A method and device for measuring the flatness of a metal product
The present invention relates to a method for measuring the flatness of a metal product such as a strip or a plate and an associated device according to the preambles of claims 1 and 12.
There is a device for measuring the flatness of a metal strip in a metallurgical processing line, in particular intended to be rolled. An example originating from the present applicant consists of a roll (known as a Planicim™ roll or other roll commonly called a “Shapemeter roll”) measuring variations in forces applied to a set of points in the cross-section of a strip traveling over said measuring roll. In this way, said forces can be compared to longitudinal tractions applied to the strip, but also more schematically to strands (per transverse measuring point) of a strip positioned between the strip edges. This measuring roll has exceptional measuring quality for strips traveling under traction, since they are mainly subjected to tractions when measuring flatness. This device is however more limited when there is a need to measure not a strip (with a maximum thickness of ˜10 mm) but a thicker plate.
In this respect, another system operates to measure the flatness of very thick plates (for example from 5 mm to more than 150 mm). This laser measuring device also represents considerable cost and, like the other preceding devices, it may thus be found to be financially senseless even to reach its measuring limits for strip flatness measurements when said strip is in a phase not associated with external (longitudinal) tractions. In fact, it is found that, with no or at least very little strip traction, strip strands (from the center to the edges) present highly specific artifacts making it impossible to measure a minute residual traction value and thus make a good assessment of flatness as with the principle of the measuring roll for a strip under traction.
Another known method for measuring flatness consists in measuring an amplitude vibration of a flat metal product under longitudinal traction resulting from the vibration excitation of said product generated by alternating pulse suction on the product traveling across a pneumatic unit (see applicant's publication EP2344286). Similarly, this method requires the presence of external traction on the product to hold it on each side of the excited portion. This external traction may thus induce uncertainty in the measurement of the real intrinsic traction of the product which the present invention is attempting to measure.
Finally, an alternative for measuring the flatness of a metal product consists, according to JP20110099821, in projecting a light matrix onto a portion of the surface of the metal product consisting of binary coded optical information (of the fringe or checkerboard type, “in black and white”) and a display system (CCD camera) making an acquisition of a two-dimensional image of the matrix projected, which, in the event of non-flatness of the product in the form of a local wave, makes it possible to record phase shifts between the fringes or checkerboards projected and those of an ideal reference network (of a flat surface). On the basis of these measurements of phase variations, the flatness of the illuminated/displayed surface zone of the product is calculated. In the case of a traveling product (for example a strip traveling at more than 150 m/min), it would, however, be necessary, for such a measurement system, to stop the traveling strip in order to perform a measurement, otherwise the phase measurements are no longer relevant. Even though this method seems not to introduce external traction on the product, this aspect of immobilization of the product is very awkward for continuously running or alternating/reversible installations, requiring at least constant (and if possible maximum) movement of the product. In the case of a metal product which is not very reflective or even being hot-rolled (at least 400° C.), it is found to be more difficult to obtain an adequate light signal-to-noise ratio on a large surface of the product illuminated by the matrix projected.
An object of the present invention is to propose a method for measuring the flatness of a metal product not by default subjected to any (external) traction at the point of measurement on the processing line where it is located, but able by extension, however, to undergo (external) traction. This therefore involves proposing a more universal system, simple and dynamically more efficient than those set out above.
Proposing an associated device making it possible to implement this method is a second object of the invention while guaranteeing, among other things, its simplicity, its reduced cost and its high measurement dynamics.
The invention thus proposes a method for measuring the flatness of a metal product and an associated device to implement it.
Said method for measuring the flatness of a metal product in the form of either a strip or a plate from a metallurgical processing line, said product to be measured being, by default, free of external traction, thus comprises the following steps:
In fact, without any external traction action, and in the case when the product is, at its simplest, positioned on a conveyor belt or table, the product no longer presents intrinsic properties in terms of flatness which are presented as strands under different internal stresses and therefore under different lengths. Given that the strands are physically side by side, the result is that the longest strands form bumps and hollows visible on the surface (these bumps and hollows being able to run from about one cm to more than 30 cm in length for products such as a strip with dimensions of 2 m×1 km and 2 mm thick, for example). It appears that these effects which we have called here (local) waves or undulations are flatness measurement values and that, under a lighting plane which is oblique in relation to the metal surface of the product and doubly oblique in relation to the plane of display of the illuminated surface, they induce differences in light reflection in relation to an ideally flat metal surface. Thus, knowing that a light line capture has been performed and in the case of a bump or hollow cutting this line, reductions or (re-)increases in the light intensity of the line observed will be recorded. The condition for obtaining such a condition is that the line or at least the light strip projected cuts, and therefore is not parallel to, the light line whose image has been captured.
Finally, the direction of the strand is preferably selected along the length of the product, but it is quite possible to choose it to be more oblique or even transverse on the product so as to be able also to measure flatness defects more spread across the width of the metal strip/plate. This aspect of the invention of being able to choose the direction of the strands measured also makes it possible to make the measurement of non-flatness more dynamically suitable for evaluating a transverse tile-effect defect in the product, but also other more longitudinal non-flatness defects, the waves of which detected one after the other on a strand present variable lengths (or periods).
At its simplest in a metallurgical line or a test bench, the method according to the invention provides that the illuminated portion extends at least over the width of the product and the strand direction selected is along the length of the product. This aspect makes it possible simply to make the product travel opposite an illumination/display assembly (corresponding to steps a) and b) mentioned previously). Thus, a relative movement between the product and the assembly comprising the means of illumination and image capture is implemented either by travel of the product in the line, or by movement of said means for a product which is motionless in the line.
In practice, the illuminated portion of slender shape over the width of the product is generated by a light source such as, at its simplest, at least one laser source or a strip light comprising at least one light source placed opposite the product which is traveling relative to said source or the strip light. The illumination (strip light or point source) and display assembly is then arranged in an optical triangulation configuration opposite the product. In the case of triangulation by a single point laser source generating a laser line projected onto the surface of the product, the deformation of said line on a matrix camera for displaying the intensities of the projected line delivers a product height in relation to its plane of movement/travel. Said height delivered over a product strand thus makes possible a simple and rapid measurement of flatness (hollows/bumps) over said strand.
Subsequently, figures and sub-claims illustrate advantageous aspects of the method according to the invention and present embodiments of devices providing for the implementation of said method.
In particular, the device comprises a synchronization unit (SYNC) between the control module and the means of transport. In
In order better to present the measurement of flatness in diagram form, two strands (L1, L2) have been selected quasi-adjacent and parallel along longitudinal direction X. It is assumed that the first strand (L1) has perfect flatness (thus the strand is rectilinear along direction X) and that the second (L2) strand has undulation indicating imperfect flatness (bump/hollow deviation in the plane X, Z), the product (1) here being mostly not under traction. However, the product could also subsidiarily be subjected to external traction not represented here in
The method according to the invention according to
The method according to the invention provides that the product can be subjected to external longitudinal traction forces. For this purpose, the direction of the strand measured can also be selected in the plane X, Y in order to measure waves revealing suspected non-flatnesses for a product (tile effect, for example, if taking the transverse direction as the direction of travel).
Experimentally, the method according to the invention provides for very effective measurement of the flatness of the product to be checked for variable processing line thicknesses, particularly between 0.1 mm and at least 150 mm. This is why it is particularly well suited for metal products including strips (thinner) and plates (thicker). In this respect, the more universal measurement method is thus applicable at the input and/or output of the rolling or leveling installation for products produced by both cold- and hot-rolling.
Similarly to
Thus, the method according to the invention provides that the illumination and image capture are performed for a product cross-section, said cross-section being located on a flat transverse zone, such as a succession of upper roll generating lines, known as a roll table, a conveyor belt (see succession of rolls under the product 1,
Finally,
The method according to the invention and a device like that in the preceding
In
In principle, the device presented in
In the case of the present invention, the inspection device, even though analog, is not intended for measurement ranges below a mm, i.e. it does not deliver topographic values (in X, Y, Z) for surface defects (in X, Y, Z) in metal products, but measures variations in intensities and therefore in portions of lengths in increments of a few cm on strands mainly of great length (5 m or more). The method according to the invention is therefore a distinct measuring application for systems such as that in FR 05 13105. It follows that a person skilled in the art wishing to obtain such a system could, at little cost, implement two distinct measuring methods, namely not only to have it measure surface microdefects, but also more macroscopic traction and thus flatness defects. These two measuring methods could collaterally be implemented as a computer program in the control module CTRL and the data processing module MEAS according to
Finally,
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
12290121 | Apr 2012 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/057035 | 4/3/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/150075 | 10/10/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4759072 | Yamane | Jul 1988 | A |
5465214 | Jeuniaux | Nov 1995 | A |
5661552 | Nishigai | Aug 1997 | A |
5894345 | Takamoto et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6067162 | Hagen et al. | May 2000 | A |
7503680 | Desvaud | Mar 2009 | B2 |
8164750 | Shimazu | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8334986 | Moll | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20020039187 | Keranen | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20060002605 | Chang | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060274930 | Laurent et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070115473 | Legoupil | May 2007 | A1 |
20070171661 | Desvaud | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070188739 | Aoshima | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080018892 | Haugholt | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080302707 | Bourely | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002707 | Berger | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1182211 | May 1998 | CN |
1982869 | Jun 2007 | CN |
101226158 | Jul 2008 | CN |
102223959 | Oct 2011 | CN |
3345198 | Jun 1985 | DE |
102006051538 | Apr 2008 | DE |
1890134 | Feb 2008 | EP |
2595815 | Sep 1987 | FR |
2895084 | Jun 2007 | FR |
9518952 | Jul 1995 | WO |
2004063664 | Jul 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Badger, J.C. et al: “Automated Surface Inspection System” Aise Steel Technology, Aise, Pittsburg, PA, US, vol. 73, No. 3, Mar. 1, 1996, pp. 48-51, XP000587196, ISSN: 0021-1559 the whole document. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150116727 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |