The present invention relates to a lithographic projection apparatus and a device manufacturing method.
The term “patterning device” as here employed should be broadly interpreted as referring to any device that can be used to endow an incoming radiation beam with a patterned cross-section, corresponding to a pattern that is to be created in a target portion of the substrate; the term “light valve” can also be used in this context. Generally, the pattern will correspond to a particular functional layer in a device being created in the target portion, such as an integrated circuit or other device (see below). Examples of such a patterning device include:
A mask. The concept of a mask is well known in lithography, and it includes mask types such as binary, alternating phase-shift, and attenuated phase-shift, as well as various hybrid mask types. Placement of such a mask in the radiation beam causes selective transmission (in the case of a transmissive mask) or reflection (in the case of a reflective mask) of the radiation impinging on the mask, according to the pattern on the mask. In the case of a mask, the support structure will generally be a mask table, which ensures that the mask can be held at a desired position in the incoming radiation beam, and that it can be moved relative to the beam if so desired.
A programmable mirror array. One example of such a device is a matrix-addressable surface having a viscoelastic control layer and a reflective surface. The basic principle behind such an apparatus is that (for example) addressed areas of the reflective surface reflect incident light as diffracted light, whereas unaddressed areas reflect incident light as undiffracted light. Using an appropriate filter, the undiffracted light can be filtered out of the reflected beam, leaving only the diffracted light behind; in this manner, the beam becomes patterned according to the addressing pattern of the matrix-addressable surface. An alternative embodiment of a programmable mirror array employs a matrix arrangement of tiny mirrors, each of which can be individually tilted about an axis by applying a suitable localized electric field, or by employing piezoelectric actuation means. Once again, the mirrors are matrix-addressable, such that addressed mirrors will reflect an incoming radiation beam in a different direction to unaddressed mirrors; in this manner, the reflected beam is patterned according to the addressing pattern of the matrix-addressable mirrors. The matrix addressing can be performed using suitable electronics. In both of the situations described hereabove, the patterning device can comprise one or more programmable mirror arrays. More information on mirror arrays as here referred to can be gleaned, for example, from U.S. Pat. No. 5,296,891 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,523,193, and PCT patent application publications WO 98/38597 and WO 98/33096, which are incorporated herein by reference. In the case of a programmable mirror array, the support structure may be embodied as a frame or table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required.
A programmable LCD array. An example of such a construction is given in U.S. Pat. No. 5,229,872, which is incorporated herein by reference. As above, the support structure in this case may be embodied as a frame or table, for example, which may be fixed or movable as required.
For purposes of simplicity, the rest of this text may, at certain locations, specifically direct itself to examples involving a mask and mask table; however, the general principles discussed in such instances should be seen in the broader context of the patterning device as hereabove set forth.
Lithographic projection apparatus can be used, for example, in the manufacture of integrated circuits (ICs). In such a case, the patterning device may generate a circuit pattern corresponding to an individual layer of the IC, and this pattern can be imaged onto a target portion (e.g. comprising one or more dies) on a substrate (silicon wafer) that has been coated with a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist). In general, a single wafer will contain a whole network of adjacent target portions that are successively irradiated via the projection system, one at a time. In current apparatus, employing patterning by a mask on a mask table, a distinction can be made between two different types of machine. In one type of lithographic projection apparatus, each target portion is irradiated by exposing the entire mask pattern onto the target portion at one time; such an apparatus is commonly referred to as a stepper. In an alternative apparatus—commonly referred to as a step-and-scan apparatus—each target portion is irradiated by progressively scanning the mask pattern under the projection beam in a given reference direction (the “scanning” direction) while synchronously scanning the substrate table parallel or anti-parallel to this direction; since, in general, the projection system will have a magnification factor M (generally <1), the speed V at which the substrate table is scanned will be a factor M times that at which the mask table is scanned. More information with regard to lithographic devices as here described can be gleaned, for example, from U.S. Pat. No. 6,046,792, incorporated herein by reference.
In a manufacturing process using a lithographic projection apparatus, a pattern (e.g. in a mask) is imaged onto a substrate that is at least partially covered by a layer of radiation-sensitive material (resist). Prior to this imaging step, the substrate may undergo various procedures, such as priming, resist coating and a soft bake. After exposure, the substrate may be subjected to other procedures, such as a post-exposure bake (PEB), development, a hard bake and measurement/inspection of the imaged features. This array of procedures is used as a basis to pattern an individual layer of a device, e.g. an IC. Such a patterned layer may then undergo various processes such as etching, ion-implantation (doping), metallization, oxidation, chemo-mechanical polishing, etc., all intended to finish off an individual layer. If several layers are required, then the whole procedure, or a variant thereof, will have to be repeated for each new layer. Eventually, an array of devices will be present on the substrate (wafer). These devices are then separated from one another by a technique such as dicing or sawing, whence the individual devices can be mounted on a carrier, connected to pins, etc. Further information regarding such processes can be obtained, for example, from the book “Microchip Fabrication: A Practical Guide to Semiconductor Processing”, Third Edition, by Peter van Zant, McGraw Hill Publishing Co., 1997, ISBN 0-07-067250-4, incorporated herein by reference.
For the sake of simplicity, the projection system may hereinafter be referred to as the “projection lens”; however, this term should be broadly interpreted as encompassing various types of projection system, including refractive optics, reflective optics, and catadioptric systems, for example. The radiation system may also include components operating according to any of these design types for directing, shaping or controlling the projection beam of radiation, and such components may be referred to below, collectively or singularly, as a “lens”. Further, the lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two or more substrate tables (and/or two or more mask tables). In such “multiple stage” devices the additional tables may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables while one or more other tables are being used for exposures. Dual stage lithographic apparatus are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,969,441 and PCT patent application publication WO 98/40791, incorporated herein by reference.
It has been proposed to immerse the substrate in a lithographic projection apparatus in a liquid having a relatively high refractive index, e.g. water, so as to fill the space between the final optical element of the projection system and the substrate. The point of this is to enable imaging of smaller features because the exposure radiation will have a shorter wavelength in the liquid than in gas (e.g., air) or in a vacuum. (The effect of the liquid may also be regarded as increasing the effective NA of the system).
However, submersing the substrate or substrate and substrate table in a bath of liquid (see for example U.S. Pat. No. 4,509,852, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference) means that there is a large body of liquid that must be accelerated during a scanning exposure. This requires additional or more powerful motors and turbulence in the liquid may lead to undesirable and unpredictable effects.
