The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or for the Government of the United States for all governmental purposes without the payment of any royalty.
The present document is related to the and commonly assigned patent application document “MEMS RF SWITCH”, AFD 729, Ser. No. 10/901,314, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,145,213; filed of even date herewith. The contents of this related even filing date document are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
MEMS technology has numerous applications in both commercial and military electrical systems. MEMS switches, for instance, can be used in routing radio frequency and microwave frequency signals in high frequency circuits. Some advantages of MEMS switches used in this manner over other active devices such as field effect transistors (FETS) and positive intrinsic negative (PIN) diodes include lower signal loss, higher signal isolation, and lower power consumption for switch activation (In this regard see for example E. R. Brown, “RF-MEMS Switches for Reconfigurable Integrated Circuits,” IEEE Trans. On Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 46, No. 11, November 1998, p. 1868-1880; J. Lee, et al. “Monolithic 2-18 GHz Low Loss, On-Chip Biased PIN Diode Switches,” IEEE Trans. On Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 43, February 1995, p. 250-255; M. Shokrani and V. J. Kapoor, “InGaAs Microwave Switch Transistors for Phase Shifter Circuits,” IEEE Trans. On Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 42, May 1994, p. 772-778.)
A MEMS package ideally should be economical in materials cost, space requirements, and incorporation technique. A MEMS packaging arrangement must protect the enclosed switch from structural damage and contaminants, allow handling, conform to the RF requirements of the host system, be low cost, and not impede the performance of the switch or circuit. Some estimates attribute more than 70% of overall device costs to packaging (see for example M. Madou, Fundamentals of Microfabrication, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., 1997, p. 378).
Several approaches exist for packaging MEMS switches. The “chip-in-a-box” approach entails dicing of un-released switch wafers, die attachment, interconnection, switch release, and lid seal. This process requires die level handling and release of switches inside the packages. A second approach is a wafer bonding arrangement that requires a capping wafer and a bonding ring around the switch (see e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,452,238, J. W. Orcutt, et al., “MEMS Wafer Level Package,” Sep. 17, 2002). Bonding arrangements may incorporate solder, eutectic, and epoxy materials. These arrangements involve low temperature processes and may result in a high aspect ratio device due to the combined thickness of the switch and the capping wafer.
The on-wafer encapsulation approach of the present invention encapsulates the switches during the fabrication process, thus eliminating die handling issues and bonding ring requirements. In principle, the encapsulation of the present invention is similar to transistor passivation and requires no additional footprint or special wafer handling. The present invention-encapsulated switches, may be diced, integrated and packaged along with other circuits of the system. The encapsulation approach is scalable to any size wafer.
The U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,082 of Liwei Lin et al. discloses a MEMS device of the electromechanical filter type that appears of interest with respect to the present invention. In
The U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,082 of Qing Ma et al. discloses an assemblage of semiconductor components into a solder-seal-ring-closed package. These components include film bulk acoustic resonators and MEMS switches. The emphasis of the Ma et al. disclosure centers around packaging semiconductor devices (referred to as microelectromechanical systems) by solder sealing two separate structures along a sealing ring extending around a cavity containing the microelectromechanical system. Ma et al. also teach use of surface mount techniques, including application of solder bumps to package the electrical components. Interconnection to the cavity is through via holes in the thinned Ma et al. wafer. The present invention however includes packaging of individual RF MEMS switches using a wafer scale approach built on surface micromachining procedures consistent with the fabrication of MEMS switches. No change in a normal fabrication technique is needed for the present invention. The present invention also does not require the use of vias or wafer thinning.
The present invention provides an integrated multi-step wafer-scale fabrication and packaging process for realizing individual RF MEMS switches. The packaging is directly integrated into the switch surface micromachining process used to build the RF MEMS switch. The achieved packaging is compatible with both capacitive and metal-to-metal contact switches.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an encapsulated MEMS switch process.
It is another object of the invention to provide an encapsulated MEMS switch process allowing for post processing operations such as wafer dicing, die pick-and-place, and die attach.
It is another object of the invention to provide a MEMS processing arrangement inclusive of the three major portions of switch fabrication, dielectric switch encapsulation and package sealing using a liquid or gaseous phase sequence.
It is another object of the invention to provide a MEMS switch packaging arrangement that is usable with either a metal-to-metal contact or a capacitive coupled switch arrangement.
