1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to techniques for verifying lithographic processes that use photo-masks and semiconductor-manufacturing processes that use write devices.
2. Related Art
Lithography processing represents an essential technology for manufacturing Integrated Circuits (IC) and Micro Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS). Lithographic techniques are used to define patterns, geometries, features or shapes. (henceforth referred to as ‘patterns’) onto an integrated circuit die or semiconductor wafer or chips where the patterns are typically defined by a set of contours, lines, boundaries, edges or curves. (henceforth referred to as ‘contours’), which generally surround, enclose, and/or define the boundary of the various regions which constitute a pattern.
Demand for increased density of features on dies and wafers has resulted in the design of circuits with decreasing minimum dimensions. However, due to the wave nature of light, as dimensions approach sizes comparable to the wavelength of the light used in the photolithography process, the resulting wafer patterns deviate from the corresponding photo-mask patterns and are accompanied by unwanted distortions and artifacts.
Techniques such as Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) attempt to improve resolution and/or a process window in a photolithography process by appropriately pre-distorting the photo-mask pattern such that the wafer pattern is printed more accurately. In addition, other techniques known as resolution enhancement technologies (RET) also modify the design of the photo-mask in order to improve photolithography.
A critical issue that arises when using OPC or RET is verifying that an intended photo-mask will print correctly on the wafer, without actually creating the photo-mask (which is an expensive process) or printing wafers in a manufacturing facility or fab (which is also expensive). In addition, there is also a need to determine the robustness of the photo-mask and/or the associated semiconductor-manufacturing process. For example, a manufacturer may be interested in exposure latitude and/or depth of focus (which define a process window). Software is sometimes used to verify suitability of a photo-mask or to estimate the process window by simulating what will actually print on a wafer (henceforth referred to as an estimated wafer pattern).
However, any such verification technique needs a way to determine what errors are acceptable, and what errors constitute a defect. Various methods are used for this purpose today. For example, so-called ‘bridging’ occurs when two features in an estimate of a printed wafer merge. This is generally considered to be a defect. Other approaches include measuring a critical dimension (CD) of a feature at a specific place in an estimated wafer pattern. Unfortunately, these existing approaches may not be systematic. As a consequence, the resulting verification may be incomplete with a negative impact on manufacturing yield and cost.
Hence what is needed are improved systems and methods to facilitate lithography verification.
One embodiment of the present invention provides a method for verifying a lithographic process. During the method, a set of guard bands are defined around a target pattern that is to be printed on a semiconductor die using a photo-mask in the lithographic process. An estimated pattern is calculated using a model of the lithographic process. This model of the lithographic process includes a mask pattern corresponding to the photo-mask and a model of an optical path. Then, whether or not positions of differences between the estimated pattern and the target pattern exceeded one or more guard bands in the set of guard bands is determined.
In some embodiments, a model of the lithographic process includes a photo-resist model.
In some embodiments, the set of guard bands correspond to tolerances associated with the target pattern.
In some embodiments, different regions in the target pattern have different guard bands in the set of guard bands. For example, the different regions may include corners, straight portions, angular portions, rectangular end portions, and/or transitional regions between any two respective regions. In some embodiments, regions including corners in the target pattern have a larger guard band than regions including straight portions in the target pattern.
In some embodiments, at least some of the guard bands in the set of guard bands are defined in accordance with user criteria and/or with topology of one or more regions in the target pattern. Furthermore the set of guard bands may be associated with features in the target pattern.
In some embodiments, a respective guard band in the set of guard bands overlaps a corresponding feature. For example, the features may include edges.
In some embodiments, the set of guard bands, target pattern, and estimated pattern include bitmap images and/or grayscale images. For those embodiments with bitmap images, the determining may include performing a logic operation (such as an exclusive OR or XOR) on the estimated pattern and the target pattern. And for these embodiments with grayscale images, the determining may be performed at sub-pixel resolution.
In some embodiments, the calculating and determining are performed over a range of process conditions in the lithographic process. Furthermore, in some embodiments a remedial action condition is asserted in accordance with the determined positions.
Another embodiment provides a computer system configured to execute instructions corresponding to at least some of the above-described operations.
Another embodiment provides a computer-program product for use in conjunction with the computer system.
Another embodiment provides a method for verifying a semiconductor-manufacturing process. During the method, a set of guard bands are defined around a target pattern that is to be printed on a semiconductor die using a write device in the semiconductor-manufacturing process. An estimated pattern is calculated using a model of the semiconductor-manufacturing process. This model of the semiconductor-manufacturing process includes a write pattern for the write device. Then, whether or not positions of differences between the estimated pattern and the target pattern exceeded one or more guard bands in the set of guard bands is determined.
