1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to plasma processing systems and methods, and in particular relates to inductively coupled high-density plasma sources suitable for use in a plasma processing system.
2. Background of the Invention
Ionized gas or “plasma” may be used during processing and fabrication of semiconductor devices, flat panel displays and other products requiring etching or deposition (“plasma processing”) of materials. Plasma may be used to etch or remove material from semiconductor integrated circuit wafers, or sputter or deposit material onto a semiconducting, conducting or insulating surface. Creating a plasma for use in manufacturing or fabrication processes typically is done by introducing a low-pressure process gas into a chamber surrounding a workpiece, such as an integrated circuit (IC) wafer, that resides on a workpiece support member, more commonly referred to as a “chuck.” The molecules of the low-pressure gas in the chamber are ionized into a plasma by a plasma source after the gas molecules enter the chamber. The plasma then flows over and interacts with the workpiece, which may be biased by providing RF power to the chuck supporting the workpiece.
To be most effective in plasma processing, the plasma preferably has a high-density (measured as the number of electrons or ions per cubic centimeter) and is uniform. High-density plasma processing can increase throughput and therefore increase production in semiconductor manufacturing. Furthermore, the plasma preferably has a small volume (thin and flat) so that the radicals in the process system have a short residence time. A short radical residence time permits control of the proper dissociation of radicals in the plasma volume for achieving high rate, selective etch in high aspect ratio etch features.
One type of plasma source that has been developed and commonly used is a parallel-plate, capacitively coupled plasma (CCP) source. Such a source uses radio-frequency (RF) power sources to generate the plasma through gas discharge. These power sources typically operate at 13.56 MHz, but can operate at other frequencies. Parallel-plate plasma sources usually have small gap spacing and small plasma volume. However, they typically generate low-density plasmas of less than 1011 ions/cc which limits the etch rate.
Another type of plasma source is an electron cyclotron resonance (“ECR”) source, which uses microwave (2.45 GHz) energy sources to generate a plasma having relatively high densities, on the order of 1011-1012 ions/cc and greater. Although an ECR source provides a relatively high plasma density and good control of ion energy, it requires in the plasma source a significant magnetic field, which is normally undesirable in the processing reactor. In addition, difficulties arise in generating uniform plasmas over large wafer areas.
A third type of plasma source is an inductively coupled plasma (ICP) source, which uses an inductively coupled radio-frequency power to generate the plasma This type of plasma source provides for a relatively high plasma density (1012 ions/cc or greater) and operates with a radio-frequency source (typically 13.56 MHz). However, a shortcoming of conventional inductively coupled plasma sources is a non-uniform plasma density in the region above the substrate. The plasma volume is also very large, resulting in very long residence times for the radicals, which limits the etch rate.
A fourth type of plasma source is the Helicon plasma source, which uses a relatively constant volume magnetic field. It is capable of generating a very high density (1013 ions/cc) and operates with a radio-frequency source (typically 2-30 MHz). The Helicon source requires propagation and damping of the low frequency whistler wave in a system with minimum length greater then one half of the propagating wavelength. In short systems, the plasma generating efficiency is usually reduced drastically.
For those prior art systems capable of producing a high-density plasma (in excess of 1012 ions/cc), efficiency is generally sacrificed in producing plasma in a small volume. This inefficiency makes high-density plasma processing a costly proposition for manufacturing purposes.
The present invention relates generally to plasma processing systems and methods, and in particular relates to an inductively coupled high-density plasma source suitable for use in a plasma processing system.
A first aspect of the present invention is a high-density plasma source that includes an annular insulating body having an upper surface, a lower surface, a cylindrical inner surface and a first central axis. An annular cavity is formed within the insulating body having a second central axis that coincides with the first central axis. A single inductor coil that serves as an antenna is arranged within the annular cavity and is operable to generate a first magnetic field within a plasma duct interior region and inductively couple to the plasma formed therein when the annular body is arranged around a portion of the plasma duct. A grounded conductive housing surrounds the annular insulating body, and an electrostatic shield is arranged adjacent the insulating body inner surface and is grounded to the conductive housing. A T-match network is in electrical communication with the inductor coil. The T-match network includes first and second variable capacitors that are tunable to provide for efficient transfer of RF power from the inductor coil antenna to the plasma.
In a second aspect of the present invention, the above-described plasma source includes a first plurality of spaced apart magnets arranged in a first concentric magnet ring adjacent the insulating body upper surface, and a second plurality of spaced apart magnets arranged in a second concentric magnet ring adjacent the insulating body lower surface.
A third aspect of the invention is a plasma reactor system for processing a workpiece. The system comprises a plasma reactor chamber having a central axis, an upper wall and sidewalls surrounding a first interior region capable of supporting a plasma. At least one plasma duct is attached to the upper wall and/or to the sidewall of the reactor chamber. The plasma ducts each have duct sidewalls that enclose second interior regions that are in communication with the plasma reactor chamber interior region. Plasma sources, as described briefly immediately above and in more detail below, surround a portion of each plasma duct, and define plasma generation regions within each second region. A chuck is arranged opposite the upper wall and supports a workpiece to be processed.
A fourth aspect of the invention is a method of forming a high-density plasma in an interior region of a plasma chamber. The method includes the steps of injecting plasma gas into a plasma generation region of a plasma duct that is in communication with the chamber interior region. The next step involves providing RF power through a T-match network to a single annular inductor coil surrounding the plasma generation region, thereby generating a first magnetic field within the plasma generation region. The next step includes measuring an amount of reflected power reflected from the inductor coil passing back through the T-match network. The last step involves adjusting the capacitance of the T-match network so as to minimize the amount of reflected power.
As the plasma uniformity requirements are more critical for still larger wafer size, it is desirable to use a plurality of smaller plasma sources, with individual plasma density control to form a high-density plasma uniformly distributed over a large region above the substrate.
The present invention relates generally to plasma processing systems and methods, and in particular relates to inductively coupled high-density plasma sources suitable for use in a plasma processing system.
With reference now to
Residing in interior region 30 adjacent lower wall 26 is a workpiece holder or “chuck” 44 having an upper surface 46 capable of supporting a workpiece W to be plasma processed. Workpiece W has an upper surface WS. The size of chamber 20 depends on the size of the particular workpieces W to be processed, as the chamber must be large enough so that the plasma generated will cover the entire portion of the workpiece. For example, if workpiece W is an eight-inch semiconductor wafer, the plasma generated within chamber 20 must have a large enough diameter (e.g. over 6 inches) to uniformly cover the full diameter of the semiconductor wafer.
Attached to upper wall 24 of chamber 20 and aligned with central axis A is a cylindrical duct 60 having an outer wall 64 and an upper wall 68 enclosing an interior region 72. The latter is in communication with interior region 30 via an aperture 78 formed in plasma chamber upper wall 24. Plasma duct upper wall 68 includes a gas inlet port 84 to which can be connected a gas source. Plasma duct 60 is preferably quartz (e.g., a quartz tube) or similar non-reactive material, such as glass or a ceramic material such as sapphire, or alumina, suitable for serving as a conduit for plasma to enter interior region 30 of chamber 20. Surrounding a portion of plasma duct 60 is electrostatically shielded radio frequency (ESRF) antenna 90, discussed in greater detail below. Duct 60 and ESRF antenna 90 constitute part of a plasma source 100 of the present invention, discussed in greater detail below.
With continuing reference to
System 10 also includes a vacuum system 120 in pneumatic communication with chamber interior region 30 via a vacuum line 124 connected to a vacuum port 130 located in lower wall 26. A vacuum can be drawn by a variety of vacuum systems, the particular system depending on the desired pressure in interior region 30. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, vacuum system 120 includes a turbomolecular pump and an electro-mechanical gate valve (not shown) between the pump and chamber 20 that is capable of being remotely operated via an electrical signal from a controller. Vacuum system 120 and gas supply system 110 together are capable of reducing the pressure in chamber 20 to within the range of approximately 1 mTorr to 1 Torr, depending on the application.
System 10 further includes a workpiece load chamber 140 having a sealable door 144, attached to plasma chamber 20 near chuck 44. Chamber 140 is in communication with interior region 30 through an aperture 150 in wall 22. Door 144 is sized to allow a workpiece W to be placed into workpiece load chamber 140. Also included is a workpiece handling system 156 in operable communication with load chamber 140 and chuck 144 for transporting workpieces W to and from the chuck through the load chamber.
Also included in system 10 is a cooling system 160 fluidly connected, via cooling in-line 162 and cooling out-line 164, to the plasma source 100, for cooling the plasma source during the plasma generation process. Cooling system 160 is discussed in greater detail below.
Also connected to the plasma source 100 via a power line 180 is a RF power supply 182 for providing RF power to the plasma source. A match network 186 is provided between RF power supply 182 and ESRF antenna 90 for providing an impedance match to the plasma, as described further below. A power meter 188 capable of measuring forward and reflected power is arranged between RF power supply 182 and match network 186, for measuring the amount of RF power provided to and reflected from plasma source 100.
System 10 may also include a chuck RF power source 190 in electrical communication with chuck 44 for biasing the chuck so that ionized gas may be drawn toward workpiece W during plasma processing.
System 10 further includes a main control system 210 electrically connected to chuck RF power supply 190, plasma source RF power supply 182, cooling system 160, workpiece handling system 156, vacuum system 120, gas supply system 110 and gas distribution system 115. Control system 210 controls and coordinates the operation of the above-mentioned systems through respective electrical signals.
With continuing reference to
The uniformity of the expanding plasma in the region of workpiece W is often limited to the workpiece's central region for larger workpieces. Accordingly, as shown in
The Compact Plasma Source
With reference now to
Plasma source 100 comprises an annular block 300 of insulating material having an inner surface 304, an outer surface 306 and an axis of rotation A′ that is aligned with central axis A of chamber 20 when the plasma source is incorporated into system 10. Annular block 300 is preferably made of TEFLON® or like non-conducting material, and is preferably formed from two separate blocks that are pieced together in the middle. Within block 300 is formed an annular inductor coil channel 316 having A′ as its axis of rotation. Further included within block 300 are one or more coolant channels 324 connected to inductor coil channel 316 and that extend toward axis A′.
Arranged within inductor coil channel 316 and mechanically constrained therein is an inductor coil 340 that constitutes a single loop antenna, identified above in
With reference now also to
Plasma source 100 further includes a housing 400 having an upper surface 404 and a lower surface 406 that surrounds block 300. Housing 400 is preferably made of a conductor, such as metal (e.g., copper), so that the housing can be grounded. Electrostatic shield 360 is electrically connected to housing 400 at its upper and lower edges so that the electrostatic shield is also grounded. Housing 400 may include seals 416 (e.g., O-rings) on upper surface 404 and/or lower surface 406 so that other apparatus can be mounted to the housing in a sealed manner.
The Magnets for the Plasma Source
With reference now also to
With reference now to
With reference to
With reference now to
With reference now to
The illustrated dipole configuration has magnetic field lines B3 that extend primarily across a transverse plane above and/or below plasma generation region 72′. Such a magnetic field orientation provides for electron confinement within plasma generation region 72′, while not strongly confining the heavier ions to this region. The magnetic field orientation in upper magnet ring 422 results in magnetic field lines B3 that can isolate plasma generation region 72′ from gas inflow from gas inlet port 84 or process reactor effluent inlet flow (not shown). Likewise, the magnetic field orientation in lower magnet ring 424 may be utilized to isolate plasma generation region 72′ from components (i.e. vacuum pumps) downstream of the plasma generation region. Alternatively, both upper and lower magnet rings 422 and 424 may be utilized in combination to isolate plasma generation region 72′ entirely. Electrons from plasma source region 72′ can only diffuse (via electron-neutral collisions) into interior region 30 of reactor chamber 20 across magnetic field B3. Such magnetic isolation is desirable for controlling the plasma. Because the fast electrons (with energy in excess of 10-30 eV) are reflected by the local magnetic field, the diffused plasma includes only low energy electrons with a temperature of about 1 eV. This property can be used in forming large uniform plasma with controllable electron energy distribution function (EEDF).
The Match Network
In one embodiment of the plasma source of the present invention, a match network, as described below, is also included. (Such match network is preferable, but not required, for use with the plasma source of the present invention.). Accordingly, with reference now to
Match network 186 includes a first variable capacitor 500 electrically connected to RF power line 180 and to a first capacitor controller 502 that is used to vary the capacitance of the first variable capacitor 500. The first variable capacitor 500 is electrically connected to an inductor coil 340. Match network 186 farther includes a second variable capacitor 506 electrically connected to a second capacitor controller 508 that is used to vary the capacitance of the second variable capacitor 500. The second variable capacitor 506 is electrically connected in parallel with inductor coil 340 and to the output node of the first variable capacitor 500, and has a grounded end 512. The topology of match network 186 is a so-called “T-match network,” and is schematically illustrated in
In
With reference again to
Operational Efficiency of Plasma Source and Match Network Combination
For a single loop antenna with a relatively small diameter, the antenna series resistance r (including the resistance of the copper coil and that of the plasma) is usually very small. The power P delivered to the resistive load equals: P=i2r, where i is the RMS current through the load. Clearly, a very large RF current through the load is required in order to achieve a significant amount of power. Consequently, the circuit resistance must be minimized so the delivered power is mostly used for plasma generation. This can be achieved by placing the capacitor Cp across the load as close to the load as possible. The capacitor itself must also contain as little series resistance as possible. The value of the capacitance should be chosen such that a resonant circuit with the loop inductance L (including what may be contributed from the plasma) is satisfied at the RF source frequency:
ω−2=L(Cs+Cp), (1)
which follows from the fact that Cs is connected in parallel with Cp and both are in series with the load.
The capacitor Cp also serves as the shunt capacitor for the impedance transformer between the RF power generator and the load, so the current passing Cs is
is=Cs/(Cs+Cp)i. (2)
The power dissipated in the load is then given by
P=i2r=is2R (3)
where R is the input impedance of the circuit in
R=[(Cs+Cp))/Cs]2r. (4)
Thus, by tuning Cp and Cs of T-match network 540 for the applied RF frequency ω to match the input impedance and output impedance. of the power generator Rg, R=Rg, an ideal match is realized.
Note that in T-match network 540 of
When the plasma is turned on, the plasma acts as a single-turn secondary of an equivalent transformer terminated by a plasma resistance. The presence of the plasma thus modifies the circuit inductance L and resistance r. Therefore adjustment for Cs and Cp must be made to achieve a good match for the desired plasma condition. The efficiency of the T-match circuit in
η=Paps/P=rplasma/(rcircuit+rplasma). (5)
The load resistance Rcircuit=(rcircuit+rplasma) is related to the match input resistance Rg by Equation (4), which is rewritten as
Rg=50Ω=K(rcircuit+rplasma), (6)
where K stands for the square of the capacitance ratio in Equation (4). In order to determine rcircuit and rplasma separately, one can now, without disturbing the capacitor setting, turn off and disconnect the RF power generator from the match. The input resistance of the antenna circuit can then be measured by an impedance meter, viz.
Rcircuit=K rcircuit. (7)
Consequently, we obtain the efficiency as follows:
η=Paps/P=rplasma/(rcircuit+rplasma)=1−Rcircuit/Rg. (8)
Strictly speaking, since the resonance frequency changes slightly when the plasma is turned off, the measured impedance Rcircuit is not exactly correct. However, as we can see from Table 1, below, this frequency difference is so small as to be of no consequence to the measurement accuracy.
Table 1 below illustrates the plasma source efficiency for different input RF power levels input to the plasma source 100′. The chart illustrates that the efficiency increases with the RF power level from 102 Watts to 1000 Watts of input power Pinp.
In the table, R is the input impedance of the circuit measured with plasma turned off and RG=50Ω is the generator resistance (output impedance), which equals to the matched input resistance for the circuit with plasma on, as discussed above in connection with
When compared to an L-type matching network commonly used for inductively coupled plasma (See, e.g., M. A. Lieberman and A. J. Lichtenberg, “Principles of plasma discharges and materials processing”, Jon Wiley & Sons, Inc.,), the T-match has four distinct advantages—higher efficiency, larger tuning range, smaller capacitances and smaller capacitors (physical dimensions). These will now be explained in turn.
Efficiency
In a L-match, the large RF current circulates through the series connection of L, Cs and Cp, where Cs>>Cp. Thus, not only does it flow through both capacitors, but the bulkiness of the capacitors makes the interconnections relatively long, causing resistive losses along the way. On the other hand, the large RF current in a T-match is contained in the loop formed by L and Cp. If the parallel capacitor is placed in the immediate vicinity of the load, the lead lengths can be made very short. Furthermore, the RF current flowing through the capacitor Cs is smaller than the RF current through the load, and consequently, the losses are much smaller.
Matching Range
The resistance transformation equation for L match is given by:
For a T-match the equivalent equation is given by:
r=ω4L2Cs2Rg. (10)
We can see from Equations (9) and (10) that matching very low resistance r with a L-match requires very large shunt capacitor Cp, while a T-match, on the contrary, requires very small series capacitor Cs.
