Membrane probing system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7403025
  • Patent Number
    7,403,025
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 23, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 22, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
A membrane probing assembly includes a probe card with conductors supported thereon, wherein the conductors include at least a signal conductor located between a pair of spaced apart guard conductors. A membrane assembly includes a membrane with contacts thereon, and supporting at least a signal conductor located between a pair of spaced apart guard conductors. The guard conductors of the probe card are electrically interconnected proximate the interconnection between the probe card and the membrane assembly. The guard conductors of the membrane assembly are electrically interconnected proximate the interconnection between the probe card and the membrane assembly.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to probe assemblies of the type commonly used for testing integrated circuits (IC).


The trend in electronic production has been toward increasingly smaller geometries particularly in integrated circuit technology wherein a very large number of discrete circuit elements are fabricated on a single substrate or “wafer.” After fabrication, this wafer is divided into a number of rectangular-shaped chips or “dice” where each die presents a rectangular or other regular arrangement of metallized contact pads through which input/output connections are made. Although each die is eventually packaged separately, for efficiency sake, testing of the circuit formed on each die is preferably performed while the dies are still joined together on the wafer. One typical procedure is to support the wafer on a flat stage or “chuck” and to move the wafer in X, Y and Z directions relative to the head of the probing assembly so that the contacts on the probing assembly move from die to die for consecutive engagement with each die. Respective signal, power and ground lines are run to the probing assembly from the test instrumentation thus enabling each circuit to be sequentially connected to the test instrumentation.


One conventional type of probing assembly used for testing integrated circuits provides contacts that are configured as needle-like tips. These tips are mounted about a central opening formed in a probe card so as to radially converge inwardly and downwardly through the opening. When the wafer is raised beyond that point where the pads on the wafer first come into contact with these tips, the tips flex upwardly so as to skate forwardly across their respective pads thereby removing oxide buildup on the pads.


The problem with this type of probing assembly is that the needle-like tips, due to their narrow geometry, exhibit high inductance so that signal distortion is large in high frequency measurements made through these tips. Also, these tips can act in the manner of a planing tool as they wipe across their respective pads, thereby leading to excessive pad damage. This problem is magnified to the extent that the probe tips bend out of shape during use or otherwise fail to terminate in a common plane which causes the more forward ones of the tips to bear down too heavily on their respective pads. Also, it is impractical to mount these tips at less than 100 micron center-to-center spacing or in a multi-row grid-like pattern so as to accommodate the pad arrangement of more modern, higher density dies. Also, this type of probing assembly has a scrub length of the needle tips of 25 microns or more, which increases the difficulty of staying within the allowed probing area.


In order to reduce inductive losses, decrease pad wear, and accommodate smaller device geometries, a second type of probing assembly has been developed that uses a flexible membrane structure for supporting the probing contacts. In this assembly, lead lines of well-defined geometry are formed on one or more plies of flexible insulative film, such as polyimide or MYLAR™. If separate plies are used, these plies are bonded together to form, for example, a multilayered transmission line structure. In the central portion of this flexible structure or membrane, each conductive line is terminated by a respective probing contact which is formed on, and projects outwardly from, an outer face of the membrane. These probing contacts are arranged in a predetermined pattern that matches the pattern of the device pads and typically are formed as upraised bumps for probing the flat surfaces conventionally defined by the pads. The inner face of the membrane is supported on a supporting structure. This structure can take the form, for example, of a truncated pyramid, in which case the inner face of the center portion of the membrane is supported on the truncated end of the support while the marginal portions of the membrane are drawn away from the center portion at an angle thereto so as to clear any upright components that may surround the pads on the device.


With respect to the membrane probing assembly just described, excessive line inductance is eliminated by carefully selecting the geometry of the lead lines, and a photolithographic process is preferably used to enable some control over the size, spacing, and arrangement, of the probing contacts so as to accommodate higher density configurations. However, although several different forms of this probing assembly have been proposed, difficulties have been encountered in connection with this type of assembly in reducing pad wear and in achieving reliable clearing of the oxide layer from each of the device pads so as to ensure adequate electrical connection between the assembly and the device-under-test.


One conventional form of membrane probing assembly, for example, is exemplified by the device shown in Rath European Patent Pub. No. 259,163A2. This device has the central portion of the sheet-like membrane mounted directly against a rigid support. This rigid support, in turn, is connected by a resilient member comprising an elastomeric or rubber block to the main body of the assembly so that the membrane can tilt to match the tilt of the device. Huff U.S. Pat. No. 4,918,383 shows a closely related device wherein radially extending leaf springs permit vertical axis movement of the rigid support while preventing it from tilting so that there is no slippage or “misalignment” of the contact bumps on the pads and further so that the entire membrane will shift slightly in the horizontal plane to allow the contacts to “scrub” across their respective pads in order to clear surface oxides from these pads.


In respect to both of these devices, however, because of manufacturing tolerances, certain of the contact bumps are likely to be in a recessed position relative to their neighbors and these recessed bumps will not have a satisfactory opportunity to engage their pads since they will be drawn away from their pads by the action of their neighbors on the rigid support. Furthermore, even when “scrub” movement is provided in the manner of Huff, the contacts will tend to frictionally cling to the device as they perform the scrubbing movement, that is, there will be a tendency for the pads of the device to move in unison with the contacts so as to negate the effect of the contact movement. Whether any scrubbing action actually occurs depends on how far the pads can move, which depends, in turn, on the degree of lateral play that exists as a result of normal tolerance between the respective bearing surfaces of the probe head and chuck. Hence this form of membrane probing assembly does not ensure reliable electrical connection between each contact and pad.


A second conventional form of membrane probing assembly is exemplified by the device shown in Barsotti European Patent Pub. No. 304,868A2. This device provides a flexible backing for the central or contact-carrying portion of the flexible membrane. In Barsotti, the membrane is directly backed by an elastomeric member and this member, in turn, is backed by a rigid support so that minor height variations between the contacts or pads can be accommodated. It is also possible to use positive-pressure air, negative-pressure air, liquid or an unbacked elastomer to provide flexible backing for the membrane, as shown in Gangroth U.S. Pat. No. 4,649,339, Ardezzone U.S. Pat. No. 4,636,772, Reed, Jr. et al. U.S. Pat. No. 3,596,228 and Okubo et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,134,365, respectively. These alternative devices, however, do not afford sufficient pressure between the probing contacts and the device pads to reliably penetrate the oxides that form on the pad surfaces.


In this second form of membrane probing assembly, as indicated in Okubo, the contacts may be limited to movement along the Z-axis in order to prevent slippage and resulting misalignment between the contacts and pads during engagement. Thus, in Barsotti, the rigid support underlying the elastomeric member is fixed in position although it is also possible to mount the support for Z-axis movement in the manner shown in Huff U.S. Pat. No. 4,980,637. Pad damage is likely to occur with this type of design, however, because a certain amount of tilt is typically present between the contacts and the device, and those contacts angled closest to the device will ordinarily develop much higher contact pressures than those which are angled away. The same problem arises with the related assembly shown in European Patent Pub. No. 230,348A2 to Garretson, even though in the Garretson device the characteristic of the elastomeric member is such as to urge the contacts into lateral movement when those contacts are placed into pressing engagement with their pads. Yet another related assembly is shown in Evans U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,638 which uses a pivotably mounted support for backing the elastomeric member so as to accommodate tilt between the contacts and the device. However, the Evans device is subject to the friction clinging problem already described insofar as the pads of the device are likely to cling to the contacts as the support pivots and causes the contacts to shift laterally.


Yet other forms of conventional membrane probing assemblies are shown in Crumly U.S. Pat. No. 5,395,253, Barsotti et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,059,898 and Evans et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,638. In Crumly, the center portion of a stretchable membrane is resiliently biased to a fully stretched condition using a spring. When the contacts engage their respective pads, the stretched center portion retracts against the spring to a partially relaxed condition so as to draw the contacts in radial scrub directions toward the center of the membrane. In Barsotti, each row of contacts is supported by the end of a respective L-shaped arm so that when the contacts in a row engage their respective pads, the corresponding arm flexes upwardly and causes the row of contacts to laterally scrub simultaneously across their respective pads. In both Crumly and Barsotti, however, if any tilt is present between the contacts and the device at the time of engagement, this tilt will cause the contacts angled closest to the device to scrub further than those angled further away. Moreover, the shorter contacts will be forced to move in their scrub directions before they have had the opportunity to engage their respective pads due to the controlling scrub action of their neighboring contacts. A further disadvantage of the Crumly device, in particular, is that the contacts nearer to the center of the membrane will scrub less than those nearer to the periphery so that scrub effectiveness will vary with contact position.


In Evans et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,355,079 each contact constitutes a spring metal finger, and each finger is mounted so as to extend in a cantilevered manner away from the underlying membrane at a predetermined angle relative to the membrane. A similar configuration is shown in Higgins U.S. Pat. No. 5,521,518. It is difficult, however, to originally position these fingers so that they all terminate in a common plane, particularly if a high density pattern is required. Moreover, these fingers are easily bent out of position during use and cannot easily be rebent back to their original position. Hence, certain ones of the fingers are likely to touch down before other ones of the fingers, and scrub pressures and distances are likely to be different for different fingers. Nor, in Evans at least, is there an adequate mechanism for tolerating a minor degree of tilt between the fingers and pads. Although Evans suggests roughening the surface of each finger to improve the quality of electrical connection, this roughening can cause undue abrasion and damage to the pad surfaces. Yet a further disadvantage of the contact fingers shown in both Evans and Higgins is that such fingers are subject to fatigue and failure after a relatively low number of “touchdowns” or duty cycles due to repeated bending and stressing.


Referring to FIG. 1, Cascade Microtech, Inc. of Beaverton, Oreg. has developed a probe head 40 for mounting a membrane probing assembly 42. In order to measure the electrical performance of a particular die area 44 included on the silicon wafer 46, the high-speed digital lines 48 and/or shielded transmission lines 50 of the probe head are connected to the input/output ports of the test instrumentation by a suitable cable assembly, and the chuck 51 which supports the wafer is moved in mutually perpendicular X,Y,Z directions in order to bring the pads of the die area into pressing engagement with the contacts included on the lower contacting portion of the membrane probing assembly.


The probe head 40 includes a probe card 52 on which the data/signal lines 48 and 50 are arranged. Referring to FIGS. 2-3, the membrane probing assembly 42 includes a support element 54 formed of incompressible material such as a hard polymer. This element is detachably connected to the upper side of the probe card by four Allen screws 56 and corresponding nuts 58 (each screw passes through a respective attachment arm 60 of the support element, and a separate backing element 62 evenly distributes the clamping pressure of the screws over the entire back side of the supporting element). In accordance with this detachable connection, different probing assemblies having different contact arrangements can be quickly substituted for each other as needed for probing different devices.


