The present application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/877,737, entitled HALOGEN GAS DISCHARGE LASER ELECTRODES, filed on Jun. 25, 2004, and of Ser. No. 10/815,387, entitled GAS DISCHARGE LASER CHAMBER IMPROVEMENTS, filed on Mar. 31, 2004, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention is related to high pulse repetition rate, e.g., 4 kHz and above gas discharge laser systems, e.g., excimer and molecular fluorine laser or CO.sub.2 systems.
Gas discharge lasers, e.g., KrF, ArF, F.sub.2, XeF, XeCl, CO.sub.2 and the like laser systems operating at pulse repetition rates of up to 6 kHz and above present certain operational problems, related, in part, to disturbances to the gas flow circulating around the lasing medium containing chamber, and particularly in the vicinity of the high repetition rate gas discharges occurring between elongated gas discharge electrodes as such electrodes are well known in the art. Applicants propose certain improvements and modifications to existing assemblies comprising, e.g., electrodes, a preionizer(s), a main insulator(s) and electrode supports.
A pulsed gas discharge laser operating at an output laser pulse repetition rate of greater than 4 kHz and a method of operating same is disclosed which may comprise a high voltage electrode having a longitudinal extent; a main insulator electrically insulating the high voltage electrode from a grounded gas discharge chamber; a preionizer longitudinally extending along at least a portion of the longitudinal extent of the high voltage electrode; a preionization shim integral with the electrode extending toward the preionizer. The preionizer may be formed integrally with the main insulator. The preionization shim may substantially cover the gap between the electrode and the preionizer. The apparatus and method may further comprise a high voltage electrode; a main insulator insulating the high voltage electrode from a grounded gas discharge chamber; the high voltage electrode being disposed in an electrode receiving pocket in the main insulator and formed to present an elongated discharge receiving area facing another electrode within the gas discharge chamber, with adjacent side surfaces of the high voltage electrode slanting away from an outer extent of side walls of the pocket in the longitudinal extent of the pocket and the high voltage electrode, forming a gas flow disturbance pocket; an aerodynamic fairing attached to the high voltage electrode and substantially closing the gas flow disturbance pocket and presenting an aerodynamically smooth surface to the gas flow. The main insulator may be formed to present an aerodynamically smooth face in the direction of the gas flow and the fairing aerodynamically smooth surface being generally aligned with the main insulator aerodynamically smooth surface. The aerodynamic fairing may be on one side of the elongated discharge receiving area and a preionizer may be positioned on the other side of the elongated discharge receiving area. The one side is the downstream side or the upstream side. The aerodynamic fairing may comprise a pair of aerodynamic fairings one on each side of the elongated discharge receiving area. The apparatus and method may comprise an aerodynamic block presenting an extension of the aerodynamically smooth surface of the main insulator. The high voltage electrode may be formed with an integral shim extending toward the preionizer and presenting an aerodynamically smooth surface to the gas flow. The apparatus and method may further comprise an elongated electrode support bar formed to have an elongated dugout portion; an elongated electrode attached to the electrode support bar in the elongated dugout portion; an upstream fairing positioned in the elongated dugout portion presenting with the electrode support bar and electrode an aerodynamically smooth surface to a gas flow past the electrode. The apparatus and method may further comprise a downstream fairing positioned in the elongated dugout portion presenting with the electrode support bar and the electrode an aerodynamically smooth surface to a gas flow past the electrode.
In order to allow for higher repetition rate operation of e.g., gas discharge lasers, e.g., excimer lasers, such as ArF, KrF, XeF, and XeCl lasers, or F.sub.2 lasers or CO.sub.2 lasers or the like, e.g., at laser output light pulse repetition rates of up to and exceeding 6 kHz, applicants had expected that the blower 18 motor speed would have to increase about 50% above those needed for currently used lasers of such a type at around 4 kHz pulse repetition rates. This can create a need for tremendously higher blower 18 power, increasing on the order of as the cube of the speed increase. According to aspects of embodiments of the present invention applicants propose certain improvements to the flow path of the laser gas being moved by the blower 18 motor within the laser chamber in order to reach the required gas flow amounts (basically gas flow speed, although those skilled in the art will realize that the flow speed is not a constant either in the elongated longitudinal electrode axis direction or a direction perpendicular to that direction, due, e.g., to flow restriction of surrounding components, flow resistance at the boundaries of the flow region, etc.).
In the past such parameters as arc free blower speed (“AFBS”) have been measured to determine, e.g., the blower speed needed. The blower speed necessary is determined to be able to move sufficient gas away from the discharge region 40 between the elongated electrodes 10, 34, 36 in such devices. This is necessary to on the one hand assure the next sequential discharge is a good one (maintains the same laser output light energy for a given applied voltage through the discharge formed lasing medium) because the gas through which the discharge occurs to form the lasing medium is “fresh”. On the other hand the gas flow sufficiency is determined by being able to avoid arcing between one of the electrodes 10, 34, 36 and the grounded chamber walls or between the electrodes through ions present in the gas through which the prior discharge occurred between the electrodes. If such ions remain close enough to the electrodes 10, 34, 36 to form an electrical path to the chamber wall at the time when the high voltage one of the electrodes is raised in voltage to ultimately cause the discharge through the lasing medium laser gas such arcing can occur. The latter effect also, to among other things, results in instability of the laser output light pulse energy from pulse to pulse.
Applicants found that this “idealized” gas flow path including an essentially uniform upper inlet gas flow surface 45 and upper exit gas flow surface 46 in combination with respective opposite lower inlet gas flow surface 47, which may correspond to an arcuate shaped surface, e.g., formed by an anode fairing 53 or a portion of an anode support bar 42 and an exit gas flow surface formed, e.g., by an downstream anode fairing 51, e.g., as shown in
Applicants found that measured gas flow speeds were indicative of the fact that the necessary blower speed with such an aerodynamically “idealized” gas flow path for, e.g., an increase in pulse repetition rate by 50% from 4 kHz to 6 kHz, was achievable and not the expected 50% increase in blower speed with the concomitant increase in required blower power supply. The idealized smooth upper 45, 47 and lower surfaces 47 remove, e.g., the effects of turbulence and flow separation created, e.g., by gaps 21A-C and open regions 44A between components of the laser system in the vicinity of the discharge region 40 and/or otherwise in the gas flow path from the blower 18 in a downstream direction 18A to the portion 12A of the lasing chamber 12 beyond the downstream extent of the anode support bar 42. The idealized smooth upper 45, 47 and lower surfaces 47 reduce the amount of turbulence, flow separation, eddies, and the like in the gas flow through the discharge region 40.
As can be seen from the illustrative partly schematic view in
According to aspects of embodiments of the present invention this may include an integral cathode shim 32 and the cathode fairing 50. A main insulator 20 may have a through hole 22 for a ground rod for integral preionizer (“PI”) 30 operation. The integral shim 32 on the cathode 10 may be specifically shaped, e.g., not only to provide the pre-ionization function of bringing the high voltage on the cathode to the vicinity of the preionizer 25 ground rod 30, but also to shape/steer the gas flow efficiently toward the discharge region 40 between the electrode gap. In this manner, the traditional gaps 21A-C between the cathode 36, e.g., as shown in
Since downstream flow separation on the anode assembly has been shown to increase the arc-free blower speed, according to aspects of an embodiment of the present invention a commensurate downstream/fastback fairing 51 (as shown in
Previously, this might have been implemented by complex machining of the cathode and fairing and bolting them together to retain the cathode's original shape. According to aspects of an embodiment of the present invention the cathode fairing 50 may be, e.g., a ceramic part, in the shape of a wedge 50, e.g., as shown in
In addition, the gas flow blocks and current return attachment plate fairings which were part of the testing fixture of
the aerodynamically smooth surfaces of the “idealized” gas flow passage of
As shown in
According to aspects of an embodiment of the present invention the gas flow in the vicinity of the discharge region 40 may be further improved by approaching an idealized flow region while maintaining the necessary distinct nature of certain parts, e.g., because they are made of different materials or are not easily fabricated as a single piece, etc. The effects of turbulence and aerodynamic drag and eddy forming protrusions in the neighborhood of the discharge region 40, among other things which impact the gas flow properties, and, therefore, also the AFBS for a given configuration and repetition rate, can be significantly ameliorated on the side of the other electrode, as well as the side of the cathode as noted above.
In the past, the anode support bar in lasers sold by applicants' assignee, Cymer, Inc., e.g., models 6XXX and 7XXX laser systems, have had an anode support bar 42, 54 with a flat upper surface 42A, 54A, such as illustrated in
These can be substantially eliminated by, e.g., providing an anode support bar 42 such as illustrated in
The downstream current return tines 62 may be fastened to the anode support bar 42 by a strip 64 held in place by a clamp plate 66 attached to the anode support bar 42 by screws 68. The fairings 53, 51 may be connected to the anode support bar by screws 86, with the upstream fairing having a brass washer 82 and the downstream fairing having a crescent washer 84. The washers may be alternated from side to side along the length of the electrode fairings 53, 51.
To allow for higher repetition rate laser operation without the need for tremendously higher blower power, applicants also propose to replace a blade/dielectric electrode, e.g., an anode as originally designed and now implemented in certain laser products of the applicants assignee, Cymer, Inc., e.g., models 6X10 and 7000, with the anode extending in height above the adjacent fairings. This was done at least in part to ensure a properly attached discharge even after the anode had worn down after some use. But at higher rep rates up to and above 6 kHz applicants have discovered a flow penalty is paid for this protrusion into the gas flow. Applicants have also discovered that reefing electrodes that develop a natural reef from the reaction of lasing gas, e.g., fluorine with material in the electrode with exposure to the lasing medium in the lasing gas caused by high voltage discharge between the electrodes in the laser system or which are provided with an artificial reef there is very little or non-existent wear over electrode life. Therefore, according to aspects of an embodiment of the present invention applicants propose to, e.g., have the electrode, e.g., the anode height matched with the fairing height, or perhaps even slightly lower than the fairing height to allow for the reef to grow where the electrode and the type of laser system naturally grow reef coatings to allow the reef coating to extend essentially to the fairing 53, 51 height. For example, as illustrated in
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the aspects of embodiments of the present invention disclosed above are intended to be preferred embodiments only and not to limit the disclosure of the present invention(s) in any way and particularly not to a specific preferred embodiment alone. Many changes and modification can be made to the disclosed aspects of embodiments of the disclosed invention(s) that will be understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art. The appended claims are intended in scope and meaning to cover not only the disclosed aspects of embodiments of the present invention(s) but also such equivalents and other modifications and changes that would be apparent to those skilled in the art. In addition to changes and modifications to the disclosed and claimed aspects of embodiments of the present invention(s) noted above the others could be implemented.