One of the solutions proposed is for a liquid supply system to provide liquid on only a localized area of the substrate and in between the final element of the projection system and the substrate (the substrate generally has a larger surface area than the final element of the projection system). One way which has been proposed to arrange for this is disclosed in PCT patent application publication WO 99/49504, hereby incorporated in its entirety by reference. As illustrated in
Accordingly, it would be advantageous, for example, to provide an immersion lithographic projection apparatus with improved functionality.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic projection apparatus comprising:
By passing a beam of radiation for a sensor through liquid, no elaborate measures need to be taken to compensate the signals from the sensor to take account of the parameters measured by the sensor being measured through a different medium to that which the substrate is imaged through. However, it may be necessary to ensure that the design of the sensor is such that it is compatible for use when covered with liquid. An example sensor includes an alignment sensor configured to align the substrate table relative to the projection system, a transmission image sensor, a focus sensor, a spot or dose sensor, an integrated lens interferometer and scanner sensor and even an alignment mark. In the case of an alignment sensor, the measurement gratings of the sensor may have a pitch than less than 500 nm, such pitch possibly improving the resolution of the alignment sensor.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided a device manufacturing method comprising:
Although specific reference may be made in this text to the use of the apparatus according to the invention in the manufacture of ICs, it should be explicitly understood that such an apparatus has many other possible applications. For example, it may be employed in the manufacture of integrated optical systems, guidance and detection patterns for magnetic domain memories, liquid-crystal display panels, thin-film magnetic heads, etc. The skilled artisan will appreciate that, in the context of such alternative applications, any use of the terms “reticle”, “wafer” or “die” in this text should be considered as being replaced by the more general terms “mask”, “substrate” and “target portion”, respectively.
In the present document, the terms “radiation” and “beam” are used to encompass all types of electromagnetic radiation, including ultraviolet radiation (e.g. with a wavelength of 365, 248, 193, 157 or 126 nm).
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts:
a illustrates a first version of a third embodiment of the present invention;
b illustrates a second version of the third embodiment;
c illustrates a third version of the third embodiment;
a and 19b depict a luminescence based DUV transmission image sensor.
Embodiment 1
As here depicted, the apparatus is of a transmissive type (e.g. has a transmissive mask). However, in general, it may also be of a reflective type, for example (e.g. with a reflective mask). Alternatively, the apparatus may employ another kind of patterning device, such as a programmable mirror array of a type as referred to above.
The source LA (e.g. an excimer laser) produces a beam of radiation. This beam is fed into an illumination system (illuminator) IL, either directly or after having traversed conditioning means, such as a beam expander Ex, for example. The illuminator IL may comprise adjusting means AM for setting the outer and/or inner radial extent (commonly referred to as σ-outer and σ-inner, respectively) of the intensity distribution in the beam. In addition, it will generally comprise various other components, such as an integrator IN and a condenser CO. In this way, the beam PB impinging on the mask MA has a desired uniformity and intensity distribution in its cross-section.
It should be noted with regard to
The beam PB subsequently intercepts the mask MA, which is held on a mask table MT. Having traversed the mask MA, the beam PB passes through the projection system PL, which focuses the beam PB onto a target portion C of the substrate W. With the aid of the second positioning device (and interferometric measuring device IF), the substrate table WT can be moved accurately, e.g. so as to position different target portions C in the path of the beam PB. Similarly, the first positioning device can be used to accurately position the mask MA with respect to the path of the beam PB, e.g. after mechanical retrieval of the mask MA from a mask library, or during a scan. In general, movement of the object tables MT, WT will be realized with the aid of a long-stroke module (course positioning) and a short-stroke module (fine positioning), which are not explicitly depicted in
The depicted apparatus can be used in two different modes:
1. In step mode, the mask table MT is kept essentially stationary, and an entire mask image is projected at one time (i.e. a single “flash”) onto a target portion C. The substrate table WT is then shifted in the X and/or Y directions so that a different target portion C can be irradiated by the beam PB;
2. In scan mode, essentially the same scenario applies, except that a given target portion C is not exposed in a single “flash”. Instead, the mask table MT is movable in a given direction (the so-called “scan direction”, e.g. the Y direction) with a speed v, so that the projection beam PB is caused to scan over a mask image; concurrently, the substrate table WT is simultaneously moved in the same or opposite direction at a speed V=Mv, in which M is the magnification of the projection system PL (typically, M=¼ or ⅕). In this manner, a relatively large target portion C can be exposed, without having to compromise on resolution.
The reservoir 10 forms, in an embodiment, a contactless seal to the substrate W around the image field of the projection system PL so that the liquid is confined to fill the space between the substrate's primary surface, which faces the projection system PL, and the final optical element of the projection system PL. The reservoir is formed by a seal member 12 positioned below and surrounding the final element of the projection system PL. Thus, the liquid supply system provides liquid on only a localized area of the substrate. The seal member 12 forms part of the liquid supply system for filling the space between the final element of the projection system and the substrate with a liquid. This liquid is brought into the space below the projection system and within the seal member 12. In an embodiment, the seal member 12 extends a little above the bottom element of the projection system and the liquid rises above the final element so that a buffer of liquid is provided. The seal member 12 has an inner periphery that at the upper end closely conforms to the shape of the projection system or the final elements thereof and may, e.g. be round. At the bottom the inner periphery closely conforms to the shape of the image field, e.g. rectangular, though this is not necessarily so. The seal member is substantially stationary in the XY plane relative to the projection system though there may be some relative movement in the Z direction (in the direction of the optical axis). A seal is formed between the seal member and the surface of the substrate. In an implementation, this seal is a contactless seal and may be a gas seal.
The liquid 11 is confined in the reservoir 10 by a seal device 16. As illustrated in
Thus, as used herein for the embodiments, the liquid supply system can comprise that as described in relation to
Embodiment 2
A second embodiment is illustrated in
In the embodiment of
The mechanism 170 shown in
A level sensor (not illustrated) is used to detect the relative heights of the primary surfaces of the substrate W and the edge seal member 17. Based on the results of the level sensor, control signals are sent to the actuator 171 in order to adjust the height of the primary surface of the edge seal member 17. A closed loop actuator could also be used for this purpose.
In an implementation, the actuator 171 is a rotating motor which rotates a shaft 176. The shaft 176 is connected to a circular disc at the end distal to the motor 171. The shaft 176 is connected away from the centre of the disc. The disc is located in a circular recess in a wedge portion 172. Ball bearings may be used to reduce the amount of friction between the circular disc and the sides of the recess in the wedge portion 172. The motor 171 is held in place by leaf springs 177. On actuation of the motor the wedge portion is driven to the left and right as illustrated (i.e. in the direction of the slope of the wedge portion) because of the excentre position of the shaft 176 in the disc. The motor is prevented from moving in the same direction as the direction of movement of the wedge portion 172 by the springs 177.
