Further features and advantages of the disclosed embodiments may become apparent by reference to the detailed description when considered in conjunction with the figures, which are not to scale, wherein like reference numbers indicate like elements through the several views, and wherein:
With reference to
The DRIE process (and other similar processes) generates heat, which may result in undesirable effects with respect to polymeric substances deposited on the wafer surface 12. For example, layers, such as organic photoresist layer 14, are typically used to provide an etch mask for the DRIE process. The photoresist layer 14 is deposited on the wafer surface 12 before DRIE is performed and is removed subsequent to the DRIE step. The wafer 10 also includes an etch stop layer 16 positioned between the dielectric layer 4 and the wafer 10 to prevent the DRIE process from etching onto the dielectric layer 4 of the electrostatic chuck 2. Since the DRIE process generates heat, the wafer 10 may have a temperature increase that causes the organic photoresist layer 14 to crosslink, thereby making the photoresist layer 14 very difficult to remove after the DRIE step is completed. The presence of undesirable residual photoresist layer material on the wafer may result in an uneven wafer surface 12, thereby affecting the subsequent adhesion of other layers, such as those used for making micro-fluid ejection heads, to the wafer surface 12.
Various exemplary embodiments described herein may offer ways to avoid undesirable heating and/or the resultant uneven surface effects caused by lingering photoresist residue.
In the embodiment shown in
In prior electrostatic chuck designs, the bulk of the heat transfer was by conduction from the wafer 10 through the dielectric layer 4 and the electrode layer 6 to the fluid circulating in heat exchangers 28. However, more effective heat transfer may be provided by convective heat transfer from the wafer 10, as described more fully herein, rather than by conductive heat transfer alone through the dielectric layer 4 and electrode layer 6.
Without being bound by theory, some basic equations are given below for the principles described herein. An electrostatic clamping force (F) applied to an object such as wafer 10 may be derived from Equation 1 as follows:
F=A×P=[ε
o/2×[(Vεr)/(d+εrg)] (Eq. 1)
F=electrostatic clamping force
A=surface area
P=electrostatic pressure
εo=vacuum dielectric constant
V=voltage across the dielectric
εr=relative constant of the dielectric
g=gap distance between the substrate and the dielectric
d=dielectric thickness
Thermal conduction (qcond) is described by Equation 2 below, wherein “dX” represents, in its integrated form, distance between the boundaries of a particular heat transfer zone.
q
cond
=−kAdT/dX (Eq. 2)
Equation 2 suggests that an increase in distance for heat transfer to take place correlates to a decrease in thermal conductivity via conduction. However, contrary to conventional wisdom, when an etch stop layer (like etch stop layer 16 in
A number or pertinent equations illustrating convective heat transfer and the factors that play a role in convective heat transfer are shown below as follows:
qconv=hcAΔT (Eq. 3)
h
c=convection coefficient=(k/L)NuL (Eq. 4)
Nu
L=0.664(Pr)1/3(ReL)1/2 (Eq. 5)
Pr=v/α=C
p
μ/k (Eq. 6)
v=kinematic viscosity measured in m2/s
Cp=specific heat measured in J/Kg-° K
μ=dynamic viscosity measured in Kg/m-s
α=thermal diffusivity measured in m2/s
Re
L
=μ
∞
L/v=ρμ∞L/μ (Eq. 7)
ρ=density measured in Kg/m3
μ∞=free stream velocity measured in (m/s)
h
c=(k4Cp2μ2μ∞3/L3v3)1/6 (Eq. 8)
h
c=(k6v2ρ3μ∞3/L3α2μ3)1/6 (Eq. 9)
While not desiring to be bound by theory, an explanation for the difference in heat transfer described above appears to be threefold as follows:
There is additional evidence to suggest that convective heat transfer is a more efficient mode of cooling the wafer. Convection is at work in the example described above. During certain experiments, when a helium source (similar to heat transfer fluid source 26 in
In addition to the evidence discussed so far that convection is the primary mode of heat transfer in the experimental results discussed above, experiments were conducted in which helium pressure within the wafer cooling zone 30 was doubled. After the pressure was raised from about 10 torr to about 20 torr the temperature of the wafer 10 decreased from about 95° degrees Centigrade to about 70° C. degrees Centigrade. Based on the equations listed above, a change in pressure should have no effect on conductive heat transfer. However, a change in pressure will directly affect convection convective heat transfer as shown in Equation 7 with reference to fluid density “ρ”. Therefore, the primary mode of heat transfer in the example given above again appears to be convection, not conduction. Hence, a change in helium pressure supports the belief that convective heat transfer is a more effective means of cooling the wafer 10.
Based on the experimental results described above, the present inventors identified a need to maximize convective heat transfer within the wafer cooling zone 30.
With reference to the equations listed above, the factors that may be increased in order to increase convective heat transfer in the wafer cooling zone 30 include the surface area (A) of heat transfer fluid in contact with wafer 10, a difference in temperature (ΔT) between boundary points in the wafer cooling zone 30, a thermal conductivity (k) of the heat transfer fluid, the specific heat (Cp) of the heat transfer fluid, the free stream velocity (μ∞,) and the fluid density (ρ). One factor that may be minimized includes a length (L) across which convective heat transfer is occurring.
In order to increase the area (A) for heat transfer between the wafer 10 and the electrostatic chuck 2 using the heat transfer fluid, physical changes to the electrostatic chuck 2 may be made. Similar physical changes to an electrostatic chuck may be made to affect the free stream velocity (μ∞) the fluid density (ρ), the length (L) of the dielectric layer 4, and the (ΔT) between boundary points in the wafer cooling zone 30. These physical changes are discussed below with regard to various exemplary embodiments of a wafer processing apparatus. Changes to the heat transfer fluid itself such as thermal conductivity (k) and specific heat (Cp) may all be altered by changing various process parameters as described in more detail below.
With reference again to
The electrostatic chuck 2 shown in
The electrostatic chuck 2 in the embodiment shown in
In a related embodiment, the apparatus 32 may also include a feedback control system 48. The feedback control system 48 may monitor the electrostatic clamping force as defined in Equation 1 and/or the pressure of the heat transfer fluid within the wafer cooling zone 30 Those skilled in the art appreciate that the pressure as measured within the cooling zone 30 is directly proportional to the heat transfer fluid density (ρ), defined in Equation 7. In this embodiment, the feedback control system 48 may have the capability to manipulate both the clamping force and the heat transfer fluid pressure by controlling electrical flow to the plurality of electrodes 40 and heat transfer fluid flow rate to the wafer cooling zone 30, respectively. By controlling the clamping force and/or the heat transfer fluid flow rate into the cooling zone 30, the feedback control system 48 may effectively control the flow rate of the heat transfer fluid through the cooling zone 30, thereby directly affecting the free stream velocity (μ28 ) and the fluid density (ρ). By increasing both or either of the free stream velocity (μ∞) and the fluid density (ρ), convective heat transfer is increased as shown by Equations 3, 8, and 9 above.
In an exemplary embodiment, electrostatic chucks like electrostatic chuck 2 include a conductive cooling system including heat exchangers 28 for circulating a cooling fluid through the electrode layer 6 for conductive cooling of the dielectric layer 4 and wafer 10. Heat exchangers 28 are located, in part, within the electrode layer 6 to provide the conductive cooling. In an exemplary embodiment, the heat exchangers 28 include a liquid coolant circuit wherein the liquid cooling agent used therein has properties similar to or identical to a silicon-based heat transfer fluid available from Dow Chemical Company of Midland, Mich., under the trade name SYLTHERM.
