Patent Grant
9366639
This patent application claims the benefit of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2012/002951 having an Internatinoal Filing Date of 13 Jul. 2012, which claims the benefit of German Patent Application No. 10 2011 109 143.6 having a filing date of 2 Aug. 2011 and German Patent Application No. 10 2011 113 704.5 having a filing date of 17 Sep. 2011.
1. Technical Field
The invention relates to a method for the optical testing of objects to be tested—test objects—during production and/or packaging of cigarettes, in particular of cigarette packs and/or blanks for cigarette packs and/or overprints and/or print substrates on or for cigarette packs, with the aid of a suitable testing device. The invention also relates to a device for carrying out such a method.
2. Prior Art
Cigarette packs are tested during the production process with suitable testing devices. Such testing devices generally comprise cameras, which record images of the packs and detect packaging defects by means of suitable methods. The production of cigarettes increasingly requires rapid, efficient adaptation to different products. For example, for the production of different products or brands it is required to produce different cigarette packagings on one the same cigarette packaging machine. In this case, the individual units of the packaging machine must be laboriously adapted to the new pack to be produced. The same applies similarly to the aforementioned testing devices.
It is known from the prior art to store for individual product types or brands machine parameters of the packaging machine, which are retrievable in the case of a change of product. In principle, it is conceivable also to store such feature values specifically for testing devices. In other words, when there is a change of brand, feature values stored for the new brand would be reverted to for the testing device. However, this procedure would already be no longer applicable if a certain brand were to be produced for the first time on a packaging machine. In such a case it is not possible at this stage to revert to feature values stored for the brand. In such a case the testing device would once again have to be laboriously set up “manually”. This requires considerable know-how and extensive experience of the person performing the setup.
On this basis, it is the object of the present invention to develop further the method and the device of the type mentioned at the beginning, in particular with regard to simplified setting up of the testing device in cases of changes of product.
This object is achieved by a method for the optical testing of objects to be tested—test objects—during the production and/or packaging of cigarettes, in particular of cigarette packs and/or blanks for cigarette packs and/or overprints and/or print substrates on or for cigarette packs, with the aid of a suitable testing device, characterized by the following features: a) for at least one feature characterizing the test object, in particular in a visual respect, a set of feature-value alternatives for the corresponding feature that are stored in a memory is displayed on a display means, for instance a screen; b) by means of an input device, for instance a keyboard or a pointing device, one of the displayed feature values of the set of feature-value alternatives is selected; c) the testing device is automatically set up or preset for the subsequent testing operations, in particular an evaluating device and/or an illuminating device and/or a suitable light detector of the testing device, the selection of the feature value influencing the setting up of the testing device; and d) the test objects are tested with the set-up testing device, and by a device for the optical testing of objects to be tested—test objects—during the production and/or packaging of cigarettes, in particular of cigarette packs and/or blanks for cigarette packs and/or overprints and/or print substrates on or for cigarette packs, in particular for carrying out the above method, with the following features: a) a display device on which, for at least one feature characterizing the test object, in particular in a visual respect, a set of feature-value alternatives for the corresponding feature that are stored in a data memory can be displayed; b) an input device with which a feature value of the displayed set of feature-value alternatives can be selected; c) a control device with which the testing device can be automatically set up, in particular an evaluating device of the testing device, an illuminating device of the testing device and/or a suitable light detector of the testing device, the selection of the feature value influencing the setting up of the testing device.
It is accordingly provided that, in the setting-up operation of the testing device—generally before the beginning of production of the test objects to be tested—, the control of the testing device ensures that, for at least one feature characterizing the test object, in particular in a visual respect, a set of feature-value alternatives for the corresponding feature that are stored in a data memory is displayed to a user on a display means, for instance a screen.
By means of an input device, for instance a keyboard or a pointing device, the user then selects one of the displayed feature values of the set of feature-value alternatives.
The control then automatically sets up or sets the testing device, the selection of the feature value by the operator influencing this setting up. Ultimately, the setting up of the testing device is directly or indirectly dependent on the selected feature-value alternative.
According to the invention, the control generally displays to the user not just one feature with corresponding feature-value alternatives, but multiple features characterizing the test object, for which a separate set of feature-value alternatives is then respectively displayed. In this case, the setting up would not only be dependent on the selected feature value of a feature, but on the or all of the selected feature values of the multiple features.
