Gallium nitride (GaN) device with leakage current-based over-voltage protection

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9202874
  • Patent Number
    9,202,874
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 2, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 1, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A gallium nitride (GaN) device with leakage current-based over-voltage protection is disclosed. The GaN device includes a drain and a source disposed on a semiconductor substrate. The GaN device also includes a first channel region within the semiconductor substrate and between the drain and the source. The GaN device further includes a second channel region within the semiconductor substrate and between the drain and the source. The second channel region has an enhanced drain induced barrier lowering (DIBL) that is greater than the DIBL of the first channel region. As a result, a drain voltage will be safely clamped below a destructive breakdown voltage once a substantial drain current begins to flow through the second channel region.
Description
FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

The present disclosure relates to electronic devices that include overvoltage and current surge protection.


BACKGROUND

Gallium nitride (GaN) is commonly cited as a superior material for high-voltage power devices due to its wide bandgap and associated high electric field required for avalanche breakdown. Ideal bulk GaN crystals have critical fields in excess of 3,000,000 V per centimeter. However, in practice, a high electric field needed for avalanche breakdown is lowered by non-idealities that are present within the structure of a GaN device. During high voltage operation of a GaN device, electrical breakdown will typically occur at defects and/or at locations with a concentrated electric field. An example of such a breakdown location is a corner of a Schottky gate. An ideal structure comprising a bulk crystal such as silicon carbide (SiC) or GaN will avalanche uniformly in a high electric field region. As a result, avalanche energy is distributed uniformly, which greatly enhances the survivability of a device made up of an ideal bulk crystal. For example, vertical p-n junctions fabricated in SiC homoepitaxial layers demonstrate avalanche breakdown ruggedness. However, breakdown in defective GaN layers will typically occur at defects within defective GaN layers. A resulting high energy density typically causes irreversible damage to a device that includes defective GaN layers.


Another factor impacting breakdown ruggedness is the nature of the metal semiconductor contacts that carry a breakdown current. Previous work with SiC Schottky diodes has demonstrated that Schottky contacts can be degraded by avalanche current. In response to this problem, junction barrier Schottky diodes have been developed to urge avalanche breakdown to occur across a bulk p-n junction with ohmic contacts rather than Schottky contacts. Thus, the breakdown ruggedness of GaN high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) may be limited by breakdown events in highly localized areas within a semiconductor due to crystal defects and/or electric field concentration. Moreover, the breakdown ruggedness of GaN HEMTs may be limited by an electrical breakdown of adjacent dielectric layers and/or high current flow through the Schottky gate electrode during breakdown events. Thus, there is a need to provide overvoltage protection for a GaN device to ensure that the GaN device handles a typically destructive breakdown voltage without being damaged.


SUMMARY

A gallium nitride (GaN) device with leakage current-based over-voltage protection is disclosed. The GaN device includes a drain and a source disposed on a semiconductor substrate. The GaN device also includes a first channel region within the semiconductor substrate and between the drain and the source. The GaN device further includes a second channel region within the semiconductor substrate and between the drain in the source. The second channel region has an enhanced drain induced barrier lowering (DIBL) that is greater than the DIBL of the first channel region. As a result, a drain voltage will be safely clamped below a destructive breakdown voltage once a substantial drain current begins to flow through the second channel region.


Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the disclosure and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description in association with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the disclosure, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure.



FIG. 1 is a graph of a prior art transfer curve of drain current versus gate voltage illustrating the effect of drain induced barrier lowering (DIBL).



FIG. 2 is a circuit schematic that represents a model of a transistor having a first channel region and a second channel region in which the second channel region has an enhanced DIBL in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 3 is a plan view of an exemplary layout for the transistor of FIG. 2.



FIG. 4 is a graph of an exemplary transfer curve of drain current versus gate voltage comparing a first DIBL effect for a typical first channel region to a second DIBL effect for a second channel region that has an enhanced DIBL in accordance with the present disclosure.



FIG. 5 depicts a cross-sectional view of a first segmented gate embodiment having a Schottky gate with an insulator region between gate segments.



FIG. 6 depicts a cross-sectional view of a second segmented gate embodiment having an insulated gate with an insulator between gate segments and between the gate segments and a semiconductor substrate.



FIG. 7 depicts a cross-sectional view of a third segmented gate embodiment having a Schottky gate with an insulator between gate segments connected by a gate strap.



