characteristics of strain-modulated surface undulations formed upon epitaxial Si1-xGex alloy layers on Si,” Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 123 (1992) pp. 333-343.
Wolf et al., “Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, vol. 1: Process Technology” (1986) pp. 201.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/310346 Aug 2001 US