The present application relates to inertial devices having proof masses in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and to processes for manufacturing same.
Silicon-based inertial devices like microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) accelerometers and gyroscopes are now widely adopted in consumer electronic products. They however have limited performances compared to macro-scale devices at low g accelerations and low frequencies, especially in terms of background noise and resolution. This may have limited their market penetration for some applications such as seismology, human activity monitoring, asset tracking and structural health monitoring. In addition, MEMS vibration energy harvesters are considered as an emergent solution to power the Internet of Things (IoT) and wireless sensor networks, but they currently must be relatively large to produce enough power.
In such applications, the limitations are partly due to the small size of MEMS and the relatively low material density of their silicon proof masses. Indeed, the sensitivity and minimal resolution of inertial MEMS depend on several factors including the transducer and read-out circuit design, but also on the size of the mass. Larger bulk micromachined silicon based devices are an explored solution, but they yield increased device footprints and thus higher costs per unit.
An alternate solution is to integrate materials with a density larger than silicon (ρSi=2.33 g/cm3) to produce the proof mass. Among common metals, gold has a greater density (ρAu=19.3 g/cm3) and can readily be electrodeposited. Gold is however expensive and has a large mismatch in coefficient of thermal expansion compared to silicon (CTE=14 vs 3). Tungsten, which also has a greater density than silicon (ρW=19.25 g/cm3=8.3×ρSi) offers a better CTE match (CTE=4) and is more cost effective. It is also compatible with MEMS and CMOS microelectronic processes. For these reasons, it is a more attractive option, although thick layers cannot be electroplated.
Screen printed masses can be made from tungsten nanoparticles filled polymer paste, but their actual density is about 50% of bulk tungsten. This density is slightly higher but comparable to nickel and copper (ρNi/Cu=8.9 g/cm3), which can both be electroplated. Tungsten can also be integrated using thin film deposition, such as metal organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD), but this may limit the potential thickness of the masses. This constraint can be circumvented by using a silicon mold structured with thin pillars or etched wells and filling it with tungsten via conformal MOCVD. The resulting mass thickness may be less than what can be achieved by bulk silicon microfabrication. In contrast, producing masses of similar thicknesses that preserve an effective density close to bulk tungsten would require challenging aspect ratios by deep reactive ion etching (DRIE).
It is an aim of the present disclosure to provide microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) with higher density proof masses.
It is a further aim of the present disclosure to provide processes for integrating higher density proof masses at wafer level for use in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS).
Therefore, in accordance with the present disclosure, there is provided an inertial device comprising: a frame, a cantilever beam having a first end connected to the frame and a second end cantilevered relative to the frame, the cantilevered beam forming a spring portion between the first end and the second end, the cantilever beam having a support surface defining a support area, wherein the frame and the cantilever beam are made from a support wafer, the support wafer being made of silicon, a thickness of the support wafer at the support area ranging between 10 μm and 800 μm; and a mass bonded to the support surface of the silicon wafer at the support area, the mass being made of tungsten, a thickness of the mass being of at least 20 μm.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, a bond layer is for instance between the cantilever beam and the mass.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, the bond layer is for instance one of an epoxy-based bond layer and a metallic bond layer.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, a hard mask may be between the support area and the mass of tungsten.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, the hard mask has for instance a layer of SiO2.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, the hard mask has for instance a layer of Si3N4.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, a hard mask may be mounted to a surface of the mass away from the support area.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, the hard mask has for instance a layer of SiO2.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, the hard mask has for instance a layer of Si3N4.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, a piezoelectric layer may be on the support surface of the cantilever beam.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, a hard mask may be on a surface of the piezoelectric layer facing away from the support area.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, an electrode layer may be on the surface of the piezoelectric layer facing away from the support wafer.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, a contact connector is provided for instance through the hard mask and in contact with the electrode layer.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, the hard mask has for instance a layer of SiO2.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, the hard mask has for instance a layer of Si3N4.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, the support wafer is for instance a silicon on insulator wafer having two layers of silicon separated by an insulator.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, at least one cap is for instance mounted to the frame and encapsulating the mass.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, lateral surfaces of the mass project for instance from the support surface in a non-perpendicular direction.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, the lateral surfaces have for instance irregular etched geometries.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, a footprint of the mass ranges for instance from 50% to 80% of the footprint of the frame.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, a footprint of the frame is for instance at most 1.0 cm2.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, the spring portion of the cantilever beam is for instance thinner than the frame and than a portion of the cantilever beam defining the support area.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, a thickness of the spring portion is for instance between 10 and 50 μm.