Capacitor Values
Because Cp is usually much larger than Cs in both L and T matching networks, the resonance conditions are determined primarily by the values of Cs in the L-match and Cp in the T-match:
Since these two capacitors have comparable values in both matching networks, it is possible to write:
CpL-match≧CsL-match≅CPT-match≧CsT-match. (12)
Thus, a T-match uses smaller capacitors than a L-match. In practice, a trim capacitor having a capacitance range of 3 to 30 pF has been inserted in parallel with a capacitor having a capacitance range of 8 to 1000 pF to serve as the parallel capacitor Cp. A capacitor having a range of 3 to 30 pF has been employed as the series capacitor Cs.
Incorporation of Coolant System into Match Network
In order to increase the plasma production efficiency, the circuit resistance is minimized by incorporation of coolant system 160 (
The step of cooling plasma source 100′ or a portion thereof using the arrangements described above serves to keep the resistance of the various circuit elements low so that the impedance is minimized. For example, while the resistance of inductor coil 340 is normally between 0.1 and 0.2 Ohms, it can get as a high as 0.5 Ohms if the temperature of the coil is allowed to get too high. Likewise, variable capacitors 500 and 506 can also have an increased resistance if their temperature is not controlled. Further, the cooling of plasma source 100 generally is necessary because of the large amounts of heat generated in forming the plasma. Subjecting the various components making up plasma source 100 to such large amounts of heat can reduce their lifetime or cause the components to prematurely fail.
Plasma Source as an Abatement System
Plasma source 100 of the present invention can also be used as an abatement system to reduce, for instance, perfluorocompound (PFC) emission. With reference now to
Attached to chamber 630 near chuck 634 is a plasma duct 670 identical to plasma duct 60 described above in connection with
The remaining elements of plasma source 100 are as described above in connection with
In operation, plasma system 600 creates plasma 628 adjacent workpiece W residing on chuck 634 by introducing a process gas that may contain, for example, a PFC, such as CF4, C4F8, C5F8, etc., into interior region 626 and activating plasma-forming system 656. Also formed are reactant species of gas, such as CF3, CF2, CF, F, etc. Further, upon processing (e.g., etching) workpiece W, other chemical species, such as SiF4, CO2, etc. are formed. Thus, the exhaust from chamber 620 is generally environmentally unfriendly and not suitable for directly exhausting into the atmosphere.
Accordingly, by placing plasma source 100 and match network 186 along the exhaust path, the various gases formed in the interior region 626 during plasma processing can be passed through plasma generation region 680′ to alter their chemistry. To ensure the dissociation of environmentally problematic gases, a plurality of plasma sources 100 and associated networks 186 can be arranged in series along the exhaust path.
For example, the plasma-generating properties of plasma source 100 can serve to dissociate a gas, such as unused CF4 into components, i.e., CFx and F; chemically reactive with hydrogen and oxygen achieved through H2O dissociation. For example, a very simplistic chemical reaction might be:
The reaction products can then comprise HF and CO2 gases readily handled by another conventional gas handling “scrubbing” system 692 downstream of exhaust system 688. The processed gases can then be exhausted into the atmosphere, or further filtered and then released into the atmosphere.
Although the use of the plasma source of the present invention is described as a exhaust abatement system in connection with a plasma reactor system, it will be clear to one skilled in the art that the plasma source can be used as an effective abatement system in other kinds of systems where noxious or otherwise undesirable gas products need to be processed prior to being exhausted into the atmosphere.
Variations
In addition to the embodiments described above, other variations are possible. In one such variation, a series of plasma sources (potentially each with at least one set of corresponding magnets) are stacked on top of each other to form a larger plasma source. In another variation, an antenna of more than one turn is used in at least one plasma source.
The many features and advantages of the present invention are apparent from the detailed specification, and, thus, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all such features and advantages of the described apparatus that follow the true spirit and scope of the invention. Furthermore, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those of skill in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation described herein. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 60/277,966, filed on Mar. 23, 2001 and U.S. application Ser. No. 60/277,965, filed on Mar. 23, 2001. The contents of those applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US02/22080 | 3/25/2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60277966 | Mar 2001 | US | |
60277965 | Mar 2001 | US |