Referring to FIGS. 3-4, the support element 54 includes a rearward base portion 64 to which the attachment arms 60 are integrally joined. Also included on the support element 54 is a forward support or plunger 66 that projects outwardly from the flat base portion. This forward support has angled sides 68 that converge toward a flat support surface 70 so as to give the forward support the shape of a truncated pyramid. Referring also to FIG. 2, a flexible membrane assembly 72 is attached to the support after being aligned by means of alignment pins 74 included on the base portion. This flexible membrane assembly is formed by one or more plies of insulative sheeting such as KAPTON™ sold by E.I. Du Pont de Nemours or other polyimide film, and flexible conductive layers or strips are provided between or on these plies to form the data/signal lines 76.


When the support element 54 is mounted on the upper side of the probe card 52 as shown in FIG. 3, the forward support 66 protrudes through a central opening 78 in the probe card so as to present the contacts which are arranged on a central region 80 of the flexible membrane assembly in suitable position for pressing engagement with the pads of the device under test. Referring to FIG. 2, the membrane assembly includes radially extending arm segments 82 that are separated by inwardly curving edges 84 that give the assembly the shape of a formee cross, and these segments extend in an inclined manner along the angled sides 68 thereby clearing any upright components surrounding the pads. A series of contact pads 86 terminate the data/signal lines 76 so that when the support element is mounted, these pads electrically engage corresponding termination pads provided on the upper side of the probe card so that the data/signal lines 48 on the probe card are electrically connected to the contacts on the central region.


A feature of the probing assembly 42 is its capability for probing a somewhat dense arrangement of contact pads over a large number of contact cycles in a manner that provides generally reliable electrical connection between the contacts and pads in each cycle despite oxide buildup on the pads. This capability is a function of the construction of the support element 54, the flexible membrane assembly 72 and their manner of interconnection. In particular, the membrane assembly is so constructed and connected to the support element that the contacts on the membrane assembly preferably wipe or scrub, in a locally controlled manner, laterally across the pads when brought into pressing engagement with these pads. The preferred mechanism for producing this scrubbing action is described in connection with the construction and interconnection of a preferred membrane assembly 72a as best depicted in FIGS. 6 and 7a-7b.



FIG. 6 shows an enlarged view of the central region 80a of the membrane assembly 72a. In this embodiment, the contacts 88 are arranged in a square-like pattern suitable for engagement with a square-like arrangement of pads. Referring also to FIG. 7a, which represents a sectional view taken along lines 7a-7a in FIG. 6, each contact comprises a relatively thick rigid beam 90 at one end of which is formed a rigid contact bump 92. The contact bump includes thereon a contacting portion 93 which comprises a nub of rhodium fused to the contact bump. Using electroplating, each beam is formed in an overlapping connection with the end of a flexible conductive trace 76a to form a joint therewith. This conductive trace in conjunction with a back-plane conductive layer 94 effectively provides a controlled impedance data/signal line to the contact because its dimensions are established using a photolithographic process. The backplane layer preferably includes openings therein to assist, for example, with gas venting during fabrication.


The membrane assembly is interconnected to the flat support surface 70 by an interposed elastomeric layer 98, which layer is coextensive with the support surface and can be formed by a silicone rubber compound such as ELMER'S STICK-ALL™ made by the Borden Company or Sylgard 182 by Dow Corning Corporation. This compound can be conveniently applied in a paste-like phase which hardens as it sets. The flat support surface, as previously mentioned, is made of incompressible material and is preferably a hard dielectric such as polysulfone or glass.


In accordance with the above-described construction, when one of the contacts 88 is brought into pressing engagement with a respective pad 100, as indicated in FIG. 7b, the resulting off-center force on the rigid beam 90 and bump 92 structure causes the beam to pivot or tilt against the elastic recovery force provided by the elastomeric pad 98. This tilting motion is localized in the sense that a forward portion 102 of the beam moves a greater distance toward the flat support surface 70 than a rearward portion 104 of the same beam. The effect is such as to drive the contact into lateral scrubbing movement across the pad as is indicated in FIG. 7b with a dashed-line and solid-line representation showing the beginning and ending positions, respectively, of the contact on the pad. In this fashion, the insulative oxide buildup on each pad is removed so as to ensure adequate contact-to-pad electrical connections.



FIG. 8 shows, in dashed line view, the relative positions of the contact 88 and pad 100 at the moment of initial engagement or touchdown and, in solid-line view, these same elements after “overtravel” of the pad by a distance 106 in a vertical direction directly toward the flat support surface 70. As indicated, the distance 108 of lateral scrubbing movement is directly dependent on the vertical deflection of the contact 88 or, equivalently, on the overtravel distance 106 moved by the pad 100. Hence, since the overtravel distance for each contact on the central region 80a will be substantially the same (with differences arising from variations in contact height), the distance of lateral scrubbing movement by each contact on the central region will be substantially uniform and will not, in particular, be affected by the relative position of each contact on the central region.


Because the elastomeric layer 98 is backed by the incompressible support surface 70, the elastomeric layer exerts a recovery force on each tilting beam 90 and thus each contact 93 to maintain contact-to-pad pressure during scrubbing. At the same time, the elastomeric layer accommodates some height variations between the respective contacts. Thus, referring to FIG. 9a, when a relatively shorter contact 88a is situated between an immediately adjacent pair of relatively taller contacts 88b and these taller contacts are brought into engagement with their respective pads, then, as indicated in FIG. 9b, deformation by the elastomeric layer allows the smaller contact to be brought into engagement with its pad after some further overtravel by the pads. It will be noted, in this example, that the tilting action of each contact is locally controlled, and the larger contacts are able, in particular, to tilt independently of the smaller contact so that the smaller contact is not urged into lateral movement until it has actually touched down on its pad.


Referring to FIGS. 10 and 11, the electroplating process to construct such a beam structure, as schematically shown in FIG. 8, includes the incompressible material 68 defining the support surface 70 and the substrate material attached thereon, such as the elastomeric layer 98. Using a flex circuit construction technique, the flexible conductive trace 76a is then patterned on a sacrificial substrate. Next, a polyimide layer 77 is patterned to cover the entire surface of the sacrificial substrate and of the traces 76a, except for the desired location of the beams 90 on a portion of the traces 76a. The beams 90 are then electroplated within the openings in the polyimide layer 77. Thereafter, a layer of photoresist 79 is patterned on both the surface of the polyimide 77 and beams 90 to leave openings for the desired location of the contact bumps 92. The contact bumps 92 are then electroplated within the openings in the photoresist layer 79. The photoresist layer 79 is removed and a thicker photoresist layer 81 is patterned to cover the exposed surfaces, except for the desired locations for the contacting portions 93. The contacting portions 93 are then electroplated within the openings in the photoresist layer 81. The photoresist layer 81 is then removed. The sacrificial substrate layer is removed and the remaining layers are attached to the elastomeric layer 98. The resulting beams 90, contact bumps 92, and contacting portions 93, as more accurately illustrated in FIG. 12, provides the independent tilting and scrubbing functions of the device.


Another suitable technique of the construction of a membrane probe is disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/115,571, incorporated by reference herein. However, for the inventions described herein, the present inventors have no preference as to the particular construction of the contacting portion of the membrane assembly nor the general structure of the membrane or membrane assembly itself.


While providing an improved technique for effective scrubbing action is significant, the present inventors determined that excessive noise still remains in the signals sensed by the measurement device.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention overcomes the aforementioned drawbacks of the prior art by providing a membrane probing assembly with a probe card that includes conductors supported thereon, wherein the conductors include at least a signal conductor located between a pair of spaced apart guard conductors. A membrane assembly includes a membrane with contacts thereon, and supporting at least a signal conductor located between a pair of spaced apart guard conductors. The guard conductors of the probe card are electrically interconnected proximate the interconnection between the probe card and the membrane assembly. The guard conductors of the membrane assembly are electrically interconnected proximate the interconnection between the probe card and the membrane assembly.


The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be more readily understood upon consideration of the following detailed description of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a membrane probing assembly bolted to a probe head and a wafer supported on a chuck in suitable position for probing by this assembly.



FIG. 2 is a bottom elevational view showing various parts of the probing assembly of FIG. 1, including a support element and flexible membrane assembly, and a fragmentary view of a probe card having data/signal lines connected with corresponding lines on the membrane assembly.



FIG. 3 is a side elevational view of the membrane probing assembly of FIG. 1 where a portion of the membrane assembly has been cut away to expose hidden portions of the support element.



FIG. 4 is a top elevational view of an exemplary support element.



FIGS. 5
a-5b are schematic side elevational views illustrating how the support element and membrane assembly are capable of tilting to match the orientation of the device under test.



FIG. 6 is an enlarged top elevational view of the central region of the construction of the membrane assembly of FIG. 2.



FIGS. 7
a-7b are sectional views taken along lines 7a-7a in FIG. 6 first showing a contact before touchdown and then showing the same contact after touchdown and scrub movement across its respective pad.



FIG. 8 is a schematic side view showing, in dashed-line representation, the contact of FIGS. 7a-7b at the moment of initial touchdown and, in solid-line representation, the same contact after further vertical overtravel by the pad.



FIGS. 9
a and 9b illustrate the deformation of the elastomeric layer to bring the contacts into contact with its pad.



FIG. 10 is a longitudinal sectional view of the device of FIG. 8.



FIG. 11 is a cross sectional view of the device of FIG. 8.



FIG. 12 is a more accurate pictorial view of the device shown in FIGS. 10 and 11.



FIG. 13 is partial plan view of a membrane assembly and a probe card.



FIG. 14A is a partial pictorial view of the traces of a membrane assembly.



FIG. 14B is a partial plan view of the interconnection between a membrane assembly and a probe card.



FIG. 14C is a partial sectional side view of the interconnection between the membrane assembly and the probe card of FIG. 14B.



FIG. 15 is a partial sectional view of a probe card illustrating the leakage currents from the end portions of the signal and guard conductors.



FIG. 16 is a partial sectional view of a probe card illustrating the interconnecting of a pair of guard conductors together with a signal conductor therebetween.



FIG. 17 is a partial plan view of a portion of a probe card illustrating power conductors, signal conductors, force conductors, sense conductors, removed interconnecting portions, and interconnected guard conductors.



FIG. 18 is a partial plan view of a portion of a membrane assembly illustrating signal conductors, force conductors, sense conductors, and interconnected guard conductors.



FIG. 19 is a partial plan view of a probe card and a membrane assembly suitable for a Kelvin connection.



FIG. 20 is a partial plan view of a probe card illustrating different geometries for the interconnection to a membrane assembly.



FIG. 21 is a partial plan view of a membrane assembly illustrating a guard conductor looping around a respective probing device.



FIG. 22 is a plan view of a “pogo-pin” probe card constructed in accordance with aspects of the present invention, where the connections to the probe card are normally electrical contacts from a probe ahead positioned above the probe card.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

With particular regard to probe cards that are specially adapted for use in measuring ultra-low currents, probe card designers have been concerned with developing techniques for controlling (e.g., minimizing) leakage currents. Unwanted currents that flow into a particular cable (or conductor) from surrounding cables (or conductors) may distort the current measured in that particular cable (or conductor). For a given potential difference between two spaced apart conductors, the amount of leakage current that will flow between them will vary depending upon the volume resistivity of the insulating material that separates the conductors. In other words, if a relatively lower-resistance insulator is used, this will result in a relatively higher leakage current. Thus, a designer of low-current probe cards will normally avoid the use of rubber-insulated single-core wires on a glass-epoxy board since rubber and glass-epoxy materials are known to be relatively low-resistance insulators through which relatively large leakage currents can flow.


One technique that has been used for suppressing inter-channel leakage currents is positioning the signal conductor between a pair of guard conductors, where each guard conductor is maintained at the same potential as the signal conductor by a feedback circuit in the output channel of the test instrument. Because the voltage potentials of the guard conductors and the respective signal conductor are made to substantially track each other, negligible leakage current will flow from the signal conductor to the corresponding guard conductors. Although leakage current can still flow between different sets of guard conductors, this is typically not a problem because the guard conductors, unlike the signal conductors, are at low impedance. By using this guarding technique, significant improvements may be realized in the low-level current measuring capability of certain probe card designs by reducing the capacitance between signal and guard, and increasing the resistance between signal and guard.


To further improve low-current measurement capability, the membrane assembly is constructed so as to likewise minimize leakage currents between the individual probing devices. Typically, this minimization involves the selection of membrane materials and likewise providing limited guarding of the signal conductor by a pair of guard conductors to a location proximate the probing device. Referring to FIG. 13, to provide the guarded path to a location proximate the probing devices each respective signal conductor 200 is located between a pair of respective guard conductors 202, 204 on the probe card 52, and the membrane assembly 72 likewise has a matching set of signal conductors 206 and guard conductors 208, 210. It is thought that this arrangement provides continuous sets of signal conductor/guard conductors to a location proximate the probing devices in a manner to achieve low leakage along nearly its entire length. However, even with the guarding of the signal conductors on the probe card 52 and the membrane assembly 72, the leakage current levels remain unacceptable for low-current low-noise measurements.


In other probe card designs, efforts have been directed toward systematically eliminating low-resistance leakage paths within the probe card and toward designing extensive and elaborate guarding structures to surround the signal conductors along the signal path. For example, in one design, the entire glass-epoxy main board is replaced with a board of ceramic material which presents a relatively high resistance to leakage currents. However, the ceramic material used in these newer designs is relatively more expensive than the glass-epoxy material it replaces. Another problem with ceramic materials is that they are relatively susceptible to the absorption of surface contaminants such as can be deposited by the skin during handling of the probe card. These contaminants can decrease the surface resistivity of the ceramic material to a sufficient extent as to produce a substantial increase in the leakage current levels. In addition, the more extensive and elaborate guarding structures that are used in these newer designs has contributed to a large increase in design and assembly costs.


It should be noted that there are other factors unrelated to design that can influence whether or not the potential of a particular probe card for measuring low-level currents will be fully realized. For example, if less special care is taken in assembling the probe card, it is possible for surface contaminants, such as oils and salts from the skin or residues left by solder flux, to contaminate the surface of the card and to degrade its performance (due to their ionic character, such contaminants can produce undesirable characteristics). Furthermore, even assuming that the card is designed and assembled properly, the card may not be suitably connected to the test instrument or the instrument may not be properly calibrated so as to completely null out, for example, the effects of voltage and current offsets. The probe card or the interconnecting lines can serve as pickup sites for ac fields, which ac fields can be rectified by the input circuit of the test instrument so as to cause errors in the indicated dc values. Thus, it is necessary to employ proper shielding procedures for (1) the probe card, (2) the interconnecting lines, and (3) the test instrument in order to shield out these field disturbances. Due to these factors, when a new probe card design is being tested, it can be extremely difficult to isolate the causes of undesirable background current in the new design due to numerous and possibly interacting factors that may be responsible.


The present inventors reconsidered a seemingly improbable source of noise, namely, the interconnection between the probe card 52 and the membrane assembly 72, which from initial considerations would appear to be effective at providing a guarded signal path to the probe device because of the “continuous” signal path upon interconnection. However, upon further consideration the present inventors determined that there is in fact significant unguarded and/or unshielded leakage paths existing in the region proximate the interconnection. Referring to FIG. 14A, each conductive path of the membrane is normally encapsulated within at least one layer of material (FIG. 14A illustrates multiple conductive paths without additional membrane materials). This provides a structure for routing conductive paths, such as the signal and guard conductors, to a location proximate the probing device without being on the exterior (lower surface) of the membrane assembly which may result in inadvertent contact with the device under test. Referring to FIGS. 14B-14C, the signal and guard lines are actually interconnected between the probe card 52 and the membrane assembly 72 by conductive structures 220 that pass through the outer layer 222 of the membrane assembly 72 to the interior conductive paths 206, 208, 210 of the membrane assembly 72. To form the electrical connection, the probe card 52 and membrane assembly 72 are mechanically aligned, and accordingly respective conductive structures 220 of the membrane assembly 72 are interconnected with the conductors 200, 202, 204 of the probe card 52. It is normally undesirable for the membrane assembly 72 interconnection to electrically connect at the absolute end of the conductors 200, 202, 204 (e.g., signal conductor and guard conductors) of the probe card 52 because then the tolerances for the interconnection would be extremely small, requiring nearly perfect alignment and extremely accurate fabrication. Accordingly, normally the signal and guard conductors supported by the probe card 52 extend beyond the region of electrical interconnection.


After further consideration, the present inventors came the realization that this extension of the signal and/or guard conductors beyond the location of electrical connection results in significant additional leakage paths. Referring to FIG. 15, the region 216 beyond the end of the guard conductors provides for surface leakage paths 218, which are primarily DC in nature with the characteristic of an added resistance between the respective conductive paths. This surface leakage path from a signal conductor around the end of the adjacent guard conductors reduces the accuracy of measurements by increasing the leakage currents. Also, the present inventors likewise realized that the region 216 beyond the end of the guard conductors provides for a bulk leakage path, which is primarily AC (e.g., not DC) in nature with the characteristic of an added capacitance, between the signal conductor and the conductors beyond the adjacent guard conductors. This bulk leakage path from the signal conductor around the end of the adjacent guard conductors reduces the accuracy of measurements by increasing the leakage currents. It is to be noted that the guard conductors, in effect, impose a guard voltage into the bulk of the probe card in a region generally underneath the respective guard conductor. This reduces the bulk capacitive leakage currents from the interposed signal conductor in regions with an adjacent guard conductor.


In many embodiments, the opening 230 into which the membrane assembly 72 is supported includes a conductive surface 232 therein (e.g., guard, shield, ground) to further isolate the membrane assembly 72 from the probe card 52. Unfortunately, the conductive surface 232 results in significant fringe fields 234 (on the surface and in the bulk of the probe card 52) at the end of the signal conductors 200 and guard conductors 202, 204. These fringe fields 234 appear to the measuring device as an additional parallel capacitance and resistance. This fringe leakage path at the end of the guard and signal conductors 200, 202, 204 reduces the accuracy of measurements by increasing the leakage currents. The cumulative result of the additional bulk leakage currents, additional surface leakage currents, and additional fringe capacitance and resistance (leakage currents), appears to the measuring device as a capacitance and resistance lumped together with the measurements of the actual device under test. It is difficult, if not nearly impossible, to calibrate such additional leakage currents out of any measurements so that the true measurement of the device under test is obtained. Further, the additional capacitance results in an increase in the settling time of signals thereby increasing the time required to obtain a set of accurate measurements.


It is desirable to maximize the number of interconnections available between the probe card 52 and the membrane assembly 72 in order to provide the capability of probing an increasingly greater number of devices under test. While increasing the size of the membrane assembly 72 to provide a greater circumferential edge may be employed, it remains desirable to limit the size of the membrane assembly 72 to minimize the length of the conductive paths to reduce leakage currents.


To increase the number of interconnections available between the membrane assembly 72 and the probe card 52, the width of the conductors of the membrane assembly 72 and the probe card 52 may be decreased together with the spacing between the conductors. While decreasing the size of the conductor increases the number of interconnections for a given circumferential edge, this unfortunately results in an increased difficultly of aligning the respective conductive traces together. Further, the greater density increases the manufacturing expense of the device.


In general, the membrane assembly 72 is suitable for a higher density of conductive paths than the probe card 52. Accordingly, the initial limit to the number of interconnects is the ability to fabricate an increasingly greater number of conductive traces on the probe card 52.


Referring to FIG. 16 the present inventors came to the realization that the preferred solution to overcome the aforementioned drawbacks of the presently accepted techniques is to interconnect the guard conductors around the end of the signal conductor, in contrast to the apparent solution of merely decreasing the feature size of the interconnects. The interconnecting portion 240 for each respective pair of guard conductors (effectively one electrical conductor) is preferably on the same plane, such as the top surface of the probe card 52, together with the guard conductors and signal conductors. The interconnecting portion 240 reduces the surface leakage path from the signal conductor by interposing a guarded path around the end of the signal conductor. In addition, the interconnecting portion 240 likewise decreases the bulk leakage path from a signal conductor by imposing a guard voltage in a region of the bulk of the probe card completely enclosing the end of the signal conductor. Also, the fringe leakage path to the central conductive surface 232 from the end of the signal conductor is substantially reduced, or otherwise eliminated, by providing the guarded interconnecting portion 240 around the end of the signal conductor. Reducing the leakage currents by including the additional interconnecting guard portion 240 results in the measurements made from the measuring device to be more accurate because less leakage currents are erroneously included in the measurements. In addition, a decrease in the settling time of the signals is achieved which reduces the time required to obtain a set of accurate measurements. One or more of the aforementioned drawbacks and/or advantages may be present and/or achieved depending upon the particular device and implementation.


With the interconnecting portion 240 electrically interconnecting together a pair of guard conductors 202, 204 another benefit is more achievable, namely, increasing the number of potential interconnections, without necessarily changing the size of the membrane assembly 72, without necessarily changing the geometry of the individual conductors, and without necessarily decreasing the spacing between adjacent conductors. Referring to FIG. 17, the contacting region 250 for the contacts 220 of the membrane assembly 72 on the probe card 52 are provided on at least one side of the interconnected guard conductor 202, 204, 240. This permits easier alignment of the membrane assembly 72 and the probe card 52. The width of the guard conductor on the side generally opposite the contacting region may be considerably thinner because there is no contact by the membrane assembly 72 with that portion of the guard conductor. The different widths of the guard conductors proximate the end of the signal conductor permits a greater density of conductors to be achieved, if desired, without decreasing the mechanical tolerances required. A pair of contacts (one on either side of the signal conductor) may be used, if desired. As a result, the density of the interconnect between the probe card 52 and the membrane assembly 72 is closer to the capability of the membrane assembly 72.


Referring to FIG. 18, to provide a single contact between the pair of guard conductors on the probe card 52 and a respective pair of guard conductors of the membrane assembly 72, the guard conductors of the membrane assembly 72 preferably include an interconnecting guard portion 260 with the inderdisposed signal conductor, in a manner similar to the interconnecting guard portion 240. The interconnecting membrane guard portion 260 provides many of the same advantages as described above with respect to the interconnecting probe guard portion 240. By including the interconnecting membrane guard portion 260, only a single conductive structure 220 needs to be provided between the membrane assembly 72 and the probe card 52 for each set of guard conductors.


Ideally in a two lead conductor system a “true Kelvin” connection is constructed. This involves using what is generally referred to as a force signal and a sense signal. The signal conductor from one of the two conductors is considered the force conductor, while the signal conductor from the other of the two conductors is considered the sense conductor. The force conductor is brought into contact with a test pad on the wafer. The force conductor is a low impedance connection, so a current is forced through the force conductor for testing purposes. The sense conductor is a high impedance connection and is also brought into contact with the same test pad (or a different test pad) on the wafer, preferably in close proximity to the sense conductor, in order to sense the voltage. As such the current versus voltage characteristics of the test device can be obtained using the force and sense conductors.


Referring to FIG. 19, one potential technique to achieve a Kelvin connection with the membrane probing system is to design the probe card 52 to include multiple sets of a force conductor, a sense conductor, and a corresponding pair of guard connectors on opposing sides of the force/sense conductors (preferably with the interconnection portion). The membrane assembly 72 likewise includes corresponding sets of a force conductor, a sense conductor, and guard conductors (preferably with the interconnecting portion). This provides a potential technique for achieving a Kelvin connection but unfortunately this wastes interconnection space on the probe card 52 in the event that a Kelvin connection for any particular device under test is not necessary. Alternatively, the probe card 52 may be redesigned for each membrane probing assembly, which is typically unique for each application. However, redesigning the probe card 52 for each application is expensive and not generally an acceptable solution.


While considering how to maintain one or more standard probe cards 52, together with providing Kelvin connections for each line, the present inventors initially observed that the probe card 52 has more available surface area for routing the conductors further from the interconnection between the probe card 52 and the membrane assembly 72. With the additional surface area at regions not proximate the interconnection between the probe card 52 and the membrane assembly 72, a pair of conductive traces 280, 282 are easily routed, the pair being located between a pair of guard conductors 284, 286, to a location generally proximate the interconnection (see FIG. 17). For non-Kelvin measurements, one of the conductors may be used as the signal line with the remaining interconnected conductor not used. If desired, the interconnection 270 between the two interconnected signal conductors may be removed (open-circuited) for low noise measurements. However, with the two signal conductors (e.g. force and sense) normally interconnected it is a simple matter to break the interconnection 270 by removing a portion of conductors at region 290. In the event of “quasi-Kelvin” connections, the interconnection portion may be maintained and one of the pair of conductors 280, 282 would be used as a force conductor and the other conductor of the pair would be used as a sense conductor. Quasi-Kelvin connections are generally formed by the interconnection of a sense conductor and a force conductor at a point before the device under test.


To accomplish effective probing with the membrane assembly 72, typically low impedance power conductors 300 are provided on the probe card 52 to supply power to the probing devices of the membrane assembly 72. The present inventors determined that the interconnection 270 between the pair of conductors may be removed and the force conductor 280 may be jumpered with a wire bond 302 (or any other suitable technique) to an unused power conductor on the probe card 52. Each of the power conductors 300 on the probe card 52 are preferably conductive members within the bulk of the probe card 52, electrically connected to the surface of the probe card 52 by using a set of vias 304, 306. Each power conductor is routed to a location proximate the interconnection between the probe card 52 and the membrane assembly 72. The power conductor is normally a low impedance conductor. Because the force conductor is a low-impedance connection designed to carry significant current it is preferable to locate the force conductor outside of the guards 284, 286 of its corresponding sense conductor. In addition, because the force conductor is a low-impedance path carrying significant (non-negligible) current levels it does not necessarily require the guarding provided by the guard conductors 284, 286 on opposing sides of the sense conductor 282.


The power conductors, to which force conductors may be interconnected with, are preferably routed within the bulk of the probe card 52 in a region directly underneath the corresponding sense conductor. The conductive power conductor provides additional protection for the sense conductor to minimize leakage currents. Alternatively, the power conductor may be routed on the top surface (or bottom surface) of the probe card, if desired.


The power conductor is preferably routed to a point “interior” to the end of the corresponding signal conductor using a “via” 306 to the upper surface of the probe card 52. Accordingly, the power conductor is available at a location suitable for interconnection to the membrane assembly 72, if desired, while likewise being available for interconnection as a force conductor. In this manner, the same power conductor may be used to provide power to the device under test, while likewise providing a force connection, both of which in a manner that maintains the density of the interconnection of the interface between the probe card 52 and the membrane assembly 72. The actual use of the power conductors depends on the application and the particular design of the membrane assembly 72.


Another technique suitable to provide a greater density of interconnects, and their corresponding interconnecting regions (normally having a greater surface area for contact to the membrane assembly 72) is to align the interconnects of the probe card 52 in a non-linear fashion (e.g., some closer and some farther from the edge of the probe card 52) around the circumference of the membrane assembly 72, as shown in FIG. 20. A further technique suitable to provide a greater density of interconnects, is to align the interconnecting regions in an overlapping manner with respect to a direction perpendicular to the adjacent membrane assembly 72. The membrane assembly 72 would likewise have corresponding structures suitable to interconnect to the two-dimensional structure of the conductors of the probe card 52.


The present inventors came to the realization that the membrane assembly is susceptible to absorption of moisture which increases the leakage currents within the membrane assembly. Referring to FIG. 21, another structure suitable to reduce leakage currents for the probing devices is shown. Preferably, the guarded conductors 310 of the membrane assembly 72 encircle the end of the probing device 312, with the signal conductor connected thereto 314. Preferably, the guarded conductors 310 are within the bulk of the membrane assembly 72 to prevent their inadvertent contact with the device under test. Providing the guarded probing devices significantly reduces the effects of leakage currents between the probing devices, especially due to the effects of humidity. However, the present inventors determined that the surface leakage currents between adjacent probing devices may be reduced by removing at least a portion of the membrane material (dielectric) 316 in a location proximate a portion of the guard conductors 310 and between the probing devices 312. In this manner, a portion of the guard conductor 310 will be exposed to the surface, albeit somewhat recessed from the surface of the membrane assembly 72, thereby impeding the passage of surface leakage between probing devices 312.


Referring to FIG. 22, in one embodiment of the present invention a pogo pin probe card includes guarded signal paths and is suitable for receiving a progo pin probe head for connection thereto.


The terms and expressions which have been employed in the foregoing specification are used therein as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that the scope of the invention is defined and limited only by the claims which follow.

Claims
  • 1. A membrane probing assembly comprising: (a) a probe card with conductors supported thereon, including: (i) an elongate probe card signal conductor including an end portion and a first portion having a first edge and a second edge; and(ii) a probe card guard conductor comprising a first portion spaced apart from said first edge of said first portion of said probe card signal conductor, a second portion spaced apart from said second edge of said first portion of said probe signal conductor and a third portion interconnecting said first and said second portions of said probe guard conductor proximate to, but spaced apart from said end portion of said probe card signal conductor; and(b) a membrane assembly including a membrane supporting: (i) an elongate membrane signal conductor including an end portion and a first portion having a first edge and a second edge; and(ii) a membrane guard conductor comprising a first portion spaced apart from said first edge of said first portion of said membrane signal conductor, a second portion spaced apart from said second edge of said first portion of said membrane signal conductor and a third portion interconnecting said first and said second portions of said membrane guard conductor proximate to, but spaced apart from said end portion of said membrane signal conductor.
  • 2. The membrane probing assembly of claim 1 wherein said membrane signal conductor includes a portion in conductive contact with said probe card signal conductor and said membrane guard conductor includes a portion in conductive contact with said probe card guard conductor.
  • 3. The membrane probing assembly of claim 2 wherein said portion of said membrane guard conductor in contact with said probe card guard conductor contacts said probe card guard conductor at a location nearer said first edge of said first portion of said probe card signal conductor than said second edge of said first portion of said probe card signal conductor.
  • 4. The membrane probing assembly of claim 1 wherein at least one of said first portion and said third portion of said probe guard conductor further comprises a contact region arranged for conductive contact with a portion of said membrane guard conductor, said contact region having a first edge proximate said probe card signal conductor and a second edge more remote from said probe card signal conductor than either edge of said first portion of said probe card guard conductor.
  • 5. The membrane probing assembly of claim 1 further comprising: (a) a second elongate probe card signal conductor supported by said probe card, said second probe card signal conductor terminating proximate to, but spaced apart from said end portion of said probe card signal conductor and comprising a portion interposed between, and spaced apart from, said second edge of said probe card signal conductor and said probe card guard conductor; and(b) a second elongate membrane signal conductor supported by said membrane, said second membrane signal conductor terminating proximate to, but spaced apart from said end portion of said membrane signal conductor and comprising a portion interposed between, and spaced apart from, said second edge of said membrane signal conductor and said membrane guard conductor.
  • 6. The membrane probing assembly of claim 5 wherein said membrane signal conductor includes a portion in conductive contact with said probe card signal conductor; said second membrane signal conductor includes a portion in conductive contact with said second probe card signal conductor; and said membrane guard conductor includes a portion in conductive contact with said probe card guard conductor.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/144,852, filed Jun. 3, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,148,711 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/909,229, filed Jul. 29, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,930,498, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/637,527, filed Nov. 29, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,838,890, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional App. 60/184,851, filed Feb. 25, 2000.

US Referenced Citations (927)
Number Name Date Kind
1337866 Whitacker Apr 1920 A
2142625 Zoethout Jan 1939 A
2376101 Tyzzer May 1945 A
2389668 Johnson Nov 1945 A
3193712 Harris Jul 1965 A
3230299 Radziekowski Jan 1966 A
3401126 Miller et al. Sep 1968 A
3429040 Miller Feb 1969 A
3441315 Paes et al. Apr 1969 A
3442831 Dickstein May 1969 A
3445770 Harmon May 1969 A
3484679 Hodgson et al. Dec 1969 A
3541222 Parks et al. Nov 1970 A
3595228 Simon Jul 1971 A
3596228 Reed, Jr. et al. Jul 1971 A
3609539 Gunthert Sep 1971 A
3634807 Grobe et al. Jan 1972 A
3654585 Wickersham Apr 1972 A
3680037 Nellis et al. Jul 1972 A
3700998 Lee et al. Oct 1972 A
3710251 Hagge et al. Jan 1973 A
3714572 Ham et al. Jan 1973 A
3740900 Youmans et al. Jun 1973 A
3806801 Bove Apr 1974 A
3829076 Sofy Aug 1974 A
3839672 Anderson Oct 1974 A
3849728 Evans Nov 1974 A
3858212 Tompkins et al. Dec 1974 A
3862790 Davies et al. Jan 1975 A
3866093 Kusters et al. Feb 1975 A
3936743 Roch Feb 1976 A
3952156 Lahr Apr 1976 A
3970934 Aksu Jul 1976 A
3971610 Buchoff et al. Jul 1976 A
3976959 Gaspari Aug 1976 A
3992073 Buchoff et al. Nov 1976 A
4008900 Khoshaba Feb 1977 A
4027935 Byrnes et al. Jun 1977 A
4038599 Bove et al. Jul 1977 A
4038894 Knibbe et al. Aug 1977 A
4049252 Bell Sep 1977 A
4066943 Roch Jan 1978 A
4072576 Arwin et al. Feb 1978 A
4093988 Scott Jun 1978 A
4099120 Aksu Jul 1978 A
4115735 Stanford Sep 1978 A
4135131 Larsen et al. Jan 1979 A
4184729 Parks et al. Jan 1980 A
4275446 Blaess Jun 1981 A
4277741 Faxvog et al. Jul 1981 A
4284033 del Rio Aug 1981 A
4284682 Frosch et al. Aug 1981 A
4287473 Sawyer Sep 1981 A
4312117 Robillard et al. Jan 1982 A
4327180 Chen Apr 1982 A
4330783 Toia May 1982 A
4357575 Uren et al. Nov 1982 A
4376920 Smith Mar 1983 A
4383217 Shiell May 1983 A
4401945 Juengel Aug 1983 A
4425395 Negishi et al. Jan 1984 A
4453142 Murphy Jun 1984 A
4468629 Choma, Jr. Aug 1984 A
4487996 Rabinowitz et al. Dec 1984 A
4515133 Roman May 1985 A
4515439 Esswein May 1985 A
4528504 Thornton, Jr. et al. Jul 1985 A
4531474 Inuta Jul 1985 A
4552033 Marzhauser Nov 1985 A
4567321 Harayama Jan 1986 A
4581679 Smolley Apr 1986 A
4588950 Henley May 1986 A
4593243 Lao et al. Jun 1986 A
4621169 Petinelli et al. Nov 1986 A
4626618 Takaoka et al. Dec 1986 A
4636722 Ardezzone Jan 1987 A
4636772 Yasunaga Jan 1987 A
4641659 Sepponen Feb 1987 A
4642417 Ruthrof et al. Feb 1987 A
4646005 Ryan Feb 1987 A
4649339 Grangroth et al. Mar 1987 A
4651115 Wu Mar 1987 A
4663840 Ubbens et al. May 1987 A
4673839 Veenendaal Jun 1987 A
4684883 Ackerman et al. Aug 1987 A
4691163 Blass et al. Sep 1987 A
4697143 Lockwood et al. Sep 1987 A
4705447 Smith Nov 1987 A
4707657 Bøegh-Petersen Nov 1987 A
4711563 Lass Dec 1987 A
4713347 Mitchell et al. Dec 1987 A
4725793 Igarashi Feb 1988 A
4727391 Tajima et al. Feb 1988 A
4727637 Buckwitz et al. Mar 1988 A
4742571 Letron May 1988 A
4744041 Strunk et al. May 1988 A
4746857 Sakai et al. May 1988 A
4749942 Sang et al. Jun 1988 A
4754239 Sedivec Jun 1988 A
4755746 Mallory et al. Jul 1988 A
4755747 Sato Jul 1988 A
4755874 Esrig et al. Jul 1988 A
4757255 Margozzi Jul 1988 A
4766384 Kleinberg et al. Aug 1988 A
4772846 Reeds Sep 1988 A
4780670 Cherry Oct 1988 A
4791363 Logan Dec 1988 A
4793814 Zifcak et al. Dec 1988 A
4795962 Yanagawa et al. Jan 1989 A
4805627 Klingenbeck et al. Feb 1989 A
4812754 Tracy et al. Mar 1989 A
4827211 Strid et al. May 1989 A
4831494 Arnold et al. May 1989 A
4837507 Hechtman Jun 1989 A
4839587 Flatley et al. Jun 1989 A
4849689 Gleason et al. Jul 1989 A
4853624 Rabjohn Aug 1989 A
4853627 Gleason et al. Aug 1989 A
4859989 McPherson Aug 1989 A
4864227 Sato Sep 1989 A
4871883 Guiol Oct 1989 A
4871964 Boll et al. Oct 1989 A
4891584 Kamieniecki et al. Jan 1990 A
4893914 Hancock et al. Jan 1990 A
4894612 Drake et al. Jan 1990 A
4899998 Teramachi Feb 1990 A
4904933 Snyder et al. Feb 1990 A
4904935 Calma et al. Feb 1990 A
4906920 Huff et al. Mar 1990 A
4912399 Greub et al. Mar 1990 A
4916002 Carver Apr 1990 A
4916398 Rath Apr 1990 A
4918383 Huff et al. Apr 1990 A
4922128 Dhong et al. May 1990 A
4922186 Tsuchiya et al. May 1990 A
4922192 Gross et al. May 1990 A
4929893 Sato et al. May 1990 A
4975638 Evans et al. Dec 1990 A
4980637 Huff et al. Dec 1990 A
4983910 Majidi-Ahy et al. Jan 1991 A
4987100 McBride et al. Jan 1991 A
4991290 MacKay Feb 1991 A
4998062 Ikeda Mar 1991 A
5001423 Abrami et al. Mar 1991 A
5003253 Majidi-Ahy et al. Mar 1991 A
5020219 Leedy Jun 1991 A
5021186 Ota et al. Jun 1991 A
5030907 Yih et al. Jul 1991 A
5041782 Marzan Aug 1991 A
5045781 Gleason et al. Sep 1991 A
5059898 Barsotti et al. Oct 1991 A
5061192 Chapin et al. Oct 1991 A
5061823 Carroll Oct 1991 A
5066357 Smyth, Jr. et al. Nov 1991 A
5069628 Crumly Dec 1991 A
5082627 Stanbro Jan 1992 A
5084671 Miyata et al. Jan 1992 A
5089774 Nakano Feb 1992 A
5091692 Ohno et al. Feb 1992 A
5091732 Mileski et al. Feb 1992 A
5095891 Reitter Mar 1992 A
5097101 Trobough Mar 1992 A
5097207 Blanz Mar 1992 A
5107076 Bullock et al. Apr 1992 A
5126286 Chance Jun 1992 A
5133119 Afshari et al. Jul 1992 A
5134365 Okubo et al. Jul 1992 A
5136237 Smith et al. Aug 1992 A
5142224 Smith et al. Aug 1992 A
5145552 Yoshizawa et al. Sep 1992 A
5148103 Pasiecznik, Jr. Sep 1992 A
5159264 Anderson Oct 1992 A
5159267 Anderson Oct 1992 A
5159752 Mahant-Shetti et al. Nov 1992 A
5160883 Blanz Nov 1992 A
5164319 Hafeman et al. Nov 1992 A
5166606 Blanz Nov 1992 A
5172049 Kiyokawa et al. Dec 1992 A
5172050 Swapp Dec 1992 A
5172051 Zamborelli Dec 1992 A
5177438 Littlebury et al. Jan 1993 A
5180977 Huff Jan 1993 A
5187443 Bereskin Feb 1993 A
5198752 Miyata et al. Mar 1993 A
5198753 Hamburgen Mar 1993 A
5202558 Barker Apr 1993 A
5207585 Byrnes et al. May 1993 A
5214243 Johnson May 1993 A
5214374 St. Onge May 1993 A
5220277 Reitinger Jun 1993 A
5225037 Elder et al. Jul 1993 A
5227730 King et al. Jul 1993 A
5232789 Platz et al. Aug 1993 A
5233197 Bowman et al. Aug 1993 A
5233306 Misra Aug 1993 A
5245292 Milesky et al. Sep 1993 A
5266889 Harwood et al. Nov 1993 A
5267088 Nomura Nov 1993 A
5270664 McMurtry et al. Dec 1993 A
5274336 Crook et al. Dec 1993 A
5280156 Niori et al. Jan 1994 A
5293175 Hemmie et al. Mar 1994 A
5298972 Heffner Mar 1994 A
5304924 Yamano et al. Apr 1994 A
5313157 Pasiecznik, Jr. May 1994 A
5315237 Iwakura et al. May 1994 A
5321352 Takebuchi Jun 1994 A
5321453 Mori et al. Jun 1994 A
5326412 Schreiber et al. Jul 1994 A
5355079 Evans et al. Oct 1994 A
5357211 Bryson et al. Oct 1994 A
5363050 Guo et al. Nov 1994 A
5367165 Toda et al. Nov 1994 A
5368634 Hackett Nov 1994 A
5369368 Kassen et al. Nov 1994 A
5371654 Beaman et al. Dec 1994 A
5373231 Boll et al. Dec 1994 A
5374938 Hatazawa et al. Dec 1994 A
5376790 Linker et al. Dec 1994 A
5389885 Swart Feb 1995 A
5395253 Crumly Mar 1995 A
5397855 Ferlier Mar 1995 A
5404111 Mori et al. Apr 1995 A
5408188 Katoh Apr 1995 A
5408189 Swart et al. Apr 1995 A
5412330 Ravel et al. May 1995 A
5412866 Woith et al. May 1995 A
5414565 Sullivan et al. May 1995 A
5422574 Kister Jun 1995 A
5441690 Ayala-Esquilin et al. Aug 1995 A
5451722 Gregoire Sep 1995 A
5451884 Sauerland Sep 1995 A
5453404 Leedy Sep 1995 A
5457398 Schwindt et al. Oct 1995 A
5467024 Swapp Nov 1995 A
5469324 Henderson et al. Nov 1995 A
5475316 Hurley et al. Dec 1995 A
5476211 Khandros Dec 1995 A
5477011 Singles et al. Dec 1995 A
5478748 Akins, Jr. et al. Dec 1995 A
5479108 Cheng Dec 1995 A
5479109 Lau et al. Dec 1995 A
5481196 Nosov Jan 1996 A
5481936 Yanagisawa Jan 1996 A
5487999 Farnworth Jan 1996 A
5488954 Sleva et al. Feb 1996 A
5493070 Habu Feb 1996 A
5493236 Ishii et al. Feb 1996 A
5500606 Holmes Mar 1996 A
5505150 James et al. Apr 1996 A
5506498 Anderson et al. Apr 1996 A
5506515 Godshalk et al. Apr 1996 A
5510792 Ono et al. Apr 1996 A
5511010 Burns Apr 1996 A
5512835 Rivera et al. Apr 1996 A
5517126 Yamaguchi May 1996 A
5521518 Higgins May 1996 A
5521522 Abe et al. May 1996 A
5523694 Cole, Jr. Jun 1996 A
5528158 Sinsheimer et al. Jun 1996 A
5530372 Lee et al. Jun 1996 A
5531022 Beaman et al. Jul 1996 A
5532608 Behfar-Rad et al. Jul 1996 A
5537372 Albrecht et al. Jul 1996 A
5539323 Davis, Jr. Jul 1996 A
5539676 Yamaguchi Jul 1996 A
5565788 Burr et al. Oct 1996 A
5565881 Phillips et al. Oct 1996 A
5569591 Kell et al. Oct 1996 A
5571324 Sago et al. Nov 1996 A
5578932 Adamian Nov 1996 A
5583445 Mullen Dec 1996 A
5584120 Roberts Dec 1996 A
5584608 Gillespie Dec 1996 A
5589781 Higgins et al. Dec 1996 A
5600256 Woith et al. Feb 1997 A
5601740 Eldrigde et al. Feb 1997 A
5610529 Schwindt Mar 1997 A
5617035 Swapp Apr 1997 A
5623213 Liu et al. Apr 1997 A
5623214 Pasiecznik, Jr. Apr 1997 A
5628057 Phillips et al. May 1997 A
5631571 Spaziani et al. May 1997 A
5633780 Cronin May 1997 A
5635846 Beaman et al. Jun 1997 A
5642298 Mallory et al. Jun 1997 A
5644248 Fujimoto Jul 1997 A
5653939 Hollis et al. Aug 1997 A
5656942 Watts et al. Aug 1997 A
5659421 Rahmel et al. Aug 1997 A
5666063 Abercrombie et al. Sep 1997 A
5669316 Faz et al. Sep 1997 A
5670322 Eggers et al. Sep 1997 A
5670888 Cheng Sep 1997 A
5672816 Park et al. Sep 1997 A
5675499 Lee et al. Oct 1997 A
5675932 Mauney Oct 1997 A
5676360 Boucher et al. Oct 1997 A
5685232 Inoue Nov 1997 A
5686317 Akram et al. Nov 1997 A
5700844 Hedrick et al. Dec 1997 A
5704355 Bridges Jan 1998 A
5715819 Svenson et al. Feb 1998 A
5720098 Kister Feb 1998 A
5723347 Hirano et al. Mar 1998 A
5726211 Hedrick et al. Mar 1998 A
5731920 Katsuragawa Mar 1998 A
5742174 Kister et al. Apr 1998 A
5744383 Fritz Apr 1998 A
5744971 Chan et al. Apr 1998 A
5748506 Bockelman May 1998 A
5751252 Phillips May 1998 A
5756021 Hedrick et al. May 1998 A
5767690 Fujimoto Jun 1998 A
5772451 Dozier, II et al. Jun 1998 A
5773780 Eldridge et al. Jun 1998 A
5777485 Tanaka et al. Jul 1998 A
5785538 Beaman et al. Jul 1998 A
5792668 Fuller et al. Aug 1998 A
5793213 Bockelman et al. Aug 1998 A
5794133 Kashima Aug 1998 A
5802856 Schaper et al. Sep 1998 A
5804607 Hedrick et al. Sep 1998 A
5804982 Lo et al. Sep 1998 A
5804983 Nakajima et al. Sep 1998 A
5806181 Khandros et al. Sep 1998 A
5807107 Bright et al. Sep 1998 A
5810607 Shih et al. Sep 1998 A
5811751 Leong et al. Sep 1998 A
5811982 Beaman et al. Sep 1998 A
5813847 Eroglu et al. Sep 1998 A
5814847 Shihadeh et al. Sep 1998 A
5820014 Dozier, II et al. Oct 1998 A
5821763 Beaman et al. Oct 1998 A
5824494 Feldberg Oct 1998 A
5829128 Eldridge et al. Nov 1998 A
5829437 Bridges Nov 1998 A
5831442 Heigl Nov 1998 A
5832601 Eldridge et al. Nov 1998 A
5833601 Swartz et al. Nov 1998 A
5838160 Beaman et al. Nov 1998 A
5841288 Meaney et al. Nov 1998 A
5846708 Hollis et al. Dec 1998 A
5847569 Ho et al. Dec 1998 A
5848500 Kirk Dec 1998 A
5852232 Samsavar et al. Dec 1998 A
5854608 Leisten Dec 1998 A
5864946 Eldridge et al. Feb 1999 A
5867073 Weinreb et al. Feb 1999 A
5869326 Hofmann Feb 1999 A
5869974 Akram et al. Feb 1999 A
5874361 Collins et al. Feb 1999 A
5876082 Kempf et al. Mar 1999 A
5878486 Eldridge et al. Mar 1999 A
5883522 O'Boyle Mar 1999 A
5883523 Ferland et al. Mar 1999 A
5884398 Eldridge et al. Mar 1999 A
5888075 Hasegawa et al. Mar 1999 A
5892539 Colvin Apr 1999 A
5896038 Budnaitis et al. Apr 1999 A
5900737 Graham et al. May 1999 A
5900738 Khandros et al. May 1999 A
5903143 Mochizuki et al. May 1999 A
5905421 Oldfield May 1999 A
5910727 Fujihara et al. Jun 1999 A
5912046 Eldridge et al. Jun 1999 A
5914613 Gleason et al. Jun 1999 A
5914614 Beaman et al. Jun 1999 A
5916689 Collins et al. Jun 1999 A
5917707 Khandros et al. Jun 1999 A
5926029 Ference et al. Jul 1999 A
5926951 Khandros et al. Jul 1999 A
5944093 Viswanath Aug 1999 A
5945836 Sayre et al. Aug 1999 A
5949383 Hayes et al. Sep 1999 A
5949579 Baker Sep 1999 A
5959461 Brown et al. Sep 1999 A
5963364 Leong et al. Oct 1999 A
5970429 Martin Oct 1999 A
5973504 Chong Oct 1999 A
5974662 Eldridge et al. Nov 1999 A
5981268 Kovacs et al. Nov 1999 A
5982166 Mautz Nov 1999 A
5983493 Eldridge et al. Nov 1999 A
5990695 Daugherty, Jr. Nov 1999 A
5993611 Moroney, III et al. Nov 1999 A
5994152 Khandros et al. Nov 1999 A
5995914 Cabot Nov 1999 A
5996102 Haulin Nov 1999 A
5998228 Eldridge et al. Dec 1999 A
5998768 Hunter et al. Dec 1999 A
5998864 Khandros et al. Dec 1999 A
5999268 Yonezawa et al. Dec 1999 A
6001760 Katsuda et al. Dec 1999 A
6002426 Back et al. Dec 1999 A
6013586 McGhee et al. Jan 2000 A
6019612 Hasegawa et al. Feb 2000 A
6020745 Taraci Feb 2000 A
6023103 Chang et al. Feb 2000 A
6028435 Nikawa Feb 2000 A
6029344 Khandros et al. Feb 2000 A
6031383 Streib et al. Feb 2000 A
6032356 Eldridge et al. Mar 2000 A
6032714 Fenton Mar 2000 A
6033935 Dozier, II et al. Mar 2000 A
6034533 Tervo et al. Mar 2000 A
6037785 Higgins Mar 2000 A
6042712 Mathieu Mar 2000 A
6043563 Eldridge et al. Mar 2000 A
6049216 Yang et al. Apr 2000 A
6049976 Khandros Apr 2000 A
6050829 Eldridge et al. Apr 2000 A
6051422 Kovacs et al. Apr 2000 A
6052653 Mazur et al. Apr 2000 A
6054651 Fogel et al. Apr 2000 A
6054869 Hutton et al. Apr 2000 A
6059982 Palagonia et al. May 2000 A
6060888 Blackham et al. May 2000 A
6060892 Yamagata May 2000 A
6061589 Bridges et al. May 2000 A
6062879 Beaman et al. May 2000 A
6064213 Khandros et al. May 2000 A
6064217 Smith May 2000 A
6064218 Godfrey et al. May 2000 A
6066911 Lindemann et al. May 2000 A
6078183 Cole, Jr. Jun 2000 A
6078500 Beaman et al. Jun 2000 A
6090261 Mathieu Jul 2000 A
6091236 Piety et al. Jul 2000 A
6091255 Godfrey Jul 2000 A
6096567 Kaplan et al. Aug 2000 A
6100815 Pailthorp Aug 2000 A
6104201 Beaman et al. Aug 2000 A
6104206 Verkuil Aug 2000 A
6110823 Eldridge et al. Aug 2000 A
6114864 Soejima et al. Sep 2000 A
6114865 Lagowski et al. Sep 2000 A
6118287 Boll et al. Sep 2000 A
6118894 Schwartz et al. Sep 2000 A
6124725 Sato Sep 2000 A
6127831 Khoury et al. Oct 2000 A
6137302 Schwindt Oct 2000 A
6144212 Mizuta Nov 2000 A
6147502 Fryer et al. Nov 2000 A
6147851 Anderson Nov 2000 A
6150186 Chen et al. Nov 2000 A
6160407 Nikawa Dec 2000 A
6166333 Crumly et al. Dec 2000 A
6166553 Sinsheimer Dec 2000 A
6168974 Chang et al. Jan 2001 B1
6169410 Grace et al. Jan 2001 B1
6172337 Johnsgard et al. Jan 2001 B1
6174744 Watanabe et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175228 Zamborelli et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176091 Kishi et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181144 Hembree et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181149 Godfrey et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181297 Leisten Jan 2001 B1
6181416 Falk Jan 2001 B1
6184053 Eldridge et al. Feb 2001 B1
6184587 Khandros et al. Feb 2001 B1
6184845 Leisten et al. Feb 2001 B1
6191596 Abiko Feb 2001 B1
6194720 Li et al. Feb 2001 B1
6206273 Beaman et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208225 Miller Mar 2001 B1
6211663 Moulthrop et al. Apr 2001 B1
6211837 Crouch et al. Apr 2001 B1
6215196 Eldridge et al. Apr 2001 B1
6215295 Smith, III Apr 2001 B1
6215670 Khandros Apr 2001 B1
6218910 Miller Apr 2001 B1
6222031 Wakabayashi et al. Apr 2001 B1
6229327 Boll et al. May 2001 B1
6232149 Dozier, II et al. May 2001 B1
6232787 Lo et al. May 2001 B1
6232788 Schwindt et al. May 2001 B1
6233613 Walker et al. May 2001 B1
6236223 Brady et al. May 2001 B1
6242803 Khandros et al. Jun 2001 B1
6242929 Mizuta Jun 2001 B1
6245692 Pearce et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246247 Eldridge et al. Jun 2001 B1
6251595 Gordon et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255126 Mathieu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6256882 Gleason et al. Jul 2001 B1
6257564 Avneri et al. Jul 2001 B1
6265950 Schmidt et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268015 Mathieu et al. Jul 2001 B1
6268016 Bhatt et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271673 Furuta et al. Aug 2001 B1
6274823 Khandros et al. Aug 2001 B1
6275738 Kasevich et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278051 Peabody Aug 2001 B1
6278411 Ohlsson et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281691 Matsunaga et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286208 Shih et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292760 Burns Sep 2001 B1
6295729 Beaman et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300775 Peach et al. Oct 2001 B1
6300780 Beaman et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307161 Grube et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307387 Gleason et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307672 DeNure Oct 2001 B1
6310483 Taura et al. Oct 2001 B1
6320372 Keller Nov 2001 B1
6320396 Nikawa Nov 2001 B1
6327034 Hoover et al. Dec 2001 B1
6329827 Beaman et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330164 Khandros et al. Dec 2001 B1
6332270 Beaman et al. Dec 2001 B2
6334247 Beaman et al. Jan 2002 B1
6335625 Bryant et al. Jan 2002 B1
6339338 Eldridge et al. Jan 2002 B1
6340568 Hefti Jan 2002 B2
6340895 Uher et al. Jan 2002 B1
6351885 Suzuki et al. Mar 2002 B2
6352454 Kim et al. Mar 2002 B1
6359456 Hembree et al. Mar 2002 B1
6362792 Sawamura et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366247 Sawamura et al. Apr 2002 B1
6369776 Leisten et al. Apr 2002 B1
6376258 Hefti Apr 2002 B2
6384614 Hager et al. May 2002 B1
6395480 Hefti May 2002 B1
6396296 Tarter et al. May 2002 B1
6396298 Young et al. May 2002 B1
6400168 Matsunaga et al. Jun 2002 B2
6404213 Noda Jun 2002 B2
6407560 Walraven et al. Jun 2002 B1
6407562 Whiteman Jun 2002 B1
6409724 Penny et al. Jun 2002 B1
6414478 Suzuki Jul 2002 B1
6415858 Getchel et al. Jul 2002 B1
6418009 Brunette Jul 2002 B1
6420722 Moore et al. Jul 2002 B2
6424316 Leisten et al. Jul 2002 B1
6429029 Eldridge et al. Aug 2002 B1
6441315 Eldridge et al. Aug 2002 B1
6442831 Khandros et al. Sep 2002 B1
6447339 Reed et al. Sep 2002 B1
6448788 Meaney et al. Sep 2002 B1
6448865 Miller Sep 2002 B1
6452406 Beaman et al. Sep 2002 B1
6452411 Miller et al. Sep 2002 B1
6456099 Eldridge et al. Sep 2002 B1
6456103 Eldridge et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459343 Miller Oct 2002 B1
6459739 Vitenberg Oct 2002 B1
6468098 Eldridge Oct 2002 B1
6475822 Eldridge et al. Nov 2002 B2
6476333 Khandros et al. Nov 2002 B1
6476442 Williams et al. Nov 2002 B1
6476630 Whitten et al. Nov 2002 B1
6479308 Eldridge Nov 2002 B1
6480013 Nayler et al. Nov 2002 B1
6480978 Roy et al. Nov 2002 B1
6481939 Gillespie et al. Nov 2002 B1
6482013 Eldridge et al. Nov 2002 B2
6483327 Bruce et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488405 Eppes et al. Dec 2002 B1
6490471 Svenson et al. Dec 2002 B2
6491968 Mathieu et al. Dec 2002 B1
6499121 Roy et al. Dec 2002 B1
6501343 Miller Dec 2002 B2
6509751 Mathieu et al. Jan 2003 B1
6512482 Nelson et al. Jan 2003 B1
6520778 Eldridge et al. Feb 2003 B1
6525555 Khandros et al. Feb 2003 B1
6526655 Beaman et al. Mar 2003 B2
6528984 Beaman et al. Mar 2003 B2
6528993 Shin et al. Mar 2003 B1
6529844 Kapetanic et al. Mar 2003 B1
6534856 Dozier, II et al. Mar 2003 B1
6538214 Khandros Mar 2003 B2
6538538 Hreish et al. Mar 2003 B2
6539531 Miller et al. Mar 2003 B2
6548311 Knoll Apr 2003 B1
6549022 Cole, Jr. et al. Apr 2003 B1
6549026 Dibattista et al. Apr 2003 B1
6549106 Martin Apr 2003 B2
6551884 Masuoka Apr 2003 B2
6559671 Miller et al. May 2003 B2
6566079 Hefti May 2003 B2
6573702 Marcuse et al. Jun 2003 B2
6578264 Gleason et al. Jun 2003 B1
6580283 Carbone et al. Jun 2003 B1
6582979 Coccioli et al. Jun 2003 B2
6587327 Devoe et al. Jul 2003 B1
6597187 Eldridge et al. Jul 2003 B2
6603322 Boll et al. Aug 2003 B1
6603323 Miller et al. Aug 2003 B1
6603324 Eldridge et al. Aug 2003 B2
6605951 Cowan Aug 2003 B1
6605955 Costello et al. Aug 2003 B1
6606014 Miller Aug 2003 B2
6606575 Miller Aug 2003 B2
6608494 Bruce et al. Aug 2003 B1
6611417 Chen Aug 2003 B2
6615485 Eldridge et al. Sep 2003 B2
6616966 Mathieu et al. Sep 2003 B2
6617862 Bruce Sep 2003 B1
6621082 Morita et al. Sep 2003 B2
6621260 Eldridge et al. Sep 2003 B2
6622103 Miller Sep 2003 B1
6624648 Eldridge et al. Sep 2003 B2
6627461 Chapman et al. Sep 2003 B2
6627483 Ondricek et al. Sep 2003 B2
6627980 Eldridge Sep 2003 B2
6628503 Sogard Sep 2003 B2
6628980 Atalar et al. Sep 2003 B2
6633174 Satya et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636182 Mehltretter Oct 2003 B2
6639461 Tam et al. Oct 2003 B1
6640415 Eslamy et al. Nov 2003 B2
6640432 Mathieu et al. Nov 2003 B1
6642625 Dozier, II et al. Nov 2003 B2
6643597 Dunsmore Nov 2003 B1
6644982 Ondricek et al. Nov 2003 B1
6646520 Miller Nov 2003 B2
6653903 Leich et al. Nov 2003 B2
6655023 Eldridge et al. Dec 2003 B1
6657455 Eldridge et al. Dec 2003 B2
6657601 McLean Dec 2003 B2
6661316 Hreish et al. Dec 2003 B2
6664628 Khandros et al. Dec 2003 B2
6669489 Dozier, II et al. Dec 2003 B1
6672875 Mathieu et al. Jan 2004 B1
6677744 Long Jan 2004 B1
6678850 Roy et al. Jan 2004 B2
6678876 Stevens et al. Jan 2004 B2
6680659 Miller Jan 2004 B2
6685817 Mathieu Feb 2004 B1
6686754 Miller Feb 2004 B2
6690185 Khandros et al. Feb 2004 B1
6701265 Hill et al. Mar 2004 B2
6701612 Khandros et al. Mar 2004 B2
6707548 Kreimer et al. Mar 2004 B2
6708403 Beaman et al. Mar 2004 B2
6710798 Hershel et al. Mar 2004 B1
6713374 Eldridge et al. Mar 2004 B2
6714828 Eldridge et al. Mar 2004 B2
6717426 Iwasaki Apr 2004 B2
6720501 Henson Apr 2004 B1
6722032 Beaman et al. Apr 2004 B2
6724205 Hayden et al. Apr 2004 B1
6724928 Davis Apr 2004 B1
6727579 Eldridge et al. Apr 2004 B1
6727580 Eldridge et al. Apr 2004 B1
6727716 Sharif Apr 2004 B1
6729019 Grube et al. May 2004 B2
6731804 Carrieri et al. May 2004 B1
6734687 Ishitani et al. May 2004 B1
6737920 Jen et al. May 2004 B2
6741085 Khandros et al. May 2004 B1
6741092 Eldridge et al. May 2004 B2
6744268 Hollman Jun 2004 B2
6753679 Kwong et al. Jun 2004 B1
6753699 Stockstad Jun 2004 B2
6759311 Eldridge et al. Jul 2004 B2
6764869 Eldridge Jul 2004 B2
6768328 Self et al. Jul 2004 B2
6770955 Coccioli et al. Aug 2004 B1
6771806 Satya et al. Aug 2004 B1
6777319 Grube et al. Aug 2004 B2
6778140 Yeh Aug 2004 B1
6778406 Eldridge et al. Aug 2004 B2
6780001 Eldridge et al. Aug 2004 B2
6784674 Miller Aug 2004 B2
6784677 Miller et al. Aug 2004 B2
6784679 Sweet et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788093 Aitren et al. Sep 2004 B2
6788094 Khandros et al. Sep 2004 B2
6791176 Mathieu et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794888 Kawaguchi et al. Sep 2004 B2
6794950 Du Toit et al. Sep 2004 B2
6798225 Miller Sep 2004 B2
6798226 Altmann et al. Sep 2004 B2
6806724 Hayden et al. Oct 2004 B2
6806836 Ogawa et al. Oct 2004 B2
6807734 Eldridge et al. Oct 2004 B2
6809533 Anlage et al. Oct 2004 B1
6811406 Grube Nov 2004 B2
6812691 Miller Nov 2004 B2
6812718 Chong et al. Nov 2004 B1
6815963 Gleason et al. Nov 2004 B2
6816031 Miller Nov 2004 B1
6817052 Grube Nov 2004 B2
6818840 Khandros Nov 2004 B2
6822463 Jacobs Nov 2004 B1
6822529 Miller Nov 2004 B2
6825052 Eldridge et al. Nov 2004 B2
6825422 Eldridge et al. Nov 2004 B2
6827584 Mathieu et al. Dec 2004 B2
6835898 Eldridge et al. Dec 2004 B2
6836962 Khandros et al. Jan 2005 B2
6838885 Kamitani Jan 2005 B2
6838890 Tervo et al. Jan 2005 B2
6839964 Henson Jan 2005 B2
6845491 Miller et al. Jan 2005 B2
6856129 Thomas et al. Feb 2005 B2
6856150 Sporck et al. Feb 2005 B2
6862727 Stevens Mar 2005 B2
6864105 Grube et al. Mar 2005 B2
6864694 McTigue Mar 2005 B2
6870381 Grube Mar 2005 B2
6882239 Miller Apr 2005 B2
6882546 Miller Apr 2005 B2
6887723 Ondricek et al. May 2005 B1
6888362 Eldridge et al. May 2005 B2
6891385 Miller May 2005 B2
6900646 Kasukabe et al. May 2005 B2
6900647 Yoshida et al. May 2005 B2
6900652 Mazur May 2005 B2
6900653 Yu et al. May 2005 B2
6902416 Feldman Jun 2005 B2
6902941 Sun Jun 2005 B2
6903563 Yoshida et al. Jun 2005 B2
6906506 Reano et al. Jun 2005 B1
6906539 Wilson et al. Jun 2005 B2
6906542 Sakagawa et al. Jun 2005 B2
6906543 Lou et al. Jun 2005 B2
6907149 Slater Jun 2005 B2
6908364 Back et al. Jun 2005 B2
6909297 Ji et al. Jun 2005 B2
6909300 Lu et al. Jun 2005 B2
6909983 Sutherland Jun 2005 B2
6910268 Miller Jun 2005 B2
6911814 Miller et al. Jun 2005 B2
6911826 Plotnikov et al. Jun 2005 B2
6911834 Mitchell et al. Jun 2005 B2
6911835 Chraft et al. Jun 2005 B2
6912468 Marin et al. Jun 2005 B2
6913468 Dozier, II et al. Jul 2005 B2
6914244 Alani Jul 2005 B2
6914427 Gifford et al. Jul 2005 B2
6914430 Hasegawa et al. Jul 2005 B2
6914580 Leisten Jul 2005 B2
6917195 Hollman Jul 2005 B2
6917210 Miller Jul 2005 B2
6917211 Yoshida et al. Jul 2005 B2
6917525 Mok et al. Jul 2005 B2
6917732 Miyata et al. Jul 2005 B2
6919732 Yoshida et al. Jul 2005 B2
6922069 Jun Jul 2005 B2
6924653 Schaeffer et al. Aug 2005 B2
6924655 Kirby Aug 2005 B2
6927078 Saijyo et al. Aug 2005 B2
6927079 Fyfield Aug 2005 B1
6927586 Thiessen Aug 2005 B2
6927587 Yoshioka Aug 2005 B2
6927598 Lee et al. Aug 2005 B2
6930498 Tervo et al. Aug 2005 B2
6933713 Cannon Aug 2005 B2
6933717 Dogaru et al. Aug 2005 B1
6933725 Lim et al. Aug 2005 B2
6933736 Kobayashi et al. Aug 2005 B2
6933737 Sugawara Aug 2005 B2
6937020 Munson et al. Aug 2005 B2
6937037 Eldridge et al. Aug 2005 B2
6937039 Barr et al. Aug 2005 B2
6937040 Maeda et al. Aug 2005 B2
6937042 Yoshida et al. Aug 2005 B2
6937045 Sinclair Aug 2005 B2
6937341 Woollam et al. Aug 2005 B1
6940264 Ryken, Jr. et al. Sep 2005 B2
6940283 McQueeney Sep 2005 B2
6943563 Martens Sep 2005 B2
6943571 Worledge Sep 2005 B2
6943574 Actmann et al. Sep 2005 B2
6944380 Hideo et al. Sep 2005 B1
6946375 Hattori et al. Sep 2005 B2
6946859 Karavakis et al. Sep 2005 B2
6946860 Cheng et al. Sep 2005 B2
6948391 Brassell et al. Sep 2005 B2
6948981 Pade Sep 2005 B2
6970001 Chheda et al. Nov 2005 B2
6987483 Tran Jan 2006 B2
7001785 Chen Feb 2006 B1
7002133 Beausoleil et al. Feb 2006 B2
7002363 Mathieu Feb 2006 B2
7002364 Kang et al. Feb 2006 B2
7003184 Ronnekleiv et al. Feb 2006 B2
7005842 Fink et al. Feb 2006 B2
7005868 McTigue Feb 2006 B2
7005879 Robertazzi Feb 2006 B1
7006046 Aisenbrey Feb 2006 B2
7007380 Das et al. Mar 2006 B2
7009188 Wang Mar 2006 B2
7009383 Harwood et al. Mar 2006 B2
7009415 Kobayashi et al. Mar 2006 B2
7011531 Egitto et al. Mar 2006 B2
7012425 Shoji Mar 2006 B2
7012441 Chou et al. Mar 2006 B2
7013221 Friend et al. Mar 2006 B1
7014499 Yoon Mar 2006 B2
7015455 Mitsuoka et al. Mar 2006 B2
7015689 Kasajima et al. Mar 2006 B2
7015690 Wang et al. Mar 2006 B2
7015703 Hopkins et al. Mar 2006 B2
7015707 Cherian Mar 2006 B2
7015708 Beckous et al. Mar 2006 B2
7015709 Capps et al. Mar 2006 B2
7015710 Yoshida et al. Mar 2006 B2
7015711 Rothaug et al. Mar 2006 B2
7019541 Kittrell Mar 2006 B2
7019544 Jacobs et al. Mar 2006 B1
7019701 Ohno et al. Mar 2006 B2
7020360 Satomura et al. Mar 2006 B2
7020363 Johannessen Mar 2006 B2
7022976 Santana, Jr. et al. Apr 2006 B1
7022985 Knebel et al. Apr 2006 B2
7023225 Blackwood Apr 2006 B2
7023226 Okumura et al. Apr 2006 B2
7023229 Maesaki et al. Apr 2006 B2
7023231 Howland, Jr. et al. Apr 2006 B2
7025628 LaMeres et al. Apr 2006 B2
7026832 Chaya et al. Apr 2006 B2
7026833 Rincon et al. Apr 2006 B2
7026834 Hwang Apr 2006 B2
7026835 Farnworth et al. Apr 2006 B2
7030599 Douglas Apr 2006 B2
7030827 Mahler et al. Apr 2006 B2
7032307 Matsunaga et al. Apr 2006 B2
7034553 Gilboe Apr 2006 B2
7035738 Matsumoto et al. Apr 2006 B2
7088981 Chang Aug 2006 B2
7096133 Martin et al. Aug 2006 B1
7101797 Yuasa Sep 2006 B2
7148711 Tervo et al. Dec 2006 B2
7187188 Andrews et al. Mar 2007 B2
7188037 Hidehira Mar 2007 B2
20010002794 Draving et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010009061 Gleason et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010009377 Schwindt et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010010468 Gleason et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010020283 Sakaguchi Sep 2001 A1
20010024116 Draving Sep 2001 A1
20010030549 Gleason et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010043073 Montoya Nov 2001 A1
20010044152 Burnett Nov 2001 A1
20010045511 Moore et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010054906 Fujimura Dec 2001 A1
20020005728 Babson et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020008533 Ito et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020009377 Shafer Jan 2002 A1
20020009378 Obara Jan 2002 A1
20020011859 Smith et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020011863 Takahashi et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020050828 Seward, IV et al. May 2002 A1
20020070743 Felici et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020070745 Johnson et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020079911 Schwindt Jun 2002 A1
20020118034 Laureanti Aug 2002 A1
20020149377 Hefti et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020153909 Petersen et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020163769 Brown Nov 2002 A1
20020168659 Hefti et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020180466 Hiramatsu et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020197709 Van der Weide et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030010877 Landreville et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030030822 Finarov Feb 2003 A1
20030032000 Liu et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030040004 Hefti et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030057513 Leedy Mar 2003 A1
20030062915 Arnold et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030072549 Facer et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030077649 Cho et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030088180 VanVeen et al. May 2003 A1
20030119057 Gascoyne et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030139662 Seidman Jul 2003 A1
20030139790 Ingle et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030155939 Lutz et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030170898 Gunderson et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030184332 Tomimatsu et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040015060 Samsoondar et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040021475 Ito et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040061514 Schwindt et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040066181 Thies Apr 2004 A1
20040069776 Fagrell et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040090223 Yonezawa May 2004 A1
20040095145 Boudiaf et al. May 2004 A1
20040095641 Russum et al. May 2004 A1
20040100276 Fanton May 2004 A1
20040100297 Tanioka et al. May 2004 A1
20040108847 Stoll et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040113640 Cooper et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040124861 Zaerpoor Jul 2004 A1
20040130787 Thome-Forster et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040132222 Hembree et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040134899 Hiramatsu et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040147034 Gore et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040162689 Jamneala et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040175294 Ellison et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186382 Modell et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040193382 Adamian et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040197771 Powers et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040199350 Blackham et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040207072 Hiramatsu et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040207424 Hollman Oct 2004 A1
20040239338 Johnsson et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040246004 Heuermann Dec 2004 A1
20040251922 Martens et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050024069 Hayden et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050026276 Chou Feb 2005 A1
20050030047 Adamian Feb 2005 A1
20050054029 Tomimatsu et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050062533 Vice Mar 2005 A1
20050083130 Grilo Apr 2005 A1
20050101846 Fine et al. May 2005 A1
20050156675 Rohde et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050164160 Gunter et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050165316 Lowery et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050168722 Forstner et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050174191 Brunker et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050178980 Skidmore et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050195124 Puente Baliarda et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050227503 Reitinger Oct 2005 A1
20050236587 Kodama et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050237102 Tanaka Oct 2005 A1
20060052075 Galivanche et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060114012 Reitinger Jun 2006 A1
20060155270 Hancock et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060158207 Reitinger Jul 2006 A1
20060226864 Kramer Oct 2006 A1
20070024506 Hardacker Feb 2007 A1
20070030021 Cowan et al. Feb 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (74)
Number Date Country
1083975 Mar 1994 CN
3637549 May 1988 DE
4223658 Jan 1993 DE
19522774 Jan 1997 DE
10000324 Jul 2001 DE
0230348 Jul 1987 EP
0259163 Mar 1988 EP
0304868 Mar 1989 EP
0 945 736 Sep 1999 EP
0945736 Sep 1999 EP
53-037077 Apr 1978 JP
53-052354 May 1978 JP
55-115383 Sep 1980 JP
56-007439 Jan 1981 JP
56-88333 Jul 1981 JP
57-075480 May 1982 JP
57-163035 Oct 1982 JP
62-11243 Jan 1987 JP
62-51235 Mar 1987 JP
62-098634 May 1987 JP
62-107937 May 1987 JP
62-239050 Oct 1987 JP
62239050 Oct 1987 JP
63-108736 May 1988 JP
63-129640 Jun 1988 JP
63-143814 Jun 1988 JP
63-318745 Dec 1988 JP
1-165968 Jun 1989 JP
1-214038 Aug 1989 JP
1-219575 Sep 1989 JP
1-296167 Nov 1989 JP
2-22836 Jan 1990 JP
2-124469 May 1990 JP
2129393 May 1990 JP
2-191352 Jul 1990 JP
3-175367 Jul 1991 JP
3-196206 Aug 1991 JP
3-228348 Oct 1991 JP
4-130639 May 1992 JP
4-159043 Jun 1992 JP
4165361 Jun 1992 JP
4-206930 Jul 1992 JP
4-340248 Nov 1992 JP
5-082631 Apr 1993 JP
51-57790 Jun 1993 JP
51-66893 Jul 1993 JP
6-85044 Mar 1994 JP
60-71425 Mar 1994 JP
6-102313 Apr 1994 JP
6-132709 May 1994 JP
7-005078 Jan 1995 JP
7-12871 Jan 1995 JP
7012871 Jan 1995 JP
8-35987 Feb 1996 JP
8-261898 Oct 1996 JP
8-330401 Dec 1996 JP
10-116866 May 1998 JP
11-4001 Jan 1999 JP
11-023975 Jan 1999 JP
2000-329664 Nov 2000 JP
2001-124676 May 2001 JP
2001-189285 Jul 2001 JP
2001-189378 Jul 2001 JP
2002-203879 Jul 2002 JP
2002-243502 Aug 2002 JP
843040 Jun 1981 SU
1392603 Apr 1988 SU
WO9807040 Feb 1998 WO
WO 0073905 Dec 2000 WO
WO0107207 Feb 2001 WO
WO 0169656 Sep 2001 WO
WO 2004065944 Aug 2004 WO
WO 2004079299 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2005062025 Jul 2005 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060284630 A1 Dec 2006 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60184851 Feb 2000 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 11144852 Jun 2005 US
Child 11509176 US
Parent 10909229 Jul 2004 US
Child 11144852 US
Parent 09637527 Nov 2000 US
Child 10909229 US