FIG. 8 depicts a cross-sectional view of a fourth segmented gate embodiment having an insulated gate with the insulator between gate segments and a semiconductor region, and between a gate strap and the semiconductor substrate.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The embodiments set forth below represent the necessary information to enable those skilled in the art to practice the disclosure and illustrate the best mode of practicing the disclosure. Upon reading the following description in light of the accompanying drawings, those skilled in the art will understand the concepts of the disclosure and will recognize applications of these concepts not particularly addressed herein. It should be understood that these concepts and applications fall within the scope of the disclosure and the accompanying claims.


It will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region, or substrate is referred to as being “over,” “on,” “in,” or extending “onto” another element, it can be directly over, directly on, directly in, or extend directly onto the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly over,” “directly on,” “directly in,” or extending “directly onto” another element, there are no intervening elements present. It will also be understood that when an element is referred to as being “connected” or “coupled” to another element, it can be directly connected or coupled to the other element or intervening elements may be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being “directly connected” or “directly coupled” to another element, there are no intervening elements present.


Relative terms such as “below” or “above” or “upper” or “lower” or “horizontal” or “vertical” may be used herein to describe a relationship of one element, layer, or region to another element, layer, or region as illustrated in the Figures. It will be understood that these terms and those discussed above are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in addition to the orientation depicted in the Figures.



FIG. 1 is a graph of a prior art transfer curve of drain current versus gate voltage illustrating the effect of drain induced barrier lowering (DIBL). In FIG. 1, the drain current is plotted on a logarithmic scale. At a high drain bias voltage, the transfer curve shifts to the left reflecting the lower threshold voltage. DIBL is defined as a ratio of ΔV to ΔVD, wherein ΔV is how much the transfer curve shifts and ΔVD is a change in drain bias voltage. Physically, DIBL is associated with drain bias voltage VD, which lowers a barrier that prevents electrons from flowing from a source and a drain of a transistor, when the transistor is in a non-conducting off state.



FIG. 2 is a schematic of a circuit model that represents a transistor 10 having a first channel region 12 and a second channel region 14 in which the second channel region 14 has an enhanced DIBL in accordance with the present disclosure. The transistor 10 is modeled using a symbolic transistor M1 in parallel with a symbolic transistor M2. However, it is to be understood that the first channel region 12 and the second channel region 14 can comprise a same channel periphery of the transistor 10. Moreover, the second channel region 14 has an enhanced DIBL that is greater than the DIBL of the first channel region 12. The enhanced DIBL is symbolically represented by the symbol for the transistor M2 being smaller than the symbol for the transistor M1. In this way, the first channel region 12 is designated as a main channel and the second channel region 14 is designated as a protective channel that leaks current once a protective channel drain voltage VPC is reached. The protective channel drain voltage VPC is below a voltage that is potentially destructive for the transistor 10.



FIG. 3 is a plan view of an exemplary layout for the transistor 10. The first channel region 12 and the second channel region 14 span between a drain D1 to a source S1. In FIG. 3, the first channel region 12 and the second channel region 14 are shown as being separated and as being approximately the same size. In this case, the second channel region 14 makes up around about 50% of the total channel periphery that includes both the first channel region 12 and the second channel region 14. However, it is to be understood that the first channel region 12 and the second channel region 14 can overlap and be one in the same. In that case, the second channel region 14 would make up 100% of a total channel periphery. In other embodiments, the second channel region 14 accounts for a range of around about 0.1% to around about 10% of the total channel periphery made up of the first channel region 12 and the second channel region 14. In yet other embodiments, the second channel region 14 accounts for around about 10% to around about 50% of the total channel periphery made up of the first channel region 12 and the second channel region 14. In still further embodiments, the second channel region 14 accounts from around about 50% to around about 100% of the total channel periphery made up of the first channel region 12 and the second channel region 14. In some of these embodiments, the first channel region 12 and the second channel region 14 are separate, while in other of these embodiments the first channel region 12 and the second channel region 14 overlap.



