The invention generally relates to semiconductor devices and methods for manufacturing such devices, and more particularly to methods for forming a smooth boundary between nitride films to enhance device performance and product yield.
Generally, metal-oxide semiconductor transistors include a substrate made of a semiconductor material such as silicon. The transistors typically include a source region, a channel region and a drain region within the substrate. The channel region is located between the source and the drain regions. A gate stack, which usually includes a conductive material, a gate oxide layer and sidewall spacers, is generally provided above the channel region. More particularly, the gate oxide layer is typically provided on the substrate over the channel region, while the gate conductor is provided above the gate oxide layer. The sidewall spacers help protect the sidewalls of the gate conductor.
The current flowing through a channel, which has a given electric field across it, is generally directly proportional to the mobility of the carriers in the channel. Thus, by increasing the mobility of the carriers in the channel, the operation speed of the transistor can be increased. Also, mechanical stresses within a semiconductor device substrate can modulate device performance by, for example, increasing the mobility of the carriers in the semiconductor device. That is, stresses within a semiconductor device are known to enhance semiconductor device characteristics.
Thus, to improve the characteristics of a semiconductor device, tensile and/or compressive stresses are created in the channel of the n-type devices (e.g., NFETs) and/or p-type devices (e.g., PFETs). However, the same stress component, for example tensile stress or compressive stress, improves the device characteristics of one type of device (i.e., n-type device or p-type device) while discriminatively affecting the characteristics of the other type device. By way of example, a tensile stress will improve the performance of an NFET and a compressive force will improve the performance of a PFET. Thus, in order to maximize the performance of both NFETs and PFETs within integrated circuit (IC) devices, the stress components should be engineered and applied differently for NFETs and PFETs.
To selectively create tensile stress in an NFET and compressive stress in a PFET, distinctive processes and different combinations of materials are used. For example, a trench isolation structure has been proposed for forming the appropriate stresses in the NFETs and PFETs, respectively. When this method is used, the isolation region for the NFET device contains a first isolation material which applies a first type of mechanical stress on the NFET device in a longitudinal direction (parallel to the direction of current flow) and in a transverse direction (perpendicular to the direction of current flow). Further, a first isolation region and a second isolation region are provided for the PFET and each of the isolation regions of the PFET device applies a unique mechanical stress on the PFET device in the transverse and longitudinal directions.
Alternatively, methods have been proposed for providing a single strain layer on the entire device, using two lithography masks for patterning. By way of one illustrative example, a single nitride layer with a first stress component is placed over the entire structure, e.g., NFET and PFET, after silicidation. In the example discussed herein, the first nitride layer imposes a tensile component within the channel of the NFET. An oxide hard mask is then deposited over the nitride layer, and a photo resist is placed over one of the transistors, e.g., NFET. A reactive ion etching (RIE) is then performed to remove the hard mask over the PFET and the remaining photo resist over the NFET. A nitride etch is then performed to remove the nitride layer over the PFET.
A nitride layer with a compressive component is then placed over the PFET and the hard mask over the NFET, across a trench isolation structure (STI). This nitride layer will impose a compressive component in the PFET to enhance device performance. A photo resist is then deposited over the nitride layer of the PFET and across the STI. This photo resist also overlaps the tensile nitride layer of the NFET, taking into consideration only the vertical edge of the first nitride layer during the mapping process. A nitrogen etching process is then performed, which etches away the compressive nitrogen layer over portions of the NFET.
However, due to normal alignment errors of the patterning process, e.g., placement of the photoresist and difficulties controlling the etching, an overlap of the nitride layers is formed near the boundary of the compressive nitride layer and the tensile nitride layer. Namely, the compressive nitride layer remains over portions of the hard mask and the tensile nitride layer over a gate poly and the STI, resulting in three layers of material. These overlaps result in subsequent etching difficulties at this overlap region.
These same alignment errors can also cause gaps between the nitride layers; however, such a gap is not very desirable because metal ions such as Cu can diffuse into silicon from back-end-of-the-line process. Thus, it is very important to ensure that there are no gaps. To guarantee that there are no gaps, further compensations are made in the etching process so that the nitride layers fill any gaps. Although such compensation ensures that the nitride layers will prevent such out diffusing, a larger overlap can occur.
In further processing steps, an oxide layer is deposited over the nitride layers, and vias are then etched into the oxide layer. A metal is then placed in the vias to create via contacts to the source and drain regions of the device. However, etching becomes very difficult due to the variations in layer thickness, especially at the overlap of the nitride layers. For example, etching in the overlap region (i.e., over the nitride layers and the hard mask layer) to make contact with the device results in over etching of the remaining portions of the device. On the other hand, etching designed for the portions of the device with one or two layers will result in an under etch of the overlap region. This under etch will result in a layer blocking contact between the device and the contact. (
While these methods do provide structures that have tensile stresses being applied to the NFET device and compressive stresses being applied to the PFET device, they may require additional materials and/or more complex processing, and thus, resulting in higher cost. Further, due to the inaccuracies of the etching processes, an under etch or over etch can result in portions of the device. In the case of under etching in the overlap region, the contact will be blocked from contacting the device.
In a first aspect of the invention, a method for manufacturing a device includes mapping extreme vertical boundary conditions of a mask layer based on vertical edges of a deposited first layer and a second layer. The mask layer is deposited over portions of the second layer based on the mapping step. The exposed area of the second layer is etched to form a smooth boundary between the first layer and the second layer. The resist layer is stripped.
In a second aspect of the invention, the method includes depositing a first strain layer over a first device and depositing a second strain layer over a second device and a portion of the first strain layer. A mask layer is deposited over portions of the second strain layer, where an edge of the mask layer will not exceed extreme vertical boundary conditions measured from vertical edges of the first strain layer and the second strain layer. The exposed areas of the second strain layer are etched to form a smooth boundary between the first strain layer and the second strain layer. The mask layer is then stripped.
In another aspect of the invention, a semiconductor device comprises a semiconductor substrate having at least one p-type device and one n-type device. A first strain layer imposes a compressive stress in the p-type device and a second strain layer imposes a tensile stress in the n-type device. A smooth boundary is provided between the first strain layer and the second strain layer. A dielectric layer is deposited over the first strain layer and the second stain layer, including the smooth boundary. A via contact is formed in the dielectric layer and connects to one of the n-type device and p-type device at the smooth boundary.
The invention provides a method for fabricating devices with improved performance characteristics. In one aspect of the invention, a smooth boundary is formed between two films or layers, i.e., a layer that imposes a tensile component in an NFET and a layer that imposes a compressive component in a PFET. The smooth boundary does not have gaps or overlaps between the layers. The smooth boundary of the tensile and compressive films is also critical to improved product yield.
To form a smooth boundary between two strain layers, a resist pattern is aligned to a vertical portion of the second layer, e.g., Si.sub.3N.sub.4, so that a minimum overlap overlay condition of the resist is aligned to the outer surface of the vertical portion of the second nitride layer. Then, an isotopic etch process is applied to remove the second nitride layer from the exposed surface and some or all of a vertical portion of the second nitride layer that is covered by the resist. In one implementation, the second layer is aligned to the first layer pattern to provide the smallest overlap possible.
In
In the example of
In the invention, the NFET and PFET devices are enhanced simultaneously using dual silicon nitride liners. In the invention, the smooth boundary between the nitride films will not block the contact to the NFET or PFET. Also, due to the strain engineering, a gap is not formed and metal ions will not diffuse into the silicon from BEOL.
While the invention has been described in terms of embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3602841 | McGroddy | Aug 1971 | A |
4665415 | Esaki et al. | May 1987 | A |
4853076 | Tsaur et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4855245 | Neppl et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4952524 | Lee et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4958213 | Eklund et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5006913 | Sugahara et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5060030 | Hoke | Oct 1991 | A |
5081513 | Jackson et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5108843 | Ohtaka et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5134085 | Gilgen et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5310446 | Konishi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5354695 | Leedy | Oct 1994 | A |
5371399 | Burroughes et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5391510 | Hsu et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5459346 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5471948 | Burroughes et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5557122 | Shrivastava et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561302 | Candelaria | Oct 1996 | A |
5565697 | Asakawa et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571741 | Leedy | Nov 1996 | A |
5592007 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5592018 | Leedy | Jan 1997 | A |
5670798 | Schetzina | Sep 1997 | A |
5679965 | Schetzina | Oct 1997 | A |
5683934 | Candelaria | Nov 1997 | A |
5840593 | Leedy | Nov 1998 | A |
5847419 | Imai et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5861651 | Brasen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5880040 | Sun et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5940736 | Brady et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946559 | Leedy | Aug 1999 | A |
5960297 | Saki | Sep 1999 | A |
5989978 | Peidous | Nov 1999 | A |
6008126 | Leedy | Dec 1999 | A |
6025280 | Brady et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6046464 | Schetzina | Apr 2000 | A |
6066545 | Doshi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6090684 | Ishitsuka et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6107143 | Park et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117722 | Wuu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133071 | Nagai | Oct 2000 | A |
6165383 | Chou | Dec 2000 | A |
6221735 | Manley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6228694 | Doyle et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246095 | Brady et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255169 | Li et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261964 | Wu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6265317 | Chiu et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6274444 | Wang | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281532 | Doyle et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6284623 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6284626 | Kim | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6319794 | Akatsu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6361885 | Chou | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362082 | Doyle et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368931 | Kuhn et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6403486 | Lou | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6403975 | Brunner et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406973 | Lee | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6461936 | von Ehrenwall | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476462 | Shimizu et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483171 | Forbes et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493497 | Ramdani et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498358 | Lach et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501121 | Yu et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6506652 | Jan et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6521964 | Jan et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531369 | Ozkan et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531740 | Bosco et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6573172 | En et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6509618 | Jan et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6621392 | Volant et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6635506 | Volant et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6717216 | Doris et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6825529 | Chidambarrao et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831292 | Currie et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6974981 | Chidambarrao et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6977194 | Belyansky et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7015082 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7205615 | Tsutsui et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220630 | Cheng et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20010009784 | Ma et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020063292 | Armstrong et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020074598 | Doyle et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020086472 | Roberds et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020086497 | Kwok | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090791 | Doyle et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030032261 | Yeh et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040158 | Saitoh | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030057184 | Yu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067035 | Tews et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030181005 | Hachimine et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040029323 | Shimizu et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040075148 | Kumagai et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040238914 | Deshpande et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262784 | Doris et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050040460 | Chidambarrao et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050082634 | Doris et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093030 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050098829 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050106799 | Doris et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050145954 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050148146 | Doris et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050194699 | Belyansky et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050214998 | Chen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050236668 | Zhu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245017 | Belyansky et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280051 | Chidambarrao et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282325 | Belyansky et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060027868 | Doris et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060043422 | Chen et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060051922 | Huang et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060057787 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060060925 | Doris et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060099763 | Liu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060148181 | Chan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060199326 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
60-52052 | Mar 1985 | JP |
64-76755 | Mar 1989 | JP |
2002-93921 | Mar 2002 | JP |
WO 0247167 | Jun 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060228836 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |