Several single-axis or multi-axis micromachined accelerometer structures have been integrated into a system to form various sensors. As the size of such sensors becomes smaller and the desired sensitivity more robust, small scale stresses on certain components of the accelerometer can detract from the accuracy of the sensors.
This document discusses, among other things, apparatus and methods for a proof mass including split z-axis portions. An example proof mass can include a center portion configured to anchor the proof-mass to an adjacent layer, a first z-axis portion configure to rotate about a first axis using a first hinge, the first axis parallel to an x-y plane orthogonal to a z-axis, a second z-axis portion configure to rotate about a second axis using a second hinge, the second axis parallel to the x-y plane, wherein the first z-axis portion is configured to rotate independent of the second z-axis portion.
This overview is intended to provide an overview of subject matter of the present patent application. It is not intended to provide an exclusive or exhaustive explanation of the invention. The detailed description is included to provide further information about the present patent application.
In the drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, like numerals may describe similar components in different views. Like numerals having different letter suffixes may represent different instances of similar components. The drawings illustrate generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, various embodiments discussed in the present document.
In certain examples the proof mass 100 can be used to detect acceleration along multiple axes. In some examples, the proof mass can include electrodes to detect acceleration along the x and y axes. The example illustrated in
In certain examples, the each pair of hinges 206 and 216, 208 and 218 can asymmetrically couple their respective z-axis portion 202, 203 to the central portion 201 to allow adjacent ends of the z-axis portions to move in opposite, out-of-plane directions for a given acceleration along the z-axis. In certain examples, each z-axis portion includes a first electrode end (Z+) and a second electrode end (Z−). In certain examples, an electrode can be formed at each electrode end. In some examples, a portion of an electrode can be formed on a major surface of each z-axis portion 202, 203 of the proof mass at each electrode end. In some examples, a second portion of each electrode can be formed on the via layer near each electrode end of each z-axis portion 202, 203. Each z-axis portion 202, 203 of the proof mass 200 can include a pair of electrodes. In certain examples, the pairs of electrodes can be complementary. Complementary electrodes can assist in eliminating residual effects of proof mass stress that can be present during operation of the sensor, can be present due to manufacturing variations of the proof mass, or can be present due to assembly operations of the sensor.
In the presence of an acceleration along the x-axis, the y-axis frame 251 and the x-axis frame 252 can move in unison with respect to the anchor region 204. The resulting motion can be detected using the x-axis accelerometer sense electrodes 211 located on opposite sides of the proof-mass, allowing differential measurement of deflections. In various examples, a variety of detection methods, such as capacitive (variable gap or variable area capacitors), piezoelectric, piezoresistive, magnetic or thermal can be used.
In the presence of an acceleration along the y-axis, the y-axis flexure bearings 210 that connect the y-axis frame 251 to the x-axis frame 252 can deflect and allow the y-axis frame 251 to move along the y-axis in unison with the proof-mass 200, while the x-axis frame 252 remains stationary. The resulting motion can be detected using the y-axis accelerometer sense electrodes 212 located on opposite sides of the proof-mass, allowing differential measurement of deflections. In various examples, a variety of detection methods, such as capacitive (variable gap or variable area capacitors), piezoelectric, piezoresistive, magnetic or thermal can be used.
In certain examples, the proof mass 200 can include x-axis flexure bearings 209 responsive to acceleration of the proof mass 200 along the x-axis. In such examples, the proof mass 200 can include first portions 211 of x-axis electrodes configured to move in relation to second, stationary portions 213 of the x-axis electrodes. In an example, the second, stationary portions 213 (not shown in
In certain examples, the proof mass can include y-axis flexure bearings 210 responsive to acceleration of the proof mass 200 along the y-axis. In such examples, the proof mass 200 can include first portions of y-axis electrodes 212 configured to move in relation to second, stationary portions 214 of the y-axis electrodes. In an example, the second, stationary portions 214 (not shown in
In certain examples, each pair of hinges 306 and 316, 308 and 318 can asymmetrically couple their respective z-axis portion 302, 303 to the central portion 301 to allow adjacent ends of the z-axis portions 302, 303 to move in opposite, out-of-plane directions for a given acceleration along the z-axis. In certain examples, each z-axis portion 302, 303 can include a first electrode end (Z+) and a second electrode end (Z−). In certain examples, an electrode can be formed at each electrode end. In some examples, a portion of an electrode can be formed on a major surface of each z-axis portion 302, 303 of the proof mass 300 at each electrode end. In some examples, a second portion of each electrode can be formed on the via layer near each electrode end of each z-axis portion. Each z-axis portion 302, 303 of the proof mass 300 can include a pair of electrodes. In certain examples, the two pairs of z-axis electrodes can be complementary. Complementary z-axis electrodes can assist in eliminating residual effects of proof mass stress that can be present during operation of the sensor, can be present due to manufacturing variations of the proof mass 300, or can be present due to assembly operations of a sensor including the proof mass 300.
In certain examples, the proof mass 300 can include x-axis flexure bearings 309 responsive to acceleration of the proof mass 300 along the x-axis. In such examples, the proof mass 300 can include first portions 311 of x-axis electrodes configured to move in relation to second, stationary portions of the x-axis electrodes. In an example, the second, stationary portions (not shown in
In certain examples, the proof mass can include y-axis flexure bearings 310 responsive to acceleration of the proof mass 300 along the y-axis. In such examples, the proof mass 300 can include first portions 312 of y-axis electrodes configured to move in relation to second, stationary portions of the y-axis electrodes. In an example, the second, stationary portions (not shown in
In this example, each of the 3-axis gyroscope 420 and the 3-axis accelerometer 400 have separate proof-masses, though when packaged, the resulting device (e.g., chip-scale package) can share a cap, and thus, the 3-axis gyroscope 420 and the 3-axis accelerometer 400 can reside in the same cavity. Moreover, because the devices can be formed at similar times and on similar materials, the invention can significantly lower the risk of process variations, can reduce the need to separately calibrate the sensors, can reduce alignment issues, and can allow closer placement of the two devices than separately bonding the devices near one another.
In addition, there can be a space savings associated with sealing the resulting device. For example, if a given seal width is used to seal each of the device individually, sharing the cap wafer and reducing the distance between devices allows the overall size of the resulting device to shrink. Packaged separately, the amount of space required for the seal width could double.
In an example, the 3-axis gyroscope 420 can include a single proof-mass providing 3-axis gyroscope operational modes patterned into a device layer of the 3-DOF IMU 440.
In an example, the single proof-mass can be suspended at its center using a single central anchor (e.g., anchor 434) and a central suspension 435 including symmetrical central flexure bearings (“flexures”), such as disclosed in the copending Acar et al., PCT Patent Application Serial No. US2011052006, entitled “FLEXURE BEARING TO REDUCE QUADRATURE FOR RESONATING MICROMACHINED DEVICES,” filed on Sep. 16, 2011, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The central suspension 435 can allow the single proof-mass to oscillate torsionally about the x, y, and z axes, providing three gyroscope operational modes, including:
(1) Torsional in-plane drive motion about the z-axis;
(2) Torsional out-of-plane y-axis gyroscope sense motion about the x-axis; and
(3) Torsional out-of-plane x-axis gyroscope sense motion about the y-axis.
Further, the single proof-mass design can be composed of multiple sections, including, for example, a main proof-mass section 436 and x-axis proof-mass sections 437 symmetrical about the y-axis. In an example, drive electrodes 438 can be placed along the y-axis of the main proof-mass section 436. In combination with the central suspension 435, the drive electrodes 438 can be configured to provide a torsional in-plane drive motion about the z-axis, allowing detection of angular motion about the x and y axes.
In an example, the x-axis proof-mass sections 437 can be coupled to the main proof-mass section 436 using z-axis gyroscope flexure bearings 440. In an example, the z-axis gyroscope flexure bearings 440 can allow the x-axis proof-mass sections 437 to oscillate linear anti-phase in the x-direction for the z-axis gyroscope sense motion.
Further, the 3-axis inertial sensor 450 can include z-axis gyroscope sense electrodes 441 configured to detect anti-phase, in-plane motion of the x-axis proof-mass sections 437 along the x-axis.
In an example, each of the drive electrodes 438 and z-axis gyroscope sense electrodes 441 can include moving fingers coupled to one or more proof-mass sections interdigitated with a set of stationary fingers fixed in position (e.g., to the via wafer) using a respective anchor, such as anchors 439, 442.
In an example, the drive electrodes 438 of the gyroscope can include a set of moving fingers coupled to the main proof-mass section 436 interdigitated with a set of stationary fingers fixed in position using a first drive anchor 439 (e.g., a raised and electrically isolated portion of the via wafer). In an example, the stationary fingers can be configured to receive energy through the first drive anchor 439, and the interaction between the interdigitated moving and stationary fingers of the drive electrodes 438 can be configured to provide an angular force to the single proof-mass about the z-axis.
In an example, the drive electrodes 438 are driven to rotate the single proof-mass about the z-axis while the central suspension 435 provides restoring torque with respect to the fixed anchor 434, causing the single proof-mass to oscillate torsionally, in-plane about the z-axis at a drive frequency dependent on the energy applied to the drive electrodes 438. In certain examples, the drive motion of the single proof-mass can be detected using the drive electrodes 438.
In the presence of an angular rate about the x-axis, and in conjunction with the drive motion of the 3-axis gyroscope 420, Coriolis forces in opposite directions along the z-axis can be induced on the x-axis proof-mass sections 437 because the velocity vectors are in opposite directions along the y-axis. Thus, the single proof-mass can be excited torsionally about the y-axis by flexing the central suspension 435. The sense response can be detected using out-of-plane x-axis gyroscope sense electrodes, e.g., formed in the via wafer and using capacitive coupling of the x-axis proof-mass sections 437 and the via wafer.
In the presence of an angular rate about the y-axis, and in conjunction with the drive motion of the 3-axis gyroscope 420, Coriolis forces in opposite directions along the z-axis can be induced on the main proof-mass section 436 because the velocity vectors are in opposite directions along the x-axis. Thus, the single proof-mass can be excited torsionally about the x-axis by flexing the central suspension 435. The sense response can be detected using out-of-plane y-axis gyroscope sense electrodes, e.g., formed in the via wafer and using capacitive coupling of the main proof-mass section 436 and the via wafer.
In the presence of an angular rate about the z-axis, and in conjunction with the drive motion of the 6-axis inertial sensor 450, Coriolis forces in opposite directions along the x-axis can be induced on the x-axis proof-mass sections 437 because the velocity vectors are in opposite directions along the y-axis. Thus, the x-axis proof-mass sections 437 can be excited linearly in opposite directions along the x-axis by flexing the z-axis flexure bearings 440 in the x-direction. Further, the z-axis gyroscope coupling flexure bearings 443 can be used to provide a linear anti-phase resonant mode of the x-axis proof-mass sections 437, which are directly driven by the anti-phase Coriolis forces. The sense response can be detected using in-plane parallel-plate sense electrodes, such as the z-axis gyroscope sense electrodes 441 formed in the device layer 105.
During the anti-phase motion, the connection beams that connect the two x-axis proof-mass sections 437 to the z-axis gyroscope coupling flexure bearing 443 apply forces in the same direction and the coupling beams undergo a natural bending with low stiffness.
In contrast, during the in-phase motion, the coupling beams of the z-axis gyroscope coupling flexure bearing 443 apply forces in opposite directions on the coupling beams, forcing the coupling beams into a twisting motion with a higher stiffness. Thus, the in-phase motion stiffness and the resonant frequencies are increased, providing improved vibration rejection.
In an example, the cap wafer 501 can be bonded to the device layer 505, such as using a metal bond 502. The metal bond 502 can include a fusion bond, such as a non-high temperature fusion bond, to allow getter to maintain long term vacuum and application of anti-stiction coating to prevent stiction that can occur to low-g acceleration sensors. In an example, during operation of the device layer 505, the metal bond 502 can generate thermal stress between the cap wafer 501 and the device layer 505. In certain examples, one or more features can be added to the device layer 505 to isolate the micromachined structures in the device layer 505 from thermal stress, such as one or more stress reducing grooves formed around the perimeter of the micromachined structures. In an example, the via wafer 503 can be bonded to the device layer 505, such as fusion bonded (e.g., silicon-silicon fusion bonded, etc.), to obviate thermal stress between the via wafer 503 and the device layer 505.
In an example, the via wafer 503 can include one or more isolated regions, such as a first isolated region 507, isolated from one or more other regions of the via wafer 503, for example, using one or more through-silicon-vias (TSVs), such as a first TSV 508 insulated from the via wafer 503 using a dielectric material 509. In certain examples, the one or more isolated regions can be utilized as electrodes to sense or actuate out-of-plane operation modes of the 6-axis inertial sensor, and the one or more TSVs can be configured to provide electrical connections from the device layer 505 outside of the system 500. Further, the via wafer 503 can include one or more contacts, such as a first contact 550, selectively isolated from one or more portions of the via wafer 503 using a dielectric layer 504 and configured to provide an electrical connection between one or more of the isolated regions or TSVs of the via wafer 503 to one or more external components, such as an ASIC wafer, using bumps, wire bonds, or one or more other electrical connection.
In certain examples, the 3-degrees-of-freedom (3-DOF) gyroscope or the micromachined accelerometer in the device layer 505 can be supported or anchored to the via wafer 503 by bonding the device layer 505 to a protruding portion of the via wafer 503, such as an anchor 506. In an example, the anchor 506 can be located substantially at the center of the via wafer 503, and the device layer 505 can be fusion bonded to the anchor 506, such as to eliminate problems associated with metal fatigue.
In Example 1, a proof mass, for an accelerometer for example, can include a center portion configured to anchor the proof-mass to an adjacent layer, a first z-axis portion configure to rotate about a first axis using a first hinge, the first axis parallel to an x-y plane orthogonal to a z-axis, a second z-axis portion configure to rotate about a second axis using a second hinge, the second axis parallel to the x-y plane; wherein the first z-axis portion is configured to rotate independent of the second z-axis portion.
In Example 2, the first z-axis portion of Example 1 optionally is configured to rotate in an opposite direction than that of the second z-axis portion in response to an acceleration of the proof mass along the z-axis.
In Example 3, the first hinge of any one or more of Examples 1-2 optionally is located opposite the second hinge with respect to the central portion.
In Example 4, the first hinge of any one or more of Examples 1-3 optionally is coupled to the first z-axis portion closer to a first end of the first z-axis portion than a second end of the first z-axis portion.
In Example 5, the second hinge of any one or more of Examples 1-4 optionally is coupled to the second z-axis portion closer to a first end of the second z-axis portion than a second end of the axis z-axis portion.
In Example 6, the proof mass of any one or more of Examples 1-5 optionally includes a third hinge, wherein the first z-axis portion is configured to rotate about the first axis in the x-y plane using the first hinge and the third hinge.
In Example 7, the proof mass of any one or more of Examples 1-6 optionally includes a fourth hinge, wherein the second z-axis portion is configured to rotate about the second axis in the x-y plane using the second hinge and the fourth hinge.
In Example 8, the central portion of any one or more of Examples 1-7 optionally includes an anchor portion and an x-axis proof mass portion, the x-axis proof mass portion configured to deflect, with respect to the anchor portion, in response to an acceleration of the proof mass along the x-axis.
In Example 9, the central portion of any one or more of Examples 1-8 optionally includes a y-axis proof mass portion, the y-axis proof mass portion configured to deflect, with respect to the anchor portion, in response to an acceleration of the proof mass along the y-axis.
In Example 10, the first z-axis portion and the second z-axis portion of any one or more of Examples 1-9 optionally substantially envelop the central portion in the x-y-plane.
In Example 11, a method can include accelerating a proof mass along a z-axis direction, rotating a first z-axis portion of the proof mass in a first rotational direct about a first axis lying in an x-y-plane using a first hinge, the rotation of the first z-axis portion of the proof mass responsive to the acceleration of the proof mass in the z-axis direction, and rotating a second z-axis portion of the proof mass in a second rotational direct about a second axis lying in an x-y-plane using a second hinge, the rotation of the second z-axis portion of the proof mass responsive to the acceleration of the proof mass in the z-axis direction. The first rotational direction can be opposite the second rotational direction using a point of reference outside a perimeter of the proof mass.
In Example 12, an apparatus can include a single proof mass accelerometer, the single proof mass accelerometer including a single proof mass formed in the x-y plane of a device layer, the single proof mass including, a central portion including a single, central anchor, a first z-axis portion configure to rotate about a first axis in the x-y plane using a first hinge, the first hinge coupled to the central portion, and a second z-axis portion configure to rotate about a second axis in the x-y plane using a second hinge, the second hinge coupled to the central portion. The first z-axis portion can be configured to rotate independent of the second z-axis portion. The single central anchor can be configured to suspend the single proof-mass. The central portion can include separate x, y, axis flexure bearings, wherein the x and y-axis flexure bearings are symmetrical about the single, central anchor.
In Example 13, the central portion of any one or more of Examples 1-12 optionally includes in-plane x and y-axis accelerometer sense electrodes symmetrical about the single, central anchor.
In Example 14, the single proof mass of any one or more of Examples 1-13 optionally includes a first portion of first and second out-of-plane z-axis accelerometer sense electrodes coupled to the first z-axis portion, and a first portion of third and fourth out-of-plane z-axis sense electrodes coupled to the second z-axis portion.
In Example 15, the apparatus of any one or more of Examples 1-14 optionally includes a cap wafer bonded to a first surface of the device layer, and a via wafer bonded to a second surface of the device layer, wherein the cap wafer and the via wafer are configured to encapsulate the single proof mass accelerometer in a cavity.
In Example 16, the via wafer of any on or more of Examples 1-15 optionally includes a second portion of the first and second out-of-plane z-axis accelerometer sense electrodes, and a second portion of the third and fourth out-of-plane z-axis sense electrodes.
In Example 17, the apparatus of any one or more of Examples 1-16 optionally includes a first portion of x-axis accelerometer electrodes coupled to the device layer, wherein the central portion of the single proof mass includes a second portion of the x-axis accelerometer electrodes, the second portion of the x-axis electrodes coupled to the single central anchor using the x flexure bearings.
In Example 18, the apparatus of any one or more of Examples 1-17 optionally includes a first portion of y-axis accelerometer electrodes coupled to the device layer, and the central portion of the single proof mass includes a second portion of the y-axis accelerometer electrodes, the second portion of the y-axis electrodes coupled to the single central anchor using the y flexure bearings.
In Example 19, The apparatus of any one or more of Examples 1-18 optionally includes a multiple-axis gyroscope within the cavity and adjacent the single proof mass accelerometer. The multiple-axis gyroscope optionally includes a second single proof-mass formed in the x-y plane of the device layer. The second single proof-mass can include a main proof-mass section suspended about a second single, central anchor, the main proof-mass section including a radial portion extending outward towards an edge of the multiple-axis gyroscope, a central suspension system configured to suspend the second single proof mass from the single, central anchor, and a drive electrode including a moving portion and a stationary portion, the moving portion coupled to the radial portion, wherein the drive electrode and the central suspension system are configured to oscillate the single proof mass about the z-axis normal to the x-y plane at a drive frequency.
In Example 20, wherein the second, single proof mass of any one or more of Examples 1-19 optionally includes symmetrical x-axis proof-mass sections configured to move anti-phase along the x-axis in response to z-axis angular motion.
The above detailed description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention can be practiced. These embodiments are also referred to herein as “examples.” All publications, patents, and patent documents referred to in this document are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, as though individually incorporated by reference. In the event of inconsistent usages between this document and those documents so incorporated by reference, the usage in the incorporated reference(s) should be considered supplementary to that of this document; for irreconcilable inconsistencies, the usage in this document controls.
In this document, the terms “a” or “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one, independent of any other instances or usages of “at least one” or “one or more.” In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, such that “A or B” includes “A but not B,” “B but not A,” and “A and B,” unless otherwise indicated. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Also, in the following claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are open-ended, that is, a system, device, article, or process that includes elements in addition to those listed after such a term in a claim are still deemed to fall within the scope of that claim. Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects.
The above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. In some examples, the above-described examples (or one or more aspects thereof) may be used in combination with each other. Other embodiments can be used, such as by one of ordinary skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.72(b), to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. Also, in the above Detailed Description, various features may be grouped together to streamline the disclosure. This should not be interpreted as intending that an unclaimed disclosed feature is essential to any claim. Rather, inventive subject matter may lie in less than all features of a particular disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/363,537, filed on Feb. 1, 2012, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,978,475 on Mar. 17, 2015, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. This application is related to Acar, International Application No. PCT/US2011/052065, entitled “MICROMACHINED MONOLITHIC 3-AXIS GYROSCOPE WITH SINGLE DRIVE,” filed on Sep. 18, 2011, which claims the benefit of priority to Acar, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/384,245, entitled “MICROMACHINED MONOLITHIC 3-AXIS GYROSCOPE WITH SINGLE DRIVE,” filed on Sep. 18, 2010, and to Acar, International Application No. PCT/US2011/052064, entitled “MICROMACHINED 3-AXIS ACCELEROMETER WITH A SINGLE PROOF-MASS,” filed on Sep. 18, 2011, which claims the benefit of priority of Acar, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/384,246, entitled “MICROMACHINED 3-AXIS ACCELEROMETER WITH A SINGLE PROOF-MASS,” filed on Sep. 18, 2010, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3231729 | Stern | Jan 1966 | A |
4511848 | Watson | Apr 1985 | A |
4896156 | Garverick | Jan 1990 | A |
5487305 | Ristic et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5491604 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5600064 | Ward | Feb 1997 | A |
5656778 | Roszhart | Aug 1997 | A |
5659195 | Kaiser et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5723790 | Andersson | Mar 1998 | A |
5751154 | Tsugai | May 1998 | A |
5760465 | Alcoe et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5765046 | Watanabe et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5894091 | Kubota | Apr 1999 | A |
6131457 | Sato | Oct 2000 | A |
6214644 | Glenn | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230566 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6301965 | Chu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6351996 | Nasiri et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366468 | Pan | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390905 | Korovin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6501282 | Dummermuth et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504385 | Hartwell | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6516651 | Geen | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6553835 | Hobbs et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6654424 | Thomae et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6664941 | Itakura et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6722206 | Takada | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725719 | Cardarelli | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6781231 | Minervini et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6848304 | Geen | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7051590 | Lemkin et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7054778 | Geiger et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7093487 | Mochida | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7166910 | Minervini et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173402 | Chen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202552 | Zhe et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7210351 | Lo et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221767 | Mullenborn et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7240552 | Acar et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7258011 | Nasiri et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7258012 | Xie et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266349 | Kappes | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7293460 | Zarabadi et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301212 | Mian et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7305880 | Caminada et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7339384 | Peng et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7358151 | Araki et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7436054 | Zhe | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7449355 | Lutz et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451647 | Matsuhisa et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7454967 | Skurnik | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7518493 | Bryzek et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7539003 | Ray | May 2009 | B2 |
7544531 | Grosjean | Jun 2009 | B1 |
7595648 | Ungaretti et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7600428 | Robert et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7616078 | Prandi et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7622782 | Chu et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7694563 | Durante et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7706149 | Yang et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7781249 | Laming et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7795078 | Ramakrishna et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7817331 | Moidu | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7859352 | Sutton | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7950281 | Hammerschmidt | May 2011 | B2 |
7965067 | Grönthal et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8004354 | Pu et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8006557 | Yin et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8037755 | Nagata et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8113050 | Acar et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8171792 | Sameshima | May 2012 | B2 |
8201449 | Ohuchi et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8250921 | Nasiri et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8375789 | Prandi et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8421168 | Allen et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8476970 | Mokhtar et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8497746 | Visconti et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8508290 | Elsayed et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8643382 | Steele et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8710599 | Marx et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8739626 | Acar | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8742964 | Kleks et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8754694 | Opris et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8813564 | Acar | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8978475 | Acar | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9006846 | Bryzek et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9246018 | Acar | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9278845 | Acar | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9278846 | Acar | Mar 2016 | B2 |
20020021059 | Knowles et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020083757 | Geen | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020117728 | Brosnihhan et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020178831 | Takada | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020189352 | Reeds, III et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196445 | Mcclary et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030033850 | Challoner et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030038415 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030061878 | Pinson | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030200807 | Hulsing, II | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030222337 | Stewart | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040051508 | Hamon et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040119137 | Leonardi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040177689 | Cho et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040211258 | Geen | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040219340 | McNeil et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040231420 | Xie et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040251793 | Matushisa | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005698 | McNeil et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050097957 | Mcneil et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050139005 | Geen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050189635 | Humpston et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050274181 | Kutsuna et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060032308 | Acar et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034472 | Bazarjani et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060043608 | Bernier et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060097331 | Hattori | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112764 | Higuchi | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060137457 | Zdeblick | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060207328 | Zarabadi et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060213265 | Weber et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060213266 | French et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060213268 | Asami et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060246631 | Lutz et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070013052 | Zhe et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070034005 | Acar et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070040231 | Harney et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042606 | Wang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047744 | Karney et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071268 | Harney et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070085544 | Viswanathan | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070099327 | Hartzell et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070113653 | Nasiri et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070114643 | DCamp et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070165888 | Weigold | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070180908 | Seeger et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070205492 | Wang | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214891 | Robert et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220973 | Acar | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222021 | Yao | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070284682 | Laming et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080022762 | Skurnik | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080049230 | Chin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080079444 | Denison | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080081398 | Lee et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080083958 | Wei et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080083960 | Chen et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080092652 | Acar | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080122439 | Burdick et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080157238 | Hsiao | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080157301 | Ramakrishna et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169811 | Viswanathan | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080202237 | Hammerschmidt | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080245148 | Fukumoto | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080247585 | Leidl et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080251866 | Belt et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080253057 | Rijks et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080290756 | Huang | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080302559 | Leedy | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080314147 | Nasiri | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090007661 | Nasiri et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090056443 | Netzer | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090064780 | Coronato et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090072663 | Ayazi et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090085191 | Najafi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090114016 | Nasiri et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090140606 | Huang | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090166827 | Foster et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090175477 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090183570 | Acar et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090194829 | Chung et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090263937 | Ramakrishna et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090266163 | Ohuchi et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100019393 | Hsieh et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100024548 | Cardarelli | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100038733 | Minervini | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100044853 | Dekker et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100052082 | Lee | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100058864 | Hsu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100072626 | Theuss et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077858 | Kawakubo et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100089154 | Ballas et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100122579 | Hsu et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100126269 | Coronato et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100155863 | Weekamp | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100194615 | Lu | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100206074 | Yoshida et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100212425 | Hsu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100224004 | Suminto et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100236327 | Mao et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100263445 | Hayner et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110023605 | Tripoli et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110030473 | Acar | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110030474 | Kuang et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110031565 | Marx et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110074389 | Knierim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110094302 | Schofield et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110120221 | Yoda | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121413 | Allen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110146403 | Rizzo Piazza Roncoroni et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110234312 | Lachhwani et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110265564 | Acar et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285445 | Huang et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130051586 | Stephanou et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130139591 | Acar | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130139592 | Acar | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130192364 | Acar | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130192369 | Acar et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130247666 | Acar | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130247668 | Bryzek | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130250532 | Bryzek et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130257487 | Opris et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130263641 | Opris et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130263665 | Opris et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130265070 | Kleks et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130265183 | Kleks et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268227 | Opris et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130268228 | Opris et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130269413 | Tao et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270657 | Acar et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130270660 | Bryzek et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130271228 | Tao et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130277772 | Bryzek et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130277773 | Bryzek et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130283911 | Ayazi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130298671 | Acar et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130328139 | Acar | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130341737 | Bryzek et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140070339 | Marx | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102156201 | Aug 2001 | CN |
1389704 | Jan 2003 | CN |
1780732 | May 2006 | CN |
1813192 | Aug 2006 | CN |
1816747 | Aug 2006 | CN |
1948906 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101038299 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101044684 | Sep 2007 | CN |
101078736 | Nov 2007 | CN |
101180516 | May 2008 | CN |
101198874 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101213461 | Jul 2008 | CN |
101270988 | Sep 2008 | CN |
101426718 | May 2009 | CN |
101666813 | Mar 2010 | CN |
101738496 | Jun 2010 | CN |
101813480 | Aug 2010 | CN |
101855516 | Oct 2010 | CN |
101858928 | Oct 2010 | CN |
102332894 | Jan 2012 | CN |
102597699 | Jul 2012 | CN |
103209922 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103210278 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103221331 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103221332 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103221333 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103221778 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103221779 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103221795 | Jul 2013 | CN |
103238075 | Aug 2013 | CN |
103363969 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103363983 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103364590 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103364593 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103368503 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103368562 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103368577 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103376099 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103376102 | Oct 2013 | CN |
203261317 | Oct 2013 | CN |
103403495 | Nov 2013 | CN |
203275441 | Nov 2013 | CN |
203275442 | Nov 2013 | CN |
103663344 | Mar 2014 | CN |
203719664 | Jul 2014 | CN |
104094084 | Oct 2014 | CN |
104105945 | Oct 2014 | CN |
104272062 | Jan 2015 | CN |
103221778 | Mar 2016 | CN |
112011103124 | Dec 2013 | DE |
102013014881 | Mar 2014 | DE |
0638782 | Feb 1995 | EP |
1335185 | Aug 2003 | EP |
1460380 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1521086 | Apr 2005 | EP |
1688705 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1832841 | Sep 2007 | EP |
1860402 | Nov 2007 | EP |
2053413 | Apr 2009 | EP |
2259019 | Dec 2010 | EP |
09089927 | Apr 1997 | JP |
10239347 | Sep 1998 | JP |
2005024310 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005114394 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005294462 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2007024864 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2008294455 | Dec 2008 | JP |
2009075097 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2009186213 | Aug 2009 | JP |
2009260348 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2010025898 | Feb 2010 | JP |
2010506182 | Feb 2010 | JP |
1020110055449 | May 2011 | KR |
1020130052652 | May 2013 | KR |
1020130052653 | May 2013 | KR |
1020130054441 | May 2013 | KR |
1020130055693 | May 2013 | KR |
1020130057485 | May 2013 | KR |
1020130060338 | Jun 2013 | KR |
1020130061181 | Jun 2013 | KR |
101311966 | Sep 2013 | KR |
1020130097209 | Sep 2013 | KR |
101318810 | Oct 2013 | KR |
1020130037462 | Oct 2013 | KR |
1020130112789 | Oct 2013 | KR |
1020130112792 | Oct 2013 | KR |
1020130112804 | Oct 2013 | KR |
1020130113385 | Oct 2013 | KR |
1020130113386 | Oct 2013 | KR |
1020130113391 | Oct 2013 | KR |
1020130116189 | Oct 2013 | KR |
1020130116212 | Oct 2013 | KR |
101332701 | Nov 2013 | KR |
1020130139914 | Dec 2013 | KR |
1020130142116 | Dec 2013 | KR |
101352827 | Jan 2014 | KR |
1020140034713 | Mar 2014 | KR |
I255341 | May 2006 | TW |
WO-0175455 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-2008014246 | Jan 2008 | WO |
WO-2008059757 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2008087578 | Jul 2008 | WO |
WO-2009038924 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO-2009050578 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-2009156485 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO-2011016859 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO-2011016859 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO-2012037492 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012037492 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012037501 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012037501 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012037536 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012037537 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012037538 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012037539 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012037539 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012037540 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012040194 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012040211 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012040245 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2012040245 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO-2013115967 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2013116356 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2013116514 | Aug 2013 | WO |
WO-2013116522 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/742,994, Non Final Office Action mailed May 1, 2015”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/755,953, Response filed May 4, 2015 to Restrictiion Requirement mailed Mar. 3, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/765,068, Notice of Allowance mailed May 7, 2015”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/813,443, Restriction Requirement mailed Apr. 29, 2015”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,609, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 23, 2015”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,842, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 18, 2015”, 20 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/860,761, Advisory Action mailed Mar. 25, 2015”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/860,761, Notice of Allowance mailed Apr. 28, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/860,761, Response filed Mar. 16, 2015 to Final Office Action mailed Jan. 16, 2015”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/860,761, Response filed Apr. 16, 2015 to Advisory Action mailed Mar. 25, 2015”, 11 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180054796.3, Response filed Apr. 14, 2015 to Office Action mailed Jan. 30, 2015”, w/ English Claims, 30 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180055630.3, Response filed Apr. 20, 2015 to Office Action mailed Dec. 22, 2014”, w/ English Claims, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180055823.9, Office Action mailed Mar. 19, 2015”, w/ English Claims, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11826067.8, Response filed Apr. 27, 2015 to Extended European Search Report mailed Oct. 6, 2014”, 32 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11826071.0, Response filed Apr. 13, 2015 to Examination Notification Art. 94(3) mailed Dec. 11, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,742, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 28, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,742, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 23, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,742, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 29, 2013”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,742, Response filed Jan. 23, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 23, 2012”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,742, Response filed Sep. 30, 2013 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 28, 2013”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,742, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Mar. 17, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,742, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed May 5, 2014”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,787, Non Final Office Action mailed May 28, 2013”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,787, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 11, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,787, Response filed Feb. 4, 2013 to Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 4, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,787, Response filed Oct. 28, 2013 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 28, 2013”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,787, Restriction Requirement mailed Oct. 4, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,787, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Mar. 21, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/947,543, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 17, 2012”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,955, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 19, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,955, Non Final Office Action mailed Apr. 15, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,955, Response filed Feb. 17, 2014 to Restriction Requirement mailed Dec. 17, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,955, Response filed Aug. 15, 2014 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 15, 2014”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/362,955, Restriction Requirement mailed Dec. 17, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/363,537, Corrected Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 28, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/363,537, Examiner Interview Summary mailed Sep. 29, 2014”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/363,537, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/363,537, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 6, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/363,537, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 7, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/363,537, Response filed Jun. 6, 2014 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 6, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/363,537, Response filed Sep. 29, 2014 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 27, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/742,942, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 28, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/742,942, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 28, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/742,942, Supplemental Notice of Allowability mailed Apr. 10, 2014”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/746,016, Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 17, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/755,841, Notice of Allowance mailed May 7, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/755,841, Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 10, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/755,841, Response filed Apr. 21, 2014 to Restriction Requirement mailed Feb. 21, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/755,841, Restriction Requirement mailed Feb. 21, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/755,841, Supplemental Notice of Allowability Jun. 27, 2014”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/813,443, Preliminary Amendment mailed Jan. 31, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,586, Preliminary Amendment mailed Mar. 8, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,586, Response filed Nov. 24, 2014 to Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 22, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,586, Restriction Requirement mailed Sep. 22, 2014”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,589, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,589, Preliminary Amendment mailed Mar. 8, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,589, Response filed Nov. 10, 2014 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2014”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,589, Response to Restriction Requirement mailed Apr. 11, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,589, Restriction Requirement mailed Apr. 11, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,598, Non Final Office Action mailed Nov. 20, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,598, Preliminary Amendment mailed Mar. 8, 2013”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,598, Response filed Oct. 15, 2014 to Restriction Requirement mailed Aug. 15, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,598, Restriction Requirement mailed Aug. 15, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,609, Preliminary Amendment mailed Mar. 8, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,609, Restriction Requirement mailed Dec. 15, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,612, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 23, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,612, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 10, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,612, Preliminary Amendment mailed Mar. 8, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,612, Response filed Oct. 23, 2014 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 23, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,619, Preliminary Amendment mailed Mar. 8, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,793, Preliminary Amendment mailed Mar. 8, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,842, Preliminary Amendment mailed Mar. 8, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,853, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 30, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,853, Preliminary Amendment mailed Mar. 8, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,853, Response filed Dec. 1, 2014 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 30, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/860,761, Non Final Office Action mailed Aug. 19, 2014”, 13 pgs. |
“Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/051994, International Republished Application mailed Jun. 7, 2012”, 1 pg. |
“Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052006, International Republished Application mailed Jun. 7, 2012”, 1 pg. |
“Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052417, International Republished Application mailed Jun. 7, 2012”, 1 pg. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 2010800423190, Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 2010800423190, Response filed Aug. 11, 2014 to Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2014”, w/English Claims, 11 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180053926.1, Amendment filed Aug. 21, 2013”, w/English Translation, 13 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180053926.1, Office Action mailed Jan. 13, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180053926.1, Response filed Apr. 29, 2014 to Office Action mailed Jan. 13, 2014”, w/English Claims, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180054796.3, Office Action mailed Jan. 16, 2014”, with English translation of claims, 8 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180054796.3, Office Action mailed Sep. 4, 2014”, w/English Claims, 11 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180054796.3, Response filed Jun. 30, 2014 to Office Action mailed Jan. 16, 2014”, w/English Claims, 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180055029.4, Office Action mailed Jan. 13, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180055029.4, Office Action mailed Jul. 2, 2014”, w/English Translation, 5 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180055029.4, Response filed May 27, 2014 to Office Action mailed Jan. 13, 2014”, w/English Claims, 29 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180055029.4, Response filed Nov. 14, 2014 to Office Action mailed Jul. 2, 2014”, w/English Claims, 23 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180055309.5, Office Action mailed Mar. 31, 2014”, w/English Claims, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180055309.5, Response filed Aug. 13, 2014 to Office Action mailed Mar. 31, 2014”, w/English Claims, 25 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180055309.5, Voluntary Amendment filed Aug. 23, 2013”, w/English Translation, 13 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201310118845.6, Office Action mailed Sep. 9, 2014”, with English translation of claims, 8 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201310119472.4, Office Action mailed Sep. 9, 2014”, w/English Translation, 11 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320165465.3, Office Action mailed Jul. 22, 2013”, w/English Translation, 2 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320165465.3, Response filed Aug. 7, 2013 to Office Action mailed Jul. 22, 2013”, w/English Translation, 39 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320171504.0, Office