FIG. 4 is a graph of an exemplary transfer curve of drain current versus gate voltage comparing a first DIBL effect for a typical first channel region to a second DIBL effect for a second channel region that has an enhanced DIBL in accordance with the present disclosure. In particular, FIG. 4 represents a case in which a gate periphery of the second channel region 14 has a relatively high DIBL with respect to a relatively low DIBL of a gate periphery of the first channel region 12. For example, the DIBL of the gate periphery of the first channel region 12 has a negligible DIBL of less than around about 0.001 V/V, which is typical for a DIBL of a traditional GaN HEMT. In contrast, the DIBL of the gate periphery for the second channel region 14 ranges from around about 0.003 V/V to around about 0.03 V/V. As a result, at a high VD, the second channel region 14 will conduct more current than the first channel region 12 as VD effectively turns on the second channel region 14. The DIBL of the second channel region 14 is enhanced such that it begins to turn on at a VD that is less than a destructive breakdown voltage of the first channel region 12. Thus, VD will be safely clamped below the destructive breakdown voltage once a substantial drain current begins to flow through the second channel region 14. In the disclosed embodiments, enhanced DIBL is defined as ΔV/ΔVPC, where ΔV is a threshold voltage shift and VPC is a drain voltage at which the second channel region 14 begins to conduct current. A ΔV for an enhanced DIBL GaN HEMT of the present disclosure ranges from around about 5 V to around about 15 V. In this case, ΔV is approximately a difference between the unshifted threshold voltage at low VD and a voltage of a negative voltage rail. A VPC for the second channel region 14 of an enhanced DIBL GaN HEMT of the present disclosure ranges from around about 600 V to around about 1400 V.


In exemplary embodiments, the DIBL of the second channel region 14 is enhanced by segmenting a gate G1 near the second channel region 14, and/or decreasing the gate length, and/or changing the dimensions of a field plate near the second channel region 14, and/or changing the spacing between the gate G1 and the drain D1 near the second channel region 14, and/or altering an epitaxial layer stack including doping near the second channel region 14. The present disclosure may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the exemplary embodiments set forth therein. Rather, these exemplary embodiments are provided so that the present disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the present disclosure to those skilled in the art. As such, details of well-known features and techniques may be omitted to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the presented embodiments.


Referring back to FIG. 3, segmenting the gate G1 at a location along a gate axis 16 near the second channel region 14 will enhance the DIBL for the second channel region 14. FIGS. 5 through 8 depict four exemplary segmented gate embodiments for enhancing the DIBL of the second channel region 14. Each of FIGS. 5 through 8 represents a cross-sectional view cut along the gate axis 16. The drain D1 and the source S1 shown in FIG. 3 are not shown in FIGS. 5 through 8 because the drain D1 and the source S1 are located on either side of the gate G1, and showing them in FIGS. 5 through 8 would obscure the details of the segmented gate embodiments.



FIG. 5 depicts a cross-sectional view of a first segmented gate embodiment with an insulator 18 between a first gate segment G1A and a second gate segment G1B comprising the gate G1. Moreover, the first gate segment G1A and the second gate segment G1B are coupled electrically by a conductor that is not visible in the cross-sectional view of FIG. 5. In this particular embodiment, the gate G1 is in Schottky contact with a semiconductor substrate 20, and an amount of DIBL enhancement for the second channel region 14 is controlled by an interval L between the first gate segment G1A and the second gate segment G1B.



FIG. 6 depicts a cross-sectional view of a second segmented gate embodiment wherein the gate G1 has the insulator 18 extending between the first gate segment G1A and the second gate segment G1B. Further still, the insulator 18 separates the first gate segment G1A and the second gate segment G1B from the semiconductor substrate 20. Thus, the gate G1 in this segmented embodiment is an insulated gate. Similar to the first segmented gate embodiment, the amount of DIBL enhancement for the second channel region 14 is controlled by the interval L between the first gate segment G1A and the second gate segment G1B. However, in this second embodiment, the DIBL of the second channel region 14 can also be controlled locally by varying a thickness TI of the insulator 18 separating the first gate segment G1A and the second gate segment G1B from the semiconductor substrate 20.



FIG. 7 depicts a cross-sectional view of a third segmented gate embodiment having a gate strap 22 that electrically couples the first gate segment G1A to the second gate segment G1B that are in direct contact with the semiconductor substrate 20. Thus, the gate G1 is a Schottky gate in this third segmented gate embodiment. Similar to the first and second segmented gate embodiments, the amount of DIBL enhancement for the second channel region 14 is controlled by the interval L between the first gate segment G1A and the second gate segment G1B. However, in this third segmented gate embodiment, the DIBL of the second channel region 14 can also be controlled locally by varying a distance DGS between the gate strap 22 and semiconductor substrate 20.