As far as the setting up of the testing device by the control is concerned, particularly an evaluating device of the testing device and/or an illuminating device of the testing device and/or a suitable light detector of the testing device, such as for instance an optoelectronic testing element, generally an electronic camera, may be correspondingly set up.
Later, the test objects, which are usually being produced for the first time, are then tested in a way known per se by the testing device set up in this way. The testing of the test objects is generally performed—though not necessarily—during the production process of the testing objects.
For example, the testing device may test cigarette packs, for instance banderoles lying on the cigarette pack, while the cigarette packs are being produced by a suitable packaging machine.
The features characterizing the test object, which are displayed to the user and the respective feature values of which the user must determine on the basis of a respective list of feature-value alternatives, generally comprise features that have an influence on the subsequent setting up of the testing device or are important for the setting up of the testing device.
They are preferably features that can be recorded optically by the light detector of the testing device and generally can be analyzed by the evaluating device of the testing device with a suitable image evaluating method.
For example, in the case of optical testing of a cigarette pack being produced for the first time, it may be important to adapt the testing device to the banderole respectively arranged on the cigarette pack to be tested. Directly or indirectly dependent on the arranged banderole, the control may for example set the sensitivity of a camera of the testing device that is directed at the banderole or the illuminating intensity of an illuminating device illuminating the banderole or other operating parameters of the testing device.
The control can in this case display selectably to a user setting up the testing device for example as feature-value alternatives a set of various combinations of top sides of cigarette packs with banderoles arranged on them. Another example would be that the control displays selectably as a set of feature-value alternatives a set of various combinations of bottom sides with bottom folding, the bottom sides and/or the bottom folding of the individual alternatives differing.
In this respect, the banderoles and/or the pack top sides or the bottom sides and/or the bottom foldings of the individual alternatives differ in particular in form or shape, in particular in their peripheral edge contours, and/or in their color and/or in their position or in other visual features.
The displayed feature values of the respective set of feature-value alternatives in this case respectively comprise at least one feature value which corresponds to the feature value that the respective test object to be newly tested has, or which is particularly similar to this value. This can then be selected by the user.
In a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the control of the testing device automatically selects in accordance with the feature value selected by the user at least one test method suitable for the test object to be tested from a (maximum) number of test methods that are stored in a data memory and with which test objects can be tested with the testing device. Insofar as feature values for multiple different features were selected by the user—as described further above—this selection is performed by the control in accordance with the multiple selected feature values or the combination of selected feature values.
Alternatively, the control may, in accordance with the selected feature value or the combination of selected feature values from the (maximum) number of stored test methods, first display selectably to the user on the display means (only) the test methods that are suitable for the selected feature or the combination of selected feature values. The user can then select one or more test methods from the test methods preselected by the control in this way and displayed on the display means.
In accordance with the test method selected either automatically by the control directly or by the user selecting in the way described, the testing of the test objects is later performed.
The test methods generally comprise at least test algorithms, in particular image evaluating methods, with the aid of which the evaluating device of the testing device performs an evaluation of images of the test object recorded in the course of testing the test objects by the testing device. For example, images of the test objects can be recorded with the testing device during the testing and evaluated with the evaluating device of the testing device with the aid of the test methods. The evaluating device in this case uses test methods which comprise suitable, software-based or electronic image evaluation methods.
According to a first test method, the recorded images could for example be compared with stored reference images to detect defects of the test objects. Moreover, the position of objects in the recorded images could be determined or checked by a second test method or an image evaluation method of the second test method. Such a test method could in fact comprise for example the checking of the correct position of the edges of a banderole on a top side of a cigarette pack.
In the aforementioned example, the setting up of the testing device, to be specific in this case the setting up of the evaluation device of the testing device, is ultimately indirectly dependent on the selection of the feature value or values by the user. This is so because the selection initially influences the type of test methods that are either directly selected by the control or displayed on the display means in the course of the described preselection. The test method(s) that is/are finally selected ultimately (by the user or by the control) in turn influences/influence the setting up of the evaluating device, in that it uses these test methods or test algorithms assigned to the test methods in the course of the testing operations on the test objects.