Another embodiment provides a data file stored in a computer-readable memory. The data file includes first information corresponding to a pattern. This pattern is to be printed in a semiconductor-manufacturing process. In addition, the data file includes second information corresponding to a set of guard bands associated with the pattern.
In some embodiments, the pattern is to be printed on a semiconductor die using the write device in the semiconductor-manufacturing process or using the photo-mask in the semiconductor-manufacturing process.
In some embodiments, the pattern is mask pattern associated with a photo-mask. This photo-mask is to print a target pattern on a semiconductor die in the semiconductor-manufacturing process.
In some embodiments, the data file is compatible with formats including GDSII or Oasis.
All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
Note that like reference numerals refer to corresponding parts throughout the drawings.
The following description is presented to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the invention, and is provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. Various modifications to the disclosed embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
Embodiments of a computer system, a method, and a computer program product (i.e., software) for use with the computer system are described. These systems and processes may be used to verify (photo-) lithographic processes and/or semiconductor-manufacturing processes. In particular, a set of guard bands may be defined around a target pattern that is to be printed. In some embodiments, this printing is to use a photo-mask in the lithographic process and/or a write device (such as a direct-write device or a laser writer) in the semiconductor-manufacturing process. An estimated pattern is calculated using a model of the lithographic process and/or a model of the semiconductor manufacturing process. For example, the model of the lithographic process may include a mask pattern corresponding to the photo-mask, a model of an optical path, and/or a photo-resist model. In addition, the model of the semiconductor-manufacturing process may include a write pattern for the write device. Then, whether or not positions of differences between the estimated pattern and the target pattern exceeded one or more guard bands in the set of guard bands is determined. Furthermore, the calculating of one or more estimated patterns and the determining of differences may be performed over a range of process conditions in the lithographic process and/or the semiconductor-manufacturing process to determine a process window.
In this way, deviations with respect to a set of tolerances may be determined and, if needed, a remedial action condition is asserted. For example, the mask pattern and/or the write pattern may be deemed unacceptable. In this case, the mask pattern and/or the write pattern may be rejected and/or modified to correct the problem. In addition, the differences that are determined may be classified in order to identify different types of errors or defects, and in particular, to separate less important or damaging defects from more important or damaging ones.
Different regions in the target pattern may have different guard bands in the set of guard bands. For example, the different regions may include corners, straight portions, angular portions, rectangular end portions, and/or transitional regions between any two respective regions. In some embodiments, regions including corners in the target pattern have a larger guard band than regions including straight portions in the target pattern. Note that at least some of the guard bands in the set of guard bands may be defined in accordance with user criteria and/or with topology of one or more regions in the target pattern. Furthermore the set of guard bands may be associated with features in the target pattern.
We now describe embodiments of a computer system, a method, and software for verify lithographic processes and/or semiconductor-manufacturing processes.
Note that guard bands for the different types of regions may have different tolerances relative to the edge or contour of the feature 110. For example, guard bands 112 associated with corners in the feature 110 are larger than guard bands 118 associated with straight portions in the feature 110. For example, one embodiment may use a 193 nm light source and a 65 nm design, guard bands 118 associated with straight portions that are about 6 nm wide, indicating an acceptable range of +/−5% of the critical dimension (CD), and guard bands 112 associated with corner regions that are about 12 nm wide, indicating an acceptable range of +/−10% of the CD. Other embodiments may use guard bands that have a width in the range of about 2 to 20 nm wide or any range subsumed therein, and/or guard bands that have a width in the range of about 5% to 100% of the CD or any range subsumed therein and/or guard bands associated with corner regions that have a width of in the range of about 1 to 3 times the width of guard bands associated with straight portions or any range subsumed therein. These are examples only and other embodiments could use smaller or larger guardbands, smaller or larger CDs, and different light sources. In addition, the guard bands 116 for the transitional regions may permit larger tolerances than the guard bands 118, but only for a short length along the side of the feature 110 relative to other guard bands. Thus, the guard bands 112, 114, 116, 118, and 120 may define areas where a difference (i.e., an error) may be tolerated (in particular, the area within the guard bands). For example, the feature 110 pattern may be thinner or wider within a guard band and not be considered an error. However, failure to print a portion of the feature 110 within an inner boundary of the guard bands or printing a portion of the feature 110 outside an outer boundary of the guard bands is considered an error.
Also note that the guard bands 112, 114, 116, 118, and 120 may overlap the edge or contour of the feature 110. Furthermore, as illustrated in
The guard bands 112, 114, 116, 118, and/or 120 may be defined based on user criteria (such as a process window in the lithographic process and/or the semiconductor-manufacturing process) and/or with topology of one or more regions in the feature 110. For example, a user may define critical regions with tight tolerance in which the guard bands are narrow. In addition, a computer system may recognize the differing topology of line ends versus longer straight lines, and use different tolerances in each case. As noted previously, corners or regions near corners may also have different guard bands.
Once guard bands have been determined, a defect may be simply defined as a difference that is positioned outside of one or more of the guard band areas. As an example, consider features in a given target pattern as those that define areas where resist should be cleared, and the absence of such features in the given target pattern as those where photo-resist should remain. If the estimated pattern includes a location, outside of one or more of the guard-band areas where resist should not be cleared but resist is present, then this would constitute a defect. Similarly, if the estimated pattern includes a location outside one or more of the guard-band areas where resist should be cleared but is not cleared, then this would also constitute a defect.
In some embodiments, the set of guard bands, target pattern, and estimated pattern include bitmap images and/or grayscale images (in which the value of the various pixels indicates a distance to the edge or contour of the feature 110). For those embodiments with bitmap images, the determining of differences may include performing a logic operation (such as an exclusive OR or XOR) on the estimated pattern and the target pattern. In particular, removing those pixels that are also present in the guard band image leaves behind only those pixels that would constitute defects. Therefore, their presence or absence may be used to determine if the image of the estimated pattern is acceptable. And for these embodiments with grayscale images, the determining of differences and/or whether such an error or defect is outside the area defined by one or more guard bands may be performed at sub-pixel resolution.
The lithographic process used to print a wafer pattern that is to approximate a target pattern that includes guard bands may include a wide variety of process and/or optical conditions. For example, off-axis illumination, dipole illumination, quadropole illumination, quasar illumination, incoherent illumination, coherent illumination, and/or any arbitrary illumination aperture may be used. In addition, one or more light sources may include I line, g line, a wavelength of 193 nm, a wavelength of 248 nm, immersion, and/or any other optical lithography wavelength in air, water, or other fluid or gas. Furthermore, the mask patterns may correspond to photo-masks that include polarizing regions, chrome regions, attenuated regions, phase-shifting regions, or attenuated phase shifting regions.
The semiconductor-manufacturing process may use a laser-writer or direct-write device. In these embodiments, the mask pattern (corresponding to the photo-mask) described above is not physically manifested. Instead, there is a write pattern that is to guide the writing of the direct-write device in order to print the target pattern on a wafer. Note that the lithographic process and/or the semiconductor-manufacturing process may include multiple exposures.
Note that in some embodiments the feature 110 in the pattern may include fewer or additional components, two or more components may be combined into a single component, and/or a position of one or more components (such as one of the guard bands 112, 114, 116, 118, and/or 120) may be changed.
Memory 224 in the computer system 200 may include volatile memory and/or non-volatile memory. More specifically, memory 224 may include ROM, RAM, EPROM, EEPROM, FLASH, one or more smart cards, one or more magnetic disc storage devices, and/or one or more optical storage devices. Memory 224 may store an operating system 226 that includes procedures (or a set of instructions) for handling various basic system services for performing hardware dependent tasks. The memory 224 may also store communications procedures (or a set of instructions) in a communication module 228. The communication procedures may be used for communicating with one or more computers, devices and/or servers, including computers, devices and/or servers that are remotely located with respect to the computer system 200.
Memory 224 may also include one or more program modules (or a set of instructions), including a verification module 230 (or a set of instructions) for verifying a lithographic process and/or a semiconductor-manufacturing process. In addition, memory 224 may include a modeling module 232 (or a set of instructions) for calculating estimated patterns. For example, the modeling module 232 may include a forward-optical model of an optical path that includes a mask pattern corresponding to a photo-mask at an object plane in order to determine an estimated pattern at an image plane. Such forward-optical models may include Fourier representations of the optical path.
In addition, in other embodiments, the modeling module is used to determine a mask pattern and/or a write pattern that correctly prints a wafer pattern as determined using the set of guard bands. For example, the determining of the mask pattern and/or the write pattern may use an inverse-optical calculation in which the desired printed pattern at an image plane of an optical path (such as that in a lithographic device) is used to determine the mask pattern (corresponding to a photo-mask) and/or a write pattern used at an object plane of the optical path.
Furthermore, memory 224 may include one or more mask and/or write patterns 234, one or more target patterns 236, one or more estimated patterns 244, one or more differences 246 between one or more estimated patterns and one or more target patterns, and/or optional process conditions. In addition, memory 224 may include a data structure 238 that includes information for different types of guard bands 240 and 242.
Instructions in the various modules in the memory 224 may be implemented in a high-level procedural language, an object-oriented programming language, and/or in an assembly or machine language. The programming language may be compiled or interpreted, i.e., configurable or configured to be executed by the one or more processing units 210.
Although the computer system 200 is illustrated as having a number of discrete components,
Computer system 200 may include fewer components or additional components, two or more components may be combined into a single component, and/or a position of one or more components may be changed. In some embodiments the functionality of computer system 200 may be implemented more in hardware and less in software, or less in hardware and more in software, as is known in the art.
We now discuss methods for verifying a lithographic process and/or a semiconductor-manufacturing process.
We now discuss data structures that may be used in the computer system 200 (
The foregoing descriptions of embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration and description only. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the present invention to the forms disclosed. Accordingly, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in the art. Additionally, the above disclosure is not intended to limit the present invention. The scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/723,320, filed Oct. 3, 2005, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4752957 | Maeda | Jun 1988 | A |
5242770 | Chen et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5301101 | MacArthur et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5418092 | Okamoto | May 1995 | A |
5489509 | Kawabata et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5508803 | Hibbs et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5525808 | Irie et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5546189 | Svetkoff et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5546225 | Shiraishi | Aug 1996 | A |
5640199 | Garakani et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5707765 | Chen | Jan 1998 | A |
5889678 | Inoue et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6022644 | Lin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6042998 | Brueck et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6096567 | Kaplan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6123733 | Dalton | Sep 2000 | A |
6383847 | Ditlow et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6468711 | Sorori et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6484306 | Bokor et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6563566 | Rosenbluth et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6596466 | Pohland et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601192 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611627 | LaRossa et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6617096 | Burkhard | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6677948 | Wasserman et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6698007 | Wu et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6703170 | Pindo | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6704920 | Brill et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6733929 | Pierrat | May 2004 | B2 |
6756980 | Hayashi | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6764795 | Aton et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6787271 | Cote | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6795069 | Raskar et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798412 | Cowperthwaite | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6799313 | LaCour | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6809797 | Baselmans et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6880135 | Chang et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6968532 | Sivakumar et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7027658 | Osher et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7031538 | Osher et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7073162 | Cobb et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7124394 | Abrams et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7175945 | Mieher et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7178127 | Abrams et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7231628 | Pack et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236123 | Siegel | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7302090 | Kalus et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7353145 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7403641 | Nakamoto et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7441227 | Abrams et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7480889 | Abrams et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7512927 | Gallatin et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7571423 | Abrams et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20020028393 | Laidig et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020066069 | Ashida et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020177050 | Tanaka | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188924 | Pierrat et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030095267 | Mieher et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103189 | Neureuther et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030106642 | Fairbairn | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030123707 | Park | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140330 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030152841 | Averbukh | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165749 | Fritze et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030198872 | Yamazoe et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040008880 | Horie et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021660 | Ng-Thow-Hing et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040031013 | Dulman et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073884 | Kroyan | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040086792 | Romeo et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101766 | Mesuda et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040136587 | Kalus et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040147121 | Nakagaki et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040161678 | Misaka | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040166422 | Yamazoe et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040214096 | Dulman et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040229133 | Socha et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040265707 | Socha | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050066300 | Zach | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050122500 | Ye et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136340 | Baselmans et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050142470 | Socha et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147893 | Ogawa et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050191566 | Liu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050251771 | Robles | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265605 | Nakamoto et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060049978 | Siegel | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060051682 | Hess et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060172204 | Peng et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060273242 | Hunsche et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070009808 | Abrams et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011644 | Abrams et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011645 | Abrams et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011647 | Abrams et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011648 | Abrams | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070026613 | Ryu et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070133862 | Gold et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136716 | Abrams et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156327 | Tipping et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070184357 | Abrams et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186206 | Abrams et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070186208 | Abrams et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070192756 | Abrams et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070196742 | Abrams et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198963 | Granik et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198966 | Abrams et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070217566 | Chen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090013304 | Peng | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090073413 | Abrams et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077526 | Abrams et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077527 | Gergov et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2006 078791 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2006 078791 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 2007 033362 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007 033362 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007 041600 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007 041600 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007041602 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007041602 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007 041701 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007 041701 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007 044557 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007 044557 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007 044630 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007 044630 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007 044827 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007 044827 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2008 039674 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008 039674 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2009036364 | Mar 2009 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070184369 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60723320 | Oct 2005 | US |