Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing method involving a member and a fluid opening

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9152058
  • Patent Number
    9,152,058
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 29, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 6, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
An exposure apparatus including a movable table, a member, movably separate from the table and located on a top surface of the table, to provide a surface substantially co-planar with a top surface of an object in or on the table, a projection system configured to project a radiation beam onto a radiation-sensitive target portion of a substrate, and a liquid supply system configured to provide a liquid to a space between the projection system and the object.
Description
FIELD

The present invention relates to a lithographic projection apparatus and a device manufacturing method.


BACKGROUND

The term “patterning device” as here employed should be broadly interpreted as referring to any device that can be used to endow an incoming radiation beam with a patterned cross-section, corresponding to a pattern that is to be created in a target portion of the substrate; the term “light valve” can also be used in this context. Generally, the pattern will correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion, such as an integrated circuit or other device (see below). Examples of such a patterning device include:


A mask. The concept of a mask is well known in lithography, and it includes mask types such as binary, alternating phase-shift, and attenuated phase-shift, as well as various hybrid mask types. Placement of such a mask in the radiation beam causes selective transmission (in the case of a transmissive mask) or reflection (in the case of a reflective mask) of the radiation impinging on the mask, according to the pattern on the mask. In the case of a mask, the support structure will generally be a mask table, which ensures that the mask can be held at a desired position in the incoming radiation beam, and that it can be moved relative to the beam if so desired.


A programmable mirror array. One example of such a device is a matrix-addressable surface having a viscoelastic control layer and a reflective surface. The basic principle behind such an apparatus is that (for example) addressed areas of the reflective surface reflect incident light as diffracted light, whereas unaddressed areas reflect incident light as undiffracted light. Using an appropriate filter, the undiffracted light can be filtered out of the reflected beam, leaving only the diffracted light behind; in this manner, the beam becomes patterned according to the addressing pattern of the matrix-addressable surface. An alternative embodiment of a programmable mirror array employs a matrix arrangement of tiny mirrors, each of which can be individually tilted about an axis by applying a suitable localized electric field, or by employing piezoelectric actuation means. Once again, the mirrors are matrix-addressable, such that addressed mirrors will reflect an incoming radiation beam in a different direction to unaddressed mirrors; in this manner, the reflected beam is patterned according to the addressing pattern of the matrix-addressable mirrors. The matrix addressing can be performed using suitable electronics. In both of the situations described hereabove, the patterning device can comprise one or more programmable mirror arrays. More information on mirror arrays as here referred to can be gleaned, for example, from U.S. Pat. No. 5,296,891 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,523,193, and PCT patent application publications WO 98/38597 and WO 98/33096, which are incorporated herein by reference. In the case of a programmable mirror array, the support structure may be embodied as a frame or table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required.


A programmable LCD array. An example of such a construction is given in U.S. Pat. No. 5,229,872, which is incorporated herein by reference. As above, the support structure in this case may be embodied as a frame or table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required.


For purposes of simplicity, the rest of this text may, at certain locations, specifically direct itself to examples involving a mask and mask table; however, the general principles discussed in such instances should be seen in the broader context of the patterning device as hereabove set forth.


Lithographic projection apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs). In such a case, the patterning device may generate a circuit pattern corresponding to an individual layer of the IC, and this pattern can be imaged onto a target portion (e.g. comprising one or more dies) on a substrate (silicon wafer) that has been coated with a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist). In general, a single wafer will contain a whole network of adjacent target portions that are successively irradiated via the projection system, one at a time. In current apparatus, employing patterning by a mask on a mask table, a distinction can be made between two different types of machine. In one type of lithographic projection apparatus, each target portion is irradiated by exposing the entire mask pattern onto the target portion at one time; such an apparatus is commonly referred to as a stepper. In an alternative apparatus—commonly referred to as a step-and-scan apparatus—each target portion is irradiated by progressively scanning the mask pattern under the projection beam in a given reference direction (the “scanning” direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate table parallel or anti-parallel to this direction; since, in general, the projection system will have a magnification factor M (generally <1), the speed V at which the substrate table is scanned will be a factor M times that at which the mask table is scanned. More information with regard to lithographic devices as here described can be gleaned, for example, from U.S. Pat. No. 6,046,792, incorporated herein by reference.


In a manufacturing process using a lithographic projection apparatus, a pattern (e.g. in a mask) is imaged onto a substrate that is at least partially covered by a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist). Prior to this imaging step, the substrate may undergo various procedures, such as priming, resist coating and a soft bake. After exposure, the substrate may be subjected to other procedures, such as a post-exposure bake (PEB), development, a hard bake and measurement/inspection of the imaged features. This array of procedures is used as a basis to pattern an individual layer of a device, e.g. an IC. Such a patterned layer may then undergo various processes such as etching, ion-implantation (doping), metallization, oxidation, chemo-mechanical polishing, etc., all intended to finish off an individual layer. If several layers are required, then the whole procedure, or a variant thereof, will have to be repeated for each new layer. Eventually, an array of devices will be present on the substrate (wafer). These devices are then separated from one another by a technique such as dicing or sawing, whence the individual devices can be mounted on a carrier, connected to pins, etc. Further information regarding such processes can be obtained, for example, from the book “Microchip Fabrication: A Practical Guide to Semiconductor Processing”, Third Edition, by Peter van Zant, McGraw Hill Publishing Co., 1997, ISBN 0-07-067250-4, incorporated herein by reference.


For the sake of simplicity, the projection system may hereinafter be referred to as the “projection lens”; however, this term should be broadly interpreted as encompassing various types of projection system, including refractive optics, reflective optics, and catadioptric systems, for example. The radiation system may also include components operating according to any of these design types for directing, shaping or controlling the projection beam of radiation, and such components may be referred to below, collectively or singularly, as a “lens”. Further, the lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two or more substrate tables (and/or two or more mask tables). In such “multiple stage” devices the additional tables may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables while one or more other tables are being used for exposures. Dual stage lithographic apparatus are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,969,441 and PCT patent application publication WO 98/40791, incorporated herein by reference.


It has been proposed to immerse the substrate in a lithographic projection apparatus in a liquid having a relatively high refractive index, e.g. water, so as to fill the space between the final optical element of the projection system and the substrate. The point of this is to enable imaging of smaller features because the exposure radiation will have a shorter wavelength in the liquid than in gas (e.g., air) or in a vacuum. (The effect of the liquid may also be regarded as increasing the effective NA of the system).


However, submersing the substrate or substrate and substrate table in a bath of liquid (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 4,509,852, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference) means that there is a large body of liquid that must be accelerated during a scanning exposure. This requires additional or more powerful motors and turbulence in the liquid may lead to undesirable and unpredictable effects.


One of the solutions proposed is for a liquid supply system to provide liquid on only a localized area of the substrate and in between the final element of the projection system and the substrate (the substrate generally has a larger surface area than the final element of the projection system). One way which has been proposed to arrange for this is disclosed in PCT patent application publication WO 99/49504, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. As illustrated in FIGS. 14 and 15, liquid is supplied by at least one inlet IN onto the substrate, preferably along the direction of movement of the substrate relative to the final element, and is removed by at least one outlet OUT after having passed under the projection system. That is, as the substrate is scanned beneath the element in a −X direction, liquid is supplied at the +X side of the element and taken up at the −X side. FIG. 15 shows the arrangement schematically in which liquid is supplied via inlet IN and is taken up on the other side of the element by outlet OUT which is connected to a low pressure source. In the illustration of FIG. 14 the liquid is supplied along the direction of movement of the substrate relative to the final element, though this does not need to be the case. Various orientations and numbers of in- and out-lets positioned around the final element are possible, one example is illustrated in FIG. 23 in which four sets of an inlet with an outlet on either side are provided in a regular pattern around the final element.


SUMMARY

Accordingly, it would be advantageous, for example, to provide an immersion lithographic projection apparatus with improved functionality.


According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic projection apparatus comprising:

    • an illuminator adapted to condition a beam of radiation;
    • a support structure configured to hold a patterning device, the patterning device configured to pattern the beam of radiation according to a desired pattern;
    • a substrate table configured to hold a substrate;
    • a projection system adapted to project the patterned beam onto a target portion of the substrate;
    • a liquid supply system configured to at least partly fill a space between the projection system and an object on the substrate table, with a liquid; and
    • a sensor capable of being positioned to be illuminated by the beam of radiation once it has passed through the liquid.


By passing a beam of radiation for a sensor through liquid, no elaborate measures need to be taken to compensate the signals from the sensor to take account of the parameters measured by the sensor being measured through a different medium to that which the substrate is imaged through. However, it may be necessary to ensure that the design of the sensor is such that it is compatible for use when covered with liquid. An example sensor includes an alignment sensor configured to align the substrate table relative to the projection system, a transmission image sensor, a focus sensor, a spot or dose sensor, an integrated lens interferometer and scanner sensor and even an alignment mark. In the case of an alignment sensor, the measurement gratings of the sensor may have a pitch than less than 500 nm, such pitch possibly improving the resolution of the alignment sensor.


According to a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a device manufacturing method comprising:

    • projecting a beam of radiation through a liquid onto a sensor; and
    • projecting the beam of radiation as patterned using a projection system of a lithographic apparatus through the liquid onto a target portion of a substrate.


Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of the apparatus according to the invention in the manufacture of ICs, it should be explicitly understood that such an apparatus has many other possible applications. For example, it may be employed in the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, liquid-crystal display panels, thin-film magnetic heads, etc. The skilled artisan will appreciate that, in the context of such alternative applications, any use of the terms “reticle”, “wafer” or “die” in this text should be considered as being replaced by the more general terms “mask”, “substrate” and “target portion”, respectively.