In a development of the invention, the control of the testing device selects in advance, and in accordance with the at least one test method selected automatically or by the user, parameters that are used by the testing device in the course of the later testing of the test objects from a number of parameters respectively stored for the testing device in a data memory and transmits them to the testing device. Such parameters may be for example setting parameters for the illuminating device and/or the light detector of the testing device. Alternatively or in addition, they may be parameters which the evaluating device needs or uses in the course of testing the test objects for an image evaluation of the images recorded from the test objects.
Alternatively or in addition, certain parameters for the illuminating device and/or the evaluating device and/or the light detector that are to be used during the testing of the test objects by the illuminating device or the evaluating device or the light detector may also be determined in advance in some other way. The determination is in this case performed in the course of a special automatic calibration of a specimen or reference test object.
For this purpose, a user arranges a reference test object, in particular at the later testing position of the test objects. To simulate the later test conditions, the control sets the illuminating device for example to stored starting parameters, so that an illuminating element of the illuminating device illuminates the test object. For example, the light intensity of the illuminating element may be set to a stored starting light intensity. The light detector, generally a camera, subsequently records at least a first image of the reference test object illuminated in this way. The recorded image is then evaluated or analyzed. If the recorded image does not correspond to predetermined criteria, for example is overexposed or underexposed, the control changes the set parameters of the illuminating device. That is to say that the control changes for example the light intensity of the illuminating element of the illuminating device. Subsequently, at least one further image of the illuminated test object is recorded. This further image is also tested with regard to the predetermined criteria. The control repeats the aforementioned steps until one of the respectively recorded images corresponds to the predetermined criteria. The parameters that are set on the illuminating device at the end of the calibrating operation, that is to say when one of the recorded images corresponds to the predetermined criteria, are then used as parameters for the later testing operation. Of course, parameters of other devices of the testing device, for example the sensitivity of the light detector or the camera, may also be determined in this way in the course of this calibrating operation.
As far as the predetermined criteria that the respective image has to satisfy in order that the control ends the calibrating process are concerned, they may be for example brightness limit values or brightness setpoint values, which the image and/or parts of the image and/or groups of pixels or image dots of the same must satisfy.
In a development of the invention, the control first displays to the user the test object on the display means. Then the user can select with the input device at least one region of the displayed test object in which the test object is to be tested by the testing device. The control visually highlights this selected region on the display means. The selection of this region has the consequence that only the selected region is tested with the testing device. For example, the user can delimit a specific test region of a banderole to be tested.
Subsequently, the control may for example set the light detector of the testing device and/or the illuminating device exactly on this region. Alternatively or in addition, it is conceivable that a or the evaluating device of the testing device that performs the evaluation of images recorded by the testing element exclusively evaluates the selected regions.
In addition or alternatively, it is conceivable that the user can use the input device to cut out a region of the test object in which it is not to be tested. The evaluating device and/or the light detector would then ignore this region.
With the present invention, the setting up of the testing device is made much easier in comparison with the necessary measures of the prior art. The control of the testing device preferably guides the user interactively for this purpose. In particular by displaying features characterizing the test object or by the possibility that a user can select the suitable feature values from a set of feature values shown in advance for the test object actually to be tested, the setting up of the testing device is significantly simplified.
The setting up of the testing device is simplified still further if suitable help displays, for instance help images and/or help texts, are displayed on the display means, comprising tips on the feature-value alternatives and/or the selectable regions. For example, it may be envisaged to display or show these when the user uses the input device to select a suitable help field displayed on the display means.