It is another object of the invention to provide a MEMS switch packaging arrangement inclusive of a new encapsulation attachment materials combination.
It is another object of the invention to provide a MEMS switch packaging arrangement in which the environment within the MEMS enclosure can be freely selected to be that most favorable for switch operation.
It is another object of the invention to provide a MEMS switch process in which switch fabrication and frozen switch capping can be achieved in a single sequence.
It is another object of the invention to provide a MEMS switch in which switch package sealing can be accomplished by a plurality of different arrangements.
It is another object of the invention to provide a MEMS switch packaging process employing relatively low temperature materials, materials having processing temperatures compatible with the MEMS switch.
It is another object of the invention to provide a MEMS switch fabrication and packaging process in which temperatures not exceeding 270° C. are used.
It is another object of the invention to provide a MEMS switch enclosure process in which dielectric materials are used in order to avoid signal transmission line perturbations attending metallic material enclosures.
It is another object of the invention to provide a MEMS switch enclosure process in which internal pressures above vacuum level are achievable in order to provide permanent physical damping for moving switch components.
These and other objects of the invention will become apparent as the description of the representative embodiments proceeds.
These and other objects of the invention are achieved by the limited temperature organic photoresist coating materials based MEMS switch realization method comprising the steps of:
fabricating metallic elements of said switch in a sequence of photoresist coating, masking, exposing and etching steps ending with MEMS switch elements being held captive on an insulating substrate in a sacrificial layer of said photoresist coating materials;
enclosing said captive switch elements in a dielectric shell using additional of said photoresist coating, masking, exposing and etching steps compatible with both said fabricating step photoresist coating, masking, exposing and etching steps and with structure formed during said fabricating step photoresist coating, masking, exposing and etching steps;
said enclosing step including forming in said dielectric shell a plurality of apertures communicating from outside to inside thereof;
wet releasing said switch elements from captivity within said dielectric shell by said sacrificial layer of said photoresist coating materials by way of reagent received through said plurality of apertures communicating from outside to inside of said dielectric shell;
covering said plurality of apertures communicating from outside to inside of said dielectric shell with a coating material temperature compatible with said switch elements and with said dielectric shell.
The accompanying drawings incorporated in and forming a part of the specification, illustrate several aspects of the present invention and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings:
The following detailed description of the invention is divided according to the major steps in fabricating a MEMS radio frequency switch device according to the invention. These major steps are generally identified as switch metal fabrication, dielectric switch encapsulation and switch sealing using a liquid or gaseous phase sequence as have been heretofore identified herein. The process described herein accomplishes a capacitance operated MEMS switch; the process is however equally relevant to a metal contact switch.
RF Metal Process
RF metal defines the bottom contact in a capacitive switch arrangement according to the invention. The metal thickness used determines the power handling capability of the switch. High power switches require thick metal (greater than 1 micrometer) that in turn requires planarization processing. Fabrication of an RF metal layer is preferably accomplished according to the steps represented in the
By way of explanation, in the following description each fabrication step is provided with a plurality of identifications and correlation keys with an associated drawing of this document. For example each step in this description includes one or more references to a drawing FIG. This FIG. reference in most instances also includes use of a identifier having a numerical value in accordance with the drawing number involved—including a hundreds digit corresponding to the drawing number (e.g. the numerical identifier 802 appears in an individual drawing of
The MEMS switch fabrication sequence may include the following steps.