FIG. 8 depicts a cross-sectional view of a fourth segmented gate embodiment wherein the insulator 18 extends between the semiconductor substrate 20 and the first gate segment G1A and the second gate segment G1B, thereby making the gate G1 an insulated gate. The insulator 18 also extends between the gate strap 22 and the semiconductor substrate 20. Similar to the first, second, and third segmented gate embodiments, the amount of DIBL enhancement for the second channel region 14 is controlled by the interval L between the first gate segment G1A and the second gate segment G1B. However, in this fourth segmented gate embodiment, the DIBL of the second channel region 14 can also be controlled locally by varying the distance DGS of the gate strap 22 and by varying the thickness TI of the insulator 18 separating the first gate segment G1A and the second gate segment G1B from the semiconductor substrate 20.


In each of the four exemplary segmented gate embodiments, the first channel region 12 extends into the semiconductor substrate 20 adjacent to both the first gate segment G1A and the second gate segment G1B. The second channel region 14 extends into the semiconductor substrate 20 and being sandwiched between the first channel region 12. Each of the four exemplary segmented gate embodiments depicted in FIGS. 5 through 8 have unique electrical characteristics due to each particular structure made up of the gate G1, the insulator 18, and the semiconductor substrate 20. The electrical characteristics are also tunable by varying the dopant levels of the semiconductor substrate adjacent to the second channel region 14. The unique electrical characteristics affect the DIBL of the second channel region 14 and can be altered to suit a particular application. Also, while the exemplary segmented gate embodiments of FIGS. 5 through 8 show only the first gate segment G1A and the second segment G1B, it is to be understood that additional gate segments can be included without deviating from the scope of the present disclosure. Moreover, while the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to GaN transistors, it is to be understood that other GaN devices such as GaN diodes and GaN thyristors can include a main channel region and a protective channel region as described in the present disclosure.


Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the embodiments of the present disclosure. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. A gallium nitride (GaN) device with leakage current-based over-voltage protection comprising: a semiconductor substrate;a drain disposed on the semiconductor substrate;a source disposed on the semiconductor substrate;a first channel region within the semiconductor substrate and between the drain and the source;a second channel region within the semiconductor substrate and between the drain and the source wherein the second channel region has an enhanced drain induced barrier lowering (DIBL) that is greater than the DIBL of the first channel region;a gate having gate segments disposed on the substrate adjacent to the second channel region; andan insulator extending between the gate segments and the semiconductor substrate, wherein the DIBL of the second channel region is controlled by a thickness of the insulator.
  • 2. The GaN device of claim 1 wherein the DIBL of the first channel region ranges from less than around about 0.001 V/V.
  • 3. The GaN device of claim 2 wherein the DIBL of the second channel region ranges from around about 0.003 V/V to around about 0.03 V/V.
  • 4. The GaN device of claim 1 wherein the DIBL of the second channel region is controlled by an interval distance between adjacent gate segments.
  • 5. The GaN device of claim 4 wherein the gate is directly disposed on the semiconductor substrate.
  • 6. The GaN device of claim 5 further including a gate strap that electrically couples the adjacent gate segments.
  • 7. The GaN device of claim 6 wherein the DIBL of the second channel region is further controlled by a distance of the gate strap from the semiconductor substrate.
  • 8. The GaN device of claim 1 further including a gate strap that electrically couples the adjacent gate segments.
  • 9. The GaN device of claim 8 wherein the DIBL of the second channel region is further controlled by a distance of the gate strap from the semiconductor substrate.
  • 10. The GaN device of claim 1 wherein the first channel region and the second channel region are one and the same.
  • 11. The GaN device of claim 1 wherein the second channel region accounts for a range of around about 0.1% to around about 10% of a total channel periphery made up of the first channel region and the second channel region.
  • 12. The GaN device of claim 1 wherein the second channel region accounts for a range of around about 10% to around about 50% of a total channel periphery made up of the first channel region and the second channel region.
  • 13. The GaN device of claim 1 wherein the second channel region accounts for a range of around about 50% to around about 100% of a total channel periphery made up of the first channel region and the second channel region.
  • 14. The GaN device of claim 1 wherein a drain voltage level for when the second channel region begins to conduct electricity ranges from around about 600 V to around about 1400 V.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/692,768, filed Aug. 24, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (207)
Number Name Date Kind
4317055 Yoshida et al. Feb 1982 A
4540954 Apel Sep 1985 A
4543535 Ayasli Sep 1985 A
4620207 Calviello Oct 1986 A
4788511 Schindler Nov 1988 A
5028879 Kim Jul 1991 A
5046155 Beyer et al. Sep 1991 A
5047355 Huber et al. Sep 1991 A
5107323 Knolle et al. Apr 1992 A
5118993 Yang Jun 1992 A
5208547 Schindler May 1993 A
5227734 Schindler et al. Jul 1993 A
5306656 Williams et al. Apr 1994 A
5361038 Allen et al. Nov 1994 A
5365197 Ikalainen Nov 1994 A
5389571 Takeuchi et al. Feb 1995 A
5414387 Nakahara et al. May 1995 A
5485118 Chick Jan 1996 A
5608353 Pratt Mar 1997 A
5629648 Pratt May 1997 A
5698870 Nakano et al. Dec 1997 A
5742205 Cowen et al. Apr 1998 A
5764673 Kawazu et al. Jun 1998 A
5834326 Miyachi et al. Nov 1998 A
5843590 Miura et al. Dec 1998 A
5864156 Juengling Jan 1999 A
5874747 Redwing et al. Feb 1999 A
5880640 Dueme Mar 1999 A
5914501 Antle et al. Jun 1999 A
5949140 Nishi et al. Sep 1999 A
6049250 Kintis et al. Apr 2000 A
6064082 Kawai et al. May 2000 A
6110757 Udagawa et al. Aug 2000 A
6130579 Iyer et al. Oct 2000 A
6133589 Krames et al. Oct 2000 A
6177685 Teraguchi et al. Jan 2001 B1
6191656 Nadler Feb 2001 B1
6229395 Kay May 2001 B1
6265943 Dening et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271727 Schmukler Aug 2001 B1
6285239 Iyer et al. Sep 2001 B1
6306709 Miyagi et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307364 Augustine Oct 2001 B1
6313705 Dening et al. Nov 2001 B1
6329809 Dening et al. Dec 2001 B1
6333677 Dening Dec 2001 B1
6342815 Kobayashi Jan 2002 B1
6356150 Spears et al. Mar 2002 B1
6369656 Dening et al. Apr 2002 B2
6369657 Dening et al. Apr 2002 B2
6373318 Dohnke et al. Apr 2002 B1
6376864 Wang Apr 2002 B1
6377125 Pavio et al. Apr 2002 B1
6384433 Barratt et al. May 2002 B1
6387733 Holyoak et al. May 2002 B1
6392487 Alexanian May 2002 B1
6400226 Sato Jun 2002 B2
6404287 Dening et al. Jun 2002 B2
6448793 Barratt et al. Sep 2002 B1
6455877 Ogawa et al. Sep 2002 B1
6475916 Lee et al. Nov 2002 B1
6477682 Cypher Nov 2002 B2
6521998 Teraguchi et al. Feb 2003 B1
6525611 Dening et al. Feb 2003 B1
6528983 Augustine Mar 2003 B1
6560452 Shealy May 2003 B1
6566963 Yan et al. May 2003 B1
6589877 Thakur Jul 2003 B1
6593597 Sheu Jul 2003 B2
6608367 Gibson et al. Aug 2003 B1
6614281 Baudelot et al. Sep 2003 B1
6621140 Gibson et al. Sep 2003 B1
6624452 Yu et al. Sep 2003 B2
6627552 Nishio et al. Sep 2003 B1
6633073 Rezvani et al. Oct 2003 B2
6633195 Baudelot et al. Oct 2003 B2
6639470 Andrys et al. Oct 2003 B1
6656271 Yonehara et al. Dec 2003 B2
6657592 Dening et al. Dec 2003 B2
6660606 Miyabayashi et al. Dec 2003 B2
6701134 Epperson Mar 2004 B1
6701138 Epperson et al. Mar 2004 B2
6706576 Ngo et al. Mar 2004 B1
6720831 Dening et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723587 Cho et al. Apr 2004 B2
6724252 Ngo et al. Apr 2004 B2
6727762 Kobayashi Apr 2004 B1
6748204 Razavi et al. Jun 2004 B1