While the particular aspects of embodiment(s) of the HIGH PULSE
REPETITION RATE GAS DISCHARGE LASER described and illustrated in this patent application in the detail required to satisfy 35 U.S.C. .sctn. 112 are fully capable of attaining any above-described purposes for, problems to be solved by or any other reasons for or objects of the aspects of an embodiment(s) above described, it is to be understood by those skilled in the art that the presently described aspects of the described embodiment(s) of the present invention are merely exemplary, illustrative and representative of the subject matter which is broadly contemplated by the present invention. The scope of the presently described and claimed aspects of embodiments fully encompasses other embodiments which may now be or may become obvious to those skilled in the art based on the teachings of the Specification. The scope of the present HIGH PULSE REPETITION RATE GAS DISCHARGE LASER is solely and completely limited by only the appended claims and nothing beyond the recitations of the appended claims. Reference to an element in such claims in the singular is not intended to mean nor shall it mean in interpreting such claim element “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more”. All structural and functional equivalents to any of the elements of the above-described aspects of an embodiment(s) that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the present claims. Any term used in the specification and/or in the claims and expressly given a meaning in the Specification and/or claims in the present application shall have that meaning, regardless of any dictionary or other commonly used meaning for such a term. It is not intended or necessary for a device or method discussed in the Specification as any aspect of an embodiment to address each and every problem sought to be solved by the aspects of embodiments disclosed in this application, for it to be encompassed by the present claims. No element, component, or method step in the present disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or method step is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element in the appended claims is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. .sctn. 112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited as a “step” instead of an “act”.
The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/169,203, entitled HIGH PULSE REPETITION RATE GAS DISCHARGE LASER, filed on Jun. 27, 2005, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,633,989, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2828775 | Rutherford | Apr 1958 | A |
3696307 | Beaulieu et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3828277 | Otto et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
4245194 | Fahlen et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4414488 | Hoffmann et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4546482 | Bagaglia et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4547886 | Kaminski et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4686682 | Haruta et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4703490 | Brumme et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4774714 | Javan | Sep 1988 | A |
4837773 | Wakata et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4876693 | Lucero et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4959840 | Akins et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5018161 | Akins et al. | May 1991 | A |
5023884 | Akins et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5025445 | Anderson et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5025446 | Kuizenga | Jun 1991 | A |
5070513 | Letardi | Dec 1991 | A |
5187716 | Haruta et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5189678 | Ball et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5247534 | Muller-Horsche | Sep 1993 | A |
5313481 | Cook et al. | May 1994 | A |
5315611 | Ball et al. | May 1994 | A |
5359620 | Akins | Oct 1994 | A |
5373523 | Fujimoto et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5448580 | Birx et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5471965 | Kapich | Dec 1995 | A |
5535233 | Mizoguchi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5557629 | Mizoguchi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5586134 | Das et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5763930 | Partlo | Jun 1998 | A |
5771258 | Morton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771259 | Dvorkin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5818865 | Watson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5852621 | Sandstrom | Dec 1998 | A |
5863017 | Larson et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5897847 | Jursich et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5953360 | Vitruk et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5978394 | Newman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982803 | Sukhman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991324 | Knowles et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6005879 | Sandstrom et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6016325 | Ness et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018537 | Hofmann et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6028880 | Carlesi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038055 | Hansch et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6067311 | Morton et al. | May 2000 | A |
6094448 | Fomenkov et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104735 | Webb | Aug 2000 | A |
6128323 | Myers et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151349 | Gong et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6164116 | Rice et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6192064 | Algots et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208674 | Webb et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208675 | Webb | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212211 | Azzola et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219368 | Govorkov | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6240117 | Gong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6290174 | Gioia | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314119 | Morton | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6317447 | Partlo et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330261 | Ishihara et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6414979 | Ujazdowski et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6466602 | Fleurov et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477193 | Oliver et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6535531 | Smith et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6549551 | Ness et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6567450 | Myers et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6570899 | Yabu et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6625191 | Knowles et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6654403 | Ujazdowski et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6690704 | Fallon et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6693939 | Klene et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6704339 | Lublin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6704340 | Ershov et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6810061 | Hori et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
7633989 | Gillespie et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20020154670 | Morton et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020191661 | Morton et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030012234 | Watson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031216 | Fallon et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030138019 | Rylov et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20060291517 | Gillespie et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Merriam Webster Online definition of “slant.” No Date. |
Nguyen, Thinh et al., “Diffusion Bonding—An Advanced Material Process for Aerospace Process for Aerospace Technology”, http://www.vacets.org/vtic97/ttnguyen.htm. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100054295 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11169203 | Jun 2005 | US |
Child | 12590307 | US |