Fabrication begins in
Spin coat the wafer substrate 100 with one coat of a photo-imagable PolydiMethylGlutarImide (PMGI) polymer photoresist 102 such as Micro Chem. Corp. NANO PMGI SF-11 photoresist,
Spin coat the wafer substrate with one coat of a photo-imagable positive photoresist such as Shipley Microposit S-1813 photoresist 104,
Using an I-line stepper or contact lithography system, expose the coated wafer substrate 100 to an appropriate RF Metal mask and develop the S-1813 resist 104 using a diluted sodium hydroxide based developer such as Shipley Microposit 351 developer,
Expose the patterned wafer substrate 100 to Deep Ultra Violet (DUV) light and develop the SF-11 resist 102 using a tetraethylammonium hydroxide solution such as Micro Chem Corp. Nano-PMGI 101 developer,
Coat the wafer substrate 100 with evaporated metal such as titanium/gold (TiAu), 200 Å Ti/3000 Å Au 106. The titanium is used as an adhesion layer and could be replaced with chromium (Cr),
Lift-off the excess metal using tape and dissolve the S-1813 resist 104 using acetone, followed by an isopropyl alcohol rinse and De-Ionized (DI) water rinse,
Strip the SF-11 photo resist 102 using a hot (90° C.) 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone stripper such as Shipley 1165 remover, followed by a De-Ionized (DI) water rinse and nitrogen dry,
RF Dielectric Process
The RF dielectric defines the capacitance of the switch in the “closed”-state. Processing steps involving the RF dielectric appear in the
Coat the
Spin coat the wafer with one coat PMGI photoresist (SF-11) 202, cure at 270° C.,
Spin coat the wafer with one coat of positive photoresist (S-1813) 204, cure at 110° C.,
Using an I-line stepper or contact lithography system, expose the coated wafer to an appropriate RF Dielectric mask and develop the S-1813 resist 204 using a diluted developer (351:DI),
Expose the patterned wafer to deep ultraviolet light and develop the SF-11 resist 202 using Nano-101 developer,
Etch the exposed thin-film dielectric film 200 using a dry or wet chemical etch,
Strip the S-1813 resist 204 using an acetone rinse followed by an isopropyl alcohol and DI water rinse
Strip the SF-11 resist 202 using hot (90° C.) 1165 remover,
Sacrificial Layer Process
In the present invention a sacrificial post determines the gap height of the switch and its capacitance in the movable member-up-state. To explain in more detail, fabrication of a MEMS switch (i.e., having a bridge or cantilever beam) requires a sacrificial layer to support the suspended portion of the beam during processing. This sacrificial layer is herein referred-to as the post layer. The completed post is shown as layer 312 in
Spin coat the wafer with one coat of PMGI photoresist (SF-11),
Spin coat the wafer with one coat of positive photoresist (S-1813), 306 in
Using an I-line stepper or a contact lithography system, expose the coated wafer to the Sacrificial Layer mask and develop the S-1813 resist 306 using a diluted developer (351:DI),
Expose the PMGI (SF-11) resist 300, 302 and 304 to deep ultraviolet light and develop the SF-11 resist 300, 302 and 304 using Nano-PMGI-101 developer,
Strip the S-1813 resist 306 using acetone followed by an isopropyl alcohol rinse and a DI water rinse;
Reflow the PMGI coating layers 300, 302 and 304 in a 250° C. hot air oven. The reflow step achieves a uniform sloped sidewall, 310 in
Bridge Metal Process
Bridge metal defines the top, movable portion of the present invention switch. The careful choice of bridge metallization minimizes curling of the switch. (See for example K. Leedy, et al, “Metallization Schemes for RF MEMS Switches”, J. Vacuum Science Technology A 21(4) July/August 2003, pp. 1172-1177.)
Spin coat the
Spin coat the wafer with one coat of a positive resist (S-1813) 402, cure at 110° C.,
Using an I-line stepper or contact lithography system, expose the coated wafer to the Bridge Metal mask and develop the S-1813 resist 402 using a diluted developer (351:DI),
Develop the LOR-10 photoresist 400 using a tetramethylammonium hydroxide developer such as Shipley Microposit developer LDD-26W. This developer should not interact with the existing PMGI sacrificial post resist 312,
Aa. Coat the patterned wafer with a thin metal film such as 7000 Å of evaporated Au 404 in
Ab. Lift-off the excess metal using tape and remove the S-1813 resist 402 using acetone, followed by an isopropyl alcohol rinse and a DI water rinse. The completed Bridge Metal step is shown in
Cap Sacrificial Layer Process
The cap sacrificial layer defines the region to be covered by the encapsulating shell. The thickness of the sacrificial layer determines the inner shell height over the switch. This process covers the captive switch and should not compromise the existing structures.
The ability to stack sacrificial layer materials such as photoresist on the
Ac. Spin coat the
Ad. Spin-coat the wafer with one coat of positive photoresist (S-1813) 506, cure at 110° C.,
Ae. Using an I-line stepper or contact lithography system, expose the coated wafer to the Cap Sacrificial mask and develop the S-1813 resist 506 using diluted developer (351:DI),
Af. Expose the PMGI SF-11 resist 500, 502 and 504 to deep ultraviolet light and develop the SF-11 resist 500, 502 and 504 using Nano-101 developer,
Ag. Strip the S-1813 resist 506 using acetone followed by an isopropyl alcohol rinse and DI water rinse,
Ah. Strip the remaining lift-off resist (LOR-10) 400 using a tetramethylammonium hydroxide developer such as Shipley Microposit developer LDD-26W, followed by a DI water rinse and nitrogen dry,
Ai. Reflow the PMGI coated wafer in a 250° C. hot air oven. This reflow provides a uniform sloped sidewall 508 required for the capping layer step coverage. The reflow process should not exceed 250° C. to minimize impact on the existing PMGI films 312. The exposure time for this reflow temperature is preferably made somewhat short in the interest of damage avoidance to the underlying layers of a device; exposure times in the range of 60 to 300 seconds are thus found to be practical. No adverse impacts on the existing films have been observed. The completed second sacrificial layer step is shown in
Capping Layer Process
The capping layer defines the dielectric shell that will enclose the RF MEMS switch. This step also defines access holes or tunnels within the dielectric shell allowing for removal of the sacrificial layer photoresist of the shell and the switch. Access holes are shown in
Aj. Coat the
The sputtered silicon nitride used in the cap at 602 has undergone extensive deposition development. Silicon nitride thin films may be fabricated by reactive RF sputtering using a 99.999% pure Si target with a Denton Vacuum Discovery-18 type of magnetron sputtering system and a base vacuum of 5×10−6 Pa. A mass flow regulated Ar—N2 sputtering pressure of 0.53 Pa and 400 watts of forward power result in a nominal deposition rate of 0.13 nm/s. The N2 partial flow rate (the ratio of the nitrogen flow rate to the total flow rate of nitrogen and argon) is 50%. Deposited films for the shell cap at 602 are 1670 nm thick and have an intrinsic compressive stress of 102 MPa.
Ak. Spin coat the dielectric coated wafer with one coat of positive photoresist (S-1818) 606, cure at 110° C.,
Al. Using an I-line stepper or contact lithography system, expose the coated wafer to the Capping Layer mask and develop the S-1818 resist 606 using a diluted developer (351:DI),
Am. Etch the exposed thick film dielectric at 602 using a dry or wet chemical etch,
An. Strip the S-1818 resist 606 using acetone followed by an isopropyl alcohol rinse and a DI water rinse,
Ao. Strip all the remaining PMGI SF-11 photoresist 508 and 312 using a hot (90° C.) 1165 stripper,
Ap. Immediately rinse the wafer in a submersion bath of isopropyl alcohol. Repeat the isopropyl alcohol bath step 3-4 times. Rinse the wafer in a bath of methanol. Repeat the methanol bath rinse step 3-4 times. Complete the release step by using a carbon dioxide critical point dry. The completed Capping Layer step with released RF MEMS switch is shown in
Although not expressly shown in the drawings the access tunnels of
PECVD Sealing Process
The Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD) process may be used to seal the access holes and tunnels of the encapsulation shell.
Aq. Bake out the
Ar. Spin coat the wafer with one coat of positive photoresist (S-1818) 702 in
As. Using an I-line stepper or contact lithography system, expose the coated wafer to the Sealing Layer mask and develop the S-1818 resist 702 using a diluted developer (351:DI),
At. Etch the exposed thick film dielectric at 704 in
Au. Strip the S-1818 resist 702 using acetone followed by an isopropyl alcohol rinse and a DI water rinse,
Spin-on-Glass Sealing Process
The spin-on-glass process may also be used to seal the access holes in the encapsulation shell. The low viscosity of the spin-on-glass minimizes penetration into the access holes or tunnels. (See for example H. Elderstig and P. Wallgren; “Spin deposition of polymers over holes and cavities”, Sensors and Actuators A 46-46, 1995, pg. 95-97.)
Av. Spin coat the
Aw. Spin coat the wafer with a thick positive photoresist, 802 in
Ax. Using an I-line stepper or contact lithography system, expose the AZ-9260 resist-coated wafer to the Sealing mask and develop the AZ-9260 photoresist with a diluted potassium hydroxide developer such as Hoechst Celanese Corp. AZ-400K,
Ay. Etch the patterned spin-on-glass 800 using a dry or wet chemical etch,
Az. Strip the AZ-9260 photoresist 802 using acetone followed by an isopropyl alcohol rinse. The completed spin-on-glass sealing process is shown in
Epoxy Sealing Process
This alternate sealing process involves deposition of epoxy droplets onto individual switch caps. For this process, a dam can be fabricated around the switch to contain the epoxy however epoxy sealing without such a dam is also feasible. This process may also be used as an alternative after step An above.
