The present invention relates to power domains, and in particular to clock power domains in memory systems such as dynamic random access memories (DRAMs).
Power consumption is a constraint on computer systems both by virtue of limited power available in portable, battery-operated systems, and also limited heat dissipation for high power devices. As devices are made faster by increasing their clock speed, the power requirements also increase since clock signal lines, receivers, and other clock circuits consume more power and generate more heat as device clock rates increase.
Some memory systems operate asynchronously. Other memory systems, to increase the speed and bandwidth, operate synchronously using a clock signal. For these synchronous systems, clock power becomes an important issue at high frequencies. High power consumption by the clock signal can exceed thermal cooling limits of the package or system or cause excessive battery drain in portable devices.
In a prior Rambus dynamic random access memory (DRAM) system, illustrated in
In a prior Rambus system, the read data path is turned on automatically by the control logic when the control logic is activated for a read. Thus, a separate control signal does not need to be sent over the interface to turn on the read data path. A register will store a count corresponding to the latency from a RAS control signal to when read data will be available from the memory core, and this register value is used to control the latency of the clock turn-on for the read data path.
One disadvantage of the prior Rambus system is the additional latency required for turning on the control logic to exit the standby power mode. Since the interface control logic and datapath must be on before an incoming command can be processed and a memory operation started, the turn-on latency of the control logic and datapath directly adds to the memory access latency. This provides a power versus latency trade off.
Another method of limiting clock power consumption is to use a slower clock signal. This is done in microprocessors which have a low power or sleep mode. Typically, these are used in laptop computers in which the user can select a lower power mode, or the laptop will automatically enter the lower power or sleep mode in the absence of any user input within a predefined period of time.
The present invention provides a memory device with multiple clock domains. Separate clocks to different portions of the control circuitry create different clock domains. The different domains are sequentially turned on as needed to limit the power consumed. The turn on time of the domains is overlapped with the latency for the memory access to make the power control transparent to the user access of the memory core.
In one embodiment, the present invention separates out the RAS control logic into a separate clock domain from the CAS control logic. This smaller amount of RAS control logic can then be left on in a standby power mode to eliminate any visible latency from a RAS signal through to data access.
The write and read data paths are also in separate clock domains to further conserve power depending upon whether an operation is a read or write operation.
In one embodiment, the power control is implicit and transparent to the user. In a standby mode, a RAS signal will cause the control logic associated with the RAS control logic to activate the CAS clock domain an appropriate latency after receipt of the RAS signal without any further control over the memory interface required. When a CAS read or write signal is received, that will implicitly, or automatically, cause the read or write clock domain to be turned on an appropriate latency after the CAS signal.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the memory device can dynamically switch between a fast and a slow clock depending upon the needed data bandwidth. The data bandwidth across the memory interface can be monitored by the memory controller, and when it drops below a certain threshold, a slower clock can be used. The clock speed can be dynamically increased as the bandwidth demand increases. Thus, rather than a coarse switch between a slow or fast clock speed depending upon user activity, clock speed can be switched automatically depending upon data access bandwidth requirements.
For a further understanding of the nature and advantages of the invention, reference should be made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In addition a low power, serial daisy-chained control interface is provided with daisy-chained segments 28 and a return segment 30. In other embodiments, the control sideband 28, 30 may be a bus instead of daisy-chained. In a powered down or nap mode, the primary control bus and data busses can be turned off with communication being initiated using the control sideband 28, 30.
Each RDRAM 16 includes multiple banks 32 of memory, each with associated core control logic 34. In addition, each chip includes interconnect logic 36.
Each of the control inputs is provided on a serial line which is converted into parallel with a respective converter 48. The control signals are sent as a packet, which is decoded in respective packet decode logic 50. From there, decoded control signals are sent to either a row state machine 52, or a column state machine 54. The state machine will then send the appropriate control signals to the memory core control logic.
Not all of the control logic segments shown in
The turning off of clock domains as they are not needed significantly reduces power consumption and heat generation of the memory chip. As will be described below with respect to
In one embodiment, a sense operation turns on the clock domain for both the precharge control and close logic. A transfer operation (by the column control logic, also sometimes called the CAS control logic) turns on the retire logic (i.e., labeled the column write control logic in
Implicit control is also used to turn off clock domains not needed for later steps in a particular operation sequence. For example, a close operation can turn off secondary control domains, such as the transfer and retire logic in the column state machine.