In the present document, the terms “radiation” and “beam” are used to encompass all types of electromagnetic radiation, including ultraviolet radiation (e.g. with a wavelength of 365, 248, 193, 157 or 126 nm).





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts:



FIG. 1 depicts a lithographic projection apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 2 depicts the liquid reservoir of a first embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 3 illustrates a second embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 4 illustrates an alternative form of the second embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5 illustrates a detail of the second embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6
a illustrates a first version of a third embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6
b illustrates a second version of the third embodiment;



FIG. 6
c illustrates a third version of the third embodiment;



FIG. 7 illustrates in detail further aspects of the first version of the third embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 8 illustrates a fourth embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 9 illustrates an fifth embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 10 illustrates a sixth embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 11 illustrates a seventh embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 12 illustrates an eighth embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 13 illustrates a eighth embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 14 illustrates an alternative liquid supply system according to an embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 15 illustrates, in plan, the system of FIG. 14;



FIG. 16 depicts an ILIAS sensor module;



FIG. 17 depicts an ILIAS sensor module with an elongated transmissive plate according to an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 18 depicts an ILIAS sensor module with a filler sheet according to an embodiment of the present invention; and



FIGS. 19
a and 19b depict a luminescence based DUV transmission image sensor.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiment 1



FIG. 1 schematically depicts a lithographic projection apparatus according to a particular embodiment of the invention. The apparatus comprises:

    • a radiation system Ex, IL, for supplying a projection beam PB of radiation (e.g. DUV radiation), which in this particular case also comprises a radiation source LA;
    • a first object table (mask table) MT provided with a mask holder for holding a mask MA (e.g. a reticle), and connected to a first positioning device for accurately positioning the mask with respect to item PL;
    • a second object table (substrate table) WT provided with a substrate holder for holding a substrate W (e.g. a resist-coated silicon wafer), and connected to a second positioning device for accurately positioning the substrate with respect to item PL;
    • a projection system (“projection lens”) PL (e.g. a refractive system) for imaging an irradiated portion of the mask MA onto a target portion C (e.g. comprising one or more dies) of the substrate W.


As here depicted, the apparatus is of a transmissive type (e.g. has a transmissive mask). However, in general, it may also be of a reflective type, for example (e.g. with a reflective mask). Alternatively, the apparatus may employ another kind of patterning device, such as a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above.


The source LA (e.g. an excimer laser) produces a beam of radiation. This beam is fed into an illumination system (illuminator) IL, either directly or after having traversed conditioning means, such as a beam expander Ex, for example. The illuminator IL may comprise adjusting means AM for setting the outer and/or inner radial extent (commonly referred to as σ-outer and σ-inner, respectively) of the intensity distribution in the beam. In addition, it will generally comprise various other components, such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO. In this way, the beam PB impinging on the mask MA has a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross-section.


It should be noted with regard to FIG. 1 that the source LA may be within the housing of the lithographic projection apparatus (as is often the case when the source LA is a mercury lamp, for example), but that it may also be remote from the lithographic projection apparatus, the radiation beam which it produces being led into the apparatus (e.g. with the aid of suitable directing mirrors); this latter scenario is often the case when the source LA is an excimer laser. The current invention and claims encompass at least both of these scenarios.


The beam PB subsequently intercepts the mask MA, which is held on a mask table MT. Having traversed the mask MA, the beam PB passes through the projection system PL, which focuses the beam PB onto a target portion C of the substrate W. With the aid of the second positioning device (and interferometric measuring device IF), the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g. so as to position different target portions C in the path of the beam PB. Similarly, the first positioning device can be used to accurately position the mask MA with respect to the path of the beam PB, e.g. after mechanical retrieval of the mask MA from a mask library, or during a scan. In general, movement of the object tables MT, WT will be realized with the aid of a long-stroke module (course positioning) and a short-stroke module (fine positioning), which are not explicitly depicted in FIG. 1. However, in the case of a stepper (as opposed to a step-and-scan apparatus) the mask table MT may just be connected to a short stroke actuator, or may be fixed.


The depicted apparatus can be used in two different modes:


1. In step mode, the mask table MT is kept essentially stationary, and an entire mask image is projected at one time (i.e. a single “flash”) onto a target portion C. The substrate table WT is then shifted in the X and/or Y directions so that a different target portion C can be irradiated by the beam PB;


2. In scan mode, essentially the same scenario applies, except that a given target portion C is not exposed in a single “flash”. Instead, the mask table MT is movable in a given direction (the so-called “scan direction”, e.g. the Y direction) with a speed v, so that the projection beam PB is caused to scan over a mask image; concurrently, the substrate table WT is simultaneously moved in the same or opposite direction at a speed V=Mv, in which M is the magnification of the projection system PL (typically, M=¼ or ⅕). In this manner, a relatively large target portion C can be exposed, without having to compromise on resolution.



FIG. 2 shows a liquid reservoir 10 between the projection system PL and the substrate W which is positioned on the substrate stage WT. The liquid reservoir 10 is filled with a liquid 11 having a relatively high refractive index, e.g. water or a suspension of particles in water, provided via inlet/outlet ducts 13. The liquid has the effect that the radiation of the projection beam is a shorter wavelength in the liquid than in gas (e.g., air) or in a vacuum, allowing smaller features to be resolved. It is well known that the resolution limit of a projection system is determined, inter alia, by the wavelength of the projection beam and the numerical aperture of the system. The presence of the liquid may also be regarded as increasing the effective numerical aperture. Furthermore, at fixed numerical aperture, the liquid is effective to increase the depth of field.


The reservoir 10 forms, in an embodiment, a contactless seal to the substrate W around the image field of the projection system PL so that the liquid is confined to fill the space between the substrate's primary surface, which faces the projection system PL, and the final optical element of the projection system PL. The reservoir is formed by a seal member 12 positioned below and surrounding the final element of the projection system PL. Thus, the liquid supply system provides liquid on only a localized area of the substrate. The seal member 12 forms part of the liquid supply system for filling the space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate with a liquid. This liquid is brought into the space below the projection system and within the seal member 12. In an embodiment, the seal member 12 extends a little above the bottom element of the projection system and the liquid rises above the final element so that a buffer of liquid is provided. The seal member 12 has an inner periphery that at the upper end closely conforms to the shape of the projection system or the final elements thereof and may, e.g. be round. At the bottom the inner periphery closely conforms to the shape of the image field, e.g. rectangular, though this is not necessarily so. The seal member is substantially stationary in the XY plane relative to the projection system though there may be some relative movement in the Z direction (in the direction of the optical axis). A seal is formed between the seal member and the surface of the substrate. In an implementation, this seal is a contactless seal and may be a gas seal.


The liquid 11 is confined in the reservoir 10 by a seal device 16. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the seal device is a contactless seal i.e. a gas seal. The gas seal is formed by gas, e.g. air or synthetic air, provided under pressure via inlet 15 to the gap between seal member 12 and substrate W and extracted by first outlet 14. The over pressure on the gas inlet 15, vacuum level or under pressure on the first outlet 14 and the geometry of the gap are arranged so that there is a high-velocity gas flow inwards towards the optical axis of the apparatus that confines the liquid 11. As with any seal, some liquid is likely to escape, for example up the first outlet 14.



FIGS. 14 and 15 also depict a liquid reservoir defined by inlet(s) 1N, outlet(s) OUT, the substrate W and the final element of projection system PL. Like the liquid supply system of FIG. 2 the liquid supply system illustrated in FIGS. 14 and 15, comprising inlet(s) IN and outlet(s) OUT, supplies liquid to the primary surface of the substrate in a localized area between the final element of the projection system and the substrate and can suffer from loss of liquid at the substrate edge.


Thus, as used herein for the embodiments, the liquid supply system can comprise that as described in relation to FIG. 2 and FIGS. 14 and 15.


Embodiment 2


A second embodiment is illustrated in FIGS. 3 to 5 and is the same or similar as the first embodiment except as described below.


In the embodiment of FIGS. 3 and 4 an edge liquid supply system provides liquid to a reservoir 30 via a port 40. The liquid in the reservoir 30 is optionally the same as the immersion liquid in the liquid supply system. The reservoir 30 is positioned on the opposite side of the substrate W to the projection system PL and adjacent the edge of the substrate W and the edge of the edge seal member 17, 117. In FIG. 4, the edge seal member 17 is comprised of an element which is separate to the substrate table WT whereas in FIG. 3 the edge seal member 117 is provided by an integral portion of the substrate table WT. As can be seen most clearly from FIG. 3, the substrate W is supported on the substrate table WT by a so-called pimple table 20. The pimple table 20 comprises a plurality of projections on which the substrate W rests. The substrate W is held in place by, e.g., a vacuum source sucking the substrate onto the top surface of the substrate table WT. With the use of the reservoir 30, when the edge of the substrate W is being imaged, (i.e. when liquid in the liquid supply system between the projection system PL and the substrate W traverses across an edge of the substrate W), liquid cannot escape from the liquid supply system into the gap between the edge seal member 17, 117 and the substrate W because that space is already filled with liquid.