As the wedge portion 172 moves left and right as illustrated in
Obviously the further wedge member 173 could be replaced by an alternative shape, for example a rod positioned perpendicularly to the direction of movement of the wedge 172. If the coefficient of friction between the wedge member 172 and the further wedge member 173 is greater than the tangent of the wedge angle then the actuator 170 is self-braking meaning that no force may be needed on the wedge member 172 to hold it in place. This is advantageous as the system will then be stable when the actuator 171 is not actuated. The accuracy of the mechanism 170 is of the order of a few μm.
Especially in the case of the edge seal member 117 being an integral part of the substrate table WT, a mechanism may be provided to adjust the height of the substrate W or the member supporting the substrate W so that the primary surfaces of the edge seal member 17, 117 and the substrate can be made substantially co-planar.
Embodiment 3
A third embodiment is illustrated in
This embodiment is described in relation to an edge seal member 117 which is an integral part of the substrate table WT. However, this embodiment is equally applicable to an edge seal member 17 which is movable relative to the substrate table WT.
In a first version of this embodiment as illustrated in
It is likely that the further edge seal member 500 will not prevent all of the immersion liquid from the liquid supply system from entering the space under the substrate W and for this reason a port 46 connected to a low pressure source may be provided under the substrate W adjacent edges of the edge seal member 117 and the substrate W in some or all of the versions of this embodiment. Of course the design of the area under the substrate could be the same as that of the second embodiment.
The same system can be used for sensors such as a transmission image sensor (TIS) on the substrate table as opposed for the substrate W. In the case of sensors, as the sensors do not move, the further edge seal member 500 can be permanently attached to the sensor, for example using glue.
Furthermore, the further edge seal member 500 can be arranged to engage with the top surface of the object (that surface closest to the projection system) rather than the bottom surface. Also, the further edge seal member 500 may be provided attached to or near the top surface of the edge seal member 117 as opposed to under the edge seal member 117 as is illustrated in
A second version of this embodiment is illustrated in
A third version of this embodiment is shown in
It will be appreciated that the embodiment will also work with only the second further edge seal member 500b, 500d with or without connection to vacuum.
Various ways of deforming the further edge seal members 500, 500a, 500b, 500c, 500d will now be described in relation to the first version of the embodiment.
As can be seen from
In an alternative or additional embodiment, a flexible further edge seal member 500 is formed with a mechanical pre-load such that it contacts the substrate W when the substrate is placed on the pimple table 20 and the flexible further edge seal member 500 deforms elastically so that it applies a force upwards on the substrate W to thereby make a seal.
In a further alternative or additional embodiment, a flexible further edge seal member 500 may be forced against the substrate W by an overpressure generated by pressurised gas on port 46.
A flexible further edge seal member 500 may be fashioned from any flexible, radiation and immersion liquid resistant, non-contaminating material, for example, steel, glass e.g. Al2O3, ceramic material e.g. SiC, Silicon, Teflon, low expansion glasses (e.g. Zerodur™ or ULE™), carbon fibre epoxy or quartz and is typically between 10 and 500 μm thick, optionally between 30 and 200 μm or 50 to 150 μm in the case of glass. With a flexible further edge seal member 500 of this material and these dimensions, the typical pressure to be applied to the duct 510 is approximately 0.1 to 0.6 bar.
Embodiment 4
A fourth embodiment is illustrated in
This embodiment is described in relation to an edge seal member 117 which is an integral part of the substrate table WT. However, this embodiment is equally applicable to an edge seal member 17 which is movable relative to the substrate table WT.
In the fourth embodiment, the gap between the edge seal member 117 and the substrate W is filled with a further edge seal member 50. The further edge seal member is a flexible further edge seal member 50 which has a top surface which is substantially co-planar with the primary surfaces of the substrate W and the edge seal member 117. The flexible further edge seal member 50 is made of a compliant material so that minor variations in the diameter/width of substrate W and in the thickness of the substrate W can be accommodated by deflections of the flexible further edge seal member 50. When liquid in the liquid supply system under the projection system PL passes over the edge of the substrate, the liquid cannot escape between the substrate W, flexible further edge seal member 50 and edge seal member 117 because the edges of those elements are tight against one another. Furthermore, because the primary surfaces of the substrate W and the edge seal member 117 and the top surface of the flexible further edge seal member 50 are substantially co-planar, the liquid supply system operation is not upset when it passes over the edge of the substrate W so that disturbance forces are not generated in the liquid supply system.
As can be seen from
The flexible further edge seal member 50 is made of a radiation and immersion liquid resistant material such as PTFE.
Embodiment 5
This embodiment is described in relation to an edge seal member 117 which is an integral part of the substrate table WT. However, this embodiment is equally applicable to an edge seal member 17 which is movable relative to the substrate table WT.
As can be seen from
The gap seal member 100 may be held in place by the application of a vacuum 105 to its underside (that is a vacuum source exposed through a vacuum port on the primary surface of the edge seal member 117). The liquid supply system can pass over the edge of the substrate W without the loss of liquid because the gap between the substrate W and the edge seal member 117 is covered over by the gap seal member 100. The gap seal member 100 can be put in place and removed by the substrate handler so that standard substrates and substrate handling can be used. Alternatively the gap seal member 100 can be kept at the projection system PL and put in place and removed by appropriate mechanisms (e.g. a substrate handling robot). The gap seal member 100 should be stiff enough to avoid deformation by the vacuum source. Advantageously the gap seal member 100 is less than 50, optionally 30 or 20 or even 10 μm thick to avoid contact with the liquid supply system, but should be made as thin as possible
The gap seal member 100 is advantageously provided with tapered edges 110 in which the thickness of the gap seal member 100 decreases towards the edges. This gradual transition to the full thickness of the gap seal member ensures that disturbance of the liquid supply system is reduced when it passes on top of the gap seal member 100.
The same way of sealing may be used for other objects such as sensors, for example transmission image sensors. In this case, as the object is not required to move, the gap seal member 100 can be glued in place (at either end) with a glue which does not dissolve in the immersion liquid. The glue can alternatively be positioned at the junction of the edge seal member 117, the object and the gap seal member 100.
Furthermore, the gap seal member 100 can be positioned underneath the object and an overhang of the edge seal member 117. The object may be shaped with an overhang also, if necessary.
The gap seal member 100, whether above or below the object, can have a passage provided through it, from one opening in a surface in contact with the edge seal member 117 to another opening in a surface in contact with the object. By positioning one opening in fluid communication with vacuum 105, the gap seal member 100 can then be kept tightly in place.