A second, CAS clock domain 68 includes CAS control logic 70 and a receiver 72. A write data clock domain 74 includes a write input pipeline 76 and a receiver 78. A read clock domain 80 includes a read output pipeline 82.
In the middle of
In operation, sideband control logic 88 will always be on, even in a power down mode. In a power down mode, DLL 86 and clock receiver 84 can be turned off via a control line 90. Because of the significant latency required to turn on clock receiver 84 and DLL 86, an intermediate power mode, called a “nap” mode is used in which receiver 84 is on, but DLL 86 is in a low power configuration that provides faster synchronization time than when the DLL is entirely off. When in the nap mode, a memory access can be initiated with an appropriate control signal over sideband control line 28.
In an alternate embodiment, the sideband control logic 88 also receives RAS, or RAS and CAS control data for initiating the memory access, since clock domain 60 will be off when the memory access is initiated. When the sideband control logic 88 receives RAS, but not CAS, control data, the sideband control logic 88 will turn on CAS clock domain 68 so that it is ready when the subsequent CAS signal is sent.
A standby power mode is initiated by an appropriate control packet to sideband logic 88. This will cause DLL 86 to transition from the nap mode to an ON mode via a control signal on line 92. At the same time, RAS clock domain 60 will be turned on by the same line 92 by enabling the gating of the clock signal through AND gate 94. Thus, in standby mode, clock receiver 84 and DLL 86 are on as well as RAS clock domain 60. When a RAS signal is received, it can be immediately processed by RAS logic 62. In anticipation of the subsequent CAS signal, control logic 62 will provide a signal on a line 96 to turn on CAS clock domain 68. This will automatically, or implicitly, turn on the CAS clock domain. Thus, the user need not send special commands to turn on and off the clock domains but rather it is done automatically in accordance with the initiation of a memory access at the appropriate time. The signal on line 96 is sent after a period of time corresponding to the latency of the CAS signal with respect to the RAS signal. This period of time can be stored in a register in RAS control logic 62 or can be determined by the memory controller. The signal on line 96 activates receiver 72, and also turns on the CAS clock domain 68 by activating AND gate 98.
The registers for setting the latency for implicit control of clock power domains can be programmed upon device initialization, or can by dynamically varied. Alternately, instead of a register, the latency can simply be designed into the circuit.
When a CAS signal is received, it will either be a CASR (CAS read) or a CASW (CAS write) signal. If it is a CASW, CAS control logic 70 will activate the write data domain 74 via control line 100, after an appropriate latency corresponding to when the write data will be received from bus 18. Control line 100 turns on receiver 78, and also enables AND gate 102 to provide the clock signal to write data domain 74.
Similarly, for a CASR operation, CAS control logic 70 activates AND gate 106, via a signal on line 104, to provide a clock signal (TCLK) to read clock domain 80.
Thus, in the present invention, when the main control busses are in standby mode, memory accesses can be performed over the fast main control bus, with power mode transitions being implicitly controlled to make the power mode transitions transparent. In this way, core access latencies are overlapped with power turn-on latencies. By automatically turning on certain interface power modes when a particular core operation command is given, implicit power control is provided which minimizes latency and saves valuable control bandwidth (no explicit power control is needed). This will efficiently integrate power control into the memory access pipeline stream.
For a write operation, similar latencies apply, as illustrated by CAS-W signal 128. This will initiate a column write operation as illustrated by arrow 130, and concurrently will provide a control signal as illustrated by line 132 to turn on the write data path. For a write operation, the data is coming in, and thus, the write data path must be turned on at a time 134 in advance of when the write data 136 is received over the data bus. Again, the latency of the power domain turn on of the write data path is transparent or hidden behind the latency of the write data arriving. The write data arriving is also pipelined so that it is not provided until needed for a column write in the memory core, as illustrated by arrow 137.
Slow Clock
A slower clock speed results in lower power because the AC power to switch the capacitive load connected to the clocks is reduced proportionately to the frequency. Also, at reduced clock speeds, the device may not require a high power phase compensation circuit (DLL or PLL), which is typically required for high speed operation. Depending on the slow clock frequency, the interface may operate without phase compensation or use a lesser performance phase compensation circuit which consumes less power.