Aaa. For the epoxy sealing process, the sacrificial layers at 312 and 508 are not initially removed.
Aab. Spin coat the wafer with a thick negative photoresist such as MicroChem. Nano SU-8-2007, 900 in
Aac. Using an I-line stepper or contact lithography system, expose the coated wafer to the Sealing Ring mask and develop the Nano SU-8-2007 using an ethyl lactate and diacetone alcohol developer such as MicroChem SU-8 Developer,
Aad. Strip the remaining PMGI SF-11 photoresist 508 and 312 using 90° C. 1165 stripper. Immediately rinse the wafer in several baths (3-4) of isopropyl alcohol, followed by rinsing in baths of Methanol, and a carbon dioxide critical point dry,
Aae. Coat the switch shells with an epoxy sealant 902 such as OptoCast 3401 or 3410 supplied by Electronics Materials Corp. Cure the epoxy using UV light followed by a 125° C. bake. The completed epoxy sealing process is shown in
Comparative Discussion
Now that the foregoing formal description of a MEMS capacitance coupled radio frequency switch device and fabrication sequence has been disclosed, it may be helpful to an appreciation of the invention to consider several differences between the disclosed fabrication sequence and the fabricated device in comparison with the more conventional fabrication sequences and devices of similar general nature as are known in the art.
Readers familiar with the MEMS device art will for example appreciate that the device fabricated in the disclosed sequence is of an electrical switch nature as opposed to a transducer or other MEMS device and that such MEMS switches are attended by a somewhat unique collection of characteristics and susceptibilities. First among these characteristics and susceptibilities is a sensitivity to normal semiconductor device fabrication temperatures, temperatures in the 900° C. region for example. Temperatures of this magnitude and even lower (but especially higher temperatures) are found to be destructive to the metal components of a MEMS switch device in that they result in warping or distortion of previously fabricated switch metal components.
In addition to temperature sensitivity it appears significant that the disclosed fabrication sequence enables the use of silicon oxide, silicon nitride and other dielectric materials in the fabrication of the switch device. These especially useful materials are excluded from possible employment in many MEMS devices that are dependent on hydrofluoric acid etching steps in achieving release of a stabilized transducer or other element for example or for other processing steps. A wet hydrofluoric acid etch removal would typically require a water rinse to remove all acid; any water rinse employed can however be catastrophic to a MEMS switch structure. Use of hydrofluoric acid also precludes the use of many dielectrics in the switch and shell including silicon dioxide, SiO2, silicon nitride, Si3N4 and alumina, Al2O3; this is especially true for a switch dielectric where precise thickness and integrity should be maintained. Thus in the above disclosed processing sequence a release of switch elements from their bound state by an organic material using an organic solvent rather than an acid, is for example employed.
A notable attribute of the present invention MEMS switch processing is the achieved seamless merging of switch formation, dielectric enclosure and dielectric enclosure sealing operations in a single integrated processing sequence, a sequence performable at the integral wafer level of MEMS fabrication as opposed to during individual die processing. Notably the photoresists and other materials involved in closure of the MEMS package and sealing of the closed package are either the same as those already employed in the fabrication of switch elements or of compatibility with these already employed materials.
Switch Operation
MEMS radio frequency switches are typically fabricated in a coplanar waveguide configuration as shown in the scanning electron microscope-produced microphotograph of
Operation of the
The purpose of the encapsulation layer 602 is to protect the switch from environmental contamination, i.e. dust and moisture. The encapsulation layer does not interfere with switch motion or degrade RF performance.
Process Demonstration
The Fabrication Process described herein has been exercised in a class 100 clean room device fabrication facility. The following microphotograph-representing images describe graphically some of the results reached in developing this fabrication process. Notably the fabrication process integrates RF MEMS switches with dielectric shells. The radio frequency test measurements included in these results show the presence of a dielectric shell does not degrade switch performance.
Several methods may be used to seal the access holes or tunnels in the switch package of the present invention. The primary sealing approach using Plasma Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition (PECVD) achieves the sealing configuration shown in the
Several alternatives in materials and processes may be employed in achieving the invention. These include the following:
Other high resistivity substrates, such as quartz, GaAs, or Si may be used.
Other materials may be used to seal the holes in the dielectric cap; materials such as Dow Corning Q1-4939 silicone; Honeywell Accuglass 512B; Electronic Materials Inc. OptoCast 3500 or 3600 series epoxies; Thermoset glob-top encapsulants; or solder shots.
A thin, stiff template similar to a shadow mask (such as made from stainless steel or other metal) could be made to include holes over the cap areas needing to be sealed. The template could be placed over the wafer containing the nitride caps and the sealing material, such as epoxy, could be flowed across the top of the caps with a squeegee or similar applicator.
A dry process can also be used to seal the access holes. Following an oven bake-out, a film is laminated over the encapsulated wafer and is heat cured. The sealed wafer is then patterned and the film removed from the contact pad areas.
A reflow process can also be used for access hole sealing. In this process, following an oven-bake out, glass or other frit beads are deposited on the wafer and reflowed to form a continuous film over the shells. The sealed wafer could then also be coated with photoresist, patterned, and etched to remove the glass film from the contact pad areas.
Once the RF MEMS switches are capped and access holes sealed additional process steps can be followed to hermetically seal the switch if required. For the case of the non-hermetic epoxy sealed cap, bake-out of the epoxy can be done in a controlled environment. A hermetic over-seal cap may then be placed on the individual switches as the next stage of the process. The individual devices can then be separated after wafer dicing and handled by conventional methods, such as by pick-and-place techniques. An attribute of the present invention is that it is multi-step in nature and allows for the possibility of hermetic sealing if needed.
The present invention represents an integrated multi-step wafer-level process tailored to the fabrication and encapsulation of RF MEMS switches. The encapsulation arrangement is compatible with the switch fabrication process and utilizes the same sacrificial photoresist for both the device and dielectric shell. The sacrificial photoresist for the dielectric shell is cured at a lower temperature than the switch sacrificial layer to minimize secondary reflow of the switch sacrificial layer. The approach inherently protects the RF MEMS switch with sacrificial photoresist until the final process step when all the sacrificial photoresist is removed. Specifically, the dielectric encapsulant and RF MEMS devices are released simultaneously as a photoresist stripper penetrates cylindrical through-holes or tunnels patterned into the dielectric shell. A separate fabrication step seals the holes or tunnels in the dielectric shell to fully encapsulate each MEMS structure on the wafer. RF MEMS switches have been fabricated and released concurrently with a perforated silicon nitride shell covering them. The measured RF performance of suspended switches when tested up to 26 GHz does not show degradation due to the presence of the dielectric encapsulant.
The present invention involves a multi-step encapsulation method in which the shell is formed using a sputtered dielectric material such as silicon nitride or alumina. This shell has photo-lithographically defined access holes that are used to simultaneously release both the RF MEMS switch and the shell sacrificial photoresist. The access holes are sealed using silicon oxide or spin-on-glass or an epoxy layer. The resulting switches are sealed at atmospheric pressure or below atmospheric pressure and can thus provide sealed-in air for switch damping. In addition, the choice of photoresists and associated curing temperatures distinguish the present process.
The present invention concept is thus believed unique for the following reasons: (1) it allows for simultaneous release of both the MEMS switch and the dielectric encapsulating shell; (2) it provides options for sealing the dielectric shell access holes; (3) it is suitable for RF MEMS switch encapsulation, specifically the dielectric shell does not impede the RF performance of the devices; (4) the individual packaged switches can then be diced (or handled) and are suitable for further incorporation into an electronic circuit; (5) the sputtering technique used to deposit silicon nitride results in structurally sound cap shells; and (6) a multi-step concept has been demonstrated.
While the apparatus and method herein described constitute a preferred embodiment of the invention, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to this precise form of apparatus or method and that changes may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention, which is defined in the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/573,892 filed May 24, 2004. The contents of this provisional application are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5090254 | Guckel et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5589082 | Lin et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
6118164 | Seefeldt et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133807 | Akiyama et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6444135 | Hanabe et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452124 | York et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452238 | Orcutt et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6472739 | Wood et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6621387 | Hopcroft | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635509 | Ouellet | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6673697 | Ma et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6686820 | Ma et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
7102472 | Nathanson et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
20020075094 | Bechtle et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020171517 | Guo et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030047533 | Reid et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030155643 | Friedhoff | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040173886 | Carley | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050074919 | Patel et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60573892 | May 2004 | US |