Embodiment 6
A sixth embodiment will be described with reference to
The sixth embodiment uses the liquid supply system described with respect to the first embodiment. However, rather than confining the immersion liquid in the liquid supply system under the projection system PL on its lower side with the substrate W, the liquid is confined by an intermediary plate 210 which is positioned between the liquid supply system and the substrate W. The spaces 222, 215 between the intermediary plate 210 and the TIS 220 and the substrate W are also filled with liquid 111. This may either be done by two separate space liquid supply systems via respective ports 230, 240 as illustrated or by the same space liquid supply system via ports 230, 240. Thus the space 215 between the substrate W and the intermediary plate 210 and the space 222 between the transmission image sensor 220 and the intermediary plate 210 are both filled with liquid and both the substrate W and the transmission image sensor can be illuminated under the same conditions. Portions 200 provide a support surface or surfaces for the intermediary plate 210 which may be held in place by vacuum sources.
The intermediary plate 210 is made of such a size that it covers all of the substrate W as well as the transmission image sensor 220. Therefore, no edges need to be traversed by the liquid supply system even when the edge of the substrate W is imaged or when the transmission image sensor is positioned under the projection system PL. The top surface of the transmission image sensor 220 and the substrate W are substantially co-planar.
The intermediary plate 210 can be removable. It can, for example, be put in place and removed by a substrate handling robot or other appropriate mechanism.
All of the above described embodiments may be used to seal around the edge of the substrate W. Other objects on the substrate table WT may also need to be sealed in a similar way, such as sensors including sensors and/or marks which are illuminated with the projection beam through the liquid such as a transmission image sensor, integrated lens interferometer and scanner (wavefront sensor) and a spot sensor plate. Such objects may also include sensors and/or marks which are illuminated with non-projection radiation beams such as levelling and alignment sensors and/or marks. The liquid supply system may supply liquid to cover all of the object in such a case. Any of the above embodiments may be used for this purpose. In some instances, the object will not need to be removed from the substrate table WT as, in contrast to the substrate W, the sensors do not need to be removed from the substrate table WT. In such a case the above embodiments may be modified as appropriate (e.g. the seals may not need to be moveable).
Embodiment 7
In the seventh embodiment the object on the substrate table WT is a sensor 220 such as a transmission image sensor (TIS). In order to prevent immersion liquid seeping underneath the sensor 220, a bead of glue 700 which is undissolvable and unreactable with the immersion fluid is positioned between the edge seal member 117 and the sensor 220. The glue is covered by immersion fluid in use.
Embodiment 8
An eighth embodiment is described with reference to
In the
In the version of
The shape of the edge seal member 117 and the top outer most edge of the object 220 can be varied. For example, it may be advantageous to provide an overhanging edge seal member 117 or indeed an outer edge of the object 220 which is overhanging. Alternatively, an outer upper corner of the object 220 may be useful.
Example of High NA Detection Sensor
Substrate-level sensors according to one or more embodiments of the invention may comprise a radiation-receiving element (1102, 1118) and a radiation-detecting element (1108, 1124) as shown in
The radiation-receiving element (1102, 1118), which may be a layer with a pinhole, a grating or another diffractive element fulfilling a similar function, may be supported on top of a quartz sensor body 1120, i.e. on the same side of the body as the projection system. The radiation-detecting element (1108, 1124), in contrast, may be arranged within the sensor body 1120, or within a concave region formed on the side of the sensor body 1120 facing away from the projection system.
At boundaries between media of different refractive indices a proportion of incident radiation will be reflected and potentially lost from the sensor. For optically smooth surfaces, the extent to which this occurs depends on the angle of incidence of the radiation and the difference in refractive index of the media in question. For radiation incident at and above a “critical angle” (conventionally measured from normal incidence) total internal reflection may occur, leading to serious loss of signal to later elements of the sensor. This may be a particular problem in high NA systems where radiation may have a higher average angle of incidence. Accordingly, in an embodiment, arrangements are provided so that gas is excluded from the region between the radiation-receiving (1102, 1118) and radiation-detecting (1108, 1124) elements in order to avoid interfaces between media of high refractive index and gas.
In addition to losses due to partial and total internal reflection, absorption may also seriously reduce the intensity of radiation intensity reaching the photocell, as may scattering from interfaces that are not optically smooth.
a shows a DUV transmission image sensor.
In the above arrangement, gas may be present in the gaps between components mounted in the sensor housing 1125, yielding a number of gas/material/gas interfaces that interrupt the propagation of radiation. By considering the path of DUV radiation and radiation arising from luminescence, it is possible to identify regions where radiation is likely to be lost. The first region of interest is the rear-side 1128 of the transmissive plate 1104, reached by DUV radiation after it has passed through the grooves 1118 and transmissive plate 1104. Here, the surface has been formed by mechanical means, such as by drilling, and is inevitably rough on the scale of the wavelength of the radiation. Radiation may therefore be lost due to scattering, either back into the transmissive plate 1104 or out past the luminescent material 1122. Secondly, after this interface, the DUV light encounters the optically smooth gas/YAG:Ce interface, where a substantial amount of reflection may occur due to the refractive index mismatch, particularly in systems of high NA. Thirdly, the luminescent material 1122 emits radiation in random directions. Due to its relatively high refractive index, the critical angle for total internal reflection at a YAG:Ce/air boundary is around 33° (where, for example, there is air in the gap between the YAG:Ce and the filter 1126) from the normal, meaning that a large proportion of radiation incident on the boundary is reflected out of the system and lost through the side walls of the luminescent material 1122. Finally, the part of the luminescence that is directed towards the photodiode has to overcome the gas/quartz interface on the diode surface where surface roughness may again account for loss of detected signal.
Each of the embodiments may be combined with one or more of the other embodiments as appropriate. Further, each of the embodiments (and any appropriate combination of embodiments) can be applied simply to the liquid supply system of
In an embodiment, there is provided a lithographic projection apparatus comprising: an illuminator adapted to condition a beam of radiation; a support structure configured to hold a patterning device, the patterning device configured to pattern the beam of radiation according to a desired pattern; a substrate table configured to hold a substrate; a projection system adapted to project the patterned beam onto a target portion of a substrate; a liquid supply system configured to at least partly fill a space between the projection system and an object on the substrate table, with a liquid; and a sensor capable of being positioned to be illuminated by a beam of radiation once it has passed through the liquid.
In an embodiment, the substrate table comprises a support surface configured to support an intermediary plate between the projection system and the sensor and not in contact with the sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a transmission image sensor configured to sense the beam and wherein the intermediary plate is positionable between the sensor and the projection system. In an embodiment, the sensor is on the substrate table. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises an alignment sensor configured to align the substrate table relative to the projection system. In an embodiment, measurement gratings of the alignment sensor have a pitch of less than 500 nm. In an embodiment, the alignment sensor is configured to be illuminated obliquely. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a transmission image sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a focus sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a spot or dose sensor, an integrated lens interferometer and scanner, an alignment mark, or any combination of the foregoing. In an embodiment, the substrate table comprises an edge seal member configured to at least partly surround an edge of the sensor and to provide a primary surface facing the projection system substantially co-planar with a primary surface of the sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor is configured to be in contact with the liquid and the beam of radiation is configured to come from the projection system or an alignment system. In an embodiment, the beam of radiation is the patterned beam. In an embodiment, an alignment system comprises the sensor and is configured receive an alignment beam of radiation from the projection system to align the substrate. In an embodiment, the substrate table comprises a vacuum port configured to remove liquid from a space between the substrate table and the sensor. In an embodiment, the apparatus further comprises a bead of material in a space between the substrate table and the sensor configured to prevent entry of the liquid.
In an embodiment, there is provided a device manufacturing method comprising: projecting a beam of radiation through a liquid onto a sensor; and projecting the beam of radiation as patterned using a projection system of a lithographic apparatus through the liquid onto a target portion of a substrate.
In an embodiment, the liquid is supported on an intermediary plate between the projection system and the sensor, the plate not being in contact with the sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a transmission image sensor configured to sense the beam and the intermediary plate is positionable between the sensor and the projection system. In an embodiment, the sensor is on a substrate table holding the substrate. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises an alignment sensor configured to align a substrate table holding the substrate relative to the projection system. In an embodiment, measurement gratings of the alignment sensor have a pitch of less than 500 nm. In an embodiment, the alignment sensor is configured to be illuminated obliquely. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a transmission image sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a focus sensor. In an embodiment, the sensor comprises a spot or dose sensor, an integrated lens interferometer and scanner, an alignment mark, or any combination of the foregoing. In an embodiment, a substrate table holding the substrate comprises an edge seal member configured to at least partly surround an edge of the sensor and to provide a primary surface facing the projection system substantially co-planar with a primary surface of the sensor. In an embodiment, the method comprises projecting the beam of radiation from the projection system or an alignment system through the liquid onto the sensor in contact with the liquid. In an embodiment, the beam of radiation is the patterned beam. In an embodiment, an alignment system comprises the sensor and is configured receive an alignment beam of radiation from the projection system to align the substrate. In an embodiment, a substrate table holding the substrate comprises a vacuum port configured to remove liquid from a space between the substrate table and the sensor. In an embodiment, the method further comprises providing a bead of material in a space between the substrate table and the sensor configured to prevent entry of the liquid.
While specific embodiments of the invention have been described above, it will be appreciated that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as described. In particular, the invention is also applicable to other types of liquid supply systems, especially localised liquid area systems. If the seal member solution is used, it may be one in which a seal other than a gas seal is used. The description is not intended to limit the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
03253636 | Jun 2003 | EP | regional |
03255395 | Aug 2003 | EP | regional |
03257068 | Nov 2003 | EP | regional |
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/698,932, filed Feb. 2, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,482,845 which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/482,122, filed Jul. 7, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,154,708 which is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/857,614, filed Jun. 1, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,213,963, which in turn claims priority from European patent applications EP 03253636.9, filed Jun. 9, 2003, EP 03255395.0, filed Aug. 29, 2003, and EP 03257068.1, filed Nov. 10, 2003, each foregoing application incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573975 | Dhaka of al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3648587 | Stevens | Mar 1972 | A |
3903413 | Manning | Sep 1975 | A |
4280054 | Guarino | Jul 1981 | A |
4346164 | Tabarelli et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4358198 | Moriyama et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4390273 | Loebach et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4396705 | Akeyama et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4465368 | Matsuura et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4480910 | Takanashi et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4509852 | Tabarelli et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4540277 | Mayer et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4853880 | Akamatsu et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4887904 | Nakazato et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4999669 | Sakamoto et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5040020 | Rauschenbach et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5121256 | Corle et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5162642 | Akamatsu et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5229872 | Mumola | Jul 1993 | A |
5243195 | Nishi | Sep 1993 | A |
5258823 | Akamatsu | Nov 1993 | A |
5296891 | Vogt et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5517344 | Hu et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523193 | Nelson | Jun 1996 | A |
5528118 | Lee | Jun 1996 | A |
5610683 | Takahashi | Mar 1997 | A |
5623853 | Novak et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5633968 | Sheem | May 1997 | A |
5654553 | Kawakubo et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5668672 | Oomura | Sep 1997 | A |
5689377 | Takahashi | Nov 1997 | A |
5715039 | Fukuda et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5825043 | Suwa | Oct 1998 | A |
5835275 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5874820 | Lee | Feb 1999 | A |
5883704 | Nishi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900354 | Batchelder | May 1999 | A |
5969441 | Loopstra et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5985495 | Okumura et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5997963 | Davison et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6031946 | Bergmann et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6046792 | Van Der Werf et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6078380 | Taniguchi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6137561 | Imai | Oct 2000 | A |
6191429 | Suwa | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6236634 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6333775 | Haney et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6417914 | Li | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6560032 | Hatano | May 2003 | B2 |
6600547 | Watson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6603130 | Bisschops et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6603530 | Kohno | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618122 | Bisschops et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6633365 | Suenaga | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650399 | Baselmans et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6710849 | Kwan et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6741331 | Boonman et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6757048 | Arakawa | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6762826 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6784432 | Wieczorek | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785006 | Nishida | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788477 | Lin | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801301 | Miyajima et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6842256 | Hill | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6867844 | Vogel et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6952253 | Lof et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954256 | Flagello et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7009682 | Bleeker | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7075616 | Derksen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7081943 | Lof et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7098991 | Nagasaka et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7199858 | Lof et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7213963 | Lof et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7227616 | Graeupner | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7411657 | Ottens et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7486380 | Hazelton et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7593093 | Lof et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7843550 | Ishii et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7978306 | Ottens et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8154708 | Lof et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8482845 | Lof et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
20010038442 | Hansell et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020018190 | Nogawa et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020020821 | Van Santen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026878 | Kwan et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020037461 | Van Der Werf et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020041377 | Hagiwara et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020057423 | Nogawa | May 2002 | A1 |
20020061469 | Tanaka | May 2002 | A1 |
20020079455 | Wieczorek | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020081760 | Whatmore | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020101574 | Tsuji | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118370 | Nishida | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020145717 | Baselmans et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020163629 | Switkes et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020163630 | Bisschops et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020167642 | Jones et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020167651 | Boonman et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020196421 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030030916 | Suenaga | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030071982 | Miyajima et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030095244 | Komatsu | May 2003 | A1 |
20030123040 | Almogy | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030174408 | Rostalski et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040000627 | Schuster | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021844 | Suenaga | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040075895 | Lin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040108467 | Eurlings et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040109237 | Epple et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114117 | Bleeker | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040114124 | Hoeks et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118184 | Violette | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040119954 | Kawashima et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123351 | Silvestri | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040125351 | Krautschik | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135099 | Simon et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040136494 | Lof et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040160582 | Lof et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040165159 | Lof et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040169834 | Richter et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040169924 | Flagello et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180294 | Baba-Ali et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040180299 | Rolland et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207824 | Lof et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040211920 | Derksen et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224265 | Endo et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040224525 | Endo et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040227923 | Flagello et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040233405 | Kato et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040253547 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253548 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040257544 | Vogel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259008 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259040 | Endo et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263808 | Sewell | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263809 | Nakano | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050002004 | Kolesnychenko et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007569 | Streefkerk et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050007570 | Streefkerk et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018155 | Cox et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050018156 | Mulkens et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050024609 | De Smit et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030497 | Nakamura | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030498 | Mulkens | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050030506 | Schuster | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036121 | Hoogendam et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036183 | Yeo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036184 | Yeo et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036213 | Mann et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050037269 | Levinson | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050041225 | Sengers et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042554 | Dierichs et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046813 | Streefkerk et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050046934 | Ho et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050048223 | Pawloski et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050052632 | Miyajima | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050068639 | Pierrat et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073670 | Carroll | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050078287 | Sengers et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050084794 | Meagley et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050094116 | Flagello et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050099635 | Kakuchi et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100745 | Lin et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050110973 | Streefkerk et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117224 | Shafer et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122497 | Lyons et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050122505 | Miyajima | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050132914 | Mulkens et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134815 | Van Santen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134817 | Nakamura | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050141098 | Schuster | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145265 | Ravkin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050145803 | Hakey et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050146694 | Tokita | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050146695 | Kawakami | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050147920 | Lin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050153424 | Coon | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050158673 | Hakey et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050164502 | Deng et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174549 | Duineveld et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050175940 | Dierichs | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050185269 | Epple et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190435 | Shafer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050190455 | Rostalski et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050205108 | Chang et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213061 | Hakey et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213072 | Schenker et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050217135 | O'Donnell et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050217137 | Smith et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050217703 | O'Donnell | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219481 | Cox et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219482 | Baselmans et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050219499 | Maria Zaal et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050225734 | De Smit et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050225737 | Weissenrieder et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050231694 | Kolesnychenko et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237501 | Furukawa et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243292 | Baselmans et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050243328 | Wegmann et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050245005 | Benson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050253090 | Gau et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259232 | Streefkerk et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259233 | Streefkerk et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050259234 | Hirukawa et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264778 | Lof et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050270505 | Smith | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060103832 | Hazelton et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060114445 | Ebihara | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060170891 | Nishinaga et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060181690 | Nishinaga et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209414 | Van Santen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060261288 | Van Santen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285100 | Hamatani et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070013888 | Flagello et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070076181 | Ishii et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070076182 | Hazelton et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070132970 | Lof et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070132979 | Lof et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070146665 | Ottens et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070268471 | Lof et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080278697 | Ottens et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090279061 | Jacobs et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20110007285 | Lof et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110285977 | Lof et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1341277 | Mar 2002 | CN |
206 607 | Feb 1984 | DE |
221 563 | Apr 1985 | DE |
224448 | Jul 1985 | DE |
242880 | Feb 1987 | DE |
0023231 | Feb 1981 | EP |
0418427 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0 605 103 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0 834 773 | Apr 1998 | EP |
1039511 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 182 511 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1 477 856 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1 494 267 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1 571 696 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1 571 701 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1 628 329 | Feb 2006 | EP |
1 628 330 | Feb 2006 | EP |
2474708 | Jul 1981 | FR |
11-297615 | Oct 1999 | JO |
A-57-153433 | Sep 1982 | JP |
58-202448 | Nov 1983 | JP |
A 59-19912 | Feb 1984 | JP |
62-065326 | Mar 1987 | JP |
62-121417 | Jun 1987 | JP |
63-157419 | Jun 1988 | JP |
2-47515 | Feb 1990 | JP |
04-305915 | Oct 1992 | JP |
04-305917 | Oct 1992 | JP |
A-5-62877 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5-251544 | Sep 1993 | JP |
A-5-304072 | Nov 1993 | JP |
06-84757 | Mar 1994 | JP |
06-124873 | May 1994 | JP |
06-168866 | Jun 1994 | JP |
A-6-168866 | Jun 1994 | JP |
07-132262 | May 1995 | JP |
07-220990 | Aug 1995 | JP |
A 08-316125 | Nov 1996 | JP |
09-066429 | Mar 1997 | JP |
A-09-184787 | Jul 1997 | JP |
10-92728 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-135316 | May 1998 | JP |
10-154659 | Jun 1998 | JP |
A-10-160582 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-228661 | Aug 1998 | JP |
10-255319 | Sep 1998 | JP |
10-303114 | Nov 1998 | JP |
10-340846 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-126112 | May 1999 | JP |
11-176727 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-239758 | Sep 1999 | JP |
11-297615 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000-058436 | Feb 2000 | JP |
A-2000-097616 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2000-331931 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-091849 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-281050 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2002-5737 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2062-5737 | Jan 2002 | JP |
A-2002-071513 | Mar 2002 | JP |
A-2002-071514 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002-513856 | May 2002 | JP |
2002-170754 | Jun 2002 | JP |
A 2002-170765 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-246309 | Aug 2002 | JP |
A-2002-250678 | Sep 2002 | JP |
A-2002-296005 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2003-332213 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-165666 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-193252 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004-289126 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005-012201 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005-101488 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-223275 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-277363 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2006-523377 | Oct 2006 | JP |
4362867 | Nov 2009 | JP |
WO 9833096 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9838597 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9838597 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO 9840791 | Sep 1998 | WO |
9939375 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 9949504 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 9960361 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 99060361 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0122480 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 02090905 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 02091078 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 03077036 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03077037 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03085708 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2004019128 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053596 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053950 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053951 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053952 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053953 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053954 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053955 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053956 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053957 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053958 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004053959 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO 2004055803 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057295 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057589 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004057590 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004077154 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004081666 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090577 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090633 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004090634 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004092830 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004092833 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093130 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093159 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004093160 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2004095135 | Nov 2004 | WO |
WO 2004105107 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2004105107 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2004112108 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2005001432 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005001572 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005003864 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005006026 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005008339 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005010611 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005013008 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005015283 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005017625 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005019935 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005022266 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005022616 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005022616 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024325 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005024517 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO 2005034174 | Apr 2005 | WO |
WO 2005050324 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005054953 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005054955 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059617 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059618 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059645 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005059654 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2005062128 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005064400 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005064405 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069055 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069078 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005069081 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO 2005071491 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005074606 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005076084 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005081030 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005081067 | Sep 2005 | WO |
WO 2005098504 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005098505 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005098506 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005106589 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005111689 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005111722 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2005119368 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2005119369 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/850,472. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532. |
U.S. Office Action dated Jun. 20, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754. |
Japanese Office Action mailed May 31, 2013 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-281445. |
Japanese Office Action mailed Jun. 12, 2013 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-027270. |
Information Disclosure Statement filed Dec. 1, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/606,913. |
Third Preliminary Amendment dated Aug. 17, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/147,265. |
Optical Microlithography XV, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4691 (2002), “Resolution Enhancement of 157 nm Lithography by Liquid Immersion”, M. Switkes et al., pp. 450-466. |
S. Owa at al., “Immersion lithography; its potential performance and issues”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5040, 2003, pp. 724-733. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm,” MIT Lincoln Lab, Orlando 2001-1, Dec. 17, 2001. |
M. Switkes at al., “Immersion Lithography: Optics for the 50 nm Node,” 157 Anvers-1, Sep. 4, 2002. |
B.J. Lin, “The Paths to Subhalf-Micrometer Optical Lithography,” SPIE vol. 922, Optical/Laser Microlithography (1988), pp. 256-269. |
J.A. Hoffnagle et al., “Liquid Immersion Deep-Ultraviolet Interferometric Lithography,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 17, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 3306-3309. |
G. Owen et al., “1/81.μm Optical Lithography,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 10, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 3032-3036. |
H. Hogan, “New Semiconductor Lithography Makes a Splash,” Photonics Spectra, Photonics Technology Wand, Oct. 2003 Edition, pp. 1-3. |
Matsuyama et al., “Nikon Projection Lens Update,” SPIE Microlithography 2004, 5377-65, Mar. 2004. |
B.J. Lin, “The k3 coefficient in nonparaxial λ/NA scaling equations for resolution, depth of focus, and immersion lithography,” J. Microlith., Miorotab., Microsyst., 1(1):7-12 (2002). |
European Search Report far EP Patent Appln. No. 03257068.1 dated May 3, 2004. |
Japanese Office Action mailed Jul. 24, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-243516. |
U.S. Office Action mailed May 24, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Jun. 8, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,404. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Jun. 14, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,938. |
Japanese Office Action mailed Nov. 6, 2012 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-243513. |
U.S Office Action mailed Nov. 26, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,938. |
U.S Office Action mailed Oct. 24, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754. |
U.S Office Action mailed Oct. 15, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,404. |
U.S Office Action mailed Sep. 27, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,932. |
U.S Office Action mailed Sep. 25, 2012 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/850,472. |
European Communication dated Jan. 3, 2012 in corresponding European Patent Application No. 04 253 354.7. |
Chinese Notification of Completion of Formalities for Registration dated Jul. 1, 2013 in corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201110083335.0. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 9, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/195,248. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Nov. 12, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/195,248. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Nov. 14, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Nov. 20, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Sep. 9, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,404. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2013 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,830. |
U.S. Office Action mailed Feb. 24, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,830. |
Singapore Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 4, 2013 in corresponding Singapore Patent Application No. 201005011-0. |
Japanese Office Action mailed Nov. 8, 2013 in corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-066781. |
U.S. Official Action dated Mar. 17, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/149,404. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 3, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 12/512,754. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/195,248. |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 4, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532. |
U.S. Official Action dated Dec. 31, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/692,865. |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 21, 2014 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532. |
V. LeRoux et al., “A reflection lithography using multicharged ions,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 57-58, pp. 239-245 (Sep. 2001). |
Ivor Brodie et al., “A Multiple-Electron-Beam Exposure System for High-Throughput, Direct-Write Submicrometer Lithography,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. EDS-28, No. 11, pp. 1422-1428 (Nov. 1981). |
