HVMOS reliability evaluation using bulk resistances as indices

Abstract
A method of determining the reliability of a high-voltage PMOS (HVPMOS) device includes determining a bulk resistance of the HVPMOS device, and evaluating the reliability of the HVPMOS device based on the bulk resistance.
Description
BACKGROUND

In some of the existing reliability tests of high-voltage metal-oxide-semiconductor (HVMOS) devices, a plurality of sample HVMOS devices is formed on a wafer. The sample HVMOS devices may have different structures, for example, with different sizes and dimensions. Time dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB) tests are performed on the sample devices. Typically, the TDDB tests are performed by stressing the HVMOS devices with currents, and the tests may be performed at elevated temperatures. The tests may be performed until the sample devices fail. Accordingly, the tests are time-consuming. The TDDB test results are then analyzed to determine the reliability of the HVMOS devices.


Due to the long time needed to perform the TDDB tests, the tests are difficult to catch up with the product design cycle time. Furthermore, the existing TDDB tests do not support the establishments of design rules, and designers cannot use the results of the TDDB tests to guide the design process.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the embodiments, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIGS. 1 through 8 illustrate top views of high-voltage p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (HVPMOS) test structures in accordance with embodiments;



FIG. 9 illustrates a cross-sectional view of a HVPMOS device as shown in FIGS. 1 through 8;



FIG. 10 illustrates the various currents in the HVPMOS device as a function of drain voltages;



FIG. 11 illustrates bulk resistances Rb and current gains β as functions of active-region-to-guard-ring spacings; and



FIG. 12 illustrates a schematic top view of a chip comprising a plurality of HVPMOS devices and a HVNMOS device.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS

The making and using of the embodiments of the disclosure are discussed in detail below. It should be appreciated, however, that the embodiments provide many applicable inventive concepts that can be embodied in a wide variety of specific contexts. The specific embodiments discussed are merely illustrative, and do not limit the scope of the disclosure.


A design rule for guiding the design of high-voltage p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor (HVPMOS) devices is provided in accordance with an embodiment. A method for quickly evaluating reliability of the HVPMOS devices is provided, wherein the reliability is related to the time dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB) characteristics of the HVPMOS devices. Throughout the various views and illustrative embodiments, like reference numbers are used to designate like elements.



FIGS. 1 through 8 are top views of test structures in accordance with various embodiments. In each of FIGS. 1 through 8, guard ring 20 is formed adjacent HVPMOS devices 22. In FIG. 1, each of active regions 24 of HVPMOS devices 22 is encircled by, and separate from each other, by guard ring 20. In FIG. 2, a row of HVPMOS devices 22 is encircled by guard ring 20, and different rows of HVPMOS devices 22 are separated from each other by guard ring 20. Active regions 24 in a same row, however, are not separated from each other by guard ring 20. In FIG. 3, a plurality of rows (such as two rows) of HVPMOS devices 22 is encircled by the same guard ring 20, and different rows of active regions 24 are not separated from each other by guard ring 20. Instead, two or more rows of active regions 24 are separated from each other by isolation regions 28, which may be shallow trench isolation (STI) regions.



FIGS. 4 through 7 illustrate guard rings 20 that are adjacent to, and extend to one side, two sides, or three sides of HVPMOS devices 22. The illustrated guard rings 20 may, or may not, form a ring encircling HVPMOS device(s) 22 in the respective top views. In FIG. 4, guard ring 20 extends along a side of HVPMOS device 22. In FIG. 5, guard ring 20 extends along a side of a plurality of HVPMOS devices 22. In FIG. 6, guard ring 20 extends along two sides of HVPMOS device 22. In FIG. 7, guard ring 20 extends along two sides of a plurality of HVPMOS devices 22, wherein the two sides of guard ring 20 may be perpendicular to each other. In FIG. 8, guard ring 20 extends along three sides of HVPMOS device 22. In alternative embodiments (not shown), guard ring 20 may extend along three sides of a plurality of HVPMOS devices 22.


In FIGS. 1 through 8, one or a plurality of gate electrodes 30, which may be polysilicon lines, may be formed over each of active regions 24. Gate electrodes 30 and the respective underlying active regions 24 thus form HVPMOS devices 22, wherein the HVPMOS devices 22 formed of different gate electrodes 30, and share a same active region 24, may be connected in parallel to form a large HVPMOS device.



FIG. 9 illustrates a cross-sectional view of a portion of one of HVPMOS devices 22 as shown in FIGS. 1 through 8. HVPMOS device 22 is formed over n-well region 36, which is further formed over a substrate (of p-type, for example, not shown). Source region 32 and drain region 34 may be formed of heavily doped p-type regions comprising p-type impurities. Guard ring 20 may be heavily or moderately doped n-type regions, which contact the underlying n-well region 36. In the described embodiments, “heavily doped” means an impurity concentration greater than about 1019/cm3. Similarly, “moderately doped” may mean an impurity concentration between about 1017/cm3 and about 1019/cm3. One skilled in the art will recognize, however, that the terms “heavily doped” and “moderately doped” are terms of art that depend upon the specific device type, technology generation, minimum feature size, and the like. It is intended, therefore, that these terms be interpreted in light of the technology being evaluated and not be limited to the described embodiments. Further, lightly doped drain extension region 38, which has a significantly lower p-type impurity concentration than source/drain regions 32 and 34, may be formed to laterally space drain region 34 from gate electrode 30, so that the breakdown voltage of HVPMOS device 22 is increased to a desirable value. Alternatively, instead of forming drain extension region 38, an STI region (not shown, similar to STI region as in FIGS. 1 through 8) is formed where drain extension region 38 is located. It is noted that in FIG. 9, guard ring 20 is shown as in the same vertical plane as source region 32 and drain region 34 of HVPMOS device 22, while it may not be in the same vertical plane in reality. Parasitic lateral bipolar junction transistor (BJT) 40 is formed, with source region 32, n-well region 36, and drain region 34 acting as the emitter, base, and collector, respectively, of lateral BJT 40.


During the operation of HVPMOS device 22, drain voltage Vd may be a high voltage, for example, 5V or higher. Source region 32 and gate electrode 30 may be applied with a low voltage such as 0V or other low voltages. In an exemplary embodiment, HVPMOS device 22 is a 5V HVPMOS device designed to be operated under drain voltage up to 5 volts without being damaged. When gate voltage Vg and source voltage Vs are 0V, with the increase in drain voltage Vd to 5V and higher, several operation stages may occur, wherein FIG. 10 illustrates the respective currents in different operation stages.


Referring to FIG. 10, lines 50, 52, 54, and 56 are currents Is, Ib, Id, and Ig, respectively, which currents are obtained with drain voltage Vd increasing from 0V to 13V. Current Is is the source current received by source region 32 (FIG. 9). Current Ib is the bulk current flowing into guard ring 20. Current Id is the drain current of drain region 34. Current Ig is the gate current of gate electrode 30. As shown in FIG. 9, bulk current Ib forms a portion of drain current Id.


Referring again to FIG. 10, in a first stage of the operation of HVPMOS device 22, drain voltage Vd is smaller than about 11V. With the increase in drain voltage Vd, drain current Id increases gradually and not abruptly. During the first stage, bulk current Ib dominates drain current Id. Lateral BJT 40 (FIG. 9) is not turned on, and there is substantially no source current Is. During a second stage of the operation, which stage ranges from Vd equal to about 11.1 volts to about 12.2 volts, lateral BJT 40 is turned on, and a soft breakdown occurs to HVPMOS device 22. During the second stage, source current Is (line 50) increases significantly, and becomes a significant portion of drain current Id. During a third stage of the operation, in which drain voltage Vd is greater than about 12.2V, source current Is (line) 50 increases significantly to substantially equal to bulk current Ib (line 52). As shown in FIG. 10, source current Is may also be greater than bulk current Ib. Since the current gain β of lateral BJT 40 is equal to Is/Ib, current gain β may be greater than 1. Accordingly, a positive feedback is established for the operation of LBJT 40 (FIG. 9), and gate current Ig (line 56) significantly increases. Therefore, the breakdown of the gate oxide of HVPMOS device 22 may eventually cause the damage of HVPMOS device 22.