Still further in accordance with the present disclosure, the frame and cantilever beam are for instance monoblock from the support wafer.
Unless stated otherwise, the schematic figures of the process and of the devices are not to scale.
Referring to
Functional wafer 1 is fabricated by forming geometries, for example springs, in a silicon substrate, whereas the higher density proof masses 2 are wafer bonded. The proof masses 2 may be patterned by a 2-step wet chemical milling approach compatible with many common cleanroom materials. According to an embodiment, the proof masses 2 are made from tungsten (W) (e.g., made from 500 μm thick tungsten substrates or wafers), although other metals can be used as discussed below. Therefore, for the sake of simplicity, reference is made to W, although proof masses 2 may be made in other materials as well. The process 10, and subsequently described processes, may generally be separated in three groups of steps: A) W and Si wafers pre-bonding preparation; B) wafer bonding; and C) mass and cantilever definition and release.
A) Pre-Bonding Wafer Preparation
In an embodiment of the pre-bonding wafer preparation, as shown at 1) in
According to 2) in
According to 3) of
According to 4) of
In parallel, the silicon wafer 1 is prepared ahead of the group of bonding steps B). Spring patterns, i.e., parts of the silicon wafer 1 of reduced thickness in contrast to a remainder of the silicon wafer 1, may be realized by photolithography and a subsequent deep reactive ion etching (DRIE), as shown in 5) of
B) Wafer Bonding
As shown at B), the wafer stack is assembled from the wafers of A) using an intermediate adhesive layer for convenience. Due to the topologies created during the previous tungsten wet etch step of the pre-bonding preparation, a roller based resist transfer method may be used to apply the resist/adhesive on the patterned substrate, as shown in 6) of
Then, as shown in 7) of
C) Mass and Cantilever Definition and Release
To complete the patterning and release of the masses, the assembled wafer stack may be re-immersed in the tungsten etchant in 8) of
In an exemplary embodiment, neither the silicon wafer 1 nor the bond layer 3 were etched, due to the compatibility of the etchant with the silicon and bond layer. The solution did not significantly etch Cr, SiO2 and Si3N4, although a slight increase of the surface roughness may be observed. Meanwhile, Cu turned to a dark brown and the layer thickness increased, suggesting oxidation of the surface. A 150 nm thick Al layer was also etched by the solution in about 15 min, which is a slower rate than the target metal (50:1 selectivity). Exemplary observations are presented in Table 1.
Moreover, based on the etching patterns observed on the hard mask during the second etching stage (post-bond), friction with the bonding tool or ionic contamination from the bonding glass may cause a degradation of the mask selectivity.