The object of the invention is also achieved by a method for the optical testing of objects to be tested—test objects—during the production and/or packaging of cigarettes, in particular of cigarette packs and/or blanks for cigarette packs and/or overprints and/or print substrates on or for cigarette packs, with the aid of a suitable testing device, in particular as claimed in one or more of the claims, characterized by the following features: a) feature values of features characterizing the test object, in particular in a visual respect, are stored by means of an input device, for instance a keyboard or a pointing device, in a data memory and/or feature values of such characterizing features are determined at least partly automatically, preferably fully automatically, by evaluation of at least one image of a reference test object and/or of a blank for such a reference test object recorded by means of an electrooptical testing element, in particular a camera; b) the testing device is set up or preset for the subsequent testing operations, in particular an evaluating device and/or an illuminating device and/or a suitable light detector of the testing device, the stored and/or determined feature values influencing the setting up of the testing device; c) the test objects are tested with the set-up testing device, and a device for the optical testing of objects to be tested—test objects—during the production and/or packaging of cigarettes, in particular of cigarette packs and/or blanks for cigarette packs and/or overprints and/or print substrates on or for cigarette packs, in particular for carrying out the above method, with the following features: a) an input device with which feature values of features characterizing the test object, in particular in a visual respect, of the test object to be tested and/or of a blank for the test object can be stored in a data memory assigned to an evaluating device; and/or b) a control device with which such feature values can be determined automatically or partly automatically by evaluation of images of a reference test object and/or of a blank for a reference test object that are recorded by means of an electrooptical test element, wherein c) the control device can be used for setting up the testing device, in particular an evaluating device of the testing device, an illuminating device of the testing device and/or a suitable light detector of the testing device, the stored and/or determined feature values influencing the setting up of the testing device.
Accordingly, for the setting up of the testing device, feature values of features characterizing the test object, in particular in a visual respect, are stored by the user—generally before the beginning of production or testing—by means of the input device in a data memory, for instance on a computer hard disk or the like. Alternatively or possibly in addition, the feature values of such features are determined by the control at least partly automatically, preferably fully automatically, by evaluation of at least one image of a reference test object and/or of a blank and/or print substrate for such a reference test object recorded by means of the electrooptical testing element, in particular a camera. Subsequently, the testing device is automatically set up by the control, the feature values that are either stored by the user and/or recorded partly or fully automatically influencing this setting up. The test objects are later tested with the testing device set up in this way.
In the case of this embodiment of the invention, it is accordingly possible in principle to dispense with a selection of feature values from a set of feature-value alternatives displayed for a feature. This embodiment may however also be combined with the steps or part-steps of the embodiment of the invention described further above.
Thus, for example, it is conceivable that either the control selects the at least one suitable test method in accordance with the feature values which have been stored or determined for the features that characterize the test object in the way described further above from the number of stored test methods, or that the control displays to the user multiple suitable test methods for selection, from which the user then selects at least one suitable method.
As far as the feature values that are stored and/or determined are concerned, they are preferably design data of the test object, such as for instance pack dimensions or score dimensions, and/or of the blank for the test object. They may also be data, in particular dimensions and/or positional indications, for image objects arranged on the test object and/or on the blank or alphanumeric characters.
With the aid of suitable algorithms, the control preferably subsequently determines an image, particularly with a spatial effect—a 3D image—, of a reference test object that can be folded from the blank from the user-entered design data of the blank for the reference test object and/or the data for the image objects/alphanumeric characters, and possibly from further characteristic features or data.
In a development of the invention, the control or the evaluating device of the testing device uses the determined image of the reference test object that can be folded from the blank in the subsequent testing of the test objects as a reference image, which is respectively compared at least in certain regions with at least one image or part-image of the respective test object to be tested that is recorded by the testing device during the testing of the test objects.
Correction parameters, in particular correction parameters by which influences of the testing device on the depiction of the test object recorded during the testing operation are addressed, are preferably included in the determination the reference image. These may be in particular influences of the optical system of the electrooptical testing element of the testing device and/or influences of the electronics of the electrooptical testing element.
Alternatively or in addition, foreseeable systematic deviations of the actual test objects produced from an ideal test object may be included in the determination of the reference image. For example, a cigarette pack actually folded from a blank generally deviates from a “virtual” cigarette pack theoretically calculated from the design dimensions of a prescribed blank. Thus, for example, roundings occur at the folding lines in the course of the actual folding operations, and lead to a deviation of the actual cigarette pack from the theoretically calculated pack. Such systematic deviations may be included in the theoretical determination of the reference image of the reference test object.
In a development of the invention, image objects and/or alphanumeric characters arranged on the reference test object or on the blank for the reference test object are detected in the automatic or partly automatic determination of the feature values of the characteristic features.
In a development of the invention, one or more image objects and/or alphanumeric characters arranged on the blank for the reference test object is or are disregarded or ignored in the comparison of the test objects with the reference test object in the course of the subsequent testing of the test objects.
The regions or the image objects/alphanumeric characters that are to be ignored in the subsequent testing of the test objects are preferably manually selected by the user, by means of the input device, to be disregarded. However, a corresponding automatic or partly automatic selection of such regions or such image objects/alphanumeric characters is also conceivable.
Further features of the present invention emerge from the accompanying dependent claims, the following description of preferred exemplary embodiments of the invention and the accompanying drawings, in which:
The schematic representation shows a cutout of the packaging machine in which the packs 10 or details of the same are optically tested by means of a testing device. The testing device has inter alia electrooptical testing elements 11, in the present case CCD cameras.
The testing elements 11 in the present case record all sides of the cigarette packs 10, even if the recording of the top sides 29 and the bottom sides 30 of the packs is not explicitly shown. In the region of the packaging machine that is represented in
Details of the structure and the operating principle of the drying turret 12 and the discharging device 13 can be taken from EP 0 605 838, to which reference is made for the purpose of complete disclosure and the content of which is made the subject of the present application to its full extent. Furthermore, this document also discloses the feeding of banderoles 14 and their attachment to the packs 10.
The packs 10 are taken off from the periphery of a conveying strand 15 of the discharging device 13 by a transfer device, in the present case a rotatably driven discharge wheel 16, and transferred directly to an upright cigarette conveyor 17. Details of the discharge wheel 16 are described in EP 0 770 551, of the cigarette conveyor 17 in EP 0 596 387. Reference is also made to these applications for the purpose of complete disclosure. The content of this application is made the subject of the present application.
As can partially be seen, for testing the packs 10, a pack side of the pack 10 is respectively assigned to a testing element 11. The images recorded by the respective testing element 11 of the testing device are analyzed in an evaluating device (not represented) of the testing device. The analysis generally serves primarily for the detection of defects of the pack respectively produced. Defective packs can consequently then be discharged from the production process.
The evaluating device may for example be part of the control or control device (likewise not represented) of the testing device, with which inter alia the individual testing elements 11 can be controlled. The evaluating device may of course also be a separate unit, for example a customary computer device with corresponding image-evaluation or analysis software for the evaluation of images of the packs 10 or of the respective pack sides that are recorded by the testing elements 11.
The testing device is adjusted to the kind of pack or pack type to be examined. Depending on the pack type or depending on the cigarette brand produced, the packs 10 differ. For instance, the packs 10 may have different banderoles 14, different overprints and so on. Different materials, colors, overprints, contrasts, etc. generally require different settings of the testing device.
An important particular aspect is that, when adjusting the testing device to the brand respectively produced or the pack type respectively produced, that is to say when setting up the testing device, the user is supported by the control of the testing device.
This is explained below by way of example on the basis of
If the testing device is to be adjusted to the testing of a pack 10 to be newly produced, features or feature values of cigarette packs that visually characterize the cigarette packs and are important for the setting up or setting of the testing device are first displayed to the user by the control on a display means or a screen. In this case, for each feature a set of feature-value alternatives is displayed on the display means and the user can select from this set the feature value that corresponds to the corresponding feature value of the pack 10 to be newly produced and to be tested with the testing device in the later testing.
For example, in
In order to simplify the representation of the feature-value alternatives and the selection by the user, the display means may be part of a touchscreen, which serves at the same time as an input device.
Also shown in
Apart from these examples, there may be many further characteristic features for which the control suggests feature-value alternatives to the user for selection.
It is also within the scope of the invention that none of the feature values 31a-c, 32a-b corresponds exactly to the corresponding feature value of the packs 10 to be newly produced. In such a case, the user may for example select the feature value that comes closest to that of the pack 10 to be produced.
The selection of the feature values 31a-c, 32a-b by the user for the features respectively characterizing the packs 10 influences the later setting up of the testing device by the control. Thus, depending on the selection of feature values made, the control first selects from a prescribed number of test methods the test method that can be used in the case of these feature values.
In the example of
On the basis of the combination 31a of top side 29a and banderole 14a selected by the user, the control selects from the test methods 27a-d that would be conceivable in principle for various combinations of top sides/banderoles and are stored in the data memory the test method 27c assigned to the selected combination 31a.
On the basis of the combination 32a of bottom side 30a and bottom folding 18a likewise selected by the user, the control also selects from the test methods 28a-c that would be conceivable in principle for various combinations of bottom sides/bottom foldings and are stored in the data memory the test method 28a assigned to the selected combination 32a.
Behind the test methods 27a-d and 28a-c there are inter alia various image evaluation methods or test algorithms with which the images recorded during the testing of the packs 10 can be evaluated by the evaluating device of the testing device.
The test method 27c may for example comprise a test algorithm with which the correct positioning and/or formation of the banderole 14 on the top side 29 of the cigarette pack 10 is tested with the aid of a suitable image evaluation method in the course of the later testing process. The test method 28a could on the other hand comprise a test algorithm that tests the correct positioning and/or formation of the folding 18 on the bottom side 30 with the aid of another suitable image evaluation method.
The selection of the test method 27c or the test method 28a by the control may also for example respectively necessitate a filtering algorithm assigned to the test method 27c or the test method 28a (for example Sobel filter, gray-morph filter). The respective filtering algorithm would be correspondingly used by the evaluating device in the electronic image detection or image evaluation of the images of the pack top sides 29 or the pack bottom sides 30 recorded in the course of the later testing of the cigarette packs 10.
To achieve optimum evaluation results, the test methods 27c and 28a are in this case adapted to the test objects respectively to be tested, in the present case the test objects comprising top side 29 and banderole 14 and comprising bottom side 30 and folding 18.
The banderole 14 to be tested of the cigarette pack 10 is for example a type of banderole that has a pattern on a dark blank or background. The top side 29 to be tested of the pack 10 consists of a dark silver foil with highly reflective properties.
A different constellation, and consequently a different selection from the feature values 31a-d by the user, in which for example a light banderole were arranged on a dark, nonreflective top side, could for example require use of the test method 27d with a different assigned filter, instead of use of the test method 27c, to allow optimum evaluation results to be achieved.
It is also provided that, with the aid of the input device, the user can cut out specifically determined regions of the pack 10 that can only be recorded with difficulty in the course of the automatic evaluation and are not to be tested by the testing device. In other words, in the present case for example it would not be the entire pack side 29, 30 of the pack 10 that were tested in each case, but only a cutout of the same.
In the example of
In a similar way, the user can specify more precisely certain regions in which the test objects are to be tested. For example in the case of the selected bottom folding 18a of the combination 32a, the user may select the region of the folding 18a that is to be specifically tested. The selected region is likewise visually highlighted on the display means, in this case by a dotted line 20. The evaluating device would only consider or evaluate this region in the image evaluation in the course of the later testing of the cigarette packs 10.
Moreover, it may be provided that help displays are shown to the user, comprising tips on feature-value alternatives and/or selectable regions. In the present example, either automatically or on request by the user, for example by the user using a pointing device to click a help field, two helping tips 21a and 21b are displayed for the region of the banderole 14a that can be cut out. In this case, tip 21a serves the purpose of pointing out to the user that it would be inadvisable to forego cutting out of the pattern of the banderole 14a. The tip 21b indicates that the pattern should be cut out correctly.
In a similar way, help displays 21c, 21d are displayed to the user for the selectable regions of the bottom folding 18a.
According to a further important aspect of the invention, which is illustrated by the boxes 34a-d in
In this respect, the user arranges reference or specimen packs respectively at the later testing position of the cigarette packs 10, that is to say at the testing positions from
In this case, the light intensity of the respective illuminating element of the respective illuminating device 26 may first be set respectively to a stored starting light intensity. The respective camera 11 subsequently records at least one image of the respective pack side illuminated in this way. The recorded image is then evaluated or analyzed by the evaluating device.
If the recorded image does not correspond to predetermined criteria, the control changes the set parameters of the respective illuminating device 26, to be specific in the present case the light intensity, until the aforementioned criteria are satisfied.
In the example of
The background of the calibration of the entire region 35 is that, with the selected combination 31a of silver-foil top side 29a and dark banderole 14a, the disturbing reflections of the silver-foil top side are great. The background of the acceptance of a high proportion of overexposed image dots is that the light intensity must be as high as possible in order in the case of this constellation of a low intrinsic contrast between the dark banderole 14a and the dark top side 29a to detect for example in the image evaluation edge transitions between the almost similarly dark banderole 14a and the top side 29a.