The mechanism 170 shown in FIG. 4 for moving the edge seal member 17 relative to the remainder of the substrate table WT is illustrated in detail in FIG. 5. The reason for moving the edge seal member 17 in this way is so that its primary surface can be made to be substantially co-planar with the primary surface of the substrate W. This allows a smooth movement of the liquid supply system over edge portions of the substrate W so that the bottom inner periphery of the liquid supply system can be moved to positions partly on the primary surface of substrate W and partly on the primary surface of the edge seal member 17.


A level sensor (not illustrated) is used to detect the relative heights of the primary surfaces of the substrate W and the edge seal member 17. Based on the results of the level sensor, control signals are sent to the actuator 171 in order to adjust the height of the primary surface of the edge seal member 17. A closed loop actuator could also be used for this purpose.


In an implementation, the actuator 171 is a rotating motor which rotates a shaft 176. The shaft 176 is connected to a circular disc at the end distal to the motor 171. The shaft 176 is connected away from the centre of the disc. The disc is located in a circular recess in a wedge portion 172. Ball bearings may be used to reduce the amount of friction between the circular disc and the sides of the recess in the wedge portion 172. The motor 171 is held in place by leaf springs 177. On actuation of the motor the wedge portion is driven to the left and right as illustrated (i.e. in the direction of the slope of the wedge portion) because of the excentre position of the shaft 176 in the disc. The motor is prevented from moving in the same direction as the direction of movement of the wedge portion 172 by the springs 177.


As the wedge portion 172 moves left and right as illustrated in FIG. 5, its top surface 175 (which is the surface of the wedge which is sloped in relation to the primary surface of the edge seal member 17) contacts the bottom sloped surface of a further wedge member 173 which is fixed to the bottom of the edge seal member 17. The edge seal member 17 is prevented from moving in the direction of movement of the wedge member 172 so that when the wedge member 172 moves left and right the edge seal member 17 is lowered and raised respectively. Some biasing of the edge seal member 17 towards the substrate table WT may be necessary.


Obviously the further wedge member 173 could be replaced by an alternative shape, for example a rod positioned perpendicularly to the direction of movement of the wedge 172. If the coefficient of friction between the wedge member 172 and the further wedge member 173 is greater than the tangent of the wedge angle then the actuator 170 is self-braking meaning that no force may be needed on the wedge member 172 to hold it in place. This is advantageous as the system will then be stable when the actuator 171 is not actuated. The accuracy of the mechanism 170 is of the order of a few μm.


Especially in the case of the edge seal member 117 being an integral part of the substrate table WT, a mechanism may be provided to adjust the height of the substrate W or the member supporting the substrate W so that the primary surfaces of the edge seal member 17, 117 and the substrate can be made substantially co-planar.


Embodiment 3


A third embodiment is illustrated in FIGS. 6 and 7 and is the same or similar as the first embodiment except as described below.


This embodiment is described in relation to an edge seal member 117 which is an integral part of the substrate table WT. However, this embodiment is equally applicable to an edge seal member 17 which is movable relative to the substrate table WT.


In a first version of this embodiment as illustrated in FIG. 6a, a further edge seal member 500 is used to bridge the gap between the edge seal member 117 and the substrate W. The further edge seal member is affixed to the edge seal member 117. The further edge seal member 500 is removably attachable against the surface of the substrate W opposite the primary surface. In this embodiment the further edge seal member 500 can be a flexible edge seal member which is actuatable to contact the under surface of the substrate W. When the flexible edge seal member 500 is deactivated it falls away from the substrate under gravity. The way this is achieved is illustrated in FIG. 7 and is described below.


It is likely that the further edge seal member 500 will not prevent all of the immersion liquid from the liquid supply system from entering the space under the substrate W and for this reason a port 46 connected to a low pressure source may be provided under the substrate W adjacent edges of the edge seal member 117 and the substrate W in some or all of the versions of this embodiment. Of course the design of the area under the substrate could be the same as that of the second embodiment.


The same system can be used for sensors such as a transmission image sensor (TIS) on the substrate table as opposed for the substrate W. In the case of sensors, as the sensors do not move, the further edge seal member 500 can be permanently attached to the sensor, for example using glue.


Furthermore, the further edge seal member 500 can be arranged to engage with the top surface of the object (that surface closest to the projection system) rather than the bottom surface. Also, the further edge seal member 500 may be provided attached to or near the top surface of the edge seal member 117 as opposed to under the edge seal member 117 as is illustrated in FIG. 6a.


A second version of this embodiment is illustrated in FIG. 6b. Two further edge seal members 500a, 500b are used. The first of these edge seal members 500a is the same as in the first version. The second of these edge seal members 500b is affixed to the substrate table 20 i.e. underneath the substrate W and extends with its free end radially outwardly from its attachment point. The second further edge seal member 500b clamps the first further edge seal member 500a against the substrate W. Compressed gas can be used to deform or move the second further edge seal member 500b.


A third version of this embodiment is shown in FIG. 6c. The third version is the same as the second version except the first further edge seal member 500c clamps the second further edge seal member 500d to the substrate W. This avoids, for example, the need for the compressed gas of the second version.


It will be appreciated that the embodiment will also work with only the second further edge seal member 500b, 500d with or without connection to vacuum.


Various ways of deforming the further edge seal members 500, 500a, 500b, 500c, 500d will now be described in relation to the first version of the embodiment.


As can be seen from FIG. 7, a channel 510 is formed in the elongate direction of a flexible further edge seal member 500 (which, in an implementation, is an annular ring) and (a) discrete port(s) are provided in an upper surface of the flexible further edge seal member which faces the projection system PL and the underside of the substrate W. By connecting a vacuum source 515 to the duct 510 the flexible further edge seal member can be made to abut the substrate W by suction. When the vacuum source 515 is disconnected or switched off, the flexible further edge seal member 500 drops under gravity and/or pressure from port 46 to assume the position shown in dotted lines in FIG. 7.


In an alternative or additional embodiment, a flexible further edge seal member 500 is formed with a mechanical pre-load such that it contacts the substrate W when the substrate is placed on the pimple table 20 and the flexible further edge seal member 500 deforms elastically so that it applies a force upwards on the substrate W to thereby make a seal.


In a further alternative or additional embodiment, a flexible further edge seal member 500 may be forced against the substrate W by an overpressure generated by pressurised gas on port 46.


A flexible further edge seal member 500 may be fashioned from any flexible, radiation and immersion liquid resistant, non-contaminating material, for example, steel, glass e.g. Al2O3, ceramic material e.g. SiC, Silicon, Teflon, low expansion glasses (e.g. Zerodur™ or ULE™), carbon fibre epoxy or quartz and is typically between 10 and 500 μm thick, optionally between 30 and 200 μm or 50 to 150 μm in the case of glass. With a flexible further edge seal member 500 of this material and these dimensions, the typical pressure to be applied to the duct 510 is approximately 0.1 to 0.6 bar.


Embodiment 4


A fourth embodiment is illustrated in FIG. 8 and is the same or similar as the first embodiment except as described below.


This embodiment is described in relation to an edge seal member 117 which is an integral part of the substrate table WT. However, this embodiment is equally applicable to an edge seal member 17 which is movable relative to the substrate table WT.


In the fourth embodiment, the gap between the edge seal member 117 and the substrate W is filled with a further edge seal member 50. The further edge seal member is a flexible further edge seal member 50 which has a top surface which is substantially co-planar with the primary surfaces of the substrate W and the edge seal member 117. The flexible further edge seal member 50 is made of a compliant material so that minor variations in the diameter/width of substrate W and in the thickness of the substrate W can be accommodated by deflections of the flexible further edge seal member 50. When liquid in the liquid supply system under the projection system PL passes over the edge of the substrate, the liquid cannot escape between the substrate W, flexible further edge seal member 50 and edge seal member 117 because the edges of those elements are tight against one another. Furthermore, because the primary surfaces of the substrate W and the edge seal member 117 and the top surface of the flexible further edge seal member 50 are substantially co-planar, the liquid supply system operation is not upset when it passes over the edge of the substrate W so that disturbance forces are not generated in the liquid supply system.


As can be seen from FIG. 8, the flexible further edge seal member 50 is in contact with a surface of the substrate W opposite the primary surface of the substrate W, at an edge portion. This contact has two functions. First, the fluid seal between the flexible further edge seal member 50 and the substrate W may be improved. Second, the flexible further edge seal member 50 applies a force on the substrate W in a direction away from the pimple table 20. When the substrate W is held on the substrate table WT by, e.g. vacuum suction, the substrate can be held securely on the substrate table. However, when the vacuum source is switched off or disconnected, the force produced by the flexible further edge seal member 50 on the substrate W is effective to push the substrate W off the substrate table WT thereby aiding loading and unloading of substrates W.


The flexible further edge seal member 50 is made of a radiation and immersion liquid resistant material such as PTFE.


Embodiment 5



FIG. 9 illustrates a fifth embodiment which is the same or similar as the first embodiment except as described below.


This embodiment is described in relation to an edge seal member 117 which is an integral part of the substrate table WT. However, this embodiment is equally applicable to an edge seal member 17 which is movable relative to the substrate table WT.


As can be seen from FIG. 9, the eighth embodiment includes a further edge seal member 100 for bridging the gap between the edge seal member 117 and the substrate W. In this case the further edge seal member 100 is a gap seal member which is positioned on the primary surfaces of the substrate W and the edge seal member 117 to span the gap between the substrate W and edge seal member 117. Thus, if the substrate W is circular, the gap seal member 100 will also be circular (annular).


The gap seal member 100 may be held in place by the application of a vacuum 105 to its underside (that is a vacuum source exposed through a vacuum port on the primary surface of the edge seal member 117). The liquid supply system can pass over the edge of the substrate W without the loss of liquid because the gap between the substrate W and the edge seal member 117 is covered over by the gap seal member 100. The gap seal member 100 can be put in place and removed by the substrate handler so that standard substrates and substrate handling can be used. Alternatively the gap seal member 100 can be kept at the projection system PL and put in place and removed by appropriate mechanisms (e.g. a substrate handling robot). The gap seal member 100 should be stiff enough to avoid deformation by the vacuum source. Advantageously the gap seal member 100 is less than 50, optionally 30 or 20 or even 10 μm thick to avoid contact with the liquid supply system, but should be made as thin as possible


The gap seal member 100 is advantageously provided with tapered edges 110 in which the thickness of the gap seal member 100 decreases towards the edges. This gradual transition to the full thickness of the gap seal member ensures that disturbance of the liquid supply system is reduced when it passes on top of the gap seal member 100.


The same way of sealing may be used for other objects such as sensors, for example transmission image sensors. In this case, as the object is not required to move, the gap seal member 100 can be glued in place (at either end) with a glue which does not dissolve in the immersion liquid. The glue can alternatively be positioned at the junction of the edge seal member 117, the object and the gap seal member 100.


Furthermore, the gap seal member 100 can be positioned underneath the object and an overhang of the edge seal member 117. The object may be shaped with an overhang also, if necessary.


The gap seal member 100, whether above or below the object, can have a passage provided through it, from one opening in a surface in contact with the edge seal member 117 to another opening in a surface in contact with the object. By positioning one opening in fluid communication with vacuum 105, the gap seal member 100 can then be kept tightly in place.


Embodiment 6


A sixth embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. 10. The solution shown in FIG. 10 bypasses some of the problems associated with imaging edge portions of the substrate W as well as allows a transmission image sensor (TIS) 220 (or other sensor or object) to be illuminated by the projection system PL under the same conditions as the substrate W.


The sixth embodiment uses the liquid supply system described with respect to the first embodiment. However, rather than confining the immersion liquid in the liquid supply system under the projection system PL on its lower side with the substrate W, the liquid is confined by an intermediary plate 210 which is positioned between the liquid supply system and the substrate W. The spaces 222, 215 between the intermediary plate 210 and the TIS 220 and the substrate W are also filled with liquid 111. This may either be done by two separate space liquid supply systems via respective ports 230, 240 as illustrated or by the same space liquid supply system via ports 230, 240. Thus the space 215 between the substrate W and the intermediary plate 210 and the space 222 between the transmission image sensor 220 and the intermediary plate 210 are both filled with liquid and both the substrate W and the transmission image sensor can be illuminated under the same conditions. Portions 200 provide a support surface or surfaces for the intermediary plate 210 which may be held in place by vacuum sources.


The intermediary plate 210 is made of such a size that it covers all of the substrate W as well as the transmission image sensor 220. Therefore, no edges need to be traversed by the liquid supply system even when the edge of the substrate W is imaged or when the transmission image sensor is positioned under the projection system PL. The top surface of the transmission image sensor 220 and the substrate W are substantially co-planar.


The intermediary plate 210 can be removable. It can, for example, be put in place and removed by a substrate handling robot or other appropriate mechanism.


All of the above described embodiments may be used to seal around the edge of the substrate W. Other objects on the substrate table WT may also need to be sealed in a similar way, such as sensors including sensors and/or marks which are illuminated with the projection beam through the liquid such as a transmission image sensor, integrated lens interferometer and scanner (wavefront sensor) and a spot sensor plate. Such objects may also include sensors and/or marks which are illuminated with non-projection radiation beams such as levelling and alignment sensors and/or marks. The liquid supply system may supply liquid to cover all of the object in such a case. Any of the above embodiments may be used for this purpose. In some instances, the object will not need to be removed from the substrate table WT as, in contrast to the substrate W, the sensors do not need to be removed from the substrate table WT. In such a case the above embodiments may be modified as appropriate (e.g. the seals may not need to be moveable).


Embodiment 7



FIG. 11 shows a seventh embodiment which is the same as the first embodiment except as described below.


In the seventh embodiment the object on the substrate table WT is a sensor 220 such as a transmission image sensor (TIS). In order to prevent immersion liquid seeping underneath the sensor 220, a bead of glue 700 which is undissolvable and unreactable with the immersion fluid is positioned between the edge seal member 117 and the sensor 220. The glue is covered by immersion fluid in use.


Embodiment 8


An eighth embodiment is described with reference to FIGS. 12 and 13. In the eighth embodiment it is a sensor 220 which is being sealed to the substrate table WT. In both versions illustrated in FIGS. 12 and 13, a vacuum 46 is provided adjacent the gap with an opening passage 47 and a chamber 44 for taking away any immersion liquid which should find its way through the gap between the edge seal member 117 and the edge of the sensor 220.


In the FIG. 12 version, the vacuum 46 is provided in the substrate table WT under an overhang portion of the object 220. The passage 47 is provided in an overhanging inwardly protruding portion of the substrate table WT. Optionally a bead of glue 700 is positioned at the inner most edge of the protruding portion between the substrate table WT and the object 220. If no bead of glue 700 is provided, a flow of gas from underneath the object 220 helps seal the gap between the sensor 220 and the substrate table WT.


In the version of FIG. 13, the vacuum 46, compartment 44 and passage 47 are provided in the object 220 itself under an inwardly protruding edge seal member 117. Again there is the option of providing a bead of glue between the object 220 and the substrate table WT radially outwardly of the passage 47.


The shape of the edge seal member 117 and the top outer most edge of the object 220 can be varied. For example, it may be advantageous to provide an overhanging edge seal member 117 or indeed an outer edge of the object 220 which is overhanging. Alternatively, an outer upper corner of the object 220 may be useful.


Example of High NA Detection Sensor


Substrate-level sensors according to one or more embodiments of the invention may comprise a radiation-receiving element (1102, 1118) and a radiation-detecting element (1108, 1124) as shown in FIGS. 16-19. Exposure radiation is directed from the final element of the projection system PL through an immersion liquid 11 at least partly filling a space between the final element of the projection system PL and the substrate W. The detailed configuration of each of these elements depends on the properties of the radiation to be detected. The sensor at substrate level may comprise a photocell only, for use in cases where it is desirable for the photocell to receive the radiation directly. Alternatively, the sensor at substrate level may comprise a luminescence layer in combination with a photocell. In this arrangement, radiation at a first wavelength is absorbed by the luminescence layer and reradiated a short time later at a second (longer) wavelength. This arrangement is useful, for example, where the photocell is designed to work more efficiently at the second wavelength.


The radiation-receiving element (1102, 1118), which may be a layer with a pinhole, a grating or another diffractive element fulfilling a similar function, may be supported on top of a quartz sensor body 1120, i.e. on the same side of the body as the projection system. The radiation-detecting element (1108, 1124), in contrast, may be arranged within the sensor body 1120, or within a concave region formed on the side of the sensor body 1120 facing away from the projection system.


At boundaries between media of different refractive indices a proportion of incident radiation will be reflected and potentially lost from the sensor. For optically smooth surfaces, the extent to which this occurs depends on the angle of incidence of the radiation and the difference in refractive index of the media in question. For radiation incident at and above a “critical angle” (conventionally measured from normal incidence) total internal reflection may occur, leading to serious loss of signal to later elements of the sensor. This may be a particular problem in high NA systems where radiation may have a higher average angle of incidence. Accordingly, in an embodiment, arrangements are provided so that gas is excluded from the region between the radiation-receiving (1102, 1118) and radiation-detecting (1108, 1124) elements in order to avoid interfaces between media of high refractive index and gas.


In addition to losses due to partial and total internal reflection, absorption may also seriously reduce the intensity of radiation intensity reaching the photocell, as may scattering from interfaces that are not optically smooth.



FIG. 16 shows an integrated lens interferometer and scanner (ILIAS) sensor module. This module has a shearing grating structure 1102 as a radiation-receiving element, supported by a transmissive plate 1104, which may be made of glass or quartz. A quantum conversion layer 1106 is positioned immediately above a camera chip 1108 (the radiation-detecting element), which is in turn mounted on a substrate 1110. The substrate 1110 is connected to the transmissive plate 1104 via spacers 1112 and bonding wires 1114 connect the radiation-detecting element to external instrumentation. A gas gap is located between the quantum conversion layer 1106 and the transmissive plate 1104. In a setup such as this designed for 157 nm radiation, for example, the gas gap within the sensor cannot easily be purged so that it will contain significant proportions of oxygen and water, which absorb radiation. Signal is therefore lost and the effect becomes worse for larger angles as these have a longer path length through gas. Thus, the dynamic range requirements for the sensor become more severe.



FIGS. 17 and 18 show improved ILIAS sensor modules according to embodiments of the present invention. In FIG. 17, the gas gap has been removed by changing the shape of the transmissive plate 1104 to fit directly to the camera 1108. This arrangement is made more difficult by the need to provide access for the bonding wires 1114 and necessitates an elongated form. From an engineering point of view, the alternative arrangement shown in FIG. 18 is easier to realize. Here, a filler sheet 1116 of the same material as the transmissive plate 1104, or of similar optical properties, is inserted between the transmissive plate 1104 and the quantum conversion layer 1106. The removal of the gas gap reduces transmission losses and relaxes dynamic range requirements (or, alternatively speaking, improves the effective dynamic range). Both arrangements improve refractive index matching and reduce the extent of spurious internal reflections at the interface with the transmissive plate 1104.



FIG. 19
a shows a DUV transmission image sensor. FIG. 19b shows a magnified view of the processing element for clarity. The pattern of transmissive grooves 1118, constituting the radiation-receiving element in this case, is realized by means of e-beam lithography and dry etching techniques in a thin metal layer deposited on a substrate by means of sputtering. DUV radiation that is projected towards the grooves 1118 is transmitted by the transmissive plate 1104 (which may be quartz or fused silica) and hits the underlying luminescent material 1122, or “phosphor”. The luminescent material 1122 may comprise a slab of crystalline material that is doped with rare-earth ions, e.g. yttrium-aluminium-garnet doped with cerium (YAG:Ce). The main purpose of the luminescent material 1122 is to convert the DUV radiation into more easily detectable visible radiation, which is then detected by the photodiode 1124. DUV radiation that has not been absorbed and converted into visible radiation by the phosphor 1122 may be filtered out before it reaches the photodiode 1124 (e.g. by a BG-39 or UG filter 1126).


In the above arrangement, gas may be present in the gaps between components mounted in the sensor housing 1125, yielding a number of gas/material/gas interfaces that interrupt the propagation of radiation. By considering the path of DUV radiation and radiation arising from luminescence, it is possible to identify regions where radiation is likely to be lost. The first region of interest is the rear-side 1128 of the transmissive plate 1104, reached by DUV radiation after it has passed through the grooves 1118 and transmissive plate 1104. Here, the surface has been formed by mechanical means, such as by drilling, and is inevitably rough on the scale of the wavelength of the radiation. Radiation may therefore be lost due to scattering, either back into the transmissive plate 1104 or out past the luminescent material 1122. Secondly, after this interface, the DUV light encounters the optically smooth gas/YAG:Ce interface, where a substantial amount of reflection may occur due to the refractive index mismatch, particularly in systems of high NA. Thirdly, the luminescent material 1122 emits radiation in random directions. Due to its relatively high refractive index, the critical angle for total internal reflection at a YAG:Ce/air boundary is around 33° (where, for example, there is air in the gap between the YAG:Ce and the filter 1126) from the normal, meaning that a large proportion of radiation incident on the boundary is reflected out of the system and lost through the side walls of the luminescent material 1122. Finally, the part of the luminescence that is directed towards the photodiode has to overcome the gas/quartz interface on the diode surface where surface roughness may again account for loss of detected signal.


Each of the embodiments may be combined with one or more of the other embodiments as appropriate. Further, each of the embodiments (and any appropriate combination of embodiments) can be applied simply to the liquid supply system of FIG. 2 and FIGS. 14 and 15 without the edge seal member 17, 117 as feasible and/or appropriate.


In an embodiment, there is provided a lithographic projection apparatus comprising: an illuminator adapted to condition a beam of radiation; a support structure configured to hold a patterning device, the patterning device configured to pattern the beam of radiation according to a desired pattern; a substrate table configured to hold a substrate; a projection system adapted to project the patterned beam onto a target portion of a substrate; a liquid supply system configured to at least partly fill a space between the projection system and an object on the substrate table, with a liquid; and a sensor capable of being positioned to be illuminated by a beam of radiation once it has passed through the liquid.


In an embodiment, the substrate table comprises a support surface configured to support an intermediary plate between the projection system and the sensor and not in contact with the sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a transmission image sensor configured to sense the beam and wherein the intermediary plate is positionable between the sensor and the projection system. In an embodiment, the sensor is on the substrate table. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises an alignment sensor configured to align the substrate table relative to the projection system. In an embodiment, measurement gratings of the alignment sensor have a pitch of less than 500 nm. In an embodiment, the alignment sensor is configured to be illuminated obliquely. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a transmission image sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a focus sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a spot or dose sensor, an integrated lens interferometer and scanner, an alignment mark, or any combination of the foregoing. In an embodiment, the substrate table comprises an edge seal member configured to at least partly surround an edge of the sensor and to provide a primary surface facing the projection system substantially co-planar with a primary surface of the sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor is configured to be in contact with the liquid and the beam of radiation is configured to come from the projection system or an alignment system. In an embodiment, the beam of radiation is the patterned beam. In an embodiment, an alignment system comprises the sensor and is configured receive an alignment beam of radiation from the projection system to align the substrate. In an embodiment, the substrate table comprises a vacuum port configured to remove liquid from a space between the substrate table and the sensor. In an embodiment, the apparatus further comprises a bead of material in a space between the substrate table and the sensor configured to prevent entry of the liquid.


In an embodiment, there is provided a device manufacturing method comprising: projecting a beam of radiation through a liquid onto a sensor; and projecting the beam of radiation as patterned using a projection system of a lithographic apparatus through the liquid onto a target portion of a substrate.


In an embodiment, the liquid is supported on an intermediary plate between the projection system and the sensor, the plate not being in contact with the sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a transmission image sensor configured to sense the beam and the intermediary plate is positionable between the sensor and the projection system. In an embodiment, the sensor is on a substrate table holding the substrate. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises an alignment sensor configured to align a substrate table holding the substrate relative to the projection system. In an embodiment, measurement gratings of the alignment sensor have a pitch of less than 500 nm. In an embodiment, the alignment sensor is configured to be illuminated obliquely. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a transmission image sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a focus sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a spot or dose sensor, an integrated lens interferometer and scanner, an alignment mark, or any combination of the foregoing. In an embodiment, a substrate table holding the substrate comprises an edge seal member configured to at least partly surround an edge of the sensor and to provide a primary surface facing the projection system substantially co-planar with a primary surface of the sensor. In an embodiment, the method comprises projecting the beam of radiation from the projection system or an alignment system through the liquid onto the sensor in contact with the liquid. In an embodiment, the beam of radiation is the patterned beam. In an embodiment, an alignment system comprises the sensor and is configured receive an alignment beam of radiation from the projection system to align the substrate. In an embodiment, a substrate table holding the substrate comprises a vacuum port configured to remove liquid from a space between the substrate table and the sensor. In an embodiment, the method further comprises providing a bead of material in a space between the substrate table and the sensor configured to prevent entry of the liquid.


While specific embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described. In particular, the invention is also applicable to other types of liquid supply systems, especially localised liquid area systems. If the seal member solution is used, it may be one in which a seal other than a gas seal is used. The description is not intended to limit the invention.

Claims
  • 1. An exposure apparatus comprising: a movable table comprising a top surface having an object support surface portion to support an object;a member, movably separate from the table and located on a member support surface portion of the top surface of the table, to provide a surface substantially co-planar with a top surface of the object in or on the table, wherein the object and member support surface portions are substantially co-planar;a projection system configured to project a radiation beam onto a radiation-sensitive target portion of a substrate; anda liquid supply system configured to provide a liquid to a space between the projection system and the object, the liquid supply system comprising an inlet to supply the liquid,wherein the table further comprises a recess recessed into the top surface of the table and extending below the object and member support surface portions and a fluid opening, below a gap opening between the object when supported on the table and the member, to remove the liquid entering the gap opening, the fluid opening being separate from the inlet and in an upwardly facing surface of the recess below the object and member support surface portions, the upwardly facing surface extending on opposite sides of the fluid opening.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the liquid supply system is configured to substantially confine the liquid to a localized area having a size smaller than the area of the substrate.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the object comprises a part of a sensor system configured to be illuminated by a beam of radiation through the liquid.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the object comprises the substrate.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the fluid opening is below a bottom surface of the member.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a vacuum opening located under the member.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising a liquid confinement structure having a bottom surface, the bottom surface having an outlet configured to remove the liquid from the space, and the liquid confinement structure having an open aperture to allow fluid communication of the supplied liquid between a bottom surface of the projection system and the movable table.
  • 8. An exposure apparatus comprising: a projection system configured to project a radiation beam onto a radiation-sensitive target portion of a substrate;a movable table comprising a part of a sensor system configured for illumination by a beam of radiation and comprising a top surface having an object support surface portion to support a further object;a liquid supply system configured to fill a space between the substrate and the projection system with a liquid via an inlet and configured to provide the liquid to a localized area, having a size smaller than the area of the substrate, on the movable table and/or on the part of the sensor system; anda plate, located on a plate support surface portion of the top surface of the table and removable from the top surface of the table, at least partly covering an edge of the part of the sensor system, providing a primary surface, facing upward, substantially co-planar with a primary surface of the part of the sensor system, and having an opening to surround the further object in or on the table, wherein the object and plate support surface portions are substantially co-planar,wherein the table further comprises a recess recessed into the top surface of the table and extending below the object and plate support surface portions and a fluid opening, below a gap opening between the further object when supported on the table and the plate, to remove the liquid entering the gap opening, the fluid opening being separate from the inlet and in an upwardly facing surface of the recess below the object and plate support surface portions, the upwardly facing surface extending on opposite sides of the fluid opening.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the plate is movable with respect to the part of the sensor system.
  • 10. A device manufacturing method, comprising: projecting a beam of radiation, using a projection system, through a liquid onto a radiation-sensitive target portion of a substrate;providing the liquid from an inlet to a space between the projection system and an object in or on a movable table, wherein a member, movably separate from the table and the substrate and located on a member support surface portion of a top surface of the table, provides a surface substantially co-planar with a top surface of the object in or on the table, wherein the movable table comprises an object support surface portion of the top surface of the table to support the object and a recess recessed into the top surface of the table and extending below the object and member support surface portions, wherein the object and member support surface portions are substantially co-planar; andremoving the liquid entering a gap opening, between the member and the object, using a fluid opening of the table that is below the gap opening, the fluid opening being separate from the inlet and in an upwardly facing surface of the recess below the object and member support surface portions, the upwardly facing surface extending on opposite sides of the fluid opening.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, further comprising substantially confining the liquid to a localized area having a size smaller than the area of the substrate.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the object comprises a part of sensor system illuminated by a beam of radiation through the liquid.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, further comprising applying a vacuum through an opening located under the member.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, wherein the fluid opening is below a bottom surface of the member.
  • 15. An exposure apparatus comprising: a movable table comprising a top surface having an object support surface portion to support an object;a member, located on the top surface of the table, to provide a surface substantially co-planar with a top surface of the object in or on the table, the member is movably separate from the table, the member has an opening to surround the object when in or on the table, and the member provides a surface substantially co-planar with a top surface of a further object in or on the table;a projection system configured to project a radiation beam onto a radiation-sensitive target portion of a substrate; anda liquid supply system configured to provide a liquid to a space between the projection system and the object, the liquid supply system comprising an inlet to supply the liquid,wherein the table further comprises an upwardly facing recess recessed below the object support surface portion, the recess extending at least partly underneath the member.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising a fluid opening below a gap opening between the object when on the table and the member, the fluid opening being separate from the inlet and in a surface of the recess below the object support surface portion.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the member is located on a member support surface portion of the top surface of the table, wherein the object and member support surface portions are substantially co-planar.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 15, further comprising a liquid confinement structure having a bottom surface, the bottom surface having an outlet configured to remove the liquid from the space, and the liquid confinement structure having an open aperture to allow fluid communication of the supplied liquid between a bottom surface of the projection system and the movable table.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the table further comprises a first fluid opening, below a first gap opening between the member and the object, to remove the liquid entering the first gap opening and a second fluid opening, below a second gap opening between the member and a further object in or on the table, to remove the liquid entering the second gap opening, wherein the first and second fluid openings are below a bottom surface of the member.
Priority Claims (3)
Number Date Country Kind
03253636 Jun 2003 EP regional
03255395 Aug 2003 EP regional
03257068 Nov 2003 EP regional
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/698,932, filed Feb. 2, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,482,845 which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/482,122, filed Jul. 7, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,154,708 which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/857,614, filed Jun. 1, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,213,963, which in turn claims priority from European patent applications EP 03253636.9, filed Jun. 9, 2003, EP 03255395.0, filed Aug. 29, 2003, and EP 03257068.1, filed Nov. 10, 2003, each foregoing application incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.