The clock source 155 itself provides both a fast clock and slow clock through a multiplexer 156.
A circuit 158 for selecting between the slow and fast clocks is preferably provided either in the controller or in a memory interconnect or some other device connected to the bus.
By monitoring bus traffic, the amount of bandwidth being used is determined by a monitor circuit 158. When bus traffic exceeds a predefined threshold (i.e., more than a predefined number of memory accesses per second), the monitor circuit selects the fast clock, and otherwise it selects the slow clock. Depending on which clock is used, the fast or slow DLL or PLL and the unused receiver are preferably turned off to conserve power. In one embodiment, the monitor circuit 158 may be implemented using a programmed microprocessor, external to the memory circuit.
As referred to above, on a transition from a slow clock to a fast clock usage, during the latency of the fast clock turn on, operations can be occurring using the slow clock.
As will be understood by those skilled in the art, the present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or central characteristics thereof. Accordingly, the foregoing description is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the invention which is set forth in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/975,322, filed Dec. 21, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,248,884 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/608,209, filed Oct. 29, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,986,584, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/107,504, filed Apr. 15, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,626,880, which is continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/742,327 filed Dec. 18, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,320,082, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/887,181 filed Jun. 21, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,701,446, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/169,378, filed Oct. 9, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,263,448, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/061,664 filed Oct. 10, 1997, which are incorporated by reference in their entirety. A related application was filed on May 7, 1996, Ser. No. 08/648,300, entitled “Asynchronous Request/Synchronous Data Dynamic Random Access Memory”, assigned to the same assignee as this application, hereby incorporated by reference as background information.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4293932 | McAdams | Oct 1981 | A |
4334295 | Nagami | Jun 1982 | A |
4388686 | Haid | Jun 1983 | A |
4484308 | Lewandowski | Nov 1984 | A |
4485461 | Kobayashi | Nov 1984 | A |
4528661 | Baher et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4617647 | Hoshi | Oct 1986 | A |
4649522 | Kirsch | Mar 1987 | A |
4694197 | Sprague | Sep 1987 | A |
4734880 | Collins | Mar 1988 | A |
4744062 | Nakamura et al. | May 1988 | A |
4792926 | Roberts | Dec 1988 | A |
4792929 | Olson et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4800530 | Itoh et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4823324 | Taylor | Apr 1989 | A |
4825411 | Hamano | Apr 1989 | A |
4831597 | Fuse | May 1989 | A |
4833656 | Tobita | May 1989 | A |
4839856 | Tanaka | Jun 1989 | A |
4875192 | Matsumoto | Oct 1989 | A |
4901282 | Kobayashi | Feb 1990 | A |
4970690 | Sherman | Nov 1990 | A |
4979145 | Remington et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5007028 | Ohshima | Apr 1991 | A |
5034917 | Bland et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5077693 | Hardee et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5083296 | Hara et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5088062 | Shikata | Feb 1992 | A |
5111386 | Fujishima et al. | May 1992 | A |
5124589 | Shiomi et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5150329 | Hoshi | Sep 1992 | A |
5173878 | Sakui | Dec 1992 | A |
5179687 | Hidaka et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5185719 | Dhong | Feb 1993 | A |
5193072 | Frenkil | Mar 1993 | A |
5202857 | Yanai | Apr 1993 | A |
5218572 | Lee | Jun 1993 | A |
5218686 | Thayer | Jun 1993 | A |
5226147 | Fujishima et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5249277 | Leftwich | Sep 1993 | A |
5249282 | Segers | Sep 1993 | A |
5251178 | Childers | Oct 1993 | A |
5258953 | Tsujimoto | Nov 1993 | A |
5260905 | Mori | Nov 1993 | A |
5267200 | Tobita | Nov 1993 | A |
5268639 | Gasbarro | Dec 1993 | A |
5268865 | Takasugi | Dec 1993 | A |
5274788 | Koike | Dec 1993 | A |
5276858 | Oak et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5278789 | Inoue | Jan 1994 | A |
5278792 | Inoue | Jan 1994 | A |
5287327 | Takasugi | Feb 1994 | A |
5291444 | Scott | Mar 1994 | A |
5293340 | Fujita | Mar 1994 | A |