Action mailed Jul. 22, 2013”, w/English Translation, 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320171504.0, Response filed Jul. 25, 2013 to Office Action mailed Jul. 22, 2013”, w/English Translation, 33 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320171616.6, Office Action mailed Jul. 10, 2013”, w/English Translation, 2 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320171757.8, Office Action mailed Jul. 11, 2013”, w/English Translation, 2 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320171757.8, Response filed Jul. 25, 2013 to Office Action mailed Jul. 11, 2013”, w/English Translation, 21 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320171757.8, Response filed Jul. 26, 2013 to Office Action mailed Jul. 10, 2013”, w/English Translation, 40 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320172128.7, Office Action mailed Jul. 12, 2013”, w/English Translation, 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320172128.7, Response filed Aug. 7, 2013 to Office Action mailed Jul. 12, 2013”, w/English Translation, 39 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320172366.8, Office Action mailed Jan. 30, 2014”, w/English Claims, 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320172366.8, Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2013”, w/English Translation, 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320172366.8, Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2013”, w/English Translation, 8 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320172366.8, Response filed Mar. 18, 2014 to Office Action mailed Jan. 30, 2014”, w/English Claims, 20 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320172366.8, Response filed Sep. 16, 2013 to Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2013”, w/English Translation, 24 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320172366.8, Response filed Dec. 24, 2013 to Office Action mailed Oct. 25, 2013”, w/English Claims, 11 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320172367.2, Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2013”, w/English Translation, 2 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320172367.2, Response filed Sep. 16, 2013 to Office Action mailed Jul. 9, 2013”, w/English Translation, 24 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320185461.1, Office Action mailed Jul. 23, 2013”, w/English Translation, 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320185461.1, Response filed Sep. 10, 2013 to Office Action mailed Jul. 23, 2013”, w/English Translation, 25 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320186292.3, Office Action mailed Jul. 19, 2013”, w/English Translation, 2 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320186292.3, Response filed Sep. 10, 2013 to Office Action mailed Jul. 19, 2013”, w/English Translation, 23 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320565239.4, Office Action mailed Jan. 16, 2014”, w/English Translation, 3 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201320565239.4, Response filed Mar. 31, 2014 to Office Action mailed Jan. 16, 2014”, w/English Claims, 38 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380007588.7, Notification to Make Rectification mailed Aug. 18, 2014”, w/English Translation, 2 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380007615.0, Notification to Make Rectification mailed Aug. 18, 2014”, w/English Translation, 2 pgs. |
“DigiSiMic™ Digital Silicon Microphone Pulse Part No. TC100E”, TC100E Datasheet version 4.2 DigiSiMic™ Digital Silicon Microphone. (Jan. 2009), 6 pgs. |
“EPCOS MEMS Microphone With TSV”, (2005), 1 pg. |
“European Application Serial No. 10806751.3, Extended European Search Report mailed Jan. 7, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 10806751.3, Response filed Jul. 24, 2014 to Office Action mailed Jan. 24, 2014”, 26 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 118260070.2, Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2014”, 1 pg. |
“European Application Serial No. 11826067.8, Extended European Search Report mailed Oct. 6, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11826068.6, Extended European Search Report mailed Jul. 16, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11826070.2, Extended European Search Report mailed Feb. 21, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11826070.2, Response filed Sep. 19, 2014 to Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11826071.0, Examination Notification Art. 94(3) mailed Dec. 11, 2014”, 4 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11826071.0, Extended European Search Report mailed Feb. 20, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11826071.0, Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2014”, 1 pg. |
“European Application Serial No. 11826071.0, Response filed Sep. 19, 2014 to Office Action mailed Mar. 12, 2014”, 20 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 11827384.6, Extended European Search Report mailed Nov. 12, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13001692.6, Extended European Search Report mailed Jul. 24, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13001692.6, Response filed Apr. 1, 2014 to Extended European Search Report mailed Jul. 24, 2013”, 19 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13001695.9, European Search Report mailed Oct. 5, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13001696.7, Extended European Search Report mailed Aug. 6, 2013”, 4 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13001719.7, Extended European Search Report mailed Jun. 24, 2014”, 10 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13001721.3, Extended European Search Report mailed Jul. 18, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13001721.3, Response filed Apr. 7, 2014 to Extended European Search Report mailed Jul. 18, 2013”, 25 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/002166, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Feb. 16, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/002166, International Search Report mailed Feb. 28, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2010/002166, Written Opinion mailed Feb. 28, 2011”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/051994, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Mar. 28, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/051994, International Search Report mailed Apr. 16, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/051994, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 16, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052006, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Mar. 28, 2013”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052006, Search Report mailed Apr. 16, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052006, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 16, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052059, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jan. 22, 2013”, 14 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052059, Search Report mailed Apr. 20, 2012”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052059, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 20, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052060, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Jan. 22, 2013”, 12 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052060, International Search Report Apr. 20, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052060, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 20, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052061, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Mar. 28, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052061, International Search Report mailed Apr. 10, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052061, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 10, 2012”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052064, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Mar. 28, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052064, Search Report mailed Feb. 29, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052064, Written Opinion mailed Feb. 29, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052065, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Mar. 28, 2013”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052065, International Search Report mailed Apr. 10, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052065, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 10, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052340, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Apr. 4, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052340, Search Report mailed Feb. 29, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052340, Written Opinion mailed Feb. 29, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052369, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Apr. 4, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052369, International Search Report mailed Apr. 24, 2012”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052369, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 24, 2012”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052417, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Apr. 4, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052417, International Search Report mailed Apr. 23, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2011/052417, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 23, 2012”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/021411, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Aug. 14, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/021411, International Search Report mailed Apr. 30, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/021411, Written Opinion mailed Apr. 30, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/023877, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Aug. 14, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/023877, International Search Report mailed May 14, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/023877, Written Opinion mailed May 14, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/024138, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Aug. 14, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/024138, International Search Report mailed May 24, 2013”, 3 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/024138, Written Opinion mailed May 24, 2013”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/024149, Written Opinion mailed”, 4 pages. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/024149, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Aug. 14, 2014”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2013/024149, International Search Report mailed”, 7 pages. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-0109990, Amendment filed Dec. 10, 2013”, 4 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7009775, Office Action mailed Sep. 17, 2013”, w/English Translation, 6 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7009775, Office Action mailed Dec. 27, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7009775, Response filed Oct. 29, 2013 to Office Action mailed Sep. 17, 2013”, w/English Claims, 23 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7009777, Office Action mailed Jan. 27, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7009777, Office Action mailed Sep. 17, 2013”, w/English Translation, 8 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7009777, Response filed Apr. 28, 2014”, w/English Claims, 19 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7009777, Response filed Nov. 5, 2013 to Office Action mailed Sep. 17, 2013”, 11 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7009788, Office Action mailed Aug. 29, 2013”, w/English Translation, 6 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7009788, Office Action mailed Dec. 27, 2013”, w/English Translation, 10 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7009788, Response filed Oct. 29, 2013 to Office Action mailed Aug. 29, 2013”, w/English Claims, 22 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7009790, Office Action mailed Jun. 26, 2013”, W/English Translation, 7 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7009790, Response filed Aug. 26, 2013 to Office Action mailed Jun. 26, 2013”, w/English Claims, 11 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7010143, Office Action mailed May 28, 2013”, w/English Translation, 5 pgs. |