US Referenced Citations (224)
Number Name Date Kind
3573975 Dhaka of al. Apr 1971 A
3648587 Stevens Mar 1972 A
3903413 Manning Sep 1975 A
4280054 Guarino Jul 1981 A
4346164 Tabarelli et al. Aug 1982 A
4358198 Moriyama et al. Nov 1982 A
4390273 Loebach et al. Jun 1983 A
4396705 Akeyama et al. Aug 1983 A
4465368 Matsuura et al. Aug 1984 A
4480910 Takanashi et al. Nov 1984 A
4509852 Tabarelli et al. Apr 1985 A
4540277 Mayer et al. Sep 1985 A
4853880 Akamatsu et al. Aug 1989 A
4887904 Nakazato et al. Dec 1989 A
4999669 Sakamoto et al. Mar 1991 A
5040020 Rauschenbach et al. Aug 1991 A
5121256 Corle et al. Jun 1992 A
5162642 Akamatsu et al. Nov 1992 A
5229872 Mumola Jul 1993 A
5243195 Nishi Sep 1993 A
5258823 Akamatsu Nov 1993 A
5296891 Vogt et al. Mar 1994 A
5517344 Hu et al. May 1996 A
5523193 Nelson Jun 1996 A
5528118 Lee Jun 1996 A
5610683 Takahashi Mar 1997 A
5623853 Novak et al. Apr 1997 A
5633968 Sheem May 1997 A
5654553 Kawakubo et al. Aug 1997 A
5668672 Oomura Sep 1997 A
5689377 Takahashi Nov 1997 A
5715039 Fukuda et al. Feb 1998 A
5825043 Suwa Oct 1998 A
5835275 Takahashi et al. Nov 1998 A
5874820 Lee Feb 1999 A
5883704 Nishi et al. Mar 1999 A
5900354 Batchelder May 1999 A
5969441 Loopstra et al. Oct 1999 A
5985495 Okumura et al. Nov 1999 A
5997963 Davison et al. Dec 1999 A
6031946 Bergmann et al. Feb 2000 A
6046792 Van Der Werf et al. Apr 2000 A
6078380 Taniguchi et al. Jun 2000 A
6137561 Imai Oct 2000 A
6191429 Suwa Feb 2001 B1
6236634 Lee et al. May 2001 B1
6333775 Haney et al. Dec 2001 B1
6417914 Li Jul 2002 B1
6560032 Hatano May 2003 B2
6600547 Watson et al. Jul 2003 B2
6603130 Bisschops et al. Aug 2003 B1
6603530 Kohno Aug 2003 B1
6618122 Bisschops et al. Sep 2003 B2
6633365 Suenaga Oct 2003 B2
6650399 Baselmans et al. Nov 2003 B2
6710849 Kwan et al. Mar 2004 B2
6741331 Boonman et al. May 2004 B2
6757048 Arakawa Jun 2004 B2
6762826 Tsukamoto et al. Jul 2004 B2
6784432 Wieczorek Aug 2004 B2
6785006 Nishida Aug 2004 B2
6788477 Lin Sep 2004 B2
6801301 Miyajima et al. Oct 2004 B2
6842256 Hill Jan 2005 B2
6867844 Vogel et al. Mar 2005 B2
6952253 Lof et al. Oct 2005 B2
6954256 Flagello et al. Oct 2005 B2
7009682 Bleeker Mar 2006 B2
7075616 Derksen et al. Jul 2006 B2
7081943 Lof et al. Jul 2006 B2
7098991 Nagasaka et al. Aug 2006 B2
7199858 Lof et al. Apr 2007 B2
7213963 Lof et al. May 2007 B2
7227616 Graeupner Jun 2007 B2
7411657 Ottens et al. Aug 2008 B2
7486380 Hazelton et al. Feb 2009 B2
7593093 Lof et al. Sep 2009 B2
7843550 Ishii et al. Nov 2010 B2
7978306 Ottens et al. Jul 2011 B2
8154708 Lof et al. Apr 2012 B2
8482845 Lof et al. Jul 2013 B2
20010038442 Hansell et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020018190 Nogawa et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020020821 Van Santen et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020026878 Kwan et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020037461 Van Der Werf et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020041377 Hagiwara et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020057423 Nogawa May 2002 A1
20020061469 Tanaka May 2002 A1
20020079455 Wieczorek Jun 2002 A1
20020081760 Whatmore Jun 2002 A1
20020101574 Tsuji Aug 2002 A1
20020118370 Nishida Aug 2002 A1
20020145717 Baselmans et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020163629 Switkes et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020163630 Bisschops et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020167642 Jones et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020167651 Boonman et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020196421 Tanaka et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030030916 Suenaga Feb 2003 A1
20030071982 Miyajima et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030095244 Komatsu May 2003 A1
20030123040 Almogy Jul 2003 A1
20030174408 Rostalski et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040000627 Schuster Jan 2004 A1
20040021844 Suenaga Feb 2004 A1
20040075895 Lin Apr 2004 A1
20040108467 Eurlings et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040109237 Epple et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040114117 Bleeker Jun 2004 A1
20040114124 Hoeks et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040118184 Violette Jun 2004 A1
20040119954 Kawashima et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040123351 Silvestri Jun 2004 A1
20040125351 Krautschik Jul 2004 A1
20040135099 Simon et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040136494 Lof et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040160582 Lof et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040165159 Lof et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040169834 Richter et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040169924 Flagello et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040180294 Baba-Ali et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040180299 Rolland et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040207824 Lof et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040211920 Derksen et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040224265 Endo et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040224525 Endo et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040227923 Flagello et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040233405 Kato et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040253547 Endo et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040253548 Endo et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040257544 Vogel et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040259008 Endo et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040259040 Endo et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040263808 Sewell Dec 2004 A1
20040263809 Nakano Dec 2004 A1
20050002004 Kolesnychenko et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050007569 Streefkerk et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050007570 Streefkerk et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050018155 Cox et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050018156 Mulkens et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050024609 De Smit et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050030497 Nakamura Feb 2005 A1
20050030498 Mulkens Feb 2005 A1
20050030506 Schuster Feb 2005 A1
20050036121 Hoogendam et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050036183 Yeo et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050036184 Yeo et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050036213 Mann et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050037269 Levinson Feb 2005 A1
20050041225 Sengers et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050042554 Dierichs et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050046813 Streefkerk et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050046934 Ho et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050048223 Pawloski et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050052632 Miyajima Mar 2005 A1
20050068639 Pierrat et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050073670 Carroll Apr 2005 A1
20050078287 Sengers et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050084794 Meagley et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050094116 Flagello et al. May 2005 A1
20050099635 Kakuchi et al. May 2005 A1
20050100745 Lin et al. May 2005 A1
20050110973 Streefkerk et al. May 2005 A1
20050117224 Shafer et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050122497 Lyons et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050122505 Miyajima Jun 2005 A1
20050132914 Mulkens et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050134815 Van Santen et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050134817 Nakamura Jun 2005 A1
20050141098 Schuster Jun 2005 A1
20050145265 Ravkin et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050145803 Hakey et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050146694 Tokita Jul 2005 A1
20050146695 Kawakami Jul 2005 A1
20050147920 Lin et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050153424 Coon Jul 2005 A1
20050158673 Hakey et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050164502 Deng et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050174549 Duineveld et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050175940 Dierichs Aug 2005 A1
20050185269 Epple et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050190435 Shafer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050190455 Rostalski et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050205108 Chang et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050213061 Hakey et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050213072 Schenker et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050217135 O'Donnell et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050217137 Smith et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050217703 O'Donnell Oct 2005 A1
20050219481 Cox et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050219482 Baselmans et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050219499 Maria Zaal et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050225734 De Smit et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050225737 Weissenrieder et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050231694 Kolesnychenko et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050237501 Furukawa et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050243292 Baselmans et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050243328 Wegmann et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050245005 Benson Nov 2005 A1
20050253090 Gau et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050259232 Streefkerk et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050259233 Streefkerk et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050259234 Hirukawa et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050264778 Lof et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050270505 Smith Dec 2005 A1
20060103832 Hazelton et al. May 2006 A1
20060114445 Ebihara Jun 2006 A1
20060170891 Nishinaga et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060181690 Nishinaga et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060209414 Van Santen et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060261288 Van Santen Nov 2006 A1
20060285100 Hamatani et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070013888 Flagello et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070076181 Ishii et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070076182 Hazelton et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070132970 Lof et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070132979 Lof et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070146665 Ottens et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070268471 Lof et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080278697 Ottens et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090279061 Jacobs et al. Nov 2009 A1