6750158 Ogawa et al. Jun 2004 B2
6750482 Seaford et al. Jun 2004 B2
6759907 Orr et al. Jul 2004 B2
6802902 Beaumont et al. Oct 2004 B2
6815722 Lai et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815730 Yamada Nov 2004 B2
6822842 Friedrichs et al. Nov 2004 B2
6861677 Chen Mar 2005 B2
6943631 Scherrer et al. Sep 2005 B2
7015512 Park et al. Mar 2006 B2
7026665 Smart et al. Apr 2006 B1
7033961 Smart et al. Apr 2006 B1
7042150 Yasuda May 2006 B2
7052942 Smart et al. May 2006 B1
7211822 Nagahama et al. May 2007 B2
7408182 Smart et al. Aug 2008 B1
7449762 Singh Nov 2008 B1
7459356 Smart et al. Dec 2008 B1
7557421 Shealy et al. Jul 2009 B1
7719055 McNutt et al. May 2010 B1
7768758 Maier et al. Aug 2010 B2
7804262 Schuster et al. Sep 2010 B2
7935983 Saito et al. May 2011 B2
7968391 Smart et al. Jun 2011 B1
7974322 Ueda et al. Jul 2011 B2
8017981 Sankin et al. Sep 2011 B2
8405068 O'Keefe Mar 2013 B2
8502258 O'Keefe Aug 2013 B2
8633518 Suh et al. Jan 2014 B2
8692294 Chu et al. Apr 2014 B2
8785976 Nakajima et al. Jul 2014 B2
8988097 Ritenour Mar 2015 B2
20010040246 Ishii Nov 2001 A1
20010054848 Baudelot et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020031851 Linthicum et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020048302 Kimura Apr 2002 A1
20020079508 Yoshida Jun 2002 A1
20030003630 Iimura et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030122139 Meng et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030160307 Gibson et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030160317 Sakamoto et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030206440 Wong Nov 2003 A1
20030209730 Gibson et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030218183 Micovic et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040070003 Gaska et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040130037 Mishra et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040241916 Chau et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050139868 Anda Jun 2005 A1
20050189559 Saito et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050189562 Kinzer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050194612 Beach Sep 2005 A1
20050212049 Onodera Sep 2005 A1
20050225912 Pant et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050271107 Murakami et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060043385 Wang et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068601 Lee et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060124960 Hirose et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060205161 Das et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060243988 Narukawa et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070093009 Baptist et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070295985 Weeks, Jr. et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080023706 Saito et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080073752 Asai et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080112448 Ueda et al. May 2008 A1
20080121875 Kim May 2008 A1
20080142837 Sato et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080179737 Haga et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080190355 Chen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080272382 Kim et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080272422 Min Nov 2008 A1
20080283821 Park et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080308813 Suh et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090072269 Suh et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090090984 Khan et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090146185 Suh et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090146186 Kub et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090166677 Shibata et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090273002 Chiou et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090278137 Sheridan et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100025657 Nagahama et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100133567 Son Jun 2010 A1
20100187575 Baumgartner et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100207164 Shibata et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100230656 O'Keefe Sep 2010 A1
20100230717 Saito Sep 2010 A1
20100258898 Lahreche Oct 2010 A1
20110017972 O'Keefe Jan 2011 A1
20110025422 Marra et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110031633 Hsu et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110095337 Sato Apr 2011 A1
20110101300 O'Keefe May 2011 A1
20110115025 Okamoto May 2011 A1
20110127586 Bobde et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110163342 Kim et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110175142 Tsurumi et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110199148 Iwamura Aug 2011 A1
20110211289 Kosowsky et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110242921 Tran et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110290174 Leonard et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120018735 Ishii Jan 2012 A1
20120086497 Vorhaus Apr 2012 A1
20120126240 Won May 2012 A1
20120199875 Bhalla et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120211802 Tamari Aug 2012 A1
20120218783 Imada Aug 2012 A1
20120262220 Springett Oct 2012 A1
20130277687 Kobayashi et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130280877 Kobayashi et al. Oct 2013 A1
20140015609 Vetury et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140054585 Ritenour Feb 2014 A1
20140054596 Ritenour Feb 2014 A1
20140054597 Ritenour et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140054602 Johnson Feb 2014 A1
20140054604 Ritenour Feb 2014 A1
20140055192 Ritenour et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140057372 Ritenour Feb 2014 A1
20140117559 Zimmerman et al. May 2014 A1
20140118074 Levesque et al. May 2014 A1
20150155222 Shealy et al. Jun 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (11)
Number Date Country
1187229 Mar 2002 EP
1826041 Aug 2007 EP
10242584 Sep 1998 JP
2000031535 Jan 2000 JP
2003332618 Nov 2003 JP
2008148511 Jun 2008 JP
2008258419 Oct 2008 JP
20070066051 Jun 2007 KR
2004051707 Jun 2004 WO
2011162243 Dec 2011 WO
2014035794 Mar 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (104)
Entry
Cho, H., et al., “High Density Plasma Via Hole Etching in SiC,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Surfaces, and Films, vol. 19, No. 4, Jul./Aug. 2001, pp. 1878-1881.
Krüger, Olaf, et al., “Laser-Assisted Processing of VIAs for AlGaN/GaN HEMTs on SiC Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 27, No. 6, Jun. 2006, pp. 425-427.
Chang, S.J. et al., “Improved ESD protection by combining InGaN—GaN MQW LEDs with GaN Schottky diodes,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Mar. 2003, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 129-131.
Chao, C-H., et al., “Theoretical demonstration of enhancement of light extraction of flip-chip GaN light-emitting diodes with photonic crystals,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, 2006, 4 pages.
Han, D.S. et al., “Improvement of Light Extraction Efficiency of Flip-Chip Light Emitting Diode by Texturing the Bottom Side Surface of Sapphire Substrate,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Jul. 1, 2006, vol. 18, No. 13, pp. 1406-1408.
Shchekin, O.B. et al., “High performance thin-film flip-chip InGaN—GaN light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, 071109, Aug. 2006, 4 pages.
Wierer, J. et al., “High-power AlGaInN flip-chip light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 78 No. 22, May 28, 2001, pp. 3379-3381.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 131973,482, mailed Nov. 5, 2014, 9 pages.
Fath, P. et al., “Mechanical wafer engineering for high efficiency solar cells: An investigation of the induced surface damage,” Conference Record of the Twenty-Fourth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Dec. 5-9, 1994, vol. 2, pp. 1347-1350.
Han, D.S. et al., “Improvement of Light Extraction Efficiency of Flip-Chip Light-Emitting Diode by Texturing the Bottom Side Surface of Sapphire Substrate,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Jul. 1, 2006, vol. 18, No. 13, pp. 1406-1408.
Fath, P. et al., “Mechanical wafer engineering for high efficiency solar cells: an investigation of the induced surface damage,” Conference Record of the Twenty-Fourth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 5-9 Dec. 1994, vol. 2, pp. 1347-1350.
Han, D.S. et al., “Improvement of Light Extraction Efficiency of Flip-Chip Light-Emitting Diode by Texturing the Bottom Side Surface of Sapphire Substrate,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Jul. 1, 2006
Examination Report for British Patent Application No. GB090255.6, issued Feb. 28, 2013, 2 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225, mailed Feb. 1, 2012, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,2525, mailed May 2, 2012, 10 pages.
Boutros, K.S., et al., “5W GaN MMIC for Millimeter-Wave Applications,” 2006 Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium, Nov. 2006, pp. 93-95.
Cho, H., et al., “High Density Plasma Via Hole Etching in SiC,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Surfaces, and Films, vol. 19, No. 4, Jul.-Aug. 2001, pp. 1878-1881.
Darwish, A.M., et al., “Dependence of GaN HEMT Millimeter-Wave Performance on Temperature,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 57, No. 12, Dec. 2009, pp. 3205-3211.
Krüger, Olaf, et al., “Laser-Assisted Processing of VIAs for AIGaN/GaN HEMTs on SiC Substrates,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 27, No. 6, Jun. 2006, pp. 425-427.
Sheppard, S.T., et al., “High Power Demonstration at 10 GHz with GaN/AlGaN HEMT Hybrid Amplifiers,” 2000 Device Research Conference, Conference Digest, Jun. 2000, pp. 37-38.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,926, mailed Dec. 19, 2014, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/942,998, mailed Nov. 19, 2014, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,526, mailed Dec. 16, 2014, 17 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed Jan. 20, 2015, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/914,060, mailed Nov. 13, 2014, 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/966,400, mailed Dec. 3, 2014, 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,986, mailed Dec. 5, 2014, 16 pages.
Author Unknown, “CGHV1J006D: 6 W, 18.0 GHz, GaN HEMT Die,” Cree, Inc., 2014, 9 pages.
Chang, S.J. et al, “Improved ESD protection by combining InGaN-GaN Mqw LEDs with GaN Schottky diodes,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, Mar. 2003, vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 129-131.
Chao, C-H., et aL, “Theoretical demonstration of enhancement of light extraction of flip-chip GaN light-emitting diodes with photonic crystals,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, 2006, 4 pages.
Fath, P. et al., “Mechanical wafer engineering for high efficiency solar cells: An investigation of the induced surface damage,” Conference Record of the Twenty-Fourth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Dec. 5-9 1994, vol. 2, pp. 1347-1350.
Han, D.S. et al., “Improvement of Light Extraction Efficiency of Flip-Chip Lighting-Emitting Diode by Texturing the Bottom Side Surface of Sapphire Substrate,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, Jul. 1, 2006, vol. 18, No. 13, pp. 1406-1408.
Hibbard, D.L. et al., “Low Resistance High Reflectance Contacts to p-GaN Using Oxidized Ni/Au and Al or Ag,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83 No. 2, Jul. 14, 2003, pp. 311-313.
Lee, S.J., “Study of photon extraction efficiency in InGaN light-emitting diodes depending on chip structures and chip-mount schemes,” Optical Engineering, SPIE, Jan. 2006, vol. 45, No. 1, 14 pages.
Shchekin, O.B. et al., “High performance thin-film flip-chip InGaN-GaN light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 89, 071109, Aug. 2006, 4 pages.
Wierer, J. et al., “High-power AIGaInN flip-chip light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 78 No. 22, May 28, 2001, pp. 3379-3381.
Windisch, R. et al., “40% Efficient Thin-Film Surface-Textured Light-Emitting Diodes by Optimization of Natural Lithography,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, Jul. 2000, vol. 47, No. 7, pp. 1492-1498.
Windisch, R. et al., “Impact of texture-enhanced transmission on high-efficiency surface-textured light-emitting diodes,” Applied Physics Letters, Oct. 8, 2001, vol. 79, No. 15, pp. 2315-2317.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Feb. 15, 2005, 2 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Dec. 16, 2004, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Jul. 23, 2004, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed May 3, 2005, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/620,205, mailed Dec. 8, 2005, 4 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,980, mailed Jan. 26, 2005, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,980, mailed May 12, 2005, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225 mailed Dec. 22, 2011, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,279, mailed Oct. 31, 2007, 7 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/397,279, mailed Apr. 17, 2008, 7 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,979, mailed Jun. 29, 2005, 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,979, mailed Jan. 11, 2005, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/689,979, mailed Oct. 26, 2005, 6 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225, mailed Nov. 9, 2012, 5 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,734, mailed Jan. 18, 2008, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/360,734, mailed Aug. 7, 2008, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,257 mailed Jan. 5, 2012, 13 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Feb. 2, 2010, 2 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Nov. 19, 2009, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Mar. 18, 2010, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed May 29, 2009, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Feb. 28, 2011, 8 pages.
Quayle Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,207, mailed Nov. 24, 2010, 4 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/458,833, mailed Dec. 15, 2008, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/458,833, mailed Apr. 1, 2008, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/458,833, mailed Mar. 9, 2009, 7 pages.
Invitation to Pay Fees for PCT/US2013/056105, mailed Nov. 5, 2013, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056126, mailed Oct. 25, 2013, 10 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056132, mailed Oct. 10, 2013, 11 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056187, mailed Oct. 10, 2013, 11 pages.
International Search Report for GB0902558.6, issued Jun. 15, 2010, by the UK Intellectual Property Office, 2 pages.
Examination Report for British Patent Application No. 0902558.6, mailed Nov. 16, 2012, 5 pages.
Examination Report for British Patent Application No. GB0902558.6, issued Feb. 28, 2013, 2 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,869, mailed Feb. 9, 2012, 10 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,869, mailed Apr. 4, 2013, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,869, mailed Jul. 19, 2012, 8 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225, mailed Apr. 16, 2012, 3 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225 mailed Feb. 1, 2012, 9 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/841,225, mailed May 2, 2012, 10 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/056105, mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 12 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/056126, mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 7 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/056132, mailed Mar. 5, 2015, 9 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2013/056187, mailed Mar. 12, 2015, 9 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed Apr. 6, 2015, 3 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,488, mailed Feb. 20, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/966,400, mailed Feb. 20, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,986, mailed Mar. 6, 2015, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,019, mailed Mar. 25, 2015, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/056105, mailed Feb. 12, 2014, 15 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,926, mailed Apr. 27, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/942,998, mailed Apr. 27, 2015, 8 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,526, mailed Jun. 17, 2015, 11 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed May 14, 2015, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,488, mailed May 29, 2015, 9 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,482, mailed May 4, 2015, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,182, mailed May 1, 2014, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,482, mailed May 23, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,986, mailed Apr. 24, 2014, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/910,202, mailed Sep. 25, 2014, 9 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/927,182, mailed Sep. 17, 2014, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/974,488, mailed Oct. 28, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/966,400, mailed Sep. 3, 2014, 9 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/973,482, mailed Nov. 5, 2014, 9 pages.
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/871,526, mailed Sep. 3, 2015, 3 pages.
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/557,940, mailed Aug. 31, 2015, 8 pages.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/067,019, mailed Oct. 13, 2015, 6 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140054601 A1 Feb 2014 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61692768 Aug 2012 US