“Korean Application Serial No. 10-2013-7010143, Response filed Jul. 24, 2013 to Office Action mailed May 28, 2013”, w/English Claims, 14 pgs. |
“T4020 & T4030 MEMS Microphones for Consumer Electronics”, Product Brief 2010, Edition Feb. 2010, (2010), 2 pgs. |
Acar, Cenk, et al., “Chapter 4: Mechanical Design of MEMS Gyroscopes”, MEMS Vibratory Gyroscopes: Structural Approaches to Improve Robustness, Springer, (2009), 73-110. |
Acar, Cenk, et al., “Chapter 6: Linear Multi DOF Architecture—Sections 6.4 and 6.5”, MEMS Vibratory Gyroscopes: Structural Approaches to Improve Robustness, Springer, (2009), 158-178. |
Acar, Cenk, et al., “Chapter 7: Torsional Multi-DOF Architecture”, MEMS Vibratory Gyroscopes: Structural Approaches to Improve Robustness, Springer, (209), 187-206. |
Acar, Cenk, et al., “Chapter 8: Distributed-Mass Architecture”, MEMS Vibratory Gyroscopes: Structural Approaches to Improve Robustness, Springer, (2009), 207-224. |
Acar, Cenk, et al., “Chapter 9: Conclusions and Future Trends”, MEMS Vibratory Gyroscopes: Structural Approaches to Improve Robustness, Springer, (2009), 225-245. |
Beyne, E, et al., “Through-silicon via and die stacking technologies for microsystems-integration”, IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2008. IEDM 2008., (Dec. 2008), 1-4. |
Cabruja, Enric, et al., “Piezoresistive Accelerometers for MCM-Package-Part II”, The Packaging Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems. vol. 14, No. 4, (Aug. 2005), 806-811. |
Dunn, C, et al., “Efficient linearisation of sigma-delta modulators using single-bit dither”, Electronics Letters 31(12), (Jun. 1995), 941-942. |
Ezekwe, Chinwuba David, “Readout Techniques for High-Q Micromachined Vibratory Rate Gyroscopes”, Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley, Technical Report No. UCB/EECS-2007-176, http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2007/EECS-2007-176.html, (Dec. 21, 2007), 94 pgs. |
Ferreira, Antoine, et al., “A Survey of Modeling and Control Techniques for Micro- and Nanoelectromechanical Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics—Part C: Applications and Reviews vol. 41, No. 3., (May 2011), 350-364. |
Fleischer, Paul E, “Sensitivity Minimization in a Single Amplifier Biquad Circuit”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems. vol. Cas-23, No. 1, (1976), 45-55. |
Krishnamurthy, Rajesh, et al., “Drilling and Filling, but not in your Dentist's Chair a look at some recent history of multi-chip and through silicon via (TSV) technology”, Chip Design Magazine, (Oct./Nov. 2008), 7 pgs. |
Kulah, Haluk, et al., “Noise Analysis and Characterization of a Sigma-Delta Capacitive Silicon Microaccelerometer”, 12th International Conference on Solid State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems, (2003), 95-98. |
Reljin, Branimir D, “Properties of SAB filters with the two-pole single-zero compensated operational amplifier”, Circuit Theory and Applications: Letters to the Editor. vol. 10, (1982), 277-297. |
Rimskog, Magnus, “Through Wafer Via Technology for MEMS and 3D Integration”, 32nd IEEE/CPMT International Electronic Manufacturing Technology Symposium, 2007. IEMT '07., (2007), 286-289. |
Sedra, Adel, et al., “Chapter 8.9: Effect of Feedback on the Amplifier Poles”, Microelectronic Circuits, 5th edition, (2004), 836-864. |
Sherry, Adrian, et al., “AN-609 Application Note: Chopping on Sigma-Delta ADCs”, Analog Devices, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/application—notes/AN-609.pdf>, (2003), 4 pgs. |
Song-Hee, Cindy Paik, “A MEMS-Based Precision Operational Amplifier”, Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences MIT, [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/16682/57138272.pdf? . . . >, (Jan. 1, 2004), 123 pgs. |
Xia, Guo-Ming, et al., “Phase correction in digital self-oscillation drive circuit for improve silicon MEMS gyroscope bias stability”, Solid-State and Integrated Circuit Technology (ICSICT), 2010 10TH IEEE International Conference on, IEEE, (Nov. 1, 2010), 1416-1418. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/742,994, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 24, 2015”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/742,994, Response filed Jan. 8, 2016 to Final Office Action mailed Nov. 24, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/755,953, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 28, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/813,443, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 4, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/813,443, Response filed Oct. 13, 2015 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 10, 2015”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,589, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 8, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,589, Response filed Oct. 19, 2015 to Final Office Action mailed Jul. 17, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,598, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 21, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,598, Response filed Oct. 7, 2015 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 7, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,619, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 13, 2015”, 11 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,793, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 24, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,793, Response filed Oct. 27, 2015 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 27, 2015”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,842, Corrected Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 19, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,853, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 25, 2016”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,853, Response filed Oct. 19, 2015 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/857,349, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 8, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/857,349, Response filed Jan. 8, 2016 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 8, 2015”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,869, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 15, 2015”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 14/023,869, Response filed Nov. 16, 2015 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 15, 2015”, 12 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180044919.5, Response filed Jan. 11, 2016 to Office Action mailed Jun. 25, 2015”, not in English, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180055630.3, Response filed Sep. 25, 2015 to Office Action mailed Jul. 10, 2015”, w/ English Claims, 14 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180055823.9, Office Action mailed Nov. 17, 2015”, w/ English Translation, 8 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180055845.5, Response filed Nov. 20, 2015 to Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2015”, With English Claims, 9 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201310115550.3, Response filed Sep. 30, 2015 to Office Action mailed May 22, 2015”, w/ English Claims, 15 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201310119730.9, Office Action mailed Jan. 29, 2016”, w/ English Translation, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201310119730.9, Response filed Sep. 18, 2015 to Office Action mailed May 4, 2015”, not in English, 5 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201310119806.8, Response filed Jan. 18, 2016 to Office Action mailed Jul. 3, 2015”, (English Translation of Claims), 11 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201310119986.X, Office Action mailed Dec. 18, 2015”, w/ English Translation, 6 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201310119986.X, Response filed Sep. 25, 2015 to Office Action mailed May 12, 2015”, w/ English Claims, 7 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201310120172.8, Office Action mailed Nov. 3, 2015”, w/ English Translation, 11 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201310127961.4, Response filed Sep. 2, 2015 to Office Action mailed May 6, 2015”, w/ English Claims, 19 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201310128046.7, Response filed Oct. 14, 2015 to Office Action mailed Jul. 23, 2015”, w/ English Claims, 23 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201310415336.X, Response filed Jan. 18, 2016 to Office Action mailed Jul. 3, 2015”, (English Translation of Claims), 11 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380007523.2, Office Action mailed Dec. 31, 2015”, w/ English Translation, 12 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380007577.9, Office Action mailed Dec. 21, 2015”, w/ English Translation, 9 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380007588.7, Response filed Oct. 26, 2015 to Office Action mailed Jun. 10, 2015”, w/ English Claims, 9 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380007615.0, Response filed Jan. 5, 2016 to Office Action mailed May 6, 2015”, w/ English Claims, 13 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380007615.0, Response filed Nov. 23, 2015 to Office Action mailed May 6, 2015”, With English Claims, 15 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13001694.2, Extended European Search Report mailed Oct. 2, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13001695.9, Response filed Aug. 24, 2015 to Extended European Search Report mailed Jan. 22, 2015”, 9 pgs. |
“European Application Serial No. 13001918.5, Extended European Search Report mailed Dec. 3, 2015”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,853, Notice of Allowance mailed May 20, 2016”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/821,853, Response filed Apr. 25, 2016 to Final Office Action Mailed Jan. 25, 2016”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/005,783 Preliminary Amendment Filed May 26, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380007523.2, Response filed May 31, 2016 to Office Action mailed Dec. 31, 2015”, with English translation of claims, 16 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201380007577.9, Response filed May 5, 2016 to Office Action mailed Dec. 21, 2015”, w/ English Claims, 17 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150185012 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13363537 | Feb 2012 | US |
Child | 14658579 | US |