Experiments results were performed on a plurality of test structures shown in FIGS. 1 through 8. The plurality of test structures have different combinations of spacings/distances A, B, C, G1, and G2, as shown in FIGS. 1 through 8. Active-region-to-guard-ring spacing A is the distance from an outer edge (the edge facing guard ring 20) of active region 24 to the nearest guard ring 20. Inner-GR-to-GR-spacing C (FIG. 2) is the distance between opposite inner sidewalls (of guard ring 20) that face each other. Active-region-spacing B (FIG. 3) is the spacing of two neighboring active regions 24 in two neighboring rows, wherein the two neighboring rows of active regions 24 are not separated from each other by guard ring 20. In the two-row test structures as shown in FIG. 3, the widths of active regions 24 are denoted as G1 and G2. Active-region-to-guard-ring spacing A, active-region-spacing B, inner-GR-to-GR-spacing C, and widths G1 and G2 are measured in the channel width direction of the respective HVPMOS device 22, which are the Y directions in FIGS. 1 through 8.


The experiment results revealed that, contrary to the conventional understanding that spacing A does not affect the respective adjacent HVPMOS devices, active-region-to-guard-ring spacing A has a significant effect on the reliability of the respective adjacent HVPMOS devices. With the increase in active-region-to-guard-ring spacing A (as shown by an arrow in FIG. 9), current gain β of lateral BJT 40 (FIG. 9) increases. In some of the sample devices, current gain β may saturate at about 3 when active-region-to-guard-ring spacing A is increased to about 80 μm. In some embodiments, substantially all sample devices with active-region-to-guard-ring spacing A greater than about 50 μm fail in the TDDB tests. When current gain β is greater than 1, the respective HVPMOS 22 is found to be not reliable, and is very likely to be damaged. Experiment results also revealed that when active-region-to-guard-ring spacing A is smaller than about 2 μm, current gain β is reduced to lower than 1, while when active-region-to-guard-ring spacing A is 5 μm, the current gain 0 is already greater than 1. This means that when spacing A is smaller than about 2 μm, the respective HVPMOS device 22 is reliable. Accordingly, in the embodiments, a design rule may be set so that all HVPMOS devices in a same chip and having guard rings nearby are designed to have the respective active-region-to-guard-ring spacings A smaller than about 2 μm.


Through experiments, it is also found that the reliability of HVPMOS devices 22 is also related to spacings B, C, G1, and G2 (FIGS. 1 through 8), and HVPMOS devices 22 are reliable when spacing B is smaller than about 6 μm, spacing C is smaller than about 30 μm, and spacings G1 and G2 are smaller than about 10 μm. HVPMOS devices 22 are more reliable if spacings A, B, C, G1, and G2 are all less than about 2 μm, 6 μm, 30 μm, 10 μm, and 10 μm, respectively. These spacing requirements regarding spacings A, B, C, G1, and G2 may be set as design rules to guide the design of HVPMOS devices.



FIG. 12 illustrates a schematic view of chip 60, which includes first HVPMOS device 22, second HVPMOS device 122, and HVNMOS device 126. It is found that the reliability of HVNMOS device 126 is not affected by spacings A′ and C′, which are defined essentially the same as the respective spaces A and C as shown in FIGS. 1 through 8. Accordingly, spacings A′ and C′ of HVNMOS device 126 may be greater than about 2 μm and 30 μm, respectively, without the reliability problem. Spacing A′ may also be greater than about 50 μm or about 80 μm without the reliability problem. Each of HVPMOS devices 22 and 122 may be a digital device, an analog device, a radio-frequency (RF) device, or the like. Regardless of the types, HVPMOS devices 22 and 124 need to have spacings following the design rules set according to the embodiments. HVPMOS devices 22 and 122 may also be the test devices as shown in FIGS. 1 through 8. In some embodiments, in order to be able to evaluate the characteristics of HVPMOS devices without causing them to pre-maturely fail, the spacings A, B, C, G1, and G2 of all, or some but not all, test structures in the same chip also need to follow the above-described design rules.


Referring back to FIG. 9 again, source region 32 and guard ring 20 has a voltage difference referred to as source-to-bulk voltage Vsb. The value Vsb/Ib (with Ib being bulk current Ib as shown in FIG. 9) defines a resistance value referred to as bulk resistance Rb. Assuming bulk resistance Rb is the value of Vsb/Ib when source-to-bulk voltage Vsb is equal to about 0.7V (or in the range between about 0.7V and about 0.8V), bulk resistance Rb and active-region-to-guard-ring spacing A has the relationship shown in FIG. 11. Alternatively, if bulk resistance Rb is defined as proportional to, but not equal to, Vsb/Ib, the relationship also holds true.


In FIG. 11, the left Y axis is the bulk resistance Rb, and corresponds to the points shown as diamonds. The right Y axis is the current gain β, and corresponds to the points shown as squares. The X axis is the active-region-to-guard-ring spacing A. As shown in FIG. 11, bulk resistance Rb and current gain β have the same trend, wherein both increase in values with the increase of active-region-to-guard-ring spacing A. FIG. 11 shows that there is a strong correlation between bulk resistance Rb and current gain β.


Since current gain β is directly related to the reliability of the respective HVPMOS devices, bulk resistance Rb may also be used as an indicator of the reliability of the respective HVPMOS devices. Accordingly, in accordance with embodiments, the evaluation of the reliability of HVPMOS devices includes forming the HVPMOS devices on silicon substrates, and measuring and calculating the bulk resistances Rb of the HVPMOS devices to determine the reliability of the respective HVPMOS devices. It is realized that the bulk resistance Rb may be affected by various factors such as the doping concentration of n-well region 36 in FIG. 9. Accordingly, a reference bulk resistance Rbref may be found from reference sample HVPMOS devices, which reference bulk resistance Rbref corresponds to current gain β of 1. The HVPMOS device with the current gain β equal to 1 is referred to as a reference HVPMOS device hereinafter.


In an example of determining reference bulk resistance Rbref, a plurality of HVPMOS devices having different spacings A may be formed on a wafer, and the current gains β of these HVPMOS devices may be measured. The spacings A of the HVPMOS devices may range from smaller than 1 μm to about 50 μm, for example, to ensure that among these HVPMOS devices, there is one reference HVPMOS device having current gain β substantially equal to 1. By measuring source currents Is and bulk currents Ib, current gains β of the HVPMOS devices may be found, and the reference HVPMOS device may be chosen. The bulk resistance of the reference HVPMOS device is measured and calculated to find reference bulk resistance Rbref.


In the embodiments, the HVPMOS devices with the bulk resistance Rb values greater than reference bulk resistance Rbref (with a reasonable margin) are determined as not reliable, while the HVPMOS devices with the bulk resistance Rb values smaller than reference bulk resistance Rbref (with a reasonable margin) may be determined as reliable. Alternatively, instead of forming the HVPMOS devices and measuring and calculating the bulk resistances Rb, simulations may be performed to find out the bulk resistances Rb of HVPMOS devices, and the reliability of the HVPMOS devices may be evaluated based on the simulated bulk resistance Rb, for example, by comparing them with reference bulk resistance Rbref, which may be simulated or measured from HVPMOS devices in physical silicon chips. Using bulk resistances Rb to evaluate the reliability of HVPMOS devices takes much less cycle time than the conventional methods of TDDB performance evaluation.


Furthermore, the evaluation of the reliability of HVPMOS devices comprises measuring spacings A, B, C, G1, and G2 (FIGS. 1 through 8) of the HVPMOS devices, wherein if any of the HVPMOS devices have the respective spacings greater than what is specified by the design rules in accordance with the embodiment shown in FIGS. 1 through 8, it may be determined that the respective HVPMOS devices are not reliable.


By using the embodiments, the adverse effects of guard ring to the reliability of HVPMOS devices are substantially eliminated. Furthermore, the bulk resistance values may be used as criteria to evaluate the reliability of HVPMOS devices, hence the reliability evaluation may be performed much faster than using conventional methods.


In accordance with embodiments, a method of determining the reliability of a HVPMOS device includes determining a bulk resistance of the HVPMOS device, and evaluating the reliability of the HVPMOS device based on the bulk resistance.


In accordance with other embodiments, a method includes determining a reference bulk resistance of a reference HVPMOS device, wherein a parasitic lateral BJT of the reference HVPMOS device has a current gain equal to about 1. The lateral BJT has a source, a drain, and a well region of the reference HVPMOS device as an emitter, a collector, and a base, respectively. Bulk resistances of a plurality of HVPMOS devices on a chip are determined. The reliability of the plurality of HVPMOS devices are determined by comparing the bulk resistances with the reference bulk resistance.