The control then changes the light intensity of the respective illuminating element of the respective illuminating device 26 in the course of the calibration until a certain proportion of image dots of the recorded image has a predetermined brightness value.
In the case of another constellation, symbolized by box 34b, in which there is a high intrinsic contrast between the banderole and the top side, for example in the case of a light banderole on a dark top side, the illuminating intensity would be changed in the course of the calibrating operation until a correspondingly low proportion of image dots in the recorded image had a certain brightness value that is lower in comparison with the constellation 34a. In other words, in the constellation according to box 34a, fewer overexposed image dots in the recorded image are accepted than would be the case in the constellation according to box 34b. Moreover, it would be conceivable in the constellation according to box 34b to dispense with the calibration of the entire top side and to calibrate essentially only the banderole.
The actual light intensity, and possibly other parameters of the illuminating device 26 that are set at the end of the calibrating operation, that is to say when the predetermined criteria that the respectively recorded image must satisfy are met, are then used as setting parameters of the illuminating device 26 for the later testing operation on the top sides of the packs 10. Of course, parameters of other devices of the testing device, for example the sensitivity of the respective camera 11, could also be determined in this way in the course of this calibrating operation.
In a similar way, the illumination parameters for the illumination of the bottom side 30a with bottom folding 18a are determined in the course of a further calibrating operation, to be precise ultimately depending on the intrinsic contrasts between the bottom side 30a and the bottom folding 18a (boxes 34c, d).
Unlike in the case of the embodiment of
According to a first alternative of the further embodiment, a user can store feature values of the pack 10 by means of the input device in a data memory assigned to the control of the testing device (step A1 in
Design data of a specimen or reference blank 22 for the packs 10 may be stored for example as feature values. The design data may describe dimensions of the blank 22, the position and length of the individual folding lines of the blank 22, the size and/or the forms of the individual folding flaps and the like. The user can derive these design data from the reference or specimen blank 22.
Apart from the design data, the user may also store further data, in particular data on image objects 23a, 23b, 23c, 23d, 23e arranged on the blank 22 or the later pack 10. These data on the image objects 23a-e comprise in particular the type, form, color, position and/or size of the image objects and the like.
It is conceivable in this respect that the user first uses the input device to select from a selection of different image objects already stored in the data memory the image objects 23a-e that coincide with the specimen blank 22. Alternatively, specifically only the image objects 23a-e may be stored as files or stored directly for the setting-up operation of the testing device for the pack 10 to be newly produced, so that the selection of the correct image objects 23a-e from a suggested set of image objects is dropped.
The image objects 23a-e may in this case be stored in the data memory, in that for example the specimen blank is scanned in, or those regions of the same that have the individual image objects are scanned in. Then individual image files of the image objects can be respectively produced from the scanned-in image data.
The user can then position the stored image objects 23a-e on a (virtual) depiction 22a (
Furthermore, a depiction 23f of a banderole to be placed on the pack 10 may also be stored separately as an image file and positioned on the virtual blank 22a.
As a result, all of the items of information or data, including the image objects, concerning the actual specimen blank 22 or the pack 10 to be produced that are necessary to be able to calculate the image 22a of the pack 10 that can be folded from the blank 22, in particular by means of suitable software, are stored in the data memory.
According to a second alternative of the further embodiment, to be specific as an alternative to the manual storing of the design data described above and the data of further characterizing features of the blank 22 by a user, it is envisaged to allow these data to be recorded automatically or at least partly automatically by the control.
For this, first an actual reference blank 22 of the packs 10 to be produced is recorded by a suitable recording element 25, generally a camera. In other words, the depiction 22a of the actual reference or specimen blank 22 is automatically produced (step A2 in
In an almost fully automatic variant, all of the design data and all of the further data (image object data etc.) that in the first variant were entered manually by the user are then determined by suitable analysis from the depiction 22a recorded by the camera, or are extracted from the depiction 22a with the aid of an evaluating device (for example a computer device), which is generally part of the control. The software of the evaluating device that is necessary for such an analysis of the depiction of the specimen blank 22 can be readily provided by a person skilled in the prior art.
It is conceivable in this respect that the user selects individual regions 25a, 25c of the depiction 22a of the blank 22 in order to simplify the detection of the individual image objects arranged on the depiction 22a in the course of the analysis described above of the depiction 22a, in this case the image objects 23a, 23b, 23c.
It is also conceivable to record, likewise with the recording element 25, separate print substrates that are to be arranged on the cigarette pack 10, such as for instance the banderole 23f, to store a depiction of the same, possibly derive necessary data and possibly arrange the depiction of the blank at a certain position of the depiction 22a of the blank 22, likewise automatically.
The arrangement of the depiction 23f on the virtual depiction 22a of the blank 22 may alternatively also be carried out manually by a user.
As soon as all of the design data, graphics, possibly alphanumeric characters, etc. of the blank 22 have been stored (alternative 1), or all of the data have been automatically derived from the depiction 22a of the recorded blank 22, recorded by means of the camera 25 (alternative 2), the evaluating device calculates an image 24a of the virtual cigarette pack 10 obtained from these data (steps B, C, D in
Subsequently, in a way described more specifically below, a reference image 24b is produced from the three-dimensional image 24a (step E). This reference image 24b serves as a comparative image during the testing of the cigarette packs 10 actually produced in the later production process. The reference image 24b, or possibly parts of the same, are thereby compared with images of the cigarette packs 10 actually produced that are recorded by the testing device or the testing elements 11. Deviations of the recorded images from the reference image 24b may then be recorded and defects of the cigarette packs 10 produced can then be discovered in a way known per se.
Correction parameters, which for example address influences of the testing device on the image recorded by it of the packs 10 actually produced, are then included as one of the factors in the determination of the reference image 24b. For instance, the testing elements 11 of the testing device generally have optical aberrations or produce such aberrations. Such aberrations can be calculated into the reference image 24b, so that they are automatically ignored in a comparison of the reference image 24b with the packs 10 actually produced.
The electronic components of the testing elements 11 may also produce aberrations that lead to images that are distorted in comparison with reality.
Apart from these correction parameters, which address influences of the testing device on the depiction recorded by it of the pack respectively to be tested, alternatively or in addition, foreseeable systematic deviations of the test objects 10 actually produced from the (virtual) depiction 24a of the cigarette pack 10 calculated in the way described above may be included.
For example, the folding of the blank 22 along the folding lines in the actual production generally deviates from a theoretically calculated folding. Thus, for example, the actual foldings have roundings, which are included in the calculation in the determination of the reference image 24b.
Both in the case of the manual input described above of the data for the specimen blank 22 and in the case of the described automatic recording of the specimen blank 22, it is moreover possible to disregard individual, particularly complicated image objects 23e, 23d during the subsequent testing of the packs 10 produced. For this purpose, the image objects 23e, 23d may be automatically detected as to be ignored in further testing. However, it is also conceivable that the user manually selects the image objects 23e, 23d on the screen and these image objects 23d, 23e are disregarded on the basis of this manual selection.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2011 109 143 | Aug 2011 | DE | national |
| 10 2011 113 704 | Sep 2011 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2012/002951 | 7/13/2012 | WO | 00 | 4/12/2014 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2013/017198 | 2/7/2013 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2991879 | Innocenti | Jul 1961 | A |
| 4053056 | Day | Oct 1977 | A |
| 4539836 | Hester | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4643027 | Deutsch | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4907607 | Focke | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4930344 | Fleenor | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4972494 | White | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5353356 | Waugh | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5383322 | Collins, Jr. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5392359 | Futamura | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5898104 | Rohrssen | Apr 1999 | A |
| 6006438 | Shrider | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6205237 | Focke | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 20020069705 | Stiller | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20060267536 | Linke | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20130113917 | Sato | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130287285 | Sato | Oct 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 4218971 | Jun 1992 | DE |
| 10065321 | Nov 2002 | DE |
| 60100782 | Jul 2004 | DE |
| 102006014345 | Aug 2007 | DE |
| 102008020239 | Nov 2009 | DE |
| 1588945 | Oct 2005 | EP |
| 3081603 | Apr 1991 | JP |
| Entry |
|---|
| Deutshces Patent- Und Markenamt, Recherchebericht (Search on related German Patent Application No. 102011113704.5) (Nov. 14, 2011). |
| State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, Notification of the First Office Action (on a related application), Sep. 18, 2015. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140226892 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