20110007285 Lof et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110285977 Lof et al. Nov 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (163)
Number Date Country
1341277 Mar 2002 CN
206 607 Feb 1984 DE
221 563 Apr 1985 DE
224448 Jul 1985 DE
242880 Feb 1987 DE
0023231 Feb 1981 EP
0418427 Mar 1991 EP
0 605 103 Jul 1994 EP
0 834 773 Apr 1998 EP
1039511 Sep 2000 EP
1 182 511 Feb 2002 EP
1 477 856 Nov 2004 EP
1 494 267 Jan 2005 EP
1 571 696 Sep 2005 EP
1 571 701 Sep 2005 EP
1 628 329 Feb 2006 EP
1 628 330 Feb 2006 EP
2474708 Jul 1981 FR
11-297615 Oct 1999 JO
A-57-153433 Sep 1982 JP
58-202448 Nov 1983 JP
A 59-19912 Feb 1984 JP
62-065326 Mar 1987 JP
62-121417 Jun 1987 JP
63-157419 Jun 1988 JP
2-47515 Feb 1990 JP
04-305915 Oct 1992 JP
04-305917 Oct 1992 JP
A-5-62877 Mar 1993 JP
5-251544 Sep 1993 JP
A-5-304072 Nov 1993 JP
06-84757 Mar 1994 JP
06-124873 May 1994 JP
06-168866 Jun 1994 JP
A-6-168866 Jun 1994 JP
07-132262 May 1995 JP
07-220990 Aug 1995 JP
A 08-316125 Nov 1996 JP
09-066429 Mar 1997 JP
A-09-184787 Jul 1997 JP
10-92728 Apr 1998 JP
10-135316 May 1998 JP
10-154659 Jun 1998 JP
A-10-160582 Jun 1998 JP
10-228661 Aug 1998 JP
10-255319 Sep 1998 JP
10-303114 Nov 1998 JP
10-340846 Dec 1998 JP
11-126112 May 1999 JP
11-176727 Jul 1999 JP
11-239758 Sep 1999 JP
11-297615 Oct 1999 JP
2000-058436 Feb 2000 JP
A-2000-097616 Apr 2000 JP
2000-331931 Nov 2000 JP
2001-091849 Apr 2001 JP
2001-281050 Oct 2001 JP
2002-5737 Jan 2002 JP
2062-5737 Jan 2002 JP
A-2002-071513 Mar 2002 JP
A-2002-071514 Mar 2002 JP
2002-513856 May 2002 JP
2002-170754 Jun 2002 JP
A 2002-170765 Jun 2002 JP
2002-246309 Aug 2002 JP
A-2002-250678 Sep 2002 JP
A-2002-296005 Oct 2002 JP
2003-332213 Nov 2003 JP
2004-165666 Jun 2004 JP
2004-193252 Jul 2004 JP
2004-289126 Oct 2004 JP
2005-012201 Jan 2005 JP
2005-101488 Apr 2005 JP
2005-223275 Aug 2005 JP
2005-277363 Oct 2005 JP
2006-523377 Oct 2006 JP
4362867 Nov 2009 JP
WO 9833096 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9838597 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9838597 Sep 1998 WO
WO 9840791 Sep 1998 WO
9939375 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9949504 Sep 1999 WO
WO 9960361 Nov 1999 WO
WO 99060361 Nov 1999 WO
WO 0122480 Mar 2001 WO
WO 02090905 Nov 2002 WO
WO 02091078 Nov 2002 WO
WO 03077036 Sep 2003 WO
WO 03077037 Sep 2003 WO
WO 03085708 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2004019128 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004053596 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053950 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053951 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053952 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053953 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053954 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053955 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053956 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053957 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053958 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004053959 Jun 2004 WO
WO 2004055803 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2004057295 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2004057589 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2004057590 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2004077154 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2004081666 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2004090577 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2004090633 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2004090634 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2004092830 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2004092833 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2004093130 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2004093159 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2004093160 Oct 2004 WO
WO 2004095135 Nov 2004 WO
WO 2004105107 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2004105107 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2004112108 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2005001432 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005001572 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005003864 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005006026 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005008339 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005010611 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005013008 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005015283 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005017625 Feb 2005 WO
WO 2005019935 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005022266 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005022616 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005022616 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005024325 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005024517 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005034174 Apr 2005 WO
WO 2005050324 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005054953 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005054955 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005059617 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005059618 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005059645 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005059654 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005062128 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005064400 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005064405 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005069055 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005069078 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005069081 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2005071491 Aug 2005 WO
WO 2005074606 Aug 2005 WO
WO 2005076084 Aug 2005 WO
WO 2005081030 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2005081067 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2005098504 Oct 2005 WO
WO 2005098505 Oct 2005 WO
WO 2005098506 Oct 2005 WO
WO 2005106589 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2005111689 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2005111722 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2005119368 Dec 2005 WO
WO 2005119369 Dec 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (124)
Entry
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/850,472.
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532.
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754.
Japanese Office Action mailed May 31, 2013 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-281445.
Japanese Office Action mailed Jun. 12, 2013 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-027270.
Information Disclosure Statement filed Dec. 1, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/606,913.
Third Preliminary Amendment dated Aug. 17, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/147,265.
Optical Microlithography XV, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4691 (2002), “Resolution Enhancement of 157 nm Lithography by Liquid Immersion”, M. Switkes et al., pp. 450-466.
S. Owa at al., “Immersion lithography; its potential performance and issues”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5040, 2003, pp. 724-733.
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm,” MIT Lincoln Lab, Orlando 2001-1, Dec. 17, 2001.
M. Switkes at al., “Immersion Lithography: Optics for the 50 nm Node,” 157 Anvers-1, Sep. 4, 2002.
B.J. Lin, “The Paths to Subhalf-Micrometer Optical Lithography,” SPIE vol. 922, Optical/Laser Microlithography (1988), pp. 256-269.
J.A. Hoffnagle et al., “Liquid Immersion Deep-Ultraviolet Interferometric Lithography,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 17, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 3306-3309.
G. Owen et al., “1/81.μm Optical Lithography,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 10, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 3032-3036.
H. Hogan, “New Semiconductor Lithography Makes a Splash,” Photonics Spectra, Photonics Technology Wand, Oct. 2003 Edition, pp. 1-3.
Matsuyama et al., “Nikon Projection Lens Update,” SPIE Microlithography 2004, 5377-65, Mar. 2004.
B.J. Lin, “The k3 coefficient in nonparaxial λ/NA scaling equations for resolution, depth of focus, and immersion lithography,” J. Microlith., Miorotab., Microsyst., 1(1):7-12 (2002).
European Search Report far EP Patent Appln. No. 03257068.1 dated May 3, 2004.
Japanese Office Action mailed Jul. 24, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-243516.
U.S. Office Action mailed May 24, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754.
U.S. Office Action mailed Jun. 8, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,404.
U.S. Office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,938.
Japanese Office Action mailed Nov. 6, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-243513.
U.S Office Action mailed Nov. 26, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,938.
U.S Office Action mailed Oct. 24, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754.
U.S Office Action mailed Oct. 15, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,404.
U.S Office Action mailed Sep. 27, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,932.
U.S Office Action mailed Sep. 25, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/850,472.
European Communication dated Jan. 3, 2012 in corresponding European Patent Application No. 04 253 354.7.
Chinese Notification of Completion of Formalities for Registration dated Jul. 1, 2013 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201110083335.0.
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532.
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/195,248.
U.S. Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/195,248.
U.S. Office Action mailed Nov. 14, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532.
U.S. Office Action mailed Nov. 20, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754.
U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 9, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,404.
U.S. Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,830.
U.S. Office Action mailed Feb. 24, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,830.
Singapore Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 4, 2013 in corresponding Singapore Patent Application No. 201005011-0.
Japanese Office Action mailed Nov. 8, 2013 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-066781.
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 17, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,404.
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754.
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/195,248.
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532.
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 31, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/692,865.
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532.