In accordance with yet other embodiments, a device includes a semiconductor chip, wherein all HVPMOS devices in the semiconductor chip and including adjacent guard rings have active-region-to-guard-ring spacings smaller than about 2 μm. The active-region-to-guard-ring spacings are distances between outer edges of active regions of the respective HVPMOS devices and corresponding nearest n-type guard rings. The active-region-to-guard-ring spacings are measured in channel width directions of the respective HVPMOS devices.


Although the embodiments and their advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the embodiments as defined by the appended claims. Moreover, the scope of the present application is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments of the process, machine, manufacture, and composition of matter, means, methods and steps described in the specification. As one of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate from the disclosure, processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps, presently existing or later to be developed, that perform substantially the same function or achieve substantially the same result as the corresponding embodiments described herein may be utilized according to the disclosure. Accordingly, the appended claims are intended to include within their scope such processes, machines, manufacture, compositions of matter, means, methods, or steps. In addition, each claim constitutes a separate embodiment, and the combination of various claims and embodiments are within the scope of the disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A structure comprising: a semiconductor substrate;a plurality of P-type Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (PMOS) devices formed at a surface of the semiconductor substrate, wherein the plurality of PMOS devices comprise a row of PMOS devices aligned as a row, and wherein the row of PMOS devices are interconnected in parallel to act as a single PMOS device; andan n-type guard region adjacent to the plurality of PMOS devices, wherein the n-type guard region comprises portions on two sides of the row, and wherein the n-type guard region comprises: a first portion on a first side of the plurality of PMOS devices, wherein the first portion is elongated and has a first lengthwise direction parallel to a row direction of the row.
  • 2. The structure of claim 1, wherein the plurality of PMOS devices form an array comprising a plurality of rows and a plurality of columns, and the plurality of rows comprise the row.
  • 3. The structure of claim 1, wherein the row has a first end and a second end, and wherein the first portion of the n-type guard region extends beyond both of the first end and the second end of the row.
  • 4. The structure of claim 1, wherein the n-type guard region further comprises: a second portion joined to the first portion, wherein a second lengthwise direction of the second portion is perpendicular to the first lengthwise direction.
  • 5. The structure of claim 4, wherein the n-type guard region terminates at a first end of the first portion and a second end of the second portion.
  • 6. The structure of claim 1, wherein the plurality of PMOS devices form an array comprising a plurality of rows and a plurality of columns, and wherein all PMOS devices in the array are interconnected in parallel to form the single PMOS device.
  • 7. The structure of claim 1, wherein the plurality of PMOS devices are physically separated from each other, and each of the plurality of PMOS devices comprises a plurality of gate electrodes.
  • 8. The structure of claim 1, wherein the plurality of PMOS devices are high-voltage PMOS devices, with each of the high-voltage PMOS devices comprising: a source region and a drain region extending into the semiconductor substrate;a gate electrode over the semiconductor substrate and between the source region and the drain region; anda lightly-doped drain extension region extending into the semiconductor substrate, wherein the lightly-doped drain extension region is laterally between the gate electrode and the drain region.
  • 9. The structure of claim 1, wherein the plurality of PMOS devices are high-voltage PMOS devices, with each of the high-voltage PMOS devices comprising: a source region and a drain region extending into the semiconductor substrate;a gate electrode over the semiconductor substrate and between the source region and the drain region; anda dielectric isolation region extending into the semiconductor substrate, wherein the dielectric isolation region is laterally between the gate electrode and the drain region.
  • 10. The structure of claim 1, wherein a first active-region-to-guard-ring spacing between the n-type guard region and a respective nearest PMOS device in the plurality of PMOS devices is smaller than about 2 μm.
  • 11. The structure of claim 10, further comprising: a High-Voltage N-type Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (HVNMOS) device; anda second n-type guard ring encircling the HVNMOS device, wherein a second active-region-to-guard-ring spacing of the HVNMOS device from the second n-type guard ring is greater than the first active-region-to-guard-ring spacing.
  • 12. The structure of claim 11, wherein a ratio of the second active-region-to-guard-ring spacing to the first active-region-to-guard-ring spacing is greater than about 25.
  • 13. A structure comprising: a semiconductor substrate;a heavily doped semiconductor region extending into the semiconductor substrate;a plurality of active regions forming an array comprising a plurality of rows and a plurality of columns, wherein the heavily doped semiconductor region partially surrounds the array, and comprises two portions extending to a first side and a second side of the array, and wherein each of the two portions is longer than a respective length and a respective width of the array; anda plurality of P-type Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (PMOS) devices formed based on the plurality of active regions.
  • 14. The structure of claim 13, wherein the plurality of PMOS devices are electrically interconnected to each other in parallel to function as a single PMOS device.
  • 15. The structure of claim 13, wherein each of the two portions extends beyond opposite ends of the array.
  • 16. The structure of claim 13, wherein the heavily doped semiconductor region is free from portions on a third side and a fourth side of the plurality of active regions, wherein the first side and the third side are opposite sides of the array, and wherein the second side and the fourth side are opposite sides of the array.
  • 17. A structure comprising: a semiconductor substrate;a heavily doped semiconductor region extending into the semiconductor substrate, wherein the heavily doped semiconductor region is of n-type, and wherein the heavily doped semiconductor region forms a partial guard ring;an active region having a first spacing from a nearest first portion of the partial guard ring, and a second spacing from a nearest second portion of the partial guard ring, wherein both of the first spacing and the second spacing are smaller than about 2 μm, and wherein the partial guard ring partially surrounds the active region from at least two sides of the active region; anda P-type Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (PMOS) device formed based on the active region.
  • 18. The structure of claim 17, wherein the heavily doped semiconductor region comprises two portions on two sides of the active region, and wherein the two portions form an L-shape.
  • 19. The structure of claim 17, wherein the heavily doped semiconductor region comprises three portions on three sides of the active region, and wherein the three portions form a U-shape.
  • 20. The structure of claim 17, comprising: a plurality of active regions that comprise the active region; anda plurality of PMOS devices formed based on the plurality of active regions, wherein the plurality of PMOS devices comprise the PMOS device, and wherein the plurality of PMOS devices are electrically interconnected in parallel to form a single high-voltage PMOS device.
PRIORITY CLAIM AND CROSS-REFERENCE

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/072,251, entitled “HVMOS Reliability Evaluation using Bulk Resistances as Indices,” and filed Oct. 16, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/599,929, entitled “HVMOS Reliability Evaluation using Bulk Resistances as Indices,” filed on Oct. 11, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,833,082 issued Nov. 10, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/995,778, entitled “HVMOS Reliability Evaluation using Bulk Resistances as Indices,” filed on Jun. 1, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,504,896 issued Dec. 10, 2019, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/959,393, entitled “HVMOS Reliability Evaluation using Bulk Resistances as Indices,” filed on Dec. 4, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,991,260 issued Jun. 5, 2018, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/111,730, entitled “HVMOS Reliability Evaluation using Bulk Resistances as Indices,” filed on May 19, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,209,098 issued Dec. 8, 2015, which applications are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (102)
Number Name Date Kind
3487301 Gardner et al. Dec 1969 A
4199776 Ahmed Apr 1980 A
4264941 London Apr 1981 A
5432370 Kitamura et al. Jul 1995 A
5548147 Mei Aug 1996 A
5633202 Brigham et al. May 1997 A
5714784 Ker et al. Feb 1998 A
5998846 Jan et al. Dec 1999 A
6046494 Brigham et al. Apr 2000 A
6072215 Kawaji et al. Jun 2000 A
6469354 Hirata Oct 2002 B1
6534867 Kamiya et al. Mar 2003 B1
6563908 Enck, Jr. May 2003 B1
6617632 Taniguchi et al. Sep 2003 B2
6686233 Soderbarg et al. Feb 2004 B2
6740939 Sayama et al. May 2004 B2
6764909 Salling et al. Jul 2004 B2
6833568 Duvvury et al. Dec 2004 B2
6858901 Ker et al. Feb 2005 B2
6879007 Takamura Apr 2005 B2
6902258 Chen et al. Jun 2005 B2
6909149 Russ et al. Jun 2005 B2
6924693 Black Aug 2005 B1
7067881 Matsumoto et al. Jun 2006 B2
7076226 Bult et al. Jul 2006 B2
7112848 Lee Sep 2006 B2
7214992 Strachan et al. May 2007 B1
7220637 Ota et al. May 2007 B2
7391200 Khanna et al. Jun 2008 B1
7465972 Wang et al. Dec 2008 B2
7480879 Checka et al. Jan 2009 B2
7525155 Chen et al. Apr 2009 B2
7531402 Ota et al. May 2009 B2
7563663 Ota et al. Jul 2009 B2
7588946 Tso et al. Sep 2009 B2
7588978 Kim Sep 2009 B2
7612364 Chuang et al. Nov 2009 B2
7655526 Ko Feb 2010 B2
7687363 Ko Mar 2010 B2
7843251 Ji Nov 2010 B2
8492873 Tan Jul 2013 B1
10504896 Huang et al. Dec 2019 B2
11482459 Chen Oct 2022 B2
20020055220 Soderbarg et al. May 2002 A1
20020074569 Taniguchi et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020096716 Salling et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020130332 Cho et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020158299 Castro Simas et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020164858 Sayama et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030059983 Ota et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030098509 Kamiya et al. May 2003 A1
20030207543 Salling et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040026750 Takamura Feb 2004 A1
20040227185 Matsumoto et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050041070 Chen et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050164439 Takamura Jul 2005 A1
20050275021 Matsumoto et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050275032 Kodama et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060202285 Kamiya et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060223269 Honma Oct 2006 A1
20060255369 Kim et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060273387 Hisanaga Dec 2006 A1
20070007545 Salcedo et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070067747 Checka et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070115606 DeVries et al. May 2007 A1
20070132008 Kang et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070148844 Ko Jun 2007 A1
20070161249 Ko Jul 2007 A1
20070202634 Ota et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080001189 Jong et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080017948 Huang et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080042197 Yamagishi et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080061358 Choi Mar 2008 A1
20080064192 Kim Mar 2008 A1
20080073721 Fuchigami Mar 2008 A1
20080073745 Tang et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080157197 Hsieh et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080207578 Chu et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080309365 Liao et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090008711 Wei et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090010072 Tanaka et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090130812 Huang et al. May 2009 A1
20090140343 Feilchenfeld et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090230457 Lee et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090261426 Feilchenfeld et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100052057 Chung et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100097125 Ji Apr 2010 A1
20100219504 Chen et al. Sep 2010 A1
20110057262 Ma et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110080454 Ghozeil et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110163375 Chu et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110193131 Blanchard et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110269283 Tien et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120026027 Steensgaard-Madsen Feb 2012 A1
20120049282 Chen et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120126319 Feilchenfeld et al. May 2012 A1
20120212279 Chen et al. Aug 2012 A1
20130161723 Yao et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130313548 Yano et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140113418 Ota et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140159172 Hu Jun 2014 A1
20140203242 Kozaki Jul 2014 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (6)
Entry
Appels, J.A., et al., “High-Voltage Thin Layer Devices (RESURF Devices)”, IEDM Tech. Dig., Dec. 3-5, 1979 IEEE, 7 pgs.
Blackburn, D.L., “Turn-Off Failure of Power MOSFETs,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. PE-2, No. 2, Apr. 1987, pp. 136-142.
Hower, P.L., et al., “Avalanche Injection and Second Breakdown in Transistors,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-17, No. 4, Apr. 1970, pp. 320-335.
Kawamoto, K., et al., “A No-Snapback LDMOSFET with Automotive ESD Endurance”, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 49, No. 11, Nov. 2002, pp. 2047-2053.
Nezar, A., “Breakdown Voltage in LDMOS Transistors Using Internal Field Rings,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 38, No. 7, Jul. 1991, pp. 1676-1680.
Zheng, G., “The Robustness Study of Power Semiconductor Devices,” Aug. 1, 1992, 6 pgs. (No English translation available.).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220367295 A1 Nov 2022 US
Divisions (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14959393 Dec 2015 US
Child 15995778 US
Parent 13111730 May 2011 US
Child 14959393 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 17072251 Oct 2020 US
Child 17815354 US
Parent 16599929 Oct 2019 US
Child 17072251 US
Parent 15995778 Jun 2018 US
Child 16599929 US