According to 9) and 10) of
After full etching of the silicon beams, as per 11) of
To avoid contamination of the tools, the beam release may not be completed during the backside DRIE. The last 50 μm may be etched in a diluted KOH bath at room temperature. However, this step may lead to device failures as the Crystal bond and SU8 bond are sensitive to diluted KOH solution. Improved yield may be achieved if the beam release is done by a through-wafer DRIE step down to an etch stop layer instead, using a silicon on insulator (SOI) wafer, as described in subsequent variations for instance as in
Device Characterization
Referring to
Therefore, the process 10 is used to integrate high density tungsten proof masses 2 in MEMS inertial devices at the wafer level for the wafer 1, in contrast to silicon proof masses. The thickness of tungsten resulting from the process 10 and from subsequently described processes of the present disclosure may be of at least 20 μm, i.e., substantially thicker than other proof masses manufactured by chemical vapor deposition techniques. For example, the thickness may range from 20 μm to 500 μm. In contrast, the thickness of the silicon wafer 1 may range from 10 μm to 800 μm. As shown in all embodiments herein, the mass 2 is on a support area of the silicon wafer 1 that forms a fraction of the overall support surface of the silicon wafer 1. For example, a footprint of the mass 2 may range from 50% to 80% of the footprint of the inertial device then diced from the support wafer 1, as shown subsequently in
The use of wet chemical milling is challenging in terms of dimensional control in addition to limiting the minimum feature sizes, which is dictated by the mass wafer thickness. However, these concerns are mitigated by the fact that the mass in MEMS harvesters and inertial sensors is typically the biggest component in the device. Moreover, adopting tungsten wafers instead of silicon to fabricate the proof masses 2 can reduce the die size or improve sensitivity by almost an order of magnitude, directly impacting cost and opening market opportunities. Although adhesive wafer bonding is used here, the process 10 could also work with other bonding methods, namely eutectic or thermocompressive bonding using intermediate metallic layers patterned with a shadow mask for instance, or even direct bonding (fusion bonding) using very smooth, flat and clean surfaces, such as Si, SiO2 or Si3N4 for example. As observed from
Variations
While tungsten is described for the proof mass 2 as an example in the process 10, table 2 provided below identifies various metals that could be used, as per their densities greater than silicon. Process variations may have the following characteristics:
A thick metallic substrate is patterned to produce high density proof masses 2 at the wafer 1 level. In the MEMS field, a metal is typically considered thick for layers that are over 10 μm thick, although it may be desirable to use substrates that are 100 μm thick or more to add more mass.
The metallic substrate is composed of a pure material (or an alloy) which has a high density compared to silicon (in kg/m3). For example, the substrate could be made from one of the material contained in Table 2, which compares their density relatively to that of silicon.
Among the materials listed above in table 2, only a few are cost effective. Many are rare or precious metals which cost several orders of magnitude more than silicon. Other materials cannot be used for different reasons (e.g., lead is banned due to its detrimental effect on the environment, bismuth has a low melting point which is challenging for back end processing).
Tungsten may be bought at a reasonable cost and has a significant advantage over silicon (>8 of relative density). Although they have a lower relative density (<4.5) which make them less attractive, other cost effective metals could be used as well, such as molybdenum, copper, nickel, iron, manganese, zinc.
As shown in the process 10 in
Referring to
The processes 90 of
The process 110 of
The process 120 of
Referring to
A cavity 152 is defined in the material of the wafer 1 so as to define a cantilevered portion or beam projecting inwardly from the frame 151 (a.k.a., anchor), and thus cantilevered relative to the frame 151. Consequently, the frame 151 and the cantilevered beam are monoblock silicon from the support wafer. The cantilevered beam may include a spring portion 153 for instance thinner than the frame 151, to reduce the stiffness of the cantilevered portion and expose its elastic deformation capability. According to an embodiment, the thickness of the spring portion 153 is between 10 and 50 μm. The proof mass 2 is at the cantilevered end of the cantilever beam to enhance the cantilever effect. Moreover, although the cantilever beam may have a uniform thickness, the cantilever beam may have a portion 154 of greater thickness on the side opposite the proof mass 2, to further increase the weight of the cantilevered end of the cantilever beam. In an embodiment, the footprint of the inertial device 150 is 1.0 cm2 or less. The proof mass 2 occupies from 50% to 80% of the footprint of the inertial device 150. While not indicated in
Tables 3 and 4 present summaries of the differences between the processes.
The present application claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/520,751, filed on Jun. 16, 2017 and incorporated herein by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2018/050736 | 6/18/2018 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62520751 | Jun 2017 | US |