V. LeRoux et al., “A reflection lithography using multicharged ions,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 57-58, pp. 239-245 (Sep. 2001).
Ivor Brodie et al., “A Multiple-Electron-Beam Exposure System for High-Throughput, Direct-Write Submicrometer Lithography,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. EDS-28, No. 11, pp. 1422-1428 (Nov. 1981).
Yuen-Chuen Chan et al., “Development and applications of a laser writing lithography system for maskless patterning,” Opt. Eng., vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 2521-2530 (Sep. 1998).
W. Häβler-Grohne et al., “An electron optical metrology system for pattern placement measurements,” Meas. Sci, Technol., vol. 9, pp. 1120-1128 (1998).
Shoji Maruo et al., “Submicron stereolithography for the production of freely movable mechanisms by using single-photon polymerization,” Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 100, pp. 70-76 (Aug. 2002).
F. Abboud et al., “Evaluation of the MEBES® 4500 reticle writer to commercial requirements of 250 nm design rule IC devices,” Proc of SPIE, vol. 2793, pp. 438-451 (Jul. 24, 1996).
Toru Tojo et al., “Advanced electron beam writing system EX-11 for next-generation mask fabrication,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 3748, pp. 416-425 (Sep. 1999).
Yoshiyuki Tomita et al., “A surface motor-driven precise positioning system,” Precision Engineering, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 184-191 (Jul. 1994).
Chang-Woo Lee et al., “An ultraprecision stage for alignment of wafers in advanced microlithography,” Precision Engineering, vol. 21, No. 2/3, pp. 113-122, (Sep./Dec. 1997).
H. Löschner et al., “Ion projection lithography for vacuum microelectronics,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 487-492 (Mar./Apr. 1993).
Hans Loeschner et al., “Large-Field Ion-Optics for Projection and Proximity Printing and for Mask-Less Lithography (ML2),” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4688, pp. 595-606 (Jul. 2002).
Won-jong Kim et al., “Modeling and Vector Control of Planar Magnetic Levitator,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1254-1262 (Nov./Dec. 1998).
Rodney Kendall et al., “A servo guided X-Y-theta stage for electron beam lithography,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol, B, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 3019-3023 (Nov./Dec. 1991).
T. Kato et al., “Submicron pattern fabrication by focused ion beams,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 50-53 (Jan./Feb. 1985).
Hans C. Pfeiffer, “Prevail: Proof-of-Concept System and Results,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 53, pp. 61-66 (2000).
L.M. Buchmann et al., “Lithography with High Depth of Focus by an Ion Projection System,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 116-120 (Sep. 1992).
T.C. Bailey et al., “Step and Flash Imprint Lithography: An Efficient Nanoscale Printing Technology,” Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 481-486 (Jan. 2002).
Oui-Serg Kim et al., “Positioning Performance and Straightness Error Compensation of the Magnetic Levitation Stage Supported by the Linear Magnetic Bearing,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 374-378 (Apr. 2003).
Ampere A. Tseng et al., “Electron Beam Lithography in Nanoscale Fabrication: Recent Development,” IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 141-149 (Apr. 2003).
Qing Ji, “Maskless, Resistless Ion Beam Lithography Processes,” University of Berkeley, 128 pages (Spring 2003).
Rik Kneppers, “HP Laser Interferometers,” Vaisala News, vol. 151, pp. 34-37 (1999).
R.S. Dhaliwal et al., “Prevail—Electron projection technology approach for next-generation lithography,” IBM J. Res. & Dev., vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 615-638 (Sep. 2001).
Kazuaki Suzuki, “EPL Technology Development,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4754, pp. 775-789 (Jul. 2002).
G. Stengl et al., “Current status of Ion Projection Lithography,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 537, pp. 138-145 (1985).
Ernst Thielicke et al., “Microactuators and their technologies,” Mechatronics, vol. 10, pp. 431-455 (2000).
G. Stangl et al., “Submicron Lithography and DUV-Master Masks Made by Ion Projection Lithography,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 167-171 (1985).
G. Stengl et al., “Ion projection lithography machine IPLM01: A new tool for sub-0.5-micron modification of materials,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 194-200 (Jan./Feb. 1986).
Carl G. Chen et al., “Nanometer-accurate Grating Fabrication with Scanning Beam Interference Lithography,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4936, pp. 126-134 (Nov. 2002).
G. de Zwart et al., “Performance of a Step and Scan System for DUV Lithography,” SPIE Symposium on Optical Microlithography in Santa Clara, pp. 0-18 (Mar. 1997).
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2015 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,190.
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2015 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532.
Jan Mulkens et al., “ASML Optical Lithography Solutions for 65 nm and 45 nm Node,” Semicon Japan, pp. 1-29, (Dec. 5, 2003).
Arnold et al., “193nm Immersion Lithography,” International Sematech Litho Forum, Slides 1-22, (Jan. 28, 2004).
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2015 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532.
Information Disclosure Statement filed Dec. 1, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No . 11/606,913.
Information Disclosure Statement filed Dec. 1, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/606,909.
Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2007 issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/606,913.
Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2006 issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/002,900.
Office Action dated May 22, 2006 issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/002,900.
Third Preliminary Amendment dated Aug. 17, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/147,285.
Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2008 issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/606,909.
Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2007 issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/606,913.
Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2007 issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/002,900.
Emerging Lithographic Technologies VI, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4688 (2002), “Semiconductor Foundry, Lithography, and Partners”, B.J. Lin, pp. 11-24.
Optical Microlithography XV, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4691 (2002), “Resolution Enhancement of 157 nm Lithography by Liquid Immersion”, M. Switkes et al., pp. 459-465.
J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst., vol. 1 No. 3, Oct. 2002, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, “Resolution enhancement of 157 nm lithography by liquid immersion”, M. Switkes et al., pp. 1-4.
S. Owa et al., “Immersion lithography; its potential performance and issues”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5040, 2003, pp. 724-733.
European Search Report for EP 02257938 dated Sep. 25, 2003.
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm,” MIT Lincoln Lab, Orlando Jan. 2001, Dec. 17, 2001.
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2353-2356.
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography: Optics for the 50 nm Node,” 157 Anvers-1, Sep. 4, 2002.
B.J. Lin, “Drivers, Prospects and Challenges for Immersion Lithography,” TSMC, Inc., Sep. 2002.
B.J. Lin, “Proximity Printing Through Liquid,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 11B, Apr. 1978, p. 4997.
B.J. Lin, “The Paths to Subhalf-Micrometer Optical Lithography,” SPIE vol. 922, Optical/Laser Microlithoqraphy (1988), pp. 256-269.
G.W.W. Stevens, “Reduction of Waste Resulting from Mask Defects,” Solid State Technology, Aug. 1978, vol. 21 008, pp. 68-72.
S. Owa et al., “Advantage and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography,” Proc. SPIE 5040 (2003).
Nikon Precision Europe GmbH, “Investor Relations—Nikon's Real Solutions,” May 15, 2003.
H. Kawata et al., “Optical Projection Lithography using Lenses with Numerical Apertures Greater than Unity,” Microelectronic Engineering 9 (1989), pp. 31-36.
Bbej.A. Hoffnagle et al., “Liquid Immersion Deep-Ultraviolet Interferometric Lithography,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 17, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 3306-3309.
B.W. Smith et al., “Immersion Optical Lithography at 193 nm,” FUTURE FAB International, vol. 15, Jul. 11, 2003.
H. Kawata et al., “Fabrication of 0.2μm Fine Patterns Using Optical Projection Lithography with an Oil Immersion Lens,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 31 (1992), pp. 4174-4177.
G. Owen et al., “1/8μm Optical Lithography,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 10, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 3032-3036.
H. Hogan, “New Semiconductor Lithography Makes a Splash,” Photonics SPECTRA, Photonics Technology World, Oct. 2003 Edition, pp. 1-3.
S. Owa and N. Nagasaka, “Potential Performance and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography,” NGL Workshop 2003, Jul. 10, 2003, Slide Nos. 1-33.
European Search Report dated May 3, 2004 for EP 03257068.1.
S. Owa et al., “Update on 193nm immersion exposure tool,” Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-51.
H. Hata, “The Development of Immersion Exposure Tools,” Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-22.
T. Matsuyama et al., “Nikon Projection Lens Update,” SPIE Microlithography 2004, 5377-65, Mar. 2004.
“Depth-of-Focus Enhancement Using High Refractive Index Layer on the Imaging Layer,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 11, Apr. 1985, p. 6521.
A. Suzuki, “Lithography Advances on Multiple Fronts,” EEdesign, EE Times, Jan. 5, 2004.
B.J. Lin, “The k3 coefficient in nonparaxial λ/NA scaling equations for resolution, depth of focus, and immersion lithography,” J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst., 1(1):7-12 (2002).
European Search Report for EP 03257068 completed Aug. 17, 2004.
Examination Report for EP Patent Appln. No. 03257072.3 dated Mar. 28, 2008.
European Search Report for EP Patent Appln. No. 03257068.1 dated May 3, 2004.
European Search Report for EP Patent Appln. No. 03255395.0 dated Aug. 19, 2004.
Japanese Office Action issued for Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-417260, dated Dec. 18, 2006.
Japanese Official Action issued for Japanese Patent Application No. 2004-169275, dated Jul. 12, 2007.
English Translation of JP 10-228661 (dated Aug. 25, 1998).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110279800 A1 Nov 2011 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 12698932 Feb 2010 US
Child 13194136 US
Parent 11482122 Jul 2006 US
Child 12698932 US
Parent 10857614 Jun 2004 US
Child 11482122 US