5299169 | Miyamoto | Mar 1994 | A |
5305278 | Inoue | Apr 1994 | A |
5307320 | Farrer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307469 | Mann | Apr 1994 | A |
5311483 | Takasugi | May 1994 | A |
5335206 | Kawamoto | Aug 1994 | A |
5337285 | Ware et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5359722 | Chan | Oct 1994 | A |
5384737 | Childs et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5432468 | Moriyama et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5440515 | Chang et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444667 | Ohara | Aug 1995 | A |
5452401 | Lin | Sep 1995 | A |
5455923 | Kaplinsky | Oct 1995 | A |
5457790 | Iwamura | Oct 1995 | A |
5471425 | Yumitori et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5471607 | Garde | Nov 1995 | A |
5481731 | Conary | Jan 1996 | A |
5498990 | Leung | Mar 1996 | A |
5524249 | Suboh | Jun 1996 | A |
5566108 | Kitamura et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5579263 | Teel et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581512 | Kitamura | Dec 1996 | A |
5585745 | Simmons et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586332 | Jain | Dec 1996 | A |
5598376 | Merritt et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5615169 | Leung | Mar 1997 | A |
5615376 | Ranganathan | Mar 1997 | A |
5623677 | Townsley et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625796 | Kaczmarczyk | Apr 1997 | A |
5629897 | Iwamoto | May 1997 | A |
5655113 | Leung et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666322 | Conkle | Sep 1997 | A |
5666324 | Kosugi | Sep 1997 | A |
5673398 | Takeda | Sep 1997 | A |
5677849 | Smith | Oct 1997 | A |
5687183 | Chestley | Nov 1997 | A |
5696729 | Kitamura | Dec 1997 | A |
5726650 | Yeoh et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742194 | Saeki | Apr 1998 | A |
5754838 | Shibata et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758132 | Strahlin | May 1998 | A |
5768213 | Jung et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790839 | Luk | Aug 1998 | A |
5793227 | Goldrian | Aug 1998 | A |
5796673 | Foss | Aug 1998 | A |
5796995 | Nasserbakht et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802356 | Gaskins et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815462 | Konishi | Sep 1998 | A |
5815693 | McDermott et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5822255 | Uchida | Oct 1998 | A |
5845108 | Yoo et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860125 | Reents | Jan 1999 | A |
5880998 | Tanimura | Mar 1999 | A |
5884100 | Normoyle et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886946 | Ooishi | Mar 1999 | A |
5890195 | Rao | Mar 1999 | A |
5910930 | Dieffenderfer | Jun 1999 | A |
5917760 | Millar | Jun 1999 | A |
5918058 | Budd | Jun 1999 | A |
5930197 | Ishibashi | Jul 1999 | A |
5955904 | Kawasaki | Sep 1999 | A |
5987620 | Tran | Nov 1999 | A |
6014339 | Kobayashi | Jan 2000 | A |
6037813 | Eto et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6088774 | Gillingham | Jul 2000 | A |
6128700 | Hsu | Oct 2000 | A |
6134638 | Olarig et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6209071 | Barth et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226723 | Gustavson | May 2001 | B1 |
6259288 | Nishimura | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263448 | Tsern et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6442644 | Gustavson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
7593285 | Cho | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20080291749 | Kishimoto et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090091987 | Butt et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100138684 | Kim et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0112140 | Jun 1984 | EP |
0308132 | Mar 1989 | EP |
308132 | Mar 1989 | EP |
552975 | Jul 1993 | EP |
94112140.2 | Mar 1994 | EP |
0638858 | Feb 1995 | EP |
96308132.8 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0778575 | Jun 1997 | EP |
61-160129 | Jul 1986 | JP |
61-160130 | Jul 1986 | JP |
61-245255 | Oct 1986 | JP |
62-135949 | Jun 1987 | JP |
1-163849 | Jun 1989 | JP |
6-103153 | Apr 1994 | JP |
09 034580 | Feb 1997 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120113738 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60061664 | Oct 1997 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12975332 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 13352177 | US | |
Parent | 12608209 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 12975332 | US | |
Parent | 11107504 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 12608209 | US | |
Parent | 10742327 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 11107504 | US | |
Parent | 09887181 | Jun 2001 | US |
Child | 10742327 | US | |
Parent | 09169378 | Oct 1998 | US |
Child | 09887181 | US |