Yuen-Chuen Chan et al., “Development and applications of a laser writing lithography system for maskless patterning,” Opt. Eng., vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 2521-2530 (Sep. 1998). |
W. Häβler-Grohne et al., “An electron optical metrology system for pattern placement measurements,” Meas. Sci, Technol., vol. 9, pp. 1120-1128 (1998). |
Shoji Maruo et al., “Submicron stereolithography for the production of freely movable mechanisms by using single-photon polymerization,” Sensors and Actuators A, vol. 100, pp. 70-76 (Aug. 2002). |
F. Abboud et al., “Evaluation of the MEBES® 4500 reticle writer to commercial requirements of 250 nm design rule IC devices,” Proc of SPIE, vol. 2793, pp. 438-451 (Jul. 24, 1996). |
Toru Tojo et al., “Advanced electron beam writing system EX-11 for next-generation mask fabrication,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 3748, pp. 416-425 (Sep. 1999). |
Yoshiyuki Tomita et al., “A surface motor-driven precise positioning system,” Precision Engineering, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 184-191 (Jul. 1994). |
Chang-Woo Lee et al., “An ultraprecision stage for alignment of wafers in advanced microlithography,” Precision Engineering, vol. 21, No. 2/3, pp. 113-122, (Sep./Dec. 1997). |
H. Löschner et al., “Ion projection lithography for vacuum microelectronics,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 487-492 (Mar./Apr. 1993). |
Hans Loeschner et al., “Large-Field Ion-Optics for Projection and Proximity Printing and for Mask-Less Lithography (ML2),” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4688, pp. 595-606 (Jul. 2002). |
Won-jong Kim et al., “Modeling and Vector Control of Planar Magnetic Levitator,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1254-1262 (Nov./Dec. 1998). |
Rodney Kendall et al., “A servo guided X-Y-theta stage for electron beam lithography,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol, B, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 3019-3023 (Nov./Dec. 1991). |
T. Kato et al., “Submicron pattern fabrication by focused ion beams,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 50-53 (Jan./Feb. 1985). |
Hans C. Pfeiffer, “Prevail: Proof-of-Concept System and Results,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 53, pp. 61-66 (2000). |
L.M. Buchmann et al., “Lithography with High Depth of Focus by an Ion Projection System,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 116-120 (Sep. 1992). |
T.C. Bailey et al., “Step and Flash Imprint Lithography: An Efficient Nanoscale Printing Technology,” Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 481-486 (Jan. 2002). |
Oui-Serg Kim et al., “Positioning Performance and Straightness Error Compensation of the Magnetic Levitation Stage Supported by the Linear Magnetic Bearing,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 374-378 (Apr. 2003). |
Ampere A. Tseng et al., “Electron Beam Lithography in Nanoscale Fabrication: Recent Development,” IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 141-149 (Apr. 2003). |
Qing Ji, “Maskless, Resistless Ion Beam Lithography Processes,” University of Berkeley, 128 pages (Spring 2003). |
Rik Kneppers, “HP Laser Interferometers,” Vaisala News, vol. 151, pp. 34-37 (1999). |
R.S. Dhaliwal et al., “Prevail—Electron projection technology approach for next-generation lithography,” IBM J. Res. & Dev., vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 615-638 (Sep. 2001). |
Kazuaki Suzuki, “EPL Technology Development,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4754, pp. 775-789 (Jul. 2002). |
G. Stengl et al., “Current status of Ion Projection Lithography,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 537, pp. 138-145 (1985). |
Ernst Thielicke et al., “Microactuators and their technologies,” Mechatronics, vol. 10, pp. 431-455 (2000). |
G. Stangl et al., “Submicron Lithography and DUV-Master Masks Made by Ion Projection Lithography,” Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 167-171 (1985). |
G. Stengl et al., “Ion projection lithography machine IPLM01: A new tool for sub-0.5-micron modification of materials,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 194-200 (Jan./Feb. 1986). |
Carl G. Chen et al., “Nanometer-accurate Grating Fabrication with Scanning Beam Interference Lithography,” Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4936, pp. 126-134 (Nov. 2002). |
G. de Zwart et al., “Performance of a Step and Scan System for DUV Lithography,” SPIE Symposium on Optical Microlithography in Santa Clara, pp. 0-18 (Mar. 1997). |
U.S. Office Action dated Apr. 2, 2015 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/615,190. |
U.S. Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2015 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532. |
Jan Mulkens et al., “ASML Optical Lithography Solutions for 65 nm and 45 nm Node,” Semicon Japan, pp. 1-29, (Dec. 5, 2003). |
Arnold et al., “193nm Immersion Lithography,” International Sematech Litho Forum, Slides 1-22, (Jan. 28, 2004). |
U.S. Office Action dated Aug. 5, 2015 in corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/306,532. |
Information Disclosure Statement filed Dec. 1, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No . 11/606,913. |
Information Disclosure Statement filed Dec. 1, 2006 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/606,909. |
Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2007 issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/606,913. |
Office Action dated Nov. 6, 2006 issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/002,900. |
Office Action dated May 22, 2006 issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/002,900. |
Third Preliminary Amendment dated Aug. 17, 2005 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/147,285. |
Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2008 issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/606,909. |
Office Action dated Dec. 28, 2007 issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/606,913. |
Office Action dated Sep. 17, 2007 issued for U.S. Appl. No. 11/002,900. |
Emerging Lithographic Technologies VI, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4688 (2002), “Semiconductor Foundry, Lithography, and Partners”, B.J. Lin, pp. 11-24. |
Optical Microlithography XV, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4691 (2002), “Resolution Enhancement of 157 nm Lithography by Liquid Immersion”, M. Switkes et al., pp. 459-465. |
J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst., vol. 1 No. 3, Oct. 2002, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, “Resolution enhancement of 157 nm lithography by liquid immersion”, M. Switkes et al., pp. 1-4. |
S. Owa et al., “Immersion lithography; its potential performance and issues”, Proceedings of SPIE vol. 5040, 2003, pp. 724-733. |
European Search Report for EP 02257938 dated Sep. 25, 2003. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm,” MIT Lincoln Lab, Orlando Jan. 2001, Dec. 17, 2001. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography at 157 nm,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2353-2356. |
M. Switkes et al., “Immersion Lithography: Optics for the 50 nm Node,” 157 Anvers-1, Sep. 4, 2002. |
B.J. Lin, “Drivers, Prospects and Challenges for Immersion Lithography,” TSMC, Inc., Sep. 2002. |
B.J. Lin, “Proximity Printing Through Liquid,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 11B, Apr. 1978, p. 4997. |
B.J. Lin, “The Paths to Subhalf-Micrometer Optical Lithography,” SPIE vol. 922, Optical/Laser Microlithoqraphy (1988), pp. 256-269. |
G.W.W. Stevens, “Reduction of Waste Resulting from Mask Defects,” Solid State Technology, Aug. 1978, vol. 21 008, pp. 68-72. |
S. Owa et al., “Advantage and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography,” Proc. SPIE 5040 (2003). |
Nikon Precision Europe GmbH, “Investor Relations—Nikon's Real Solutions,” May 15, 2003. |
H. Kawata et al., “Optical Projection Lithography using Lenses with Numerical Apertures Greater than Unity,” Microelectronic Engineering 9 (1989), pp. 31-36. |
Bbej.A. Hoffnagle et al., “Liquid Immersion Deep-Ultraviolet Interferometric Lithography,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 17, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 3306-3309. |
B.W. Smith et al., “Immersion Optical Lithography at 193 nm,” FUTURE FAB International, vol. 15, Jul. 11, 2003. |
H. Kawata et al., “Fabrication of 0.2μm Fine Patterns Using Optical Projection Lithography with an Oil Immersion Lens,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 31 (1992), pp. 4174-4177. |
G. Owen et al., “1/8μm Optical Lithography,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 10, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 3032-3036. |
H. Hogan, “New Semiconductor Lithography Makes a Splash,” Photonics SPECTRA, Photonics Technology World, Oct. 2003 Edition, pp. 1-3. |
S. Owa and N. Nagasaka, “Potential Performance and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography,” NGL Workshop 2003, Jul. 10, 2003, Slide Nos. 1-33. |
European Search Report dated May 3, 2004 for EP 03257068.1. |
S. Owa et al., “Update on 193nm immersion exposure tool,” Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-51. |
H. Hata, “The Development of Immersion Exposure Tools,” Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-22. |
T. Matsuyama et al., “Nikon Projection Lens Update,” SPIE Microlithography 2004, 5377-65, Mar. 2004. |
“Depth-of-Focus Enhancement Using High Refractive Index Layer on the Imaging Layer,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 11, Apr. 1985, p. 6521. |
A. Suzuki, “Lithography Advances on Multiple Fronts,” EEdesign, EE Times, Jan. 5, 2004. |
B.J. Lin, “The k3 coefficient in nonparaxial λ/NA scaling equations for resolution, depth of focus, and immersion lithography,” J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst., 1(1):7-12 (2002). |
European Search Report for EP 03257068 completed Aug. 17, 2004. |
Examination Report for EP Patent Appln. No. 03257072.3 dated Mar. 28, 2008. |
European Search Report for EP Patent Appln. No. 03257068.1 dated May 3, 2004. |
European Search Report for EP Patent Appln. No. 03255395.0 dated Aug. 19, 2004. |
Japanese Office Action issued for Japanese Patent Application No. 2003-417260, dated Dec. 18, 2006. |
Japanese Official Action issued for Japanese Patent Application No. 2004-169275, dated Jul. 12, 2007. |
English Translation of JP 10-228661 (dated Aug. 25, 1998). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110279800 A1 | Nov 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12698932 | Feb 2010 | US |
Child | 13194136 | US | |
Parent | 11482122 | Jul 2006 | US |
Child | 12698932 | US | |
Parent | 10857614 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 11482122 | US |