In another exemplary embodiment, the dielectric layer 4 includes a plurality of convection orifices 42 as shown in
In addition to the various embodiments of the apparatus 32 described above, another exemplary embodiment includes a method for making a micro-fluid ejection head structure. For illustrative purposes, the electrostatic chuck 2 and wafer 10 as shown in
In the method described above, the heat transfer fluid used might be a forming gas, wherein the forming gas includes, but is not limited to, a gas mixture of helium and hydrogen. A forming gas, as understood herein, includes from about 90 percent to about 99 percent helium and from about 1 percent to about 10 percent hydrogen by volume. The forming gas might be desirable because of its nonvolatile properties, its very high specific heat (Cp) value, and its relatively high thermal conductivity (k). The presence of only about 5 percent hydrogen by volume in the forming gas is capable of increasing convective heat transfer by almost 30 percent as compared to using substantially pure helium. This is true because hydrogen has a very high specific heat (Cp) value.
In other related embodiments, the heat transfer fluid used in the method described above may be substantially pure helium, substantially pure hydrogen, or other fluids with similar thermal properties. If substantially pure hydrogen is used, heat transfer by convection is theoretically improved by almost 600 percent as compared to the use of pure helium. However, the use of the forming gas allows for the benefit of some hydrogen being present without the negative effects such as high reactivity when using higher concentrations of hydrogen.
In another exemplary embodiment of the method described above, the heat transfer fluid is allowed to leak from the wafer cooling zone 30 at a desired rate In an exemplary embodiment, the leak rate is controlled using the feedback control system 48 shown in
In a related embodiment, heat transfer fluid may also be allowed to leak through a reclamation port, such as a valve or other similar device known to those skilled in the art. The presence of the reclamation port allows for the pressure of the heat transfer fluid to be increased without forcing the wafer 10 off of the electrostatic chuck 2. By increasing the pressure, the flow rate of the heat transfer fluid is increased, thereby increasing convective heat transfer as shown by equations 3 and 8 above. Moreover, heat transfer fluid leakage along the edge of the wafer becomes less necessary because heat transfer fluid is allowed to escape through the reclamation port, thereby allowing the necessary convective heat transfer. Increasing the clamping force allows for the heat transfer fluid pressure to be increased without forcing the wafer 10 off of the electrostatic chuck 2. As stated above with reference to equations 3 and 8, increased heat transfer fluid pressure translates into increased convective heat transfer.
In yet another embodiment, a method is provided similar to the methods described above, but further including a step for cooling the heat transfer fluid, such as using heat exchangers 28 shown in
In a related embodiment in which the wafer 10 includes, for example, a plurality of micro-fluid ejection head substrates, the method includes a step of dicing the wafer 10 to separate at least some of the substrates from the wafer. After dicing the wafer 10, the individual substrates may be used to form more complex structures, such as fluid ejection heads in fluid ejection devices such as, for example, ink jet printers.
In another exemplary embodiment, the methods described above include clamping a wafer to an electrostatic chuck and flowing heat transfer fluid through the three dimensional space within the wafer cooling zone 30. Additionally the method might includes a step of etching partially through the wafer 10 such as by using DRIE. By not etching completely through the wafer 10, the need for an etch stop layer such as etch stop layer 16 could be circumvented.
According to the foregoing procedure, the etch distance 52 may range from about sixty percent to about ninety-five percent of the overall average thickness of the wafer 10. During the etching step, the wafer 10 is cooled using one or more of the other method steps and apparatus described above. The wafer 10 is subsequently removed from the electrostatic chuck 2 and the remaining distance 54 is ground off to open features 50 through the wafer 10. By using the steps outlined in this embodiment a number of steps are eliminated including, but not limited to, an initial grinding step before the etching step, the step of adding the etch stop layer 16 to the wafer 10, and the step of removing the etch stop layer 16 from the etched wafer 10.
Having described various aspects and embodiments of the disclosure and several advantages thereof, it will be recognized by those of ordinary skills that the embodiments described herein are susceptible to various modifications, substitutions and revisions within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60828906 | Oct 2006 | US |